# Mesothelioma Lawyer Center

> Finding the Best Mesothelioma Lawyer


## Posts

### Judge Dismisses Johnson & Johnson’s Lawsuit Against Mesothelioma Researcher

Dr. Jacqueline Moline is a highly respected researcher and noted expert on the subject of malignant mesothelioma. She is frequently called upon for expert witness testimony in asbestos exposure lawsuits. Recently, she was named in a suit filed by Johnson & Johnson’s subsidiary LTL Management: the suit called her writings fraudulent and libelous, but New York federal judge Georgette Castner dismissed their claim, saying there was no proof that her conclusions were “verifiably false” and noting that they were protected under her free speech rights.







Talc Companies Object to Mesothelioma Researcher’s Conclusions



At issue in Johnson & Johnson’s case against the occupational medicine researcher was a paper she authored that linked asbestos-contaminated talcum powder products to mesothelioma. The company, which is facing over 61,000 lawsuits from people diagnosed with ovarian cancer and malignant mesothelioma, sued four researchers, attacking their studies and calling Dr. Moline’s work false advertising.



The paper that the company’s subsidiary LTL Management objected to discussed the connection between exposure to asbestos-contaminated talcum powder and asbestos-related diseases, including malignant mesothelioma. The suit focused on five of the people who had been included in her study who may have been exposed to asbestos from sources other than the talc. But the judge rejected this argument



Judge Calls Mesothelioma Researcher’s Conclusions “Tentative”



In dismissing the claim against Dr. Moline, Judge Caster pointed out that the mesothelioma researcher had specifically identified her research as “tentative scientific conclusions” rather than unequivocal statements of fact.  The judge also criticized the consumer giant’s assertion that it was problematic for the researcher to both publish scientific studies and participate as an expert witness in asbestos cases, noting that the research had specifically referenced that aspect of her professional work.



Finally, the judge referenced the First Amendment’s protection of free speech and said that Dr. Moline’s publication of her asbestos research fell into that category. Johnson & Johnson has pledged to appeal the judge’s decision in the case.


## Pages

### Mesothelioma-net

CALL NOW: 1-800-123-4567
    
  








If you have Mesothelioma, you could be owed compensation



It's very likely you developed this disease through asbestos exposure in certain trades. Mesothelioma patients are getting multi-million dollar settlements, decades later, from their ex-employers. We can help you find out if you qualify for a case in minutes.




We'll analyze your situation at no cost



Determine how much compensation you could be entitled to



Show you the next steps to get what you're owed


































$30 Billion is Available in Trust for Mesothelioma Patients



Tradesmen in many industries were negligently exposed to asbestos materials well into the 1990s. Whether you developed Mesothelioma yourself due to asbestos exposure or you're the surviving family of a lost loved one you could be entitled to significant compensation.




GET STARTED






















How much Money do People Receive from a Mesothelioma Case?



Depending on where you were exposed and a few other factors, you can get a settlement from 6 to 7 figures. Here are a few examples of Mesothelioma Settlements received by our clients. These figures are the total compensation after attorney fees and expenses are deducted.





























$6,142,500



Exposed through heavy duty vehicles



$5,939,010



Exposed through boat repair



$3,600,450



Exposed through navy service





$6,033,510



Exposed through general contracting



$3,921,750



Exposed through navy service



$3,403,890



Exposed through HVAC trades































We've Recovered over $1 billion for Mesothelioma Patients



We've helped hundreds of people just like you get compensation for their pain or loss. Don't delay, contact us today for a free evaluation for your case.




GET STARTED

















® 2025 Mesothelioma Network. We will not share your information. Read our privacy policy. Sponsored by: Paul Danziger, Attorney - Houston, Texas.

### HTML Sitemap



### Mesothelioma Lawsuits

Mesothelioma Trust Funds and Compensation



If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, you may be entitled to significant compensation. Mesothelioma lawsuits, including both personal injury and wrongful death claims, are designed to hold asbestos companies accountable and help families recover money for medical expenses, lost income, and pain and suffering. What many don’t realize is that over $30 billion has already been set aside in asbestos trust funds—available right now for eligible victims.



To learn what you may qualify for, fill out our quick form to receive your Free Financial Compensation Packet. It includes information about top mesothelioma lawyers near you, how to access asbestos trust fund money in as little as 90 days, and a step-by-step guide to filing your claim.



Get information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim and much more.






 




What Is a Mesothelioma Lawsuit? 



A mesothelioma lawsuit is a legal action taken by victims of asbestos exposure against the companies responsible for exposing them. Very few ever go to trial. Most end in negotiated settlements compensating the victims. 



Who Can File a Mesothelioma Lawsuit?



A mesothelioma lawsuit may be filed by individuals who have been diagnosed with mesothelioma or another asbestos-related disease due to occupational, environmental, or secondary asbestos exposure. In addition, family members or estate representatives may file a wrongful death claim on behalf of a loved one who passed away from mesothelioma. Each case is unique, and eligibility often depends on medical documentation, confirmed asbestos exposure history, and the timing of diagnosis or death. Speaking with an experienced mesothelioma attorney can help determine whether you or a loved one may qualify.



Anyone exposed to asbestos with resulting symptoms or illness is eligible to file a lawsuit. Any company that exposed workers or others to asbestos can be held liable for resulting expenses.



If you lost a family member to mesothelioma, you might also be eligible to sue the responsible companies. You can also sue on behalf of the estate of your loved one.



What Evidence Is Needed to File a Claim?



To support a mesothelioma claim, certain documents and records must be presented to establish a clear connection between asbestos exposure and the diagnosis. This typically includes medical records confirming a mesothelioma diagnosis, work or military history showing probable exposure, and any supporting documentation like expert testimony, witness statements, or pathology reports. A knowledgeable legal team can help gather and organize this evidence to strengthen your case and increase the chances of a successful outcome.



Why Should I Consider Filing a Mesothelioma Lawsuit?



Asbestos illnesses like mesothelioma are expensive. You face steep medical bills and also lost wages if the illness prevents you from working. Most people choose to file a mesothelioma or asbestos lawsuit for compensation. 



There are several reasons to consider filing a lawsuit over your asbestos exposure:




Companies responsible for your exposure to asbestos and resulting illness should be held accountable.



Holding these companies responsible deters others from exposing workers in the future.



A lawsuit provides compensation for you, the victim. 



A lawsuit can also provide financial security for your family. 




A lawsuit is just one option for legal recourse, but it is important to seek justice and recover damages.







Can You File a Lawsuit for Asbestos Exposure Before Becoming Ill?



The short answer is no; filing a lawsuit for asbestos exposure typically requires a diagnosed illness. Legal systems generally necessitate that you demonstrate actual harm, not just potential risk, due to asbestos exposure.



What Qualifies as Harm?



To pursue legal action, you need to show documented evidence of an asbestos-related illness, such as mesothelioma or asbestosis. Alongside this diagnosis, you should have tangible damages like:




Medical Expenses: Costs associated with diagnosis and treatment.



Lost Income: Wages lost due to inability to work.



Pain and Suffering: Emotional and physical distress caused by the illness.




Why Is Diagnosis Required?



Legal proceedings prioritize cases with concrete evidence of harm. Courts are reluctant to act on potential future risks, focusing instead on measurable impacts on your health and finances.



If you're concerned about future illness from known exposure, consider medical monitoring and regular check-ups. Always consult legal professionals to understand your specific situation and potential options.



Types of Mesothelioma Lawsuits



There are two main types of mesothelioma lawsuits: personal injury claims and wrongful death claims. A personal injury lawsuit is filed by the person diagnosed with mesothelioma and seeks compensation for medical expenses, lost income, and pain and suffering. A wrongful death claim, on the other hand, is filed by surviving family members after a loved one has passed away from the disease. Both types of cases can also involve compensation from asbestos trust funds, depending on the companies responsible for the exposure.



Personal Injury Lawsuit



If you are the victim of asbestos exposure, you can file a personal injury lawsuit against the companies that provided asbestos materials. 




Your suit will be filed against the company or companies negligent in your illness. 



You may recover damages for medical bills and other illness-associated expenses.



A personal injury lawsuit also includes future expected expenses and lost wages. 



Depending on state laws, you can also seek non-economic damages for pain, suffering, and other intangible costs of being sick. 




Wrongful Death Lawsuit



If you have lost a loved one to an asbestos illness, you can file a wrongful death lawsuit against those responsible. 




You can claim compensation for medical bills, funeral expenses, and lost wages that would have supported dependents. 



You can also seek non-economic damages such as loss of companionship.






Doug D.



“I was truly lost and did not know which way to go when I was diagnosed. Thankfully, Mesothelioma Lawyer Center came to my rescue. Your website and other resources have helped me and my family understand this terrible cancer.”





How Do I File a Mesothelioma Lawsuit?



The first step in filing a lawsuit is to  find the right lawyer. Hire a law firm with proven experience helping other victims of asbestos exposure.



A qualified law firm will have the most knowledge and experience and will be able to give you the best guidance. Your lawyer will take you through several steps in the lawsuit process:




Understanding the Complexity: Mesothelioma cases are intricate. You'll need to identify how and when you were exposed to asbestos and pinpoint the companies responsible. This step alone can be daunting without professional legal assistance.



Navigating Legal and Medical Challenges: Filing deadlines, obtaining medical records, and understanding complex medical and legal terminology are just a few hurdles. An experienced attorney can handle these for you, ensuring nothing falls through the cracks.



Access to Resources: Expert testimony is often required to substantiate your claims. This typically demands substantial financial resources and connections that a seasoned law firm can provide, making a significant difference in the potential outcome of your case.



Pursuing Compensation: In some situations, compensation may be available through asbestos trust funds. A knowledgeable lawyer can determine the best course of action and pursue all avenues of compensation on your behalf.




By choosing a law firm with a proven track record, you're not just hiring a lawyer; you're securing a team dedicated to holding corporations accountable and fighting for the justice you deserve.



1. Gathering Information



Your legal team will begin by investigating and gathering information to make your case. Be prepared to provide your:




Employment history



Medical history and records



Medical expenses related to your illness



Costs related to being ill, such as travel expenses for treatment



Documentation of asbestos in the workplace, if possible



Documentation of physical disabilities and activities you can no longer do




2. Pre-Litigation Phase and Filing



Your lawyer will file the complaint or lawsuit with all the necessary information to build a strong case. 



The complaint goes to the defendants, who then have a period, usually 30 days, to file an official response. Failure to respond can result in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.



3. The Discovery Phase



In most cases, the defendants will respond and deny any negligence. Attorneys on both sides then continue investigating and building a case. 



Each side can access information from the other. They may hold interviews, talk to experts, conduct depositions, and investigate medical records. This can take several months.



4. Settlement



Many defendants will settle at this point. Settling helps defendants avoid the potentially higher costs of a lawsuit. 



Juries are often sympathetic to the victim and award higher amounts than those negotiated in settlements. Compensation amounts vary by individual, but they take into account several factors:




Lost wages



Medical expenses



The length of the illness



The severity of the illness



Mental and emotional suffering



Physical discomfort



Case costs, including filing fees




Between 80% and 90% of personal injury cases end in settlements. You can expect to receive monthly payments rather than a lump sum with a settlement.



5. Going to Trial



If both sides disagree on a settlement, your case will go to trial. Each side presents evidence and examines witnesses in front of the jury. 



The trial's length depends on several factors, like witnesses, medical documents, and the case's complexity.



Do You Need to Travel to File a Mesothelioma Lawsuit?



If you're concerned about travel when filing a mesothelioma lawsuit, rest assured that it typically isn't necessary. Many legal firms understand the challenges faced by those dealing with such diagnoses and offer accommodating services. Here's what you can expect:




Flexible Meeting Options: Most law firms will come to you, especially if you're located in the Pacific Northwest region. They prioritize client comfort and often have attorneys who travel to meet clients at a location convenient for them.



Virtual Consultations: The advent of technology means consultations can easily take place over phone calls or video chats. This flexibility ensures you can handle critical steps from the comfort of your home.



Minimal Travel for Legal Proceedings: While legal cases often settle out of court, if you are required to participate in a deposition or testify, options are available to accommodate your health needs. This can include providing testimony via video conference or even potentially avoiding it altogether if your condition doesn't allow.



Focus on Health and Family: Law firms typically manage the complex tasks of filing and pursuing claims so that you can invest your time in rest and recovery.




In summary, travel is usually limited or unnecessary for filing a mesothelioma lawsuit, thanks to the client-focused services many law firms provide.



Do You Need to Travel to File a Mesothelioma Lawsuit?



If you're concerned about travel when filing a mesothelioma lawsuit, rest assured that it typically isn't necessary. Many legal firms understand the challenges faced by those dealing with such diagnoses and offer accommodating services. Here's what you can expect:




Flexible Meeting Options: Our lawyers will come to meet you where you live. We prioritize client comfort and often have attorneys who travel to meet clients at a location convenient for them.



Virtual Consultations: The advent of technology means consultations can easily take place over phone calls or video chats. This flexibility ensures you can handle critical steps from the comfort of your home.



Minimal Travel for Legal Proceedings: While legal cases often settle out of court, if you are required to participate in a deposition or testify, options are available to accommodate your health needs. This can include providing testimony via video conference or even potentially avoiding it altogether if your condition doesn't allow.



Focus on Health and Family: Law firms typically manage the complex tasks of filing and pursuing claims so that you can invest your time in rest and recovery.




In summary, travel is usually limited or unnecessary for filing a mesothelioma lawsuit, thanks to the client-focused services many law firms provide.







Are There Alternatives to Filing a Lawsuit? 



If you don't feel comfortable filing a mesothelioma lawsuit, talk to your lawyer about other ways to get compensation. You might qualify to claim with an asbestos trust. 



Asbestos trusts were set up by companies that filed for bankruptcy and no longer take on lawsuits. They currently hold $30 billion in funds, and you could be eligible for your share. 



If you served in the military, your lawyer can help you get veteran benefits. They can also help you with Social Security Disability and other types of benefits. 



Landmarks in Mesothelioma and Asbestos Lawsuits



Mesothelioma is a rare disease, yet thousands of people have filed lawsuits over it. Clarence Borel, an industrial worker, filed the first asbestos case in 1969. 



It was the legal turning point for victims of asbestos-related disease by providing a way for victims to get compensation. Borel won his case against the Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation.




1963-1965 Risks of Asbestos Exposure Discovered




In the 1960s, Dr. Selikoff, a physician in Paterson, New Jersey, treated members of the Asbestos Workers Union. He soon noticed that an unusual number of workers suffered from mesothelioma, a rare disease. Dr. Selikoff connected mesothelioma to asbestos exposure.



In 1963, Dr. Selikoff published his findings. His research and other studies finally pushed the Occupational Safety and Health Administration to enforce workplace safety regulations regarding asbestos.




1965 Tort Laws




The American Law Institute of The Restatement of the Law of Torts published section 402A:




 "[Any party] who sells any product in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user or consumer or to his property is liable for the harm caused by that product to the consumer or end user."




This allowed victims of asbestos products and materials to sue the manufacturers for damages. 




1969 to Present: Lawsuits Triple




The amount of mesothelioma cases has more than tripled to over 700,000 after the success of the first asbestos lawsuit and proof that asbestos contributes to life-threatening illnesses. 



More than 10,000 companies have been named in asbestos lawsuits.



What's the Latest in Mesothelioma Litigation?



Mesothelioma Diagnoses and Deaths




Over 30,000 people worldwide received a mesothelioma diagnosis in 2020, according to the Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.



New cases of cancer are on the rise. Approximately 19.3 million new cases of cancer and around 10 million cancer deaths are expected to be reported by the end of 2020.



Worldwide mesothelioma cases totaled 30,870, with 26,278 deaths.




Johnson & Johnson Knew About Asbestos 




Reuters reports that Johnson & Johnson knew for decades that its baby powder was contaminated with asbestos. Victims' lawyers discovered that the company actively hid this information.



The investigative report comes on the heels of a successful lawsuit against J&J. Numerous plaintiffs diagnosed with asbestos illnesses proved their cases and won compensation.



In October 2019, despite their protests that their products contained no asbestos, Johnson & Johnson pulled 33,000 baby powder bottles from store shelves, according to a report by The New York Times. The recall happened after the Food and Drug Administration announced it discovered asbestos in one of the bottles.



In October 2020, the company agreed to pay over $100 million to help resolve more than 1,000 lawsuits over asbestos in baby powder.



In November 2020, Johnson & Johnson lost its appeal to overturn a $2.12 billion verdict awarded to women diagnosed with ovarian cancer in Missouri.




Asbestos-Related Litigation on the Rise




Rates of mesothelioma have been declining, but lawsuits filed over asbestos exposure and cancer continue to rise. The number of asbestos cancer cases filed by victims increased by nearly 66% between 2007 and 2017.



In 2017, there were 2,124 mesothelioma filings, an all-time high.



Women are filing more asbestos cases than ever, with greater increases in lawsuits than men.



Much of the increase can be attributed to the Johnson & Johnson talcum powder cases. The number of lawsuits filed over talc products and asbestos increased by 11% in 2019.




International Asbestos Facts




According to the World Health Organization (WHO), 125 million people worldwide experience asbestos exposure on the job.



Preventing lung diseases caused by exposure to asbestos is part of the WHO's Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases through 2020.



Deaths in the United Kingdom related to asbestos exposure have reached a crisis level at more than 2,500 deaths per year from mesothelioma. This is expected to be the peak of asbestos diseases in the country.




Mesothelioma Lawsuit FAQs



Before proceeding with a lawsuit, get all your questions answered. This is a great place to start, but you should also contact an experienced asbestos attorney. 



What if I Don't Know Which Companies to Sue? 



If you received a mesothelioma diagnosis, asbestos is the most likely cause. You probably encountered it at work or in the military. An asbestos law firm has the resources to investigate your past exposure and pin down the companies responsible and liable for damages. 



What if the Responsible Company No Longer Exists? 



Most bankrupt asbestos companies set up asbestos trust funds to compensate victims. They funded the trusts with enough money to provide for claimants well into the future. Your lawyer can find the appropriate trusts for you to make claims. 



How Long Does it Take to Get Compensation From a Mesothelioma Lawsuit?  



A lawsuit can potentially take years to resolve. However, most mesothelioma lawsuits end in settlements. Many victims get payments within a few months. Courts understand that mesothelioma patients have limited time and try to expedite cases as much as possible. 



Many settlements result in cash for the asbestos victim within about 90 days. 



Will I Have to Go to Court? 



Because most of these cases don't go to trial, you probably won't have to go to court. If your case goes to trial and you are too sick to attend, your lawyer can make accommodations. 



What Happens if the Patient Dies During a Mesothelioma Lawsuit? 



When a patient dies before a case resolves, either a family member or their estate may continue the lawsuit. Loved ones can also decide to start a wrongful death lawsuit. 



What if I Can't Afford to File a Lawsuit? 



Asbestos lawyers do not charge their clients fees until they win the case. You won't have to pay anything until you get a settlement or verdict in your favor. 



Should I Join a Mesothelioma Class Action Lawsuit? 



Class-action or group lawsuits are rare in mesothelioma cases. In a typical class-action lawsuit, all plaintiffs’ claims are combined into a single case, and any award is divided amongst them. This approach is common when many individuals have experienced similar harm from the same defendant or group of defendants. However, every mesothelioma case has a unique combination of defendants and circumstances, which necessitates separate litigation. Thus, when your case settles or results in a verdict, you won’t have to share your proceeds with other plaintiffs.



You generally have a better chance of recovering damages if you file individually.



Another option is to join multidistrict litigation (MDL). This is when the courts process several similar claims together, but each plaintiff remains part of an individual lawsuit. This approach can streamline pre-trial proceedings while ensuring that each case is judged on its own merits.



What Is the Average Settlement for a Mesothelioma Lawsuit? 



The average settlement in mesothelioma lawsuits ranges from $1 million to $1.4 million. Jury verdicts are usually larger, but by going to trial, you risk getting nothing. It also takes much longer to reach a verdict in most cases. 



How Much Is My Mesothelioma Lawsuit Worth? 



Even the best lawyers cannot predict exactly how much you can get from an asbestos lawsuit. They can provide a very accurate estimate based on several factors:




Your past and ongoing medical expenses



Expected future medical and care expenses



Lost wages and lost earning capacity



The degree of liability on behalf of the defendants



The severity of your illness



Your physical and emotional pain and suffering




Asbestos lawsuits that go to trial and result in a win for the plaintiff often have very high jury awards, worth several million dollars. 



Is a Mesothelioma Settlement Taxable? 



If or how your settlement will be taxed depends on individual factors and state laws. You should not have to pay taxes on compensation for medical expenses. Lost wages are usually taxed. 



Is There a Statute of Limitations on Mesothelioma Cases? 



Yes, every state has a statute of limitations for personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits. They range from one to six years. Make sure you act quickly after receiving a diagnosis or losing a family member to avoid missing your opportunity to sue the responsible companies. 



Where Can I Get Legal Assistance with My Lawsuit?



Fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you need additional assistance, feel free to contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Can Asbestos Kill You?

The Lethal Nature of Asbestos Exposure



Yes, asbestos exposure can be fatal. Inhalation of asbestos fibers can lead to serious diseases, including mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis. These conditions often develop years after exposure and can be life-threatening.



Diseases Caused by Asbestos




Mesothelioma: A rare and aggressive cancer affecting the lining of the lungs, abdomen, or heart. Approximately 80% of mesothelioma cases are linked to asbestos exposure. The disease has a long latency period, often appearing 20 to 50 years after exposure. en.wikipedia.org



Lung Cancer: Asbestos exposure increases the risk of lung cancer, especially among smokers. The combination of smoking and asbestos exposure significantly amplifies the risk. 



Asbestosis: A chronic lung disease caused by inhaling asbestos fibers, leading to lung tissue scarring and breathing difficulties. In severe cases, asbestosis can be fatal.




No Safe Level of Exposure



The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) states that there is no safe level of asbestos exposure. Even brief or low-level exposures can cause health issues, as asbestos fibers can remain in the lungs for years, causing inflammation and scarring. pennmedicine.org



Global Impact



According to the World Health Organization (WHO), more than 200,000 deaths annually are attributed to occupational asbestos exposure, accounting for over 70% of all work-related cancer deaths. who.int



Real-Life Cases




Jarni Greatorex, an 18-year-old from Australia, developed peritoneal mesothelioma, a rare cancer caused by asbestos exposure. Her case underscores that asbestos-related diseases can affect individuals of all ages.



Libby, Montana: Residents of this town suffered from widespread asbestos exposure due to a vermiculite mine, leading to hundreds of deaths and numerous illnesses. The situation highlights the dangers of environmental asbestos contamination




What Is Asbestos?



Asbestos is a natural mineral that can be mined and used as an insulating material. Asbestos was used in many industrial, commercial, and construction materials in the past. It is a known human carcinogen and causes mesothelioma, lung cancer, and other illnesses.



With more than $30 billion currently set aside in trust funds, you may qualify for substantial compensation if you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 







Facts About Asbestos




Asbestos is a group of fibrous minerals found in deposits in the ground, especially in certain types of rocks, like serpentine. 



Asbestos minerals are made up of bundles of long, thin fibers that easily break apart. 



Asbestos is strong, lightweight, flexible, and an excellent insulator. 



It resists heat but also electricity, fire, and many chemical reactions. 



People have been using asbestos for these properties for thousands of years. 



Larger-scale asbestos mining and use began with the industrial age of the 1800s. 



Peak asbestos use in the U.S. occurred between the 1930s and 1970s.



Asbestos exposure causes cancer and illness in some people. 



Mesothelioma is a rare cancer, and asbestos exposure is the only known cause. 



Asbestos has not been banned in the U.S., but its use is severely restricted.



The construction industry used asbestos more than almost any other industry. 



Although most industries no longer use asbestos, it lingers in older buildings. 



Asbestos was once mined in the U.S. and Canada but now mostly comes from Russia, China, and Kazakhstan. 




Major Suppliers and Manufacturers of Asbestos



Asbestos found its way into numerous industries thanks to a variety of manufacturers who heavily used it in their products. Initially, asbestos was predominantly used for insulating steam engines, pipes, and locomotives. Over time, its application expanded significantly, and it became a staple in the production of boilers, gaskets, cement, roofing shingles, and automotive brake pads.



Key Industry Players




Large Corporations: Several major corporations dominated the asbestos supply market. These companies were instrumental in developing and distributing asbestos products on a large scale.



Manufacturing Giants: Some of the largest manufacturers specialized in creating products such as insulation materials, cement, and various automotive components. These businesses recognized asbestos for its heat-resistant properties but often overlooked its health risks.



Diverse Product Range: The companies involved were not limited to only one type of product. Their portfolios included materials crucial for industrial and consumer applications alike.




These manufacturers were at the forefront, supplying a wide array of asbestos-containing products and knowingly exposing workers, consumers, and the environment to the associated hazards. While the benefits for industries were clear, the long-term impact on health was profound and far-reaching.






                
                        
                            Calculate Case Value
                            
                        
                        Diagnosis-- Select --MesotheliomaAsbestosisAsbestos-Related Lung CancerIs Diagnosed Person Alive?-- Select --YesPassed away under 2 years agoPassed away over 2 years agoAge of Diagnosed Person-- Select --Under 6565-8485 or olderExposure-- Select --MilitaryOccupationalSecond-HandOther / UnknownMain Job Site-- Select --ShipyardsBoiler RoomsPowerhousesPaper MillsConstruction SitesAutomotiveFirefightingRailroadsRefineriesOther / UnknownMain Asbestos Product Used-- Select --Fire Protection ProductsBrake Pads / LiningsCeiling Textures / Tile / PlasterElectrical ProductsTransite ProductsHeating & Cooling ProductsVermiculiteRoofing ProductsPaints / Plasters / Wall CoveringsOther / UnknownState-- Select --AlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaNorthern Mariana IslandsOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahU.S. Virgin IslandsVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces EuropeArmed Forces PacificPhone(Required)Email(Required)First Name(Required)Last Name(Required)EmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
         Any information you send is secure and will never be sold or released.This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
        
                        Δ
                        





Types of Asbestos 



There are six types of asbestos minerals: 




Tremolite: Tremolite asbestos is generally found in certain talcum powders but usually wasn’t used commercially. Additionally, this type of asbestos was used in vermiculite as well as products containing vermiculite. Tremolite is in the family of amphibole asbestos; a mineral with long and thin fibers. Colors range from dark green to off-white. 





Amosite: Amosite asbestos is commonly known as “brown asbestos” because of its brownish-gray color. Amosite was the 2nd most frequently used asbestos commercially, and also one the deadliest, according to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). It was widely used in thermal insulation products, ceiling tiles, spray coatings, and motor industry asbestos plastics. 





Chrysotile: The serpentine asbestos chrysotile was the most commonly used asbestos in the United States. It’s referred to as “white asbestos” because of its color, and according to the EPA, is another one of the deadliest types of asbestos. Per the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, chrysotile was confirmed to be linked to malignant mesothelioma and other forms of asbestos cancer. Chrysotile was mainly used in sheets, pipes, and shingles. Other additional products that may contain chrysotile are textiles, rubber sealants, brake pads for motor vehicles, textiles, and asphalt. 





Crocidolite: Crocidolite, also referred to as “blue asbestos,” was used the least commercially. Crocidolite is the most harmful type of asbestos in the amphibole group. Crocidolite was mined by workers, usually in Australia and South Africa. According to the EPA, at least 18% of those miners have died from long-term exposure. This type of asbestos was used mainly for cement products due to its ability to add durability and strength. It was rarely used for fire resistance or insulation as this type of asbestos is not nearly as heat resistant as some of the more popular types.





Anthophyllite: Anthophyllite is another type of asbestos in the amphibole family. It’s one of the lesser-known asbestos, yet it can be just as dangerous if inhaled. Anthophyllite’s long and sharp fibers are easily ingested and can get lodged in the chest area. This type of asbestos has been linked to lung cancer. It can be found in talc mines all across the world.





Actinolite: Although actinolite was rarely used commercially, it has been found in certain paint products, sealants, drywall, and even toys. Part of the amphibole group, actinolite is dense and brittle and can be easily ingested and become stuck in the chest and abdominal area. Long-term exposure has been linked to both lung cancer and mesothelioma.




Asbestos can also be categorized as friable or non-friable. Friable is asbestos that crumbles easily and reduces fibers. This is more dangerous than non-friable asbestos, which stays intact and doesn't readily release harmful fibers. 



Friable asbestos products included spray-on insulation and fireproofing, drywall, plaster, and popcorn ceilings. Examples of non-friable asbestos include roofing and flooring materials, cement sheets, and transite panels. 



Does All Asbestos Cause Cancer? 



Asbestos is bad for human health. It is a carcinogen, meaning exposure to it can cause cancer. It can also cause non-cancerous health conditions, particularly respiratory conditions.



All of the types of asbestos can cause cancer. Non-friable asbestos that is well encapsulated and maintained is unlikely to cause exposure and put people at risk for cancer. 



Asbestos-Related Illnesses



Asbestos exposure causes cancer, but it can also cause non-cancerous diseases. The illnesses associated with asbestos exposure include: 




Mesothelioma. Most often associated with asbestos, mesothelioma is a cancer of the tissue that lines organs in the body. Pleural mesothelioma occurs in the chest cavity and is the most common form. Peritoneal mesothelioma develops in the abdominal cavity. Asbestos is the only known cause of mesothelioma. 



Lung cancer. Lung cancer is much more common than mesothelioma, but it can be caused by other things, such as smoking. Asbestos has been associated with the development of lung cancer in both smokers and non-smokers. 



Other cancers. Mesothelioma can also cause or contribute to pharynx, larynx, and ovarian cancers. 



Asbestosis. Asbestosis is a non-cancerous but progressive disease of the lungs. It causes scarring in lung tissue that cannot be reversed. 



Pleural plaques and thickening. Areas of thickened tissue around the lungs caused by asbestos are not malignant. However, these areas can become cancerous. 



Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Like lung cancer, there are other causes of COPD, but asbestos exposure may contribute to it. 



What Are the First Signs of Asbestos Exposure?



Initial exposure to asbestos doesn't immediately produce noticeable symptoms. This makes it difficult for individuals to realize they've been affected early on. However, as asbestos-related conditions start to develop, certain signs and symptoms can emerge.



Early Symptoms to Watch For:



Shortness of Breath: Difficulty in breathing is often one of the first indicators that asbestos has affected the lungs.



Persistent Dry Cough: A cough that doesn't seem to go away could be an early sign of asbestos-induced lung damage.



Chest or Abdominal Discomfort: Pain in these areas may suggest early development of asbestos-related diseases.



These early signs are often subtle and can be mistaken for less serious conditions. If you experience any of these symptoms and have a history of asbestos exposure, it's crucial to consult a healthcare professional promptly for assessment and advice.




How Was Asbestos Used? 



Asbestos was used most heavily in the construction industry but also in these types of workplaces: 




Manufacturing facilities



Chemical plants



Shipyards



Power plants



Oil refineries



Automotive plants and mechanics shops



Steel mills and ironworks




Asbestos was used primarily as an insulator. It was used in many industries that generated heat and in construction to insulate and fireproof buildings. Some of the many materials and products made with asbestos in the past include: 




Insulation



Pipes and insulating pipe wrapping



Cement



Textiles



Flooring tiles



Roofing materials



Adhesives



Caulking



Drywall



Gaskets



Valves



Brakes



Clutches



Duct connectors




Major Suppliers and Manufacturers of Asbestos



Asbestos found its way into numerous industries thanks to a variety of manufacturers who heavily used it in their products. Initially, asbestos was predominantly used for insulating steam engines, pipes, and locomotives. Over time, its application expanded significantly, and it became a staple in the production of boilers, gaskets, cement, roofing shingles, and automotive brake pads.



Key Industry Players




Large Corporations: Several major corporations dominated the asbestos supply market. These companies were instrumental in developing and distributing asbestos products on a large scale.



Manufacturing Giants: Some of the largest manufacturers specialized in creating products such as insulation materials, cement, and various automotive components. These businesses recognized asbestos for its heat-resistant properties but often overlooked its health risks.



Diverse Product Range: The companies involved were not limited to only one type of product. Their portfolios included materials crucial for industrial and consumer applications alike.




These manufacturers were at the forefront, supplying a wide array of asbestos-containing products and knowingly exposing workers, consumers, and the environment to the associated hazards. While the benefits for industries were clear, the long-term impact on health was profound and far-reaching.



Who Is at Risk for Asbestos Exposure? 



Workers in the past were at a much higher risk of asbestos exposure. Workers today might encounter asbestos, but it is less likely. They are also more likely to be aware of asbestos and to have training and safety gear. 



Some of the occupations that put past workers at high risk of asbestos exposure include: 




Construction workers



Pipefitters



Boilermakers



Shipyard workers



U.S. Navy service members



Electricians



Plumbers



Steelworkers



Auto mechanics



Railroad workers



Miners




These workers are still at risk of mesothelioma today. Asbestos illnesses take decades to develop. Workers who have long retired may be diagnosed with mesothelioma. 



Some workers today are still at risk of asbestos exposure: 




Repair and renovation workers



Demolition workers



Plumbers



Insulation workers



HVAC workers



Auto mechanics



Firefighters




Is Asbestos Still Used Today? 



Medical experts have long known that asbestos is dangerous for people, especially those exposed to it for an extended period. Many manufacturers stopped using it after the health risks and mesothelioma symptoms came to light.



The phase-out of asbestos began when significant medical evidence linked asbestos to cancer. In the 1960s, medical studies confirmed asbestos causes mesothelioma, prompting labor unions to fight back. An important milestone occurred in 1973 when an asbestos insulator won the first major asbestos lawsuit. By the 1980s, American companies phased out most uses of asbestos, although it was too late for many workers who had already been exposed for decades.



Asbestos manufacturers continued to put workers in danger. They didn’t necessarily warn companies and their employees of the risks. During the 1930s, some asbestos companies conducted secret research on health effects and kept the results hidden. As early as 1927, a worker filed the first known workers’ compensation claim for asbestos-related disease.



The history of asbestos cover-ups stretches back to the late 19th century. By the mid-20th century, asbestos use was widespread, while evidence of its dangers was steadily mounting.



Key Events in the Asbestos Industry's Deception




1898: The death of H.W. Johns from lung scarring marked an early indication of the hazards associated with asbestos.



: An autopsy in England documented the first death from asbestosis, a disease directly linked to asbestos exposure.



1924: Research began to connect asbestos with severe health issues, laying the groundwork for identifying it as a carcinogen.



1929: Workers started voicing health complaints related to asbestos, with some employees even taking their grievances to their employers.



1940s: Despite internal experiments revealing cancer in asbestos-exposed mice, the industry worked to suppress these findings.



1955: A critical study highlighted elevated rates of lung cancer among asbestos workers.




Throughout these decades, internal records revealed that companies were aware of the health risks associated with asbestos. Yet, they persisted in manufacturing and using these toxic materials. This negligence led to a growing number of lawsuits from asbestos disease victims seeking justice for their suffering.



The asbestos industry's choices were guided largely by profit, putting countless lives at risk while information about the dangers remained hidden from the public eye. As the truth emerged, regulatory bodies began to respond, but only after decades of unchecked corporate malfeasance.



Today, asbestos is rarely used in any industry. One industry that still uses asbestos is the manufacturing of chlorine. Chlor-alkali plants use asbestos in a specific type of filter.



Another ongoing use of asbestos is in automotive brakes and clutches. New cars do not contain asbestos, but imported aftermarket parts often do.



Construction was the heaviest user of asbestos in the past. While new construction materials no longer contain asbestos, many older buildings still have asbestos components in them. Most of the asbestos that remains in buildings today is legacy asbestos. Asbestos is safe if undisturbed, but renovations, demolition, fire, or natural disasters can release its fibers. These microscopic fibers can become airborne and be inhaled, posing a continuing risk.



In some instances, asbestos manufacturers continued to put workers in danger. They didn't necessarily warn companies and their employees of the risks. 



Today, asbestos is rarely used in any industry. One industry that still uses asbestos is the manufacturing of chlorine. Chlor-alkali plants use asbestos in a specific type of filter. Another ongoing use of asbestos is in automotive brakes and clutches. New cars do not contain asbestos, but imported aftermarket parts often do. Construction was the heaviest user of asbestos in the past. While new construction materials no longer contain asbestos, many older buildings still have asbestos components in them.



Asbestos mining in the United States reached its peak in the late 1960s and early 1970s, with more than 299 million pounds produced annually. However, as awareness of its health risks increased, mining activity steadily declined. By 2002, the last asbestos mine in the U.S. Had closed.



Despite the end of domestic mining, asbestos is still mined in other parts of the world and continues to be imported into the U.S. Under certain restrictions. Notably, a ban on chrysotile asbestos was enacted in 2024, although a complete ban on asbestos does not yet exist.



The decline in mining and regulatory changes reflect the global shift away from asbestos use, yet some industries persist in utilizing this hazardous material. Understanding both the historical context and current applications of asbestos provides a comprehensive view of its ongoing impact and the efforts to reduce its presence in everyday products. 





Where Is Asbestos Found Today?



Even though asbestos has been banned from being used in most places of employment in the U.S. and other countries, it can still be found in many homes, buildings, and industrial workplaces built before the law prevented its use. 



The most common places where asbestos can be found are ceiling and floor tiles, pipe and boiler insulation, shingles, plasters, and joint compounds.



Public and government buildings also often contain asbestos. Older school buildings usually have asbestos. School districts are not required to remove it, but they must conduct regular inspections and create safety plans to protect staff and students. 



How to Protect Yourself From Asbestos Exposure



Asbestos is much less risky today than in the past, but it still causes harm. Far too much asbestos was used in the past to completely eliminate it from all homes, public buildings, and workplaces. Know where asbestos is and how to avoid exposure to stay safe. 



Asbestos Safety Regulations in the Workplace



Employers at workplaces that contain asbestos must follow strict federally mandated requirements with no exceptions. Workers cannot be exposed to more than 0.1 fibers of asbestos per cubic foot during a regular work shift, typically 8 hours. Rotating different employees to meet this guideline is strictly prohibited. Additionally, all workers who can potentially come in contact with an even small amount of asbestos must be able to get a medical exam every 30 days, provided by their employers. Further, protective clothing and hygiene products must be available at all times. If you work somewhere with asbestos, take all training available and use the safety gear your employer provides. Never go home in clothing contaminated with asbestos.



Asbestos regulation extends beyond the workplace and includes standards for using, handling, and removing legacy asbestos. These laws are in place to safeguard public health and are enforced at local, state, and federal levels to minimize exposure risks. This framework not only protects workers but also consumers and the environment.



Procedures for dealing with asbestos involve rigorous approaches, including testing and safe disposal methods. Continuous monitoring and enforcement ensure compliance, reducing hazards related to asbestos exposure.



While American companies have ceased manufacturing asbestos-containing building materials, other nations still incorporate asbestos into their products. Imported items such as roofing materials, joint compounds, and gaskets may contain asbestos, necessitating ongoing vigilance and regulation.



Globally, efforts to ban asbestos are underway, with significant attention given to phasing out its use. For instance, a planned ban on chrysotile asbestos, the only type currently imported into the U.S., reflects progress toward eliminating this hazardous material. Manufacturers are increasingly turning to safer alternatives like polyurethane foam and cellulose fiber, offering low-cost and effective substitutes. These materials provide a range of options for replacing asbestos, each with unique properties and applications:




Polyurethane Foam:

Form/Composition: Available in foam blocks, sheets, or spray-on forms.



Qualities: Excellent for molding to fill cracks and gaps, providing seamless insulation.



Products: Commonly used as insulation or filler in thermal products.





Cellulose Fiber:

Form/Composition: Made from plant-based materials, such as shredded newspaper, wood, or leaves.



Qualities: Chemically treated to improve heat and fire resistance.



Products: Often used in insulation, offering an eco-friendly alternative.





Woven Cloth:

Form/Composition: Typically sold in large sheets that can be tailored to size.



Qualities: Offers resistance to chemicals, heat, and abrasion.



Products: Integrated into fireproof gear and thermal barriers.





Natural Combinations:

Form/Composition: Includes products like wheat flour, rice flour, cork, or wood flour mixed with a binding agent.



Qualities: Effective for sealing and insulating when poured into cracks and crevices.



Products: Used in sealing and insulating applications.






These alternatives not only address safety concerns but also align with modern environmental standards, offering versatile solutions across various industries.



How to Stay Safe From Asbestos in the Home



Although it’s much rarer these days for workers to come into contact with asbestos, exposure still happens when older buildings, insulation, flooring, and other parts containing asbestos need to be repaired or replaced.



If any part of your home or a building that could potentially contain asbestos has been damaged, you should not clean up or repair the damages yourself. Contact your local Safety and Health Administration.



If you work or live in a building built before the 1980s, do not do anything that will disturb asbestos fibers, such as drilling, cutting, hammering, or sawing in areas where asbestos is located. 



Contact a certified asbestos abatement professional if you need parts repaired or removed from these types of houses and buildings.



Employees who deal with asbestos have been professionally trained and are protected while working around the dangerous fibers.



How to Identify Asbestos Products in Homes and Workplaces



Recognizing asbestos-containing products in homes or workplaces is a critical yet challenging task. It's important to highlight that identifying these products should always be left to trained professionals, as the risks associated with asbestos exposure are significant.




Professional Expertise Required:Professionals with specialized training are equipped with the knowledge and tools necessary to accurately identify and manage asbestos. These experts deploy specific techniques to confirm the presence of asbestos in materials.



Potential High-Risk Areas:Buildings constructed before the 1980s are more likely to contain products featuring asbestos. During that era, asbestos was commonly used in various construction materials due to its fire-resistant properties and durability.



Common Materials Containing Asbestos:

Insulation: Older homes might have attic and pipe insulation containing asbestos.



Flooring: Vinyl floor tiles and adhesives used before the 1980s could include asbestos fibers.



Roofing and Siding: Some shingles and sidings from older buildings are known to contain asbestos.





When Asbestos Becomes a Risk:Asbestos becomes a health hazard when its fibers are disturbed and become airborne. This typically occurs during renovations, repairs, or natural deterioration over time. Even natural disasters can release fibers from intact materials.



Current Regulations and Risks:Present-day regulations classify certain products as lower risk if asbestos is intact and correctly contained. However, exposure risks increase significantly when fibers are exposed or damaged.




In conclusion, attempting to identify or manage asbestos without professional help is not advisable. Certified professionals can ensure safety by correctly handling and, if necessary, removing asbestos materials. Prioritizing health over DIY solutions is always the best course of action.



What if I Was Exposed to Asbestos? 



While no amount of asbestos exposure is considered safe, a one-time incident will not likely make you sick. If there is a chance you were repeatedly exposed, talk to your doctor. Regular medical screenings are essential for identifying and treating asbestos illnesses early.  



Also, consider working with a lawyer to seek compensation. You could be entitled to compensation through a lawsuit or asbestos trust fund. 



Asbestos companies are often considered liable for exposure in the past. They knew about the risks of asbestos long before they began warning workers and their employers. 



A mesothelioma lawsuit can help you get compensation in the form of a settlement or a jury award. Most of the lawsuits end in settlements. 



You cannot sue an asbestos company that went bankrupt. These companies are protected, but they set up asbestos trust funds to compensate victims. You may qualify to make a claim with a trust. 



Contact an asbestos law firm if you have a mesothelioma diagnosis. They can help you determine how you encountered asbestos and explain your legal options.



Understanding Secondary Asbestos Exposure



What is Secondary Asbestos Exposure?



Secondary asbestos exposure, often referred to as secondhand exposure, happens when individuals encounter asbestos fibers indirectly. Unlike direct exposure, where individuals work with asbestos-containing materials, secondary exposure involves contact through another person.



How Does Secondary Asbestos Exposure Occur?



Here's how it typically unfolds:




Occupational Carriers: Workers dealing with asbestos may unknowingly bring home the dangerous fibers on their clothing, shoes, or hair. Once home, family members and friends can come into contact with these fibers, leading to secondary exposure.



Contaminated Clothing: Washing the clothes of someone who has been exposed to asbestos can release fibers into the air, further increasing the risk for those handling the laundry.



Shared Spaces: Even spending time in a shared vehicle or room with someone who has asbestos fibers on them can pose a risk. These fibers can easily become airborne and travel through the air to settle in different areas.




Secondary exposure is a serious concern because it can lead to the same health risks as direct exposure. Being informed and taking precautions is essential to prevent unintended exposure to asbestos.



How Can You Be Tested for Asbestos Exposure?



If you suspect exposure to asbestos, several medical tests are available to determine if its fibers are present in your body. While no test can pinpoint exactly how much asbestos you've been exposed to, a few methods can detect its presence.




Lung Tissue Examination: A biopsy of lung tissue is one of the most definitive ways. This involves analyzing a sample to see if asbestos fibers are embedded in the lung tissue.



Fluid and Sample Analysis:

Lung Fluid: Tests on fluid from the lungs can reveal asbestos presence.



Urine and Stool Samples: Sometimes, asbestos fibers can be detected in urine or stool, offering additional insight.



Mucus Examination: Asbestos may also be found in mucus samples, providing another testing avenue.






While these methods can confirm exposure, it's important to note they cannot forecast whether an asbestos-related disease will develop. The best course of action if you're concerned about exposure is to consult with a healthcare professional who can guide you through appropriate testing and further steps.



Asbestos FAQs



What Does Asbestos Do to Humans? 



Asbestos gets inside the body through inhalation or ingestion. It causes damage to tissue and cells. In some people, this damage leads to illnesses like mesothelioma, lung cancer, or asbestosis. 



Why Is Asbestos So Bad? 



Mesothelioma is rare, but asbestos is the only known cause. No one should have to suffer from this aggressive cancer because asbestos exposure is preventable. Mesothelioma is most often terminal and causes a lot of painful symptoms. 



Can I Get Compensation if I Was Exposed to Asbestos?



If you have a diagnosis of an asbestos-related illness, you may be entitled to compensation. You must be able to show where you were exposed and the companies responsible. An experienced mesothelioma or asbestos lawyer can help you do that. 



Where Could I Be Exposed to Asbestos? 



Asbestos exposure is less common today than in the past. You might be exposed to it in an older home or other building. You can also find asbestos in aftermarket car parts. Some industrial workplaces might still use asbestos. 



Getting Legal Help



If you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, there is a good chance you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### Mesothelioma Legal Advice

Mesothelioma legal advice helps victims impacted by asbestos seek compensation. Asbestos exposure is the leading cause of mesothelioma and is largely preventable. You have a right to take legal action to seek justice and recover damages. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 











                
                        
                            Calculate Case Value
                            
                        
                        Diagnosis-- Select --MesotheliomaAsbestosisAsbestos-Related Lung CancerIs Diagnosed Person Alive?-- Select --YesPassed away under 2 years agoPassed away over 2 years agoAge of Diagnosed Person-- Select --Under 6565-8485 or olderExposure-- Select --MilitaryOccupationalSecond-HandOther / UnknownMain Job Site-- Select --ShipyardsBoiler RoomsPowerhousesPaper MillsConstruction SitesAutomotiveFirefightingRailroadsRefineriesOther / UnknownMain Asbestos Product Used-- Select --Fire Protection ProductsBrake Pads / LiningsCeiling Textures / Tile / PlasterElectrical ProductsTransite ProductsHeating & Cooling ProductsVermiculiteRoofing ProductsPaints / Plasters / Wall CoveringsOther / UnknownState-- Select --AlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaNorthern Mariana IslandsOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahU.S. Virgin IslandsVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces EuropeArmed Forces PacificPhone(Required)Email(Required)First Name(Required)Last Name(Required)NameThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
         Any information you send is secure and will never be sold or released.This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
        
                        Δ
                        






 




When Do I Need Mesothelioma Legal Advice? 



Anyone diagnosed with mesothelioma or who lost a loved one to mesothelioma can benefit from expert legal advice. Most cases of this rare cancer are preventable. One or more companies can probably be held accountable for the asbestos exposure that caused your illness. 



As a victim of asbestos exposure and mesothelioma, you have a right to take legal action. This right is not just about seeking compensation; it's about holding asbestos companies accountable for their actions. For decades, these companies knew that asbestos exposure could lead to mesothelioma, lung cancer, and other serious diseases. Yet, they chose profit over safety, failing to protect or inform workers and their families.



Because of this negligence, approximately 3,000 Americans are diagnosed with mesothelioma each year. By filing a legal claim, you are sending a powerful message that asbestos manufacturers cannot escape the harm they've caused.



You also have multiple options and need an expert asbestos lawyer to help you sort through them. An experienced attorney can guide you through the legal process, ensuring you pursue the best course of action for your situation. Legal action not only seeks justice for you but also aims to prevent future negligence, protecting others from similar harm.



"Many asbestos lawsuits settle within a few months. It could take a year or longer to resolve if you have to go to trial. The more straightforward your claim, the less time it will take."



Payout timelines for mesothelioma lawsuits can vary widely, depending on the specifics of each case. However, many clients have reported starting to receive settlement checks in 90 days or less when working with experienced law firms. This swift resolution is often possible when cases are clear-cut and do not require a lengthy trial process.



Here’s what typically influences the timeline:




Complexity of the Case: Simpler cases often settle faster.



Going to Trial: If a settlement isn’t reached, the trial process can extend the timeline significantly.



Legal Representation: Working with a skilled law firm can expedite the process.




Understanding these factors can help manage expectations and prepare for the journey ahead.



Payout timelines for mesothelioma lawsuits can vary widely, depending on the specifics of each case. However, many clients have reported starting to receive settlement checks in 90 days or less when working with experienced law firms. This swift resolution is often possible when cases are clear-cut and do not require a lengthy trial process.



Here’s what typically influences the timeline:




Complexity of the Case: Simpler cases often settle faster.



Going to Trial: If a settlement isn’t reached, the trial process can extend the timeline significantly.



Legal Representation: Working with a skilled law firm can expedite the process.




Understanding these factors can help manage expectations and prepare for the journey ahead.



Facts About Mesothelioma and Legal Help




Around 3,000 people receive a mesothelioma diagnosis each year in the U.S.



Victims of asbestos-related diseases were usually exposed at work. Many workplaces once used asbestos heavily in parts, machinery, and equipment.



People who develop an asbestos-related illness have the right to sue the negligent party that exposed them to the life-threatening mineral.



If you file an asbestos lawsuit, you may have questions regarding who is responsible, how the lawsuit process works, and more.



Asbestos lawyers help clients get compensation. The average settlement for mesothelioma is between $1 million and $1.4 million. 




What Are the Legal Options if I Have Mesothelioma? 



The most important reason to talk to an experienced asbestos or mesothelioma lawyer is to understand your options:



Mesothelioma and Asbestos Personal Injury Lawsuit



Many people with mesothelioma choose to file a lawsuit. A mesothelioma lawsuit is filed against the company or companies that exposed you to asbestos. This may be a past employer or the asbestos manufacturers that supplied your workplace.



A personal injury lawsuit is initiated directly by the person diagnosed with mesothelioma, targeting the entities responsible for asbestos exposure. Your attorney will assist in:




Determining when, where, and how you were exposed to asbestos



Identifying the companies that may be responsible



Gathering necessary evidence



Ensuring the claim is filed within the legal deadline




A lawsuit can be an overwhelming process, but it is one of the most important ways to recover damages. A lawyer can guide you through a lawsuit and give you the best chance of getting compensation to cover medical expenses. Lawsuits involve many steps, but most asbestos lawsuits end in a settlement, never going to trial. This is the fastest way to get compensated.



Mesothelioma Wrongful Death Lawsuit



If you lost a family member to mesothelioma, you can file a wrongful death lawsuit to seek compensation. Many close family members, including spouses and dependent children, are eligible to recover damages.



These lawsuits are filed by family members or estate representatives when a victim passes away. The attorney's role includes proving that asbestos products contributed to the death and demanding compensation from the responsible companies.



An asbestos attorney can advise you about your eligibility for this type of lawsuit. They can walk you through the process and ensure you get the compensation you deserve if you are eligible.



Mesothelioma Class Action Lawsuit



What Are the Legal Options if I Have Mesothelioma?



The most important reason to talk to an experienced asbestos or mesothelioma lawyer is to understand your options:



Mesothelioma Asbestos Trust Fund Claims



If a company that exposed you to asbestos is bankrupt, they likely set up a trust fund to compensate future claimants. Mesothelioma claims provide less money than lawsuit settlements but can be a quick source of funds to cover medical bills.



Understanding the Trust Fund Compensation Process:




Eligibility Assessment: Your lawyer will first determine which trust funds you can file claims with, based on your specific asbestos exposure history.



Filing the Claim: Your lawyer will then file the necessary trust fund claims, detailing how, when, and where the asbestos exposure occurred and how it led to your diagnosis of mesothelioma.



Review by Trustees: The board of trustees, who manage the trust fund, will review your claim to assess its validity and determine compensation.



Receiving Compensation: Once approved, compensation is awarded, and you will start receiving payments. Many claimants begin to see payments within 90 days or less.




With over 60 active asbestos trusts today, mesothelioma victims often qualify to file claims with multiple trusts, providing a broader opportunity for financial relief. This process, while generally yielding smaller sums than a lawsuit, offers a more immediate source of funds to help manage ongoing medical expenses.



Other Sources of Mesothelioma Compensation



In addition to legal actions, a lawyer can help you seek compensation through other avenues: 




Veteran Benefits



Social Security Disability 



Medicare and Medicaid Benefits




Notable Settlements and Verdicts in Mesothelioma Cases



When it comes to mesothelioma cases, significant financial outcomes have been achieved through settlements and verdicts, providing substantial compensation to affected individuals and their families.



Significant Settlements:




Carpenter with Pleural Mesothelioma: A notable settlement amounted to $13.1 million, providing much-needed relief and support.



Former Laborer: Secured $12 million, reflecting the seriousness of their pleural mesothelioma diagnosis.



Pipefitter and Maintenance Worker: Received $10.5 million, recognizing the exposure faced in high-risk environments.



Plumber and Pipefitter: Managed to settle for $8 million, showcasing the importance of acknowledging occupational hazards.



Boilermaker with Asbestos Exposure: Achieved a settlement of $6.5 million, compensating years of exposure to dangerous conditions.



U.S. Marine Corps Veteran and Former Carpenter: Was awarded $4.1 million, honoring military service and subsequent occupational risks.



Delivery Worker with Peritoneal Mesothelioma: Obtained $3.64 million, highlighting the diverse nature of exposure beyond industrial sites.




Key Verdicts:




Former Steelworker from Indiana: A landmark verdict resulted in a $250 million award, setting a precedent for future cases.



Veteran Exposed on Navy Ships: Secured $40 million, underlining the risks faced by military personnel.



Construction Supervisor from California: Received a $30 million verdict, drawing attention to widespread construction-related exposure.



Family of an Insulator in Missouri: Awarded $10 million, providing posthumous justice and financial stability to the family.



Secondhand Exposure Affecting a Nurse: The verdict of $7.1 million acknowledges the perils of indirect asbestos exposure.




These settlements and verdicts illustrate the far-reaching impact of asbestos exposure, showcasing determined legal efforts to secure justice and compensation for afflicted individuals and their families.



How Mesothelioma Legal Help Can Secure Financial Stability for Patients and Their Families



Mesothelioma patients often face overwhelming financial burdens due to treatment costs, lost income, and unexpected expenses. Legal assistance can significantly alleviate these pressures, providing both immediate and long-term financial security.



Key Benefits of Legal Assistance:




Recovering Treatment Costs: Legal action can help patients recover expenses related to medical treatments, ensuring they don't have to compromise on necessary care. This reimbursement can cover hospital bills, medication, and specialized therapies.



Compensation for Lost Wages: Many patients are unable to work during treatment and recovery. Legal settlements or compensation through trust funds can replace lost income, helping maintain the household's financial stability.



Debt Reduction: Legal support can aid in managing or reducing debt incurred from medical expenses or other related costs. This can relieve a significant portion of the financial stress that often accompanies a mesothelioma diagnosis.



Securing Family's Future: Beyond immediate costs, legal help can pave the way for long-term financial security. Compensation received can be invested or saved to ensure that loved ones are financially protected in the future.



Peace of Mind: With financial concerns eased, families can focus more on spending quality time together, making the most of every moment without the constant worry of financial distress.




By addressing these crucial areas, mesothelioma legal help acts as a vital resource not just for patients, but for their entire families, providing a level of security and peace of mind that is invaluable during such challenging times.



State-by-State Legal Advice for Mesothelioma



Laws guiding personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits vary by state. Asbestos lawsuits aren't always filed in the state where the claimant lives. This can make it confusing, so it's important to work with law firms that have national reach and experience working in all states. 





About Asbestos and Mesothelioma Law Firms



Mesothelioma law firms and lawyers work with asbestos victims around the country. They have experience working with victims, tracking down evidence of past asbestos exposure, and holding companies responsible. 



Before you take any legal action, choose the right lawyer. The best firms for asbestos cases have national reach, proven experience winning for victims, and extensive resources to help cases run smoothly and quickly. 



We offer free online appointments and can arrange for representatives to meet you within just one mile of your home.



Why Should I Hire a Lawyer to File an Asbestos Lawsuit?



It's not a requirement, but it's a good idea to retain the services of an experienced mesothelioma law firm if you plan to file a lawsuit for many reasons: 




Mesothelioma and asbestos lawsuits are complicated. The average person doesn't have the experience or knowledge to make a strong case for an employer's or manufacturer's liability. 



A lawyer can explain your options. You might think that suing a company is your only choice. A lawyer will lay out all the options and advise you on the best one.



Mesothelioma attorneys have extensive asbestos resources. They have access to information about companies that used asbestos and their locations. With your job history, these resources are invaluable for building a strong case. 



Asbestos lawyers offer free consultations. You can get your questions answered by an expert for free. It's worth talking to a mesothelioma lawyer, even if you don't file a lawsuit. 




Remember that mesothelioma attorneys are knowledgeable and experienced in all aspects of state and federal asbestos laws and personal injury. They can offer you a wealth of legal advice and help. 




 




Why Choose a Local Attorney for Your Mesothelioma Case?



Opting for a local attorney can provide numerous benefits when navigating a mesothelioma case. Here's why local representation can make a difference:




Community Insight: Local attorneys possess in-depth knowledge of the regional legal landscape and local court procedures. This understanding can be crucial in navigating the complexities of mesothelioma litigation within a specific jurisdiction.



Established Connections: Attorneys who practice locally often have built strong relationships with nearby medical professionals and specialists. These connections can be invaluable in gathering expert testimony and evidence to strengthen your case.



Convenient Access: Having an attorney close to home simplifies communication and coordination. You'll find it easier to attend in-person consultations, meetings, and court appearances, reducing the stress associated with long-distance travel.



Tailored Strategy: Understanding the nuances of the local community allows a local attorney to tailor their approach to resonate with local juries and judges, potentially increasing your case's effectiveness.




Choosing a local attorney can offer strategic advantages that go beyond legal expertise, making the process smoother and potentially enhancing the outcome of your mesothelioma case.



How Mesothelioma Legal Aid Eases Financial Burdens for Families



Dealing with mesothelioma can be overwhelming, and the financial impact is often significant. Legal aid plays a crucial role in alleviating these burdens. Here's how it helps:




Securing Compensation: Through lawsuits and trust fund claims, mesothelioma patients can access compensation. This financial support helps cover medical expenses, lost income, and other associated costs.



Providing Stability: Achieving a favorable legal outcome can ensure long-term financial security for patients and their families. This stability is essential for managing day-to-day expenses and planning for future needs.



Reducing Stress: With the assistance of experienced legal professionals, families can focus on spending quality time together. Knowing that necessary financial arrangements are being handled eases anxiety.



Navigating Complex Legal Processes: Specialized lawyers understand the intricacies of asbestos-related cases, helping families navigate through complex legal procedures efficiently.




In summary, mesothelioma legal aid not only addresses immediate financial challenges but also establishes a foundation for long-term stability, giving families invaluable peace of mind.



Questions to Ask Top Rated Mesothelioma Lawyers



The best person to provide you with mesothelioma legal advice is an experienced asbestos lawyer. Here are some common questions to start your search for answers. 



When Was Asbestos Banned, And How Did I Get Exposed? 



You most likely came into contact with asbestos at work. The U.S. government has not entirely banned asbestos. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency put strict limitations on its use in the 1970s. 



Mesothelioma has a long latency period. You might have worked with asbestos in the 1960s and received a diagnosis today. Because asbestos is not banned and companies used it so heavily in the past, it lingers in many buildings and workplaces. People are still at risk of exposure. 



Am I Eligible for a Mesothelioma Lawsuit? 



If you have mesothelioma or any other asbestos-related disease, you have the right to sue the party who exposed you to asbestos. You may not know where or if you were exposed, but an experienced lawyer can investigate and find out. 



How Long Does a Mesothelioma Lawsuit Take? 



Time is precious when you have mesothelioma. Advocates work fast to get their clients much-needed compensation sooner. While every case is different, you could expect to receive payments as soon as 90 days after beginning a claim or lawsuit. 



What Is the Statute of Limitations? 



The statute of limitations is a legal deadline for filing a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit. Talk to a lawyer as soon as possible after getting a mesothelioma diagnosis. You don't want to miss your opportunity to file. Statutes of limitations vary by state and are between one and six years. 



How Do Lawyers Prove Mesothelioma Is from Past Asbestos Exposure? 



Proof is a key element in getting compensation for mesothelioma. The burden of proof in these cases is not high, but to seek damages, you must be able to show you worked in a certain location when asbestos was in use. 



Experienced asbestos lawyers have resources that help them track down past asbestos exposure. Using your job history and knowledge of when and where asbestos was used, they will find the source of asbestos that caused your illness. 



How Much Mesothelioma Compensation Can I Expect?



The amount of compensation varies significantly by case. In general, mesothelioma and asbestos lawsuits provide compensation for:




Lost wages



Medical expenses, both past and future



Financial losses to dependents



Emotional pain and suffering



Physical pain and suffering



In some instances, punitive damages




What Is the Average Settlement for Mesothelioma Victims? 



The average settlement in a mesothelioma lawsuit is between $1 and $1.4 million. However, your potential payout can vary significantly based on several factors, including the number of companies involved in your case.



For a clearer picture, consider some notable settlements that have been awarded:




$13.1 million for a carpenter diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma



$12 million awarded to a former laborer facing pleural mesothelioma



$10.5 million for a pipefitter and maintenance worker



$8 million for a plumber and pipefitter with pleural mesothelioma



$6.5 million to a boilermaker who worked in high-risk asbestos jobs



$4.1 million to a U.S. Marine Corps veteran and former carpenter



$3.64 million for a delivery worker diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma




In addition to settlements, mesothelioma trial verdicts typically range from $5 million to $11.4 million. These figures highlight the potential outcomes if a case proceeds to trial, offering a broader perspective on possible compensation.



How Do Mesothelioma Settlements Work? 



Most mesothelioma and asbestos lawsuits end in settlements. This means that your lawyer and representatives for the defendants agree on an amount of compensation for you. 



Your lawyer will try to get a settlement by showing evidence that the defendants are liable for your asbestos exposure and resulting illness. For instance, the defendant might be a manufacturer that supplied asbestos to your workplace. 



You do not have to accept a settlement amount. Your lawyer will discuss a settlement agreement with you and will only accept it if you agree. 



Can a Lawyer Guarantee a Compensation Amount? 



No one can guarantee you compensation from your lawsuit since each case is unique. An experienced lawyer can give you a reasonable estimate of what to expect in recovered damages. 



Several different factors go into determining compensation in a mesothelioma lawsuit, such as how long you've had the disease, the progression of the disease, medical expenses, how it's affected your life, and more.



What if the Defendants Won't Settle? 



Most mesothelioma claims settle out of court. However, if companies cannot agree on a settlement amount, asbestos-related cases can end up going to trial.



If you go to trial with your case, you have a chance to prove to a jury that you deserve compensation. If the jury decides in your favor, it will also assign an amount the defendants must pay you. 



Will I Have to Go to Court if I'm Sick? 



If your case goes to trial, there is a possibility that you will have to go to court. Yet, sometimes cases are settled during the trial period as well.



Your lawyer will handle most of the work of going to trial. If you are too ill to attend, they can arrange for you to give virtual or recorded testimony. 



How Long Does it Take to Get a Mesothelioma Settlement? 



The duration of a lawsuit depends on many factors unique to each case. Many asbestos lawsuits settle within a few months. It could take a year or longer to resolve if you have to go to trial. The more straightforward your claim, the less time it will take. 



What if I Pass Away Before My Case Settles? 



Courts understand and recognize that asbestos-related illnesses are terminal, and victims may have a short life expectancy. They try to move cases along as fast as possible.



If you pass away while your case is still in progress, your estate typically acts on your behalf and divides your compensation among your surviving dependents and spouse (if applicable). 



In addition, your family also has the legal right to file a wrongful death lawsuit.



How Long Do I Have to File an Asbestos Lawsuit? Do Asbestos Laws Vary By State? 



The statute of limitations for filing a mesothelioma lawsuit will depend on the state in which you're filing. 



In general, most states require that cases be filed within anywhere from one to five years from the time of the diagnosis.



For more information, read over our state-specific mesothelioma articles, which provide the statute of limitations for each state.



What if I Was Exposed to Asbestos in the Military?



If you were exposed to asbestos in the military, you could file a lawsuit against the manufacturers who provided asbestos to the military. You cannot sue the military itself. You may also qualify for benefits and assistance via the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).



For veterans diagnosed with mesothelioma due to military asbestos exposure, filing for VA benefits is a crucial step. Here's how you can proceed:




Seek Legal Assistance: Consider working with a mesothelioma attorney who can guide you through the process. They specialize in these cases and can help ensure your application is complete and submitted properly.



Understand the Benefits: Veterans with mesothelioma may receive monthly benefits worth $4,044.91 in most cases. This financial support can alleviate some of the burdens associated with medical expenses and loss of income.




By pursuing these options, you can secure both legal recourse and the necessary benefits to support your health and financial needs.



Can I Get Compensation Without an Asbestos Lawsuit?  



Other sources of compensation for medical and other expenses include health and disability insurance, Social Security, and VA. Although not legal actions, a lawyer can advise you and help you get these benefits.  



Mesothelioma legal advice is invaluable for anyone living with this terrible disease. Let an expert handle all your legal matters, so you and your family can focus on treatment and your health. 



Why Is Asking for References or Case Examples Important When Selecting a Mesothelioma Attorney?



Selecting a mesothelioma attorney is a critical decision, and your choice can significantly impact the outcome of your case. By asking for references or case examples, you gain a clearer understanding of the attorney’s track record, ensuring that you place your trust in someone competent and proven.



Insight into Previous Successes



Case examples offer tangible evidence of the attorney’s ability to successfully handle cases similar to yours. They provide insight into the strategies employed and their effectiveness, helping you assess whether the attorney has the necessary expertise and experience.



Assessing Client Satisfaction



References allow you to hear directly from former clients about their experiences. Were they satisfied with the attorney's communication, professionalism, and results? These insights are invaluable in choosing an attorney who not only wins cases but also prioritizes client satisfaction and care.



Gauging Ethical Standards



References and case examples can also shed light on an attorney’s ethical standards and integrity. Reviews and feedback from previous clients can reveal whether the attorney upholds ethical practices throughout the case process, giving you confidence in their legal and moral standing.



Understanding Case Complexity



Different cases vary in complexity. By reviewing case examples, you can determine if an attorney has managed cases with complexities akin to your own. This helps ensure they’re capable of navigating any unique challenges your case might present.



In summary, references and case examples aren’t just about wins and losses. They offer a comprehensive view of what you can expect in terms of strategy, client service, and ethical practice—helping you make an informed decision.



What if I Can't Afford a Mesothelioma Attorney?



Most mesothelioma lawyers understand that victims of asbestos-related illnesses are not in the position to pay up-front legal fees. 



Most experienced and knowledgeable attorneys offer contingency fee structures.



A contingency-based payment means that you pay no money at all up-front. Lawyer fees are collected as a percentage of your compensation if and when you win your case.



The contingency amount will vary according to each attorney, but an average range is typically around 25% to 40% of your compensation.



How Do I Find Good Mesothelioma Legal Advice? 



The best source of legal advice is a mesothelioma or asbestos law firm or lawyer. These are specialists in asbestos laws, past asbestos use in workplaces, asbestos illnesses, and taking legal action over exposure and disease. 



Don't settle for advice from someone you know who has been through this or a general lawyer. You need an expert in both law and asbestos. 



Where Can I Find a Mesothelioma Lawyer Near Me? 



You can find top asbestos law firms nationwide because asbestos has affected people in all states and major cities. 



The best mesothelioma lawyers have years of experience working with victims of asbestos exposure. Interview attorneys and firms before settling on someone to advise you. 



We offer free online appointments and can arrange for representatives to meet you within just one mile of your home. Can talk us now, we are open!



How Can I Find Additional Information?



If you've been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you'll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 



We offer free online appointments and can arrange for representatives to meet you within just one mile of your home. Open Now.

### Mesothelioma Remission

Mesothelioma remission occurs when doctors can no longer find traces of the cancer in a patient's body. Remission is rare for mesothelioma, which is aggressive and fast-spreading. Even without remission, the right treatments help patients live longer and with fewer symptoms. 



If you suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about knowledgeable mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













What Does Remission Mean? 



According to the National Cancer Institute (NCI), remission is defined as the absence of signs and symptoms of cancer in people diagnosed with mesothelioma or any other type of cancer. 



There are two remission types for cancer: 




Complete remission means that all signs of cancer have disappeared. 



Partial remission is when some of the cancer signs and symptoms (at least 50%) have disappeared.




Per the American Cancer Society (ACS), cancerous tumors that shrink must stay that way for at least one month for the patient to be considered in partial remission. 



Can Mesothelioma Go Into Remission? 



Remission is possible with mesothelioma but rare. Most patients have a poor prognosis and are unlikely to achieve complete or even partial remission. Mesothelioma remission is rare for a few reasons: 




Mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer that spreads readily. 



Most people diagnosed with mesothelioma are already in the later stages when the cancer has spread. 



Mesothelioma doesn't always respond well to treatment. 



Many patients with mesothelioma are not good candidates for surgery to remove all or most tumors. 




Has Anyone Ever Gone Into Remission for Mesothelioma? 



Yes, there are recorded cases of mesothelioma remission, although they are uncommon: 




A case study published in 2007 described a 61-year-old woman with pleural mesothelioma who was found to be in remission from mesothelioma six months after her diagnosis. Doctors followed up with her five years later, and she was still cancer-free. This was an extremely rare case of spontaneous remission without treatment. Researchers do not know why it happened.





A 71-year-old peritoneal mesothelioma patient went into remission 223 days after surgery to remove the tumors. Cancer recurred in the pleural tissue eight months later. 





A 2019 report described a case study of a 53-year-old man who achieved remission from stage 4 pleural mesothelioma. It is especially rare to go into remission from late-stage mesothelioma. The man received chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and an experimental treatment.





Paul Kraus was diagnosed with metastatic mesothelioma in 1997 and was given six months to live. He chose lifestyle changes and complementary medicine and achieved remission. Although he has had recurrences of other types of cancer, Kraus has been in remission from mesothelioma for decades. 




What Factors Influence Whether a Mesothelioma Patient Is Considered Cured?



Determining if a mesothelioma patient is truly "cured" as opposed to being in remission involves assessing multiple factors. Here's a breakdown of the key elements:




Type and Stage of CancerThe specific characteristics of the mesothelioma, including its type (such as pleural or peritoneal) and stage at diagnosis, play a crucial role. Early-stage cancers generally have a better prognosis, making the path to being considered cured more attainable.



Effectiveness of TreatmentThe success of treatments—ranging from surgery and chemotherapy to radiation therapy—significantly influences outcomes. A treatment plan that effectively eradicates cancer cells increases the likelihood of considering a patient cured.



Patient’s Overall HealthThe individual's baseline health and ability to tolerate aggressive treatments impact their recovery and potential for a cure. A robust immune system may better eliminate residual cancer cells.



Timeframe of Non-RecurrenceDoctors often use time as a measure, typically waiting five years or more of no cancer recurrence before considering a patient cured. This period can vary based on the cancer's nature and recurring tendencies.



Medical Definitions and CautionPhysicians tend to be cautious with the term "cured." They may prefer terms like "complete remission" or "no evidence of disease" for an extended period to ensure long-term cancer absence.




The decision to classify a mesothelioma patient as cured is a complex and cautious one, influenced by each of these interlinked factors.



What Is the Average Life Expectancy After Being Diagnosed With Mesothelioma? 



Life expectancy varies significantly by individual. It depends on the type of mesothelioma, the stage of the disease, the patient's age and health, and other factors. On average, and for all types and stages of mesothelioma, the life expectancy is 12 to 21 months. 



Treatments That Can Lead to Remission



There are currently a variety of treatment options that can help lead mesothelioma patients to remission. Clinical trials that offer unique medication, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery are among the many treatments offered for mesothelioma.



Surgery



Surgery holds the most promise for mesothelioma remission. During surgery, for those who qualify, surgeons remove as much of the cancer as possible.  



Age, stage of the disease, and overall general health are assessed before physicians can determine which patient qualifies for surgery.



Two aggressive types of surgery give pleural mesothelioma the best chance of achieving remission: 




Pleurectomy/Decortication (P/D). During a P/D procedure, the surgeon removes the entire pleura from the chest cavity, including the tissue around the lungs and heart. They reconstruct the pleural tissue using mesh. 



Extrapleural Pneumonectomy (EPP). EPP is more aggressive and risky. It involves removing the pleural tissue and one entire lung on the side of the chest cavity where the mesothelioma originated. 




All surgery comes with risks, but EPP is particularly risky. Even when completed successfully, patients face many health issues living with just one lung. It is important to weigh the risks and benefits when choosing this procedure. 



Remission is more likely with peritoneal mesothelioma than pleural mesothelioma. One reason is an effective treatment called cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC. 



The treatment begins with surgery to remove as much of the cancer as possible. The second step is circulating heated chemotherapy drugs throughout the abdominal cavity. 



A similar treatment for pleural mesothelioma, called hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy, is becoming more common. 



Radiation Therapy



Radiation therapy alone isn’t too powerful when helping mesothelioma patients go into remission. However, combined with chemotherapy or surgery (known as multimodal therapy), patients have a better chance of remission.



The Role of Radiation Therapy



Radiation therapy is a well-established treatment for various types of cancer, including mesothelioma. On its own, it may not be sufficient to achieve remission. However, its effectiveness increases significantly when used as part of a multimodal approach.




Pre-Surgery Use: Radiation can be used to shrink tumors before surgery, making them easier to remove and potentially improving surgical outcomes.



Post-Surgery Application: After surgery, radiation helps to "clean up" any remaining cancer cells, which can further increase the chance of remission.




Effectiveness in Multimodal Therapy



While radiation therapy alone is unlikely to cause remission, its integration with other treatments has shown promising results. This combined approach, especially when paired with surgery or chemotherapy, has led to significant strides toward achieving remission in mesothelioma patients. By targeting cancer cells from multiple angles, the likelihood of remission improves, offering hope to those undergoing treatment.



Through these strategies, radiation therapy plays a crucial role in a comprehensive treatment plan, enhancing the overall effectiveness in the battle against mesothelioma.



Chemotherapy



Chemotherapy is powerful when fighting against mesothelioma, but similar to radiation therapy, a combination of treatment methods is usually the best way to achieve remission. 



Chemotherapy can help boost the chances of remission by killing any cancer cells or small tumors that a surgeon could not remove. 



With advancements in medical care, several strong chemotherapy medications are available today that were not available in the past.



Assessing the Effectiveness of Immunotherapy in Mesothelioma Remission



Immunotherapy has emerged as a promising treatment option for mesothelioma, particularly when surgery is not viable. This approach is gaining traction as it offers a new avenue for those battling this aggressive cancer.



FDA Approvals and Treatment Combinations



Several immunotherapy drugs, such as Opdivo, Keytruda, and Yervoy, have received FDA approval for cases where surgery isn’t an option. Notably, Opdivo and Yervoy are often used together, enhancing their impact on mesothelioma. On their own, these drugs offer a median survival extending between 18 to 20 months.



Keytruda, in particular, is often administered alongside chemotherapy. This combination aims to boost treatment efficacy and improve overall patient outcomes.



Role of Immunotherapy in Multimodal Therapy



The incorporation of immunotherapy into multimodal treatment plans is critical, as it provides a more comprehensive strategy against mesothelioma. Specialists indicate that the best chances for achieving remission could be through such combined approaches. Immunotherapy can be deployed either before or after surgical interventions in clinical settings, serving to enhance the effectiveness of the surgery.



Potential for Remission and Limitations



Much like chemotherapy, immunotherapy has the potential to lead patients into partial or complete remission. However, it’s important to note that these remissions may be temporary, often lasting only a few months. While not a definitive cure, immunotherapy offers an essential hope for extending survival times and improving the quality of life for patients.



In conclusion, while immunotherapy presents a valuable tool in the fight against mesothelioma, its effectiveness is still subject to individual patient circumstances and should be viewed as part of a broader treatment strategy.



Clinical Trials



Clinical trials are a way for scientists to test out new treatment methods for mesothelioma, as well as a way for mesothelioma patients to discover treatments that can help them get their disease under control and possibly into remission.



There are several promising novel therapies currently being explored in clinical trials. These include oncolytic virus therapy, gene therapy, and various types of immunotherapy. Among these, CAR T-cell therapy stands out as a leading option. Traditionally successful in blood cancer cases, this therapy is now showing potential for solid tumors like mesothelioma, although more research is needed to replicate those successes.



There are no guarantees that clinical trials will work. A clinical trial provides a chance for a mesothelioma patient to achieve remission with a novel therapy.



One inspiring example is mesothelioma survivor Kendra Ferreira, who found remission through participation in clinical trials. Her story exemplifies the potential benefits of exploring these cutting-edge treatments.



Some people may be hesitant to participate in clinical trials since the medications and treatment options aren’t available to the public. It’s important to remember that every treatment for every type of disease was once in its novel stages before being released to the public. This highlights the importance of considering all available options, especially for patients with advanced cancer seeking alternative solutions.



Recurrence After Mesothelioma Remission



Recurrence occurs when doctors find signs of cancer after total remission. Types of cancer recurrence include: 




Local Recurrence. This occurs when the cancer comes back to the area where it originally developed. In pleural mesothelioma, this would be a recurrence in the pleura. 



Regional Recurrence. Recurrence is regional when it develops in lymph nodes near the original cancer site. 



Distant Recurrence. This occurs when the cancer develops in another part of the body, for instance, in the bone of someone in remission from pleural mesothelioma. 




In some cases, what looks like a recurrence is really a progression of the cancer. Progression is when cancer spreads or gets worse. For many patients, the cancer was probably not completely in remission, so regrowth is really a progression of the disease. 



How to Reduce the Risks of Recurrence



Remission is a great achievement in mesothelioma treatment, but recurrence is likely. If you achieve remission, you can take certain steps to reduce the risk of recurrence. Just keep in mind that you will likely eventually experience a recurrence. 



For the best possible chances of avoiding remission, keep all medical appointments and treat mesothelioma as an ongoing illness. Although mesothelioma can go into remission, it’s never completely cured.



To manage this disease effectively, consider the following steps:




Regular Surveillance: Schedule and attend regular doctor appointments. Consistent monitoring through surveillance testing is crucial for catching any signs of recurrence early.



Recognize Symptoms: Be proactive in recognizing and reporting symptoms associated with mesothelioma, no matter how minor they may appear. Immediate consultation with your doctor can make a significant difference.



Treatment Options: If a relapse occurs, remember that treatment options like chemotherapy or immunotherapy can be restarted. Discuss with your healthcare team to determine the best course of action for your situation.




Maintain good overall health with lifestyle choices: a healthy diet, regular exercise, getting enough sleep, and managing other illnesses.



While remission may be rare with mesothelioma, it is possible. Talk to your doctors about the best treatments for you and your goals. Remember, achieving remission once means it can happen again with the support of your medical team.



Additional Help and Resources for Mesothelioma Patients



Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on qualified asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. For additional assistance or if you have any questions, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Mesothelioma Compensation

Mesothelioma compensation provides funds for medical care and other expenses. Patients can claim compensation for asbestos exposure and mesothelioma through lawsuits, asbestos trust funds, and veteran benefits. 



If you or a loved one was diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, COPD or asbestosis, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.



Why is Legal Compensation Important for Mesothelioma Cases?



Legal compensation plays a crucial role in supporting those affected by mesothelioma, a devastating illness largely caused by asbestos exposure. Here's why pursuing these claims is essential:




Coverage of Medical Expenses: Mesothelioma treatment can be incredibly costly, involving surgeries, chemotherapy, and ongoing medical visits. Compensation helps alleviate the financial burden of these treatments, ensuring patients can access the best possible care without the stress of mounting bills.



Replacement of Lost Income: Individuals with mesothelioma may find themselves unable to continue working due to their illness. Legal compensation can provide a financial safety net, helping families maintain their standard of living and manage everyday expenses during this challenging time.



Support for Travel and Miscellaneous Costs: Treatment often requires travel to specialists or cancer centers far from home. Compensation can cover travel expenses, accommodations, and other unexpected costs, reducing the stress on patients and their families.



Peace of Mind for Families: Beyond the immediate costs, legal compensation offers long-term financial security. Knowing that one's family is financially protected if a loved one cannot return to work brings peace of mind during an emotionally overwhelming period.



Holding Negligent Parties Accountable: Seeking compensation is also about justice. Legal actions can hold employers, manufacturers, or other entities accountable for exposing individuals to harmful asbestos, potentially preventing future negligence and promoting safer conditions.




In essence, legal compensation for mesothelioma isn't just about covering expenses; it's about providing comprehensive support that empowers patients and their families to focus on what truly matters—health, well-being, and justice.



Mesothelioma Compensation



Mesothelioma compensation provides funds for medical care and other expenses. Patients can claim compensation for asbestos exposure and mesothelioma through lawsuits, asbestos trust funds, and veteran benefits.



If you or a loved one was diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, COPD or asbestosis, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.





                
                        
                            Calculate Case Value
                            
                        
                        Diagnosis-- Select --MesotheliomaAsbestosisAsbestos-Related Lung CancerIs Diagnosed Person Alive?-- Select --YesPassed away under 2 years agoPassed away over 2 years agoAge of Diagnosed Person-- Select --Under 6565-8485 or olderExposure-- Select --MilitaryOccupationalSecond-HandOther / UnknownMain Job Site-- Select --ShipyardsBoiler RoomsPowerhousesPaper MillsConstruction SitesAutomotiveFirefightingRailroadsRefineriesOther / UnknownMain Asbestos Product Used-- Select --Fire Protection ProductsBrake Pads / LiningsCeiling Textures / Tile / PlasterElectrical ProductsTransite ProductsHeating & Cooling ProductsVermiculiteRoofing ProductsPaints / Plasters / Wall CoveringsOther / UnknownState-- Select --AlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaNorthern Mariana IslandsOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahU.S. Virgin IslandsVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces EuropeArmed Forces PacificPhone(Required)Email(Required)First Name(Required)Last Name(Required)CommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
         Any information you send is secure and will never be sold or released.This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
        
                        Δ
                        





Why is Legal Compensation Important for Mesothelioma Cases?



Legal compensation plays a crucial role in supporting those affected by mesothelioma, a devastating illness largely caused by asbestos exposure. Here's why pursuing these claims is essential:




Coverage of Medical Expenses: Mesothelioma treatment can be incredibly costly, involving surgeries, chemotherapy, and ongoing medical visits. Compensation helps alleviate the financial burden of these treatments, ensuring patients can access the best possible care without the stress of mounting bills.



Replacement of Lost Income: Individuals with mesothelioma may find themselves unable to continue working due to their illness. Legal compensation can provide a financial safety net, helping families maintain their standard of living and manage everyday expenses during this challenging time.



Support for Travel and Miscellaneous Costs: Treatment often requires travel to specialists or cancer centers far from home. Compensation can cover travel expenses, accommodations, and other unexpected costs, reducing the stress on patients and their families.



Peace of Mind for Families: Beyond the immediate costs, legal compensation offers long-term financial security. Knowing that one's family is financially protected if a loved one cannot return to work brings peace of mind during an emotionally overwhelming period.



Holding Negligent Parties Accountable: Seeking compensation is also about justice. Legal actions can hold employers, manufacturers, or other entities accountable for exposing individuals to harmful asbestos, potentially preventing future negligence and promoting safer conditions.




In essence, legal compensation for mesothelioma isn't just about covering expenses; it's about providing comprehensive support that empowers patients and their families to focus on what truly matters—health, well-being, and justice.



Facts About Mesothelioma Compensation



If you or a loved one received a mesothelioma diagnosis, you have legal rights. You can seek compensation. Here are some of the basic facts you need to know about mesothelioma compensation:




Most asbestos exposure occurs at work.



Victims of exposure can hold companies liable for the harm caused.



Mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses are costly. You can seek compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, and more.



You can seek compensation through a lawsuit and settlement, an asbestos trust fund, or benefits claims.



Average compensation amounts from mesothelioma settlements are between $1 million and $1.4 million.



The amount of compensation you may receive depends on the unique factors of your case, including the severity of your illness and actual medical expenses.



If you die from mesothelioma, your surviving loved ones can seek compensation.




How Much Is My Mesothelioma Compensation Claim Worth?



There is no clear-cut answer to this question, as compensation amounts differ according to the details of each case. A lawyer experienced in mesothelioma cases can reasonably estimate your claim's worth. They cannot guarantee you a certain amount.



Your lawyer will consider a variety of factors when seeking compensation for your mesothelioma claim:




Medical costs and expenses



Future medical costs



Travel costs



Lost wages



Losses to dependents



Pain and suffering




Compensation amounts also depend on the defendants' actions and the number of companies involved. The extent and duration of your asbestos exposure matters, as does the severity of your illness.



Who Is Eligible for Mesothelioma Compensation?



Anyone diagnosed with an asbestos illness can apply for compensation. This includes mesothelioma, lung cancer, asbestosis, and others, as long as they can be connected to asbestos exposure.







To prove eligibility for compensation, begin by gathering evidence of asbestos exposure and obtaining a formal diagnosis of your illness. Medical records and employment history often serve as key documentation in these cases.



Family members and dependents may also claim for compensation. For example, if your disease has rendered you unable to work and your family depends on your income, your loved ones may be able to receive compensation.



Emotional trauma and the loss of companionship can also factor into a family member’s compensation. Additionally, in cases where a loved one has passed away due to an asbestos-related disease, proving the connection between the illness and asbestos exposure becomes crucial for filing a claim.



In the event of the death of a loved one from an asbestos-related disease, family members and dependents have the legal right to file a wrongful death lawsuit, which may bring about a substantial settlement amount. This legal action can be a crucial step in securing financial compensation that addresses various needs.



Such compensation can cover medical expenses incurred during the battle with mesothelioma, help replace lost wages, and ease travel costs associated with treatment. It is designed to mitigate the financial burden on families, providing a level of financial security when a loved one can no longer contribute to the household income.



By pursuing a wrongful death lawsuit, families not only seek justice but also ensure that they have the necessary resources to support themselves during a difficult time.



What Are Average Mesothelioma Compensation Amounts?



Every case is different, and it is impossible to guarantee an amount. However, it helps to look at the averages:




Lawsuit settlements average between $1 million and $1.4 million.



Jury verdicts are usually higher, $2.4 million on average.



The average asbestos trust fund payout is $180,000.




What Is the Highest Payout for Mesothelioma?



The highest types of mesothelioma compensation come from jury trials. Juries award the highest payouts for mesothelioma victims, often in the tens of millions of dollars.



Some states cap the amount of damages an asbestos victim can recover. This means the court could reduce a high jury award.




 




Facts About Mesothelioma Compensation



If you or a loved one received a mesothelioma diagnosis, you have legal rights. You can seek compensation. Here are some of the basic facts you need to know about mesothelioma compensation: 




Most asbestos exposure occurs at work. 



Victims of exposure can hold companies liable for the harm caused. 



Mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses are costly. You can seek compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, and more. 



You can seek compensation through a lawsuit and settlement, an asbestos trust fund, or benefits claims.



Average compensation amounts from mesothelioma settlements are between $1 million and $1.4 million. 



The amount of compensation you may receive depends on the unique factors of your case, including the severity of your illness and actual medical expenses. 



If you die from mesothelioma, your surviving loved ones can seek compensation.




How Much Is My Mesothelioma Compensation Claim Worth?



There is no clear-cut answer to this question, as compensation amounts differ according to the details of each case. A lawyer experienced in mesothelioma cases can reasonably estimate your claim's worth. They cannot guarantee you a certain amount. 



Your lawyer will consider a variety of factors when seeking compensation for your mesothelioma claim:




Medical costs and expenses



Future medical costs



Travel costs



Lost wages



Losses to dependents



Pain and suffering




Compensation amounts also depend on the defendants' actions and the number of companies involved. The extent and duration of your asbestos exposure matters, as does the severity of your illness. 



Who Is Eligible for Mesothelioma Compensation? 




Anyone diagnosed with an asbestos illness can apply for compensation. This includes mesothelioma, lung cancer, asbestosis, and others, as long as they can be connected to asbestos exposure.








To prove eligibility for compensation, begin by gathering evidence of asbestos exposure and obtaining a formal diagnosis of your illness. Medical records and employment history often serve as key documentation in these cases.



Family members and dependents may also claim for compensation. For example, if your disease has rendered you unable to work and your family depends on your income, your loved ones may be able to receive compensation.



Emotional trauma and the loss of companionship can also factor into a family member’s compensation. Additionally, in cases where a loved one has passed away due to an asbestos-related disease, proving the connection between the illness and asbestos exposure becomes crucial for filing a claim.



In the event of the death of a loved one from an asbestos-related disease, family members and dependents have the legal right to file a wrongful death lawsuit, which may bring about a substantial settlement amount. This legal action can be a crucial step in securing financial compensation that addresses various needs.



Such compensation can cover medical expenses incurred during the battle with mesothelioma, help replace lost wages, and ease travel costs associated with treatment. It is designed to mitigate the financial burden on families, providing a level of financial security when a loved one can no longer contribute to the household income.



By pursuing a wrongful death lawsuit, families not only seek justice but also ensure that they have the necessary resources to support themselves during a difficult time.





What Are Average Mesothelioma Compensation Amounts? 



Every case is different, and it is impossible to guarantee an amount. However, it helps to look at the averages: 




Lawsuit settlements average between $1 million and $1.4 million. 



Jury verdicts are usually higher, $2.4 million on average.



The average asbestos trust fund payout is $180,000.




What Is the Highest Payout for Mesothelioma? 



The highest types of mesothelioma compensation come from jury trials. Juries award the highest payouts for mesothelioma victims, often in the tens of millions of dollars. 



Some states cap the amount of damages an asbestos victim can recover. This means the court could reduce a high jury award. 





“From the first phone call through meetings at our home, depositions and the entire claim process, your firm and its people were absolutely wonderful. They were sensitive to our needs, answering all our questions and working diligently on our behalf. We’re extremely impressed and grateful.”
Sharrie




What Are the Available Types of Asbestos and Mesothelioma Compensation?



There is no single way to get compensation after a mesothelioma diagnosis. Finding the right legal representation for an asbestos case is crucial for securing the compensation you deserve. Start by researching national firms that specialize in asbestos litigation. These firms have the experience and resources necessary to handle complex cases effectively.



Once you've identified potential candidates, talk to an experienced asbestos attorney to determine which compensation types make sense for you. This consultation can help clarify your options and tailor your legal strategy to your specific needs.



To streamline the process, consider these steps:




Research National Firms: Look for firms with a proven track record in asbestos litigation. Check reviews, testimonials, and case histories.



Evaluate Expertise: Ensure the firm or attorney has specific experience with asbestos-related cases. This expertise is key to navigating the legal complexities involved.



Schedule Consultations: Most firms offer free initial consultations. Use this opportunity to ask questions about the process, fees, and potential outcomes.




By following these steps, you'll be better equipped to choose an attorney who can effectively advocate for your rights and secure the best possible outcome.



Personal Injury Lawsuit



One of the most common ways to seek mesothelioma compensation is with a lawsuit against asbestos companies. Manufacturers of asbestos materials can be held liable in court for the harm they caused.



A mesothelioma lawsuit may end in a settlement or a verdict. Most cases end in a settlement. A settlement is desirable for most plaintiffs because it results in compensation sooner.



Settlements occur when the defendant pays the plaintiff to dismiss the lawsuit. This often happens because defendants find it more cost-effective than incurring ongoing legal fees. The average settlement ranges from $1 million to $2 million, providing timely financial relief.



Lawyers take these cases to trial only when negotiations for a settlement fail. A jury may award more damages, but it can take years to resolve. Some defendants may prefer a trial, hoping for a favorable verdict or a better negotiation position at any point during the trial.



Wrongful Death Lawsuit



Family members and estates of people who passed away from asbestos diseases can file wrongful death lawsuits. As with a personal injury lawsuit, the defendants are typically asbestos companies. A wrongful death case can also end in a settlement or a verdict.



A qualified asbestos law firm will negotiate settlements on your behalf. They’ll advise you about whether to take the compensation or pursue a court trial, ensuring you make the best decision for your circumstances.



Asbestos Trust Funds



Many businesses involved with asbestos filed for bankruptcy because of the large number of lawsuits brought by mesothelioma victims.



In most cases, the bankruptcy courts mandate that these companies set up a trust fund specifically for future mesothelioma victims. 



Anyone exposed to asbestos because of the company and who developed a related illness can file a claim with the trust fund to get compensated. Asbestos trusts currently contain $30 billion, so there is plenty to go around. 



Compensation for Veterans



If you served in the military and became ill because of asbestos, you may be entitled to compensation from the Veteran’s Administration (VA). 



The VA provides disability compensation if you can show that your illness resulted from time spent in service. Loved ones of deceased veterans may also be eligible for compensation. Contact your local VA or discuss your options with your attorney.



Veterans who were victims of asbestos exposure may also sue the companies that supplied the military with asbestos-containing materials. 



Other Benefits



Your lawyer can determine your eligibility for other benefits and compensation types: 




Health Insurance. If you have private health insurance, it probably covers some of your medical expenses. How much it helps depends on your plan and details, such as coverage limits, deductibles, and co-pays. 



Workers' Compensation. Workers' compensation insurance supplies benefits for injuries or illnesses sustained at work. If you are covered by this type of insurance and encountered asbestos on the job, you could qualify for payments. 



Long-Term Disability. You might also have disability insurance, which covers some of your salary when you cannot work for medical reasons. Typically, you must be unable to work for several months. 



Social Security. If you qualify, Social Security Disability can provide benefits. You might also qualify for a program called the Social Security Compassionate Allowances. This fast-tracks eligible applications for benefits based on the diagnosis of a serious illness, including mesothelioma. 



Medicare and Medicaid. These government programs cover some medical expenses for qualifying participants. Medicaid applies to workers over 65, while Medicaid is for some people with low incomes or disabilities. 



Charitable and Community Organizations. Many charitable groups and organizations within your community assist people experiencing medical hardship. They may offer grants or help to get medical equipment, for instance. 




How to File for Mesothelioma Compensation



Exactly how you file will depend on the type of action taken. A lawyer will guide you through the steps, which generally include the following:




Investigating and collecting evidence. A law firm will need to gather evidence before taking on your case or taking any formal actions. They must be able to show where and when you encountered asbestos, the companies responsible, and the connection to your illness. Experienced asbestos lawyers have the resources and experts to track down this information.



Filing the lawsuit or claim. With a strong case planned, your lawyer will file the paperwork to start a lawsuit or claim benefits or trust fund compensation. The right attorney will help you understand all your options for filing a claim if you're within the time limit to file.



Proving asbestos exposure and tracking expenses. A crucial part of the attorney's job is to prove your history of asbestos exposure and track expenses related to your illness. This includes costs that insurance often does not cover, such as transportation, home health aides, and complementary therapies.



Negotiating for a settlement. Most asbestos lawsuits proceed next to negotiations for a settlement. Settling benefits both sides. For you, it means getting compensation sooner. Your legal team will also manage the process if you accept a defendant’s settlement offer, ensuring that both sides report the settlement agreement to the court, which will issue an order of settlement.



Going to trial if necessary. At trial, a jury decides if and what the defendants owe you for compensation. Cases usually only go to trial if both sides disagree on a fair settlement amount. An expert lawyer works to maximize your compensation without promising a certain amount.



Handling documentation and appeals. The defense will prepare a document called the release, and once agreed upon, your lawyer will send it to you to sign and have notarized. Your lawyer may need to appeal if a jury decision doesn’t go your way. They may also appeal a denial of benefits or an asbestos trust fund claim.




An experienced attorney will not only navigate the complexities of filing for mesothelioma compensation but will also provide guidance and support throughout the entire legal process, ensuring you receive the compensation you deserve.



How Long Does it Take to Get Mesothelioma Compensation? 



Compensation times vary depending on individual factors. Jury verdicts can take years to reach. A settlement is much faster but still might take a few months. Trust funds are similarly quick, with benefits going out within a few months of filing. 



Examples of Mesothelioma Settlements



Settlement amounts vary significantly based on individual factors. The average settlement amount is between $1 million and $1.4 million. These are some examples of actual asbestos and mesothelioma settlements: 




One of the biggest mesothelioma settlements occurred in 2011 when a Missouri circuit court judge approved a $43 million settlement for over 1,300 miner workers in Libby, Montana. The settlement amounts varied significantly, between $500 and $61,000 per person.



In New Jersey, a construction worker's family received a settlement amount of $2.1 million after he passed away. Also, in New Jersey, a U.S. Navy veteran received $460,000 after he developed asbestos-related lung cancer.



In California, a former plastic molder received $18.5 million in 2006 after developing mesothelioma. In 2012, a former Los Angeles contractor's family received $48 million after the victim developed an asbestos-related disease from doing routine home inspections.



In New York, a boilermaker received $3.7 million after developing asbestos-related lung cancer. In a similar case, a maintenance worker in New York received $2 million after receiving a mesothelioma diagnosis.




When Should I File for Mesothelioma Compensation? 



Do not delay talking to a lawyer about seeking mesothelioma or asbestos compensation. Mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer with a relatively short life expectancy of just one to two years or less. 



There are also legal time limits on filing lawsuits for asbestos exposure. States set a deadline called the statute of limitations, after which you cannot file. 



Talk to a lawyer as soon as possible after receiving a mesothelioma diagnosis. They can speed you through the process of seeking compensation so you get assistance as quickly as possible. 







Where Can I Get Help with My Compensation?



Keep in mind that if you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for financial compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, lost wages, emotional trauma, and much more. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. 











Take Action Now: Secure Your Future with Expert Legal Help



If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to significant financial compensation. Our dedicated team of mesothelioma lawyers is here to guide you through every step of the legal process, ensuring your rights are protected and you receive the justice you deserve.



📄 Get Your Free Financial Compensation Packet!Fill out our simple form today to receive a comprehensive packet with details about experienced asbestos and mesothelioma law firms and lawyers in your area [near me], along with essential resources to help you make informed decisions about your case.



💡 Why Choose Us?




Decades of experience handling asbestos-related cases.



No upfront fees – you only pay if we win your case.



Personalized, compassionate support to help you focus on your health.




📞 Contact Us Today for Additional Legal Assistance and Advice!Call us at 800-793-4540 to speak with our team. Don’t wait—your time to file a claim is limited, and your family’s financial future could depend on taking action now.



You’re not alone in this fight. Let us help you secure the justice and compensation you deserve.

### Mesothelioma Causes

The leading cause of malignant mesothelioma cancer is prolonged and repeated asbestos exposure. Inhaled asbestos fibers cause tissue damage that can lead to cancer, most frequently around the lungs. Most people with mesothelioma were exposed to asbestos in the workplace. 



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds awaiting those who’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about qualified mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













What Is Most Likely to Cause Mesothelioma? 



Asbestos exposure is the leading and most likely cause of mesothelioma. 



Before the 1970s, many industries used asbestos and asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) because of their ability to insulate against heat and protect against fire. 



After extensive research and investigations determined that asbestos is extremely harmful to people, most businesses and manufacturers stopped using it. However, this was decades after extensive exposure in millions of people. 



Even though experts determined that asbestos was dangerous, several businesses continued to use it. It was a matter of profits over care for workers. 



Unlike other forms of cancer, mesothelioma doesn't have a long list of causes. One of its alternate names is asbestos cancer because the primary cause of mesothelioma is long-term exposure to asbestos. 



Who Is at Risk for Mesothelioma? 



Asbestos exposure is the leading cause of mesothelioma, but not everyone knows how much they were exposed to in the past or if they were exposed at all. These are some of the most critical risk factors for a mesothelioma diagnosis: 




Worked in an industry that used asbestos



Served in the military



Older age and male



Lived with someone who worked with or around asbestos



Family history of mesothelioma




Some of the jobs that most put people at risk for asbestos exposure included: 




Construction



The military (especially the Navy)



Automotive repair work, especially brakes and clutches



Industrial plants and factories



Asbestos products plants



Vermiculite processing plants



Ship repair and shipbuilding




People who worked with asbestos have the highest risk of mesothelioma. Also at risk are people who lived with them. Family members were often exposed at home through secondhand exposure. 



Workers inadvertently brought asbestos fibers home on their clothing, causing repeated exposure. Some of these family members later developed mesothelioma. 



Asbestos and Mesothelioma Studies



In 2009, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) confirmed the investigations and findings and released a statement that the primary cause of mesothelioma is asbestos exposure.



The statement indicated that people who worked around asbestos daily run the highest risk of getting mesothelioma. The most common work sites associated with using asbestos include: 




Factories and industrial sites



Steel mills



Asbestos and other mines



Asbestos processing plants




People at home are also at risk, especially if they live near a naturally occurring asbestos deposit site or in an older home built during peak asbestos use. 



Two other studies performed in 2010 by the Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation and the Cancer Institute revealed again that the leading cause of mesothelioma is asbestos exposure. 



Once the fibers enter, it’s almost impossible for the body to expel them. The fibers then begin to attack the mesothelium, which in turn causes lesions and tissue damage.



Over time, cells in the damaged tissue may become cancerous and form tumors. It can then take up to 50 years for the first symptoms of mesothelioma to surface.



How Does Asbestos Cause Mesothelioma? 



People are exposed to asbestos by inhaling the delicate fibers that the mineral produces. These fibers then get lodged in the lungs. Someone can also unknowingly swallow asbestos, and the fibers make their way down to the abdominal area. 



Asbestos fibers in the body can cause significant tissue damage, causing scarring and inflammation. In some people, this leads to mesothelioma. Although scientists and physicians are still trying to determine exactly why asbestos fibers cause cancer, researchers have several ideas: 




Changes in Genetics. Asbestos can disrupt mesothelial cells, which are naturally occurring cells in the body. This, in turn, hinders the functions of the cells, which can lead to cancer.



Inflammation of Cells. When the body’s cells become irritated, inflammation and scarring occur. Consequently, it leads to cell damage and cancer. 



Free Radicals. Asbestos produces free radicals in the body. Once this happens, DNA can become damaged, which leads to cancer. 



Oncoproteins Growth. When asbestos is in the body, cells begin producing oncoproteins. Oncoproteins hinder normal cell production, which can consequently lead to cancer. 




Inhaled asbestos is most likely to cause pleural mesothelioma, which develops in the tissue around the lungs. Ingested fibers may cause a less common form in the abdomen called peritoneal mesothelioma. Even rarer is pericardial mesothelioma, which develops around the heart. 



Certainly! Asbestos fibers are categorized into six types, and not all of them pose the same level of risk. The two main groups are serpentine, which includes chrysotile, and amphibole, which includes amosite, crocidolite, tremolite, actinolite, and anthophyllite.



Different Types, Different Dangers




Chrysotile Asbestos:

Also known as white asbestos, these fibers are curly and found in serpentine rocks.



Less harmful compared to other types, but still pose a significant health risk.





Amphibole Asbestos:

Includes amosite (brown asbestos) and crocidolite (blue asbestos), among others.



Rod-like and brittle, these fibers are more likely to lodge in lung tissue.



Generally considered more harmful due to their shape and durability.






Why Are Some Fibers More Dangerous?




Shape and Size: Fibers from the amphibole group have a needle-like structure, making them more likely to penetrate lung tissue and remain lodged there.



Chemical Composition: The mineral composition can affect how the fibers interact with biological tissues.



Durability: Some fibers are more resistant to the body's natural defense mechanisms, leading to prolonged exposure within the lungs.




It's crucial to understand these differences because they influence the severity of health risks associated with asbestos exposure.



Is Mesothelioma Caused by Anything Other Than Asbestos? 



Asbestos exposure is the only widely proven cause of mesothelioma. However, some people are diagnosed with no known asbestos exposure.



Some of these additional diagnoses may involve people who were exposed to asbestos in the past but didn’t know about it. Others are certain to have had no asbestos exposure, which means there are other causes or contributing factors for mesothelioma.



Understanding Why Asbestos Exposure Doesn’t Always Lead to Mesothelioma



While asbestos is a significant risk factor, not everyone exposed will necessarily develop mesothelioma. This discrepancy can be attributed to several factors:




Genetic Predisposition: Research has shown that mutations in the BAP1 gene can increase vulnerability. This mutation is part of a tumor predisposition syndrome, making individuals more likely to develop mesothelioma after exposure.



Exposure Variability: The risk of developing mesothelioma increases with the type and duration of exposure. For instance, individuals who worked in environments with heavy, prolonged asbestos exposure, such as shipyards, face higher risks.



Secondhand Exposure: Even without direct contact, people can develop mesothelioma. Family members might be exposed to asbestos fibers brought home on clothing, leading to indirect but significant exposure.



Type of Asbestos: Not all asbestos fibers are equally harmful. Some types, like amosite, are more damaging than others, such as chrysotile, contributing to the risk disparity.




Each of these factors illustrates why asbestos exposure doesn't always lead to mesothelioma, highlighting the complex interplay of genetics, exposure details, and fiber types.



Secondary Cause of Mesothelioma: Drug Interactions



Although rare, some mesothelioma patients have never been exposed to asbestos. Researchers found links between a drug called Thorotrast and mesothelioma.



Patients administered the drug are at an elevated risk of developing lung carcinoma and mesothelioma.



Thorotrast is a mixture of particles used primarily in the 1930s and 1940s when performing X-ray imaging. It helped the physician produce high-quality images, but the particles remain in the human body.



SV40



Simian Virus 40 (SV40) has also been linked to mesothelioma. SV40 is a virus found in a few species of monkeys and later found in Polio vaccinations.



More than 90 million Americans received a Polio vaccination between 1955 through 1963. It was during this period that the Polio vaccine was contaminated with SV40.



Although humans typically aren’t susceptible to mesothelioma after getting the vaccine, studies have shown that at least 40 patients with mesothelioma also have traces of SV40. More research is needed to understand how this happens.



Erionite



Another possible cause of mesothelioma is exposure to erionite. Though much less common than asbestos exposure, erionite is similar to asbestos in that both are naturally occurring minerals that are harmful when ingested or inhaled.



Furthermore, erionite-caused cancer mimics the same process of development as asbestos-related cancers, taking up to 50 years for the first symptoms to appear.



However, the biggest difference is that erionite is inhaled and ingested primarily through the environment and not in the workplace.



Studies have also shown that erionite poses a higher risk of victims developing mesothelioma and other types of lung cancers when compared to asbestos. Mesothelioma also develops more quickly and with less exposure to erionite than asbestos.



Erionite can be found in volcanic ashes that weather and water disrupted. In rare instances, erionite has been found in water purification systems and softeners. Usually, however, erionite is found in natural deposit sites.



There are known erionite deposits throughout the world, including:




Russia



Japan



Germany



Turkey



Kenya



Italy




In the United States, erionite deposits can be found in:




North Dakota



Wyoming



Arizona



Oregon



Nevada



California



Utah




Turkey yields the highest amount of erionite. In fact, in the village of Tuzkoy, there is an extremely high amount of malignant mesothelioma victims because of the naturally occurring and high amounts of erionite deposits surrounding the area. 



In the United States, scientists are still studying the adverse effects of erionite, particularly in North Dakota. The risks appear low compared to asbestos, but more study is needed. 



Mesothelioma and Genetic Factors



Experts have suggested that certain people may be genetically predisposed to developing mesothelioma. Genes are not likely to cause mesothelioma, but they might increase the risk of developing mesothelioma after asbestos exposure. 



Research funded by the National Institutes of Health (NHI) found a specific mutation gene called the BAP1 that puts the carriers of the gene at significant risk for developing both mesothelioma and melanoma of the eyes. These people are also at a much higher risk of developing an asbestos-related disease if they are exposed to the mineral.



People with BAP1 are also at risk for developing different kinds of cancers, such as breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and renal.



Understanding Asbestos Exposure and Mesothelioma



When considering the risk of mesothelioma, particularly concerning asbestos exposure, it's crucial to know that no amount of asbestos is deemed safe. Exposure to asbestos fibers, irrespective of the duration, is associated with potential health hazards, including mesothelioma—a cancer that affects the lining of the lungs and abdomen.




Minimal Exposure Risks: There have been instances where even brief exposure, lasting just days, has been linked to the development of mesothelioma in individuals. This outlines the treacherous nature of asbestos, highlighting that even seemingly negligible encounters can have severe long-term consequences.



How Asbestos Affects the Body: When asbestos fibers are inhaled or ingested, they can embed themselves in the lining of the lungs or abdominal cavity. Over time, these lodged fibers cause irritation and inflammation, which might eventually lead to cancerous changes.



Latency Period: One of the most concerning aspects is the long latency period associated with mesothelioma. Often, the disease does not manifest until 10 to 50 years after exposure. This delay complicates identifying the exposure source and underscores the need for stringent safety measures.




In summary, even minimal contact with asbestos can be dangerous, given the unpredictable nature of its impact on health. It's essential to avoid asbestos exposure altogether to mitigate the risk of developing mesothelioma and other related diseases.



Know the Signs of Mesothelioma for an Early Diagnosis



The symptoms are almost always the same regardless of how someone contracts mesothelioma. Remember that some people may exhibit more symptoms than others, and it typically takes decades for even the most common symptoms of mesothelioma to surface.



Typical mesothelioma symptoms include:




Chest pain that can fluctuate from minor to severe



Fluid buildup in the lungs



Difficulty swallowing and pain when attempting to swallow



An overwhelming sense of fatigue and lethargy



Nausea and vomiting



Unexplained weight loss



Dyspnea (shortness of breath)



Dry coughing, wheezing and hacking



Pleural effusions




Less Common but more serious symptoms include: 




Lung Collapsing



Coughing up blood



Nerve damage in the arms



Blood clots on the hands and arms



Horner’s Syndrome (rare condition that affects the nerves in the eyes and face)




How Early Detection Can Enhance Life Expectancy for Mesothelioma Patients



Mesothelioma is a challenging disease that requires timely intervention for the best possible outcome. Early detection plays a pivotal role in improving life expectancy for those diagnosed with this condition. Here’s how it makes a difference:




Enhanced Treatment Options: When mesothelioma is identified in its initial stages, a wider range of treatment options become viable. Procedures such as surgery, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy tend to have higher success rates when the cancer has not extensively progressed.



Minimal Spread of Cancer: Catching the disease early can often mean that it has not yet spread to distant parts of the body. Localized cancer is generally easier to treat and manage, reducing complication risks and potentially lengthening life expectancy.



Personalized Care Plans: Early-stage detection allows healthcare providers to tailor treatment plans that effectively target the cancer. This personalized approach can improve overall outcomes and extend the lives of patients.




Ultimately, early detection is not just about fighting cancer; it’s about providing an opportunity for a longer, more managed life with mesothelioma. Prompt medical attention and regular check-ups are key to identifying the disease early and exploring effective treatment avenues.



Available Treatments for Early-Stage Mesothelioma



When mesothelioma is detected early, patients have a wider array of treatment options that can potentially enhance their life expectancy.




Surgery: Surgical procedures can be quite effective in the initial stages. Options may include removing the cancerous tissue or, in some cases, entire affected organs. This intervention aims to eliminate as much of the tumor as possible.



Chemotherapy: This treatment involves the use of drugs to target and destroy cancer cells. For early-stage mesothelioma, chemotherapy can be more effective, especially when combined with other treatments.



Immunotherapy: Leveraging the body's immune system to fight cancer is becoming increasingly popular. Immunotherapy treatments can provide significant benefits for those diagnosed at an early stage, potentially slowing the progression of the disease.




Each of these treatments has its unique benefits and potential side effects. It's crucial to consult with a medical professional to tailor the best approach to your individual situation. Early detection allows for more aggressive and potentially curative treatment plans, making it a key factor in improving outcomes.



Finding the right specialist for mesothelioma diagnosis and treatment is crucial for receiving proper care. Here's a step-by-step guide to help you locate a qualified professional:



1. Consult Online Medical Directories



Start by exploring reputable online medical directories, such as WebMD or the American Cancer Society. These platforms offer a wealth of information on specialists throughout the country.



2. Seek Referrals From Your Primary Doctor



Your primary care physician can be an excellent resource for specialist recommendations. They can provide referrals based on their professional network and your specific medical needs.



3. Contact Local Hospitals and Cancer Centers



Reach out to hospitals or cancer centers near you. They often have dedicated oncology departments with experienced mesothelioma specialists. For instance, the National Cancer Institute designates several top cancer centers where you can find experts in this field.



4. Network With Support Groups



Join mesothelioma support groups, either in-person or online. These communities can offer personal recommendations based on firsthand experiences. They can also provide emotional support as you navigate through the diagnosis process.



5. Check Professional Certifications



Verify the qualifications and certifications of potential specialists. Look for those who are board-certified in oncology or have specialized in mesothelioma. This ensures they have received the requisite training and accreditation.



6. Utilize Social Media and Patient Reviews



Social media platforms and patient review sites can offer insights into the reputation and patient satisfaction levels of different specialists. While personal experiences may vary, they can provide a broad sense of what to expect.



By following these steps, you can effectively find a specialist who can provide you with an accurate diagnosis and effective treatment plan.



How to Prevent Mesothelioma



The best way to prevent mesothelioma is to protect yourself from asbestos exposure. You might not be able to reverse past exposure, but if you worked around asbestos or have mesothelioma symptoms, act quickly. The earlier you get a diagnosis, the more treatment options you have. 



If you currently work in an industry that might have asbestos, you should be provided with safety training, information, and protective gear. If not, you can file a complaint with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 



OSHA ensures companies limit asbestos exposure and provide workers with information, training, and gear. 



If you live in an older home, find out if you have asbestos by contacting a licensed inspector. It is especially important to avoid doing any renovation or repair work until you know the location of any asbestos. 



If you were diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact a lawyer to seek compensation from the companies responsible for your asbestos exposure. 



Getting Legal Help



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form for our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on knowledgeable asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Top Mesothelioma Treatment Centers

The top mesothelioma treatment centers are industry-leading cancer treatment centers staffed by specialists. They offer the best, most advanced treatments and collaborative teams of specialists to handle all aspects of mesothelioma treatment and patient care. These cancer centers also host clinical trials. 



Trust funds containing over $30 billion have been set aside for victims injured by asbestos exposure. If you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













About Mesothelioma Cancer Treatment Centers



Over 900 hospitals and medical facilities in the U.S. offer specialized mesothelioma treatment to cancer patients. Many of these centers focus on cancer treatment in general, though all are also active in cancer research.



Specialists and scientists working in these cancer care centers focus on discovering new and effective treatments and carrying out research and clinical trials. 



They also seek more effective treatments, including chemotherapy, hormone therapy, immunotherapy, radiation, and surgery. Cancer researchers look for ways to prevent cancer with vaccines, with the ultimate goal of completely eradicating all forms of cancer.



Why Accreditation Matters for Mesothelioma Treatment Centers



Accreditation is crucial for mesothelioma treatment centers because it signifies adherence to stringent quality standards. It not only reflects a center's commitment to excellence but also showcases their proficiency in handling mesothelioma specifically.



Key Benefits of Choosing an Accredited Center




Access to Cutting-Edge Therapies: Accredited centers are often at the forefront of medical research and technology. They offer the latest therapies, giving patients more options for advanced treatments.



Participation in Clinical Trials: These centers frequently offer clinical trials, allowing patients to benefit from emerging treatments not widely available.



Collaborative Care Teams: Expert teams in accredited centers work together to create personalized treatment plans, ensuring comprehensive care tailored to individual needs.




Assurance and Peace of Mind



Accreditation offers peace of mind by ensuring that patients receive care that meets high standards. This empowers patients and their families to make confident, informed decisions regarding their treatment path.



Types of Accrediting Bodies



Various reputable organizations grant accreditation to cancer centers, each with its own criteria for quality. Some of these include:




American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)



Commission on Cancer (CoC)



National Cancer Institute (NCI)



National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)




When a center is recognized by these bodies, it's an indicator of top-tier care, providing patients with the assurance that they are in capable hands.



In summary, choosing an accredited mesothelioma treatment center ensures access to superior care, innovative therapies, and a dedicated team working towards the best possible outcome for patients.



To determine which treatments are available at different cancer centers, patients should start by researching the specific treatments each facility offers. This often involves looking into the expertise of the physicians and healthcare teams working there. Centers renowned for treating conditions like mesothelioma typically have specialists skilled in a range of treatments such as chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, and immunotherapy.



Steps to Identify Treatment Availability:




Review Online Resources: Many cancer centers have detailed information on their websites about the treatments they provide.



Consultation with Healthcare Providers: Talking to oncologists or primary care doctors can offer valuable insights, as they might know which centers have the necessary facilities and expertise.



Seek Patient Testimonials: Reading about other patients' experiences can give a clearer picture of treatment options and outcomes at various centers.



Contact Centers Directly: Calling or emailing centers to inquire about available treatments is a direct way to get current and specific information.




Engaging with support groups or online forums can also be beneficial, as these platforms often share experiences and recommendations about different treatment centers.



The Benefits of Choosing an Accredited Cancer Center



Considering a cancer center for your care involves many factors, but one critical aspect is its accreditation. Opting for an accredited facility offers numerous benefits that can significantly impact your treatment journey.



Assurance of Quality and Expertise



Accreditation signifies that a cancer center adheres to high-quality standards across all aspects of care. It highlights the center's expertise in specific areas, such as mesothelioma, reassuring patients and their families that they are receiving top-notch treatment.



Access to Advanced Treatments and Clinical Trials



Accredited centers often afford patients access to the latest therapies and cutting-edge technology. Such facilities are usually involved in clinical trials, providing opportunities to explore innovative treatments not available in non-accredited centers.



Collaborative and Personalized Care



These centers are equipped with expert teams that work collaboratively to devise customized treatment plans. This approach ensures that patients receive care tailored specifically to their needs, increasing the chances of successful outcomes.



Recognized Standards from Reputable Agencies



Accreditation comes from respected bodies such as the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the Commission on Cancer (CoC), the National Cancer Institute (NCI), and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Their endorsement implies adherence to rigorous standards and practices.



Peace of Mind and Empowerment



One of the most significant benefits is the peace of mind it brings. Knowing that a well-accredited facility backs your treatment can empower you to make informed decisions throughout your healthcare journey.



In summary, choosing an accredited cancer center ensures high-quality care, access to innovative treatments, and a holistic approach to managing your health, giving you confidence through every step of the process.



What Is the Number One Cancer Treatment Center in the U.S.?



Organizations and experts consistently rank the MD Anderson Cancer Center as the best cancer treatment facility in the U.S. Other facilities that rank high include the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, the Mayo Clinic with multiple locations, and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston.



The top cancer centers in the U.S. are ranked by statistics like patient mortality rate and readmission. Also considered are the specialists on staff, the research conducted, and the variety of treatments available.



Mesothelioma is a rare cancer. Even the highest-ranked cancer centers do not treat very many cases. When choosing the right treatment facility for your needs, consider whether it treats mesothelioma patients and any specialists on staff with experience working with and helping mesothelioma patients. 



Why Choose a Cancer Center for Mesothelioma Treatment? 



A dedicated cancer center is not the only type of facility that treats cancer patients. General hospitals and individual oncologists also treat cancer. 



It is important to choose a cancer center or mesothelioma cancer center for treatment for several reasons:




Cancer centers treat cancer exclusively and specialize in various types of cancer. 



They have more resources than stand-alone oncologists or general hospitals. 



Many cancer centers are part of a larger network that provides additional resources to benefit patients. 



They have the most up-to-date treatments, equipment, and technologies for patient care. 



Cancer centers are staffed by specialists who can offer the best care. 



Some cancer centers have mesothelioma specialists on staff. 



Comprehensive cancer centers conduct research and provide patients access to the latest treatments through clinical trials. 




Mesothelioma is rare, so you will get the best treatment at a cancer center staffed by physicians who specialize in mesothelioma or at least have experience treating it. 



What Are the Best Cancer Centers for Pleural Mesothelioma? 



Pleural mesothelioma, which develops in the chest cavity, is the most common form of this rare cancer. Several cancer centers in the U.S. can treat pleural mesothelioma. 



1. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX)



Known informally as MD Anderson Cancer Center, this Houston-based facility was founded in 1941.



MD Anderson is affiliated with the University of Texas Health Science Center and the Baylor University School of Medicine. The main campus is a 616-bed facility that is both an academic institution and a cancer research and treatment center.



MD Anderson Cancer Center is one of the three original comprehensive care centers in the U.S. created by the National Cancer Act of 1971.



MD Anderson Cancer Center has treated over 900,000 patients since 1944, 115,000 in 2012. It has 19,000 employees and operates several off-campus facilities in the Houston area.



One area of specialty at MD Anderson is diagnosing and treating lung and chest cancers. This includes both pleural and the very rare pericardial mesothelioma. On staff is mesothelioma specialist Dr. Anne Tsao. She researches proton therapy, a novel treatment for patients with fewer side effects. 



2. Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center (Cleveland, OH)



The Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center is an NCI-designated Case Comprehensive Cancer Center with a staff of more than 700. It includes the Taussig Cancer Institute and 25 other clinics.



The lung cancer department treats patients with pleural mesothelioma. It offers video-assisted surgeries, immunotherapy, and all the standard therapies mesothelioma patients need. The Cleveland Clinic lung cancer specialists are recognized worldwide for their expertise and innovative care. 



3. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital (Boston, MA)



This small 30-bed medical facility is affiliated with Harvard University Medical School and is part of a National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Care Center. A



long with Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Dana Farber runs the International Mesothelioma Program (IMP), located in the Brigham and Women’s Cancer facility in Boston.



The IMP treats 300 mesothelioma patients a year. Though this number seems small, it’s a significant portion of the nearly 2,000 patients diagnosed with mesothelioma each year in the U.S. Founded by Dr. David Sugarbaker, the IMP focuses on research, treatment, and support of mesothelioma patients and their families.



4. Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (Baltimore, MD)



Johns Hopkins is the teaching hospital and medical research facility for Baltimore’s Johns Hopkins University. 



Founded in 1889, the original hospital campus has been supplemented by a modern complex of 20 buildings that house 560 private rooms for adult and pediatric patients, with around 920 beds. It has a medical staff of 1,700 doctors and a support staff of 30,000 employees.



Johns Hopkins Hospital has four cancer-related departments under the guidance of the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center. The Lung Cancer Program treats patients with pleural mesothelioma.



5. UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles



Pleural mesothelioma specialist Dr. Robert Cameron leads the Lung Cancer Program and Thoracic Oncology Program at the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center. He has been instrumental in developing lung-sparing surgical procedures for mesothelioma patients.



The Cancer Center was established in 1974 as a treatment and research facility. It became an NCI Comprehensive Cancer Center in 1976.



The Jonsson Cancer Center partners with the Pacific Mesothelioma Center. The goal of the Center is to cure mesothelioma and to develop treatments that help patients live longer with mesothelioma as a chronic illness. 



6. Baylor College of Medicine Lung Institute, Houston



Baylor College of Medicine is an independent part of the Texas Medical Center, although it started as part of Baptist University. It is considered one of the best medical schools in the country. 



For mesothelioma patients, Baylor is important for its Lung Institute, founded in 2014 by mesothelioma specialist Dr. David Sugarbaker. He founded the Institute for researching and treating various lung disorders.



Within the Lung Institute is the Mesothelioma Treatment Center, which has some of the most sophisticated diagnostic technology in the world. It treats pleural mesothelioma patients in collaborative teams of specialists. Patients also benefit from the research done here and have access to clinical trials. 



7. Mount Sinai Hospital, New York



Mount Sinai Hospital was established in 1852 and is one of the world's most esteemed medical treatment centers. It brings together specialists from the Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Cancer Center, and Tisch Cancer Institute to treat patients with pleural mesothelioma.



Specialists at Mount Sinai use a multidisciplinary approach to treat patients from all angles and with various therapies. Mesothelioma expert Dr. Raja Flores is on staff here and heads the thoracic surgery department. 



Under Dr. Flores, the mesothelioma team at Mount Sinai has developed safer surgical procedures for patients, including video-assisted surgeries. He also leads mesothelioma research and provides patients with access to clinical trials. 



8. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa



Florida State Representative H. Lee Moffitt helped spearhead the effort to open this world-leading cancer treatment center in 1978. His support included helping to levy a cigarette tax to fund the cancer center. Its doors officially opened in 1986. 



The thoracic oncology department, led by specialist Dr. Jhanelle Gray, treats patients with pleural mesothelioma. Another team member, Dr. Jacques Fontaine, is a thoracic surgeon specializing in treating pleural mesothelioma. 



The Moffitt Cancer Center offers all the latest treatments for mesothelioma patients. Moffitt's treatment outcomes for mesothelioma are 2.5 times higher than the national average. 



What Are the Best Cancer Centers for Peritoneal Mesothelioma? 



Peritoneal mesothelioma, which develops in the abdomen, is even rarer than pleural mesothelioma. Still, several excellent treatment centers in the U.S. have specialists who treat peritoneal mesothelioma. 



1. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa



The Moffitt Cancer Center specializes in treating both pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma patients. Moffitt offers cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC, the leading and most effective treatment for peritoneal mesothelioma. 



On staff is Dr. Sophie Dessureau, a gastrointestinal surgical oncologist. She specializes in treating GI cancers, including peritoneal mesothelioma. She can perform cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC. Another specialist at Moffitt, Dr. Tawee Tanvetyanon, also offers this procedure. 



2. The University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago



The Cancer Center is part of the medical campus at the University of Chicago. It became an NCI Comprehensive Cancer Center in 2008. It receives federal funding for research into mesothelioma and other cancers and to conduct clinical trials.



The Cancer Center's Mesothelioma Program is a leading research and treatment facility for mesothelioma. It is the largest such program in the Midwest. Research conducted here led to developing the standard mesothelioma chemotherapy combination of pemetrexed and cisplatin. 



Dr. Hedy Lee Kindler leads the Mesothelioma Program. She is a specialist in gastrointestinal cancers, including peritoneal mesothelioma. She leads treatment for patients and also organizes and gives patients access to important clinical trials. 



3. Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh



The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center's Hillman Cancer Center was established in 1984. It has more than 300 physicians on staff, as well as researchers leading cancer studies and clinical trials.



Hillman's Mesothelioma Specialty Care Program opened in 2011. It provides mesothelioma patients with a multidisciplinary approach to treatment. 



Dr. David Bartlett leads the surgical oncology department and is an expert in treating abdominal cancers, including peritoneal mesothelioma. He led the development of regional perfusion, the type of chemotherapy used in HIPEC, the leading treatment for peritoneal mesothelioma. It has proven more effective than traditional intravenous chemotherapy for most patients. 



4. The Washington Cancer Institute, Washington, D.C.



The Washington Cancer Institute is part of the Washington Hospital Center. It was founded in 1992 and is the largest cancer treatment center in Washington, D.C.



Specialist teams here can treat any type of mesothelioma, but the primary area of specialty is peritoneal mesothelioma. Treatment is led by Dr. Paul Sugarbaker, a leading expert in peritoneal mesothelioma. 



Dr. Sugarbaker developed the now standard treatment of cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. It is often referred to as the Sugarbaker procedure. 



The Washington Cancer Institute also specializes in innovative types of radiation therapy. The radiation oncology department is often involved in treatment teams for mesothelioma patients. 



Mesothelioma Treatment for Veterans



Veterans have some of the highest rates of mesothelioma. The military, especially the U.S. Navy, used asbestos heavily in the past. Veterans can access treatment through U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals and medical centers, but not all treat mesothelioma. 



The West Los Angeles VA Medical Center does have a mesothelioma program. It is led by Dr. Robert Cameron of the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center. Veterans here benefit from his expertise and network.



The VA Boston Healthcare System also has affiliations with top mesothelioma specialists. It is affiliated with mesothelioma treatment programs at Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. 



The Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center is in Houston and is affiliated with the Lung Institute and Mesothelioma Treatment Center at the Baylor College of Medicine. 



Advantages of VA Centers for Mesothelioma Treatment Compared to Private Hospitals



When selecting a facility for mesothelioma treatment, veterans often find that VA centers offer several benefits over private hospitals.




Access to Clinical Trials: VA centers frequently participate in a variety of clinical trials, giving veterans opportunities to access cutting-edge therapies that might not be available in other settings.



Lower Costs: One of the standout advantages is the reduced financial burden. VA centers typically have minimal copays, making treatment more affordable for veterans.



Comprehensive Care Teams: These centers employ multidisciplinary teams that integrate specialists from various fields. This collaboration ensures that veterans receive holistic and coordinated care tailored to their unique needs.



Convenient Telehealth Services: With the rise of digital health solutions, VA centers have strengthened their telehealth offerings. Veterans can access consultations and follow-ups remotely, reducing the need for frequent travel.




Additionally, for those veterans who prefer or need care outside the VA network, options like the Veterans Choice Program allow them to receive treatment from non-VA providers. The expenses for such treatments are usually covered by the VA, ensuring veterans have flexibility in choosing their care path.



In summary, VA centers provide a combination of innovative treatments, cost-effective care, and comprehensive support systems, making them a compelling option for veterans with mesothelioma.



How Does the Veterans Choice Program Benefit Veteran Patients?



The Veterans Choice Program offers an essential advantage to veteran patients by expanding their options for receiving medical care. This program allows veterans to seek treatment outside the traditional Veterans Affairs (VA) network, with the VA covering the associated costs.



This flexibility means that if veterans find the VA facilities overwhelmed or too distant, they aren’t limited to those options. Instead, they can access civilian healthcare providers, ensuring they receive timely and convenient care. Moreover, it empowers veterans by providing them with more healthcare resources, ensuring their needs are met efficiently both within and outside the VA system.



If you’re a veteran, this program helps you gain access to a broader range of medical services, ensuring you have the support and resources necessary for comprehensive care.



How to Choose a Mesothelioma Treatment Center



If you have a mesothelioma diagnosis, you should begin treatment as soon as possible. Specialist care at a dedicated cancer center is the best option. Consider these factors when doing research and making your choice: 




Specialists. Most importantly, look for treatment somewhere that has mesothelioma specialists on staff. They should have experience treating patients with the same type of mesothelioma that you have. 



Innovative Treatments. Mesothelioma is a difficult cancer to treat, so you should have the option of benefitting from the latest, and most effective therapies. 



Clinical Trials. Look for a facility that can provide access to clinical trials. You could benefit from treatments not yet available to the general population. 



Multidisciplinary Teams. Patients benefit from working with a team of specialists. The best cancer centers use multidisciplinary teams of different specialists who collaborate and share information to provide the best care.



Location. Practical matters are important too. Can you access the facility easily? If you need to travel for treatment, how far is it reasonable to go, and where will you stay? 




Key Accreditations for Mesothelioma Treatment Centers



When selecting a mesothelioma treatment center, it's crucial to consider certain accreditations that signify excellence and comprehensive care. Here are the primary accreditations to look for:




National Cancer Institute (NCI) Designation: NCI designation indicates that the facility is part of a prestigious group recognized for exceptional cancer research and treatment capabilities. This ensures access to cutting-edge treatments and clinical trials.



Association of American Cancer Institutes (AACI) Membership: Facilities that are members of the AACI have demonstrated a commitment to cancer research, treatment, and education, providing patients with innovative care options.



National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Membership: Being part of the NCCN highlights that the treatment center adheres to rigorous clinical guidelines and offers advanced care protocols.




These accreditations ensure that you're not only receiving top-notch medical care but also have access to mental health support and additional resources for both patients and their families. Always verify these credentials to ensure that the center you choose meets the highest standards of care.



Getting Legal Help



Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. Remember to use our Asbestos Attorney Locator Tool to find an experienced mesothelioma attorney in your area. If you have questions, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Mesothelioma Cancer Diagnosis and Help for Victims

Mesothelioma diagnosis involves imaging scans, blood tests, and biopsies. Mesothelioma is rare and difficult to diagnose, so many people initially receive a misdiagnosis. Early diagnosis is essential for effective treatment and a better patient outcome. 



If you have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.











What Are the Early Warning Signs of Mesothelioma? 



Mesothelioma tends to sneak up on people. It develops over many years after asbestos exposure. Often, the symptoms are mild or non-existent for decades. 



If you know or suspect you may have been exposed to asbestos, it is essential to watch out for early signs.  Some early symptoms of pleural mesothelioma include: 




Chest pains



Coughing



Shortness of breath



Fatigue




Early symptoms of peritoneal mesothelioma include: 




Abdominal pain and discomfort



Abdominal swelling



Decreased appetite and weight loss



Diarrhea or constipation



Fatigue




Early symptoms of pericardial mesothelioma include: 




Difficulty breathing



Chest pains



Fatigue



Heart murmurs




The first step in diagnosing mesothelioma is recognizing symptoms and talking to your doctor about them. 





                
                        
                            Calculate Case Value
                            
                        
                        Diagnosis-- Select --MesotheliomaAsbestosisAsbestos-Related Lung CancerIs Diagnosed Person Alive?-- Select --YesPassed away under 2 years agoPassed away over 2 years agoAge of Diagnosed Person-- Select --Under 6565-8485 or olderExposure-- Select --MilitaryOccupationalSecond-HandOther / UnknownMain Job Site-- Select --ShipyardsBoiler RoomsPowerhousesPaper MillsConstruction SitesAutomotiveFirefightingRailroadsRefineriesOther / UnknownMain Asbestos Product Used-- Select --Fire Protection ProductsBrake Pads / LiningsCeiling Textures / Tile / PlasterElectrical ProductsTransite ProductsHeating & Cooling ProductsVermiculiteRoofing ProductsPaints / Plasters / Wall CoveringsOther / UnknownState-- Select --AlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaNorthern Mariana IslandsOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahU.S. Virgin IslandsVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces EuropeArmed Forces PacificPhone(Required)Email(Required)First Name(Required)Last Name(Required)PhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
         Any information you send is secure and will never be sold or released.This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
        
                        Δ
                        





How Is Mesothelioma Diagnosed?



Mesothelioma is a challenging diagnosis. The symptoms of mesothelioma are similar to many more common illnesses. Doctors don't often consider mesothelioma until they have ruled those out. If you have symptoms consistent with mesothelioma, your diagnosis will likely follow several steps: 



Medical History and Physical Exam



The first step is to discuss your medical history with your doctor. This is a good time to inform your doctor of any asbestos exposure in your past or any suspected asbestos exposure. 



Your doctor will conduct a physical exam, during which they might be able to identify: 




Fluid around the lungs



Abdominal swelling due to fluid buildup



Difficulty breathing



A cough




Imaging Tests



If your doctor is concerned about your symptoms and physical exam, they will likely order imaging tests. For respiratory symptoms, they will probably begin with a chest X-ray. This can rule out common respiratory conditions, like pneumonia. 



A chest X-ray can also find areas of thickening on the pleura, fluid between the two layers of the pleura, and some abnormalities in the lungs. If your doctor still doesn't have a diagnosis or suspects cancer, they will order additional imaging tests, such as a CT scan, to get a closer look. 



How Mesothelioma X-ray Findings Influence Treatment Options



Mesothelioma X-ray results play a crucial role in determining the appropriate treatment path for patients. By revealing vital information about the condition of the lungs, these X-rays can highlight the presence and location of tumors, any obstructions, and other notable changes within the lung area. This visibility can inform decisions on whether procedures like placing a chest tube are necessary to alleviate fluid buildup around the lungs.



Key Factors from X-rays:




Tumor Identification: Locating the tumor helps in planning surgical interventions or radiation therapy.



Obstructions: Recognizing blockages can guide whether surgical removal or other treatments are needed.



Pleural Effusion Presence: Identifying fluid accumulation is critical for deciding on drainage procedures.




While X-rays provide essential insights, they are one piece of the puzzle. To form a comprehensive treatment strategy, doctors consider additional factors such as:




Disease Stage: Understanding how advanced the disease is.



Biopsy Results: Pathology testing provides deeper insights into the type and aggressiveness of the cancer.



Patient Health: Overall patient health plays a significant role in treatment type and intensity.




Ultimately, combining X-ray findings with these elements allows healthcare providers to tailor treatment plans effectively, aiming for the best possible outcomes for the patient.



Biopsy



If the imaging scans show abnormal areas of tissue, the next diagnostic step is to take a biopsy. This involves taking a sample of tissue, either with a thin needle or surgically. A pathologist examines the tissue to look for cancer cells, and if present, to identify the type. 



Blood Tests



Blood tests can be useful for identifying the cancer type. Specific molecules in the blood, known as markers, are often characteristic of certain types of cancer. 



Mesothelioma cannot be diagnosed by a blood test alone, but it is a useful tool for confirming a diagnosis. 



What Tests Do Doctors Use to Diagnose Mesothelioma?



Oncologists and other specialists use a variety of imaging, biopsies, and blood tests throughout the mesothelioma diagnostic process:




Chest Computed Tomography (CT): Similar to a conventional chest X-ray, this is a non-invasive test that involves taking detailed pictures of a patient’s lungs. Normally used to look for emphysema, pneumonia, excess fluids in the lungs, or tuberculosis, it can also be used to detect tumors. This type of testing is being used more and more for victims who may have an asbestos-related disease.





Conventional Chest X-ray: This procedure is used to take pictures of the pleural regions in order to detect visual changes in the lungs and other vital organs. It is usually carried out in conjunction with other tests, such as biopsies and cytology of pleural fluids.





Needle Biopsy: The least invasive way to get a tissue sample for testing is a needle biopsy. The doctor inserts a long, hollow needle through the skin and tissue to remove a small piece of tissue from the suspected tumor. This does not require general anesthesia. It can also be used to remove fluid from around the lungs for testing. 





Open Lung Biopsy: An open lung biopsy involves removing a small amount of tissue from the lung to see if it exhibits any signs of infection, injury, or cancer. The tissue is examined for signs of the disease and infection once removed. A small incision is made in the chest area in order for the physician to remove the tissue. A chest tube is typically left in the lungs for a few days after the biopsy is performed to ensure that the lungs don’t collapse.





Pleural Biopsy: As with an open lung biopsy, a pleural biopsy involves the surgical removal of a small amount of tissue from the pleural cavity. The tissue is then examined for signs of infection or disease. The difference is that various tissues are usually removed during a pleural biopsy as opposed to just a small amount of tissue during an open lung biopsy. Additionally, the ribs are usually separated in order to remove tissue.





Cytology of Pleural Fluid: During a procedure called thoracentesis, a small amount of fluid from the chest cavity is extracted with a needle that is inserted into the patient’s back. A local anesthetic is used in conjunction with this procedure to prevent discomfort. The fluid is then examined in a laboratory for signs of cancer.





Biomarker and Blood Tests: A biomarker is a test that’s used to help doctors find and diagnose a particular disease. For mesothelioma, there are several different diagnostic biomarkers and blood tests used to detect the disease, including Fibulin 3 and MESOMARK. 





Fibulin 3: Fibulin 3 is a relatively new biomarker that works by testing the Fibulin 3 in the patient’s bloodstream. Fibulin 3 is a protein found in the body, and in patients with mesothelioma, the protein can be significantly higher. For testing purposes, the protein is extracted via the body’s lung fluids.





MESOMARK: MESOMARK, also known as MESOMARK assay, is an in vitro test that’s used to test and monitor the soluble mesothelin-related peptides (SMRP) in a patient’s bloodstream. Mesomark will then determine if the patient has a high amount of SMRP, which may indicate pleural mesothelioma. In 2007, Mesomark was approved by the Federal Drug Administration (FDA)  as a laboratory test used to detect malignant mesothelioma. 





SOMAmer Test: SOMAmer is highly accurate and detects more than 1,000 different cancer biomarkers. Researchers found that the test could correctly diagnose mesothelioma in 90% of people already known to have it. 





PET Scan Imaging: PET scan imaging works by scanning the body to determine how the organs are working together and if there are any problems. A radiopharmaceutical material can be inserted into the bloodstream or inhaled before imaging, which will help to detect cancer spots on various organs.





Thoracoscopy and Laparoscopy: Thoracoscopy and laparoscopy are methods of detecting cancer via a small camera inserted into the body. The difference is that a thoracoscopy involves scanning and detecting abnormalities through tissue samples, whereas a laparoscopy detects abnormalities via the body’s stomach organs.





Mediastinoscopy: A mediastinoscopy involves inserting a small camera into the lung area in an attempt to examine the tissues on the front of the lungs.





Lipid Profiling: Recent studies have found that lipids could prove to be another useful biomarker in mesothelioma diagnosis. Lipids are fat molecules necessary for cell structure. Researchers compared lipid profiles in blood samples between healthy controls and mesothelioma patients. They found different patterns between the groups. Although not used currently, this could be a useful diagnostic tool for the future. 




After the Diagnosis: Staging Mesothelioma



A diagnosis of mesothelioma is followed quickly by staging. Specialists use the diagnostic information to determine the stage of the cancer, from 1 through 4. 



Information from biopsies and imaging scans tells specialists where the tumors, their size, and their number. The farther tumors have spread from the initial location, the more advanced the stage is. 



The Importance of Early Diagnosis in Mesothelioma



Most asbestos exposure victims don't receive a diagnosis until decades later—the earlier the diagnosis, the better the prognosis.



Early detection makes it easier for medical professionals to provide mesothelioma treatments to remove cancer from the body. Although mesothelioma is incurable, an early diagnosis will help prolong life spans and help victims deal more effectively with pain.



Why Is Mesothelioma Difficult to Diagnose? 



Mesothelioma is notoriously difficult to diagnose for several reasons: 




Mesothelioma is rare, so doctors do not often think of it as a possibility until they have ruled out other illnesses. 



Mesothelioma symptoms are similar to more common illnesses. This can lead to a misdiagnosis that delays an accurate diagnosis. 



The latency period from asbestos exposure to diagnosis is long, so many people forget or do not realize that they were once exposed to asbestos. 



Even when cancer is detected, mesothelioma if often mistaken for lung cancer. 




The Problem of Misdiagnosis in Mesothelioma



Physicians can sometimes misdiagnose mesothelioma. Keep in mind that mesothelioma is considered a rare form of cancer in the medical world. Many doctors don't consider it a possibility until they have ruled out more common illnesses. 



For example, since the symptoms of mesothelioma closely mimic the common cold and the flu, patients have often been diagnosed with mesothelioma prematurely or not diagnosed with mesothelioma at all. In other instances, pathologists confuse mesothelioma with other similar cancers.



Don't hesitate to seek the opinion of another mesothelioma doctor if you have questions or concerns about your diagnosis



Mesothelioma Diagnosis Statistics



Although it is theoretically possible for just about anyone exposed to asbestos to be diagnosed with asbestos-related cancer, 80% of mesothelioma cancer victims are men who suffered prolonged exposure to asbestos at work. 



Many job sites previously used asbestos in machinery, equipment, and various products. Typical occupations included steel mills, power plants, paper mills, the automotive industry, the military, and different kinds of factories.



Detecting Mesothelioma



It is not uncommon for a patient to go for years with undetected mesothelioma. The long period of dormancy is one factor as the symptoms of mesothelioma can take decades to appear. 



When doctors make a connection between a patient’s exposure to asbestos and symptoms that align with an asbestos illness, they can order mesothelioma-specific tests. 



Anyone who has worked around asbestos should always get regular check-ups. Let your doctor know that you have a history with asbestos. 



Those exposed to second-hand asbestos or who worked in an occupation not generally associated with asbestos should also get regular screenings. Women and younger people are two groups that are often overlooked, although anyone at any age can develop the disease.



Women and Mesothelioma 



Women have a lower risk of being diagnosed with mesothelioma. Most of the job sites that used asbestos were in fields that were employed by a majority of males. 



Yet, since asbestos can be found in schools, hospitals, and homes built between 1930 and the early 1970s, women, too, are at some risk of being afflicted by mesothelioma. Additionally, women who worked in aircraft factories or shipyards during the Second World War are the most likely to be diagnosed with asbestos-related cancer.



Further, family members and loved ones who come into contact with someone who worked around asbestos run a small risk of contracting an asbestos-related illness. 



For example, a wife who washed her husband's asbestos-contaminated clothing may be susceptible to secondary asbestos exposure.



Young People and Mesothelioma



Mesothelioma isn't typically diagnosed in younger patients since the disease is more prevalent in older adults. According to a study by New York City’s Mount Sinai Hospital, results showed that out of 110 mesothelioma victims, only ten were under the age of 39. 



These patients had the usual symptoms of mesothelioma, such as coughing and difficulty with breathing, but because of their age, doctors didn’t diagnose the disease until months later.



Again, it’s imperative to discuss your work history and any form of asbestos exposure with your physician as soon as possible. Testing to diagnose asbestos-related diseases will be much quicker if a physician knows that you’ve worked around asbestos. 



What to Do After a Mesothelioma Diagnosis



A diagnosis of mesothelioma can be shocking and overwhelming. One of the most important things you can do after receiving a diagnosis of mesothelioma is start treatment. The earlier you begin aggressive treatments, the better the prognosis is. 



Seek out a specialist team for treatment, so you get the best options and most advanced care. Talk to your family about how you want to proceed. 



You might also want to take legal action against the companies that exposed you to asbestos. Mesothelioma is almost always caused by negligent workplace exposure. Those companies can be held to account, and you can seek compensation. 



Contact an experienced mesothelioma lawyer to learn about your legal options. You are likely entitled to compensation through a lawsuit or an asbestos trust fund claim. A lawyer should offer a free consultation to answer your questions. 





Legal Assistance



Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on skilled asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. For questions and assistance, feel free to contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Mesothelioma Prognosis Guide

Mesothelioma prognosis is typically poor. This is an aggressive cancer that spreads rapidly. Prognosis varies by individual and depends on factors like overall health, age, cancer stage and type, and treatment choices. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on qualified mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













What Does Prognosis Mean? 



Doctors often give patients a prognosis after a diagnosis of mesothelioma. A prognosis is an estimate of how the disease will develop. There are several ways a doctor can describe prognosis: 




Disease stage (1 through 4 for cancer)



Survival time



Life expectancy



Chance of remission




The prognosis is only an estimate. It is not definite. It also varies significantly by individual and is based on general facts and personal factors. Know your prognosis, understand what it means, and find out what you can do to improve it. 



What Is the Overall Prognosis for Mesothelioma? 



Unfortunately, the prognosis for most patients with mesothelioma is poor. Mesothelioma is aggressive, often diagnosed in late stages, and difficult to treat. 



Mesothelioma Prognosis Facts




The typical median survival time for mesothelioma is between 12 months and 21 months. 



The average life expectancy for mesothelioma is one to two years with treatment. 



The life expectancy is closer to six months without treatment. 




These are very general numbers that apply to the whole population of patients with mesothelioma. Everyone is different and receives a unique prognosis based on these statistics and unique factors. 



Is Mesothelioma Always Terminal? 



For most patients, mesothelioma is terminal, but treatments are improving. Many mesothelioma specialists now treat it like a chronic illness. You might not achieve remission, but you can keep treating it to slow its progression and improve your quality of life. 



Early Mesothelioma Diagnosis Improves Prognosis



Mesothelioma is a cancer that results from mostly long-term exposure to asbestos fibers. Because of the rarity of this type of cancer, it's difficult for healthcare providers to give an early diagnosis. This means most patients have an unfavorable prognosis. 



As with all types of cancer, each case is unique, and several factors determine a patient’s prognosis. 



Early detection is one of the most critical factors in improving prognosis. The type of mesothelioma and where it is found in the patient’s body also affects the prognosis. 



Generally, the earlier a diagnosis is made, the better the chances are for a mesothelioma patient to get effective treatment and to live longer. 



How Do Doctors Determine Mesothelioma Prognosis? 



An early diagnosis is one of the most important factors in getting a better prognosis for mesothelioma. Many other factors go into estimating a prognosis. 



Type of Mesothelioma and Prognosis



The most commonly diagnosed mesothelioma is the type known as pleural mesothelioma. This type of mesothelioma affects the pleura, the lining of the lungs, and the internal chest wall. It can spread past the chest wall and into other organs, such as the abdomen and heart.



The other major type of mesothelioma is called peritoneal mesothelioma. It affects the lining of the abdominal cavity (peritoneum) and can damage major organs there. 



Other areas susceptible to mesothelioma are the pericardium, the sac that surrounds the heart, and the tunica vaginalis, which surrounds the testes. 



Pericardial mesothelioma, although rare, causes a substantial amount of damage to the pericardial lining of the heart. Today, pericardial mesothelioma represents only 10% of the total mesothelioma cases.



Five-year survival rates for mesothelioma types with treatment vary significantly: 




Pleural mesothelioma - 10%



Peritoneal mesothelioma - 41% to 47%



Pericardial mesothelioma - 9%




Peritoneal mesothelioma has such a high relative survival rate only when patients are treated with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. This is an effective treatment that combines surgery with localized chemotherapy.



Mesothelioma Cell Types and Prognosis



Three cell types are associated with mesothelioma cancer:




The most common is epithelial mesothelioma. It occurs between 50 and 60% of all diagnoses, and it is the most responsive to medical treatment. Epithelial mesothelioma has a better prognosis than the other types. 



The second most common cell type is biphasic mesothelioma; this cell type combines genetic characteristics of epithelial and sarcomatoid cells and occurs in 30 to 40% of mesothelioma cases. 



The rarest cell type, sarcomatoid, looks like fibers and appears only in about 10-20% of all cases. Sarcomatoid is the most aggressive cell type and has the worst prognosis. 




Disease Stage



After doctors diagnose mesothelioma, its location, and cell type, they determine a stage. Cancers are staged from 1 through 4. The stage describes how advanced the cancer is in terms of the size and location of tumors. The more the cancer has spread, the later the stage. 



The prognosis is poorer at later stages. Metastasis is one of the most important factors in this. By stage 4, mesothelioma has spread to more distant parts of the body. Controlling it is nearly impossible, and the prognosis is poor. 



These are the median survival times after a diagnosis of mesothelioma at each stage with treatment: 




Stage 1 - 22.2 months



Stage 2 - 20.0 months



Stage 3 - 17.9  months



Stage 4 - 14.9 months




Mesothelioma Survival Statistics



Individual factors are very important in determining prognoses, but general facts about mesothelioma are also essential. These include statistics that describe the survival or life expectancy of large groups of patients. 



The five-year survival rate is one important statistic. It is a percentage that describes how many patients are still alive five years after diagnosis. These are the five-year survival rates for mesothelioma patients at varying stages of the disease: 




Localized mesothelioma - 24%



Regional mesothelioma - 16%



Metastatic mesothelioma - 7%



All mesothelioma stages combined - 12%




Patient Health and Demographics



Younger patients diagnosed with mesothelioma usually have a better prognosis than older patients. This is probably because they are healthier and have more treatment options. Another reason could be that they received a diagnosis at an earlier stage of the disease. 



Overall health affects prognosis. The body is better able to tolerate aggressive treatments when healthier. More aggressive treatments are associated with a better prognosis. 



Gender also affects prognosis. Women with mesothelioma generally have a better outlook than men. They are more likely to be diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma, which is usually more treatable. 



Can I Improve My Mesothelioma Prognosis? 



Talk to your oncologist about the prognosis if you received a mesothelioma diagnosis. This is an aggressive cancer, but there is always hope and a way to improve your life expectancy. You cannot control all the prognostic factors, but you can change some: 




Get treatment as soon as possible. The sooner you can start treatment for mesothelioma, the better your outlook will be. 



Choose aggressive treatments. The type of treatment matters. To improve your prognosis, choose the most aggressive treatments for which you qualify. If you are eligible for surgery, it can extend your life expectancy. 



Work with mesothelioma specialists. Mesothelioma is rare, and many oncologists have limited or no experience treating it. To get the most out of treatment, find specialists for your care. 



Enroll in clinical trials. Mesothelioma specialists can determine if you qualify for any clinical trials. These studies give you access to emerging treatments that could prolong your life. 



Choose a healthy lifestyle. Improving your health allows you to better tolerate and get results from treatment. With your medical team's supervision, try exercise and a healthier diet. If you smoke, ask for help quitting. 



Manage symptoms and treatment side effects. Being as comfortable as possible does more than improve your quality of life. It can also help you get more out of your treatments. Work with your medical team on palliative care and any alternative practices that help you feel better. 



Manage your mental health. Mental health is often secondary to medical treatment for cancer patients, but it is vital. Studies have found that patients with better mental health live longer. Join a support group, work with a therapist, and rely on friends and family for emotional support. 




Getting Legal Help for Mesothelioma



Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on knowledgeable asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. Keep in mind that if you have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for considerable compensation. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Top Mesothelioma Doctors Guide

The top mesothelioma doctors are specialists in diagnosing and treating this rare cancer. Treatment teams for mesothelioma include oncologists, thoracic surgeons, radiologists, and support professionals. Contact top specialists for the best care if you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma. 



With more than $30 billion currently set aside in trust funds, you may qualify for substantial compensation if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 











Why Specialist Care Is Important for Mesothelioma



Since malignant mesothelioma is so rare, not many physicians have treated it. Patients who receive a diagnosis should work with oncologists, surgeons, and other specialists with experience treating mesothelioma. 



A handful of mesothelioma specialists work in hospitals and cancer centers across the U.S. These physicians provide specialized care and help improve the quality of life for mesothelioma cancer patients.



Mesothelioma specialists can access the most effective treatments that give patients the best outcomes. They also have access to other specialists and usually work together in multidisciplinary teams. They often conduct research and can get patients enrolled in clinical trials. 



Why Seek a Specialist's Second Opinion for Mesothelioma?



When faced with mesothelioma, it's crucial to consult a specialist. General practitioners and even some oncologists may lack experience with this rare and aggressive cancer.



Here’s why a second opinion from a mesothelioma specialist is vital:




Expertise in Rare Conditions: Unlike common cancers, mesothelioma requires a nuanced understanding. Specialists have the experience to navigate its complexities, ensuring accurate diagnosis and innovative treatment strategies.



Tailored Treatment Plans: A specialist can offer a personalized treatment plan that addresses your unique needs. This includes access to the latest therapies and clinical trials not widely available.



Comprehensive Resources: Specialists connect you with a network of support services, from counseling to financial assistance, easing the burden on you and your family.



Peace of Mind: Knowing you've explored every option adds reassurance during a stressful time, helping you make informed decisions about your healthcare.




By consulting a specialist, you ensure that you're receiving care from someone who understands the intricacies of mesothelioma, offering the best chances for treatment success.



Can Specialists Cure Mesothelioma? 



Mesothelioma is currently considered incurable, even by the best specialists. Mesothelioma specialists approach treatment as the management of a chronic illness, not as a disease that can be cured.



Remission of a few years or more is rare but possible with mesothelioma. Work with mesothelioma specialists for the best chance of remission and extending your life expectancy. 



Who Can Provide a Second Opinion on a Mesothelioma Diagnosis?



When you're faced with a mesothelioma diagnosis, seeking a second opinion can be invaluable. Various medical professionals specialize in this area, each offering unique insights and treatment options:




Oncologists: These cancer specialists focus on diagnosing and treating various types of cancer, including mesothelioma. They can assess your diagnosis and propose alternative treatments or new clinical trials.



Surgeons: Specifically, thoracic surgeons are well-versed in operations related to the chest area and can provide another perspective on surgical options and outcomes.



Radiologists: Experts in imaging technology, such as MRIs and CT scans, radiologists can offer an accurate interpretation of medical imaging to confirm or reevaluate your condition.




By consulting these specialists, you not only gain a fresh perspective but may also discover pioneering treatments or clinical trials that weren't previously considered.





                
                        
                            Calculate Case Value
                            
                        
                        Diagnosis-- Select --MesotheliomaAsbestosisAsbestos-Related Lung CancerIs Diagnosed Person Alive?-- Select --YesPassed away under 2 years agoPassed away over 2 years agoAge of Diagnosed Person-- Select --Under 6565-8485 or olderExposure-- Select --MilitaryOccupationalSecond-HandOther / UnknownMain Job Site-- Select --ShipyardsBoiler RoomsPowerhousesPaper MillsConstruction SitesAutomotiveFirefightingRailroadsRefineriesOther / UnknownMain Asbestos Product Used-- Select --Fire Protection ProductsBrake Pads / LiningsCeiling Textures / Tile / PlasterElectrical ProductsTransite ProductsHeating & Cooling ProductsVermiculiteRoofing ProductsPaints / Plasters / Wall CoveringsOther / UnknownState-- Select --AlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaNorthern Mariana IslandsOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahU.S. Virgin IslandsVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces EuropeArmed Forces PacificPhone(Required)Email(Required)First Name(Required)Last Name(Required)EmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
         Any information you send is secure and will never be sold or released.This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
        
                        Δ
                        





Top Pleural Mesothelioma Doctors



Pleural mesothelioma specialists diagnose and treat this most common form of mesothelioma that develops around the lungs. Many thoracic surgeons work with oncologists, radiation specialists, and others to provide complete treatment.



Raphael Bueno, MD, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA



Dr. Raphael Bueno directs the International Mesothelioma Program at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston. He is a thoracic surgeon and the head of thoracic surgery and a professor of surgery at Harvard Medical School. 



In his role treating patients with mesothelioma, Dr. Bueno leads multidisciplinary teams that meet weekly to discuss individual cases. As a researcher, he has helped develop better and more accurate diagnostic tests for mesothelioma. 



Dr. Robert Cameron, MD, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, CA 



A 1984 UCLA School of Medicine graduate, Dr. Cameron specializes in surgical oncology and thoracic surgery. Dr. Cameron is certified in thoracic surgery by the American Board of Thoracic Surgery and surgery by the American Board of Surgery. 



He directs the mesothelioma program at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA. Dr. Cameron is one of the most experienced mesothelioma specialists in the country and was instrumental in developing the pleurectomy/decortication procedure to avoid removing a patient's lung. 



Marcelo DaSilva, MD, AdventHealth, Orlando, FL



Dr. DaSilva is a thoracic surgeon specializing in lung cancer and pleural mesothelioma. He is currently the Medical Director of Thoracic Surgery at AdventHealth Orlando. He previously worked with pleural mesothelioma patients at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston.



Dr. DaSilva works directly with and treats mesothelioma patients through individualized plans developed with other specialists. He has also conducted research to advance treatment for mesothelioma. 



His research has included developing and refining hyperthermic intraoperative chemotherapy, now a standard treatment for peritoneal mesothelioma. He was one of the first surgeons to use it to treat pleural mesothelioma. 



Raja Flores, MD, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY



Dr. Flores is the Chief of Thoracic Surgery at Mount Sinai and the Director of the Thoracic Surgical Oncology Program at Mount Sinai Cancer Center. 



Dr. Flores completed residencies at Brigham and Women's Hospital during his training. There, he worked with world-renowned mesothelioma specialist Dr. David Sugarbaker and was inspired to specialize in pleural mesothelioma. 



Dr. Flores treats patients and also conducts research and improves surgeries for patients. He helped develop VATS lobectomy, a video-assisted, minimally invasive technique for treating pleural mesothelioma that helps patients heal faster. 



Jacques P. Fontaine, MD, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL



Dr. Fontaine trained in thoracic surgery at Brigham and Women's Hospital under the legendary pleural mesothelioma expert Dr. David Sugarbaker. He brought valuable mesothelioma experience to his role as a thoracic surgeon at the Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa. 



Dr. Fontaine works with a team of specialists to treat pleural mesothelioma and other thoracic cancers. He specializes in minimally invasive and robotic procedures. 



Rodney Landreneau, MD, Penn Highlands Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, DuBois, PA



Dr. Landreneau is a cardiothoracic surgeon in private practice in Pennsylvania. He previously treated patients at the Ochsner Cancer Institute in New Orleans and the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. 



At Ochsner, Dr. Landreneau treated many patients with pleural mesothelioma. There, he was one of the first surgeons to use debulking surgery with hyperthermic regional chemotherapy. The strategy is now commonly used in peritoneal mesothelioma patients but rare in those with pleural mesothelioma. 



Dr. Landreneau now specializes in debulking and hyperthermic procedures in Pennsylvania. He also specializes in video-assisted lobectomy for lung cancer and pleural mesothelioma, laser surgery, cyberknife robotic surgery, and photodynamic therapy. 



Abraham Lebenthal, MD, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA



Dr. Lebenthal is a thoracic surgeon specializing in pleural mesothelioma. He trained under leading mesothelioma expert Dr. David Sugarbaker at Brigham and Women's Hospital. He sees patients there and at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. 



Dr. Lebenthal also works with veterans with pleural mesothelioma. He is the Director of Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery at the VA Boston Healthcare System. Dr. Lebenthal specializes in minimally invasive procedures, video-assisted surgery, and photodynamic surgery. 



Harvey Pass, MD, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York City, NY



Dr. Pass is a pleural mesothelioma expert and thoracic surgeon. He is the Chief of the Thoracic Surgery Division at Langone Medical Center in New York. 



In addition to treating patients, Dr. Pass leads important cancer and mesothelioma research. He has been instrumental in developing the use of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of pleural mesothelioma. He also helped discover osteopontin, a biomarker used to make earlier mesothelioma diagnoses. 



Dr. David C. Rice, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX



Dr. Rice is an associate professor at the University of Texas Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Division of Surgery. 



A 1991 graduate of the School of Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin (Ireland), Dr. Rice continued his medical training at Minnesota’s Mayo Clinic and Houston’s Baylor College of Medicine. 



He is a Fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland and has been on the faculty of the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center at UT Houston since 2001.



Although his other area of clinical interest is minimally invasive surgery for thoracic malignancies, Dr. Rice is internationally renowned for his work on mesothelioma.



Valerie Rusch, MD, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY



Dr. Rusch is a thoracic surgeon and a leading expert in pleural mesothelioma. Her current positions at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center allow her to work with patients and lead mesothelioma research. 



Dr. Rusch was instrumental in proving that bimodal treatment could be more effective for mesothelioma patients than other approaches. She helped improve survival times for numerous pleural mesothelioma patients. Her research also includes the investigation into distinguishing between lung cancer and mesothelioma to make earlier diagnoses. 



Anne Tsao, MD, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX



Dr. Tsao is the Director of the Mesothelioma Program and the Thoracic Chemo-Radiation Program at MD Anderson Cancer Center, one of the best treatment centers for pleural mesothelioma patients in the world. 



Dr. Tsao works with patients as part of multidisciplinary teams. She also conducts and leads important research. This includes leading clinical trials testing novel chemotherapy drugs for pleural mesothelioma patients. She also researches proton therapy. 



Elliot Wakeam, MD, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON



Dr. Wakeam is a thoracic surgeon and researcher at the University of Toronto. He returned to Toronto after doing important work to advance pleural mesothelioma treatment at the University of Michigan. 



Dr. Wakeam specializes in minimally invasive surgeries for pleural mesothelioma and other thoracic cancers. He is also an expert in lung transplantation. 



In his research, Dr. Wakeam contributed to developing the SMART protocol, a novel treatment for pleural mesothelioma that uses radiation therapy before surgery to extend patient survival time. 



Stephen C. Yang, MD, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD



Dr. Yang is a faculty member of the School of Medicine at Johns Hopkins’ Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, where he teaches in the Surgery and Oncology Department. 



He earned his medical degree from Virginia Commonwealth University in 1984. He also has a bachelor’s degree in chemistry from Duke University and a strong thoracic oncology background.



In addition to his teaching post at Johns Hopkins, Dr. Yang is an attending surgeon at The Johns Hopkins Hospital and The Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center. His research interests include the development of markers for the early diagnosis of lung cancer and the molecular biology of mesothelioma.



Top Peritoneal Mesothelioma Doctors



Peritoneal mesothelioma develops in the abdomen. Doctors who treat this form of mesothelioma are typically gastrointestinal specialists and surgeons. 



David Bartlett, MD, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA



Dr. Bartlett is an experienced oncology surgeon specializing in abdominal cancers. He trained at some of the leading cancer centers in the country, including a research fellowship at the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston. 



As a specialist in abdominal cancers, Dr. Bartlett treats patients with peritoneal mesothelioma. He was instrumental in developing regional perfusion, a novel way of administering chemotherapy. Regional perfusion was essential in developing HIPEC, a leading and now standard treatment for peritoneal mesothelioma. 



John Chabot, MD, Columbia University Medical Center, New York City, NY



Dr. Chabot leads the Division of Gastrointestinal and Endocrine Surgery at New York Presbyterian Hospital and Columbia University Medical Center. He also directs the Pancreas Center. He has spent his entire career here, beginning with a surgical residency and internship. 



As a specialist in gastrointestinal surgery, Dr. Chabot has experience treating patients with peritoneal mesothelioma. In addition to treating patients, he has contributed to research that improves the diagnosis and management of mesothelioma. 



W. Charles Conway II, MD, Ridley-Tree Cancer Center, Santa Barbara, CA



Dr. Conway is a surgical oncologist treating patients at the Ridley-Tree Cancer Center in Santa Barbara. He specializes in treating abdominal cancers, including peritoneal mesothelioma. He developed an interest in the rare cancer while working in New Orleans, where there is a high rate of mesothelioma. 



Dr. Conway offers patients debulking surgery with HIPEC, the leading treatment for peritoneal mesothelioma. He also specializes in treating patients with advanced robotic procedures. 



Sophie Dessureault, MD, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL



Dr. Dessurealtu is a leading expert in managing peritoneal mesothelioma. She sees patients at the Moffitt Cancer Center, one of Florida's most important treatment facilities for patients with mesothelioma. She is a surgical oncologist in the Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology. 



Dr. Dessureault is one of the few providers to offer cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC, one of the best and most effective treatments for peritoneal mesothelioma. As a researcher, Dr. Dessureault leads clinical trials and works on novel cancer vaccines. 



Hedy Lee Kindler, MD, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 



Dr. Kindler is the director of the University of Chicago’s Mesothelioma Program. She is also an associate professor of medicine and the medical director of UC’s Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology.



Dr. Kindler started her practice in 1995 and is an internationally recognized expert on various types of cancer, including malignant mesothelioma. 



Listed several times over the past few years in Best Doctors in America and America’s Top Doctors for Cancer, Dr. Kindler is a recipient of the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization’s Selikoff Lifetime Achievement Award.



How Are Top Mesothelioma Doctors and Specialists Rated and Ranked?



When considering how the leading mesothelioma doctors and specialists are rated and ranked, several key aspects are taken into account to ensure these medical professionals can provide top-notch care and set future benchmarks in treatment.



Key Criteria for Evaluation:




Personalized Treatment Plans: Each patient's unique needs and conditions are paramount. Specialists are assessed on their ability to create tailored treatment strategies that address individual circumstances effectively.



Collaborative Approach: Involvement in multidisciplinary teams is crucial. These experts typically work at prestigious cancer centers across the United States, collaborating with other healthcare professionals to enhance patient outcomes.



Research and Innovation: Leading doctors are actively involved in advancing mesothelioma treatment through clinical trials and research initiatives. Their work is regularly published in esteemed medical journals, contributing to the global knowledge pool.



Thought Leadership: These specialists are often at the forefront of the field, sharing their insights at both national and international conferences. Their ability to lead discussions and present research is a testament to their expertise and influence.




By evaluating these critical areas, patients and their families can identify the top-rated mesothelioma doctors who are not only experienced but also deeply committed to improving patient care and advancing medical understanding.



In Memory of Dr. David J. Sugarbaker, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA



Along with being the Chief of the Division of Thoracic Surgery at Boston’s Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dr. Sugarbaker was the Richard E. Wilson Professor of surgical oncology.



Graduating from Weill Medical College of Cornell University in 1979, he specialized in thoracic surgery, specifically focusing on lung and thoracic cancer. Dr. Sugarbaker’s clinical interests included general thoracic surgery, lung and pleural cancer, and mesothelioma.



In 2018, Dr. Sugarbaker passed away at the age of 65. He's remembered as a "pioneer in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) for nearly 30 years," according to NIH.



Mesothelioma is a rare cancer and difficult to treat. The number of specialists available is limited, so you may have to travel for the best treatment. It is worth the effort to meet with these experts in pleural and other types of mesothelioma. 





How to Choose a Mesothelioma Doctor



Getting treatment right away after a diagnosis is one of the most important factors in extending life expectancy for mesothelioma patients. A mesothelioma patient's choice of doctor can also improve life expectancy. 



Mesothelioma patients have a better chance of extending survival time by working with a mesothelioma specialist. Specialists have knowledge, experience, access to the latest treatments, and networks of other specialists. 



Mesothelioma experts are not common, but patients still have options. Here are some important factors to consider when choosing a mesothelioma doctor for treatment: 




Expertise and experience. Choose a specialist in the type of mesothelioma you have. They should have experience treating and helping patients like you. Don't be afraid to ask about a doctor's experience and how long they have been working with mesothelioma patients. 



Location. With few mesothelioma specialists to choose from, you might need to travel to get treatment. Consider the locations of doctors and if you can afford to or are willing to travel to work with them. 



Costs and insurance. Mesothelioma treatment is costly. Talk about expenses before choosing a doctor. The specialist you work with should accept your insurance to keep costs down. 



Availability. It is so important to begin treatment as soon as you can, so a doctor's availability for new patients should be an important decision. 



Treatments and clinical trials. The doctor you choose should be able to offer you the best and most innovative treatments for the cancer you have. They should also be able to give you access to clinical trials.




When selecting leading mesothelioma specialists, several crucial criteria are considered to ensure high-quality patient care and advanced research. Here's a comprehensive overview of what makes a top-tier specialist in this field:



1. Personalized Treatment Plans: Specialists are required to craft personalized treatment strategies tailored to meet the unique needs of each patient, ensuring the most effective and compassionate care.



2. Collaborative Approach: These professionals actively participate in multidisciplinary teams at renowned cancer centers across the United States. This collaboration leverages diverse expertise, leading to innovative treatment options.



3. Pioneering Research: An emphasis is placed on involvement in cutting-edge clinical trials and research. Specialists are expected to contribute to progress in the field by publishing their findings in prestigious medical journals.



4. Thought Leadership: Leading specialists often share their insights and discoveries by speaking at both national and international conferences, driving forward the conversation on mesothelioma treatment and innovation.



By focusing on these core areas, the selection process ensures that only the most qualified and dedicated professionals are chosen to advance the standards of mesothelioma care.



The Significance of Hospital Affiliations in Choosing a Mesothelioma Specialist



When selecting a mesothelioma specialist, the hospital affiliations of the doctor play a crucial role in determining the quality of care you will receive. Here’s why these connections matter:




Access to Advanced Resources: Specialists linked to leading hospitals often have access to cutting-edge resources, including state-of-the-art equipment and comprehensive clinical trial programs. This access can make a significant difference in treatment outcomes.



Collaborative Care: Being part of a reputable hospital network allows your specialist to collaborate seamlessly with a multidisciplinary team. This ensures that every aspect of your treatment is considered and optimized, from diagnosis to follow-up care.



Hospital Reputation: The reputation of the hospital where your specialist practices can provide insights into the level of care you can expect. Top-notch facilities are often equipped with the latest medical advancements, enhancing the quality of treatment.



Comfort and Safety: Your comfort and sense of safety during visits are paramount. Hospitals associated with positive patient experiences often reflect their dedication to providing a welcoming and secure environment.




Assessing a specialist's hospital affiliations can offer peace of mind and assurance that you are making an informed choice for your healthcare.



What to Expect at Your First Appointment With a Mesothelioma Doctor



A first visit to a specialist can be overwhelming. It's a good idea to bring a family member or close friend. They can provide emotional support and take notes so you don't forget important information. 



Come prepared to the appointment with: 




A list of questions you have for the specialist



A list of your current medications and supplements



Any patient forms you were required to complete before the appointment



Information about your work history and any suspected asbestos exposure



Your insurance information



Medical records and diagnostic information




Your primary specialist may recommend setting up appointments with additional specialists. You will likely be treated by a team of experts, including: 




Surgical oncologists



Thoracic surgeons



Radiation oncologists



Medical oncologists



Pulmonologists



Palliative care specialists



Gastrointestinal specialists




After reviewing your information, the specialist will probably discuss treatment options. Ask any questions you have so you can make informed decisions about your next steps. 



Remember, if you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma or asbestos-related cancer, there is a good chance you'll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.



Understanding the Role of a Pathologist in Diagnosing Mesothelioma



Pathologists play a crucial role in the diagnosis of mesothelioma, a rare and aggressive form of cancer. Their expertise is pivotal from the initial suspicion of the disease to the definitive diagnosis.



Examining Tissue Samples



A key responsibility of pathologists is to meticulously examine tissue samples under a microscope. This involves a careful analysis of biopsy samples obtained from patients. Through this microscopic examination, pathologists look for the presence of abnormal or cancerous cells that could indicate mesothelioma.



Identifying Tumor Cells



Pathologists are trained to identify specific tumor cells. They differentiate mesothelioma cells from other cancerous or benign cells. This skill is vital because mesothelioma's symptoms can resemble those of other diseases, making accurate identification essential for effective treatment planning.



Confirming Mesothelioma Diagnosis



Upon identifying suspicious cells, pathologists use various techniques to confirm the diagnosis of mesothelioma. They may employ specific staining methods or molecular tests to ensure the accurate classification of the cancer type. This confirmation is critical for oncologists to determine the best course of treatment.



By investigating these samples with precision and utilizing advanced diagnostic techniques, pathologists provide valuable insights that guide the treatment process. Their findings are fundamental to understanding the nature and extent of the disease, ultimately impacting the patient's care pathway and prognosis.



How Patients Can Connect with Over 500 Mesothelioma Specialists



Finding the right specialist is crucial for effective mesothelioma treatment. Patients seeking to connect with a broad network of over 500 specialists can rely on services that have been fostering such connections for over a decade. Here's how it works:




Comprehensive Database Access: Utilize specialized healthcare platforms offering access to a vast database of board-certified mesothelioma specialists. These platforms often provide detailed profiles of each doctor, highlighting their credentials, experience, and areas of expertise.



Personalized Recommendations: Many services offer personalized assistance. By assessing a patient’s specific needs, these services can recommend specialists who not only have extensive experience but also demonstrate compassion and a strong support team behind them.



Resource Connections: Patients and their families can tap into a wide range of support resources, from patient advocacy groups to treatment centers. These resources often have partnerships with top specialists and can facilitate introductions and referrals.



Community Support: Engage with online communities and forums dedicated to mesothelioma. These platforms often have members who share their firsthand experiences and can recommend specialists based on personal encounters.




By leveraging these strategies, patients can effectively build connections with a vast network of highly qualified specialists dedicated to providing comprehensive care.



Take Action Now: Secure Your Future with Expert Legal Help



If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to significant financial compensation. Our dedicated team of mesothelioma lawyers is here to guide you through every step of the legal process, ensuring your rights are protected and you receive the justice you deserve.



📄 Get Your Free Financial Compensation Packet!Fill out our simple form today to receive a comprehensive packet with details about experienced asbestos and mesothelioma law firms and lawyers in your area [near me], along with essential resources to help you make informed decisions about your case.



💡 Why Choose Us?




Decades of experience handling asbestos-related cases.



No upfront fees – you only pay if we win your case.



Personalized, compassionate support to help you focus on your health.




📞 Contact Us Today for Additional Legal Assistance and Advice!Call us at 800-793-4540 to speak with our team. Don’t wait—your time to file a claim is limited, and your family’s financial future could depend on taking action now.



You’re not alone in this fight. Let us help you secure the justice and compensation you deserve.

### Veterans & Mesothelioma Cancer Guide

Veterans account for 30% of all mesothelioma diagnoses. Military veterans have high rates of mesothelioma because of the extensive use of asbestos in all branches of the military. The VA offers benefits and medical care to qualifying veterans with asbestos illnesses. 



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 



We offer free online appointments and can arrange for representatives to meet you within just one mile of your home.











                
                        
                            Calculate Case Value
                            
                        
                        Diagnosis-- Select --MesotheliomaAsbestosisAsbestos-Related Lung CancerIs Diagnosed Person Alive?-- Select --YesPassed away under 2 years agoPassed away over 2 years agoAge of Diagnosed Person-- Select --Under 6565-8485 or olderExposure-- Select --MilitaryOccupationalSecond-HandOther / UnknownMain Job Site-- Select --ShipyardsBoiler RoomsPowerhousesPaper MillsConstruction SitesAutomotiveFirefightingRailroadsRefineriesOther / UnknownMain Asbestos Product Used-- Select --Fire Protection ProductsBrake Pads / LiningsCeiling Textures / Tile / PlasterElectrical ProductsTransite ProductsHeating & Cooling ProductsVermiculiteRoofing ProductsPaints / Plasters / Wall CoveringsOther / UnknownState-- Select --AlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaNorthern Mariana IslandsOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahU.S. Virgin IslandsVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces EuropeArmed Forces PacificPhone(Required)Email(Required)First Name(Required)Last Name(Required)NameThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
         Any information you send is secure and will never be sold or released.This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
        
                        Δ
                        













Facts About Mesothelioma in Veterans



Mesothelioma is a rare type of cancer that develops in the mesothelium and is caused by asbestos exposure. The most common type of mesothelioma, pleural mesothelioma, develops in the part of the mesothelium that surrounds the lungs. 



Military veterans have some of the highest rates of mesothelioma in the U.S. Approximately 30% of all people diagnosed with mesothelioma are veterans. 



Why Do Veterans Get Mesothelioma at High Rates? 



Veterans are overrepresented in mesothelioma diagnoses because all branches of the military used asbestos extensively. The peak years of asbestos use were between approximately 1930 and the 1970s. 



Asbestos was used as an insulating and fireproofing material in equipment, machinery, buildings, ships, vehicles, and aircraft. 



Which Veterans Are at Greatest Risk for Mesothelioma? 



Veterans from any branch of the military who served during times of peak asbestos use are at risk for mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses. The U.S. Navy used the most asbestos because it was a crucial component in ships. 



Veterans in the following roles in any military branch have a particularly high risk of being diagnosed with mesothelioma: 




Boiler workers



Insulation installers



Shipyard workers



Engine room workers



Vehicle and aircraft repairers



Pipefitters



Construction workers



Demolition workers




Family members of military men and women were also at risk for asbestos exposure and later illness. They may have brought asbestos fibers home on their clothing, exposing members of the household. 



Are Veterans at Risk for Other Asbestos Illnesses? 



Yes, exposure to asbestos in the past can lead to mesothelioma but also many other illnesses: 




Asbestosis



Pleural plaques



Lung cancer



Other types of cancer




How Does the VA Support Veterans With Mesothelioma? 



The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is the federal government agency that provides qualifying veterans with benefits and healthcare. The VA supports veterans with mesothelioma by offering disability compensation, specialist medical care, and compensation and funeral benefits for families of veterans. 





History of Asbestos Use in the Military



Connections between asbestos exposure and health problems have been known for decades, but companies suppressed that information for many years. The widespread use of asbestos-laden materials in the military peaked in the 1940s during World War II.



As early as the 1960s, many ex-sailors, Marines, and shipyard workers began to show symptoms of asbestos diseases, including asbestosis and mesothelioma. Also, many World War II-era vessels were in active service in Korea and Vietnam. This exposed even more people to asbestos long after World War II ended.



At the height of asbestos’ widespread use, military and civilian personnel in the Army, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard were exposed to asbestos fibers in tiles, construction materials, automotive parts (such as brakes and clutches), and the insulation used in steam pipes.



Engineers and construction workers involved in erecting or renovating barracks, repair facilities, offices, and schools on military bases are thus more likely to be exposed to asbestos fibers. However, due to the widespread use of asbestos before its initial restriction by the U.S. government in the late 1970s, anyone is at risk of being exposed.



World War II and Asbestos Use



All branches of the military used asbestos before the late 1970s. The U.S. Navy was an especially large user of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs), particularly during World War II. Large amounts of asbestos were added to the building materials used to build Navy vessels of all types to help protect them from fires.



Asbestos was also widely used in naval ships and shore facilities built between World War II and the early stages of the Vietnam War. Asbestos materials are mainly found in fire-prone areas such as ships’ engineering spaces and boiler rooms.



Not only was combat and support ships’ hulls made with asbestos-laden steel, but their electrical systems, including the insulation and wiring, were also manufactured with asbestos-containing materials (ACMs).



Korean War and Asbestos Use



Like World War II, military personnel were exposed to asbestos during the Korean War. A good majority of equipment used during the Korean War was manufactured during the World War II era.



Along with the Merchant Marine and Navy ships that were created with loads of asbestos, barracks, chow halls, shops, and buildings that housed all branches of the military were laden with asbestos during the Korean War.



Many who served in the Korean War began experiencing mesothelioma and asbestosis symptoms during the 1980s, and by the 1990s, thousands were diagnosed with these dangerous diseases. 



The average age of those who served in the Korean War who developed an asbestos-related disease is around 65 because of the long dormancy period associated with the illnesses.



As veterans reach their 70s, more cases of mesothelioma come to light as symptoms of mesothelioma begin to surface. As diseases go, mesothelioma is not a common affliction. Averages of 3,000 new cases are diagnosed each year.



Vietnam War and Asbestos Use



Vietnam veterans were also exposed to asbestos in numerous ways. Regardless of what branch the veterans served in during Vietnam, the risk of asbestos exposure was extremely high, resulting in thousands of severe illnesses.



The Navy particularly placed veterans at the highest risk for exposure. Every naval ship contained asbestos in various parts, from tiles, cables, pipes, and gaskets. Of course, this is not to say that veterans in other service branches weren’t at risk for exposure.



Much like the wars that preceded Vietnam, asbestos was used in motorized vehicles, barracks, insulation, ceiling tiles, flooring tiles, brakes, gaskets, and more.



Asbestos in the U.S. Navy



The U.S. Navy has always considered fire at sea one of the most significant hazards to its ships and their crews. In turn, measures are taken to reduce fire-related damage. Therefore, many Navy personnel assigned to refit or repair naval vessels were exposed before the health risks of asbestos were officially acknowledged in the 70s.



After the U.S. entered the war in late 1941, the Navy expanded in size to meet the needs of a global conflict. The U.S. Navy started World War II with several hundred warships and auxiliary vessels, but by the time the war ended in August of 1945, it operated over 1200 warships.



All of these vessels, whether they were combatants or support craft such as tankers and transports, were full of asbestos.



Warships were especially packed with asbestos. Almost every compartment or component of a fighting ship had asbestos insulation or parts built with the mineral to prevent fires from spreading. In addition, sailors assigned as firefighters wore protective gear such as fire proximity suits made from asbestos fibers.



Although the Navy’s intentions may have been geared toward safety, the long-term effects of extensive use of asbestos in its ships proved to be negative.



VA Benefits for Mesothelioma and Asbestos Exposure



That veterans are at such a high risk of mesothelioma is a tragedy. Victims of this terrible disease and their families can access resources and benefits through the VA. 



Is Mesothelioma a VA Disability? 



Yes, the VA considers mesothelioma to be a disabling illness. Many people with mesothelioma are very sick and unable to work or do other activities. They are facing a terminal illness that affects every aspect of their lives. Veterans who qualify can receive monthly compensation for mesothelioma as a disability. 



What Is the VA Rating for Mesothelioma? 



The VA rates disabilities to determine how much compensation a veteran is entitled to receive. Mesothelioma is rated 100% disabling, allowing veterans with this diagnosis to get full benefits. 



Lung cancer caused by asbestos also has a rating of 100%. Other asbestos illnesses can be rated anywhere from 10% to 100%, depending on individual factors.



Other Types of VA Compensation for Mesothelioma



Monthly disability compensation is just one benefit veterans with mesothelioma might qualify for. Other types include: 




Special Monthly Compensation. This type of compensation is available to veterans in special circumstances, often those who need assistance in the home. 



Dependency and Indemnity Compensation. Surviving spouses and dependent children of veterans who died from mesothelioma may qualify for this type of monthly compensation. 



Burial Benefits. Survivors can also qualify for a one-time benefit to help pay funeral and burial costs. 




Am I Eligible for VA Mesothelioma Benefits? 



The VA determines who qualifies for benefits. To find out if you are eligible, you must file a claim with the VA. In general, you must be able to show two things to get benefits: 




That you have a medical condition caused by asbestos exposure



That you encountered asbestos during your military service




The best way to make a successful VA benefits claim is to rely on the guidance of a Veterans Service Organization representative or asbestos lawyer. They can ensure you have all the paperwork and evidence necessary to get your benefits. 



Where Can Veterans Get Specialty Treatment for Mesothelioma?



Another important benefit the VA offers veterans is healthcare. Qualifying veterans can get free medical care at VA hospitals and medical centers nationwide. 



Some of the VA facilities that treat mesothelioma, have mesothelioma specialists on staff, or have access to world-class cancer treatment centers include: 




Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX



VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA



VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA



Miami VA Healthcare System, Miami, FL




Getting Help



When a hardworking father and Navy veteran—let’s call him Mr. R.—was diagnosed with mesothelioma at just 62, his family’s world was turned upside down. Mr. R. had spent his life providing for his wife and three children, working tirelessly in industrial jobs and serving his country. What he didn’t know was that years of exposure to asbestos would one day come back as a devastating illness.



The diagnosis was a heavy blow. His wife, Mrs. R., was heartbroken and overwhelmed. How would they cover the rising medical costs while supporting their youngest child in college? Treatments, pain, and uncertainty consumed their once-stable lives, leaving them feeling helpless.



But Mrs. R. wasn’t ready to give up. In her search for help, she reached out to a trusted mesothelioma attorney through the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center. That decision was the turning point for their family.



The attorney carefully listened to their story and immediately began investigating Mr. R.’s work history and asbestos exposure. With compassion and expertise, they uncovered crucial details about his exposure during his Navy service and industrial work, and filed a claim against the companies responsible.



After months of determined effort, the attorney secured a substantial settlement for the family. The funds provided immediate relief—covering cutting-edge treatments that gave Mr. R. more precious time with his loved ones. The financial burden of medical bills was lifted, allowing Mrs. R. to focus on caring for her husband. And their youngest child was able to graduate college without the crushing weight of financial worry.



For Mr. R., the settlement wasn’t just about money—it was about justice. It brought him peace of mind knowing his family’s future was secure, and that the companies responsible for his suffering were held accountable. The settlement gave his family the resources to navigate their journey with dignity and hope.



This family’s story is a powerful reminder of resilience, love, and the difference that taking action can make. Their lives were forever changed, all because Mrs. R. made one phone call.



If you or someone you love has been affected by mesothelioma, take the first step toward justice today. Call us now, and let us fight for the justice and compensation you deserve. Your family’s future is too important to wait.



If you've been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you'll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on our top rated experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 



Veterans: Get the Justice and Compensation You Deserve for Asbestos-Related Illnesses



As a veteran, you’ve served our country with honor, but many service members were unknowingly exposed to asbestos during their time in the military. If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for significant compensation to help cover medical costs and secure your family’s future.



📄 Get Your Free Financial Compensation Packet!Fill out our form today to receive a comprehensive guide tailored for veterans, including information on trusted asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers who specialize in representing those who served in the armed forces.



💡 Why Veterans Choose Us:




Expertise in handling asbestos-related claims for veterans.



Knowledge of VA benefits and additional compensation options.



Compassionate, experienced legal support tailored to your unique needs.




📞 Contact Us for Personalized Assistance!Call us at 800-793-4540 to speak with our dedicated team. We understand the challenges veterans face and are here to fight for the justice you deserve.



You’ve fought for your country—now let us fight for you. Don’t wait. Reach out today to learn how we can help you secure the financial support you’re entitled to.

### Mesothelioma Information - Frequently Asked Questions

Mesothelioma is a rare type of cancer caused by asbestos exposure. It's a terrible diagnosis that leaves patients and their families with many questions. Talk to your doctor and find a specialist to answer all your most important questions. 



Mesothelioma Basics



Mesothelioma is a rare, aggressive cancer and a devastating diagnosis. You probably have a lot of questions. We've put together the most helpful mesothelioma information to help guide your decision making process. 



What Is Mesothelioma?



This is one of the most common questions since mesothelioma is considered a rare disease. Malignant mesothelioma is cancer in the mesothelium, a double layer of tissue that lines the body's organs. 



The most common type of mesothelioma affects the pleura, the tissue around the lungs. However, mesothelioma can affect several parts of the body, including the heart and abdomen. 



In most cases, people affected by mesothelioma were exposed to asbestos while on the job and via products that contain asbestos-containing products. Companies that supplied asbestos and asbestos-containing products are usually liable for damages if they provided no warnings regarding their products. 



As a result, several asbestos trust funds have been set up to compensate people suffering from mesothelioma due to the negligence of others. Over $30 billion has been set aside in trust funds.  



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to significant compensation.  Trust funds with more than $30 billion are available right now for those diagnosed with an asbestos disease. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on qualified mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 







What Are the Early Warning Signs of Mesothelioma? 



Mesothelioma often doesn't show worrying signs for many years. When it does, those symptoms are similar to more common, less severe illnesses. Some of the earliest noticeable signs of pleural mesothelioma, the most common form, include: 




Shortness of breath



Coughing



Chest pains




Peritoneal mesothelioma develops in the abdomen and causes: 




Abdominal swelling and discomfort



Abdominal pain



Diarrhea or constipation




What Causes Mesothelioma?



The only known cause of and leading risk factor for mesothelioma is prolonged asbestos exposure. In some rare instances, victims may get mesothelioma after exposure for only a short period. 



Most mesothelioma victims get the disease by inhaling or ingesting asbestos fibers in the workplace.



Who Is Most at Risk of Mesothelioma?



Mesothelioma victims range from oil workers, factory workers, teachers, military personnel, mechanics, ship workers, construction crews, and more. Anyone exposed to asbestos daily is capable of getting the disease. 



Men get mesothelioma at higher rates than women. This is most likely because the jobs that previously used asbestos were worked more by men than women.



When Should I See My Doctor About Mesothelioma? 



If you know or suspect you were exposed to mesothelioma, you should talk to your doctor about it. They can discuss your risk factors, symptoms to watch for, and recommended health screenings. If you have symptoms of mesothelioma, see your doctor as soon as possible. 



Is There a Cure for Mesothelioma?



At this time, there is no cure for mesothelioma. However, there are a variety of treatment plans available, such as surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, and alternative treatments that help kill cancerous cells and put the disease into remission.



Can I Survive Mesothelioma?



Although there is no cure for the disease, treatments are available. Many mesothelioma patients prolong their lives while managing the pain and symptoms through aggressive treatment. 



Most victims don’t experience the first symptoms of mesothelioma until decades after asbestos exposure. But, the sooner you can get a diagnosis, the sooner you can start treatment. Earlier treatment increases the possibility of surviving. 



Who Is the Longest-Living Person With Mesothelioma? 



Although rare, some people achieve remission with mesothelioma and long outlive their prognosis. Paul Kraus is known for being one of if not the longest-living person with a mesothelioma diagnosis. He is thriving decades after his diagnosis. 



Does Anything Make Mesothelioma Worse? 



Mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer that will progress often despite treatment. However, some factors can make it worse, including ongoing asbestos exposure and cigarette smoking.



Understanding the Difference: Mesothelioma vs. Asbestos-Related Lung Cancer



Mesothelioma and asbestos-related lung cancer are two distinct diseases, both linked to asbestos exposure, yet they differ significantly in their nature, origin, and progression.



Mesothelioma: A Rare and Aggressive Cancer




Origin and Location: Mesothelioma primarily affects the mesothelium, a protective lining covering many internal organs. It most commonly targets the pleura, the membrane encasing the lungs, but can also occur in the abdomen (peritoneal mesothelioma) and other regions.



Cause and Risk: Almost exclusively linked to asbestos exposure, mesothelioma occurs when inhaled asbestos fibers become lodged in the mesothelium, eventually leading to cellular damage and malignancy.



Symptoms and Progression: Symptoms often include chest pain, shortness of breath, and fluid buildup around the lungs. Mesothelioma typically has a slow onset, with symptoms appearing decades after exposure.



Diagnosis and Treatment: Diagnosis usually involves imaging tests, biopsies, and biomarker studies. Treatment options include surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, though the prognosis remains generally poor due to late-stage detection.




Asbestos-Related Lung Cancer: More Common but Diverse




Origin and Location: Unlike mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer originates in the lung tissue itself. It resembles other forms of lung cancer and may not be exclusively caused by asbestos.



Cause and Risk: While asbestos is a significant risk factor, other factors like smoking play a crucial role, which can either independently cause lung cancer or exacerbate the risks associated with asbestos exposure.



Symptoms and Progression: Symptoms may include persistent cough, coughing up blood, and respiratory distress. Unlike mesothelioma, lung cancer related to asbestos may appear sooner after exposure and is influenced by lifestyle choices such as tobacco use.



Diagnosis and Treatment: Diagnostic methods include imaging scans, tissue biopsies, and lung function tests. The treatment regimen depends on the cancer's stage and includes a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and targeted therapies, often offering better recovery prospects compared to mesothelioma.




Key Distinctions




Cellular Origin: Mesothelioma originates from the mesothelium; lung cancer arises from lung tissues.



Risk Factors: Mesothelioma is almost solely attributed to asbestos, while lung cancer has multiple contributors.



Prognosis and Detection: Mesothelioma is often diagnosed at an advanced stage, resulting in a poorer prognosis, whereas lung cancer may be detected earlier and treated more effectively.




Understanding these differences can assist in accurate diagnosis and tailored treatment strategies for those affected by asbestos exposure. Always consult medical professionals for advice specific to individual health conditions.



Understanding the Difference: Mesothelioma vs. Lung Cancer



When discussing cancers that affect the chest cavity, it's essential to distinguish between mesothelioma and lung cancer. Both impact the lungs but differ significantly in origin, causes, symptoms, and treatments.



Origin and Affected Areas



Mesothelioma primarily starts in the mesothelium, the thin layer of tissue covering most internal organs. The most common type, pleural mesothelioma, begins in the pleura surrounding the lungs. However, it can also arise in the peritoneum, pericardium, or tunica vaginalis.



Lung cancer, on the other hand, stems from the lung tissues themselves. It directly affects the lung tissue and can be categorized into two main types: small cell lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer.



Causes and Risk Factors



A notable cause of mesothelioma is asbestos exposure. Asbestos fibers, once inhaled, lodge in the pleura or other mesothelial linings, eventually leading to cancer. Mesothelioma often manifests after decades of exposure, making it insidious and difficult to detect early.



Lung cancer also can be caused by asbestos, but smoking remains the predominant risk factor. Other contributors include exposure to radon gas, air pollution, and family history.



Symptoms



The symptoms of both cancers can overlap but generally vary. For mesothelioma, signs might include:




Chest pain



Persistent cough



Fluid buildup in the pleura (pleural effusion)




With lung cancer, symptoms often include:




A chronic cough that worsens over time



Coughing up blood



Hoarseness and weight loss




Treatment Options



Treatment for mesothelioma may encompass surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, often in combination. However, due to its aggressive nature, the prognosis remains challenging.



Lung cancer treatments generally depend on the cancer type and stage. They might include surgery, radiation therapy, targeted drug therapy, or immunotherapy.



Understanding the distinctions between mesothelioma and lung cancer can improve awareness and encourage early consultation with healthcare professionals when necessary. Early detection is key, especially given the serious nature of these conditions.



Understanding the Impact of Mesothelioma on the Lungs



Mesothelioma is a rare but aggressive cancer primarily caused by exposure to asbestos. It most commonly affects the lining of the lungs, known as the pleura, leading to a specific type called pleural mesothelioma.



How It Starts



When asbestos fibers are inhaled, they can become lodged in the lung tissue. Over time, these fibers cause inflammation and genetic mutations in the cells. This damage can lead to the uncontrolled cell growth that is characteristic of cancer.



The Effects on Lung Function




Reduced Lung Capacity: Mesothelioma can cause the pleura to thicken and harden, limiting the lungs' ability to expand fully. This restriction can reduce lung capacity, leading to difficulty in breathing.



Pleural Effusion: The cancer can also cause fluid to accumulate between the layers of the pleura, known as pleural effusion. This buildup puts pressure on the lungs, exacerbating shortness of breath and causing chest pain.



Tumor Growth: Tumors may form within the pleura and potentially spread into the lung tissue itself. This growth can obstruct airways, further impairing respiratory function and contributing to persistent cough and wheezing.



Pain and Discomfort: The pressure from tumors and fluid can cause significant pain and discomfort, making deep breaths painful and leading to chronic cough.




Progression and Further Complications



As mesothelioma progresses, it can spread to other parts of the body. This metastasis complicates treatment and may contribute to a deterioration in overall health.



While treatments, such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, aim to manage symptoms and slow progression, early detection remains crucial for better outcomes. Regular check-ups for those with known asbestos exposure are recommended, as symptoms often appear decades after initial contact with the fibers.



By understanding these impacts, patients and caregivers can better recognize symptoms early and pursue appropriate medical care.



Preventing Mesothelioma After Asbestos Exposure



Mesothelioma, a cancer linked to asbestos exposure, poses significant health risks. While it's challenging to completely eliminate the risk once you've been exposed, there are several proactive steps you can take to reduce the likelihood of developing mesothelioma.



1. Schedule Regular Medical Check-Ups



Early detection is crucial. Regular check-ups allow healthcare professionals to monitor your health for any signs of asbestos-related diseases. Inform your doctor about your history of asbestos exposure so they can recommend specific screenings, such as imaging tests or lung function assessments.



2. Quit Smoking



If you smoke, quitting is one of the most important steps you can take. Smoking significantly increases the risk of lung cancer among those exposed to asbestos. By quitting, you reduce the strain on your lungs and improve overall respiratory health.



3. Boost Your Immune System



Maintaining a healthy immune system can aid in fighting off potential carcinogens. Consider:




Eating a balanced diet rich in fruits, vegetables, and whole grains



Engaging in regular physical activity



Ensuring adequate sleep



Managing stress effectively




4. Stay Informed About Mesothelioma Symptoms



Understanding the symptoms of mesothelioma—such as persistent cough, chest pain, or unexplained weight loss—can lead to earlier intervention and treatment. If you experience these symptoms, seek medical advice immediately.



5. Utilize Protective Equipment



If you continue to work in environments with asbestos exposure, use personal protective equipment (PPE) such as masks and respirators. Ensure proper workplace safety protocols are followed, including adequate ventilation and asbestos handling procedures.



6. Consult with Specialists



If you've been exposed to asbestos, consult with a specialist in lung health or an oncologist. They can provide personalized advice and recommend preventive strategies based on your specific exposure level and health condition.



7. Educate Yourself and Others



Awareness is a powerful tool. Educate yourself and those around you about the risks of asbestos and the importance of safety measures. Encouraging a culture of safety can significantly reduce exposure risks.



By taking these preventive measures, you can proactively manage your health and potentially reduce your risk of developing mesothelioma. Stay vigilant, informed, and proactive in your approach to health following asbestos exposure.



Mesothelioma Treatment



After a diagnosis of mesothelioma, consider your treatment options. It's best to get started right away. 



What Are the Treatment Options for Mesothelioma? 



Your medical team will tell you about the best treatment options for you. Generally, mesothelioma is treated with a combination of one or more therapies, most commonly: 




Chemotherapy



Surgery



Radiation therapy



Immunotherapy




Not everyone is a good candidate for surgery due to age, overall health, and tumor location. Doctors typically focus on chemotherapy with radiation and palliative treatments for those patients. 



A standard treatment for peritoneal mesothelioma begins with cytoreductive surgery, a procedure to remove as much of the cancerous tissue as possible. This is followed by HIPEC, the circulation of heated chemotherapy drugs throughout the abdomen. 



How Do I Find Treatment Centers and Specialists? 



Talk to your diagnosing oncologist about mesothelioma specialists. You can be treated by any cancer team, but specialists are best for a rare disease like mesothelioma. 



You might have to travel to reach specialists. Some of the top treatment centers for mesothelioma are: 




MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas



Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts



The Pacific Mesothelioma Center, Los Angeles, California



Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York



The University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois




Veterans with mesothelioma can access specialists at VA medical centers in Boston and Los Angeles. 



Are There Any New Treatments That Increase Mesothelioma Survival Rates?



According to the National Cancer Institute (NCI), clinical trials are currently being held to help figure out new treatments for mesothelioma and other asbestos-related illnesses. 



If physicians and scientists can determine effective treatments during clinical trials, they may become available to the public.



What Is a Mesothelioma Clinical Trial?



A clinical trial is a research study where people volunteer to help scientists and physicians determine effective treatments for diseases. 



Mesothelioma clinical trials were created to help find new ways to treat cancer, find and diagnose new patients, determine better pain management, and more.



Mesothelioma clinical trials are set up for all stages of the disease, even those in the beginning stages. However, participants must pass the eligibility requirements of each trial. For more information, contact the Cancer Information Service (CIS) at 1-800-4-CANCER.



Is Treatment for Mesothelioma Expensive?



Mesothelioma treatment can indeed get expensive. Whether your treatment involves surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or combinations of all three, the prices for treatment need to be factored in. 



Planning for expenses beforehand and educating yourself on the costs will help. Still, there are also charities, government assistance programs, insurance, and other forms of financial assistance for which you may qualify.



Asbestos Exposure FAQs



Asbestos is the only known cause of mesothelioma. It is the leading risk factor and most often occurs in the workplace. 



What Is Asbestos? 



Asbestos is a natural mineral mined and used in many industries throughout the 20th century until about the 1980s. It was used heavily in construction, manufacturing, power and oil industries, and shipbuilding. 



Asbestos is made up of tiny fibers that easily shed and contaminate spaces. Unprotected workers breathed in these fibers for many years. Some of them got sick years later. 



Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos? 



The vast majority of asbestos exposure occurred in the workplace. If you have mesothelioma now, that's probably where you encountered it. Some of the industries and jobs that were most at risk for asbestos exposure include: 




Shipbuilding and repair



U.S. Navy



Construction



Mining



Automotive repair



Industrial manufacturing



Insulation workers



Boiler workers



Steel mill workers




Can Secondhand Asbestos Exposure Cause Mesothelioma?



There have been some reported cases of mesothelioma from secondhand exposure. For instance, a spouse washing the clothes of someone who worked around asbestos for prolonged periods can lead to cancer. 



Typically, though, most people diagnosed with mesothelioma were exposed first-hand while working around asbestos for extended periods.



Does Anything Else Cause Mesothelioma?



Secondhand asbestos exposure can explain some cases of mesothelioma with no known workplace exposure. While asbestos exposure is the primary cause of mesothelioma, it's not the sole factor. There are still a few cases that cannot be explained. Genetics could be a contributing factor. Some research suggests that a similar mineral called erionite might also cause mesothelioma. Natural deposits of erionite are found in some parts of the U.S.



Other Potential Causes




Genetic Predisposition: Some individuals may have a genetic susceptibility that increases their risk, even with minimal or no asbestos exposure.



Mineral Exposure: Erionite, a naturally occurring mineral similar to asbestos, has been linked to mesothelioma in certain regions. This mineral is found in specific areas in the U.S. And other countries.



Radiation: Previous radiation treatments for other cancers have occasionally been associated with mesothelioma development later in life.




Understanding the Rarity



Despite these alternative factors, non-asbestos-related mesothelioma cases are rare. Ongoing research aims to understand these unique instances better, offering hope for more targeted prevention and treatment strategies.



In summary, while asbestos is the main culprit, mesothelioma can arise under other circumstances, although these are less common. Keeping informed about these possibilities is crucial for early detection and intervention.



Mesothelioma and Asbestos Legal FAQs



If you have mesothelioma, treatment is a top priority. Once you start treatment, consider your legal options. 



Can I Get Compensation for Having Mesothelioma? 



Most people with mesothelioma can seek compensation for their illness. Compensation can be used to cover: 




Past and current medical expenses



Future medical expenses



Home care



Medical equipment



Prescriptions



Travel costs




Am I Eligible to File a Mesothelioma Lawsuit or Make a Claim? 



A mesothelioma lawyer can determine your eligibility for legal action to seek compensation. Mesothelioma is almost always caused by negligent workplace asbestos exposure, so you are most likely eligible to make a claim. 



Who Will I Sue in a Mesothelioma Lawsuit? 



Almost every mesothelioma victim developed the disease after prolonged exposure to asbestos in the workplace, while others developed it from using asbestos products.



There are likely multiple companies you can sue for your mesothelioma. It might not be your employer. Often, several companies supplied employers with asbestos materials that can be held liable. 



Our experienced mesothelioma lawyers will help you determine which companies are responsible for your asbestos exposure and will help you get the compensation you deserve.



I'm a Veteran With Mesothelioma. How Can I Get Compensation? 



As a veteran with mesothelioma, you could be eligible for one or two options for seeking compensation: 




Filing a lawsuit or claim against the asbestos companies that supplied the military



Making a claim with the VA for monthly disability compensation and other benefits




Veterans cannot sue the military or the U.S. government for asbestos exposure. 



Do Any Lawyers Specialize in Mesothelioma Cases? 



Yes, in fact, it’s highly recommended that you choose an attorney who specializes in mesothelioma cases. Mesothelioma attorneys have specialized training, experience, and knowledge of asbestos-related diseases and issues, including how to uncover the parties responsible for your asbestos exposure.



Mesothelioma lawyers also understand the disease and its complications in-depth and will almost always provide you with a better shot at successfully winning your case.



Questions to Ask Your Medical Team



If you received a mesothelioma diagnosis, you probably have many more questions. A lot of these questions can only be answered by your doctors. Make a list of everything you want to know before your next appointment. Here are some examples of important things to ask:




What type of mesothelioma do I have? 



What is my stage of mesothelioma? 



What is my prognosis? 



What are my chances of surviving mesothelioma or going into remission? 



Do I need any more tests?



What are my treatment options? 



How do I choose from all the treatments available? 



Can I get treatments for my symptoms? 



What are the goals of treatment? 



Do I need to see any other specialists? 



What additional support can I get for coping with a mesothelioma diagnosis? 



Could I benefit from alternative therapies? 



Do I need to change anything about my lifestyle? 




I’d Like to Know More About My Rights. Can You Send Me More Information?



If you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you need additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Costs and Expenses of Mesothelioma Treatment

The costs and expenses of mesothelioma treatment run high. Treatments like surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy are expensive. Mesothelioma treatment costs are around $25,000 per hospitalization on average. 



If you or a loved one has mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 











How Much Does Mesothelioma Treatment Cost?



The cost of mesothelioma treatment is significant, often exceeding $500,000 to $1 million over the course of care. Expenses include surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and newer treatments like immunotherapy, which can cost tens of thousands per session. Additional costs arise from diagnostic tests, hospital stays, medications, and travel to specialized treatment centers. Beyond medical expenses, patients may face financial burdens from lost income and caregiving needs. These costs highlight the importance of seeking compensation through settlements, trust funds, or other legal actions to help alleviate the financial strain on patients and their families.





                
                        
                            Calculate Case Value
                            
                        
                        Diagnosis-- Select --MesotheliomaAsbestosisAsbestos-Related Lung CancerIs Diagnosed Person Alive?-- Select --YesPassed away under 2 years agoPassed away over 2 years agoAge of Diagnosed Person-- Select --Under 6565-8485 or olderExposure-- Select --MilitaryOccupationalSecond-HandOther / UnknownMain Job Site-- Select --ShipyardsBoiler RoomsPowerhousesPaper MillsConstruction SitesAutomotiveFirefightingRailroadsRefineriesOther / UnknownMain Asbestos Product Used-- Select --Fire Protection ProductsBrake Pads / LiningsCeiling Textures / Tile / PlasterElectrical ProductsTransite ProductsHeating & Cooling ProductsVermiculiteRoofing ProductsPaints / Plasters / Wall CoveringsOther / UnknownState-- Select --AlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaNorthern Mariana IslandsOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahU.S. Virgin IslandsVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces EuropeArmed Forces PacificPhone(Required)Email(Required)First Name(Required)Last Name(Required)CommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
         Any information you send is secure and will never be sold or released.This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
        
                        Δ
                        





Know What to Expect When Paying for Mesothelioma 



Mesothelioma tends to progress at a quick pace despite its long latency time. This makes it even more difficult as you’re faced with mounting medical costs in a relatively short time. 



Educating yourself about the costs of mesothelioma treatments and the factors involved with payments will help you better prepare financially for future expenses.



Patients typically undergo chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, or a combination of all to battle the disease and reduce the symptoms of mesothelioma. 



The cost of each treatment depends on several factors, including the type of surgery, the medications used for chemotherapy, the type of radiation therapy procedure, and more.



Also, expect extra expenses for supplemental therapies, vitamins, and pain medications. 



Vitamins, medication, homeopathic agents, and natural extracts can be used. This form of treatment is still in its trial stages, so the associated cost has not been determined.



Although these types of treatments are not as pricey as traditional treatments, the expenses can add up.



Why Mesothelioma Patients Should Keep Detailed Records of Medical Bills



For mesothelioma patients, maintaining meticulous records of medical bills is crucial. Here's why:




Accurate Compensation: Detailed records ensure that all medical expenses are considered when seeking compensation. This includes everything from hospital stays to medication costs, which can significantly impact the total amount awarded.



Financial Clarity: Keeping track of all medical expenses provides a clear picture of financial commitments. This helps in planning budgets and anticipating future costs, reducing stress during an already challenging time.



Insurance Claims: Insurance companies often require detailed documentation to process claims efficiently. Having an organized record can expedite reimbursements and reduce discrepancies.



Legal Proceedings: In legal contexts, thorough documentation supports stronger cases for compensation. It provides concrete evidence of the financial burden mesothelioma has imposed, strengthening your claim.



Personal Health Management: Understanding your treatment costs can also guide decisions about future healthcare choices and highlight areas where alternative options might be available.




By maintaining comprehensive records, mesothelioma patients can navigate the financial aspects of their treatment with greater ease and security.



How Much Do Mesothelioma Treatments Cost? 



Costs for treatment vary by individual. Average prices can be helpful for patients facing some of these common treatments for mesothelioma. 



Mesothelioma Surgery Costs



A cancer patient undergoing surgery can expect the costs to be around $39,000 or more, according to a study performed by the U.S. News and World Report. This is an increase from surgery costs only a decade earlier at close to $7,000. 



The type of surgery, the stage of the disease, after-treatments, and follow-ups will factor into the cost. Another factor that will affect the cost is the type of surgery needed. For example, palliative surgery may have different costs when compared to curative surgery or diagnostic surgery.



Here are some average costs of surgical procedures mesothelioma patients might need based on a 2019 analysis: 




Pleural drainage: $16,089



Pleural biopsy: $16,575



Thoracentesis: $19,899



Pleurectomy/decortication: $53,993



Extrapleural pneumonectomy: $62,408




The most extensive procedure, extrapleural pneumonectomy, costs the most. It is a complicated surgery performed by only a handful of specialists. 



Average costs can also be categorized more generally: 




Average price of a minor surgical procedure: $13,493



Average price of a major surgical procedure: $30,734




The Cost of Chemotherapy for Mesothelioma Patients



Again, treatment costs vary, but a typical course of chemotherapy treatment for mesothelioma patients is $38,779. This includes six cycles of chemotherapy with pemetrexed and cisplatin or carboplatin. 



Some mesothelioma patients benefit from adding the targeted drug bevacizumab (Avastin) to chemotherapy treatment. This brings the cost up to $87,741 for the full course of treatment. Bevacizumab is often recommended for patients who are not candidates for surgery. 



The costs of chemotherapy are based on the drugs used. There is a lot of variation in their pricing. For instance, cisplatin is just $308 for six cycles, while pemetrexed is over $38,000. 







Radiation Therapy Costs



Mesothelioma patients rarely receive radiation therapy alone, but it is often used to supplement chemotherapy and surgery. 



Statistics regarding radiation therapy costs for mesothelioma patients are limited. The median price of a course of radiation therapy for lung cancer patients is $9,000. 



How Much Does Immunotherapy for Mesothelioma Cost? 



Immunotherapy is not yet a standard treatment, but it is becoming more common and available for mesothelioma patients. 



These are the approximate costs of three of the immunotherapy drugs most commonly used in mesothelioma patients: 




Pembrolizumab (Keytruda): $12,500 per month and $150,000 per year



Nivolumab (Opdivo): $12,500 per month and $150,000 per year



Ipilimumab (Yervoy): $130,000 for one 12-week course




Understanding the Costs of Mesothelioma Diagnosis



When seeking to diagnose mesothelioma, the financial implications can vary significantly based on the diagnostic methods utilized. A pivotal study from 2014 highlighted an average cost of $7,567 for a general diagnostic workup for lung cancer patients, though this excludes any insurance contributions.



Challenges and Steps in Diagnosing Mesothelioma



Due to its rarity and the nuanced symptoms associated with it, confirming a mesothelioma diagnosis is often complex. The condition's long latency period further complicates timely detection, necessitating multiple tests for a definitive diagnosis.



Biopsies, considered the gold standard for diagnosing mesothelioma, are the most cost-intensive. The same 2014 study placed the average biopsy expense for lung cancer patients at $14,634. Biopsies involve extracting tissue or fluid samples and include both needle and surgical modalities, with costs differing across types.



Before proceeding to biopsies, imaging tests like X-rays, CT scans, MRIs, and PET scans are commonly employed to ascertain tumor specifics such as location and size. A chest CT scan, for instance, was estimated at an average of $184, though prices vary with the extent of the scan.



Blood tests offer a more budget-friendly approach and are typically used to search for biomarkers associated with mesothelioma. These tests may include assessments for substances like MESOMARK and Fibulin-3, although biomarker research is still evolving, making precise cost estimations challenging.



Overall, while a biopsy remains crucial for diagnosis, initial tests such as imaging and blood work can provide a pathway to understanding whether further, more expensive procedures are warranted.



How Do Emerging Treatments and Clinical Trials Affect the Cost of Mesothelioma Treatment?



Emerging therapies for mesothelioma can significantly influence treatment costs, often in ways that differ from traditional approaches. While these innovative treatments might initially seem expensive due to their cutting-edge nature, participating in clinical trials can provide a financial advantage. Here's how:




Clinical Trial Sponsorship: Many clinical trials are funded by government grants or research institutions. This funding can cover a substantial portion of the cost, reducing the financial burden on patients.



Insurance Coverage: Depending on the trial and the patient's policy, insurance providers may cover some or all of the costs associated with participation. This is because many trials are linked to approved treatments or established protocols.



Access to New Therapies: By enrolling in a clinical trial, patients can access emerging therapies that might not be widely available yet. These can sometimes be more effective or have fewer side effects, which may reduce associated health costs.




In summary, while emerging treatments often come with uncertainties regarding pricing, clinical trials offer a pathway to potentially lower overall expenses and access state-of-the-art care.



Comparing Mesothelioma and Lung Cancer Treatment Costs



Understanding the financial implications of cancer treatment is crucial. When comparing the costs of mesothelioma treatment to lung cancer, several factors come into play.



Treatment InfluencesCosts can significantly vary based on the type of treatment received, the disease's progression, and the healthcare provider chosen. Insurance plans also play a major role in determining out-of-pocket expenses for patients.



Data Availability and ComparisonsSince mesothelioma is a rare condition, concrete data on average treatment costs is limited. However, lung cancer treatment costs offer a useful benchmark given the similarities in required care. According to the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the initial treatment costs for lung cancer patients averaged approximately $68,293, based on data from 2013 to 2017.



Variations in Cost FactorsBoth mesothelioma and lung cancer care can involve surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or a combination of these. The specific regimen a patient undergoes will affect the overall expenditure. While exact figures for mesothelioma can be elusive, lung cancer statistics provide a practical estimate for financial preparation.



In summary, while direct comparisons are challenging due to data limitations, lung cancer treatment costs provide a reasonable gauge for understanding potential expenses related to mesothelioma.





Additional Mesothelioma Expenses



When considering how much it will cost to treat mesothelioma, it is important to include additional expenses. Some examples of the hidden costs associated with treating mesothelioma include: 




Travel. Mesothelioma is rare, so you might need to travel to get specialist care. Consider the costs of transportation, hotel stays, and more. 



Lost Income. If you were working when you got sick and can no longer work, you must consider the loss of income as an expense. 



Home Care. Many patients need in-home personal care or nursing care. You might also need to hire someone to do chores and daily tasks, like grocery shopping, cleaning, and cooking. 



Medical Equipment. In-home care might require medical equipment, like an oxygen tank or the equipment associated with fluid drainage. 



Mental Health Care. Most people with mesothelioma experience declines in mental health with diagnosis and benefit from therapy, counseling, and other mental health care services. 



Financial and Legal Costs. When facing end-of-life decisions, you will probably need to work with a financial advisor, lawyer, or both. 




Planning for Unexpected and Recurring Mesothelioma-Related Expenses



Caring for a mesothelioma patient isn't just about managing treatment costs. It includes an array of additional expenses that can take patients and caregivers by surprise if not properly planned for. Here's a comprehensive guide to navigate these financial challenges:



Anticipate All Forms of Expenditures



Beyond medical treatments, consider the broader spectrum of care-related expenses, such as:




Travel and Accommodation: For those receiving treatment far from home, travel expenses and the cost of lodging can accumulate quickly.



Home and Hospice Care: Costs for in-home assistance or hospice care towards the end stages are significant and often not covered completely by insurance.



Support Services: Expenses for cancer coaching, mental health services, and therapy sessions should factor into your budget.



Nutrition and Wellness: Specialized diets and nutritional supplements to manage dietary needs can involve unexpected outlays.




Prepare for Fluctuating and Recurring Costs



Treatment plans may require multiple rounds of chemotherapy or other therapies, which can lead to recurring expenses. Additionally, expenses often increase towards the end-of-life stage due to intensive care needs.



Utilize Financial Aids and Resources



To better manage these financial obligations, consider these steps:




Insurance Review: Ensure a thorough understanding of what your health insurance covers and identify any gaps. Consider discussing additional coverage options with a specialist.



Financial Assistance: Look into organizations that provide grants or financial aid specifically for cancer patients. The American Cancer Society and CancerCare offer support programs that can mitigate costs.



Budgeting and Planning: Work with a financial advisor who specializes in healthcare to develop a comprehensive budget that accounts for variable costs.



Support Networks: Tap into patient support groups, which can offer insights into available resources and shared experiences in managing costs.




Anticipating these costs and leveraging available resources can alleviate some of the financial burdens associated with mesothelioma care. Preparing ahead ensures that both patients and caregivers can focus more on treatment and support, rather than financial stress.



How to Pay for Mesothelioma Treatment



Very few people can pay the high costs of mesothelioma treatment out of pocket. Consider all the available resources if you are facing these expenses. 



Health Insurance



Most patients use some type of health insurance plan to cover some of the costs of mesothelioma treatment. A study of late-stage lung cancer patients broke down the average costs of care with different types of insurance: 




Employer Insurance. Patients with employment-based insurance paid $5,654 on average for care. The largest portion of the costs was co-pays, followed by premiums and deductibles. 



Individual Private Insurance. For those patients with an individual health insurance plan, the average cost was $10,114. 



Medicare. Patients who qualified for Medicare paid the least for lung cancer treatment. They paid an average of $8,396. 




Government Assistance



Government programs can provide compensation or healthcare coverage for patients who qualify: 




Medicare is federal health insurance for people over 65 who worked and contributed to the program. 



Medicaid is a federal program administered by each state that covers health care costs for low-income individuals. 



Social Security Disability provides monthly compensation for individuals who worked and contributed to Social Security but can no longer work. 



Veterans Affairs. The VA offers benefits to qualifying veterans, including disability compensation and free medical care. 




Clinical Trials



Clinical trials are studies of new and emerging treatments or treatment protocols. If you qualify for a clinical trial, you can get cutting-edge treatment at no cost. Keep in mind, though, that you will have to pay for any associated costs, such as travel expenses.



However, clinical trials can also offer financial advantages. Treatments in the clinical trial phase often come with lower out-of-pocket expenses compared to standard treatments. This can make them a more affordable option for patients seeking innovative care.



Moreover, in some instances, insurance may cover participation in clinical trials. This includes coverage for certain patient care costs, further reducing financial burden. It's essential to check with your insurance provider to understand what specific costs are covered.



In summary, clinical trials not only provide access to the latest medical advancements but can also serve as a cost-effective treatment path. Be sure to explore all available options and consult with your healthcare provider to see if a clinical trial is right for you.



When navigating the complexities of insurance coverage for mesothelioma treatment, it's crucial to communicate effectively with your provider. Here’s a streamlined guide on questions you should ask:



Verification and Approvals




Pre-Approval Requirements: Is pre-authorization necessary before beginning treatment? Understanding this can prevent unexpected delays or out-of-pocket expenses.




Coverage Details




Treatment Coverage Percentage: What portion of each treatment session will be covered? This detail helps you anticipate potential costs and plan your finances accordingly.




Network Providers




Doctor and Facility Inclusion: Is my mesothelioma specialist part of the insurance network, and are the treatment facilities covered? Ensuring your provider is within the network can significantly reduce expenses.




Financial Responsibilities




Copays and Deductibles: What are the copayment amounts for each visit, and how will they impact my deductible? Knowing these figures allows you to budget effectively and prioritize treatments.




By preparing these targeted questions, you can gather essential financial information, empowering you to make informed decisions about your healthcare options.



Legal Options for Compensation



If you received a mesothelioma diagnosis, you might be eligible for compensation for treatment and related expenses. An experienced mesothelioma lawyer or asbestos law firm can help you understand your options: 




Personal Injury Lawsuit. Mesothelioma is usually considered a personal injury because it is caused by negligent workplace asbestos exposure. A lawyer can help you determine which companies are responsible and help you file a lawsuit. These lawsuits often end in settlements, but some go to trial and result in large jury awards for victims. 



Wrongful Death Lawsuit. If you lose a loved one to mesothelioma, you can file a wrongful death suit to seek compensation. This can be useful for paying medical bills from their treatment. You can also use the compensation for funeral expenses. 



Asbestos Trust Fund Claim. If the companies responsible for your asbestos exposure went bankrupt, you cannot sue them. You might be eligible for a trust fund claim. Bankrupt asbestos companies set up trusts to compensate future claimants. 



Veteran Benefits. Veterans have high rates of mesothelioma due to asbestos use by the military. You cannot sue the military or the government, but you are likely eligible for VA benefits. These include specialist medical care and monthly disability compensation. A lawyer can help you make a successful claim, which requires proving that you were exposed to asbestos during your time in the service. 








Mesothelioma Financial Assistance: Support for Patients and Families



For those battling mesothelioma, financial assistance can provide critical relief from the overwhelming costs of treatment and related expenses. Support options include compensation through settlements, asbestos trust funds, and veterans’ benefits for those exposed during military service. Additionally, government programs like Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and Medicare can help offset medical bills and lost income.



Explore Direct Financial Assistance:




Medicare and Medicaid: These government programs can significantly reduce the cost of medical care for eligible patients.



Disability Benefits: Qualifying for disability benefits can provide a steady income, alleviating the financial pressure of lost wages.



Legal Action: Pursuing compensation through legal channels can offer substantial financial support. Working with an experienced mesothelioma attorney can maximize compensation opportunities and connect patients to the resources they need.




Additional Support Options:



Nonprofit organizations and cancer support groups may offer grants, housing assistance, or travel aid for specialized treatments. These resources can be invaluable in covering expenses that insurance or direct financial aid might not fully address.



By leveraging these various forms of assistance, patients can find significant relief from the financial burden, allowing them to focus more fully on their health and recovery.



Getting Help



Fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. Keep in mind that if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for considerable compensation. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Asbestos Diseases Guide

Asbestos diseases are caused by exposure to asbestos. While no amount of exposure is safe, most asbestos illnesses result from years of exposure in the workplace. Asbestos causes malignant mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis and may contribute to other illnesses. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 













About Asbestos Diseases



Asbestos is a natural mineral that was heavily used for decades in construction and other industries. When asbestos is disturbed or deteriorates, it releases tiny fibers. People can inhale or ingest these fibers if not protected with safety gear. 



In some people, ingested or inhaled asbestos fibers damage cells and tissue and cause or contribute to illness. The most serious asbestos-related disease is cancer. 



What Are the Main Diseases Associated with Asbestos? 



Asbestos is a carcinogen, so the main disease associated with it is cancer. Mesothelioma is most often connected to asbestos. This is because asbestos exposure is the only known cause of mesothelioma. Asbestos can also cause lung cancer and has been associated with other cancer types.



While mesothelioma is a form of cancer, asbestosis is not. Asbestosis is a non-cancerous lung disease caused by asbestos exposure. The two conditions, though related to asbestos, differ significantly in their nature and progression.




Asbestosis: This disease remains confined to the lungs and the pleura, the protective lining that covers the lungs. It does not spread to other parts of the body as cancer does. It primarily results in scarring of lung tissue and is a chronic condition.



Mesothelioma: In contrast, mesothelioma begins in the tissue of the lungs and abdomen. It is an aggressive cancer that can spread throughout the body, affecting various organs and systems.




Asbestos may contribute to other illnesses, but cancer and asbestosis are the primary asbestos diseases. Understanding these differences is crucial in recognizing the varied impacts of asbestos exposure on health.



What Is the Most Common Asbestos-Related Disease? 



While mesothelioma is most often associated with asbestos, it is rare. More common is lung cancer, which can have multiple causes. Lung cancer is more often caused by smoking, but lung cancer is more common than mesothelioma among people exposed to asbestos. 



Does Everyone Exposed to Asbestos Get Sick? 



One of the mysteries of asbestos exposure is that not everyone gets sick from it. Anyone exposed to asbestos can potentially get sick. There is no safe level of exposure, but people repeatedly exposed to asbestos over many years have the highest risk of illness.



While the risk of developing an asbestos-related disease exists, it's important to note that everyone encounters low levels of asbestos in their environment at some point. These low levels are virtually everywhere—whether at home, in buildings, or even outdoors.



Historical Exposure: The danger was most pronounced before the 1970s when asbestos was widely used in construction and manufacturing. During that time, many workers faced high levels of exposure on a daily basis.



Current Regulations and Risks: Despite stringent regulations put in place to reduce on-the-job exposure, accidental contact with asbestos can still occur. This is particularly true in older buildings where asbestos materials may be disturbed.



Symptoms of exposure often take years to develop, which means new cases are still being diagnosed today. Understanding the history and current landscape of asbestos exposure can help us better navigate and mitigate these risks. 



How Long After Asbestos Exposure Are There Symptoms? 



People who get sick from asbestos exposure often don't have symptoms for many years. Asbestos diseases, especially mesothelioma, have long latency periods. 



The latency period is the time between exposure and symptoms that lead to a diagnosis. The latency period for mesothelioma is 20 to 50 years. 



Should I Avoid All Asbestos Products?



Asbestos has long been associated with severe health risks, but it’s crucial to understand how these risks manifest to make informed decisions. Here’s what you need to know:




Understanding Asbestos Risk: Health issues arise primarily when asbestos fibers become airborne and are inhaled. These microscopic fibers can lead to serious conditions, such as asbestosis or mesothelioma, over time.



Bonded Asbestos Products: Many modern building materials incorporate bonded asbestos. In these products, asbestos fibers are tightly bound, reducing the likelihood of them becoming airborne. When intact, these materials are generally considered safe for use, minimizing health risks.



When to Exercise Caution: Despite the inherent safety in bonded forms, it is crucial to handle these materials with care. Avoid actions that might damage the product, such as sanding, tearing, or any form of abrasion. Such disruptions can release harmful fibers into the air.



Safety Precautions: If you encounter old or damaged asbestos products, it’s advisable to consult with professionals who are trained in safely handling and disposing of asbestos materials. By doing so, you can effectively mitigate unnecessary health hazards.




In summary, while not all asbestos products must be avoided, understanding how they are used and the condition they are in is key to ensuring safety. By ensuring proper handling and maintenance, the risk associated with these materials can be significantly minimized.



What Products Still Contain Asbestos?



Despite increasing regulations, asbestos can still be found in various products, especially those designed for construction, automotive, and even household use. Let's explore some of these categories:



Automotive Components




Brake Pads and Linings: Essential for vehicle safety, these parts may still incorporate asbestos due to its heat resistance.



Clutch Facings and Gaskets: In some older models, these components rely on asbestos for durability under high friction.




Building and Construction Materials




Cement and Plaster: Certain formulations use asbestos for added strength and fire resistance.



Insulation and Pipe Wrapping: Known for its insulating properties, asbestos might still be present in older installations.



Roof Shingles and Siding: Some exterior construction materials leverage asbestos for weather resistance.



Vinyl Floor Tiles and Adhesives: Asbestos may be used to provide additional wear resistance.




Electrical and Soundproof Materials




Electrical Wire Casings: Asbestos provides heat resistance, protecting against electrical fires.



Soundproofing Products: Its dense nature helps enhance acoustic insulation.




Miscellaneous Household Items




Fireproof Fabrics: Items like gloves, table pads, and certain fabrics may include asbestos for fire resistance.



Plastics, Paints, and Adhesives: A diverse range may still rely on asbestos for added durability.



Vermiculite Attic Insulation: This common insulator occasionally includes asbestos, particularly in older homes.




While newer products are generally asbestos-free, older items and specific international products might still include this hazardous mineral. Always check product labels and consult professionals for safe handling.



Does My Asbestos Exposure at Work Pose a Health Risk to My Family?



Yes, if you're exposed to asbestos at work, it can increase health risks for your family. This risk arises from what's known as "secondary asbestos exposure." When individuals handle asbestos, tiny fibers can cling to their clothing, shoes, skin, and hair. Once you leave the workplace, these particles can inadvertently be carried home.



Minimizing the Risk



Most industries that involve asbestos have strict safety protocols to mitigate such risks:




Workplace Dress Code: Many companies provide uniforms that are left on-site, reducing the likelihood of bringing fibers home.



Changing Rooms: Employees are often required to change clothes before leaving work, ensuring their street clothes remain uncontaminated.



On-site Showers: Showers are commonly provided to wash off any lingering fibers from hair and skin before an employee leaves the premises.




By adhering to these precautions, the chance of family members coming into contact with asbestos is significantly reduced. Nevertheless, if you suspect any exposure, taking these preventive measures is crucial for safeguarding your loved ones' health.



When to Consult a Healthcare Provider



Experiencing potential symptoms or having a history of exposure to harmful substances can be concerning. It's crucial to recognize when to seek professional medical advice.



Symptoms to Watch For




Persistent Breathing Issues: If you notice ongoing difficulty in breathing that doesn't improve or worsens over time, it's time to get checked out.



Chest Pain or Discomfort: Any unusual sensation in your chest, whether it's consistent pain or intermittent discomfort, deserves attention.



Chronic Cough: A cough that lingers for weeks without signs of improvement should be evaluated, especially if you've had exposure to hazardous materials.




Important Considerations




History of Exposure: Even if your exposure to potentially dangerous substances, like asbestos, occurred indirectly (secondhand exposure), it's still important to inform your healthcare provider. Early intervention can be crucial.



Changes in Health: Monitor for changes in your general health, such as unexplained fatigue or weight loss, and promptly report them to your provider. These can sometimes be subtle indicators of underlying conditions.




Being proactive about your health can make a significant difference. Don't hesitate to schedule a visit with your healthcare professional whenever you encounter these signs or any other unusual symptoms. Your well-being comes first.



Mesothelioma



Although malignant mesothelioma is a rare form of cancer caused by prolonged exposure to asbestos, it’s the most well-known type of asbestos cancer. These are some important facts about mesothelioma: 




There are four types of mesothelioma depending on where it develops: pleural, peritoneal, pericardial, and testicular. 





Pleural mesothelioma is the most common form and develops in the chest cavity in the tissue around the lungs. 





Symptoms of pleural mesothelioma consist of chest pain, fluid buildup in the lungs and chest, fatigue, weight loss, lethargy, and shortness of breath. 





However, in some instances, only short periods of exposure have led to mesothelioma.





Currently, there are around 2,000 to 3,000 cases of mesothelioma annually in the U.S., with a current total of a little over 540,000. 





Most people diagnosed with mesothelioma are between 50 and 70, with men three times more likely to be diagnosed than women.





The survival rate of mesothelioma is low, usually because it's already in its advanced stages before diagnosis. Treatment options are covered in-depth in our Treatment Guide.




Asbestosis 



Asbestosis is a type of interstitial lung disease caused by asbestos exposure. It is also a type of pulmonary fibrosis characterized by scarring in the lung tissue. It is progressive and stiffens the lungs, making it difficult to breathe.



Understanding the Risk Factors for Asbestosis



Despite regulations that minimize on-the-job asbestos exposure, certain occupations still face significant risks, especially those involving the demolition or renovation of buildings constructed before the 1970s. Homes built prior to 1977 may contain asbestos in materials like pipes, ceilings, and floor tiles. However, living in such a home doesn't automatically put you at risk. The danger arises when asbestos is in an inhalable form, like dust; when it's solid, the risk is negligible.



High-Risk Occupations



Long-term exposure to asbestos is a key factor in developing asbestosis, particularly in professions that handle asbestos-containing materials. Jobs with higher risk include:




Asbestos miners, installers, or removers



Auto and aircraft mechanics



Construction crews



Electrical workers



Railroad and shipyard workers




Additionally, those involved in rescue and cleanup operations, such as the World Trade Center site after the attacks, are also at risk for asbestos-related diseases.



Factors Influencing Risk



Several elements affect the likelihood of developing asbestosis:




Duration of Exposure: Longer exposure generally means a higher risk.



Intensity of Exposure: The more asbestos you encounter, the greater the risk.



Industry Type: Risk is lower when asbestos is bonded into products like walls or tiles and higher when it's airborne, such as during sawing or demolition.



Personal Risk Factors: Smoking or preexisting lung diseases can exacerbate risk.



Genetics: Genetic mutations, like those in the BAP1 gene, can increase susceptibility.




People typically develop asbestosis after years of occupational exposure. Disrupting asbestos during a home renovation is unlikely to cause the disease if proper precautions are taken.



Symptoms of asbestosis include: 




Difficulty breathing



Shortness of breath



A dry cough



A dry crackling sound in the lungs



Chest pains



Chest tightness



Loss of appetite and weight loss



Finger and toe clubbing




Unfortunately, there is no cure for asbestosis, and it is progressive, which means it worsens over time. Treatment can slow the progression and improve symptoms. Once asbestos fibers are inhaled, they remain in your body, and the damage they cause is irreversible.



The outlook for individuals with asbestosis can vary significantly. Factors such as the duration and intensity of asbestos exposure play a crucial role in determining the disease's progression. Many people with mild asbestosis continue to live fulfilling lives for years, while others may experience a more rapid decline and require ongoing medical intervention.



Regular monitoring is essential to managing asbestosis effectively. Healthcare providers will likely recommend periodic chest X-rays and lung function tests to track changes in lung scarring as the condition evolves. By staying vigilant and adhering to medical advice, individuals can better navigate the challenges posed by this chronic illness.



Quitting smoking is one of the best things anyone with asbestosis can do. Smoking worsens the condition and symptoms. Treatments include oxygen supplementation, pulmonary rehabilitation, and, in rare cases, a lung transplant.



To prevent asbestosis, it's crucial to avoid long-term exposure to asbestos. If your work environment involves asbestos, wearing a respirator is essential. This specialized mask filters out harmful particles, reducing the risk of inhaling asbestos fibers.



Regular medical check-ups and chest X-rays are advisable if you've been exposed to asbestos. These tests won't prevent asbestosis, but they can help detect it early, allowing for timely management.



Finally, if you have been exposed to asbestos and you smoke, quitting smoking is vital. It not only helps manage asbestosis symptoms but significantly reduces your risk of developing cancer. Taking these steps can help protect your lungs and improve your overall health.



Understanding Life Expectancy for Asbestosis Patients



When diagnosed with asbestosis, a chronic lung disease caused by asbestos exposure, life expectancy can vary significantly based on several factors. Generally, individuals diagnosed with asbestosis can expect an average life span of around 10 years following diagnosis. However, this number is not set in stone and depends on various conditions and personal health factors.



Factors Influencing Life Expectancy




Severity of the Disease: The extent of lung damage plays a crucial role. Those with mild cases may live longer than those with severe symptoms.



Progression Speed: The rate at which the disease worsens is critical. Slower progression can mean a longer life expectancy.



Age at Diagnosis: Younger patients diagnosed with asbestosis may have a better prognosis than older individuals.



Overall Health: Co-existing health conditions like heart disease or diabetes can affect longevity.



Lifestyle Choices: Smoking can exacerbate asbestosis and shorten life expectancy, while healthy living may have the opposite effect.




Managing Asbestosis for Better Outcomes



Effective management of asbestosis can potentially improve quality of life and overall survival. Here are some strategies:




Regular Medical Monitoring: Consistent check-ups help in managing symptoms and catching complications early.



Medications and Treatments: While there's no cure, treatments like inhalers and oxygen therapy can improve breathing.



Lifestyle Adjustments: Quitting smoking, following a balanced diet, and engaging in moderate exercise can enhance lung function.




Understanding the nuances of asbestosis and its impact can empower patients and their families to make informed decisions regarding treatment and lifestyle adjustments. Each individual’s journey is unique, making personalized medical advice essential.



Managing Asbestosis at Home: Essential Tips



Embrace a Healthy Lifestyle



If you're managing asbestosis, adopting a healthy lifestyle is crucial. Here's what you can do:




Quit Smoking: Eliminate tobacco use entirely. This is vital since smoking accelerates disease progression. Consider seeking support to help you quit, such as counseling or nicotine replacement therapies.



Improve Air Quality: Ensure the air around you is clean and free from pollutants. Avoid areas with high levels of allergens, pollution, and secondhand smoke.




Stay Hydrated and Eat Well




Hydration: Keep your body well-hydrated by drinking plenty of water throughout the day. This helps to keep your system flushed and functioning optimally.



Nutritious Diet: Focus on a balanced diet rich in fruits, vegetables, lean proteins, and whole grains. Proper nutrition strengthens your immune system and supports overall health.




Avoid Infections




Good Hygiene: Practice thorough handwashing regularly to minimize exposure to germs. Maintain distance from individuals who are unwell to reduce your risk of catching infections.




Incorporate Exercise Wisely




Regular Physical Activity: Engage in exercises that are safe and beneficial for you. Before starting any routine, discuss it with your healthcare provider to tailor a plan suited to your needs.




By implementing these strategies, you can effectively manage asbestosis symptoms at home, improving your quality of life.



Understanding Asbestosis-Related Complications



Asbestosis can lead to several serious complications, especially if left unmanaged. Breathing issues, such as persistent coughing and shortness of breath, are common early symptoms. Over time, more critical and potentially life-threatening conditions may develop.



Potential Complications Include:




Increased Risk of Lung Cancer: The risk of developing lung cancer is significantly heightened, particularly among those who also smoke. The combination of cigarette smoke and asbestos exposure is especially dangerous.



Mesothelioma Development: This rare cancer affects the lining of the lungs, chest, or abdomen. Even minimal exposure to asbestos can eventually result in mesothelioma, which underscores the importance of early detection and management.



Respiratory Failure: As the disease progresses, the lungs may struggle to transfer oxygen efficiently, leading to increased carbon dioxide levels in the body, a condition known as respiratory failure.



Heart Issues: Complications can extend to the cardiovascular system, sometimes resulting in right-sided heart failure. This occurs when the heart's right ventricle cannot pump effectively due to increased pressure in the lungs.




By understanding these potential complications, individuals can better manage their health and seek timely medical attention to mitigate risks.



Understanding the Timeline for Asbestosis Development



Asbestosis is a lung condition that develops from prolonged exposure to asbestos fibers. The timeline for developing this condition can vary significantly.



Latent Period




Decades of Delay: It often takes several decades for symptoms to manifest. People may not notice any signs of asbestosis until many years after their initial exposure.



Average Onset: Symptoms typically develop 20 to 30 years after exposure begins. This extended latency period means individuals might not connect their symptoms to past asbestos contact.




Why the Delay?



The prolonged latency period results from the gradual accumulation of asbestos fibers in the lungs, which eventually leads to inflammation and scarring as the body's response. Over time, this causes the condition to progress and symptoms to emerge.



Common First Signs




Breathlessness: One of the earliest symptoms is shortness of breath, often noticed during physical activity.



Persistent Cough: A continuous, dry cough can be an early indication of asbestosis.




Despite the extended timeframe, regular health check-ups and early detection can help manage symptoms and improve quality of life. If you suspect previous asbestos exposure, consult a healthcare provider for a thorough evaluation.



How Common is Asbestosis?



Asbestosis, a serious lung condition caused by asbestos exposure, affects a significant number of people, particularly those exposed in workplaces. The World Health Organization (WHO) highlights that millions are at risk due to this hazardous material.



Long Latency Period



One of the challenges in determining the exact prevalence of asbestosis is its long latency period. Symptoms often do not manifest until 30 to 40 years after initial exposure, making it difficult to calculate current statistics accurately.



Risk of Development



Research indicates a notable risk factor: around 20% of individuals exposed to asbestos might develop an asbestos-related disease during their lifetime. However, not all of these cases will be diagnosed as asbestosis.



Beyond Asbestosis



It's essential to recognize that asbestos exposure doesn't only lead to asbestosis. Other possible health issues include:




Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD)



Pleural Effusion



Certain types of lung cancer, such as pleural mesothelioma




In summary, while estimating the exact number of those affected by asbestosis is complex, the condition remains a serious concern due to the widespread exposure to asbestos and the array of diseases it can cause. Awareness and protective measures are crucial to address and mitigate these health risks.



Asbestos-Related Lung Cancer



According to the Environmental Working Group (EWG), asbestos-related lung cancer is diagnosed more than any other type of asbestos-related illness. 



Up to 10,000 asbestos-related lung cancer fatalities occur annually in the United States. Asbestos-related lung cancer occurs when asbestos fibers are inhaled and become stuck in the lungs.



After years of being lodged in the lungs, these fibers eventually cause cell damage and form tumors. 



Per the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA), the higher the amount of fibers lodged in the lungs, the higher the risk that the victim will develop lung cancer.



Symptoms of Asbestos Lung Cancer



Lung cancer symptoms are similar, regardless of the cause: 




A persistent cough



Blood with coughing



Shortness of breath and difficulty breathing



Chest pains



Chest tightness and discomfort



Wheezing



Loss of appetite and weight loss



Fatigue



Chronic respiratory infections




Smoking and Asbestos-Related Lung Cancer



Smoking can also play a part in asbestos-related lung cancer. If the victim is a smoker, the chances of developing lung cancer triples.



In many instances, lung cancer related to smoking can get confused with asbestos-related lung cancer. Because of this, the Helsinki Criteria were created to help determine if lung cancer is asbestos-related or from other forms.



The Helsinki Criteria mandates that the lung cancer must have developed at least ten years after asbestos exposure, that a high percentage of asbestos must be found in the lungs, and that the victim must have had prolonged and a high amount of asbestos exposure.



Other Cancers Caused By Asbestos



Although mesothelioma and asbestos-related lung cancer are the most prevalent diseases caused by asbestos, exposure may contribute to other types. 



Other Respiratory Cancers



Inhalation is the most common route of asbestos exposure, which increases the risk for several types of cancers related to the respiratory system: 




Pharyngeal cancer 



Laryngeal cancer 



Esophageal cancer



Throat cancer




Ovarian Cancer



Asbestos has more recently been associated with ovarian cancer. Studies have found that women with a history of work-related asbestos exposure have higher rates of ovarian cancer. 



Another source of exposure that might lead to ovarian cancer is talcum powder. Thousands of lawsuits in recent years have shown that women who used talcum powder for many years were at a higher risk of developing cancer. This is likely due to asbestos contamination in talc. 



Gastrointestinal Cancers



Asbestos exposure may cause or increase the risk of some types of gastrointestinal cancers. While inhalation is the most common route of exposure to asbestos fibers, they can also be ingested. 



Ingestion of asbestos fibers can lead to peritoneal mesothelioma, the type of mesothelioma that develops in the abdominal cavity. It may also lead to other types of abdominal cancers: 




Stomach cancer



Colorectal cancer



Bile duct cancer




Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)



Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a respiratory illness characterized by blocked airways. 



COPD mainly affects smokers, but people exposed to asbestos and other dangerous substances are also at risk. Studies suggest at least 15% of all COPD cases are associated with work-related activities, such as inhaling asbestos fibers while at a job site.



COPD is a progressive disease that gets worse over time. It manifests itself as either chronic bronchitis or emphysema. 



Symptoms and Statistics



Those with COPD often suffer from a persistent, hacking cough accompanied by sputum. They may also experience difficulty breathing, fatigue, weight loss, and tightness in the chest. 



COPD affects an estimated 24 million Americans and is the fourth leading cause of death in the U.S.



Treatment Options



There is no cure for COPD. However, it can be managed by various treatments, including bronchodilators, anti-inflammatory drugs, and, in extreme cases, oxygen therapy. 



People with COPD can also take preventive measures to avoid exposure to second-hand cigarette smoke and other pollutants.



Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD)



Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a medical condition caused by exposure to harmful pollutants and underlying disorders. Asbestosis is the name for ILD caused by asbestos exposure. 



Regardless of how ILD develops, all cases are marked by excessive and irreversible lung scarring. 



Although treatment can't reverse lung scarring, it can help prevent additional scarring and reduce the risks of other medical complications.



Pleural Effusion



Pleural effusion is a fluid buildup between the tissues around the lungs and the chest cavity. 



Usually, the body makes a small amount of fluid to lubricate the pleural lining surrounding the lungs. However, lung injuries and diseases can cause the formation of abnormal buildups of pleural fluid.



Pleural effusions can make breathing difficult because the fluid pushes on or displaces lung tissue.



Pleural effusions alone are not life-threatening, but the conditions that create them are, such as mesothelioma. 



Although the effusions usually resolve within three months, they recur frequently. 



Treatment options include medications and thoracoscopic surgery, which entails draining the excessive fluid.



Pleural Thickening and Pleural Plaques



Pleural plaques are areas of thickened tissue in the pleura, the tissue that surrounds the lungs. They are common after asbestos exposure and are not usually a significant health problem. They may cause some difficulty with breathing. 



Diffuse pleural thickening occurs when larger areas of the pleura thicken. This can cause more severe and debilitating symptoms. Neither condition is malignant, but they may indicate a higher risk of cancer developing later. 



Diagnosing and Treating Asbestos Diseases



Diagnosis and treatment vary depending on the type of disease. Diagnosis can be difficult because asbestos diseases are not very common. If you have or suspect you have a history of asbestos exposure, you must inform your doctor. This will help guide the diagnostic process.



Your healthcare provider will examine you and ask about your medical history. Remember to tell them about your exposure to any harmful substances like asbestos. This is crucial for making a more accurate diagnosis, especially if you have symptoms.



If you've been exposed to asbestos, regular screenings are essential. Your healthcare provider may order specific tests to complete the diagnosis. These might include:




A chest X-ray to look for irregularities in the lungs.



A computed tomography (CT) scan for more detailed imaging.



Lung function tests like spirometry to assess breathing capacity.



Bronchoscopy to examine the airways directly.




Treatment for asbestos illnesses is most effective when it begins early. The sooner you can get a diagnosis and start treatment, the better your prognosis will be. If you are unhappy with a diagnosis, don’t hesitate to seek a second opinion.



By understanding the steps involved in diagnosing asbestosis, you can better prepare for discussions with your healthcare provider and advocate for your health.



Legal Assistance



If you've been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you'll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area.

### The Coast Guard, Asbestos Exposure, and Mesothelioma

The U.S. Coast Guard has a long history of asbestos use on its vessels. Asbestos on ships and in equipment exposed countless Coast Guard veterans who are now at risk of developing mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses. Coast Guard veterans with mesothelioma are eligible for healthcare and other benefits. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













Why Are Coast Guard Veterans at Risk for Mesothelioma? 



Out of approximately 3,000 new cases in the U.S. every year, 30% of mesothelioma diagnoses are in veterans. All branches of the military, including the Coast Guard, used asbestos extensively and put service members at risk of exposure and later illness. 



Like the U.S. Navy, the Coast Guard operated ships and boats built with large amounts of asbestos in many components. Asbestos was used to insulate and protect against heat and friction in gaskets, insulation, steam pipes, boilers, and many other components. 



Even protective clothing worn by damage control parties to fight shipboard fires had asbestos fibers woven into their material. This was done to protect ships and crews from fires, especially at sea. Even the bases and shore installations used by the Coast Guard contained asbestos. 



"Asbestos use in the Coast Guard put veterans at risk for mesothelioma, lung cancer, asbestosis, and other illnesses. Prolonged exposure to asbestos fibers can lead to severe health complications, often manifesting only after several decades.



While symptoms may take years to surface, the resulting conditions are frequently incurable and terminal. The risk is particularly concerning because, by the time symptoms emerge, significant and irreversible damage may have already occurred.



Associated Health Conditions




Mesothelioma: A rare and aggressive cancer primarily affecting the lining of the lungs and abdomen.



Lung Cancer: Often indistinguishable from other forms of lung cancer, but with a direct link to asbestos exposure.



Asbestosis: A chronic lung disease causing scarring of lung tissue, leading to severe breathing difficulties.




Understanding the impact of asbestos exposure is crucial for those who served, as early detection and intervention can play a critical role in managing these serious health issues."



Which Veterans Are Most at Risk for Mesothelioma? 



All Coast Guard veterans are at risk, but some were more likely to experience ongoing exposure than others: 




Shipyard and ship insulators



Ship inspectors



Boiler room workers



Engine room workers



Vessel renovators



Construction workers



Demolition workers




What Benefits Are Available to Coast Guard Veterans With Mesothelioma? 



If you have mesothelioma or another asbestos illness related to your time serving in the Coast Guard, you could be eligible for one or more types of benefits and compensation. 



VA Compensation for Coast Guard Veterans



The Coast Guard is part of the U.S. Armed Forces, so veterans are entitled to benefits offered by the U.S. Veterans Administration (VA). The VA provides disability compensation to qualifying veterans, which is a tax-free monthly payment designed to support those who have sustained a service-connected disability.



A service-connected disability occurs when an injury or illness arises from duties performed in the military, impacting everyday functioning. The VA determines your degree of disability through medical records or a VA-administered health examination. This assessment results in a disability rating, expressed as a percentage. The higher the percentage, the more significant the disability and, consequently, the higher your monthly payout.



Monthly disability compensation varies depending on your degree of disability. The VA assigns a 100% disability rating to mesothelioma and asbestos lung cancer. Veterans with these illnesses and the required documentation are entitled to full disability payments.



Additionally, the VA offers special disability compensation to certain veterans. If you have mesothelioma and need care in your home, you could qualify for this additional benefit.



By understanding these details, Coast Guard veterans can better navigate their eligibility for disability compensation and ensure they receive the support they're entitled to for their service-connected conditions.



Specialized Healthcare for Veterans



Veterans can receive medical care at VA medical centers across the U.S. Because mesothelioma rates are so high in veterans, several VA facilities offer specialist mesothelioma care and treatment for other asbestos illnesses. 



Some VA medical centers with access to mesothelioma specialists are in Houston, Boston, Los Angeles, and Miami. These facilties connect with local hospitals, giving veterans access to even more specialists. 



Benefits for Dependents and Family Members



Monthly disability compensation for veterans with mesothelioma includes additional payment for spouses, dependent children, and, in some cases, parents. 



Families can also apply for dependency and indemnity compensation, payments to certain family members after the death of a veteran. Funeral benefits are also available. 



Benefits Available to Civilian Employees Exposed to Asbestos in Coast Guard Shipyards



Civilian employees working in Coast Guard shipyards and exposed to asbestos face unique challenges. Although they aren't eligible for VA benefits, there are still several avenues for support available to them:



Federal Employee Health Benefits (FEHB)



For those looking for healthcare coverage, the Federal Employee Health Benefits program is a valuable resource. This program extends its coverage to Coast Guard civilian employees, retirees, and their families. Surviving family members may also utilize the program following the employee's death. Eligible recipients include spouses, children up to the age of 26, and adult disabled children unable to support themselves.



Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI)



Social Security Disability Insurance offers financial relief for those unable to work due to a disability. This program provides monthly, tax-free payments to eligible individuals whose disabilities are anticipated to last more than a year or result in death. To be eligible, individuals must have paid into the Social Security system through either payroll or self-employment taxes and demonstrate their disability to the Social Security Administration.



Supplemental Security Income (SSI)



Supplemental Security Income is designed for individuals over 65 or those with disabilities who have limited income and resources. Recipients can receive SSI benefits without having contributed to Social Security. Application for both SSI and SSDI can be completed online or in person at your local Social Security office.



These programs provide a safety net for civilian employees facing health issues due to asbestos exposure, helping to mitigate financial burdens and provide necessary support.



Can Veterans Sue the Coast Guard for Asbestos Exposure? 



Veterans cannot sue the military or federal government for asbestos exposure during service. The VA offers benefits that compensate injured and ill veterans for service-related harm. 



Understanding the VA Pension: Eligibility and Benefits



The VA pension is a financial assistance program designed for veterans who served during times of war and have a low income. It is distinct from disability benefits and does not require a service-connected disability for eligibility.



Eligibility Requirements:



To qualify for the VA pension, veterans must meet several criteria:




Service During Wartime: The veteran must have actively served during designated wartime periods.



Income Guidelines: Only those with limited financial resources are eligible, emphasizing the program's focus on low-income individuals.



Age or Disability Considerations: While a service-connected disability is not necessary, some general age or disability conditions may enhance eligibility for additional benefits.



Net Payment Rule: If a veteran qualifies for both a pension and disability compensation, they will receive the payment that results in the highest net benefit. However, it's important to note that both benefits cannot be claimed simultaneously.




Additional Benefits:



Veterans receiving a VA pension may also qualify for:




Aid and Attendance Allowance: Designed for veterans requiring assistance with daily activities due to disabilities.



Housebound Benefits: Available to veterans whose disabilities significantly limit their ability to leave their home.




These supplemental benefits aim to provide additional financial support to those veterans facing significant day-to-day living challenges due to disabilities.



For veterans and their families, understanding the intricacies of these benefits can be crucial in securing the support they need.



Understanding VA Health Care: What It Is and What It Covers



VA Health Care is a comprehensive medical service program exclusively for veterans who have served on active duty and received an honorable discharge or a discharge that isn’t dishonorable. This program aims to ensure that those who have served the nation receive the necessary health services as part of their benefits.



What Does VA Health Care Cover?



VA Health Care offers a broad range of services, including but not limited to:




Preventive Care: Routine check-ups, vaccinations, and regular health screenings to maintain your well-being.



Diagnostic Tests: Various tests and assessments to diagnose potential health issues accurately.



Medical Treatment: Access to treatments for a wide array of medical conditions. This includes consultations with specialists and hospitalization if needed.



Therapy: Includes physical therapy, mental health counseling, and other therapeutic services to aid recovery and support mental health.



Rehabilitation: Essential services to help veterans recover from physical injuries or surgeries.



Acute Care: Urgent medical attention for accidents, sudden illnesses, or severe health issues.



Prescription Drugs: Medications prescribed by VA health professionals, ensuring veterans have access to necessary pharmaceuticals.




Accessibility and Additional Support



Veterans can receive these medical services through their local VA medical centers or VA health clinics. If a specific service is unavailable in the immediate vicinity, third-party clinics that have been approved by the VA may also be used. Additionally, the program provides reimbursement for travel expenses if veterans need to travel long distances for their medical treatments.



For those diagnosed with mesothelioma or similar conditions related to asbestos exposure during their service, VA Health Care may offer specialized care at no cost. This commitment highlights the program's focus on meeting the unique medical needs of veterans effectively.



Other Options for Compensation - Lawsuits and Asbestos Trusts



Although veterans cannot sue the military, they can sue asbestos companies for compensation. Many companies supplied the Coast Guard and other branches of the military with asbestos materials. Veterans can hold them accountable in one of two ways: 




Mesothelioma lawsuit. If the asbestos companies involved are still in business, you can sue them for damages. Most mesothelioma lawsuits end in settlements for the victim. 



Asbestos trust fund claim. If the companies went bankrupt, you could be eligible for an asbestos trust fund claim. Bankrupt companies were required to set up these trusts to compensate future claimants with asbestos illnesses. 




Talk to an experienced asbestos or mesothelioma lawyer to take these steps. Asbestos cases and claims can be very complicated. The right law firm will have the resources available to gather evidence, prove your case, and get you a settlement.



What Damages May Be Recoverable in a Lawsuit Related to Asbestos Exposure?



If you've been affected by asbestos exposure, it's crucial to understand the potential damages you may be entitled to recover through a lawsuit. Below is a breakdown of compensations often sought in these cases:




Healthcare Costs: This includes any expenses for medical treatments, hospital stays, doctor’s visits, medications, and ongoing care related to the exposure.



Lost Income: If the exposure has affected your ability to work, you may be able to claim compensation for lost wages or reduced earning capacity.



Domestic Services: Any costs incurred from needing help with household tasks due to your condition might be recoverable.



Physical and Emotional Distress: This covers compensation for both the physical pain and the emotional suffering endured as a result of the exposure.



Consortium Loss: Compensation might be sought if the exposure has adversely affected your relationship with your spouse.



Psychological Impact: This includes the compensation for mental distress such as anxiety or depression triggered by your medical condition.



Diminished Quality of Life: If your ability to enjoy daily activities and overall quality of life has been compromised, this can also form part of your claim.




Each case is unique, and the damages awarded can vary significantly. Consulting with legal experts can provide guidance tailored to your specific situation.



Understanding who may be liable for asbestos exposure in the U.S. Coast Guard involves looking beyond the military itself. Primarily, liability extends to the manufacturers and suppliers of asbestos-containing products used by the military. These companies, despite knowing the risks, continued to sell their hazardous products, often leading to devastating health issues for those in contact with them.



Here are some potential parties that might be held accountable:




Manufacturers: Companies that produced asbestos materials knew of the risks but failed to warn users or provide safer alternatives.



Distributors and Suppliers: Entities that distributed or supplied asbestos products to military branches can also be liable. They played a pivotal role in the asbestos supply chain.



Contractors and Subcontractors: Businesses hired to install or maintain asbestos-containing products could also be at fault if they failed to adhere to safety protocols or misrepresented the dangers.




Affected individuals, including active-duty personnel and civilian workers, may have legal grounds to seek compensation. This extends to surviving family members, who could file claims on behalf of loved ones impacted by asbestos-related illnesses.



Types of Compensation: Compensation can include costs for medical treatment, loss of income, and emotional damages. Additional damages might cover pain and suffering, reduced quality of life, and even legal penalties against negligent companies.



Legal Considerations: It's essential to be aware of legal nuances, such as statutes of limitations or jurisdictional limitations on damages. Therefore, contacting an experienced asbestos attorney swiftly is crucial for exploring your legal options and organizing a strong case.



Several companies have historically been known to supply asbestos-containing products to the military. These include well-known manufacturers and suppliers from both the insulation and construction industries, as well as other specialized sectors.



Key Companies in Asbestos Supply to the Military:




AO Smith Water Products Company - This company was involved in producing various industrial and commercial products, which included materials containing asbestos.



Metalclad Insulation Corporation - Specialized in insulation materials, this corporation provided products that often incorporated asbestos for its heat-resistant properties.



Owens-Illinois - Renowned for its glass products, Owens-Illinois also distributed asbestos-containing materials used extensively in military applications.



Fibreboard Corporation - A major player in the manufacturing of construction materials, Fibreboard Corporation supplied asbestos products that were utilized in numerous military infrastructure projects.



John Crane, Inc. - Known for its mechanical products, John Crane, Inc. offered components that included asbestos, employed in various military machinery and equipment.




These companies contributed significantly to the military’s reliance on asbestos for its durability and fire-resistant characteristics, despite the health risks that eventually surfaced.



Asbestos in Coast Guard Vessels



The U.S. Navy is larger and often gets more attention for past asbestos use, but the Coast Guard also used asbestos in all its major vessels throughout much of the 20th Century. 



Many high-endurance cutters launched between 1939 and 1980 contained substantial amounts of ACMs, and many veterans were exposed to asbestos on them. 



Asbestos in Coast Guard Stations and Buildings



Although the Coast Guard is smaller than the Navy, it has a nationwide network of bases, air stations, headquarters, repair facilities, and administration buildings to support its sea and air assets. Some of these facilities are relatively new and were built with materials that don’t contain asbestos.



However, many Coast Guard shore installations date from as far back as the 1800s. Even those Coast Guard buildings renovated between 1915 and 1980 include asbestos materials.



Asbestos-based products, including flooring material, roof tiles, insul, and even wiring, were used in berthing spaces, repair shops, barracks, dependent housing, and schools.



Under most conditions, asbestos is harmless if it’s left undisturbed. However, activities such as repairs or renovations stir up “friable” asbestos fibers and release them into the environment.



Coast Guard regulations now state that “(u)nprotected personnel shall not be exposed to airborne asbestos fiber concentrations greater than 0.1 fibers per cubic centimeter [0.1 f/cc) averaged over an eight-hour day.” Health experts have determined that exposures that exceed these levels pose serious health risks.



The Coast Guard also prohibits using ACMs even though there are no satisfactory substitutes. This requirement applies to shipboard use, shore installations, and aircraft.



Examples of United States Coast Guard Locations Associated with Asbestos Use:




Mt. Edgecumb Coast Guard barracks, Sitka, Alaska



U.S. Coast Guard, Alameda, California



U.S. Coast Guard, 12th District, San Francisco, California



U.S. Coast Guard Yard, Curtis Bay, Baltimore, Maryland



U.S. Coast Guard ET Shop/ CGES Warehouse Building # 105, San Juan, Puerto Rico



U.S. Coast Guard, Mess Hall, Building 39, Alameda, California



U.S. Coast Guard, Mess Hall, Building 9, Benicia, California



U.S. Coast Guard, Pier 16, Long Beach, California



U.S. Coast Guard, Terminal Island, California



U.S. Coast Guard, Sebago Lake, Maine



U.S. Coast Guard Air Station, Borinquen, Puerto Rico



U.S. Coast Guard Air Station, San Francisco, California



U.S. Coast Guard Air Station, St. Petersburg, Florida



U.S. Coast Guard Navigation School, Groton, Connecticut



U.S. Coast Guard, Gulfport, Mississippi



U.S. Coast Guard, Loran-A Radar Station: Ocean Cape, Spruce Cape, and  Biorka, Alaska



U.S. Coast Guard Air Station, New York, New York



U.S. Coast Guard Station, Tybee Island, Georgia



U.S. Coast Guard Station, Islamorada, Florida



U.S. Coast Guard Station, Panama City, Florida



U.S. Coast Guard Station, Yankeetown, Florida




Are Coast Guard Service Members Still at Risk of Asbestos Exposure?



Unfortunately, the dangers of asbestos have not disappeared. Asbestos was used so heavily that it has been impossible to abate or replace it all, especially in buildings. Many military installations, including Coast Guard bases, still have asbestos in buildings, barracks, and housing. The asbestos should be contained, but if disturbed, could cause exposure.



The Hidden Dangers of Asbestos



Asbestos poses a significant health hazard when its fibers are damaged or disturbed, causing them to become airborne. At this point, they can be easily inhaled. These fibers are microscopic, making them invisible to the naked eye, which adds to their danger. Furthermore, there are no immediate symptoms to alert individuals that they have inhaled these harmful fibers, allowing health risks to go unnoticed until they develop into serious conditions.



Monitoring and Prevention



The Coast Guard’s Occupational Medical Surveillance & Evaluation Program provides Coast Guardsmen with monitoring for exposure to asbestos and other toxic chemicals. Current service members and veterans can undergo medical screenings through this program to catch illnesses earlier. This proactive approach is crucial in environments where asbestos could still be present, ensuring any health impacts are identified and managed promptly.



By understanding both the pervasive presence of asbestos and the invisible nature of its fibers, service members can better appreciate the need for vigilance and regular health monitoring.



Legal Help and Additional Information



Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. Keep in mind that if you have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for considerable compensation. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### The Air Force, Asbestos, and Mesothelioma

The U.S. Air Force used asbestos throughout bases, aircraft, and vehicles. Many Air Force veterans were exposed to asbestos and developed an asbestos-related disease, while more are still at risk of developing lung cancer, asbestosis, and mesothelioma. VA benefits are available to those who qualify. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim and much more. 













Are Air Force Veterans at Risk for Mesothelioma? 



Mesothelioma is a rare cancer caused by asbestos exposure. Approximately 3,000 Americans are diagnosed with mesothelioma every year. Thirty percent of people diagnosed with mesothelioma are veterans, including U.S. Air Force veterans. 



This high proportion of veterans with mesothelioma is a result of the heavy use of asbestos in all military branches for several decades. 



The military used asbestos for its insulating properties. It was cheap and abundant and could be used in ships, aircraft, buildings, vehicles, and equipment to insulate and protect against fire. 



The military no longer uses asbestos and has abated much of it from existing equipment and structures. But, the latency period of mesothelioma is long, and veterans are still at risk of diagnosis. 



Veterans may experience a long latency period before mesothelioma symptoms become apparent. This period can span anywhere from 10 to 50 years. As a result, many veterans only discover their condition decades after their military service, given the disease's protracted development timeline.



Are Air Force Veterans at Risk for Other Asbestos Illnesses? 



Yes, asbestos exposure during service can cause mesothelioma but also several other illnesses: 




Lung cancer



Other cancers



Asbestosis




How Did the U.S. Air Force Use Asbestos? 



Established in 1947 by the National Security Act, the U.S. Air Force is the aerial warfare branch of the military and the youngest of the nation’s armed forces. Originally part of the U.S. Army and operating under various names from 1907 to 1947, the Air Force has participated in many military and humanitarian operations. 



Asbestos use throughout the U.S. and the military peaked during the early years of the Air Force and continued for decades.



The U.S. government became one of the asbestos industry’s largest customers. Every branch of the military wanted to protect personnel, facilities, and equipment from fire, extreme heat, and electric shocks. At the time, asbestos was touted as a safe and efficient fire and heat-resistance mineral.



Every air base built between 1907 and 1980 was constructed with ACMs. This includes facilities set up when the Air Force was a semi-independent organization within the Army. 



The most extensive use of asbestos occurred between 1939 and the early 1970s, which coincided with the Army Air Force’s expansion during World War II, the establishment of the independent service, and the Cold War.



Peak Use of Asbestos By the Air Force During World War II



To understand the magnitude of the Air Force’s asbestos problem, it is important to remember that by July of 1944, the then-Army Air Forces operated 79,908 aircraft and had 2.4 million members. 



During World War II, the Air Force built hundreds of bases in the U.S. and overseas, using asbestos in many areas while expanding those already in existence.



While not all Air Force veterans who served in the 1940s suffered from the effects of asbestos-related diseases, many were put at risk.



Post-World War II Asbestos Use in the Air Force



During post-World War II, the independent Air Force still had many bases and installations that contained asbestos. Further, many aircraft built between 1947 and 1980 included parts made with ACMs.



Starting in 1973, studies by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officially linked asbestos exposure to lung cancer, asbestosis, and malignant mesothelioma. 



The Defense Department stopped using asbestos and ACMs for new construction and in Air Force equipment in 1980, but many older installations still contain large amounts of the cancer-causing material.



Where Did the Air Force Use Asbestos? 



The Air Force used asbestos for decades for its ability to insulate and protect against fire. The most important uses were in buildings and aircraft. 



Asbestos in Air Force Bases and Housing



Construction is one of the industries that used the most asbestos materials for both civilian and military buildings. Many Air Force buildings were constructed with asbestos in: 




Insulation



Siding



Roofing materials



Drywall



Caulking



Adhesives



Soundproofing



Cement



Vinyl flooring




Asbestos that is well contained and maintained poses no risks. However, the men and women who installed these items were at risk of exposure. Anyone working near these materials as they deteriorate can also be exposed. 



Some Air Force bases contained so much asbestos that they became ongoing health hazards that required cleanup. One example is Lowry Air Force Base in Denver, Colorado, which has risked contaminating nearby residents with toxic chemicals and asbestos.



How Secondhand Asbestos Exposure Affects Air Force Families and Civilians



When Air Force veterans came into contact with asbestos-contaminated products, they often unknowingly carried asbestos dust on their clothing or belongings. This dust could easily be transferred to family members at home. As a result, loved ones faced significant health risks, including asbestosis, mesothelioma, and other asbestos-related diseases.



The danger wasn't limited to military families. Civilians living and working near contaminated Air Force bases, like Lowry, also faced potential exposure. These communities were at risk because of their proximity to areas with high levels of asbestos contamination.



The presence of asbestos at these bases not only posed a direct threat to the personnel stationed there but also extended to the broader communities, making it a public health concern. The impact of secondhand exposure highlights the need for comprehensive cleanup efforts to protect both military and civilian populations.



To effectively manage asbestos risks, Air Force bases must follow strict protocols. These guidelines, first developed in 1986 by the USAF Occupational and Environmental Health Laboratory, align with Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards for minimizing asbestos exposure.



Key actions required include:




Regular Monitoring: Bases must conduct air sampling every six months to detect any airborne asbestos particles.



Asbestos Abatement Plans: It is essential for each base to implement and maintain a robust asbestos abatement plan to address any identified issues promptly.




In 2014, further directives enhanced these requirements. The Air Force Policy Directives (AFPD) 32-10 and 32-70 established comprehensive asbestos management principles. These directives ensure that all Air Force facilities and programs maintain consistent asbestos management practices.



However, adhering to these protocols remains crucial, as some bases have fallen behind in compliance, according to a 2020 Department of Defense report. Neglect in these areas can continue to pose significant health risks to Air Force personnel.



Aircraft and Asbestos



The Air Force is known for its aircraft. Aircraft used in the military contained asbestos in: 




Brakes



Fireproofing materials



Gaskets



Heat shields



Valves




Mechanics who worked on these aircraft were at the greatest risk of asbestos exposure. When they repaired or replaced parts, they disturbed the materials, setting asbestos fibers loose that they could have inhaled. Anyone who worked near mechanics was also at risk. 



Are Current Members of the Air Force at Risk of Asbestos Exposure? 



Although the military no longer actively uses asbestos, it continues to be an ongoing risk for men and women serving in the Air Force. Asbestos lingers, especially in buildings where it can expose service members and their families. 




Natural disasters can create issues anywhere asbestos exists in buildings. In 2019, flooding at Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska caused structural damage to buildings. This disturbed asbestos and put airmen at risk of exposure. 





Sometimes, the danger comes from people violating safety or environmental laws. In 2021, employees of Balfour Beatty Communities, a private company that provides housing in the military, covered up information about poor housing conditions on Air Force bases. Their actions were fraudulent and put airmen and their families at risk of exposure to asbestos and other harmful substances. 




Regulations and Guidelines Safeguarding Air Force Veterans from Asbestos



Over the years, a variety of national regulations and guidelines have been designed to shield Air Force veterans from the dangers of asbestos exposure. These measures primarily aim to detect asbestos risks and ensure its safe removal.



Key Historical Regulations and Guidelines




1986 Guidelines by the USAF Occupational and Environmental Health Laboratory: This initiative established safety protocols for identifying asbestos-related hazards on Air Force bases. These guidelines were crafted following the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards, emphasizing the restriction of asbestos exposure.



Air Sampling and Abatement Plans: Air Force bases were instructed to conduct air samples biannually to monitor airborne asbestos levels. Additionally, each base needed to implement an asbestos abatement strategy to manage potential threats.




Policy Directives for Enhanced Safety



In 2014, the Air Force rolled out two crucial policy directives aimed at bolstering asbestos management:




AFPD 32-10: Focused on Installations and Facilities, ensuring that structures were maintained free from asbestos risks.



AFPD 32-70: Pertained to Environmental Quality, highlighting comprehensive asbestos management across all Air Force operations.




While these directives set a robust framework for safe asbestos handling, as per a 2020 report, not all bases fully adhere to these standards. Continued vigilance is necessary to prevent any risk of exposure to Air Force personnel.



What Mesothelioma Benefits Do Air Force Veterans Qualify For? 



Qualifying veterans and their families have access to several types of compensation and benefits through the VA: 




Disability compensation. This type of benefit provides monthly compensation based on the severity of the disability. The VA gives mesothelioma a disability rating of 100%. Qualifying veterans are entitled to maximum compensation. 



Special Monthly Compensation. Veterans who need care in their homes may be eligible for additional monthly compensation to cover the costs. 



Dependency and Indemnity Compensation. Surviving spouses and dependants can apply for this type of compensation. Parents of deceased veterans may also qualify for this benefit.




How Much Compensation Can Air Force Veterans with Mesothelioma Receive from VA Benefits?



Air Force veterans diagnosed with mesothelioma may be eligible for significant monthly compensation through VA benefits. In 2021, veterans with this condition could receive approximately $3,100 each month.



Factors Influencing Compensation




Dependent and Spousal Support: Veterans with dependents and spouses may qualify for additional financial support, resulting in higher monthly payments.



Disability Ratings: Mesothelioma is typically assigned a 100% disability rating, ensuring maximum compensation. However, other asbestos-related illnesses are often rated lower, which can affect the compensation amount.




These elements indicate that while the baseline payment is substantial, individual circumstances such as family status and disease severity can influence the final benefits.



How to File for VA Benefits



If you are an Air Force veteran with an asbestos illness, you must file a claim to receive benefits. The VA requires that you prove you have a disease caused by asbestos and that you encountered asbestos during your military service. To apply, you'll need: 




Service records that indicate you were in a position that was likely to have exposed you to asbestos



Medical records that detail your diagnosis



A statement from a doctor that your illness was caused by asbestos exposure




You can file a claim without assistance, but to speed the process and get the best outcome, rely on an experienced asbestos attorney. They can get the claim done fast and with all the right information so your benefits are not delayed. 



Are There Other Ways for Veterans to Get Benefits? 



Air Force veterans can seek benefits from the VA but cannot sue the government or military for past asbestos exposure. Veterans can, however, sue the companies that provided the military with asbestos. 



They can file a lawsuit that could end in a settlement or jury award. If the asbestos companies went bankrupt, they can file a claim with an asbestos trust fund. Some of the companies that supplied the Air Force with asbestos materials include: 




Bendix



Cleaver Brooks



General Electric



Johns Manville



Owens-Corning



Pratt & Whitney



Raytheon




If you choose to seek compensation this way, you need the guidance of a mesothelioma lawyer. Asbestos lawsuits and claims are complicated. If you win compensation this way, it will not affect your VA benefits. 



Healthcare Benefits for Air Force Veterans With Mesothelioma



Veterans with mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses are also entitled to healthcare benefits. They can receive medical care at VA facilities. This includes specialist care for mesothelioma. Some of the VA medical centers that offer mesothelioma treatment include: 




VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA



VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA



Miami VA Healthcare System, Miami, FL



Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX




Understanding the Veterans Community Care Program (VCCP) and Its Benefits



The Veterans Community Care Program (VCCP) is an essential initiative designed to broaden healthcare access for veterans. It empowers those who have served by allowing them to receive medical services from non-VA healthcare providers when certain criteria are met.



How Does the VCCP Assist Veterans?




Expanded Access to Care: For veterans who live far from VA facilities, the VCCP offers a crucial lifeline. It enables them to access healthcare services in their local areas, alleviating the burden of lengthy travel.



Specialized Treatment Options: Veterans can seek specialized treatment at institutions outside the VA network, ensuring they receive the care best suited to their unique medical needs.



Improved Healthcare Experience: By offering choices in providers, the program ensures veterans can receive timely and potentially higher-quality care, which can be pivotal for those with specific health conditions.




The VCCP thus plays a vital role in meeting the healthcare needs of veterans, ensuring flexibility and convenience while maintaining high standards of care.



United States Air Force Bases with Possible Asbestos Exposure



Alabama:




Maxwell AFB and Gunter Annex, Montgomery



Brookley AFB, Mobile




Alaska:




Eielson AFB, Moose Creek



Elmendorf-Richardson AFB, Anchorage



Ladd AFB, Fairbanks




Arizona:




Luke AFB, Glendale



Williams AFB, Mesa




California:




Edwards AFB, Rosamond



Hamilton Field AFB, San Pablo Bay



March Air Reserve Base, Riverside County



McClellan AFB, Riverside



Norton AFB, San Bernardino



Travis AFB, Travis



Vandenberg AFB, Lompoc




Colorado:




Lowry AFB, Denver




Delaware:




Dover AFB, Dover




Florida:




Eglin AFB, Eglin



Homestead AFB, Homestead



MacDill AFB, Tampa



Orlando AFB, Orlando



Patrick AFB, Brevard County



Tyndall AFB, Panama City




Georgia:




Dobbins AFB, Marietta



Hunter AFB, Savannah



Robins AFB, Warner Robins




Hawaii:




Hickam AFB, Oahu




Illinois:




Chanute AFB, Rantoul



Scott AFB, St. Clair County




Indiana:




Bakalar AFB, Columbus



Bunker Hill AFB, Kokomo




Kansas:




Forbes AFB, Topeka



McConnell AFB, Wichita



Schilling AFB, Saline County




Louisiana:




Barksdale AFB, Bossier City




Maine:




Air National Guard, Bangor



Loring AFB, Limestone




Massachusetts:  




Hanscom AFB, Hanscom



Westover Air Reserve, Springfield




Michigan:




K.I. Sawyer AFB, Marquette County



Selfridge AFB, Harrison




Minnesota:




Duluth Air National Guard, Duluth




Missouri:




Richards-Gebaur AFB, Kansas City



Whiteman AFB, Knob Noster




New York:




Griffiss AFB, Rome



Hancock AFB, Syracuse




Ohio:




Rickenbacker AFB, Columbus



Wright-Patterson AFB, Dayton




Oklahoma:




Tinker AFB, Oklahoma City




Pennsylvania:




Harrisburg Air National Guard, Harrisburg




Rhode Island:




Rhode Island Air National Guard




South Carolina:




Charleston AFB, Charleston



Donaldson AFB, Greenville



Shaw AFB, Sumter




South Dakota:




Ellsworth AFB, Piedmont




Tennessee:




Arnold AFB, Franklin County




Texas:




Amarillo AFB, Potter County



Bergstrom AFB, Austin



Brooks AFB, San Antonio



Naval Air Station Joint Reserve, Fort Worth



James Connally AFB, Waco



Goodfellow AFB, San Angelo



Kelly AFB, San Antonio



Laredo AFB, Laredo



Midland AFB, Midland/Odessa



Reese AFB, Fort Worth



Sheppard AFB, Wichita Falls




Utah:




Hill AFB, Ogden




Washington




Fairchild AFB, Spokane



Larson AFB, Grant County



McChord AFB, Pierce County




Wisconsin:




Truax AFB, Madison




Additional Information and Legal Assistance



If you have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may for significant compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### The Navy, Asbestos Exposure, and Mesothelioma

U.S. Navy veterans have some of the highest risk for developing mesothelioma of any group. The military, especially the Navy, used asbestos extensively in buildings, ships, vehicles, and more. Navy veterans with malignant mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses are entitled to benefits and compensation. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Why Are U.S. Navy Veterans at Risk for Mesothelioma? 



About 3,000 Americans receive a mesothelioma diagnosis every year. Approximately 30% of mesothelioma diagnoses are in veterans. Navy veterans are diagnosed with mesothelioma more than veterans from any other branch of the military. 



Veterans are at such high risk for mesothelioma because most were exposed to asbestos during their time in the service. For much of the Navy’s history, asbestos was linked to the safety of almost every ship in the fleet. 



From the early ironclads and steam frigates of the Civil War to the aircraft carriers built during World War II and most of the Cold War, most ships bearing the USS prefix before their names contained tons of asbestos. 



Exposure to asbestos is problematic anywhere. On ships, cramped spaces and poor ventilation worsened asbestos exposure and its consequences. 



Did the Navy Know Asbestos Was Hazardous to Human Health?



Indeed, the Navy was well-informed about the hazards associated with asbestos as early as the 1930s. Being at the forefront of research, it possessed extensive knowledge about the substance's health risks. Despite recognizing asbestos as a major occupational threat, the Navy believed these risks could be mitigated through diligent handling and safety measures.



By 1939, the Navy had implemented several safety protocols to manage asbestos exposure:




Dampening asbestos to minimize airborne particles



Mandating respirators for certain personnel



Supplying protective gloves




In environments where respirators were impractical, especially on ships, keeping asbestos wet was advised to reduce dust.



Even with its comprehensive understanding of asbestos dangers, the Navy delayed informing sailors and commanding officers until 1962. It was then that guidance on preventing asbestosis was distributed. However, this information was incomplete. At that time, the focus was wrongfully limited to long asbestos fibers, ignoring the lethal potential of even the tiniest particles, now known to contribute to diseases like mesothelioma.



How Did the Navy Use Asbestos on Ships? 



Navy vessels used asbestos in nearly every component for many decades. Asbestos was used to insulate ships, fireproof them, and to protect sailors and others from heat and fire. Some examples of where asbestos could be found on Navy vessels include: 




Insulation



Pipe lagging



Boilers



Engine rooms



Gaskets



Seals



Valves



Pumps



Bulkheads



Firefighting gear



Flooring 



Ceiling tiles



Paint



Textiles



Packing materials



Adhesives




Other Uses of Asbestos in the Navy



Ships and shipyards where service men and women worked on and repaired ships had the most asbestos. But, the U.S. Navy also used asbestos in equipment, vehicles, and aircraft. It went into components, like brakes and clutches, to protect against friction and heat.



Asbestos Exposure in Naval Shipyards



In naval shipyards, workers directly handled asbestos and its components, often during intense tasks like complete rip-outs of hulls, gaskets, and other parts laden with asbestos. Measurements from places like the Long Beach Naval Shipyard revealed asbestos levels ranging from 40 to 150 fibers per cubic centimeter during removal operations. This elevated exposure primarily occurred during the overhaul or reconversion of ships, where the removal of old insulation was common.



While pipe coverers wore protective gear, many nearby workers did not, leading to what's known as bystander exposure. This risk extended to insulation shop workers who faced asbestos exposure during both the installation and removal of insulation. In pipe covering shops, exposure happened during several processes, including:




Cutting hard pieces of asbestos with band saws



Manufacturing asbestos pipe covering



Cutting and pounding asbestos matting




Shipyard workers encountered asbestos not only in hulls and insulation but also during the installation, repair, and routine maintenance of engine parts, brakes, wallboards, and plumbing pipes. They faced exposure when working with wiring, adhesives, and industrial compounds. While asbestos exposure during shipbuilding primarily occurred until the late 1970s, it may still happen during repairs involving older ships.



Both the civilian and military construction industries also used a lot of asbestos. Barracks, offices, and other buildings on Navy bases were constructed with asbestos in the insulation, roofing materials, drywall, flooring tiles, and more. 



Which Navy Occupations Were Most at Risk for Asbestos Exposure? 



Anyone who served in the Navy was at risk for asbestos exposure and is now at risk for an asbestos illness. 



No amount of exposure is safe, but one or even a few exposures to asbestos are unlikely to cause mesothelioma. The Navy veterans at the highest risk for mesothelioma were repeatedly exposed to asbestos, usually on Navy ships. 



Navy occupations that put veterans at the greatest risk for developing asbestos illnesses later include: 




Boiler technicians



Engine operators



Firefighters



Gunners



Insulators



Machinists



Mechanics



Pipefitters



Welders




Any role that involved maintenance or repairs on ships put sailors at high risk of asbestos exposure. These workers often had to cut into or remove asbestos materials, which released fibers. Asbestos exposure was even more harmful in the small, poorly ventilated spaces on a vessel. 



When Did the Navy Use the Most Asbestos? 



The Navy’s use of asbestos and ACMs peaked between 1939 and the early 1970s. This period coincided with the fleet’s massive expansion due to American participation in World War II.



From 1939, the year the war began in Europe, until 1945, the U.S. built 124,000 ships of all types. Most were merchant ships needed to haul supplies and troops overseas, but many vessels were warships.



During the war, the Navy built ten battleships, 27 aircraft carriers,110 escort carriers, 211 submarines, and 907 cruisers, destroyers, and escort vessels. All of these vessels carried combustible fuel and an assortment of munitions. The Bureau of Ships required the use of asbestos in almost every part of each vessel as a safety measure.



Thousands of civilian shipyard workers throughout the U.S. were also exposed to asbestos. Many of these sailors and workers later developed asbestos-related illnesses.



The constant motion and vibration of naval ships contributed to the deterioration of asbestos-containing materials, leading to increased exposure risks. Shipyard workers were directly exposed while engaging in routine maintenance and repairs on engines, piping, and other mechanical components.



Naval shipyard workers faced significant asbestos exposure during operations such as:




Removing hulls, gaskets, and other parts with high asbestos content.



Cutting hard pieces of asbestos with band saws.



Manufacturing asbestos pipe coverings.



Handling insulation installation and removal.




Measurements from shipyards, like those at Long Beach, revealed asbestos levels ranging from 40 to 150 fibers per cubic centimeter during such activities. Despite pipe coverers wearing protective gear, nearby workers often did not, resulting in bystander exposure.



Asbestos exposure was particularly prevalent during shipbuilding until the late 1970s. However, encounters with asbestos can still occur today when conducting repairs or rip-outs on older vessels. These activities underscore the enduring health risks faced by shipyard workers.



Did the Navy Do Enough to Protect Workers from Asbestos Exposure?



The protection measures implemented by the Navy to safeguard workers from asbestos exposure have been scrutinized over time. While they did require workers who handled asbestos to wear protective gear, they fell short in critical areas.



Inadequate Asbestos Handling Measures




Containment Issues: The lack of proper containment meant that asbestos fibers were not restricted to specific areas. Without sealed environments, these fibers could easily spread, increasing exposure risks.



Preventative Measures for Nearby Workers: Unfortunately, the Navy did not extend protective measures to workers who were not directly handling asbestos, leaving many unprotected. As a result, fibers could freely circulate in shipyards and other work environments.



Air Quality Control: What stands out is that the air was not regularly monitored with HEPA filtration equipment, a standard protocol in industries handling asbestos today. This oversight likely contributed to the pervasive contamination.



Lack of Decontamination Protocols: There were no rigorous decontamination procedures for workers exiting contaminated zones, which means asbestos fibers could inadvertently be carried to non-contaminated areas.



Restrictive Practices: Current regulations, such as those by OSHA, mandate strict area markings and restricted access to asbestos-risk zones. The Navy's policies did not reflect such stringent controls.




Impact on Health



The consequences of these insufficient measures are significant. Statistics reveal that roughly 30% of malignant pleural mesothelioma cases occur in military veterans, predominantly those who served in the Navy. The Environmental Working Group has projected a staggering number of veteran casualties due to asbestos-related diseases, estimated at around 40,000.



Conclusion



In hindsight, the Navy's protective strategies were not aligned with today's standards for asbestos safety. The lack of comprehensive containment and protective protocols contributed to widespread exposure and subsequent health issues among veterans. More robust protective measures could have potentially mitigated these risks and reduced the overall impact.



What VA Benefits Are Available to Navy Veterans With Mesothelioma? 



The U.S. Veterans Administration (VA) offers qualifying veterans with asbestos illnesses and their families certain benefits. 




Monthly Disability Compensation. The VA provides monthly payments for service-related disabilities. The amount of compensation a disabled veteran depends on their disability rating and whether they have a spouse or dependent children. Mesothelioma has a 100% disability rating, so veterans with this diagnosis are eligible for maximum disability payments.



Special Monthly Compensation. Some disabled veterans need care in their own homes. This is common in veterans with mesothelioma. They can apply for additional compensation to cover these costs. 



Geriatric and Extended Care. Many veterans with mesothelioma are elderly. They may qualify for programs that provide home care, palliative care, assisted living, and respite care.  



Dependency and Indemnity Compensation. Families of deceased veterans may qualify to receive monthly compensation. 



Funeral Expenses. Surviving families can also apply for funeral or burial expenses. This benefit is a reimbursement given after the family has paid the costs. 




How Do Navy Veterans Apply for VA Benefits? 



To get VA benefits, you must apply. The application process can take a few minutes, so starting early is important. Veterans qualify for benefits if they can show that they have an illness caused by asbestos and that they were exposed to asbestos during their service in the Navy. 



How Do Veterans Prove Asbestos Exposure in the Navy? 



Applying for VA benefits can be a little complicated. It involves more than just filling out an application. Navy veterans must supply three types of documentation with their applications: 




Service records to indicate they had a role that likely exposed them to asbestos



Medical records with a diagnosis



A doctor's statement that the diagnosis is related to past asbestos exposure




Who Can Help a Veteran Apply for VA Benefits? 



Veterans can file on their own or ask someone to help them. The process can be confusing and complicated, especially for someone who is very ill. While anyone can help, the best people to assist veterans with VA claims include: 




A Veterans Service Organization representative



A mesothelioma or asbestos lawyer




These people have the training, experience, and resources to help veterans make a successful claim for benefits. 



Can Veterans Sue the Navy for Asbestos Exposure? 



No, veterans cannot sue the U.S. Navy for asbestos exposure. They cannot sue the federal government either. The government provides the VA and its benefits to help veterans cope with illnesses resulting from asbestos exposure. 



Veterans can sue private companies, though. Veterans can sue asbestos companies that supplied the Navy. An asbestos lawsuit can result in compensation through a settlement or jury award. 



Another option veterans have is to make a claim with an asbestos trust fund. These funds were set up by asbestos companies that filed for bankruptcy. 



Filing a lawsuit or making an asbestos trust fund claim does not impact a veteran's VA benefits. Receiving compensation from these sources does not reduce VA compensation. 



Mesothelioma Treatment for Navy Veterans



Mesothelioma is a difficult illness to treat. Patients get the best results from specialists in both cancer and mesothelioma. 



Because mesothelioma rates are high in veterans, several VA medical facilities offer treatment. Some VA centers staff mesothelioma specialists or have access to specialists at nearby hospitals. A few examples of these include: 




Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX



VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA



VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA



Miami VA Healthcare System, Miami, FL




The Legacy of Asbestos Use by the U.S. Navy



As the years and decades passed, doctors noticed an increase in patients with lung cancer, asbestosis, and mesothelioma. Most of these patients were former World War II-era sailors or shipyard workers now in their 50s, 60s, and 70s.



Also, because Navy ships have service lives between 20-50 years, many sailors and Marines who served after World War II were also exposed to asbestos. 



The Bureau of Ships and its latter-day counterparts, Naval Ship Systems Command and Naval Sea Systems Command, continued purchasing and using asbestos until the late 1970s.



Since the U.S. Banned most commercial use of asbestos in recent years, the Navy has carried out various cleanup programs to limit sailors’ exposure on older ships still in service. Ships’ commanders are responsible for implementing asbestos safety training. They must also treat every ship launched before 1980 as though it contained friable asbestos in insulation material. The maintenance of an emergency asbestos response team is also mandatory.



Historically, the Navy was at the forefront of asbestos research and recognized its dangers by the 1930s. As one of the most knowledgeable agencies globally regarding asbestos, the Navy was aware of its severe occupational hazards. However, it believed these could be managed with proper handling. As early as 1939, the Navy began recommending and requiring exposure protections, including:




Wetting down asbestos materials to prevent dust.



Mandating that certain workers wear respirators.



Providing protective gloves to those handling asbestos.




When respirators were impractical aboard ships, the Navy advised keeping amosite asbestos wet at all times to mitigate dust. These historical precautions complement the modern measures in place, ensuring a comprehensive approach to asbestos safety across both past and present contexts.



Todd Shipyards Asbestos Lawsuit



Todd Shipyards was one of the major suppliers of naval ships during much of the 20th Century.



In its many years of operations under the Todd brand name, the company built, repaired, or renovated hundreds of ships. Todd and its modern counterpart, Vigor Shipyards, worked on many civilian contracts. Todd also received lucrative contracts from the U.S. Navy, Coast Guard, and the Royal Australian Navy.



Using production techniques designed by Henry Kaiser, Todd Shipyards turned out oil tankers at a rate of one ship every four-and-a-half days during World War II.



The adverse effects of the shipbuilding activity resulted in several asbestos lawsuits against Todd Shipyards. Before Vigor purchased the company in 2010, the directors reported to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that 565 plaintiffs had filed 490 asbestos complaints. 



The company also told the SEC it was defending against 194 medical claims, including ten related to asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma.



Many former employees of Todd facilities at the Brooklyn Navy Yard and Los Angeles filed claims and alleged that asbestos exposure caused their illnesses. Todd/Vigor defended their past use of asbestos in court, forcing the plaintiffs to go to the U.S. Court of Appeals.



The shipbuilder lost several cases and had to pay the victims. Before Vigor took over the company, Todd Shipyards told the SEC that it had a bodily injury fund of over $3 million to cover the payouts.



Examples of Naval Shipyards and Air Stations Associated with Asbestos Use




California Navy Shipyard



San Diego Naval Shipyard



Bender Shipbuilding



Washington Navy Yard



Pensacola Naval Air Stations



Portsmouth Naval Shipyard



Ingalls Shipbuilding



Brooklyn Navy Yard



Albina Shipyard



Bethlehem Steel Shipyard



Norfolk Naval Shipyard



Houston Shipyards



Todd Shipyards



Pearl Harbor Naval Yard



ADDSCO Shipyard



Penn Shipbuilding



Willamette Shipyard



Newport Naval Yard



Swan Island Shipyard




Additional Information and Legal Help



Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 



Veterans: Get the Justice and Compensation You Deserve for Asbestos-Related Illnesses



As a veteran, you’ve served our country with honor, but many service members were unknowingly exposed to asbestos during their time in the military. If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for significant compensation to help cover medical costs and secure your family’s future.



📄 Get Your Free Financial Compensation Packet!Fill out our form today to receive a comprehensive guide tailored for veterans, including information on trusted asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers who specialize in representing those who served in the armed forces.



💡 Why Veterans Choose Us:




Expertise in handling asbestos-related claims for veterans.



Knowledge of VA benefits and additional compensation options.



Compassionate, experienced legal support tailored to your unique needs.




📞 Contact Us for Personalized Assistance!Call us at 800-793-4540 to speak with our dedicated legal team. We understand the challenges veterans face and are here to fight for the justice you deserve.



You’ve fought for your country—now let us fight for you. Don’t wait. Reach out today to learn how we can help you secure the financial support you’re entitled to.

### Occupational Asbestos Exposure

Occupations Associated with Asbestos and Mesothelioma



Asbestos-Linked Jobs and Mesothelioma



Mesothelioma has long been associated with asbestos exposure in the workplace. Many companies used asbestos from the early 1900s through the 1970s or 1980s. Some of the workers at greatest risk for asbestos exposure in the past worked in construction, shipyards, mechanic shops, and factories. 



If you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more.



Yes, occupational asbestos exposure is often covered under workers’ compensation or other legal avenues, depending on your location and circumstances. If you develop mesothelioma due to workplace asbestos exposure, you may be entitled to compensation.



How an Attorney Can Help:



An experienced asbestos attorney can be an invaluable ally in your fight for justice and compensation. Here’s how they can assist:




Accountability: Attorneys can help hold negligent companies accountable. The asbestos industry had knowledge of the dangers associated with asbestos exposure for decades but failed to act. Lawyers can pursue legal action against these responsible parties.



Navigating Complex Legal Processes: Attorneys are equipped to guide you through the intricate legal processes involved in filing claims and lawsuits, ensuring your rights are protected and your case is strong.



Maximizing Compensation: They can help you identify all potential sources of compensation, including various trust funds and legal claims, to maximize your financial recovery.




Steps to Take:




Workers’ Compensation: In many cases, workers’ compensation programs provide benefits for medical expenses and lost wages, but they may limit your ability to sue your employer directly.



Asbestos Trust Funds: Many companies that used asbestos have established trust funds to compensate individuals diagnosed with asbestos-related diseases like mesothelioma.



Lawsuits: You may be able to file a lawsuit against manufacturers of asbestos-containing products, contractors, or other third parties responsible for your exposure.



VA Benefits: If you are a veteran and were exposed to asbestos during military service, you may qualify for VA benefits.




What to Do Next:



If you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, consult an experienced asbestos attorney or legal specialist. They can help you navigate compensation options and ensure your rights are protected. Prompt action is crucial, as there are statutes of limitations that may apply to filing claims or lawsuits.



By understanding both your legal options and the role an attorney plays, you can take informed steps towards securing the justice and compensation you deserve.





                
                        
                            Calculate Case Value
                            
                        
                        Diagnosis-- Select --MesotheliomaAsbestosisAsbestos-Related Lung CancerIs Diagnosed Person Alive?-- Select --YesPassed away under 2 years agoPassed away over 2 years agoAge of Diagnosed Person-- Select --Under 6565-8485 or olderExposure-- Select --MilitaryOccupationalSecond-HandOther / UnknownMain Job Site-- Select --ShipyardsBoiler RoomsPowerhousesPaper MillsConstruction SitesAutomotiveFirefightingRailroadsRefineriesOther / UnknownMain Asbestos Product Used-- Select --Fire Protection ProductsBrake Pads / LiningsCeiling Textures / Tile / PlasterElectrical ProductsTransite ProductsHeating & Cooling ProductsVermiculiteRoofing ProductsPaints / Plasters / Wall CoveringsOther / UnknownState-- Select --AlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaNorthern Mariana IslandsOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahU.S. Virgin IslandsVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces EuropeArmed Forces PacificPhone(Required)Email(Required)First Name(Required)Last Name(Required)PhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
         Any information you send is secure and will never be sold or released.This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
        
                        Δ
                        









About Asbestos and Mesothelioma



Asbestos is a natural, fibrous mineral that can be mined and used in many industrial applications. Asbestos was used heavily in the past for its ability to insulate and protect against heat and fire. 



When asbestos sheds its tiny fibers, they become part of the dust in the air and on surfaces. Without adequate protection, anyone in the area can inhale or ingest the fibers. Asbestos fibers cause damage to internal tissues that can lead to serious illnesses like mesothelioma. 



Asbestos is the only known cause of mesothelioma. Mesothelioma is most often associated with workplace asbestos exposure. 



Not everyone exposed to asbestos gets mesothelioma or another illness. The workers most likely to get mesothelioma experienced repeated and prolonged asbestos exposure. Many different trades and occupations are associated with asbestos exposure, from manufacturing to construction to automotive mechanics. 



Risk of Asbestos Exposure



Asbestos exposure poses serious health risks, especially when its fibers become airborne and are inhaled. Who Is at Risk? Workers in industries like construction, shipbuilding, and manufacturing are at the highest risk due to frequent contact with asbestos-containing materials. Health Impacts include conditions such as asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma, which may develop decades after exposure. How Does Exposure Happen? Disturbing asbestos-containing products during activities like demolition, renovation, or improper handling can release harmful fibers. Prevention involves using protective equipment, following safety protocols, and ensuring professional asbestos removal in contaminated areas.



Why Early Diagnosis is Critical for Asbestos-Related Conditions



If you’ve had prolonged exposure to asbestos, early diagnosis is crucial for several reasons:




Timely Treatment: Receiving an early diagnosis of conditions like mesothelioma, asbestosis, or COPD allows for prompt medical intervention. Starting treatment early can help slow disease progression and improve quality of life.



Better Prognosis: In many cases, identifying the condition at an early stage leads to better treatment outcomes. With conditions like mesothelioma, early intervention can expand treatment options, potentially prolonging survival rates.



Informed Decisions: Knowing your condition empowers you to make informed choices regarding your health plan and lifestyle. You can seek guidance from specialists, explore advanced therapies, or participate in clinical trials.



Financial Planning: An early diagnosis provides a clearer understanding of potential medical expenses. This can be critical for financial planning and ensuring you have the necessary resources to cover future healthcare needs.



Legal Recourse: Early diagnosis can also be pivotal if you decide to pursue legal action. Asbestos industries were aware of exposure risks yet often neglected protective measures. Knowing your diagnosis early allows you to gather evidence and consult with a specialized attorney to recover compensation for medical costs, loss of income, and other damages.




In conclusion, detecting asbestos-related conditions early not only improves health outcomes but also provides a solid foundation for making decisions about treatment and legal options. Don’t delay; if you suspect exposure, consult a healthcare professional today.



Why Is the Treatment of Asbestos-Related Conditions Often Delayed?



The delayed treatment of asbestos-related conditions is primarily due to their insidious nature. These illnesses, including mesothelioma, often develop silently over many years. Symptoms may not appear until decades after exposure to asbestos, making early detection challenging.



Factors Contributing to Delay:




Long Latency Period:

Asbestos-related diseases can take 20-50 years to manifest post-exposure. This long latency period complicates timely diagnosis.





Subtle Initial Symptoms:

Early symptoms resemble common ailments like the flu or a persistent cough. This similarity leads individuals to dismiss them as minor, delaying medical consultation.





Complex Diagnostic Process:

Confirming an asbestos-related disease often requires specialized tests. Without obvious signs, these tests aren't conducted early, slowing down the diagnosis.






The combination of these factors often results in treatment starting only after the condition has significantly progressed, reducing the effectiveness of potential interventions.



A History of Asbestos in the Workplace




As Western Europe and the U.S. became more industrialized and built more factories and power plants, asbestos use increased significantly. 





By the turn of the 20th Century, asbestos was in power generation plants, steel mills, shipyards, automobile factories, and the construction industry. Eventually, asbestos could even be found in textiles and certain types of clothing.





Asbestos affected almost every manufacturing, transportation, and power generation occupation. As early as the 19th Century, workers in the minerals extraction business were exposed to asbestos fibers, even mining for gold, silver, iron, or other materials.





In Minnesota, for instance, iron miners would inadvertently disturb naturally-occurring asbestos deposits when they dug into the earth of the Iron Hills region in their quest for rich iron ore. 





Mined asbestos was distributed to and used by many different industries. Workers in manufacturing plants made materials using raw asbestos. Workers in other industries used those products in their work. 





Asbestos was more heavily used in construction than almost any other industry. All the occupations involved in building industrial, commercial, public, and residential buildings were at risk of asbestos exposure at one time. 





Most companies didn't stop using asbestos until the 1970s. This is when the dangers of asbestos became more widely known. It's also when the government began restricting its use. 





Today, very few industries or companies still use asbestos. Workers still at risk for asbestos exposure are more likely to encounter old asbestos materials that have never been replaced. 






Facts About Workplace Asbestos Exposure




About 27 million American workers were exposed to asbestos on the job from 1940 to 1979. 



Workplace asbestos exposure continues to be a problem. Approximately 125 million people are exposed to asbestos on the job worldwide. 



In the U.S., about 1.3 million workers are still at risk of asbestos exposure.



More than 70,000 workers in the European Union in 2019 died from asbestos exposure. 



More than three-quarters of all occupational cancers in Europe are related to asbestos. 




Mining



Deliberate mining of asbestos contributed to mesothelioma in workers involved with mineral extraction. Even those who didn't work in asbestos mines were exposed to natural deposits within those of other minerals. 



Until asbestos mining was curtailed in the U.S. during the 1970s and 1980s, many miners worked for W. R. Grace near Libby, Montana, to extract vermiculite, later found to be contaminated with asbestos. 



The miners and residents near the mines were exposed to asbestos. Grace sold asbestos-contaminated vermiculite. It shipped the product to processing facilities in nearly every state, exposing millions of factory workers and nearby residents. 



Shipbuilding



The shipbuilding industry was a huge consumer of asbestos products for decades. Asbestos was used in both commercial and U.S. Navy ships. 



Fire at sea is one of the most feared dangers by ships’ captains and crews. Until the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) linked asbestos exposure to mesothelioma in the early 1970s, vessels built in U.S. shipyards contained large amounts of asbestos. 



Ships contained asbestos in nearly every component, from the crows’ nest on the superstructure to the ship’s keel. Pipes, engineering spaces, boilers, and the insulated wiring of a vessel’s electrical system contained asbestos.



Shipfitters, stevedores, boiler room personnel, repair yard workers, engineering officers, and other personnel afloat or ashore were exposed to asbestos fibers. Even the most routine activities on a ship or a dockyard had the potential to stir and release asbestos fibers. 



Military



Military personnel, especially those who served during World War II, Korea, and much of the Vietnam War, were often exposed to asbestos during their active duty stints.



Veterans over the age of 65 are in one of the largest demographic groups diagnosed with mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases.



Since the U.S. Navy had the same concerns as civilian maritime enterprises regarding fires at sea, it was a major purchaser of asbestos. All of its ships contained large amounts of asbestos materials.



Consequently, many naval personnel and members of the armed services who traveled on U.S. Navy ships or passed through naval facilities have been diagnosed with mesothelioma. Veterans today have some of the highest rates of mesothelioma of any population. 



Personnel with occupational specialties comparable to those in the civilian shipbuilding industry, such as navy repair yard workers, suffered the most exposure. As a result, they tend to develop mesothelioma in more significant numbers than other naval veterans.



Paper Mills



Many people who worked in paper mills were exposed to asbestos daily. Paper mills use high temperatures to process pulp. The machinery, boilers, pipes, and other components of mills were insulated with asbestos materials. 



Some of the workers at the most significant risk of exposure worked with boilers. Additionally, simple daily, routine maintenance of the machinery and equipment in paper mills placed workers at risk. For instance, particles and dust containing asbestos fibers would become airborne whenever a machine was cleaned or maintained.



Former paper mill employees have filed many lawsuits over asbestos exposure. One lawsuit involved plaintiff Henry Barabin, who won a $10 million jury award. He was diagnosed with mesothelioma after working at Crown Zellerbach Paper Mill for over 30 years.



Railroad Workers



The use of railroads and trains dates back several hundred years, and almost every railroad was built using asbestos. Asbestos prevented vital components, like brakes, from overheating and failing.  



Repair workers encountered asbestos fibers and dust whenever they did maintenance work. They risked inhaling asbestos fibers used in crates, brake linings, and clutches.



Inspectors also faced the same dangers each time a train and its parts were inspected. Anyone around railroads for extended periods should seek medical attention immediately.



Construction Workers



The construction industry used hundreds of asbestos components. Construction workers faced some of the highest risks of exposure in any occupation. Workers in construction today still face risks from asbestos materials in older buildings. 



All types of workers on construction jobs faced and continue to face asbestos exposure risks: 




Carpenters



Insulation installers



Plumbers



Electricians



Drywallers



Painters



Tilers 



Roofers



Laborers




Even workers who didn't handle asbestos were often exposed simply by being on the worksite.



See also - Asbestos: Home Repair and Remodeling



Factory and Industrial Workers



Workers in a wide range of industrial factories and manufacturing facilities faced asbestos exposure risks. Factories contained asbestos in insulation, machinery, equipment, welding materials, protective gear, furnaces, boilers, and more. 



While working alongside each other on assembly lines, many factory workers handled asbestos-containing products daily. 



In addition to handling the asbestos products, the lathes that spun the products and conveying belts that moved products down the assembly lines were also made with asbestos to prevent friction.



Even if workers were not a part of the assembly line, they still risked asbestos exposure by simply being in a factory. 



Firefighters



Firefighting is one of the most dangerous occupations in the world. They are the heroes who rescue people and risk their own lives while putting out burning buildings and homes, but these aren't the only risks. 



When old buildings are destroyed by fire, asbestos materials get damaged and release harmful fibers. Anyone working in the area is at risk of exposure. Firefighters can also be exposed to many other toxic chemicals used on the job and in older buildings, increasing the risk of cancer and other illnesses. 



Insulation Workers



Asbestos was most often used in the past to insulate materials. Many homes and commercial buildings were once insulated with asbestos-containing products. In fact, before EPA's strict regulations, asbestos was used in most homes and buildings in the United States.



Insulation workers who installed and repaired insulation typically didn't wear the proper protective gear when working, which places this group of workers at risk of developing an asbestos illness. Removing insulation can be especially risky, as the action can disturb fibers. 



Plumbers



Plumbers often repair pipes insulated with asbestos wrap or lagging. Asbestos was used frequently in pipe coverings to prevent extremely high temperatures. They cut into insulated pipes, releasing fibers. 



Additionally, plumbers may work with and around pipe blocks, cement, gaskets, and welding rods built with asbestos.



Electricians



Asbestos insulates against heat, but it also resists electricity. Asbestos was once commonly used to insulate electrical materials. Electricians often installed, repaired, or cut into and replaced these asbestos materials, releasing fibers and risking exposure. 



Textile Workers 



Textile mill work involved asbestos in two different ways. Like other manufacturing facilities, textile mills used asbestos-insulated machinery, especially with high-temperature equipment like boilers. Workers could be exposed to these materials. 



Many mills once made asbestos fabrics and other types of textiles. Workers handled asbestos when making these products, putting them at high exposure risk. 



Auto Mechanics 



Several automotive parts once contained asbestos. It was primarily found in friction products like brakes and clutches. 



Auto mechanics not only faced asbestos exposure in the past while working, but they're still at risk today when working on brakes, clutches, and other vehicle parts. 



Some manufacturers still use asbestos in their products, and many older cars still have asbestos-containing components.



There are currently numerous asbestos lawsuits against automobile parts manufacturers, many of which are popular nationwide companies still in business today.



Workers in Public Buildings



Many government and school buildings were built with asbestos insulation and other materials. All workers in these buildings were at risk of exposure, especially during repairs or renovations. Maintenance workers had some of the highest risks. 



One example of this kind of asbestos exposure is in postal workers. Not only were postal workers in the past in danger of asbestos exposure, but current workers are also at risk when the buildings are not properly maintained. 



In recent years, post offices nationwide have faced hefty OSHA fines for failing to follow required asbestos regulations.



Carpenters



Carpentry work remains a high-risk occupation for asbestos exposure. Most carpentry product manufacturers don't use asbestos anymore. They are still at risk of exposure when renovating cabinetry and rooms and working on other projects constructed initially with asbestos. 



Part of their job requirements may be to sand, cut through, and remove asbestos products that contain asbestos, such as insulation and tiles.



In the past, some carpenters went home covered in asbestos dust, putting family members at risk of developing asbestos-related diseases via second-hand exposure. 



Carpentry work remains an occupation associated with a high risk of developing an asbestos-related illness.



Boiler Workers 



Boilermakers, also known as boiler workers, typically work in extremely high-heat environments and around equipment protected from heat and fire by asbestos products.



In many instances, a boiler worker was required to deliver asbestos-containing materials to processing areas, dispose of asbestos-containing ingredients,  and work in cramped spaces where asbestos dust permeated the air.



The long-term effects, of course, have left former and retired boilermakers battling life-threatening illnesses, specifically malignant mesothelioma, the disease boilermakers have "been most" diagnosed with.



Other Occupations at Risk for Asbestos Exposure



While the above occupations and industries had the highest risks of asbestos exposure, other workers faced risks, too. Asbestos was so prevalent across industries that many people had some risk of exposure, even people living in their own homes. 



These are just some of the many other jobs or workplaces with some risk of asbestos exposure: 




Agricultural workers



Chemical plant workers



Engineers



HVAC workers



Metal workers



Welders



Aerospace workers



Aircraft mechanics



Chimney sweeps



Teachers



Warehouse workers




Secondhand Occupational Asbestos Exposure



Secondhand exposure is often overlooked as an important cause of asbestos illnesses. Secondhand asbestos exposure occurs when a worker brings asbestos fibers home on clothing or in their hair. This can expose anyone in the home.



This happened much more frequently in the past when workers were not given protective clothing and were not warned of the risks of carrying home asbestos fibers.



Wives of workers had risks of exposure and illness from laundering contaminated work clothes. Some children of asbestos workers got sick at young ages from early exposure.



While workers in industries handling asbestos products face the highest risk, they are not the only ones affected. Family members, such as spouses and children, unknowingly inhaled or ingested these fibers brought home. This unintentional exposure placed them at a slightly higher risk of developing asbestos-related illnesses.



Moreover, individuals involved in activities like home renovations, where asbestos materials might be disturbed, also fall into the risk category. During the s, when awareness was low and safety measures were scarce, these exposures were unfortunately common, affecting many unsuspecting households.



Understanding these risks highlights the widespread impact of asbestos beyond the workplace, emphasizing the need for awareness and safety precautions even today.



Is Occupational Asbestos Exposure Still a Risk? 



Workplace asbestos exposure is much less common today than decades ago, but it is still a risk. The primary risk of exposure comes from older materials still in workplaces. 



Construction workers face some of the highest ongoing risks of exposure. Workers who repair, renovate, remodel, or demolish older buildings risk exposure to old asbestos materials.



Risk of Mesothelioma in the Workplace



Mesothelioma, a rare and aggressive cancer, is primarily caused by workplace exposure to asbestos. High-Risk Occupations include construction workers, shipyard employees, insulation installers, and industrial workers who often handled asbestos-containing materials. How Does Workplace Exposure Occur? Inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers released during activities like cutting, sanding, or demolition is the primary route. Long-Term Impact: Mesothelioma may not develop until 20–50 years after exposure, making early detection difficult. Workplace Safety: Employers must adhere to regulations, provide protective equipment, and educate workers about asbestos risks to minimize exposure and protect health.



How Are Workers Today Protected from Asbestos Exposure?



The government now regulates asbestos exposure in the workplace. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regulates asbestos through the Clean Air Act. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) enforces safety rules and exposure limits in occupational settings. 



OSHA lists several requirements for employers in settings where asbestos could be present, including: 




Signposting asbestos locations



Providing training for working safely around asbestos



Providing protective gear, such as respirators



Medical surveillance programs when workers are exposed to asbestos



Ensuring safe exposure limits are not exceeded




The current maximum acceptable exposure limit for asbestos fibers in the air in a workplace is 0.1 fibers per cubic centimeter. Workers can file complaints with OSHA if their employers fail to follow asbestos safety regulations.



If you worked in an industry that used asbestos, talk to a mesothelioma lawyer or asbestos law firm about your legal options. But before you take legal action, it’s crucial to prioritize your health. Start by informing your doctor about any potential asbestos exposure, even if you haven't noticed symptoms like difficulty breathing or persistent coughing. Early detection and treatment can significantly improve your prognosis.



For those who have been diagnosed with conditions such as mesothelioma, asbestosis, or COPD after prolonged asbestos exposure, reaching out to a legal professional is an important next step. You may be entitled to financial compensation for medical expenses, lost income, and other damages.



Remember, the asbestos industry was aware of the risks for decades yet failed to protect workers and the public. By consulting with an asbestos attorney, you can explore your options for holding these parties accountable while securing the resources you need for your recovery.



If you worked in an industry that used asbestos, talk to a mesothelioma lawyer or asbestos law firm about your legal options. 



Getting Legal Help



Yes, occupational asbestos exposure is often covered under workers’ compensation or other legal avenues, depending on your location and circumstances. If you develop mesothelioma due to workplace asbestos exposure, you may be entitled to compensation.



Exposure to asbestos can lead to serious health conditions, including mesothelioma, asbestosis, pleural plaques, and COPD. If you or someone you know has been diagnosed with any of these conditions due to asbestos exposure, understanding your legal rights is crucial. You could be entitled to financial compensation for your medical expenses, lost income, pain and suffering, and other damages.



Steps to Take:




Workers’ Compensation:

In many cases, workers’ compensation programs provide benefits for medical expenses and lost wages. However, they may limit your ability to sue your employer directly.





Asbestos Trust Funds:

Many companies that used asbestos have established trust funds to compensate individuals diagnosed with asbestos-related diseases like mesothelioma.





Lawsuits:

You may be able to file a lawsuit against manufacturers of asbestos-containing products, contractors, or other third parties responsible for your exposure.





VA Benefits:

If you are a veteran and were exposed to asbestos during military service, you may qualify for VA benefits.






Next Steps:




Consult an Asbestos Attorney: Engaging with a legal professional experienced in asbestos-related claims can help clarify your eligibility for compensation and guide you through the complex legal process. An attorney can ensure you are fully aware of all potential avenues for financial recovery.




Taking these steps can provide you with the necessary support and resources to manage the impact of asbestos exposure effectively.



Act Now: Protect Your Rights with Trusted Legal Support



Remember, if you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma or asbestos-related cancer, we can help. Please fill out our form for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma specialized lawyers in your area and we can start. We will get you the max for your claim.



A diagnosis of mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis can be overwhelming, but you don’t have to face it alone. You may be eligible for substantial financial compensation, and our experienced mesothelioma lawyers are here to stand by your side, protecting your rights and pursuing the justice you deserve.



📄 Get Your Free Financial Compensation Packet Today!Complete our quick form to receive a detailed packet with information about top asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area, plus valuable resources to help you take control of your case.



💡 Why Partner with Us?




Proven track record with decades of experience in asbestos-related claims.



No upfront costs—you only pay if we win your case.



Compassionate guidance tailored to your unique situation, so you can focus on your health.




📞 Contact Us for Immediate Assistance!Call us today at 800-793-4540 to connect with our knowledgeable team. Time is critical—don’t miss the opportunity to secure your family’s future.



You’re not alone in this battle. Let us help you achieve the justice and compensation you deserve.

### Asbestos Exposure

Asbestos exposure occurred more often in the past, but some people are still at risk today. Exposure to asbestos can cause mesothelioma, lung cancer, and other diseases. There is no safe level of exposure to this harmful mineral. 



Asbestos is a group of naturally occurring minerals known for their heat resistance, strength, and insulating properties. It was widely used in construction, manufacturing, and various industries throughout the 20th century in products like insulation, roofing materials, floor tiles, and brake linings. Its durability and affordability made it a popular choice, but its health risks were not fully understood until later.







What Is Raw Asbestos and Why Is It So Dangerous?




https://youtube.com/shorts/NVfGReFCTEs




Raw asbestos is one of the most hazardous materials ever used in construction—but where does it come from, and why was it used so widely? In this video, presenter David Foster explains how asbestos is mined, its natural origins, and how it became common in homes, schools, and industrial buildings.







Common Products Containing Asbestos



Asbestos found its way into a myriad of products, spanning from household items to industrial components. Here's a closer look at the products that commonly contained this mineral:




Household Items: Many vintage appliances and items, such as hair dryers, ovens, toasters, ironing boards, and oven mitts, may still pose a risk of asbestos contamination.



Building Materials: Structures built before the 1980s, including military and public buildings, often contain asbestos in insulation, drywall, ceiling and floor tiles, cement, paint, and textiles.



Automotive and Machinery Parts: Asbestos was extensively used in friction products like brakes and clutches, impacting automotive parts, airplanes, trains, and other machinery.



Contaminated Talc Products: Asbestos-contaminated talc has been found in products like baby powder, makeup, and various children's items, raising concerns over exposure risks.




By understanding the variety of products that once contained asbestos, we gain insight into potential exposure risks in both past and present contexts.



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, now is the time to take the first steps in determining what you may be eligible for. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more.



Asbestos Exposure



Asbestos is a natural mineral that has long been mined and used as an insulator and for other purposes. The heaviest use of asbestos in modern times was in the middle of the 20th century. It was used in construction, shipbuilding, and many industrial workplaces.



Asbestos exposure occurs when someone breathes in or ingests the small fibers that asbestos materials consist of. Asbestos exposure is harmful and increases the risk of cancers like mesothelioma, lung cancer, and other illnesses.



Key Facts About Asbestos Exposure




On-the-job exposure is the most common: This typically affects construction, military, industrial, and first responder workers who are at high risk.



Construction industry risk: The construction industry has the highest exposure rate in the U.S., making it a significant area of concern.



Airborne fibers: Asbestos can become airborne if disturbed because it’s so light, posing a risk to anyone nearby.



Fiber settlement: Asbestos fibers may take up to 48 to 72 hours to settle in an undisturbed environment, highlighting the persistence of exposure risk.




How Easy Is It to Be Exposed to Asbestos?



Asbestos is a group of naturally occurring minerals known for their heat resistance, strength, and insulating properties. It was widely used in construction, manufacturing, and various industries throughout the 20th century in products like insulation, roofing materials, floor tiles, and brake linings. Its durability and affordability made it a popular choice, but its health risks were not fully understood until later.



Asbestos is a fibrous mineral, which means it breaks apart easily. The tiny fibers released when asbestos is disturbed or deteriorating become part of the dust in the air and on surfaces. Anyone in the area can be exposed without proper containment or safety gear.



How Common Is Asbestos Exposure?



Most harmful exposure to asbestos occurred in the past and in workplaces. Risks of exposure today are much less but still possible. When asbestos materials are intact, contained, and undisturbed, they pose little risk of exposure.



People living in older homes, working in older buildings, or working in industries that still contain some asbestos are more likely to be exposed today.



What Are the Health Risks of Asbestos Exposure?



Exposure to asbestos can lead to serious health problems, including asbestosis (lung scarring), mesothelioma (a rare cancer of the lung lining), and lung cancer. These conditions often develop decades after exposure. Inhaling asbestos fibers is particularly dangerous because they can become trapped in the lungs, causing inflammation and long-term damage.



How Many People Exposed to Asbestos Get Sick?



While there is no safe level of asbestos exposure, most people exposed do not get sick. Those who do get sick often develop life-threatening illnesses. There is no way to tell who will get an asbestos illness and who won’t.



Known risk factors for asbestos illnesses include:




Repeated, prolonged, and heavy exposure to asbestos



Working in an industry that used asbestos



Being male and older



A family history of mesothelioma




Smoking increases the risk of developing lung cancer after asbestos exposure. Smoking does not seem to impact the development of mesothelioma.



Exposure to asbestos can lead to serious health problems, including asbestosis (lung scarring), mesothelioma (a rare cancer of the lung lining), and lung cancer. These conditions often develop decades after exposure. Inhaling asbestos fibers is particularly dangerous because they can become trapped in the lungs, causing inflammation and long-term damage.



Researchers believe these fibers can reach different organs and cause scarring, which leads to DNA damage—a critical step in the development of cancer. Over time, this DNA damage disrupts normal cell function, eventually leading to the uncontrolled cell growth characteristic of cancer.



Understanding the pathway from inhalation to disease underscores the importance of minimizing asbestos exposure. By preventing fibers from entering the body, individuals can significantly reduce their risk of developing these serious health conditions.



Know where asbestos is, so you can protect yourself and your family from it. If you suspect you have asbestos in your home, hire a licensed asbestos professional to inspect and test the materials.



If asbestos materials in the home are contained and unlikely to be disturbed, there is minimal risk in leaving it alone. If it poses a risk, a licensed abatement company can safely remove it.



Workplace exposure to asbestos is much less common today, but still possible. Employers are obligated to follow safety guidelines to keep workers safe from asbestos in the workplace. Take advantage of all safety training and equipment offered if there is asbestos in your line of work.



Workers should also be proactive in their safety measures:




Avoid disturbing asbestos products: Refrain from handling or brushing against materials that might contain asbestos.



Do not dry sweep asbestos-containing dust: This can release dangerous fibers into the air.



Prevent bringing fibers home: Clean contaminated shoes and clothing at the job site, and take a shower before returning home to protect your family.




Employers in at-risk industries should provide the necessary facilities for these precautions. If they don't, or if you suspect your employer is not following asbestos regulations, you can file a complaint with OSHA and demand better protections.











Workplace Asbestos Exposure: A Serious Risk



Exposure to asbestos at work has been a major cause of mesothelioma and other asbestos-related illnesses, particularly in industries like construction, manufacturing, shipbuilding, and automotive repair. Workers handling asbestos-containing materials—such as insulation, roofing, or brake linings—are at the highest risk, especially in environments where safety measures were inadequate or nonexistent. Even brief exposure to asbestos fibers, which can become airborne and inhaled, may lead to severe health issues decades later. Secondary exposure is also a concern, as workers can unknowingly bring asbestos fibers home on their clothing, putting family members at risk. If you suspect workplace asbestos exposure, it’s crucial to seek medical advice and explore your legal options to pursue compensation for potential health impacts.



What Are the First Signs of Asbestos Exposure? 



If you’ve worked in industries like construction, shipbuilding, or manufacturing before the 1980s, you may have been exposed to asbestos. Symptoms of exposure, such as persistent coughing, shortness of breath, and chest pain, typically appear years later. If you suspect exposure, consult a healthcare professional for an evaluation and consider a chest X-ray or CT scan to detect any early signs of asbestos-related disease.



Symptoms of asbestos exposure usually don't appear until decades have passed. This is known as the latency period, and it can be as long as 50 or 70 years with asbestos illnesses. 



Signs of asbestos illnesses also vary depending on the area of the body affected. Asbestos exposure most commonly causes respiratory diseases like pleural mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis. Symptoms of pleural asbestos diseases include: 




Coughing 



Chest pains



Chest tightness



Wheezing



Difficulty breathing and shortness of breath



Lumps under the skin of the chest



Fatigue



Weight loss




Less commonly, asbestos exposure causes peritoneal mesothelioma, a cancer that affects tissue and organs in the abdominal cavity. Symptoms of peritoneal mesothelioma include: 




Abdominal pain



Abdominal swelling



Unexpected weight gain or loss



Gastrointestinal symptoms, like diarrhea or constipation



Bowel blockage




How Can You Be Exposed to Asbestos? 



Occupational exposure is the most common way people are exposed to asbestos. Today, some people are still at risk for exposure on the job at shipyards, construction sites, automotive mechanic chops, and some industrial, manufacturing, and energy-based workplaces. Asbestos was used heavily in these industries and may still be present in some workplaces. 



Older residences and public buildings can also be sources of ongoing exposure. Aftermarket car parts that contain asbestos, like brakes and clutches, continue to put hobbyist mechanics at risk of exposure. 



A recently recognized source of asbestos exposure is talcum powder hygiene products. Talc is a natural mineral that sometimes occurs with asbestos deposits. These products should be asbestos-free, but evidence suggests this isn't always true. 



Most occupational asbestos exposures occurred in the past. This is still a concern because it takes decades for illnesses to develop after exposure. Several industries caused significant harm, and people still feel the consequences today. 



In the past, many individuals were unknowingly exposed to asbestos in their workplaces due to its widespread use in various industries. Asbestos was valued for its heat resistance, durability, and insulating properties, making it a common material in construction, shipbuilding, manufacturing, and automotive industries. Workers handling materials like insulation, roofing, flooring, cement, and brake linings often came into direct contact with asbestos fibers. Without adequate safety measures or protective equipment, these fibers could become airborne, posing a significant health risk when inhaled. Employers and regulatory bodies at the time were often unaware of or overlooked the long-term dangers of asbestos exposure, leaving many workers vulnerable to serious conditions like asbestosis, lung cancer, or mesothelioma, which often developed decades after the exposure occurred.



Shipyards



Since asbestos prevents corrosion and resists heat and fire, it was frequently used to build ships. 



From boiler insulation, hot water, pipes, and more, asbestos was used for various reasons on ships and often in poorly ventilated areas.



The end result is that numerous ship workers have been diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma and other illnesses associated with asbestos exposure. 



Most victims were exposed on ships during the Korean War and World War II. During that time, doctors and scientists were uninformed of the devastating effects that asbestos exposure caused. Over four million Americans worked on ships during World War II, and many worked as asbestos insulators. 



It wasn’t until the 1960s that the dangers of asbestos were thoroughly investigated and taken more seriously.



California is the leading state for the most diagnosed cases of asbestos cancer. Along with having an overabundance of natural asbestos deposits in the state, California has one of the most extensive coastlines in North America, making it a convenient place for shipyards.



Power Plants



Asbestos was used in power plants because of its ability to endure extremely high temperatures while preventing fires. It covered machinery, pipes, boilers, and other products. 



This continued through the early 1980s, even though the dangerous effects of asbestos were already well-known.



Steel Mills and Metal Working



Asbestos was used widely in factory machines because of its fireproof insulation. Many welders, steel mill employees, blacksmiths, and aluminum and iron factory employees experienced prolonged exposure. 



In addition to factory machines that contained asbestos, most plants were made using asbestos and as many of the products that employees used.



Metalworkers would spend many hours working in plants and factories covered in asbestos. 



In turn, these workers have a heightened risk of developing mesothelioma cancer and other asbestos-related diseases.



Construction



According to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), construction work is not only one of the most dangerous occupations in the world, but workers also have a high risk of asbestos exposure. 



Even with strict regulations on asbestos use, many construction workers still frequently work on homes and buildings constructed before the EPA's regulations.



Construction work encompasses a variety of different job functions, most of which come with the risk of asbestos exposure, including:




Tearing down walls



Home repairs



Sanding, dusting



Cutting through wood



Carpentry and drywall work



Roofing



Setting and cutting tile and more




Firefighters



Like construction workers, firefighters also have one of the most dangerous occupations. 



Firefighters may still encounter asbestos in homes and buildings with dangerous minerals before the EPA's strict regulations.



Firefighters today may not know that they've developed an asbestos-related illness until decades later, sometimes up to 50 years later. Firefighters must always get regular medical check-ups.



Chemical Production



Chemical plants once used asbestos in numerous components. Asbestos was used in insulation and heat-producing or carrying elements, like boilers and pipes. Asbestos was also used in containers for corrosive chemicals. 



Today, the chlor-alkali industry still uses asbestos in filters, putting workers at risk. Chlor-alkali plants make chlorine. The primary chlorine manufacturers are currently phasing out asbestos use. 



Oil Refineries



Oil refinery workers face occupational hazards because of the highly flammable materials used, and many workers face prolonged asbestos exposure.



Before EPA regulations, asbestos was used to insulate many components in oil refineries, ranging from ovens, roasters, tanks, boilers, furnaces, pumps, and more. 



Oil refinery workers were exposed to asbestos daily, and although it helped them prevent fires and burns, it also put them in danger.



Paper Mills



The paper manufacturing industry has long used ACMs in paper mills. These facilities, especially older paper mills, are full of equipment that generates high temperatures or requires friction-reducing materials. 



ACMs are still used in paper-manufacturing machines, such as drying machines.



Older paper mills also used asbestos in insulation in boilers and pipes. Further, these mills were built with cement, paint, ceiling and floor tiles, roofing materials, countertops, and asbestos siding.



Vermiculite Processing



Vermiculite is another natural mineral. It is used in insulation and other building materials, as well as soil additives. W.R. Grace vermiculite mines in Libby, Montana, produced asbestos-contaminated vermiculite for decades until the 1990s. 



W.R. Grace shipped tainted vermiculite to processing facilities all over the U.S. Workers in these plants risked exposure to the asbestos in the vermiculite they handled. 



School Buildings



According to the EPA, over 130,000 elementary, middle, and high schools in the U.S. contain asbestos. 



Since the typical age of a school building is over 40 years old, millions of children and teachers are exposed to a slight amount of asbestos each year. Only schools built after the late 1970s to mid-1980s are asbestos-free.



Today, schools must be inspected routinely to develop an effective management plan for asbestos exposure. 



However, per the National Center for Health Statistics, school teachers, specifically elementary school teachers, risk developing mesothelioma.



Asbestos in Older Homes



Older homes built before the mid to early 1980s may contain asbestos. Before the EPA’s regulations, numerous manufacturers and companies used asbestos heavily in insulation, ceiling tiles, vinyl flooring, appliances, caulking, window seals, walls, paints, and more.



Families still occupy millions of homes built with asbestos-containing materials (ACMs).



Seek the help of a state-certified asbestos inspector if you live in an older home, as the human eye cannot detect asbestos fibers. 



Until then, make sure never to start any renovations or heavy-duty cleaning projects, as these activities can stir up asbestos fibers.



Asbestos in Children's Products



As recently as 2015, asbestos was found in certain brands of children's crayons and toys. 



Per the Environmental Working Group Action Fund (EWG), the following crayon brands found with asbestos were shelved and on display in several popular stores:




Saban Power Rangers Super Megaforce Crayons



Disney Mickey Mouse Clubhouse Crayons



Nickelodeon’s Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Crayons



Amscan Crayons




Investigators found asbestos in the following toys:




Edu Science Deluxe Forensics Lab Kit



Inside Intelligence Secret Spy Kit




In 2009, another children's product, CSI: Crime Scene Investigation toy kit, contained asbestos. 



CBS and several major retailers settled a class-action asbestos lawsuit involving the product. It's since been removed from store shelves and is no longer manufactured.



Military Veterans



In addition to civilian industries, the U.S. military used asbestos heavily. The Navy used the most asbestos because it was so common in ships. All branches had asbestos in vehicles, equipment, barracks, and other buildings. 



Today, veterans have higher rates of mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses than other populations. Any veteran with symptoms of asbestos illnesses should be screened. They were likely exposed to asbestos during military service. 



Environmental Asbestos Exposure



Asbestos is a natural mineral. Where it occurs in deposits, it can cause local exposure. Activities that disturb these deposits cause exposure: mining, road building, and natural disasters. 



Environmental exposure risk is highest in areas where asbestos exists and where development is expanding. Also at risk are people living near industries that use asbestos. This mostly occurred in the past, for instance, in neighborhoods near vermiculite processing plants. 



Secondhand Asbestos Exposure



Occupational and direct environmental exposure to asbestos is the principal means by which the toxic fibers enter the body and trigger asbestos-related illnesses. 



However, people can be exposed to asbestos in other ways, usually through secondhand exposure, also known as secondary exposure.



Secondhand exposure is more prevalent in women and children than occupational exposure, which tends to affect male workers.



Secondary exposure generally occurred when men returned home from work in industrial job sites or other places where asbestos exposure took place and brought the fibers along on their work clothes, skin, and hair. 



Consequently, women who came in contact with the asbestos-covered clothes while cleaning or handling them created small clouds of the fibers and inhaled them.



Children were also exposed to asbestos fibers when they hugged or played with their fathers, brothers, or family friends who unwittingly brought them home on their coveralls or other clothing worn for work.



How to Prevent Asbestos Exposure



The first step in preventing or lowering the risk of asbestos exposure is awareness. Know where asbestos is, so you can protect yourself and your family from it. If you suspect you have asbestos in your home, hire a licensed asbestos professional to inspect and test the materials. 



If asbestos materials in the home are contained and unlikely to be disturbed, there is minimal risk in leaving it alone. If it poses a risk, a licensed abatement company can safely remove it. 



Workplace exposure to asbestos is much less common today but still possible. Employers are obligated to follow safety guidelines to keep workers safe from asbestos in the workplace. Take advantage of all safety training and equipment offered if there is asbestos in your line of work. 



If you suspect your employer not following asbestos regulations, you can file a complaint with OSHA and demand better protections. 



Exposure to asbestos can lead to several serious health conditions, primarily affecting the lungs and respiratory system. These conditions often develop years or even decades after exposure. The most common asbestos-related diseases include:




Asbestosis: A chronic lung condition caused by inhaling asbestos fibers, leading to scarring of lung tissue (fibrosis). This causes shortness of breath, coughing, and reduced lung function.



Mesothelioma: A rare and aggressive cancer that affects the mesothelium, the thin layer of tissue covering the lungs, abdomen, or heart. This condition is strongly linked to asbestos exposure and is often diagnosed in later stages.



Lung Cancer: Asbestos exposure significantly increases the risk of lung cancer, especially in individuals who smoke. Symptoms may include persistent coughing, chest pain, and difficulty breathing.



Pleural Disease: Non-cancerous conditions affecting the pleura, such as pleural plaques (hardened areas of tissue), pleural thickening, or fluid buildup (pleural effusion). These can impair lung function and cause discomfort.



Other Cancers: Although less common, asbestos exposure has also been linked to cancers of the throat, esophagus, stomach, colon, and rectum.




Organs Affected by Asbestos Exposure



While the lungs are the primary site of asbestos fiber accumulation, other organs can also be significantly affected:




Esophagus: Some studies have found an association between asbestos exposure and esophageal cancer, affecting the food passageway.



Larynx: Exposure to asbestos is linked to cancer of the voice box, posing risks to the vocal cords and throat.



Pleural Membrane: Inhaled asbestos fibers adhere to the pleural membrane, causing scarring and mesothelioma, a cancer affecting the lung lining.



Diaphragm: Asbestos fibers can become embedded in this crucial muscle, complicating breathing mechanics.



Heart: Although asbestos fibers do not directly affect the heart, they can infiltrate the soft lining, leading to pericardial mesothelioma.



Abdomen: Asbestos can cause peritoneal mesothelioma, a cancer in the lining of the abdominal cavity.




By understanding the wide-reaching impact of asbestos on various organs, individuals can better grasp the severity of asbestos exposure and its potential health implications.



What to Do if You Have Been Exposed to Asbestos



Talk to your doctor immediately if you suspect you have ever worked with or been around asbestos. The sooner you get a diagnosis, the better your prognosis. 



An early diagnosis means you can start treatment sooner. You are also more likely to catch the disease in an earlier stage when it can be treated more effectively. Early diagnosis gives you more treatment options. 



Exposure to asbestos can lead to several serious health conditions, primarily affecting the lungs and respiratory system. These conditions often develop years or even decades after exposure. The most common asbestos-related diseases include:




Asbestosis: A chronic lung condition caused by inhaling asbestos fibers, leading to scarring of lung tissue (fibrosis). This causes shortness of breath, coughing, and reduced lung function.



Mesothelioma: A rare and aggressive cancer that affects the mesothelium, the thin layer of tissue covering the lungs, abdomen, or heart. This condition is strongly linked to asbestos exposure and is often diagnosed in later stages.



Lung Cancer: Asbestos exposure significantly increases the risk of lung cancer, especially in individuals who smoke. Symptoms may include persistent coughing, chest pain, and difficulty breathing.



Pleural Disease: Non-cancerous conditions affecting the pleura, such as pleural plaques (hardened areas of tissue), pleural thickening, or fluid buildup (pleural effusion). These can impair lung function and cause discomfort.



Other Cancers: Although less common, asbestos exposure has also been linked to cancers of the throat, esophagus, stomach, colon, and rectum.




Because these diseases often have long latency periods, individuals may not experience symptoms until decades after the initial exposure. Regular medical checkups and monitoring are crucial for those who have been exposed to asbestos to catch potential health issues early.







Conditions Caused by Asbestos Exposure



Exposure to asbestos can lead to several serious and often life-threatening conditions, with mesothelioma being the most well-known. This aggressive cancer primarily affects the lining of the lungs (pleura), abdomen (peritoneum), or, more rarely, the heart (pericardium). Other conditions include asbestosis, a chronic lung disease caused by inhaling asbestos fibers, leading to scarring of lung tissue and severe respiratory issues. Lung cancer is another common outcome of prolonged exposure, while pleural plaques and pleural thickening are non-cancerous but still debilitating effects. These conditions typically take decades to develop after initial exposure, underscoring the long-term health risks of asbestos. Early diagnosis and medical intervention are critical for managing these diseases, as is seeking legal advice to explore compensation options.



How to Seek Compensation After Asbestos Exposure



Also, consider talking to a mesothelioma lawyer to find out how to seek compensation. Most asbestos exposure is considered negligent, which means victims have a right to hold asbestos companies accountable. 



If you have an asbestos illness, a lawyer can help determine where and when you were exposed. They can also pinpoint which companies are responsible. You may be able to file a lawsuit to seek a settlement or make a claim with an asbestos trust fund. 



If you are a veteran with an asbestos illness, a meso lawyer near you can help you apply for VA benefits. These include monthly compensation and benefits for dependents. 





                
                        
                            Calculate Case Value
                            
                        
                        Diagnosis-- Select --MesotheliomaAsbestosisAsbestos-Related Lung CancerIs Diagnosed Person Alive?-- Select --YesPassed away under 2 years agoPassed away over 2 years agoAge of Diagnosed Person-- Select --Under 6565-8485 or olderExposure-- Select --MilitaryOccupationalSecond-HandOther / UnknownMain Job Site-- Select --ShipyardsBoiler RoomsPowerhousesPaper MillsConstruction SitesAutomotiveFirefightingRailroadsRefineriesOther / UnknownMain Asbestos Product Used-- Select --Fire Protection ProductsBrake Pads / LiningsCeiling Textures / Tile / PlasterElectrical ProductsTransite ProductsHeating & Cooling ProductsVermiculiteRoofing ProductsPaints / Plasters / Wall CoveringsOther / UnknownState-- Select --AlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaNorthern Mariana IslandsOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahU.S. Virgin IslandsVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces EuropeArmed Forces PacificPhone(Required)Email(Required)First Name(Required)Last Name(Required)PhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
         Any information you send is secure and will never be sold or released.This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
        
                        Δ
                        





Getting Legal Help



Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you need additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Veteran Mesothelioma Claims Guide

Veteran mesothelioma claims are available through the Veterans Administration (VA) for those who qualify. The U.S. Armed Forces used a lot of asbestos in buildings, ships, equipment, and more. As a result, veterans have higher rates of asbestos illnesses than the general population.



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more.



Key Facts About Mesothelioma & Veterans




Eligibility for Disability Compensation: Veterans with mesothelioma may be eligible for 100% disability compensation, offering crucial financial support for affected individuals.



VA Claims and Health Care Access: Veterans can file VA claims for compensation and access VA health care for mesothelioma, providing a clear pathway to benefits.



Legal Settlements: Many veterans also receive compensation through legal settlements, expanding financial recovery options.



Assistance from Claims Agents: A VA-accredited claims agent can help answer questions about VA disability, assisting veterans in navigating the claims process effectively.




What Are VA Mesothelioma and Asbestos Claims?



A VA claim is a request for benefits veterans can make to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The role of the VA is to care for the men and women (and their families) who served the U.S. In the military.



This care includes benefits for veterans harmed by their time in the service. Benefits include medical care and compensation. Veterans must file a claim and meet qualifications to receive VA benefits.



Who Should File a Mesothelioma or Asbestos VA Claim?



Any veteran harmed by asbestos exposure during their time in the military can file a claim for VA benefits. If you have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness and your asbestos exposure occurred during active service, you are entitled to benefits. Make a claim to ensure you receive them.



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. 



We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 



We offer free online appointments and can arrange for representatives to meet you within just one mile of your home.











How Asbestos Exposure Leads to Mesothelioma



Unseen Threats: The Airborne Nature of Asbestos



Asbestos is a naturally occurring mineral that, when disturbed, can release tiny fibers into the air. These fibers are often invisible to the naked eye, posing a hidden danger.



Inhalation and Entrapment



When breathed in, these microfibers can become lodged in the lining of the lungs, abdomen, or heart. The body struggles to expel them, leading to long-term imprisonment within the tissues.



Irritation and Cellular Transformation



Over time, the presence of these fibers causes chronic irritation and inflammation. This ongoing irritation can cause damage at the cellular level, prompting abnormal cell behavior.



The Path to Cancer



The eventual outcome of such persistent cellular irritation may be genetic mutations. These mutations can turn healthy cells into cancerous ones, leading to the development of mesothelioma, a rare and aggressive cancer.



Slow Onset of Symptoms



Another concerning aspect of asbestos exposure is its long latency period. Symptoms of mesothelioma may take decades to appear, often becoming apparent only when the disease has reached an advanced stage.



Understanding the pathway from asbestos exposure to mesothelioma underscores the importance of protective measures and regular health screenings for those at risk.



How and When Did the Military Use Asbestos?



Malignant mesothelioma is caused almost exclusively by exposure to asbestos. The U.S. military and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) recognize this disease as a service-related disability. 



According to the VA, personnel who worked in any of the following occupations may have been exposed to asbestos when they were on active duty:




Carpentry and construction



Demolition of old structures



Insulation work



Manufacturing and installation of cement sheet, flooring, pipe products, or roofing



Milling



Mining



Servicing of friction products such as brake linings or clutch facings



Shipyard work




The VA also acknowledges the possibility that veterans who served in the Middle East, especially in Iraq and adjoining countries, were exposed to asbestos. 



Many old structures in the region contain asbestos. Military personnel and civilian defense contractors on duty in this part of the world are constantly exposed to asbestos fibers when these buildings are damaged or demolished.



Which Asbestos Illnesses Does the VA Recognize? 



To receive benefits, you must have a diagnosis of an illness caused by asbestos. Or, asbestos must be a significant contributing factor, and asbestos exposure must have occurred during your time in the service. 



The VA recognizes several illnesses that are caused by asbestos and that are eligible for benefits: 




Pleural mesothelioma



Peritoneal mesothelioma



Lung cancer



Bronchial cancer



Pharynx cancer



Larynx cancer



Gastrointestinal cancer



Asbestosis



Lung fibrosis



Pleural plaques



Pleural effusion




The amount of compensation a veteran is entitled to depends on the diagnosis and the severity of the illness. 



What Benefits Are Available to Veterans With Asbestos Illnesses? 



The VA offers a variety of benefits to veterans and their families. One of the most important is medical care. Several VA hospitals offer specialist care for asbestos illnesses. Veterans may qualify for VA Disability Compensation and VA health care if military service caused or worsened their health conditions. Veterans’ families can stay at Fisher House homes while a veteran is in the hospital receiving medical care. This ensures families have a supportive environment during challenging times.



The types of compensation veterans can file a claim to receive include:




Disability Compensation. Monthly disability compensation is a regular payment for veterans with certain disabilities. The VA considers mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses to be disabilities.



Special Monthly Compensation. Veterans who need to hire care workers for in-home medical or personal care can file for this additional compensation.



Dependency and Indemnity Compensation. Spouses of veterans who died from asbestos exposure can file for this monthly compensation. If the veteran was not already receiving disability benefits when they died, the spouse must file and make a case that the death was related to asbestos exposure during service.



Caregiver Compensation and Support. The VA offers assistance to family members providing care to disabled and ill veterans with a disability rating of at least 70%.




These resources and support systems are crucial for veterans and their families, offering both financial relief and practical support during their healthcare journey."



How to File a VA Benefits Claim for Asbestos



According to the VA, any veteran exposed to asbestos during their time in the armed forces who develops asbestosis, asbestos-related lung cancer, or mesothelioma is eligible for service-connected compensation benefits.



The VA has the following eligibility requirements for veterans to process asbestos-related claims:




Veterans must have been discharged under all conditions except dishonorable



Veterans must have been exposed to asbestos while serving in the armed forces



Veterans must have a disease or disability connected to the asbestos exposure that took place in military service




You can apply online or in person. You can also enlist someone to help you file. Any friend or family member can help, or you can work with a Veteran Service Officer or asbestos lawyer. 











                
                        
                            Calculate Case Value
                            
                        
                        Diagnosis-- Select --MesotheliomaAsbestosisAsbestos-Related Lung CancerIs Diagnosed Person Alive?-- Select --YesPassed away under 2 years agoPassed away over 2 years agoAge of Diagnosed Person-- Select --Under 6565-8485 or olderExposure-- Select --MilitaryOccupationalSecond-HandOther / UnknownMain Job Site-- Select --ShipyardsBoiler RoomsPowerhousesPaper MillsConstruction SitesAutomotiveFirefightingRailroadsRefineriesOther / UnknownMain Asbestos Product Used-- Select --Fire Protection ProductsBrake Pads / LiningsCeiling Textures / Tile / PlasterElectrical ProductsTransite ProductsHeating & Cooling ProductsVermiculiteRoofing ProductsPaints / Plasters / Wall CoveringsOther / UnknownState-- Select --AlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaNorthern Mariana IslandsOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahU.S. Virgin IslandsVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces EuropeArmed Forces PacificPhone(Required)Email(Required)First Name(Required)Last Name(Required)PhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
         Any information you send is secure and will never be sold or released.This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
        
                        Δ
                        





How Do You Prove Asbestos Exposure in VA Claims? 



The VA recognizes asbestosis, asbestos-related lung cancer, and malignant mesothelioma as diseases or disabilities connected to asbestos exposure if such exposure took place during a claimant’s term of active duty service. 



To ensure that the claims are processed properly and to prevent false claims from being filed, the VA has established the following evidence requirements:




Veterans filing an asbestos exposure claim must show that the exposure occurred when they were on active duty. They can describe their Military Occupation Specialty (MOS) or where they were stationed at the time. 



Veterans are required to show proof that they have asbestosis, lung cancer, or mesothelioma and that a causative link exists between these diseases or disabilities and asbestos exposure while they served in the armed forces. It is important to note that the VA will not process claims of asbestos exposure per se; veterans must file claims based on the asbestos-related disease or disability. 




As part of the claims process, the VA will routinely ask veterans to undergo a medical exam and seek a physician’s determination if the disability or disease is connected to asbestos exposure.



Four Quick Facts About VA Disability Compensation Claims



The Department of Veterans Affairs is surrounded by myths and misconceptions about what it does and how its compensation programs work. 



Many people don’t file disability claims because they think they are not qualified. This section consists of four quick facts to dispel some of these myths and misconceptions.




Former members of the military do not need to have seen combat or served during wartime to be considered veterans. A company clerk who was in the Army after the 1983 invasion of Grenada and left the service before Operation Just Cause in 1989 is as much a veteran as a Marine who saw action in those two operations. 



Veterans can file for VA compensation under any type of discharge from military service except Dishonorable Discharge. Contrary to a common misconception, Veterans separated from the armed forces under all other discharge conditions, including Bad Conduct Discharge and Other-than-Honorable Discharge, are still eligible for VA benefits and compensation.



The VA will not force veterans who file any medical disability claim to see a VA physician. Though veterans who obtain a VA Disability Rating are eligible for VA Health Care, enrollment is not compulsory. Veterans enrolled in other insurance programs with their own physicians can keep them and are not forced to switch to VA Health Care or VA-approved doctors.



Survivors of veterans who died from mesothelioma or any asbestos-related condition but did not file a claim with the VA are just as eligible for Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) as survivors of veterans who filed for disability compensation. The DIC vetting process is slower in such cases, and survivors must persuade VA case evaluators that the veteran’s asbestos exposure took place during his or her time in the military.




How Much Compensation Do Veterans Get for Mesothelioma?



The VA compensation guidelines are based on disability ratings determined by how seriously disabled a veteran is. These ratings are explained as a percentage scale, starting with 0 (minimal disability) to 100 (total disability).



Compensation amounts vary depending on the disability ratings, measured in increments of 10 percentage points. 



For example, a married veteran with a spouse and one child and a 100% disability rating is currently entitled to receive a little over $3,000 per month. Most cancers, including mesothelioma and lung cancer, have a VA disability rating of 100%.



Per VA and government regulations, VA disability compensation is tax-free. Veterans are eligible for compensation if the disability or disease is conclusively shown to be connected to their time in the military.



A mesothelioma lawyer can help you file and give you a better chance of making a successful claim. 



Steps for Veterans After Noticing Mesothelioma Symptoms



If you're a veteran and begin noticing symptoms associated with mesothelioma, it's crucial to take decisive action. Early intervention can open up more treatment avenues and possibly improve outcomes. Here's a step-by-step guide on what to do next:



1. Assess Asbestos Exposure




Begin by reflecting on your military service. Determine if there was any likelihood of asbestos exposure during your duty. This is a critical first step in understanding your risk.




2. Consult a Healthcare Professional




If you're experiencing symptoms, promptly schedule an appointment with your doctor.



Discuss your concerns and seek a referral to a specialist experienced in dealing with asbestos-related conditions. Advocates in the healthcare system can assist in finding one near you.




3. Obtain an Official Diagnosis




Should mesothelioma be suspected, ensure you receive a thorough diagnostic evaluation. Accurate diagnosis is essential for effective treatment planning.




4. Explore Treatment Options




Look into specialized treatments available for veterans. You have access to options both through the Veterans Affairs (VA) and outside healthcare providers.




5. Support for Caregivers




If you're a caregiver for a veteran dealing with mesothelioma, gather information on how to provide the best support. Numerous resources can offer guidance and assistance.




6. Investigate Benefits and Legal Support




Learn about VA benefits and legal avenues that may be available for you and your family. A VA-accredited claims agent can provide detailed advice and support.




7. Consider Palliative and Hospice Care




Depending on the stage of the disease, you might want to consider incorporating palliative care into your treatment plan. For late-stage diagnoses, exploring hospice care options could be beneficial.




Taking these proactive steps can significantly affect your journey and provide clarity and support during a challenging time.



Treatment Options for Veterans with Mesothelioma



Mesothelioma treatment for veterans typically involves a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. These are the standard approaches for managing and potentially controlling this aggressive disease. However, the path to choosing the right treatment varies, depending on individual cases and how far the disease has progressed.



Mesothelioma Symptoms and Diagnosis



Symptoms of mesothelioma can take years to surface. It's crucial for veterans with potential asbestos exposure, particularly during military service, to be vigilant. If diagnosed, connecting with a specialist knowledgeable about mesothelioma is vital. These professionals can provide tailored treatment plans considering a veteran's unique history and risk factors.



Specialist Access and Support



Accessing top-tier mesothelioma specialists is crucial for optimal treatment. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) offers support to help veterans connect with leading experts across the nation. These specialists are equipped with the latest strategies and treatment options specifically designed for veterans.



Veterans Choice Program



For those who find VA facilities too distant or appointment wait times too lengthy, the Veterans Choice Program offers a solution. Eligible veterans can seek medical care outside of the VA system if they live more than 40 miles from a VA facility or cannot secure an appointment within 30 days. Discussing these alternatives with a VA doctor can help veterans find the best care path tailored to their needs.



In summary, while mesothelioma presents significant challenges, veterans have a wide range of treatment resources and programs available to support them through their healthcare journey.



How Veterans Can Access Care Far from a VA Facility



If you're a veteran living at a considerable distance from a Veterans Affairs (VA) facility, accessing timely medical care might seem challenging. However, there's a program designed precisely to address this issue.



Veterans Choice Program



The Veterans Choice Program is a valuable resource for eligible veterans who find themselves far from the nearest VA health care center. This program allows veterans to seek treatment from healthcare providers outside of the VA system, ensuring they receive the necessary care without undue delay.



Eligibility Criteria




Distance Requirement: If your residence is more than 40 miles away from the closest VA medical facility, you may qualify for this program. This distance is measured using the shortest route available.



Appointment Wait Time: Veterans who face a wait time of over 30 days for the next available VA appointment are also eligible to participate.




Steps to Access Care




Consult Your VA Doctor: Begin by discussing your situation with your VA healthcare provider. They can guide you through the eligibility verification process and help you understand your options.



Verify Eligibility: Once your eligibility is established, you'll receive authorization to seek treatment from an approved non-VA provider.



Choose a Provider: With authorization, you can select a suitable healthcare provider outside the VA network, ensuring it fits within the program's guidelines.




By utilizing the Veterans Choice Program, you can access the care you need without being constrained by geographical limitations or scheduling delays. This initiative aims to make healthcare more accessible and efficient for veterans, enhancing their overall well-being and quality of life.





How to Enroll in VA Health Care for Mesothelioma



Enrolling in VA health care for mesothelioma involves a few key steps to ensure your service-related illness is recognized.



Steps to Enroll




Determine EligibilityAssess your income level and service history to determine your eligibility for VA health care benefits.



Gather Necessary DocumentationCompile all necessary documents, including medical records that link your mesothelioma to your military service. This could include any records showing asbestos exposure during active duty.



Submit Evidence of Service ConnectionIf your mesothelioma is connected to your service—such as proving that a significant portion of your asbestos exposure occurred while on duty—provide this evidence to the VA. The VA requires proof to acknowledge the illness as service-related.



Apply for VA Health CareComplete your application via the VA’s online portal, by mail, or in person at a VA medical center. Include all gathered documentation as part of your submission.




Factors to Consider




Income LevelDetermine how your income affects your eligibility, as it plays a role in the application process.



Service Connection DocumentationStrong documentation linking your mesothelioma to your military service will support your case. This can significantly impact the VA’s decision.




Enrolling in VA health care with a service-related illness like mesothelioma requires careful preparation and submission of evidence. By following these steps, you can navigate the process more effectively.



The VA offers a variety of benefits to veterans and their families. One of the most important is medical care. Several VA hospitals offer specialist care for asbestos illnesses. The types of compensation veterans can file a claim to receive include:




Disability Compensation. Monthly disability compensation is a regular payment for veterans with certain disabilities. The VA considers mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses to be disabilities.



Special Monthly Compensation. Veterans who need to hire care workers for in-home medical or personal care can file for this additional compensation.



Dependency and Indemnity Compensation. Spouses of veterans who died from asbestos exposure can file for this monthly compensation. If the veteran was not already receiving disability benefits when they died, the spouse must file and make a case that the death was related to asbestos exposure during service.



Caregiver Compensation and Support. The VA offers assistance to family members providing care to disabled and ill veterans with a disability rating of at least 70%.




In addition to financial support, veterans and their families have access to VA health care services, which can be critical for managing mesothelioma. Specialized treatment and care are available to address the unique health challenges posed by asbestos exposure.



Moreover, the Fisher House Foundation provides a valuable resource for families. These homes offer a comforting place to stay at no cost while veterans undergo medical treatment in hospitals, ensuring that loved ones can remain close during critical times of care.



Together, these resources offer a comprehensive support system for veterans facing the challenges of mesothelioma, ensuring both medical and financial needs are addressed.



How to Access Burial Benefits for Veterans with Service-Connected Mesothelioma



Veterans' families may be eligible for a burial allowance of $2,000 if the veteran's death is linked to a service-related illness like mesothelioma due to asbestos exposure. Here's how you can access these benefits:




Prove Funeral Expenses: To qualify, you must demonstrate that you personally covered the veteran’s burial or funeral costs. This confirmation typically involves submitting receipts or invoices.



Establish Service-Related Death: It is crucial to show that the death resulted from a disability connected to military service. In the case of mesothelioma, this involves proving the disease was caused by asbestos exposure during the veteran’s service.



Submit the Claim Form: File the appropriate claim form with the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), including all necessary documentation and evidence supporting the service-related condition.



Review the Requirements: Understanding the VA's specific requirements for filing a claim is essential. Double-check that all documents are complete to avoid delays in processing your application.




By following these steps, you can navigate the process and potentially secure the burial benefits that honor your veteran's service.



Legal Help for Veterans



Two months later, when Mr. R. was 62 years old, a lifelong father and Navy veteran, he was diagnosed with mesothelioma, a rare and deadly cancer. This heartbreaking news shocked his family’s world. Mr. R. had spent years working in various industrial jobs and serving his country, and he had worked so hard to provide for his wife and three children, unknowingly subjecting himself to the ravages of long-term asbestos exposure that he would develop such a serious illness.



The diagnosis added huge challenges. His wife, Mrs. R., was devastated and anxious. How would they pay for the skyrocketing medical bills and still get their youngest child through college? Their already stable life became beset by treatments, pain, and a palpable sense of uncertainty.



Because she refused to give up hope, Mrs. R. reached out for help and found a qualified mesothelioma attorney at Mesothelioma Lawyer Center. That was a critical moment for their family.



The lawyer carefully reviewed Mr. R.’s work history and his exposure to asbestos. Using diligence and empathy, they were able to unearth key details from his time in the Navy and at industrial jobs, and go on to file a claim against the companies responsible.



After months of tireless work, the lawyer secured a substantial settlement for the family. The compensation provided a catch-up readjustment, allowing access to advanced treatments that helped prolong Mr. R.’s time with his family. It took the financial burden of medical bills off Mr. R.’s shoulders and enabled Mrs. R. to concentrate on caring for her husband. Most telling, however, is the fact that they have had no trouble making sure their youngest child was able to finish college without crushing debt.



For Mr. R., the settlement was more than financial support—it was an affirmation of justice. It gave him peace of mind that his family’s future was secure, and that those responsible for his suffering had paid. The settlement enabled his family to tackle its obstacles with dignity and optimism.



This family’s journey is a testament to the power of resilience, love, and decisive action. Their lives changed because Mrs. R. picked up the phone.



Take the first step in seeking justice today if you or a loved one has been affected by mesothelioma. Call us today to pursue the compensation and justice you deserve. Your family’s future is too important to put off.



If you've been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you'll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. 



Take Action Now: Secure Your Future with Expert Legal Help



If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to significant financial compensation. Our dedicated team of mesothelioma lawyers is here to guide you through every step of the legal process, ensuring your rights are protected and you receive the justice you deserve.



📄 Get Your Free Financial Compensation Packet!Fill out our simple form today to receive a comprehensive packet with details about experienced asbestos and mesothelioma law firms and lawyers in your area [near me], along with essential resources to help you make informed decisions about your case.



💡 Why Choose Us?




Decades of experience handling asbestos-related cases.



No upfront fees – you only pay if we win your case.



Personalized, compassionate support to help you focus on your health.




📞 Contact Us Today for Additional Legal Assistance and Advice!Call us at 800-793-4540 to speak with our team. Don’t wait—your time to file a claim is limited, and your family’s financial future could depend on taking action now.



You’re not alone in this fight. Let us help you secure the justice and compensation you deserve.

### Find Top Mesothelioma Attorneys | Free Legal Assistance for Mesothelioma & Asbestos Lawsuits

Get Legal Assistance from a Top-Rated Mesothelioma Lawyer Near You




Find a top-rated mesothelioma law firm for maximum compensation



See client testimonials and average settlements for mesothelioma claims



File for your share of $30 billion in asbestos trust funds



Submit the form for free legal assistance from an asbestos legal expert







                
                        
                            Calculate Case Value
                            
                        
                        Diagnosis-- Select --MesotheliomaAsbestosisAsbestos-Related Lung CancerIs Diagnosed Person Alive?-- Select --YesPassed away under 2 years agoPassed away over 2 years agoAge of Diagnosed Person-- Select --Under 6565-8485 or olderExposure-- Select --MilitaryOccupationalSecond-HandOther / UnknownMain Job Site-- Select --ShipyardsBoiler RoomsPowerhousesPaper MillsConstruction SitesAutomotiveFirefightingRailroadsRefineriesOther / UnknownMain Asbestos Product Used-- Select --Fire Protection ProductsBrake Pads / LiningsCeiling Textures / Tile / PlasterElectrical ProductsTransite ProductsHeating & Cooling ProductsVermiculiteRoofing ProductsPaints / Plasters / Wall CoveringsOther / UnknownState-- Select --AlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaNorthern Mariana IslandsOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahU.S. Virgin IslandsVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces EuropeArmed Forces PacificPhone(Required)Email(Required)First Name(Required)Last Name(Required)NameThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
         Any information you send is secure and will never be sold or released.This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
        
                        Δ
                        









For over 25 years we’ve been connecting families with highly experienced mesothelioma lawyers.



Justice for Asbestos and Mesothelioma Victims Starts Here



We connect patients and families with top-rated mesothelioma attorneys who have recovered billions in asbestos-related compensation. No fees unless you win.



Have You or a Loved One Been Diagnosed with Mesothelioma or Asbestos-Related Cancer?



Mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive cancer caused by asbestos exposure — often decades ago. Victims are entitled to significant compensation, even if the exposure happened at work, in the military, or in older buildings.



Here’s How We Help:




Connect you with top mesothelioma law firms across the U.S.



Help you file lawsuits or claims with asbestos trust funds



Assist veterans with VA benefits and private legal action





Time is limited. Most states have strict deadlines to file.




Choosing the right legal representation for you and your family is crucial. It can also be overwhelming. At Mesothelioma Lawyer Center we clear through the confusion on your behalf and connect you with highly respected mesothelioma lawyers near you.



Fill out our form to receive a FREE Financial Compensation Packet. We’ll send you valuable information on highly qualified mesothelioma and asbestos lawyers in your area, client testimonials, and how to file for your share of over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, plus more.



Get the answers to questions about asbestos, mesothelioma, legal representation, and compensation. Fill out our Contact Form or call us toll free at 800-793-4540.



We have decades of experience helping asbestos victims across the country, in all 50 states. Let our top rated and experienced meso legal professionals in your area help you learn more and decide what steps to take next.



We offer free online appointments and can arrange for representatives to meet you within just one mile of your home. Open Now.




Find Lawyers by State












































































Marilyn & Family



“There aren’t enough words to describe how much our family appreciates everything you have done for us since we met 4 years ago. I feel a very special bond between us that will continue for a very long time.”








 



 




Finding the Best Mesothelioma Lawyer





Browse the Top Lawyers for Mesothelioma & Asbestos Claims



Directory of Mesothelioma Lawyers by State



One of the most important decisions you’ll make is choosing a lawyer to represent you. Mesothelioma and asbestos cases are complicated. Choosing a legal team that has experience with asbestos cases will give you the best chances of winning your claim.



Your lawyer should also be someone who makes you feel comfortable. Before moving forward, there should be no doubts in your mind that your legal team has your best interests in mind. Choose a top rated lawyer who will fight for you, educate you about asbestos laws, and who will keep you posted as your meso case proceeds see possible payout amounts now.



A good asbestos mesothelioma lawyer should also help you decide what to do to get justice and maximum compensation. Whether you should file a claim with an asbestos trust fund, start a lawsuit, go to trial with your case, or seek compensation through the Veterans Administration is a tough decision to make without good legal advice.



Calculate your claim value and get legal assistance 












 








Asbestos & Mesothelioma Trust Funds





Get Help Maximizing Your Mesothelioma Claim Payout



Mesothelioma settlements and verdicts often range from $1 million to over $5 million, depending on your case specifics.



Typical Asbestos Payouts May Cover:




Lost wages and future income



Medical expenses and travel costs



Pain and suffering



Funeral costs and wrongful death damages




Even if the company responsible has gone bankrupt, you may still qualify for asbestos trust fund compensation.



Filing a Mesothelioma Lawsuit



Mesothelioma trust funds are financial trusts set up by companies that faced bankruptcy over asbestos lawsuits. Before being eligible for bankruptcy protection, these companies were required to set up the trusts to compensate victims of asbestos exposure now and in the future.



Previously, asbestos victims had to rely on lawsuits for compensation. Now, with many companies ordered to set up mesothelioma trust funds, compensation is more readily available without the hassle of a trial.



Get more information about asbestos trust funds 








 








Legal Assistance for Mesothelioma Settlements





Best Mesothelioma Law Firms



The majority of mesothelioma lawsuits settle out of court. In a settlement, the plaintiff’s representation negotiates a compensation amount with the defendant’s legal team. Although it’s difficult to determine how long a settlement will take, they are generally much quicker than going to trial.



Mesothelioma settlement amounts vary according to how long you’ve lived with an asbestos-related illness (or if the victim is deceased), the stage and severity of the illness, and the circumstances surrounding how asbestos exposure took place. No lawyer can guarantee you will win a certain amount, but mesothelioma settlements average about $1 million. 



It’s important to understand how mesothelioma settlements work so that you know what to expect.



Get more information about settlements  








 








Veterans Claims





Mesothelioma Legal Help for Veterans



Over 30% of all mesothelioma cases involve U.S. military veterans. The Navy, in particular, used asbestos extensively in ships, shipyards, and bases.



We Help Veterans:




Access VA benefits (up to $3,600/month)



Pursue lawsuits against manufacturers (not the military)



Connect with mesothelioma specialists in the VA system




You served your country — now let us serve you.



If you served in the U.S. military and believe your asbestos exposure occurred during your service, you may be able to file for and receive compensation through the Veterans Administration (VA).



There are certain requirements you need to meet in order to qualify for veterans’ compensation. To sort through the complicated process, and to determine what you qualify for, let an experienced mesothelioma lawyer guide you.



Mesothelioma Lawsuit FAQs



What is the average settlement for a mesothelioma case?



Most settlements range from $1 million to $2.4 million. However, the total amount depends on your exposure history, the state you file in, and the defendant’s ability to pay.



Can I sue if the company responsible has gone bankrupt?



Yes. You may be eligible to file a claim with an asbestos trust fund — many were set up by bankrupt companies to compensate victims.



Do mesothelioma lawsuits affect VA benefits?



No. You can receive both VA benefits and financial compensation from a legal case. We help veterans navigate both systems.



How long do I have to file a claim?



Most states have a 1-3 year statute of limitations from diagnosis. If a loved one passed away, it may be 1-3 years from the date of death. Speak with an attorney and get legal assistance ASAP. 



Learn more about what the VA offers asbestos victims  











The Latest from Our Mesothelioma Blog













Check Out More Blog Posts

### The Army, Asbestos Exposure, and Mesothelioma

U.S. Army veterans are at an increased risk for mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses. The Army used asbestos in bases, housing, vehicles, equipment, and more. Veterans with mesothelioma are eligible for benefits and compensation. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Why Army Veterans Are at Risk for Mesothelioma



Mesothelioma is a rare cancer known to be caused by asbestos exposure. Approximately 3,000 people are diagnosed with mesothelioma in the U.S. every year. Nearly 30% of mesothelioma diagnoses are in veterans of any branch of the military. 



The connection between high rates of mesothelioma in veterans and asbestos use in the military is clear. Many veterans who served in the Army between the 1930s and the end of the Vietnam War were exposed to asbestos. 



Are Army Veterans at Risk for Other Asbestos Illnesses? 



Even with high rates of exposure, mesothelioma is a rare diagnosis. Most veterans exposed to asbestos will never have mesothelioma, but they can develop other more common illnesses: 




Lung cancer



Other cancers



Asbestosis



Pleural plaques



Pleural thickening




Which Veterans Are Most at Risk for Mesothelioma? 



No amount of asbestos exposure is safe, but anyone exposed to asbestos once or twice is unlikely to develop mesothelioma. The Army veterans at greatest risk for mesothelioma were repeatedly exposed to asbestos through their jobs. 



Asbestos was most heavily used in construction materials, vehicles, and equipment. Veterans in the following roles have a higher risk of mesothelioma:




Construction



Carpentry



Demolition



Insulation repair or installation



Pipefitting



Plumbing



Boiler work



Mechanical and vehicle repair and maintenance




Family members of men and women who worked around asbestos in the Army are also at risk for mesothelioma. Secondhand exposure occurred when workers brought fibers of asbestos home on their clothing, exposing family members. Some of these family members develop asbestos illnesses later. 



Benefits for Army Veterans With Mesothelioma



Members of the U.S. Army should have been protected from asbestos exposure. Those who develop related illnesses later are entitled to certain benefits from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). 



Compensation for Veterans With Asbestos Illnesses



One of the most important types of benefits for veterans with mesothelioma is compensation. Mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses are debilitating. Most people with these illnesses cannot work. They also face treatment costs, travel for care, and home care. 



The VA offers two main types of compensation benefits for Army veterans with mesothelioma: 




Disability compensation provides veterans with a monthly payment for being disabled. 



Special monthly compensation is available to some veterans who need care in their homes. It is extra compensation in addition to regular monthly disability payments. 




Compensation for Family of Veterans Affected by Asbestos



The VA also offers compensation for spouses, dependent children, and sometimes parents of veterans with mesothelioma. This is part of the monthly disability compensation, which increases for each additional dependent of the veteran.



Families can also receive compensation when a veteran dies from an asbestos illness:




Dependency and indemnity compensation is a benefit offered to qualifying surviving spouses and children of veterans.



Funeral expenses cover some or all of the burial and funeral costs for a deceased veteran.




Additional VA Benefits for Veterans



Beyond financial compensation, the VA provides a variety of benefits to support veterans in multiple aspects of life. Veterans may qualify for housing grants, which can assist in acquiring or adapting homes to meet their specific needs.



Life insurance options are available, offering peace of mind for veterans and their families. Access to health benefits ensures veterans receive necessary medical care, particularly critical for those with service-related conditions.



For veterans exposed to asbestos and suffering from related diseases, the VA offers specialized treatment at medical centers staffed with doctors experienced in diseases like mesothelioma. This healthcare support is crucial given the historical use of asbestos in military environments.



These offerings highlight the VA's commitment to addressing the diverse needs of veterans, ensuring they receive both financial and non-financial support throughout their lives.



How Much Disability Compensation Can Army Veterans Get? 



The amount of compensation veterans receive depends on their disability rating and number of dependents. The VA gives mesothelioma and lung cancer caused by asbestos a disability rating of 100%. These veterans are entitled to full disability compensation. 



The VA rates other asbestos illnesses between 10% and 100%, depending on individual factors. These veterans receive a percentage of the total amount. 



As of 2023, the monthly disability compensation for a veteran with a 100% rating and no spouse, children, or qualifying parents is $3,621.95. 



Healthcare Benefits for Veterans with Mesothelioma



Veterans with mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses can receive free or low-cost medical care at VA medical centers and hospitals. Because veterans are at such high risk for mesothelioma, several VA facilties offer treatment and staff specialists: 




Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX



VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA



VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA



Miami VA Healthcare System, Miami, FL




Understanding the Veterans Community Care Program (VCCP)



The Veterans Community Care Program (VCCP) is a crucial resource designed to support Army veterans, especially those dealing with health issues like asbestos-related diseases. It's a revamped initiative, stemming from the former Veterans Choice Program, aiming to enhance healthcare access for veterans.



Key Benefits of the VCCP




Access to Local Healthcare: One of the standout features of the VCCP is its provision for veterans to receive medical care at non-VA facilities closer to their homes. This is particularly beneficial for veterans suffering from asbestos-related diseases who might not live near a VA medical center.



Improved Convenience: For Army veterans dealing with mobility issues or who are in need of urgent and frequent care, traveling long distances to access VA facilities can be burdensome. The VCCP alleviates this by allowing care at more conveniently located community providers.



Eligibility Criteria: While specific eligibility criteria must be met to participate, these details are readily accessible on the official VA website, ensuring veterans can easily determine their qualification for this program.




By enhancing accessibility and convenience, the Veterans Community Care Program ensures Army veterans receive the timely and effective healthcare they need, right within their communities.



Treatment Options for Army Veterans with Mesothelioma



Army veterans diagnosed with mesothelioma have a range of treatment options available to them. The pathway to effective care often begins with understanding the resources provided by the VA and nearby specialized medical facilities.



VA's Community Care Network



One of the primary avenues for treatment is the VA’s Community Care Network (CCN). This program enables veterans to access experienced mesothelioma specialists locally, ensuring they receive care without the need to travel extensively. The CCN is designed to provide flexibility and convenience, empowering veterans to seek expert medical help close to home.



VA Healthcare System



Apart from the CCN, veterans can also explore treatment options within the VA healthcare system itself. The system offers a variety of services tailored to meet the needs of those affected by asbestos-related conditions. Veterans may benefit from the comprehensive medical care provided by VA hospitals and clinics, where they can receive treatments spanning from surgery to chemotherapy and other advanced options.



Specialized Mesothelioma Centers Near Army Bases



Several centers are strategically located near large Army bases, offering veterans the possibility to access top-tier cancer treatment facilities. Some renowned centers include:




UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center: Known for its cutting-edge research and treatment options.



Baylor Scott & White Clinic – Temple: Provides a range of treatments backed by specialists in cancer care.



Swedish Cancer Institute at Swedish Medical Center: Offers innovative therapies and supportive care services.




Finding a Mesothelioma Center



Veterans should take proactive steps to find a suitable mesothelioma center that aligns with their healthcare needs. Locating a center involves assessing treatment options, evaluating proximity to home, and considering the expertise of the medical team. Such centers often provide personalized care plans geared towards improving quality of life and extending survival.



By leveraging these resources, Army veterans can access the necessary medical attention to manage mesothelioma, supported by a network designed to cater to their unique needs.



How to File a Claim for VA Benefits



If you are a veteran diagnosed with an asbestos illness, you have a right to seek benefits. To get those benefits, you must file a claim. 



How Do I Qualify for VA Benefits? 



The VA has two eligibility requirements for Army veterans to receive asbestos-related disability benefits: 




The veteran's illness is related to asbestos exposure. 



The veteran was exposed to asbestos during military service. 




How Do I Prove Asbestos Exposure in the Army? 



When you file a claim with the VA for benefits, the burden is on you as the veteran to prove you are eligible. You must submit three things: 




Military service records that show you performed a role in the Army that likely exposed you to asbestos



Medical records proving you were diagnosed with mesothelioma or another illness



A doctor's statement demonstrating that your diagnosis is related to asbestos exposure




Who Can Help Me File a VA Benefits Claim? 



Anyone can help you file a claim for VA benefits. The process can be confusing, so relying on a professional with experience is best. Two good options include: 




An official Veterans Service Organization representative



An experienced asbestos lawyer




Can Veterans Sue the Army for Asbestos Exposure? 



Army veterans cannot sue the military or federal government for asbestos exposure and resulting illnesses. The VA provides benefits, including compensation, to make up for this. 



Veterans can sue asbestos companies that supplied the Army with asbestos-containing materials. Asbestos companies that went bankrupt cannot be sued, but they set up asbestos trust funds to compensate claimants. 



An experienced asbestos law firm or mesothelioma lawyer can help veterans with either of these options. They can help them sue asbestos companies or make a claim for compensation through a trust. These alternative sources of compensation do not disqualify a veteran or reduce the amount of their VA benefits. 



How Did the Army Use Asbestos? 



As with all other military branches, however, the Army’s heavy reliance on asbestos resulted in a multitude of soldiers developing life-threatening diseases such as mesothelioma and asbestosis.



The Army first used asbestos in the 1800s. The mineral, now classified as toxic to humans, was mixed with rubber to make gaskets and other parts for steam engines. 



Steam engines were used in railroad trains that could quickly haul thousands of men across long distances. They were also used in steamboats, cargo ships, and other seagoing vessels that could carry American soldiers and their equipment to U.S. waterways or battlefields overseas.



Asbestos in Bases, Housing, and Other Buildings



Like the civilian construction industry, the Army also used asbestos as insulation to protect its facilities from fire or excessively high temperatures. 



Military bases and their various supporting facilities were built with asbestos-containing materials. Every building in an Army base built from the early 1900s to the 1980s included flooring, wiring, insulation, drywall, and roofing material that contained asbestos.



Some of the Army bases known to have used asbestos include: 




Blue Grass Army Depot, KY



Camp Blanding, FL



Camp San Luis Obispo, CA



Fort Benning, GA



Fort Bragg, NC



Fort Campbell, TN



Fort Collins, CO



Fort Dix, NJ



Fort Hood, TX



Fort Jackson, SC



Fort Lee, VA



Fort Lewis, WA



Fort Monmouth, NJ



Fort Shafter, HI



New Cumberland Army Depot, PA



Rock Island Arsenal, IL




Asbestos in Vehicles and Equipment



As the Army became more mechanized during the 20th Century, asbestos was mixed liberally with rubber and other materials to manufacture various mechanical parts and equipment. This was done to protect vehicles and facilities from heat damage caused by friction.



Army motor pools and train depots carried huge stocks of brake pads, gaskets, and clutches made with asbestos-containing materials. This exposed many mechanics to asbestos while performing routine maintenance on Army vehicles, especially during World War II.



Asbestos in Protective Gear and Clothing



The Army exploited the minerals’ innate flexibility and wove asbestos fibers into soldiers’ protective gear. During World War I and the following years, U.S. Army gas masks contained filters made with asbestos fibers. 



Intended as a safety feature to protect soldiers from breathing deadly chlorine gases, these filters made it easy for asbestos to enter their respiratory systems.



The Army also wove asbestos fibers into certain types of clothing, particularly in jackets, gloves, and trousers used by firefighters on Army bases and auxiliary facilities. 



During World War II, asbestos could be found in nearly everything the Army used. Parachute flares, rockets for bazookas, parts for Sherman tanks and Willys jeeps, wiring in B-17 bombers, and field dressings used by battlefield medics contained asbestos. 



Is Asbestos Exposure Still a Risk in the Army Today? 



Asbestos continues to be a risk in the Army and other branches of the military. It was used so extensively in the past that it has been impossible to completely eradicate asbestos, especially in buildings on bases. 



In 2020, a Department of Defense report detailed asbestos issues at several military installations, including two in the Army. Several of the installations lacked accurate records of where asbestos was located. They also failed to notify service members and their families of asbestos risks in housing. 



These issues are despite the Army's Installation Asbestos Management Program. Implemented in the 1990s, the program is supposed to protect soldiers and their families from asbestos. 



"The program is supposed to follow state and federal laws regarding asbestos safety. It also outlines guidelines for managing asbestos as it is identified on bases and in buildings. The program has led to numerous asbestos abatement projects."



The Army's Installation Asbestos Management Program, initiated in the late 1990s, plays a crucial role in safeguarding soldiers and workers from asbestos exposure. It mandates Army facilities both in the U.S. and overseas to:




Comply with stringent asbestos regulations at both state and federal levels.



Develop and implement asbestos management plans to address identified asbestos swiftly and safely.




This comprehensive approach not only ensures adherence to legal standards but also proactively manages asbestos risks. As a result, many bases have undertaken significant asbestos abatement projects, replacing the hazardous mineral with safer alternatives as recommended by the program. This ongoing effort reflects the Army's commitment to maintaining a safe environment for its personnel.



The Hidden Dangers of Asbestos



After World War II, the War Department and the Department of the Army continued using asbestos. The asbestos manufacturers suppressed data demonstrating a link between asbestos and its health dangers. 



Well-connected companies such as W.R. Grace and Johns-Manville ensured that information gathered by doctors as early as the 1890s remained out of the public eye.



The federal government kept purchasing and utilizing it in substantial quantities because asbestos was a safe and necessary material.



Researchers at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) carried out numerous studies that officially linked asbestos to three debilitating and fatal illnesses: asbestosis, asbestos-related lung cancer, and mesothelioma cancer.



Asbestos-related illnesses had been recorded much earlier, however. As early as Roman times, chronicles described cancer-like diseases that affected workers who had mined or processed asbestos. But, these accounts were not widely known. 



When asbestos was first used on a massive industrial scale, the miners and distributors marketed the fibrous minerals as beneficial and healthy.



Eventually, medical studies in Great Britain and other asbestos-using countries established a causal link between the previously beneficial minerals, cancer, and asbestosis. 



As a result of the EPA’s research on the growing number of mesothelioma cases, the U.S. government, including the Department of the Army, finally stopped purchasing asbestos.



Help for Army Mesothelioma and Asbestos Victims



If you've been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you'll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Mesothelioma Cancer Guide

Malignant mesothelioma is a type of cancer that grows in a type of tissue in the body called the mesothelium and is caused by asbestos exposure. The widespread use of asbestos in the U.S. caused countless incidents of exposure and resulting illnesses. Learn more about your diagnosis in our mesothelioma cancer guide, and discover what you can do if you think you've been exposed.



If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, COPD or asbestosis, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive a free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 











What Is Mesothelioma Cancer?



Mesothelioma is a type of cancer that begins in the mesothelium, the tissue that lines organs in the body. The most common type of this cancer is pleural mesothelioma, in which tumors form in the tissue around the lungs. 



Asbestos fibers that are inhaled lodge in tissue and cause damage over decades. Other rarer types of mesothelioma attack the peritoneum in the abdominal cavity or the pericardium around the heart.



Malignant mesothelioma takes decades—sometimes up to 50 years—to develop after exposure to asbestos, and because it is rare with symptoms similar to more common illnesses, diagnosis is often delayed.



What Causes Mesothelioma?



The main and only confirmed cause of mesothelioma is asbestos exposure. No level is safe, but repeated and prolonged exposure to products that contain asbestos is more likely to lead to a later diagnosis of mesothelioma. 



Asbestos is a natural, fibrous mineral used in many materials and products. When asbestos products shed tiny fibers, they become part of the dust in the air and on surfaces. People in the area without protective gear inadvertently inhale or ingest those fibers. 



Asbestos fibers stick in tissues inside the body and cause inflammation and damage. In some people, over many years, this damage can lead to illness, including mesothelioma or other cancers. 



While anyone can potentially be exposed to asbestos, the primary cause of mesothelioma is occupational asbestos exposure. 



Other factors might play a role in the development of mesothelioma, including genetics. However, asbestos remains the leading cause. 





                
                        
                            Calculate Case Value
                            
                        
                        Diagnosis-- Select --MesotheliomaAsbestosisAsbestos-Related Lung CancerIs Diagnosed Person Alive?-- Select --YesPassed away under 2 years agoPassed away over 2 years agoAge of Diagnosed Person-- Select --Under 6565-8485 or olderExposure-- Select --MilitaryOccupationalSecond-HandOther / UnknownMain Job Site-- Select --ShipyardsBoiler RoomsPowerhousesPaper MillsConstruction SitesAutomotiveFirefightingRailroadsRefineriesOther / UnknownMain Asbestos Product Used-- Select --Fire Protection ProductsBrake Pads / LiningsCeiling Textures / Tile / PlasterElectrical ProductsTransite ProductsHeating & Cooling ProductsVermiculiteRoofing ProductsPaints / Plasters / Wall CoveringsOther / UnknownState-- Select --AlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaNorthern Mariana IslandsOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahU.S. Virgin IslandsVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces EuropeArmed Forces PacificPhone(Required)Email(Required)First Name(Required)Last Name(Required)NameThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
         Any information you send is secure and will never be sold or released.This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
        
                        Δ
                        





Who Is at Risk for Mesothelioma?



Any amount of asbestos exposure puts people at risk of developing mesothelioma. Those at the highest risk worked around asbestos for many years. Asbestos was used in several industries throughout most of the 1900s. Some of the most at-risk people worked in: 




The military, especially the U.S. Navy



Construction



Shipyards



Industrial and manufacturing jobs



Automotive repair shops




Other workplaces likely to have contained asbestos include:




Power plants



Steel plants



Manufacturing facilities



Oil refineries



Power stations



Welding businesses



Chemical plants



Mines



Vermiculite processing plants



Textile mills




Secondhand Asbestos Exposure 



Anyone who lived with someone who worked with asbestos could also develop mesothelioma. They often were exposed to fibers brought home on the worker’s clothing or skin.



This is known as secondhand asbestos exposure. It occurred before people understood the risks of being around mesothelioma and carrying fibers home with them. 



Mesothelioma Risk in Veterans



U.S. Navy veterans have some of the highest rates of mesothelioma in the country. American naval vessels built from the 1930s to the early 1960s contained large amounts of asbestos. 



Floors, hulls, electrical systems, insulation, boilers, steam pipes, and more contained asbestos fibers to add tensile strength, heat resistance, and low electrical conductivity.



Other Mesothelioma Risk Factors



 Mesothelioma is a rare type of cancer. Not everyone exposed to asbestos will develop mesothelioma, although exposure is the leading cause.



In the United States, mesothelioma is indeed considered rare, with approximately 3,000 to 4,000 new cases diagnosed each year. Of these, around 2,500 are cases of malignant pleural mesothelioma, the most common form of this cancer.



Understanding the rarity and specific statistics of mesothelioma helps highlight the importance of awareness and early detection, especially for those with known asbestos exposure.



Older males are diagnosed with mesothelioma the most, particularly those who worked decades ago in facilities with asbestos.



Family history is also a risk factor, suggesting there may be a genetic component to mesothelioma. Finally, radiation therapy to the chest can increase the risk of developing mesothelioma. 



How Can I Prevent Mesothelioma? 



If you know you worked with asbestos in the past, you are at risk for mesothelioma. You can reduce your risk by improving your overall health, but you cannot eliminate the risk. 



Workers today who might still be at risk of being around asbestos can lower their risk of exposure to prevent mesothelioma. Know your risk factors on the job. If there is asbestos present, your employer should make you aware of it and provide safety training and gear. 



Follow all safety protocols to protect yourself at work. If your employer has not provided information and safety equipment, you can report these violations to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. 



Types of Mesothelioma



Mesothelioma can develop in the mesothelium in various parts of the body, most commonly in the chest and the abdomen. There are four main types based on the location of the cancer. 



Pleural Mesothelioma



Pleural mesothelioma is the most common form of mesothelioma cancer. It develops in the pleural tissue, which surrounds the lungs. It is likely the most common form because of how easy it is to inhale asbestos fibers. More than 75% of mesothelioma diagnoses are pleural. 



Peritoneal Mesothelioma



The second most common is peritoneal mesothelioma, which develops in the peritoneum, the tissue lining abdominal organs. Fewer than 20% of diagnoses are peritoneal mesothelioma. It is likely caused by the ingestion of asbestos fibers. 



Pericardial Mesothelioma



Pericardial mesothelioma develops in the pericardium. This is the part of the mesothelium that surrounds the heart. It is rare and accounts for about 1% of mesothelioma diagnoses. It might occur when asbestos fibers migrate from pleural tissue to the heart. 



Testicular Mesothelioma



The rarest type of mesothelioma develops in the tissue around the testicles. Very few cases have been diagnosed, so information about them is limited. The official name for the condition is tunica vaginalis testis mesothelioma. 



Epithelioid vs. Sarcomatoid Mesothelioma



Another way to categorize mesothelioma is by cell type. Mesothelioma in epithelial cells is the most common, accounting for about 70% of cases. 



Between 10% and 20% of mesothelioma diagnoses occur primarily in sarcomatoid cells. This type is more aggressive. 



When there is a mix of epithelial and sarcomatoid cells in a mesothelioma biopsy sample, it is considered to be biphasic. 



What Are the Symptoms of Mesothelioma? 



Mesothelioma symptoms often don't appear or become worrisome for many years after asbestos exposure. They are often similar to symptoms of more common illnesses, which can lead to confusion and  inaccurate diagnosis. 



Even so, it's important to understand the symptoms of the different types of mesothelioma, especially if you know or think you may have been exposed to asbbestos



Earlier symptoms of pleural mesothelioma include: 




Shortness of breath



Chest pains



Persistent dry coughing




Later symptoms of pleural mesothelioma include: 




Severe chest and lung pain



Fatigue



Night sweats



Weight loss



Fever




Symptoms of peritoneal mesothelioma include: 




Abdominal pain and swelling



A feeling of fullness and loss of appetite



Diarrhea or constipation



Nausea



Vomiting



Fatigue



Weight loss



Bowel obstruction




Pericardial mesothelioma causes difficulty breathing, heart palpitations, irregular heartbeat, chest pains, coughing, fever, swelling in lower limbs, fatigue, and heart failure. 





How Is Mesothelioma Cancer Diagnosed? 



It can take decades to diagnose mesothelioma. Symptoms of mesothelioma may not be evident for 20 to 50 years after exposure. Even then, the symptoms may initially seem mild and mimic those of pneumonia, the flu, and other common illnesses.



Physicians need to know if patients with mesothelioma-like symptoms may have been exposed to asbestos in the past. This helps them make the most accurate diagnosis and refer patients to the right specialists.



After a physical exam, a diagnosis will likely involve: 




Blood tests to look for markers



X-rays to rule out more common respiratory illnesses



Other types of imaging scans



If tumors or growths are seen in scans, the next step is to perform a biopsy




A biopsy is when a doctor removes a small piece of tissue for pathologists to examine under a microscope. This is usually the most conclusive way to determine if growths are cancerous. After mesothelioma is diagnosed, a specialist will stage the disease.



What Are the Signs and Symptoms of Mesothelioma of the Tunica Vaginalis Testis?



Mesothelioma in the tunica vaginalis testis is a rare condition, presenting unique symptoms that require attention. Below are the common signs to look out for:




Fluid Buildup in the Scrotum: This can lead to swelling, often due to a condition known as hydrocele. It's one of the early indicators that something might not be right.



Presence of a Lump: A noticeable lump or mass in the scrotum can be alarming. This lump is often detected during a routine examination or can be felt physically.



Inguinal Hernia: Experience of discomfort or protrusion in the groin area, commonly associated with an inguinal hernia, may also indicate an underlying issue with the tunica vaginalis.



Cyst Development in the Epididymis: Known as spermatocele, these cysts can form and cause additional symptoms or discomfort.




These symptoms are crucial red flags. If you notice any of these signs, it’s important to seek medical advice promptly for accurate diagnosis and treatment.



Diagnosing Mesothelioma Early



Diagnosing mesothelioma early is challenging but important. Many people are diagnosed in later stages of mesothelioma for several reasons: 




Symptoms are delayed years after asbestos exposure



Symptoms are similar to more common illnesses



Symptoms and even diagnostic test results can be similar to lung cancer




A late-stage diagnosis of mesothelioma has a poor prognosis. The disease is often difficult to treat at this point. The earlier you can get a diagnosis, the more treatment options you have and the better the prognosis will be. 



Staging Mesothelioma



As with other cancers, oncologists assign one of four stages after diagnosing mesothelioma to describe how advanced it is:




Stage I. Mesothelioma is rarely diagnosed in this earliest stage. At this point, the cancer has not spread from the pleural tissue. Patients in stage I have many treatment options and the best chance of surviving.





Stage II. By stage II, the cancer has spread away from the primary location but has not yet spread to lymph nodes or other types of tissue. Symptoms are still mild, and there are multiple treatment options to extend life expectancy, including surgery.





Stage III. Stage III mesothelioma is characterized by the spreading of the cancer to tissues near the pleura, such as the chest wall or lungs. It may have spread to the lymph nodes. Symptoms are more severe and treatment options are limited.





Stage IV. The most advanced stage of mesothelioma is metastatic. The cancer has spread to lymph nodes, to the other side of the chest cavity, and to other distant areas of the body. Treatment options are limited and focused on palliative care.




What Is the Outlook for Mesothelioma Patients?



Mesothelioma cancer currently has nosons that the prognosis is not usually positive. Many individuals face a challenging journey, as a significant number die within the first four to six months after diagnosis, and most within 12 months. However, there are always exceptions, with some people surpassing these timelines and a rare few reaching the five-year survival mark.



Additionally, the prognosis is often not very good because most cases of mesothelioma are diagnosed in the later stages when treatment options are limited. This late-stage diagnosis can significantly impact the effectiveness of medical interventions.



Each patient is different, and while one person may survive a year, another person may go on to live for decades. Work with your physician on the best treatment options for you and your unique situation. Remember, personalized care and staying informed about the latest treatment advancements can make a difference in your journey.



Understanding the Fatality of Mesothelioma



When discussing mesothelioma, it's important to distinguish between its two main forms: benign and malignant.



Benign Mesothelioma:This type is non-cancerous and typically not life-threatening. With appropriate medical care, individuals with benign mesothelioma can lead normal lives without the severe consequences associated with its malignant counterpart.



Malignant Mesothelioma:Unfortunately, this form is generally fatal. Its high mortality rate stems from two key factors:




Silent Progression: Malignant mesothelioma often develops silently, without noticeable symptoms, which can delay diagnosis until the disease has advanced significantly.



Limited Treatment Success: Current treatments, while continually evolving, have yet to consistently provide successful outcomes for those affected by malignant mesothelioma.




In conclusion, while benign mesothelioma does not pose a threat to life, the malignant form remains notoriously lethal, heavily influencing the overall prognosis associated with this condition.



Treatment for Mesothelioma



Chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, or a combination of these have proven to be the most effective mesothelioma treatments so far. Whenever possible, oncologists recommend surgery to remove as much of the cancerous tissue as possible. 



Patients who are not good candidates for surgery are in stage III or r are in poor physical conditi poor health.



Patients who undergo surgery are then usually given chemotherapy or radto try to eliminate any remaining cancer cells. Those who cannot have surgery may be given one or both of these treatments to slow the cancer's spread and extend life.



What is the Treatment for Benign Mesothelioma?



Benign mesothelioma, unlike its malignant counterpart, is not cancerous and does not spread to other areas of the body. However, it can still require medical intervention due to its growth in regions like the pleura, abdomen, and reproductive organs.



Primary Treatment: Surgical Removal




Surgical Procedure: The primary approach for treating benign mesothelioma is surgical removal. Healthcare professionals typically perform surgery to excise the tumor completely. When these tumors are entirely removed, they generally do not recur.




Additional Considerations




Chemotherapy Options: In specific cases, some healthcare providers might recommend chemotherapy as an additional layer of treatment. This step is usually considered for certain types of benign mesothelioma to prevent further complications.




The combination of surgical intervention and, in some cases, chemotherapy, offers a comprehensive approach to managing benign mesothelioma effectively.



What Are the Complications of Treatment for Malignant Mesothelioma?



Treating malignant mesothelioma often involves surgery, chemotherapy, or a combination of both. While these treatments can be effective, they come with potential complications that patients should be aware of:




Infection: Post-surgical infections can occur, as the body is more vulnerable during recovery.



Cardiac Issues: There is a risk of heart problems, such as heart attacks, particularly in patients with pre-existing conditions.



Renal Complications: Kidney failure might arise due to the stress of treatment or medications used during therapy.



Multiple Organ Failure: In some cases, the burden of treatment can lead to the failure of more than one organ system.



Respiratory Challenges: Patients may experience difficulty weaning off ventilators if their respiratory system is compromised.




Understanding these potential issues is crucial for anyone considering treatment options for malignant mesothelioma. Always discuss these risks with your healthcare provider to make informed decisions about your care plan.



The Future of Mesothelioma Treatment



Mesothelioma research is ongoing, and some exciting emerging treatments may help more patients in the future:




Better, more targeted chemotherapy drugs that are selective for cancer cells.



Photodynamic therapy, which uses light-activated drugs to target tumors.



Immunotherapy is a treatment that harnesses the patient’s own immune system to target and kill cancer cells.



Gene therapy may allow the manipulation of cancer cell genes to make them easier to kill.



Virus therapy is in the very early stages of research but may be useful in harnessing viruses to attack and kill cancer cells selectively.




How Can I Find Mesothelioma Treatment Near Me? 



Because mesothelioma is rare, many oncologists have little to no experience treating it. Talk to your doctor or diagnosing oncologist for recommendations. 



For the best treatment options, look for a large cancer center with mesothelioma specialists on staff. You may need to travel to get the best care. 



Some of the top cancer treatment centers in the U.S. for mesothelioma are: 




MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas



Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts



The Pacific Mesothelioma Center, Los Angeles, California



Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York



H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida



The University of Chicago Cancer Center, Chicago Illinois




Veterans with mesothelioma can work with specialists at the VA hospitals and medical centers in Boston and Los Angeles. 



When Should I See a Doctor About Mesothelioma? 



If you know or suspect you were exposed to asbestos in the past, talk to your doctor as soon as possible. You do not need to have any symptoms to discuss options, including regular health screenings. 



If you have any symptoms similiar to any of the types of mesothelioma, see your doctor. They should be able to rule out more common illnesses and refer you to specialists for an accurate diagnosis. If you are not happy with your doctor's diagnosis or they do not take your concerns seriously, seek a second opinion. 



Frequently Asked Questions About Mesothelioma



Here are some answers to additional questions people commonly ask about mesothelioma and asbestos. 



How Did I Get Mesothelioma? 



You were most likely exposed to asbestos at one or more past workplaces. An experienced asbestos attorney can use your work history and their extensive resources to confirm where and when you encountered asbestos. 



Is There a Cure for Mesothelioma? 



There is no cure for mesothelioma right now. Specialists treat mesothelioma like a chronic illness. Expect to need ongoing treatment to extend your life expectancy and improve your quality of life. 



Researchers continue to study the mechanisms of mesothelioma and better treatments to help more patients achieve remission. 



Does Anyone Survive Mesothelioma? 



Although there is no cure for mesothelioma, some people go into remission and live ten years or longer after a diagnosis. This is unusual but possible. The best chance of a longer life expectancy is to diagnose mesothelioma early and begin aggressive treatments right away. 



What Is the Life Expectancy for Mesothelioma? 



Many different factors contribute to a patient's life expectancy: age and overall health, stage of the cancer, treatment options, and more. Considering all mesothelioma patients, the average life expectancy is 12 to 21 months. However, this figure can vary widely due to several key factors.




Types of Mesothelioma: There are various forms of this disease, each influencing life expectancy differently. For instance, pleural mesothelioma generally has a different prognosis compared to peritoneal mesothelioma.



Individual Factors: Life expectancy is also affected by personal aspects such as age, overall health, and any existing medical conditions. Younger, healthier individuals may have a better prognosis.



Early Detection and Treatment: Catching mesothelioma early and treating it aggressively can improve outcomes. Patients who receive prompt and comprehensive treatment often experience better results.




In summary, while the average life expectancy provides a general guideline, it's important to consider these individual and medical factors for a more accurate prediction tailored to the patient's unique situation.



Getting Legal Help



Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. Keep in mind that if you have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for considerable compensation. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Mesothelioma Support Guide

A mesothelioma support guide can be a great help as you go through these uncertain times. A mesothelioma diagnosis can leave you feeling anxious, depressed, and frightened. Getting information, support, and resources is essential for coping with this difficult illness. 



Over $30 billion has been set aside in trust funds to help victims and their loved ones cope with the financial and emotional impact of mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about knowledgeable mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













What Is Malignant Mesothelioma?



At the most basic level, it's important to understand the disease you are facing. Mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive type of cancer caused by asbestos exposure. Mesothelioma develops in the mesothelium, a thin layer of tissue that surrounds organs. 



Pleural mesothelioma is the most common type and develops around the lungs. The next most common is peritoneal mesothelioma, which grows in the abdomen. Extremely rare is pericardial mesothelioma around the heart and testicular mesothelioma. 



How Did I Get Mesothelioma? 



The only known cause of mesothelioma is asbestos exposure. Most people with a mesothelioma diagnosis were exposed to asbestos at work. Mesothelioma symptoms often do not appear for decades, so you were likely exposed many years ago at one or more jobs. 



How Is Mesothelioma Treated? 



The primary treatment for mesothelioma is a combination of two or more of the following: 




Surgery



Chemotherapy



Radiation therapy



Immunotherapy




What Is the Life Expectancy for Mesothelioma? 



The average life expectancy for all types of mesothelioma is between 12 and 21 months. Factors that extend life expectancy include an early diagnosis, aggressive treatment, and being female, younger, and in relative good health. 



Does Anyone Live a Long Time After a Mesothelioma Diagnosis? 



Mesothelioma is aggressive, and the prognosis is usually poor, even with treatment. Remission is rare, as is survival longer than a year or two. However, it does happen. Some people have gone into remission, and a few have lived years and even decades after a mesothelioma diagnosis. 



Get the Facts About Your Diagnosis



A general understanding of mesothelioma can help. Even more important is to get the facts about your diagnosis. The disease is different for everyone, including appropriate treatments and life expectancy. 



Ask your doctor as many questions as you have about your diagnosis. Some essential questions for your medical team include: 




Where is the exact location of the asbestos cancer in my body? 



What stage of development is my mesothelioma in? 



Is my cancer treatable with surgery? 



Has my mesothelioma metastasized to other parts of my body? 



What are the available mesothelioma treatments? 



What other tests or procedures do I need to have done? 



What are the pros and cons of the various cancer treatments? 



Can anyone in my family get mesothelioma cancer? 




Having a close friend or family member accompany you to doctor visits during these post-diagnosis appointments is a good idea. Not only can another person help you think of questions to ask your physician, but they can provide much-needed emotional support.



You may feel apprehensive about this educational process,  but you'll discover that the more informed you are about mesothelioma, the less anxious you'll be.



While there is currently no cure, treatments can ease the symptoms of mesothelioma and give you much more time to spend with friends and loved ones. 



Learning about what your healthcare provider can do during the treatment and what you can expect will better prepare you to cope with all the things that come with being a mesothelioma victim.



Coping Tips After a Mesothelioma Diagnosis



The more support you get after a mesothelioma diagnosis, the easier it will be to cope with this terrible illness. Here are some important things to remember as you navigate your new reality. 



Focus on Communication, Not Isolation



Though you may feel the need to shield your friends and loved ones from your emotions, especially negative ones such as sadness or anger, keep in mind that this may make the process more difficult. Right now, you need support from loved ones more than ever. 



Pretending that nothing bad has happened or putting up a facade of false cheer may end up hurting you in the long run, as you won’t have an outlet to share your experiences and frustrations.



Be Honest About Your Illness



Leading psychiatrists recommend that mesothelioma patients be honest with everyone, including their doctor, and express their feelings. Don't let relatives or close friends try to protect you from bad news. Such attempts to bolster your spirits will usually backfire and leave you isolated.



The best thing to do for yourself is to keep the lines of communication open. Remember that in situations such as this, emotional honesty is the best policy.



It is perfectly acceptable to want to withdraw from family and friends and find your own solace, but keep in mind that eventually, it’s recommended that you seek out some support, whether through family or friends or through a support group.



Let Family and Friends Help



Your loved ones will also suffer with this diagnosis, and they want to help. Letting them help support you during this challenging time benefits you both. 



Be clear about the kind of support you want. Let your friends and family know if you need someone to listen or if you would rather just spend time with them doing fun activities. Ask for help with practical matters if you need it, such as housekeeping or cooking.



Understanding the Challenges of a Mesothelioma Diagnosis



A mesothelioma diagnosis brings with it a whirlwind of emotional, physical, and financial challenges that can overwhelm even the strongest individuals and their families.



Emotional Challenges




Shock and Fear: The initial news often leaves individuals in shock, grappling with fear and uncertainty about the future.



Anxiety and Depression: Daily life can become fraught with anxiety as patients face potential lifestyle changes and difficult treatment decisions.



Isolation: The rarity of mesothelioma can lead to feelings of loneliness, as those diagnosed might feel disconnected from others who are facing more common ailments.




Physical Challenges




Pain and Fatigue: As the disease progresses, patients often deal with significant pain and debilitating fatigue, which can hinder day-to-day activities.



Treatment Side Effects: Chemotherapy, radiation, and surgeries can lead to numerous side effects, including nausea, hair loss, and reduced immune function.



Activity Limitations: Due to symptoms and treatment effects, maintaining physical independence often becomes challenging, necessitating support and assistance.




Financial Challenges




Healthcare Costs: Treatments involve high medical expenses, which can strain even the most prepared savings accounts.



Loss of Income: Patients might be unable to work, reducing household income and adding financial strain.



Legal and Out-of-Pocket Expenses: At times, families pursue legal action for compensation, which involves legal fees alongside additional non-covered medical expenses.




Navigating these challenges requires a robust support system, both emotionally and practically, to help patients and their families manage their health and ensure financial stability.



Types of Mesothelioma Support



Loved ones can provide a lot of great social support, which is essential after a diagnosis. It might not be enough, though. As you cope with your illness and everything that comes with it, consider the types of practical support you will need: 



Medical Care



Getting treatment for mesothelioma should be a top priority after a diagnosis. Your doctor and diagnosing oncologists can recommend specialists and treatment facilities in your area. 



Because mesothelioma is rare, many oncologists have never treated it. It is essential to reach out to specialists so you can access the best treatment and medical care. You might have to travel to reach a cancer center with physicians who have experience treating mesothelioma. 



Mental Health Care



Mesothelioma affects your body and also your mental health. Don't overlook this vital aspect of cancer care. Mesothelioma and the effects of treatment can cause fear, anxiety, and depression and even trigger a mental illness. 



Talk to your medical team about getting mental health care. You could benefit from a therapist or a counselor who specializes in working with cancer patients. 



Home Care



As your symptoms worsen or treatment side effects kick in, you might find it difficult to do normal daily tasks. Many mesothelioma patients benefit from support in the home. Consider hiring a personal care worker, a healthcare worker, or a family member who can assist in the home and make your life easier and more comfortable.  



Legal and Financial Support



Mesothelioma treatment is expensive. You are also facing difficult financial choices related to end-of-life decisions. A financial professional can provide advice and help you make these tough decisions.



One way to address financial issues related to mesothelioma is to take legal action. Because most mesothelioma cases are caused by negligent asbestos exposure, you are likely eligible to file a mesothelioma lawsuit or make an asbestos trust fund claim.



Work with an experienced mesothelioma and asbestos lawyer to seek compensation. They can give you the best chance of recovering damages that will help cover expensive medical costs.



Understanding Treatment Costs and Seeking Compensation



Treating mesothelioma comes with staggering costs due to its aggressive nature. Patients often face high medical bills, which can include surgery, chemotherapy, and ongoing care. These expenses add up quickly, making financial planning critical.



If you've been diagnosed after asbestos exposure, pursuing legal action is a viable step. Filing a personal injury claim or accessing asbestos trust funds are common routes. An experienced attorney specializing in mesothelioma can guide you through this process, ensuring you have the best opportunity to recover the compensation you deserve.



By having expert legal support, you can focus on your health while they work to secure financial relief, covering the high costs of treatment and providing peace of mind during a challenging time.



Working with an experienced mesothelioma and asbestos lawyer can give you the best chance of recovering damages that will help cover expensive medical costs. These experts can guide you through the process of filing a personal injury claim, specifically targeting compensation for losses due to asbestos exposure.



By filing a personal injury claim, you can aim to recover compensation for a range of losses, including medical expenses and other related costs. A seasoned attorney can help navigate the complexities of the legal system, ensuring that your claim is as strong as possible. With the right legal support, you have a better chance of securing the funds necessary to manage your health and financial wellbeing.



End-of-Life Support



Unfortunately, mesothelioma is usually a terminal diagnosis. At some point, you will be dealing with end-of-life decisions and needs. Plan now for how you will cope with this transition. 



Hospice care and palliative programs offer a broad spectrum of support for patients in this situation. Your medical team can recommend a program or hospice center. 



Finding Support Groups for Cancer and Mesothelioma



A mesothelioma diagnosis can be devastating. Find a support group to help you cope emotionally. Get in touch with support groups geared specifically toward cancer and mesothelioma victims for emotional assistance. The makeup and focus of such groups vary widely.



For example, some are led by professional behavioral health specialists such as psychologists or social workers, while others are peer or self-help groups directed by other mesothelioma patients.



Gain New Perspectives and Coping Skills



Engaging with a support group allows you to hear firsthand how others are navigating similar challenges. These shared stories can provide valuable insights and new perspectives on managing your own journey after diagnosis. Learning different coping strategies from peers can be incredibly empowering.



Build Social Connections



Joining a mesothelioma support group can also help alleviate feelings of isolation. You’ll connect with others who are processing the same impacts, fostering a sense of community and mutual understanding. This connection is vital for emotional resilience and can enhance your overall well-being.



By combining professional guidance with peer support, these groups offer a comprehensive approach to coping with mesothelioma. Whether through structured sessions or informal exchanges, the benefits are profound and can significantly aid in emotional healing. 



Here are some resources to help you find a mesothelioma or cancer support group: 




Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation (MARF). MARF allows patients and their caregivers to register for free. By registering, you gain access to online support groups. Some are private, while others are open to anyone. MARF also offers phone support, so you can talk to someone in real time about what you're going through. 



Canadian Mesothelioma Foundation (CMF). Canadian mesothelioma patients and caregivers can find support through the CMF’s Mesothelioma Patient Support Network. It provides a searchable database of financial aid, legal help, medical centers, and support groups.



Cancer Hope Network. The Cancer Hope Network offers a different type of support from the traditional support group. Both patients and caregivers contact the group to get matched with a volunteer. They are former caregivers, patients, or loved ones of cancer patients who have been through a similarly difficult time. 



American Cancer Society. Use the ACS searchable online database online to find a local support group. This is a great option if you prefer to find face-to-face cancer support groups.



Cancer Support Community. The Cancer Support Community provides patients and loved ones with the MyLifeLine program. Joint and register to get access to an online platform for sharing information and participating in a support group. You can also find links to regional and local face-to-face cancer support groups.



Cancer Care Lung Cancer Patient Support Group. This group has an online support group for patients with lung cancer. Led by an experienced oncology social worker, it also offers a separate support group for caregivers of patients with lung cancer.




The Role of Medical Professionals in Mesothelioma Support Groups



Medical professionals are integral to the functioning of mesothelioma support groups. Serving as facilitators, they bring a wealth of knowledge and expertise to these meetings. Here’s how they contribute:




Expert Guidance: Nurses and other healthcare specialists lead the sessions, providing accurate and reliable information. They serve as credible sources for understanding various aspects of the illness and treatment options.



Resource Navigation: Medical professionals help participants and their families navigate the complex healthcare landscape. They offer insights into available mental health services, respite care, and pertinent resources tailored to individual needs.



Emotional and Practical Support: These facilitators also play a crucial role in offering emotional support, guiding discussions, and ensuring a safe space for sharing personal experiences. They empower attendees by providing practical advice that can assist in managing day-to-day challenges related to mesothelioma.




By leading these support group meetings, medical professionals ensure not only the provision of informed care guidance but also help build a community of trust and support.



Religious Organizations



If you need spiritual guidance, local religious organizations or leaders can assist you to deal with weighty matters such as grief counseling, coping with death, physical and emotional pain, and the meaning of life. Your local church or synagogue can refer you to clergy who are well prepared in these matters. 



How Can I Help Someone With Mesothelioma? 



A mesothelioma diagnosis is not just devastating for the patient. It also affects their loved ones. If you care about someone with mesothelioma, you are suffering too and might not know what to do. Here are some tips and ideas for supporting a loved one with mesothelioma: 




Offer your support. This might sound simple, but the offer of help isn't necessarily apparent. Tell your loved one that you are available and willing to provide support. 



Ask what they need. Don't make assumptions about what the patient needs or wants. Instead, ask them. Ask for specific things you can do to help. It might be a ride to an appointment or simply some time spent listening to what they're going through. 



Be a good listener. Your loved one will have specialists and experts working on their behalf, so they probably don't need your advice or guidance. Instead, what they need is a caring person to listen. Be a thoughtful listener and only offer help or advice if they ask for it. 



Provide a sense of normalcy. As their world is turned upside down, your loved one will appreciate anything that remains the same. Keep up routines with them as much as possible. Do activities with them that are normal and that provide some distraction. 




Getting Legal Help



Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on qualified asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### How Much Is Your Mesothelioma Case Worth?

CALL NOW: 1-800-123-4567
    
  












If you have Mesothelioma, you could be owed compensation



It's very likely you developed this disease through asbestos exposure in certain trades. Mesothelioma patients are getting multi-million dollar settlements, decades later, from their ex-employers. We can help you find out if you qualify for a case in minutes.




We'll analyze your situation at no cost



Determine how much compensation you could be entitled to



Show you the next steps to get what you're owed






























$30 Billion is Available in Trust for Mesothelioma Patients



Tradesmen in many industries were negligently exposed to asbestos materials well into the 1990s. Whether you developed Mesothelioma yourself due to asbestos exposure or you're the surviving family of a lost loved one you could be entitled to significant compensation.




GET STARTED






















How much Money do People Receive from a Mesothelioma Case?



Depending on where you were exposed and a few other factors, you can get a settlement from 6 to 7 figures. Here are a few examples of Mesothelioma Settlements received by our clients. These figures are the total compensation after attorney fees and expenses are deducted.

























$6,142,500



Exposed through heavy duty vehicles



$5,939,010



Exposed through boat repair



$3,600,450



Exposed through navy service





$6,033,510



Exposed through general contracting



$3,921,750



Exposed through navy service



$3,403,890



Exposed through HVAC trades































We've Recovered over $1 billion for Mesothelioma Patients



We've helped hundreds of people just like you get compensation for their pain or loss. Don't delay, contact us today for a free evaluation for your case.




GET STARTED

















® 2025 Mesothelioma Network. We will not share your information. Read our privacy policy. Sponsored by: Paul Danziger, Attorney - Houston, Texas.

### Mesothelioma Lawyers

Mesothelioma lawyers specialize in helping victims of asbestos exposure take legal action and seek compensation. Only hire a lawyer with specific and proven experience working with clients on asbestos lawsuits. Ideally, they work as part of a larger team with a network of legal, asbestos, and medical experts. 



Overview of Recent Mesothelioma Settlements and Awards



Mesothelioma lawsuits have brought crucial financial support to numerous individuals affected by asbestos exposure, but estimating the value of each case can be challenging due to its unique nature. Here are some noteworthy recent settlements and awards:




$117 Million in 2018: This significant award was granted to a retired banker, Stephen Lanzo III, and his wife following a successful lawsuit against prominent companies. It was determined that his mesothelioma was linked to years of using asbestos-laden talcum products between 1979 and 2003.



$75 Million in 2017: A remarkable settlement was achieved by the wife of a race car driver who consistently swept a garage filled with asbestos-containing gaskets. These products, manufactured by various auto parts companies, lacked warning labels about the risks of asbestos exposure.



$32.7 Million in 2020: Franklin Finch, a tire plant worker, secured a substantial settlement after exposure to asbestos in pipe insulation during his 20-year tenure at a tire manufacturing facility.



$32 Million in 2021: The family of Kathy Weist received a significant award posthumously. Her exposure came from her father’s and husband’s insulator work, which ultimately led to her developing mesothelioma.



$29.4 Million in 2019: Teresa Leavitt successfully claimed compensation after revealing that her illness was due to years of using asbestos-contaminated talcum powder. The jury awarded a portion of the damages to her spouse as well.








Across 2021 and 2022, the average asbestos lawsuit trial verdict was reported at $10.6 million, as per the most recent litigation data. Typically, settlements in these cases vary between $1 million and $2 million.



These cases highlight the ongoing impact of asbestos exposure and the importance of pursuing legal avenues for financial relief.



Why Choose a National Law Firm?




Widespread Practice: These lawyers have licenses to practice in multiple states, giving them the advantage to serve you regardless of your location.



Specialized Expertise: Their profound expertise in mesothelioma cases ensures that you're represented by someone who comprehensively understands your situation and who is well-versed in securing the compensation you deserve.



Convenience: The flexibility they offer by traveling means that you can focus on your health and well-being, rather than the logistics of meeting with legal professionals.




With a top mesothelioma lawyer, the need for travel should be the least of your concerns. Trust that they will come to you when needed, bringing with them a wealth of knowledge and a commitment to fight on your behalf.



Understanding the intricacies of asbestos claims across different states is vital for those seeking justice and compensation. State laws regarding these claims are not uniform, and this variance can significantly affect the outcome of cases.



State-Specific Differences




Court Sympathy and Jurisdictions

Some states are known for their courts being more empathetic towards those affected by asbestos exposure. This sympathy can influence the ease of proving negligence or causation, thereby affecting the likelihood of success in litigation.





Filing Deadlines

Each state has its own statute of limitations for filing asbestos-related claims. These time limits can vary widely — some states allow several years from the diagnosis, while others enforce stricter deadlines.





Key Litigation States

Certain states stand out as prominent venues for filing asbestos claims due to their procedural advantages and past case outcomes. States like California, New York, and Pennsylvania often see a high volume of asbestos litigation due to their industry history and legal frameworks.






Navigating the Legal Landscape



Experienced mesothelioma attorneys are crucial in navigating these state-specific legal nuances. They possess the expertise to guide you through the complexities of filing in the right jurisdiction and meeting crucial deadlines.



Nationwide Legal Support



Top law firms offer a broad reach, boasting the capability to file asbestos claims in any state. These firms often have established networks and partnerships that allow them to provide comprehensive representation, no matter where you reside.



In summary, understanding the differences in state laws can shape your legal strategy and influence the outcome of your asbestos claim. Choosing the right legal representative with a strong grasp of these regional variations is a critical step toward securing the compensation and justice you deserve.



To find out if you are entitled to substantial compensation, we invite you to fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the most experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to file a claim for the $30 billion asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more.



We offer free online appointments and can arrange for representatives to meet you within just one mile of your home. Open Now.






 




What Is a Mesothelioma Lawyer? 



A mesothelioma and asbestos lawyer is a lawyer who specializes in helping victims of asbestos exposure. Many industries used asbestos in products, equipment, and buildings. This harmful mineral exposed millions of workers, leading to thousands of diagnoses of devastating illnesses: 




Pleural mesothelioma



Peritoneal mesothelioma



Lung cancer



Asbestosis




The government now restricts asbestos use and sets guidelines for worker protections. Asbestos illnesses take decades to develop, so many workers exposed in the past are now getting sick. Asbestos also lingers in many buildings, creating an ongoing risk. 



Mesothelioma lawyers work with people exposed to asbestos. They explain their legal rights, provide advice and guidance, and take legal actions on behalf of clients. An asbestos attorney can help you hold companies accountable and get compensation for your illness. 



Many people sue for mesothelioma because their asbestos exposure was negligent. They also sue because mesothelioma is a costly disease. A jury award or settlement helps pay medical bills. 



What You Need to Know About Working with a Mesothelioma Lawyer




They know the filing deadlines for mesothelioma lawsuits and act fast. 



They file more than 2,000 mesothelioma lawsuits every year. 



Mesothelioma lawyers get an average of more than $1 million in damages for their clients. 



They also help clients get their share of the $30 billion available in asbestos trust funds. 



They have unparalleled experience working with and helping victims of asbestos exposure. 




Why Should You Hire a Mesothelioma Lawyer?



A mesothelioma diagnosis leaves you with many tough choices to make. You may be ready to focus on treatment and getting well, but you still need to make legal and financial decisions.



There are several important reasons to consider hiring a mesothelioma lawyer: 




You're not sure if you were exposed to asbestos. 



You feel confident you were exposed but don't know where or when. 



You just received a diagnosis of an asbestos illness, and you don't know what to do next. 



You aren't sure if you are eligible to sue, claim with an asbestos trust, or get other benefits. 



You know you want to file an asbestos lawsuit but don't know where to begin. 



You've tried to claim with a trust but were denied or got less than you feel you deserve. 



An insurer offers you compensation, but you aren't sure if you should accept it. 






Marilyn & Family



“There aren’t enough words to describe how much our family appreciates everything you have done for us since we met 4 years ago. I feel a very special bond between us that will continue for a very long time.”





How Can a Mesothelioma Lawyer Help Me?



With expertise in asbestos laws and cases, the right lawyer can explain all your options. You have several choices; the best one depends on individual factors. A mesothelioma lawyer is in the best position to help you make this decision. 



For years, Mrs. T., a retired public school teacher in her late 50s, was thriving with a loving husband, two children, and three grandchildren. Gardening, volunteering, and spending time with her family were the highlights of her days. But then there was a twist: She became plagued with persistent chest pain and fatigue. After many visits to doctors, she arrived at a startling diagnosis: mesothelioma—a disease she had never heard of.



It was a confounding diagnosis. How could a healthy person like Mrs. T. develop such a rare and aggressive cancer? Looking into her background, the cause became evident: years earlier, when she worked in an older school building, she had been unwittingly exposed to asbestos still present in crumbling buildings.



Her family was heartbroken. Her husband was resolved to support her at all costs, but dire medical bills and an uncertain future weighed heavily. Following a friend’s recommendation, they contacted the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center. Mrs. T.’s family members, though skeptical at first, decided to take a chance.



The attorney they spoke with was both sympathetic and clearly very talented. They quickly discovered important evidence of asbestos exposure in the schools where Mrs. T. had worked. The lawyer then made a claim against the companies that were found to be responsible for failing to inform workers of the dangers associated with asbestos.



The family got life-changing news after months of persistence: the attorney had won a sizable settlement. The money allowed Mrs. T. to obtain cutting-edge therapies that greatly enhanced her well-being. Her husband got relief as expenses of medication were out of consideration and they spent quality time making precious memories. The settlement also spared their children from growing up in debt to pay for medical expenses.



For Mrs. T., the settlement was more than a financial windfall—it was justice. It has helped give her family what they need to approach the future with hope and dignity. The knowledge that the corporations responsible for her illness were held accountable was what provided her with closure and peace.



This family’s story draws a lesson about the need for action. You don’t have to go through this journey alone if you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma. Contact us today. Your story is important, and we are here to assist you in your fight for the justice and compensation you deserve.



Mesothelioma Attorneys Help Clients Sue Asbestos Companies



One of the options you might have is to sue one or more companies that made or supplied asbestos for your workplace. A lawsuit may seem intimidating, but the right lawyer will guide you and do most of the work.



But, Am I Eligible for an Asbestos Lawsuit? 



This is an important question many victims of asbestos exposure have. Don’t assume you can’t sue. If you have an asbestos illness, someone is likely responsible for your exposure. You are entitled to challenge those companies.



If you have received a mesothelioma diagnosis, you may be eligible to file an asbestos personal injury lawsuit. It's essential to understand that this opportunity isn't limited just to the diagnosed individual. Surviving family members can also take action by filing a mesothelioma lawsuit after a loved one's passing.



An experienced asbestos attorney can review your specific situation to determine your eligibility. They’ll help you navigate the legal landscape, ensuring you meet all necessary criteria to file an asbestos claim. Remember, seeking professional guidance can be a crucial step in asserting your rights and holding the responsible parties accountable.



Isn't a Mesothelioma Lawsuit Expensive and Time-Consuming? 



Mesothelioma lawyers don't charge fees until they win compensation for their clients. A lawsuit may take time, but your lawyer will do the work. 



Experienced asbestos attorneys understand how sick their clients are and make the process easy for them. 



How Long Does it Take to Get a Mesothelioma Settlement? 



This is an essential question for individuals with terminal illnesses like mesothelioma. Your lawyer understands you need compensation quickly to cover medical and other expenses. 



They work hard on your behalf to settle as soon as possible, often within a few months. Expect to get compensation within 90 days of a settlement agreement. 



Mesothelioma Lawyers Are Research Experts



It can be tricky to prove your illness resulted from workplace asbestos exposure. To win a case, you need evidence. 



Mesothelioma and asbestos attorneys are experts in researching past asbestos use by companies. They have resources, experience, and networks that help them gather the evidence needed to prove your case: 




History of asbestos use



History of asbestos products



Employment records



Past asbestos lawsuits



Military records



Residential records



Medical records




Asbestos Lawyers Get Clients Settlements



The best outcome of taking legal action is a settlement. Most lawsuits over asbestos end in a settlement, but going to trial is always possible.



A settlement is desirable because it will allow you to recover damages more quickly without a lengthy trial. Most defendants are willing to settle out of court, and your lawyer will fight for this outcome.



Learn more about settlements



Mesothelioma Lawyers Take Cases to Trial



If a company won't settle and offer you a fair amount of compensation, your lawyer can represent you in a trial. 



Your legal team will make your case before a judge and jury. This may take longer and can be stressful, but jury awards are often higher than settlement amounts. If you have a strong case, your lawyer may advise you to go forward with a trial. 



Learn more about trials



They Can Help You Get Compensation From Asbestos Trust Funds



Many companies responsible for asbestos exposure set up trust funds to compensate victims. This includes companies that went out of business or filed for bankruptcy. 



The negligent party that owes you compensation could be your employer or a company that supplied asbestos to your employer. Your lawyer can help you file with the appropriate trust fund. 



Learn more about trust funds



Johns Manville created the first asbestos trust fund in 1988. [Photo by Wikipedia/Public Domain]



Mesothelioma Lawyers Get Veterans Benefits



Military veterans who developed mesothelioma during active duty can apply for healthcare and disability benefits through the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). 



If you can prove your illness is connected to your time in service, you'll likely get approved for VA benefits and claims.



Learn more about veteran claims







Can I Hire Any Lawyer for My Asbestos Case?



Asbestos cases are highly specialized and complicated. You cannot settle for a general lawyer or a specialist in another area of the law. 



Mesothelioma lawyers are experts in their subject. They know which companies used asbestos and when and where. They have networks of investigators and medical experts. Most importantly, they have proven wins for clients like you. 



The right lawyer, an expert in asbestos and mesothelioma, can help you in several ways:




Provide expertise to explain your options



Guide your decisions in taking legal action



Use access to databases and experts to investigate your asbestos exposure



Explain your rights to compensation



File a lawsuit and negotiate on your behalf for a settlement



Take your case to court if necessary



File a claim with an asbestos trust fund for compensation



Give you a better chance of winning as compared to a general practice lawyer




How Do I Find a Mesothelioma Lawyer Near Me? 



You can find a mesothelioma or asbestos lawyer by searching online or responding to advertisements for asbestos services. 



If you know someone who has gone through a similar experience, they may be able to refer you to a good lawyer. You may have a lawyer you trust who can refer a specialist in asbestos cases. 



If you can't get any personal references, contact your state bar association or local advocacy groups for asbestos or mesothelioma victims. 




 




Will I Need to Travel to Meet with a Top Mesothelioma Lawyer?



Absolutely not. Leading mesothelioma attorneys are often part of national law firms with extensive experience in asbestos litigation. These firms understand the demands and stress of a medical condition like mesothelioma. That's why they make it a priority to come to you, no matter where you are.



What to Look For in a Mesothelioma Lawyer



Once you have searched in your area for a mesothelioma lawyer, be discriminating. You don’t have to settle for the first lawyer or firm you talk to.



Choosing the right mesothelioma lawyer is a crucial decision, and it's important to consider several key factors to ensure you receive the best representation. Here's a comprehensive guide to making your choice:



The best mesothelioma and asbestos lawyers and law firms:




Expertise in Asbestos Laws: Are experts in all areas of state and federal asbestos laws and have years of experience handling mesothelioma cases.



Understanding of Asbestos-Related Diseases: Understand asbestos-related diseases and know the special needs of patients, ensuring they can address your specific situation.



Compassionate Support: Trained to work compassionately with asbestos victims and their families, offering support through challenging times.



Investigative Skills: Know how to investigate companies to find details of asbestos exposure and have access to asbestos informational databases.



Free Consultations: Offer free consultations to determine if they can take your case, providing an opportunity to assess their expertise without financial obligation.



Proven Track Record: Have a track record of success and can provide references from previous clients.



Nationwide Reach: Your chosen asbestos firm should have national reach, as mesothelioma lawsuits are often tried out of state. The defendants involved are typically big companies with headquarters in other states or even countries.




Don’t hesitate to ask all the questions you have before hiring a lawyer or firm. Effective communication is essential; look for a lawyer who can present legal matters in a way you understand and keep you informed about the progress of your case. There is no obligation to hire someone after an initial consultation. If you don’t feel it’s a good fit, move on to the next option.



Additionally, seek recommendations from trusted sources and take your time to find a lawyer you feel comfortable with to fight for your rights. Remember, this is a step towards seeking justice and ensuring you have the best possible support on your side.



Although they have an office near you, your chosen asbestos firm should have national reach. Mesothelioma lawsuits are often tried out of state. The defendants involved are typically big companies with headquarters in other states or even countries. 



Mesothelioma Lawyer FAQs



A mesothelioma diagnosis raises many questions, especially as you consider legal action. Here are answers to some of the most common questions mesothelioma lawyers get: 



How Will a Mesothelioma Lawyer Prove My Case? 



This is one of the main reasons you need an experienced mesothelioma attorney. They have the knowledge and experience to track down your past exposure. 



The right lawyer can determine where and when you encountered asbestos. They also work with medical experts to show that the exposure led to your illness. 



Your lawyer will need you to provide as much information as you have, including your entire work history, any military service history, and medical records. 



Can a Lawyer Help if I Lost a Loved One to Mesothelioma? 



Yes, a mesothelioma lawyer can help you make a wrongful death claim. As with asbestos personal injury claims, you could be eligible for compensation through a lawsuit and settlement. 



What Can I Expect for a Settlement Amount? 



Settlements in asbestos cases vary widely and depends on individual factors: 




How long you were exposed



The negligence of companies or employers responsible for your exposure



How sick you are



Your medical bills and future estimated expenses



Any wages you have lost due to being sick 




What Is the Average Mesothelioma Settlement? 



Every settlement is different because of the varying factors involved in each case. The average settlement amount for asbestos exposure victims is $1 million and $1.4 million.



What is most important to remember as you seek compensation is that a mesothelioma lawyer can maximize your settlement amount. 



How Much Can an Asbestos Lawyer Get Me from a Trust? 



As with settlements, the amount depends on individual factors. In general, trust amounts are much less than settlements from lawsuits. On average, asbestos trust fund claims are $180,000. 



What if I Can't Afford a Lawyer? 



Most lawyers who help asbestos victims only charge a fee if and when they win for you. This is known as a contingency payment plan.



When considering legal representation for a mesothelioma case, it's important to know that most lawyers offer free consultations. This means you can discuss the specifics of your case without any obligation or initial financial commitment.



If you decide to move forward with a lawsuit, the financial arrangement remains straightforward: your lawyer will only receive payment if you receive a monetary award. This ensures that your legal team is fully invested in achieving the best possible outcome for your case, aligning their success with yours.



Do I Have a Case if I Don't Know Where I Was Exposed?



There have been many cases where people have won their lawsuits only after an attorney uncovered where the asbestos exposure occurred.



If you aren't sure where you encountered asbestos, your lawyer will investigate and get answers.



Will I Have to Sue My Employer? 



You may file a lawsuit for asbestos exposure against a previous employer. But you will more likely file a lawsuit against the companies that manufactured asbestos products and supplied them to your employer.



When considering your legal options, it's important to note that lawsuits generally target these companies rather than the government. Therefore, if your exposure occurred during military service, suing the military or government is not typically an option.



However, veterans who faced asbestos exposure during their service have alternative routes. They can file a VA claim to seek compensation through veteran benefits. Additionally, they may explore filing an asbestos trust fund claim or pursue a lawsuit against the relevant asbestos manufacturers.



By understanding these pathways, you can make informed decisions about pursuing justice and compensation for asbestos-related health issues.



I Was Exposed in the Military, But I Can't Sue the Government, Can I? 



While it is true that the government isn't held liable for your asbestos exposure, veterans can still seek compensation. You will file against the manufacturers that supplied asbestos products to the government and military.



Will I Have to Attend Hearings? 



Mesothelioma is a painful and fatiguing illness. Being physically present in a court may not be possible. 



Always let your lawyers know how you feel so they can make arrangements accordingly.



Can a Mesothelioma Attorney Help Me Get Disability Benefits? 



Yes, your lawyer can help you get disability payments for your illness.



Will I Get Updated on the Progress of My Case?



Once you've found your lawyer, never hesitate to contact them with questions or for assistance. The best attorneys will always keep their clients updated.



When Should I File My Claim?



“It’s important to act quickly on mesothelioma claims and lawsuits. The average life expectancy after a diagnosis of mesothelioma is only 18 months. Additionally, states have statutes of limitations that limit the time you have to start a lawsuit.”



Acting swiftly is not just about timelines; it's about maximizing your chances of receiving compensation. The sooner you hire a mesothelioma attorney, the better your prospects for a successful claim. This urgency is due in part to state laws that impose strict deadlines on filing asbestos-related claims, which means waiting too long after your diagnosis could hinder your ability to seek justice and financial restitution.



To ensure you don't miss out on potential compensation:




Consult a specialized attorney immediately after diagnosis to understand your legal rights and options.



Gather any related medical and occupational documentation, as your attorney will need this to build a strong case.



Stay informed about the statutes of limitations in your state, as they can vary and directly impact your case's viability.




Taking these steps promptly can make a significant difference in the outcome of your legal journey.



Additionally, states have statutes of limitations that limit the time you have to start a lawsuit.



How Long Does it Take to Get a Mesothelioma Settlement? 



A mesothelioma lawsuit may end in a settlement within a few months or even less. If it goes to trial, it could take several months, even a year or more, to get a verdict. 







How Do I Start Getting Legal Help Today?



Fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet with information on the experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area. Or call us at 800-793-4540. ong with our packet, an experienced asbestos attorney will be able to assist and provide you with in-depth information regarding your federal and state rights. Along with our packet, an experienced asbestos attorney can assist and provide you with in-depth information regarding your federal and state rights.   and provide you with in-depth information regarding your federal and state rights.









Understanding the intricacies of asbestos claims across different states is vital for those seeking justice and compensation. State laws regarding these claims are not uniform, and this variance can significantly affect the outcome of cases.



State-Specific Differences




Court Sympathy and Jurisdictions

Some states are known for their courts being more empathetic towards those affected by asbestos exposure. This sympathy can influence the ease of proving negligence or causation, thereby affecting the likelihood of success in litigation.





Filing Deadlines

Each state has its own statute of limitations for filing asbestos-related claims. These time limits can vary widely — some states allow several years from the diagnosis, while others enforce stricter deadlines.





Key Litigation States

Certain states stand out as prominent venues for filing asbestos claims due to their procedural advantages and past case outcomes. States like California, New York, and Pennsylvania often see a high volume of asbestos litigation due to their industry history and legal frameworks.






Navigating the Legal Landscape



Experienced mesothelioma attorneys are crucial in navigating these state-specific legal nuances. They possess the expertise to guide you through the complexities of filing in the right jurisdiction and meeting crucial deadlines.



Nationwide Legal Support



Top law firms offer a broad reach, boasting the capability to file asbestos claims in any state. These firms often have established networks and partnerships that allow them to provide comprehensive representation, no matter where you reside.



In summary, understanding the differences in state laws can shape your legal strategy and influence the outcome of your asbestos claim. Choosing the right legal representative with a strong grasp of these regional variations is a critical step toward securing the compensation and justice you deserve.

### Mesothelioma Law Firm

Mesothelioma law firms specialize in asbestos cases and help victims of exposure and their families. They help clients hold companies accountable and recover damages to cover medical expenses. Many asbestos law firms represent clients nationwide. 



You may be eligible for a large amount of compensation if you suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 






 




What Is a Mesothelioma Law Firm? 



A mesothelioma law firm is a firm that specializes in clients who have been exposed to asbestos. They include the best mesothelioma lawyers who dedicate their professional lives to working with victims of exposure and their families. 



Mesothelioma firms typically have medical experts, nurses, investigators, and client liaisons on staff. They cover every aspect of asbestos cases, from investigating the source of exposure and connecting it to a diagnosis to recovering damages for their clients. 



What Is the Difference Between a Mesothelioma Law Firm and Other Law Firms?



Law firms focusing on mesothelioma help victims of asbestos exposure who have developed cancer and other asbestos-related diseases. 



This sets them apart from other firms specializing in another area of the law or taking on many different types of cases. If you have an asbestos illness diagnosis, it's essential you hire a mesothelioma law firm for many reasons: 




A general personal injury lawyer may be good at what they do, but asbestos lawsuits are different and more complicated. 



Going up against companies that exposed workers to asbestos requires significant knowledge and relevant experience.



Mesothelioma attorneys at asbestos law firms know how and where industries and specific companies used asbestos and how they exposed workers.



They also have investigative staff to help to uncover incriminating information about past asbestos exposure.



These firms understand asbestos illnesses and treat their clients compassionately. 






Dale R.



“When dad was diagnosed with mesothelioma, our world was turned upside down. Not knowing what to do next, I researched and interviewed many firms. Some firms were nothing more than marketers. Others offered up call screeners to take my name and number. And then there was Mesothelioma Lawyer Center. It was with them that I found peace, knowledge and professionalism. They have done everything they said they would do and then some. Contacting Mesothelioma Lawyer Center was the best decision I could have made for my family.”





How Can a Mesothelioma Law Firm Help Me?



The legal process can be confusing for victims of asbestos exposure. You are battling a deadly illness while also sorting through a lot of new information.



The right law firm will guide you and help you better understand your options. They can provide answers to essential questions, such as:



Why Act Swiftly After a Mesothelioma Diagnosis?



Being diagnosed with mesothelioma can be overwhelming, both emotionally and physically. However, one critical step that shouldn't be delayed is seeking legal assistance. Here's why timing is of the essence:



1. Statutes of Limitations



Every state has specific laws—known as statutes of limitations—dictating the timeframe within which you must file an asbestos-related claim. These time limits can vary significantly, and missing the deadline may result in losing your right to compensation. Consulting with a law firm experienced in asbestos cases ensures your claim is filed on time.



2. Preservation of Evidence



Key evidence, such as medical records, employment history, and product identification, needs to be gathered promptly. Delays can result in the loss or deterioration of crucial evidence. Legal experts know how to secure and document these details effectively.



3. Access to Resources



Top mesothelioma law firms have the resources and networks necessary to build a strong case. This includes access to medical experts, investigators, and databases containing information about asbestos-containing products and companies.



4. Financial Support for Medical Expenses



Mesothelioma treatment can be costly. Early legal action may lead to a faster settlement or verdict, helping alleviate financial burdens due to medical bills, lost income, and other related expenses.



5. Peace of Mind



Finally, having a dedicated legal team allows you to focus on your health and spending time with loved ones. It provides reassurance that knowledgeable professionals are advocating for your rights and seeking the compensation you deserve.



By acting quickly, you not only protect your legal rights but also safeguard your financial future during a challenging time.



How Can a Mesothelioma Law Firm Help Me?



Mesothelioma is a devastating disease often caused by exposure to asbestos. If you or a loved one has been diagnosed, you may have legal rights to seek compensation. A mesothelioma law firm can guide you through the complex legal process, ensuring your rights are protected while focusing on getting the compensation you deserve. Here’s how these specialized firms can help:







Exploring Compensation Options



We understand that every case is unique. In addition to lawsuits, we help you access other forms of compensation, including:




Asbestos Trust Funds: Many companies have established trust funds for victims of asbestos exposure.



Veterans’ Benefits: For those exposed during military service, we assist with VA claims.



Workers’ Compensation: If your exposure occurred at work, we help you claim the benefits you’re entitled to.




Navigating the Legal Process



The legal system can feel overwhelming, especially when you’re dealing with a serious illness. Mesothelioma law firms specialize in handling asbestos-related cases and can:




Investigate your exposure history to determine where and how asbestos exposure occurred.



File your claim in the appropriate jurisdiction based on the details of your case.



Handle all paperwork, deadlines, and communications with defendants, insurers, and courts.




These firms work to reduce your stress so you can focus on your health and your family.







Key Questions and Answers Provided by Law Firms



When you consult with a mesothelioma attorney, they’ll address key concerns, such as:




Am I eligible to file a lawsuit? They’ll review your medical diagnosis, work history, and exposure to determine your eligibility.



What is the timeline for a case? While timelines vary, they’ll provide an estimated timeframe for resolution.



What if the company responsible no longer exists? Experienced firms have access to asbestos trust funds established for cases like yours.




They provide clarity and confidence throughout the legal journey.



Even if you’re unsure about your exposure or eligibility, a law firm can investigate on your behalf.







Eligibility for Filing a Lawsuit



Eligibility for a mesothelioma lawsuit depends on several factors:




A confirmed mesothelioma diagnosis linked to asbestos exposure.



A history of exposure, often through work, secondhand exposure, or environmental contact.



Filing within the statute of limitations, which varies by state.



When you've been affected by mesothelioma, knowing the timeline for taking legal action is crucial. The window to hire an asbestos law firm and file a claim is governed by the statute of limitations, which differs from state to state. Typically, this timeframe ranges from 1 to 3 years following the diagnosis or the passing of a loved one due to mesothelioma.



Acting promptly is imperative, as missing this deadline could forfeit your right to seek compensation. It’s advisable to consult with a qualified asbestos attorney who can navigate the specific laws of your jurisdiction, ensuring your claim is properly filed within the designated period.












Non-Lawsuit Options



For individuals who prefer not to pursue litigation, there are alternative options:




Asbestos Trust Funds: Many companies responsible for asbestos exposure have set aside funds to compensate victims. Filing a claim against these trusts is typically faster and less adversarial than a lawsuit.



Workers’ Compensation: If your exposure occurred on the job, you might be eligible for workers' compensation benefits.



Veterans’ Benefits: Veterans exposed to asbestos during military service may qualify for benefits through the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).




Your attorney will help you explore all available avenues.







Identifying Responsible Parties



One of the critical roles of a mesothelioma law firm is identifying the parties responsible for your exposure. This often involves:




Investigating employers, product manufacturers, and property owners linked to your exposure.



Reviewing historical documents and employment records.



Collaborating with experts to build a strong case.




Even in cases of secondary exposure or multiple sources, experienced attorneys can pinpoint accountability.







Estimating Compensation



Compensation varies depending on the specifics of your case. Factors include:




Medical expenses, including treatment and care costs.



Lost wages and diminished earning capacity.



Pain, suffering, and emotional distress.



Travel costs for treatment and caregiving support.




An attorney can provide a realistic estimate based on past cases and your unique circumstances.



When exploring the achievements of mesothelioma law firms, several significant settlements and verdicts are notable for their impact and the compensation awarded to victims. These firms have secured substantial financial recoveries for individuals affected by asbestos exposure.



Here are some exemplary results:




A remarkable $40 million was awarded to a U.S. Navy veteran in Washington, highlighting the extensive support these firms provide to military personnel.



In California, a construction supervisor received $30 million, emphasizing the legal expertise available to construction industry workers.



Illinois saw a janitor receiving $24.4 million, illustrating the commitment to helping laborers across various sectors.



When a mechanic in Missouri faced asbestos-related illness, the compensation reached $20 million, demonstrating the breadth of representation.



A longshoreman from Louisiana was awarded $10 million, underscoring the dedication to maritime workers.



New York laborers also benefited from dedicated legal advocacy, with a notable settlement of $4.7 million.



A U.S. Army veteran in Maryland was awarded $3.9 million, which showcases the firms' focus on assisting veterans beyond service environments.



Another Louisiana longshoreman again received a payout of $10 million, reflecting consistent success in high-stakes cases.




These substantial sums reflect the rigorous legal support provided to victims of mesothelioma, ensuring they receive the compensation required to manage their health and finances.







Average Settlement Information



The average mesothelioma settlement ranges from $1 million to $1.4 million. Trial verdicts may award higher amounts, but settlements are often faster and less stressful. Your attorney will help determine whether pursuing a settlement or going to trial is in your best interest.



Am I Eligible to File an Asbestos Lawsuit? 



A law firm will review your case and tell you how strong it is. They can estimate your chances of success in a settlement or lawsuit. They will not take your case unless they feel confident about winning.



Is a Lawsuit My Only Option? 



Experienced asbestos lawyers explain all your options and help with non-lawsuit actions such as claiming with an asbestos trust or seeking VA benefits. 



Who Is Responsible for My Illness? 



Companies can move, go out of business, or change ownership. This makes it hard to figure out who is responsible. The law firm’s job is to research and determine responsible parties liable for your asbestos exposure.



How Much Compensation Can I Get? 



A law firm taking on your case will estimate how much you may get for compensation. This is based on past expenses, daily expenses, medical bills, lost wages, emotional trauma, physical suffering, and future expenses. This is not a guaranteed amount.



What Is the Average Settlement for a Mesothelioma Case? 



Most mesothelioma and asbestos lawsuits end in settlements rather than jury verdicts. The average settlement amount ranges from $1 million to $1.4 million. 



What Are the Characteristics of Top Asbestos Law Firms? 



When looking for legal representation, choose a law firm based on these critical factors: 



The Best Mesothelioma Law Firms Have Years of Asbestos Experience



These law firms are staffed by top mesothelioma lawyers and legal professionals with years of experience working on cases like yours. They know the asbestos industry and all its players. They have studied the relevant laws and applied them to hundreds of cases. 



They Have a Proven Track Record of Winning Asbestos Lawsuits 



All that experience means little unless the firm has a record of winning for its clients. A good firm will be willing to show you the proof that they get results for clients. 



Top Asbestos Law Firms Can Document Your Exposure



These firms win cases by proving their clients were negligently exposed to asbestos. This isn't easy to do. As experts, they have resources such as asbestos databases to find sources of exposure. They collect information and records to prove client cases. 



They Take Time to Answer Your Questions and Explain Your Options



The best mesothelioma lawyers work in firms that encourage respect for clients. They offer free initial consultations to evaluate your case and answer all your questions. Before taking any concrete steps, they make sure you understand your options. 



Top Mesothelioma Lawyers Charge Nothing Until They Win



No reputable firm will charge you a dime until they win your case. They charge on a contingency basis, taking a percentage of your settlement or jury award as a fee. 



The Top Firms Rely on Networks of Asbestos and Medical Experts



Mesothelioma law firms extend their services to clients by maintaining a network of relevant experts. They work with investigators and asbestos professionals to pinpoint where and when clients were exposed. They also work with medical experts to prove that the exposure led directly to illness. 



The Best Mesothelioma Law Firms Are Sensitive to the Needs of Mesothelioma Patients



Living with mesothelioma is exhausting, both physically and mentally. Law firms working with these clients understand the disease and are compassionate and sensitive. 



How Mesothelioma Law Firms Offer Personalized Attention to Their Clients



Mesothelioma law firms are dedicated to offering personalized attention that ensures every client feels supported throughout their legal journey. Here's how they make it happen:




24/7 Availability: These firms prioritize being accessible, offering round-the-clock support to answer questions and address concerns promptly, ensuring clients never feel alone in the process.



Expert Guidance: Legal teams are composed of experienced professionals who guide clients through complex legal procedures with clarity and empathy, making sure each step is explained and understood.



Tailored Communication: By customizing communication methods to suit each client’s preferences, whether through in-person meetings, phone calls, or digital platforms, these firms ensure that clients receive updates and information in the most convenient way for them.



Emotional Support: Understanding the emotional weight of a mesothelioma diagnosis, these firms provide not just legal advice but also emotional support, often connecting clients with counseling and support groups.



Comprehensive Resources: Firms frequently offer additional resources, such as medical and financial advice, to assist clients in managing all aspects of their situation beyond just the legal case.




Ultimately, mesothelioma law firms focus on creating a supportive environment that combines legal expertise with genuine care, addressing both the legal and emotional needs of their clients.



Why a Nationwide Network Matters in Choosing a Mesothelioma Law Firm



When facing a mesothelioma diagnosis, selecting the right law firm can significantly impact the outcome of your case. Opting for a nationwide firm offers unparalleled advantages compared to smaller, local firms. Here’s why:



Broader Resources and Expertise




Comprehensive Resources: National firms have access to an extensive pool of resources, including medical experts, investigators, and specialized legal teams. This advantage allows for a more thorough investigation and robust case-building process.



Experienced Attorneys: These firms often employ attorneys with a proven track record in mesothelioma cases. Their expertise ensures that your case is handled with the highest level of professionalism and understanding.




Strategic Jurisdictional Reach




Filing Flexibility: With jurisdictional flexibility, national law firms can file claims in multiple states. This strategic benefit increases the likelihood of filing in a jurisdiction where compensation awards tend to be higher.



Tailored Legal Strategy: They can tailor strategies based on regional legal variations, maximizing the effectiveness of your case.




Financial Capabilities




Greater Financial Backing: Having a large network often means stronger financial support for your case. They can cover upfront costs such as filing fees and expert witness testimonies, ensuring that you are not financially burdened during the process.




Proven Track Record




Successful Outcomes: National firms usually have a history of successful verdicts and settlements in mesothelioma cases. This history reflects their ability to handle complex cases effectively.




A nationwide mesothelioma law firm not only brings more resources and expertise to your case but also enhances your chances for a favorable outcome through strategic filing options and robust financial backing.



What to Expect When Working with Mesothelioma Law Firms



The first thing to expect is a free consultation. Come to this initial meeting with a list of questions to ask and as much information as you can provide about your case: 




Provide your lawyers with all related medical records.



Be prepared to provide your work history and information, including the full company names, addresses, phone numbers, your job roles, and when you worked at each job.



Keep track of all expenses related to your illness. This includes copies of medical bills, mileage used to get to appointments, medical supplies, and mental health care related to being sick.




Once you choose a firm to hire, they'll go through several steps to get the best result: 




Investigate and Gather Evidence. The firm will investigate your case, discovering all the details of your exposure and how it led to your illness. This is essential for providing evidence to build a strong case. 



Explore and Explain Your Options. With more information, the firm can give you all the options for the next steps and advise you on the decision. 



File Mesothelioma Claims. Expert asbestos attorneys look for all avenues to compensation for their clients. This means they may want to file claims with asbestos trusts in addition to filing a lawsuit. 



File a Mesothelioma Lawsuit. Your team will take all the necessary steps to file your suit and all the required paperwork. 



Begin Settlement Negotiations or Go to Trial. Most of these cases end in a settlement. Your lawyers will enter into negotiations with the defendants' attorneys to get you a fair amount. If necessary, they will represent you in a jury trial. 



Follow up on Compensation. Your lawyer's work doesn't end with a win in court or the negotiation room. They will follow up and ensure you get the money. 





 




Where Can I Find Top Mesothelioma Lawyers Near Me? 



Look through ads, directories, and informational websites to find law firms specializing in mesothelioma cases. Many work with clients nationwide, but you may also want to find someone local. Laws vary by state, so working with a firm that operates in your state is essential. 



What if I Can't Afford to Hire a Law Firm?



Law firms that work with mesothelioma clients know that patients cannot afford up-front fees for legal representation. Many firms work on a contingency fee basis.



Contingency means a law firm only gets paid if and when you get paid. They take a percentage of the damages you recover.



Contingency percentages and rates vary by law firm. Before hiring a lawyer, knowing the fee and agreeing on a percentage is essential.



If a law firm doesn't provide a contingency fee option for payment, they don't have the financial resources to investigate and prove your case. Only choose a law firm that works on contingency.



Can I Hire an Asbestos Law Firm on Behalf of a Loved One? 



Yes, if you lost a loved one to mesothelioma, you can work with a law firm to file a wrongful death lawsuit. If your loved one is still with you but very ill, you can work with the firm on their behalf. 



Where Can I Get Assistance?



Simply fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 



We offer free online appointments and can arrange for representatives to meet you within just one mile of your home. Open Now.

### Asbestos Trust Fund Filing Process

Understanding Fees in Trust Fund Settlements



When dealing with trust fund settlements, it’s essential to be aware of the fees involved, particularly attorney fees. 



Here’s what you need to know:




Attorney Fees: Typically, the fee your attorney will collect is a percentage of the settlement amount. This percentage is often determined when you initially hire them. It’s crucial to discuss this rate upfront to avoid surprises later in the process. Generally, your attorney will receive the same percentage of a trust fund settlement that you agreed to when you retained their services.



Fee Caps: Be aware that some trust funds may have restrictions on the maximum fees attorneys can charge. These caps are in place to ensure fair distribution of funds to claimants. Some trust funds specifically cap attorney fees, so it’s important to verify these limits when entering into an agreement.




When engaging in a trust fund settlement, always verify the specific terms and conditions of attorney compensation and any regulatory limits that might apply. This knowledge helps ensure that you are prepared for all related expenses.



Understanding Trust Fund Criteria








To navigate the complexities of filing a claim, it is crucial to understand the specific criteria associated with trust funds. Trust funds have established requirements that must be adhered to by claimants. Legal experts, particularly those specializing in mesothelioma claims, can provide invaluable assistance in meeting these requirements.




Initially, they will assess key factors such as exposure history and employment records to determine the appropriate trusts to target. Once these trusts are identified, they will ensure compliance with each trust's unique filing criteria.



Importance of Time Frames



Each trust may impose different filing time frames, which can vary significantly. These time frames might even change based on the particulars of your case. Some trusts incorporate state statutes of limitations, adding another layer of complexity. Being aware of these deadlines is vital to avoid jeopardizing your claim.



In summary, understanding the intricacies of trust fund criteria not only facilitates a smoother claims process but also positions you to make informed decisions regarding legal representation and potential costs. By understanding both the set percentage and potential caps, you can make informed decisions and manage your expectations effectively.



Most claims take just a few months, about 90 days, to pay out to victims. However, the timeframe can vary significantly depending on the specific trust involved. Some asbestos trusts may approve claims in as little as one to two weeks, while others might take as long as one to three months. In certain cases, the process can extend from six months to a year.



Many trusts prioritize the cases of living claimants, which can influence how quickly a claim is processed. The best way to navigate this process efficiently and potentially expedite your claim is to work with a top rated lawyer experienced in filing asbestos trust claims. They can help ensure all necessary documentation is in order and submitted promptly, reducing the likelihood of delays.



We offer free online appointments and can arrange for representatives to meet you within just one mile of your home. Open Now.



Understanding the Difference: Asbestos Trust Fund Claim vs. Mesothelioma Lawsuit



When considering legal options for mesothelioma compensation, it's vital to distinguish between filing a trust fund claim and pursuing a lawsuit. Each path caters to unique circumstances and comes with its specific process and potential outcomes.



Trust Fund Claim




Target Entity: Trust funds are established by bankrupt asbestos companies to compensate victims of asbestos-related diseases.



Process: Once a claim is submitted, trust administrators review the details and decide on approval.



Payouts: Generally, approved claims result in payouts that vary, typically ranging from several thousand dollars to over $100,000.




Mesothelioma Lawsuit




Target Entity: Filed against companies currently liable for asbestos exposure.



Process: Legal proceedings can lead to settlements negotiated between the parties, or advance to trial where a judge or jury delivers a verdict.



Compensation: Settlements often exceed $1 million, while jury verdicts can reach or surpass $2.4 million.




In summary, while trust fund claims tend to offer lower compensation through a streamlined process, mesothelioma lawsuits potentially yield higher awards but involve more complex legal proceedings. Each option involves distinct timeframes, eligibility criteria, and compensation potential that should be carefully assessed based on personal circumstances.



Can Mesothelioma Victims Receive Compensation from Multiple Asbestos Trust Funds?



Yes, individuals diagnosed with mesothelioma can indeed seek compensation from multiple asbestos trust funds. This is because numerous companies responsible for asbestos exposure have established these funds, each designed to compensate victims. Importantly, filing a claim with one trust does not disqualify an individual from seeking compensation from others.



How It Works




Multiple Trusts Available: Many companies that produced or used asbestos-based products have filed for bankruptcy and subsequently established trust funds to handle claims. Each of these trusts operates independently.



No Restriction on Filing: Victims can file claims with several trusts as long as they meet the specific criteria set by each one. The eligibility requirements vary, typically based on the products used and the extent of exposure.



Strategic Compensation Process: Legal experts often recommend a strategic approach to maximize the compensation potential, ensuring that each trust fund's unique procedures and timelines are adhered to properly.




By working with a knowledgeable attorney, mesothelioma victims can navigate the complexities of filing claims with multiple asbestos trusts, thus optimizing their compensation from the wide network available. This multi-trust approach helps ensure that victims receive comprehensive financial support for their medical and personal needs.






 




What Is an Asbestos Trust Fund?



An asbestos or mesothelioma trust fund is a fund that contains money set aside to compensate victims of asbestos exposure and their families. Many companies used asbestos for decades, exposing workers to this toxic mineral that causes mesothelioma, lung cancer, asbestosis, and other illnesses. 



Why Did Companies Create Asbestos Trust 



Understanding Asbestos Company Bankruptcies



Bankrupt companies that exposed workers to asbestos created asbestos trust funds to compensate those who developed mesothelioma and other illnesses. Asbestos trusts support future claimants and their families and still contain about $30 billion in available funds. 



Bankrupt companies that exposed workers to asbestos created asbestos trust funds to compensate those who developed mesothelioma and other illnesses. Asbestos trusts support future claimants and their families and still contain about $30 billion in available funds.



For mesothelioma patients, asbestos trust fund compensation can be a vital lifeline. Here's how it helps:




Covers Treatment and Travel Expenses: The compensation can significantly ease the financial burden of medical treatments and associated travel costs, ensuring patients can access necessary care.



Provides Financial Security: It offers a safety net for patients and their families, helping to maintain financial stability during challenging times.



Replaces Lost Income: When a patient is unable to work, these funds can help replace lost income, alleviating stress and allowing families to focus on recovery.




If you or a loved one have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about highly-respected mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more.



Victims of asbestos exposure and eligible family members file claims with the trusts to receive compensation for medical and other expenses.



Because these companies went bankrupt, the trusts protected them from lawsuits. If a company that exposed you to asbestos went bankrupt, a trust fund might be your only source of compensation.



Understanding Bankruptcy Options for Asbestos Companies



When an asbestos company faces severe financial challenges, it can seek relief under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Two primary options are Chapter 7 and Chapter 11 bankruptcy, each serving distinct purposes.



Chapter 7 Bankruptcy: Liquidation




Purpose and Process: This type of bankruptcy involves liquidating the company's assets. The proceeds from these sales are used to repay creditors. It's often chosen when a company sees no feasible path to continue operations.



Outcome: Chapter 7 results in the termination of the company. Once the assets are liquidated, the business does not continue.




Chapter 11 Bankruptcy: Reorganization




Purpose and Process: In contrast, Chapter 11 is aimed at reorganizing the company's debt structure. This process allows the business to negotiate terms with creditors in hopes of regaining financial stability.



Outcome: Unlike Chapter 7, a successful Chapter 11 bankruptcy allows the company to emerge as an operational entity. A key component for asbestos companies might include setting up an asbestos trust fund to handle future claims.




Key Differences




Continuation vs. Closure: Chapter 7 leads to business closure, while Chapter 11 attempts to keep the company afloat.



Asset Management: Chapter 7 focuses on selling assets to pay creditors. Chapter 11 involves negotiating debt terms and restructuring without liquidating assets.



Long-Term Impact: A terminated company ceases all operations under Chapter 7, whereas Chapter 11 offers a chance for survival and future growth.




Each bankruptcy type offers unique paths depending on whether the company's ultimate goal is to close operations or continue serving its market.



If you or a loved one have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about highly-respected mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 





Funds?



Expensive lawsuits over asbestos illnesses forced many companies into bankruptcy. Companies had to create these funds as a requirement of reorganization under Chapter 11 protection. 



How Does the Asbestos Trust Fund Work? 



There are several asbestos trust funds set up by individual companies or groups of a few related companies and subsidiaries. 



Victims of asbestos exposure and eligible family members file claims with the trusts to receive compensation for medical and other expenses. 



Because these companies went bankrupt, the trusts protected them from lawsuits. If a company that exposed you to asbestos went bankrupt, a trust fund might be your only source of compensation. 



DOJ's Concerns About Asbestos Trust Funds



The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) has actively engaged in efforts to reform tort practices, with a particular focus on issues surrounding asbestos trust funds. The primary concerns highlighted by the DOJ include instances of fraud and the mismanagement of these trusts, which are designed to compensate victims of asbestos exposure.



Specific Interventions




Objections to Appointments: In 2018, the DOJ raised objections regarding the appointment of a legal representative to a particular asbestos trust, indicating concerns about potential governance issues.



Bankruptcy Proceedings: The DOJ has stepped in on multiple occasions during trust bankruptcy cases, emphasizing the need for better mechanisms to prevent fraudulent claims and ensure that funds are appropriately managed and distributed.




These interventions reflect the DOJ's ongoing commitment to safeguarding trust funds from misuse, though the necessity and impact of these actions continue to be topics of debate among stakeholders.



Important Facts About Mesothelioma and Asbestos Trust Funds




In 1971, the widow of a Louisiana man who developed cancer from one of the company’s products sued the Johns-Manville Sales Corporation. The plaintiff won, and shortly after, courts across the nation were flooded with asbestos-related lawsuits.



For many companies, the burden of lawsuits led to bankruptcy. However, as a condition for filing for bankruptcy protection, these companies were required to set up trusts to compensate victims of asbestos-related illnesses. 



Johns-Manville set up the first asbestos trust in 1988. 



The trust funds are designed to handle current claims while retaining enough funds also to compensate future claims. 



The trust funds have already distributed billions of dollars to asbestos victims. 



There are now hundreds of asbestos trusts and an estimated $30 billion set aside for victims. If you’ve developed an illness due to exposure to asbestos, now is the time to reach out and find out if there is a trust that can compensate you.






Mr. and Mrs. Evans



“When I was diagnosed with mesothelioma it was like falling into a dark hole but the Patient Advocates at Mesothelioma Lawyer Center told us “Don’t worry, this is what you do, this is how we will help you.” They gave us recommendations and have been there all along the way. Not everyone you talk to in law firms understand how critical this is but Mesothelioma Lawyer Center does.”





How Do I File an Asbestos Trust Fund Claim?



The first step in the process of filing a claim is to find one or more asbestos trusts for which you are eligible. To determine your eligibility, gather proof, and make a claim, it's a good idea to rely on the advice and guidance of an asbestos law firm. 



1. List of Asbestos Trust Funds



There are now hundreds of asbestos trusts and an estimated $30 billion set aside for victims. If you've developed an illness due to exposure to asbestos, now is the time to reach out and find out if there is a trust that can compensate you.



Currently, there are more than 60 established asbestos trust funds specifically designed to compensate victims of asbestos exposure. These trusts have been set up by companies as part of their bankruptcy restructuring plans. Some companies are still in the process of creating additional trusts, which will contribute further to the pool of resources available for affected individuals.



By tapping into these funds, victims can receive the financial support they deserve. It’s crucial to stay informed about the availability and status of these trusts, as they continue to evolve.



For those seeking detailed information, here's a snapshot of some key asbestos trust funds:




A-Best Products: Established the A-Best Asbestos Settlement Trust in 2004 with an initial funding of $18 million.



Armstrong World Industries: Their trust was created in 2006 with $2.06 billion to support victims.



ASARCO, LLC: Formed the ASARCO LLC Asbestos Personal Injury Settlement Trust in 2009, initially funded with $830 million.



Babcock & Wilcox Company: This trust began in 2006 with $1.85 billion available for claims.



DII Industries, LLC (Dresser Industries): Set up their trust in 2005, providing an impressive $2.51 billion.




These examples highlight the significant resources available through asbestos trust funds. While the list above is not exhaustive, it represents a selection of the substantial funds established to aid those affected by asbestos exposure. Additional funds continue to be created, expanding the support network for victims.



This is a partial list of important companies that set up trusts to compensate victims. Contact an experienced asbestos lawyer to determine where you were exposed, the companies responsible, and the appropriate trust for making your claim.




ABB Lummus Global



A&I Corporation



A-Best



API Inc.



A.P. Green Industries 



Armstrong Cork Company



Armstrong World Industries 



APG



ARTRA (Synkoloid)



ASARCO LLC



Babcock & Wilcox Corporation



Bartells



Brauer Supply Company



Burns and Roe Enterprises



C.E. Thurston & Sons



Celotex Corporation



Combustion Engineering



Congoleum Corporation



Dana Corporation



DII Industries



EaglePicher Industries Inc.



Federal-Mogul Corporation



The Flintkote Company



Forty-Eight Insulations Inc.



Fuller-Austin Inc.



G-1 Holdings Inc.



General Aniline and Film (GAF) Corporation



General Motors (GM)



H.K. Porter Company



Harbison-Walker



Hercules Chemical Company



J.T. Thorpe and Son, Inc.



Johns-Manville



Kaiser Aluminum



Keene Creditors



Lykes Bros. Steamship



Mid Valley Inc.



National Gypsum Company



North American Refractories Company (NARCO)



Owens Corning



Pittsburgh Corning



Porter-Hayden Company



Raymark/Raytech/Raybestos-Manhattan



Quigley Fire Company



Rutland Fire Clay Company



Shook & Fletcher Insulation Company



Swan and Silica



Skinner Engine



T H Agriculture and Nutrition



Thorpe Insulation



UNR



Utex Industries



United States Lines



W.R. Grace & Co.



Wallace & Gale



Western MacArthur




2. Determine Your Eligibility for Filing a Claim



To have your claim approved, you must meet specific criteria. You can find the requirements on the trust fund's website.   Eligibility criteria vary by fund, but they generally include: 




When and where you encountered asbestos



A diagnosis of an asbestos illness



Evidence of asbestos products you used or worked near



A time limit for filing




3. Collect Evidence



You must support your claim with evidence. An experienced mesothelioma lawyer can help you do this. You will likely need medical documentation, a physician statement, and employment records. 



4. File the Claim



With everything in order, you can claim with one or more trusts. Your lawyer can do this for you and ensure the claim contains everything you need for a payout. 



5. Wait for Review and Approval



Once the trust administrators receive your claim, they will review it. There are two ways they can approach this step: 




An individual review is filed when you don’t meet the mandated medical requirements of an expedited or quick review. It requires a deeper look at your personal information and medical history to determine a compensation amount. Due to its detailed nature, this review usually results in slower payouts.



An expedited review has a fixed compensation amount, and victims are usually paid more quickly when compared to an individual review. Because individual reviews don’t have set value amounts, they require more evidence from the victim, including in-depth work and medical history, to be processed.This method is typically faster because it involves predetermined criteria, allowing for quicker payouts.




In both instances, a consistent payment percentage is applied to ensure fairness across all processed claims.



Your lawyer will know which type of review to request to give you the best chance of approval. Experienced asbestos lawyers can evaluate the specifics of your case and guide you in selecting the optimal review type, ensuring you receive the compensation you deserve.



6. Claim Liquidation



Once the claims are reviewed, liquidation begins for qualified plaintiffs. The trust provides the plaintiff with a financial offer.



At this point, a plaintiff can accept or deny the offer amount. If you accept, your claim will go into a payment queue. 



Your claim will enter alternative dispute resolution (ADR) if you reject the offer. Your lawyer will negotiate with the trust to get you a better offer. 



Am I Eligible for Asbestos Trust Fund Claims? 



This is an important question to answer before you start the claims process. In general, anyone exposed to asbestos and who developed an asbestos illness, such as mesothelioma, asbestosis, or lung cancer, may file. You are eligible if you got sick after: 




Working with or near asbestos products and materials



Living with someone who worked with asbestos and brought fibers home on their clothing



Living near a workplace with asbestos or naturally-occurring asbestos




Loved ones who lost a family member to asbestos illnesses may also be eligible to claim with a trust. 



Medical requirements will vary according to each trust. For some, you may need to provide an in-depth medical and work history, while other trusts may be more lenient in proof requirements. It is up to you to ensure you provide all the necessary information. 



What Is the Average Asbestos Trust Fund Settlement? 



From 1998 to 2010, according to GAO, 3.3 million trust cases have been paid, totaling about $17.5 billion. The actual amounts awarded from the mesothelioma trust funds depend on individual factors in each claim. 



According to reports, claim payouts range widely from $7,000 to $1.2 million. The median payment is $180,000. 



How Much Compensation Will I Get From a Trust Fund? 



The amount of compensation any individual can get from an asbestos trust fund varies. There are several factors involved. 



Personal Factors for Determining Asbestos Compensation



Factors unique to each individual often play a role in determining compensation amounts: 




The type of illness diagnosed



The severity of the illness



The extent of past asbestos exposure



The number of asbestos products involved




What Percentage Does an Asbestos Trust Pay? 



Another factor is the payment percentage of the trust. Unfortunately, most companies don’t have enough funds to pay the total compensation amount awarded to claimants. Many trusts operate under the percentage value, meaning that claimants will get a certain percentage of the total amount.



For example, if the total amount happens to be $1.5 million and the company is offering 25 percent of the total amount, then the claimant can expect to receive $375,000. 



There is a chance that the trust payout will be higher than 25 percent, but rarely does compensation fall below 25 percent.



Why Do Asbestos Trust Funds Only Pay a Percentage of Compensation Owed? 



According to the United States Government Accountability Office (GAO), if companies paid the full amount of the claim, funds may not be available for future cases. 



FAQs About Asbestos Trust Funds



The best way to get all your questions answered is to contact experienced asbestos lawyers in your area. Here are some answers to get you started. 



Can I File a Lawsuit and a Trust Claim?



It’s possible to file both a mesothelioma lawsuit and a trust fund simultaneously. If you receive trust compensation, it may affect the amount you receive in a lawsuit.



State laws vary in the amount of compensation you can receive in a lawsuit if you also file a claim for trust fund compensation.



Can a Victim File Claims with Multiple Asbestos Trust Funds?



Absolutely, there is no restriction on the number of asbestos trust funds a victim can claim against. Victims can pursue claims against all available trusts that correspond to the companies responsible for their asbestos exposure.



Why is Multiple Claim Filing Possible?



Over the years, numerous companies involved with asbestos have set up trust funds to manage and pay out claims. This was done to handle the overwhelming number of cases while these companies often continued operations under bankruptcy protection. Because of this structure, each trust fund operates independently, allowing victims to file claims with as many trusts as necessary, without facing a cumulative limit.



How Does This Benefit Victims?




Comprehensive Compensation: Victims can maximize their compensation by submitting claims to multiple trusts tied to different liable companies.



Broader Coverage: Having access to numerous funds increases the likelihood of achieving sufficient financial relief to cover medical and related expenses.



No Overlap Concerns: Each trust evaluates claims based on its distinct set of criteria related to that specific company’s asbestos usage.




By leveraging the availability and flexibility of these funds, victims and their families can pursue full financial recovery.



Is There a Time Limit to File a Claim? 



Yes, each trust fund sets a statute of limitation for filing. Most are two or three years, so it's essential to act quickly once you receive a diagnosis. Talk to a lawyer or asbestos law firm as soon as possible. 



How Long Does it Take to Get a Mesothelioma Trust Fund Payout? 



Most claims take just a few months, about 90 days, to pay out to victims. The best way to get through this process faster is to work with a lawyer experienced in filing claims. 



Will Trust Amounts Have Enough for All Victims?



This is a valid concern, with more and more victims coming forward and filing claims against the responsible parties. 



However, with over $30 billion in trust funds and strict management to ensure that the funds are allocated fairly, there is no reason to worry.



Do I Need an Asbestos Lawyer to File a Claim? 



Most trust funds do not require legal representation to file. However, it's best to work with an experienced asbestos attorney to get your claim approved quickly. 



A lawyer can also negotiate on your behalf, helping you get the maximum amount of compensation possible. 



What if I Have Lung Cancer, Not Mesothelioma? 



If your lung cancer is related to asbestos exposure, you can file a claim for compensation from an asbestos trust. Your lawyer can help you find a medical expert to prove your illness resulted from asbestos. 



Will My Claim Be Taxed? 



Trust fund payouts are not usually taxed, but you should consult your lawyer or a tax attorney to determine if your compensation is tax-exempt. Payments from asbestos trust funds are generally not taxable. However, certain laws and regulations could result in taxes on some claims or parts of claims. This means that while your payment may initially seem tax-free, complexities in the law could affect the tax status of specific portions of your compensation.



To fully understand the tax implications of your specific situation, it’s crucial to seek professional advice. A mesothelioma lawyer or tax expert can provide valuable insights into whether your payout is subject to taxes, ensuring you have all the information you need to make informed decisions. By consulting with these professionals, you can gain clarity and peace of mind regarding any potential tax obligations tied to your trust fund payment.



Notable Companies with Large Asbestos Trusts



Johns-Manville set up the first asbestos trust in 1988. This pioneering move laid the groundwork for others to follow. Since then, several companies have established their own longstanding trusts. Notably, National Gypsum Company, Eagle-Picher Corporation, and Keene Corporation have also set up significant trusts that continue to operate today.



The establishment of these trusts has been a pivotal development in addressing asbestos-related liabilities. As the number of companies creating asbestos trusts continues to grow, these early adopters remain at the forefront, demonstrating a long-term commitment to managing the impact of asbestos exposure.



These are just a few more details of the most important asbestos trust funds:



Owens Corning



After World War II, the Owens Corning Corporation quickly became a leader in the insulation industry. It used asbestos heavily in its products from the 1930s through the 1980s. 



The company bought the Fibreboard Corporation in 1997. Fibreboard also relied on asbestos for its products.



Shortly after the acquisition, Owens Corning set up a trust anticipating asbestos lawsuits against both companies. Known as the Owens Corning Fibreboard Asbestos Personal Injury Trust of 2006, the company placed close to $7 billion in the fund. 



Owens Corning used asbestos in:




Equipment, duct, and pipe insulation



Roof tile insulation



Fiberglass



Finishing cement



Laminated panels



One Cote cement



Mastic




Armstrong World Industries



Armstrong World Industries has been making cabinets and ceiling and flooring materials since 1860. Armstrong faced a string of lawsuits beginning in 1970 when Clarence Borel, an industrial insulation worker, filed a lawsuit against Armstrong and ten asbestos manufacturers after developing mesothelioma.



Borel won against Armstrong and marked a milestone for asbestos victims.



Thousands of cases against Armstrong followed Borel’s. After paying millions out to former workers who developed asbestos-related diseases, Armstrong filed for bankruptcy in 2000.



In 2006 the company created the Armstrong World Industries Asbestos Trust. In the first two years alone, the Armstrong World Industries Asbestos Trust had over 200,000 cases.



Armstrong once used asbestos in a variety of products, including:




Floor tile



Asbestos paper



Cement



Adhesives



Sealers



Asphalt tiles



Cork coverings



Floor felt



Mastics



Emulsions



Finishes




National Gypsum



Established in 1925, National Gypsum (NGC) produces wallboard products under the Gold Bond trademark. Many of the company’s products contained asbestos. NGC declared bankruptcy in 1990 after facing many lawsuits over asbestos illnesses.



NGC created a trust to help handle more than 40,000 pending lawsuits as part of this process. NGC had paid out over $200 million by 2010.



The three primary products that NGC made with asbestos were:




Gold Bond gypsum board



PermaBase cement board



Proform drywall finishing products




Combustion Engineering



Combustion Engineering (CE) manufactured boilers that included several asbestos-containing materials. The company began in 1912 and was bought in 1990 by Asea Brown Boveri (ABB Group). ABB Group became responsible for any asbestos lawsuits.



By 2002 CE still had close to 111,000 pending lawsuits, which ABB successfully reduced to 94,000. Since the number of asbestos cases was extremely high, ABB established a trust several years later, which covered any unsettled asbestos lawsuits as well as any future claims.



Products that CE and ABB manufactured with asbestos include:




Boilers



Ropes



Block sticks



Cement



Joint material



Protective and weather coating




Johns Manville



The Johns Manville Trust is the largest asbestos trust fund created in the U.S., with an estimated $2.5 billion. The company established the trust in 1988 after thousands of people began developing diseases after being exposed to asbestos in the company’s products.



Johns Manville began in 1858 as a construction and insulation company that provided many asbestos-containing products for the construction of residential and commercial buildings.



In 1927, the company also began manufacturing products for the military. Many of these went into U.S. Navy ships that required significant insulation and fireproofing.



As early as 1929, Johns Manville faced its first lawsuit after employees laid health-related charges against the company. Numerous asbestos claims followed, resulting in the establishment of the 1988 trust.



A large number of workers in a variety of industries were potentially affected by Johns Manville asbestos products:




Construction workers



Factory workers



Electricians



Bakers



Firefighters



Military veterans



Painters



Roofers



Pipefitters



Shipbuilders



Insulation installers



HVAC installers and repair workers




Products containing asbestos, provided by Johns Manville, included:




Adhesives



Siding sheets



Roofing materials



Tiles



Insulation



Caulking putty



Roof shingles



Panels



Wallboard



Protective clothing



Flexboards



Transite sheets



Fireproof sheets








Limitations on Asbestos Trust Fund Claims



Legitimate victims of asbestos exposure through bankrupt companies should have no problem getting compensation from a trust. There are some limitations, though, and you should be aware of them. 



Statute of Limitations



As with lawsuits, there are deadlines for filing asbestos trust fund claims. Every trust sets its own statute of limitations, determining when it is too late to file. Your lawyer can guide you here and ensure you don't miss the deadline. 



Other State Laws



Another reason to work with a lawyer to make an asbestos trust claim is that state laws vary. Your state might limit your ability to collect compensation through certain laws. This is especially important if you are also filing a lawsuit. The asbestos lawsuit process is dictated by state law. 



The Furthering Asbestos Claim Transparency Act



Some states have passed what is known as a FACT law (Furthering Asbestos Claim Transparency). This law requires anyone filing an asbestos or mesothelioma lawsuit to disclose any asbestos trust fund claims they have made. They must also disclose any claims they plan to make in the future.



The law limits the amount of damages a victim can recover in a lawsuit over asbestos exposure. If they have received trust fund compensation from a bankrupt company, that amount can be deducted from damages or a settlement against another company.



The FACT Act is part of a larger tort reform movement aimed at making it harder for victims to file legal claims and to limit compensation. This movement has introduced the FACT Act in Congress multiple times, although no legislative action has been taken since 2017.



A key provision of the FACT Act is the requirement for asbestos trust funds to publicly disclose claims, which has been met with criticism. Opponents argue that these provisions invade privacy and could slow down the claim review process, making it more challenging for victims to receive timely justice.



While Congress has not recently pursued the FACT Act, it remains a possibility for future reintroduction. Advocates for asbestos victims continue to stand against the bill, ensuring that the rights and privacy of those affected by asbestos exposure are protected.



This ongoing debate highlights the tension between transparency and privacy, as well as the broader implications for asbestos litigation and victim compensation.



Where Can I Get Legal Assistance with Asbestos Trust Funds?



Remember, if you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Don’t forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area.



Accessing compensation from asbestos trust funds can be a crucial step in securing financial support. Here's how you can navigate this process effectively:




Eligibility for Multiple Trusts: Mesothelioma victims might be eligible for compensation from several asbestos trust funds. Filing a claim with one does not preclude you from seeking compensation from others. This maximizes your potential compensation.



Understanding Eligibility Requirements: Trust funds require specific documentation, such as proof of asbestos exposure and a medical diagnosis. Meeting these requirements is essential, and working with an experienced asbestos attorney can be invaluable.



Role of Trustees and Payout Factors: Trustees manage the trust funds and process claims. Payouts depend on several factors, including the severity of your disease, your age, and the fund's payment percentage. Understanding these elements can help set realistic expectations.



Legal Guidance: Attorneys specializing in asbestos cases can help navigate the intricacies of filing claims, ensuring all eligibility requirements are met and optimizing your compensation. They can also assist in identifying the appropriate funds against which to file.




To further empower yourself with knowledge, you can request our free guide on understanding your legal rights. This comprehensive resource will provide detailed information on navigating your legal options, ensuring you are fully informed about your entitlements and the steps you can take.



If you need additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-454. Our team is ready to guide you through the process and answer any questions you may have about your legal rights and compensation opportunities.



When it comes to filing a mesothelioma trust fund claim, having an attorney is not just beneficial—it's crucial. Here’s why:




Understanding Eligibility Requirements: The criteria for trust fund claims can be complex. An experienced asbestos attorney can help determine if you meet these requirements.



Maximizing Compensation: Lawyers skilled in these matters are adept at negotiating to ensure you receive the maximum compensation possible.



Knowledge of Accepting Trusts: With numerous trusts available, an attorney's familiarity with those currently accepting claims can streamline your application process.




By partnering with a seasoned lawyer, you can navigate the intricacies of filing a claim more efficiently and effectively. Our knowledgeable team is here to support you every step of the way.



Comprehensive Support for Mesothelioma Patients



Legal Guidance and Financial Assistance




Learn More About Your Legal Rights: Understand your entitlements and the process to secure them. Request our free guide for detailed insights into your legal options.



Financial Support for Treatment: Treatment costs can be overwhelming. Our guide includes information on financial aid programs designed to ease your burden.




FREE Financial Compensation Packet




Info on law firms that will recover your HIGHEST COMPENSATION



Learn how to get paid in 90 days



File for your share of $30 billion in trust funds




Personalized Assistance




Have a Question About Mesothelioma?: Our experts are ready to address your concerns. Reach out to us for personalized advice and support.




Remember, if you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Don’t forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area.



To further empower yourself with knowledge, you can request our free guide on understanding your legal rights. This comprehensive resource will provide detailed information on navigating your legal options, ensuring you are fully informed about your entitlements and the steps you can take.



If you're specifically looking for financial assistance to help with treatment costs, we offer resources that address these needs directly:




Request our Free Financial Assistance Guide: This guide includes detailed information on various types of financial aid available, helping you manage treatment expenses effectively.



Explore Legal Rights and Support: Understanding your legal rights can open up additional avenues for financial compensation. Our guide will walk you through these options.




If you need additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. Our team is ready to guide you through the process and answer any questions you may have about your legal rights and compensation opportunities.



For any other questions about mesothelioma, don't hesitate to reach out. Our team is here to help you navigate these complex waters, ensuring you have access to all the resources you need.

### Mesothelioma and Asbestos Lawyers by State

We have a team of experienced mesothelioma and asbestos attorneys in all 50 states and D.C. For information on mesothelioma, asbestos, and legal actions in your area, click on your state.




    

    
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
            
            
        
    
    





Alabama



Alaska



Arizona



Arkansas



California



Colorado



Connecticut



Delaware



Florida



Georgia



Hawaii



Idaho



Illinois



Indiana



Iowa



Kansas



Kentucky



Louisiana



Maine



Maryland



Massachusetts



Michigan



Minnesota



Mississippi



Missouri



Montana



Nebraska



Nevada



New Hampshire



New Jersey



New Mexico



New York



North Carolina



North Dakota



Ohio



Oklahoma



Oregon



Pennsylvania



Rhode Island



South Carolina



South Dakota



Tennessee



Texas



Utah



Vermont



Virginia



Washington



West Virginia



Wisconsin



Wyoming



Washington, D.C.








Nationwide Support for Mesothelioma and Asbestos Cases



Our top rated and dedicated team of experienced mesothelioma and asbestos attorneys is available to provide personalized support in all 50 states and Washington, D.C. Whether you need information about asbestos exposure in your area, want to explore your legal options, or are ready to take action, we’re here to help. By clicking on your state, you can access localized resources, including:




Details on asbestos regulations and laws in your region.



Insights into industries and locations commonly linked to asbestos exposure.



Guidance on filing mesothelioma claims and trust fund applications.



Information on settlements, verdicts, and compensation amounts in your area.



A connection to a local attorney who understands your state’s specific legal procedures.




We’re committed to fighting for justice and maximum compensation for mesothelioma victims and their families. Take the first step by selecting your state to learn more about how we can assist you.



What Are the Qualifications for Filing an Asbestos-Mesothelioma Claim?



If you've been exposed to asbestos, particularly before 1983, you might be eligible to file a claim for financial compensation. Here's what you need to know to determine if you qualify:




Occupational Exposure: You must have worked in an environment where asbestos was present. Common industries include construction, shipbuilding, and automotive repair. Your job role and the extent of exposure will influence your eligibility.



Medical Diagnosis: A formal medical diagnosis of mesothelioma or another asbestos-related illness is required. This diagnosis typically needs to be confirmed by certified healthcare professionals.



Exposure Timeline: Claims are more likely to be successful if your exposure occurred before 1983. This benchmark is due to significant regulatory changes that were implemented during that time.



Trust Funds Availability: Many asbestos manufacturers filed for bankruptcy and established trust funds to compensate victims. Your eligibility and potential compensation can be directly linked to these funds, which were set aside specifically for individuals affected by asbestos exposure.



Documentation: Providing proof of employment, medical reports, and detailed exposure history is essential. Accurate documentation strengthens your claim and expedites the process.




By meeting these qualifications, you can take the first steps toward securing the compensation you deserve for the hardships endured due to asbestos exposure.



What Guarantees Are Offered by Asbestos-Focused Legal Services?



Navigating the legal landscape of asbestos exposure can be daunting. For those affected, it's crucial to understand the guarantees provided by specialized legal services that focus on asbestos-related claims.




Complimentary Health Testing: Many legal firms offer complimentary asbestos health tests, ensuring you start your journey to justice without any initial financial burden.



Cost-Free Claim Evaluation: There's often no charge for the review of your asbestos claim, allowing you to assess your legal standing without upfront expenses.



Contingency Fee Arrangement: A common promise is the "no fees unless you win" guarantee. This means the legal service charges no fees unless they successfully recover compensation for you.




These guarantees aim to provide peace of mind, enabling individuals to pursue rightful claims without the stress of immediate costs.



File for your share of $30 billion in trust funds. Asbestos manufacturers, held accountable for the harm caused by their products, have set up substantial trust funds to compensate affected individuals. These funds were established after many companies declared bankruptcy as a means to ensure victims receive due compensation.



To qualify for these funds, you'll need to undergo specific medical exams that confirm exposure and related health conditions. The process can be complex, but you don't have to navigate it alone. Legal professionals specializing in asbestos claims can guide you through the required steps and help you access necessary medical evaluations, often at no out-of-pocket cost.



We offer free online appointments and can arrange for representatives to meet you within just one mile of your home. Open Now.



Take the first step towards securing the compensation you deserve by understanding your eligibility and the resources available to support your claim.



What is Asbestos and How is it Linked to Mesothelioma?



Understanding the link between asbestos and mesothelioma can be crucial for health and safety. Let’s delve into what asbestos is and how it’s connected to this serious illness.



What is Asbestos?



Asbestos is a naturally occurring mineral known for its durability and resistance to heat and chemicals. These qualities led to its widespread use in various industries, specifically in construction and manufacturing. From the early 20th century until the late 1980s, asbestos became a common component in:




Building materials: Used in roofing shingles, ceiling tiles, and floor tiles.



Insulation products: Found in home and industrial insulation.



Automotive parts: Incorporated into brake pads and clutches.




Despite its valuable industrial applications, prolonged exposure to asbestos fibers can have severe health consequences. Although its usage has been restricted in many countries, asbestos still exists in older buildings and products today.



How is Asbestos Linked to Mesothelioma?



Mesothelioma is a rare but aggressive form of cancer primarily affecting the lining of the lungs, known as the pleura. The direct cause of most mesothelioma cases is inhaling microscopic asbestos fibers. These fibers can become trapped in the body upon exposure, leading to inflammation, scarring, and eventually, cancerous growths over a period of decades.



Key points to understand the connection:




Latency Period: Mesothelioma may not manifest until 20-50 years after asbestos exposure.



High Risk Occupations: Individuals working in construction, shipbuilding, and certain industrial environments have a heightened risk of exposure.



Secondary Exposure: Family members of those exposed to asbestos at work can also be at risk if fibers are brought home on clothing.




Efforts to minimize exposure and strict regulations on the use of asbestos have helped reduce cases, but vigilance is still necessary due to its prevalent legacy presence in numerous older structures and products.



How Has Asbestos Use Been Regulated in the United States?



Asbestos, a naturally occurring mineral known for its insulating and fire-resistant properties, was heavily utilized in various commercial and industrial products across the United States until regulatory changes in the late 1980s. This period saw a growing awareness of the health dangers associated with asbestos exposure, leading to significant regulatory measures.



Key Regulatory Steps




Ban on New Uses: By the late 1980s, federal regulations severely limited the use of asbestos in the U.S. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) spearheaded these efforts, banning new uses and heavily restricting existing applications.



Prohibition in Certain Products: Specific products, especially those in construction and automotive industries, saw the most stringent bans. Common materials like insulation, building materials, and brake pads were scrutinized due to their frequent asbestos content.



Continued Presence: Despite these regulations, asbestos is still present in many pre-ban structures and products. Buildings erected before the restrictions may still contain asbestos, prompting ongoing management and abatement efforts.



Ongoing Monitoring and Legislation: New legislation and continuous monitoring ensure compliance and safety. The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) provides a framework for the EPA to assess and regulate asbestos-containing materials further.




In conclusion, while asbestos mining continues in some parts of the world, extensive regulatory action in the United States has curtailed its use significantly, aiming to protect public health from its hazardous effects.



What Types of Jobs Exposed Workers to Asbestos?



Many occupations have historically exposed workers to the dangers of asbestos. Below is a comprehensive look at some of these roles:




Construction Workers: Including roles such as roofers, electricians, and plumbers, these individuals often handled materials containing asbestos.



Shipyard Workers: Due to extensive use of asbestos for its heat-resistant properties, those working on ships, especially during the mid-20th century, faced high exposure.



Factory Workers: Employees in textile mills, chemical plants, and manufacturing facilities often came into contact with asbestos used in machinery and equipment.



Insulation Installers: Tasked with applying and removing asbestos insulation, these workers regularly encountered harmful fibers.



Maintenance Crews: Workers responsible for repairs and upkeep in older buildings often dealt with materials that included asbestos.



Automotive Mechanics: Brake linings and clutch facings historically contained asbestos, putting mechanics at risk during repairs.




These roles highlight the widespread use of asbestos across various industries, leading to significant occupational health risks. Understanding these roles underscores the importance of safety regulations and health monitoring for affected workers.



Understanding the Impact of Asbestos Exposure: Key Statistics



Asbestos exposure continues to be a serious health concern, with new cases surfacing regularly. Here's a comprehensive look at the statistics surrounding asbestos exposure and its health consequences:




Financial Allocations: An estimated $32 billion has been set aside in trust funds to support victims who have been impacted by asbestos-related issues. This financial reserve provides a lifeline for those seeking compensation for health damages incurred.



Workplace Exposure: Approximately 1.2 million people have been exposed to asbestos in their workplaces. This figure highlights the widespread occupational risk and underscores the need for strict safety regulations.



Health Outcomes: From 1999 to 2020, there have been over 47,000 recorded deaths attributable to mesothelioma, a cancer primarily caused by asbestos exposure. This statistic emphasizes the severe health risks associated with asbestos.



Affected Job Sites: There are over 12,000 job sites identified where asbestos exposure has occurred. This number indicates the extensive industrial and environmental presence of asbestos, making workplace safety assessments crucial.




These numbers paint a stark picture of the ongoing risks and consequences of asbestos exposure, reminding us of the urgent need for awareness and prevention efforts.



What Illnesses Are Associated with Asbestos Exposure?



Asbestos exposure is a serious health risk that can lead to several debilitating diseases. Here’s a closer look at the illnesses commonly linked to asbestos:




Mesothelioma

This rare and aggressive cancer primarily affects the lining of the lungs (pleura) but can also impact the abdomen (peritoneum). It is almost exclusively caused by asbestos exposure.





Lung Cancer

Beyond smoking, asbestos exposure is a significant cause of lung cancer. The risk increases significantly for individuals who both smoke and have been exposed to asbestos.





Asbestosis

A chronic lung disease resulting from the inhalation of asbestos fibers. It leads to lung tissue scarring, causing breathing difficulties and increasing the risk for more severe health issues.





Other Cancers

Exposure to asbestos can heighten the chances of developing cancers in other parts of the body, including the larynx and ovaries.






Each of these illnesses can take years, or even decades, to develop following exposure, making the dangers of asbestos particularly insidious. If you've had any exposure to asbestos, it's crucial to inform your healthcare provider and undergo regular check-ups to catch any potential health issues early on.



If you're concerned about potential asbestos exposure and want to secure a health test, there are several steps you can take to get tested at no cost.



1. Contact Your Local Health Department



Start by reaching out to your local health department. Many health departments offer free screenings or can provide vouchers for free tests. They might also direct you to community health events where screenings are available.



2. Explore Non-Profit Organizations



Several non-profit organizations specialize in asbestos-related issues. Groups like the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization (ADAO) sometimes facilitate access to free health screenings or have resources to help connect you with providers offering free tests.



3. Check Hospital and Clinic Community Programs



Hospitals and clinics occasionally offer community wellness events, which include free health screenings. Contact nearby medical facilities to inquire about programs focused on occupational health or environmental exposure.



4. Consult Your Primary Care Physician



Although a primary care physician visit isn't free of charge, your doctor might be able to inform you about upcoming free screening events in your area or suggest alternative resources where tests are offered at no cost.



5. Research Online for Community Resources



Online forums and local community boards, such as Mesothelioma Lawyer Center can be rich resources for discovering free health events. Websites and social media pages dedicated to community health often list upcoming screenings and health fairs where asbestos exposure tests might be available.



By exploring these avenues, you can find a pathway to obtaining a free health test for asbestos exposure, taking an important step in safeguarding your health.

### Mesothelioma Compensation Calculator: How Much is Your Asbestos Claim Worth?

Mesothelioma Compensation Calculator







Understanding Mesothelioma Case Values



Mesothelioma case values vary significantly based on factors such as the severity of the illness, the responsible parties, and the legal jurisdiction. On average, settlements in mesothelioma cases range from $1 million to $2.4 million, depending on the specifics of the claim. Cases that go to trial and result in a verdict may yield higher compensation, sometimes exceeding $10 million, although trial outcomes are less predictable. Trust fund payouts for asbestos exposure typically range from $7,000 to $200,000, depending on the trust and the claimant’s exposure history. Each case is unique, and actual values depend on the evidence, the claimant’s medical and financial needs, and the legal strategy employed.



A mesothelioma compensation case value calculator is a tool designed to provide individuals diagnosed with mesothelioma, or their families, an estimate of the potential monetary compensation they may be eligible to receive. These calculators typically consider factors such as:




The extent and duration of asbestos exposure.



The stage and severity of the mesothelioma diagnosis.



Medical costs, lost wages, and other financial impacts.



The jurisdictions involved (since laws and compensation amounts vary by location).



The defendant companies and their level of liability.




While these tools can offer a rough estimate, they are not definitive. Compensation amounts depend on many variables, including the strength of the case, settlement negotiations, or court verdicts. Consulting an experienced mesothelioma attorney is recommended for an accurate evaluation of a case’s value.



What factors determine the value of my mesothelioma compensation case?



Factors include the severity of your illness, your medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, the jurisdiction where the case is filed, and the liable asbestos companies. Your exposure history and evidence linking it to your illness also play a significant role.







How much compensation can I expect for my mesothelioma claim?



Compensation amounts vary widely. Asbestos mesothelioma settlements often range from $1 million to $2.4 million, but this depends on the specifics of your case. A legal professional can provide a more precise estimate based on your circumstances.







What types of compensation are available for mesothelioma claims?



Mesothelioma compensation options include settlements, jury verdicts, asbestos trust fund claims, workers’ compensation, and veterans’ benefits. Eligibility depends on your work history, exposure, and other factors.







How does the mesothelioma case value calculator work?



The mesothelioma case value calculator uses inputs like your age, diagnosis details, exposure history, medical expenses, and work history to estimate potential compensation. It provides a starting point but is not a substitute for legal advice.







Do I need a lawyer to file a mesothelioma compensation claim?



While it’s not legally required, working with an experienced mesothelioma attorney is highly recommended. They understand asbestos laws, have access to resources, and can maximize your compensation.







How long does it take to receive compensation for a mesothelioma or asbestos claim?



Settlement cases may resolve within months, while cases that go to trial can take years. Trust fund claims generally process faster, often within a few months.







What if the company responsible for my asbestos exposure is bankrupt?



Many bankrupt asbestos companies have established trust funds to compensate victims. Filing a trust fund claim can help you receive compensation even if the company is no longer operational.







Asbestos Trust Funds: A Lifeline for Victims



Asbestos trust funds were established by bankrupt companies that produced or used asbestos-containing products to compensate individuals diagnosed with asbestos-related illnesses, such as mesothelioma. These funds ensure that victims can still receive compensation even if the responsible company is no longer in operation. With over $30 billion currently available across various trusts, individuals can file claims based on their exposure history and medical diagnosis. Trust fund payouts vary depending on the fund’s policies and the severity of the claimant’s illness, typically ranging from $7,000 to $200,000 or more. Filing a claim can be a complex process, often requiring documentation of asbestos exposure and proof of diagnosis, but experienced attorneys can help navigate the system and maximize compensation.



Asbestos & Mesothelioma Settlements and Verdicts



Mesothelioma settlements and verdicts provide financial compensation to victims and their families for medical expenses, lost income, and pain and suffering caused by asbestos exposure. Settlements are the most common outcome, with average amounts ranging from $1 million to $2.4 million, depending on the case specifics, including the extent of the illness and the strength of the evidence. These agreements are reached out of court, offering a quicker resolution compared to a trial. Verdicts, decided by a jury, can result in even higher awards, sometimes exceeding $10 million, but they carry greater uncertainty and can take years to resolve. Consulting with an experienced mesothelioma attorney is essential to understand your legal options and secure fair compensation.



What Does It Mean to Be Exposed to Asbestos?



Asbestos exposure occurs when tiny asbestos fibers are released into the air and inhaled or ingested. This typically happens during the manufacturing, use, or demolition of materials containing asbestos, such as insulation, roofing shingles, or fireproofing products. Individuals most at risk include those who worked in industries like construction, shipbuilding, and manufacturing, as well as those who lived near asbestos mines or factories. Even family members of exposed workers can face risks due to secondary exposure from asbestos fibers carried on clothing or equipment. Prolonged exposure significantly increases the risk of developing serious diseases, such as mesothelioma, asbestosis, or lung cancer. If you suspect exposure, it’s important to seek medical evaluation and legal counsel to understand potential health impacts and compensation options.



Understanding Asbestos Exposure and Its Impact



Exposure to asbestos occurs when individuals inhale or ingest microscopic asbestos fibers, which can become airborne during the mining, manufacturing, or handling of asbestos-containing materials. Common sources of exposure include workplaces like construction sites, shipyards, and factories, as well as older buildings containing asbestos insulation or flooring. Even minimal exposure can lead to serious health conditions, such as mesothelioma, asbestosis, or lung cancer, often decades after the initial exposure. Identifying the source of asbestos exposure is crucial for pursuing compensation and ensuring proper medical treatment. If you suspect you’ve been exposed, consult a healthcare professional and seek legal advice to protect your health and rights. Contact us today!





Let Our Asbestos Legal Experts Help You Maximize Your Mesothelioma Claim Value



If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to significant financial compensation. Our dedicated team of mesothelioma lawyers is here to guide you through every step of the legal process, ensuring your rights are protected and you receive the justice you deserve.



📄 Get Your Free Financial Compensation Packet!Fill out our simple form today to receive a comprehensive packet with details about experienced asbestos and mesothelioma law firms and lawyers in your area [near me], along with essential resources to help you make informed decisions about your case.



💡 Why Choose Us?




Decades of experience handling asbestos-related cases.



No upfront fees – you only pay if we win your case.



Personalized, compassionate support to help you focus on your health.




📞 Contact Us Today for Additional Legal Assistance and Advice!Call us at 800-793-4540 to speak with our team. Don’t wait—your time to file a claim is limited, and your family’s financial future could depend on taking action now.



You’re not alone in this fight. Let us help you secure the justice and compensation you deserve.

### Can I Trust a Mesothelioma or Asbestos Commercial?

Commercials about mesothelioma and asbestos can be moving, emotional, and extremely convincing. They can also leave you wondering if you can trust their messages. Most mesothelioma or asbestos commercials are paid for by reputable, experienced mesothelioma law firms that you can trust. 



Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more. With over $30 billion currently available in asbestos trust funds, if you or a loved one have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant financial compensation. 









Why Am I Seeing So Many Mesothelioma Commercials?



Although the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) placed strict regulations on asbestos, use more than 30 years ago, victims of asbestos exposure are still getting sick today. 



What Are Mesothelioma Commercials About? 



Asbestos exposure can trigger serious illnesses with long dormancy periods between 20 and 50 years. Someone exposed to asbestos on the job in the 1970s might not receive a diagnosis until now. 



Also, although no one uses asbestos as heavily as in the past, some people are still at risk of being exposed to it today.



This means there are still victims of asbestos exposure who can benefit from taking legal action against those responsible. They can sue or make compensation claims that covers medical and other expenses. 



Who Is Behind Mesothelioma Commercials? 



Mesothelioma lawsuits have become big business for law firms. These firms spend money on advertising to reach clients. Many lawyers specialize solely in asbestos-related personal injury cases because of how much money a settlement or verdict can bring. These lucrative opportunities often drive personal injury law firms to invest heavily in advertising, such as mesothelioma commercials. Typically, these commercials are funded by the law firms whose names and phone numbers are prominently displayed on the screen.



Some law firms handle mesothelioma cases directly, leveraging their expertise to manage the entire legal process. Others, however, may choose to refer cases to other attorneys, maintaining only minimal involvement while still benefiting financially from the referrals.



This dual approach allows law firms to maximize their reach and influence in asbestos litigation, ensuring they capitalize on the significant financial rewards these cases can provide.







What Is Asbestos and What Does it Have to Do With Mesothelioma? 



Asbestos is a mineral made up of tiny fibers that easily flake off and become part of the dust in the air and on surfaces. Many industries used asbestos as insulation, adding strength and fireproofing to materials. 



The tiny fibers of asbestos get into the body when workers inhale them. They irritate tissues, which in some people leads to later diseases: mesothelioma, lung cancer, asbestosis, and more. 



Mesothelioma is almost always preventable. People diagnosed with it should have been protected. Companies that made or used asbestos can be held liable through lawsuits and other legal actions. This is a devastating, expensive illness. 



How Do I Know if I Can Trust a Mesothelioma and Asbestos Commercial?



Like most businesses, some asbestos attorneys are more trustworthy than others, even with similar messages and appealing advertisements. 



To determine if you can trust a particular advertisement, research the lawyer or law firm behind the commercial.



Reputable and professional law firms will be able to prove that they have a record of representing asbestos victims and winning their cases. Check these lawyers' websites for related information and clear contact details.



Also, even if you see a commercial where a law firm advertises mesothelioma and asbestos case representation, it doesn't mean they only take asbestos cases or specialize in them. 



Many attorneys advertising for mesothelioma representation are general personal injury lawyers. This isn’t necessarily bad, but you should check that the firm has extensive experience with asbestos-exposure victims.



Mesothelioma cases present unique challenges that not every attorney is equipped to handle. These cases often involve:




Complex Scientific Data: Understanding the established link between asbestos exposure and mesothelioma is crucial. Attorneys must be well-versed in the scientific evidence to build a compelling case.



Industry Knowledge: The asbestos industry has a long history of concealing the dangers of asbestos. Attorneys need to have an in-depth understanding of these tactics to effectively counter the defense strategies used by large corporations.



Resources for a Strong Fight: Taking on big companies requires significant financial resources. This includes conducting private investigations, gathering substantial evidence, and retaining top medical experts.




While many law firms can produce impressive advertisements, only those with the right combination of knowledge, experience, and resources can truly stand up to the formidable defense mounted by large asbestos companies. Ensure you choose a firm that is not only experienced but also fully prepared to support you in your fight for justice for asbestos-exposure victims. 



Another thing to remember is that while mesothelioma lawsuits are usually worth millions, the exact amount you're entitled to depends on several factors:




How long you've lived with an asbestos-related illness



The level of severity of the disease



The state you live in



Your age



Your general health and more




Many factors come into play in asbestos cases. This means that no attorney can promise you a certain amount of compensation, no matter how much experience they have. 



A good lawyer, however, can give you a reasonable estimate. Be suspicious of any ad that guarantees compensation.



Why Do Attorneys Want Me to “Call Now?"



Every state has a statute of limitations that limits when you can file mesothelioma and asbestos cases. 



The clock starts on the date you were diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. For wrongful death cases, it begins at the time of the victim’s death.



Statutes of limitations vary by state. Typically, the statute of limitations for asbestos is between one and six years from the date of diagnosis or the date of the victim’s death. 



It's important to contact a lawyer right away if you have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness so you don't miss your opportunity to get justice. 



Why Do Asbestos Commercials Say I Pay Nothing Up-Front?



This is a valid statement in most cases. It is not too good to be true, and there's no catch. In fact, no up-front payment is generally a sign of a trustworthy law firm. Mesothelioma law firms typically work on a contingency fee basis. 



A contingency payment plan means that you pay nothing up-front for your case. Your attorney will collect the fee for representing you once you win your case.



Be cautious of working with a law firm that will not work on a contingency basis. This indicates that the firm doesn't have the resources to research your case. 



By offering a contingency plan, a law firm shows that it feels confident about your case and has the necessary funds to research your exposure and gather evidence. 



A Mesothelioma Commercial Said I Should Be Concerned If I Worked in the Construction Industry



This is, unfortunately, true. Before the late 1970s, manufacturers created many asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) for many different industries, including building construction. 



The construction industry, in particular, put many workers at risk due to the sheer amount of asbestos that workers were around. 



Asbestos was used in insulation, wiring, pipes, tiling, walls, ceiling and flooring materials, siding, and more. 



What Other Industries Used Asbestos and Put Workers at Risk? 



Other industries and job sites associated with asbestos include:




All branches of the military



Refineries



Oil companies



Paper mills



Breweries



Automotive plants



Metalworks



Power plants



Shipyard workers



Firefighters



Railroad Workers




Even if you didn't work in a related industry, you could still be at risk of developing an asbestos-related illness. You could encounter asbestos in an older home or in an older building where you worked. 



Some people are even exposed because of a spouse who worked in an asbestos-related industry. This is known as second-hand asbestos exposure.



Second-hand exposure can occur when workers come home from a job site with asbestos contaminating their hair, skin, and work clothes. 



If you or a loved one has mesothelioma, or if there is any chance you were exposed to asbestos and you are now sick, a law firm specializing in asbestos can help.



Additional Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Asbestos Lawyers

Asbestos lawyers work with victims of mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses to help them take legal action and get compensation. Top mesothelioma and asbestos attorneys work in firms with proven track records and experience fighting for victims and their families. 



There is currently more than $30 billion available in asbestos trust funds. If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about qualified lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.



We offer free online appointments and can arrange for representatives to meet you within just one mile of your home. Open Now.





                
                        
                            Calculate Case Value
                            
                        
                        Diagnosis-- Select --MesotheliomaAsbestosisAsbestos-Related Lung CancerIs Diagnosed Person Alive?-- Select --YesPassed away under 2 years agoPassed away over 2 years agoAge of Diagnosed Person-- Select --Under 6565-8485 or olderExposure-- Select --MilitaryOccupationalSecond-HandOther / UnknownMain Job Site-- Select --ShipyardsBoiler RoomsPowerhousesPaper MillsConstruction SitesAutomotiveFirefightingRailroadsRefineriesOther / UnknownMain Asbestos Product Used-- Select --Fire Protection ProductsBrake Pads / LiningsCeiling Textures / Tile / PlasterElectrical ProductsTransite ProductsHeating & Cooling ProductsVermiculiteRoofing ProductsPaints / Plasters / Wall CoveringsOther / UnknownState-- Select --AlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaNorthern Mariana IslandsOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahU.S. Virgin IslandsVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces EuropeArmed Forces PacificPhone(Required)Email(Required)First Name(Required)Last Name(Required)EmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
         Any information you send is secure and will never be sold or released.This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
        
                        Δ
                        






 




What Is an Asbestos Lawyer? 



Asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers specialize in helping victims of asbestos exposure take legal action. They help their clients file lawsuits, get settlements or verdicts, claim with asbestos trust funds, and file for benefits. 



Many companies exposed workers to asbestos for decades. Workers who later developed illnesses like mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis can hold these companies responsible and seek damages. Asbestos lawyers help them do that. 



How Can an Asbestos Lawyer Help Me?



Mr. J. was the kind of person everyone admired—a hardworking father and husband who spent over three decades in construction, building homes and dreams for his family. He took pride in his work, always putting his family’s needs above his own. But when he was diagnosed with mesothelioma at 64, the life he had worked so hard to create was suddenly thrown into chaos.



For years, he had unknowingly been exposed to asbestos on job sites—cutting drywall, laying insulation, and working with roofing materials. He never imagined that simply doing his job could one day cost him his health. The diagnosis hit the family hard. Medical bills piled up, and the once-steady foundation of their lives began to crumble.



Mr. J.’s wife was overwhelmed, trying to care for him while keeping the household running. Their children, now adults, felt helpless as they watched their dad—their rock—struggle. They all knew they needed help, but they didn’t know where to start. Then, a friend mentioned the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, and with cautious hope, they reached out.



From the first call, everything changed. They were connected with an attorney who truly cared—not just about their case, but about their family’s well-being. The attorney dug into Mr. J.’s work history, uncovering the companies responsible for exposing him to asbestos without warning or protection. With expertise and determination, they fought for justice.



The settlement they received wasn’t just a check—it was life-changing. It allowed Mr. J. to access better treatments and focus on the time he had left with his loved ones. His wife no longer had to worry about how she would pay the bills, and his children could honor his legacy without the burden of financial stress. The settlement brought a sense of peace in a time of unimaginable difficulty.



For Mr. J., the settlement wasn’t just about money. It was about ensuring his family’s future was secure, even if he couldn’t be there to see it. It was about holding companies accountable and standing up for people who deserve better.



If you or someone you love is facing mesothelioma, don’t wait to act. You deserve justice, too. Call us today and let us help you take the first step—because every family deserves hope, and every story deserves a chance to be heard.



If you or a family member received a diagnosis of an asbestos illness, it's worth talking to a lawyer. Rather than settle for a general lawyer or a firm with no asbestos experience, seek out experts in this area of the law: 



Asbestos attorneys can help you in several ways: 



Understanding Your Options



One of the most important things a mesothelioma lawyer does for clients is explain their options. It's easy to feel helpless when diagnosed with an asbestos illness. You can do several things about it; a lawyer will guide those next steps. 



Investigating Asbestos Exposure



To make a case and get a settlement, you need evidence. The right lawyer will help you get it. Asbestos law firms have the experience, knowledge, and resources to track down past asbestos exposure. They can also find medical experts to connect your exposure to a mesothelioma diagnosis. 



Getting a Mesothelioma Settlement



Ultimately, you need compensation to cover your medical expenses, lost wages, and losses to your dependents.



An asbestos lawyer's priority is getting you the compensation you deserve. They can help you file a lawsuit, negotiate a settlement, and, if necessary, go to trial for a jury verdict and award. 



Filing an Asbestos Trust Fund Claim



A lawsuit is not your only option. You may also qualify for a payout from an asbestos trust fund. Asbestos lawyers know the trusts and can file to give you the best chance of a higher payout. 



VA Benefits



Many veterans encountered asbestos during active service. An asbestos attorney helps veterans get the benefits the government owes them. This includes disability compensation and compensation for surviving family members. 



Peace of Mind



This is a stressful time for you and your family. You need to focus on treatment and your health. It's easier to relax with an experienced asbestos lawyer advocating for you. Mesothelioma attorneys provide the peace of mind of knowing that an expert is doing their best for you. 





“With my husband passing away so many details needed to be taken care of. The attorneys have always taken their time with us when I didn’t understand the paperwork and explained everything in a language that I could understand.”
Gurtie




How Do I Choose the Best Asbestos Lawyer?



Choosing the best attorney to represent you is an important decision that will affect the outcome of your case. There are several things to look for when selecting mesothelioma lawyers:



Proven Success in Asbestos Cases



Reputable, experienced asbestos attorneys should have a proven track record of wins in asbestos cases. This should include recently-won cases (within the past five years), large settlement amounts, and verdicts won in cases that went to trial.



Experience with Asbestos Trust Funds



Going to trial may not be the best option for your situation. A good lawyer will advise you if filing a claim with an asbestos trust fund makes more sense. 



You need a lawyer who understands these trust funds and how to file claims correctly. Making a mistake with filing could sabotage your chances of collecting compensation.



Contingency-Based Payment Plans



A contingency-based payment plan means you pay nothing unless you win your case. It's important to retain a lawyer who offers fees on a contingency basis. 



It shows that the law firm has the financial resources to investigate and work on your case and truly believes it can win.  



An Asbestos Lawyer You Can Trust



Perhaps the most critical factor in choosing a lawyer is finding someone you feel comfortable with and can trust. An asbestos lawyer should never claim you will win millions in a settlement or guarantee a winning outcome to get your business.



Nationwide Reach



The most successful asbestos lawyers work all over the country. A local office is convenient, but asbestos cases are not always tried in the state where the plaintiff lives. 



Asbestos cases are complicated and often involve national or even international companies. Nationwide firms have handled cases in most states and have a network of experts all over the country. 







Frequently Asked Questions about Working with Asbestos Lawyers



Will a Lawyer Charge Me to Review My Case?



Most experienced asbestos attorneys offer free legal evaluations before taking on your case. Although this is the norm, you should always ask each potential lawyer if they charge for a case consultation.



How Long Does it Take to Resolve a Mesothelioma Lawsuit?



Every case is different, so there is no definite way to know. Factors that impact the time it takes to get compensation include: 




Type of case. Settlements take less time to resolve than jury trials.



Jurisdiction. Where you file can impact the duration of the lawsuit. 



Health. Sometimes, cases can be expedited for those in extremely poor health.




What if I Can't Afford a Mesothelioma Lawyer?



An experienced lawyer who offers a contingency-based payment option will not charge you for any lawsuit expenses unless your case settles and you receive compensation. 



How Much Can a Lawyer Get Me for a Settlement? 



There is no way for a lawyer to know exactly how much you can get. They will consider your illness, medical bills, lost wages, your dependents' needs, the actions of the defendants, and more to make a reasonable estimate. 



A reputable lawyer will never promise or guarantee you a specific settlement amount. 



How Much of My Compensation Will a Lawyer Take?



Asbestos attorney fees are usually between 25% to 40% of your total compensation for settlements or if your case goes to trial. Always ask about fees during the initial consultation so there are no surprises later. 



Will an Attorney Accept a Settlement on My Behalf? What if I Don't Agree With the Amount?



You have to formally agree and sign paperwork acknowledging you agree to a proposed settlement amount by law. An attorney will not accept the settlement without getting your signed approval.



I Was Diagnosed with Mesothelioma, But My Spouse Worked Around Asbestos, Not Me. Can I Get a Settlement? 



Yes, many asbestos victims who won their lawsuits experienced second-hand exposure. You have the legal right to file for damages if you encountered asbestos through a spouse's or parent's work clothes, school buildings, or any other kind of indirect exposure.



Is There Mesothelioma Compensation for Family Members?



If you've lost a loved one due to asbestos exposure, you have the legal right to file a wrongful death lawsuit. You may also be entitled to workers' compensation death benefits.



How Do I Find an Asbestos Lawyer Near Me? 



Recent studies from the American Bar Association (ABA) found that, while referrals are still popular when searching for an attorney, more and more people are turning to the Internet for legal help.



Many people find legal representation on websites that allow them to post legal questions and receive answers from attorneys or on comprehensive sites that provide information on specific types of cases, like asbestos.



Reputable and informative websites can be good resources. Other options for finding a good asbestos lawyer include contacting your state’s bar association or contacting advocacy groups for mesothelioma and asbestos victims.



Where Can I Get Additional Assistance?



If you or a loved one is suffering from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a substantial amount of compensation. Get our free Financial Compensation Packet for info on mesothelioma and asbestos lawyers in your area. Over $30 billion is available in trust funds. For additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540.

### Mesothelioma Case Values

Mesothelioma case values depend on the individual factors of each case. An expert asbestos attorney can estimate a reasonable amount. They act on behalf of their clients to get this amount through lawsuits, claims, and asbestos trust funds. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about qualified mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim and much more. 



We offer free online appointments and can arrange for representatives to meet you within just one mile of your home. Open Now.







How Do I Find Out What My Mesothelioma Case Is Worth?



A lot of factors go into determining the value of a mesothelioma claim. There is no way to predict an exact amount, but an experienced asbestos attorney can make a reasonable estimate. 



If you work with an asbestos law firm or lawyer, they will review the circumstances of your case to determine an amount to seek. They will fight for that amount through a lawsuit, settlement, and other sources of compensation. 



Fill out the following form and we will calculate your asbestos or mesothelioma claim's estimated payout for free.





                
                        
                            Calculate Case Value
                            
                        
                        Diagnosis-- Select --MesotheliomaAsbestosisAsbestos-Related Lung CancerIs Diagnosed Person Alive?-- Select --YesPassed away under 2 years agoPassed away over 2 years agoAge of Diagnosed Person-- Select --Under 6565-8485 or olderExposure-- Select --MilitaryOccupationalSecond-HandOther / UnknownMain Job Site-- Select --ShipyardsBoiler RoomsPowerhousesPaper MillsConstruction SitesAutomotiveFirefightingRailroadsRefineriesOther / UnknownMain Asbestos Product Used-- Select --Fire Protection ProductsBrake Pads / LiningsCeiling Textures / Tile / PlasterElectrical ProductsTransite ProductsHeating & Cooling ProductsVermiculiteRoofing ProductsPaints / Plasters / Wall CoveringsOther / UnknownState-- Select --AlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaNorthern Mariana IslandsOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahU.S. Virgin IslandsVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces EuropeArmed Forces PacificPhone(Required)Email(Required)First Name(Required)Last Name(Required)EmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
         Any information you send is secure and will never be sold or released.This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
        
                        Δ
                        





What Is the Average Settlement for Asbestos Cases? 



Settlement amounts vary widely in mesothelioma lawsuits and depend on the specifics of each case. The average settlement in mesothelioma and asbestos lawsuits is between $1 and $1.4 million. 



Most mesothelioma lawsuits end in settlements, but some go to trial. A jury usually awards a much higher amount. The verdicts in asbestos lawsuits range between $5 and $11.6 million. The average is around $2.4 million. 



What Is the Highest Mesothelioma Settlement? 



Settlement amounts are not always disclosed, so it is not possible to identify the largest amount awarded. However, verdicts are a matter of public record. 



A Mississippi jury awarded a record verdict for an asbestos case in 2011. The amount, $322 million, went to Thomas Brown Jr. 



Brown worked in oil fields for decades and developed asbestosis later in life. The jury awarded the amount against Chevron Phillips and Union Carbide. 



The record-setting award included $300 million in punitive damages. Unfortunately, the judge vacated the verdict, but the results show how willing juries are to compensate victims. 



What Is the Typical Asbestos Trust Fund Payout?



Companies that go bankrupt due to asbestos lawsuits often set up trust funds to compensate future claimants. The average payout from an asbestos trust fund is $180,000, but again, there is a lot of variation. 



What Factors Affect Mesothelioma Case Value? 



Averages are helpful to give you an idea of what your asbestos case could be worth, but it's essential to understand how much amounts vary. Your individual mesothelioma case value depends on several factors: 



Medical Costs 



Anyone dealing with an aggressive disease such as mesothelioma will tell you how costly treatment is. Treatments, therapies, medications, and even the costs of getting to and from medical appointments, factor into your case worth.



Medical costs will differ depending on your medical center and the type of treatment you receive. 



For instance, the average cost of lung surgery can be around $39,000, whereas the average price of chemotherapy can be $30,000 and over. Even if the patient has insurance, radiation therapy can sometimes cost $2,000 or more monthly.



Lost Wages



Economic losses for both the patient and the patient's loved ones are factored into the overall mesothelioma and asbestos case worth. 



For instance, you might miss work due to medical appointments and treatments. The illness is so severe for many patients that they can never return to work. 



Stage and Severity of the Disease 



The stage of your disease and how long you've suffered from mesothelioma will significantly impact your case value. People in the later stages of the disease and those who've lived with the disease for a long time after diagnosis typically have a higher case value.



The Extent of Asbestos Exposure



The amount of asbestos you were exposed to, and the duration of exposure matters in determining overall case value. 



Although asbestos is unsafe at any level, generally, the longer the exposure and the higher the amount of exposure, the more likely the patient will develop an aggressive asbestos-related illness.



Non-Economic Costs 



Mesothelioma is a life-threatening disease that puts a physical and mental strain on both victims and loved ones. 



The physical and emotional pain you and your loved ones have endured may factor into your case value.



Losses to Dependents 



If you have dependents, your case value may increase due to loss of economic support, loss of emotional support, and more. This may include anyone who lives in your household that depends on you for financial support.



You may qualify for loss of consortium if you have a spouse or partner who suffered due to your illness.



Other Factors



Other factors that help determine a mesothelioma and asbestos case value include:




Your age



The type of asbestos involved



The strength of your proof of asbestos exposure



The companies involved and their degree of negligence



The defendants' actions toward the victim and in the workplace



Any eyewitness testimony



State laws where you live or file your lawsuit




What Are Mesothelioma Wrongful Death Claims Worth? 



If you lost a loved one to an asbestos illness or if they died during their lawsuit, you may want to pursue a wrongful death claim. 



The value of this claim depends on many of the same factors as a lawsuit brought by the victim. Additionally, you can consider funeral expenses and your own emotional suffering and loss of companionship. 







Sources of Compensation to Boost Your Mesothelioma Case Value



As a victim of asbestos exposure, you can seek compensation through multiple sources. Doing so may increase your case's value and the compensation you receive to cover medical and other expenses. 



Lawsuit Settlements



Most mesothelioma cases end in settlements. However, there are instances in which your case may go to trial. 



There are pros and cons to both trials and settlements, but an experienced asbestos attorney will ensure you understand your options and what's best for you.



Settlements provide a guaranteed way for you to obtain compensation for your disease. 



An attorney typically negotiates a settlement amount with the defense after providing solid proof of your case. Settlements are also much quicker than trials, and you don't have to worry about the other side appealing the decision.



Lawsuit Verdicts



Settlement amounts are usually lower than verdict amounts awarded during trials. On the other hand, going to trial is a risk. If the jury decides in favor of the defendants, you get nothing. 



Trials also take longer to resolve than settlements and are typically more mentally and physically taxing. For someone with a terminal illness, a trial may be too much and take too long. 



Asbestos Trust Funds



When companies are responsible for asbestos exposure and resulting illnesses, they often face thousands of costly lawsuits. This led many companies to file for bankruptcy. As part of the restructuring process, these companies set up asbestos trust funds to compensate claimants.



If you're eligible for compensation from an asbestos trust fund, the administrator determines your claim value by looking at:  




The amount of funds in the trust 



How much of the funds must be set aside for future claimants



The stage of your disease



The extent of your exposure and illness




Benefits



A mesothelioma lawyer can help you get any benefits to which you are entitled: 




Workers' compensation



Disability insurance



Social Security Disability payments



VA benefits for veterans




Mesothelioma case values vary significantly because asbestos and illness affect people differently. Rely on an experienced mesothelioma lawyer to evaluate your case and maximize the value of your claims. 



Work with a Mesothelioma Lawyer to Maximize Compensation



The best way to ensure you have a fair chance of recovering the money you really need is to work with an experienced mesothelioma lawyer. Mesothelioma and asbestos firms have years of experience working on cases like yours. 



They have the resources necessary to prove companies were negligent in your asbestos exposure. They can also prove that your illness resulted from that exposure. 



Additionally, the right lawyer will be able to maximize the value of your case. They can find all the expenses you might not have considered. Find a reputable, successful firm with proven experience winning for asbestos clients. 





Additional Resources to Help Determine Your Case Value



Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. For additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Asbestosis Guide

Asbestosis is a lung disease caused by asbestos exposure that triggers scarring in the lungs. Symptoms include difficulty breathing, chest pain, and coughing. Asbestosis is not reversible, but treatments help manage symptoms and limit additional damage to lung tissue. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related cancer, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 













What Is Asbestosis? 



Asbestosis is a chronic respiratory condition that affects the lungs. It is caused by inhalation of asbestos fibers. Asbestos exposure that leads to asbestosis usually occurs in the workplace over several years. 



Asbestos fibers in the lungs trigger inflammation, which leads to scarring. The scarring is permanent and makes lung tissue rigid. Symptoms of asbestos-related lung damage often don't appear for decades after exposure, even if the damage has already begun. 



About Asbestos Exposure and Asbestosis



As with all asbestos-related diseases, victims of asbestosis are usually exposed to asbestos at work. Job sites in many industries used asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) before regulations limited the use of the mineral. 



Asbestos was commonly used in brakes, pipes, floors, shingles, cement, and as insulation before the dangers were more widely known. 



By the time production and shipping of asbestos stopped, many victims had already been exposed to so much of the toxic set of minerals that their health was already in poor condition.



Who Is at Risk for Asbestosis? 



Anyone exposed to asbestos is at risk for developing asbestosis. The risk of asbestosis is most significant with repeated and prolonged workplace asbestos exposure. These are some examples of occupations at high risk for asbestos exposure before the 1980s: 




Asbestos mining



Automotive or aircraft repair and maintenance



Boiler work



Construction



Demolition



Industrial manufacturing



Insulation work



Oil refining



Power generation



Shipbuilding and repair



U.S. Navy




Asbestos exposure is the most critical risk factor for asbestosis, but other factors increase the risk of developing the disease:  




Smoking



Poor health



Older age



Genetic factors and family history




How Is Asbestosis Different From Mesothelioma? 



Mesothelioma is another disease caused by asbestos exposure. The primary difference is that asbestosis is benign, and mesothelioma is malignant. Mesothelioma is a cancerous growth that begins in the pleura, the tissue around the lungs. 



Pleural mesothelioma causes some of the same symptoms as asbestosis, but it is deadlier. It progresses rapidly and is nearly always fatal. 



What Causes Asbestosis?



Asbestos exposure causes asbestosis. Not everyone exposed to asbestos will develop it. The risk is higher with more exposure and exposure that is repeated over a longer period of time. 



When you breathe in asbestos, you risk fine, odorless, microscopic fibers lodged in your lungs. The fibers cause damage inside the body, leading to diseases like asbestosis. Prolonged asbestos exposure is the cause of asbestosis. 



What Are the Symptoms of Asbestosis? 



Again, some asbestosis victims may not experience many symptoms, and almost all victims have a long latency period between exposure and the first symptoms. The most common warning signs of asbestosis are:




Chest tightness and pain



Difficulty in breathing with shortness of breath



An odd crackle-type sound when inhaling



Appetite changes such as loss of appetite



Clubbed fingers or toes




The symptoms of asbestos illnesses, including asbestosis, often take many years to appear. It could be decades after asbestos exposure before a person has enough troubling symptoms to seek a diagnosis. 



Complications of Asbestosis



Asbestosis can also cause or contribute to other medical conditions. Potential complications of asbestosis include: 




Pulmonary hypertension



Respiratory failure



Pleural mesothelioma



Lung cancer



Other types of cancer



Heart damage




How Is Asbestosis Diagnosed? 



Because asbestosis is progressive and causes symptoms that affect quality of life, it's important to get a diagnosis as soon as possible. 



To diagnose asbestosis, a physician typically begins with a medical history and physical exam. Inform your doctor of any past asbestos exposure or suspected exposure. This is vital information for an accurate diagnosis. 



The next step is to undergo imaging scans, like chest X-rays, to look for fluid in the lungs and rule out pneumonia and other more common illnesses. 



An X-ray can also catch signs of asbestosis. Asbestosis on an X-ray image has a honeycomb appearance. It is easier to see as the disease progresses. 



A CT scan shows the bones and soft tissues of the chest cavity to help doctors look for abnormalities, like scarring or tumors. A CT can show signs of asbestosis earlier than an X-ray.



A biopsy is often the next step. A biopsy removes a small amount of fluid or tissue for diagnostic testing. There are two ways to perform a biopsy for asbestosis testing: 




Bronchoscopy. A bronchoscope is a small tube inserted into the lungs through the mouth or nose. Doctors use a small camera on the end of the scope to image the lungs. It can also be used to take a biopsy. 





Thoracentesis. During this procedure, a doctor uses a needle inserted into the chest cavity to remove fluid. It only requires local anesthesia. 




Pathologists look at biopsy samples to check for cancerous cells. This is important if you have a history of asbestos exposure. 



Treatment for Asbestosis



Although there is no cure for it, asbestosis is treatable. Treatments for asbestosis help manage symptoms to improve quality of life and extend life expectancy. 



The most important thing a patient with asbestosis can do is eliminate any ongoing asbestos exposure. Most people were exposed years ago, but if asbestos is still an issue, removing it will slow the progression of the disease.



Treatments for asbestosis include: 




Pulmonary rehabilitation. This is a type of treatment that helps maximize respiratory function. A pulmonary specialist or respiratory therapist uses several strategies to help you breathe more easily. 





Supplemental oxygen. Scarred lungs are stiff and do not expand as much as healthy lungs. This makes it difficult to get adequate oxygen. Supplemental oxygen provides more oxygen per breath.





Aerosol medications. Medication delivered as an aerosol into the respiratory system thins fluid in the lungs. This makes it easier to breathe. 





Surgery. Surgery is an uncommon treatment for asbestosis. Very few patients qualify for a lung transplant, but for those who do, it may be a treatment option. 





Lifestyle changes. Patients with asbestosis can benefit from lifestyle changes, such as quitting smoking. 




What Is the Outlook for Asbestosis? 



According to the American Lung Association (ALA), asbestosis can last a lifetime and can also be the cause of death. The severity of the disease varies by individual and depends on the amount of asbestos exposure and how soon treatment is started. 



The best prognosis for asbestosis is in patients with less asbestos exposure, an early diagnosis, and early treatment. 



Can Asbestosis Be Cured? 



There is no cure for asbestosis because the damage caused by asbestos fibers is permanent. No treatment or intervention can reverse the damage. Treatments can stop the damage and prolong life. 



In rare cases, a patient with asbestosis may qualify for a lung transplant. This is the only way to restore lung function, but it is an uncommon treatment for this disease.  



What Is the Life Expectancy for Asbestosis? 



According to a study of asbestos diseases, the median age when people died from asbestosis was 79. This indicates it is possible to live many years with asbestosis. 



Another study showed that asbestosis patients with less than average damage could live up to 14 years after a diagnosis. The median life expectancy for all patients in the study was ten years. 



Treatment that slows the progression of asbestosis is the most important factor in prolonging life expectancy. 



What Happens When Someone Dies of Asbestosis? 



Severe asbestosis can cause death, but many people live with this as a chronic illness for many years. Death might result from a complication or another unrelated cause. 



Living with Asbestosis



Aside from medical treatments, try these home care strategies to relieve symptoms and improve your quality of life. 



Eat a Healthy Diet



Eating a healthy diet improves overall health, makes it easier to tolerate treatments, and improves quality of life. 



A healthy diet should consist of plenty of fruits and vegetables while limiting salt intake, according to the Agency for Toxic Substances & Diseases Registry (ATSDR). 



Additionally, unless specified otherwise by your physician, you should drink at least seven to eight glasses of water daily.



Get Enough Sleep 



Along with a proper diet, people living with asbestosis should always get enough rest. ATSDR suggests getting at least eight hours of sleep per night and light naps to reduce your chances of getting too tired.



Protect Your Lungs



If you have asbestosis, your lungs don't function normally. One of the most important things to do is stop smoking. Smoking worsens symptoms and may even accelerate its progression. If you don't smoke, protect your lungs from other pollutants. 



Stay indoors if pollution or smog is high, and avoid getting too close to cleaning supplies that contain aerosol, gasoline fumes, and other irritants that can flare up your lungs.



Track Your Symptoms



Further, ATSDR recommends keeping a journal to track down your symptoms and things that may have triggered pain. 



Pay close attention to breathing difficulties and how long each bout lasts. Be sure to share your information with your physician. They can use this information to change treatment or recommend activities to avoid. 



Asbestosis Lawsuits



In the early 1980s, the state of New Jersey experienced the first mass tort lawsuit after several victims and family members of deceased victims came forward to file wrongful death and personal injury claims.



This was the start of what would become standard in courts nationwide as more and more victims came forward. 



The plaintiffs in these cases were all exposed to asbestos, particularly raw asbestos, which led to asbestosis and other asbestos-related diseases.



Asbestosis cases have not been limited solely to the U.S. For example, in 1984, an Australian attorney helped over 300 workers fight for compensation after exposure to asbestos at the Wittenoom mill.



Wittenoom is a national park in Western Australia, yet what was once a beautiful park is now known as a place of suffering after thousands were exposed to asbestos while mining in the area.



In another Australian lawsuit, several victims and family members came forward after being exposed to asbestos in the Latrobe Valley. The State Electricity Commission of Virginia (SECV) employed workers in their power stations.



During the power station construction, employees worked daily while being subjected to large amounts of asbestos. As a result, a good portion of the workers were later diagnosed with asbestosis.



Seeking Compensation for an Asbestosis Diagnosis



If you received a diagnosis of asbestosis, talk to an asbestos attorney. They can help you track down your past asbestos exposure and take legal action to seek compensation. 



Mesothelioma is often associated with recovering damages after asbestos exposure, but asbestosis also qualifies for compensation. You could be eligible to make a claim with an asbestos trust fund or to file a lawsuit against asbestos companies. 



If you were exposed to asbestos in the military, you might qualify for VA benefits. An experienced mesothelioma lawyer can identify all your options for compensation and help you take the next steps. 



Getting Legal Help



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma or asbestos-related cancer, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form for our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area.

### Mesothelioma Cancer and Mental Health

Cancer and mesothelioma significantly impact patient health and well-being. Treatment and support are available and can improve quality of life and even physical health and cancer treatment outcomes. It is important to speak up about living with mesothelioma cancer and mental health issues. 









How Does Having Cancer Affect Mental Health?



It’s easy to understand that having cancer can take a toll on mental and emotional health. The diagnosis, the treatments, the symptoms, and living with a terminal prognosis all affect the patient and their loved ones.



Learning you have a diagnosis of mesothelioma can trigger a lot of negative emotions, like anger, fear, and confusion. Many people learn to cope as they go through fives mental stages that are much like those associated with grief after the loss of a loved one: 




Denial



Anger



Bargaining



Depression



Acceptance




Acceptance isn't easy, but it can lead to greater mental health. Some of the mental illnesses that many cancer patients deal with include anxiety, depression, and stress. 



Cancer and Anxiety



Anxiety is to be expected in someone living with mesothelioma, but when it becomes overwhelming, anxiety reduces the quality of life. Symptoms of an anxiety disorder include: 




Uncontrollable worry



Muscle tension and pain



Restlessness



Gastrointestinal symptoms



Difficulty focusing



Irritability




Depression in Cancer Patients



Facing the major life changes triggered by a cancer diagnosis and treatment is also likely to cause feelings of sadness. Important signs and symptoms of depression include: 




Persistent sadness



Hopelessness



Loss of interest in enjoyable activities



Changes in sleeping or eating habits



Fatigue



Thoughts of suicide or death.




Stress and Cancer



Stress is not a mental health diagnosis, but it is an uncomfortable feeling that is both mental and physical. Excessive stress can make you feel overwhelmed, unable to cope, and hopeless. It can be a symptom of depression, anxiety, and other mental illnesses. 



Does Cancer Cause Mental Illness? 



There is a definite link between a cancer diagnosis and an increased risk for mental health challenges. Patients with cancer have higher rates of mental illness than the general population:




Approximately one-third of people undergoing cancer treatment have a mental illness.



Young people with cancer have an even greater risk of developing a mental illness.



Depression is about three times higher in cancer patients than in the general population.



Nearly 40% of cancer patients report that their medical teams never discussed mental or emotional health with them.




How Does Mental Health Affect Outcomes for Mesothelioma Patients?



Addressing mental health in cancer patients is important for quality of life. It is also important for medical outcomes. Research increasingly shows that mental health impacts longevity and the effectiveness of treatments.



A study of veterans being treated for lung cancer studied mental health and outcomes in more than 50,000 patients. Those who had a mental illness and received mental healthcare lived longer than patients who did not receive the appropriate care.



Another study found that cancer patients with fewer depression symptoms lived longer. Regardless of treatment or an official diagnosis, patients with more depressive symptoms had worse outcomes. Patients who feel better mentally are more likely to stick with their medical treatment plans.







How to Cope Emotionally with a Mesothelioma Diagnosis



Receiving a diagnosis of any type of cancer is devastating. Mesothelioma is particularly difficult to cope with because of its poor prognosis. There are things patients can do to manage tough emotions.



Talk to Your Medical Team About Mental Health



Mental health carries a lot of stigma and can be hard to talk about, but speaking up is so important. Medical teams often overlook mental health and only treat the physical illness. Talk to your doctors about how you feel and ask for what you need in terms of treatment.



Ask for Help from Family and Friends



Again, it can be tough to bring this up, but asking your most trusted family and friends for help benefits your mental health. Whether you need someone to talk to or help with household chores that feel overwhelming, getting help is important.



Join Cancer Support Groups



Professional mental health treatment is great, but you can also get a lot of relief from talking to other cancer patients. Find an in-person or online support group to listen and share feelings and experiences.



Prioritize Healthy Choices



Even when sick, you’ll feel better when you take care of yourself. Exercise, being outside, eating well, and getting adequate sleep will all boost your mood.



Studies have found that exercise is both safe and helpful for most people with a cancer diagnosis. Exercise can reduce fatigue, make you stronger, and help you feel better physically, which positively impacts mental health. Check with your doctors before you try exercising. 



Try Journaling



Putting your feelings down on paper is a great way to find some emotional relief. It can also help you track your emotions and moods, so you know what affects you negatively and positively.



Get Spiritual



Religion and spirituality are not for everyone, but many patients find comfort in turning to them. This can mean going to formal religious services or trying spiritual practices on your own, such as meditation or prayer.



How to Cope with a Terminal Illness



Completely separate from coping with cancer is the fact of facing one's own mortality. Mesothelioma is almost always terminal, so patients with this diagnosis must cope with being sick, going through treatments, financial stresses, and facing death. 



This can, of course, have a significant impact on mental health, causing fear, depression, and anxiety. Every patient is different, but in general, these tips can help you cope while facing the reality of having terminal cancer: 




Get All the Information. Most patients benefit from knowing what to expect as the cancer worsens. Talk to your doctors about what end-stage mesothelioma is like and what it will feel like as your body weakens and fails. 



Take Advantage of Palliative Treatments. Palliative care is a huge help to most terminal patients. It includes medical care to treat symptoms but also mental health care, social support, and spiritual support, all provided by professionals trained to work with end-of-life patients. 



Take Care of Legal and Financial Decisions. Many patients worry about what they are leaving behind. Making important decisions in advance can put your mind at ease. Work with a lawyer and financial advisor to put your affairs in order. 



Make Important Medical Decisions Now. It also helps to make decisions in advance about your medical care toward the end of life. Talk to your loved ones and medical team about how long you want to continue treatment, about palliative care, and about hospice. 



Seek Mental Health Care. Rely on both professional mental health care and support from groups of other cancer patients during this difficult time. Professionals are trained to help terminal patients, while other patients can provide valuable support and understanding about what you're facing. 




How to Support a Mesothelioma Patient



If a loved one has received a cancer or mesothelioma diagnosis, you might not know what to say or do. Here are some ideas:  




Ask What They Need or Want. Don’t assume you know what a loved one wants or needs. It's always best to ask and respect their boundaries and wishes. Even if they don’t want your help, a loved one will feel better simply knowing that you care enough to offer.



Listen. You might not think you have much to offer someone going through an experience you don’t understand, but the simple act of listening is powerful.



Provide Practical Support. Doing chores, cooking, providing childcare, and other practical types of assistance might not seem like much. These actions go a long way to removing some of the burden from the patient, which can be a big mental relief.



Spend Time Together. A cancer patient often just wants to spend time with their loved ones, not talking about their illness. Do things with them that they enjoy and just have fun.




How to Talk to Children About a Cancer Diagnosis



Talking to a child about a loved one with cancer has unique challenges. It’s better to talk about it than to avoid it, but always keep the conversation age appropriate.



Parents and other adults can help children cope by letting them express their feelings and ask questions. A child learning about cancer might be scared and need comfort. Spending more time with a child during this time can be comforting and reassuring.



Professional therapy can also benefit a child, especially if they are losing someone very close to them, such as a parent. Child-appropriate therapy can help them process emotions and learn to navigate grief in healthy ways.



Mental Health Treatment for Cancer Patients



Mental health treatment for mesothelioma and cancer patients is similar to care for anyone else. Treatment usually includes therapy, and when it makes sense, medication.



While mental health is still often overlooked in cancer treatment, it is becoming more common. Talk to your medical team about mental health resources. They can recommend oncology therapists specially trained to work with cancer patients.



Many cancer patients benefit from palliative care, which often includes treatment for mental and emotional health. The goal of palliative care is to improve quality of life by relieving symptoms and addressing non-medical needs. 







Additional Support for Mesothelioma Patients



Mental health treatment is important, but other types of support help patients cope indirectly. These types of support remove some of the burden of living with cancer, at least partly relieving anxiety, stress, and worry:




Medical Care. Getting the best possible medical treatment for mesothelioma provides more than just physical benefits. Knowing you’re in the best hands with a specialist or being able to make the treatment choices that are best for you also benefits mental health.



Legal Resources. A mesothelioma lawyer can be a huge benefit when coping with a diagnosis. They review cases for free and provide initial advice. They can help patients and their families make important legal decisions, from creating wills to suing asbestos companies. Having a legal expert guiding decisions is often a big relief for patients.



Financial Resources. Another major burden of a cancer diagnosis is money. Patients face medical expenses and losing income when they can no longer work. One of the things a lawyer can do is help patients find financial resources and assistance.




Mesothelioma Lawyer Center can help you find all of these resources. We are available to answer questions 24/7 and offer options for legal assistance, financial resources, and the best treatment centers. Mental health is too often overlooked in patients with devastating medical conditions, but it is as important as physical health. Reach out for support and resources.

### Peritoneal Mesothelioma Lawyer

A peritoneal mesothelioma lawyer represents victims of asbestos exposure who have been diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma. Most mesothelioma cases are preventable, which means that a company or organization can be held liable. An experienced mesothelioma lawyer helps these victims seek justice and recover damages.






 




What Is a Peritoneal Mesothelioma Lawyer?



Peritoneal mesothelioma lawyers work with people exposed to asbestos and subsequently diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma. They also help the families of asbestos exposure victims. 



Asbestos in the workplace is the leading cause of peritoneal mesothelioma. It is largely preventable. Peritoneal mesothelioma lawyers help their clients seek justice against companies responsible for asbestos exposure. 



Facts About Peritoneal Mesothelioma




Peritoneal mesothelioma is the second most common form of this type of cancer that affects the mesothelium, the thin layer of tissue surrounding organs in the body.



Peritoneal cancer forms in the peritoneum, the part of the mesothelial tissue that surrounds abdominal organs.



About 20 percent of mesothelioma diagnoses are peritoneal, while most are in the pleural tissue around the lungs.



Peritoneal mesothelioma is almost always caused by asbestos exposure. Not everyone exposed to asbestos develops mesothelioma, but it is the leading risk factor.



Most people experience asbestos exposure in the workplace. Several industries used asbestos in the past, including construction, shipyards, the military, automotive, manufacturing, and others.




What Are the Symptoms of Peritoneal Mesothelioma? 



Symptoms of mesothelioma are often mild in the early stages. Eventually, peritoneal mesothelioma symptoms include: 




Abdominal swelling



Abdominal pain



Gastrointestinal problems



Weight loss



Fatigue




Unfortunately, many people receive a diagnosis of peritoneal mesothelioma in the late stages of the disease. The symptoms are similar to much more common illnesses, so misdiagnosis is common and delays an accurate diagnosis. 



Is it Possible to Survive Peritoneal Mesothelioma? 



Yes, it is rare, but possible to survive this type of cancer. Compared to pleural mesothelioma, survival rates are higher. The average life expectancy is 14 months. 



Life expectancy varies depending on individual factors, such as age and overall health, cancer stage, and treatment choices. You have the best chance of surviving peritoneal mesothelioma with an early diagnosis and aggressive treatments. 



How Is Asbestos Related to Peritoneal Mesothelioma?



Asbestos is the number one risk factor for peritoneal mesothelioma, which means it is largely preventable. In very rare cases, mesothelioma develops in someone with no asbestos exposure. 



Most exposed people handled asbestos or worked near asbestos at work. They were either not warned of the risks or did not receive appropriate safety training and gear.



If you worked around asbestos, dislodged fibers circulated in the air and settled on surfaces. You may have inhaled or ingested those tiny fibers. 



Inside the body, asbestos fibers lodge in tissues. This most often occurs in the airways. Asbestos fibers can also migrate to the abdomen, triggering inflammation and damage that leads to peritoneal mesothelioma. 



How Do I Know if I Need a Peritoneal Mesothelioma Lawyer?



Peritoneal mesothelioma is a devastating disease. In most cases, someone is to blame for it. You face significant medical expenses and a shortened life expectancy. You have a right to take legal action for both justice and compensation. 



The right lawyer will do several things to make your life easier during this challenging time: 




Investigate your case to track down where and when asbestos exposure occurred



Determine which parties are liable for your exposure



Use medical experts to connect exposure to asbestos to your peritoneal mesothelioma diagnosis



File a lawsuit or an asbestos trust fund claim



Help you get compensation through other avenues, such as workers’ compensation, disability, or compensation through the Veterans Administration if you were exposed in the military



Negotiate on your behalf for the best possible settlement



Represent you in a trial if your case goes to a judge or jury



Help you appeal a case if it does not go in your favor



Provide you with clear explanations of your legal rights and option




How Can a Peritoneal Mesothelioma Lawyer Help Me?



Mesothelioma is an expensive and deadly disease. A lawyer cannot treat or cure your illness, but they can help give you peace of mind. An experienced lawyer can do all the legwork necessary to get you the compensation you need so you can focus on your treatments. 



If you have been diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma, you have several choices for your next steps. An experienced asbestos lawyer can help you understand your options and take action: 



Filing a Personal Injury Lawsuit



Peritoneal mesothelioma resulting from negligent asbestos exposure is a case of personal injury. Actions or inactions on the part of a company or employer led to your illness, and they can be held liable. 



For a successful lawsuit, you will need to prove negligent asbestos exposure, that it caused your condition, and that you have suffered damages as a result.



Filing a Wrongful Death Lawsuit



If a loved one passed away from peritoneal mesothelioma, you can still file a lawsuit to recover damages. In this situation, it will be a wrongful death suit. 



You can recover damages for lost wages and support for dependents, funeral expenses, and non-economic costs like loss of consortium.



Reaching a Settlement Faster



A lawsuit may go to trial, in which case a jury or judge will determine liability and award any appropriate damages. Most personal injury and wrongful death cases never get that far. 



You are more likely to be a part of a settlement agreement. This is when both sides agree on an amount of damages for the victim to receive.



Maximizing Your Mesothelioma Settlement



Not only can an experienced lawyer help you get settlement cash sooner, but they can also maximize the total. Peritoneal mesothelioma lawyers have experience and resources that help them negotiate successfully for more money. 



They understand all the costs of living with mesothelioma, from medical care to emotional pain and suffering. They will work hard to get you the highest settlement amount possible. 



Filing an Asbestos Trust Fund Claim



Many companies that exposed workers to asbestos went into bankruptcy because of the expense of lawsuits. Most were required to set up an asbestos trust fund as a part of reorganizations. 



The trust funds contain money to compensate current and future exposure victims. If your peritoneal mesothelioma came from one of these companies, your lawyer could help you get compensation this way.



Seeking Benefits



Lawyers can also be valuable allies in getting benefits. You may be entitled to Social Security or insurance disability benefits. If you are a veteran of any branch of the military, you may qualify for benefits from the Veterans Administration. 



Navigating these systems can be confusing and complicated, especially if you're sick. A lawyer can make the process easier and give you a better chance of getting the benefits you deserve.



How Much Compensation Can I Get When Working With a Lawyer?



The amount of compensation you may receive depends on factors unique to your situation: 




The extent and severity of your illness



The extent of your asbestos exposure



The actions of the asbestos companies or a past employer



Your current and expected future medical expenses



Lost wages if you can no longer work



Pain and suffering



Losses to your dependents




The average settlement for a mesothelioma or asbestos lawsuit is $1 million to $1.4 million. Trial verdicts take longer to get but are often higher. Asbestos trust amounts are usually lower, averaging around $180,000. 



When Should I Hire a Peritoneal Mesothelioma Lawyer? 



Start talking to lawyers as soon as possible after receiving a mesothelioma diagnosis. States limit how long you have to file a lawsuit, so acting quickly is essential. 



The statute of limitations on filing asbestos personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits ranges from one to six years after a diagnosis. 



How Much Does it Cost to Hire a Mesothelioma Lawyer? 



Hiring a lawyer for your peritoneal mesothelioma case shouldn't cost you anything. Personal injury firms offer free initial consultations. This allows you to interview a lawyer before hiring them with no risk. 



Asbestos lawyers also work on a contingency basis. This means they get paid as a percentage of your settlement or jury award. They do not get paid unless you get paid.



How Do I Find Good Lawyers Near Me?



There are several ways to look for a good mesothelioma lawyer. Contact past co-workers who may have already taken legal action for their illnesses and asbestos exposure. They may recommend a lawyer they like. 



You can also check with your state bar association for a lawyer specializing in asbestos and mesothelioma. Also, look at ads and directories online for asbestos law firms.



How to Choose the Right Lawyer or Asbestos Law Firm



For the best results in legal action, be sure to choose a lawyer or a law firm with specific peritoneal mesothelioma and asbestos experience. 



It should be someone who has worked with clients in similar situations. Look for these factors when making the selection:




Experience working with peritoneal mesothelioma patients



Proven wins in cases involving asbestos exposure and mesothelioma



Investigative resources and connections for determining the source of asbestos exposure



Access to expert witnesses for testimony



A contingency-based payment plan so that you do not need to come up with payment until you recover damages



A compassionate, understanding way of working with patients and their families




Getting justice for the harm caused by exposure to asbestos requires an experienced lawyer. Choose one with expertise in asbestos, mesothelioma, and peritoneal mesothelioma for the best outcome. Negligence almost always causes mesothelioma, so ensure you get the compensation owed.

### Class Action Mesothelioma Lawsuit

A class action mesothelioma lawsuit is filed on behalf of several plaintiffs with complaints against the same defendant. Class actions are designed to move more cases through the courts but force plaintiffs to waive the right to an individual suit. Class action lawsuits are not common in cases of asbestos exposure and mesothelioma.









What Is a Mesothelioma Class Action Lawsuit? 



Plaintiffs may file personal injury lawsuits individually or as a group, known as a class action. A mesothelioma class action is a lawsuit with a group of plaintiffs suing the same defendants over asbestos exposure. 



One or more plaintiffs begin a class action lawsuit on behalf of many more. These people have been harmed similarly and by the same defendant or defendants. An individual case involves just one plaintiff. 



Can Mesothelioma Lawsuits Be Class Actions?



The rules governing which cases can be class actions and how they proceed vary by state and differ in federal courts. Courts decide if the similarities between plaintiffs are enough to warrant a class action. They also consider whether individual lawsuits would be a burden to the system.



Mesothelioma Class Action Lawsuit vs. Individual Lawsuit



The reason for class actions is to gather together similar cases for a speedier, more efficient process. Instead of taking thousands of cases through the court system, one large group of plaintiffs can benefit from a single decision.



In terms of compensation, individual lawsuits almost always pay more to the victim. A class action win must be split between multiple people. 



Benefits of a mesothelioma class action lawsuit include: 




A more efficient process



An easier way to group exposed workers from the same job or employer




Downsides of a mesothelioma class action lawsuit include: 




Difficulty finding enough similarities between individual plaintiffs



Less compensation for each victim




Why Mesothelioma Class Actions Are Uncommon



Mesothelioma class action lawsuits are not common. They are much more often filed as individual mesothelioma lawsuits. This is because there are often too many differences between the individual cases to group them: 




How and where the plaintiffs were exposed to asbestos



The degree of exposure



The type of diagnosis



How the illness manifests and progresses. 




More Common Class Action Lawsuits



Class actions are more common for things like defective products. A faulty medical device, for instance, causes similar harm to hundreds of thousands of people who used it. In this case, a class action is more efficient for getting justice and damages for victims.



What Is Mesothelioma Multidistrict Litigation? 



Multidistrict Litigation, or MDL, is a legal action that moves multiple similar cases to one federal court. Unlike a class action, each plaintiff retains their individual lawsuit. MDLs improve the efficiency of the courts and save money. 



Cases in MDLs are similar enough to be grouped in this way but also have enough differences to remain individual. This is often an ideal setup for asbestos claims.



MDL 875 for Asbestos Lawsuits



The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation created MDL 875 in 1991 for asbestos lawsuits. It began as a group of lawsuits filed by merchant marines in Ohio in the 1980s. 



The Eastern District of Pennsylvania handles cases in MDL 875. It is the largest federal MDL in the country. It includes the original merchant marines on one docket with another for land-based asbestos cases. 



How Do I Join an Asbestos or Mesothelioma Multidistrict Litigation? 



Your lawyer will advise you on whether you qualify for MDL 875 and if it makes sense to join it. If you want to join, your lawyer will submit the necessary paperwork. The court may send your case back to the original jurisdiction. 



How Do I Get in on a Class Action Lawsuit for Mesothelioma? 



When a class action is filed, anyone who could be a plaintiff has a right to be notified. It may be impossible to contact every person individually, but the legal representatives must make a reasonable effort. 



This includes using television or magazine advertisements. Once notified, potential plaintiffs choose to opt into the class action.



Should I Join a Mesothelioma Class Action? 



If you know of a class action for which you qualify, you may wonder if joining makes sense. The best way to decide is to get advice from an experienced asbestos lawyer or law firm. For instance, it might make sense for your situation if you do not want to file an individual lawsuit. 



A major drawback to joining a class action is that it generally results in less compensation for each plaintiff. The group of plaintiffs must split the damages award between them. 



The harm you suffer is significant regarding asbestos exposure and mesothelioma. What you can recover from a mesothelioma class action lawsuit is generally inadequate to cover your costs. 



Other Options for Mesothelioma Claims



As a victim of asbestos exposure, you have several choices for seeking compensation and many good alternatives to joining a class action. 



A mesothelioma lawyer can help you decide which option, or multiple options, make sense in your situation:



Filing an individual personal injury lawsuit







You may file a personal injury lawsuit in which you will be the sole plaintiff. Any damages recovered through a settlement, jury, or judge verdict will not be shared with other plaintiffs.



In the context of mesothelioma, a personal injury lawsuit involves an individual filing a claim against manufacturers of asbestos products believed to have caused their cancer. This type of lawsuit allows for personalized compensation, which can be crucial for covering medical expenses and other cancer-related costs.



Pursuing an individual lawsuit rather than joining a class action can often lead to higher compensation. Unlike class actions, where the settlement is divided among many plaintiffs, personal injury lawsuits allow you to retain any damages awarded. Most of these lawsuits are settled out of court, simplifying the process and often leading to quicker resolutions.



Experienced law firms specialize in navigating these cases, leveraging their expertise to negotiate favorable settlements. They will guide you through the legal intricacies, ensuring your case is handled with care and precision, maximizing the potential for a successful outcome.



Filing a wrongful death lawsuit 



Filing a wrongful death lawsuit. You can file a wrongful death claim if you lost a family member to an asbestos disease. In such cases, the surviving family members step forward to pursue justice, asserting that their loved one's passing was due to asbestos exposure.



Filing this type of lawsuit is not just about holding those responsible accountable; it also aims to secure financial compensation. This compensation can help cover funeral costs, medical expenses, and other related bills, easing the financial burden during a difficult time.



Most wrongful death lawsuits related to mesothelioma are resolved out of court, with settlements typically ranging from $1 million to $2 million. These settlements provide families with vital financial support as they navigate their loss.



Making a claim with an asbestos trust. 



If the company negligent in your asbestos exposure is bankrupt, you may need to file a claim with an asbestos trust fund it set up to be compensated.



Filing a claim with the Veterans Administration



If you are a military veteran and experienced exposure during service, you may be entitled to free healthcare and compensation or disability payments.



Filing for other benefits. A claim through your employer’s workers’ compensation insurance may be appropriate in your situation and will not impact your ability to file a class action or individual lawsuit. You may also be eligible for disability insurance or Social Security Disability benefits.











What Is the Average Settlement for Asbestos and Mesothelioma Lawsuits?  



A lawyer cannot predict exactly how much your asbestos lawsuit is worth, but averages can give you a good idea of what to expect. The highest payouts for mesothelioma cases are in the tens of millions of dollars. However, it is important to realize that every case is different. 



What Is the Average Settlement for Mesothelioma Victims? 



Most individual mesothelioma lawsuits never go to trial and end in settlements. The average payouts are between $1 million and $1.4 million. 



What Is the Average Jury Award in Asbestos Lawsuits? 



If an individual lawsuit goes to trial, the average jury verdict is $2.4 million. Noteworthy cases often result in much higher verdicts. The courts sometimes reduce these verdicts depending on state laws that cap damages awards. 



How Do Mesothelioma Class Action Payouts Compare to Individual Lawsuits?



Payouts for class actions are usually much less than individual settlements and lawsuit verdicts. This is because there are more plaintiffs involved. The award is split between each member of the class action. 



How Do I File a Mesothelioma Claim? 



If you choose one of the alternatives, a lawyer can guide you through the process. For benefits or an asbestos trust, the process involves completing applications and going through a review. 



It's best to let an experienced attorney do this for you. They know what the reviewers need to see and can appeal if necessary. 



Again, you will rely on an experienced lawyer or asbestos law firm to file a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit. They will take you through the important steps to seek compensation:



Gather Evidence



Before your lawyer makes the lawsuit official, they will investigate your exposure and collect evidence to make a case. They need this evidence to prove the defendants exposed you to asbestos and that the exposure led to your diagnosis.



File the Lawsuit



With adequate evidence, your lawyer will officially file a lawsuit. The filing goes to the courts and all defendants involved so that they can respond and prepare. 



Negotiate a Settlement



Most individual mesothelioma lawsuits end in settlements. Your lawyer will most likely push for a settlement as long as they can get a fair amount from the defendants. It's a faster way to get the compensation you need for medical expenses. 



Go to Trial



Your lawyer represents you and argues your case before a jury in court. The jury decides if the defendants owe you damages and select an amount. If settlement negotiations fail, your lawyer will advise you on whether or not you should take your case to trial. 



How Long Do Individual and Class Action Mesothelioma Lawsuits Take? 



Lawsuit duration varies significantly based on individual factors. If you file a separate lawsuit, and your situation is straightforward, you will probably get a settlement within a few months. Going to trial takes longer, even years, in some cases. 



Class action lawsuits often take years to resolve. Some may be quicker, ending within a few months to a year, but most take more than a year. This is because the process requires additional steps, such as notifying plaintiffs and getting the case certified by the courts. 



A class action lawsuit gets more people through the courts faster, but the wait time for each plaintiff is usually longer than for an individual lawsuit. 



Examples of Class Action Mesothelioma Lawsuits



While individual lawsuits are more common in asbestos cases, there have been some notable class actions against big companies that harmed hundreds of thousands of people:



W.R. Grace



Over 25,000 people filed a class-action lawsuit in 2000 against W.R. Grace in Montana. The company operated a mine in Libby that produced vermiculite. 



For decades that mineral included asbestos contamination that sickened thousands of workers and nearby residents. In 2008, W.R. Grace settled, agreeing to pay victims $140 million, including money for a trust fund.



Amchem Products



Not all class actions go in favor of the plaintiffs. In the 1990s, nearly two million people were eligible for a class action against Amchem for asbestos exposure. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the case as a class action because it was unclear how the exposure would affect each plaintiff in the long term.



This is a typical roadblock in asbestos class action suits, as not everyone gets sick due to asbestos exposure. Some exposure victims might become severely ill and be unable to collect any more damages because the earlier class action would have cleared the company of liability.



Jackson County Courthouse



Not all mesothelioma class action lawsuits are filed against corporations or asbestos manufacturers. In the case of the Jackson County, Missouri case, two former employees at the courthouse began the suit on behalf of thousands of others.



The county and U.S. Engineering were found negligent in exposing workers to asbestos during building renovations. The case ended up with a settlement of $80 million to provide former employees with free medical screenings over 30 years.



Who Can I Talk to About a Class Action Lawsuit for Mesothelioma?



Contact a mesothelioma and asbestos lawyer to discuss your legal options and if a class action lawsuit is right for you. These lawyers represent asbestos victims, file lawsuits on their behalf, negotiate settlements, and investigate asbestos exposure.



Choose a lawyer or law firm with extensive experience working with asbestos victims. This is important because these cases are complex and require knowledge of the asbestos industry and personal injury laws.



A class-action lawsuit may or may not be the right option for your situation, but legal action is often the next step. Someone was likely negligent in your exposure, and a lawyer can help you determine who and what to do next.

### Mesothelioma Wrongful Death Lawyer and Lawsuit

A mesothelioma wrongful death lawsuit is a legal action available to family members who lost loved ones to asbestos illnesses. Mesothelioma wrongful death claims provide compensation for surviving family members. A meso lawyer specializing in asbestos lawsuits can help you pursue this claim against negligent asbestos manufacturers. 










 




What Does Wrongful Death Mean?



Wrongful death is any death that can be proven to have been caused by negligence or misconduct. Many companies are considered negligent in exposing people to asbestos, resulting in deadly diseases like mesothelioma. Victims of asbestos exposure, and their families, hold these companies liable for the resulting damages. 



What Is a Mesothelioma Wrongful Death Lawsuit?



A mesothelioma wrongful death lawsuit is a civil legal action that holds the negligent party liable for damages resulting from an asbestos-related death.



The negligent party is usually a company that made asbestos products. The victim likely experienced exposure to asbestos on the job without being warned of the risks or provided appropriate protection.



Who Can File an Asbestos Wrongful Death Lawsuit? 



Laws vary by state, but generally, a close family member of the deceased can file a lawsuit over wrongful death caused by asbestos exposure. This usually includes: 




Spouses and life partners



Children, stepchildren, and grandchildren



Parents and grandparents



Financial dependents




In many cases, the estate of the deceased files the lawsuit. The deceased may have designated someone to represent the estate. If not, the court can choose a representative, who may be a family member, a friend, or a fiduciary representative. 



What Kind of Asbestos Compensation Can You Get in a Wrongful Death Case? 



A representative of the victim may file a wrongful death lawsuit to recover economic damages for:




Lost wages and financial support for the dependents of the victim



Medical expenses incurred because of mesothelioma treatments before the victim died



Funeral expenses




The lawsuit may also seek to recover non-economic damages resulting from losing a loved one, typically a spouse or parent:




Survivor pain and suffering



Loss of consortium in the case of a spouse



Loss of companionship, guidance, care, and protection




The main reason to file a wrongful death lawsuit in the case of mesothelioma is to recover damages. These are costs to the victim’s dependents and family, who would not have incurred them if not for the negligent death.



Why Should I File a Mesothelioma Claim for Wrongful Death? 



Losing a loved one to mesothelioma and asbestos exposure is a terrible experience. You may be uncertain about what to do next. Holding companies accountable is important, but you also may wonder if it's worth the time, effort, and emotional distress it could cause. 



An experienced asbestos attorney can do most of the work for you, so filing a lawsuit is not as difficult as you may assume. They can find the source of exposure, connect your loved one's death to that exposure, and do most of the legwork of filing and following through with the case. 



There are several good reasons to consider filing a mesothelioma wrongful death lawsuit: 




Mesothelioma claims after death cover major expenses, like medical bills and funeral costs. 



A claim may also include compensation for dependents and compensate for the income your loved one lost due to being sick. 



Companies that caused this harm should be held accountable. Getting justice can bring peace of mind. 



Holding companies accountable legally signals to other companies that they must prioritize worker safety, preventing future harm. 




What Is the Average Mesothelioma Wrongful Death Settlement? 



Settlements in mesothelioma cases average between $1 million and $1.4 million. Most of these lawsuits end in settlements rather than going to trial. 



In a trial, the plaintiff may recover no damages. It is a risk most do not take. If a jury awards damages to the plaintiff, the amount is typically higher than they would receive in a settlement. 



How To File an Asbestos Claim Over Wrongful Death



Filing a mesothelioma wrongful death lawsuit can be lengthy and complicated. You need an experienced attorney to guide you through the steps: 



1. Case Review



The first step in taking legal action is to work with an experienced asbestos law firm. They will review your case and determine if it is strong enough to file with a good chance of recovering damages. A reputable firm will only take your case if they believe they can win and have the resources to follow through with it. 



2. Filing the Lawsuit



Your lawyer will file the lawsuit in the appropriate jurisdiction and court. The filing serves to make the suit official and notify all defendants involved. 



3. Discovery



The filing triggers a discovery period. Your lawyer will use this time to build your case with evidence from your employment records and medical history. 



Experienced asbestos firms have resources and consultants to track down the source of your loved one's exposure and find evidence to make your case. They also work with medical experts to ensure you can prove the illness resulted from asbestos exposure. 



4. Settlement Negotiations



In most cases, the defendants will agree at this point to enter into negotiations for a settlement. It's less costly for them than going to trial. A settlement is beneficial for the plaintiffs because it provides a quicker damages payout. 



Your lawyer will represent you in negotiations, offering evidence to get you the most compensation possible. They will not agree to a settlement amount without your approval. 



5. Trial



In rare cases, wrongful death lawsuits over mesothelioma go to trial. A jury decides the case and awards damages if they decide in your favor. 



Is There a Time Limit on Filing a Wrongful Death Lawsuit? 



Yes, the time limit on filing a wrongful death lawsuit is called a statute of limitations. Every state sets this time limit, which is typically one to three years from the time of death. 



When Personal Injury Becomes Wrongful Death



Because mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer that shortens lifespan significantly, it is not unusual for the plaintiff in a personal injury case to die before resolution. 



If your loved one dies during their asbestos lawsuit, their estate can continue as a wrongful death claim. If this happens, the lawyer working on the case can guide your next steps. 



What Is a Mesothelioma Wrongful Death Lawyer?



Mesothelioma wrongful death lawyers advocate for the victims’ survivors. They have experience investigating asbestos exposure, using medical experts as witnesses, negotiating settlements, and litigating wrongful death cases in court when necessary. 



How Can a Mesothelioma Wrongful Death Lawyer Help Me? 



If you have a family member who has died from mesothelioma and are unsure if the asbestos exposure that caused the illness involved negligence, you need this expert lawyer on your side. 



An asbestos attorney can provide several valuable services:




Advice and guidance. The loss of a loved one to mesothelioma is stressful and difficult. If you don’t understand what your rights are or what you can do about it, a mesothelioma lawyer will help. They know the laws and your rights and can explain them to you and provide expert guidance and advice.



Investigations. Finding out how, where, and when your loved one was exposed to asbestos can get complicated. Lawyers specializing in asbestos and mesothelioma have the resources and experience to make this investigation. This is a part of the services they offer to victims' families. They will find out if your loved one worked with asbestos and which companies can be held liable for exposure.



Determine damages. A wrongful death lawyer can assess the potential damages you can recover in a case. Without this expertise, you may miss something.



Lawsuits. To recover damages, you may need to file a lawsuit, which is a complex process with multiple steps. Mesothelioma wrongful death lawyers know the process well and will guide you from filing to discovery to litigation if necessary.



Settlements. Most wrongful death lawsuits never actually go to litigation in a trial. They usually end in settlements. You’ll need this lawyer to represent you in a negotiation with a large company or their insurance company, who will try to limit the amount of damages you receive.



Asbestos trust fund claims. If the company negligent in the asbestos exposure has gone bankrupt, you may need to file a claim with an asbestos trust fund to recover damages. This can also be tricky and requires an experienced lawyer.




How Do I Find a Mesothelioma Wrongful Death Attorney Near Me? 



Finding the right lawyer or law firm to work with after the death of a loved one from mesothelioma is essential. This is a difficult time, and you need lawyers who are both experts in wrongful death asbestos cases and compassionate and kind.



Make sure you select a lawyer who has helped people in your situation and recovered damages for asbestos victims’ family members. Asbestos cases involve a lot of complicated parts, and it is not enough to choose a good general lawyer or even a general personal injury lawyer.



The firm you choose should also work on contingency and prepare to investigate your case without payment if they take it. A lawyer charging money upfront does not have the resources to perform an adequate investigation to make your case.



Working with a mesothelioma wrongful death lawyer is a big step but is essential if you lose a family member to this terrible disease. Mesothelioma is preventable, which means that someone can be held liable. Let a lawyer guide your decisions and help you recover damages.



Take Action Now: Secure Your Future with Expert Legal Help



If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to significant financial compensation. Our dedicated team of mesothelioma lawyers is here to guide you through every step of the legal process, ensuring your rights are protected and you receive the justice you deserve.



📄 Get Your Free Financial Compensation Packet!Fill out our simple form today to receive a comprehensive packet with details about experienced asbestos and mesothelioma law firms and lawyers in your area [near me], along with essential resources to help you make informed decisions about your case.



💡 Why Choose Us?




Decades of experience handling asbestos-related cases.



No upfront fees – you only pay if we win your case.



Personalized, compassionate support to help you focus on your health.




📞 Contact Us Today for Additional Legal Assistance and Advice!Call us at 800-793-4540 to speak with our team. Don’t wait—your time to file a claim is limited, and your family’s financial future could depend on taking action now.



You’re not alone in this fight. Let us help you secure the justice and compensation you deserve.

### Mesothelioma Personal Injury Lawyers

Mesothelioma personal injury lawyers work with victims of asbestos exposure and resulting illnesses to recover damages through legal action. They investigate exposure cases, take clients through legal processes, provide advice, and represent clients in litigation and settlement negotiations.





What Is Personal Injury?



A personal injury is any injury to a person’s body, mind, or health, as opposed to damage to property or an object. Personal injury falls under tort law, the area of the law that deals with acts or omissions that cause harm to an individual. 



This is civil, not criminal, law. In other words, the person, company, or organization that caused harm did not commit a crime.



Tort law ensures that people harmed by the action or lack of action of another can be given relief in the form of monetary compensation. It also helps victims hold the negligent party responsible and helps deter future negligent acts. 



Is Mesothelioma a Personal Injury? 



Mesothelioma is a personal injury when a company is negligent in the asbestos exposure that caused the illness. This is almost always the case with asbestos illnesses because they are preventable. Workers should have been prepared for and warned of the risks of being around asbestos. 



Most people with mesothelioma encountered asbestos on the job. Either an employer or asbestos manufacturer may be negligent. There are often multiple liable companies.



The workplace isn't the only setting where people experience negligent asbestos exposure. You may have been exposed if you lived with someone who worked with asbestos. This is called secondhand exposure. 



Other sources of exposure are related to where you live. Living near a factory or mine with asbestos can cause you harm.  Natural deposits of asbestos can also expose nearby residents. 



Should I File a Personal Injury Mesothelioma Lawsuit? 



There are many good reasons to file a personal injury lawsuit if you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma. Ultimately, the decision is yours, but consider these facts: 




Personal injury lawsuits hold responsible companies accountable for the harm they caused. 



These lawsuits can prevent future harm by punishing companies now. 



For you, a personal injury lawsuit provides a way to get much-needed compensation. 



Compensation from a lawsuit can help you pay for treatment and also make up for lost income and other expenses. 




How to File a Mesothelioma Personal Injury Lawsuit



To file a lawsuit for mesothelioma, you need to work with an expert lawyer. A lawyer experienced in asbestos cases can do all the work of filing your suit and giving you the best chance of a win. 



They will file, investigate to build a case with solid evidence, negotiate with the defendants' lawyers, and, if necessary, take your case to trial. 



Your lawyer does all the work, but you are responsible for staying informed and deciding how to proceed with the case. 



What Is a Mesothelioma Personal Injury Lawyer?



A personal injury lawyer of any type specializes in tort law. They represent victims of negligence, including slip and fall accidents, car accidents, defective products, and medical malpractice, among many other examples of mesothelioma law firms.



Many personal injury lawyers narrow their specialty to a specific type of negligence. A mesothelioma lawyer represents people diagnosed with mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses.



A mesothelioma lawyer helps victims file a lawsuit to recover damages for their illness, medical expenses, lost wages, and other costs associated with asbestos exposure and mesothelioma. In these cases, the patient files a lawsuit. If they die, their family may file a wrongful death lawsuit.



How Can a Personal Injury Lawyer Help Me After a Mesothelioma Diagnosis? 



To say that this type of lawyer represents and advocates for asbestos and mesothelioma victims is the short answer. What they do for victims daily involves so much more. Personal injury cases are often complex, and expert, skilled lawyers step in to help victims get the justice they deserve.



Explain Your Rights and Provide Advice



If you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, you likely have many questions. Often the first thing a personal injury lawyer will do is give you answers. 



They have a deep understanding of tort law and the asbestos industry and can explain your legal rights and advise what to do next.



Investigate Asbestos Exposure



Mesothelioma personal injury lawyers are not just experts in the law; they also know the asbestos industry and understand the illnesses it causes. With a mesothelioma diagnosis, you may or may not know where you encountered asbestos. You may not even know where to start.



A personal injury legal team has the knowledge and resources to investigate your case and determine where you experience asbestos exposure and which companies may be held liable. They consult with other medical experts or the industry you worked in to get a complete picture.



Assess Damages



The ultimate goal of a personal injury case is to recover monetary damages. With the information from the investigation and the records you provide, a personal injury lawyer can assess what you may be owed in damages.



Personal injury lawsuits and settlements can result in compensation for many expenses, some you may not have considered:




Medical expenses, past and future



Lost wages



Travel costs for treatments



Physical or emotional pain and suffering



Disfigurement



Losses to dependents




File a Lawsuit



A mesothelioma personal injury lawyer can file a lawsuit on your behalf with all the information in place. As the plaintiff in the case, you allege that the defendant is liable for negligently exposing you to asbestos, leading to your illness.



With the lawsuit filed, your lawyer or legal team, and the lawyers on the defendant’s side, go through a discovery period. They gather information, interview witnesses, and conduct depositions under oath.



Negotiate a Settlement



Most personal injury lawsuits never go to trial. Following the discovery period, both sides have enough information to determine if the better course of action is to negotiate a settlement. If so, your lawyer represents you in this negotiation for as much as the total amount of damages as possible.



Litigate in a Trial



If you can't settle, your lawyer can represent you in court before a judge and a jury. Your personal injury lawyer will present all the evidence and expert witnesses to prove the defendant is liable for your damages. 



The jury or judge then decides if they are liable and, if so, what they owe you in damages.



Make an Asbestos Trust Claim



In some asbestos personal injury cases, the negligent company has gone bankrupt. You cannot sue these companies, but they may have established an asbestos trust to compensate victims. Your lawyer can guide you to the appropriate trust and help you file a claim.



How Do I Know if I'm Eligible to File a Mesothelioma Claim? 



Contact a mesothelioma lawyer to find out if you are eligible. Generally, you can file a personal injury lawsuit if diagnosed with an asbestos illness. 



If your loved one files a personal injury lawsuit for mesothelioma but dies before the case concludes, you may continue it for them as a wrongful death lawsuit. 



What Is the Average Settlement for Mesothelioma Personal Injuries?



If you choose to work with a mesothelioma lawyer for personal injury, your primary goal may be to recover damages. A settlement can cover your medical expenses and lost wages and compensate your dependents. This is why most people make asbestos claims. 



The average settlement for mesothelioma claims is between $1 million and $1.4 million. It is essential that you work with an asbestos law firm or lawyer to maximize the amount you receive. 



How Do I Find an Asbestos Lawyer Near Me? 



Finding a law firm or attorney specializing in asbestos cases in your area shouldn't be difficult. Many firms handling these cases are large and have both local and national reach. 



Look closely at advertisements and online listings for firms that handle asbestos cases. They should focus only on personal injury lawsuits and have extensive experience working with victims of asbestos exposure. 



You can also look for references for a mesothelioma personal injury lawyer. If you know a lawyer personally, ask them to refer you to a trusted colleague who handles asbestos cases. Past co-workers may have filed asbestos claims and could have a good referral for you. 



How Do I Choose a Mesothelioma Lawyer? 



Your choice of lawyer or firm is essential because it impacts the outcome of your case. The best mesothelioma lawyers have these characteristics: 




They are personal injury lawyers who specialize in asbestos and asbestos illnesses.



They have worked on cases like yours and for victims like you.



They have won cases for similar victims and recovered damages.



They take the time to answer all your questions and are prepared to investigate your case with no up-front fees.




Personal injury lawyers work on a contingency basis, meaning they do not charge you until they win the case. Discuss contingency fees before settling on a lawyer, and avoid any firm that requests payment before doing any investigation.



Personal Injury Mesothelioma Attorney FAQs



The right lawyer can answer all your questions, but this is a good place to start: 



When Do I Need a Personal Injury Lawyer? 



You need a personal injury lawyer if you suffered harm from asbestos exposure and have expenses as a result. A lawyer can give you compensation options and help you decide what to do next. 



Is it Ever Too Late to Talk to a Mesothelioma Lawyer? 



Never hesitate to reach out to a lawyer for advice. However, there are time limits on filing a personal injury lawsuit. The statute of limitations varies by state. Talk to a lawyer as soon after a diagnosis as possible. 



What Happens After the Initial Consultation with a Mesothelioma Attorney? 



After a free initial consultation, a lawyer will tell you if they think you have a case. If so, they'll offer to represent you. They will then explain your options and help you decide which step to take. 



If you want to file a personal injury lawsuit, they will do most of the work and keep you updated on the progress of your case. 



How Can a Mesothelioma Personal Injury Lawyer Prove My Case? 



To win a personal injury lawsuit and recover damages, you must prove you were exposed to asbestos and that it led to your illness. 



Experienced asbestos law firms have the resources and expertise to track down asbestos exposure through employment history and prove which companies were responsible. They also have medical experts to testify that asbestos caused your diagnosis. 



What Do Damages in a Mesothelioma Personal Injury Lawsuit Cover? 



Damages vary by case, but they typically cover: 




Current and past medical bills



Expected future medical expenses and other costs of care



Lost wages



Losses to dependents



Pain and suffering




What if I Can't Afford an Asbestos Attorney? 



Reputable personal injury law firms never charge clients a fee until they win. You shouldn't have to pay anything until your lawyer recovers damages and you get the compensation. 



I'm a Veteran, Can a Personal Injury Lawyer Help Me? 



Yes, mesothelioma attorneys understand the outsized impact asbestos had on veterans of the U.S. military. They can help you sue the asbestos manufacturers and apply for VA benefits. 



How Can I Work with a Lawyer During COVID Restrictions? 



Personal injury firms have not slowed down during the pandemic. They offer virtual meetings and consultations. They also work with the courts virtually so that cases can proceed. 



A mesothelioma personal injury lawyer is your best ally in the fight to recover damages for your negligent asbestos exposure. Don’t settle for a general lawyer or anyone without this kind of experience.



Take Action Now: Secure Your Future with Expert Legal Help



If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to significant financial compensation. Our dedicated team of mesothelioma lawyers is here to guide you through every step of the legal process, ensuring your rights are protected and you receive the justice you deserve.



📄 Get Your Free Financial Compensation Packet!Fill out our simple form today to receive a comprehensive packet with details about experienced asbestos and mesothelioma law firms and lawyers in your area [near me], along with essential resources to help you make informed decisions about your case.



💡 Why Choose Us?




Decades of experience handling asbestos-related cases.



No upfront fees – you only pay if we win your case.



Personalized, compassionate support to help you focus on your health.




📞 Contact Us Today for Additional Legal Assistance and Advice!Call us at 800-793-4540 to speak with our team. Don’t wait—your time to file a claim is limited, and your family’s financial future could depend on taking action now.



We offer free online appointments and can arrange for representatives to meet you within just one mile of your home. Open Now.



You’re not alone in this fight. Let us help you secure the justice and compensation you deserve.

### Mesothelioma Compensation in Canada

Mesothelioma compensation in Canada is available to workers victimized by corporate negligence and asbestos exposure. Canadian workers with mesothelioma can seek compensation through lawsuits, asbestos trust funds, and government benefits. An experienced Canadian asbestos lawyer can explain your options and help you get the compensation you deserve. 



If you suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more.



Asbestos and Mesothelioma in Canada



Canada has a long history of asbestos mining and asbestos use in many industries. Many people got sick because of asbestos and have died from mesothelioma or are living with this and other asbestos diseases.




Mesothelioma diagnoses in Canada continue to rise. Numbers jumped 60% from 2000 to 2012. 



Asbestos exposure is one of the leading causes of occupational deaths in Canada. 



The most recent mesothelioma statistics are from 2016, when 445 Canadians were diagnosed. 



Nearly 500 Canadians died from mesothelioma in 2017. 



Several asbestos mines operated in Quebec until the last one closed in 2011. 



Mesothelioma prevalence in Canada is highest in Quebec because of the mines and in southwestern Ontario due to the concentration of industrial workplaces. 



Many areas of Quebec are still contaminated by asbestos. 




Steps to Receive Mesothelioma Compensation 



Many people with mesothelioma are entitled to compensation. Most cases of mesothelioma were caused by negligent workplace asbestos exposure. Victims should have been protected and can now be compensated. Follow these steps to get the compensation you deserve: 




Hire a Canadian mesothelioma lawyer to explain your options and represent you. 



Determine which type of compensation you qualify for, including lawsuits, asbestos trust funds, and veterans' benefits. 



Gather evidence of asbestos exposure, including a detailed work history. 



Gather evidence of your illness, including medical records. 



File a claim with the assistance of your lawyer. 




Sources of Compensation for Canadian Mesothelioma Patients



Identifying the type of compensation you qualify for is an important step in this process. If you are confused about your options, talk to an experienced mesothelioma lawyer. 



Mesothelioma Lawsuits



With an asbestos lawsuit, also called a mesothelioma lawsuit, you can go after the companies directly unless they are already protected under bankruptcy law and have a trust fund set up. 



One issue is that not all companies that used asbestos products or shipped asbestos products have set up trust funds, and the only way to seek justice is to file a lawsuit against them. 



Asbestos lawsuits have the potential to offer more compensation when compared to trust funds or government benefits. However, remember that there is no upfront, set amount when you sue a company. 



Sometimes, you won't know how much you'll receive until after you go to trial and win. 



Or, you could be offered a settlement amount before the case makes it to trial, but you won't know the amount until your asbestos attorney gets through the discovery phase of your case. 



There are many things to consider when deciding if a lawsuit is the best way to obtain mesothelioma compensation. There are also numerous laws and rules that must be adhered to. 



You'll need an experienced Canada mesothelioma lawyer to assist you and to ensure you have the best shot at receiving maximum compensation.



Asbestos Trust Funds 



Asbestos trust funds, also known as asbestos compensation trust funds, were established by companies that previously shipped and supplied asbestos-related products to job sites. 



The trust funds have been set up to compensate people injured by these products. Although many of the trust funds are set up in the U.S., Canadian residents, by law, must be treated the same as United States claimants. In other words, the same laws apply to both Canadians and Americans. 



Although no court action is generally needed to apply for compensation for an asbestos trust fund, the process can be intricate.



Further, which companies supplied asbestos to which job sites is not always apparent. You also may be able to file against more than one company.



An experienced asbestos lawyer can simplify the process and give you the best chance of obtaining compensation. 



Compensation amounts vary, depending on the type of injury that resulted from asbestos exposure, the payment schedule each particular trust set up, and the percentage of the payment for the trust you're filing for. 



Payment percentage can range anywhere from 1% to up to 100%. A Canada mesothelioma lawyer will explain the payment percentages in detail to you once it's established which trust you are filing for. 



Asbestos trust funds are set up to help claimants with compensation for past, present, and future medical expenses, loss of income, and cancer treatment travel expenses. 



In Canada, asbestos exposure doesn't necessarily have to occur at job sites only. You may be eligible for trust fund compensation if: 




Work done in your home led to an asbestos illness, such as home renovation work



Second-hand exposure, such as a family member coming home in asbestos-filled clothing, led to an asbestos illness



A loved one with an asbestos illness is now deceased, and you're filing on their behalf 




Workers' Compensation for Canadian Workers with Mesothelioma



Workers' Compensation Benefits apply to people specifically exposed to asbestos while at a Canadian job site and, in turn, developed an asbestos-related disease. 



Every province in Canada has its own set of rules that determines eligibility. 



You'll need to present your request to the Workers Compensation Board and prove when and how long you worked at a company that used asbestos. 



You'll also need to prove the company used asbestos-related products and for how long. Further, you'll need to prove you were injured by asbestos while on the job. 



According to reports, many Canadians are injured by asbestos in non-work environments, which prohibits them from getting benefits from Workers Compensation. 



However, other forms of compensation could be available to those who don't qualify, such as a lawsuit against the asbestos manufacturers and the aforementioned trust funds. 



Things to Remember if You Qualify



For those who do qualify, payments are generally a lump sum for non-economic loss, followed by a monthly pension. You'll also receive free medical care for your asbestos illness. 



If you're filing on behalf of a deceased family member, survivor's benefits and a pension would apply. Funeral expenses are included. 



Keep in mind that Canadian laws indicate that if you apply and your worker's compensation benefits are granted, you cannot apply for trust fund compensation or file an asbestos lawsuit against any company. 



Disability Benefits for Canadian Veterans



If you were in the military and harmed by asbestos while serving, you may be eligible for compensation from Veteran Affairs Canada. Veterans have higher rates of asbestos diseases than any other population group. 



The amount of compensation will depend upon the type of disease, the extent of the disease that was caused while serving in the military, and the stage of the disease. 



Veterans may also be covered under the "Canadian Forces Members and Veterans Re-establishment and Compensation Act" and are generally eligible for a "Disability Award," according to the Veteran Affairs Canada official site. 



How Much Compensation Can Mesothelioma Patients Get? 



Compensation amounts vary significantly depending on individual factors in each claim: 




The asbestos companies involved



The number of companies involved



The extent of the companies' negligence



The severity of the patient's illness




The type of claim is also important. A lawsuit that goes to trial can lead to a multimillion-dollar verdict. Most lawsuits, however, end in settlements. Mesothelioma settlements average between $1 million and $1.4 million. Trust fund claims usually provide less compensation because they only pay a percentage of each claim. 



How Long Does it Take to Receive Compensation for Mesothelioma?



Everyone's case is different and proceeds along a unique timeline. Factors that affect the timeline include the complexity of the case, the evidence available, and the number of asbestos companies involved. 



Asbestos trusts do their best to expedite claims because they know time is limited for mesothelioma patients. The same is true for lawsuits. They often end in settlements, so patients get compensated sooner. A typical timeline for receiving compensation is three to six months. 



Additional Help and Assistance 



Simply fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540.

### Mesothelioma Compensation guide | FREE Financial Packet

To expedite the shipping of your FREE resources, please provide your mailing address.







Mesothelioma compensation is designed to help individuals and families affected by this rare cancer manage medical costs, lost income, and other expenses. Compensation can come from various sources, including settlements, verdicts, trust funds, and workers' compensation. Settlement amounts vary widely depending on factors such as the severity of the illness, the level of negligence by the responsible party, and jurisdiction, but they often range from hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars. Trust funds, established by bankrupt asbestos companies, provide additional resources, though payouts depend on the fund’s policies and the claimant’s exposure history. Understanding the types of compensation available is crucial for victims seeking justice and financial security.

### Pleural Mesothelioma Lawyer

If you've been diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma, you need legal representation. Negligent workplace exposure is the leading cause of this type of cancer. A pleural mesothelioma lawyer can find out how and where you were exposed and help you take legal action.










 




What Is a Pleural Mesothelioma Lawyer? 



Asbestos in the workplace is the leading cause of pleural mesothelioma, a deadly and expensive illness. Pleural mesothelioma lawyers represent patients with this rare type of cancer which affects the lining of the lungs. They work with clients who want to take legal action against companies responsible for exposing them to asbestos. 



Facts About Working with a Pleural Mesothelioma Lawyer



If you are just beginning to think about hiring a lawyer because of a pleural mesothelioma diagnosis, you might be unsure of how to begin. Or if you even should. Consider these facts before you decide: 




Mesothelioma and asbestos lawsuits are complicated, but mesothelioma lawyers and firms are specialists with years of experience working on these cases. 



Thousands of pleural mesothelioma lawsuits are filed every year. 



On average, pleural mesothelioma lawyers get their clients more than $1 million in settlement money. 



When they go to trial, mesothelioma lawsuit verdicts often rise into the tens of millions of dollars. 



Lawyers help their clients get their portion of the $30 billion currently set up in asbestos trust funds.



Pleural mesothelioma attorneys help clients seek justice and recover damages in wrongful death lawsuits after losing a loved one.  




Facts About Pleural Mesothelioma



Pleural mesothelioma is the most common type of a rare cancer affecting some people exposed to asbestos. 




Pleural mesothelioma is a rare cancer of the pleura. The pleura are two layers of thin tissue surrounding the lungs. 



Even experienced doctors and specialists often misdiagnose pleural mesothelioma. They often confuse it with lung cancer. 



Pleural mesothelioma is the most common form of this cancer, accounting for about 75% of diagnoses.



Approximately 3,000 people get a diagnosis of mesothelioma every year. 



Pleural mesothelioma is aggressive. It spreads rapidly and is most often considered terminal.



Most people don't receive a diagnosis until decades after asbestos exposure.  



In the later stages, pleural mesothelioma is painful and restricts mobility and quality of life. 



Almost all cases of pleural mesothelioma are preventable, which means victims can hold companies accountable and seek compensation for medical expenses. 




How Does Asbestos Exposure Cause Pleural Mesothelioma? 



People who develop pleural mesothelioma often take legal action because this type of cancer is almost entirely preventable. Workplace exposure to asbestos causes most cases of mesothelioma. Less often, residential and secondary exposure causes mesothelioma. 



Asbestos is a mineral that many industries once used to make light, strong, fireproof, and heat-resistant materials. The sharp fibers of asbestos can contaminate air and surfaces leading to inhalation or ingestion. Eventually, it became clear that working around asbestos could lead to serious illnesses.



In the body, these fibers cause damage to the pleural tissue around the lungs, and this can cause disease over time. Not everyone exposed to asbestos will become ill, but many develop mesothelioma.



Many workers were exposed to asbestos without knowledge or being warned of the risks. Some of those people got sick decades later. This can be considered a negligent personal injury.



Because asbestos lingers in many workplaces, people are still at risk of getting pleural mesothelioma.



Why Do I Need a Pleural Mesothelioma Lawyer?



Pleural mesothelioma is a terrible, aggressive disease. It is painful and shortens your life. It leaves loved ones behind. For these reasons, many people exposed to asbestos who later become sick choose to take legal action against those responsible. 



Many employers in the past used asbestos extensively. A past employer or a manufacturer that supplied your employer with asbestos-containing materials can be held accountable for being negligent in your exposure and current illness.



Even if you don't want to sue, a pleural mesothelioma lawyer can help you seek compensation through settlements, trust funds, and benefits, such as those offered to veterans through the VA. 



With the right lawyer on your side, you can seek justice for the harm caused to you, recover damages, and get money to pay for your cancer treatment. 



How Can a Pleural Mesothelioma Lawyer Help Me?  



A pleural mesothelioma lawyer will help you decide the type of legal action to take in your search for justice and compensation. A lawsuit is not suitable for every client, and a good lawyer will review your information and goals and determine what path is best.




File a Lawsuit. One option is to file a lawsuit against one or more companies you believe to be negligent in your asbestos exposure. Your lawyer will investigate to find evidence of asbestos, even if you aren’t sure when or where you may have been exposed in your past work. Your legal team will then file the lawsuit for you and negotiate a settlement with the defendants. Your lawyer will take your case to court if they can't settle. 





File a Wrongful Death Lawsuit. If your loved one died from pleural mesothelioma, you may be eligible to file a claim for wrongful death. A lawyer can find the necessary evidence and build a case to help you recover damages for lost wages, funeral expenses, and more. 





File an Asbestos Trust Fund Claim. If the company that exposed you no longer exists or went through a bankruptcy, your lawyer may suggest you file a claim with an asbestos trust fund. These funds were set aside during the bankruptcy filing and included money to compensate current and future victims.





File for Government or VA Benefits. Further, your lawyer may suggest filing for various types of disability or government compensation. If you are a veteran, your lawyer can help you find out if your exposure happened during your service. They can help you file for VA compensation and access to health care.




When Should I Hire a Pleural Mesothelioma Lawyer? 



Talk to an asbestos lawyer or firm as soon after a pleural mesothelioma diagnosis as possible. States set time limits on filing personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits. Known as the statute of limitations, these deadlines range from one to six years after your diagnosis. 



You don't want to miss your opportunity to seek justice and damages. Don't hesitate to reach out to a firm. They will answer your questions, and you have no obligation to hire them. You have nothing to lose. 



How Much Compensation Can a Lawyer Help Me Get? 



Although getting justice for the negligence that made you sick is essential, the need to recover damages is more pressing. The compensation a lawyer can help you get covers necessary treatment costs, especially since pleural mesothelioma requires specialty care. 



The exact amount of compensation awarded in pleural mesothelioma cases varies depending on individual factors. 



What Does a Pleural Mesothelioma Settlement Include? 



Some of the types of expenses that compensation may cover include:




Past, current, and future treatment costs



Medications



Supportive therapies



Lost wages if you can no longer work



Travel expenses for getting treatment



Costs of home care and supportive care equipment




Depending on your state and the laws there, you may also be able to seek compensation for non-economic costs, including pain and emotional suffering. You can request compensation for emotional suffering, loss of companionship, funeral expenses, and medical bills for wrongful death cases.



Make sure your pleural mesothelioma lawyer has access to all the information needed to make a claim. This may include medical records and bills, travel receipts, homecare receipts, and employment history.



What Is the Average Mesothelioma Settlement Amount? 



The average settlement amount for a mesothelioma case ranges from $1 million to $1.4 million, so it's worth talking to a lawyer to determine the best course of action. 



Asbestos trust funds, on average, pay out $180,000 to victims of exposure. 



How Do I Choose a Pleural Mesothelioma Lawyer?



A general lawyer, who practices all types of law or even all kinds of personal injury cases, is not suitable for your pleural mesothelioma case. You need an experienced lawyer who understands all the complexities of pleural mesothelioma and asbestos exposure cases. 



Look for the following attributes in your search for a lawyer to take your case:




A deep understanding of personal injury and asbestos laws and asbestos trust funds



Proven experience working with other mesothelioma clients and asbestos victims



A track record of winning for these victims



References from previous clients



Accessibility and willingness to spend time answering your questions



Adequate resources to help investigate your case and determine where and how you experienced exposure to asbestos



Compassion and empathy when working with sick clients




What if I Can’t Afford a Pleural Mesothelioma Lawyer?



Reputable law firms and pleural mesothelioma lawyers only charge clients on a contingency basis. 



This means that the lawyer recovers no fees unless you win your case. Your lawyer will charge a percentage of the damages you recover and does not get paid unless you do.



This is how most pleural mesothelioma lawyers work because they know victims of asbestos exposure are already struggling to cover treatment costs. 



Always look for a lawyer who accepts contingency payments to avoid additional financial stress. And make sure you discuss those fees before hiring any lawyer.



The best pleural mesothelioma lawyer will be your trusted guide and advocate during this difficult time. Even if you aren’t sure you need to take legal action, talk to a lawyer to explore your options and rights. 



Most importantly, if you struggle to make ends meet and pay for needed treatment, a lawyer is a powerful ally to help you recover damages from those responsible for your illness.



FAQs About Pleural Mesothelioma



What Are the Symptoms of Pleural Mesothelioma? 



Early symptoms of pleural mesothelioma are mild and similar to more common illnesses. This is one reason people rarely get an early-stage diagnosis. As mesothelioma develops into late-stage cancer, you may experience: 




Chest pains



Difficult breathing, wheezing, and shortness of breath



A persistent cough



Pain at sites where the cancer has spread



Fatigue



Weight loss




How Do I Know If I Have Pleural Mesothelioma? 



Only a medical team can tell you if you have pleural mesothelioma. The symptoms are very similar to more common illnesses, like pneumonia or COPD. 



If you have these symptoms and they persist, talk to your doctor about cancer screenings. Tell them about any asbestos you were exposed to in the past. This can be a very important clue for a more accurate diagnosis. 



Pleural mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer. Your prognosis will be better if you catch it early and start treatment right away. Take symptoms seriously and consider asking for a second opinion if you are not confident in a diagnosis. 



Does Anyone Survive Pleural Mesothelioma? 



Mesothelioma is treatable but is generally not considered curable. Rarely, a person may survive many years with pleural mesothelioma. This is most likely with diagnosis during an early stage and with aggressive treatment. 



How Long Can I Live with Pleural Mesothelioma? 



Life expectancy for pleural mesothelioma is generally short, but it depends on individual factors: age and health, cancer stage, treatment choices, and more. 



The median survival time for pleural mesothelioma is nine months, a statistic that includes people who do not receive treatment. By beginning treatment right away, you can significantly extend your life expectancy.

### Mesothelioma Case Rejected

Asbestos victims get their mesothelioma cases rejected for various reasons. One of the primary reasons is choosing the wrong lawyer for representation. If you or someone in your family received this diagnosis, our asbestos lawyers will work with you and help you get the money you’re owed. 



Exploring Financial Assistance Options for Mesothelioma Survivors



For those affected by mesothelioma, there are several avenues of financial support that can offer some relief:




Asbestos Trust Funds: Numerous manufacturers of asbestos products established trust funds after declaring bankruptcy. These funds are specifically designed to compensate individuals diagnosed with mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases. It's essential to gather documentation and evidence of exposure to apply successfully.



Veterans' Benefits: Veterans who developed mesothelioma due to asbestos exposure during military service may qualify for various benefits through the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). This can include disability compensation, health care services, and additional support for dependents.



Workers' Compensation: If asbestos exposure occurred in the workplace, mesothelioma patients might be eligible for workers' compensation benefits. This can help cover medical expenses and lost wages, although it may not fully compensate for all financial losses.



Social Security Disability Benefits: Individuals unable to work due to mesothelioma can apply for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI). Approval can expedite access to monthly payments, providing some financial stability during treatment.



Legal Claims: Consider consulting with a mesothelioma attorney to explore the potential for a personal injury lawsuit. Legal actions can sometimes lead to additional compensation, especially if the asbestos exposure was due to negligence.




Navigating these options can be complex, so it's often beneficial to seek guidance from professionals who specialize in mesothelioma-related claims to ensure you pursue the most effective strategies for your circumstances.



Mesothelioma Cases Rejected – Why it Happens



Mesothelioma, a rare type of cancer, is almost always caused by exposure to asbestos. Proving that a person or a company is negligent in causing the exposure is not always easy. Proving that another party failed to warn you about asbestos can also be complicated.



Since connecting a company’s negligence and a mesothelioma diagnosis can be challenging, some lawyers will turn down cases. They don’t want to put in the work or the money it takes to fight for justice for the victim.



Money is generally the main issue when a lawyer or law firm rejects a mesothelioma case.



If the lawyer does not believe the case will result in a big enough settlement or jury award to the plaintiff, it could be rejected. 



Researching, hiring expert witnesses, and doing the other work necessary to prepare and follow through with a case can cost a lot of money.



Even if the case is strong and easy to prove, if a lawyer doesn’t believe the payout, in the end, will be enough, they will turn clients away.





                
                        
                            Calculate Case Value
                            
                        
                        Diagnosis-- Select --MesotheliomaAsbestosisAsbestos-Related Lung CancerIs Diagnosed Person Alive?-- Select --YesPassed away under 2 years agoPassed away over 2 years agoAge of Diagnosed Person-- Select --Under 6565-8485 or olderExposure-- Select --MilitaryOccupationalSecond-HandOther / UnknownMain Job Site-- Select --ShipyardsBoiler RoomsPowerhousesPaper MillsConstruction SitesAutomotiveFirefightingRailroadsRefineriesOther / UnknownMain Asbestos Product Used-- Select --Fire Protection ProductsBrake Pads / LiningsCeiling Textures / Tile / PlasterElectrical ProductsTransite ProductsHeating & Cooling ProductsVermiculiteRoofing ProductsPaints / Plasters / Wall CoveringsOther / UnknownState-- Select --AlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaNorthern Mariana IslandsOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahU.S. Virgin IslandsVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces EuropeArmed Forces PacificPhone(Required)Email(Required)First Name(Required)Last Name(Required)EmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
         Any information you send is secure and will never be sold or released.This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
        
                        Δ
                        





Why All Mesothelioma Cases Should Be Accepted



As long as you or someone you care about has received a legitimate diagnosis of mesothelioma, you should be able to seek justice with appropriate representation. 



No one should have ever been exposed to harmful asbestos. Nearly every diagnosis of an asbestos illness was preventable. 



There is always a case to make against one or more companies that exposed people to asbestos.



Some cases will be more difficult, time-consuming, and expensive than others. Some will result in smaller payouts. These issues are not good enough reasons to prevent victims from seeking justice. 



Everyone who has suffered harm from being around asbestos, who has to live with a deadly mesothelioma diagnosis, should have lawyers on their side.



How Can I Ensure My Asbestos Claim Is Not Rejected?



There is no way to guarantee a firm will take your case. You can take some steps before talking to a lawyer to make it easier for them to accept your case. 



The most important thing you can do is provide information. The more information you have, the easier for a lawyer to evaluate your case. 



This doesn’t mean you need to know where or how you encountered asbestos. Provide your complete employment history and medical records, and an experienced lawyer will be able to track down your exposure details.



Understanding the role of your work history is crucial in determining the value of your mesothelioma case. Your lawyer will delve into your occupational background, asking detailed questions about the types of jobs you held and the products you came into contact with. This comprehensive approach helps establish the context of your asbestos exposure, which is pivotal in evaluating the strength and potential compensation of your case.



By compiling a thorough occupational history, your legal team can identify key exposure points and substantiate your claims, enhancing the likelihood of a favorable outcome. Rest assured, even if you're unsure of the specifics, your lawyer's expertise will guide the investigation process effectively.



Also important is the choice of a law firm or lawyer. Your chances of rejection are higher if you consult with a firm with limited or no experience working on asbestos cases. 



Do a little research to find the lawyers in your area with proven track records of working with and winning cases for people with mesothelioma. 



What Our Legal Team Can Do for You



Our qualified attorneys are standing by to help you. Asbestos and mesothelioma cases can be complicated and lengthy, and you need expert lawyers to have the best chance of success. 



Here's what our team can do for you: 




Our mesothelioma lawyers have the expertise and the experience to help you understand your case. 





We will find the evidence to prove you were harmed by asbestos. We will then negotiate a settlement or take your case through the courts for a jury award.





The right mesothelioma lawyer will guide you through the process and help you make the best choices. You will need to decide if you should file a claim with an asbestos trust fund or file a lawsuit against the company that caused your exposure.





A good lawyer with experience in asbestos cases will help you determine if a past employer or a manufacturer of materials you worked with is to blame.





Most importantly, the right lawyer with the right experience will be your advocate. They will always make decisions and take actions in your best interest.






What Kind of Settlement Can a Lawyer Get Me for Mesothelioma? 



Mesothelioma lawsuits almost always end in settlements, a negotiated compensation amount the defendants agree to pay the plaintiff. Settlements are preferred because they provide compensation faster than lawsuits, offering a more immediate solution for plaintiffs who need to cover expenses quickly.



There is no way to determine how much you can get in a settlement. Several factors come into play, including the extent of asbestos exposure, the severity of the illness, medical expenses, lost wages, and more. Despite the potential for higher compensation through court verdicts, the majority of cases are settled before trial due to the certainty and speed settlements offer.



The average mesothelioma settlement is between $1 million and $1.4 million. The best way to determine how much you may be eligible for is to talk to an experienced asbestos attorney. They can provide insight into the specifics of your case and help navigate the complexities of reaching a fair settlement.



We fight for all victims of mesothelioma. If you or someone you care about has gotten this diagnosis, you can rely on our lawyers to take your case and provide the guidance, expertise, and support you need to get the compensation you deserve.



How Long Does It Take to Receive a Mesothelioma Settlement Check?



When settling a mesothelioma claim, patience is key. After reaching an agreement with the responsible party, the timeline to receive a settlement check can vary.



Here’s what you can generally expect:




Initial Agreement: After negotiating and accepting a settlement offer, the formal paperwork is completed and signed by all parties involved.



Processing Time: Once the agreement is finalized, it typically takes 1 to 3 months for the settlement check to be processed and delivered. This period allows for administrative steps and fund allocation.



Variations in Timing: The exact duration can depend on several factors, including:

Complexity of the Case: More intricate cases might take longer due to additional paperwork or legal procedures.



Company's Financial Processes: Each company's internal processes for fund disbursement can significantly affect the timeline.



Jurisdictional Factors: Depending on local laws and regulations, some areas may have faster or slower processing periods.





Additional Delays: In some instances, unforeseen circumstances such as holidays, legal disputes, or backlogs can further extend this timeframe.




By staying informed and maintaining communication with your attorney, you can often expedite the process. However, patience and diligence are crucial to ensure everything proceeds smoothly.



How Are Mesothelioma Settlements Paid Out?



When it comes to mesothelioma settlements, the procedure for payment involves a few key steps. Here's a breakdown of how the process typically works:




Negotiation Phase: Initially, the settlement begins with negotiations between the affected individual (or their legal representative) and the asbestos-producing company responsible.



Settlement Agreement: Once an agreement is reached, both parties draft a formal settlement document. This outlines the specifics of the payment amount and any conditions tied to the settlement.



Acceptance: Upon accepting the offer, the individual may need to sign a release form, indicating they agree to the terms and will not pursue further legal action regarding this specific claim.



Payment Distribution:

Lump Sum: Often, the settlement is disbursed in a single, lump-sum payment. This allows recipients to immediately access the funds needed for treatments, legal fees, or other associated costs.



Structured Payments: Alternatively, in some cases, payments can be structured over a set period. This method provides a consistent flow of funds over time, ensuring ongoing support for medical or personal needs.





Timeline: The timeline for receiving these payments can vary. Some settlements might be resolved swiftly, within months, while others could extend over a longer period, depending on the complexity of the case.




By understanding this payout process, individuals affected by mesothelioma can better prepare and manage their expectations as they navigate the legal landscape.



How Much Does It Cost to Hire a Mesothelioma Attorney?



Hiring a mesothelioma attorney can be surprisingly affordable, especially if budget constraints are a concern. Most attorneys in this field work on a contingency fee basis, which means you won’t need to pay any upfront fees. Here’s how it works:




No Initial Fees: You won't be required to pay any money out of pocket when you hire a lawyer.



Payment Upon Success: The attorney only gets paid if they successfully secure compensation for you or your family.



Percentage of Settlement: The attorney's fee is typically a percentage of the final settlement or court award. This percentage is agreed upon before the case begins.




This approach ensures that your financial risk is minimized, allowing you to focus on your health and peace of mind while seeking justice.



What Are Some Notable Mesothelioma Lawsuit Settlements and Verdicts?



Mesothelioma, a cancer linked to asbestos exposure, has led to numerous high-profile legal cases. Though actual settlement amounts are often kept confidential, several verdicts and settlements have captured public attention over the years.



Metal Worker’s Landmark CaseIn a groundbreaking 2003 verdict, a steel company faced a $250 million payout to the widow of a former employee who succumbed to mesothelioma. While the final settlement was less than the initial award, the case remains one of the largest in history for an asbestos-related lawsuit.



Consumer vs. Major CorporationsA consumer who consistently purchased talcum powder over several decades won a $117 million verdict in 2018.** A jury ruled in favor of him and his wife, holding the corporations responsible for asbestos contamination leading to his illness.



Navy Veteran’s CompensationA notable verdict in 2014 saw a California jury award $70.8 million to a Navy machinist. His claim centered around asbestos-laden products he encountered during his lengthy military service, bringing significant attention to the dangers of asbestos in military occupations.



Case of the Drywall WorkerIn 2020, a drywall worker received a $13.4 million verdict, along with an additional $75,000 in settlements, due to his mesothelioma diagnosis. His work with asbestos-containing products, including specific joint compounds, was the basis of his claim.



Mechanic’s Family SettlementThe family of a mechanic received a $630,000 settlement in 2018. The wrongful death lawsuit was filed due to asbestos exposure from materials like brakes and clutches, which ultimately led to his disease.



These cases illustrate the substantial financial implications and legal complexities associated with mesothelioma lawsuits. Settlement amounts can differ significantly based on individual circumstances. Partnering with seasoned legal professionals can be crucial in navigating these intricacies and optimizing compensation outcomes.



Advantages and Disadvantages of Mesothelioma Settlements Compared to Verdicts



When navigating mesothelioma lawsuits, it's crucial to understand the distinct paths of settlements and verdicts—each with its own blend of pros and cons.



Advantages



Settlements:




Speed and Efficiency

Settlements offer a faster route to compensation, shortening the process significantly compared to a trial. This is a critical factor for individuals who might face mounting medical bills and need quick financial support.





Lower Risk and Predictability

Settlements are negotiated agreements, providing more certainty and control over the outcome. There’s less risk involved since both parties agree to specific terms without the unpredictability of a court decision.





Cost-Effective

Avoiding a lengthy trial reduces legal expenses, making settlements more economical for plaintiffs. In contrast, trials can incur large costs due to legal representation and related fees.





Confidentiality

Many settlements are kept confidential, which can protect both parties’ privacy—a significant advantage for those preferring discretion.






Verdicts:




Potentially Larger Payouts

Verdicts can lead to more substantial compensation amounts if the judge or jury sides in favor of the plaintiff. This can be a major advantage despite the risks involved.





Publicity and Awareness

A public verdict can raise awareness about mesothelioma and asbestos exposure, serving a broader purpose beyond individual compensation.






Disadvantages



Settlements:




Potentially Smaller Compensation

Settlements often result in lower financial awards compared to what might be possible through a successful verdict. They are a trade-off between certainty and the possibility of a larger payout.





Limited Legal Recourse

Once a settlement is agreed upon, there is typically no further opportunity to seek additional compensation, unlike verdicts where appeals might be an option.






Verdicts:




High Risk and Uncertainty

There’s no guaranteed outcome in a trial. Even if successful, verdicts can be subject to appeal, delaying compensation further and possibly reducing the award.





Time and Expense

The trial process can be grueling, taking years to resolve and resulting in high legal fees that accumulate over time.





Loss of Control

Outcomes are determined by the judge or jury, reducing plaintiffs’ control over the resolution of their case.






In summary, settlements and verdicts each offer distinct advantages and carry specific disadvantages. Weighing these factors carefully is essential for those involved in mesothelioma lawsuits, ensuring an informed decision that best suits their personal needs and circumstances.



Current Mesothelioma Lawsuit Settlement and Verdict News



In recent years, U.S. Courts have seen a steady flow of asbestos-related lawsuits, with thousands filed annually. Most are settled before they ever reach a jury. Here are some notable recent cases:




January 2025 Update: In a significant case, the jury ruled in favor of a plaintiff's estate against a major healthcare company, attributing negligence and deception regarding product safety. Though the verdict initially favored the plaintiff, further legal challenges by the company may alter the outcome.



December 2024 Update: The family of an engineer, who succumbed to mesothelioma, received a substantial punitive damages award from a Connecticut judge. This decision built upon an earlier sizable jury verdict. The case highlighted allegations against a corporation for asbestos contamination in talc, reportedly affecting the victim during his career in the plastics industry from the 1960s to the late 1970s.



November 2024 Update: A mechanic battling mesothelioma secured a meaningful financial award from a New York jury. He had brought a lawsuit against multiple companies, asserting their awareness of the hazards associated with asbestos-laden auto parts. The settlement underscores the accountability and responsibility companies face over asbestos-related health issues.




These developments underscore the severe implications for firms linked to asbestos exposure, reflecting ongoing legal battles and financial repercussions. These cases also serve as a stark reminder of the persistent dangers posed by asbestos-linked illnesses.



How Does a Defendant's Litigation History Affect Settlement Outcomes?



When examining the impact of a defendant's litigation history on settlement outcomes, many layers come into play.




Past Case Verdicts and Settlements: If a defendant has frequently settled or lost similar cases, they may be inclined to negotiate a settlement more quickly, aiming to sidestep the risk and expense of another courtroom defeat.



Reputation and Precedents: A history of unfavorable verdicts can tarnish a defendant's reputation, potentially encouraging them to settle sooner or for higher amounts to maintain or restore their public image.



Legal Strategy Adjustments: Defendants with a history of litigation losses might refine their legal strategies, either to fight more aggressively or to offer more favorable settlements as a proactive measure.



Jurisdiction Influence: The outcomes of previous cases can influence the jurisdiction's view and handling of current claims, possibly swaying the defendant to settle in jurisdictions where they’ve previously faced setbacks.




Each of these factors plays a significant role, individually and collectively, in shaping how a defendant approaches settlements, directly impacting the outcomes for claimants.



Understanding the Tax Implications of Mesothelioma Settlements



When receiving a settlement for mesothelioma, one of the primary concerns for recipients and their families often involves understanding the tax implications. Let's dive into whether these settlements are counted as taxable income.



Taxability of Mesothelioma Settlements



Here's some good news: mesothelioma settlements are generally not considered taxable income. This means that individuals receiving compensation for their illness typically do not have to worry about paying federal income taxes on these earnings.



Why Are They Non-Taxable?




Nature of Compensation: The settlement is primarily intended to compensate for personal injury or physical sickness. According to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), compensatory damages for these reasons are typically non-taxable.



Restorative Purpose: The funds are aimed at reimbursing medical expenses, pain, and suffering, or losses incurred due to the illness, which aligns with the IRS's guidelines on what is considered non-taxable.




Exceptions to Consider



While general mesothelioma settlements are not taxable, there are certain aspects to keep in mind:




Interest and Punitive Damages: Any interest accrued on the settlement amount or punitive damages awarded may be subject to taxation. It is crucial to differentiate these components in your settlement agreement for clarity.



Lost Wages Compensation: If your award includes compensation for lost wages, that portion might be considered taxable, as it replaces taxable income.




Seek Professional Guidance



To navigate your settlement's nuances, consulting with a tax professional or legal advisor is highly recommended. They can provide personalized assistance, ensuring you fully understand any potential tax obligations.



Steps in the Asbestos Settlement Process



Navigating an asbestos lawsuit can be daunting, but understanding the steps involved can make the process smoother. Here’s a detailed breakdown of what to expect:



1. Initial Consultation



Your journey begins by consulting an experienced mesothelioma attorney. This legal expert will be your guide, helping you understand your rights and the potential paths forward.



2. Evidence Collection



Your attorney will assist you in gathering crucial documentation, including medical records that confirm your asbestos-related illness. This evidence is vital to building a strong case.



3. Filing the Lawsuit



Once your case is prepared, your lawyer will officially file the lawsuit. This sets the legal process in motion, compelling the defendants to respond.



4. Response from Defendants



Upon filing, the defendants typically have 30 days to reply. Although some might propose a quick settlement, it's common for them to deny responsibility initially.



5. Discovery Phase



In this phase, both parties collect further evidence. Lawyers on each side will gather documents, take depositions, and establish the details of the case. This critical stage can last several months, depending on the complexity of the evidence and willingness of parties to cooperate.



6. Settlement Negotiations



At various stages, settlement discussions may occur. Your attorney will evaluate offers with you, considering factors like potential compensation and the strength of your case.



7. Trial or Settlement Decision



If a fair settlement isn’t reached, the lawsuit might proceed to trial. Your attorney will guide you through this decision, weighing the risks and benefits of continuing versus accepting a settlement.



Each case is unique, and outcomes can vary significantly based on the details presented and strategies employed. Through each step, your attorney's expertise is crucial in navigating the legal landscape and striving for a favorable outcome.



Deciding on an Asbestos Settlement: Is It the Right Choice for You?



Navigating the complexities of an asbestos settlement offer can be overwhelming. The decision rests on weighing numerous factors, and the insights of an experienced attorney can be invaluable.



Your legal counsel plays a pivotal role in this journey. Their expertise helps ensure that any offer you consider is fair and just, tailored to your unique circumstances. This guidance can provide clarity in a situation where the stakes are high, and emotions run deep.



In making your decision, consider the following:




Financial Implications: A settlement often provides quicker financial relief compared to a lengthy trial. This speedy resolution can be crucial for those facing mounting medical expenses and the cost of care.



Time and Stress: Trials can be time-consuming and emotionally draining. Accepting a settlement may spare you and your loved ones the rigors of a courtroom battle, preserving your energy for what truly matters.



Certainty vs. Risk: A settlement guarantees compensation, whereas a trial outcome is uncertain. It eliminates the risk of losing in court and walking away with nothing.



Family Considerations: Every family’s needs and financial situation are different. Discussing options with your family and attorney ensures that any decision aligns with your long-term goals and offers adequate protection.




Ultimately, choosing to accept a settlement is a deeply personal decision. It should reflect your values, priorities, and the specific needs of your family. With the right legal guidance and a clear understanding of the implications, you can make a choice that feels right for you and your loved ones.

### Libby, Montana, and Asbestos

Libby, Montana, remains one of the most infamous asbestos contamination sites in the U.S. The Libby site alone has caused thousands of mesothelioma and asbestosis cases after W.R. Grace mined asbestos-contaminated vermiculite here for decades. 





How Did Libby, Montana, Get Contaminated with Asbestos? 



This small town in Lincoln County, Montana, was once home to a dangerous vermiculite mining operation for decades. From 1919 to 1990, the W.R. Grace mine produced vermiculite contaminated with asbestos and shipped it all over the country to be processed. 



The final product went into construction products, mostly insulation. The type of asbestos found naturally in the Libby mine is particularly friable and, therefore, harmful. 



While people around the country have been affected by the asbestos in Libby vermiculite, the residents of the small Montana town have felt most of the consequences.



The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the state of Montana continue to work on the cleanup of the Superfund site. W.R. Grace, the company responsible for the asbestos production, still pays people who became sick from the exposure.



The History of Vermiculite and Asbestos in Libby




Mining in Libby dates back to the gold rush. Gold miners in the area discovered vermiculite in 1881. 





In 1919, E.N. Alley bought the claims for the resources in the Vermiculite Mountain deposit. Alley's company began mining vermiculite and called itself Zonolite. 





The Zonolite Company operated in Libby until 1963 when W.R. Grace bought it. The new company continued the operation uninterrupted and kept producing vermiculite ore and concentrate until the mine shut down in 1990.





Even before W.R. Grace took over operations at the mine, workers in the facility had complained of lung problems. Many workers died. The company, at the time, did not acknowledge that these illnesses and deaths were in any way related to the mine. W.R. Grace has since been accused of knowing about the presence of asbestos in the vermiculite it mined and failing to warn workers of the risks.





The W.R. Grace mine in Libby produced about 80% of the world's vermiculite while it operated. It shipped harmful, asbestos-contaminated vermiculite to processing facilties throughout the U.S. This put workers in many locations at risk of asbestos exposure, not just in Libby. 





The EPA responded to concerns about the mine beginning in 1999. By 2002, it had listed the area as a Superfund site on the National Priorities List. 





The EPA declared Libby a Public Health Emergency in 2009, the first time the agency had ever made that declaration. This allowed people affected by the mine to receive federal health care assistance. 





The EPA completed cleanup of the majority of the Libby site in 2018. All that remained was to tackle the mine itself and nearby forested areas. 




About Vermiculite and Asbestos



Both vermiculite and asbestos are natural minerals that can be mined from deposits in the earth. 



What Is Vermiculite?



Vermiculite is a mineral that expands when heated, known as exfoliation. It was used in molded boards for fireproofing, soundproofing, or heat insulation. 



It can also be used in other construction materials, as a soil-free growing medium, or mixed into the soil. These are just a few of the more common uses for vermiculite.



What Is Asbestos? 



Asbestos is a similar set of minerals with similar properties. Companies used it to make insulation and add strength and fireproofing to construction and ship materials, brakes and clutches, and industrial equipment. 



Asbestos is extremely harmful to health. Asbestos fibers can lodge in the body and cause life-threatening illnesses, including malignant mesothelioma, lung cancer, or asbestosis. 



What Type of Asbestos Is in Libby, MT? 



The Libby mine is contaminated with a type of asbestos called tremolite-actinolite series. The specific asbestos in Libby has come to be known as Libby Amphibole asbestos, or LA. 



This kind of asbestos is highly friable, which means it sheds fibers very easily. This characteristic makes Libby asbestos very harmful to human health. 



How Has Libby Vermiculite and Asbestos Affected People? 



Decades of operation at the Libby mine took a toll on miners and the people in the nearby town. The mine is located just seven miles outside the town of Libby. The asbestos in the mine affected miners but also residents in the town nearby and workers in vermiculite plants nationwide. 



Asbestos Diseases in Miners



The miners have been affected the most, with many getting sick with asbestosis, a progressive lung scarring disease, lung cancer, or mesothelioma. 



These illnesses usually take decades to manifest, so the total impact of the asbestos in the mine is still not fully known. Someone who worked in the mine 40 years ago may now get sick.



One study found that death from asbestosis among Libby miners was 165 times higher than in the general population. 



In the same study, researchers found that 18 percent of people living in Libby had pleural abnormalities in chest X-rays. These were consistent with asbestos exposure. More than half of the miners had these abnormalities.



Asbestos and Libby Residents



The initial EPA study of the area found Libby Amphibole asbestos fibers in indoor and outdoor air, vermiculite insulation and other materials, soil, water, and indoor dust. Fibers were also found in fish and animal tissue in the area. 



All of this contamination put residents of Libby and the surrounding area at risk of exposure and resulting illnesses. 



Among both miners and residents, overall asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma rates were much higher than the national average over 20 years of study.



The town of Libby has a population of only about 2,600. Some reports have indicated that nearly 200 people died because of asbestos, and another 1,000 are sick to some extent.



Asbestos at Vermiculite Processing Sites



While the miners and those who lived near the mine were most affected by Libby vermiculite, people around the country were also at risk of exposure to asbestos because of W.R. Grace. 



The mine produced most of the vermiculite used in the U.S. at the time. It operated and shipped out millions of tons of vermiculite concentrate to facilities that processed it and made it into products like insulation.



The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) evaluated 28 Libby vermiculite processing sites. The ATSDR chose these sites because they processed large amounts of Libby vermiculite, and the EPA designated them as sites that need further cleaning.



The evaluation ultimately found that asbestos dust is still an issue in the facilities that processed Libby vermiculite. People who worked in these facilities risked harmful asbestos exposure.



Is Vermiculite Insulation Safe?



Numerous homes and other buildings in the U.S.  still contain vermiculite insulation that originated in Libby, which means these homes likely contain asbestos. During the years that the mine operated, Libby produced 70 percent of all vermiculite used in the U.S.



Any vermiculite insulation from 1919 and 1990 is likely to be the contaminated Libby material. The EPA recommends that homeowners treat any vermiculite insulation as if it contains asbestos and have it handled and abated by a professional asbestos worker.



Asbestos Lawsuits Over W.R. Grace and Libby Asbestos



Workers, residents, and family members have filed lawsuits and made compensation claims. Victims and their lawyers have claimed W.R. Grace knew about the risks of working and living near the mine yet did not warn workers or provide safety equipment or training. The state of Montana and its insurer has also faced lawsuits and fines. 




W.R. Grace initially faced about 150 asbestos lawsuits. It settled most of these, while a few went to trial. 





W.R. Grace filed for bankruptcy in 2001, creating an asbestos trust fund as part of the process. The company tried to protect its assets in subsidiaries. The Department of Justice found this move fraudulent. It required W.R. Grace to fund an asbestos trust with $1.8 million. 





A lawsuit involving about 1,300 plaintiffs resulted in a $43 million settlement from the state of Montana. The state began making payments to the plaintiffs in 2012, ten years after they started the lawsuit. 





The state was again required to pay victims as the result of a lawsuit settled in 2017. This suit involved more than 100 plaintiffs and resulted in a $25 million settlement. Plaintiffs and their lawyers argued that Montana health officials knew about the dangers of the W.R. Grace mine but did nothing to protect residents. 





In 2023, W.R. Grace and the state of Montana reached a settlement after years of negotiations. The company agreed to pay $18.5 million to the state for damage to natural resources. 





Although W.R. Grace went bankrupt, some victims continue to fight for compensation from the company's insurer. In 2022, Ralph Hutt, a former miner, won a jury award of $36.5 million to be paid by Maryland Casualty Company, which provided workers' compensation insurance for W.R. Grace. 





In 2021, the Montana Supreme Court made an important decision that would help compensate more victims. The Court affirmed earlier rulings that the state's insurer must pay $98 million, funds that will go to exposure victims. 





In 2023, the Center for Asbestos Related Disease (CARD) was ordered to pay $6 million in fines and damages to the government. CARD was set up as a clinic to help local victims of asbestos exposure. CARD was found guilty of submitting hundreds of false claims. It filed for bankruptcy after the ruling. 




Libby Asbestos Site Cleanup Activities



The Libby mine is listed as an EPA Superfund site. Most of the site has been remediated. The EPA delisted areas of the site in 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022. 



The EPA conducted a final risk assessment in 2015 and declared the indoor and outdoor cleanup efforts successful. 



As of 2018, the EPA finished cleaning more than 2,600 properties in the area. This includes Libby and the city of Troy, about 20 miles from downtown Libby. The EPA has removed over one million cubic yards of asbestos-contaminated soil from the area. 



The areas that the EPA has completed remediating in and around Libby and Troy include all: 




Schools



Parks



Residences



Commercial buildings



Vermiculite processing plants



Public areas




Is Libby, Montana, Safe From Asbestos Today? 



The town of Libby and most of the surrounding area is much safer today. According to the EPA, the amount of asbestos in the air downtown is 100,000 times less than when the mine operated. 



The surrounding forests are still contaminated and continue to pose a risk. When soil and dust become airborne, asbestos fibers can blow into town and expose residents.



This risk became clear in August 2023 when forest fires began burning in Libby's so-called Asbestos Forest. That part of the fire was dealt with aggressively. Ash from the fire likely contains asbestos and could be carried to nearby areas by the wind. 



Seeking Legal Help After Asbestos Exposure in Libby



If you believe that you were exposed to asbestos and got sick due to that exposure, and you can trace that exposure to Libby vermiculite, you may have a case to make against W.R. Grace. 



The company still sees lawsuits, and many victims have successfully won settlements.



Contact an experienced Libby mesothelioma or asbestos lawyer to find out if you have a case. Find out what steps you need to take next to get justice for yourself or a loved one.

### Georgia-Pacific

Georgia-Pacific is most well-known for its paper products, but it also makes building and construction products, chemicals, mining products, and aerospace products. Many of Georgia-Pacific's past products, especially Bestwall products, contained asbestos. The company now faces thousands of asbestos lawsuits.  





Did Georgia-Pacific Use Asbestos? 



Georgia-Pacific's connection to asbestos comes from the acquisition of Bestwall Gypsum. Bestwall made construction materials with asbestos for many years, even after Georgia-Pacific bought the company. 



Georgia-Pacific History



The history of paper giant Georgia-Pacific dates back to 1927. Founder Owen Robertson Cheatham began the company as the Georgia Hardwood Lumber Company in Augusta. The hardwood lumber wholesale company also opened and operated sawmills.




In the 1940s, the company supplied more lumber to the war effort than any other company. After the war, it expanded westward, opening a facility in Bellingham, Washington. 





In 1948, the company's name changed to Georgia-Pacific Plywood and Lumber Company, shortened to Georgia-Pacific Corporation in 1956.





In 1957, Georgia-Pacific entered the paper and pulp manufacturing industry with its first pulp and liner board mill opening in Toledo, Oregon. In 1963, the company made its first tissues with the Coronet brand.





Over the next several decades, Georgia-Pacific continued to grow and acquire more businesses along the way, including Bestwall Gypsum in 1965. Bestwall products contained asbestos until the 1980s.





In 2005, Koch Industries bought Georgia-Pacific Corporation for $21 billion. It remains operational as a subsidiary of Koch. 




What Georgia-Pacific Products Contained Asbestos? 



Georgia-Pacific has been held liable for asbestos exposure due primarily to Bestwall Gypsum products. It acquired the company in the 1960s and continued to use asbestos in Bestwall products through the 1970s. 



Bestwall Gypsum made drywall and the first-ever gypsum wallboard, called Beaver Products’ Bestwall. It was a popular building material used beginning in the late 1920s and throughout the 1940s.



When Georgia-Pacific bought Bestwall, it continued manufacturing asbestos-containing products. This was around the time when companies were learning that asbestos was causing health problems in workers, although research about the harmful asbestos dates back centuries before then.



Gypsum is not harmful, but the Bestwall products included asbestos fibers. These were mixed into the gypsum to add strength, insulation, and fireproofing. 



Some of the Bestwall/Georgia-Pacific products that contained asbestos include: 




Acoustical plaster



Bedding compound



Ceiling texture



Central mix



Drywall



Drywall adhesive



Joint compound



Kalite



Laminating compound



Roof coating



Spackling compound



Topping compound



Wallboard joint compound




Who Was at Risk of Asbestos Exposure From Georgia-Pacific? 



The use of asbestos in these gypsum products provided useful qualities for building materials but also put many people at risk of serious health problems. Asbestos fibers can be easily inhaled or ingested when released into the air.



Once in the body, the fibers become lodged in tissues and cause damage that, over many years, can lead to the development of lung cancer, mesothelioma, a rare type of cancer, and asbestosis, a progressive scarring of lung tissue.



Many workers were exposed to asbestos because of Bestwall and Georgia-Pacific products. Workers who manufactured the materials worked directly with asbestos, mixing it with gypsum.



Before the dangers were known, these workers lacked protective safety gear. They were at serious risk of inhaling the fibers and bringing them home on their clothing to contaminate family members.



Another group at risk is construction workers. This is a much bigger group because it includes anyone who worked with or around the asbestos products made by Bestwall and Georgia-Pacific. 



The group also includes drywall workers who worked directly with the products, but also all other types of workers on building construction sites:




Laborers



Carpenters



Electricians



Plumbers



HVAC workers




One particular hazard was that these workers sanded the dried joint compound, causing asbestos fibers to become airborne. This activity put anyone working in the area at risk of inhaling the fibers. 



Anyone who did renovation or remodeling work on an older home that contains these asbestos materials is also at risk of developing mesothelioma.



Georgia-Pacific Asbestos Lawsuits



Georgia-Pacific has been fighting asbestos lawsuits for years. People exposed who later got sick have sued the company for damages.  



For example, a Florida man who sued the company ended in a jury award of $9.4 million to the victim. 



As a construction worker, Ron Taylor worked as a painting supervisor in the 1970s. He worked with Georgia-Pacific and Bestwall joint compound.



Taylor described being covered in dust most days from the sanding down of the joint compound. He was ultimately diagnosed with mesothelioma. 



Taylor sought $29 million but was awarded $9.4 million by the jury, which found that he was partly liable and that Georgia-Pacific was primarily liable for his illness.



Georgia-Pacific Fraudulent Asbestos Research 



Facing thousands of lawsuits and claims, Georgia-Pacific conducted a secret, fraudulent research program hoping to prove that its products did not cause cancer, according to reports. 



The company hired experts to conduct the studies and publish the desired evidence. Ultimately, 18 scientists were paid over $6 million to do this work. 



A New York appeals court determined that this practice would likely result in fraud. The study results were likely to be manipulated to help Georgia-Pacific limit its liability. 



Georgia-Pacific Asbestos Bankruptcy Controversy



Georgia-Pacific has continued to face controversy over how it has handled asbestos claims. As part of Koch Industries, the company has tried to dodge liability by performing the Texas Two-Step legal maneuver. 



This involves spinning off a subsidiary to hold the company's asbestos liabilities. That subsidiary then files for bankruptcy, halting all lawsuits against the parent company. It is controversial because it delays and limits the ability of asbestos illness victims to get the compensation they need for medical bills. 



In 2023, asbestos victims and their lawyers tried to halt the Georgia-Pacific subsidiary's bankruptcy so that they could continue their lawsuits. A court ruled in June that the stay on lawsuits could continue as Georgia-Pacific proceeds with the bankruptcy process. 



How to Seek Compensation if You Were Exposed to Georgia-Pacific Asbestos



If you worked with Georgia-Pacific or Bestwall asbestos products, you can rely on an experienced and compassionate mesothelioma lawyer to help you file a lawsuit and seek compensation.



Lawsuits against Georgia-Pacific are currently paused, but there may be other ways to recover damages. A lawyer can review your work history and find all the companies potentially liable for your illness. You could be eligible for asbestos trust fund claims or lawsuits against other companies. 



Legal Help



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don’t forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. 

### Nutrition Tips for Mesothelioma Patients

Nutrition is important for everyone, especially those battling aggressive cancers like mesothelioma. Cancer and its treatments trigger muscle and weight loss and even nutritional deficits. Nutrition tips for mesothelioma patients include working with a dietician and focusing on healing foods. 



Any form of treatment for mesothelioma can get extremely expensive. With chemotherapy, treatment sessions (along with medication) can quickly add up to prices that are usually above the average family’s budget. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 





Why Nutrition Is Important for Cancer Patients



Patients with mesothelioma, lung cancer, or any type of cancer should pay special attention to nutrition for several reasons:




A healthy diet helps a patient maintain optimal health, which makes cancer treatment more effective and more tolerable. 



A healthy diet boosts immunity. Cancer patients are vulnerable to illness and infections. 



Getting adequate nutrition helps patients avoid losing weight and important body tissue and avoid or prevent getting infections. 



Good nutrition is also important for helping patients avoid or find some relief from the symptoms of cancer and the side effects of cancer treatment, improving quality of life. 



Being well-nourished may actually improve a cancer patient’s odds of survival and overall prognosis.




Malnutrition and undernutrition are common in cancer patients. Being malnourished is bad for anyone, but for a mesothelioma patient, malnourishment can increase the risk of:  




A poor quality of life



Uncomfortable side effects from treatments



Complications from surgery



Weight loss and muscle wasting



Being unable to tolerate or continue treatments




What Is Good Nutrition?



Good nutrition means eating a balanced diet that provides an adequate intake of calories for a healthy weight. It also means getting the right balance of macronutrients like fats, proteins, and carbohydrates. 



You'll also need good amounts of micronutrients like vitamins and minerals. Avoid harmful foods, such as sweets, and foods fried in unhealthy grease. 



Most people need to eat a good mix of lean proteins, healthy fats, vegetables, fruits, complex carbohydrates, or whole grains.



What Is Good Nutrition for Cancer Patients?



Good nutrition for a cancer patient is not always exactly the same as for someone who is healthy. Cancer may impact how the body digests and uses nutrients from food, depending on the type. 



For instance, someone with peritoneal mesothelioma may have a large abdominal tumor that affects the release of nutrients into the bloodstream.



Most cancer treatment treatment also impacts nutrition, often because the side effects make it difficult to eat. Chemotherapy, for example, causes mouth sores, making eating painful.



The complexity of living with mesothelioma and going through treatments is why it is important to work with an experienced dietician or nutritionist. 



Is There a Best Diet for Mesothelioma? 



No single diet works best for every patient. Broadly, there are certain foods mesothelioma patients should include in their diets and foods they should avoid. The details, however, depend on individual needs. 



In general, a good diet for a mesothelioma patient includes: 




A good balance of nutrients



Plenty of fruits and vegetables



Whole grains



Lean proteins



Healthy fats



More whole foods than processed foods




Foods to Promote Healing



Cancer patients should try to load their plates with foods that combat inflammation and other factors that may promote cancer growth. 



Some of the foods that promote healing and can help cancer patients enjoy optimal health include: 




All fruits and vegetables



Dark, leafy greens



Tomatoes



Berries



Olive oil



Nuts



Fatty fish




What Foods Should You Avoid With Mesothelioma? 



Good nutrition is about eating the right foods and avoiding the wrong foods. For anyone, including cancer patients, it is important to avoid or restrict foods that contain carcinogens, compounds known to cause cancer and foods that promote inflammation in the body. 



These foods have the opposite effect of healing foods and can make a cancer patient feel worse or heal more slowly.



Some examples of carcinogens in food include compounds called HCAs, found in the charring on grilled or overcooked meat, and nitrites and nitrates, which are used as preservatives in some meats, especially deli meats. 



Researchers found a correlation between red meat consumption and higher cancer risks, so limiting meat is often recommended for anyone.



It is also best to avoid foods that cause inflammation. Low-grade, chronic inflammation in the body has been linked to cancer risk and is most often associated with being overweight or obese. 



Foods that promote or trigger inflammation in the body include:




Refined carbohydrates, such as white bread and sugar



Fried foods



Red meat



Soda



Margarine



Saturated fats



Processed meats 



Alcohol




Dietary Supplements for Mesothelioma



Supplements can provide essential benefits for mesothelioma patients. It is important to talk to your medical team before trying any supplements. A supplement might interfere with a medication or cause other issues. 



Certain supplements are generally considered safe and could help you feel better or promote healing: 




Ginger has long been used to manage nausea and indigestion. 



Fish oil supplements can make it easier to get more healthy fats in your diet and reduce inflammation. 



High-calorie supplements, like shakes, can help cancer patients slow or reverse weight loss. 



Fiber supplements can regulate bowel movements and also reduce inflammation.  




How Can Nutrition Manage Mesothelioma Treatment Side Effects? 



A healthy diet that avoids carcinogens and inflammatory foods and includes plenty of healing foods is essential for everyone. For cancer patients, though, a healthy diet often means considering specific factors, particularly the side effects of treatment strategies and the nutritional deficits that these treatments may cause. 



Here are some examples of common complaints mesothelioma patients have that dietary strategies can help manage:




Dry mouth. Hard candy and gum have helped some people with dry mouth issues. Also helpful is eating foods with sauce or gravy or pureeing foods to make swallowing easier. Avoid alcohol and smoking.





Diarrhea. Foods that are lower in fiber and fat can help combat diarrhea. Also important in balancing nutrition is to increase fluid, sodium, and potassium intake.





Constipation. On the flip side, combating constipation means eating more fiber. Warm drinks also help.





Mouth sores or sore throat. It is difficult to eat with mouth and throat soreness, so being careful to get enough nutrition is important. Nutritional shakes may help, as can avoiding spicy, hot, acidic foods.





Nausea and vomiting. With nausea, it is important to stick with bland foods and foods that don’t have strong odors and to avoid fatty and greasy foods.





Changes in taste and smell. This side effect also makes eating challenging. Trying different foods helps until you find something that is appealing. It also helps to use lemonade or ginger ale to rinse the mouth of the characteristic bitter flavor.





Fatigue. Include lots of fluids, as hydration exacerbates fatigue. Stabilize blood sugar levels by including protein, fat, and fiber in every meal or snack. Good choices include nuts with fruit or cottage cheese with fruit.




Should I Work With an Oncology Dietician?



Since nutrition is such an important part of healing, feeling well, and battling mesothelioma, it makes sense to work with a professional. A dietician is a health professional with training in food, nutrition, and the body.



An oncology dietician is a professional with additional training and experience with nutrition, diet, and cancer patients. This expert can help you figure out what you should be eating every day, which takes the stress of making those choices out of your hands. Check with your medical center or medical team to find out if a dietician is on staff.



An oncology dietician can do more than plan your diet. They also help you choose specific foods that will have beneficial effects. Your dietician can help you choose foods for mitigating the side effects of chemotherapy, for instance, or to help you better respond to treatments, reduce fatigue, or to minimize pain.



Additional Nutrition and Diet Tips for Mesothelioma Patients




Include plenty of protein in your diet to reduce the risk of muscle loss and muscle wasting. 



Eat smaller, more frequent meals if you have digestive issues or a poor appetite. Snack if you feel hungry, even if it is between meal times. 



Let friends or family help you eat better by doing grocery shopping or making healthy meals. 



Eat what tastes good. There are plenty of healthy foods to choose from, so don't force yourself to eat those you don't like. 



Listen to your body and avoid foods that don't make you feel good. 



Prep meals and snacks for a week or several days to avoid reaching for unhealthy foods and snacks. 




Food Safety for Mesothelioma Patients



Food safety is even more important for cancer patients than for healthy individuals. If you have cancer and are going through certain treatments, your immune system could be compromised. You are more likely to get sick and may have a harder time recovering from illnesses and infections. 



Food safety tips can reduce the risk of getting sick from any of the foods you eat: 




Wash fresh produce with soap and water. Rinse it thoroughly. 



Wash your hands before preparing food and before eating. 



Only eat foods that have been thoroughly cooked. Use a thermometer to check the temperatures of cooked meats. 



Avoid cross-contamination. Keep raw meat separate from other foods and wash utensils after using them on raw meat. 



Do not consume unpasteurized dairy products. 



Be aware of sell-by dates on foods. 



Store food properly and date it to avoid eating anything that has gone bad. 




Good nutrition is vital to overall health and wellness, but it takes on a new level of importance for someone living with mesothelioma. If you are battling this or another type of cancer, you can use food to aid your treatment, improve your ability to heal and recover, and generally enjoy a better quality of life.



If you feel lost when deciding what and how to eat, rely on the professional guidance of a licensed and experienced dietician.

### Benefits of Chiropractic Care for Patients with Mesothelioma

The benefits of chiropractic care for patients with mesothelioma include pain management, stress relief, improved mobility, and more. Talk to your medical team about using chiropractic care to supplement standard medical treatments for mesothelioma. 



Keep in mind that if you’ve been exposed to asbestos and have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to considerable compensation. Right now, more than $30 billion is available in trust funds for those affected by asbestos. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on knowledgeable mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more.













What Is Chiropractic Care?



Chiropractors are trained and licensed practitioners of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) dedicated to working with the body's musculoskeletal system. This means that chiropractors examine, diagnose, and treat patients, often in conjunction with a traditional physician.



What Do Chiropractors Do With Patients? 



Chiropractors treat symptoms and conditions by applying controlled forces to the body, most often to the spine. The spine is the primary area of focus in chiropractic care because of its relationship to the central nervous system. Physical manipulation of the spine can improve mobility, resulting in less pain. 



Many chiropractors also offer massage therapy, nutrition guidance, and advice for other lifestyle changes. These additional offerings make chiropractic care a holistic approach to wellness. 



Chiropractors treat symptoms and conditions without the use of drugs or surgery. Chiropractic care cannot treat everything, but it can be a valuable and beneficial supplement to traditional medicine.



Can Cancer and Mesothelioma Patients Go to a Chiropractor? 



Mesothelioma should be treated with traditional medicine. However, patients often get more relief from symptoms when they include a variety of specialists in their medical teams. There is plenty of evidence that certain CAM practitioners can help improve symptoms for mesothelioma patients.



If you have mesothelioma and are interested in chiropractic care, talk to your doctor and medical team about it beforehand. Your oncologist may even have a chiropractor to recommend.



While chiropractic care can help you and bring additional relief, there are limitations and risks too. You need to be sure you can withstand the physical manipulations a chiropractor will use and that your practitioner will understand your limitations and unique needs as a cancer patient.



 If you take all of these things into consideration, you could receive many benefits of chiropractic care.



What Are the Benefits of Chiropractic Care for Mesothelioma Patients? 



Not only can mesothelioma patients see a chiropractor, but they can also potentially get a lot of benefits from it. 



Chiropractic Care Reduces Pain



Pain is the number one reason that people visit chiropractors for care. It is well documented in research that chiropractic manipulation can reduce pain, especially back pain, neck pain, and headaches. 



Mesothelioma patients experience pain, sometimes from cancer itself, such as when tumors push against the spine, and sometimes from the treatments.



Chiropractors may not be able to eliminate pain for these patients, but they are likely to reduce it.



Increase Mobility



A serious consequence of chronic pain is limited mobility. For a patient with mesothelioma, being in pain can seriously limit mobility, which in turn limits activity. 



When chiropractic care can make a dent in that chronic and sometimes debilitating pain, it means that patients can move more, be more active, and do at least some of the things they used to do before getting sick.



Limit Pain Medications



In one study of cancer patients treated by chiropractors, researchers found that the patients reduced the narcotic painkillers they took while receiving chiropractic care.



These prescription painkillers cause their own side effects and can also be habit-forming. By reducing pain, chiropractic care can also reduce the need for these drugs. 



Anxiety and Stress Reduction



Chiropractic care has also been proven to reduce negative emotions. Being in pain and being immobile can contribute to anxiety, stress, and depression. 



By relieving that pain and helping mesothelioma patients regain some mobility, chiropractors can help them reduce stress, anxiety, and depression and elevate their mood.



Fight Nausea and Indigestion



Mesothelioma and its treatments, like chemotherapy, can cause a range of symptoms and side effects. These may include digestive tract symptoms like indigestion, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. 



Studies show that chiropractic manipulations impact the nervous system and that this, in turn, can have a therapeutic effect on the digestive system, reducing symptoms like nausea and indigestion.



Better Nutrition



Nutrition is often a concern for mesothelioma patients for several reasons. Symptoms like nausea and vomiting make eating difficult. Chemotherapy reduces appetite, and certain medications can reduce the absorption of nutrients from food.



Most chiropractors have received nutrition training and take a holistic approach to treating patients. They can counsel mesothelioma patients about nutrition and what to eat for maximum benefits. 



Better Quality of Life



With mesothelioma, there is no cure. Patients are living with limited time. The most important thing that CAM can do for a patient is improve the time a patient has left. The many benefits of chiropractic care combine to provide cancer patients a better quality of life than they would otherwise have.



These patients can live a better life with less pain, less stress, better sleep, better nutrition, and greater mobility, which allows them to be more active and enjoy life more.



Chiropractic Care and Massage Therapy



Chiropractors approach patient care from a holistic perspective, which means embracing other care types, including massage. Chiropractors often work together with massage therapists to help patients feel better. 



As with chiropractic care, massage therapy has been proven to help cancer patients find relief from pain and immobility and enjoy a better quality of life.



If a chiropractor is limited in treating a patient, they may turn to a massage therapist to help the patient.



Chiropractic Care as Part of Medical Care



Many physicians consider chiropractic care legitimate health care. If you think chiropractic care could help you feel better, talk to your physician about it. Most insurance plans cover chiropractic care since it's recognized as medical care.



This type of care can improve quality of life, from pain relief to better nutrition and reduced stress. Be sure to talk to your medical team before beginning treatment and take their recommendations for a trained professional experienced in working with patients being treated for cancer.



Chiropractic care is not a substitute for traditional care, but it is a supplement that can provide many benefits.



Is Chiropractic Care Right for Me? 



Talk to your doctors before trying any kind of complementary treatment. Chiropractic care can provide a lot of benefits, but there might be important reasons it's not a good choice for you. Only your medical team can advise you on how effective or safe chiropractic care is for you.

### Mesothelioma and the Benefits of Massage Therapy

The benefits of massage therapy for mesothelioma patients range from pain relief and increased mobility to relief from stress and anxiety. Talk to your medical team before trying massage therapy. It may not be suitable for every cancer patient. 



Keep in mind that if you’ve been exposed to asbestos and have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to considerable compensation. Right now, more than $30 billion is available in trust funds for those affected by asbestos. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on knowledgeable mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more.









What Is Massage Therapy?



Massage therapy is different from just a casual massage. It's considered a part of medicine, often under complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). 



Massage therapists are trained and licensed therapists, many of whom work with chiropractors or physicians to provide additional treatment to patients. 



While some people may get massages simply because it feels nice, others use massage therapy to treat real conditions and symptoms. 



Massage therapy involves rubbing and manipulating muscles, skin, tendons, and ligaments to produce specific results. These may include reducing the pain caused by a sports injury or reducing stress to lower blood pressure. 



There are also specialties in massage therapy, such as medical, sports, or spinal health massage. Regardless of the specialization, all massage therapists tailor their treatment to each individual patient’s needs and health goals.



What Are the Benefits of Massage Therapy?



The benefits of massage therapy are varied and numerous. Studies have proven that massage can provide significant health benefits to a variety of patients:




Improve mood and reduce anxiety and stress



Reduce pain (including headaches and back pain)



Improve digestion and digestive disorders



Improve healing and help injuries heal faster




Evidence from some studies shows that this last benefit may be because massage stimulates the immune system and helps it work better and more efficiently. 



Oncology Massage Therapists



The general health benefits of massage have been proven in studies, but these benefits can also extend to specific health conditions, including cancer. Oncology massage therapists specialize in treating cancer patients, including those with mesothelioma.



Oncology massage therapists are practitioners of oncology massage. They are educated on cancer, what it does to the body, how treatments work, and the side effects of treatment. 



They work with patients to develop individualized treatment plans that help them feel better and meet specific targets, such as reducing pain and improving mobility.



There are some risks and limitations to practicing massage therapy with cancer patients. A patient with mesothelioma may be more fragile or at risk for pain than a healthy patient or may have tender spots from treatment or tumors that need to be treated gently or avoided.



It is important that oncology massage therapists work with a patient’s medical team and learn all about the specific needs and limitations of the therapy.



The Benefits of Oncology Massage for Mesothelioma Patients 



The general health benefits of massage therapy are well documented, but there are also specific reasons that mesothelioma patients might try to reap the benefits of massage. 



Underlying all of these benefits is the fact that together, they give cancer patients a better quality of life:



Massage Reduces Stress and Anxiety



There is no question that patients living with a diagnosis of mesothelioma are suffering physically as well as emotionally. To have terminal cancer, to be sick, and to suffer symptoms and side effects of treatment is emotionally draining. 



Studies have found that massage therapy reduces negative emotions, especially stress and anxiety. Mesothelioma patients can benefit from regular massage for this reason, but also before frightening procedures.



Massage Therapy Mitigates Treatment Side Effects



The effects of cancer are physical as well as emotional, but treatments also cause the symptoms. Chemotherapy, in particular, causes fatigue and nausea. 



Massage therapy has been shown to increase energy and reduce fatigue. It may also help patients regain mobility more quickly after having a surgical procedure.



Drain Fluid Buildup



Many cancer patients deal with excess fluid resulting from tumors and inflammation. Fluid buildup can be uncomfortable or even painful. Manual lymphatic drainage is a massage therapy technique that can effectively reduce excess fluid. 



Massage Improves Recovery



Massage therapy cannot directly treat cancer, but studies have shown that it affects immune system action. Mesothelioma patients face slow recovery times after receiving chemotherapy, radiation, or surgical procedures.



Massage therapy can help the body heal faster and speed up recovery time. Massage even helps patients recover more quickly from being under general anesthesia.



Massage Provides a Better Quality of Life



Living with mesothelioma means living in discomfort, in pain, in some cases with limited mobility, and in most cases with added stress and anxiety. 



When massage therapy can reduce some of these side effects of having cancer, it gives patients a better quality of life. It allows a patient to do more, thanks to reduced fatigue and less pain; it helps patients sleep better because of stress reduction. 



Massage can also help people cope better with the struggles of having cancer because it boosts mood and reduces anxiety.



What Are the Risks of Massage Therapy for Cancer Patients?



While there are clear benefits to using oncology massage for patients with cancer, there are also some limitations. 



Patients with cancer are at a greater risk of experiencing adverse events from massage. These could include: 




Bruising



Internal hemorrhaging



Bleeding through wounds



Infections



Increased pain



Bone fractures




One risk you do not need to worry about is a myth that sometimes circulates about massage therapy. No evidence supports the idea that massage increases the risk of metastasis. 



Choosing an Oncology Massage Therapist



In addition to the benefits of massage therapy for a mesothelioma patient, there are limitations and a few risks. 



Massage may cause more pain if not done correctly. It could cause bleeding, bruising, and infections. Massage may worsen wounds or, in extreme cases, cause bone fractures.



Minimize the risks by selecting a trained, licensed massage therapist experienced in working with cancer patients. 



A trained professional will know how to avoid certain places on a patient’s body, where and when to use gentler movements, and how to work with the medical team to determine a patient’s needs and limitations. 



Work with your doctor or other members of your medical team to find a good oncology massage therapist. Your doctors are likely to know of trained massage therapists and may even work with one or two, and recommend them to patients. 



Even if you choose a therapist unrelated to your medical team, talk to your doctor about it, and keep all members of the medical team in the loop so that you get the best all-around care.



There are so many important benefits of massage therapy for mesothelioma patients. To complement traditional treatments, use massage therapy to help mitigate pain and other treatment side effects, have more energy and mobility and be better equipped to cope emotionally with living with and battling cancer.

### FREE Financial Compensation Packet - Mesothelioma Compensation Guide

If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma or another asbestos-related disease like COPD, a Free Financial Compensation Packet can provide the guidance you need. This comprehensive resource includes information on how to file a claim, details about asbestos trust funds, and insights into legal rights for victims of asbestos exposure. It also explains potential compensation amounts, eligibility criteria, and steps to secure benefits for medical expenses, lost wages, and more. Request your free packet today to take the first step toward financial security and justice for you and your family.











FREE Financial Compensation Packet




Info on law firms that will recover your HIGHEST COMPENSATION



Learn how to get paid in 90 days



File for your share of $30 billion in trust funds








Mesothelioma Compensation Guide



Mesothelioma compensation is designed to help individuals and families affected by this rare cancer manage medical costs, lost income, and other expenses. Compensation can come from various sources, including settlements, verdicts, trust funds, and workers' compensation. Settlement amounts vary widely depending on factors such as the severity of the illness, the level of negligence by the responsible party, and jurisdiction, but they often range from hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars in payouts. Trust funds, established by bankrupt asbestos companies, provide additional resources, though payouts depend on the fund’s policies and the claimant’s exposure history. Understanding the types of compensation available is crucial for victims seeking justice and financial security. Call or fill out a form today!



Mesothelioma Disability Claims: Securing Benefits for Patients



Mesothelioma disability claims provide financial support to individuals diagnosed with this debilitating disease, helping them manage lost income and ongoing medical expenses. Patients with mesothelioma from asbestos exposure are often eligible for disability benefits through government programs like Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) in the United States, which recognizes mesothelioma as a qualifying condition. To file a claim, individuals need to provide medical records confirming their diagnosis and evidence linking it to their work history or asbestos exposure. Additionally, veterans exposed to asbestos during military service may qualify for disability benefits through the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Consulting with a legal or claims expert can ensure a smoother application process and maximize benefits for those affected.









What Are Asbestos Trust Funds for Mesothelioma?



Asbestos trust funds are financial reserves established by companies that used asbestos products but filed for bankruptcy to compensate victims of asbestos-related diseases, including mesothelioma. These funds ensure that individuals diagnosed with mesothelioma can still receive compensation even if the responsible company is no longer operational. With over $30 billion available across various trusts, claimants can file for compensation by proving their exposure history, diagnosis, and connection to the bankrupt company. Payout amounts vary depending on the trust's guidelines and the severity of the illness, with individual payouts typically ranging from $7,000 to $200,000 or more. Filing a claim can be complex, but experienced attorneys can streamline the process and help secure the compensation victims deserve.



Understanding Mesothelioma Compensation Amounts



Mesothelioma compensation amounts vary widely depending on factors such as the severity of the illness, the strength of the evidence, and the type of compensation pursued. Settlements, the most common form of compensation, typically range from $1 million to $2.4 million, offering quicker payouts without the need for a lengthy trial. Jury verdicts, while less predictable, can result in higher awards, sometimes exceeding $10 million, especially in cases with clear negligence or egregious misconduct by asbestos manufacturers. Asbestos trust fund payouts, designed to support victims even if the responsible company is bankrupt, usually fall between $7,000 and $200,000, depending on the trust’s rules and available funds. Each case is unique, and working with an experienced mesothelioma attorney is key to maximizing compensation.







Questions and Answers About Mesothelioma Compensation



Q: What is mesothelioma compensation?A: Mesothelioma compensation refers to financial payouts awarded to individuals diagnosed with mesothelioma due to asbestos exposure. This compensation helps cover medical expenses, lost income, and other damages resulting from the illness.







Q: Who is eligible for mesothelioma compensation?A: Individuals diagnosed with mesothelioma due to direct or secondary asbestos exposure, as well as their family members, may be eligible. Eligibility often depends on proving the source of exposure and the responsible party’s liability.







Q: What types of compensation are available?A: Compensation can come from settlements, jury verdicts, asbestos trust funds, workers’ compensation, and veterans’ benefits. Each source has specific eligibility requirements and payout structures.







Q: How much can I receive in a mesothelioma compensation case?A: Compensation amounts vary widely, with settlements averaging $1 million to $2.4 million, while trust fund payouts may range from $7,000 to $200,000. Jury verdicts can sometimes exceed $10 million, but outcomes depend on the specifics of the case.







Q: How long does it take to receive mesothelioma compensation?A: Settlement cases typically resolve within 6-12 months, while trust fund claims may take a few months. Trials leading to verdicts can take years due to court processes.







Q: Do I need an attorney to file for mesothelioma compensation?A: While not required, working with an experienced mesothelioma attorney greatly improves the chances of receiving fair compensation. They can navigate complex legal processes, gather evidence, and negotiate effectively.







Q: Can I still get compensation if the company responsible for my exposure is bankrupt?A: Yes, many bankrupt asbestos companies have set up trust funds to compensate victims. You can file a claim with these trusts if you meet their eligibility requirements.







Q: Is mesothelioma compensation taxable?A: Generally, compensation for physical injuries or illnesses, including mesothelioma settlements and trust fund payouts, is not taxable under U.S. law. However, some exceptions may apply, such as punitive damages or lost wages. Consult a tax professional for details.







Q: Can family members receive compensation if the victim has passed away?A: Yes, family members can file a wrongful death claim on behalf of a loved one who passed away due to mesothelioma. This compensation helps cover funeral costs, lost income, and other damages.







Q: How do I start the process of filing for mesothelioma compensation?A: Begin by consulting an experienced mesothelioma attorney. They will evaluate your case, identify liable parties, gather evidence, and guide you through the claims or legal process to secure compensation.







Does Submitting the Form Create an Attorney-Client Relationship?



Submitting the form does not establish an attorney-client relationship. It’s important to know that filling out a form is merely the first step in initiating contact with a legal professional.



Here’s what happens when you submit a form:




Initial Evaluation: Your information is reviewed to determine if you have a potential case.



Consultation: You may be contacted for further discussion, providing more context and details.



Formal Agreement: Only when both parties sign an agreement does an attorney-client relationship begin.




Until the formal agreement is signed, you are not legally represented by the attorney. This process ensures your interests are thoroughly evaluated before committing.



Get in Touch



Want to reach out to us? It's simple. Follow the steps below to leave a message or get in contact with our team:




Fill Out Your Details:Start by entering your name, email, and phone number. This helps us know who you are and how we can get back to you.



Write Your Message:Share what you need or the questions you have. The more details, the better we can assist you.



Send Your Request:Once your information is complete, hit the "Contact Us" button. We’ll be on it promptly.




Why Contact Us?




Personalized Assistance: We tailor our response to your unique needs.



Quick Response Times: Expect to hear from us soon after you submit your message.



Comprehensive Support: From inquiries to more detailed concerns, we're here to help.




Need Immediate Help?



For urgent matters, consider calling our customer service team. Phone numbers are often the quickest way to connect for time-sensitive inquiries.



Feel free to reach out—we're here for you!



Reach Out to Us



Are you wondering if our firm offers nationwide representation? Absolutely! Our top rated team is proud to serve clients across the entire country. With over 25 years of experience in various legal fields, we are equipped to help you no matter where you're located.



What We Offer




Free Consultation: Start your journey with a no-obligation consultation to discuss your needs and explore how we can assist you.



Decades of Expertise: Benefit from our extensive knowledge and experience, gathered over more than two decades in the legal industry.



Nationwide Presence: We stand ready to represent clients from coast to coast, ensuring our top-notch legal services are accessible to all.




Feel free to reach out to us for a comprehensive discussion about your case and how we can best support you nationwide. We offer free online appointments and can arrange for representatives to meet you within just one mile of your home. Open Now.



The firms we work with typically boast over 25 years of experience. With more than a quarter-century under their belt, they have cultivated a deep understanding and extensive expertise in their field. This impressive experience enables them to handle complex cases with confidence and proficiency. Whether you're seeking legal advice or another specialized service, you can trust in their well-established track record of success and client satisfaction.



What Are Some Reviews from Past Clients?



Our clients consistently express gratitude for the personalized care and dedication they receive.



One client shared their heartfelt thanks, mentioning that they have never experienced such attentive assistance before. They appreciated having someone truly look out for their best interests, especially during challenging times. This level of support is rare and deeply valued.



Another client recounted a touching moment, reflecting on advice from a loved one. Before passing, this loved one predicted that someone genuinely supportive would step in—and they found that in us. These testimonials highlight the extraordinary commitment we bring to each client relationship.



Feel free to submit your own review and join the many satisfied clients we've had the privilege to assist.

### Settlements and Verdicts We've Won

For over 20 years we've been dedicated to helping asbestos victims. Our years of experience have given us the knowledge and expertise needed to get you and your family ALL the money you're owed.



Click here to fill out our FREE Financial Compensation Packet form to learn about obtaining your own large settlement



*All cases listed below are recoveries for mesothelioma victims. The results are net to clients after attorney fees and expenses.
































































Calculate Your Case Value




Learn more mesothelioma settlements, compensation amounts and what the process looks like here.

### Asbestos and Carpenters

Asbestos exposure in carpenters has long been an issue in the construction industry. The exposure led many to develop deadly diseases, including malignant mesothelioma. Even today, carpenters working in older buildings risk exposure to asbestos materials. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













How Are Carpenters Exposed to Asbestos? 



Carpenters work on construction sites and in homes and other buildings. They work with and manipulate construction materials, many of which contained or still contain asbestos. 



When cutting, sanding, or otherwise handling asbestos materials, fibers of asbestos often come loose. Tiny asbestos fibers become a part of the dust in the air. Workers can easily inhale these fibers if they do not have protective gear. 



This kind of asbestos exposure in carpenters was common in the past when most buildings were made with hundreds of asbestos products.



Asbestos in the Construction Industry



Many industries once used asbestos, some heavily. Few industries used more asbestos than building construction. From pipe insulation and furnaces to roofing and siding, hundreds of construction materials were once made with asbestos. 



The construction industry used asbestos so heavily primarily for its ability to insulate. Asbestos is an excellent insulator. Asbestos reduces energy loss in construction materials and protects against heat and fire. Asbestos was once inexpensive and abundant, so it made sense to use it before the dangers were well known. 



Construction materials that carpenters used and worked around contained asbestos until approximately the 1970s. When the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) began regulating asbestos, manufacturing companies phased it out. 



Are Carpenters Still Exposed to Asbestos Today? 



Asbestos use in construction materials peaked in the middle of the 20th century. Most use of asbestos was phased out by the late 1970s. 



Even though new construction doesn't use asbestos, carpenters are still at risk of exposure. They often work in older buildings doing renovations and remodeling. Many of these buildings contain old asbestos materials. 



Carpenters must sand, cut through, and remove asbestos products that contain asbestos, such as insulation and tiles.



Carpenters generally protect themselves today by wearing the appropriate safety gear. In the past, though, many carpenters had no protective gear. 



Studies on Carpenters and Asbestos Exposure



Many studies confirmed what was already suspected by scientists: carpenters have a higher than average chance of asbestos exposure. 



In 1983, over 100 buildings across the U.S. were included in a study involving fireproofing insulation. Most of the buildings in the study were created with asbestos-containing insulation, specifically chrysotile asbestos.



When carpenters began renovating the buildings, they were exposed to around 16 asbestos fibers (dry) per cubic centimeter of space. 



The amount was more than triple the amount of asbestos they were exposed to before starting the projects, which measured at around two fibers per cubic centimeter.



A study published in 1995 by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) stated that pleural plaques were the most prevalent type of asbestos-related injuries sustained by over 600 of the 7,349 carpenters who participated in the research.



Sometimes, it takes only months of asbestos exposure for carpenters to develop an asbestos illness. 



For instance, a 2010 Danish study showed that a man who developed fluid buildup in both lungs had no other cause that a doctor could find aside from working around asbestos for about six months during the 1970s.



In Britain, a study concluded that around 1 in 10 people who worked as carpenters during the 1960s will die from asbestos-related illnesses, particularly malignant mesothelioma. 



Professor Julian Peto, one of the lead researchers on the study, carried out by Cancer Research UK, stated that for several years, asbestos was used with wild abandon in the carpentry industry, and former carpenters are now paying a huge price for the mistakes of others.




"Huge quantities of these asbestos materials were brought in from South Africa. It was being sawed up on every building site without any control at all. It just wasn't appreciated that exposure was heavier and it was far larger numbers of people exposed. It was an error by science and society. We have shown that the risk in some occupations, particularly the building industry, is higher than we previously thought. If you are exposed in your 20s you have a huge lifetime risk of mesothelioma."
Julian Peto



Carpentry and Construction Products Made with Asbestos



Carpenters worked directly with many products made with asbestos. They also worked around other workers, like drywallers or roofers, who disturbed additional asbestos products, putting all workers on a construction site at risk of exposure. 



Carpenters today can still be exposed to asbestos in older materials in buildings that contain asbestos, including: 




Insulation



Vinyl floor tiles and adhesives



Cement pipes



Roofing materials



Siding



Textured paint and ceiling treatments



Patching compounds



Paper and cement sheets around wood-burning stoves



Furnaces



Electrical insulation and shielding




Which Companies Made Asbestos Construction Materials? 



Several manufacturers supplied asbestos-containing products to the carpentry industry in the past. Some of the major asbestos-producing companies include: 




Georgia-Pacific Company: Georgia-Pacific primarily supplied drywall adhesives and joint compounds to the carpentry and construction industry.



National Gypsum: National Gypsum supplied adhesives, blocks of cement, plaster, and roofing materials to the carpentry and construction industry.



Congoleum Corporation: This company mostly supplied different types of asbestos-containing flooring products to the carpentry and construction industry.



Johns Manville: Johns Manville faced some of the biggest lawsuits over asbestos exposure after supplying insulation, roofing materials, siding, cement board, and wallboard made with asbestos. 




Asbestos Carpentry Lawsuits



These companies, as well as many others, faced numerous asbestos lawsuits from carpenters and other construction workers who got sick after exposure to their products. 



These are a few examples of lawsuits won by carpenters exposed to asbestos or their families: 




David Konstantin was a carpenter in the 1970s. He worked in New York and eventually was diagnosed and died from mesothelioma. Konstantin's widow filed a lawsuit over his wrongful death, targeting several companies that made asbestos construction materials. She cited the use of asbestos drywall as a particular source of exposure. She won $8 million in a jury award. 





A carpenter from Mississippi, who worked for a construction company for decades, developed asbestos illnesses. He sued multiple companies and eventually recovered $820,000 in damages. 




How to Seek Compensation if You Were Exposed to Asbestos as a Carpenter



Contact a mesothelioma law firm if you worked as a carpenter during peak asbestos use. They can help you determine your legal options. 



When workers are diagnosed with asbestos illnesses, lawyers can usually track down several companies to hold liable. Carpenters often worked with products made by multiple companies, offering several sources of compensation. 



An experienced lawyer can review your work history and find options for seeking compensation. You might be able to make a claim with an asbestos trust fund or file an asbestos lawsuit to seek damages. 



Additional Information and Resources for Asbestos Victims



Remember, if you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Don’t forget to fill out our form for our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you need additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Asbestos in Home Repair and Remodeling

Asbestos in the home is a major health risk during repairs and renovations. Asbestos materials are dangerous when disturbed and can cause exposure. Know where asbestos might be in the home and work with an abatement professional before doing any work. 







If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more.









Hidden Asbestos Hazards in Electrical Wiring and Residential Construction





https://youtube.com/shorts/4GGuVOR7_l0




Asbestos isn’t limited to insulation and floor tiles—it was also used in unexpected places like electrical wiring. In this short video, David Foster highlights the hidden dangers of asbestos in older residential construction materials, focusing on electrical components that may still be present in homes built before the 1980s.You’ll learn why asbestos was used in wiring, where it might still be hiding, and why even minimal exposure can pose serious health risks. If you're renovating or maintaining an older home, this is essential information for protecting yourself and others.








Why Is Asbestos Dangerous in Home Renovations? 



Asbestos is dangerous when it is friable. Friable means it releases tiny fibers into the air. Anyone around the fibers can inhale or ingest them. Asbestos fibers in the body cause damage and can ultimately lead to very serious illnesses, including mesothelioma, asbestosis, and lung cancer. 



Most homes at one time were built with asbestos materials. Many of those homes still contain original asbestos components. If those materials are in good shape, they don't pose much risk. 



If asbestos products in homes deteriorate or are disturbed by repairs and renovations, they can become friable and cause exposure. Working on asbestos materials in the home can be very dangerous for this reason. 



Does My Home Have Asbestos? 



Many people have no idea if their homes contain asbestos. As a general rule, if a home was built before the 1980s, it could have asbestos. If a house was built after that time, it probably does not contain asbestos. 



An older home renovated after the 1980s might have had asbestos encapsulated or abated (safely removed). Knowing your home's history lets you determine if any abatement work was done. 



Where Is Asbestos Located in Homes?



Before regulations enforced by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and state agencies, asbestos was used during construction projects on residential homes and commercial buildings. 



The most common places to find asbestos in residential homes are:




Ceiling tiles



Floor tiles



Patching compound and textured paint (banned in 1977)



Roofing shingles



Insulation (this typically applies to homes built between 1930-1950)



Hot water pipes



Furnaces (both oil and coal)



Walls and flooring surrounding wood-burning stoves



Patching and joint compounds




If you're unsure if asbestos is in your home, the U.S. Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC) states that you should never touch or disturb anything. Do not start home repairs or any renovation projects until you know for sure if your home has asbestos.



How to Check Your Home for Asbestos



Unless you're a certified asbestos professional, you likely won't know if your home has asbestos. If it was built before the 1980s, some of the above materials might contain asbestos. 



If you see pipes in your home with grey or white insulation remnants and fittings, that can indicate asbestos. 



The remnants could also be other materials, so your safest bet is to search for a qualified asbestos inspection professional. They can tell you with certainty if and where asbestos is in your home. 



How to Safely Renovate Your Home



Many people begin renovation projects without considering the possibility of finding asbestos. You don't have to hire an asbestos inspector before doing work, but it is a good idea. If you plan to begin renovations without checking for asbestos, take these steps to stay safe: 



Know Where Asbestos Might Be



Knowing what types of materials used to contain asbestos gives you an idea of where it could be in your home. Some of the areas of the house where asbestos is most likely to linger include: 




Hot water pipes



Wood-burning stoves, chimneys, and fireplaces



Textured walls and ceilings



Flat areas of roofs



Vinyl floors



HVAC and duct insulation



Siding




Some of the activities associated with these areas of the home have a high potential to cause asbestos exposure. For instance, chipping away a textured ceiling with asbestos generates a lot of dust that can cause harmful exposure. 



Similarly, pulling up old vinyl flooring can get dusty, as can drilling into or cutting pipe insulation or pulling siding off a house. 



Don't Disturb Asbestos



If you plan to do work where asbestos is unlikely to be found, you can probably do it safely. You might be working near asbestos materials, so take care. For instance, accidentally damaging or disturbing an insulated pipe could lead to exposure. 



Don't Work Directly With Asbestos Materials



Never tackle renovations or repairs that require you to handle or remove asbestos directly. If you know or suspect something you want to work with has asbestos, it's safest to call a professional to inspect it. You can then decide if it needs to be abated or safely encapsulated. 



What Should I Do With Damaged Asbestos? 



Call a professional immediately if you find damaged asbestos while doing renovation work. Seal off the area and don't let anyone near it until a professional can take care of it safely. 



What to Do if You Find Asbestos in Your Home



There's no need to panic if an inspector finds asbestos in your home. Even if it doesn't pose an immediate risk, you must halt any repair or renovation plans until the asbestos is abated. 



When home repairs and renovation projects begin, asbestos can get easily disturbed. Tiny asbestos fibers can permeate the air up to 75 feet from the source. 



The safest way to do renovations is to allow a professional to remove or encapsulate asbestos. Encapsulation means that they seal it off safely. As long as it remains undisturbed, encapsulated asbestos poses no risk. 



How to Hire an Asbestos Abatement Professional



If you choose to remove asbestos from your home, hire a professional. They can do the work safely and significantly reduce the risk that you or a family member are harmed by asbestos. 



Asbestos abatement companies and individuals must be specially trained. They also must be licensed through the appropriate state agency to prove they are qualified to do the work. Always check licensing before hiring an abatement professional. 



It's helpful to check reviews of abatement companies and if there are complaints with the Better Business Bureau. You can also find out if a company has ever been fined. Even licensed abatement companies sometimes make mistakes or knowingly violate asbestos rules, so it's crucial to check thoroughly before hiring anyone. 



Tips to Remember



The following tips can help keep you safe from asbestos until a professional can inspect and abate your home:




Never drill holes or saw into any walls until you're certain your home either doesn't have asbestos or has been abated.



Don't strip your waxed floors with power strippers or abrasive pads.



Stay out of your attic, and never let your children (or anyone else) play in insulated attics.



Don't do repairs on old furnaces or other older appliances. Even small repairs can result in disturbing asbestos.



Before hiring an asbestos professional, the EPA recommends you ensure they're accredited by the state. Some states don't require state accreditation before becoming a professional asbestos inspector, but having that guarantee will ensure better chances of hiring someone reputable and reliable.



If any area of the home has been damaged, limit activities in that area until you can get it inspected.




What Should You Do if Exposed to Asbestos in Your Home? 



No amount of asbestos exposure is considered safe, but a one-time exposure to asbestos is unlikely to make you sick. Talk to your doctor if you are worried about it or have symptoms. 



What Are the Signs of Asbestos Poisoning? 



Most symptoms and illnesses caused by asbestos occur after years of repeated exposure. Unless you lived with exposed asbestos in your home for a long time, you probably won't experience symptoms. 



However, there is no safe amount of asbestos exposure, so it's important to know the signs. Most asbestos illnesses affect the respiratory system and cause: 




Difficulty breathing



Shortness of breath



Coughing



Chest pains




In rare cases, mesothelioma develops in the abdomen after asbestos exposure. This is called peritoneal mesothelioma, and it causes swelling and fluid accumulation in the abdomen, abdominal pain, and gastrointestinal symptoms. 



If you or someone in your family received a mesothelioma diagnosis after living in a home with asbestos, contact an experienced lawyer. They can help you determine the source of exposure and help you take legal action. 



Additional Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form today for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Asbestos and Boiler Workers

Decades of asbestos use in boilers exposed countless workers. Many boiler workers and boilermakers developed asbestos illnesses like mesothelioma. Even today, asbestos exposure remains a concern in the boiler industry, as older materials can be dangerous. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 

















Are Boiler Workers Exposed to Asbestos? 



Boilers were once constructed with asbestos components. Boiler workers in the past were at high risk of exposure to asbestos in these materials. 



Because boilers are built for very high temperatures, they need effective insulation to retain heat and protect workers. Asbestos was the insulator of choice in boilers for decades. 



Asbestos exposure occurs when fibers of asbestos come loose from materials and workers inhale or ingest them. Boiler workers faced this risk as they disturbed asbestos in boiler components by installing, removing, or repairing them. 



About Boilers and Asbestos Use



A boiler is a vessel used to heat fluids. Boilers are often used to produce steam to heat buildings or to turn turbines for power generation. Small boilers are used in residential buildings, while large boilers are used in industrial facilities. Ships also contain boilers. 



Boilers and surrounding equipment must be well insulated to avoid heat loss, to prevent fires, and to protect workers from high temperatures. Most boilers built before the 1980s contained asbestos insulation in several components and surrounding materials: 




Pipe wrap



Boiler lining



Sealants



Gaskets



Valves



Pumps



Packing



Bearings



Access windows



Steam traps



Cement



Protective materials on floors, ceilings, and walls




What Do Boiler Workers Do? 



A boilermaker or boiler worker is someone who builds, repairs, installs or maintains boilers. 



Boiler work is often considered a dangerous occupation. Workers are expected to handle extremely hot boilers and boiler components. 



The U.S. Department of Labor indicated that boiler factory production workers must first assemble boiler machines and, later, install them correctly.



Operations workers are responsible for managing production workers and watching over the boiler rooms daily. Operations and production workers generally clean the equipment and make repairs when necessary.



How Were Boiler Workers Exposed to Asbestos? 



In the past, boiler rooms were extremely small, and workers were required to do their jobs in enclosed spaces. Several aspects of boiler work made it dangerous and put workers at risk for asbestos exposure: 




Most boiler rooms were constructed with asbestos-containing materials (ACMs), such as asbestos-containing cement millboard, often used to cover ceiling spaces above boilers.





Not only were employees working in enclosed spaces, but the boiler rooms usually didn't have the proper ventilation, making it easier for workers to inhale loose asbestos fibers.





In addition to asbestos in construction materials, boiler equipment was made with asbestos in many of its components. 





Many boiler workers handled asbestos materials directly, which can lead to fibers coming loose and causing exposure. Repair and maintenance work on boilers was particularly risky. 





Workers in the area of boilers who did not directly handle asbestos materials also faced risks. Anyone in the area could inhale loose asbestos fibers. 




High Risk of Asbestos Exposure and Illnesses in Boiler Workers



Several studies have proven that many boiler workers were exposed to dangerously high levels of asbestos. This put boiler workers at an elevated risk of developing asbestos-related diseases, such as malignant mesothelioma, asbestosis, and asbestos-related lung cancer.



Elevated Asbestos Exposure in Boiler Workers



An independent study on boiler delagging indicated that boiler workers in charge of stripping out all of the lagging had asbestos exposure levels at least 4.5 times higher than the researchers had initially predicted. 



The airborne fibers had a concentration level of 1.171 per milliliter of air.



Pleural Plaques and Respiratory Illnesses in Boiler Workers



A study conducted by researchers and scientists at Wayne State University and the University of Michigan showed that boiler workers have high rates of diagnosed pleural plaques, breathing difficulties., and interstitial fibrosis. 



The study was conducted on boiler workers who had worked in the trade for at least a decade.



In addition, around 30% of boiler workers in the trade for over 20 years showed advanced pleural abnormalities during imaging scans.



Over half of the workers had loud respiratory sounds when they inhaled. Workers responsible for disposing of boiler room insulation were exposed to extremely high levels of asbestos. 



Other Workers Exposed to Asbestos in Boilers



Boiler workers had high risks of exposure to asbestos, but boilers affected other workers, too. Plumbers and pipefitters, for instance, often cut into asbestos-insulated pipes connected to boilers. 



Some people did their work in the same area as boiler workers, which put them at risk of exposure. Examples include electricians, engineers, shipyard workers, and ship crew members. 



Are Boiler Workers Still at Risk of Asbestos Exposure?



A 2005 survey noted that over 160,000 machines currently being used at boiler companies were made more than 30 years ago when asbestos was used heavily to create them. 



This means that even today, boiler workers are at risk of asbestos exposure, especially if their employers fail to train them properly on asbestos and fail to provide the necessary safety gear.



The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulates asbestos exposure in the workplace. OSHA requirements for employers include things like properly labeling asbestos with warnings and providing workers with safety training and protective gear. 



Asbestos Lawsuits Involving Boiler Workers



Some boiler workers who got sick years after working with asbestos filed lawsuits against companies that manufactured boilers and their asbestos components. These are a few examples of asbestos lawsuits involving boiler workers: 




Frank Gondar worked with asbestos boilers from several companies, including Burnham. He developed mesothelioma years later and sued the boiler companies. He received a jury award of $22 million. 





The son of a deceased pipefitter who worked with and around boilers and handled asbestos gaskets received a jury award of $8.45 million for wrongful death. His father began the lawsuit but died from asbestos illnesses before it concluded. 





Former boiler operator William Pfeifer received a settlement after suing John Crane, Inc. The company made many of the asbestos products he worked with during his career. Pfeifer received a diagnosis of mesothelioma in 2009. 




If You Were Exposed to Asbestos Working with Boilers



Boiler workers should always seek medical help and undergo routine monitoring as soon as possible. Tell your doctor if you were exposed to asbestos in the past. This can lead to an earlier diagnosis and better outcome.



It's also important to talk to an experienced mesothelioma lawyer. They can review your work history and explain your options for seeking compensation. 



Depending on the companies involved in exposing you to asbestos, you could be eligible for claims with asbestos trust funds. A lawsuit may be another option to recover damages.  



Additional Help and Resources for Boiler Workers



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Asbestos and Post Office Workers

Post office workers in the past were at risk of asbestos exposure in their workplaces. The exposure risks come from asbestos use in building materials and vehicles. Some postal workers continue to face asbestos exposure risks today and are at risk for mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses.



If you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













How Are Postal Workers Exposed to Asbestos? 



United States Postal Service (USPS) workers are not routinely exposed to asbestos. Some may never encounter it. However, some postal workers are exposed to asbestos through materials in older postal buildings and postal vehicles. 



Before the 1980s, most buildings were constructed with asbestos in numerous materials. Asbestos was commonly found in insulation, floor and ceiling tiles, roofing materials, and more. 



Even if postal workers never handled these materials, they could cause exposure. Asbestos construction materials can release harmful fibers as they deteriorate, when damaged, or when disturbed by repairs or renovation work. 



Another source of exposure is the machinery workers use to sort mail. The electric motors used to propel conveyor belts in postal facilities contained asbestos materials in the brakes. Asbestos was used to reduce overheating from friction. Workers who used or maintained this equipment risked exposure. 



Postal vehicles also contained asbestos in clutches, brakes, and potentially other components. Any workers who handled repairs or maintenance work on vehicles risked asbestos exposure. 



EPA Regulations and Post Office Buildings



In 1979, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) placed strict regulations on asbestos use at job sites. Most job sites, including post offices, phased out asbestos use. 



Yet, most post offices built before the EPA's regulations remain open today. Several post offices constructed with asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) are still in use.



If post office facilities aren't maintained properly, the older offices may present asbestos exposure, not only to workers but also to guests who come to the post offices to pick up mail or drop off a package. 



Asbestos exposure is the leading cause of toxic illnesses such as malignant mesothelioma and asbestos-related lung cancer.



Early Warnings of Asbestos in Postal Workplaces



The U.S. Postal Service indicated concerns about asbestos exposure as early as 1981. The USPS requested an evaluation by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) on May 4, 1981. 



The USPS was concerned about potential asbestos exposure at the Washington Bulk Mail Center. The concern came after five maintenance workers were diagnosed with cancer. The workers might have been exposed to asbestos in conveyor belt parts. 



NIOSH tested air samples at the facility and did not find troubling or dangerous levels of asbestos fibers. NIOSH recognized the potential risk to workers and recommended measures to reduce the potential harm to workers. 



Government Watchdog Group Exposes Asbestos at Post Offices



In 2016, watchdogs for the government revealed that several post offices across the U.S. are possibly exposing workers to toxins, including asbestos. According to a report provided by The Daily Caller:



"The Postal Service must improve adherence to building maintenance, safety, and security standards, and employee working condition requirements at its retail facility. Cleaning and general maintenance and repairs” and “concerns for health, safety and security.”



The report also added that most post offices had “locked or blocked emergency exits, asbestos and mold, improper storage of flammable materials, insect infestation, trip hazards, and exposed electrical outlets and switches, as well as sanitary issues."



Although the names of the post offices weren't provided, earlier this year, a Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, postal worker contacted a local newspaper, The Daily Tribune, and alerted them about a potential asbestos problem at the W. Alabama Street location. 



According to the story, the complaint was submitted after several workers began experiencing respiratory illnesses and chronic coughing.



Local postmaster Cindy Anderson responded to the complaint. She stated she conducted a 6-month investigation. After signing a form indicating that she understood that the post office building was identified as containing asbestos, she added,




“I conducted my 6-month inspection. I have identified damaged tiles. I have been in contact with Dallas Safety. We have temporarily repaired tiles as instructed by Dallas safety. I have reported the facility for the landlord to repair."
Cindy Anderson



The newspaper questioned the post office about potential asbestos exposures. The post office workers were reportedly required to watch a video on the hazards of asbestos. The postal workers were warned to never talk to the media about asbestos issues.



A few days later, Arlene A. Sanchez, with the Dallas, Fort Worth, and Oklahoma Districts of the U.S. Postal Service, wrote that the post office works with OSHA to identify and correct any asbestos-related problems immediately.




"During the most recent visual inspection which was conducted less than two weeks ago, we discovered damage to some floor tiles in the facility.  All OSHA regulations are being followed and the areas where damage was found have been treated, using an interim employee-protective measure which will remain in place until abatement is completed.





We are currently working with the building owner regarding the abatement.  Signs advising that asbestos is present in the facility are posted.  All work-related illnesses and injuries are handled through the Office of Workers’ Compensation."
 Arlene A. Sanchez



When The Daily Tribune reached out to OSHA, there was no report of the organization working with that particular post office, nor had anyone from the post office notified them about asbestos. 



Meanwhile, post office workers stated that the loose tiles, built with ACMs, were repaired with cardboard.



OSHA Asbestos Violation at an Indiana Post Office



In April 2016, OSHA proposed a fine of nearly $50 million on a southern Indiana post office for violating numerous asbestos laws. The West Baden Springs post office, specifically, has allegedly:




Failed to provide safety training to their employees regarding the dangers of asbestos



Failed to properly clean up messes and spills around areas in which asbestos could be disrupted



Failed to label areas where asbestos was present



Failed to use dry sweeping




The Indiana post office is just one among several post offices across the U.S. that continue to place postal workers at risk. 



Asbestos contains microscopic fibers that are undetectable to the human eye. The fibers are also odorless and tasteless and are easily ingested/inhaled without being noticed.



Asbestos in Other USPS Facilities



Several post office buildings across the U.S. have been found to contain asbestos at various times. Workers at a Tampa post office were evacuated in 2000 and forced to work outside in tents after a worker discovered asbestos ceiling tiles in a storage room. 



In 2022, postal workers in a Yakima, Washington, facility were evacuated after a pipe burst and flooded the building. Workers then found asbestos in the building while making repairs due to the flooding. The postal workers had to work outside for months during the completion of the work. 



A Topeka, Kansas, post office closed in 2023 due to remodeling that led to the discovery of asbestos in the building. The landlord of the building was notified of the closure two months into a new lease with the USPS. 



If You Were Exposed to Asbestos as a Postal Worker



If you or a loved one worked or works for the post office, specifically in buildings built before the early to mid-1980s, you should undergo routine medical check-ups. Be sure to tell your physician that you may have been exposed to asbestos. 



Contact a mesothelioma lawyer to find out how you can seek compensation. You could be entitled to compensation through a lawsuit or asbestos trust fund, depending on the asbestos product suppliers involved. 



Additional Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma or asbestos-related cancer, there is a good chance you qualify for significant compensation. Remember to fill out our form for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### Asbestos Disposal and Recycling

Asbestos disposal and recycling are essential for protecting people from the harmful effects of asbestos exposure. Laws and regulations describe how asbestos should be disposed of, while new technologies may lead to safer recycling of asbestos. Contact a licensed asbestos professional if you suspect you have asbestos in your home. 









Why Is Asbestos So Dangerous? 



Asbestos is a naturally occurring set of minerals mined from the earth. Asbestos exposure has been linked to life-threatening illnesses such as malignant mesothelioma and asbestos-related lung cancer. 



Asbestos is a fibrous material that releases tiny fibers when disturbed or when it deteriorates. Anyone near it can inhale or ingest the fibers if not protected with safety gear. 



Asbestos fibers inside the body get stuck in tissues, causing damage and inflammation. This leads to illness in some people. The more frequent and prolonged the asbestos exposure, the higher the risk of getting sick years later. 



Where Is Asbestos Found Today? 



Because of its useful properties, asbestos has been used in many applications over the years. There's a record of its use dating back to ancient times.



Asbestos was used extensively as insulation in homes and on ships in modern times, specifically, the materials used to make vinyl flooring, roofing tiles, siding, paint, and patching compound. Asbestos was also used in heat-resistant fabrics, around steam pipes, and in car brakes and clutches. 



The U.S. government does not currently ban asbestos. Strict regulations limit asbestos use and are supposed to ensure workers and others are protected from exposure.



Because it has never been banned and because asbestos was used so extensively in many industries, it lingers in many places. People today might encounter asbestos in older homes and public buildings: 




Caulking



Ceiling tiles



Floor tiles



Heat resistant fabrics



Joint compound



Insulation



Roofing shingles



Siding



Textured paints



Walls and floors around wood-burning stoves




Workplaces in the past also used asbestos extensively and might still contain asbestos in: 




Automotive brakes and clutches



Boilers



Cement 



Chemical containers



Electrical conduits and insulation



Heat-protective materials



Insulation



Pipe coverings



Roofing materials



Sealants



Textiles




The Importance of Handling Asbestos Safely



Asbestos found in older buildings can often be safely left in place. It poses no risk of shedding fibers and exposing people if it is intact or encapsulated. If the asbestos is damaged or needs to be removed to do other work, it poses serious exposure risks. 



Safe handling of the repair or removal of asbestos materials is essential in preventing exposure and illness. Laws and regulations from the federal to the local level describe how asbestos must be handled to avoid exposure risks. 



Not following these regulations can result in exposure and harm. In some situations, it can also result in hefty fines or even jail time. 



Regulations for the Safe Handling of Asbestos



Numerous laws and regulations at the federal, state, and local levels dictate how asbestos must be handled in public buildings, workplaces, and residences of a certain size. 



The Clean Air Act and Toxic Substances Control Act



Two federal laws passed in the 1970s have had a big impact on managing asbestos contamination. The Clean Air Act of 1970 established that asbestos is a harmful air pollutant. It also gave the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the authority to set standards for asbestos levels in air. 



Under this law, the EPA set guidelines and standards for monitoring, handling, and disposing of asbestos. These guidelines set the stage for state and local regulations. 



The Toxic Substances Control Act passed in 1976 gave the EPA even more authority to regulate asbestos beyond air pollution. 



National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)



The EPA developed the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) to help people avoid illnesses and fatalities caused by toxic air pollutants, including asbestos. 



The standards include guidelines for demolishing buildings with asbestos and disposing of the asbestos correctly.



According to the EPA, any building (unless the affected area is less than 260 linear feet) undergoing demolition and renovation must first be inspected to determine how much asbestos it contains. 



If a certain threshold amount of asbestos is found during an inspection, it must be reported to the appropriate agency, typically a state agency. 



Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act and Asbestos School Hazard Abatement Reauthorization Act



Older school buildings are important sources of old asbestos materials that pose safety risks. Students and staff can be harmed by old, deteriorating asbestos and by renovations and regular maintenance that disturbs asbestos materials. 



These two laws were passed to protect school staff and students. They set standards for the monitoring, handling, and removal of asbestos in school buildings. 



Occupational Safety and Health Administration and Asbestos



OSHA is responsible for setting and enforcing workplace safety standards, including those related to asbestos exposure. OSHA addresses the safe handling and disposal of asbestos across all occupations and job sites. 



Because asbestos was used so heavily in construction, OSHA has separate standards specifically for exposure limits and safe asbestos handling on construction worksites. It also includes separate standards for maritime worksites, like shipyards. 



An Example of State Asbestos Regulations



In Florida, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection handles reports of asbestos. Like most states, it requires that you hire a professional, licensed asbestos inspector to detect asbestos in homes and buildings. 



Trained, licensed professionals must also carry out asbestos abatement. The guidelines for removing asbestos and preparing it for disposal include:




Wetting all materials that contain the mineral and sealing them in leak-tight containers, clearly labeled, or with thick bags (at least 6 mm and double bagged), sealed tight with duct tape for rigid, non-friable asbestos



Ensuring there are warning signs, clearly labeled, around the work area, that alerts the public about asbestos



Wearing protective gear at all times when preparing asbestos for disposal, including a HEPA respirator




How to Handle Asbestos Safely



The safest way to handle asbestos is to leave it to professionals. Asbestos professionals are trained and licensed according to state and federal regulations. They know how to encapsulate or, remove and dispose of asbestos safely. 



Asbestos professionals follow specific processes to keep people safe from asbestos during their work: 




Asbestos abatement begins with an inspection and a detailed plan for removal and disposal. The plan also includes securing appropriate permits. 



They then prepare the work area by sealing it with plastic and negative pressure units. They install warning signs. 



Asbestos workers wear appropriate safety gear while working on an asbestos site. They remove and decontaminate this gear before leaving the area. 



Asbestos materials are wetted before removal, and throughout the process, to keep asbestos fibers from releasing into the air. 



The workers contain and dispose of asbestos according to laws and safety regulations. 




If you hire an abatement team, ensure they follow these safety guidelines and any other regulations applicable in your state and local area. 



How to Report Violations of Asbestos Handling Regulations



Asbestos abatement professionals must follow the law when handling asbestos, but this doesn't always happen. Take care when hiring asbestos companies. Check their licensing and ask how they plan to do the job. Check with your local government or Better Business Bureau for any pending legal actions or past violations. 



If you do encounter asbestos abatement professionals not following the rules, you can report them. Report to your state's or county's environmental quality department or the EPA. If violations occur in a workplace, you can file a report with OSHA. 



How Is Asbestos Disposed of in Landfills? 



Once asbestos or asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) are wetted and secured in the proper containers, the materials must be transported to an appropriate disposal facility. 



Not all landfills accept asbestos. The EPA designates landfills in each state specifically used for asbestos disposal. 



For instance, in Massachusetts, the only available place to dispose of asbestos is the Waste Management Fitchburg/Westminster Sanitary Landfill. Substantial fines are enforced for anyone disposing of the dangerous substance in inappropriate places.



The contained waste material must be transported in trucks labeled as containing asbestos. 



Landfills that handle asbestos must have a designated area for disposing of the material. This area should be clearly delineated from the rest of the landfill. 



The landfill is also responsible for ensuring no emissions from the asbestos disposal area and that the leak-tight containers used to contain the material retain their integrity over time.



The asbestos area of a landfill cannot be compacted for this reason, but it does have to be covered.



Can Asbestos Be Recycled?



The disposal process for asbestos is generally considered safe if all rules are followed, but it isn’t perfect. Safe disposal requires a lot of landfill area. It must be protected to prevent future exposure. 



The Benefits of Recycling Asbestos



Recycling asbestos provides a safer, more permanent solution to disposing of asbestos materials. It eliminates the need to find and protect permanent storage areas. 



When materials with asbestos can be recycled, they can also be reused, eliminating even more waste from landfills. Recycling asbestos has the potential to save on costs of abatement and keeps asbestos out of the waste stream. 



How Is Asbestos Recycled? 



Researchers have been working on methods for recycling asbestos and ACMs that could potentially be used in the future. 



For example, a metal pipe with asbestos adhered to it does not need to be thrown out entirely. A chemical solution can remove the adhered fibers to reuse the metal.



Researchers also experimented with mechanical and chemical procedures to treat ACMs to safely remove the asbestos, contain it, and reuse the non-asbestos material. 



Another procedure being tested involves changing the fibrous structure of the mineral so that it becomes inert and cannot enter the air where people may inhale it.



More research should be forthcoming into how asbestos can be abated and disposed of while recycling the materials attached to the mineral. 



Being able to recycle asbestos will save landfill space, time, and money while keeping people safe.

### Asbestos and Auto Mechanics

Auto mechanics have a higher risk of asbestos exposure and resulting illnesses due to the use of asbestos in certain automotive parts, like brakes and clutches. The risk is lower today, but some parts still contain asbestos. Some mechanics who developed asbestos illness have sued car parts manufacturers for damages. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Are Auto Mechanics Exposed to Asbestos? 



Asbestos is an efficient insulator, which makes it useful for many applications. Asbestos was used in many industries in the 1900s, including automotive manufacturing. Today, asbestos is rarely used but lingers in older materials. 



Auto mechanics working on vehicles in the past had high risks of asbestos exposure. Asbestos was used in several car parts but posed the most significant risk in clutches and brakes that produced a lot of harmful dust. 



Mechanics today can still be exposed to asbestos through older car parts and imported aftermarket parts. Home mechanics and hobbyists are also at risk of asbestos exposure. 



What Auto Products Contain Asbestos?



During peak asbestos use in auto parts in the 1970s, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reported that brake linings contained between 33% and 75% asbestos. 



Asbestos is not used today to the same extent as before the EPA began regulating it. However, asbestos can still be found in some auto parts. This is especially true of older cars, specifically vehicles manufactured before the early 1980s. Asbestos was most prevalent in these automotive parts: 




Brakes. Asbestos in brakes can be particularly dangerous due to the brake lining wearing down through use, which can release asbestos fibers into the air. Fibers can also build up in the dust between the brake drums.



Clutches. Like brakes, asbestos fibers in clutches become disturbed during normal friction and wear and tear.



Automobile Hood Liners. Hood liners insulate and prevent cars from catching on fire. They once contained asbestos. 



Gaskets and seals. Gaskets and seals help reduce leaks in automobiles but may contain asbestos in older cars. 




Other automotive parts that contained asbestos in the past include: 




Electrical insulation



Fiberglass body components



Transmission housings



Heat shields



Air conditioning housings



Undercoatings



Soundproofing materials



Adhesives and body putty




Who Is at Risk of Exposure to Automotive Asbestos Products? 



In the past, workers in facilities that manufactured asbestos car parts and installed them on vehicle assembly lines faced risks of asbestos exposure. Also at risk were mechanics who removed and repaired asbestos parts. 



Today, mechanics remain at risk of exposure to asbestos in older and aftermarket car parts. Professional mechanics risk exposure to asbestos, but so do home mechanics. Hobbyists working on older cars and people who maintain their own vehicles can still be exposed to asbestos in car parts. 



How Are Mechanics Exposed to Asbestos? 



Asbestos exposure in any industry occurs when workers unintentionally inhale or ingest asbestos fibers. Asbestos materials readily shed tiny fibers that become part of the dust in the air and on surfaces. The more easily an asbestos product sheds fibers, the more dangerous it is for workers. 



Automotive parts made with asbestos degrade with time and use, releasing asbestos dust that exposes workers. Mechanics are also exposed by their work, removing and cleaning asbestos drum brakes, for instance. These activities release more asbestos fibers. 



Asbestos fibers in the body are harmful because they cause tissue damage that can lead to illness over time. Not everyone exposed to asbestos will get sick, but all are at risk for diseases like malignant mesothelioma, asbestosis, and asbestos lung cancer.



Some of the many ways auto mechanics were and still could be exposed to asbestos include:




Dusting the assembly area



Spraying down dust



Using a vacuum not strong enough to remove tiny asbestos fibers



Failing to wear proper protection when working with brakes, gaskets, clutches, etc.



Cleaning drum brakes with compressed air




Since asbestos fibers are small and light, they tend to permeate the air around workers (typically up to 80 feet). Mechanics who directly handle asbestos products are not the only ones at risk of exposure. Anyone working in the area can also be exposed. 



Do Automotive Parts Still Contain Asbestos? 



Asbestos is not entirely banned in the U.S. and can still be found in vehicles. Automotive manufacturers in the U.S. do not use asbestos in their products today. Mechanics remain at risk of exposure to asbestos in older cars and parts. 



Mechanics can also be at risk today from asbestos in imported, aftermarket car parts. These asbestos components are not banned in the U.S. Car parts from India and China are especially likely to contain asbestos. 



Manufacturers That Made Asbestos Auto Products



In the past, many companies made or distributed asbestos automotive parts. Some of the companies shut down when the EPA placed strict regulations on asbestos use. Other companies, still in business, are facing asbestos lawsuits after numerous workers filed claims.



These are some of the many companies known to have manufactured or sold automotive asbestos parts: 




Abex Corporation



Advance Auto Parts



Austin Auto Parts Inc.



Auto Zone



Bendix Corporation



Borg-Warner



Canton Auto Parts Inc.



Dana Corporation



Fisher Auto Parts



Ford Motor Company



Garlock Sealing Technologies



General Motors



Genuine Auto Parts



Globe Foreign Auto Parts



Johns Manville



LAS Replacement Parts



O'Reilly Automotive



Pep Boys



Potsdam Auto Parts



Raymark/Raybestos



Ren Auto Parts



Scanlon's Auto Parts



Uniroyal




Asbestos Illnesses in Automotive Mechanics



Anyone who worked with or around asbestos materials has an increased risk of developing an asbestos illness. These illnesses often do not develop until decades after initial asbestos exposure. Mechanics who handled asbestos products years ago could still be diagnosed today. 



Research shows that mechanics are at risk for mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses. One study from 2000 looked at the content of dust from six auto mechanic shops in different states. The study found asbestos in most of the samples taken, indicating that workers in the shops were at risk of exposure and illness. 



A study from 2018 measured the risk more directly. Researchers looked at pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma diagnoses in hundreds of brake mechanics in the U.S. and other countries. The results show that mechanics are at high risk for exposure and resulting illness. 



Asbestos Safety Guidelines for Auto Mechanics



The EPA created a comprehensive brochure for auto mechanics detailing how to stay as safe as possible when working around asbestos. 



The following safety recommendations are the key components:




Only use a  Negative-Pressure Enclosure/HEPA Vacuum System Method when dusting off brakes and clutches.



Use only low-pressure, wet cleaning methods with low-pressure spray equipment designed specifically to prevent dust from becoming airborne.



Never take your work clothes inside your home. Second-hand asbestos exposure can occur when you go to your home wearing dirty work clothes.



Assume all auto parts have asbestos, as it's not detectable by the human eye. Always protect yourself with the appropriate breathing mask and other safety gear.



Do not bring work tools home without cleaning them thoroughly with hot, soapy water.



Use ready-to-install parts.




Asbestos Lawsuits Involving Mechanics



Many workers in a range of industries were negligently exposed to asbestos. Some of these workers got sick and sued the companies that failed to protect them from harmful asbestos. These are examples of asbestos lawsuits brought by mechanics: 




Jerry Coogan worked as a mechanic handling asbestos parts made or distributed by various companies. He was diagnosed with mesothelioma and died at the age of 67. Coogan's widow sued asbestos car part manufacturers and distributors, winning an $81.5 million jury award. After appeals, the Washington Supreme Court upheld the jury decision. 





Bill Trokey worked on Ford brakes during his career as a mechanic. He developed mesothelioma later. Trokey and his wife sued Ford and were awarded $20 million by a Missouri jury after showing evidence that Ford knew of the risks of asbestos exposure. 





Tomas Sorrentino worked as a mechanic, replacing clutches and brakes in Volkswagen vehicles. After dying from mesothelioma in 2021, his family sued the car company. They received a $5.75 million award from a jury in Washington. 




How Mechanics Can Seek Compensation for Asbestos Exposure



Contact a mesothelioma lawyer if you worked as a mechanic or worked with old cars and now have an asbestos illness. They can help you take legal action to seek compensation. 



An experienced asbestos attorney has the resources necessary to investigate your past exposure. They can review your work history and any car parts you used at home to find all the possible companies liable for damages. 



Depending on the companies involved, you could be eligible for a claim with an asbestos trust fund or to file an asbestos lawsuit. 



Additional Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Medical Marijuana for Mesothelioma

Medical marijuana for mesothelioma and other cancers is a growing area of study and is increasingly available to patients. Cannabis, CBD, and medical marijuana offer some patients relief from symptoms and treatment side effects. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 













What Is Medical Marijuana?



Medical marijuana is a medicine made from the plant Cannabis sativa. Also known as cannabis, marijuana is legal for medical use in many states but is still a controlled substance under federal law.   



Some of the more common medical uses for cannabis include: 




Alzheimer's disease



Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)



Cancer symptoms and treatment side effects



Crohn's disease



Epilepsy



Glaucoma



HIV/AIDS



Multiple sclerosis



Muscle spasms



Severe or chronic pain



Severe nausea




What Are the Beneficial Compounds in Marijuana? 



Cannabis contains more than 400 chemicals, but its two main active ingredients for medical treatment are THC and CBD. THC, or tetrahydrocannabinol, is the ingredient found in marijuana that causes people to feel a “high." Yet, it's also been shown to improve appetite and suppress nausea. 



CBD, or cannabidiol, doesn't produce a high feeling but helps relieve pain and may have numerous other benefits.



According to Dr. Barth Wilsey of the University of California in Davis, pain is often the primary reason most people seek out medical marijuana. The pain ranges from anything as minor as a headache to something as severe as mesothelioma cancer.



Laura Borgelt, PharmD of the University of Colorado's School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, stated that the chemicals in marijuana help the already natural chemicals that our bodies produce, which helps reduce pain.



Why Do Doctors Prescribe Marijuana to Cancer Patients?



Mesothelioma and other cancer patients suffer from various side effects, both from the disease itself and the effects of aggressive treatment options, such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy. 



In numerous clinical trials that studied mesothelioma patients who used medical marijuana, patients not only experienced pain relief but also:




A decrease in nausea



Better sleep quality



An increased appetite



Diminished anxiety



Improved food intake for IV patients (when smoked)




As with most medical treatments, marijuana has its own side effects, but the study participants indicated mild side effects. The most common side effects include:




Dizziness



Feeling paranoid



Food digestion issues (slower to digest food)



Red eyes



Increased heartbeat



Low blood pressure



Hallucinations



Dry mouth




Can Medical Marijuana Treat Cancer Directly? 



Medical marijuana is mostly used to treat symptoms and treatment side effects in cancer patients, not to treat the cancer directly. However, studies indicate that compounds in cannabis could have antitumor potential: 




In an animal study, cannabinoids improved the effectiveness of chemotherapy treatments. 



Another animal study showed that cannabis compounds could slow or even stop tumor growth. 



A study using cell cultures found that cannabinoids killed breast cancer cells and not healthy cells. 




Because marijuana is a federally controlled substance, research into its anti-cancer capabilities is limited. With growing legalizations by state, this kind of research is picking up pace. 



What Are the Prescription Medical Marijuana Drugs? 



The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved three prescription drugs based on cannabinoids. A fourth drug is in clinical trials in the U.S. and is already in use in Canada and Europe. 




Cesamet (nabilone). Cesamet is a synthetic THC sometimes prescribed to treat severe chemotherapy nausea when other drugs have not helped. 



Epidiolex® (cannabidiol). This CBD product is used to treat some patients with seizure disorders. 



Marinol (dronabinol). Marinol is synthetic THC. It treats severe chemotherapy nausea and vomiting. It can also be used to help HIV/AIDS patients with poor appetite gain weight. 



Sativex (nabiximols). Not yet FDA-approved, Sativex is used in Europe and Canada to treat pain associated with cancer. It contains both THC and CBD. 




Can CBD Help With Mesothelioma? 



CBD oil is becoming increasingly popular as more research details its tremendous benefits. This includes patients with mesothelioma and children with severe epilepsy and other painful disorders that traditional medication hasn't helped.



CBD is not the same as medical marijuana because it is not a mind-altering compound. CBD oil uses non-intoxicating cannabis as an oil-based medication that's said to treat several ailments, including cancer. Several mesothelioma patients reported great success in battling pain after using CBD oil.



There are still relatively few studies on adults with mesothelioma and CBD oil. However, several studies show it would work as a treatment for lung cancer in general. 




In 2007, Harvard University scientists studied CBD oil and cancer and determined that cannabidiol stops epithelial growth in lung cancer cell migration. 





In 2011, Harvard researchers performed another study, which determined that cannabinoids can be used to treat lung cancer.





The American Cancer Society (ACS) published an article entitled “Marijuana and Cancer," which backed the findings. The story claimed that “certain cannabinoids may slow growth and reduce the spread of some forms of cancer.”





CBD oil can be taken by simply adding drops onto your tongue and swallowing. There's no conclusive study to determine how many drops to take or how many times per day, but research indicates that it more likely depends on each person's health makeup.





In 2012, two scientists from San Francisco's California Pacific Medical Center found that the CBD compound can stop malignant growth in numerous types of cancer. According to one of the scientists involved in the study, Pierre Desprez:





“What we found was that his Cannabidiol could essentially ‘turn off’ the ID-1......We started by researching breast cancer. But now we’ve found that Cannabidiol works with many kinds of aggressive cancers—brain, prostate—any kind in which these high levels of ID-1 are present.”




ID-1 is a gene found in the body that causes cancer to metastasize.



Where Is Medical Marijuana Legal?



Each state has its own set of laws, and some states require that you obtain a medical card from your physician before using marijuana. Most states now allow medical marijuana use with varying regulations and restrictions. 



The following states have comprehensive or regulated programs for adults:  




Alabama



Alaska



Arizona



Arkansas



California



Colorado



Connecticut



District of Columbia



Delaware



Florida 



Hawaii



Illinois



Kentucky



Louisiana



Maine



Maryland



Massachusetts



Michigan



Minnesota



Mississippi



Missouri



Montana



Nevada



New Hampshire



New Jersey



New Mexico



New York



North Dakota



Ohio



Oklahoma



Oregon



Pennsylvania



Rhode Island



South Dakota



Utah



Vermont



Virginia



Washington



West Virginia




States that allow medical marijuana with CBD and only low levels of THC include: 




Georgia



Indiana



Iowa



North Carolina



South Carolina



Tennessee



Texas



Wisconsin



Wyoming




The only states without a medical marijuana program are Idaho, Nebraska, and Kansas. 



Is Medical Marijuana Right for Me? 



Cannabis isn't right for everyone. Talk to your doctors before trying any medical marijuana products. As you consider using medical marijuana, keep these important facts in mind: 




Using cannabis to treat pain isn't new. It actually dates back to more than 3,000 years ago.



Cannabis is considered a controlled substance in the U.S., but many states allow its use with a prescription and a doctor's recommendation.



Medical marijuana can be inhaled, taken by mouth, or in the spray form.



The National Cancer Institute (NCI) confirms that medical marijuana can assist cancer patients with the painful side effects of traditional treatment options.



Cannabis has been proven to kill cancer cells and promote antitumor activity.



There is still not enough evidence to suggest whether inhaling medical marijuana is better or worse than ingesting it.



Medical marijuana can cause side effects, but most people report that the effects are minor.



Cannabis is not yet approved by the FDA for cancer treatment, therefore, it remains a complementary and alternative form of treatment or a treatment for symptoms. 



Animal studies have shown that delta-9-THC can increase appetite and decrease nausea.



Animal studies have also shown that medical marijuana can decrease nerve problems, reducing pain, tingling, swelling, and numbness.




Who Should Not Use Medical Marijuana? 



Medical marijuana has mainly proven safe for most people with minimal and minor side effects. However, some people should not use it because of safety concerns: 




Pregnant women



People with a history of psychosis



People with heart disease




You should always talk to your doctors before trying any new medication, supplement, or herb, including medical cannabis. There could be important reasons that it isn't right for you. 



How Can I Get Access to Medical Marijuana? 



If you are interested in trying medical marijuana, talk to your medical team. If it is legal in your state, they can recommend products or even prescribe something to help you. 



There are a few different forms of medical marijuana with important differences to consider: 




Inhaling marijuana. The traditional recreational way to use marijuana is to smoke it. This isn't ideal for most mesothelioma patients who have respiratory limitations and symptoms. One benefit of inhaling it is that the effects are generally felt right away. 



Edible marijuana. It is now easy to find edible products with varying amounts of CBD or THC. Edibles take longer to work, but many people also find they produce milder psychoactive effects. Edibles often come in the form of baked goods or candies, but you can also find tinctures and capsules. 



Topical marijuana. Less common but increasingly available are creams and lotions that contain cannabinoids. These can be applied directly to an area of the body that is in pain. CBD topical products are the most common. 




Additional Help and Resources for Mesothelioma Victims



Keep in mind that you may qualify for significant compensation if you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related cancer, or asbestosis. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540.

### Reviews of Our Legal Services

Marilyn & Family



"There aren't enough words to describe how much our family appreciates everything you have done for us since we met 4 years ago. I feel a very special bond between us that will continue for a very long time."













Dale R.



"When dad was diagnosed with mesothelioma, our world was turned upside down. Not knowing what to do next, I researched and interviewed many firms. Some firms were nothing more than marketers. Others offered up call screeners to take my name and number. And then there was Mesothelioma Lawyer Center. It was with them that I found peace, knowledge and professionalism. They have done everything they said they would do and then some. Contacting Mesothelioma Lawyer Center was the best decision I could have made for my family."









Mylon B.



"The doctors I met said there was nothing that could be done for me. One said I should make funeral arrangements. You directed me to the right doctor and so here I am. You guys were my life saver. Without your firm, I would not have had the financial resources or medical assistance I needed so badly."









Doug D.



"I was truly lost and did not know which way to go when I was diagnosed. Thankfully, Mesothelioma Lawyer Center came to my rescue. Your website and other resources have helped me and my family understand this terrible cancer."









Mr. and Mrs. Evans



"When diagnosed with mesothelioma it was like falling into a dark hole but the Patient Advocates at Mesothelioma Lawyer Center told us “Don’t worry, this is what you do, this is how we will help you.” They gave us recommendations and have been there all along the way. Not everyone you talk to in law firms understand how critical this is but Mesothelioma Lawyer Center does."









"My family will forever be grateful to you for your care, compassion, understanding and support during our crisis. Thank you for your words of comfort and encouragement, and for making it possible for us to gather with family and seek help without any worry about work responsibilities. You have such an exemplary and kind heart and we cannot thank you enough for all you did (and continue to do) to help us get through a difficult time."
Nellie








"With my husband passing away so many details needed to be taken care of. The attorneys have always taken their time with us when I didn’t understand the paperwork and explained everything in a language that I could understand."
Gurtie








"From the first phone call through meetings at our home, depositions and the entire claim process, your firm and its people were absolutely wonderful. They were sensitive to our needs, answering all our questions and working diligently on our behalf. We’re extremely impressed and grateful."
Sharrie








"We really did not know where to turn when my husband was diagnosed, and you helped us find a doctor and a support group. Thanks again to your very kind staff."
Mary H.










Calculate Your Case Value

### Mesothelioma and Talcum Powder Lawsuits

Mesothelioma and talcum powder lawsuits are rising as more people realize that asbestos in their hygiene products caused cancer. Scientific studies have shown that talc, a mineral used in numerous products, often contains contaminating asbestos. Contact an asbestos attorney if you used talcum powder for years and now have mesothelioma or ovarian cancer. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related cancer, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim and much more. 













The Dangers of Asbestos in Talcum Powder



Asbestos deposits and talc deposits are frequently found alongside each other and mixed together. Workers who mine talc deposits can be exposed to the harmful contaminant. Asbestos poses a risk for consumers when it ends up in commercial talc products. 



Numerous products contain talc, including talcum powder, cosmetics, chalk, ceramic, rubber, and even pharmaceuticals.



Asbestos in talcum powder has contributed to cases of mesothelioma in people who used these products for decades. Many women also developed ovarian cancer from using baby powders. 



Who Is at Risk for Asbestos Talcum Powder Exposure? 



Anyone who has used or worked around products with talc could have been exposed to asbestos. Not all talc or talc products contain asbestos, but it is always possible. 



Because of its ability to absorb moisture and reduce friction, talc is used in many hygiene and cosmetic products as well as some other commercial products:




Baby powder



Dry shampoo



Eye shadow



Foundation



Compact makeup



Blush and bronzer



Children's cosmetics



Crayons



Chalk



Ceramics




Talc's properties have also made it useful in industrial products. Talc is often used in:




Glazes



Ceramics



Clay



Paint



Toilets



Sinks



Paper



Joint Compound



Anti-caking agents




Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuits



Johnson & Johnson has faced many of the most significant lawsuits over asbestos and talcum powder in recent years. These are a few noteworthy examples: 




 In 2016, the family of Jacqueline Fox sued the company over her death from ovarian cancer. The jury awarded them $72 million for the wrongful death. 





In 2021, the Supreme Court upheld a $2 billion verdict against Johnson & Johnson. The case involved 22 women who developed cancer after using their products for decades. The company tried to appeal the jury verdict but lost. 





A California jury awarded Christina Prudencio $26.4 million in 2021 for mesothelioma. She sued Johnson & Johnson, claiming her illness resulted from asbestos in the company's talcum powder products. She used the products throughout her childhood and then with her younger siblings. 




Johnson & Johnson is now trying to limit its liability in these cases through a controversial legal move called the 'Texas Two-Step.' The first step in the process is to form a subsidiary in Texas. The company moves its asbestos liabilities to that subsidiary. 



The subsidiary then declares bankruptcy, which limits its liability. The move is controversial because it would prevent victims from suing for damages. 



Johnson & Johnson has been battling in court to take these steps. Most recently, a bankruptcy judge in New Jersey denied the company's attempts. The judge ruled that talc lawsuits did not put Johnson & Johnson in immediate financial distress, so the move was unnecessary. This is a win for asbestos victims. 



Colgate-Palmolive Talcum Powder Lawsuit



In May 2015, a California woman won a $13 million talcum powder mesothelioma lawsuit against Colgate-Palmolive. Judith Winkel, 73, used "Cashmere Bouquet" talcum powder from 1961 to 1976 and subsequently developed mesothelioma. 



Colgate-Palmolive attorney Faith Gay tried in vain to argue the case, stating that the company didn't harm Winkel.



"Cashmere Bouquet did not harm Mrs. Winkel. There was a clear absence of proof connecting any disease to our product."



The jury disagreed. After a two-week trial, the jury sided with the plaintiff, finding Colgate-Palmolive 95% responsible. Her attorney stated the amount is fair since the company put people at risk for numerous years.



"This is an example of the legal system exposing what a company should have been honest about 50 years ago. Judith Winkel only wanted a jury to hear the truth about this product and hopefully to help others who are similarly exposed.”



Representatives for Colgate-Palmolive expressed disappointment with the verdict. According to company spokesman Tom DiPiazza,



“Colgate was disappointed with the jury’s verdict. [Cashmere Bouquet] played no part in causing the plaintiff’s illness. In order to avoid devoting resources to continuing litigation through the appeals process, the parties have entered in a confidential settlement."



According to Colgate-Palmolive's 2015 quarterly report, the company faces 23 additional talc and asbestos lawsuits from plaintiffs in California, New York, New Jersey, Illinois, Maryland, South Carolina, Delaware, Washington D.C., and Wisconsin. 



The company's attorneys “believe these cases are without merit and intend to challenge them vigorously.” 



Secondhand Talcum Powder Asbestos Exposure Lawsuit



On January 7, 2016, Wisconsin resident Steven P. Schultz and wife Kimberly Schultz filed a lawsuit against several companies. They claimed secondhand asbestos exposure from his mother's talcum powder caused Steven to develop mesothelioma. 



The case was filed not only against Colgate-Palmolive but also against Coty, Inc., Cyprus Amax Minerals, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Pfizer, Inc., and Whittaker Clark & Daniels, Inc.



The plaintiffs claim that Steven Schultz's mother used the talcum powder (Cashmere Bouquet) throughout the 1960s and 1970s, as well as Coty Airspun Face Powder from the late 1960s until the 1980s. 



Steven Schultz alleged that secondhand exposure to asbestos in the products caused him to develop mesothelioma. He's now seeking damages for mental and physical anguish, permanent disability, loss of enjoyment of life, loss of earning capacity, and medical bills.



Kimberly Schultz is seeking damages for deprival of monetary benefits, mental stress, spousal support, and household support.



Talc Supplier and Industrial Talc Lawsuits



Talc suppliers and companies that use industrial talc products have also faced mesothelioma lawsuits: 




Whittaker, Clark & Daniels. In 2013, talc supplier Whittaker, Clark & Daniels lost a lawsuit to a New Jersey woman who developed mesothelioma secondhand after her father came home in asbestos-ridden work clothes. The plaintiff was awarded $2 million.





Imerys Talc America and Vanderbilt Minerals. In 2017, a California jury awarded Richard Booker's family over $22 million for his wrongful death due to mesothelioma. Booker worked with paints that contained talc contaminated with asbestos. The talc came from suppliers Imerys Talc America and Vanderbilt Minerals. Both companies were held liable. 





Vanderbilt Minerals. In 2018, Vanderbilt Minerals settled a mesothelioma lawsuit brought against the company. Robert Lord worked with industrial talc in Vancerbilt's ceramic tiles. His case went to trial, but Vanderbilt ended up settling with Lord for an undisclosed amount. 




Am I Eligible for a Talcum Powder Mesothelioma Lawsuit?



If you've developed mesothelioma and you think talcum products might have caused it, contact an experienced mesothelioma attorney. 



Mesothelioma lawsuits are complex and intricate, and a lawyer experienced in this sort of litigation will be able to direct you. Remember to keep copies of all of your medical documentation, which will make the process of determining if you have a case run more smoothly.



In general, however, if you've developed mesothelioma using talcum powder products, you more than likely have a valid case.



Choosing a Top Talcum Powder Lawyer



Talcum powder lawsuits are part of an emerging trend, but there are already lawyers and firms experienced in handling these cases. Choose an asbestos or mesothelioma lawyer or law firm with relevant expertise for the best outcome. 



They should have proven experience with similar cases and wins for clients like you. Only experts in asbestos and talcum powder can provide the resource necessary to settle your case successfully. 



Time Limitations on Talcum Powder Lawsuits



Another important aspect to remember is that if you think you may have developed mesothelioma from talcum powder, you'll need to consult with an attorney as soon as possible.



Each state in the U.S. has its own statute of limitations for mesothelioma cases, meaning that you have a certain amount of time from the day you were diagnosed with the disease. Statutes of limitation range from one year to six years from the day you received the mesothelioma diagnosis. 



Compensation for Talcum Powder Lawsuits



It's difficult to determine exactly how much compensation you're entitled to for your case. Several things factor into the total damages, including how long you've lived with mesothelioma, the stage of the disease, your age, how you were exposed, the state you live in, and more. 



So far, however, as seen in past talcum powder lawsuit verdicts, the compensation tends to be generous.



Compensation will also depend upon whether you settle your case or take it to trial. 



Whereas most mesothelioma lawsuits are handled out of court, sometimes, such as a Colgate-Palmolive case, the defendant would rather fight the charges instead of owning up to their responsibility. 



Settlements typically have a lower payout than trials, but at the same time, you have assured a victory, and the process is over quicker.



Trials, on the other hand, take longer than settlements, and there is no guarantee of victory. Yet, verdicts rendered in the plaintiff's favor after a trial usually result in a high compensation payout.



Additional Help and Resources for Talcum Powder Mesothelioma Victims



If you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma or asbestos-related lung cancer, it’s important to understand your choices, legal rights, and medical options. You may be entitled to compensation for mesothelioma treatments, lost wages, physical pain, emotional suffering, and much more. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on seasoned asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys. If you need additional assistance, feel free to contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Mesothelioma and Talcum Powder

Mesothelioma and talcum powder have been connected in several cases due to contaminating asbestos in the mineral talc. After years of talcum powder use, many people have sued companies like Johnson & Johnson over malignant mesothelioma and ovarian cancer. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on qualified mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













What Is Talcum Powder? 



Talcum powder is a product made from a mineral called talc. Talc is a soft mineral consisting of magnesium, oxygen, and silicon. Talc is useful in many applications because it absorbs moisture and reduces friction between surfaces. 



These properties have made talc useful in industrial applications. It has also long been used in hygiene products, like talcum powder and cosmetics. 



Does Talcum Powder Contain Asbestos? 



Talc deposits often exist alongside or with asbestos, another natural mineral. Some mined talc contains asbestos, usually tremolite asbestos. This contaminating asbestos may still be in the talc when used in consumer and hygiene products. 



Talcum powder manufacturers assert that only the purest asbestos-free forms of talc go into products. There is no way to be sure since the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) doesn't screen these consumer products and allows the cosmetics industry to monitor its products.



In 1973, the FDA tried to require testing for asbestos in talcum powder. The Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association resisted the requirement. Ultimately the FDA agreed to let the industry regulate itself. 



Since then, some studies have found asbestos in talcum powder products. In 2014, researchers reported on asbestos studies in one particular brand of talcum powder. 



They found asbestos in several samples of the company's baby powder. They also tested how easy it was to inhale the products and concluded it could cause mesothelioma. 



An investigative report published in 2018 found that Johnson & Johnson talc products contained asbestos. The report also found that the company knew about the asbestos and never reported it to the FDA. 



Additional Asbestos Studies on Talcum Powder



According to occupational studies done on talcum powders, when women used these powders, toxic asbestos fibers, which were mixed into talcum products before the late 1970s, could cause ovarian cancer. This type of cancer occurs after the asbestos fibers in the power build and accumulate in a woman's ovaries.



In 2014, the International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health published a detailed study regarding mesothelioma victims who used talcum powder:




Investigative journalist Andrew Schneider, the writer of the story, pointed out in detail that many women who passed away with mesothelioma developed the disease from asbestos after using common household products such as talcum powder. 



The reason behind the mesothelioma remained a mystery until the story uncovered the culprit.



Schneider wrote that scientists from three different laboratories tracked asbestos-containing talc for over a year in both mines and consumer products. 



The scientists then linked asbestos to a woman's lungs, who had passed away from mesothelioma. She had used talcum products for numerous years.




Other reports of women who used talcum powder and subsequently died followed. According to Ronald Gordon, a pathologist and a contributor to the study,




"Of course we knew that there was asbestos contaminating the talc in many cosmetic powders, but who would have ever thought that that's the way these women were being exposed?"




At the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Gordon analyzed a deceased female's lung tissues. It confirmed further that the cause of her mesothelioma stemmed from asbestos found in talc.



"We have traced the asbestos in the talc to the mines from which it originated, into the milled grades, into the product, and finally into the lung and lymph nodes of the users of those products, including one woman who developed mesothelioma."



According to the study, the female mesothelioma victim frequently used a talcum powder called Cashmere Bouquet, manufactured by Colgate, which "contained identifiable asbestos fibers with the potential to be released into the air and inhaled during normal personal talcum powder application."



In addition to mesothelioma, the study, similar to the previous occupational studies done, confirmed that not only are women who use talcum powder at risk for developing mesothelioma, but they also have a heightened risk of developing ovarian cancer.



Which Companies' Talc Products Contained Asbestos? 



Several companies that make cosmetics and hygiene products, as well as talc mining companies and suppliers, have been associated with contaminating asbestos: 




Beauty Plus Global, Inc.



Chanel



Claire's 



Colgate-Palmolive



Imerys Talc America, Inc. 



Johnson & Johnson



Shulton Co. (Proctor & Gamble)



Vanderbilt Minerals



Whittaker, Clark & Daniels




Is Talcum Powder Use Still Risky? 



Although talcum powder manufacturers stopped using asbestos in their products more than 30 years ago, this doesn't necessarily mean that today's talcum powders are safe. 



Studies of talcum powder use have found that there is an elevated risk: 




According to a 2006 study published by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, using talcum powder, even without any asbestos mixed in, can still be dangerous as it's “possibly carcinogenic to humans."





In another study performed on talc powder in 2013 by the American Cancer Society (ACS), results confirmed that using non-asbestos talcum powder “is associated with a modest 20-30 percent increase in the risk of developing epithelial ovarian cancer.”




There isn't an accurate way to know if talcum powder is asbestos-free unless the FDA begins to inspect the products thoroughly. For now, the companies that manufacture the products are still responsible for inspections.



Thousands of talcum powders are shipped into the United States from overseas all the time. The FDA or any other federal agency does not inspect these products.



Unfortunately, the makers of cosmetic products aren't required to prove that the ingredients used in the products are safe before selling them. According to a statement on the FDA website:



“Cosmetic companies have a legal responsibility for the safety and labeling of their products and ingredients, but the law does not require them to share their safety information with FDA.”



Who Is at Risk of Asbestos Exposure from Talcum Powder? 



Many studies that connected cancer with talcum powder involved women who used hygiene products for decades. They are not the only people at risk for asbestos exposure from contaminated talc. 



Talc is also used in industrial workplaces. It is used in coatings and paints, lowers friction between parts in manufacturing equipment, and is used in paper, chalk, crayon, and ceramics manufacturing. Anyone working with industrial talc could be at risk. 



Talc miners can also be at risk for asbestos exposure. A 2002 study involving talc miners in New York found that these workers have higher rates of mesothelioma than the general population. Nearby residents could also be at risk of exposure. 



Lawsuits Against Talcum Powder Companies



Several companies make talcum powder hygiene products. In recent years, they have faced thousands of lawsuits over mesothelioma and ovarian cancer. 



Colgate-Palmolive



In 2015, a woman sued Colgate-Palmolive over her mesothelioma diagnosis. She used the company's Cashmere Bouquet for 15 years. The case went to trial, and a jury awarded the California woman $13 million. 



Whittaker, Clark & Daniels



A California man diagnosed with mesothelioma sued Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, a talc supplier, in 2016. The man was exposed to talcum powder products for many years in his father's barbershop. The supplier used talc from mines in Alabama and North Carolina, known to have asbestos. 



Johnson & Johnson



Johnson & Johnson has faced more lawsuits than other talcum powder companies. It has faced so many lawsuits that it is currently trying to push asbestos liabilities into a subsidiary that would then declare bankruptcy. The courts have so far not allowed this controversial move. 



Several lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson have been successful. These include a $4.7 billion verdict awarded to 22 women with ovarian cancer in 2018. An Appeals Court reduced the amount to $2 billion. The company continued to try to appeal the award, but the Supreme Court declined to hear the case. 



What to Do if You Used Talcum Powder



Occasional use of talcum powder isn't likely to put you at significant risk for mesothelioma or another type of cancer. If you used any of these products regularly for years, you should talk to your doctor about the risks. 



Your doctor can provide information about risk factors and symptoms to look for. They can also offer any necessary health screenings. 



If you get a diagnosis of cancer and suspect it is related to your talcum powder use, talk to an asbestos attorney or law firm. They can investigate your situation and determine if talcum powder or asbestos played a role. They can also give you legal options and guide your next steps if you want to seek compensation. 



Resources and Assistance for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Asbestos and Textile Mill Workers

Textile mill workers faced high risks of asbestos exposure on the job. Textile mills contained asbestos in machinery and often made textiles embedded with asbestos. Former textile workers are now at greater risk of developing mesothelioma, and many have filed lawsuits to seek damages.



If you suffer from mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related cancer, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.





Did Textile Mills Use Asbestos? 



Like most industrial workplaces, textile mills have used asbestos in machinery, equipment, and building materials for decades. Many textile mills also used asbestos to manufacture products. Asbestos textiles were made for a variety of industries. 



Textile mills today no longer use asbestos in equipment or processes. Most of the risk of asbestos exposure was in the past. However, current textile factory workers could still be exposed to asbestos through older materials. 



What Do Textile Workers Do? 



Textile workers generally work in the manufacturing mill, making textiles using raw materials, wool, cotton, and polyester. 



Textile workers have a variety of different job functions, which may include:




Setting up, operating, maintaining, and running textile machines



Repairing machinery



Bleaching and dyeing textiles and operating bleaching equipment



Testing and inspecting materials



Supervising and managing production lines



General maintenance and cleanup




According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), textile mill workers usually work in three different areas of the textile industry: apparel manufacturing, textile production mills, or textile mills.



How Were Textile Workers Exposed to Asbestos?



Throughout the 1940s until the late 1970s, many products produced in textile mills were made with asbestos and asbestos-containing materials (ACMs). Additionally, textile mills used asbestos in equipment and machinery used to make products. 



This placed textile workers at a heightened risk of inhaling and ingesting asbestos, leading to the threat of developing toxic illnesses such as malignant mesothelioma, asbestosis, and asbestos-related lung cancer.



Workers with the highest risks of exposure handled asbestos to make asbestos textiles. Handling raw asbestos causes fibers to be released into the air, where workers can inhale them. Other workers in the area were also at risk of exposure. 



Even in mills that did not use raw asbestos fibers to make textiles, workers faced exposure from equipment. Asbestos parts often released fibers due to natural deterioration and friction and when workers made repairs or performed maintenance tasks. 



Although today's textile manufacturing centers do not use asbestos as much as they once did, the sheer amount of people who were once exposed to asbestos while working in textile mills is astounding. 



Asbestos Products Used in the Textile Industry



The most obvious source of asbestos in textile mills that exposed workers was raw asbestos. This was used in mills that manufactured asbestos textiles. Some of the types of asbestos products workers made in textile mills include: 




Fire curtains



Roofing felt



Fireproof clothing



Asbestos aprons



Potholders and oven mitts



Welding blankets



Asbestos rope




Many other products in textile mills contained asbestos, including those that made asbestos products and those that did not:




Insulation



Pipe lagging



Boilers and furnaces



Gaskets



Valves



Machinery brakes and other friction parts




The Risk of Asbestos Illnesses in Textile Workers



Scientific studies have been carried out on textile workers and asbestos, confirming that these workers are at a heightened risk of developing asbestos diseases.




A study published by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) studied people who worked in four textile plants in North Carolina and chrysotile asbestos from January 1950 until December 1973. Of the 5,770 workers included in the study, 277 people died from some form of lung cancer, including pleural mesothelioma, a disease directly linked to asbestos exposure. Those who developed asbestos illnesses were exposed more significantly to asbestos than others.





Another study was a follow-up of a previous study that found an increased risk for both pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma in textile workers. Not many studies have investigated the connection between textile work and peritoneal mesothelioma, a rarer, abdominal form of mesothelioma. This study found that the risk of developing persisted, even years after workers were no longer exposed to asbestos. 




A study published in 2018 followed cases of mesothelioma diagnosed in women and men from 1993 to 2012. The researchers found that many of the women with mesothelioma worked in chemical and plastic factories.  ut, the highest rates of mesothelioma among women in the study were among those who worked in textile factories. 



Manufacturers That Supplied Asbestos to Textile Mills



In the past, manufacturers supplied asbestos-containing products to textile mills. If a textile worker develops an asbestos illness, the manufacturers that supplied the products could be liable for damages. 



The most notable manufacturers include:




Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Inc.



Southern Textile Corp.



Raymark Industries



Johns Manville



Southern Asbestos Company



Regal Textile



H.K. Porter Co.



Coats & Clark Thread Company




What to Do if You Worked in a Textile Mill



Past textile workers are at an increased risk for asbestos illnesses.  f this includes you, talk to your doctor about your risk for mesothelioma and other illnesses. An early diagnosis gives you more treatment options and a better outcome. 



The next step is to contact a mesothelioma lawyer to determine your options for seeking compensation. You could be eligible to file a lawsuit against asbestos suppliers or to file a claim with an asbestos trust fund.  Your lawyer can review your work history and find all possible avenues for recovering damages. 



Additional Resources and Assistance for Textile Workers



Don't forget to fill out our form for our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. You may be entitled to damages for pain, suffering, medical expenses, lost wages, and more. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540.

### Asbestos and Plant Workers

Plant workers and factory workers once had some of the highest risks of developing mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses compared to other industries. In the past, many types of factories relied on asbestos in parts, equipment, and machinery. Workers in asbestos plants had the highest rates of exposure. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 





Did Plants and Factories Use Asbestos? 



Many types of industrial plants and factories used asbestos in the past. Some used asbestos in their products, such as asbestos textiles or insulation. 



Plants also used asbestos in equipment and machinery, specifically in friction components. Many plants contained asbestos in insulation and other construction materials used to build the facility. 



Asbestos Products in Plants and Factories



Some factories used asbestos in their processes and the products they made. These are highly specific to the industry. Plants of all types commonly used asbestos in equipment and building materials: 




Boilers and other heat-related equipment. Many factories used boilers and furnaces and had steam and hot water pipes. These pieces of equipment needed to be well insulated to prevent heat loss and harm to workers from heat or fire. For many years, asbestos was the choice for insulation and pipe lagging.



Machinery parts. Industrial factories rely on various types of machinery. Many of the parts in machinery once contained asbestos to reduce overheating from friction, prevent heat loss, and seal components. These parts included gaskets, valves, packing, pumps, conveyor belts, bearings, and more. 



Construction materials. Most industrial plants were constructed with hundreds of asbestos materials. Asbestos was once used in insulation, wallboard, adhesives, ceiling and floor tiles, roofing materials, and many other materials. While workers might not have directly handled these materials, they could release fibers if they were damaged or deteriorated or during maintenance and repair work. 




Raw Asbestos Fibers in Plants



Some plants made products that contained asbestos. Workers in these factories handled or worked near raw asbestos fibers. Workers mixed asbestos fibers into other materials, like cement or paper pulp, to make products for other industries. 



Raw asbestos fibers pose some of the biggest exposure risks. The fibers easily become airborne, contaminating the air and surfaces. Any workers in the facility could have been exposed, even if they never handled asbestos. 



Plant Workers Exposed to Asbestos



Factory and plant workers are responsible for many job duties that contribute to production work in factories. Tasks may include molding, smelting, cutting, and reshaping materials.



Heavy equipment and machinery are almost always used for these job tasks, and they once contained asbestos in components. Workers are often responsible for the installation, repair, and upkeep of these machines.



Other duties of plant workers include:




Working on production lines



Measuring and pouring ingredients



Scraping waste materials from machinery and equipment



Loading and unloading processing equipment



Pouring materials into machinery



Recording data



Reading gauges and more



Inspecting products for quality assurance



Sweeping up debris, which included asbestos debris and other toxins




Asbestos Exposure in Plant Workers



Regardless of factory workers' job duties, most were at risk of asbestos exposure. 



Asbestos was once used in all plant products, materials, and machinery. Factories were also constructed with asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) and found in the insulation, flooring, wiring, and walls.



Plant workers were at a significantly higher risk of developing an asbestos-related illness due to all the sanding, drilling, shaping, smelting, and cutting that took place daily.



Asbestos fibers were quickly released into the air. Workers ingested the tiny, odorless fibers without even realizing it.



Even worse, the health hazard went on for many decades, unreported by manufacturers that knew of the dangers of asbestos but kept the information disclosed to make a profit.



Studies on Asbestos Exposure and Mesothelioma in Plant Workers



Scientific studies conducted on plant workers and asbestos indicate a high rate of people in the industry develop asbestos illnesses, including malignant mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, and asbestosis.



In one particular study carried out in 1968 by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), results revealed that workers in plants, especially asbestos plants, developed lung cancer about twice as much as the general population.



A total of 3,276 former plant workers participated in the study, of which 63 passed away from asbestos-related lung cancer.



The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports that a study carried out in 1975 on plant workers revealed that out of the 2,722 men and 554 women studied:




49 men died from lung cancer



13 people died from mesothelioma, 4 of whom were women. 



76 died from asbestosis




All workers in the study worked at factories where asbestos exposure was common.



A study conducted in Belgium and reported in 2015 found that metal factory workers were 87% more likely to have and die from mesothelioma than the general public. 



A 2010 study conducted at a Raybestos Manhattan facility in Connecticut looked at workers who manufactured friction asbestos products. Seven of the workers had mesothelioma, and all could be traced to workplace asbestos exposure. 



These are just some of many asbestos studies that found higher rates of exposure and illness in plant and factory workers of all types. 



Asbestos Plant Worker Lawsuits



Factory workers from all types of industries have sued employers and asbestos product suppliers. Many have recovered significant damages for their illnesses and related expenses. 




Jayne Menssen worked as a secretary at a rubber factory in Bloomington, Illinois, in the 1960s. She never handled asbestos but was exposed to fibers in the facility. Menssen developed mesothelioma and sued suppliers Honeywell International and Pneumo Abex. After a trial in 2010, she won a $17.8 million jury award. 





James Crawford worked in factories throughout his career, eventually developing mesothelioma. He filed a lawsuit against more than 30 companies that supplied factories with asbestos and asbestos products. An Illinois jury awarded him $16 million. 





Mark Buttitta worked at a General Motors factory and distribution warehouse for many years. He developed mesothelioma and died a year after his diagnosis. His family sued and was awarded $30.3 million, New Jersey's largest asbestos verdict at the time in 2010. 




What to Do if You Worked in a Plant with Asbestos



If you worked in a plant decades ago, when asbestos was everywhere, you are at risk of getting sick. Talk to your doctor about your risks and screenings. Asbestos exposure often causes illnesses decades later. 



If you are diagnosed with an asbestos illness, you could be eligible for compensation. Talk to an asbestos attorney to determine the legal actions you can take. A mesothelioma lawyer can review your work history, find all the companies liable for your illness, and help you take steps to recover damages. 



Additional Help and Resources for Plant Workers



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related cancer, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### Asbestos and Electricians

Electricians are among the many types of workers at risk of asbestos exposure and developing mesothelioma. Although the risk is less now, electricians today still encounter asbestos in older electrical systems and insulation. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 









About Electricians and Asbestos Exposure



Electricians face several hazards on the job, including exposure to asbestos. Electricians can have many duties, depending on their job description. In general, electricians are responsible for:




Assembling and installing electrical wiring



Repairing malfunctioning electrical systems



Connecting wires



Testing electrical systems



Preparing blueprints and sketches



Placing pipes and tubing into walls, partitions, and other areas




Electricians often work with electrical wiring and panels, turbines, generators, and other older equipment made with asbestos. Electrical equipment once contained asbestos for its ability to insulate against heat and electricity and protect against fire. 



Asbestos exposure risks for electricians were higher in the past, but electricians today can still be exposed to asbestos. The risk today comes from older asbestos materials lingering in buildings. 



The risk of exposure to asbestos comes from electrical products containing asbestos and other sources. Electricians working on construction sites are vulnerable to the dust created by other workers, for instance, drywallers or painters sanding materials. Asbestos in that dust puts electricians at risk. 



What Electrical Products Were Made with Asbestos? 



Asbestos was long used in the construction industry because it is an efficient electrical and heat insulator. It also makes materials stronger and was readily available and inexpensive. 



As the health risks of asbestos became more well-known and regulations limited it, asbestos use in the industry declined. Before the transition away from its use occurred, many electrical products contained asbestos: 




Electrical cable wraps insulated with asbestos were wrapped or molded around electrical cables. Braided cables also often contained asbestos and covered electrical wires. 



Electrical paper made with asbestos was once used in electrical boxes to prevent fires. 



Electrical shielding shield electrical components and were once made with asbestos cement. 



Generators and turbines were made with asbestos insulation to reduce overheating risks and resulting damage. 



Heating units contained asbestos to prevent heat from degrading electrical wires. 



Plastic panels were often used as electrical shields but also contained asbestos for insulation. 




Are Electricians Still at Risk of Asbestos Exposure? 



Most asbestos use occurred in the past, but old asbestos materials linger in residential, commercial, and industrial buildings. Electricians today risk exposure to asbestos when working with or around these materials. 



For example, a study from 2021 found that electrical arc chutes still in use but made before the 1980s contain as much as 36% chrysotile asbestos. 



Electricians remove, manipulate, or even cut apart these materials, exposing asbestos and releasing harmful fibers into the air. 



Manufacturers That Supplied Asbestos Products



In the past, numerous manufacturers supplied asbestos-containing products to companies and job sites where electricians worked. Some of the most notable manufacturers that put electricians at risk of asbestos exposure are:




General Electric (GE)



Crane Co.



Union Carbide



Uniroyal Inc.



Foster Wheeler



Uniroyal Inc.



Johns Manville



Siemens Energy & Automation




Mesothelioma Risk in Electricians



Asbestos exposure is the only known cause of mesothelioma. Electricians faced risks of inhaling asbestos fibers, which, when lodged in tissue in the respiratory system, can cause mesothelioma, asbestosis, lung cancer, and other diseases. 



Studies confirm the risk and highlight the increased rate of mesothelioma in electricians. In one study, researchers examined mesothelioma markers in over 100 workers, including electricians. Electricians were among the types of workers with the highest risk of having biomarkers that indicate mesothelioma cancer cells. 



Another study confirmed a higher-than-average incidence of mesothelioma in electricians. They found that exposure to asbestos comes from electrical products but even more so from being around workers creating asbestos dust during renovations and other work. 



Electricians and Asbestos Lawsuits



In May 2012, six people who worked for R&R Electric Corporation filed an asbestos lawsuit in Roane County, Tennessee, after all developed mesothelioma from working around asbestos-containing products.



The plaintiffs, who worked as electrician helpers, sued several government agencies, including the head of the project, the Department of Energy (DOE). The plaintiffs' asbestos attorney stated that while working,




“The chop saws created thick clouds of fine dust and debris, which completely coated Plaintiffs’ bodies and clothing every day, and which they breathed continuously." 




The plaintiffs were also subjected to a fire in 2001, which resulted in inhaling toxic fumes after a contracting company, BNFL Inc., attempted to burn copper coils and asbestos-containing insulation material.




“The coils were burned in open fires in the BNFL switchyard over a period of a week, creating huge plumes of smoke. On information and belief, the insulating material and wrapping contained significant quantities of ACM (asbestos-containing material).”




While looking over the documentation, the plaintiff's asbestos attorney discovered that the DOE knew that the materials contained asbestos, according to the organization's manual.



In July 2011, the family of former Navy electrician David Lanpher successfully won a lawsuit against numerous manufacturers that supplied asbestos-containing products to ships. 



According to court documents, Lanpher never received warnings from the manufacturers of the dangers of working around asbestos products. In turn, he developed malignant mesothelioma and died on July 13, 2008.



While working on naval ships from 1954 to 1973, Lanpher handled wiring, engine parts, insulation boards, and many other asbestos products. 



Due to the extreme exposure to the toxic mineral, Lanpher's family received $6.3 million in damages.



Compensation for Electricians Exposed to Asbestos



If you were exposed to asbestos on the job, talk to your doctor as soon as possible. The sooner you get a diagnosis of an asbestos illness, the better the outcome will be. Your doctor can assess your risk and provide early screenings. 



If you receive a diagnosis, consult with a mesothelioma lawyer to learn about your options for seeking compensation. Asbestos companies can be held liable for exposing workers to asbestos without providing adequate warnings of the risks. 



A mesothelioma lawyer will review your work history to find all the companies that could be held liable for damages. Depending on the companies involved, you might be eligible for a claim with an asbestos trust fund or to file a lawsuit to recover damages. 



Additional Help and Resources for Electricians



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### Asbestos and Plumbers

Plumbers are at risk of asbestos exposure and for developing an asbestos-related illness, such as mesothelioma. Although asbestos use is much less today, plumbers still work around older, asbestos-containing pipes. Plumbers with asbestos illnesses may be eligible for compensation through lawsuits and asbestos trust funds. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.









How Plumbers Are at Risk for Asbestos Exposure



Plumbers are responsible for many duties, including maintaining, repairing, and installing pipes and related fixtures used for waste disposal and water distribution. 



Plumbers work in both commercial buildings and residential homes and sometimes work as part of a construction crew or work for a company responsible for repairing pre-existing plumbing problems.



Before the early 1980s, especially between the 1940s and the late 1970s, asbestos often insulated boilers, pipes, water tanks, and other products that plumbers work with.



Items needed for plumbers to perform their jobs correctly were once made with asbestos, including tools, cement, valves, gaskets, welding rods, and more.



Plumbers sand down, cut, remove, install, and repair asbestos-containing products to make pipes and other materials work correctly. These actions can release asbestos fibers into the air. Airborne asbestos fibers can be inhaled, resulting in damage and later illnesses in some people. 



Are Plumbers Still at Risk for Asbestos Exposure? 



Yes, plumbers are still at risk for asbestos exposure on the job. Asbestos is no longer used in construction but lingers in older buildings and materials. 



When plumbers work in older buildings, they may encounter old insulation, asbestos cement, and other products with asbestos. They can be exposed when cutting into, sanding, or otherwise manipulating old asbestos pipes and other materials. 



Old asbestos pipes and asbestos-insulated pipes pose the biggest exposure risk to plumbers. They cut into these pipes, which spreads asbestos fibers into the air. Without adequate protective gear, exposure is certain. 



Asbestos Products Used By Plumbers



Even though these products are no longer made with asbestos, older pipes and valves are still used today. Over time, the pipes can wear down, break apart, and release asbestos fibers.



These are some of the common products made with asbestos that plumbers once handled regularly and may still encounter on jobs today: 




Insulation. Asbestos was once common in all types of insulation, including lagging, insulation that wraps around pipes carrying hot water or steam. Asbestos insulation was also found in boilers, ducts, and hot water tanks. 





Cement. Asbestos cement was also common in construction and was used to make many products, including pipes. When plumbers cut into old asbestos cement pipes, they risk exposure. 





Heat Shields. Water heaters and tanks often had asbestos heat shields around them to protect against heat exposure. Today, old heat shields can put plumbers at risk of exposure when they need to remove or replace them. 





Gaskets, Valves, and Pumps. Smaller pieces of equipment that go into plumbing systems can pose a risk to plumbers. Pumps, gaskets, valves, seals, and packing materials were often made with asbestos in the past. 





Joint Compound. Plumbers in the past often used joint compound that contained asbestos. Asbestos was used in these materials to resist heat and to add strength. 




Manufacturers of Asbestos-Containing Plumbing Materials and Parts



Several manufacturers supplied asbestos-containing products to plumbing and construction companies. 



These manufacturers are generally responsible when plumbers develop an asbestos illness. Some of the manufacturers that supplied asbestos to plumbing and construction companies include:




Celotex Corporation



Certainteed Products Corporation



Eagle-Picher Industrie



Garlock, Inc.



GAF Corporation



Gypsum



Keene Corporation



John Crane



The Flintkote Company



Union Carbide




Studies on Plumbers, Asbestos, and Mesothelioma Risk



According to a 2007 study published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and The Annals of Occupational Hygiene (AOH), plumbers run a high risk of asbestos exposure while working and even after working, as asbestos fibers tend to stick to the hair, skin, and clothing.



The study indicates that maintenance workers, including plumbers, are exposed to amphibole asbestos more often than other types of asbestos. 



Amphibole asbestos was once considered highly valuable for commercial use. This type of asbestos was used on parts and products that plumbers regularly come into contact with. 



The American Cancer Society (ACS) states that amphibole asbestos poses a higher risk of developing cancer when compared to other forms of the mineral.



During the study, samples obtained confirmed that at least 68% of the workers involved in the research were exposed to significantly high asbestos levels.



Studies from Europe have also linked plumbers with higher rates of asbestos exposure and illness. One study found high rates of asbestosis in British plumbers. Another found an increased risk of mesothelioma in 24 different occupations in Sweden, with plumbers topping the list. 



Asbestos Lawsuits and Plumbers



Many plumbers filed mesothelioma lawsuits against the manufacturers that supplied asbestos to their job sites after developing the disease. The majority of plumbers who filed lawsuits have been successful in winning their cases.



$7 Million for Mesothelioma



Larry Stewart, who worked as a plumber from the late 1960s until he was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2007, filed against Union Carbide and won over $7 million in economic and non-economic damages.



Stewart was responsible for grand-scale commercial and residential projects, which brought him into contact with drywallers. Drywallers once used asbestos-containing joint compounds while working, and Stewart's lawyer successfully proved that, on many occasions, Stewart breathed in asbestos fibers for long periods. 



The joint compounds were manufactured by Hamilton Materials but obtained by Union Carbide, a company that mined asbestos in Coalinga, California, and sold the asbestos as "Calidria."



During the lawsuit, Stewart's asbestos attorney showed proof that Union Carbide knew beforehand how dangerous asbestos is yet made no attempt to warn people who worked with or around their asbestos-containing products.



$8.45 Million for Mesothelioma Death



Robert Swanson died from mesothelioma after working as a plumber and a pipefitter. His career led him to be exposed to asbestos repeatedly. 



Swanson's family sued suppliers of asbestos products he used or was in contact with on his job sites. These included boilers, rope, cement, and gaskets made by Weil-McLain. The case went to trial, and a jury awarded the family $8.45 million for wrongful death. 



What to Do if You Worked With Asbestos as a Plumber



If you worked as a plumber before the 1980s, you were at high risk for asbestos exposure. Even later, plumbers risked exposure to older asbestos products. Talk to your doctor about your risk factors and screenings for cancer and asbestos illnesses. 



A mesothelioma lawyer can help if you get a diagnosis of an asbestos illness like mesothelioma or lung cancer. They can review your work history and find companies responsible for exposing you to asbestos. 



You might be eligible to file a lawsuit or an asbestos trust fund claim to seek compensation. An experienced asbestos attorney will explain your options and help you take the next steps. 



Help and Resources for Plumbers



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form for our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area.

### Asbestos and Insulation Workers

Insulators install, remove, and replace insulation in various work settings. A lot of insulation was once made with asbestos, putting these workers at high risk for asbestos exposure. Current workers still face risks when working in older buildings with outdated asbestos insulation.  



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 









How Insulation Workers Are Exposed to Asbestos



Insulation workers install, replace, and repair insulation materials, many containing asbestos. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, insulators typically work indoors and in confined spaces where insulation materials, including asbestos, getting in the eyes, lungs, and hair.




Asbestos was heavily used in construction until about the 1970s. At that time, the dangers became more well-known, and companies began phasing it out. One of the most common uses of asbestos was in insulation. Asbestos is a very efficient insulator. 





Past workers in the industry risked exposure from inhaling the tiny fibers that often break free from raw asbestos and asbestos insulation. Inhaled asbestos fibers cause damage in the body that can lead to illnesses years later, including mesothelioma, lung cancer, asbestosis, and others. 





Today's insulation workers still face risks of asbestos exposure. They often must handle old asbestos insulation, which can be even more harmful than it was in the past. Older asbestos insulation is more likely to have deteriorated and to release fibers. 





Current workers in insulation also risk exposure as they cut, tear, and remove old products with asbestos. These activities are highly likely to release asbestos fibers. 





In addition to asbestos insulation, older vermiculite insulation can also cause asbestos exposure. W.R. Grace once mined vermiculite contaminated with asbestos. The contaminated vermiculite went into insulation products for decades and was distributed throughout the country. 




Where Is Asbestos Insulation Found in Buildings?



Asbestos insulation was used in many locations and products that went into the construction of residential, commercial, and industrial buildings: 




Pipes. Pipes and pipe coverings were once made with asbestos to reduce heat loss and protect against burns from pipes carrying heated steam and other fluids. Asbestos-wrapped pipes were commonly used in industrial settings with boilers and furnaces. Decaying asbestos pipe insulation is a major source of exposure for workers today. 





Attics and walls. Zonolite insulation that contained asbestos-contaminated vermiculite was once used heavily in the majority of homes and buildings built before the 1980s. Asbestos-containing insulation was often built into walls to reduce heat loss. 





Spray-on materials. Spray-on insulation was a huge source of asbestos exposure for workers in the past. Spraying asbestos onto walls, ceilings, and attics produced a lot of harmful fibers. Today, workers who remove this type of insulation continue to face exposure risks. 





Block insulation. Asbestos block insulation was used in concrete blocks in homes and other buildings. 




Companies that Made Asbestos Insulation



Numerous manufacturers were responsible for supplying asbestos-containing insulation to companies throughout the nation. Some of the most notable manufacturers of past asbestos insulation are:




A C & S



A. P. Green Industries



Bestwall Gypsum



C.E. Thurston & Sons



Celotex



CertainTeed Corporation



Combustion Engineering



Crown Cork & Seal



EaglePicher



Ehret Magnesia



Flintkote



GAF Corporation



Johns Manville



Kaiser Aluminum



Keasbey & Mattison (Nicolet)



National Gypsum



Owens Corning



Owens-Illinois



Rock Wool Manufacturing



Shook & Fletcher



Unarco



Western MacArthur



W.R. Grace




Many asbestos manufacturers knew of the dangers asbestos posed to people but did not warn workers or consumers of the risks. 



These manufacturers have faced and continue to face mesothelioma lawsuits over exposure to asbestos and resulting illnesses.



Studies on Asbestos and Mesothelioma in Insulators



Many studies have proven that insulators are exposed to asbestos and have connected this exposure to mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses:




In a study published by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), researchers and scientists found that 2,270 asbestos-related deaths occurred among 17,800 insulation workers in the U.S. and Canada. The study was conducted from 1967 to 1976, and scientists and researchers observed that the dormancy period for the workers' diseases ranged from two to four decades. The most common diseases among the asbestos workers were pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma.





In another study published in the British Journal of Industrial Medicine, over 140 insulation workers who worked in Belfast during 1940 were studied for incidents of asbestos-related diseases. The results state the men, who were between the ages of 16 and 66, died at an alarming rate due to asbestos illnesses.





A study conducted in Sweden and published in 2016 looked at asbestos cancers diagnosed in workers between 1961 and 2009. The researchers found that insulation workers had pleural mesothelioma at rates ten times higher than others. 




Insulators and Asbestos Lawsuits



Many insulators who got sick from asbestos exposure on the job have been able to recover damages through lawsuits. Asbestos insulation manufacturers can be held liable for exposure and resulting illnesses. 



In an early case, John Karjala sued Johns Manville and other insulators after developing asbestosis. He worked as an insulation installer from 1948 to 1966 and reported regularly inhaling asbestos dust. He settled with several companies but took Johns Manville to court. The company was ordered to pay $200,000 in damages. 



What to Do if You Were Exposed to Asbestos as an Insulator



If you know or even suspect you were exposed to asbestos in the workplace, talk to your doctor as soon as possible. They can explain the risks of getting sick and recommend screenings and tests. Earlier diagnosis of an asbestos illness leads to a better outcome. 



If you get a diagnosis of an asbestos illness, contact an asbestos law firm. Experienced mesothelioma lawyers can help you take legal action and seek compensation. 



They will review your work history to find all the companies that could be held liable for your asbestos exposure and illness. They will explain your options for recovering damages, including asbestos trust funds and lawsuits. 



Additional Help and Resources for Insulation Workers



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related cancer, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form for our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area.

### Asbestos and Paper Mill Workers

Paper mill workers, specifically those who worked in the mills before the 1980s, are at a heightened risk of developing malignant mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases. Most paper mills across the nation once used an abundance of asbestos-containing materials in machinery, products, and equipment.



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.









Did Paper Mills Use Asbestos? 



Paper mills used asbestos in the past, which put workers at risk of exposure. Mills used asbestos in some of the equipment used to manufacture paper. They also contained asbestos in building materials in the factories where people worked. 



While paper mills today no longer use asbestos, exposure in the past can still lead to asbestos illness diagnoses today. Older mills might also still contain asbestos in insulation and other building materials. 



How Did Paper Mills Use Asbestos?



The process of making paper products involves preparing, pulping, and refining raw materials. The process includes chemicals like bleach and talc, special coatings, high temperatures, and a drying period. Two main sources of asbestos were used to make paper this way.  



Paper Mill Materials and Equipment



Industrial paper-making used asbestos in some of the materials that went into products and in the equipment workers used. Machinery used to make paper contained asbestos in gaskets and friction parts to reduce the risk of overheating and fire. 



Paper-making required the use of boilers and high temperatures. The equipment associated with boilers, including pipes, were often lagged, or insulated, with asbestos. 



Some of the materials specific to the paper industry also contained asbestos. For example, dryer felts were often made with asbestos. Dryer felts acted like conveyor belts for large sheets of paper as they dried. Asbestos fibers in dryer felts could easily come loose when handled or cleaned. 



The paper industry also used talc in many of its processes. Talc is a natural mineral that is often contaminated with asbestos. It is light and contributes to dust in the air, which could also contribute to asbestos exposure. 



Some types of paper were actually manufactured with asbestos in them. Factories that made asbestos papers put workers at serious risk of exposure. 



Building Materials with Asbestos



The other source of asbestos in paper mills was the buildings themselves. Most industrial buildings were once built with asbestos materials in many components. Insulation, floor and ceiling tiles, roofing materials, and other construction products contained asbestos. 



Maintenance workers in these buildings faced major risks of exposure by handling and disturbing asbestos materials. Even workers who never handled asbestos building components faced exposure risks when these materials released asbestos fibers. 



Who Was at Risk of Asbestos Exposure in Paper Mills? 



Paper mill workers were commonly exposed to asbestos via paper mill insulation, asbestos-containing materials in the machinery and equipment, and construction materials used to build the paper mills.



Maintenance workers ran the highest risk of asbestos exposure as they worked around deteriorating asbestos-containing products and materials while doing repairs.



However, regardless of job function, all paper mill workers are at risk of developing an asbestos illness, including malignant mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, and asbestosis.



Companies That Exposed Paper Mill Workers to Asbestos



Paper manufacturing companies were sources of asbestos exposure for many workers, but the suppliers of asbestos materials to the mills are the companies often held liable. Some of the major suppliers of asbestos materials to paper mills included: 




AstenJohnson, Inc. 



Johns Manville



Kaiser Aluminum



Kimberly-Clark



Scapa Waycross, Inc. 



W.R. Grace




Some of the many paper companies that used asbestos in their buildings and equipment include: 




Allied Paper Corporation



Boise Cascade Corporation



Croswell-Parsons



Crown Zellerbach Corporation



Dixie Pulp Paper Inc.



Georgia-Pacific



Hammermill Paper Company



International Paper Company



Louisiana-Pacific Corporation



Med Corporation



Solo Cup Company



Union Bag and Paper Company



Wausau Paper Corporation



Weyerhaeuser




The Dangers of Asbestos in Paper Mills



Over the years, many studies on asbestos exposure and paper mill workers have been conducted. The results have shown that workers are susceptible to developing fatal illnesses due to the high amount of asbestos used at paper mills.




In 2005, the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) published a study performed on the paper mill industry in Pistoia, Italy. The research was performed on a small paper mill factory that used asbestos cement as insulating panels. The three different types of asbestos used in the insulating panels included crocidolite, amosite, and chrysotile. The researchers found asbestos in the drying machines and the paper mill's dust.





A 1996 study published in the American Journal of Industrial Medicine (AJIM) reports that paper mill workers are at a heightened risk of developing lung cancer and malignant mesothelioma, especially maintenance workers. The study also noted that paper mill workers are in danger of developing malignant lymphoma and leukemia.





In 2013, Swedish researchers found that former paper mill workers had an increased risk of developing pleural mesothelioma compared to the general population. Nearly three-quarters of the workers had been definitively exposed to asbestos, and most were maintenance workers. 




Paper Mill and Asbestos Lawsuits



Paper manufacturers and suppliers of asbestos materials to paper mills have been held liable for former workers' illnesses and resulting damages in numerous lawsuits. These are just some examples of asbestos paper mill lawsuits: 




Kevan Holdsworth worked at a Crown Zellerbach paper mill in Camas, Washington, from 1964 to 2001. Scapa Waycross supplied the mill with asbestos-containing dryer felts. Holdsworth worked on the crew that cleaned the dryer felts, which exposed him to asbestos fibers. He died from mesothelioma in 2019. His family was awarded $16.67 million in a verdict against Scapa Waycross. 





Henry Barabin also worked at a Crown mill in Washington. He developed mesothelioma in 2006 and sued Scapa Waycross and AstenJohnson. He won a $10.2 million verdict against the companies in 2009 due to his exposure to asbestos in their dryer felts. 





Former paper mill workers still have opportunities to file lawsuits for damages. Workers from the Waldorf paper mill in St. Paul, Minnesota, are currently being encouraged to file if they develop asbestos illnesses. Workers at the facility in the past are now at risk of getting sick. It stopped making paper products in 2022. 




What to Do if You Were Exposed to Asbestos in a Paper Mill



If you worked in a paper mill in the past, consider talking to an asbestos attorney who can help you seek compensation for asbestos exposure and illness. Workers are still being diagnosed today, even if they worked in mills decades ago. 



Even if you are unsure whether you encountered asbestos, a mesothelioma lawyer can help you answer that question. They can provide you with legal options for seeking damages and the best chance of recovering compensation. 



Additional Help and Information for Paper Mill Workers



Remember that you may qualify for significant compensation if you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related cancer. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area.

### Asbestos and Factory and Industrial Workers

Factory workers faced high risks of asbestos exposure until the 1980s, when widespread use of asbestos stopped. Many factories used asbestos in products, machinery, equipment, and building materials. Mesothelioma lawsuits filed by former factory workers are still ongoing today. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related cancer, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.









How Were Factory Workers and Industrial Workers Exposed to Asbestos?



Asbestos was used for decades in many industries due to its ability to insulate, protect against heat and fire, and strengthen materials. Industrial factories used asbestos more than many other workplaces. 



Workers in these settings may have handled asbestos or products with asbestos directly. This kind of work caused asbestos materials to release fibers that became part of the dust in the air. Whether they handled asbestos or not, workers in the area risked exposure by inhaling the fibers in the air. 



Some factories used raw asbestos fibers to make asbestos products. Others used asbestos materials to manufacture other products. Nearly all factories, regardless of what they made, had asbestos in machinery, equipment, and the building itself. 



Even in factories that did not make asbestos products, workers risked exposure through fibers released during work and maintenance on machinery and other equipment. 



What Materials in Factories Contained Asbestos?



Factories that made asbestos products used raw asbestos fibers. Workers who moved and used these fibers to mix them into other materials or products had very high risks of exposure. Any other workers in the area risked exposure as well. 



These types of factories made numerous products with asbestos, including: 




Insulation



Drywall



Other construction products



Asbestos textiles



Asbestos paper




Asbestos in Machinery and Equipment



All types of factories used equipment and machinery that likely contained asbestos. Asbestos was used to insulate machinery and equipment, for instance, around boilers, furnaces, and steam pipes. 



Asbestos was also used to prevent overheating from friction in many components, including pumps, bearings, lathes, and conveyor belts. Parts with asbestos included valves, gaskets, seals, packing, and coatings. 



Daily use caused these materials to deteriorate over time, which could lead to exposure to asbestos fibers. Any repairs or maintenance work on equipment could also cause exposure. 



Asbestos in Building Components



The factory buildings themselves contained asbestos in many of their components. Most construction materials at one time contained asbestos, from insulation to flooring tiles, adhesives, and roofing. These materials could cause exposure if they deteriorated or were damaged during repair and maintenance work. 



Industrial Jobs at Risk for Asbestos Exposure



Factory workers with the highest risks of exposure worked in facilities that handled and used raw asbestos to make products. Manipulating raw asbestos released harmful fibers into the air. Those workers who handled asbestos directly had the highest risks. 



Mechanics and maintenance employees who worked in factories faced the highest risk of excessive asbestos exposure. 



The workers were required to maintain and repair malfunctioning asbestos-containing machines, which required direct contact with airborne asbestos fibers.



Once the machines were ready for use, factory machinists were at risk of asbestos exposure as soon as they started the equipment.



All workers in factories with asbestos faced some risks of exposure. When asbestos fibers entered the air as dust, anyone in the area could inhale them. 



Studies on Factory Workers and Asbestos Exposure



Many studies over the years have proven that factory and industrial workers have faced high rates of asbestos exosure that put them at risk for asbestos illnesses, like mesothelioma. 




A study published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) described research on asbestos exposure at a factory that manufactured drying machines after 250 former employees passed away. Dust samples and samples from the factory's drying machines were analyzed. The results found significant amounts of asbestos. Of the 250 former workers who passed away, 234 were found to have either mesothelioma or lung cancer.





Another study investigated deaths in machine operators in factories and workers who handled industrial insulation. More than 650 workers out of 7,000 died from peritoneal cancer, a type of mesothelioma that affects the abdomen. 





A 2015 study conducted in Belgium looked at deaths related to asbestos in workers between 2001 and 2009. The researchers found that workers in metal factories were 87% more likely to have died of mesothelioma when compared to other workers. 





A study from 2010 involved workers at a Raybestos factory in Connecticut. They manufactured asbestos friction products. A previous study had claimed that nobody from the factory died from asbestos exposure. The more current study found at least seven deaths related to asbestos among the workers. 




Are Factory Workers Still at Risk of Asbestos Exposure? 



Factory workers today have much less risk of asbestos exposure. The risk is not zero because asbestos lingers in older factories. Deteriorating materials can still cause exposure. Maintenance and repair work can also cause exposure. 



Most importantly, people who worked in factories before the 1980s are at a heightened risk of developing asbestos illnesses such as malignant mesothelioma, asbestosis, and asbestos-related lung cancer.



Factory Workers and Mesothelioma Lawsuits



The high amount of asbestos exposure and related diseases that factory workers faced resulted in mesothelioma and asbestos-related lawsuits against the manufacturers that once supplied asbestos to companies.



In 2008, the family of Mark Buttitta, a former factory worker from Hackensack, New Jersey, filed an asbestos lawsuit in Bergen County after Buttitta passed away from mesothelioma. 



Buttitta worked at General Motors (GM) in the parts warehouse in both Bloomfield and Englewood, which led to asbestos exposure and premature death at the age of 50.



According to the family attorney, Buttitta's case was just one of the many cases in which factory workers in New Jersey were unaware of the dangers they were facing at work.




"In Bloomfield, Englewood, and all across New Jersey, men and women who wouldn't know a brake shoe from a horseshoe can be struck down by this horrible disease decades later from simply living with someone who dealt with asbestos in his daily occupation. In Mark Buttitta's case we were able to get justice for him and his young family."




Buttitta's family won over $30 million.



Manufacturers That Used Asbestos in Factories



Many manufacturers supplied factories with asbestos or made asbestos products, including: 




Johns Manville



Honeywell



Turner & Newell



BF Goodrich



Celotex



Dana Corporation



Raybestos



Porter Hayden Co.



John Crane Co.




What to Do if You Were Exposed to Asbestos in a Factory



If you worked in a factory during peak years of asbestos use, talk to your doctor about the risks and any medical screenings you need. Not everyone exposed to asbestos gets sick, but for those who do, an early diagnosis produces a better outcome. 



If you get a diagnosis of mesothelioma or another asbestos illness, talk to an experienced mesothelioma lawyer. They can review your work history, identify companies responsible for your exposure, and help you take steps to seek compensation.  



Additional Help and Resources for Factory Workers



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related cancer, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area.

### Asbestos and Construction Workers

Construction workers have high risks of occupational asbestos exposure. Although asbestos isn't used as heavily in today's construction industry as it once was, asbestos materials linger in older buildings. Construction workers are still at risk of exposure and asbestos illnesses. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma or asbestos-related cancer, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.





How Are Construction Workers Exposed to Asbestos? 



Construction is one of the most dangerous industries for workers. Among the many risks are asbestos exposure. Asbestos posed a risk in the past and continues to harm workers in the industry today. 



Construction workers are at risk for exposure because asbestos was once used heavily in materials used to construct buildings. This includes residential, commercial, and industrial buildings. 



Asbestos is an efficient insulator and also strengthens materials. It was also, at one time, readily available and inexpensive. It was a material of choice in hundreds of construction products until approximately the 1970s. 



Asbestos materials cause exposure when they deteriorate or are disturbed by handling, cutting, or sanding. These activities release tiny asbestos fibers that enter the air as dust. Whether they handle asbestos directly or not, workers in the area can easily inhale the fibers. 



Inhaled asbestos fibers cause damage and inflammation to tissues in the body. In some people, this causes illnesses years later, including mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis. 



Construction workers who directly handled asbestos materials, especially those who cut or sanded them,  had the highest risks of exposure. 



Construction Materials Made with Asbestos



Nearly all materials that went into buildings in the past contained asbestos. Some of the main categories of construction materials made with asbestos include: 




Insulation



Flooring



Roofing



Siding



Drywall



Joint compound and packing



Textured paints



Furnace and wood-burning stove components



Products made with vermiculite




Are Construction Workers Still at Risk of Asbestos Exposure? 



Most construction materials manufactured and used today are asbestos-free. However, many buildings constructed before the 1980s still contain asbestos materials. 



Modern construction workers still face risks of exposure to asbestos in older materials, including insulation, boilers, pipes, electrical conduits and insulation, roofing materials, siding, and vinyl flooring. 



Construction workers who work around insulation in older homes and buildings have some of the highest risks of developing an asbestos-related disease. Removing and cutting into asbestos insulation releases a lot of fibers. 



According to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), these construction materials might still contain asbestos if installed before 1981:




Caulk



Ceiling tiles



Cement



Heat-resistant textiles



Industrial pipe wrapping



Plaster



Roofing



Siding



Spray-on coatings



Thermal system insulation




Companies That Made Asbestos Construction Materials



Many different companies manufactured construction materials with asbestos. These are just some of the largest companies that made and distributed asbestos construction products: 




Bestwall Gypsum



C.E. Thurston & Sons



Celotex



Congoleum Corporation



Flintkote Company



Johns Manville



Kentile Floors



National Gypsum



Owens Corning



Synkoloid



W.R. Grace




Studies Show Link Between Asbestos and Illness in Construction Workers



According to a 2004 study published by the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, an estimated 1.3 million construction workers in the U.S. are still at risk for asbestos exposure. 



Another study was conducted in Italy but illustrates how at-risk construction workers are for asbestos exposure. Researchers looked at the Italian disease registry to analyze exposure and asbestos illnesses. 



They found that among 17,191 mesothelioma cases with known asbestos exposure, 3,574 were people who worked in construction. The number of affected workers in construction increased from the 1990s to the 2000s, indicating more people are being diagnosed with mesothelioma. 



A study of construction workers in North Carolina looked at the cause of death for those who passed away between 1988 and 1994. The results indicated that they had higher cancer rates than other groups of workers, including higher incidences of pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma. 



Another U.S. study investigated mesothelioma diagnoses and asbestos fibers in the lung tissue of thousands of workers. Out of 952 cases of mesothelioma, 251 of the workers were in the construction industry. Construction workers had high amounts of asbestos fibers in their lungs. 







Where Is Asbestos Found in Homes—and Why Should You Care?





https://youtube.com/shorts/Wjys9yXGS74




Asbestos remains a hidden danger in many older homes, often tucked away in materials most people overlook. In this short introductory video, David Foster outlines the common places asbestos is found in residential construction—from insulation and tiles to joint compounds and wiring.You’ll discover why asbestos is still a concern today, how exposure can occur during everyday repairs or renovations, and why awareness is the first step toward protection. Whether you're a homeowner, contractor, or simply curious about construction safety, this video offers a clear starting point for understanding the risks.








Types of Construction Workers at Greatest Risk for Asbestos Exposure



With asbestos materials lingering in older industrial, commercial, and residential buildings, thousands of workers are still at risk of exposure to asbestos. 



According to studies, workers in the following occupations face risks of asbestos exposure and developing an asbestos-related disease.



Insulators



Workers who handle insulation materials have high risks of asbestos exposure. Asbestos insulation was used in all kinds of buildings, especially around pipes in industrial settings. 



Workers who cut, remove, or repair old insulation face high risks of exposure. Their work is likely to cause asbestos fibers to come free from insulation, contaminating the air in the workspace. 



Drywall Workers



While cutting and shaping drywall panels, drywall workers risk ingesting asbestos fibers that come loose. In addition, sanding down taping compounds results in high amounts of asbestos fibers releasing and permeating the air.



Today, drywall workers aren't at risk when working on newer structures, but any home or building built before the 1980s may contain asbestos.



Roofers and Tilers 



Roofers and tilers who work on asbestos-containing shingles and tiles are exposed to asbestos fibers each time a tile or shingle is removed or repaired. 



In the past, numerous roof and floor products were constructed with asbestos-containing materials (ACMs).



Bricklayers



Bricklayers and masons once mixed asbestos into other materials to do their jobs. They may have cut into or ground down materials, which put them at risk for additional asbestos exposure.



Although bricklayers and masons today hardly ever use asbestos-containing products, thousands of people were previously exposed to asbestos daily. 



Pipefitters



Pipefitters were responsible for sanding down and cutting products that contained asbestos, in addition to installing and fitting the pipes correctly. 



Gaskets once contained asbestos, and some pipefitters are responsible for sanding them down to fit.



Pipefitters can be exposed to various asbestos-containing products while working, including Aircell asbestos paper, silica mixed with asbestos, laminated sponge felts, and joint compounds.



Other construction-type occupations at risk of asbestos exposure include:




Carpenters



Home renovators



Plumbers



Wrecking crews



Demolition crews



Labor helpers



Painters



Plasterers



Plumbers




Protecting Construction Workers from Asbestos



Because construction workers still face high risks of asbestos exposure, it is essential to be aware of protective measures. OSHA regulates workplace safety, including issues related to asbestos exposure. Some of the asbestos safety protections OSHA ensures for workers include: 




Asbestos exposure limits cannot exceed 0.1 fibers per square centimeter of air.



Employers must share information with workers regarding asbestos risks and clearly label areas in the workplace that contain asbestos. 



Employers must monitor workplaces regularly for asbestos and damaged asbestos materials as well as air levels. 



Workers must be provided with safety training and protective gear when working around asbestos. 



If exposed to asbestos, workers must be given medical surveillance benefits. 




Construction Workers and Asbestos Lawsuits



Many construction workers filed mesothelioma lawsuits against asbestos suppliers and manufacturers after developing asbestos illnesses.



For example, in 2012, John Doherty, a New York resident who worked as an acoustical construction worker and a carpenter, filed an asbestos lawsuit after spending years working around asbestos at the World Trade Center. 



For around 15 years, Doherty shaped, cut, and installed asbestos sheetrock and tiles in both towers.



Doherty developed asbestos-related lung cancer due to working around asbestos products for numerous years during the 1960s and early 1970s. He was employed by the Port of New York Authority but did contract work for construction companies.



Doherty sued Tishman Realty and Construction Co., claiming that the site manager knew workers were being exposed to asbestos yet didn't provide any protection or advise them of asbestos exposure.



The Supreme Court upheld Doherty's case and ruled in his favor. Unfortunately, the former contractor passed away due to complications with his disease.



Seeking Compensation for Asbestos Exposure in the Construction Industry



If you worked in construction and now have an asbestos disease, let a mesothelioma lawyer guide your next steps. You could be eligible to file a lawsuit against asbestos companies to recover damages. 



If the companies responsible for your exposure went bankrupt, you probably qualify to make a claim with an asbestos trust fund to receive compensation. 



An experienced asbestos attorney can review your work history and determine which companies could be held liable for your asbestos illness. You likely have multiple options for seeking compensation. 



Additional Information and Resources for Construction Workers



Remember, if you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma or asbestos-related cancer, you may qualify for significant compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form for our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area.

### Asbestos and Firefighters

Firefighters are at high risk for asbestos exposure and exposure to other toxins on the job. Firefighters routinely enter older buildings with exposed and deteriorating asbestos materials. Both current and retired firefighters are at risk of being diagnosed with mesothelioma and other asbestos diseases.



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 









How Firefighters Are Exposed to Asbestos



Firefighters have a high risk of asbestos exposure. Asbestos is no longer used as heavily as in the past, but it is not banned. Asbestos can still be found in many products and materials.



When asbestos materials are disturbed, they release fibers. These tiny fibers become part of the dust and debris in the air, and anyone in the area can inhale them. 



Inhaled asbestos fibers cause damage inside the body, leading to mesothelioma, asbetosis, and several cancers. Repeated and prolonged asbestos exposure is more likely to cause illnesses decades later. Firefighters are at risk for this in several ways. 



Asbestos Construction Materials



When firefighters enter burning buildings, they face a lot of debris, which is toxic. Older buildings often contain asbestos. Fire destroys asbestos materials and releases fibers into the air. 



Before the construction agency phased it out, asbestos was used in hundreds of products that went into residential, commercial, and industrial buildings: 




Vinyl flooring



Flooring adhesive



Roofing



Siding materials



Shingles



Insulation



Ceiling tiles



Furnaces



Wood-burning stoves



Boilers



Pipes



Joint compound



Textured paints and finishes



Soundproofing and fireproofing materials




Asbestos in Protective Gear



In addition to exposure to asbestos from burning buildings, firefighters in the past wore protective clothing that was also made of asbestos. Asbestos is an effective insulator and fireproofing material. It was used extensively in protective gear before the health risks were widely known. 



From the early 1900s until the late 1970s, firefighter gear and clothing, including helmets, boots, jackets, and coats, contained asbestos.



Asbestos in Fire Stations



Fire stations in the past were also built with asbestos-containing products. Firefighters who spent time in these stations, especially those who helped make repairs or do maintenance, risked inhaling asbestos fibers.



Firefighters working today remain at risk of exposure to asbestos in old fire station buildings. If the asbestos materials in the buildings are not maintained, they can deteriorate and release harmful fibers. 



Firefighters and Asbestos Exposure on 9/11



Firefighters and other first responders face exposure risks whenever an older building with asbestos materials is destroyed. A massive example of this risk occurred on 9/11 when the Twin Towers came down, releasing tons of harmful toxins. 



This was a rare example of first responders being exposed to vast amounts of asbestos at one time. According to studies, about 1% of the dust released on 9/11 was asbestos. Because of the huge quantity of dust, this amounted to tons of asbestos fibers in the air. 



The High Risk of Asbestos Exposure in Firefighters



The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports that a multi-year study was performed between 1987 and 2003 by the United States Fire Administration (USFA) and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 



The study examined the risks firefighters have of developing cancer due to exposure to smoke, soot, asbestos, fumes, and other toxins that are a part of a firefighter's job.



According to the study, which included more than 18,000 former and current firefighters, there is a strong chance of firefighters developing asbestos-related illnesses. These include malignant mesothelioma, asbestosis, and asbestos-related lung cancer. 



A study from 2013 reported on the incidence of all types of cancer in firefighters. Respiratory cancers were the most common. The study found that firefighters had mesothelioma diagnoses at a rate two times greater than that of the general population. 



Firefighters Have High Risk of Dying from Cancer



Asbestos is the only known cause of mesothelioma, which firefighters are diagnosed with at unusually high rates. Studies also indicate that firefighters have higher rates of cancer overall. They are more likely to die of cancer as compared to the general population.



In fact, cancer is often the leading cause of death in firefighters. The International Association of Fire Fighters reported that cancer was the cause of death for 74% of firefighters who passed away in 2022.



The statistic reflects the harmful chemicals firefighters are exposed to on the job. Asbestos is just one of these. The International Agency on the Research of Cancer listed the act of firefighting as a group one carcinogen. 



Legal Actions and Fines for Asbestos Exposure in Firefighters



Numerous firefighters have sued the manufacturers who supplied asbestos-containing products to homes and buildings. Many firefighters have even sued the city in which the asbestos exposure occurred.



For example, in 2007, several firefighters in Everett, Washington, were exposed to asbestos during training exercises.



The building where the training took place contained significant amounts of asbestos. Court records indicate that a fire official knew of the asbestos yet didn't move the training to another place nor offer any protective gear during the training period.



The firefighters sued the city of Everett in 2011 and won a settlement. The settlement covers lifetime health monitoring for the individuals exposed. 



Firefighters Push for Total Asbestos Ban



Regulations have limited asbestos use, but there is no total asbestos ban in the U.S. Asbestos affects many people, but firefighters are disproportionately harmed. For this reason, the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) advocates for an asbestos ban. 



According to the IAFF, firefighters are 200 times more likely to develop an asbestos disease than other people. In a recent statement, the IAFF cited a recent incident in Richmond, Indiana. An old warehouse burned, releasing asbestos. The firefighters on the scene spent days fighting it and risking exposure. 



The IAFF supports the Alan Reinstein Ban Asbestos Now Act, which would ban importing, using, and selling asbestos in the U.S. 



Safety and Prevention for Current Firefighters



Although asbestos is no longer used in fire stations and protective clothing, firefighters risk of inhaling asbestos while on the job. 



There are several things that firefighters can do to protect themselves as much as possible when working around asbestos:




Remove all work clothes and wash them as soon as possible.



Always wear a regulation respirator when working; ordinary dust masks will not prevent you from ingesting or inhaling asbestos.



When working after a fire, make sure the area is wetted down thoroughly.



Make sure to leave all work gear in the same storage place, thoroughly washed.



Take a hot shower as soon as possible after work.



When washing work gear, ensure it's in a washer specifically for asbestos clothing and gear only.



Never bring gear home that could contain any toxic materials. 



Request regular cancer screenings. Early cancer diagnoses save lives. 




When called to an emergency, it's often hard to discern where asbestos is located. In most instances, firefighters don't have the time to stop and check.



Wearing the proper protective equipment is extremely important as it can help save lives when working in a building or home with asbestos.



Asbestos Compensation for Firefighters



If you worked as a firefighter, discuss asbestos screenings with your doctors. Contact a mesothelioma lawyer if you get sick. They can help you seek compensation through asbestos trust funds or lawsuits. 



The September 11th Victim Compensation Fund provides benefits for individuals present at the sites of the 9/11 terrorist actions who developed related illnesses. This includes asbestos-related illnesses. The program was permanently authorized in 2019, so victims can still seek compensation. 



Additional Help and Resources for Firefighters



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related cancer, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out the form for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540.

### Asbestos, 9/11, and Mesothelioma

The fallen World Trade Center towers released clouds of toxic dust on 9/11, including asbestos, a mineral that causes mesothelioma, lung cancer, and other illnesses. The tragedy of 9/11 left some first responders and others with debilitating diseases, like mesothelioma, lung cancer, and others. 



If you or a loved one received a diagnosis of mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 





Asbestos at Ground Zero 



On September 11, 2001, tragedy struck the United States when terrorists flew two hijacked airplanes into the World Trade Center (WTC), killing over 2,000 people and injuring many more. 



The area of devastation left by the incident became known as Ground Zero. It was contaminated with all the debris of the buildings. This included many harmful toxins, like asbestos. 



What Was in World Trade Center Dust? 



The debris and dust left after the disaster included everything contained in the Twin Towers before they fell. Some of the substances detected in the dust included: 




Glass



Asbestos



Cement



Heavy metals



Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)



Dioxin



Gypsum



Cellulose




In the week after the attacks, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency found more than 1% asbestos in 25% of the samples it took at Ground Zero. Anything over 1% is considered a significant risk. 



Why Was There Asbestos in the World Trade Center? 



The World Trade Center was built in the 1960s and 1970s, a peak time for asbestos use in construction. Many construction materials contained asbestos to provide strength and heat and fire resistance. Estimates suggest there were between 300 and 400 tons of asbestos materials in the north tower. 



Many of the steel beams in the north tower were sprayed with asbestos foam, for instance. This provided fireproofing. As construction continued on the towers, asbestos use was largely discontinued. However, many components with asbestos had already gone into the buildings. 



Health Effects of Exposure to 9/11 Debris and Dust



In the aftermath, thousands of people and approximately 400 dogs helped search for survivors and clean up the debris and waste after the disaster. Several groups of people were affected by the aftermath. It is estimated that nearly 500,000 people had some exposure to the toxic World Trade Center dust. 



First Responders 



Around 4,000 police officers, firefighters, and EMT professionals provided invaluable help during and after the 9/11 tragedy. The main focus of these professionals was to save as many lives as possible. As a result, first responders didn't necessarily have time to ensure they had the proper protective gear.



After the attacks, firefighters worked tirelessly among toxins permeating the air, trying to extinguish fires. Others had to work in dangerous materials, breathing in asbestos and other toxins.



According to a study published in 2011, firefighters who responded to the World Trade Center site are 19% more likely to develop cancer than the general population. The increased risk is due to the inhalation of asbestos and other toxins.



Cleanup Crews



Cleanup crews worked extremely long hours for many months, trying to clear out the debris in the aftermath of 9/11. Many of the cleanup crews consisted of truck drivers who would load waste and unload it at disposal sites. 



Many of the cleanup workers didn't wear the proper protection, nor did most understand the type of toxins they were being exposed to while cleaning up the site.



Local Residents and Workers



Anyone near the 9/11 incident, including workers, children at school, and even residents in nearby areas, risked inhaling asbestos fibers and other toxic materials in the air. 



When interviewed after the attacks, numerous residents in the area described the air as a gray and white-colored dust that eventually settled onto their homes.



At the time, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) assured people that the air was safe. Yet, when independent companies tested the air quality, the results indicated that the air was extremely dangerous. 



In some places, the amount of asbestos in the air was 20 times the standardized threshold.



Others that are at a heightened risk of developing an asbestos-related illness after helping during 9/11 include:




Engineers



Carpenters



Masons



American Red Cross volunteers



Truckers



Steelworkers



Additional volunteers




Asbestos materials were blown to dust and permeated throughout the area. It not only affected rescue and cleanup workers but also anyone within the vicinity. 



Regardless of job title and rescue effort, every person was at risk of developing mesothelioma and other asbestos-related illnesses.



According to The World Trade Center Health Registry, over 400,000 people were exposed to harmful toxins in the aftermath of 9/11. Rescue workers, in particular, are at the highest risk of developing mesothelioma and other dangerous diseases, as they were the first people on the scene and the last to leave.



Asbestos Exposure and Health Issues After 9/11



According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 20 stories worth of asbestos-containing products "pulverized asbestos to ultra-fine particles," which then spread all across Manhattan. 



Asbestos exposure causes several life-threatening illnesses, including malignant mesothelioma, asbestosis, and asbestos-related lung cancer.



Many people affected by asbestos exposure during 9/11 may not even know they've developed an asbestos-related illness yet. 



In many cases, asbestos illnesses can take anywhere from 20 to 50 years before the first symptoms surface, although sometimes the deadly disease presents itself much sooner. 



How Many People Have Died From Toxic 9/11 Dust? 



According to a 2015 report published by USA Today, over 1,700 people have already passed away from illnesses connected to the aftermath of 9/11. More recent reports will almost certainly include more deaths related to the attacks. 



Study Says People Are Dying Earlier Than Average



Mesothelioma is one of the many illnesses found during a study performed by The World Trade Center Health. The study also indicated that some people died much sooner than is typical with asbestos exposure and mesothelioma. 



For example, the National EMS Memorial Service reported that 42-year-old Deborah Reeve lost her battle with mesothelioma in 2004, only three years after being exposed to asbestos while working with a rescue crew.



Experts Say More People Will Develop an Asbestos Disease



Experts predict more people involved in Ground Zero will develop an asbestos-related disease in the future. Advocates for those affected during the 9/11 rescue and cleanup efforts urge lawmakers to extend the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act, which expired on September 30, 2015.



In April 2019, the Daily Toreador reported that "as of 2018, more than 10,000" people involved in Ground Zero have been diagnosed with cancer and illnesses connected to the incident.



Other Cancers and Illnesses Associated with 9/11 Exposure



Mesothelioma is specifically related to asbestos exposure. Asbestos can also contribute to other cancers. The other toxins in the 9/11 dust are also linked with numerous other types of cancer. Anyone exposed to the dust could be at an increased risk for:




Leukemia



Lung cancer



Lymphoma



Mesothelioma



Myeloma



Oropharyngeal cancers



Prostate cancer



Thyroid cancer




Non-cancerous illnesses associated with 9/11 exposures include: 




Asbestosis



Cardiovascular disease



Chronic respiratory disease



Depression



Early-onset dementia



Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)



Hearing loss



Obstructive sleep apnea



Post-traumatic stress disorder



Pulmonary fibrosis



Sarcoidosis




Low Birth Weights After 9/11



Even young people not born before September 11 have been affected by the incident. Since the 9/11 tragedy, New York has recorded more infants born with low birth weight than usual. 



Although it's still unknown whether 9/11 is the cause of the low birth rates, numerous studies theorize women who inhaled the toxins during 9/11 may have led to having a baby with low birth weight.



Could I Be at Risk for Asbestos Illness After 9/11? 



Anyone involved in the first response and cleanup of the World Trade Center site could be at risk for related illnesses. But other people are at risk too. If you were in the area that day, you could have been exposed to harmful toxins. 



The 9/11 Treatment Referral Program provides free treatment to survivors of the tragedy with a related illness. It defines survivors as anyone within a 1.5-mile radius of the World Trade Center. 



This includes people who were present on the day of the incident. It also includes people within the survivor radius later, who attended school, worked there, or provided support, and now have an illness connected to the site. 



What Should I Do if I Was Exposed to 9/11 Asbestos Dust? 



If you were in the area all those years ago, you could still be at risk for illness. Asbestos diseases, like mesothelioma, often only develop decades after exposure. If you are concerned about your exposure to the 9/11 dust, you should: 




Try to recall when and where you were in the area and for how long



Talk to your doctor about the risks



Ask your doctor about any health screenings you should have



Note any symptoms you have that could be relevant



Notify your doctor as soon as you have any symptoms and get regular checkups




Resources for 9/11 Survivors



Whether you were a first responder or a bystander during the 9/11 attacks in New York City, you could be entitled to healthcare or compensation. 



The World Trade Center Health Program



The World Trade Center Health Program provides benefits counseling, health monitoring, treatment, and mental health care for survivors. You can enroll as a member of one of the following groups: 




Fire Department of New York (FDNY) responders



Other responders



New York City survivors



Pennsylvania and Pentagon responders




9/11 Victims Compensation Fund



Congress established the Victims Compensation Fund (VCF) in 2001 to provide victims with financial relief, but it closed in 2004. 



In 2011, President Obama signed the Zadroga Act, which reactivated the VCF. It was to remain active for five years. It was extended through December 18, 2020, with funding increased to $7.375 billion. 



President Trump signed The Never Forget the Heroes: James Zadroga, Ray Pfeifer, and Luis Alvarez Permanent Authorization of the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund in 2019. 



The 2019 law extended the fund through 2090. It also authorized as much funds as needed to meet all eligible claims. 



Additional Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



Remember that you may qualify for significant compensation if you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis. Fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you need additional assistance or have any questions, feel free to contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Asbestos and Railroad Workers

Railroad workers faced serious asbestos exposure risks for decades. Some are still at risk today as asbestos lingers in older equipment and materials. Some railroad workers now have asbestos illnesses, like mesothelioma, and have filed lawsuits to recover damages. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 





Did the Railroad Industry Use Asbestos? 



Many products used in the railroad industry contained asbestos. Asbestos use in railroads peaked between the 1930s and 1970s. Asbestos was used in friction parts, insulation, fireproofing, and other materials. 



Workers in railways in the past had higher risks of exposure than workers today, who still may be exposed to older parts. Past asbestos exposure puts railroad workers at risk of asbestos illness today, including mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis. 



How Were Railroad Workers Exposed to Asbestos? 



Like many other industries, railways once used asbestos heavily. Asbestos was used for specific characteristics. It is an effective insulator and also protects against heat and fire. 



In locomotives, asbestos reduced the risk of overheating and resulting fire in friction products like brakes and clutches. It was used in gaskets and seals to insulate and prevent leaks and heat loss. Boilers and furnaces were often insulated with asbestos. Passenger railroad cars often contained asbestos floor and ceiling tiles, insulation, and wallboard. 



Workers who maintained and repaired areas and parts of locomotives that contained asbestos had the highest risks of exposure. The work they did likely released asbestos fibers. This could cause exposure in these workers but also any other workers or passengers in the area. 



Are Railroad Workers Still at Risk for Asbestos Exposure? 



Asbestos is no longer as significant a risk as it once was for railroad workers. However, asbestos was previously used in many products and machinery, placing past workers at risk of developing illnesses. Current workers still face risks working on trains or with equipment containing old asbestos materials. 



Today's railroad workers are protected by workplace standards and oversight by the Federal Railway Administration (FRA). Workers should be informed of any asbestos in their workplace and be provided with necessary safety equipment and training. They can make a complaint with the FRA if standards are not met. 



Railroad Products, Parts, and Materials with Asbestos



Many parts and products used in locomotives and railroad equipment contained asbestos for insulating and fireproofing. These are some of the commonly used asbestos parts in the railroad industry: 




Brakes and Clutches. Friction parts like brakes and clutches contained asbestos to reduce the risk of overheating. Overheating can cause brakes to fail and can even spark fires. 





Boilers. Locomotive boilers were often insulated with asbestos. This included lagging, insulation, and refractory cement made with asbestos. Firebricks made with asbestos were also used in high-heat areas of locomotives. 





Insulation. Many other areas of locomotives were insulated with asbestos: engines, metal body parts, ceilings, pipes, electrical panels, boxcars, and more. 





Gaskets and Seals. Many parts on trains had gaskets, seals, packing, and rope used to seal machinery components. They often contained asbestos to insulate and increase the strength of the materials. 





Passenger Cars. Many components of passenger cars contained asbestos, including floor and ceiling tiles, insulation, wallboard, plaster, and paint. Disposable ashtrays were also made with asbestos on some trains. 




Some of the many companies that supplied railways with asbestos products include: 




Abex Corporation



General Motors Electro-Motive Diesel



H.K. Porter



Johns Manville



Keasbey & Mattison



Railroad Friction Products Corporation



Raybestos-Manhattan




Asbestos Studies on Railroad Workers



The Department of Medicine of Brigham and Women's Hospital conducted a study during the 1950s involving railroad workers and their exposure to asbestos. According to the study published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH),




"Before the transition from steam- to diesel-powered locomotives during the 1950s certain railroad workers had the opportunity for significant occupational exposure to asbestos. Past studies have demonstrated that older workers with jobs associated with the repair of steam locomotives had the most exposure."



A 1985 study took health measurements for nearly 400 railroad workers to look for signs of asbestos disease. The researchers found higher-than-average rates of pleural plaques, shortness of breath, and interstitial lung disease, showing these workers suffered as a result of workplace asbestos exposure. 




Railroad Asbestos Lawsuits



Since railroad workers don't always qualify for workers' compensation, many workers injured by asbestos filed an asbestos lawsuit against their employers, allowed under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA).



Under FELA, railroad workers can sue employers by proving that negligence contributed to their asbestos-related injuries and illnesses. 



These are a few examples of lawsuits brought by railroad workers affected by asbestos: 




Ray Williams filed a lawsuit against his employer, CSX Transportation, under FELA in 2006. He was diagnosed with mesothelioma and died before resolving the case. Williams's widow Shirley eventually recovered $7.4 million in a jury verdict. The courts found that CSX was negligent in failing to warn workers of the risks of asbestos. 





Stephen Fowlkes died from asbestosis after years of working for Norfolk and Western Railway Co. He repaired locomotives, which exposed him to asbestos. Fowlkes sued the company and was found 80% liable for his injuries because he smoked. The company was still required to pay his surviving family $1 million. 




What to Do if You Worked in the Railroad Industry



If you worked in the railroad industry and now have an asbestos illness, let a mesothelioma lawyer help you decide what legal steps to take next. 



They can help you navigate FELA or file a lawsuit against an asbestos supplier. You could be eligible for compensation through a lawsuit or an asbestos trust fund claim. 



Additional Help for Railroad Workers



Remember, if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related cancer, you may qualify for significant compensation. Remember to fill out our form for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### Asbestos Exposure and Mining

Asbestos mining and even mining other minerals has caused significant asbestos exposure in workers and continues to be risky today. The Mine Safety and Health Administration regulates mine safety, but it is still a dangerous industry and workplace. 



If you suffer from malignant mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 





How Miners Are Exposed to Asbestos



Asbestos is a natural mineral made up of fibers. When disturbed, asbestos releases tiny fiber fragments into the air. Anyone near asbestos might inhale these fibers. This is known as asbestos exposure. 



Asbestos exposure can cause serious illnesses, often decades later: mesothelioma, asbestosis, lung cancer, and other conditions. 



Mining has long been considered a high-risk profession for several occupational hazards, including asbestos exposure. There are a few ways miners can be exposed to asbestos: 




Exposure in asbestos mines. Asbestos is no longer mined in the U.S. Miners who worked in asbestos mines before they closed had high risks of exposure because they handled and removed raw asbestos from deposits in the ground. 





Exposure to contaminating asbestos. Few minerals exist in the ground in isolation. They are often interspersed with each other. Miners working today might come into contact with asbestos deposits in other types of mines, such as vermiculite. 





Exposure to asbestos in machinery. The work of mining requires large machinery, equipment, and tools. Some of this equipment contains asbestos in friction parts to prevent overheating and fire. Brakes and clutches in heavy machinery are most likely to contain asbestos. 




Asbestos Mining in the United States



Asbestos mining in the U.S. started at the beginning of the 20th century. It began in Georgia but expanded across the Eastern portion of the nation within the next several years. 



Eventually, asbestos mining started on the West Coast, including Washington, Oregon, and California. Numerous other states followed.



Asbestos mining in the U.S. continued for years, peaking around the early 1970s. By the late 1970s, the dangers of asbestos were well known, and regulations began limiting its use. The last operating U.S. asbestos mine was in San Benito County, California, and closed in 2002. 



Libby, Montana



Libby, Montana, is a small town surrounded by the Cabinet Mountains, but it's home to large amounts of asbestos-contaminated vermiculite. 



Vermiculite is a group of minerals that often contains other contaminating minerals. In Libby, one of those contaminating minerals was asbestos. 



Mining in Libby, Montana, began around 1920. W.R. Grace & Company took over mining in the 1960s. At this time, workers and residents suffered exposure to the contaminating asbestos. 



Not only were those mining at significant risk of developing a deadly illness, but the people within the city were also in danger. The contamination in Libby was so severe that the EPA designated it a Superfund cleanup site in 2002.



Along with workers who developed asbestos illnesses and eventually passed away, thousands of Libby residents were also affected by airborne asbestos fibers and other toxic contaminants.



In 2009, the town of Libby remained at risk of toxic asbestos fibers and other contaminants. It was declared a public health emergency. Cleanup of the town is still ongoing.



Iron Range, Minnesota



Numerous people who mined in the taconite plants in Iron Range, Minnesota, developed asbestos-related illnesses after prolonged asbestos exposure. 



One former worker, Gene Olds, who worked at the LTV Steel plant, developed asbestosis in 1996, which led to him wearing an oxygen mask permanently.



Olds passed away in 2013 from asbestosis complications, but before his passing, he opened up on how difficult it was for him and his family to live with an asbestos illness.




"It's something I don't wish on anyone. I just don't. It's hard on my family. It's hard on me. I can't do the things I always wanted to do."




According to a report published in MPR News, 80 Minnesota miners died from asbestos-related illnesses during the 1990s alone.



Most miners worked at the taconite plants because of the excellent wages and benefits, although they were placed at great risk each time they went to work. 



However, they were never informed of the risks they were taking as the dangers of asbestos were well-hidden, even though manufacturers knew of its toxicity.



Locations of Asbestos Mines in the U.S. 



Asbestos mining took place in many states in the U.S., including, but not limited to:




California



Oregon



Georgia



North Carolina



Virginia



Maryland



Massachusetts



Maryland



Connecticut



Pennsylvania



Vermont



Texas



Montana




Asbestos Mining Outside the U.S. 



Canada was also once home to several asbestos mines. Most of those mines were in Quebec, and made Canada one of the largest exporters of asbestos. Much of the mines' asbestos went to the U.S. The last Canadian asbestos mine closed in 2012. 



Only a handful of countries still mine asbestos. As of 2022, Russia, Kazakhstan, Brazil, China, and Zimbabwe are the biggest producers. Russian mines produced over 700,000 metric tons of asbestos in 2022. 



Asbestos Safety Concerns for Current Miners 



Although no asbestos mines operate in the U.S., miners can still be exposed to asbestos. Mining equipment poses a risk, but so do deposits of minerals with contaminating asbestos. 



The Mining Health and Safety Administration (MHSA) regulates all aspects of safety in mining, including asbestos exposure. As of 2008, the MHSA limit for exposure in mine workers is 0.1 asbestos fibers per cubic centimeter of air. This was raised from the two fibers limit set in the 1970s and is comparable to limits in other industries. 



Current workers in the mining industry should know the safety regulations and file a complaint with the MHSA if their employers are not following them. 



Some of the safety guidelines mine employers must follow to protect workers from asbestos include: 




Employers must provide workers with appropriate safety training and protective gear, such as respirators. 



They are responsible for monitoring the air regularly for asbestos and ensuring limits do not exceed the acceptable allowance. 



Workers should be provided with the right equipment to do their jobs safely, for instance, approved vacuums and filters for dealing with asbestos. 



Workers must have access to showers and changing areas for decontamination after working around asbestos. 



Employers must provide health screenings for workers exposed to asbestos.




Mining and Asbestos Lawsuits



Many employers in mining and other industries failed to protect workers from the dangers of asbestos. Some workers who got sick later successfully sued companies for damages. These are just a couple of examples: 



The most comprehensive example of asbestos lawsuits related to mining involved the W.R. Grace mines in Libby. Initially, individuals and small groups sued and recovered damages. Eventually, W.R. Grace agreed to supply $18.5 million to settle remaining claims. Libby victims also recovered $25 million in damages from the state of Montana in 2017.



A former miner who worked in talc mines in New York in the 1970s died from mesothelioma in 2012. Talc is one of many minerals that is often contaminated with asbestos. His family sued and recovered $10.55 million for his wrongful death. 



Compensation for Miners Exposed to Asbestos



If you work as a miner and suspect or know you were exposed to asbestos, talk to your doctor about the risks and important health screenings. Talk to your employer about screenings available to you. 



Work with a mesothelioma lawyer to seek compensation if you worked as a miner and now have an asbestos illness. They can provide legal options for recovering damages. You might be eligible for an asbestos lawsuit or an asbestos trust fund claim. 



Additional Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you've been injured by mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related cancer, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you'll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### Who We Help

Every day we help people throughout the country understand their legal options and get the help they need.



If your situation falls into one of these categories, we've been helping people just like you for over 20 years:



You've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis



Getting a diagnosis of mesothelioma or another asbestos-related disease can turn your world upside down. You have a lot to deal with. The last thing you need is the hassle of dealing with your legal options.





We clear through the confusion and get you information on the experienced asbestos lawyers in your area. Over $30 billion is available in Asbestos Trust Funds, and we'll make sure you get what you're owed.



You are a family member or friend of someone with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis



If you are a family member or friend of someone with mesothelioma or an asbestos-related disease, one of your first thoughts is probably, "How can I help?"



A person battling an asbestos illness has a lot to deal with, and the thought of financial compensation is sometimes the furthest thing from their mind. Family and friends can help the situation by contacting us for expert legal advice and information on the experienced asbestos attorneys in your area.



Over $30 billion is available to asbestos victims via trust funds, and we'll make sure your loved one gets what they are entitled to.







Your family member or loved one passed away from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis



The loss of a family member to an asbestos disease is always tragic. And to make matters worse, it can be financially debilitating and can leave loved ones desiring some type of justice.



Financial compensation is available to families that lost a loved one from mesothelioma or an asbestos-related disease--but time is of the essence due to the statute of limitations.



We will make sure you get the immediate help you need toward recovering the money your family is owed. Over $30 billion is currently available to people just like you.



You are a military veteran and have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis



Tragically, military veterans account for about 30 percent of all mesothelioma cases, many of them navy veterans who worked on asbestos-laden ships or shipyards.



We have helped many veterans get all the money owed due to an asbestos-related illness. VA Benefits and over $30 billion in Asbestos Trust Fund money are available.



You were exposed to asbestos while on the job and now have mesothelioma, lung cancer, or asbestosis



Usually, a diagnosis of mesothelioma or an asbestos-related disease comes after working around asbestos for many years. Perhaps you worked in construction and were frequently exposed to asbestos. Or maybe you worked in shipbuilding where asbestos was heavily used. No matter how you were exposed to asbestos while on the job, we can help.



If you now suffer from mesothelioma, lung cancer, or asbestosis because of your exposure to asbestos on the job, your share of over $30 billion in Asbestos Trust Funds is available, and we will help you get what you're owed.



You were exposed to asbestos second-hand and now have mesothelioma, lung cancer, or asbestosis



The typical scenario involves a family member who worked around asbestos coming home with these deadly fibers covering their clothes, stuck in their hair, and on their skin--unknowingly putting their family at risk for second-hand asbestos exposure.



If second-hand asbestos exposure caused your asbestos illness, we will help you get the justice and financial compensation you're owed. Over $30 billion is available in Asbestos Trust Funds.



We are highly experienced at helping people just like you get the financial compensation they are owed.



Fill out our contact form today or call us now at 800-793-4540.



We clear through the confusion of your legal options and get you and your family the help and money you need right away!



Act Now: Protect Your Rights with Trusted Legal Support



A diagnosis of mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis can be overwhelming, but you don’t have to face it alone. You may be eligible for substantial financial compensation, and our experienced mesothelioma lawyers are here to stand by your side, protecting your rights and pursuing the justice you deserve.



📄 Get Your Free Financial Compensation Packet Today!Complete our quick form to receive a detailed packet with information about top asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area, plus valuable resources to help you take control of your case.



💡 Why Partner with Us?




Proven track record with decades of experience in asbestos-related claims.



No upfront costs—you only pay if we win your case.



Compassionate guidance tailored to your unique situation, so you can focus on your health.




📞 Contact Us for Immediate Assistance!Call us today at 800-793-4540 to connect with our knowledgeable team. Time is critical—don’t miss the opportunity to secure your family’s future.



You’re not alone in this battle. Let us help you achieve the justice and compensation you deserve.

### Mesothelioma and Women

Mesothelioma occurs far less often in women than in men. Women get mesothelioma but are often exposed to asbestos in different ways. Women also respond differently to treatment and typically have better outcomes than men. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on qualified mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Can Women Get Mesothelioma? 



Yes, although mesothelioma is less common than in men, many women have been diagnosed with mesothelioma. Women account for approximately one in four cases of mesothelioma. 



In addition to the different occurrence rates, there are many other important differences. Women are more likely to have certain types of mesothelioma and typically have better outcomes than men. 



Facts About Mesothelioma in Women



Mesothelioma is a rare cancer. It is even rarer in women, but when it does occur, it can be devastating. It is important to understand the facts about mesothelioma in women for prevention and to improve outcomes: 




The incidence of mesothelioma in men in the U.S. between 2003 and 2008 was 1.93 per 100,000. For women, it was 0.41 per 100,000. 



The UK and Australia have the highest incidences of mesothelioma in women. 



The number of mesothelioma deaths in women in the U.S. increased by 25% from 1999 to 2020. 



Women account for more cases of peritoneal mesothelioma than men, who are much more likely to have pleural mesothelioma. 



The most represented occupations among U.S. women who died from mesothelioma from 1999 to 2020 were homemakers, teachers, and registered nurses.



Many women were exposed to occupational asbestos through old, asbestos-containing construction materials in their workplaces. 



Other women were exposed to asbestos through fibers husbands or fathers brought home from work on their clothing.  



One year after a mesothelioma diagnosis, 45% of women are still living. The same statistic for men is 38%. 



Women are often diagnosed with mesothelioma at a younger age than men. 




How Are Women Exposed to Asbestos? 



The leading cause of mesothelioma is workplace asbestos exposure, which accounts for the gender discrepancy. Asbestos was heavily used in industries in the 20th century that mostly employed men. 



Women who developed mesothelioma often don't know how they were exposed, but there are a few possibilities. These include secondhand exposure, workplace exposure, consumer products, and environmental exposure. 



Secondhand Asbestos Exposure in Women



Many women developed mesothelioma after secondhand asbestos exposure. This usually occurred via their spouse or other loved ones who worked around asbestos on job sites and brought asbestos fibers home on their clothing. 



Most workers were unaware of the dangers they were bringing into the home. For a long time, no one knew the risks of asbestos. Even after scientists connected it to mesothelioma, companies failed to protect workers and their families for years. 



Secondhand exposure to asbestos remains one of the top reasons that women develop mesothelioma. 



In fact, a study published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) indicates that almost half of all women's pleural mesothelioma cases stemmed from secondhand exposure through family.



Occupational Exposure



Most men exposed to asbestos came into contact with it on the job. Asbestos mainly affected industrial workplaces, including factories, construction, manufacturing plants, shipyards, garages, and more. 



Women who were exposed to asbestos at work, however, often worked clerical jobs in buildings made with asbestos materials or as teachers in schools made with asbestos materials.



Women are also at risk of asbestos exposure if they worked in:




Bakeries



Hospitals



Churches



Government buildings




Some women were also exposed to asbestos at the same job sites as men. For instance, during World War II, many women worked in shipyards and factories.



Teachers were often exposed to asbestos due to older materials in school buildings. Deteriorating pipe insulation, for instance, can cause exposure over many years. 



Environmental Exposure



Men and women alike are susceptible to environmental exposure to asbestos if they live near naturally-occurring asbestos. According to the Agency for Toxic Substance & Diseases Registry (ATSDR), naturally-occurring asbestos isn't dangerous unless disturbed.



Naturally-occurring asbestos is found in the East, Southeast, Midwest, and West Coast areas of the United States. The most concentrated areas of naturally-occurring asbestos are California, Florida, New York, Pennsylvania, and Texas.



In Australia, many women were exposed to natural asbestos deposits in and near the town of Wittenoom. An asbestos mine operated there from the 1940s through the 1990s. Mesothelioma deaths in women in that area are much higher than in other parts of Australia. 



Asbestos in Talcum Powder



Another source of asbestos exposure in women recently came to light and has triggered thousands of lawsuits. Some women who used talcum powder hygiene products for decades now have mesothelioma or ovarian cancer. 



Tests of products and studies of patients have found that talcum powder often contains some asbestos and that women can develop mesothelioma because of it. Talc is a natural mineral that often occurs in deposits along with asbestos. 



Some companies, including Johnson & Johnson, have been shown in lawsuits to have known about asbestos in their products. They failed to act on that knowledge and are now paying the price in lawsuits. 



Misdiagnosing Mesothelioma in Women



Misdiagnosis is a common problem for all mesothelioma patients. It is a rare cancer with symptoms that mimic other illnesses. Unless there is known asbestos exposure, doctors often turn to more common diagnoses before considering mesothelioma. 



This issue is even more common in women. Because women were less likely to work in industries with asbestos, doctors often don't consider mesothelioma as a possible diagnosis. 



Women need to advocate for themselves during the diagnostic process. Seek additional opinions if you are unsatisfied with your diagnosis or if doctors do not take you seriously. 



Treating Mesothelioma in Women



Treatment for mesothelioma is very similar in men and women. The exact treatment plan depends more on individual factors, like age and health, stage and type of mesothelioma, and personal preferences. The most typical mesothelioma treatment options are: 




Chemotherapy



Surgery



Radiation therapy




Most patients benefit from a combination of treatments, called a multimodal approach. Immunotherapy treatments are becoming increasingly common for both male and female mesothelioma patients. 



Women with mesothelioma generally have more treatments options and outcomes than men for a couple of reasons: 




Women are often diagnosed with mesothelioma at a younger age and are healthy enough for more aggressive treatments. 



Women are more likely to have peritoneal mesothelioma, a more treatable form. 




Survival Rates for Women with Mesothelioma



Studies indicate that women diagnosed with mesothelioma generally have a longer survival rate when compared to men. 



The type of mesothelioma, however, will affect survival rates as well. Women with epithelial tumors generally survive longer than women with nonepithelial tumors.



Epithelial tumors have consistent patterns, whereas nonepithelial tumors have inconsistent, random patterns, and although patients may receive the same type of treatment, those with epithelial tumors generally live much longer.



NIH states that most women diagnosed with mesothelioma have the epithelioid subtype.



How Can Women Prove Negligence for Secondhand Exposure?



Secondhand exposure is the primary way that women develop mesothelioma. However, proving negligence can get a bit tricky.



Since most women who developed asbestos via secondhand exposure didn't work at the job sites, they are ineligible for workers' compensation. In addition, proving a secondhand exposure case can be more complicated than a man who worked at a job site with asbestos. 



If you've been exposed to asbestos through a spouse or family member and you were diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness, find an experienced mesothelioma lawyer. They know how to find evidence to build a case for secondhand exposure.  



More and more women are winning mesothelioma lawsuits for secondhand asbestos exposure, holding manufacturing companies liable in recent years.



Know the Symptoms of Mesothelioma



Women should be aware of any risk fa have for mesothelioma, including possible past asbestos exposures. You should also know and be on the lookout for mesothelioma symptoms and warning signs. 



Signs of pleural mesothelioma in women include: 




Coughing



Chest pains



Shortness of breath



Difficulty swallowing



Fever



Loss of appetite



Weight loss



Night sweats




Women with pleural mesothelioma are more likely to have coughing and chest pains than men. 



Signs of peritoneal mesothelioma in women include: 




Abdominal pain



Abdominal swelling



Bowel obstruction



Fatigue



Diarrhea



Constipation



Fever



Vomiting 



Weight loss




Mesothelioma Lawsuits Involving Women



Women exposed to asbestos and with a mesothelioma diagnosis have as much right as men to take legal action. Because the exposure source is often more difficult to determine, cases involving women may be more complicated. 



If you are a woman with mesothelioma, rely on a lawyer who is an expert in asbestos and mesothelioma cases. They have the experiences and resources to track down your past asbestos exposure and build a successful case. 



A big win for a woman who contracted mesothelioma from secondhand exposure occurred in California in 2010. Rhoda Evans was diagnosed after years of secondhand exposure through her husband. He worked for CertainTeed, a company that made asbestos construction materials. 



A jury found CertainTeed 70% liable for her mesothelioma diagnosis. The California jury awarded Evans $200 million. 



Many women in recent years have won cases against talc and talcum powder companies. Ann Zoas sued Johnson & Johnson and supplier Imerys America Talc in 2018. Zoas used baby powder for many years and developed pleural mesothelioma. She received a $1.5 million settlement. 



If you believe you were wrongly exposed to asbestos and are now sick, don't hesitate to reach out to a lawyer. Reputable mesothelioma lawyers offer free initial consultations. There is no risk to get in touch and get your case reviewed. 



Additional Information and Helpful Resources



Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on knowledgeable asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Desmoplastic Mesothelioma

Desmoplastic mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive subtype of mesothelioma. It is a sarcomatoid mesothelioma with a poor prognosis. Patients can benefit from chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and palliative treatments. 



If you or a loved one have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 









What Is Desmoplastic Mesothelioma?



Desmoplastic mesothelioma is a rare, aggressive subtype of mesothelioma that mainly occurs in pleural tissue around the lungs. Even rarer are cases of desmoplastic mesothelioma in the peritoneum of the abdomen or the pericardium around the heart. 



Desmoplastic tumors are around 50% fibrous and are difficult for doctors to detect. It is considered an aggressive type of cancer. As with other types of asbestos diseases, the earlier it is detected, the better the chances of more favorable outcomes.



How Common Is Desmoplastic Mesothelioma? 



Desmoplastic mesothelioma is rare among an already rare cancer. It accounts for around 5% to 10% of all diagnosed mesothelioma cases. 



What Are the Characteristics of Desmoplastic Mesothelioma? 



All mesothelioma diagnoses can be categorized by primary cell type: epithelioid, sarcomatoid, or biphasic, a mix of the two. Most cases of desmoplastic mesothelioma are sarcomatoid, but some are biphasic.



Sarcomatoid mesothelioma cells are spindle-shaped and resemble the cells of sarcomas, cancers of connective tissue. They readily separate from each other, making it easy to metastasize. All sarcomatoid mesotheliomas are considered aggressive. 



Desmoplastic mesothelioma cells form dense, fibrous tissue rich in collagen. They generally lack any pattern, which makes them difficult to identify. 



What Causes Desmoplastic Mesothelioma? 



Asbestos exposure is the only confirmed cause of any type of mesothelioma. However, some people diagnosed with mesothelioma have no known history of exposure to asbestos. 



Case studies of patients with desmoplastic mesothelioma have found that asbestos exposure is a likely primary cause. 



Most people with mesothelioma were exposed to asbestos in the workplace years ago. They unknowingly inhaled harmful asbestos fibers that lodged inside the body, triggering inflammation and damage. In some people, this led to cancer decades later. 



What Are the Symptoms of Desmoplastic Mesothelioma? 



Since desmoplastic mesothelioma tends to occur mainly in the pleural area, it can have the same symptoms as pleural mesothelioma, including:




Chest congestion



Coughing



Fluid buildup in the lungs



Rib and/or back pain



Chest pain



Night sweats



Fever



Weakness and fatigue




As with any type of mesothelioma, as the cancer progresses, the symptoms worsen and become more numerous. 



Diagnosing Desmoplastic Mesothelioma 



Desmoplastic mesothelioma is diagnosed just like any other asbestos-related illness. Physicians perform a biopsy after conducting a physical exam and using imaging scans to find areas of tissue that might be cancerous.



During a biopsy, the doctor removes a sample of the suspected tumor. A pathologist then examines it for cell features. 



When diagnosing desmoplastic mesothelioma, doctors look for several characteristics, features, and markers: 




At least half of the tissues are fibrous in nature.



The tissue is highly collagenized.



There is necrosis (tissue death) in some areas. 



There are spindle-shaped cells, indicating the sarcomatoid cell type. 



Certain markers are present, including p53, WT1, smooth muscle actin, calretinin, and desmin. 




Is Desmoplastic Mesothelioma Ever Misdiagnosed? 



Rare mesotheliomas are always difficult to diagnose. Mistaking them for more common illnesses, cancers, and even mesothelioma subtypes is easy. 



One condition that is difficult to distinguish from malignant desmoplastic mesothelioma is benign pleural thickening. This is also known as pleural fibrosis, a thickening of fibrous pleural tissue around the lungs that is not malignant. 



Benign pleural thickening can result from heart surgery, pleural infections, rheumatoid pleuritis, hemothorax, uremic pleuritis caused by kidney disease, and other non-cancerous conditions. 



Some of the characteristics pathologists use to differentiate desmoplastic mesothelioma include: 




A storiform (woven) pattern in the cells



A general lack of pattern or disorganization in the cells



Minimal blood vessels



Invasive growth of the tissue into surrounding tissue




Desmoplastic Mesothelioma Treatment Options



Patients with desmoplastic mesothelioma have similar treatment options to those with other types of sarcomatoid mesothelioma. Because this is an aggressive subtype, it is often advanced when diagnosed. This limits treatment options. 



Desmoplastic mesothelioma patients benefit from multimodal treatment. This is a combination of therapies, most commonly surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and immunotherapy. 



Not all patients qualify for surgery if the cancer is widespread. These patients can get some relief from symptoms and extended life expectancy with other therapies, especially chemotherapy and immunotherapy. 



A recent study of the immunotherapy drug pembrolizumab (Keytruda) showed positive activity in treating malignant mesothelioma. One patient in the study had desmoplastic mesothelioma and had a 21% reduction in tumor size. Immunotherapy could become a more common treatment for desmoplastic mesothelioma. 



Many patients with desmoplastic mesothelioma choose palliative care. Palliative treatments help ease side effects and symptoms, make patients more comfortable, and improve quality of life.



For example, mesothelioma treatments such as chemotherapy and radiation can relieve pressure from the lung area and help reduce tumors. 



Another option for patients with rare, aggressive mesothelioma is participating in a clinical trial. This gives them access to new treatments that are not widely available. 



What Is the Prognosis for Desmoplastic Mesothelioma?



Desmoplastic mesothelioma has a generally poor prognosis, although every patient is different. The average survival time after a diagnosis of desmoplastic mesothelioma is between 5 and 8 months. 



This is a rare subtype, and more information is needed for doctors to formulate a favorable treatment plan that can help extend survival rates.



Studies show that most desmoplastic are in the category of sarcomatoid cancer, which has an extremely low survival rate. Also, most patients are diagnosed in the later stages of mesothelioma, when the cancer is already widespread. 



If you received a diagnosis of desmoplastic mesothelioma, talk to your doctors about treatment options. Also, consider talking to an asbestos attorney about your legal rights. 



Resources and Help for Asbestos Victims



Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. Remember, if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for considerable compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain, suffering, and much more. For additional assistance or for any pertinent questions, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Lymphohistiocytoid Mesothelioma

Lymphohistiocytoid mesothelioma is an extremely rare cell subtype of mesothelioma, accounting for less than 1% of diagnosed asbestos cancer cases. Lymphohistiocytoid mesothelioma is a type of sarcomatoid mesothelioma, which is aggressive and difficult to treat. It is easy to misdiagnose this cancer as the more common lymphoma. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.









What Is Lymphohistiocytoid Mesothelioma?



Lymphohistiocytoid mesothelioma is a rare, aggressive, sarcomatoid type of mesothelioma. These tumors often contain inflammatory immune cells, white blood cells, and histiocytes. They sometimes also have some epithelioid cells.



About Mesothelioma Cell Types



Mesothelioma is often categorized by the location of tumors: pleural, peritoneal, and pericardial. It can also be categorized by cell type: 




Epithelioid - Cells that line the surfaces of organs and a less aggressive type of mesothelioma



Sarcomatoid - Fibrous cancer cells of connective tissue and a more aggressive type of mesothelioma



Biphasic - A mixture of epithelioid and sarcomatoid cells




Most of the few cases of lymphohistiocytoid mesothelioma diagnoses were sarcomatoid. More recent studies indicate that this type of mesothelioma might actually behave more like the epithelial type. 



Sarcomatoid mesothelioma cells spread more readily than epithelial cells. In general, sarcomatoid mesotheliomas are more aggressive and have a poorer prognosis. 



Diagnosing Lymphohistiocytoid Mesothelioma 



With so few cases, there is not much information on lymphohistiocytoid mesothelioma. Because it is so rare, few patients have been studied. Instead, experts rely on the tumor characteristics to help provide a correct diagnosis.



Lymphohistiocytoid tumors, as mentioned earlier, typically have a large number of immune cells. This makes diagnosis difficult as it mimics other more common diseases. 



The National Institutes of Health (NIH) states that this form of mesothelioma has been misdiagnosed as ganglioneuroma, malignant lymphoma, and inflammatory pseudotumor.



To differentiate the tumors, doctors take samples during a biopsy so that pathologists can identify the cells. When studying the tumor sample, physicians look for a histological type that shows histiocytoid cells shaped like a spindle. 



Most cells are large and polygonal-shaped as well. White blood cells are generally found mixed into the cells. These characteristics and fluid buildup in the lungs and other related symptoms help doctors confirm the diagnosis.



Full immunohistochemical staining of the cells is required before doctors can confirm a diagnosis. This process helps differentiate other cells that closely resemble each other. 



Misdiagnosis of Lymphohistiocytoid Mesothelioma



Any rare cancer is likely to be misdiagnosed as something more common. Lymphohistiocytoid mesothelioma can be easily confused with lymphoma. Lymphoma is a cancer of lymphocytes, cells in the immune system. 



Other cancers or tumors that lymphohistiocytoid might be misdiagnosed as include: 




Thymoma



Lymphoepithelial carcinoma



Ganglioneuroma



Inflammatory pseudotumors



Sarcomatoid lung cancer




Lymphohistiocytoid Mesothelioma Symptoms 



Lymphohistiocytoid mesothelioma symptoms closely resemble symptoms of other cell types of pleural mesothelioma. Early warning signs of pleural mesothelioma include: 




Chest pains



Coughing



Shortness of breath



Wheezing



Difficulty breathing




As mesothelioma progresses, these symptoms get worse, and new symptoms often arise: 




Fatigue



Weight loss



Small bumps and lumps under the skin, around the chest area



Night sweats



Fever



Lower back pain




Treating Lymphohistiocytoid Mesothelioma



With such limited information on lymphohistiocytoid mesothelioma, physicians usually rely on standard forms of mesothelioma treatment, including surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and immunotherapy.



Most patients benefit from multimodal therapy, a combination of two or more treatments. Surgery is the best option for extending life expectancy, but not all patients are good candidates for it, especially those with sarcomatoid mesothelioma. 



Combinations of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiation therapy, and emerging treatments can help relieve symptoms. They may also extend a patient's life expectancy. 



Lymphohistiocytoid Mesothelioma Prognosis



According to the American Journal of Clinical Pathology (AJCP), in the 1980s, early cases of lymphohistiocytic mesothelioma indicated that the prognosis was not favorable after several patients died within five months of treatment. 



However, later studies conducted in the 2000s showed that with the right treatment, the survival rate for those with lymphohistiocytoid mesothelioma can be extended up to two years.



As with all cases of mesothelioma, however, it's important to remember the survival rates vary significantly. Whereas one person may only survive five months, another patient may go on to live years with the right treatment, diet plan, exercise, and other healthy lifestyle choices.



Another study indicated that a few patients with lymphohistiocytoid mesothelioma have lived more than five years after diagnosis.



If you have been diagnosed with any type of mesothelioma, talk to a lawyer about options. You can probably hold companies accountable for past asbestos exposure. 



Additional Resources and Helpful Information



Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. Keep in mind that if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for considerable compensation to help cover expenses for medical costs, as well as compensation for pain, suffering, and much more. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Deciduoid Mesothelioma

Deciduoid mesothelioma is a rare subtype of mesothelioma of the epithelial cell type. It is significantly different from other mesothelioma types and occurs primarily in women. It occurs mostly in cases of peritoneal mesothelioma. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.









What Is Deciduoid Mesothelioma?



Epithelial mesothelioma is the most common cell type of mesothelioma. Deciduoid mesothelioma is an uncommon subtype of the epithelial mesothelioma cell type. Only about 25 cases have ever been described. 



The term deciduoid mesothelioma was first described in the 1980s, and so far, very few people have been diagnosed with this cell type. Initially, researchers thought that deciduoid mesothelioma only occurred in the peritoneum area, and only young women were affected. 



However, as more research surfaced, evidence showed that deciduoid elements were also found in the lung and heart area and among older males and females.



The few reported cases of deciduoid mesothelioma are split roughly half and half between pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma. 



What Does Deciduoid Mean? 



Deciduoid cells resemble the cell transformation that takes place during early pregnancy. The lining in the uterus (during pregnancy) that assists in forming the placenta is known as the decidua. Hormonal changes cause changes in these cells during early pregnancy. 



The cells are said to deciduize. The cells involved in deciduoid mesothelioma are different from those involved in early pregnancy. Deciduoid mesothelioma cells resemble these other cells in a few ways: 




Large size



Ovoid or polygonal shape



Single or multiple nuclei in the cells



Well-defined cell edges




What Causes Deciduoid Mesothelioma? 



Most cases of mesothelioma were caused by past asbestos exposure. Deciduoid mesothelioma is one of the few types not definitely linked to asbestos. Only a third of all patients diagnosed with this type of mesothelioma were exposed to asbestos in the past.



Some physicians believe hormonal changes contribute to deciduoid mesothelioma. This is based on the fact that more than half of all diagnosed patients have been female, with a few of them pregnant.



What Are the Symptoms of Deciduoid Mesothelioma? 



Deciduoid pleural mesothelioma causes some common symptoms: 




Shortness of breath



Wheezing



Coughing



Chest pains



Lumps under the skin on the chest




Common symptoms of deciduoid peritoneal mesothelioma include: 




Abdominal pain



Abdominal swelling



Gastrointestinal issues



Unintentional weight loss or weight gain




Patients with either type of deciduoid mesothelioma experience worsening symptoms as the disease progresses. They might also experience fatigue, fevers, weight loss, and muscle wasting. 



Diagnosing Deciduoid Mesothelioma 



Doctors diagnose this type of mesothelioma with a series of tests, just as with any other form of mesothelioma. However, deciduoid mesothelioma resembles other diseases and even other tumors, such as pseudotumoral deciduosis. This makes it difficult to get an accurate diagnosis. 



In addition, the features of the deciduoid cell type in tumors can be extremely small and isolated. Or, they can be widespread. This further complicates diagnosis. 



In turn, many patients have been misdiagnosed with pseudotumoral deciduosis, which is a non-cancerous tumor that requires different treatment options. 



Immunohistochemical testing is essential for distinguishing deciduoid mesothelioma cells from other types. Pathologists use antibodies as markers to identify the cells. 



Treatment Options for Deciduoid Mesothelioma 



Treatment is difficult for deciduoid mesothelioma as with other types of mesothelioma. A treatment plan depends on the stage of the cancer and the patient's preferences or goals. 



Most patients benefit from multimodal treatment, a combination of surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, or sometimes immunotherapy. Not all patients qualify for surgery and must rely mostly on chemotherapy to shrink tumors. 



What Is the Prognosis for Deciduoid Mesothelioma?



Unfortunately, the prognosis is usually grim for those with deciduoid mesothelioma. On average, the survival rate has been around seven months after diagnosis. 



Yet, since there are so few cases of the disease, future research results may have doctors formulate a better treatment plan to help extend lives.



It's also important to note that some patients may live longer than the average survival rate. 



For instance, past studies indicate that around 30% of those with deciduoid mesothelioma may survive a year after treatment. In addition, one confirmed patient lived more than four years after being diagnosed with deciduoid mesothelioma.



Deciduoid mesothelioma is a rare and troubling diagnosis. If you have this type of cancer, talk to your doctors about your options. 



Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. Keep in mind that if you have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for considerable compensation. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Heterologous Mesothelioma

Heterologous mesothelioma is a rare subtype of mesothelioma. With just a few cases ever recorded, information about heterologous mesothelioma is limited. Diagnosis, symptoms, and treatment options are similar to other types of mesothelioma. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 









What Is Heterologous Mesothelioma?



Mesothelioma is a cancer of the mesothelium, a layer of tissue that lines organs in the body. Mesothelioma cancer cells arise from mesothelial cells. Heterologous mesothelioma is a rare subtype of mesothelioma with tumors that contain cells from other tissue types, not just the mesothelium. 



Heterologous mesothelioma closely resembles any other type of mesothelioma. Its only difference is that the cancerous cells' structures inside the tumor do not resemble other cell structures.



For instance, the tumors may have bone or muscle cells. Physicians are still unsure of how this happens, which makes treatment difficult.



About Mesothelioma Cell Types



Mesothelioma is often categorized by location, with the three main types being pleural, peritoneal, and pericardial. It can also be divided by cell type: 




Epithelioid mesothelioma contains epithelial cells and is the least aggressive type. 



Sarcomatoid mesothelioma tumors contain cells that resemble sarcomas, cancers of connective tissues. This type is more aggressive. 



Biphasic mesothelioma occurs when the tumors contain a mixture of epithelial and sarcomatoid cells. 




In the limited number of heterologous mesothelioma cases diagnosed, most were sarcomatoid or biphasic. Very few are epithelioid. 



Characteristics of Heterologous Mesothelioma



Heterologous mesothelioma is extremely rare. Few cases have been reported in the scientific and medical literature. Based on these case studies, experts know a few facts about it: 




Most cases of heterologous mesothelioma are pleural mesothelioma. 



Most patients are older men. 



Cell types found in heterologous mesothelioma tumors include bone, cartilage, and muscle. 



Some patients have just one additional cell type, while others have multiple types. 




What Causes Heterologous Mesothelioma?



As with other types of mesothelioma, exposure to asbestos seems to be the primary cause of heterologous mesothelioma. Yet, it's still unclear how the subtype's histological aspects affect people. 



So far, research indicates that cellular differentiation is also an important factor when determining the cause of heterologous mesothelioma:




Cellular differentiation occurs when cells adapt and become more specialized and able to perform specific functions. For instance, a cell adapts to become a muscle cell. 





After differentiation, cells have a lifespan and ultimately die without dividing to produce new cells. Cancerous cells that differentiate are atypical and continue to grow and divide. 





Healthy mesothelium cells are capable of differentiating into connective tissue cells. This might explain how some people with mesothelioma have a mix of cell types in their tumors. 




Diagnosing Heterologous Mesothelioma



Diagnosis for mesothelioma begins with a physical exam, medical history, and a review of work history to find any past asbestos exposure. Doctors order imaging scans, like X-rays, MRIs, or CT scans, to look for abnormal growths. 



If they find growths, they perform a biopsy to remove a small amount of tissue for study. A pathologist examines the biopsy sample to look for signs of malignancy and to identify the cell types. 



Even when cancer is diagnosed, determining if it is mesothelioma, which cell type, and any rare cell subtypes is challenging. Pathologists look at the visible appearance of cells for characteristic patterns. 



They also perform immunohistochemical tests. These use antibodies to identify characteristic antigens in tumor cells. These immune system proteins can help doctors determine cancer and cell types. 



Heterologous mesothelioma is easily misdiagnosed as pleural osteosarcoma or chondrosarcoma. These are cancers of bone and connective tissue that have spread to the pleural tissue. 



To diagnose heterologous mesothelioma, doctors look for bone, muscle, or cartilage cells in the tumors along with markers specific to mesothelioma. 



Treating Heterologous Mesothelioma



There is no standard treatment for heterologous mesothelioma. Treatment plans depend on individual factors and usually follow treatment strategies for sarcomatoid mesothelioma. 



Because sarcomatoid mesothelioma is aggressive, it is usually already widespread at the time of diagnosis. Surgery is not often an option for these patients. 



Treatment options for patients ineligible for surgery include chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and immunotherapy. The best treatment plan is usually multimodal, a combination of two or more treatments.



Recent studies have found that sarcomatoid mesothelioma patients benefit from immunotherapy. They get a greater extension of survival time than patients with epithelioid patients. 



In one case study of heterologous mesothelioma, the patient underwent surgery and received chemotherapy and radiation therapy. This trimodal approach helped him live 12 months past his diagnosis. 



Heterologous mesothelioma patients may qualify for clinical trials. These offer the chance to access treatments not readily available. Patients could benefit from these emerging treatments. 



What Is the Prognosis for Heterologous Mesothelioma?



The prognosis for heterologous mesothelioma is similar to that of other types of sarcomatoid mesothelioma. As an aggressive cell type, sarcomatoid mesothelioma spreads rapidly and has a poor prognosis. 



According to the few studies conducted on this subtype, the average survival time for heterologous mesothelioma patients is just six months after diagnosis. 



As with all types of mesothelioma, averages are useful, but survival rates vary significantly by individual. One patient diagnosed with heterologous mesothelioma lived for more than five years after treatment.



How to Improve Your Mesothelioma Prognosis



Furthermore, as with all types of mesothelioma, your lifestyle will play a role in your survival rate. Consider the following that could potentially help in extending the survival rate:




Maintain a strong support group, whether it be family, friends, in-person mesothelioma support meetings, or online support groups.



Consume a diet that consists of green, leafy vegetables, fruits, lean meat, or other forms of protein. Your physician can help you work out a diet plan for your needs.



Get as much exercise as possible, but be certain to stop if you feel ill or too winded. Again, your physician can help you develop a good exercise plan as well.



Try to keep your stress levels as low as possible. Stress contributes to numerous illnesses.




Any diagnosis of mesothelioma is difficult, but the heterologous type can be especially confusing. Talk to your doctor about treatment options and contact an experienced lawyer to learn what you can do about past asbestos exposure. 



Additional Help for Mesothelioma Victims



Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. Keep in mind that if you have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for considerable compensation for pain, suffering, medical expenses, and more. For additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Minesweepers and Asbestos

U.S. Navy minesweepers were vital to counteracting the threat of sea mines. Unfortunately, minesweepers were made with asbestos for decades, putting service members at risk of exposure and later illness. Navy veterans with mesothelioma can now access benefits and resources. 



If you or a loved one have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more.













About Navy Minesweepers



Minesweepers are ships that detect and remove explosive mines from the sea. Minesweepers serve two vital purposes for the U.S. Navy: 




Clearing waterways of mines



Ensuring waterways are safe for other vessels to launch, land, and engage in sea battles




Minesweepers are not as important to Naval operations today, but there are still a few in the U.S. Navy fleet. These small yet powerful vessels patrol and conduct anti-submarine movements. 



The Navy has commissioned and used several types of minesweepers over the years: 




Minesweepers (AM)



Motor minesweepers (AMS)



Coastal minesweepers (MSC)



Inshore minesweepers (MSI)



Harbor minesweepers (AMB)



Mine Countermeasures (MCM)



Ocean minesweepers (AMO)



Coastal minehunters (MHC)



Underwater mine locator (AMCU)




The History of Minesweepers in the U.S. Navy



The history of minesweepers begins in Great Britain. Before World War I, the Royal Navy developed trawlers to clear mines from the English Channel. The first crew members on these vessels were fishermen. The British fleet led to the development of minesweeping vessels in the U.S. Navy. 



World War I Minesweepers



The U.S. Navy's first minesweeper was the USS Lapwing (AM 1). It was commissioned in 1918. The name of the first class of U.S. minesweepers was the Lapwing class. 



The Navy's minesweepers cleared mines in the North Sea during the war. They worked along the coasts of  Norway and Scotland to remove mines laid by Germany. 



World War II



Minesweepers became even more important in the U.S. Navy during World War II. Most of the minesweepers the Navy ever built were commissioned during this period, a time of heavy asbestos use. Nearly 500 minesweepers were active during the war. 



World War II minesweepers were low-tech. They towed cutters to clip cables attached to mines. The crew on the minesweepers would then detonate the mines using guns as they rose to the surface. WWII minesweepers also escorted other Navy vessels. 



Korea and Vietnam



Minesweepers were less important during the Korean War but still in use. They cleared mines and helped restrict the movement of enemy ships around North Korea. The steel hulls of the U.S. Navy's minesweepers attracted newer magnetic mines, which caused a lot of damage. 



The heavy damage caused by mines during the Korean War led to the creation of a new class of minesweepers as the Vietnam War began. They had hulls made of bronze and wood. 



These vessels could clear mines in the old-fashioned way. They were also equipped to detect and clear more advanced magnetic and acoustic mines. 



The Cold War and the Modern Era



Minesweepers continued to patrol waters during the Cold War, but to a much lesser degree. Newer minesweepers built in the 1980s used sonar, video, and remote detonation. 



Today there is only one active minesweeper class: the Avenger class. There are eight minesweepers commissioned in the U.S. Navy today. Four are stationed in Bahrain, and the rest are in Japan. 



U.S. Navy Minesweepers With Asbestos



Most minesweepers made by the U.S. Navy contained asbestos in hundreds of components. This is an incomplete list of minesweepers with known asbestos and their commissioned dates: 




USS Admirable, 1943



USS Affray, 1958



USS Albatross, 1940



USS Barrier, 1944



USS Cardinal, 1940



USS Chickadee, 1943



USS Conquest, 1955



USS Curlew, 1940



USS Dominant, 1954



USS Eagle, 1942



USS Excel, 1955



USS Goldfinch, 1941



USS Gull, 1940



USS Illusive, 1953



USS Intrigue, 1944



USS Murrelet, 1945



USS Oracle, 1943



USS Persistent, 1956



USS Pilot, 1943



USS Reaper, 1954



USS Revenge, 1943



USS Rival, 1954



USS Salute, 1955



USS Starling, 1942



USS Staunch, 1944



USS Tanager, 1945



USS Wheatear, 1945



USS Zeal, 1943




Why Did the Navy Use Asbestos in Minesweepers? 



The Navy used asbestos From the 1930s through the 1970s to construct minesweepers and other vessels. 



The U.S. military used asbestos in many capacities. For Navy vessels, like minesweepers, asbestos was used for its ability to insulate and fireproof. Ships need a lot of insulation to contain heat and prevent fires. 



During the decades of asbestos use, it was abundantly available from mines and affordable. It was also lightweight, a property ideal for shipbuilding. 



Where Was Asbestos Used on Minesweepers? 



In minesweepers, asbestos was used primarily as insulation. This means it went into many components to protect crew members from heat and the risk of fire. Some of the many components of minesweepers with asbestos included: 




Pipes lagging



Boilers



Wall panels



Flooring and ceiling materials



Gaskets



Valves



Textiles



Firefighting and heat protective gear




According to the Navy, more than 300 vessel parts used on minesweepers and other ships contained asbestos.



Who Was at Risk for Asbestos Exposure on Minesweepers



Everyone who served on minesweepers made with asbestos was at risk of exposure. Tight quarters, poor ventilation, and long periods of time spent on Navy vessels increased exposure risks. Some roles on minesweepers had the most risk of exposure and later illness: 




Boiler room work



Engine room work



Insulation repair or installation



Pipefitting



Maintenance and repair work



Steam fitting



Electrical work




Any job that required being around asbestos materials a lot or disturbing those materials to make repairs increased the risk of exposure. 



Both Navy and civilian shipyard workers are also at a high risk of asbestos exposure. Workers who painted minesweepers, installed insulation, carried out regular maintenance, performed electrical work, and worked as plumbers or pipefitters were exposed to asbestos fibers. 



Benefits for Navy Veterans With Mesothelioma



The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) offers several benefits for veterans who are now disabled because of their time in the service. The VA assigns a 100% disability rating to both mesothelioma and asbestos lung cancer. 



If you are diagnosed with either of these illnesses from asbestos exposure serving in the Navy, you could qualify for full disability benefits. 



The VA also offers additional compensation for veterans who need home care. Specialist mesothelioma treatment is available at select VA medical facilities. 



Veterans also have the option of suing asbestos companies that supplied the Navy. They may also qualify for asbestos trust funds set up by asbestos companies that went bankrupt. 



If you or a loved one worked on or around minesweepers, seek routine medical care and ensure your physician knows about possible asbestos exposure. 



Talk to a mesothelioma lawyer about your legal options. They can help you get VA benefits or take private legal action to seek compensation. 



Helpful Resources for Veterans



Remember, if you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you need additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Frigates and Asbestos

Before the late 1970s, U.S. Navy frigates were constructed with asbestos materials that exposed veterans and put them at risk of serious illness. Hundreds of frigates in the Navy played various roles during wartime. Veterans who served on frigates and now have mesothelioma may be eligible for compensation. 



If you or a loved one has mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













About Frigates



According to the U.S. Navy, frigates help fulfill two important military missions: 




Anti-Submarine Warfare 



Protection of Shipping 




The anti-submarine warfare frigates helped to protect the military from maritime enemies. The frigates also protected against merchant convoys.



Frigates were initially designed for affordability in construction. The lower cost of building them was useful but meant frigates didn't have the capabilities of many of the newer modern warships.



Frigate History in the U.S. Navy



Frigates were first created in 1794 when the Navy constructed six sailing frigates. The name sailing frigates was changed to simply frigate during World War II.



In the following years, many frigates of various sizes were built, redesigned, and modified. Although larger than corvette ships, frigates are considered small vessels. 



They were created initially to make up for what the corvette vessels lacked, such as unfit hulls, limited speed, inadequate range, and shortness of maneuvering effectively.



1975 Frigate Reclassification



The frigate classification stopped in June 1975. Although most of the gun frigates had already been removed, the DLG class of frigates was redesigned as cruisers. The USS Farragut class of frigates became destroyer vessels.



All of the nuclear-powered frigates turned into nuclear-powered cruisers. Cruisers were also reclassified during this time, as the Soviet Union military defined the term "cruiser" differently than the U.S. military.



Consequently, the difference in terms caused political tension, which led to the U.S. military redefining the cruiser. Cruisers became decommissioned, with the last one being the gun cruiser decommissioned in 1975.



Why Was Asbestos Used in Frigates? 



Frigates and other Navy vessels were constructed with hundreds of asbestos components. During peak asbestos use, approximately the 1930s to 1970s, asbestos was valued for its insulating ability. 



Ships like frigates need to have insulating materials to protect the crew from heat and fire. Asbestos was inexpensive, abundantly available, and excellent at insulating. 



How Was Asbestos Used in Frigates? 



The military used numerous asbestos materials in frigate construction for decades. This was before the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) strict rules on the use of asbestos. 



According to the military, over 250 asbestos-containing were sent to shipyards and used to construct and repair military vessels like frigates. 



Many U.S. military purchase receipts, documentation, and repair orders indicate that many asbestos-containing products were used to construct and repair frigates.



Some of the many components of frigates that contained asbestos include: 




Insulation



Pipe lagging



Boilers



Pumps



Valves 



Gaskets




Who Was at Risk of Asbestos Exposure on Navy Frigates? 



All men and women who served on Navy frigates with asbestos were at risk of exposure. Some are at an increased risk of developing asbestos illnesses:




Shipyard workers



Pipefitters



Boiler workers



Repair and maintenance workers



Painters



Electrician



Insulation installers




Anyone who works around asbestos in any industry is at risk of exposure. People who served on ships were at heightened asbestos exposure risk. 



Navy service men and women on ships spent long hours in close quarters with asbestos and with limited ventilation. This increased the amount of asbestos fibers they likely inhaled. 



U.S. Navy Frigates with Asbestos



This is an incomplete list of U.S. Navy frigates known to have contained asbestos materials: 




USS Albert David (FF-1050) 



USS Aylwin (FF-1081) 



USS Badger (FF-1071) 



USS Bagley (FF-1069) 



USS Barbey (FF-1088) 



USS Blakely (FF-1072) 



USS Bowen ​​(FFT-1079) 



USS Bradley (FF-1041) 



USS Brewton (FF-1086)



USS Bronstein (FF-1037) 



USS Brooke (FFG-1) 



USS Brumby (FF-1044) 



USS Capodanno (FF-1093) 



USS Connole (FF-1056) 



USS Cook (FF-1083) 



USS Davidson (FF-1045) 



USS De Wert (FFG 45) 



USS Donald B. Beary (FFT-1085) 



USS Downes (FF-1070) 



USS Duncan (FFG-10) 



USS Edward McDonnell (FF-1043) 



USS Elmer Montgomery (FF-1082) 



USS Estocin (FFG-15) 



USS Fahrion (FFG-22) 



USS Fanning (FF-1076) 



USS Flatley (FFG-21) 



USS Francis Hammond (FF-1067) 



USS Gallery (FFG-26) 



USS Garcia (FF-1040) 



USS George Philip (FFG-12) 



USS Glover (AGFF-1)



USS Gray (FF-1054) 



USS Harold E. Holt (FF-1074) 



USS Hepburn ​​(FF-1055) 



USS Ingraham (FFG-61) 



USS Jack Williams (FFG-24) 



USS Jesse L. Brown (FFT-1089) 



USS John A. Moore (FFG-19) 



USS John L. Hall (FFG-32) 



USS Joseph Hewes (FFT-1078) 



USS Julius A. Furer (FFG-6) 



USS Kauffman (FFG-59) 



USS Kirk (FF-1087) 



USS Knox (FF-1052) 



USS Koelsch (FF-1049) 



USS Lang (FF-1060) 



USS Lewis B. Puller (FFG-23) 



USS Lockwood (FF-1064) 



USS Mahlon S. Tisdale (FFG-27) 



USS Marvin Shields (FF-1066) 



USS McCandless ​​(FFT-1084) 



USS McCloy (FF-1038) 



USS McClusky (FFG-41) 



USS McInerney (FFG-8) U



SS Meyerkord (FF-1058) 



USS Miller (FF-1091) 



USS Moinester (FFT-1097) 



USS O’Callahan (FF-1051) 



USS Oliver Hazard Perry (FFG-7) 



USS Ouellet (FF-1077) 



USS Patterson (FF-1061) 



USS Paul (FF-1080) 



USS Pharris (FF-1094) 



USS Ramsey (FFG-2) 



USS Rathburne (FF-1057) 



USS Reasoner (FF-1063) 



USS Richard L. Page (FFG-5) 



USS Roark (FF-1053) 



USS Robert E. Peary (FF-1073) 



USS Robert G. Bradley (FFG-49) 



USS Sample (FF-1048) 



USS Samuel Eliot Morison (FFG-13) 



USS Schofield (FFG-3) 



USS Sides (FFG-14) 



USS Stark (FFG 31) 



USS Stein (FF-1065) 



USS Stephen W. Groves (FFG-29) 



USS Talbot (FFG-4) 



USS Thach (FFG-43) 



USS Thomas C. Hart (FF-1092) 



USS Trippe (FF-1075) 



USS Truett (FFT-1095) 



USS Underwood (FFG-36) 



USS Valdez (FF-1096) 



USS Voge (FF-1047) 



USS Vreeland (FF-1068) 



USS W. S. Sims (FF-1059) 



USS Wadsworth (FFG-9) 



USS Whipple (FF-1062)




Do Navy Frigates Still Contain Asbestos? 



The Navy stopped building ships with asbestos in the 1970s. It also embarked on projects to remove asbestos from areas of ships that posed the greatest risks. These included areas where parts needed to be maintained or replaced frequently. 



Some older Navy vessels, including frigates, still contain asbestos today because it is not feasible to remove all asbestos materials. These materials should be contained and sealed so that anyone serving on the ships is at low risk or no risk for exposure. 



Benefits and Compensation for Veterans with Asbestos Illness



If you served on a frigate and now have a mesothelioma diagnosis or another asbestos illness, you could be eligible for compensation. Options include benefits offered by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and private legal options: 




VA Benefits. The VA offers several benefits for disabled veterans and their families. These include monthly disability compensation, payments for veterans who need in-home care, compensation for dependents of deceased veterans, and funeral benefits. 



VA Healthcare. Veterans with mesothelioma and other illnesses can access expert medical care at VA facilities nationwide. Many VA hospitals have access to mesothelioma specialists because this cancer occurs at higher rates in veterans than in the general population. 



Mesothelioma Lawsuit. Veterans cannot sue the Navy over asbestos exposure. But they can sue private companies that supplied the military with asbestos. A lawsuit can potentially end in a settlement for the veteran. 



Asbestos Trust Fund Claim. Asbestos suppliers that went bankrupt have asbestos trust funds. Veterans may qualify for these trust funds and can make a claim for additional compensation. 




If you are a Navy veteran with mesothelioma or are concerned about past exposure on frigates, contact an experienced mesothelioma lawyer. They can advise and guide your next steps to help you get compensation. 



Help and Resources for Veterans



Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. For additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Auxiliary Ships and Asbestos

U.S. Navy auxiliary ships were constructed with asbestos components for decades. The support, defense, and numerous other roles of auxiliary ships were crucial to the U.S. military. Unfortunately, veterans who served on them are now at risk of asbestos illnesses. 



If you or a loved one have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. There is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













About Auxiliary Ships



Auxiliary ships have always been an important part of the Navy. Auxiliary ships are responsible for replenishing supplies and food to other vessels, transporting fuel, and transporting boats and sailors. 



Some auxiliary ships tow damaged vessels to safety, while others served as defense vessels. Auxiliary ships vary significantly in size.



Some of the most common types of auxiliary ships developed by the U.S. Navy include:




Crane ships (AB)



Colliers (AC)



Ammunition ships (AE)



Store ships and combat store ships (AF and AFS)



Icebreakers (AGB)



Environmental research ships (AGER)



Major communication relay ships (AGMR)



Survey ships (AGS)



Hospital ships (AH)



Cargo ships (AK)



Vehicle cargo ships (AKR)



Oilers – fuel oil tankers (AO)



Transport ships (AP)



High-speed transport ships (APD)



Aircraft ferry (AKV)



Net laying ships (AN)



Repair ships (AR)



Ocean tugs (ATO)



Seaplane tenders (AV)



Aircraft escort vessels (AVG)



Distilling ships (AW)



Unclassified ships (IX)




Although there were once numerous types of auxiliary ships in use, the Navy doesn't currently have many active today. 



Along with 16 Barracks ships, 14 dry cargo ships, and 13 Unclassified Ships, the only active auxiliary ships today include the following:




USS Emory S Land



USS Mercer



USS Frank Cable



USS Neodesha



USS Pueblo




Why Did the Navy Use Asbestos in Auxiliary Ships? 



The U.S. Navy used asbestos on ships because of its insulating properties. Insulation was the most common use of asbestos in all industries. On ships, being able to protect against heat and fire is essential. 



During the decades it was used, asbestos was readily available from mines, was inexpensive, and had all the properties needed for shipbuilding. 



When Was Asbestos Used on Navy Auxiliary Ships?



The U.S. Navy constructed ships with asbestos materials from approximately the 1930s through the 1970s. Archived military documents and memos showed that asbestos-containing products were used on auxiliary ships from 1944 until 1966.



The Navy stopped using asbestos because of the risks to human health. Exposure is always a risk near asbestos, but higher on ships. People working on ships are more likely to inhale asbestos fibers because of the close quarters, limited ventilation, and long periods of time spent onboard. 



Where Was Asbestos Uses in Auxiliary Ships?



As with every other vessel constructed by the military before the 1970s, auxiliary ships were built with asbestos-containing products. The military used the toxic mineral for its affordability, ease of use, and resistance to heat and fire. Over 250 asbestos-containing products were once used to build vessels.



Asbestos was used in a variety of products and equipment on auxiliary ships, including:




Boilers



Gaskets



Ship decks



Walls



Insulation



Bulkheads



Cement



Pipes




Johns Manville was one of the leading suppliers of asbestos to the military. It was an asbestos and construction materials company that faced numerous mesothelioma lawsuits and ultimately filed for bankruptcy and reorganized. 



Other asbestos manufacturers that supplied asbestos materials that went into auxiliary ships include Eagle Picher and Union Asbestos and Rubber Company.



Who Was Most at Risk of Asbestos Exposure on Auxiliary Ships? 



Anyone serving on ships that contained asbestos was at risk of exposure and later illness. Some veterans had higher risks based on their roles and where in the ships they worked:




Boiler room workers



Engine room workers



Pump room workers



Machinists



Electricians



Pipefitters



Firefighters




Which Auxiliary Ships Contained Asbestos? 



Nearly every ship built for the U.S. Navy between the 1930s and 1970s contained asbestos. These are some of the auxiliary vessels with confirmed asbestos and their commissioning dates: 




USS Caliente,1943



USS Caloosahatchee,1950



USS Sangamon, 1942



USS Carpellotti,1959



USS Delta, 1952



USS Wyandot, 1944



USS Hector, 1949



USS Cabot, 1943



USS Cowpens, 1943



USS Franklin, 1943



USS Monterey, 1943



USS San Jacinto, 1943



USS Myrmidon, 1945



USS Arcadia, 1945



USS General G.O. Squier, 1943



USS Vulcan, 1941



All AP-designated ships built in the 1940s




The History of Auxiliary Ships in the U.S. Navy



The U.S. Navy has used auxiliary ships since the 1800s. They have more varied roles than any other type of ship. Unlike some types of Navy vessels, many auxiliary ships remain active during peacetime. 



Auxiliary Ships During World War I



The U.S. Navy rapidly expanded its fleet at the onset of WW I. This included the acquisition of private vessels that were transformed into Navy auxiliaries. These vessels received the designation ID. 



The primary role of acquired auxiliary ships in WW I was transport. These vessels transported people and supplies. They also moved vessels around ports and assisted with duties within ports and harbors. 



At the end of the war, the Navy decommissioned its acquired auxiliaries and began building a real fleet from scratch. Some of the new auxiliary ships from this period were the AP transport vessels. 



Between WW I and WW II, the Navy built more than 60 auxiliary ships. This included more diversity of vessel types: ammunition ships (AE), repair ships (AR), and more. 



World War II



As the possibility of entering WW II loomed, the Navy began building its fleet once again, including building more auxiliary vessels and modernizing older ones. Repair ships were particularly important for maintaining a strong fleet, and at this time, the Navy introduced the landing craft repair ships (ARL). 



Also vital to the effort were the fuel oil tankers (AO), used to transport fuel to other ships and land installations during the war. Other auxiliary ships built during WWII include the special barracks and store ships (AF).



Korean and Vietnam Wars



The Korean War brought about an expansion of the auxiliary fleet, although it was much smaller than the expansion during WW II. Getting supplies to Korea was vital, and several auxiliary ships, either new or recommissioned, served this role. 



Ammunition ships (AE) became very important during the Vietnam War. Auxiliary ships that transported people became less important during this period. The military began using more long-range passenger aircraft to move personnel. 



The Modern Auxiliary Fleet



The auxiliary fleet is much smaller today than before but still plays a crucial role. The Navy created a new class of auxiliary vessels in 2006, the dry cargo and ammunition ships (AKE). Also active today are barracks, dry, and vehicle cargo ships. 



Much of the modern auxiliary fleet is now part of the Military Sealift Command. These are considered non-commissioned ships rather than decommissioned. They are manned by civilians and are used to supply Navy vessels and perform other duties. 



Benefits for Navy Veterans With Mesothelioma



U.S. Navy veterans who constructed, repaired, or worked aboard auxiliary ships are at the highest risk of developing asbestos illnesses. These include malignant mesothelioma, asbestosis, and asbestos-related lung cancer. 



Asbestos illnesses are debilitating and often terminal. Veterans diagnosed with these conditions can seek compensation through the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and private legal actions. Some of the options include: 




Disability benefits. The VA gives mesothelioma and asbestos lung cancer a disability rating of 100%. Veterans with these diagnoses are eligible for full monthly disability compensation. If they need in-home care, they can apply for additional compensation. 



Dependent benefits. Veterans can also receive additional compensation for dependents. Family of veterans who pass away from asbestos illnesses can apply for dependency and indemnity compensation and burial benefits. 



Medical care. Veterans with asbestos illnesses can receive specialist medical care at VA facilities throughout the country. 



Mesothelioma lawsuits. Veterans cannot sue the military, but they can sue the asbestos companies that supplied Navy vessels to seek a settlement. This type of compensation does not affect a veteran's VA benefits. 



Asbestos trust funds. Many asbestos suppliers filed for bankruptcy in the face of lawsuits. When they did this, they created asbestos trust funds to compensate victims. Veterans may qualify for one or more trusts and can make a claim for compensation. 




If you served in the military and received a diagnosis of asbestos illness, contact an asbestos attorney. They can help you understand your legal options and seek compensation and benefits. 



Additional Help and Information



Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. Keep in mind that if you have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for considerable compensation. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Small Cell Mesothelioma

Small cell mesothelioma is a rare subtype of epithelioma mesothelioma. The tumor cells are smaller than cells in the tumors of other mesothelioma types. Small cell lung cancer is a common misdiagnosis for small cell mesothelioma. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 









What Is Small Cell Mesothelioma?



Small cell mesothelioma is a rare epithelial cell subtype of malignant mesothelioma. It is less common than other cell subtypes. Less than 6% of all mesothelioma tumors contain small cells.



Small cell mesothelioma tumors usually contain a mixture of cell types, with at least 50% small cells. The small cells are round, uniform, and small but with a large nucleus. 



The few cases of small cell mesothelioma reported in the literature included both pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma. Many, but not all, of the patients studied had past asbestos exposure. 



Characteristics of Small Cell Mesothelioma



Small cell mesothelioma cells are round, all similar in appearance, and contain a distinguishable single, large nucleus in each cell.



Small cell mesothelioma looks like small cell carcinoma, yet without the ribbon patterns that are prevalent throughout carcinoma. According to one case study, mesothelioma small cell tumors have specific features: 




Large nuclei



Minimal cytoplasm around the nuclei



Infrequent mitosis (cell division)



Powdery chromatin




Pathologists use characteristics like these to identify small cells during a mesothelioma diagnosis. 



Symptoms of Small Cell Mesothelioma



When small cell mesothelioma forms in the pleural tissue, it causes these typical symptoms: 




Coughing



Shortness of breath



Difficulty breathing



Chest pains




Symptoms of small cell peritoneal mesothelioma include: 




Abdominal pain



Abdominal swelling



A feeling of fullness



Unintentional weight loss or gain



Diarrhea or constipation




Diagnosing Small Cell Mesothelioma Diagnosis



It's difficult for physicians to correctly diagnose small cell mesothelioma because it looks similar to other cell types and to small cell lung cancer. 



After diagnosing mesothelioma, pathologists examine biopsy samples carefully for characteristics of cell types. They also use immunohistochemical tests, which identify markers specific to certain cancers and cell types. 



According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), an accurate diagnosis of small cell mesothelioma is possible with the following:




"We conclude that the accurate diagnosis of small cell mesothelioma is possible, provided that the clinical presentation is known, the tumour is adequately sampled and the microscopy carefully assessed."




Physicians usually need to conduct and collect numerous samples before accurately diagnosing small cell mesothelioma. After the samples are collected and tested, they must test negative for other types of cells before an accurate diagnosis is made.



Small Cell Mesothelioma and Small Cell Lung Cancer



Small cell mesothelioma is often mistaken for small cell lung cancer. The similarity in cell type and the location of the tumors in the chest cavity make it difficult to distinguish this rare mesothelioma from a much more common lung cancer. 



Making the correct diagnosis is essential for a patient to get the most appropriate and effective treatment. Small cell lung cancer is an aggressive type of lung cancer, but treatments are not exactly the same as for aggressive mesothelioma. 



One study of 13 cases of small cell mesothelioma helped outline important differences between the two cancers. The researchers found that small cell lung cancer tumors have specific growth patterns lacking in mesothelioma. These include what they described as ribbons, rosettes, and streams. 



Treating Small Cell Mesothelioma 



Although there are not enough cases of small cell mesothelioma to have a detailed standard of treatment, most doctors approach it the way they would approach other types of epithelioid mesothelioma. 



The usual treatments include surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, or a combination. The specific treatment plan depends significantly on individual patient factors. 



Patients may qualify for surgery if small cell mesothelioma is diagnosed before it is too widespread. Surgery is usually combined with chemotherapy and sometimes radiation therapy. 



Patients who do not qualify for surgery can benefit from chemotherapy and immunotherapy. They also benefit from palliative treatments to relieve symptoms and improve quality of life. 



Small Cell Mesothelioma Prognosis



Small cell mesothelioma is an epithelial mesothelioma, the least aggressive type of mesothelioma. Even so, the prognosis is often poor for small cell mesothelioma. 



According to a study of seven patients, the average survival time of small cell mesothelioma patients is a little over eight months.



Keep in mind that, as with forms of mesothelioma, the long-term outlook can vary according to each patient. While some may live only eight months, others may go on to beat the standard prognosis and live for another year, another five years, and even longer. 



Overall health, physical activity, stress levels, age, and how quickly treatment starts all factor in the long-term outlook.



In addition, more studies are needed on small cell mesothelioma, including favorable treatment options, which may change the median survival rate.



Small cell mesothelioma is a rare, uncommon diagnosis. Talk to your medical team to get more information and discuss treatment options.



Additional Resources and Helpful Information for Mesothelioma Patients



Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Cystic Mesothelioma

Cystic mesothelioma is a rare type of benign, noncancerous abdominal tumor. Fewer than 200 people have been diagnosed with this type of mesothelioma. The prognosis is good after surgical treatment to remove the tumor. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 









What Is Cystic Mesothelioma?



Cystic mesothelioma is a rare, benign abdominal tumor that occurs in women of reproductive age. Like malignant peritoneal mesothelioma, it forms in the peritoneum, the tissue that lines the abdominal cavity.



In most cases of cystic mesothelioma, the tumor develops in the lower pelvic area of the peritoneum. It may also form near the uterus, rectum, bladder, or omentum, a layer of fat over the abdomen.



Benign means this type of tumor does not spread to other tissues or organs like a malignant (cancerous) tumor. In very rare cases, cystic mesothelioma becomes malignant. 



Cystic mesothelioma is extremely rare. Only about 150 cases have been reported. Only two of these reported cases became malignant. 



The cystic subtype of mesothelioma differs from most other mesotheliomas in that it primarily affects women. Most other forms of mesothelioma affect more males. It can affect young women as well as middle-aged women. However, the average age of diagnosis is around 37-38 years.



What Causes Benign Cystic Mesothelioma? 



Most types of mesothelioma are caused by asbestos exposure. Cystic mesothelioma is not caused by asbestos. Because it is so rare, no one knows for sure what causes cystic mesothelioma. 



Since it mainly occurs in females, experts suggest a prior case of endometriosis may contribute to the development of cystic mesothelioma.



Other studies suggest that female hormones, prior surgery, or chronic irritation may affect the disease's development.



What Are the Symptoms of Cystic Mesothelioma? 



In the rare cases reported of cystic mesothelioma, some of the common symptoms were: 




Abdominal pain



A noticeable mass in the abdomen



Painful sexual intercourse



Absence of menstruation



Painful urination



Unintentional weight loss or weight gain



Intestinal blockages



Changes in bowel habits




Characteristics of Cystic Cell Types



Cystic mesothelioma cells are characterized by smooth, thin-walled cysts held together by fibrovascular tissue. The individual cells are flat or cube-shaped. 



The cysts fill up with mucinous or gelatinous fluid and can grow as large as 20 cm in diameter. On imaging scans, doctors may be able to see separate “chambers” in the cystic tumor. Once removed from the body, the tumors may appear pale yellow.



Unlike many types of cancer, cystic mesothelioma does not metastasize. It is considered a localized tumor.



How Is Cystic Mesothelioma Diagnosed? 



Troubling abdominal symptoms are usually the beginning of a diagnosis. A doctor will conduct a physical exam, during which they might be able to feel a mass in the abdomen. 



They will then perform imaging scans to get a better look at the mass. To determine if the tumor is cancerous, they will remove a small sample of tissue from it. This is called a biopsy. A pathologist examines the tissue to identify the cells and look for signs of malignancy. 



A distinctive characteristic of a benign tumor is that it consists of multiple fluid-filled cysts. A cancerous tumor has multiple small nodules. These are the types of characteristics pathologists look for. 



During diagnosis, pathologists will also look for calcified plaques after using immunohistochemical staining. This helps them differentiate cystic cells from other types and make a more accurate diagnosis. 



Misdiagnosing Cystic Mesothelioma



Because it is so rare, most doctors and even pathologists consider many other similar illnesses before diagnosing cystic mesothelioma. It is common for women, and especially men, with this condition to get an initial misdiagnosis. 



Some of the other conditions cystic mesothelioma might be mistaken for include: 




Cystic peritoneal lymphangioma, another type of benign tumor



Psuedomyxoma peritonei, a rare malignant cancer



Other cancers that have metastasized to the peritoneum. 



Other types of benign tumors




Cystic Mesothelioma Treatment



Surgery is generally recommended as the best treatment for cystic mesothelioma. Surgery removes benign cysts, but there is always a chance they will return. 



Some patients may undergo HIPEC (heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy) after surgery to reduce the risk of recurrence. This type of chemotherapy involves circulating heated chemotherapy drugs throughout the abdominal cavity. 



What Is the Prognosis for Cystic Mesothelioma?



Since cystic mesothelioma develops slowly and does not metastasize, most patients have a favorable prognosis. Surgery is often curative, but even if the cysts recur, they can be removed again. Chemotherapy can reduce the risk of a recurrence. 



In very rare cases, cystic mesothelioma becomes malignant, which has a less favorable prognosis. In one of these instances, a 36-year-old woman with benign cystic mesothelioma later developed cancer that invaded her lymph nodes.  



Additional Resources for Mesothelioma Patients



Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. Keep in mind that if you have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for considerable compensation. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Patrol Boats and Asbestos

A patrol boat is a small vessel that serves several purposes in the U.S. Navy. Many Navy patrol boats constructed before the 1980s contained asbestos. Patrol boats and asbestos led to veterans developing diseases such as malignant mesothelioma.



If you were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you might be entitled to considerable compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 













About Patrol Boats in the U.S. Navy



Patrol boats are smaller naval vessels primarily used for defending coastlines or enforcing laws and borders. Both the U.S. Navy and Coast Guard use patrol boats. 



In the U.S. Navy, patrol boats carried sailors and their supplies through rivers and along the coast. Patrol boats were also small enough to perform stealth military missions.



Different designs of patrol vessels served specific purposes for the Navy. During World War II, some patrol boats were built to find and destroy submarines, while others helped escort people to safety. 



Different types of patrol boats used in the U.S. Navy include:




Patrol Craft Coastal



Hydrofoil Vessels



Submarine Chasers



Patrol Craft Escort



Patrol Craft Rescue Escort



Patrol Craft Sweeper



Eagle-Class Patrol Craft



Patrol Frigate



Patrol Gunboat



Motor Gunboat



River Gunboat



Patrol Torpedo Boat



Patrol Yacht



Coastal Patrol Yacht



Submarine Chaser




Patrol boats were used during both World War I and World War II. These navy ships were in high demand, and to construct them quickly, the military armed motorboats and trawlers with machine guns and other weapons at a fast pace.



Two of the most well-known classes of Navy patrol vessels were the Eagles and the Cyclones. The Eagles were first built after World War I and deployed during World War II. 



The Navy commissioned the Cyclone class of patrol boats beginning in the 1990s. The Navy used Cyclones for surveillance, coastal patrol, and to support or conduct special operations in shallow waters. 



The last two cyclones were decommissioned in 2023. After decommissioning, the Navy transferred the USS Monsoon and USS Chinook to the Philippine Navy. 



Was Asbestos Used on Navy Patrol Boats?



Although patrol boats are small compared to other vessels, they were still constructed with large amounts of asbestos-containing products. The Navy built patrol boats using asbestos through the late 1970s. 



The Navy used asbestos on all of its ships for several decades. Asbestos was in demand mostly for its ability to insulate. It protected vessels and their crews from fire and heat. 



Mant patrol vessels contained asbestos. Some of the last Navy patrols built with asbestos were the following: 




USS Grand Rapids



USS Pegasus



USS Tucumcari




Asbestos is no longer actively used on Navy vessels but still lingers in older boats. 



Where Was Asbestos Used on Patrol Boats? 



Asbestos-containing products were used in various areas all over patrol boats. Asbestos was found in all kinds of insulation and anything on boats that generated or contained heat. Some of the areas or components of Navy vessels that contained asbestos include: 




Gaskets



Valves



Seals



Boilers



Pipes



Insulation



Ropes



Deck materials



Firefighting and protection gear




Who Was at Risk of Exposure to Asbestos on Navy Patrol Boats? 



Anyone who worked on patrol boats in the past or was even aboard or around them is at a heightened risk of developing life-threatening asbestos diseases. 



Serving on Navy vessels put veterans at high risk of exopsure because they often worked in enclosed spaces with little ventilation. They were highly likely to inhale any exposed asbestos fibers. 



Some of the positions on patrol boats and other Navy vessels that put veterans at the highest risk of asbestos exposure include: 




Boiler work



Engine room work



Insulation work



Repair work



Shipbuilding in shipyards




Benefits for Veterans with Mesothelioma



If you served on patrol boats and other Navy vessels with asbestos, you are at risk for mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) offers benefits for disabled veterans. This includes asbestos illnesses. 



Monthly disability compensation provides a monthly payment for qualifying veterans with service disabilities. Mesothelioma and asbestos lung cancer both get a 100% disability rating from the VA. 



Veterans who need home care or who have dependents may qualify for additional benefits. Dependents of deceased veterans can apply for monthly compensation and burial benefits. 



Healthcare is another important benefit the VA offers. Mesothelioma is rare, with few physicians who specialize in treating it. Several VA medical facilities have access to mesothelioma specialists. 



Can Veterans Sue the Navy for Asbestos Exposure? 



You cannot sue the Navy or the government for your service-related asbestos exposure. You can get VA benefits and sue private companies that supplied the Navy with asbestos. 



Many veterans who sued asbestos companies have received substantial settlements. A settlement or award from a lawsuit does not affect your VA benefits. 



Another source of compensation is an asbestos trust fund claim. Bankrupt asbestos companies set up these funds to compensate future claimants. 



Talk to a mesothelioma lawyer if you received an asbestos illness diagnosis after serving in the U.S. Navy. They can help you file a lawsuit, determine if you qualify for any asbestos trusts, and help you make a claim for VA benefits.  



Help and Resources for Mesothelioma Victims



Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the top experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. Keep in mind that if you have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for considerable compensation. For additional assistance or questions, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Epithelioid Mesothelioma

Epithelioid mesothelioma is a rare type of cancer caused by asbestos exposure. It is the most common cell type of mesothelioma and has a better prognosis than other mesothelioma cell types. Life expectancy for this diagnosis is several months longer than for other mesothelioma types. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim and much more. 









What Is Epithelioid Mesothelioma?



Mesothelioma can be categorized by two major cell types: epithelial and sarcomatoid. Epithelioid mesothelioma is mesothelioma in which the majority of cancer cells are of the epithelial type. 




Epithelial cells tend to stick together after growing, so the cancer progresses more slowly than with other cell types. 



People with epithelioid mesothelioma often have a better prognosis and more treatment options than those with sarcomatoid or biphasic cell types.



Epithelioid mesothelioma accounts for around 60% of all diagnosed mesothelioma patients. 



All of the mesothelioma types—pleural, peritoneal, pericardial, testicular—can potentially be epithelial. 



The majority of people who develop epithelioid mesothelioma are males over 45 years of age with pleural mesothelioma.




What Are Epithelial Cells? 



Epithelial cells are found throughout the body and make up tissue that lines organs and blood vessels. They provide a safe barrier for various tissues and organs. 



The epithelial cells have a unique structure. They are long, egg-like cells that are clearly defined and different from other mesothelioma cell types.



What Are the Stages of Epithelioid Mesothelioma? 



Epithelioid mesothelioma progresses through four stages based on the location and spread of tumors:




Stage 1. In stage 1, tumors are still localized in the pleural or peritoneal tissue but may have spread to a few other nearby areas, such as the outer edge of a lung. 



Stage 2. Stage 2 is still considered early-stage mesothelioma, but the tumors have spread more within the primary tumor region. 



Stage 3. In stage 3, tumors have spread further in the chest cavity and to nearby lymph nodes. 



Stage 4. Stage 4 is metastatic mesothelioma, meaning the tumors have spread to more distant parts of the body. 




This staging is used for all cell types of mesothelioma. Patients with early-stage epithelioid mesothelioma have the best chances of achieving remission with treatment. 



What Causes Epithelioid Mesothelioma? 



Most cases of any type of mesothelioma result from past workplace asbestos exposure. Many industries used asbestos for decades without protecting workers. When those workers inhaled asbestos fibers, they caused damage in the body. 



There are some cases of mesothelioma with no past asbestos exposure. Experts are still uncertain how these people developed mesothelioma. Genetics and other environmental exposures could be contributing factors. 



Epithelioid Mesothelioma Cell Subtypes



Within the broad category of epithelioid mesothelioma, there are several cell subtypes. It is important for pathologists to identify subtypes because many of them can easily be misdiagnosed as other cancer types: 




Small cell. Small cell mesothelioma tumors consist of small, uniform cells. They are similar to and easily mistaken for small cell lung cancer cells. This type can be misdiagnosed as lung cancer. 



Adenomatoid. Adenomatoid cells are similar to cells in glands. Adenomatoid mesothelioma can be misdiagnosed as benign adenomatoid tumors. 



Tubulopapillary. These cells have a very unique pattern of papillary structures and small tubules. It is a common mesothelioma subtype and can be misdiagnosed as an adenocarcinoma that has metastasized to the pleura. 



Deciduoid. Deciduioid tumors have cells with large, polygonal shapes. It is a very rare subtype and easy to misdiagnose as something more common. 



Solid. Solid cell types can be one of two types: poorly or well-differentiated. Well-differentiated cells are round and arranged in an orderly pattern. Poorly differentiated cells are not uniform. I might be misdiagnosed as lymphoma or large-cell carcinoma.



Cystic. Cystic mesothelioma occurs most often in the peritoneum. It is often benign rather than mesothelioma and is more common in women. 



Well-differentiated. Well-differentiated epithelial mesothelioma is most common in peritoneal mesothelioma. It is often benign and develops in women with no known asbestos exposure.



Glomeruloid. These cells are oval-shaped and rare in mesothelioma. There is no known connection to asbestos exposure. 




Is Epithelioid Mesothelioma Curable? 



Epithelioid mesothelioma is not considered curable by specialists. No type of mesothelioma is considered curable. Specialists who treat mesothelioma patients take a management approach. They help patients meet treatment goals, such as extending life expectancy and managing symptoms. 



Some patients with mesothelioma do achieve remission, but there is always a chance that the cancer will recur. Patients with epithelioid mesothelioma have a better chance of remission than sarcomatoid mesothelioma. 



Epithelioid Mesothelioma Symptoms



Symptoms of pleural epithelioid mesothelioma include:




Shortness of breath



Difficulties in breathing



Chest pain



Lumps under the skin on the chest



Fluid buildup in the chest area



Chronic coughing



Weight loss



Fatigue



Fever




Symptoms of peritoneal epithelioid mesothelioma, which is less common, include: 




Abdominal swelling and fluid buildup



Abdominal pain



Diarrhea or constipation



Intestinal blockage



Weight loss



Fatigue



Fever




How Is Epithelioid Mesothelioma Diagnosed? 



Diagnosing mesothelioma always begins with a physical exam triggered by a patient's troubling symptoms. This is followed by several additional steps: 




The next step is to use imaging scans—X-rays, MRI, CT, PET—to look for areas of tissue that might indicate tumors. 





If doctors find suspicious masses on imaging scans, the next step is a biopsy. A biopsy is a procedure used to remove a small amount of tissue for examination. A pathologist can then view cells under a powerful microscope to identify cell types.





Once a pathologist identifies cancerous cells as mesothelioma, they continue to investigate them to identify cell type and subtype. Epithelial cells have unique shapes and patterns that differentiate them from sarcomatoid cells.  





Pathologists also use immunohistochemistry to look for markers of specific cell types, including rare subtypes of epithelioid. Immunohistochemistry detects antigens (proteins) with a staining process that uses antibodies. 




Diagnosing mesothelioma is challenging and complicated. There is no single test, and misdiagnosis is common. Getting an accurate diagnosis, not just of mesothelioma but also of the cell type, is essential for planning effective treatment. 



Epithelioid Mesothelioma Treatment



Treatment for epithelioid mesothelioma follows the same protocol for other types of mesothelioma treatments, which usually includes a multimodal approach, a combination of two or more of the following standard mesothelioma treatments: 




Surgery. For patients who qualify, surgery removes as much of the cancerous tissue as possible. 



Chemotherapy. Chemotherapy uses drugs to kill cancer cells. It is often used before or after surgery or as the primary treatment in patients who do not qualify for surgery. 



Radiation therapy. Radiation is never a primary treatment for mesothelioma. Doctors may use it before surgery to shrink tumors or after surgery to reduce the risk of recurrence. 



Immunotherapy. Immunotherapy is a newer treatment for mesothelioma that is becoming more common. It uses drugs that harness the patient's immune system to kill cancer cells. 




Surgery for Epithelioid Mesothelioma



Epithelioid mesothelioma patients are often better candidates for surgery than sarcomatoid mesothelioma patients. Surgery is not a good option for patients whose cancer is advanced and widespread. 



Extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) surgery is one of the most effective treatments for epithelioid pleural mesothelioma and can significantly extend a patient's life expectancy. It is a radical procedure that involves removing an entire lung. It comes with significant risks, so not all qualifying patients choose it. 



Not everyone will qualify for EPP surgery due to its invasiveness. A pleurectomy with decortication (P/D) is another form of surgery that may be an option. Known as lung-sparing surgery, P/D can also extend life expectancy. 



Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy for Epithelioid Mesothelioma



If the cancer is too widespread, a patient might not be eligible for surgery. These patients can benefit from chemotherapy and, increasingly, from immunotherapy. Patients who undergo surgery can also benefit from these as additional therapies. 



Chemotherapy can be administered in one of two ways: 




Systemic Chemotherapy. Chemotherapy administered through an IV circulates drugs throughout the entire body. The drugs target fast-growing cells, which include cancer cells and some healthy cells. This can be effective, but it also causes a lot of side effects when it kills healthy cells. 



Regional Perfusion. Another option is to circulate chemotherapy drugs in the abdomen or chest cavity after surgery. This is a newer type of chemotherapy that causes fewer side effects, and that is often more effective. It is called HIPEC when used for peritoneal mesothelioma and HITHOC when used for pleural mesothelioma. 




Immunotherapy is increasingly common in the treatment of all types of mesothelioma, sometimes used along with chemotherapy. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved a combination of two immunotherapy drugs for treating mesothelioma in 2020. 



Nivolumab (Opdivo) with Ipilimumab (Yervoy) became the first new, approved treatment for mesothelioma in decades. Researchers are also finding good results with pembrolizumab (Keytruda) in treating epithelioid and other types of mesothelioma. 



Other Treatment Options for Epithelioid Mesothelioma



In addition to the four standard mesothelioma treatments, doctors may use emerging treatments for epithelioid mesothelioma. These include targeted therapies, gene therapies, tumor-treating fields, cryotherapy, and photodynamic therapy. 



Patients who qualify may also join clinical trials. These are tests of emerging therapies in human patients. They give patients access to otherwise unavailable treatment options but also come with additional risks. 



What Is the Survival Rate for Epithelioid Mesothelioma?



According to the American Cancer Society (ACS), people with epithelioid mesothelioma have better prognoses than other mesothelioma cell types. This is because it spreads less aggressively than sarcomatoid mesothelioma. 



The median survival rate for epithelioid mesothelioma is 8 to 14 months, including patients with and without treatment. Studies have shown that many people diagnosed with epithelioid mesothelioma have gone on to live for over five years.



Survival time depends on many factors, not just cell type. One of the most critical factors is treatment. Patients undergoing the most aggressive treatment soon after diagnosis can significantly extend their life expectancies. 



One study looked at mesothelioma patients who had undergone surgery and other treatments. Those with epithelioid mesothelioma experienced a median survival time of 23.4 months. Treatment makes a big difference in the outcome. 



Talk to your medical team about your diagnosis so you can get all your questions answered. Consider talking to a lawyer as well, who can explain your legal options after past asbestos exposure. 



Additional Help and Resources for Epithelioid Mesothelioma Patients



Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. Keep in mind that if you have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for considerable compensation. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Amphibious Warships and Asbestos

Most amphibious warships constructed before the late 1970s contained asbestos in numerous components. Anyone who worked aboard or around these vessels is at a heightened risk of developing asbestos illnesses like mesothelioma. Benefits and compensation are available to veterans with mesothelioma. 



If you or a loved one have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 













About Amphibious Warships



Amphibious ships are vessels that can go between land and sea. They provide transport and support and cover ground troops. The design of amphibious ships is based on aircraft carriers. Like carriers, they often have flight decks to use helicopters for landing troops. 



Today's U.S. Navy includes several amphibious ship classifications:




Amphibious Command Ships (LCC). The LCC ships have advanced technologies for collecting intelligence and for communications. 



Dock Landing Ships (LSD). Dock landing ships provide support. They have docking areas for smaller vessels and the most aircraft landing capability of any class. 



San Antonio Class (LPD). San Antonio ships are landing platform docks that provide transport. 



Tarawa Class (LHA). LHA ships (landing helicopter assault) are general-purpose vessels that can carry up to 30 helicopters.



Wasp Class (LHD). These ships are landing helicopter docks. They carry more aircraft than the LHAs and are nearly as large as aircraft carriers. They support special operations and humanitarian operations. 




Why Did Amphibious Warships Contain Asbestos? 



Like all vessels in the U.S. Navy, amphibious warships were constructed with hundreds of asbestos components. The Navy built ships with asbestos from approximately the 1930s through the 1970s. 



The Navy used asbestos extensively for its insulating properties. Asbestos is very effective at insulating against heat and protecting against fire, important qualities for materials on ships. 



The History of Amphibious Warships



Amphibious Warships were created in the late 1800s around the Battle of Pisagua. The military needed an effective way to carry its troops and cargo during amphibious tasks and operations. Here are some additional facts about these vital Navy ships: 




The Chilean government created the first amphibious warship.





When World War I started, the U.S. military began experimenting with constructing amphibious warships. By 1933, the U.S. Marines and the U.S. Navy set up the Fleet Marine Force (FMF), a special forces operation that designed and constructed amphibious warships and Naval fleets.





Shortly after, the FMF began constructing vessels known as "Higgins Boats," large vessels with extra-wide ramps that could carry over 30 troops, a vehicle, and cargo.





By World War II, the military became interested in creating better vessels to hold more ships and cargo. At the beginning of the war, the military had no amphibious assault ships and looked to the British military for ideas.





The British Royal Navy began creating numerous amphibious warships, such as the LCT Mark 1, LCT Mark 2, and the LCT Mark 3. Each vessel built could hold additional troops and cargo.





The LCT Mark 4 was created shortly after but was constructed slightly smaller than the previous versions to help cross-channel operations easier.





The U.S. military created the LCT Mark 5, which could hold 150 tons of cargo and hundreds of troops. 




Numerous designs followed, leading to many new amphibious warships, including:




General-purpose assault ships



Multi-purpose assault ships



Force Flagships



Command ships



Attack transports



High-speed transports



Cargo Ships




Where Was Asbestos Used on Amphibious Warships?



According to military documents and memos, over 250 different asbestos-containing products were used when making military vessels. Many of these products were also used when constructing and repairing amphibious warships. 



Asbestos-containing products on amphibious were found in:




Pipes



Gaskets



Insulation



Cables



Packing materials



Boilers



Decks



Ceilings



Tubes



Valves




Who Is at Risk for Mesothelioma from Asbestos on Amphibious Warships? 



Asbestos exposure is the only known cause of mesothelioma. Anyone exposed to asbestos could develop this type of cancer and other illnesses, including lung cancer. 



Veterans, in particular, are at the highest risk of developing an asbestos-related disease, such as malignant mesothelioma or asbestos-related lung cancer. 



Many veterans who helped build or repair amphibious warships didn't wear the proper gear to help protect them from asbestos fibers. For many years, they were never warned of the risks involved in being around asbestos. 



Anyone serving on Navy ships during the years of asbestos use could have been exposed, but some roles put service members at greater risk: 




Boiler room workers



Engine room workers



Insulation installers or repairers



Firefighters



Machinists



Gunners



Mechanics




Which Amphibious Warships Contained Asbestos? 



These are just some of the U.S. Navy amphibious warships known to have contained asbestos and their year of commissioning: 




USS Anchorage, 1969



USS Blue Ridge, 1970



USS Casa Grande, 1944



USS Catamount, 1944



USS Charleston, 1968



USS Cleveland, 1967



USS Comstock, 1945



USS Denver, 1968



USS Donner, 1945



USS Durham, 1969



USS El Paso, 1970



USS Fort Mandon, 1945



USS Francis Marion, 1960



USS Goodhue, 1944



USS Inchon, 1970



USS Iwo Jima, 1961



USS Kleinsmith, 1945



USS Lenoir, 1944



USS Mobile, 1969



USS Mount McKinley, 1944



USS Nashville, 1970



USS New Hanover, 1944



USS Newman, 1943



USS Okinawa, 1962



USS Rockbridge, 1944



USS Rushmore, 1944



USS Saipan, 1977



USS San Marco, 1945



USS Shadwell, 1944



USS Spiegel Grove, 1956



USS St. Louis, 1969



USS Starr, 1944



USS Stokes, 1944



USS Tate, 1944



USS Tortuga, 1945



USS Whetstone, 1946




Do Amphibious Ships Still Have Asbestos? 



The Navy stopped constructing ships with asbestos in the late 1970s. Around that time, it also began a program to remove asbestos from ships. Unfortunately, the Navy has not removed all asbestos from all ships. 



Many Navy vessels, including amphibious ships, still contain some asbestos components. These asbestos materials put the men and women currently serving in the Navy at risk of exposure. The asbestos materials should be safe and contained, but the risk is always there. 



Benefits and Compensation for Navy Veterans with Mesothelioma



If you served on an amphibious ship or any other Navy vessel and now have mesothelioma, you have options for seeking compensation. 



V.A. Benefits



The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (V.A.) offers benefits to veterans who have become ill or injured during their time in the service. The VA also has benefits for qualifying dependents. 



An important benefit for veterans with mesothelioma is monthly disability compensation. The VA gives mesothelioma a disability rating of 100%. Veterans with this diagnosis may be eligible for maximum monthly benefits. 



Also crucial to veterans with mesothelioma is medical care. Because mesothelioma is more common in veterans than the general population, several VA facilities have mesothelioma specialists on staff or have access to specialists at local hospitals. 



Mesothelioma Lawsuit



Veterans cannot sue the military or federal government, but there is another option. Veterans can sue the asbestos companies that supplied the military. An asbestos lawsuit can lead to a substantial settlement, which does not affect the veteran's V.A. benefits. 



Asbestos Trust Fund Claim



Many asbestos companies went bankrupt and can no longer be sued. These companies set up trust funds to compensate claimants in the future. Veterans may be eligible to make claims with one or more of these funds. 



If you served on an amphibious Navy ship and now have an asbestos illness, talk to an experienced mesothelioma or asbestos law firm. These legal experts can review your options and help you get the compensation you need. 



Additional Help and Information for Veterans and Mesothelioma Victims



Don’t forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. Keep in mind that if you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for considerable compensation to cover medical expenses, pain, lost wages, anguish, and much more. For additional assistance or if you have any pertinent questions, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Battleships and Asbestos

The U.S. Navy constructed many of its battleships with asbestos in hundreds of components. These materials caused exposure, and many veterans who served on battleships now face life-threatening illnesses. Navy veterans with mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses are entitled to benefits. 



If you or a loved one have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













About Battleships in The U.S. Navy



The U.S. Navy constructed its battleships with asbestos components for decades. Battleships were the most powerful warships during the 19th and 20th centuries. 




The first use of battleships was during the 1700s. 



During World War I, battleships dominated as the military's best naval weapon. They were armored and included heavy artillery. 



The dreadnought battleship was the most common type of battleship used in the 20th century. 



The ship designation for battleships was BB. Different classes within the BB designation included fast, standard, and coast defense battleships. 



Battleships began to decline as the most powerful Navy vessels when World War II began. By the end of the war, the construction of battleships ceased. 



Aircraft carriers replaced the once-powerful battleships. Battleships, to this day, remain inactive.



The last battleships struck from the U.S. Naval Registry in 2006 were the USS Wisconsin and the USS Iowa. 




A History of Battleships in the U.S. Navy



The U.S. Navy's first armored, modern battleship was the USS Monitor. The Union used it during the Civil War. The Confederate States also had a battleship, the CSS Virginia. 



These early battleships led to the development of more modern versions. Battleships were armored and armed and used for attack and defense. They were built to be a balance between big and powerful and also fast. 



The U.S. Navy's 20th-century battleships were modeled after Great Britain's 190s HMS Dreadnought, a ship both fast and heavily armored. This kind of ship continued to evolve and peaked during World War II. 



After the war, the development of radar began to make battleships obsolete. Radar and aircraft allowed militaries to detect enemy craft. Aircraft carriers could then bring the battle to any location in the world. Battleships were no longer needed to fight at sea or support land battles. 



The U.S. Navy decommissioned many battleships after World War II. Some continued to be used in specialized situations and to support other ships or land actions. The last battleships were decommissioned in 2006. 



Why Was Asbestos Used on U.S. Navy Battleships? 



The U.S. Navy used asbestos on all of its ships for several decades. Before the health risks of asbestos were widely known, it was prized for its ability to insulate against heat and protect against fire. 



Asbestos was also lightweight, abundant, and inexpensive. The Navy took advantage of these properties and used asbestos in hundreds of components in battleships and other vessels. 



According to U.S. military records and documents, over 300 asbestos-containing products were used to construct U.S. Navy vessels.



Where Was Asbestos Used on Battleships? 



Asbestos went into nearly every area of battleships. Some of the most common uses for asbestos on Navy vessels include: 




Insulation 



Boilers



Pipe lagging



Gaskets



Seals



Valves 



Pumps



Firefighting gear



Textiles



Paint



Flooring materials



Ceiling panels




How High Was the Risk of Asbestos Exposure on Navy Ships? 



Anyone serving on board battleships with asbestos was at risk for asbestos exposure. Asbestos is a fibrous material. It easily sheds tiny fibers that anyone in the area can inadvertently inhale or ingest. 



Asbestos fibers get lodged inside the body, causing inflammation and tissue and cell damage. In some people, this damage leads to later illnesses, including mesothelioma, lung cancer, or asbestosis. 



Many people worked with or around asbestos in several industries and in the military. Veterans who served on ships had some of the highest risks of exposure and later illness for several reasons: 




Working with asbestos materials caused fibers to shed, leading to exposure. 



Battleships and other Navy vessels contained asbestos in hundreds of components. 



Small interior spaces and poor ventilation made it more likely that people on ships would inhale disturbed asbestos fibers. 



Veterans who served on ships were on board for weeks and months at a time, putting them at risk for constant exposure. 




Which Veterans Were at Risk for Asbestos Exposure on Battleships? 



Anyone who served on U.S. battleships risked asbestos exposure, but some had higher risks than others. The risk level varied depending on where a person worked and their role on the ship. Those stationed in small areas of the ship with limited ventilation and a lot of asbestos materials were at greatest risk: 




Boiler rooms



Engine rooms



Propulsion rooms



Pump rooms



Turrets



Munition storage rooms




Repair and maintenance workers in any area of the ships also had a high risk of exposure. They disrupted asbestos materials, potentially dispersing fibers. 



Which U.S. Battleships Contained Asbestos? 



Most battleships built by the U.S. Navy contained asbestos. These are some of the ships with known asbestos components with their commissioning year: 




USS Alabama, 1942



USS Arizona, 1916



USS Arkansas, 1912



USS California, 1921



USS Colorado, 1923



USS Delaware, 1910



USS Florida, 1911



USS Idaho, 1908



USS Idaho, 1919



USS Indiana, 1942



USS Iowa, 1943



USS Kansas, 1907



USS Maryland, 1921



USS Massachusetts, 1942



USS Michigan, 1910



USS Mississippi, 1917



USS Missouri, 1944



USS Nevada, 1916



USS New Hampshire, 1908



USS New Jersey, 1943



USS New Mexico, 1918



USS New York, 1914



USS North Carolina, 1941



USS North Dakota, 1910



USS Oklahoma, 1916



USS Pennsylvania,1916



USS South Carolina, 1910



USS South Dakota, 1942



USS Tennessee, 1920



USS Texas, 1914



USS Utah, 1911



USS Vermont, 1907



USS Washington, 1941



USS West Virginia, 1923



USS Wisconsin, 1944



USS Wyoming, 1912




Benefits for Veterans Who Served on Battleships



Mesothelioma is a devastating and costly illness. Veterans who served on U.S. battleships and now have an asbestos illness have options for seeking compensation. 



VA Benefits



The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) offers several options for benefits. Disabled veterans can file a claim for monthly disability compensation. The VA rates mesothelioma and asbestos lung cancer as 100% disabling, qualifying these veterans for full benefits. 



Veterans who need assistance in their homes due to illness and disability can also apply for special monthly compensation. 



Benefits for families of veterans with mesothelioma include additional monthly disability payments, dependency and indemnity compensation, and burial benefits. 



Specialist medical care is vital for anyone with mesothelioma. Veterans can seek care from specialists at several VA hospitals and medical centers nationwide. 



Lawsuits and Asbestos Trust Funds



Veterans cannot sue the military over asbestos exposure, but they can sue companies that supplied the military. Veterans can file a lawsuit to seek a settlement from one or more asbestos companies. 



Another option for compensation is to file a claim with an asbestos trust fund. Asbestos companies that went bankrupt set up these funds to compensate victims. 



If you served on battleships and now have an asbestos illness, contact an experienced lawyer. Asbestos law firms can help you take legal action and seek compensation. 



Additional Help and Assistance for Asbestos Victims



Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. Keep in mind that if you have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for considerable compensation to help cover medical bills, lost wages, pain, suffering, and more. For additional assistance or if you have any questions, contact us at toll-free 800-793-4540. 

### Biphasic Mesothelioma

Biphasic mesothelioma is a type of cancer and is caused by asbestos exposure. Biphasic mesothelioma is one of three mesothelioma cell types characterized by a mix of epithelial and sarcomatoid cells. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 









What Is Biphasic Mesothelioma?



Mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive cancer caused by asbestos exposure. The most common type of mesothelioma is pleural mesothelioma, which develops around the lungs. Peritoneal mesothelioma is less common and develops in the abdomen. 



Biphasic mesothelioma is diagnosed when pathologists find a mixture of two cell types in the tumors: sarcomatoid and epithelioid. 



About Mesothelioma Cell Types 



A complete mesothelioma diagnosis includes the cell type. There are two main types of cells in mesothelioma tumors: 




Epithelioid. Epithelioid, or epithelial, cells line the surfaces of tissues and organs. They have a tubular shape and adhere to each other. This is the least aggressive type of mesothelioma. Between 60% and 70% of mesothelioma diagnoses are epithelioid. 



Sarcomatoid. Sarcomatoid cells are spindle-shaped and resemble sarcomas, cancers of connective tissue. Sarcomatoid mesothelioma is the most aggressive type. Approximately 10% to 15% of mesothelioma cases are sarcomatoid. 




When pathologists find both types of cells in mesothelioma tumors, and one of them accounts for at least 10% of the total cells, they diagnose it as biphasic mesothelioma. 



Biphasic mesothelioma is the second most common type of diagnosed cell type of mesothelioma cancer, accounting for around 30% of all diagnoses.



What Are the Symptoms of Biphasic Mesothelioma? 



Mesothelioma cell types do not generally cause different symptoms. Common symptoms of biphasic pleural mesothelioma include: 




Shortness of breath



Wheezing



Coughing



Chest pains



Lumps under the skin on the chest




Some of the common symptoms of biphasic peritoneal mesothelioma are: 




Abdominal swelling



Abdominal pain



Diarrhea



Nausea



Constipation




Symptoms worsen as the mesothelioma progresses. Patients with either type of biphasic mesothelioma will likely experience more severe symptoms, as well as fatigue, fever, weight loss, and muscle wasting. 



How Is Biphasic Mesothelioma Diagnosed?



Diagnosis for any type of mesothelioma begins with a physical exam, description of symptoms, medical history, and work history in the case of past asbestos exposure. 



The next step in diagnosis is usually imaging tests. An X-ray can rule out some more common conditions, like pneumonia. MRI, CT, and PET scans can help doctors find areas of tissue that might be cancerous. 



If they find these, the next step is a biopsy. A biopsy is a minor procedure that removes a small amount of tissue from the suspected tumor. A pathologist examines the sample to identify cancer cells and, if they find cancer cells, what type they are. 



Once a pathologist has diagnosed mesothelioma, they will investigate the cells further to identify the primary cell type. 



When diagnosing biphasic mesothelioma, doctors generally use immunohistochemistry, a medical technique that involves coating the cells with a colored dye to identify cells more easily. 



This and other histological tests help pathologists identify mesothelioma as predominantly epithelial or sarcomatoid, or a mix of the two, biphasic. 



Biphasic Mesothelioma Is Often Misdiagnosed



Mesothelioma is difficult to diagnose. It causes symptoms that mimic those of more common illnesses. Even when cancer is diagnosed, it can be challenging to distinguish mesothelioma cells from others, like lung cancer. 



When pathologists have made a firm diagnosis of mesothelioma, identifying the cell type is still a challenge. Biphasic mesothelioma is the most likely cell type to be misdiagnosed.



Because the tumors consist of a mixture of cell types, a single biopsy might not accurately represent the overall proportion of epithelial to sarcomatoid cells. 



A study of diagnosing mesothelioma cell type found that a diagnostic procedure called a thoracotomy was best at correctly identifying biphasic mesothelioma. Thoracotomy led to the correct diagnosis in 83% of cases, compared to 74% and 44% for other diagnostic techniques. 



A thoracotomy is a more invasive procedure than the less accurate biopsies. It involves surgically removing a piece of tissue. Other types of biopsies use a needle or a camera to sample cancerous tissue. 



Treatment for Biphasic Mesothelioma



Mesothelioma treatment plans vary depending on each individual patient. Cell type is an important factor in planning care. Most mesothelioma patients benefit from a multimodal approach. This is a combination of therapies that might include two or more of the following: 




Surgery



Chemotherapy



Radiation therapy



Immunotherapy




Treatment plans also depend on a patient's goals and preferences. Patients who want to extend their life expectancy as much as possible often choose surgery with other treatments. 



Patients with biphasic mesothelioma are not always good candidates for surgery because of the presence of sarcomatoid cells. Sarcomatoid cells spread rapidly and aggressively, so often the tumors have spread too far to make surgery a good option. 



Of course, there are exceptions. A study recently concluded that surgery with HIPEC (a particular type of chemotherapy) could be effective in patients with peritoneal biphasic mesothelioma. Whether or not surgery is an option depends significantly on individual factors. 



What Is the Prognosis for Biphasic Mesothelioma?



Most mesothelioma patients have a poor prognosis, regardless of type. However, there is some variation by cell type. Patients with epithelial mesothelioma generally have the best prognosis and sarcomatoid the worst. 



Patients with biphasic mesothelioma have a prognosis that falls between epithelial and sarcomatoid:




Patients with a higher proportion of epithelioid cells generally have a better long-term outlook. 



Patients with more sarcomatoid cells have a poorer prognosis. 




Generally, the median survival time for patients with a biphasic mesothelioma diagnosis is 12 months. 



However, remember that each case is different from the next as each patient has a unique medical history. This means that many patients can go on to beat the odds of the average survival rate and live much longer by living a healthy, stress-free lifestyle.



The stage of cancer will also determine the long-term outlook. Patients in the earlier stages of cancer, stage 1 and stage 2, have a better chance of a prolonged survival rate. Those in the later stages of cancer, stage 3 and stage 4, have a lower survival rate. 



A diagnosis of biphasic mesothelioma can be confusing. Talk to your medical team about your diagnosis and any questions you have regarding cell type. 



Additional Help and Information for Biphasic Mesothelioma Patients



If you've been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you'll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Submarines and Asbestos

The U.S. Navy has relied on submarines for over 100 years. Most submarines were made with asbestos until about 1980. Asbestos on submarines caused exposure and left many veterans with a diagnosis of mesothelioma or lung cancer. 



If you were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you might be entitled to considerable compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Why Did U.S. Navy Submarines Have Asbestos? 



Submarines and most other Navy vessels built from about the 1930s to 1970s were made with hundreds of asbestos components. 



Navy vessels of all types used asbestos primarily as an insulator. During its peak use, asbestos was abundant and expensive. It was a readily available material that could insulate all the heat-generating and heat-carrying areas of ships. It could also effectively protect against fires on ships. 



Did the Navy Stop Using Asbestos on Submarines? 



Yes, when the dangers of asbestos became well known, the Navy stopped using asbestos. The first official recorded use of asbestos on submarines was in 1922. The Navy stopped using asbestos in the 1970s and began removing it from vessels shortly after. 



Do Any Submarines Still Contain Asbestos? 



While the Navy stopped using asbestos and even actively removed it, some asbestos lingers on vessels, including submarines. It hasn't been feasible to remove it all. Any asbestos that remains should be contained and poses little risk to current service men and women. 



About Submarines



Submarines are large Navy vessels that operate fully submerged in water. Submarines can travel and operate at depths of 1,600 feet.



U.S. Navy Submarine Designations



The Navy has been using submarines for over 100 years. The Union and Confederate States even had primitive submarines in use during the Civil War. Today, the three main types of submarines are: 




Attack submarines (SSN). SSN vessels seek and destroy enemy vessels. They utilize Tomahawk cruise missiles that can also be used on shore. Attack submarines also gather intelligence, support fleets, lay mines, and conduct surveillance. 



Ballistic missile submarines (SSBN). Ballistic missile submarines are capable of launching nuclear weapons. They are used solely for strategic deterrence. 



Guided missile submarines (SSGN). SSGN vessels are designed for strike missions and special operations. They are loaded with tactical missiles. They also have high-tech communication systems to connect with Combatant Commanders and Special Ops. 




A History of U.S. Navy Submarines



Submarines were in use during the Civil War, but they were limited. The Confederate States' Hunley sank a Union ship in Charleston Harbor. It was the first sinking of an enemy vessel by a submarine during war. 




Submarines in World War I. By WWI, submarines were much more advanced and useful in warfare. The U.S. Navy's first submarine was the USS Holland. By 1916 the Submarine Force U.S. Atlantic Fleet was prepared for the U.S. entering the war in 1917. The Navy then began building a Pacific Fleet. U.S. submarines in WWI defended coasts and patrolled the English Channel and North Sea. 





World War II Submarines. The U.S. Navy destroyed over 30 percent of the Japanese Navy's vessels using submarines. This included a battleship, cruisers, and aircraft carriers. A total of 314 submarines were used during World War II by the U.S. Navy. At least 52 of these submarines were lost during the war, yet the powerful vessels were also responsible for sinking 1,560 enemy ships. They also rescued American pilots.





Post-War Submarines. The Navy continued to upgrade submarines after WWII. These newer vessels could move faster and stay underwater longer. New classes during this period included the Tang, Skate, and Seawolf submarines. During the Cold War and continuing today, submarines became important as deterrents to war. Today, there are more than 50 submarines active in the U.S. Navy. 




Where Was Asbestos Used on Submarines? 



According to military documents and memos, asbestos was used extensively when constructing and repairing submarines. It went into hundreds of components to protect against heat and fire. These are just some examples: 




Insulation throughout vessels



Boilers



Turbines



Torpedo rooms



Gaskets



Valves



Flooring and ceiling materials



Firefighting gear



Pipe lagging




Documentation of Asbestos Use in Submarines



Many sales orders, repair logs, documents, memos, and letters on file with the U.S. military confirmed that asbestos-containing products were purchased and used on submarines.



Two submarines, in particular, the USS Croaker and the USS Triton, were found to have excessive amounts of asbestos. Almost all of the other submarines created before the late 1970s were found to have unsafe levels of asbestos.



U.S. Submarines With Asbestos



Documentation makes it clear that many submarines were constructed with asbestos. These are some of the known vessels with known asbestos: 




USS Abraham Lincoln



USS Albacore



USS Andrew Jackson



USS Balao



USS Barracuda



USS Batfish



USS Benjamin Franklin



USS Dace



USS Dorado



USS Daniel Boone



USS Ethan Allen



USS Gato



USS Grouper



USS Halibut



USS Hammerhead



USS Icefish



USS James Monroe



USS Kamehameha



USS Lafayette



USS Lewis and Clark



USS Lionfish



USS Manta



USS Nathan Hale



USS Patrick Henry



USS Pollack



USS Pompon



USS Robert E. Lee



USS Runner



USS Sailfish



USS Sam Houston



USS Sea Devil



USS Sea Robin



USS Spadefish



USS Tecumseh



USS Theodore Roosevelt



USS Ulysses S. Grant



USS Von Steuben




Who Was at Risk of Asbestos Exposure on Submarines? 



Anyone who worked with or around asbestos risked exposure. Several factors made exposure more likely on Navy vessels and especially on submarines: 




Asbestos was used in hundreds of components on Navy vessels, including submarines.



Men and women serving on submarines were confined to their vessels for months at a time.



They worked in small spaces where ventilation was poor, and asbestos fibers could circulate in the air indefinitely. 




Today's veterans who worked on or aboard submarines built before the late 1970s are at the highest risk of developing an asbestos-related illness. This includes people who:




Worked at the shipyard



Repaired submarines



Replaced submarine parts



Worked with insulation



Worked for long periods aboard submarines.




Compensation for Submarine Veterans with Mesothelioma



Contact an asbestos law firm if you served on a submarine and now have an asbestos illness. You may be able to seek compensation for your medical expenses. 



VA Benefits



The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs offers benefits to veterans with service-related disabilities. These include asbestos illnesses like mesothelioma. Types of benefits you or your family can file a claim for include: 




Monthly disability compensation for veterans with qualifying service-related disabilities



Special monthly compensation for additional monthly expenses related to in-home medical and personal care



Dependency and indemnity compensation for dependants of deceased veterans



Burial benefits for families of deceased veterans




Veterans can also seek free medical care at VA facilities. A few VA medical centers and hospitals have access to mesothelioma specialists. 



Lawsuits and Asbestos Trust Funds



Veterans cannot sue the U.S. government or the Navy for past asbestos exposure. Veterans can sue the companies that supplied the Navy with asbestos materials for building submarines. 



Mesothelioma lawsuits often end in settlements for veterans and their families. Rarely do they go to trial. Any awards from these lawsuits are in addition to VA benefits and do not reduce disability compensation. 



If asbestos companies went bankrupt, veterans cannot sue them. These companies set up asbestos trust funds to compensate future claimants as part of the bankruptcy process. Veterans may qualify to make claims with one or more of these trusts. 



Examples of Submarine Veterans Who Made Claims or Filed Lawsuits



Many veterans have claimed VA benefits for mesothelioma and asbestos illnesses after serving on submarines. 



One example is a veteran who served on submarines between 1964 and 1984. He later developed cancer related to asbestos exposure. He worked as a nuclear power technician and electronic technician. 



Another veteran who served on submarines between 1961 and 1978 sued asbestos companies after developing mesothelioma. He maintained pumps that contained asbestos. 



If you worked on submarines and are now sick, contact an asbestos law firm or mesothelioma lawyer. They can explain your legal options, help you file a lawsuit, make a trust fund claim, or help you claim VA benefits. 



Additional Help and Resources for People Who Worked Aboard Submarines



Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. Keep in mind that if you have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for considerable compensation. For additional assistance or questions, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Destroyers and Asbestos

Known as "greyhounds of the sea," destroyers are war vessels built to defend other ships from short-distance attacks. These powerful ships were made with hundreds of asbestos products and materials, which exposed those who served on board. Many veterans developed asbestos-related diseases after serving on U.S. Navy destroyers.  



If you or a loved one have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Why Did the Navy Use Asbetos on Destroyers? 



Many destroyers and other U.S. Navy ships were constructed with asbestos. The Navy used asbestos in ship construction from the 1930s through the 1970s. It used asbestos in insulation, fireproofing, and other materials. 



The Navy and other industries used asbestos mostly for its insulating properties. Additionally, it was abundant and inexpensive. It insulated heat-generating equipment and protected crew from fire on both civilian and military vessels. 



History of Destroyers in the U.S. Navy



Destroyers are fast and maneuverable vessels that escort and protect larger and slower ships. They defend against attacks. The first destroyers were used in the early 1900s after the development of ships that used torpedos. 



The hull designation for destroyers in the U.S. Navy is DD. The Navy has built and used several types of destroyers: 




Guided-Missile Destroyer (DDG)



Destroyer Escort (DE)



Destroyer Leader (DL)



Guided-Missle Destroyer Leader (DLG)



Nuclear-Powered Guided-Missile Destroyer Leader, DLGN




The earliest destroyers in the U.S. Navy date to the Spanish-American War. Spanish torpedo boats were a significant threat, so the Navy developed destroyers as fast-moving vessels that could protect other ships from torpedo attacks. The first destroyer built by the U.S. Navy was the USS Bainbridge in 1902. 



World War I Destroyers



The Navy improved on the design of early destroyers as World War I unfolded. They became faster, more maneuverable, and better able to travel long distances. 



They could also attack submarines as well as more typical torpedo boats. U.S. destroyers engaged in hundreds of battles with German submarines during the war. 



Destroyers in World War II and Later



Destroyers were equally important to the Naval fleet during World War II. The Navy commissioned many more vessels in this class as the U.S. entered the war. They were used to target submarines, rescue airmen, clear shorelines, and attack enemy aircraft. 



When World War II ended, destroyers were used for combat roles once given to cruisers and battleships. 



During the Korean and Vietnam Wars, U.S. Navy destroyers navigated shallow coastal waters that other vessels couldn't reach. 



The U.S. Navy's modern fleet still includes destroyers, some of the Navy's most powerful ships. They continue to be vital for defense. 



Where Was Asbestos Used on Destroyers? 



Before the dangers of asbestos were widely known, the Navy used more than 300 asbestos components in building vessels, including destroyers. 



Destroyers were created with asbestos insulation and asbestos-containing products and mixtures inside engine rooms, boiler rooms, pipes, ceilings, flooring, and more. These are just some of the components in destroyers that had asbestos: 




Wall panels



Pipe lagging



Boiler insulation



Gaskets 



Valves



Flooring tiles



Gunners' gloves



Firefighting gear



Ceiling panels




Who Was at Risk of Exposure to Asbestos on Destroyers? 



Anyone who served on a destroyer containing asbestos was at risk of exposure. Ships posed particular risks for asbestos exposure. Service men and women on ships worked in confined spaces with poor ventilation. If they disturbed asbestos fibers, they were likely to inhale a significant amount of them.



Those at the greatest risk for ongoing and harmful asbestos exposure worked in the parts of destroyers with the most asbestos, including engine, boiler, and pump rooms.



Workers who helped construct or repair destroyers worked around asbestos fibers each day they went to work. Repair workers were especially at risk of asbestos exposure. They tore out old parts, which resulted in the asbestos becoming airborne. 



Do Destroyers Still Have Asbestos? 



The Navy stopped building ships with asbestos decades ago, but that doesn't mean all vessels are asbestos-free. The Navy has embarked on projects to remove asbestos. Most areas of ships with high repair needs have been cleared of asbestos. This limits exposure risks. 



Some destroyers and other Navy vessels still contain some asbestos materials. It is not cost-effective to remove it all, but it should be well contained and only a minimal risk to men and women serving today. 



A Veteran's Experience With Asbestos on a Destroyer



In one incident, a Navy veteran who once worked aboard the USS Chevalier, a Fletcher-class destroyer, developed a collapsed lung after being around asbestos aboard the vessel during the Korean War.



The veteran testified to the Board of Veterans' Appeals that although he was required to wear asbestos gloves while shooting his firearm and loading it with ammunition, he received no other type of protective gear while aboard the ship.



He also testified that he slept around many pipes constructed with asbestos-containing products while in his sleeping quarters. 



When he fired his gun, asbestos would shake and become loose from the pipes in the area. The veteran also indicated that there was so much airborne asbestos that it looked like it was snowing inside the vessel.



Which U.S. Navy Asbestos Destroyers Contained Asbestos? 



Most Navy vessels built during the middle of the 20th century included asbestos, but evidence proves this for specific ships. 



Confirmed asbestos use was present, according to the documents, in many destroyers, including these ships with their commissioned dates: 




USS Aaron Ward, 1944



USS Abbot, 1919



USS Abner Read, 1943



USS Agerholm, 1946



USS Albert W. Grant, 1943



USS Alden, 1919



USS Alfred A. Cunningham, 1944



USS Allen M. Sumner, 1944



USS Arnold J. Isbell, 1946



USS Ault, 1944



USS Bache, 1942



USS Basilone, 1949



USS Bausell, 1946



USS Bigelow, 1957



USS Black, 1943



USS Blandy, 1957



USS Brownson, 1945



USS Burrows, 1911



USS Caron, 1977



USS Carpenter, 1949



USS Charles R. Ware, 1945



USS Comte de Grasse, 1978



USS Conolly, 1978



USS Corry, 1946



USS Cotten, 1946



USS Du Pont, 1957



USS Eugene A. Greene, 1945



USS Gainard, 1944



USS Gearing, 1944



USS Hawkins, 1945



USS Hull, 1958



USS Ingersoll, 1943



USS James C. Owens, 1945



USS James E. Kyes, 1946



USS Keppler, 1947



USS Kinkaid, 1976



USS McCaffery, 1945



USS McKean, 1945



USS Noa, 1945



USS O’Brien, 1945



USS O’Brien, 1977



USS Oldendorf, 1978



USS Perry, 1946



USS Peterson, 1977



USS Robert L. Wilson,1946



USS Shields, 1945



USS Steinaker, 1945



USS Theodore E. Chandler, 1946



USS Thorn, 1943



USS Vesole, 1945



USS Vogelgesang, 1945



USS Walke, 1944



USS Willis A. Lee, 1954



USS Wren, 1944




Benefits and Compensation for Destroyer Veterans with Mesothelioma



Veterans who served on destroyers during the peak years of asbestos use in the Navy are at risk for mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses. Mesothelioma takes decades to develop, so some veterans are still being diagnosed today. Benefits and other sources of compensation are available. 



VA Benefits for Mesothelioma



The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) offers several benefits for veterans with mesothelioma and their families. These include monthly disability compensation, compensation for home care, and compensation for dependants of deceased veterans. 



Veterans with asbestos illnesses can seek medical care at VA facilities across the country. Because mesothelioma is prevalent in veterans, VA hospitals have access to specialists who can treat this complex type of cancer. 



Can Veterans Sue the Navy for Damages? 



Veterans cannot sue the Navy or the government over asbestos exposure, but they have other legal options for compensation: 




Mesothelioma and asbestos lawsuits. While veterans cannot sue the military, they can sue asbestos companies. Many companies supplied the Navy with the asbestos and asbestos components that went into ships. Asbestos lawsuits often end in settlements for the victims and do not affect their VA benefits. 



Asbestos trust funds. Asbestos companies that went bankrupt cannot be sued. These companies set up trust funds. Veterans may qualify to make a claim with one or more of these trusts. 




If you served on a Navy destroyer and now have a mesothelioma diagnosis, talk to an experienced asbestos lawyer or law firm. They can help you take the necessary steps to get your benefits and any additional compensation you are eligible for. 



Additional Help and Resources for Veterans



If you've been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you'll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Tacoma Dry Dock

Located in Washington State, Tacoma Dry Dock was a ship maintenance and construction facility also known as Seattle-Tacoma Shipbuilding. Tacoma Dry Dock used asbestos in its daily operations. Asbestos exposure at the dry dock led to an increased risk of asbestos-related illnesses like mesothelioma.



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.





Did Tacoma Dry Docks Use Asbestos? 



Little information exists on the history of Tacoma Dry Docks. However, a well-known fact about the company is that it used dangerous asbestos products for many years.



Tacoma Dry Docks operated at a time when asbestos use was common in the shipbuilding and repair industries. Shipyards used asbestos as an insulator and fireproofing material. 



Tacoma Dry Docks History



Tacoma Dry Docks began as the Seattle Construction and Drydock Company, which was purchased by Todd Corporation in 1916. Skinner & Eddy acquired the shipyard in 1918. 



Todd Shipyards went on to employ over 30,000 workers during World War II. Most of these people were exposed daily to asbestos as crew members, maintenance workers, construction workers, painters, welders, electricians, and more.



After World War II ended, Todd Shipyards sold the company to the U.S. Navy. It eventually became the Port of Tacoma. Today, the site is part of a Port Commencement Bay Industrial Development District redevelopment.



How Did Tacoma Dry Docks Use Asbestos? 



According to internal documents about Tacoma Dry Docks, asbestos was used in the following:




Gaskets



Asbestos cement



Packing materials



Fireproofing sprays



Fire bricks



Boiler rooms



Electrical fittings



Ceilings



Floor paneling



Insulation for steam pipes



Insulation for boilers



Incinerators




How Did Asbestos Use at Tacoma Drydocks Affect Workers? 



During its peak operation, Tacoma Dry Docks used large amounts of asbestos. Most shipyards did the same thing before the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) placed strict regulations on asbestos use in the 1970s.



Before the EPA's regulations, Tacoma Drydocks and many other shipyards relied on asbestos because of its cheap cost, resistance to high heat and fire, and ability to mix well with other ingredients.



Many types of workers at Tacoma Drydocks were at risk of exposure. Those with the greatest risk handled asbestos materials directly or worked very close to them: 




Insulation workers



Boiler workers



Pipefitters



Plumbers



Repair workers



Demolition and shipbreaking workers




Spouses and children of these workers are also at risk of developing asbestos-related illnesses via second-hand exposure. Most shipyards in the past didn't require workers to wear protective gear, nor did they supply the gear.



Some shipyards added showers to the job site, but there were complaints from workers that there were only a few showers for hundreds of workers to use. 



Most workers didn't want to wait two hours to shower after a long workday. Instead, they returned home with asbestos-filled clothing and asbestos fibers in their hair and on their skin.



Compensation for Tacoma Dry Docks Workers Exposed to Asbestos



Talk to an experienced asbestos attorney if you were exposed to asbestos at the Tacoma Drydocks. They can help you seek compensation. 



Victims of workplace asbestos exposure can seek compensation through a lawsuit. Asbestos companies that supplied shipyards like Tacoma Dry Docks can be held liable for damages resulting from asbestos illnesses. 



If asbestos companies went bankrupt, they are protected from lawsuits. These companies set up trust funds as an alternative way to compensate victims. A mesothelioma lawsuit can help you find any trusts you qualify for and guide you in making a claim. 



Additional Help and Resources



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Cruisers and Asbestos

Cruisers have served a vital role in the U.S. Navy, but they were built with asbestos in hundreds of components for decades. This put veterans at high risk for asbestos exposure and a later mesothelioma diagnosis. Veterans with asbestos illnesses can now seek benefits and compensation. 



If you or a loved one have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Asbestos on Navy Ships



Cruisers and many other Navy ships contained asbestos. From approximately the 1930s through the 1970s, most Navy vessels were built with over 300 asbestos parts. 



Asbestos was used to insulate and protect against heat and fire. Although found throughout cruisers, asbestos use was heaviest in areas of the ships with a lot of heat: engine rooms, boiler rooms, steam pipes, and turbines. 



About U.S. Navy Cruisers



Cruisers are navy warships that have varied in size and purpose over the years. According to the U.S. Navy, cruisers can take out airborne targets, as well as the ocean, under waves, and onshore targets.



A formal limit was placed on cruisers in 1922 by the Washington Naval Treaty. When World War II started, the treaty was off, and cruisers became the most used vessels once the Navy stopped using battleships. 



Uses for Navy cruisers have included: 




Planting mines



Shore raiding and bombardment



Escorting merchant ships and troop carriers



Gunfire support



Air defense




Over many decades of use, the Navy fleet has included several types of cruisers: 




Heavy cruiser (CA)



Large cruiser (CB)



Armored cruiser (AR)



Guided missile cruiser (CG)



Guided missile heavy cruiser (CAG)



Guided missile cruiser with a helicopter (CGH)



Guided missile cruiser, nuclear powered (CGN)



Guided missile cruiser light (CLG)



Guided missile cruiser light, nuclear powered (CLGN)



Large command ship (CBC)



Command cruiser (CC)



Command light cruiser (CLC)



Light cruiser (CL)



Anti-aircraft light cruiser (CLAA)



Scout cruiser (CS)



Strike missile cruiser (CSG)



Strike missile cruiser, nuclear powered (CSGN)



Aviation cruiser (CLV)




Today, six nations worldwide operate cruisers, including the United States, Italy, and Russia. The U.S. currently has 22 Ticonderoga-class guided-missile cruisers in the Navy fleet.



Where Was Asbestos Used on Cruisers? 



From the late 1920s until the late 1970s, asbestos was heavily used to construct and repair navy cruisers. Cruisers contained asbestos in: 




Insulation



Boilers



Pipe lagging



Gaskets



Valves



Packing



Seals



Flooring



Ceiling panels



Firefighting gear



Gunner gear



Ropes



Textiles



Deck matting




Asbestos was heaviest in high-heat areas of cruisers. But it was truly everywhere in these ships, even in sleeping quarters and galleys. 



Which Navy Cruisers Had Asbestos? 



The following are among a few of the cruisers are confirmed to have asbestos with their commissioning dates:




USS Belknap, 1964



USS California, 1974



USS Galveston, 1958



USS Halsey, 1963



USS Josephus Daniels,1965



USS Jouett, 1966



USS Mississippi, 1978



USS Little Rock, 1944



USS Oklahoma City, 1944



USS Astoria, 1943



USS Biloxi, 1943



USS Duluth, 1944



USS Manchester, 1946



USS Miami, 1942



USS Providence, 1944



USS Wilkes-Barre, 1944



USS Denver, 1942



USS Canberra, 1943



USS Dayton, 1945



USS England, 1963



USS Chicago, 1945



USS Duluth, 1944



USS Guam, 1944



USS Pasadena, 1944



USS Pittsburgh, 1944



USS St. Paul, 1945



USS Tallahassee, 1943



USS Topeka, 1944



USS San Diego, 1942



USS Oregon City, 1946



USS Quincy, 1943



USS Baltimore, 1943



USS Helena, 1945



USS Los Angeles, 1945



USS Worcester, 1948




Who Was Most at Risk of Asbestos Exposure on Cruisers?



All Navy veterans are at a heightened risk of developing mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases, especially those who served before the late 1970s. 



Veterans responsible for repairing or upgrading cruisers had to pull out parts from the ships with asbestos, resulting in airborne asbestos fibers permeating the air. They inhaled the tiny, fine, and odorless asbestos fibers.



Veterans who held the following job roles in the Navy are also at risk:




Electricians



Welders



Plumbers



Construction workers



Painters



Pipefitters



Boilermakers



Insulators



Crew members aboard the cruisers




Crew members were exposed to the hazardous mineral almost daily. As they performed their duties aboard cruisers, they were around asbestos anywhere on their vessels. 



In addition, numerous crew members worked in small rooms with inadequate ventilation, which heightened the risk of developing malignant mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses even further.



Children and spouses of veterans are at risk as well. Since workers didn't have proper protection when working aboard cruisers, they would come home with asbestos fibers embedded in their work clothing, hair, and skin. This resulted in second-hand exposure for family members.



A History of Cruisers in the U.S. Navy



The term cruiser has been used for hundreds of years but didn't have a consistent meaning until the mid-1800s. This was when it became an official classification in the U.S. Navy. Still, the purpose and design of this type of ship were highly variable until the early 1900s and World War I. 



Cruisers in World War I and the Interwar Years



When the U.S. entered WWI, it deployed about 30 cruisers for convoy, patrol, and escort missions. Later in the war, cruisers also planted mines. The USS Baltimore planted mines north of Ireland and along the coast of Norway. 



After WWI, the Washington Naval Treaty of 1922 limited the construction and size of Navy cruisers. The treaty responded to rising tensions and a fear of an international arms race. 



According to the treaty, U.S. Navy cruisers could not be more than 10,000 tons. Their guns had to be less than eight inches. Despite the limitations, the Navy commissioned more cruisers during this period to put people to work during the Great Depression. 



World War II Cruisers



The treaty restrictions were lifted at the start of WWII. The U.S. Navy deployed around 100 cruisers during the war. They acted as convoy escorts and provided defense and gunfire support. 



The cruisers were vital in the response to the advances in aircraft warfare. A single vessel couldn't survive an air attack, so the Navy built many more cruisers and transitioned to using larger fleets that could attack and neutralize aircraft. 



Korea and Vietnam



During the Korean War, aircraft carriers became increasingly important in warfare. Cruisers could not go up against air attacks nearly as well. The Navy modernized cruisers with better guns to provide more effective support.



Cruisers saw a resurgence during the Vietnam War and were used for gunfire support. Heavy cruisers like the USS Canberra were vital in destroying shore batteries in North Vietnam. They also became more important in communications. 



The Cold War and Modern Cruisers



Cruisers contributed to the blockade of Cuba in the 1960s to prevent Soviet weapons from reaching the island nation. The cruiser USS Long Beach became one of the first nuclear-powered vessels in the Navy in 1964. 



The Navy began updating Ticonderoga-class guided-missile cruisers in the 1980s. They received updated combat systems. Today, the Ticonderogas are the only cruisers left in the U.S. Navy. 



Benefits and Compensation for Navy Veterans With Asbestos Illnesses



If you are a Navy veteran who served on cruisers with asbestos, you are at an increased risk of mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses. 



If you have been diagnosed with one of these illnesses, you can seek compensation through several sources: 




VA Benefits. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs rates mesothelioma and asbestos lung cancer as 100% disabling. You could be entitled to full monthly disability compensation, and more if you have dependants. Veterans with asbestos illnesses can also apply for compensation for home care. Families of deceased veterans can claim benefits too. 



VA Healthcare. Mesothelioma is a difficult illness to treat. If you are a veteran, you can find specialist care at VA facilities. A few VA medical centers have mesothelioma and asbestos specialists. 



Mesothelioma Lawsuits. Veterans cannot sue the Navy or federal government for asbestos exposure. You can, however, sue asbestos companies that supplied the Navy to seek damages. 



Asbestos Trust Fund Claims. You cannot sue an asbestos company that went bankrupt. These companies set up trust funds that you can make a claim with to receive compensation. 




Your best ally in seeking benefits and compensation for asbestos exposure is a mesothelioma lawyer. Contact an experienced attorney for more information and guidance on getting the compensation you deserve. 



Help and Resources for Veterans and Their Loved Ones



If you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you need additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Aircraft Carriers and Asbestos

The U.S. Navy constructed aircraft carriers with asbestos materials for decades. Men and women who served on these ships were at risk for asbestos exposure. Many Navy veterans have developed mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses because of exposure on aircraft carriers. 



If you or a loved one have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more.













About Aircraft Carriers



The first experimental aircraft carrier was created in 1910 from the deck of the USS Birmingham cruiser. It was built right before World War II when they played important roles in the military.



After the success of using aircraft carriers during World War II, the U.S. Navy began creating different types of vessels that would go on to serve significant roles in the Cold War, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War. 



Different types of aircraft carriers constructed include:




CVA (attack carrier)



CVL (light aircraft carrier)



CVAN (nuclear-powered attack carrier)



CVS (anti-submarine warfare carrier)



CVT (training aircraft carriers)



CVB  (large aircraft carrier)



CV (generic aircraft carrier)



CVHA (helicopter assault aircraft carrier)



CVHE (helicopter escort aircraft carrier)




A total of 10 aircraft supercarriers are still in commission in the United States today.



Why Was Asbestos Used on Aircraft Carriers? 



Documents, purchase orders, and military repair logs prove that U.S. Navy aircraft carriers contained a significant amount of asbestos. The use of asbestos on aircraft carriers continued through the early 1980s. 



The Navy used asbestos on ships because it insulates and protects against heat and fire. Before the health risks were well known, asbestos was abundant and inexpensive. Asbestos is also lightweight, making it an ideal material for ships. 



Where Was Asbestos Used on Aircraft Carriers? 



Aircraft carriers were built with asbestos in hundreds of components. Some of the parts that contained asbestos include: 




Gaskets



Insulation



Pipe lagging



Boilers



Valves



Pumps



Floor tiles



Textiles




All areas of aircraft carriers contained asbestos. It was used especially heavily in areas that generated a lot of heat, including engine and boiler rooms. 



Who Was at Risk of Asbestos Exposure on Aircraft Carriers? 



Anyone who served on an aircraft carrier was at risk of asbestos exposure. Asbestos materials pose no risk when contained. Asbestos becomes risky when it releases fibers that anyone in the area might inhale. 



This happened during the building and repair of asbestos-containing vessels. Exposure can also occur if asbestos materials are allowed to deteriorate over time. 



People who repaired or maintained aircraft carriers were at high risk of developing an asbestos-related illness. Airborne asbestos fibers permeated the air as the workers took parts apart and replaced them. Men and women who worked in high-asbestos areas also had a significant risk of exposure. 



Do Aircraft Carriers Still Contain Asbestos? 



Many of the carriers constructed with asbestos have been decommissioned. Three aircraft carriers that were made with asbestos are still active: 




USS Carl Vinson, CVN-70



USS Dwight D. Eisenhower, CVN-69



USS Nimitz, CVN-68




Asbestos that lingers in Navy vessels poses less risk to service men and women than in the past. The Navy knows where the asbestos is and knows how it harms human health. 



Today, people serving on these ships are protected by maintaining asbestos materials, keeping them contained, and providing safety training and gear for anyone who has to repair or work with asbestos components. 



U.S. Navy Aircraft Carriers That Contained Asbestos



These are aircraft carriers used in the U.S. Navy and known to have been constructed with asbestos components and materials and the year they were commissioned: 




USS America, 1965



USS Antietam, 1945



USS Bataan, 1943



USS Belleau Wood, 1943



USS Bennington, 1944



USS Boxer, 1945



USS Bunker Hill, 1943



USS Cabot, 1943



USS Carl Vinson, 1981



USS Constellation, 1961



USS Coral Sea, 1947



USS Cowpens, 1943



USS Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1977



USS Enterprise, 1938



USS Enterprise, 1961



USS Essex, 1942



USS Forestall, 1955



USS Franklin, 1944



USS Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1945



USS Hancock, 1944



USS Hornet, 1941



USS Hornet, 1942



USS Independence, 1959



USS Intrepid, 1943



USS John F. Kennedy, 1968



USS Kearsarge, 1946



USS Kitty Hawk, 1961



USS Langley, 1942



USS Lexington, 1943



USS Leyte, 1946



USS Midway, 1945



USS Monterey, 1943



USS Nimitz, 1975



USS Oriskany, 1950



USS Philippine Sea, 1946



USS Princeton, 1943



USS Randolph, 1944



USS Ranger, 1957



USS Saipan, 1946 



USS San Jacinto, 1943



USS Saratoga,1956



USS Shangri-La, 1944



USS Tarawa, 1945



USS Ticonderoga, 1944



USS Valley Forge,1946



USS Wasp, 1944



USS Wright, 1946



USS Yorktown, 1943




Am I at Risk for Mesothelioma if I Served on an Aircraft Carrier? 



If you served on an aircraft carrier or worked in shipyards, you may be at risk for asbestos illnesses. Anyone who served on these vessels could have been exposed to asbestos. Your risk of developing mesothelioma later is highest if you handled asbestos materials or worked in high-risk areas, such as boiler rooms. 



Benefits and Resources for Navy Veterans with Mesothelioma



If you have a mesothelioma diagnosis or another asbestos illness, you can seek benefits and compensation. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) offers monthly compensation for disabilities, which includes asbestos illnesses. 



You can also seek specialist medical care through the VA. Several VA medical facilities treat mesothelioma because so many veterans have this type of cancer. 



Another option to seek compensation is through private legal actions. Veterans cannot sue the Navy, but they can sue the private companies that supplied the military with asbestos materials. 



Talk to an expert mesothelioma lawyer to discuss your options. You could be eligible to file a lawsuit to seek a settlement or make a claim with an asbestos trust fund. 



Additional Help and Resources



Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Company

For 70 years, Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Company built and repaired ships. It also played an important role in World War II. Sun Ship's use of asbestos led to asbestos diseases such as mesothelioma and asbestos-related lung cancer in many workers.



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, awaiting those who’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did Sun Ship Use Asbestos? 



Sun Shipbuilding operated during the decades of peak asbestos use in the maritime industry and in many other industries. This peak period lasted from about the 1930s to the 1970s. 



Sun Ship used asbestos in hundreds of components that went into ships. The primary use for asbestos in shipbuilding and repair was for insulation and fireproofing. 



Sun Shipbuilding History



The Sun Oil Company created Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Company just before the U.S. entered World War I. It was built on the Delaware River in Chester, Pennsylvania. Sun Ship built many types of vessels in its 70 years of operations, but its main output was tankers.  



After launching its first ship in 1917 and contributing to the war effort, Sun Ship continued building vessels, primarily tankers for Standard Oil Company. It grew to eight shipways and two dry docks. 



As the U.S. entered World War II, the U.S. Maritime Commission asked Sun Ship to expand its facilities to meet the needs of the war. Sun Ship built more shipyards, shipways, and dry docks. It received a contract to build 92 tankers to supply Navy vessels during the war. 



The company continued to grow throughout World War II, becoming one of the top five largest shipyards in the nation. At its peak of operations during the war, Sun Ship employed nearly 40,000 workers. By the end of the war, it had launched 318 vessels. 



After the war, production slowed down at Sun Shipbuilding, which resulted in one of the shipyards converting into a facility for industrial development efforts.



In 1982, the company was sold to Pennsylvania Shipbuilding. The company only lasted seven years before it permanently closed its doors in 1989.



How Did Sun Shipbuilding Use Asbestos? 



As with most shipyards in the past, Sun Shipbuilding used asbestos when building and preparing ships. Asbestos materials went into hundreds of components used to build civilian and naval vessels. Some examples include: 




Insulation



Pipes



Cement



Adhesives



Boilers



Pumps



Gaskets 



Valves




Shipyards like Sun Ship also used asbestos as insulation in buildings and in friction parts in equipment and vehicles. 



Who Was Exposed to Asbestos at Sun Ship? 



Regardless of job function, most people who worked at Sun Shipbuilding were exposed to asbestos at some point. Asbestos readily releases fibers into the air that anyone can inhale or ingest. 



Workers at greatest risk of exposure handled asbestos. They cut into asbestos materials, removed them from ships, or otherwise manipulated them, releasing harmful fibers. some of these workers included: 




Insulation workers



Boiler workers



Pipefitters



Repair workers



Demolition and shipbreaking workers




Seeking Compensation for Workers Exposed to Asbestos at Sun Ship



Although the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) placed strict regulations on the use of asbestos in the 1970s, it happened well after many people had already been exposed to the toxic minerals.



Most companies that manufactured and supplied asbestos to Sun Shipbuilding and other shipyards knew about the dangers of asbestos. 



Contact an asbestos law firm or mesothelioma lawyer if you have a diagnosis of an asbestos illness and worked at Sun Shipbuilding. They can help you seek compensation by suing asbestos companies or filing a claim with an asbestos trust fund. 



Additional Information and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Hunters Point Naval Shipyard (San Francisco Dry Dock)

San Francisco Dry Dock (Hunters Point Naval Shipyard) was one of the oldest shipyards in the U.S., with one of the highest rates of past asbestos use. The company's use of asbestos-containing products left many workers with life-threatening asbestos illnesses like mesothelioma. 



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, awaiting those who’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. We invite you to use our Asbestos Attorney Locator Tool to find an experienced mesothelioma lawyer in your area.













Did Hunters Point Naval Shipyard Use Asbestos? 



Hunters Point and before that, the San Francisco Dry Dock operated shipbuilding and repair facilities when many industries used asbestos. Shipyards used asbestos extensively, primarily between the 1930s and 1970s. 



Asbestos provided the shipping industry with a lightweight, inexpensive solution for insulating and fireproofing. It could be found in hundreds of components that went into ships. 



San Francisco Dry Dock and Hunters Point Naval Shipyard History



San Francisco Dry Dock was initially created in 1870 by the Union Iron Works Company. Once the company stopped making money, it was bought by the Bethlehem Shipbuilding Company under the name Hunters Point Dry Dock. 



In preparation for the upcoming World War I, Bethlehem Shipbuilding Company began building all types of vessels, including destroyers, cruisers, and more. During this time, the shipyard built the West Coast's first steel ship.



Once World War I started, the shipyard continued building different vessels, including 18 submarines and over 60 destroyers. After the war, the Navy leased docks from private owners, which provided deep-water access between Bremerton, Washington, and San Diego. 



When World War II started, the Navy bought the docks from the owners and changed the shipyard's name to Hunters Point Naval Shipyard.



The shipyard became one of the largest shipyards on the West Coast and the main site for the military's applied nuclear research facility, the Naval Radiological Defense Laboratory. At one point, it was home to the world's largest gantry crane. 



Hunters Point ceased operations in 1974. The Navy leased the space until 1986 when it was reactivated. The Navy finally closed the site for good in 1991 after it was listed as a Superfund Site. 



Eventually, Bethlehem Steel sold the site to the United States Marine Repair, currently known as BAE Systems Ship Repair. Puglia Engineering bought the property in 2017. 



The San Francisco Dry Dock covers 26 acres and is being redeveloped for new uses. These include artist studios, office space, housing, and event venues. 



How Did Hunters Point Use Asbestos? 



Like other shipyards of its era, Hunters Point used asbestos heavily. The primary use for asbestos was as an insulating material. Some of the many materials that went into ships and that contained asbestos include: 




Insulation



Wall panels



Pipes



Boilers



Pumps



Engines



Gaskets



Valves



Seals



Adhesives



Textiles



Rope




In addition to the asbestos shipped to and used at Hunters Point, the site sat on top of a natural deposit of serpentine rock with asbestos. 



Who Was Exposed to Asbestos at Hunters Point and San Francisco Dry Dock? 



Anyone who worked at Hunters Point and veterans who served there were at risk of asbestos exposure. Asbestos materials readily shed tiny fibers that workers could then inhale. 



Workers with the most significant risk of exposure handled asbestos materials directly. Insulators and pipefitters, for instance, had to cut into and manipulate asbestos insulation as they worked, causing high exposure levels. 



Numerous former workers at the shipyard have already developed life-threatening asbestos illnesses, including malignant mesothelioma and asbestos-related lung cancer.



Family members were also at risk of developing asbestos illnesses. Although the dangers of asbestos were known, most workers at San Francisco Dry Dock weren't given the proper protective gear and clothing to help protect them from asbestos fibers.



Workers could then return to their family home in work clothes that were filled with tiny asbestos fibers. 



Hunters Point Superfund Site



San Francisco Dry Dock used asbestos and numerous other hazardous substances throughout its facilities and on vessels. In fact, in 1989, so many toxins were found that the EPA named the site a Superfund.



Cleanup was a big project, which included the removal of more than 220,000 square feet of asbestos materials in just one year. 



In 2018, a letter from the EPA outlined ongoing issues at Hunters Point. The local Superfund division manager accused the Navy of falsifying information and understating the severe contamination at the site. 



As San Francisco began redevelopment of the Hunters Point site, issues with asbestos arose. Developers dug into serpentine deposits, releasing natural asbestos. The Bay Area Air Quality Management District fined the developer in 2007 for putting workers and residents at risk of asbestos exposure. 



Local residents tested positive for asbestos and other contaminants in their blood. Levels of asbestos in the air reached 138,000 particulate matter, much higher than is safe. 



Hunters Point Asbestos Lawsuits



If you or a loved one worked at San Francisco Dry Dock and Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, talk to a mesothelioma lawyer about your legal options. 



Victims of workplace asbestos exposure, both civilians and veterans, can sue asbestos suppliers for damages if they get sick. 



One example of a lawsuit related to Hunters Point involved Ulysses Collins. Collins worked as a welder at Hunters Point from 1960 to 1973. He sued several companies that supplied the shipyard with asbestos materials after developing mesothelioma. 



Collins died from mesothelioma in 2005, but his family carried on the lawsuit. A jury sided with the family and awarded them more than $10 million in damages. 



A lawsuit is one option for seeking compensation for asbestos exposure and illness. You might also qualify for compensation through an asbestos trust fund. If you are a veteran, a lawyer can help you apply for VA benefits, like disability payments. 



Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to use our Asbestos Attorney Locator Tool to find an experienced mesothelioma attorney in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### San Diego Naval Shipyard

The San Diego Naval Shipyard (Naval Base San Diego) is home to almost 56 Naval vessels and is the home base for the Pacific Fleet. Although the shipyard no longer uses asbestos, it once had a long history of using the toxic mineral. Workers risked asbestos exposure and later illnesses such as malignant mesothelioma and asbestos-related lung cancer.



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, awaiting those who’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did Naval Base San Diego Use Asbestos? 



San Diego Naval Shipyard, today known as Naval Base San Diego, used asbestos in its operations for many years. All shipyards in the U.S. used asbestos to some extent, with peak years of use between the 1930s and 1970s. 



Both Navy and civilian shipyards used asbestos in components that went into ships as they were built and repaired. They also had asbestos in shore buildings, equipment, and vehicles. 



San Diego Naval Shipyard History



Where the San Diego Naval Shipyard is today began as Pacific Marine Construction, established by Glenn H. Curtiss, a famous Wright Brothers. After World War I, the company began to lose money and sold the land to the city of San Diego.




The United States Navy was looking for land for ship repairs. In 1919, after an approved $750,000 appropriations bill from Congress, the land was given to the Navy. 





Shortly after, the land became known as the U.S. Destroyer Base, San Diego, and grew quickly as a vessel repair facility.





By 1943, the San Diego Naval Shipyard was re-designated as a U.S. repair base. It began overhauling, repairing, commissioning, and maintaining thousands of vessels, including destroyers, submarines, cruisers, and more. 





The shipyard also added a fleet training program and 155 floating dry docks, which were deployed to various bases.





After World War II ended, the shipyard continued to supply repair and dry-docking services to active fleet vessels. By the 1990s, the shipyard was re-aligned as the Naval Station San Diego, and it became the home port to the Long Island Naval Shipyard. 





It also became the hub for all Naval operations in the region and took on responsibility for the Naval Medical Center San Diego.




Currently, the Naval Aviation Depot section of the Naval Base San Diego is the largest employer in the aerospace industry in the area. It also supports nuclear-powered aircraft carriers. Its facilities include San Clemente Island, Beach and Naval Air Landing Facility, Outlying Field Imperial, and Naval Amphibious Base Coronado. 



How Was Asbestos Used at San Diego Naval Shipyard?



Like other shipyards in the U.S., Naval Base San Diego used asbestos in its vessels, facilities, and equipment. Shipbuilding and repair long relied on asbestos as an insulating and fireproofing material. 



Asbestos went into hundreds of components on both Navy and civilian vessels, including: 




Insulation



Pipes



Boilers



Pumps



Gaskets



Valves



Seals



Adhesives




Even on land, shipyards like Naval Base San Diego contained a lot of asbestos. Buildings had asbestos in insulation and any equipment that involved heat, like furnaces and boilers. Equipment and vehicles contained asbestos in brakes, clutches, and other friction parts. 



Ongoing Asbestos Risks at Naval Base San Diego



The Navy found asbestos throughout Naval Base San Diego in 2006. Asbestos lingered in a salvage yard that contained debris from demolishing old ships. 



In addition to the salvage yard, a storage area used until the 1950s still had large traces of asbestos in 2010, and an area in the shipyard used to create corrosives, metal finishings, and solvents.



Most troublingly, a waste storage area found to contain asbestos was close to a storm drain. This could have led to contamination of the water with asbestos. 



Many sites and areas in the shipyard were cleaned up or put under regulation programs that helped with cleanup efforts. Some of these sites are still under the cleanup process today.



In 2009, the Navy finished cleaning up Murphy Canyon Housing. This followed the implementation of programs to ensure safer housing for military members and families. 



Who Was at Risk of Asbestos Exposure at San Diego Naval Shipyard?



People who worked at San Diego Naval Shipyard during peak asbestos use are at risk of developing an asbestos-related illness. Anyone who worked there during that time could have been exposed. 



Workers who handled asbestos materials directly were at the greatest risk. They risked exposure through fibers released from asbestos materials. Some of the most at-risk roles for asbestos exposure in a shipyard include: 




Insulation workers



Pipefitters



Plumbers



Electrician



Repair workers



Demolition and shipbreaking workers



Boiler workers








Family members of those who worked at the shipyard are also at risk. Employees and contractors were not given the proper protective gear to help protect themselves against asbestos fibers and other toxins. 



Many workers would return home in work clothes filled with asbestos fibers, which in turn would transfer into the family home.



Compensation for San Diego Naval Shipyard Workers



If you or a loved one developed an asbestos illness after working at the San Diego shipyard, contact an asbestos attorney to find out how to seek compensation. 



One option may be to file a lawsuit against one or more asbestos companies that supplied the shipyard. This is an option for both civilian workers and veterans. It could lead to a settlement or a jury award. 



Many of the asbestos companies that supplied shipyards went bankrupt after facing thousands of asbestos lawsuits. As part of bankruptcy filing, they had to set up asbestos trust funds. You could be eligible to file a claim with an asbestos trust fund. 



Veterans also have the right to seek benefits through the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). If you are a veteran and were exposed to asbestos during your service, you could qualify for disability compensation and medical care. 



Additional Help and Resources



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Orange Shipbuilding

Orange Shipbuilding, now a part of Conrad Industries, used asbestos in its daily operations for many years. This put workers at risk of asbestos exposure. Some workers later developed asbestos illnesses, including mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis.  



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, awaiting those who’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did Orange Shipbuilding Use Asbestos? 



Yes, like other shipyards in the U.S., Orange Shipbuilding and its predecessors in the area used asbestos. Shipyards used asbestos mainly because of its insulating properties. 



The use of asbestos in shipbuilding and repair did not stop until the late 1970s or early 1980s. This was when the dangers of asbestos became widely known, and federal regulations limited its use. 



History of Orange Shipbuilding Company 



Orange, Texas, has long been home to shipyards and a shipbuilding and repair industry. It began in 1859 when Samuel Levingston built the first shipyard in the area. By World War I, there were four shipyards in Orange: 




Orange Maritime Corporation



Levingston Shipbuilding Company



Weaver and Sons



National Shipbuilding Company




Together, these shipyards played a major role in supplying the Navy with vessels for the war effort. The Navy also awarded the facilities numerous contracts during World War II. All of the existing shipyards in the area expanded during this time. The population of Orange grew from a few thousand to 70,000 people. 



During the 1990s, Orange Shipbuilding expanded again and began shipping open lighters and tank barges to the U.S. Navy. In addition, the company started constructing towboats for the Corps of Engineers, eventually leading to Conrad Industries purchasing the shipping company in 1997.



Orange Shipbuilding and Asbestos Use



Orange shipyards used asbestos for many years. Peak asbestos use occurred between the 1930s and 1970s. Asbestos could be found in buildings, equipment, and vehicles, as well as on ships. 



Asbestos was prized in shipbuilding for its ability to insulate and fireproof. It was also lightweight, inexpensive, and abundant. Some of the many asbestos components that went into ships at Orange and elsewhere include: 




Insulation



Pipes



Adhesives



Gaskets



Valves



Cement



Boilers



Pumps




Who Was at Risk of Asbestos Exposure at Orange Shipyards? 



Orange shipyard workers risked asbestos exposure from inhaling the tiny fibers that easily release from asbestos materials. Anyone who worked in the shipyards risked exposure. 



Workers with the greatest risk of exposure to asbestos handled asbestos materials directly. They manipulated, moved, and even cut into asbestos, releasing harmful fibers. Orange shipyard workers with the highest risk of asbestos exposure included: 




Insulation workers



Repair workers



Pipefitters



Steamfitters



Welders



Electricians



Plumbers




Seeking Compensation for Asbestos Illnesses



If you worked in the Orange shipyards during the years of asbestos use, you could be at risk for an asbestos illness. If you get a diagnosis of mesothelioma, you have legal options for seeking compensation. 



One option is to file a lawsuit to seek a settlement. Many victims of workplace asbestos exposure sue the companies that supplied shipyards with asbestos materials. 



Many of those companies went bankrupt over asbestos lawsuits. They created asbestos trust funds to compensate future claimants. An asbestos trust fund claim is another way to seek compensation for an asbestos illness. 



Contact an experienced mesothelioma lawyer to learn more about your options. 



Orange Shipbuilding Today



Orange Shipbuilding remains under Conrad Industries today. The company continues to build tugboats, ferries, and deck barges. It also repairs and overhauls numerous types of vessels, including cargo ships, container ships, marine craft, fishing vessels, trawlers, tankers, and more. The company no longer uses asbestos in any of its products.



If Orange Shipbuilding's past use of asbestos harmed you or your family, you have legal rights. Contact an asbestos attorney for guidance. 



Helpful Information and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Portsmouth Naval Shipyard (PNS)

Situated in Kittery, Maine, on over 270 acres, Portsmouth Naval Shipyard (PNS) is one of the only four remaining public naval shipyards active in the U.S. Although the shipyard is still going strong today, its history of asbestos use put workers and veterans at risk of exposure and mesothelioma. 







If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, awaiting those who’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.









Did Portsmouth Naval Shipyard Use Asbestos? 



Like most shipyards in the U.S., Portsmouth Naval Shipyard used asbestos in numerous components for many years. Peak asbestos use in shipbuilding and repair occurred between the 1930s and 1970s. 



Shipyards used asbestos for its ability to insulate and fireproof ships. Hundreds of components with asbestos went into ships built during this period. 



History of Portsmouth Naval Shipyard



Established in 1800, Portsmouth Naval Shipyard is one of the oldest naval shipyards in the nation. Its first 74-gun vessel, the USS Washington, launched in 1814. 




Within the next several years, a hospital, barracks, and the Franklin Ship House were built, which was used to house the large wooden ship, the Franklin, which took more than ten years to complete.





During the Civil War, Portsmouth served as a shipbuilding and repair facility. Years later, it created a military prison known as "The Castle," which was used as the central prison for both the Navy and Marines, as well as captured German boats.





When World War I started, PNS began building and repairing submarines. In fact, it produced the L-8, the first submarine ever constructed by a United States naval shipyard. 





The shipyard also continued to repair surface vessels. It continued to build and repair submarines throughout World War II, and by that time, the need for production was so high that the shipyard employed more than 25,000 people.





The shipyard's last submarine, the Lance, was built and launched in 1969. 




Today, Portsmouth Naval Shipyard is staffed by civilians who overhaul and repair the Navy's nuclear-powered submarines. They specialize in the Los Angeles and Virginia class attack submarines. 



Asbestos Use at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard



As with most other shipyards in the past, PNS used asbestos for its affordability, ease of use, and resistance to fire and heat.



Asbestos-containing insulation was used throughout most of the submarines and other types of vessels built at the shipyard, as well as throughout more than 350 buildings that encompassed PNS. This includes the prison, which now sits abandoned but is still riddled with asbestos. 



Asbestos was also used in boiler rooms, in millboard materials, on water pipes, in curtains, thermal blankets, and more. 



In building and repairing ships, workers handled, installed, and maintained hundreds of asbestos parts and materials, including: 




Insulation



Pipes and pipe lagging



Cement



Wall and ceiling panels



Flooring materials



Boilers



Pumps




Who Was Exposed to Asbestos at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard? 



Although the shipyard phased its use of asbestos during the late 1970s, many workers developed life-threatening diseases after daily, prolonged exposure to the hazardous mineral.



To make matters worse, the shipyard's poor ventilation system resulted in asbestos dust and fibers continuously circulating throughout the air. Most workers did not wear any protective gear to help protect them from breathing in fine, odorless asbestos fibers.



By 1978, a study performed at PNS showed that cancer rates were unusually high at the shipyard. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) began a detailed investigation into the extent of asbestos use at the shipyard. 



Results indicated that sheet metal workers, electricians, and welders were exposed to the highest amount of asbestos. Still, since asbestos permeated most areas of the shipyard, most workers at PNS faced asbestos exposure.



Asbestos Lawsuits Against Portsmouth Naval Shipyard



The Federal Employee’s Compensation Act (FECA) protected the United States Navy from lawsuits brought on by workers due to asbestos use. 



Yet, numerous former workers at PNS and other naval shipyards filed mesothelioma lawsuits against the manufacturers and businesses that supplied asbestos-containing products to shipyards.



For instance, workers from PNS filed lawsuits against more than 25 asbestos manufacturers, claiming the companies were negligent. This ultimately led to numerous workers developing diseases such as malignant mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, and asbestosis.



In addition to PNS workers developing toxic illnesses, many family members of employees and contractors developed asbestos illnesses, including the daughter of an insulation worker. 



She breathed in asbestos fibers via her father's work clothing. She eventually died from malignant pleural mesothelioma.



Portsmouth Naval Shipyard Superfund Site



The heavy contamination of Portsmouth Naval Shipyard includes asbestos and other types of hazardous waste. This led the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to list Portsmouth as a Superfund site in 1994. 



As a result, the shipyard was slated to close in 2008. However, the "Save Our Shipyard," launched by employees, helped the committee reverse its decision on the shipyard's closure.



In 2023, the EPA recommended removing Portsmouth Naval Shipyard from the Superfund list. The EPA has stated that the site's cleanup programs have been completed. It will continue to monitor the area and conduct five-year reviews. 



Compensation for Portsmouth Asbestos Exposure Victims



If you or a family member worked at Portsmouth, you could be at risk for an asbestos illness. Contact an experienced mesothelioma or asbestos lawyer to learn what you can do about it. 



One option may be to file a lawsuit. Mesothelioma is generally considered a personal injury due to negligent workplace asbestos exposure. You may be able to sue the asbestos companies that supplied Portsmouth to seek a settlement. 



If those companies went bankrupt, another option is to file a claim with an asbestos trust fund. These are funds that bankrupt asbestos companies set up as a requirement of bankruptcy protection. 



Some of the asbestos companies that supplied Portsmouth and now have trust funds include: 




Babcock & Wilcox



Combustion Engineering



Fibreboard



Flexitallic



GAF



Keene Corporation



Owens Corning



Pittsburgh Corning



U.S. Gypsum



Yarway




If you are a veteran, you can seek compensation and other benefits through the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. The VA offers monthly disability compensation to veterans who qualify. You can also get free medical care from mesothelioma specialists. 



Additional Help for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard

Pearl Harbor played an infamous role in history, with the attack that led to the U.S. entering World War II. Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard's use of asbestos is less well-known, but still caused harm. Workers and Navy veterans exposed to asbestos in Pearl Harbor later faced the risk of serious illnesses like mesothelioma. 



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, awaiting those who’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 













Did Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard Use Asbestos? 



Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard used asbestos in many ways and for many years. Peak asbestos use in all shipyards occurred between the 1930s and 1970s. 



While Pearl Harbor and other shipyards no longer use asbestos today, the harm was done. Former workers and Navy veterans risked harmful exposure. Many were later diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, lung cancer, and other illnesses. 



Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard History



Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard was founded in 1899, shortly after the annexation of Hawaii. It was initially created as a way to allow room for more vessels. 



Over the years, over 80 acres were added, and the Navy spent time upgrading the shipyard. Upgrades included machine shops, housing, a smith and foundry, and much more.



Throughout the early and mid-1900s, Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard continued to expand and develop further, including widening the channels for the area to accept much larger vessels.



During World War I, Pearl Harbor played a significant role in helping defend the West Coast of the nation. It was known as the "Gibraltar of the Pacific." 



Once the Great Depression hit the U.S., production and expansion slowed considerably at the shipyard for many years, lasting until World War II.



In 1941, Pearl Harbor was attacked and bombed by Japan. It became one of the most well-known and one of the most tragic events in U.S. history. 



The surprise attack spurred the launch of World War II, and once again, the shipyard began expanding and developing to help accommodate the war. Along with massive expansion came the use of asbestos and asbestos-containing products.



Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard Today



Pearl Harbor today is the Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility located a few miles from the Honolulu International Airport. It sits on over several hundred acres on the island of Oahu.



Pearl Harbor serves as one of the largest repair and maintenance facilities for the U.S. Navy. It employs about 6,000 people who service destroyers, aircraft carriers, submarines, and more. 



How Was Asbestos Used at Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard?



Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard relied on asbestos in the past. Peak asbestos use by most shipyards in the U.S. lasted from the 1930s through the 1970s. 



As a ship repair facility, Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard used many of the same asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) that were once used at civilian shipbuilding facilities. 



The U.S. Navy has stated that more than 250 different types of asbestos-containing products were used at shipyards. Some of the many components that went into ships at Pearl Harbor and contained asbestos include: 




Insulation



Pipes



Cement



Adhesives



Boilers



Gaskets



Valves




Who Was Affected by Asbestos at Pearl Harbor? 



The National Institutes of Health (NIH) reports that people who worked at the Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard were found to have a heightened risk of lung cancer. 



There is also a heightened increase in developing mesothelioma compared to shipyard workers in other parts of the U.S.



Anyone who worked at or served at Pearl Harbor during the peak years of asbestos use could have been exposed. They were put at risk of later illnesses, like mesothelioma and lung cancer. 



Some workers had greater risks than others. They handled asbestos materials directly or worked very closely with them: 




Insulation workers



Pipefitters



Boiler workers



Steamfitters



Welders



Electricians



Repair workers




Both civilian workers and U.S. Navy service members risked asbestos exposure at Pearl Harbor. A benefits claim filed with the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs highlights this. 



The veteran who made the claim worked as a civilian at Pearl Harbor before enlisting in the military. He was exposed to asbestos in the shipyard for four years. He later developed asbestosis and lung cancer. 



Pearl Harbor Naval Complex Superfund Site



The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated Pearl Harbor a Superfund site in need of cleanup and remediation. The Complex includes 12,600 acres encompassing both water and land. 



Among the many contaminants in the Pearl Harbor Naval Complex is asbestos. The EPA, the U.S. Navy, and the state of Hawaii are all involved in cleanup efforts. Cleanup and testing are ongoing. 



Compensation and Benefits for Asbestos Exposure at Pearl Harbor



Both civilians and veterans have a right to seek compensation for asbestos illnesses as a result of exposure at Pearl Harbor. 



Veterans cannot sue the military or government. Both civilians and veterans can sue the asbestos companies that supplied shipyards. These lawsuits often lead to settlements for the victims. 



Another source of compensation is an asbestos trust fund. These are funds set up by asbestos companies that went bankrupt and can no longer be sued. 



Veterans can file for VA benefits. These include monthly disability compensation, medical care, and benefits for dependents. 



If you have mesothelioma and worked or served at Pearl Harbor when asbestos was used, contact a mesothelioma lawyer. They can help you take legal action, claim with a trust fund, or get the veterans benefits you are owed. 







Additional Information and Helpful Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### New York Shipbuilding Corporation

The New York Shipbuilding Corporation (New York Ship) was a large shipyard in Camden, New Jersey. It was vital to the war effort, building more ships for World War II than any other shipyard. New York Ship used asbestos extensively, leaving many of its workers with life-threatening diseases like mesothelioma. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did New York Shipbuilding Use Asbestos? 



New York Ship used asbestos during its operations as a shipyard. All shipyards used asbestos in the past. The peak years of asbestos use in the industry were from the 1930s through the 1970s. 



Workers who handled the hundreds of asbestos components that went into ships were at risk for exposure. Many later developed asbestos illnesses like mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis. 



New York Shipbuilding History



Henry G. Morse created the New York Shipbuilding Corporation in 1899. Instead of locating in New York as initially planned, he settled on Camden, New Jersey. New York Ship began building right away, constructing various ship types. 



The first battleship built at New York Ship was the USS Kansas, finished in 1907. Workers here also constructed luxury liners, barges, and many Navy vessels. 



New York Ship was one of the largest and most productive shipyards in the U.S. It operated for many years until closing in 1967. These are some of the highlights of the shipyard's history:




New York Shipbuilding continued building vessels for several years and eventually became one of the largest shipyards in World War I. 





The shipyard added additional yards and space, situated more than two miles along the Delaware River. As the business continued to boom, the company built many vessels after the military invested over $20 million for its expansion.





New York Shipbuilding built the USS Saratoga (CV-3). The vessel was supposed to be a battlecruiser but was used as an aircraft carrier for the United States Navy during World War II. 





New York Ship employed more than 30,000 people during WWII and built more than 200 ships. 





After WW II, New York Ship began constructing nuclear submarines for the U.S. Navy. It also built the first commercial nuclear-powered vessel, the NS Savannah. 





New York Ship began building its largest ship, the supercarrier USS Kitty Hawk. 




Demand for the shipyard's vessels declined drastically in the early 1960s. New York Shipbuilding closed its doors in 1967. Today, the area is part of the Port of Camden



How Did New York Shipbuilding Use Asbestos?



Similar to most shipyards in the past, the New York Shipbuilding Corporation relied heavily on asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) and products while building vessels. 



Not only was asbestos affordable, but it was also easy to mix into other materials and resistant to heat and fire. Some of the hundreds of asbestos components used to build ships at New York Ships include: 




Insulation



Pipes



Cement



Boilers



Pumps



Gaskets



Valves



Textiles




Who Was at Risk for Asbestos Exposure at New York Ship? 



Shipyard employees and contractors worked with and around asbestos daily and for prolonged periods of time at New York Ship. 



Many shipyard employees worked in the cramped engine rooms in vessels with asbestos dust permeating the air as they sprayed asbestos-filled sprays onto ship parts and walls.



The workers were never warned of the dangers of asbestos, nor were they given any protective gear, such as respirators, to wear while working around massive amounts of the dangerous minerals.



Some of the workers at greatest risk of asbestos exposure were those who handled asbestos materials directly: 




Insulators



Pipefitters



Steamfitters



Boiler workers



Repair workers



Shipbreakers



Welders




Compensation and Benefits for Asbestos Exposure at New York Ship



Due to the excessive use of asbestos, numerous New York Shipbuilding employees and contractors developed fatal illnesses, including malignant mesothelioma, asbestosis, and asbestos-related lung cancer.



Many of the workers at New York Shipbuilding are United States Navy veterans. These workers could qualify for free medical assistance and compensation from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). VA benefits include disability compensation, compensation for dependents, and medical care. 



Non-veterans and veterans who were injured by asbestos can file lawsuits against the asbestos companies that supplied shipyards.



If those suppliers went bankrupt, another option is to file a claim with an asbestos trust fund. Bankrupt asbestos companies were required to set up these trusts to compensate victims. 



If you worked at New York Shipbuilding, talk to a mesothelioma lawyer about your rights. They can help you seek compensation through any of these steps. 



Additional Resources and Helpful Information for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation for pain, suffering, medical costs, and much more. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers.

### Seward Ships Drydock

Seward Ships Drydock opened in the 1970s when many shipbuilders still used asbestos. Workers at the shipyard worked on older ships built with asbestos products. This left many workers at risk for life-threatening illnesses.



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds awaiting those diagnosed with an asbestos illness. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim and much more. 













Did Seward Ships Drydock Use Asbestos? 



Seward Ships opened toward the tail end of heavy asbestos use in the shipbuilding and repair industries. Shipyards used asbestos most extensively between the 1930s and 1970s. Seward Ships used asbestos for several years in ship components and equipment. 



Seward Ships Drydock History



During the 1970s, there was an urgent need to repair ships. Seward Ships Drydock helped the growing demand when it opened in 1973. 




Seward Ships repaired marine fishing ships at a small facility in Seward, Alaska. After a significant increase in business, the company moved to a larger industrial park, where it continued to repair vessels of all sizes.





In 1979, Seward Ships Drydock leased a marine railway facility at Lowell Point. They rebuilt the 300-ton facility and stayed in operation until 1985. Afterward, the company began offering services to vessels at the Seward Marine Industrial Center.





The company also leased two additional acres at the facility and continued with drydock and vessel repair work. This led to an 11-acre expansion, which included over two thousand square feet of offices and covered areas for work.




Today, Seward is operated as Seward Ship Facility by JAG Alaska, Inc. It has two drydocks and a TraveLift. It can accommodate four large vessels at any given time with a covered work area of 35,000 square feet. Seward is the second-largest shipyard north of Seattle. 



How Did Seward Ships Drydock Use Asbestos? 



Shipyards in the past used a lot of asbestos in many different ways. Its primary use was as an insulating material. In shipbuilding and repair, asbestos materials went into vessels as a lightweight type of insulation that also provided fireproofing. 



Seward Ships Drydock would have used asbestos in many components that went into the ships they repaired, including:




Pipe insulation



Insulating wall panels



Boiler and pump insulation



Fireproofing materials



Gaskets



Valves



Adhesives




Most shipyards and other industries stopped using asbestos by the 1970s or early 1980s, so Seward's use of asbestos didn't last long. 



Who Was at Risk of Asbestos Exposure at Seward? 



Like other past shipyards, workers at Seward Ships Drydock were likely exposed to asbestos. Even after shipyards mostly stopped using asbestos, workers would have encountered it in older ships they repaired. 



Asbestos exposure was a risk for anyone working at the facility. Workers at greatest risk handled asbestos materials. They manipulated asbestos components, releasing fibers that they were likely to inhale. This includes insulation workers, plumbers, pipefitters, boiler workers, welders, and those doing demolition or shipbreaking work. 



Compensation for Workers Exposed to Asbestos at Seward



Workers exposed to asbestos on the job who are later diagnosed with mesothelioma or other illnesses have a right to seek compensation. 



One option is to file a lawsuit against the asbestos companies that supplied the shipyard to seek a settlement or jury award. Another option is to make a claim with an asbestos trust fund. 



If you worked at Seward and later developed an asbestos illness, contact a mesothelioma law firm for advice and guidance in seeking compensation. 



Additional Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Todd Shipyards

Todd Shipyards has a long history of shipbuilding in the U.S. and built many vessels for the military. Todd Shipyards also has a long history of asbestos use. This resulted in workers developing life-threatening illnesses, such as mesothelioma and asbestos lung cancer.



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, awaiting those who’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













Did Todd Shipyards Use Asbestos? 



Todd Shipyards used asbestos extensively for many years. Shipyards once used asbestos in hundreds of components that went into ships. 



Both shipbuilding and repair relied on asbestos materials for insulating and fireproofing. The peak time for asbestos use in the shipbuilding industry was from the 1930s through the 1970s. 



Todd Shipyards History



Todd Shipyards was created in 1916 when William H. Todd Corporation bought properties in New Jersey and New York. Todd Shipyards would eventually include locations in Seattle, Oakland, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Galveston, and New Orleans. 




Since the shipyard was built shortly after World War I started, business picked up quickly as the need for vessels was extremely high at the time. 





There were so many demands for ships that Todd Shipyards operated 24 hours per day, with numerous people working around the clock.





When World War II began, Todd Shipyards again began building numerous vessels, including 60 cargo ships for the British Purchasing Commission. 





Todd Shipyards built over 300 landing craft vessels for the United States Maritime Commission and the United States Navy, including destroyer vessels, frigates, and more. During this time, Todd Shipyards employed close to 57,000 workers.





When World War II ended, the shipyard bought a plant in San Pedro, California, which eventually became the Los Angeles division of Todd Shipyards. The new division added to the expansion of Todd Shipyards and two other shipyard facilities in Galveston, Texas and Seattle, Washington. 





Todd Shipyards continued building ships throughout the early 1980s, including opening additional facilities in New Orleans, Brooklyn, and San Francisco.





By 1983, the shipyard began declining, and part of its downfall was due was its excessive use of asbestos, which left Todd Shipyards facing hundreds of asbestos-related lawsuits.





In 1987, Todd Shipyards filed for bankruptcy, claiming that the business lost money on the two current contracts. 




Today, many of the former Todd Shipyards are run by Vigor Shipyards. 



Notable Todd Shipyard Locations



Todd Shipyards was a major shipbuilding and repair operation. It started in New York and New Jersey and expanded to multiple shipyards across the U.S. 



Todd Shipyards Seattle



The Seattle location was a flagship for Todd Shipyards and one of the largest shipbuilding facilities on the Pacific Coast. It was originally the Seattle Construction and Dry Dock Company, founded in 1882. It was hugely important in the war effort during World War II and also built Washington State ferries and serviced vessels for the U.S. Coast Guard. 



Todd Shipyards Brooklyn



Robin Dry Dock and Repair Co. in Brooklyn was one of the original shipyards acquired by Todd. It dates back to the mid-1800s. During World War II, the shipyard built destroyers and other Navy vessels. The shipyard closed in the 1980s. Asbestos was found on-site during redevelopment projects. 



Todd Shipyards San Francisco 



The San Francisco location for Todd Shipyards was active during World War I and later expanded to accommodate the needs of World War II. Workers here built transport ships during the war and repaired both civilian and naval vessels. Asbestos was later found on the site in pipes, insulation, and other materials.



Todd Shipyards Galveston



The Todd Shipyards in Galveston, Texas, opened in 1934. Previously, the location was known as the Galveston Dry Dock & Construction. The site acquired other local businesses to expand and also leased the Brown Shipbuilding property. It filed for bankruptcy and shuttered operations in 1990. 



Todd Shipbuilding Houston



Todd Shipyards operated an emergency shipyard in Houston during World War II. Operated along with Kaiser Corporation, the shipyard opened in 1941 and closed in 1946 after building over 200 Liberty ships. 



Todd Shipyards Oakland



Todd Shipyards acquired United Shipbuilding in Oakland in 1949. The work here focused on repairing fishing boats as well as large oil tankers. Unlike other shipyards in the area, Oakland was a repair facility and did not build ships. 



Todd Shipyards Los Angeles



The U.S. Navy originally operated the Los Angeles shipyard. It handed over operations to Todd Shipyards in 1943 and was at the time known as the San Pedro Shipyards. Todd Shipyards officially gained ownership of the shipyard in 1945. 



Other Todd Shipyard Locations



In addition to these sites, Todd Shipyards operated facilities in New Orleans, South Portland, Maine, Portland, Oregon, Charleston, South Carolina, Alabama, and Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Many served as emergency facilities for World War II. 



How Did Todd Shipyards Use Asbestos?



Todd Shipyards used asbestos extensively in all of its locations. Shipyards used asbestos for insulating and fireproofing on ships. It also could be found in buildings in the yard and in the equipment and vehicles workers used. 



Hundreds of components that went into ships contained asbestos, including: 




Boilers



Insulation



Pipes



Gaskets



Valves



Pumps



Adhesives



Wall panels



Ceiling panels



Textiles




Who Was at Risk for Asbestos Exposure at Todd Shipyards?



All workers at all Todd Shipyards risked asbestos exposure. The asbestos materials easily shed fibers that become part of the dust in the air and on surfaces. Anyone working in the area and not wearing protective gear can inhale the fibers and be exposed in this way. 



Some workers in shipyards had a higher risk of exposure than others. Todd Shipyard workers who handled asbestos materials made repairs to them, or worked very close to these workers, were more likely to inhale fibers: 




Insulation installers and repairers



Pipefitters



Plumbers



Electricians



Boiler workers



Welders



Demolition workers and shipbreakers




Todd Shipyard Asbestos Lawsuits



The problems of asbestos issues got so severe that Todd Shipyards was once up against 490 asbestos-related lawsuits, including claims for mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, asbestosis, and other injuries and illnesses. The shipyard settled most of these cases with money set aside in reserves and insurance funds.



Los Angeles Shipyard Boilermaker Wins Case



Todd Shipyards also fought back on numerous claims from people who worked at the shipyard's Brooklyn facility and Los Angeles facility.



For instance, in the 1970s, a Los Angeles shipyard boilermaker, Sidney Osmundsen, filed an asbestos lawsuit against both Todd Shipyards and Travelers Insurance.



Both companies challenged the claim, which was eventually denied due to failure to give notice in time of being aware of his condition and how it related to the asbestos exposure at the job site (33 U.S.C. Sec. 912(a)).



After numerous delays and appeals, Osmundsen won his case before the U.S. Court of Appeals. Court documents indicate that at the time, Todd Shipyards still had over $3 million in a bodily injury fund to pay off these types of claims and lawsuits.



Win for Secondhand Asbestos Exposure Victim



George Kraemer developed mesothelioma after being exposed to asbestos as a child. His father handled asbestos-wrapped pipes at his job at the Seattle Todd Shipyard. His father died from lung disease, and his brother also developed asbetosis. 



Rather than suing Todd Shipyards, the Kraemer family filed a lawsuit against asbestos suppliers. The family ultimately won a jury award of $10 million. 



How to Seek Compensation if You Were Exposed to Asbestos at Todd Shipyards



Contact an asbestos law firm if you believe exposure at Todd Shipyards led to your mesothelioma, lung cancer, or asbestosis diagnosis. An experienced mesothelioma lawyer can review your case and explain your options for seeking compensation. 



Most victims are eligible to seek compensation through a lawsuit or an asbestos trust fund. Most lawsuits are against the companies that supplied shipyards with asbestos. If those companies went bankrupt, a claim with an asbestos trust fund is another option. 



If you are a veteran affected by ships repaired or built at Todd Shipyards, you can seek benefits through the VA. VA benefits include monthly disability compensation and medical care, as well as compensation for dependents. 



Additional Help and Resources For Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Newport News Shipyard

Newport News Shipyard (today Newport News Shipbuilding) was once one of the largest shipbuilders in the United States. It used hundreds of asbestos products in its daily operations. Asbestos at Newport News led to exposure in many workers who were at risk of developing mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses. 



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, awaiting those who’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













Did Newport News Shipbuilding Use Asbestos? 



The Newport News Shipyard operated during a time of peak asbestos use in the shipbuilding industry. From about the 1930s through the 1970s, Newport News Shipbuilding used hundreds of asbestos components in ships and in the buildings and equipment at the shipyard. 



Shipyards like Newport News relied on asbestos primarily for its insulating abilities. It could also provide fireproofing for ships and was affordable and readily available. Most shipyards and many other industries used asbestos for decades, putting workers at risk of exposure and illness. 



Newport News Shipyard History



Newport News Shipyard started as the Chesapeake Dry Dock & Construction Company in 1886 along the James River in Newport News, Virginia. Years later, its name changed to Newport News Shipyard as it began building both naval and commercial vessels.



Early History



Collis P. Huntington, an industrialist, built the shipyard, and by 1891, Newport News Shipbuilding had built its first vessel. The shipyard built several other ships within the next six years, including the  USS Nashville, USS Wilmington,  and USS Helena.



In 1927, Newport News Shipyard built the GRT SS California, one of the largest merchant ships to be built in the United States. Several other vessels followed, including Virginia, Pennsylvania, President Coolidge, and SS America. 



World War II and Post-War Years



During World War II, the Newport News Shipbuilding received a $22 million investment from the U.S. Navy. The shipyard built numerous aircraft carriers, cruisers, battleships, and more.



By the end of the war, the shipyard had built over 240 ships and was awarded an "E" for excellence pennant by the U.S. Navy.



In 1960, Newport News built the Robert E. Lee, the shipyard's first nuclear submarine. In 1961, the USS Enterprise was launched, followed by the USS Nimitz in 1975. During the 1970s, Newport News Shipyard also launched two of the biggest tanks ever built and several liquefied natural gas carriers.



Newport News Shipbuilding Today



In 2008, Newport News Shipyard was combined into the Northrop Grumman Ship Systems. In 2011, the shipyard was combined with Ingalls Shipyard to create the Huntington Ingalls Industries, owned by Northrop Grumman.



Today, Newport News Shipyard is the largest industrial employer in Virginia. It concentrates on building nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and submarines for the Navy.



How Did Newport News Shipbuilding Use Asbestos? 



As with almost every other shipyard in the past in the U.S., Newport News Shipyard relied on asbestos for its resistance to heat and fire, affordability, and ease of use. 



Asbestos went into hundreds of components used to build and repair ships, including: 




Insulation



Pipes



Cement



Wall and ceiling panels



Gaskets



Pumps



Valves




Shipyards also had asbestos in the insulation in buildings. Equipment and vehicles used by workers often contained asbestos in friction parts, in gaskets, and in seals. 



Who Was Affected by Asbestos at Newport News?



Anyone who worked at Newport News Shipbuilding during the years of asbestos was at risk of exposure. This included the more than 30,000 people employed during World War II. 



Asbestos is harmful because it sheds tiny fibers when handled by workers. Anyone in the area can inhale those fibers. Once inhaled, asbestos fibers can cause significant damage inside the body and may lead to mesothelioma, lung cancer, or asbestosis. 



Workers at Newport News Shipbuilding at the greatest risk of exposure handled and worked with asbestos products directly. Some examples of these workers include: 




Insulation workers



Pipefitters



Plumbers



Electricians



Boiler workers



Repair workers




Asbestos Lawsuits Related to Newport News



Newport News Shipyard and the asbestos companies that supplied it faced numerous asbestos-related lawsuits from former yard employees.



Bert Minton is one example of a successful asbestos lawsuit brought by a former Newport News worker. Minton worked as a shipfitter and repair supervisor on Exxon oil tankers at Newport News Shipyard during the 1960s and 1970s.



Minton later developed pleural mesothelioma. He sued Exxon, arguing that the company knew about the risks of working with asbestos but failed to warn workers or provide adequate protection. 



Many former workers at Newport News sued asbestos companies that supplied the shipyard and ship owners like Exxon. Minton and his lawyers decided to hold Exxon accountable, which paid off. 



A jury in Virginia agreed that Exxon was liable for expenses related to Minton's illness and awarded him $25 million. The award was reduced later but was still a significant win for Minton and his family. 



How to Seek Compensation as a Former Newport News Shipyard Worker



Contact an asbestos law firm if you worked at Newport News and now have a diagnosis of an asbestos illness like mesothelioma. They can review your case, offer options, and guide your next steps. There are a few ways to get compensation for past asbestos exposure: 




Mesothelioma lawsuits. Victims of asbestos exposure and illnesses can file personal injury lawsuits to seek a settlement or jury verdict. These lawsuits are most often filed against the asbestos companies that supplied shipyards like Newport News. 



Asbestos trust fund claims. If the asbestos suppliers responsible went bankrupt, a lawsuit may not be an option. These companies set up trust funds as part of the bankruptcy process to help compensate future claimants. 



VA benefits claims. Veterans affected by asbestos at Newport News can file for benefits through the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Benefits include monthly disability compensation, benefits for dependents, and medical care. 




If you worked at Newport News Shipbuilding and now have an asbestos illness, reach out to a mesothelioma lawyer for advice and options. 



Additional Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys. 

### Brown Shipbuilding (Todd Houston Shipyard) and Asbestos

Brown Shipbuilding (Todd Houston Shipyard), located in Houston, Texas, built many ships during World War II. Workers used and worked around asbestos before and after the war, putting them at risk for exposure and later illnesses, including mesothelioma. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Brown Shipbuilding History



The Brown Shipbuilding Company was created in 1942 to build vessels for the U.S. Navy and the war effort. 




The idea of the new shipyard began in 1941 when the Navy asked brothers George R. Brown and Herman Brown to build four submarine chasers for the military.





Although the brothers had no prior shipbuilding experience, they did help build the Corpus Christi Naval Air Station. With $9 in funding from the Navy, they created Brown Shipbuilding in time to help with the efforts of World War II.





Once the submarine chasers were built, Brown Shipbuilding continued to develop and deliver ships, including 61 destroyer escorts, 254 amphibious assault ships, and over 350 Navy warships in total.  





When World War II ended, the Todd Houston Shipbuilding Company bought Brown Shipbuilding.





Todd Houston Shipbuilding, also known as the Todd Houston Shipyard, closed its doors in 1985, and once again, the shipyard went back to Brown and Root, where it was used as a ship construction and repair site until 2004.





One of the most famous vessels constructed at Brown Shipbuilding was the United States Coast Guard destroyer, the USS Vance. 




How Did Brown Shipbuilding Use Asbestos?



Shipyards all over the U.S. used asbestos materials before government regulations restricted its use. Shipyards used hundreds of asbestos components that went into all types of vessels. 



Shipbuilding and repair relied on asbestos largely for its insulating and fireproofing properties. It was also abundant and inexpensive. Asbestos is lightweight, another property that makes it ideal for fitting ships. 



The ships built at Brown Shipbuilding contained asbestos in these and many other parts: 




Insulation



Pipe lagging



Boilers



Gaskets



Valves



Adhesives



Fire protection gear



Ceiling tiles



Floor tiles




Who Was Exposed to Asbestos at Brown Shipbuilding? 



Anyone who worked at Brown Shipbuilding was at risk of being exposed to asbestos. When asbestos materials are handled, they shed small fibers that become part of the dust in the air and on surfaces. 



Anyone working with or around these materials and without adequate protective gear inhales asbestos fibers. This puts them at risk for later illnesses like mesothelioma and lung cancer. 



Workers at greatest risk of asbestos exposure handled and manipulated asbestos materials: 




Insulation workers



Boiler workers



Pipefitters



Plumbers



Electricians



Welders



Repair workers



Shipbreakers




Also at risk were the members of the Navy who served on these ships. They worked in cramped conditions with poor ventilation, which put them at significant risk of inhaling asbestos fibers. 



How Did Asbestos Affect Brown Shipyard Workers?



As with many other shipyards, Brown shipyard workers were not required to and did not wear protective gear while working. None of the workers knew the damage that could occur when inhaling asbestos fibers.



The U.S. Navy confirmed that shipyards nationwide used over 250 asbestos-containing products, many of which were used at Brown Shipbuilding. 



Scientists estimate that, in total, over 4 million shipyard workers were exposed to asbestos while working in shipyards during World War II alone.



Workers from Brown Shipbuilding began developing life-threatening diseases, such as malignant mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, and asbestosis. 



To make matters worse, many children and spouses of Brown Shipbuilding workers eventually developed asbestos-related diseases via second-hand asbestos exposure.



Most Brown Shipbuilding shipyard workers did not shower or change clothes before returning home. Many children and spouses unknowingly inhaled asbestos via the worker's clothing.



Compensation for Former Brown Shipbuilding Workers



If you worked at Brown or Todd Shipyards during peak asbestos use, talk to a mesothelioma lawyer about your rights and legal options. 



Both civilian and military workers with asbestos can file lawsuits against the companies that supplied the shipyard with asbestos materials. Asbestos lawsuits often end in settlements for the victims. 



You cannot sue companies that went bankrupt over asbestos lawsuits. Alternatively, you may be eligible for compensation from an asbestos trust fund. Bankrupt asbestos companies set up these trusts to compensate future claimants. 



If you are a Navy veteran, make a claim with the VA for benefits. You could be eligible for monthly disability compensation, free medical care, and more. 



Asbestos Trust Funds Associated with Brown Shipbuilding



Some of the companies that supplied Brown Shipbuilding with asbestos and now have active trust funds include: 




Babcock & Wilcox



Combustion Engineering



Fibreboard



J.T. Thorpe



Keene Corporation



NARCO




Additional Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Washington Navy Yard

The Washington Navy Yard is one of the oldest military installations in the U.S. Today, it is an administrative and ceremonial site, but in the past, it was an active Naval yard that used asbestos. Workers and Navy service members at Washington Navy Yard risked asbestos exposure and later illnesses.



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, awaiting those who’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim and much more.













Did Washington Navy Yard Use Asbestos? 



The Washington Navy Yard's role as a shipbuilding facility was well before the peak period of asbestos use in the industry. By the time asbestos was a common material in industrial workplaces, the Navy Yard was no longer building ships. 



The Washington Navy Yard manufactured munitions and ordnance and used asbestos in these operations. This went on through the 1960s when manufacturing operations ceased. 



Washington Navy Yard History



The Washington Navy Yard is one of the oldest military installations in the U.S. It was created in 1799 on Washington D.C.'s 9th and M Street after an Act of Congress purchased the land. 




The initial role of the Washington Navy Yard was for shipbuilding. Ships were constructed here for the War of 1812. It also served as a strategic center for the war. The U.S. military burned this early version of the Navy Yard to keep it out of the hands of the British army. 





After it was rebuilt, the Navy Yard serviced ships during the Civil War, including the USS Monitor. It also served as a munition and ordnance plant. 





Manufacturing continued at the Washington Navy Yard through World War II, when the company added guns and ammunition manufacturing. 





During World War II, the Washington Navy Yard employed over 20,000 people. It became the largest naval ordnance plant in the world at the time and continued to design numerous weapons. 





In 1945, its name changed to the U.S. Naval Gun Factory, and it continued crafting guns and ammunition until the 1960s.





In 1973, the Washington Navy Yard was placed on the National Register of Historic Places. Within three years, it became a part of the National History Landmark.




Today, the Washington Navy Yard is an administrative center for the Chief of Naval Operations, Naval Sea Systems Command, the Naval Historic Center, the Naval Facilities Engineering Command, and other Naval groups. 



How Did Washington Navy Yard Use Asbestos? 



Washington Navy Yard was no longer a shipbuilding or repair facility when other shipyards used asbestos. However, it did manufacture munitions, including asbestos products and materials. 



For instance, documents dating back to 1918 indicate that metal blocks contained over 65% asbestos that was molded into the backs of cannons. 



Asbestos was also found in:




Fireproof paint



Electric boosters



Sealants



Ignitions



Insulation



Ceilings



Boards



Equipment




How Did Asbestos at Washington Navy Yard Affect Workers and Veterans? 



Anyone who worked at the site, including both civilian workers and Navy service members, could have been exposed to asbestos. 



Asbestos releases fibers when handled. These fibers can be inhaled by anyone working in the area. Workers who handled asbestos materials directly had the highest risk of exposure. 



Another issue people faced was second-hand exposure, which became a significant concern at many industrial sites throughout the United States. 



Since Washington Navy Yard workers rarely used protective gear nor changed clothing before returning home every day, children and spouses were exposed to asbestos by simply doing laundry or hugging their loved ones.



Several children who grew up around fathers who worked at shipyards developed mesothelioma themselves years later.



Washington Naval Yard Superfund Site



In April 1998, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Diseases Registry (ATSDR) designated the Washington Navy Yard as a Superfund site. 



Within a year, ATSDR conducted several site investigations, including evaluating groundwater and on-site soil data.



At least 17 locations throughout the shipyard contained contaminated soil and groundwater contamination. 



Even though large amounts of asbestos were found at the site, metals were the primary concern, as well as lead paint. ATSDR indicated that lead paint was the primary source of surface soil contamination, which was over 18,700 ppm of the EPA's recommended 400 ppm level.



The EPA and ATSDR took several steps to ensure public safety, including but not limited to the following:




Removing the Coal Storage Yard in order to abate contaminants



Removing Admiral's Row to remove excessive levels of toxins



An awareness program for the public, as well as construction workers, the military, and anyone else who may still work around asbestos



Posting advisory warnings to area residents, and more.




Compensation for Asbestos Exposure at Washington Naval Yard



If you believe exposure at the Washington Navy Yard contributed to your asbestos illness, contact a mesothelioma lawyer to find out what you can do about it. 



Neither civilians nor veterans can sue the military or federal government over asbestos exposure, but they can sue the asbestos companies. These companies supplied military institutions like the Washington Naval Yard with asbestos without warning workers of the risks. 



A lawsuit against asbestos companies can lead to a settlement or a jury award. If the companies involved went bankrupt, a lawsuit is not an option. In these cases, most victims qualify to make a claim with an asbestos trust fund. 



Veterans can claim benefits through the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. VA benefits include monthly disability compensation, medical care, and benefits for dependents. 



Help and Additional Resources



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Was Asbestos Used at Lockheed Shipbuilding?

Lockheed Shipbuilding and Construction Company in Seattle played an important role in constructing and repairing vessels for the U.S. Navy. It relied on asbestos for years, putting workers and Navy veterans at risk of exposure and illnesses like mesothelioma. 



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, awaiting those who’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did Lockheed Shipbuilding Use Asbestos? 



Most U.S. shipyards used asbestos for decades. Asbestos went into hundreds of components used to build and repair ships. It was also found in buildings at shipyards and equipment and vehicles. 



Lockheed Shipbuilding used asbestos during its operations for many years. It operated during the peak years of asbestos use in the U.S., from the 1930s through the 1970s. 



Lockheed Shipbuilding and Construction Company History



The origin of Lockheed Shipbuilding dates back to the Puget Sound Bridge and Dredging Company, founded in 1898. It entered the shipbuilding industry in the 1930s. 




Lockheed Aircraft Company bought the shipyard in 1959, and it became the Lockheed Shipbuilding and Construction Company. Lockheed Shipbuilding was located on the west side of Seattle's Harbor Island along the Duwamish River. 





The shipyard built ferries for the state of Washington and many vessels for the Navy during and after World War II. It also built commercial vessels, like tugs, dredgers, and ice breakers. 





The company continued to build vessels during the 1960s, including the USS Rathburn, USS Stein, USS Reasoner, USS Shreveport, and more. 





By the time Lockheed bought the shipyard, it was already highly contaminated with asbestos and other toxic substances. 





The shipyard, spread out over 18 acres, had three dry docks, five piers, and a shipway. Lockheed was just one of several companies that built and repaired vessels along the Duwamish River, causing contamination and pollution issues. 





This would ultimately lead to the area becoming a Superfund Site. The heavy pollution was one reason the Lockheed shipyard closed in 1987.




How Did Lockheed Shipbuilding Use Asbestos? 



Shipyards used asbestos for decades for many reasons. Primarily, asbestos was useful in constructing and repairing ships because it is an excellent insulator. It is also a good fireproofing material. 



During the years of its peak use, asbestos was inexpensive and abundantly available. All these properties made it a valuable substance in shipyards. 



Hundreds of components with asbestos went into ships repaired and built at Lockheed, including: 




Insulation



Pipe lagging



Cement



Adhesives



Boilers



Pumps



Gaskets



Valves



Ceiling, floor, and wall panels




Shipyards like Lockheed also had asbestos insulation in buildings. The equipment and vehicles used at shipyards had asbestos in friction parts, like brakes or clutches. 



Who Was Exposed to Asbestos at Lockheed Shipbuilding? 



Anyone working at Lockheed during the years of asbestos use was at risk of asbestos exposure. Handling asbestos materials causes it to shed tiny fibers that workers can inhale. 



The workers at greatest risk of asbestos exposure and later illnesses handled asbestos directly or worked very close to people who did: 




Installation installers



Repair workers



Pipefitters



Boiler workers



Mechanics




These workers often had to cut into or manipulate asbestos materials. Doing so without proper protective gear led to significant exposure. 



Asbestos-Related Lawsuits Against Lockheed Shipbuilding



Many of the people exposed to asbestos while working at Lockheed Shipbuilding eventually developed related illnesses, like mesothelioma. Some of these people took legal action, suing asbestos companies that supplied the shipyard or Lockheed itself. 



A significant mesothelioma lawsuit against Lockheed occurred when a father and son both developed asbestosis and, ultimately, mesothelioma.



Reuben Arnold (father) and Daniel Arnold (son) both worked at Lockheed.  Reuben, however, was a general contractor at Lockheed. His employer at the time was E.J. Bartells.



On August 31, 2010, the Court of Appeals of Washington ruled that Lockheed was responsible for ensuring its workers were safe from the dangers of asbestos. 



This went for Lockheed employees and contractors who worked at the shipyard. Reuben, a subcontractor, worked at the shipyard as an insulator during the early 1960s.



After Reuben was diagnosed with mesothelioma, his son, Daniel, developed the disease after second-hand exposure from his father's work clothing. Both father and son died within 15 months of each other.



Under Washington state law, companies who hire contractors and subcontractors are ultimately responsible for worker safety. 



Lockheed claimed it did not work as a general contractor, but the court rejected their claim after evidence confirmed that the company directed how Arnold performed his work. Per Washington law,




"An employer of an independent contractor is generally not liable for injuries to the independent contractor's employees. Kelley v. Howard S. Wright Constr. Co., 90 Wn.2d 323, 330, 582 P.2d 500 (1978). An exception exists where the employer retains control over some part of the contractor's work. Kelley, 90 Wn.2d at 330. An employer retains control if the employer retains "the right to direct the manner in which the work is performed."
Arnold v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc., et al.,



Ultimately, however, in 2011, the appeal was reversed when the court approved a summary judgment that Lockheed subsequently filed.



Lockheed Shipbuilding Superfund Site



In addition to asbestos, Lockheed Shipbuilding contained numerous other toxins, including chemical contaminants, arsenic, lead, zinc, and mercury. 



The landfills around the shipyard were extremely unsafe, causing concern for area residents.



Lockheed had two major shipyard areas: Shipyard 1 and Shipyard No. 2 (Yard II). Yard II is where most of the shipbuilding and repair work took place. 



In 2007, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated Shipyard 2 as a Superfund site. By 2010, the site's name was changed to the Lockheed West Seattle Superfund Site. Cleanup began shortly after.



Sandblasting operations close to Yard II's dry docks and shipway caused a lot of contamination. 



According to the Lockheed Martin Corporation, contaminants associated with a large amount of sandblasting activities left excessive amounts of pollutants around the surrounding areas of the dry docks and shipways.



Seeking Asbestos Compensation After Working at Lockheed Shipbuilding



If you worked at Lockheed Shipbuilding during the years of asbestos use, talk to an asbestos law firm to find out what you can do about it. Victims of asbestos exposure are often eligible to file a lawsuit or make a claim with an asbestos trust fund to seek compensation. 



Many asbestos lawsuits end in settlements for people diagnosed with mesothelioma. They may also end in settlements for the families of asbestos victims who died from mesothelioma. 



Asbestos companies that went bankrupt cannot be sued for damages. Many of these companies set up trust funds to compensate victims. Some of the companies with trusts associated with asbestos at Lockheed Shipbuilding include: 




Babcock & Wilcox



Combustion Engineering



Fibreboard



NARCO



Owens Corning



Pittsburgh Corning




Additional Help and Resources



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Moore Dry Dock Company (Moore Shipbuilding)

Moore Dry Dock (Moore Shipbuilding) played an integral part in repairing and building ships during World War II. However, the company's use of asbestos injured thousands of workers constantly exposed to the dangerous material. Some later developed mesothelioma or other asbestos illnesses. 



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, awaiting those who’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did Moore Dry Dock Use Asbestos? 



Until its closure in 1961, Moore Dry Dock used asbestos in its operations. Like many other shipyards, Moore Dry Dock used asbestos in shipbuilding and repair. 



Asbestos was commonly used in the shipbuilding industry because of its insulating properties and ability to provide fireproofing. Most shipyards used asbestos until greater awareness of its health risks spread, and the government began regulating it in the 1970s. 



Moore Dry Dock History



Moore Dry Dock was founded in 1905 and was originally located in San Francisco. It began when the founders purchased National Iron Works and named the new business Moore & Scott Iron Works. 



The company changed its name to Moore Shipbuilding shortly before the start of World War I. At the same time, the business moved to Oakland. It focused primarily on ship repair. The name then changed to Moore Dry Dock Company in 1922. 



Before World War I, Moore Dry Dock repaired commercial vessels like dredgers, ferries, and tankers. During the war, the company swelled to more than 12,000 employees and contributed to the war effort. It provided more than 60 new ships. 



After World War I, Moore Dry Dock returned to the ship repair business, and the number of employees dropped significantly. 



When World War II started, the company began shipbuilding again. It received a U.S. Navy contract to build ships. This was the peak period of activity at Moore Dry Dock, with more than 35,000 workers. They made 112 ships for the Navy before and during WWII. 



The company focused on ship repair over the years following the war. Moore Dry Dock closed its doors permanently in 1961. Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. bought the site in Oakland. 



How Did Moore Dry Dock Use Asbestos? 



Most shipyards that operated during the same time as Moore used asbestos. Asbestos use in shipbuilding and repair peaked from the 1930s to the 1970s. 



Asbestos was found in hundreds of components that went into all kinds of vessels: 




Insulation



Pipes



Pumps



Cement



Boilers



Gaskets



Valves



Adhesives



Textiles




Shipyards also used asbestos in fire protective gear, such as that worn by welders. It was found in the insulation in buildings on-site and in friction parts in machinery and vehicles.  



Asbestos Exposure at Moore Dry Dock



The shipyard's asbestos use exposed many workers at Moore Dry Dock to asbestos. Anyone who worked there was at risk of exposure because asbestos materials shed fibers into the air. 



Although the military understood the dangers of asbestos, it didn't inform shipyard workers nationwide. Numerous workers in various job functions at Moore Dry Dock were at high risk of exposure to asbestos, including:




Insulation installers



Pipefitters



Electricians



Welders



Boilermakers



Repair workers



Painters



Sanders




Secondhand Asbestos Exposure



In addition to workers exposed to asbestos at Moore Dry Dock, many family members who never set foot on the shipyard were also exposed to the toxic minerals. 



Workers generally did not wear protective gear and rarely changed clothes before leaving work. Many left work with clothing covered asbestos fibers that permeated throughout their homes.



Asbestos Lawsuits Against Moore Dry Dock Company



In the past, shipyards were typically not held liable for asbestos exposure. Instead, the manufacturers that shipped asbestos-containing products to the shipyards were targeted in thousands of asbestos-related and mesothelioma lawsuits.



One case that involved Moore Dry Dock illustrated the direct risks to workers and the risk of secondhand exposure in families. 



Sandra Foglia filed a lawsuit in 2018 after her son was diagnosed with mesothelioma. He was exposed to asbestos fibers from his father, who worked at Moore Dry Dock. Unfortunately, she did not win their case. The court decided in favor of Moore, which stated it had no duty of care for the family of an employee. 



Many other cases brought by asbestos exposure victims have been successful, providing them and their families with much-needed compensation. 



Seeking Compensation for Asbestos Exposure at Moore Dry Dock



Victims of asbestos exposure at Moore Dry Dock and other shipyards have a couple of options for seeking compensation after being diagnosed with an asbestos illness: 




Mesothelioma or asbestos lawsuit. Asbestos illnesses are generally considered personal injuries, so you can file a lawsuit to seek damages. Most of these lawsuits are filed against asbestos companies that supplied shipyards like Moore. 



Asbestos trust fund claim. If the asbestos companies that exposed you have gone bankrupt, you cannot sue. They should have set up an asbestos trust fund to compensate victims like you. You could be eligible for one or more of these trusts. 




If you have mesothelioma after working at Moore Dry Dock or another shipyard, contact an asbestos attorney or law firm for advice and guidance.



Additional Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Willamette Iron and Steel Works

Willamette Iron and Steel Works played an essential role during World War II, building warships for the U.S. Navy. As productive as the shipyard was, its long history of asbestos use left workers with life-threatening, asbestos-related diseases. The shipyard also faced numerous safety violations and lawsuits, eventually closing.



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, awaiting those who’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did Willamette Iron and Steel Works Use Asbestos? 



Oregon's Willamette Iron and Steel Works used asbestos for decades in its shipbuilding, ship repair, and other manufacturing operations. Peak asbestos use in these industries occurred between the 1930s and the 1970s. 



Willamette used asbestos primarily for its ability to insulate and provide fireproofing. Asbestos is harmful to human health, a fact many asbestos suppliers knew but failed to make clear. As a result, many shipyard workers like Willamette were exposed and later developed illnesses like mesothelioma. 



Willamette Iron and Steel Works History



Willamette Iron and Steel Works was established in 1865 in Portland, Oregon. The company originally focused on manufacturing engines and boilers for steamboats. By 1904, it had expanded into constructing and repairing vessels.




During World War I, Willamette built boilers and fitted ships for Northwest Steel. The boilers went to machine works and shipyards along the west coast. 





In World War II, Willamette Iron and Steel Works created different vessels and war-related products, including crafts, minesweepers, naval auxiliaries, and more. 





In World War II alone, Willamette built more than 70 ships for the U.S. Navy, as well as Baldwin steam locomotives for Vladivostok, Russia.





Between the wars, Willamette built some small commercial vessels. It also made steam-powered engines called steam donkeys. 





Once World War II ended, the shipyard focused on vessel repairs and other types of manufacturing. Workers made turbines for the Grand Coulee Dam and fire hydrants for cities. 




Business for Willamette slowed down with the opening of larger shipyards. Ultimately, it couldn't compete and permanently closed its doors in 1990.



How Did Willamette Iron and Steel Use Asbestos? 



Shipyards used asbestos heavily in their operations for decades. Asbestos was added to materials to provide insulation, fireproofing, and strength. Willamette used asbestos in shipbuilding, ship fitting, ship repair, and the manufacturing of steam engines and boilers. 



During the peak years of asbestos use, it went into hundreds of ship components, including: 




Pipes



Cement



Wall and ceiling panels



Adhesives



Gaskets



Valves



Boilers



Packing



Textiles




The manufacturing equipment in Willamette's facilities likely also contained asbestos. It was probably in the insulation and pipes in buildings and around boilers and furnaces. 



Who Was Exposed to Asbestos at Willamette? 



All workers at Willamette Iron and Steel Works were put at risk of asbestos exposure while used on the site. Asbestos materials shed tiny fibers that workers can inhale. This exposure can lead to later illnesses, including mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis. 



Some workers at Willamette had a higher risk of asbestos exposure than others. These workers directly handled asbestos materials, which resulted in more fibers being shed. Insulation workers, boiler workers, mechanics, and ship repair workers were all at high risk. 



Willamette Iron and Steel Works Asbestos Lawsuits



Asbestos companies and sometimes shipyards are often considered negligent in asbestos exposure and resulting illnesses. 



In most instances, workers generally file asbestos-related lawsuits against the manufacturers that supplied asbestos products to shipyards.



However, there have been lawsuits in which workers or loved ones filed a claim against Willamette and the companies that supplied asbestos to the shipyard. 



One such instance was the case of James McAllister, a former employee of Willamette who worked as a carpenter.



McAllister died from malignant mesothelioma in 2002, but his wife continued the lawsuit on his behalf. 



While in the past, federal courts made plaintiffs prove that asbestos was extensively used at shipyards, in the case of McAllister, the shipyard had to prove that it did not.



McAllister's widow won the case after Willamette failed to prove that workers were not exposed to asbestos. It set the stage for no longer allowing shipyards to ignore their parts in exposing people to harm.



Willamette Iron and Steel Works Closure



As more and more people began to fall ill, the shipyard faced several complaints. When asbestos regulations were outlined in the late 1970s, Willamette declined after it could no longer keep up with bigger competitors. 



In 1990, Willamette Iron and Steel closed its doors for good.



Along with asbestos, the shipyards left behind numerous toxins, which placed it on the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) orphan list as a potential Superfund cleanup site.



Safety Violations at Willamette Iron and Steel Works



Willamette Iron and Steel Works also faced many safety violations against its workers for numerous years.



One of the biggest complaints stemmed from the company's lack of proper safety and housekeeping aboard the vessels, which caused numerous worker injuries. 



In some cases, workers were injured so severely that they were physically disabled permanently.



The company repeatedly violated safety rules so often that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) stepped in during the 1970s. 



Willamette tried to argue that its rights were violated, but courts ruled against the shipyard and ordered it to pay substantial fines.



Compensation for Willamette Workers Exposed to Asbestos



If you worked at Willamette, contact a mesothelioma lawyer to learn about options for seeking compensation for asbestos illnesses.



You could be eligible to file a lawsuit against asbestos companies that supplied Willamette and failed to warn workers of the risks of their products. These lawsuits often end in settlements for the plaintiffs. 



Another option may be to file a claim with an asbestos trust fund. Companies that went bankrupt set up these funds to compensate victims. You cannot sue a company protected by bankruptcy, but asbestos trusts provide an alternative compensation source. 



Additional Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don’t forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540.  

### The Kane Shipbuilding Company

The Kane Shipbuilding Company operated in Galveston, Texas, until it closed in the 1970s. Kane Shipbuilding used asbestos throughout its operations, leaving some workers with life-threatening illnesses like mesothelioma. 



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, awaiting those who’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.









Did Kane Shipbuilding Use Asbestos? 



Shipyards throughout the U.S. used asbestos for insulation, fireproofing, and other purposes. Kane Shipbuilding used asbestos for decades until it ceased operations in the 1970s. 



Asbestos use in shipyards was common and also damaging. It exposed many workers and led to thousands of cases of mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses in workers and Navy veterans. 



Kane Shipbuilding History and Asbestos Use



Kane Shipbuilding started as Kane Boiler Works. It was created in 1892 as a vessel repair yard in Galveston, Texas. By World War II, its name changed to reflect that it built ships for the U.S. Navy and U.S. Coast Guard.




Before the war, Kane Shipbuilding only had a small number of workers. As the war called for more and more ships, the shipyard grew and the number of workers doubled.





Workers built a total of 12 coastal tankers and 16 deck barges at Kane Shipbuilding. While constructing the ships, workers breathed in large amounts of toxic asbestos fibers. 





Ship repair workers were also at a heightened risk of developing an asbestos-related disease. Almost every part and tool used to repair vessels contained asbestos.





Over 2,000 Kane Shipbuilding workers went on strike in 1952. They joined other shipyard workers in Galveston striking over pay.





Kane permanently shut down in the 1970s. All of its years of operation coincided with peak asbestos use in the shipbuilding industry. 




How Did Kane Shipbuilding Use Asbestos? 



Before federal regulations on its use, asbestos was common in shipbuilding and ship repair. Shipyards used asbestos for its ability to insulate and fireproof. It went into hundreds of components of ships. 



Some of the asbestos parts workers at Kane Shipbuilding likely handled include: 




Insulation



Pipes



Cement 



Wall panels



Boilers



Gaskets



Valves



Seals



Adhesives




Shipyards like Kane also used asbestos in buildings, especially in the insulation. Equipment and vehicles also included asbestos parts. 



How Did Asbestos at Kane Shipbuilding Affect Workers? 



Most workers at Kane Shipbuilding didn't know that asbestos exposure could lead to life-threatening illnesses such as malignant mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, and asbestosis.



Most workers didn't even wear respirators or other protective gear while unknowingly breathed in tiny asbestos fibers.



In addition, some families of Kane Shipbuilding workers were at risk of mesothelioma through secondhand exposure to asbestos fibers. 



Compensation for Kane Shipbuilding Workers Exposed to Asbestos



If you worked for Kane Shipbuilding, consider talking to an attorney about your right to seek compensation for asbestos exposure. Experienced mesothelioma lawyers can explain your legal options and help you take steps to recover damages.



You may be eligible to file a lawsuit against the asbestos companies that supplied Kane Shipbuilding. Many companies supplied asbestos materials without warning of the risks of exposure. You can sue these companies for a settlement or jury award. 



If the asbestos companies responsible for your exposure went bankrupt, you cannot sue them. They likely set up an asbestos trust fund, and you may qualify to make a claim. 



If you are a veteran with mesothelioma, consider filing for VA benefits. You could be eligible for monthly disability compensation and specialist medical care. 



Resources and Help for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Kaiser Shipyards and Asbestos

Kaiser Shipyards consisted of a total of seven shipyards that were used to build and repair vessels. The shipyards played an important role during World War II. Asbestos use at Kaiser Shipyards exposed thousands of workers and put them at risk for mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses. 



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, awaiting those who’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













Did Kaiser Shipyards Use Asbestos? 



All shipyards in the U.S. used asbestos for many years. The years of peak asbestos use in shipbuilding and repair were from the 1930s to the 1970s. 



Kaiser is one of many shipyards that used asbestos. Asbestos went into insulation and other materials on ships to protect against heat and fire. The use of asbestos only ceased when its dangers became more well-known, and the government began regulating it. 



Kaiser Shipyards History



The Kaiser Shipyards consisted of seven shipyards along the West Coast in California, Washington, and Oregon:




Four Richmond Shipyards in Richmond, California



Oregon Shipbuilding Corporation in Portland, Oregon



Swan Island Shipyard in Portland, Oregon



Vancouver Shipyard, in Vancouver, Washington




Kaiser Shipyards in World War II



Henry J. Kaiser founded Kaiser Shipyards in 1941 in response to the U.S. Maritime Commission's call for shipbuilding for World War II. An industrialist, Kaiser already had experience in shipbuilding for the Maritime Commission and for Great Britain. 



Beginning with the Richmond Shipyards, Kaiser would go on to open seven shipyards and build nearly 800 ships during wartime production. 



Kaiser Shipbuilding was short-lived, serving a wartime need only. In 1945, the four California shipyards closed down, followed by the closure of one of the Portland and Vancouver sites. 



The only remaining shipyard, the Swan Island Portland Shipyard, is now managed and operated by Cascade General.



Notable Facts About Kaiser Shipyards



During its short run, Kaiser Shipyards set records and led a movement to diversify the American workforce. With men going off to war, Kaiser recognized the need to include women and minorities in shipyards. He even fought unions to ensure Black workers could work toward skilled, unionized jobs. 



Kaiser Shipyards set a record for building a ship in less than five days. This was the SS Robert E. Peary. It also built the SS Joseph N. Teal ten days. These were Liberty ships, cargo ships used during World War II.



How Did Kaiser Shipyards Use Asbestos?



Kaiser Shipyards relied on asbestos for its resistance to heat and fire, ease of use, and affordability. Throughout most of the war, Kaiser Shipyards used asbestos in various equipment, rooms, machinery, and more. 



Ships built at Kaiser and at other shipyards during this period contained hundreds of asbestos components. Some of these include: 




Insulation



Pipe lagging



Wall panels



Cement



Textiles



Gaskets



Valves



Pumps



Adhesives




How Were Kaiser Shipyard Workers Affected By Asbestos? 



Often, employees and contractors worked in poorly ventilated shops, increasing their risk of developing an asbestos-related disease.



Kaiser Shipyards also never required workers to wear protective gear while working around asbestos. 



Although documents confirm that the U.S. Navy knew full well of the dangers of asbestos, they never enforced the use of respirators or any other form of safety protection against asbestos fibers.



Numerous workers performing different job functions at Kaiser Shipyards were exposed to asbestos daily, including:




Insulators



Boilermakers 



Mechanics



Pipfietters



Steamfitters 



Repair workers



Electricians




Asbestos Lawsuits Against Kaiser and the Kaiser Asbestos Trust Fund



As more and more workers developed asbestos-related illnesses numerous years after working at Kaiser Shipyards, lawsuits began to stack up. 



Most lawsuits were against manufacturers that supplied asbestos-containing products to the shipyard. Per the U.S. Navy, more than 200 types of asbestos-containing products from many different companies were used at shipyards throughout the nation.



In 2006, the Kaiser Asbestos Personal Injury Trust was created after thousands of lawsuits against Kaiser started mounting. 



This includes the shipyards and "any valid asbestos personal injury claims for which Kaiser has legal responsibility."



Kaiser's asbestos-containing products, which included materials also sent to the construction, aerospace, and automotive industries, include:




Insulation



Unitab bricks



Fire bricks



Ore



Finishing mud cement, and



Cement




How to Seek Compensation for Asbestos at Kaiser Shipyards



If you were affected by Kaiser asbestos products, contact an asbestos law firm to learn about your legal options for seeking compensation. 



If you or a loved one has a mesothelioma diagnosis, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit against asbestos companies. Settlements can provide valuable compensation for victims or their families who lost loved ones to asbestos exposure. 



The Kaiser asbestos trust is another option. When asbestos companies go bankrupt, they can no longer be sued but should have trust funds available. A mesothelioma lawyer can review your case and help you take action to seek compensation. 



Additional Resources and Help for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. 

### New London Naval Submarine Base (Groton Naval Base)

New London Naval Submarine Base (Groton Naval Base) built submarines for the U.S. Navy for years. It also used asbestos in its operations, exposing workers and putting them at risk for illnesses like mesothelioma. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













Did Groton Naval Base Use Asbestos? 



Today known as Naval Submarine Base New London, the former Groton Naval Base once used asbestos in hundreds of components. The use of asbestos in shipyards like Groton peaked from the 1930s to the 1970s and left behind contaminated facilities. 



Asbestos use at Groton put civilian workers and Navy service members at risk of exposure. Many of these people later developed asbestos illnesses like mesothelioma, asbestosis, and lung cancer. 



Naval Submarine Base New London History



Groton Naval Base was established in 1868 after the U.S. Navy acquired 112 acres in Groton, Connecticut, along the Thames River. Although it started as a coaling station, it became a submarine base in 1916. 



The base grew and housed numerous submarine tenders and submarines, including the G-1, G-2, and G-4, under the submarine tender USS Ozark. 



Groton Naval Base in World War I



By World War I, Groton Naval Base, with $1 million approved by Congress, greatly expanded and added numerous buildings, additional land, barracks, a hospital, industrial facilities, and multiple workshops to help its substantial growth.



At the end of World War I, Groton had more than 80 buildings to house over one thousand service members. The base was also home to 20 submarines. The base employed thousands of civilians, too. 



World War II and Later



Another significant expansion came in World War II when the base grew from 112 acres to almost 500 acres. The expansion included a 100-foot-tall structure, the Escape Training Tank. It became the most recognizable part of the base.



One of the most significant accomplishments of the shipyard was launching the USS Nautilus in 1954. The USS Nautilus marked the first nuclear-powered vessel ever created. It was eventually retired in the 1980s but can now be viewed as a historical landmark.



Naval Submarine Base New London Today



After several decades of building and maintaining submarines and training people, the base officially closed in 2005. 



In a reverse decision, the base reopened. It remains open as a Submarine Force Library, a museum, a training center for submariners, and a Base Operations Support (BOS) infrastructure.



In its current form, Naval Submarine Base New London employs nearly 10,000 people. It has 11 submarine piers and 1,500 family housing units. 



How Did Groton Naval Base Use Asbestos?



Like all shipyards that operated during the peak years of asbestos use, Groton Naval Base had asbestos in many areas. Buildings contained asbestos in insulation and other products. Hundreds of components that went into submarines also had asbestos. 



An investigation conducted in 1982 found faulty pipes and a large amount of asbestos present. Most of the asbestos was found in the piping at the Industrial Hygiene Branch. The base's Medical Center recommended removal.



The faulty, deteriorating pipes were posing difficult problems for the workers, and the renovation of the Industrial Hygiene Branch was an arduous task, and large amounts of asbestos were released. In addition, a leaky roof in the building released even more asbestos, placing people at risk.



Asbestos was also found all over the base, including in industrial buildings, schools, training camps, vessels, walls, ceilings, insulation, and shipbuilding facilities. 



Although the base closed in 2005, a 2009 project began on Building 448 to remove all asbestos by replacing the ceiling, HVAC, pipes, insulation, coils, ducts, and pipes.



Who Was Affected by Asbestos at Naval Submarine Base New London? 



Unfortunately, the abatement project came several decades after numerous workers had already been exposed to large amounts of asbestos.



Many former workers later developed toxic, life-threatening diseases, including malignant mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, and asbestosis, after prolonged exposure to asbestos while working at the base. 



The United States Navy said over 200 asbestos-containing products were once used in shipyards and bases nationwide, including Groton Naval Base.



The Navy and numerous asbestos manufacturers knew the risks of asbestos exposure yet continued to use the dangerous mineral because it was affordable yet profitable for business.



Naval Submarine Base New London Superfund Site



The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency listed Naval Submarine Base New London a Superfund site following the 1982 investigation. The investigation turned up asbestos and many other toxic substances that leaked, spilled, and contaminated the surrounding area. 



Contaminants leaked from a landfill into groundwater. Some of the substances found include asbestos, PCBs, and battery acid. Cleanup at the site is ongoing. 



How to Seek Compensation for Asbestos Exposure



If you worked at Naval Submarine Base New London and now have an asbestos illness, contact a mesothelioma lawyer to learn more about your legal options. They might include: 




Mesothelioma lawsuit. While you cannot sue the government or military over asbestos exposure, you can sue the companies that supplied the base with asbestos. Many victims of exposure sue these companies and get compensation in the form of settlements.



Asbestos trust fund claim. You might also qualify for a compensation claim with an asbestos trust fund. These trusts were established by asbestos companies that filed for bankruptcy after facing many asbestos lawsuits. 




If you are a U.S. Navy veteran, you likely qualify for VA benefits. The VA offers disability compensation, benefits for dependents, and specialist medical care. An experienced asbestos attorney can help you take private legal action or file for VA benefits. 



Additional Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys. 

### San Francisco Naval Shipyard at Hunters Point

San Francisco Naval Shipyard, better known as Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, used asbestos for many years in its daily operations. Many workers were exposed to asbestos at Hunters Point, and some developed mesothelioma. Lawsuits and ongoing cleanups continue to plague the site. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, set up for those who are victims of asbestos-related diseases. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.







Did Hunters Point Naval Shipyard Use Asbestos? 



Hunters Point used asbestos in its shipbuilding and repair operations for many years. All shipyards in the U.S. used asbestos. During peak years of industrial asbestos use, it was prized for its insulating and fireproofing properties. Hundreds of parts on ships built between the 1930s and 1970s contained asbestos. 



Hunters Point Naval Shipyard History



Hunters Point Naval Shipyard was founded in 1867 in San Francisco, California. It was originally built on dry, serpentine rock that contained natural asbestos. 




By 1916, the shipyard was not only the first dry dock for commercial use on the West Coast but also one of the biggest, with over 800 waterfront acres.





Hunters Point Naval Shipyard began as a shipbuilding and repair service. In 1941, the U.S. Navy acquired the shipyard and renamed it the San Francisco Naval Shipyard. 





The shipyard continued shipbuilding and repairing throughout World War II, which included maintenance and modifications on submarines.





Continuing on during World War II, the shipyard repaired 600 support and fighting vessels. 





In the meantime, the Navy Radiological Defense Laboratory (NRDL) was created at the shipyard, to decontaminate vessels involved in nuclear testing. This lasted until the late 1960s when budget cuts closed the program down.





Operations at the site ceased in 1974. The Navy reactivated it in 1986 and finally shut down and deactivated the site in 1991 due to contamination that included asbestos. 




Today, the Hunters Point site has been the target of cleanup and redevelopment. Issues with the cleanup have caused environmental pollution and health risks to nearby residents. Several controversies have slowed redevelopment efforts. 



How Did Hunters Point Use Asbestos? 



Hunters Point, like many shipyards, used asbestos as an insulating and fireproofing material. Shipbuilding and ship repair used hundreds of asbestos components, including: 




Insulation



Pipes



Cement



Boilers



Gaskets



Valves



Textiles



Adhesives




Asbestos was also used in buildings, equipment, and vehicles. The Hunters Point site is also situated on top of natural asbestos deposits, which has also caused issues. 



Who Was at Risk for Asbestos Exposure at Hunters Point? 



Anyone who worked at Hunters Point during the years of asbestos use was at risk of exposure. Asbestos materials shed tiny fibers that are easy to inhale. 



People who worked most closely with asbestos or even cut or manipulated asbestos materials had the highest risks of exposure. They were more likely to disturb and inhale asbestos fibers. These people include insulators, boiler workers, pipefitters, and ship repair workers. 



Asbestos has lingered at the site long after it was officially used in shipbuilding and repair. People who worked at Hunters Point after the shipyard closed could have been exposed. Residents in the area have also been put at risk of exposure. 



Hunters Point Environmental Cleanup and Controversy



Asbestos levels at the shipyard were so excessive that in 1989, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated Hunters Point as a Superfund site. 



Cleaning up and attempting to redevelop the site have posed ongoing issues. One development company dug into the natural asbestos deposits below Hunters Point, releasing dangerous plumes of asbestos fibers. The company was fined, but the damage was already done. 



Due to the high contamination levels at the shipyard and the natural deposits, area residents began having health issues. This has included a confirmed diagnosis of both mercury and asbestos in one resident's bloodstream. 



A fire also broke out at the shipyard in August 2000, putting residents at risk of exposure to toxic substances again. 



During the 1980s, the city of San Francisco bought the shipyard site and turned it into a housing project for low-income families. 



Soon after, the site's inspection company was fined for failing to notify anyone of the risks. Shortly after that, residents were evacuated. Advocates and community groups continue to fight for proper cleanup of the site. 



Compensation for Workers Exposed to Asbestos at Hunters Point



If you worked at Hunters Point and now have a diagnosis of an asbestos illness, you have a right to seek compensation. Contact a mesothelioma lawyer or asbestos law firm to learn more about your options. 



Many victims of workplace asbestos exposure are eligible to seek compensation through a lawsuit or an asbestos trust fund. A lawsuit is usually filed against the asbestos companies that supplied shipyards. 



Asbestos companies that went bankrupt cannot be sued, but they most often set up asbestos trust funds to compensate future claimants. You could qualify to make a claim with one of these trusts. 



If you are a veteran, file for VA benefits. These include monthly disability compensation, compensation for dependents, and medical care. 



Additional Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Did Ingalls Shipbuilding Expose Workers to Asbestos?

Ingalls Shipbuilding operated in Pascagoula, Mississippi, and built and repaired ships using asbestos. Today, it operates as part of Huntington Ingalls Industries and builds and repairs ships for the U.S. Navy. Although it no longer uses asbestos, past use exposed workers and put them at risk for mesothelioma and other illnesses. 



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, awaiting those who’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 

















All shipyards in the U.S. used asbestos at one point in time. Peak asbestos use in ships occurred between approximately the 1930s and the 1970s. This is when Ingalls Shipbuilding used asbestos and put workers at risk of exposure. 



Like other shipyards, Ingalls used asbestos in ships for its ability to insulate. It was also prized for fireproofing and being lightweight. This heavy asbestos use occurred before most workers understood the risks of being around asbestos. 



A History of Ingalls Shipbuilding 



Ingalls Shipbuilding Corporation was founded in 1938 by businessman Robert Ingersoll Ingalls, Sr. The company was opened in a convenient location in Mississippi, along the Pascagoula River and the Gulf of Mexico.




Business grew for Ingalls with the onset of World War II and the U.S.'s involvement in the war. The shipyard built many vessels for the Navy. 





Ingalls also won a contract with the United States Navy in 1957. The company built a dozen nuclear attack submarines for the Navy. 





During the late 1960s, Litton Industries bought out Ingalls Shipbuilding and began creating a line of warships, including more nuclear submarines, destroyers, submarine tenders, and more. The need for additional ships resulted in the shipyard expanding onto the other side of the Pascagoula River.





Ingalls Shipbuilding continued to thrive and, by 1977, employed more than 27,000 people. 





By 2001, the company changed hands once again when the Northrop Grumman Corporation purchased the business.





Although business was great for the company, 2005's Hurricane Katrina stopped shipbuilding after many of the shipyard's buildings and equipment were destroyed. 




Today, Ingalls Shipbuilding is part of Huntington Ingalls Industries, a subsidiary of Northrop Grumman. Ingalls won a Navy contract in 2015 to repair vessels and build landing craft and destroyers. Additional contracts won in 2023 to update the Navy's Zumwalt-class destroyers keep workers busy. 



How Did Ingalls Shipbuilding Use Asbestos?



Like other shipyards in the U.S., Ingalls used asbestos for its ability to insulate and fireproof ships and equipment. Insulation was one of the most important uses for asbestos on ships. 



Some of the hundreds of asbestos components that went into ships built and repaired at Ingalls include: 




Pipe insulation



Boilers



Pumps



Gaskets



Valves



Cement



Textiles



Rope



Firefighting gear




Who Was at Risk of Asbestos Exposure at Ingalls Shipbuilding? 



Anyone working at Ingalls when it used asbestos could have been exposed. Exposure occurs when asbestos is handled and releases fibers. These tiny fibers enter the air, where anyone in the area can inhale them. 



People who worked directly with or handled asbestos had the greatest risk of inhaling higher concentrations of fibers. These people included: 




Insulation workers



Boiler workers



Pipefitters 



Plumbers



Repair workers



Electricians




Ingalls Shipbuilding Asbestos Lawsuits



Ingalls is one of the few shipyards that acknowledged asbestos exposure. However, it helped make the company and its shipyard a centerpiece of asbestos legislation. This is primarily because of the shipyard's locations. Being located in Mississippi meant that mass torts were favorable.



Ingalls Shipbuilding became the target of many asbestos-related claims. While working at the shipyard, most of the claims were from workers who developed asbestos-related illnesses, such as malignant mesothelioma and asbestos-related lung cancer.



Robert H. Overly v. Ingalls Shipbuilding



According to court documents, Robert and Louise Overly filed a lawsuit against Ingalls Shipbuilding in the 1990s over Robert's mesothelioma diagnosis. 



Although Robert was an employee of Westinghouse, he made trips to Ingalls in the 1960s, where he spent several days working on the ships as a field engineer.



At Ingalls, Robert was exposed to "several types of asbestos insulation products, including pipe covering, block insulation, cement, and tape." 



He was surrounded by large amounts of asbestos dust while working on insulation products and when he installed turbines.



During testimony, Robert said he had no idea that asbestos dust could harm his health. 



According to court testimony, no one ever told him at Ingalls about the dangers of asbestos, nor were there any warning signs.



No Protective Gear



Robert also said he was never offered protective gear, such as a respirator mask or safety clothing. Others who worked at Ingalls were defense witnesses for Robert and confirmed his claim that no safety gear was ever offered.



No Safe Level of Asbestos



Robert's attorney presented evidence that there is no safe level of asbestos. The mesothelioma lawyer also presented substantial evidence indicating Ingalls was aware of, or should have been, the dangers of asbestos to workers. 



Dr. Barry Castleman, an expert witness for the prosecution, stated that there had been information regarding asbestos dangers since the 1890s.



On December 3, 1996, a San Francisco jury  [74 Cal.App.4th 170] found Ingalls Shipbuilding, Westinghouse, another shipyard owner, Avondale, and several other companies guilty of negligence against the Overly family.



A total of $400,000 in non-economic damages was given to the Overly family, in addition to $25,000 for the loss of consortium to Louise Overly.



Compensation for Ingalls Workers Exposed to Asbestos



If you were affected by asbestos at Ingalls, contact a mesothelioma lawyer to find out what you can do about it. Most people have two options for seeking compensation for mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses. 



Mesothelioma Lawsuit Settlement



Most mesothelioma cases are considered personal injuries because the cause is negligent workplace asbestos exposure. An asbestos attorney can review your work history and determine which companies are responsible for exposing you to asbestos at Ingalls. 



If a lawsuit is an option, they can help you sue those asbestos companies. Most mesothelioma and asbestos lawsuits end in settlements. Only a few ever go to trial. 



Asbestos Trust Fund Claim



You cannot sue the asbestos companies that exposed you to asbestos if they went bankrupt. Many of these companies filed for bankruptcy as a result of lawsuits. 



These companies had to set up asbestos trust funds to compensate victims as an alternative to a lawsuit. You could be eligible to file a claim. Some of the asbestos companies associated with exposure at Ingalls Shipbuilding that set up trust funds include: 




Babcock & Wilcox



Combustion Engineering



Fibreboard



Flintkote



JT Thorpe



Kaiser Aluminum



Keene Corporation



NARCO



Owens Corning



Pittsburgh Corning




Additional Information and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### Duwamish Shipyard

The Duwamish Shipyard, located in Seattle, Washington, was one of the largest shipbuilding sites in the nation. It focused on repairing vessels and related equipment. Duwamish Shipyard used asbestos in numerous products, putting many workers at risk of developing mesothelioma and other illnesses. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













Did Duwamish Shipyard Use Asbestos?



Duwamish Shipyard used asbestos in its ship maintenance and repair operations for decades. Shipbuilding and ship repair long used asbestos for its ability to insulate and fireproof. 



Until regulations forced shipyards to stop using it, asbestos was heavily used in shipyards like Duwamish from about the 1930s to the 1970s. 



Duwamish Shipyard History



The Duwamish Shipyard was established in May 1941 after it was acquired from King County. 




In the beginning, the primary function of the shipyard was the repair and maintenance of ships and ship-related equipment. The shipyard contained a graving dock and two dry docks.





During the 1970s, Duwamish Shipyard expanded substantially, and the employee rate grew to around 500 workers. 





During this time, the shipyard took on shipbuilding but could not keep up with the demand. It eventually reverted to the repair and maintenance of vessels only. 





Over the years, Duwamish Shipyard's productivity began to dwindle until it finally shut down permanently in 2007. 




Duwamish was just one of several shipyards in the area to close in the 2000s. Duwamish and other industrial operations, like Lockheed Shipbuilding, left the Duwamish River contaminated with numerous substances, like PCBs and asbestos. Cleanup projects are being planned for the Duwamish Superfund Site. 



How Did the Duwamish Shipyard Use Asbestos? 



One of the primary uses of asbestos-containing products at Duwamish Shipyard was in refitting and overhauling hundreds of barges. This continued throughout the late 1970s when the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) placed strict regulations on the use of asbestos at job sites, including shipyards.



The shipyard restored many vessels with asbestos-containing products. One such restoration on the Lightship No. 83 vessel contained excessive amounts of asbestos. 



Additional asbestos was found in the following products and materials and Duwamish Shipyard:




Boiler room parts



Generator exhaust pipe insulation



Steam drum insulation



Feedwater heater insulation



Steam piping insulation



Gaskets 



Valves




Who Was Harmed By Asbestos at Duwamish Shipyard? 



Anyone who worked at Duwamish during the years of asbestos use was at risk for exposure. Asbestos releases small fibers into the air that anyone in the area can inhale. Even workers who did not handle asbestos could have been exposed. 



The workers at greatest risk handled asbestos materials. They cut into the materials, manipulated them, or removed and installed them. This caused the materials to release fibers right around the workers, who most likely inhaled them. 



Duwamish Shipyard Cleanup



The Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) created an agreement in 2010 with the shipyard to clean up the site. 



Duwamish Shipyard accepted the agreement and took responsibility for the cleanup under the Model Toxics Control Act.



According to the DOE, the Duwamish Shipyard agreed to:




Remedial Investigation (RI). The RI will collect data necessary to adequately characterize the contamination in soil, groundwater, stormwater, and sediments.



Feasibility Study (FS). The FS will use the results of the RI to propose cleanup alternatives for the site.




The DOE states the cleanup and remediation of the site is still underway. Aside from asbestos, other toxic substances found at Duwamish Shipyard include arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, zinc, and more.



Compensation for Former Duwamish Workers



There have never been any asbestos-related lawsuits filed against Duwamish Shipyard. This is because workers file cases against the asbestos manufacturers that provided asbestos to shipyards. 



If you worked at Duwamish and were diagnosed with an asbestos illness, you could be entitled to compensation through a lawsuit. A mesothelioma lawyer can review your case and determine which companies are responsible for your illness. 



Additional Help and Resources



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. 

### Defoe Shipbuilding Company

The Defoe Shipbuilding Company in Bay City, Michigan, used asbestos for its affordability, ease of use, and resistance to heat and fire. The shipyard's asbestos use led to workers developing life-threatening diseases years later. These included mesothelioma and lung cancer. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did Defoe Shipbuilding Use Asbestos? 



Like many other shipyards of the time, Defoe Shipbuilding Company used asbestos from about the 1930s through the 1970s. This was the peak period of asbestos use at shipyards throughout the U.S. 



Shipyards used asbestos in hundreds of materials to build and repair ships. It was prized for its ability to insulate and protect against fire. Eventually, it became widely known that asbestos harms health and causes diseases like mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis. 



Defoe Shipbuilding Company History



Established in 1905 between a partnership by two brothers and their brother-in-law, Defoe Shipbuilding Company started under the name Defoe Boat and Motor Works. 



The shipyard focused on building and repairing gasoline-fueled and knock-down vessels. The shipyard was conveniently located along the Saginaw River.



World War I and the Interwar Years



By 1917, Defoe Shipbuilding Company expanded after being given a contract by the United States Navy to build five Spent Tornado Chasers. 



A year later, the shipbuilding company built eight Tumor Mine Planters for the Navy.



Throughout the next several years, until 1939, Defoe Shipbuilding Company built various commercial and government vessels, as well as private yachts. 



World War II



When World War II began, the shipbuilding company's focus was primarily on the war effort. The shipbuilding company created a total of 11 destroyer transports, 13 destroyer escorts, four Auk-class minesweepers, over 150 ships, a patrol craft, and a multitude of landing crafts.



Post-War Years



After World War II, Defoe Shipbuilding Company continued to build vessels, including two large Great Lakes bulk carriers. It also continued with vessel repairs, re-powering, and conversions.



The shipyard also constructed some famous yachts. These included the Barbara Anne for Dwight Eisenhower, the Honey Fitz for John F. Kennedy, and the Tricia for Richard Nixon. 



The Defoe Shipbuilding Company closed in December 1976 after the Navy contracts expired due to dwindling business. The shipyard's site is now used as a scrapyard.



How Did Defoe Shipbuilding Use Asbestos?



Defoe Shipbuilding was not alone in using asbestos. Shipyards once used asbestos in hundreds of materials and products that went into ships. They also used asbestos in buildings, equipment, and vehicles. 



Some of the many asbestos products that went into ships built at Defoe and other shipyards include: 




Insulation



Pipe lagging



Valves



Gaskets



Seals



Adhesives



Boilers



Pumps




How Did Asbestos Harm Workers at Defoe Shipbuilding? 



Employers at Defoe knew about the dangers of asbestos as early as 1944. The U.S. Maritime Commission released a report on known risks of asbestos exposure in shipbuilding. 



The report included recommendations for protective gear for workers handling asbestos. Asbestos is harmful because it sheds tiny fibers that can be easily inhaled. Once inside the body, asbestos fibers cause damage that can lead to illnesses later. 



Most shipyards neglected to provide workers with the necessary safety gear to protect them from asbestos fibers. Some of the workers at Defoe most at risk of asbestos exposure worked directly with or handled asbestos materials: 




Insulation installers



Repair workers



Pipefitters



Boiler workers



Welders



Electricians




Compensation for Defoe Shipbuilding Workers with Asbestos Illnesses



If you have an asbestos disease diagnosis or worked at Defoe, talk to a mesothelioma lawyer about your options. Mesothelioma is generally considered a personal injury because it is caused by negligent workplace exposure. This gives you two options to seek compensation: 




Mesothelioma lawsuit. Workers can sue asbestos companies that supplied the shipyard. Lawsuits often end in settlements for workers and rarely go to trial. 



Asbestos trust fund claim. Companies that filed for bankruptcy cannot be sued. These companies set up trust funds to compensate future claimants. A lawyer can determine if you are eligible for compensation from any of these trusts. 




Additional Resources and Information for Asbestos



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Curtis Bay Coast Guard Yard

The Curtis Bay Coast Guard Yard, now known as the United States Coast Guard Yard, is the U.S. Coast Guard's primary shipbuilding and repair facility. The shipyard used large amounts of asbestos in the past, exposing workers. Many civilian workers and veterans later developed mesothelioma and other asbestos-related illnesses.



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did Curtis Bay Coast Guard Yard Use Asbestos? 



Curtis Bay Coast Guard Yard used asbestos in its operations for several decades. Like other shipyards, Curtis Bay relied on asbestos to insulate and protect against fire on vessels. 



Asbestos use in shipyards like Curtis Bay lasted from about the 1930s through the 1970s. By the 1970s, the harmful health effects of asbestos exposure were well known and government regulations came into effect. 



Curtis Bay Coast Guard Yard History



The Curtis Bay Coast Guard Yard, established in 1899, began as both a boat repair facility and a training academy. By 1910, the shipyard began building vessels and continued to repair boats. 




These activities continued throughout World War II. The war brought about additional work for the shipyard, including buoy manufacturing and construction and complete vessel overhauls.





World War II also brought a newly constructed 3,000-ton dry dock to Curtis Bay Shipyard, in addition to a new concrete pier and two new shipways. 





The shipyard was designated as the official U.S. Coast Guard Yard during this time. An estimated 3,100 civilian workers were employed at the shipyard during the war.





As World War II ended, work ended for many employees as the shipyard focused on repairing vessels and building wooden boats. It also continued to overhaul old ships and create numerous larger vessels. 





Operations at Curtis Bay Coast Guard Yard slowed after WWII. Many people lost their jobs.




Today, the facility is called the U.S. Coast Guard Yard. It is the only shipbuilding facility serving the Coast Guard and continues to operate as a repair center. Approximately 1,300 people work there today. 



How Was Asbestos Used at Curtis Bay Coast Guard Yard?



The use of asbestos at Curtis Bay Coast Guard was typical of both civilian and military shipyards of the time. The military used more than 300 asbestos-containing products before the EPA regulated asbestos use. 



Asbestos was known to have been used in the following at the Curtis Bay Coast Guard Yard:




Electric wiring



Electric equipment



Pipes



Pipe fittings



Insulation



Deck coatings



Flooring



Engine and boiler rooms




Asbestos may have also been used in:




Life boats



Utility boats



Response boats



Port security boats




Asbestos was also in the pipes and insulation in buildings in the Coast Guard Yard. It could be found in equipment, machinery, and vehicles. 



Who Was Exposed to Asbestos at the Curtis Bay Coast Guard Yard? 



Both civilians and the men and women of the Coast Guard were affected by asbestos at the shipyard. Anyone who worked at Curtis Bay Coast Guard Yard was at risk of asbestos exposure and later illnesses. 



Asbestos sheds tiny fibers that can be inhaled or ingested by anyone working with or around it. Workers who cut, manipulated, or handled asbestos materials had the highest risk of exposure. These included: 




Maintenance and repair workers



Mechanics



Insulation workers



Boiler workers



Pipefitters



Steamfitters



Welders



Electricians




Curtis Bay Coast Guard Yard Superfund Site



The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency listed Curtis Bay Coast Guard Yard as a Superfund site in 2002. Both the Yard and the EPA contributed to the site's cleanup, which was riddled with toxic substances like asbestos. 



The official cleanup of Curtis Bay concluded in 2013. The EPA continues to monitor groundwater on the site. One area may need additional remediation. 



Curtis Bay Coast Guard Yard Asbestos Lawsuits



Many workers who developed asbestos-related illnesses filed asbestos-related lawsuits against the manufacturers that provided the products to the shipyard. 



One such asbestos manufacturer, Owens-Illinois Glass, faced a lawsuit from the family of Harry Hunter, a man who once worked at the Curtis Bay Coast Guard Yard in the summer of 1956. He was an electrician and worked regularly with and around asbestos materials. 



Hunter died of malignant mesothelioma in 2001, but his family carried out the lawsuit and eventually won $4.2 million for Hunter's wrongful death.



Unfortunately, since the lawsuit was filed in Maryland, state laws prevented the family from getting the total amount, and it was subsequently reduced to $2.6 million. 



How Can Curtis Bay Asbestos Victims Get Compensation? 



Both veterans and civilians with an asbestos illness can sue the asbestos companies that supplied the Coast Guard. Mesothelioma lawsuits often result in substantial settlements for victims. 



Former Curtis Bay workers with mesothelioma may also qualify for compensation claims with asbestos trust funds. These are funds set up by asbestos companies that filed for bankruptcy because of lawsuits. 



Veterans who served at Curtis Bay may qualify for benefits through the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). VA benefits include disability payments, compensation for dependants, and specialist medical care. 



If you worked at Curtis Bay and now have an asbestos illness, contact an experienced lawyer for advice. You have legal options for seeking compensation. 



Additional Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### Charleston Naval Shipyard - Asbestos Exposure

Charleston Naval Shipyard played an important role during World War I and World War II, supplying the Navy with ships and employing thousands of civilians. The Charleston Naval Shipyard also used asbestos and put workers and Navy veterans at risk of exposure. Many later developed mesothelioma illnesses like mesothelioma. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













Charleston Naval Shipyard History



Established in 1901, the Charleston Naval Shipyard originally provided primary support and maintenance for U.S. Navy vessels. This included surface ships, submarine tenders, cruisers, destroyers, and frigates.



For nearly 100 years, until its closure in 1996, the Charleston Naval Shipyard employed civilians who helped build hundreds of Navy ships. 



World War I and World War II



Production increased at Charleston Naval Shipyard during World War I. Employment skyrocketed during the war, with more than 5,000 people working at the shipyard. When the war ended, many workers lost their jobs. 



The shipyard had considerably fewer employees during the start of World War II, with an average of around 200 workers. However, that quickly changed during the peak of the war, when the shipyard employed close to 26,000 people.



During the wars, two of the largest vessels built at the Charleston Shipyard included the USS Bryce Canyon (AD-36) and the USS Tidewater (AD-31).



When the war ended, the shipyard became a repair and alteration area for captured German submarines.



Korea and Vietnam



During the 1950s, when the Korean War reached its peak, the shipyard again began building vessels. During the Vietnam War, the shipyard built submarines (including nuclear submarines) and missiles.



The shipyard slowed down after the Vietnam War but continued its operations. Workers at the shipyard during this time built submarines, submarine tenders, destroyers, and cruisers. 



By the 1980s, the Charleston Naval Shipyard was a large home port that employed thousands of people. Despite this, the shipyard closed permanently in 1996. 



Asbestos Use at Charleston Naval Shipyard



Both civilian and military shipbuilding used asbestos and asbestos-containing materials from approximately the 1930s through the 1970s.



Shipyards like Charleston relied on asbestos as an effective insulator and fireproofing material. It was also cheap and abundantly available. As a lightweight material, it worked well on ships. 



Some of the many materials and ship parts that contained asbestos include: 




Insulation



Fireproofing materials



Pipe lagging



Boilers



Pumps



Gaskets



Valves



Textiles




Who Was at Risk of Asbestos Exposure at Charleston Naval Yard? 



Anyone who worked at the Charleston Naval Yard during the years of asbestos use was at risk of exposure. Asbestos sheds fibers that enter the dust in the air and on surfaces. Anyone in the area likely inhaled some of the fibers. 



Workers closest to the asbestos materials faced the greatest risk. Workers who handled asbestos materials often had to cut into them or manipulate them in ways that released even more fibers. Some of the shipyard workers at greatest risk of asbestos exposure included: 




Insulation workers



Boiler workers



Pipefitters



Plumbers



Electricians



Machine operators



Welders




Any workers at Charleston Naval Yard could have been exposed to asbestos. This put all workers and Navy veterans at risk for later developing mesothelioma, asbestosis, lung cancer, and other serious illnesses. 



Asbestos at Charleston Naval Yard Affected Residents



Shortly after its closing, many people who lived close to the shipyard complained about the mounting numbers of people diagnosed with pleural cancers around the area.



The Department of Health and Environmental Control thoroughly evaluated the community. The organization confirmed that the Charleston region had four times more pleural cancer diagnoses than the expected rate.



Many of the diagnosed cases were from people who once worked at the Charleston Shipyard. Lawmakers in South Carolina passed a law in 2006 to speed asbestos lawsuits for residents and workers affected by the shipyard. 



Compensation for Victims of Charleston Navy Yard Asbestos



Many former workers and people who lived close to the shipyard filed asbestos-related claims and mesothelioma lawsuits against manufacturers that supplied asbestos products to the shipyard. 



An asbestos or mesothelioma lawsuit could help you recover damages through a settlement or jury award. Another option is to file a claim with an asbestos trust fund. Asbestos companies that went bankrupt over lawsuits created these funds to compensate victims. 



Some of the asbestos companies associated with Charleston Naval Shipyard with active trusts include: 




A.P. Green



Armstrong



Babcock & Wilcox



Combustion Engineering



Fibreboard



Flexitallic



Keene Corporation



Owens Corning



Pittsburgh Corning



U.S. Gypsum




Talk to an asbestos law firm if you believe you were exposed to asbestos at the Charleston Naval Shipyard. An experienced mesothelioma lawyer can explain your options, investigate your exposure, and build a case to ensure you have the best chance of receiving compensation.  



The Charleston Naval Shipyard Today



Charleston Naval Shipyard ceased operations and closed in 1996. The closure meant that many workers lost their jobs. Since the closure, the site has been redeveloped and repurposed, making up for some of those lost jobs. 



Several businesses and organizations have moved onto the property. These include government agencies, nonprofits, academic organizations, and apartment buildings. The site now includes around 5,000 workers, many fewer than the shipyard employed. 



Additional Information and Resources



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Was Asbestos Used at Consolidated Steel Shipyards?

Consolidated Steel Corporation's shipyards relied heavily on asbestos for many years. The use of asbestos in shipbuilding and repair put workers at risk of exposure. Many later received diagnoses of mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses.  



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who are victims of asbestos-related diseases. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more.













Did Consolidated Steel Shipyards Use Asbestos? 



Yes, Consolidated Steel used asbestos in all of its shipyards during the middle of the 20th century. The peak years of asbestos use in shipbuilding and repair were approximately the 1930s to the 1970s. 



Asbestos was prized in shipbuilding for its ability to insulate and fireproof. It was also lightweight, inexpensive, and readily available. 



Consolidated Steel Corporation History



Consolidated Steel Corporation began in 1929 after a merger between Baker Iron Works, Llewellyn Iron Works, and Union Iron Works. The first Consolidated Steel shipyard opened in Long Beach, California.




By 1941, a new shipyard was built in Wilmington, California. The United States Maritime Commission funded the construction of the shipyard on a $13 million contract. It delivered ships to the U.S. Navy. 





The Wilmington shipyard employed over 12,000 workers, including maintenance workers, pipefitters, boilermakers, steelworkers, and more. 





In 1943, Consolidated Steel Corporation bought Ackerman Boat Works in Newport Beach, California. During World War II, the shipyard constructed 47-foot MTLs, as well as 96-foot TPs, for the United States Army.





In addition to the Wilmington shipyard, Consolidated Steel Corporation opened its fabrication plant in 1941 in Orange, Texas. A year after its opening, it started building vessels. 





From 1942 until 1945, Orange shipyard workers built various vessels, including several different types of destroyers. The Orange, Texas shipyard employed around 20,000 workers as production needs increased. 





The Consolidated shipyards ceased operations at the end of World War II. 




Today, the former Orange, Texas, Consolidated Steel shipyard is the West Orange Shipyard, owned by Signal International. The site of the former Wilmington shipyard is now the Port of Los Angeles container terminal, also known as TraPac. 



How Did Consolidated Steel Use Asbestos? 



Consolidated Steel Corporation shipyards used asbestos for many decades. All shipyards used asbestos extensively during the same period, especially during World War II. 



Asbestos went into hundreds of components used to build ships. It was useful for insulating and fireproofing and is also lightweight, an important property for building ships. 



Some of the many ship components that contained asbestos include: 




Insulation



Pipe coverings



Boilers



Pumps



Gaskets



Valves



Wall panels



Ceiling tiles




Asbestos exposure is now known to cause life-threatening diseases, such as malignant mesothelioma and asbestos-related lung cancer. 



Although the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) didn't regulate its use until the 1970s, many manufacturers knew of the risks several decades earlier. 



Asbestos at Wilmington Shipyard



Insulation was the primary product that caused asbestos exposure at the shipyard. It was used in the construction of the shipyard, including pipes, walls, and more.



Numerous workers at the Wilmington location began to develop mild symptoms of asbestos-related illnesses, but they continued to work since the symptoms mimicked common ailments.



The Port of Los Angeles container terminal (TraPac) is now located where the Wilmington shipyard used to be.



Asbestos at the Orange Shipyard



As with the Wilmington, California shipyard, asbestos was heavily used throughout the Orange, Texas shipyard. 



Asbestos-containing insulation was used in flooring, pipes, bulkhead blankets, pipes, walls, and more. Most shipyard workers faced asbestos exposure each day they went to work.



Johns Manville and Asbestos at Consolidated Steel



Johns Manville, an asbestos manufacturer that faced thousands of mesothelioma lawsuits, was one of the primary asbestos suppliers to the Orange shipyard. 



Numerous workers at the Orange shipyard filed their own claims against Johns Manville after developing mesothelioma and other asbestos-related illnesses.



Johns Manville denied liability against the Orange shipyard workers and stated they were unaware that asbestos was dangerous.



A representative for Johns Manville cited scientific data indicating that there was not enough information to show that asbestos was harmful. 



Regardless, Johns Manville lost so many asbestos-related lawsuits that it eventually filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection and created an asbestos trust fund to handle all pending and future claims.



Who Was Harmed By Asbestos at Consolidated Steel? 



Anyone who worked at any of the Consolidated Steel shipyards was at risk of asbestos exposure and illness. By handling asbestos materials, they released fibers into the air. Anyone near these fibers likely inhaled them. 



The workers at greatest risk of asbestos exposure handled asbestos materials directly: 




Insulation workers



Pipefitters



Repair workers



Boiler workers



Electricians



Plumbers




How to Seek Compensation for Asbestos Exposure



If you worked at Consolidated Steel or another workplace that exposed you to asbestos, you have rights. Asbestos illnesses are generally considered personal injuries because they are caused by negligent exposure. 



You may be eligible to file a lawsuit against asbestos companies that supplied the shipyards. If those companies went bankrupt, you could still qualify for compensation through an asbestos trust fund. 



Contact an asbestos lawyer or law firm to review your options. They can investigate your work history and build a case that helps you get the compensation you deserve. 



Additional Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### Mare Island Naval Shipyard

Mare Island Naval Shipyard was a U.S. Naval shipyard that repaired and built vessels during World War I and World War II. Mare Island used asbestos, leading to exposure in workers and the risk of mesothelioma and asbestos-related lung cancer in workers and veterans. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 













Did Mare Island Naval Shipyard Use Asbestos? 



Mare Island Naval Shipyard used asbestos in its operations for decades. Like other shipyards, both naval and civilian, asbestos was prevalent. It was found in hundreds of components that went into building ships. 



Shipyards like Mare Island used asbestos for its insulating properties and ability to fireproof effectively. It was also readily available and cheap. 



Mare Island Naval Shipyard History



Established in 1854, Mare Island Naval Shipyard was the first West Coast Naval base established in Vallejo, California. The area's name comes from General Mariano Guadalupe Vallejo, a cavalry commando from Mexico who founded that area in the 1700s.



During the mid-1800s, the first dry dock and the first U.S. warship were built at the Mare Island Naval shipyard. The ship was the USS Saginaw, the first of nearly 500 ships built at the shipyard in its long history. 



In 1910, Mare Island built the first aircraft landing deck, a wooden platform on the USS Pennsylvania. Mare Island workers still hold a record for building the USS Ward, a destroyer, in just under 18 days during World War I. 



Mare Island in World War II



Shipbuilding activity surged at Mare Island as World War II began. The shipyard built hundreds of vessels for the war, including landing crafts, submarines, destroyer escorts, and submarine tenders. 



Mare Island also played an important role in receiving and repairing damaged ships during the war. The number of civilians employed at Mare Island peaked during this time at nearly 39,000. 



Post-War Years



Mare Island remained vital in ship repair for the U.S. Navy after World War II. The primary focus was on repairing and updating submarines. 



The shipyard continued building submarines, including the first nuclear submarine on the West Coast, the USS Sargo. This was one of several nuclear-powered submarines constructed here. 



With its expertise in nuclear submarines, Mare Island opened the Nuclear Power School. It trained workers to build and operate nuclear-powered vessels. Mare Island built its last submarine in 1970. 



The Closure of Mare Island Naval Shipyard



Mare Island Naval Shipyard was recommended for closure in 1993 and closed in 1996. The reasons for its closure included a reduced need for nuclear-capable facilities and the ongoing costs of dredging the area around the shipyard. 



Mare Island today is a mixture of public spaces, commercial businesses, and industrial sites. Several businesses, organizations, and government agencies own different areas of the property. 



How Did Mare Island Naval Shipyard Use Asbestos?



Mare Island Naval Shipyard relied heavily on asbestos when building vessels and repairing ship parts. Additionally, asbestos could be found in buildings, equipment, and vehicles. 



Hundreds of components that went into building and repairing ships at Mare Island contained asbestos, including: 




Insulation



Pipes



Cement



Wall panels



Boilers



Gaskets



Valves



Textiles




Who Was Harmed by Asbestos at Mare Island Naval Shipyard? 



Pipefitters, mechanics, insulators, maintenance workers, and many other employees and contractors were exposed to asbestos daily while doing routine work activities. 



Most workers were never given protective gear, which heightened the risk of developing asbestos-related diseases. They were also exposed to other dangerous materials, including pesticides, lead-based paint, and petroleum fuels.



Many employers and contractors developed asbestos-related illnesses, including malignant mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, and asbestosis. 



Many asbestos-related lawsuits followed after workers became ill. The plaintiffs, mostly retired Naval workers, generally filed their claims against the asbestos manufacturers that provided asbestos-containing products to the shipyard. 



Lingering Contamination at Mare Island Shipyard



Over 100 years of building and repairing ships with toxic materials like asbestos, the shipyard left a mark on the area. When Mare Island closed, it left hundreds of thousands of tons of contaminating substances behind. 



Massive cleanup was required to redevelop the area. Some sites are complete, but the project is ongoing. The site includes contaminated soil, spill sites, explosives and munitions, and contaminated groundwater. 



Mare Island Naval Shipyard Today



Currently, the shipyard is being used and leased out by commercial and industrial businesses, including the California Conservation Corps and numerous other prominent organizations. 



Additionally, the U.S. Navy developed the "economic development conveyance" on the shipyard to convert the BRAC into civilian communities. It also transferred many of the shipyard's properties to multiple government agencies.



The shipyard's island buildings were also used as a set for several Hollywood movies, including Jack, Metro, Sphere, and Flubber. 



Compensation for Workers Exposed to Asbestos at Mare Island



If you worked at Mare Island, you could be at risk for asbestos illnesses. A mesothelioma lawyer can help you understand your rights and seek compensation. 



One option may be to file a lawsuit. While you cannot sue the military or government, you can seek damages from the asbestos companies that supplied Mare Island. Both veterans and past civilian workers can file a lawsuit to seek a settlement or a jury award. 



Companies that went bankrupt cannot be sued. These companies set up trust funds to compensate victims. They serve as an alternative to filing a lawsuit. Some of the companies that supplied Mare Island and that have active asbestos trust funds include: 




Armstrong



Combustion Engineering



Fibreboad



Flexitalic



Keene Corporation



Owens Corning



Pittsburgh Corning



Turner & Newall



Western MacArthur




Veterans can also file claims for VA benefits. These include monthly disability payments, special compensation, benefits for dependents, and medical care. 



Additional Resources and Help for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Caddell Dry Dock and Asbestos

Caddell Dry Dock is a New York shipyard that once used asbestos and asbestos-containing products. Although the company no longer relies on asbestos, its long history of use has left many workers with malignant mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases.



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













Did Caddell Dry Dock Use Asbestos? 



Caddell Dry Dock has operated for over 100 years, dry docking and repairing both civilian and military ships. It operated during a time of peak asbestos use in the industry. 



From about the 1930s to the 1970s, Caddell and other shipyards used asbestos to build and repair ships. They used asbestos mostly to insulate materials and protect against fire. 



The use of asbestos in shipyards put workers at risk of developing fatal asbestos-related illnesses, such as malignant mesothelioma, asbestosis, and lung cancer.



Caddell Dry Dock History



Caddell Drydock and Repair Company Inc. was created in 1903 by a team that included a shipbuilder, accountant, and salesman. It got its name from the founding shipbuilder, John Caddell. 



The shipyard is one of the oldest shipyards on the East Coast. It was one of the most productive shipyards in New York. 



Caddell Dry Dock saw its most significant expansion and profitability during the 1930s. Although the Great Depression greatly affected the United States economy during this time, the U.S. government relied on shipyards to build and repair vessels. 



The shipbuilding field was still one of the few thriving industries at the time. Caddell bought Larson Shipyard and Brighton Marine Shipyard in 1936, expanding its operations. 



During the 1940s, the shipyard started focusing on the repair and service of boats. With six dry docks, the shipyard serviced hundreds of vessels during the war, including repairs, electrical work, painting, welding, coating, and much more.



How Did Caddell Dry Dock Use Asbestos? 



Shipyards like Caddell used asbestos to construct and repair ships because it is an effective insulator and fireproofing material. During its time of peak use, asbestos was also inexpensive and abundant. 



Asbestos went into hundreds of components and materials on ships, including: 




Insulation



Pipe lagging



Boilers



Pumps



Gaskets



Valves



Adhesives



Textiles



Rope



Wall panels



Ceiling tiles




Many shipyards also had asbestos insulation in their buildings. Machinery, equipment, and vehicles used in shipyards had asbestos in gaskets, insulation, and friction parts, like clutches and brake pads. 



How Were Caddell Dry Dock Workers Affected By Asbestos? 



Workers who handled asbestos had the highest risk of exposure. Disturbed asbestos materials release fibers that workers inhaled. In some workers, inhaled asbestos caused enough damage to lead to illnesses years later. 



Lack of ventilation at the shipyard and asbestos in areas with high temperatures heightened the risk of developing illnesses.



For instance, many people worked in boiler rooms and engine rooms for numerous hours each day in poorly ventilated areas with airborne asbestos permeating all around them. 



Some of the other shipyard workers at greatest risk of asbestos exposure were: 




Insulation workers



Pipefitters



Electricians



Plumbers



Machine operators



Mechanics




Does Caddell Dry Dock Use Asbestos Today?



Caddell Dry Dock is still operating today but no longer uses asbestos. Greater awareness of the harms of asbestos, as well as federal regulations, led to the decline of asbestos use in the 1970s. 



The shipyard currently works with non-profit organizations to restore historical ships. One of the shipyard's most notable projects includes a replica of Henry Hudson's Half Moon.



Compensation for Caddell Dry Dock Workers with Mesothelioma



If you worked at Caddell Dry Dock during asbestos use, talk to a mesothelioma lawyer about your rights. If you have a mesothelioma diagnosis or another asbestos illness, you could be entitled to compensation. 



One option is to file a lawsuit against the asbestos companies that supplied Caddell. Asbestos illnesses are often considered personal injuries because workplace exposure was negligent. You could get a substantial settlement from a lawsuit. 



If the companies that affected you went bankrupt, you cannot sue them. You may, however, qualify for compensation from an asbestos trust fund. A lawyer can help you make a claim for compensation. 



Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Bremerton Puget Sound Naval Shipyard

Bremerton Naval Shipyard (Puget Sound Naval Shipyard at Bremerton) once relied on asbestos for its affordability, resistance to heat and fire, and ease of use. As convenient as it was, asbestos led to harmful exposure. Some workers later developed serious illnesses, such as asbestosis and malignant mesothelioma.



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.





About Bremerton Naval Shipyard



Although once known as Bremerton Navy Yard or Naval Shipyard, today this facility is the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility. It is located near Bremerton, Washington, and has been previously called Navy Yard Puget Sound and Bremerton Naval Complex. 



The current facility is one of the largest industrial installations in the state. It is the largest Naval shore facility in the Pacific Northwest. It is the only facility in the U.S. certified to recycle nuclear ships. It is home to several vessels of the U.S. Navy reserve fleet. 



Bremerton Puget Sound Naval Shipyard History



Bremerton Naval Shipyard was established in 1891 when the U.S. Navy activated it for repair work. Eventually, it would add shipbuilding to its regular operations.



During World War I, it built seven submarines, 25 subchasers, and several other vessels vital to the war effort. 



The facility switched back to ship repair remained the most important work done at Puget Sound. During World War II, it was the only facility in the U.S. large enough to house and repair battleships and other big vessels. 



By the start of the Korean War, the shipyard began building vessels again and also, modernized carriers, and activated new Navy ships.



Puget Sound made repairs to the first nuclear-powered submarine, the USS Sculpin, in 1965. The facility continues to recycle nuclear-powered ships today. 



How Did Bremerton Puget Sound Naval Yard Use Asbestos? 



Bremerton Naval Shipyard used asbestos materials in nearly everything it did. This was typical in all shipyards in the middle of the 20th century. 



Shipbuilding and repair used asbestos mostly for its insulating and fireproofing properties. The safety of crew on ships depends on managing heat and reducing the risk of fire. Asbestos was also abundant and inexpensive. Both civilian and Naval shipbuilding used asbestos liberally for decades. 



Some of the many ship components with asbestos used at Bremerton Puget Sound include: 




Insulation



Pipe lagging



Cement



Boilers



Gaskets



Valves



Seals



Textiles



Adhesives



Firefighting gear



Ceiling panels



Flooring tiles




Who Was at Risk of Asbestos Exposure at Bremerton Naval Yard? 



Anyone who served or worked at Bremerton Puget Sound during the years of asbestos use was at risk of exposure. Asbestos materials shed tiny fibers. Anyone in the vicinity can inhale those fibers, which cause damage inside the body. This leads to mesothelioma, lung cancer, or asbestosis in some people. 



Workers at greatest risk were those who handled and manipulated asbestos products. Insulation workers and pipe laggers, for instance, cut asbestos insulation and pipe wrap, releasing fibers.



Bremerton Naval Shipyard Designated as Superfund Site



Bremerton Naval Shipyard used asbestos for various products, equipment, and machinery for many decades. The shipyard became aware of the hazards of asbestos in the 1940s. Yet, a spokesperson for Bremerton said there was not enough for anyone to be fully aware of how hazardous it was.



The EPA first considered designating the shipyard as a Superfund site in 1993. This was after the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency fined the facility $300,000 in 1992 for asbestos issues and violations. 



Along with thousands of workers placed at risk, anyone who lived in the general area was susceptible to inhaling deadly asbestos fibers on any given day. According to the EPA, up to 50,000 people live within a mile of the shipyard.



As of 2023, the cleanup of the site is ongoing. It is not yet approved for anticipated reuse, although the cleanup in some areas is complete. 



Bremerton Naval Shipyard Asbestos Lawsuits and Investigations



Court documents indicate that many workers have sued the asbestos manufacturers that shipped products to Bremerton Naval Shipyard.



Uniroyal, an asbestos cloth manufacturer, faced many mesothelioma lawsuits and other asbestos-related claims after supplying the shipyard with numerous asbestos products.



One of these lawsuits was filed against Uniroyal by the son of Gary Allen, a former civilian worker at Bremerton. He died of asbestos-related lung cancer. The courts initially dismissed the lawsuit, but an appeals court overturned the dismissal. 



Another lawsuit involved Vernon Braaten, who worked as a pipefitter for his entire career at Bremerton. As part of his job, he had to cut into asbestos pipe insulation. Braaten's case helped prove that the manufacturers of pipes and insulation had a duty to warn workers of the risks associated with their products. 



Bremerton Naval Shipyard Today



Bremerton Naval Shipyard is now known as the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard & Intermediate Maintenance Facility (PSNS & IMF). 



According to the U.S. Navy, the shipyard offers the Navy support via technical assistance, logistics support, vessel maintenance and modernization, and engineering assistance. The shipyard, situated on over 170 acres, employs close to 12,000 people. 



If you worked at Bremerton, you might be eligible for compensation. Talk to an asbestos attorney about your options. 



Additional Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



Keep in mind that you may qualify for significant compensation if you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. 

### Brooklyn Navy Yard and Asbestos

During its peak, the Brooklyn Navy Yard produced many ships for the U.S. Navy. The shipyard used a lot of asbestos in machinery and products. This led to many cases of mesothelioma and deaths in workers and Navy veterans. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 









Brooklyn Navy Yard History



Brooklyn Navy Yard was established in 1801 as one of the first of the five original shipyards in the United States. The government purchased 42 of land from a shipowner and converted it into a Naval shipyard. 




The previous owner of the land, John Jackson, built a frigate known as ADAMS, the first government-appointed vessel built at the Brooklyn Navy Yard.





The Brooklyn Navy Yard became an important part of the War of 1812 when over 100 ships were built for the battle. A few years later, the shipyard built the first steamship, The Fulton.  





The Brooklyn Navy Yard built the first steamship in the U.S., the Fulton. It also built the USS Connecticut, President Theodore Roosevelt's flagship. 





The Navy Yard expanded significantly during World War II when it employed more than 70,000 people. Among the many ships built here were three battleships, eight tank landing ships, five aircraft carriers, and two floating workshops. The USS Arizona, sunk at Pearl Harbor, was built here. 





Operations wound down after the war and increased again as the Korean War began. By then, the shipyard was also retrofitting Navy ships, including the USS Antietam, the first angled-deck aircraft carrier.




The Navy Yard closed operations in 1966 when it employed about 9,000 people. A few years later, the City of New York reopened it as a private corporation.



How Was Asbestos Used at Brooklyn Navy Yard?



Like all shipyards, the Brooklyn Navy Yard once used asbestos in its operations. It was in buildings and equipment and in hundreds of materials that workers installed or repaired on ships. 



Shipbuilding primarily relied on asbestos from about the 1930s through the 1970s as an insulating material. It insulates effectively against heat, protects against fire, and was abundant and cheap at the time it was used so heavily. 



Asbestos on Ships



Shipyards were full of asbestos mostly because of the hundreds of asbestos components used to build ships. Some of the many asbestos products on ships include: 




Insulation



Pipe lagging



Boilers



Gaskets



Valves



Fireproofing materials



Firefighting gear



Pumps




Asbestos Textiles at Brooklyn Navy Yard



Along with asbestos in machinery, ship materials, and insulation, an onsite shop at Brooklyn Navy Yard manufactured asbestos-containing cloths. 



The cloths were used as insulation for steam and water piped on ships and in the shipyard's central power plant and boiler shop.



The pipe shop onsite at the shipyard used asbestos in its manufacturing lagging. The cloth insulated hot water and steam pipes in the vessels repaired at the shipyard. 



The boiler shop and the central power plant also used asbestos-containing material. Workers produced it on-premises as insulation.



Who Was at Risk of Asbestos Exposure at Brooklyn Navy Yard? 



Anyone who worked at the shipyard during the years of asbestos use risked exposure. Asbestos materials shed small fibers. Anyone in the area without adequate protective gear can inhale these fibers, resulting in tissue damage that leads to mesothelioma and other illnesses. 



Some workers had a much higher risk of asbestos exposure than others. Workers who directly handled asbestos materials were more likely to disturb and inhale asbestos fibers. Shipyard workers at elevated risk included: 




Insulation workers



Pipefitters



Laggers



Plumbers



Welders



Electricians



Maintenance and repair workers



Machine operators




Safety Measures at Brooklyn Navy Shipyard



It's important to note that Brooklyn Navy Shipyard took precautions to help protect workers from asbestos as early as the 1930s. It wasn't enough to stop thousands of people from developing asbestos-related diseases. 



Some of the safety measures included providing safety masks, safety goggles, and large exhaust fans to help blow out asbestos and magnesia dust.



Workers were also provided ample water at the job site to help wash and rinse off asbestos fibers.



The U.S. Public Health Service issued recommendations to the Brooklyn Navy Yard to keep workers as safe as possible. It included various suggestions, such as advising workers to get chest X-rays every six months or every year, depending upon the job function. 



For example, the recommendations included that sandblasters get semi-annual chest X-rays. These workers were at high risk of exposure because they created the dust. Anyone else who worked around asbestos was directed to get chest X-rays every year.



Asbestos Lawsuits Related to Brooklyn Navy Yard



Victims of asbestos exposure who develop illnesses later are entitled to seek compensation. One option is to file a lawsuit to recover damages. Neither civilian workers nor veterans can sue the Navy over asbestos exposure, but they can sue the asbestos companies that supplied the shipyard. 



There have been thousands of lawsuits over asbestos exposure at the Brooklyn Navy Yard. The New York Courts settled around 200 of these cases in 1990. This avoided costly and lengthy trials and helped asbestos victims get compensation sooner. 



A notable case involving the Brooklyn Navy Yard went all the way to the New York State Supreme Court. Bernard Mayer and Noah Pride worked at the shipyard and developed mesothelioma after working with asbestos products supplied by the John Crane company. 



Pride died before the case concluded, but his estate continued the action. Mayer and Pride's estate were ultimately awarded $22 million. John Crane tried to overturn the jury award but was unsuccessful. 



Brooklyn Navy Yard Asbestos Trust Funds



Many asbestos companies that supplied shipyards and other worksites faced thousands of lawsuits. This led many of them to file for bankruptcy and protection against lawsuits. 



Companies that filed for bankruptcy over asbestos were required to set up asbestos trust funds. Workers with asbestos illnesses who cannot sue a bankrupt company can file a claim with these trusts to seek compensation. 



These are some of the asbestos companies that supplied the Brooklyn Navy Yard and now have asbestos trust funds:




A.P. Green



Armstrong



Babcock & Wilcox



Combustion Engineering



Fibreboard



Flexitallic



Halliburton



Keene Corporation



Owens Corning



Pittsburgh Corning



U.S. Gypsum



U.S. Mineral




If you worked at Brooklyn Naval Yard during its shipbuilding days, talk to an asbestos law firm about your legal options. 



Brooklyn Navy Shipyard Today



Shortly before Brooklyn Navy Shipyard closed in 1966, an engineering student created a detailed plan for converting it into a commercial shipyard to save thousands of jobs. The plan, however, was never carried out.



Today, the shipyard, screened by trees, is a manufacturing and commercial center. Over 200 businesses currently operate at the former shipyard, with around 5,000 employees. 



One of the businesses includes Brooklyn Grange Rooftop Farms, which sits on a 65,000 square feet arm on top of Building 3. The Brooklyn Grange Rooftop Farms offers public and private events, including tours, workshops, a youth farming program, and more.



Another prominent company currently located at the old shipyard is Steiner Studios, a 580,000 square feet state-of-the-art entertainment production company.



As of 2023, the Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp. is requesting proposals for continued development of the entire area. The current plan is to include commercial, industrial, and public outdoor spaces to turn the area into a genuine New York neighborhood. 



The shipyard hosts a museum dedicated solely to the history of the Brooklyn Navy Yard. It displays photographs and other memorabilia. Visitors are also allowed tour bus visits and bike rides throughout the campus.



Additional Help and Legal Resources



Keep in mind that you may qualify for significant compensation if you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corporation (BethShip)

The Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corporation, or BethShip for short, was once one of the largest shipyard companies in the U.S. Bethlehem Shipbuilding relied on asbestos for many years, leading to asbestos exposure and illness in workers. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corporation History



The Bethlehem Steel Corporation Shipbuilding Division was created in 1907 by the Bethlehem Steel Corporation after it bought the Union Iron Works shipyard. It began in Quincy, Massachusetts, but in the 1960s, moved to Sparrows Point, Maryland.



According to Time magazine, Bethship was considered the #1 shipbuilding company in the 1940s compared to the "Big 3 U.S." shipbuilders that could build any type of vessel.



BethShip was instrumental in the war effort in the 1940s. It built more ships during that time than any other company and employed nearly 200,000 people. 



Shipbuilding continued until 1997, when Bethship focused more on its steel operations. The company's focus turned to steel, tunnel construction, and repairing and refurbishing ships. 



Did Bethlehem Shipbuilding Use Asbestos? 



Like most shipyards, BethShip used asbestos in its shipbuilding activities for decades. Bethlehem's busiest period coincided with the peak use of asbestos in the industry, which put hundreds of thousands of workers at risk of exposure and asbestos-related illnesses. 



BethShip used asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) in products, equipment, and machinery. Some workers were more at risk of exposure than others. 



How Did Bethlehem Shipbuilding Use Asbestos? 



Shipyards used asbestos in hundreds of components that went into ships. Asbestos was prized for its ability to insulate and protect against fire, important properties in shipbuilding. It was also easy to get and inexpensive. Some of the many asbestos products BethShip workers installed in ships include: 




Insulation



Pipe lagging



Textiles



Gaskets



Valves



Boilers



Pumps



Floor tiles



Ceiling tiles



Adhesives




Who Was at Risk of Asbestos Exposure at BethShip? 



Workers all over Bethlehem's shipyards were once exposed to asbestos on a daily basis. Maintenance workers routinely tore out and replaced asbestos-containing insulation and worked with Raybestos cloths made out of asbestos.



Boiler and engine room workers were constantly around machinery and equipment made with asbestos-containing products. Welders worked around gaskets and other products filled with asbestos.



Numerous contractors were hired to install asbestos-containing products, such as cement, insulation, and blocks. 



One company, in particular, McCormick Asbestos Company, not only supplied large amounts of asbestos-containing products but also sent its employees and contractors to install them.



McCormick Asbestos Company is one of the many asbestos manufacturers that faced many asbestos-related lawsuits after people began developing fatal illnesses, including asbestos-related lung cancer and malignant mesothelioma. 



Other companies that supplied Bethlehem Shipbuilding with asbestos products include: 




Armstrong Contracting and Supply



Eagle-Picher Industries



Johns-Manville



Pittsburgh Corning



Raybestos



Ruberoid




Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corporation Ignores Safety Standards



Although the United States Navy provided a booklet in 1943 with a set of safety guidelines for the safe use of asbestos, BethShip reportedly ignored the guidelines and continued to expose workers to asbestos. 



BethShip also failed to provide respirators to its workers and properly ventilate areas known to contain high amounts of asbestos.



Shipyards Owned by Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corporation




Bethlehem Wilmington (Wilmington, DE.)



Hunter's Point Dry Docks (San Francisco, CA.)



Bethlehem Sparrows Point Shipyard (Sparrows Point, MD.)



Union Iron Works (San Francisco, CA.)



Fore River Shipyard (Quincy, MA.)



Bethlehem Elizabethport (Elizabethport, NJ)



Alameda Works Shipyard (Alameda, CA)



Victory Plant Shipyard (Quincy, MA.)



Bethlehem Mariners Harbor (Staten Island, NY)



Bethlehem Southwest Marine Terminal Shipyard (San Pedro, CA)



Bethlehem Fairfield Shipyard (Baltimore, MD)



Bethlehem Hingham Shipyard (Hingham, MA)



Bethlehem Atlantic Works (Boston, MA)



Bethlehem Brooklyn Shipyard (Brooklyn, NY)



Hoboken Shipyard (Hoboken, NJ)



Bayonne Naval Drydock (Bayonne, NJ)



Bethlehem Pennsylvania Shipyards (Beaumont, TX)




Asbestos Lawsuits Related to Bethlehem Shipbuilding



Many of the people who worked at BethShip shipyards and later developed asbestos illnesses sued for damages. Most often, they sued the asbestos companies that supplied Bethlehem. 



These lawsuits illustrate the risks of working at BethShip and all the ways workers were exposed to asbestos: 




In one case, a worker sued Armstrong after developing an asbestos illness. He worked as a rigger at the Bethlehem Steel Key Highway Shipyard from 1964 to 1982. He worked near laggers, the workers who installed or repaired asbestos pipe insulation. They cut into and fit lagging, which released asbestos fibers into the air. 



Another former worker sued Eagle-Picher. He worked with the company's insulating asbestos cement at BethShip facilities and developed mesothelioma later. 




If you worked at a BethShiph facility and now have an asbestos disease, contact a mesothelioma lawyer to learn how to seek compensation. You may be eligible to file a lawsuit or to make a claim with an asbestos trust fund. 



Resources and Help for Asbestos Victims



Keep in mind that you may qualify for significant compensation if you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### Barbours Cut Container Terminal (Barbours Cut Terminal)

Owned and operated by the Houston Port Authority, Barbours Cut Terminal has a long history of asbestos use. The heavy use of asbestos at the original Barbours Cut Container Terminal exposed many workers and put them at risk for mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did Barbours Cut Terminal Use Asbestos? 



Yes, like many shipyards and ports, the Barbours Cut Container Terminal used asbestos and put workers at risk of exposure. The terminal wasn't built until the 1970s, at the end of peak asbestos use in shipping. 



While Barbours Cut isn't that new, it is a part of the older and more extensive Port Houston. Ports, terminals, and shipyards used asbestos in several ways, but primarily because of its ability to insulate and protect against fire. 



Barbours Cut Terminal History



Barbours Cut Terminal opened in 1977, which provided a better alternative to the already-established Turning Basin terminal. It is owned by Port Houston. 



Turning Basin was more than six hours away from the Gulf of Mexico. Barbours Cut Terminal cut the time in half by being placed only three hours away from the Gulf.



Over time, the terminal expanded to over 250 acres. It also opened a cruise ship terminal, which was used until 2007. Today, Barbours Cut still operates and has undergone several modernizations. 



How Was Asbestos Used at Barbours Cut Terminal?



In 2008, a report released by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) indicated that Barbours Cut Terminal contained large amounts of asbestos. 



Shipyards and terminals use asbestos mostly as an insulating material. It went into buildings to insulate pipes, furnaces, and boilers. It filled the same role on ships. Vehicles, equipment, and machinery used in ports and terminals contained asbestos in friction components like brakes and clutches. 



Barbours Cut Terminal Removes Building Containing Asbestos



A 2003 inspection report carried out by the Houston Port Authority Commissioner showed that the terminal's administration building was littered with asbestos. It was subsequently demolished and removed. 



The removal, estimated to cost over $30,000, was handled by the Port Authority.



How Did Asbestos at Barbours Cut Harm Workers and Residents?



The use of asbestos at the terminal put workers at risk for asbestos-related diseases. Working with or near asbestos can lead to exposure through the inhalation of fibers. 



In some people, inhaled asbestos fibers caused enough damage to lead to later diagnosis of mesothelioma, lung cancer, asbestosis, or other illnesses. 



Many people in the La Porte and Houston areas developed leukemia, according to a 2007 University of Texas study. The terminal used various hazardous chemicals. Children within a two-mile radius of the terminal are twice as likely to develop leukemia.



Asbestos Lawsuits Related to Barbours Cut



Although there are currently no records of workers filing asbestos-related lawsuits against Barbours Cut Terminal, many who worked at other shipyards owned by the Houston Port Authority filed claims against asbestos manufacturers that supplied asbestos-containing materials to shipyards.



You could qualify for compensation if you worked at Barbours Cut and now have an asbestos illness. Contact a mesothelioma lawyer to find out how to file an asbestos lawsuit or claim compensation through an asbestos trust fund. 



Additional Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



Keep in mind that you may qualify for significant compensation if you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. 

### Alabama Dry Dock and Shipbuilding Company (ADDSCO)

The Alabama Dry Dock and Shipbuilding Company (ADDSCO) used asbestos in products, equipment, and machinery. Based in Mobile, Alabama, it was once one of the largest marine production facilities in the nation. Past workers at Alabama Dry Dock are at risk for mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did Alabama Dry Dock Use Asbestos? 



Alabama Dry Dock and Shipbuilding Company (ADDSCO) used asbestos in its operations for decades. This was typical in shipbuilding, where everything from boilers to pipes, electrical work, and insulation contained asbestos.



Like other shipyards, ADDSCO likely used asbestos in repairing and building ships from about the 1930s to the 1970s. Even after asbestos was no longer used in shipbuilding, it lingered in machinery, equipment, parts, and old ships. 



Alabama Dry Dock and Shipbuilding Company History



ADDSCO was founded in 1916 by the president of Alabama Iron Works, D. R. Dunlap, along with his cousin, George H. Dunlap. The duo merged several small dry dock companies that offered berths for shipping, ship repair facilities, and other maritime-related activities.




ADDSCO employed more than 4,000 people during World War I, ranging from welders, electricians, engineers, shipbuilders, and much more. When World War II began, the shipyard saw its greatest boom and focused almost exclusively on war efforts.





The shipyard became so huge that by 1943, over 30,000 people worked there in various jobs. The need for workers was so great that women were trained and hired to work as welders.





ADDSCO also employed Black men and women as President Roosevelt's Fair Employment Practices Committee urged many workplaces to hire these workers. In 1943, racial tensions led to riots at the shipyard. The National Guard was called in to restore peace. 





ADDSCO became well-known for building 20 Liberty ships, as well as over 100 oil tankers, including the Arickaree, the largest ship ever constructed along the U.S. Gulf Coast. ADDSCO also created over 2,000 combat vessels before the end of World War II.





After the war, many people were laid off as the shipyard slowed down its production of vessels. ADDSCO began focusing on repairing ships and various maritime projects. The yard closed in the 1970s because of labor unrest. It reopened later, and while it has changed hands many times, it never stopped operating. 





BAE Systems acquired the ADDSCO shipyard in 2010. BAE announced in 2018 that it would close the yard completely. Alabama Shipyard acquired it in 2019, and it has remained in operation. 




Alabama Dry Dock Today



ADDSCO hit rough times beginning in the 1970s. It closed for a period, reopened, and changed ownership several times. Today, it is a part of Alabama Shipyard, the largest shipyard in Mobile. 



Alabama Shipyard operates the yard for ship maintenance, repairs, and overhauls. It is a contractor for the Departments of Transportation and Defense. 



During its heyday in the 1940s, ADDSCO employed thousands of people but had fewer than 12 by 2018. Under new ownership, the yard is thriving. In 2022, it began a major overhaul of the USNS Comfort, a Navy hospital ship, and other USNS ships. The current staff includes nearly 300 workers. 



How Workers Were Harmed by Asbestos at ADDSCO



ADDSCO was not unusual in its use of asbestos. Asbestos was used heavily in shipbuilding for its insulating and fireproofing properties. Hundreds of asbestos components went into ships. 



Anyone who worked at Alabama Dry Dock during the years of asbestos use was at risk of exposure. Workers handled products with asbestos that released fibers into the air.



Inhaled asbestos fibers lodge inside the body, causing damage to tissue and cells. In some people, this leads to cancers like mesothelioma or lung cancer many years later. Some exposed workers develop non-malignant respiratory illnesses, like asbestosis. 



The workers at greatest risk for exposure handled asbestos directly or even had to cut into it to do their jobs: 




Insulation installers



Pipefitters



Boiler workers



Machine operators



Repair workers



Mechanics



Demolition or shipbreaking workers




AADSCO Workers File Asbestos Lawuits



Many of the workers and their families who were affected by asbestos use at AADSCO filed lawsuits. They sued the shipyard and companies that supplied it with asbestos.  



Several employees filed a class-action lawsuit against the AADSCO in 1984. Most workers sued the manufacturing companies that provided the asbestos-containing products to the shipyard. Unfortunately for the workers, that lawsuit was dismissed. Other suits against asbestos companies were successful. 



If you worked at AADSCO during the asbestos years, contact a mesothelioma or asbestos lawyer to find out how to seek compensation. 



Additional Help and Resources



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Navy Ships and Asbestos

The U.S. Navy used more than 300 asbestos products and parts on ships for several decades, from the 1930s to the early 1980s. Asbestos exposure was a real risk for anyone who served on or worked on these ships. Many Navy veterans and former shipyard workers are now at risk for mesothelioma. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













Why Did the U.S. Navy Use Asbestos on Ships?



Asbestos was used in numerous areas and places on ships. The toxic asbestos was so prevalent on ships that it was almost impossible for anyone who worked on or around vessels to avoid ingesting or inhaling the microscopic and colorless asbestos fibers. 



The U.S. Navy and civilian shipbuilding companies used asbestos for its insulating properties. It was useful for protecting the ship and crew from heat and fire. Asbestos was also cheap and abundant and is lightweight, making it a perfect material for ship insulation. 



Asbestos went into ships before its risks to human health were widely known. This lasted through the late 1970s to early 1980s. 



Where Was Asbestos Used on Navy Ships? 



Asbestos was in hundreds of components and materials on Navy ships. Some of the common areas and parts on ships that contained asbestos include:




Gaskets



Packing materials



Vessel paneling



Insulation



Cables



Valves



Boilers



Tubes



Adhesives



Capacitors



Deck materials



Firefighting and protection gear




Asbestos was found in nearly every area of the ship. Mess halls and crew living quarters had asbestos in wall and ceiling panels and flooring. High-temperature areas, like boiler, pump, and engine rooms, often contained the most asbestos. 



Navy Veterans Most at Risk for Mesothelioma



Anyone who served in the Navy while ships contained so much asbestos is now at risk for developing mesothelioma. Working with or around asbestos in the cramped, poorly ventilated spaces on ships put Navy veterans at particular risk of inhaling asbestos fibers. 



Some veterans had an increased risk of asbestos exposure and later illness based on the jobs they did while serving on ships. According to research, veterans in these roles have the highest rates of asbestos-related mortality: 




Machinist's mates



Boiler technicians



Water tenders



Fire control technicians




Also at risk were Navy and civilian workers in shipyards who built or repaired vessels with asbestos materials. 



How Were Veterans Exposed to Asbestos on Navy Ships? 



Asbestos exposure generally occurs in two ways: inhalation and ingestion. Asbestos materials easily shed tiny fibers that become part of the dust in the air and on surfaces. Anyone in the vicinity can unknowingly inhale or ingest them. 



Many civilian industries used asbestos and put workers at risk, but sailors and officers on ships had even higher risks of asbestos exposure for several reasons: 




Hundreds of components on ships contained asbestos.



Poor ventilation on ships meant asbestos fibers stayed in the air for a long time. 



Close quarters on ships made exposure more likely.



Sailors lived and worked on ships for months at a time without a break from being around asbestos. 




The Types of Navy Ships That Contain Asbestos



Asbestos was used on many different types of vessels of all sizes. Between 1930 and the 1970s, almost all military ships were built with tons of asbestos.



Auxiliary Ships



During World War I, auxiliary ships acted as recreational vessels. When World War II started, the military began building them to help with war efforts, such as stocking up other vessels with food, equipment, and supplies.



Aircraft Carriers



Aircraft carriers are war vessels sent out to recover aircraft at sea and launch aircraft from the sea. These vessels eliminated the need to use local military bases to launch planes.



Amphibious Ships



Amphibious ships are responsible for transporting troops, food, and other supplies while withstanding enemy attacks during the wars. These types of vessels also helped during crises in World War II and today, such as humanitarian efforts and disaster relief operations.



Battleships



Battleships are some of the most powerful vessels ever to exist. During the wars, these vessels kept soldiers safe and attacked enemies. It was the primary attack vessel during World War II.



Submarines



Although submarines date back to the 1800s, during World War II, these vessels played their most important role in finding and destroying enemy vessels.



Navy Cruisers 



Navy cruisers are warships that helped during the nation's wars by providing air defense, combat, and shore raiding. Navy cruisers became the most powerful ships during World War II after battleships became obsolete.



Destroyers



Destroyers are high-endurance warships and the heaviest combat vessels in the United States. Destroyers were originally made to check on unattended ocean operations, but they turned into large guided ships with superior firing power after World War II.



Patrol Boats 



A patrol boat is a small vessel that served various purposes during World War I and II. Yet, their small size didn't stop the military from using asbestos when constructing them. Numerous asbestos-containing products were used to build patrol boats, leading to veterans developing harmful diseases.



Frigates 



Frigates, larger than corvette vessels but smaller than cruisers, helped the military with submarine maritime enemies and protection during shipping (POS). Frigates were reclassified in 1975.



Minesweepers 



Minesweepers are small yet powerful vessels that help the military find and neutralize mines in the sea and help create safe water pathways for other military ships.



How Has Asbestos on Ships Affected Veterans? 



Many studies have shown that those who served in the military, particularly the United States Navy, are at a high risk of developing an asbestos-related disease. More than 30% of all diagnosed cases of mesothelioma in the nation are from people who served in the Navy.



The period during World War II produced some of the highest numbers of vessels in history. Workers had to build and repair ships at high speed while keeping costs as low as possible. 



Asbestos was chosen to be used in many vessel parts for its resistance to heat and fire and its affordability and ease of use.



In addition to building and repairing ships, shipyard workers were exposed to asbestos by building and repairing vessels. Asbestos fibers are thin, odorless, and easily become airborne. Once ingested, these fibers can lodge inside the body and are almost impossible to remove altogether.



Do Navy Ships Still Have Asbestos? 



The military no longer uses asbestos in its vessels and has since taken precautions and removed many asbestos-containing products. 



However, older vessels may still contain dangerous minerals, as safety issues become a significant concern when removing brittle, dried-out asbestos fibers.



Most current men and women serving in the Navy are not at high risk for asbestos exposure. The military knows where asbestos is and its risks. Service members should be trained and protected when working with or around asbestos materials. 



Benefits and Legal Options for Veterans Exposed to Asbestos on Ships



Navy veterans who now have mesothelioma or other asbestos illnesses have options for seeking compensation or taking legal action. 



VA Benefits



The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) considers mesothelioma and other asbestos diseases to be disabilities. Veterans can apply for and receive benefits for these illnesses: 




Monthly Disability Compensation. The VA rates mesothelioma and asbestos lung cancer as 100% disabling. Qualifying veterans can receive full monthly disability payments for these diagnoses. 



Special Monthly Compensation. Veterans with disabilities who require special care in their homes are eligible to receive additional monthly compensation. 



Medical Care and Treatment. VA medical facilities offer specialist medical care for veterans with asbestos illnesses. 



Compensation for Dependents. Veterans with mesothelioma and dependents can get extra monthly compensation. Dependents may also qualify for compensation after the death of a veteran. The VA also offers families funeral benefits. 




Lawsuits and Asbestos Claims



Veterans cannot file a lawsuit against the government or military. They can file a lawsuit against asbestos companies that supplied the Navy. 



Many companies distributed several tons of asbestos to shipyards regularly before the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) placed strict regulations on its use. 



Most of these asbestos suppliers knew and understood that asbestos was dangerous to humans, but instead of informing the public, they kept distributing it for profit.



Veterans can sue these companies, or if they went bankrupt, file a claim with an asbestos trust fund to seek compensation. 



What Should I Do if I Was Exposed to Asbestos on a Navy Ship? 



If you know or believe you may have been exposed to asbestos on a ship, talk to your doctor immediately. Getting a diagnosis early is essential for the best outcome from treatment. 



Even if you don't have symptoms or don't have troubling symptoms, talk to your doctor about cancer screenings. Tell them about your past history with asbestos. 



If you get diagnosed with an asbestos illness, talk to an asbestos lawyer to discuss your options. They can help you apply for VA benefits and make other claims to get compensation. 



Additional Resources and Help For Shipbuilders and Veterans



If you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, it’s important to understand your choices, legal rights, and medical options. You may be entitled to compensation for mesothelioma treatments, lost wages, physical pain, emotional suffering, and much more. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. 

### J.H. France Refractories Co., Inc.

J.H. France Refractories Co., now known as Snowshoe Refractories Inc., was a refractory materials manufacturer with a long history of asbestos use. Although Snowshoe no longer uses asbestos, J.H. France's long association left workers with life-threatening illnesses such as lung cancer and malignant mesothelioma.



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 









Did J.H. France Refractories Use Asbestos? 



Refractory products are materials designed to withstand very high temperatures, such as those in foundries or steel mills. J.H. France used asbestos in its refractory products for many years. Asbestos was once used heavily in many industries for its ability to insulate and protect against fire. 



J.H. France Refractories Co. History




J.H. France began in the early 1900s as a refractory brick manufacturing company. J.H. France used asbestos early on for its affordability, ease of use, and resistance to heat and fire.





The company began its operations in Long Island, New York, but quickly expanded and added on subsidiaries, including the Van Brunt Company.





The Van Brunt Co. sold asbestos in products, including cement. Franco-Therm cement, in particular, was known to contain high amounts of asbestos. 





J.H. France continued to use asbestos until the 1970s, when the risks became more widely known.





By then, however, numerous workers had already been exposed to the company's asbestos products for prolonged periods, leading to life-threatening illnesses, such as malignant mesothelioma, asbestosis, and asbestos-related lung cancer.





In addition to asbestos, J.H. Frances also used silica in its products, a colorless compound that, similar to asbestos, poses significant health danger when workers inhale it. 




J.H. France Refractories Products That Contained Asbestos



Essentially, all of J.H. France's products contained asbestos at one point in time. Refractory materials were once made with asbestos to help them withstand very high temperatures without breaking. Examples of J.H. France products with asbestos include: 




Cement



Firebricks



Molded refractory products



Textiles




J.H. France stopped using asbestos in its refractory materials in the early 1970s.



Who Was Affected By J.H. France Asbestos Products? 



J.H. France employees who manufactured asbestos products faced high risks of exposure. Handling asbestos materials often releases fibers, which anyone in the area can inhale. 



Also at risk were workers in all the industries that used J.H. France Refractories asbestos products. Examples of workers who might have handled J.H. France products and been at risk of asbestos exposure include: 




Smelter Operators



Maintenance Workers



Construction Workers



Boiler workers



Foundry workers



Steel mill workers



Masons




J.H. France Refractories Co. Lawsuits



Most asbestos-related lawsuits against J.H. France Refractories were from former foundry employees and contractors. The following cases are among a few of the numerous asbestos-related lawsuits that the company faced.



Roscoe H. Peters



Roscoe H. Peters, a former electrician with Weirton Steel, filed an asbestos-related lawsuit against J.H. France and numerous other asbestos manufacturers in 2012, after he was diagnosed with mesothelioma. 



According to court documents, Peters worked at Weirton Steel from 1950 until 1983, where he was exposed to J.H. France's asbestos-containing products.



Charles Klingensmith



In another 2012 lawsuit, a 59-year-old Pennsylvania man, Charles Klingensmith, filed an asbestos-related lawsuit against J.H. France and numerous other businesses after he developed mesothelioma. 



Court documents indicate that from 1971 until 1988, Klingensmith worked as a brick cutter, a metal fabricator, and a welder.



During this time, Klingensmith was exposed to asbestos-containing products regularly, including products manufactured by J.H. France Refractories Co.



Although J.H. France faced mounting asbestos-related lawsuits, the company never filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy nor set up an asbestos trust fund to help compensate the claimants.



Insurance Lawsuits



In addition to lawsuits brought by exposure victims, J.H. France faced legal issues related to its insurers. Allstate and United National Insurance Companies both tried to avoid defending J.H. France in these expensive lawsuits. 



They began lawsuits against J.H. France, claiming the company misrepresented the number and costs of claims before accepting the terms of insurance policies. They claimed no liability for these claims as a result. 



J.H. France Refractories Co. Today



In 2007, J.H. France Refractories Co. changed its name to Snow Shoe Refractories. The company supplies refractory bricks to consumers and businesses of all sizes and no longer uses asbestos in its products.



If you worked with J.H. France products in the past, you might be at risk for asbestos illnesses. Contact a mesothelioma lawyer to learn about your legal options. 



Additional Information and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Westinghouse Electric Company

Westinghouse used asbestos for many years to manufacture electrical and power generation equipment and home appliances. Asbestos use led to illnesses in some workers, including mesothelioma. Many workers who got sick from Westinghouse asbestos products sued the company for damages. 



If you suffer from mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related cancer, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 







Did Westinghouse Use Asbestos? 



Westinghouse made many products for the power generation industry. These products needed to withstand and insulate against high temperatures. Westinghouse used asbestos in many of its products until the 1980s. Asbestos was a common choice for insulation in the 1900s, and many companies used it. 



Westinghouse Electric History




The original Westinghouse Electric Company manufactured equipment for alternating-current electrical generating plants and was founded by George Westinghouse in 1886. 





The alternating electrical current faced a lot of opposition during that time. Still, Westinghouse Electric was successful and went on to branch out into many types of electrical production. 





Eventually, Westinghouse Electric became one of the largest product suppliers to the electrical power industry. The company manufactured and distributed electrical-related products, such as machinery and equipment used for controlling, transmitting, and distributing electricity.





The company also took on many important projects, such as building elevators for the Rockefeller Center in New York and creating turbines for ships and Navy vessels.





Westinghouse supplied the military during World War II. Its biggest contribution was providing the Navy with Westinghouse turbines. 





After the war, Westinghouse expanded into the nuclear power industry. It made reactors for power plants and for Navy submarines. 





During the 1990s, Westinghouse bought several radio stations and television stations, including CBS Inc. and Infinity Broadcasting Corporation. It then sold many of its industrial businesses to focus on radio and television broadcasting.





In 1997, the company changed its name to CBS Corporation. In 2000, Viacom bought the CBS Corporation.





The company began to struggle financially with these acquisitions and changes. It also faced thousands of costly lawsuits over asbestos exposure. 





British Nuclear Fuels Limited bought Westinghouse Electric, which then sold it to Toshiba in 2006. Westinghouse filed for bankruptcy in 2017 but was saved when Brookfield Business Partners purchased it. 





Today, Westinghouse supplies the nuclear power industry. Westinghouse does not use asbestos in any of its current products. 




Westinghouse Asbestos Products



Westinghouse was in the business of power generation for many years. The power industry relies on equipment that insulates well and protects against overheating and fire. Asbestos was long the material of choice for insulation industrial applications. 



Many of the products Westinghouse made contained asbestos insulation: 




Caulking paste



Electronic panels



Electrical wires



Gaskets



Micarta insulation



Packing materials



Power cables



Power lines



Turbines



Welding rods




Occupations Affected by Westinghouse Electric



Although Westinghouse manufactured products with asbestos, such as rods, light bulbs, and pipes, the company's turbines caused the most damage. Many workers who worked around turbines developed asbestos-related diseases, especially while working on ships during World War II.



Westinghouse Employees



Workers in Westinghouse manufacturing facilities faced high risks of asbestos exposure. They handled asbestos materials directly or worked around people who did. Handling asbestos is risky because fibers can come loose and enter the air, where workers can inhale them. 



Workers in Other Industries



Westinghouse's asbestos products were mostly used in power generation. Workers in power plants and other industries faced exposure risks when handling, removing, installing, or maintaining asbestos products. 



Workers in different occupations who were likely affected by Westinghouse asbestos products include: 




Construction Workers



Power plant workers



Shipbuilders



Shipyard workers



Technicians



Equipment mechanics



Machine operators



Electricians



Pipefitters



Insulators



Welders



Warehouse Workers




Westinghouse Asbestos Products and the U.S. Navy



Westinghouse supplied the U.S. Navy with turbines that contained asbestos. The turbines caused more asbestos exposure than many other of the company's products. They put Navy service members at significant risk. Navy veterans today have very high rates of mesothelioma. 



Westinghouse Asbestos Lawsuits



Westinghouse relied heavily on asbestos as an insulator until the 1980s. This led to thousands of lawsuits. 



However, Westinghouse's asbestos-related lawsuits were minor in the beginning compared to those of other asbestos companies, but they still led to losses. 



In 1988, the company faced just under 3,000 asbestos-related lawsuits, whereas most businesses associated with asbestos use faced a much higher number.




In 2014, a Pennsylvania state court jury found Westinghouse responsible for the death of Edward Merwitz, a former shipyard worker who died from mesothelioma complications. According to court documents, both Westinghouse Electric Co. LLC and General Electric Co. were found liable for exposing Merwitz to asbestos via their asbestos-containing products distributed to the shipyards where he worked. The companies paid $7.25 million to the estate of Merwitz.





Gerald Sylvestre worked as an equipment operator at a coal-fired electrical plant in New Hampshire. He worked there during the 1960s and 1970s when equipment still contained asbestos. Sylvestre sued CBS, the owner of Westinghouse at the time of his lawsuit, after he developed mesothelioma. He and his wife were awarded $7.75 million. 




Westinghouse and its parent companies never set up an asbestos trust fund to compensate claimants. Instead, they chose to settle or fight lawsuits in court. Westinghouse continues to face asbestos lawsuits today. 



How to Seek Compensation from Westinghouse for Asbestos Exposure



Westinghouse products may have contributed to your asbestos illness. Contact a mesothelioma lawyer to investigate and find out how to seek compensation. You may be eligible to sue Westinghouse and other companies for damages. 



An experienced lawyer can review your entire work history and find all the asbestos companies that could be held liable for your diagnosis. You might have several options for seeking compensation. 



Additional Resources and Information



If you've been injured by mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related cancer, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you'll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### Western MacArthur Company

The Western MacArthur Company is a commercial and residential insulation products manufacturer based in St. Paul, Minnesota. MacArthur used asbestos in its insulation for many years. This led to mesothelioma and other asbestos diseases in workers and resulted in lawsuits and an asbestos trust fund. 



If you suffer from mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 













Did Western MacArthur Use Asbestos? 



Asbestos was once a common ingredient in all kinds of insulation products. Before knowledge of the risks was widespread, most insulation manufacturers used asbestos. Western MacArthur used asbestos in many of its products until the late 1970s. 



Western MacArthur Company History




The company that would become Western MacArthur was established in 1913 as a small pipe insulation manufacturing company called MacArthur Company. 





In 1967, MacArthur merged with Western Asbestos and became the Western MacArthur Company.





After the merger, the company expanded substantially and began producing a full line of insulation products, most of which it manufactured with asbestos. This continued into the 1970s when many companies had to stop using asbestos due to health risks and lawsuits. 





In addition to making its own products with asbestos, Western MacArthur distributed Johns Manville construction products. Johns Manville was one of the largest manufacturers of asbestos construction materials. 





Western MacArthur faced lawsuits over asbestos exposure and resulting illnesses in workers. The costly lawsuits led to bankruptcy in 2002. 





Western MacArthur emerged from bankruptcy reorganization in 2004 as the MacArthur Company and with a $2 billion asbestos trust fund. 





MacArthur today is an employee-owned company that makes pipe insulation and other construction products without asbestos. MacArthur does not use asbestos in its products today. 




Which Western MacArthur Products Were Made With Asbestos? 



Asbestos was once a common material used in construction products. It was especially prevalent in insulation. Asbestos is an effective insulator that also adds strength to materials. 



Western MacArthur used asbestos in the majority of its products up until the 1970s, including:




Pipe covering



Pipe insulation



Duct board



Duct wrap



Duct tape



Calking



Coatings



Fire blankets



Commercial and residential roofing materials




Western MacArthur asbestos products went into commercial and residential buildings. Johns Manville asbestos products distributed by Western MacArthur were used in industrial buildings, shipyards, and public buildings like schools. 



Workers at Risk of Asbestos Exposure From Western MacArthur



Western MacArthur employees in the company's manufacturing facilities were first in line to be exposed. These workers handled and worked near asbestos materials, which shed fibers and caused exposure. 



Construction workers were primarily affected by the distribution of Western MacArthur and Johns Manville asbestos products. Workers who could have been exposed to asbestos in products sold by Western MacArthur include: 




Construction workers



Insulators



Roofers



Plumbers



Pipefitters



Laborers



HVAC workers



Boiler workers



Demolition workers



Shipbuilders



Shipyard workers



Industrial and factory workers




Western MacArthur sold many of its products to the shipbuilding industry, where insulation on ships was vital. This included U.S. Navy ships and shipyards. 



Navy ships contained so many asbestos materials that veterans now have very high rates of mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses. 



Exposure to asbestos in insulation was also a risk in homes. Homeowners with Western MacArthur or Johns Manville asbestos materials in their houses could be exposed when those materials deteriorate. They could also be exposed during repair, maintenance, or renovation work. 



Western MacArthur Asbestos Lawsuits



Decades of asbestos use inevitably led to exposure and illness in workers. Many workers with mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses took action and sued Western MacArthur for damages. 



These are just a couple of examples of the asbestos lawsuits Western MacArthur faced: 




Jack and Rose Kaminski sued Western MacArthur and other companies in 1985. Jack worked at San Francisco's Bethlehem Shipyard during World War II and then enlisted in the U.S. Air Force. He worked as a ship fitter's mate and used insulated asbestos fabrics. He remembered and testified that the fabrics would often tore and relseased asbestos fibers. Jack was diagnosed with mesothelioma and ultimately won a $500,000 jury award. 





Janice Huges filed an asbestos lawsuit over the wrongful death of her husband from asbestosis and mesothelioma in 1978. He worked for Western Asbestos and was exposed to the asbestos the company used. Janice lost her initial case but won on appeal ten years later, in 1987.




Bankruptcy and Asbestos Trust Fund



By early 2000, the amount of asbestos-related claims against Western MacArthur was so substantial that the company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. 



In 2004, the company emerged from bankruptcy and created the Western Asbestos Settlement Trust.



According to the official Western Asbestos Settlement Trust website, the trust fund is set up to compensate plaintiffs who file claims against the MacArthur Company, Western Asbestos Company, and Western MacArthur Company.



The fund allows claims from those diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, asbestosis, or lung cancer caused by asbestos exposure due to products made by MacArthur, Western Asbestos, or Western MacArthur. 



As of February 21, 2023, the payment percentage for the Western MacArthur asbestos trust is 51.1%. This is a higher payment percentage than most asbestos trusts offer. 



Western MacArthur Today



Western MacArthur continues to provide both commercial and residential insulation products and accessories, including HVAC, fireproof, waterproof, and FRP materials. 



Although the company no longer uses asbestos in any of its products, it receives asbestos-related claims to its trust fund.



How to Seek Asbestos Compensation from Western MacArthur



Talk to a mesothelioma lawyer if Western MacArthur products contributed to your asbestos illness. They can help you seek compensation through the trust fund and any other available options. 



Even if you are unsure where you came into contact with asbestos, it's worth talking to an experienced asbestos attorney. They can review your work history and find all companies that could be held liable. 



Additional Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



Use our free Asbestos Attorney Locator Tool to find an experienced mesothelioma attorney in your area. Don't forget to fill out our form for our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area.

### W.R. Grace & Co.

W.R. Grace made asbestos products and mined and distributed vermiculite contaminated with asbestos. It was responsible for polluting the small town of Libby, Montana, with asbestos and has been held accountable through lawsuits and fines. W.R. Grace currently compensates claimants through two asbestos trust funds. 



If you suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did W.R. Grace Use Asbestos? 



W.R. Grace used asbestos in its products and indirectly in products made by subsidiary companies. W.R. Grace also operated a vermiculite mine in Montana that was contaminated with asbestos. Most of its products made with asbestos were insulation and other construction materials. 



W.R. Grace History




W.R. Grace & Co. was founded in 1854 by William Russell Grace in Peru. Grace's brother joined the company a few years later, and together, they moved to New York City and changed the business name to Grace Brothers & Co.





In the beginning, the company focused on machinery and fertilizer products until its official incorporation in 1895. W.R. Grace evolved from a business focused on agricultural products to a chemical and transportation company. 





As the company expanded, W.R. Grace entered numerous industries, including banking and passenger ships. By the 1970s, W.R. Grace's chemical sales made up more than half of the company's yearly revenues. It acquired Davison Chemical Company, Dewey & Almy Chemical Company, and others. 





In 1963, W.R. Grace acquired Zonolite and took over the operations of vermiculite mines in Libby, Montana. The vermiculite mines were contaminated with asbestos. Not only were workers placed at risk, but Libby residents were exposed and developed asbestos diseases at higher-than-average rates. 





Also affected by the mine's asbestos-contaminated vermiculite were workers in processing plants. The company distributed vermiculite throughout the country to plants where workers made Zonolite insulation. 





Court documents indicate that W.R. Grace knew about the hazards of asbestos exposure from the mines. Yet, the company chose not to warn anyone and continued to mine. 





W.R. Grace eventually faced hundreds of thousands of lawsuits over the mines in Libby and its asbestos products. It filed for bankruptcy in 2001, reorganized, and opened asbestos trusts to resolve claims. 





In 2023, W.R. Grace settled with the Montana Department of Environmental Quality over the cleanup of the site in Libby, Montana. 




W.R. Grace Asbestos Products



W.R. Grace began using asbestos as early as the 1930s. At the time, and until the 1970s, asbestos was used in many industries to insulate and strengthen materials. Most of W.R. Grace's asbestos products were used in the construction industry. Some of these products include: 




Ez Tex



Monokote Cement



Monokote Fireproofing



Perltex Spray Surfacer



Perltex Super-40 Perlite



Zono-Coustic



Zonolite Acoustical Plastic/Plaster



Zonolite Cement



Zonolite Fireproofing



Zonolite Plaster



Zonolite Spra-Tex



Z-Tex



Econo-White



Insulating Cement




Who Was Affected by W.R. Grace Asbestos? 



W.R. Grace's asbestos use affected people all over the U.S. From its own employees to workers in the construction industry and residents living near Zonolite facilities, hundreds of thousands of people came into contact with asbestos because of W.R. Grace. 



W.R. Grace Employees



First in line to be exposed to asbestos from W.R. Grace were the company's employees. Workers in manufacturing plants risked exposure when handling and using asbestos to make construction products. 



Also at risk were miners and other workers at the vermiculite mines in Libby. Anyone working directly with or near people working with asbestos has a high risk of exposure. By handling asbestos and asbestos materials, they release fibers into the air, where they can be inhaled. 



Vermiculite Plant Workers



Zonolite workers who processed vermiculite to make insulation faced the same risks. W.R. Grace shipped asbestos-contaminated vermiculite to processing plants all over the country. These workers handled the contaminated mineral for years without being told of the risks and dangers. 



Workers in Other Industries



W.R. Grace and Zonolite asbestos products were distributed to other companies for use in other industries, especially construction. Some of the many workers at risk of asbestos exposure from working with or near W.R. Grace asbestos products include: 




All construction workers



Insulators



Carpenters



Plumbers



Electricians



Roofers



Painters



HVAC workers



Laborers



Demolition workers



Maintenance, repair, and renovation workers




Residents in Libby and Near Vermiculite Plants



The residents in and around Libby, Montana, were exposed to asbestos while the mine operated. According to studies, more than 400 residents in the area died as a result of asbestos exposure. This is a very high rate for a small population of just a few thousand. 



Residents of the areas around the many Zonolite vermiculite plants also faced exposure risks. 



W.R. Grace Asbestos Lawsuits



W.R. Grace has faced hundreds of thousands of lawsuits over asbestos exposure from its products, vermiculite plants, and the Libby mines. Lawsuits have come from individuals, groups, and government agencies. 



In 2005, the U.S. Department of Justice started a criminal proceeding against the company. Per court documentation, at least seven W.R. Grace executives understood the risks of asbestos and knowingly continued putting people in harm's way.



These executives knew about the dangers as early as the 1970s. W.R. Grace didn't shut down the contaminated mine until 1990. 



Although the company was eventually acquitted of the criminal charges in 2009, W.R. Grace wasn't let off the hook for the many lives ruined due to asbestos exposure. The government ordered the company to pay fines and cleanup fees. This included $250 million paid to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for cleanup efforts at the Superfund site. 



Montana's government also sued W.R. Grace for Libby contamination. They settled after years of negotiations. W.R. Grace agreed to pay the state $18.5 million. 



Although the company's asbestos trust now resolves claims, W.R. Grace also faced lawsuits from individuals. A jury in New York awarded Marvin Penn $16.25 million in 2008 for his mesothelioma diagnosis. Penn was exposed to asbestos in products made by W.R. Grace and other companies. The jury found W.R. Grace to be 40% liable. 



Facing some of the most significant asbestos-related lawsuits in the United States, W.R. Grace filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in 2001. 



Bankruptcy and the W.R. Grace Asbestos Trust



W.R. Grace filed for voluntary bankruptcy on April 2, 2001. The company planned to resolve asbestos claims and reorganize under Chapter 11 protection. 



At the time of the bankruptcy filing, W.R. Grace faced over 129,000 asbestos lawsuits. About 120 of these were related to the Libby mines. 



W.R. Grace settled with the Official Committee of Asbestos Personal Injury Claimants and others in 2008. A plan to create two trusts and emerge from bankruptcy was approved and confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court in 2011. 



All appeals of the bankruptcy plan were resolved by 2013, and the Joint Plan of Reorganization became effective on February 3, 2014. 



W.R. Grace opened two trusts to compensate asbestos claimants: 




The Zonolite Attic Insulation Trust was established to reimburse homeowners with Zonolite attic insulation. The funds are to help people remove and replace this asbestos insulation. 



The WRG Asbestos Personal Injury Trust was established to address all asbestos claims related to personal injuries, including claims related to the Libby mines. 




The WRG Asbestos PI Trust recognizes a total of eight diseases, including the most serious: 




Asbestosis



Mesothelioma



Lung cancer




Part of W.R. Grace's accepted agreement was to allocate $1.8 billion to compensate asbestos victims. Before filing for bankruptcy, the company tried to hide billions of dollars in subsidiaries. The Department of Justice called the action fraudulent and required the company to move $1 billion back. 



The WRG PI Asbestos Trust currently has a payment percentage of 31.7%. This is higher than most asbestos trusts. 



The W.R. Grace Libby Superfund Site



The EPA listed the Libby, Montana, site as a Superfund and has since been participating in cleanup efforts. The EPA and other agencies have been working on the site since 2000, but it is not clear of asbestos. 



The efforts have made a difference. Testing indicates that levels of asbestos fibers in the air are 100,000 times lower than when the mine last operated. 



In addition to cleaning up the area, the EPA has helped bring in healthcare for residents. The EPA declared a Public Health Emergency, which made Libby residents eligible for federal health aid. 



W.R. Grace contributed nearly $300 million to the cleanup of Libby. It has also provided $54 million for other Superfund sites across the country. 



W.R. Grace Today



In 2014, shortly after it emerged from bankruptcy, W.R. Grace built a 90,000-square-foot headquarters in Columbia, Maryland, which sits on 160 acres. 



The company is still in the international chemicals, technology, and materials field, but it no longer uses asbestos in any of its products. Now known as just Grace, it also operates a technical services center, as well as a manufacturing plant in Baltimore.



What to Do if You Were Exposed to W.R. Grace Asbestos



Contact an asbestos law firm if you think you can trace your asbestos illness to W.R. Grace mines, vermiculite, or other products, like Zonolite insulation. 



A mesothelioma lawyer can help you determine if you are eligible for a claim and help you file. They can also review your work history and find any other asbestos companies that are liable for your illness. 



Additional Resources and Information



If you've been injured by mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related cancer, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you'll qualify for considerable compensation for pain, suffering, medical costs, and much more. Remember to fill out our form for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### Union Carbide

Union Carbide was a chemical manufacturing, mining, and asbestos company. It never made asbestos products but distributed the mineral to many industries, exposing countless workers. Union Carbide later faced thousands of asbestos lawsuits. 



If you have asbestosis, mesothelioma, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 













Did Union Carbide Use Asbestos? 



Union Carbide didn't use asbestos in the same way many companies did. Rather than manufacturing products with asbestos, Union Carbide supplied companies with asbestos from 1962 to 1985. It mined asbestos in King City, California, and distributed it. 



Union Carbide History




The Union Carbide & Carbon Corporation was founded in 1917 by merging several companies, including Prest-O-Lite, Linde Air Products, and Electro Metallurgical. 





Union Carbide was founded to manufacture chemicals. In 1920, it opened the first ethylene plant in the U.S. in West Virginia. The plant used a patented process to make the chemical. 





Within a few years, the company began manufacturing additional chemical products. It acquired other chemical companies and the Bakelite Corporation, adding plastics to its product line. 





Throughout the next 40 years, Union Carbide continued to expand substantially. During World War II, the company began manufacturing raw materials and developing plastics. It also began mining uranium ore and then opened several uranium ore plants.





Union Carbide began mining and processing asbestos in King City, California, in 1962. The asbestos was chrysotile and was marketed under the name Calidria. Union Carbide sold the King City asbestos mine in 1985. 





The distribution of Calidria to other companies eventually caused problems for Union Carbide. When workers started developing asbestos illnesses due to Union Carbide's products, asbestos-related lawsuits soon followed.





Dow Chemical acquired Union Carbide for $11 billion in 2001. It remains a subsidiary of Dow and has never filed for bankruptcy or set up an asbestos trust fund. 




Products Made With Union Carbide Asbestos



Union Carbide did not make asbestos products. It mined, milled, and distributed asbestos to other companies that used it in many different products, including: 




Adhesive



Cement



Coatings



Insulation



Joint compound



Packing



Paint



Wallboard



Wall coatings




Some of the companies that bought asbestos from Union Carbide include Kelly-Moore Paints, Georgia Pacific, and U.S. Gypsum. 



What Workers Were Exposed to Union Carbide Asbestos? 



Union Carbide workers in the King City mine and who processed or milled the mined asbestos had very high risks of asbestos exposure. Also at risk were all the employees of companies that bought asbestos from Union Carbide. 



Any workers who handled asbestos and asbestos materials before the adequate protective gear was readily available risked exposure. They were likely to have released fibers from the asbestos that they inhaled. Anyone working in the area, even those not directly working with asbestos, was likely to have been exposed. 



Some of the industries and types of companies Union Carbide distributed asbestos to include: 




Manufacturers of construction products



Insulation factories



Textile mills



Paper mills



Oil and gas companies




Construction workers had a particularly high risk of exposure to asbestos. They installed, removed, and repaired many asbestos materials that went into residential, commercial, and industrial buildings. 



Union Carbide Asbestos Lawsuits



Union Carbide has been facing mesothelioma and asbestos lawsuits for decades. It has taken on these lawsuits without filing for bankruptcy or setting up an asbestos trust fund. These are just some examples of the many asbestos lawsuits filed against Union Carbide: 




In the most recent case to be resolved, a jury in Los Angeles found in favor of the plaintiff, awarding his family $107 million. Joel Hernandezcueva worked as a janitor and died from mesothelioma in 2014. He was only 45. He was exposed to asbestos in a wall compound that was disturbed during renovations of a building where he worked. The jury found that Union Carbide was liable for his death. 





In 2010, William Aubin received a $6.66 million jury award in a trial against Union Carbide. After working as a contractor for many years and being exposed to asbestos in construction products, Aubin developed mesothelioma. He sued several companies, and Union Carbide was found liable for just less than half of the damages. 





Willis Edenfield died from mesothelioma after working with and around Union Carbide asbestos in factories. His widow sued for wrongful death and recovered $2.38 million from Union Carbide. 




What Did Union Carbide Know About the Dangers of Asbestos? 



In a 2014 trial, a California jury awarded plaintiff Bobbie Izell $18 million. During the trial, lawyers found that Union Carbide knew a lot about the dangers of asbestos but failed to protect workers. 



According to court documents, the jury found that Union Carbide caused "reprehensible indifference to the health and safety of others" after reviewing a series of documents that indicate that "the company was well-aware of the dangers of asbestos, yet continued to place workers at risk for years."




"[A]s Union Carbide acknowledged, had it warned of the known risk of cancer, the result may have been 'fatal' for its asbestos business, but it also likely would have prevented Mr. Izell from being exposed to its dangerous product."




Hawks Nest Tunnel



Not only did Union Carbide expose thousands of people to asbestos, but between 1927 and 1932, workers were also exposed to silica while mining West Virginia's Hawks Nest Tunnel (under the direction of Union Carbide). 



The company failed to provide workers with protective gear as they worked in the mines. A total of 406 workers died, primarily due to developing silicosis, a fatal lung disease caused by ingesting silica dust.



The devastating tragedy prompted legislation to take notice of the dangers of silica and enforce new laws to help protect workers in the future.



Bhopal, India, and the Union Carbide Disaster



In 1984, Union Carbide was in the hot seat once again after its plant in Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India, released gas and injured more than 500,000 people. 



Over 3,7000 of those people died, and at least 40,000 were disabled for life. For its negligence, Union Carbide was ordered by the Indian Supreme Court to pay $470 million in 1989.



Union Carbide Today



In 2001, the Dow Chemical Company bought Union Carbide for an estimated $11.6 billion. 



Before the purchase, Union Carbide sold off a few of its businesses, leaving Dow Chemical with its electronic chemicals, gasses, polyurethane, and carbon products.



If You Were Exposed to Union Carbide Asbestos



If you developed an asbestos disease through your workplace years ago, there is a chance Union Carbide asbestos contributed. Contact a mesothelioma lawyer to determine your legal rights and to seek compensation. 



An experienced lawyer can review your work history and find all the companies liable for your asbestos exposure. You could be eligible for a lawsuit or to make a claim with asbestos trust funds. 



Resources and Help for Asbestos Victims



Don't forget to fill out our form for our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you need additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Unarco (Union Asbestos and Rubber Company)

Unarco (Union Asbestos and Rubber Company) used asbestos to produce construction materials, especially insulation. Unarco filed for bankruptcy in 1982. It established a trust fund after facing thousands of lawsuits from workers exposed to asbestos. 



If you suffer from mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.





Did Unarco Use Asbestos? 



Unarco today manufactures shopping carts. In the past, Unarco made insulation products using asbestos. It continued using asbestos until 1962 when it switched from making insulation to making shopping carts. 



Most manufacturers of insulation used asbestos in the middle of the 20th century. Asbestos is an inexpensive and effective insulator. 



Unarco History




Unarco was founded in Paterson, New Jersey, in 1941 and manufactured asbestos-containing insulation products.





The end of World War II led to a housing and construction boom in the U.S. Unarco took advantage of the boom and expanded. 





Unarco once dominated the insulation industry in the U.S. It made and sold various insulation and construction products for residential construction, industrial settings, boilers, and furnaces. 





In 1962, Unarco sold its Unibestos line of asbestos insulation to Pittsburgh Corning and shifted its focus to manufacturing and distributing commercial shopping carts. It changed its name to Unarco Commercial Products and relocated to Oklahoma.





Unarco began facing lawsuits from workers who got sick after exposure to asbestos in its insulation. Unarco became the first company to file for bankruptcy because of asbestos liabilities. It filed in 1982 and established an asbestos trust fund. 




Asbestos Products Made By Unarco



Unarco made products for the construction industry, both commercial and industrial. Most of its products were insulating and contained asbestos. These are some examples:




Amocel pipe insulation



Asbestos fibers



Asbestos rope



Cloth



Gaskets



Insubestos felt



Insutape slip-on



Insutape wrap-on



No. 50 and 75 finishing cement



Packing



Tubing



Unibestos block insulation



Unibestos pipe covering



Woven lagging tape




Occupations Affected by Unarco Asbestos Products



Unarco's employees were the first in line to be exposed to asbestos. The workers in manufacturing facilities either handled asbestos directly or worked near it, risking exposure. When handled, asbestos often releases fibers that anyone in the area can easily inhale. 



Unarco distributed asbestos insulation to many different industries, affecting people in several occupations: 




Construction Workers



Insulators



Factory and industrial workers



Boiler workers



Welders



Pipefitters



Shipyard workers



Railroad workers



Power plant workers



Oil refinery workers



Steel mill workers



Chemical plant workers




Asbestos Exposure at Unarco's Paterson, New Jersey Factor



More than one study found evidence of asbestos illnesses linked with asbestos in the Unarco plant in Paterson, New Jersey. The first was a survey of Unarco employees who worked at the factory in the 1940s. The researchers found that these Unarco factory workers had a much higher rate of asbestos diseases than the general population. 



A study in the 1970s followed up with the families affected by asbestos at Unarco in the 1940s and 1950s. The study found that some of the wives and children of the workers were also beginning to show signs of asbestos illnesses. 



About 40% of people who experienced secondhand exposure had lung abnormalities. The researchers recorded mesothelioma in three children of Unarco workers and lung cancer in one. 



Unarco Asbestos Lawsuits 



Unarco began facing asbestos lawsuits in the 1950s. In 1951, several employees filed claims with Unarco, stating that working with asbestos made them sick. 



More recently, a family sued Unarco in 2009. Juanita Rodarmel died from mesothelioma after experiencing secondhand asbestos exposure. Her husband worked for Unarco. She was exposed to asbestos on his clothing for years. The Rodarmel family received a $2 million settlement after their lawyers showed the company attempted to hide the dangers of working with asbestos. 



While Unarco faced many lawsuits, some were filed against Pittsburgh Corning, which acquired Unibestos insulation in 1962 and continued making it. 



Bankruptcy and Asbestos Trust Fund



The claims continued for several more decades until 1982 when Unarco filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. It was the first asbestos company to file for bankruptcy. Several other companies followed its lead. 



Johns Manville, one of the largest manufacturers of asbestos products, filed for bankruptcy just a few months after Unarco. 



As part of its bankruptcy plan, Unarco eventually established an asbestos trust fund. Known as the UNR Trust, it was set up in February 1990 to compensate all pending and future asbestos-related claims.



The trust was funded with $114 million and accepted claims from workers exposed to Unarco asbestos before 1982. The trust closed in 2019 when it ran out of funds. 



Unarco's History of Suppressing Information



As with many other asbestos manufacturers, Unarco hid known information that using asbestos would potentially cause life-threatening diseases.



During a 2007 trial in which a former employee filed a mesothelioma lawsuit against the company, the court determined that Unarco was liable for the worker's toxic illness. It also found the company hid information that asbestos was dangerous to consumers and employees. 



Unarco was ultimately ordered to pay the plaintiff $2.6 million.



Unarco Today



In 2003, Unarco developed a cart restoration program and, by 2006, started a cart restoration facility. It now focuses solely on manufacturing both metal and plastic shopping carts. 



The company does not use asbestos in any of its products today.



What to Do if You Were Exposed to Unarco Asbestos Products



If you worked with or around Unarco products, talk to an asbestos law firm about your legal options. An experienced mesothelioma lawyer can help you find alternative sources of compensation now that the Unarco trust is closed. 



Most people with asbestos illnesses were exposed to asbestos through multiple companies. By reviewing your work history, a lawyer should be able to find potential defendants and asbestos trust funds for which you qualify. 



Resources and Help for Asbestos Victims



Remember, if you or a loved one have been injured by asbestos, there is a great chance that you'll qualify for considerable compensation for pain, suffering, medical expenses, and more. Remember to fill out our form for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. 

### Albina Shipyard

The Albina Shipyard, also called the Albina Engine and Machine Works Shipyard, was one of the first major shipyards established in Portland, Oregon. Albina used asbestos in its ships for many years. This put workers at risk of asbestos exposure and later illnesses, including mesothelioma, asbestosis, and lung cancer. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 













Did Albina Shipyard Use Asbestos? 



Like other shipyards in the middle of the 20th century, Albina Shipyard used a lot of asbestos in many applications. Albina was a major employer in Portland, but it also harmed workers in the area. 



All shipbuilding and repair involved asbestos. Albina and other shipyards used asbestos most heavily from the 1930s through the 1970s.



Albina Shipyard History



William Cornfoot founded the Albina Engine & Machine Works in the Albina neighborhood of Portland, Oregon, in 1904. 




Also known as Albina Shipyard, it repaired and built ships along the Willamette River. 





Workers at Albina aided the war effort, building ships in the 1940s. They constructed tugboats, subchasers, landing craft, fireboats, tankers, freighters, and barges for Naval and civilian applications. 





After the war, Albina Shipyard began focusing on commercial vessels, including ferries, barges, yachts, and tugboats for use across the world.





Success continued for the shipyard throughout the 1960s, including building its own ferry that carried vehicles across the Columbia River. However, when the Astoria Bridge was built in 1966, the ferry, known as the Convoy, was retired.





In 1971, Albina became Dillingham Ship Repair. In 1986, Dillingham became Cascade General with primary operations at Swan Island Shipyard. The original Albina Shipyard closed in 1987. 




How Was Asbestos Used at Albina?



Most vessels made in shipyards all over the U.S. contained asbestos well into the 1970s. This set the stage for numerous lawsuits against asbestos manufacturers later on. 



Asbestos was used in various areas on ships, including throughout engine rooms, sleeping quarters, pipe insulation, boiler rooms, and more. More than 300 asbestos-containing products went into many ships during the period of peak asbestos use. 



Some of the asbestos-containing products and equipment Albina workers would have been in contact with include: 




Insulation



Gaskets



Valves



Packing



Adhesives



Boilers



Concrete



Welding gear



Fire and heat protective gear




Albina Shipyard Health Issues Related to Asbestos



Albina closed in 1987, and the business moved to the Cascade General Portland Shipyard. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) found extensive asbestos contamination on the 216-acre yard former site. 



Not only was the site contaminated with asbestos but also with oil, petroleum compounds, diesel fuel, and poison.



The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated the old shipyard area as an "orphan" site and never issued a funded cleanup.



Nevertheless, many lives were ruined, and numerous families were left without loved ones after the toxic effects of asbestos led to workers developing fatal illnesses.



Asbestos Illnesses in Albina Workers



Regular contact with asbestos on the job caused serious illnesses in many people who worked at Albina: 




Mesothelioma



Lung Cancer



Asbestosis



Other types of cancer




Compensation for Former Albina Workers



Former shipyard workers who now have an asbestos illness have legal options to seek compensation. Workplace asbestos exposure is considered negligence, so one option is to file a personal injury lawsuit. 



If you worked at Albina, your lawsuit would likely be against asbestos companies that supplied the shipyard with asbestos. If those companies went bankrupt, you could be eligible to file a claim with an asbestos trust fund for compensation. 



If you have questions about your legal options or don't know what step to take next, contact a mesothelioma lawyer. 



Additional Information and Resources for Asbestos Victims and Their Families



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Shipyards and Asbestos

Workers in shipyards used a lot of asbestos to build and repair ships. Both civilian and Navy workers risked asbestos exposure and later illnesses. Former shipyard workers with mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses can now seek compensation. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you might be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. 



Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













How Did Shipyards Use Asbestos? 



The U.S. shipbuilding industry is older than the country, but it took off during World War II. The boom in shipbuilding began with Navy vessels but also included civilian vessels. 



This increase in shipbuilding in the U.S. coincided with a time of peak asbestos use. Until the late 1970s, when asbestos regulations took effect, millions of people who worked in shipyards were at risk of asbestos exposure. 



Shipbuilding used asbestos for several reasons: 




Asbestos was abundant and inexpensive. 



Asbestos is an effective insulator and protects ships and crews from excessive heat. 



Asbestos can also protect against fire, a major risk on board vessels. 



Asbestos is lightweight and strong, making it easy to use on ships. 




When Did Shipyards Use Asbestos? 



Asbestos has been in use for thousands of years. In the modern era, asbestos use grew due to its properties, abundance in mines, and low cost. 



Asbestos was most heavily used in shipyards from about the 1930s through the 1970s. As the health risks of being around asbestos became more widely known, industries slowed and largely stopped asbestos use. 



U.S. government regulations took effect in the 1970s, limiting uses of asbestos but not completely banning it. 



Where Was Asbestos Used in Shipyards? 



Asbestos was used in hundreds of parts and materials that went into ships. It was also in the vehicles, equipment, and buildings in shipyards. Some of the asbestos components that went into ships include: 




Pipe insulation



Other types of insulation



Boiler and boiler cladding



Pumps



Gaskets



Valves



Wall panels



Cement



Ceiling and flooring tiles



Textiles



Ropes




Equipment and machinery used to build ships contained asbestos in friction parts to insulate against heat and protect against fire. Brakes and clutches in vehicles, for instance, contained asbestos. Shipyard buildings had asbestos in insulation and around heat-generating equipment like boilers and furnaces. 



Who Was at Risk of Asbestos Exposure and Illness From Shipyards? 



Anyone who worked in a shipyard was at risk of being exposed to asbestos. They were also at risk of developing mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses years later. 



The workers at the highest risk of asbestos exposure in shipyards worked near or directly with asbestos materials. They handled asbestos parts or engaged in activities that could disturb asbestos materials and release harmful fibers. 



Examples of shipyard workers with the greatest risk of asbestos exposure include: 




Insulation workers



Pipefitters



Machine operators



Boiler workers



Repair and maintenance workers



Crane operators



Demolition and shipbreaking workers



Longshoremen



Carpenters



Welders



Electricians



Plumbers








Asbestos and Navy Shipyards



Navy shipyards also used asbestos. Both civilian workers and Navy veterans were put at risk of asbestos exposure and now have higher rates of mesothelioma. 



Navy veterans have even higher rates of asbestos illnesses because they spent so much time on board ships with asbestos materials. They spent weeks or months at a time in cramped, poorly ventilated areas of Navy ships. Asbestos exposure was highly likely in these conditions.



Do Shipyards Still Have Asbestos? 



Shipbuilding stopped actively using asbestos in the late 1970s or early 1980s, but asbestos didn't just go away. It lingered in buildings, equipment, and ships. It was not feasible to abate all the asbestos previously used in the industry. 



Current shipyard workers are much safer from asbestos than those in the past. There is still some risk of asbestos exposure in shipyards today. Asbestos is not completely banned, and it remains in older ships. 



When workers have to handle these materials, for instance, by cutting into old pipe insulation, they can release and inhale asbestos fibers. 



The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has standards that protect modern workers from asbestos. Shipyard workers today should be told of the risks of asbestos and be provided with safety training and gear. 



Which States Were Most Affected by Asbestos in Shipyards? 



All states with a coastline and a shipbuilding industry were affected by asbestos. Some states had and still have large shipyards, contributing significantly to the economy. These states were most affected by the asbestos used in shipbuilding and repair. 



California



Thanks to its long Pacific coastline, California has long been home to shipyards. California is a leading state for asbestos exposure in shipyard workers. 



In addition to the high number of shipyards, California has natural asbestos deposits and mining. These two industries made California one of the top states for asbestos illnesses and asbestos-related deaths.  



New York



New York has less coastline than other states but has long been highly industrialized. New York has a long history of asbestos exposure and related deaths. The Brooklyn Navy Yard was an important site of asbestos exposure. 



New York courts have a special division dedicated solely to resolving the thousands of asbestos lawsuits related to exposure in shipyards and other industries. 



Louisiana



Louisiana is another state with high mesothelioma rates due to industries that involve shipyards. Louisiana's short coastline has many shipyards that have contributed to local asbestos exposure. These include several Avondale Shipyards. 



Mississippi



Like Louisiana, Mississippi has a lot of shipping-related industry along its short Gulf of Mexico Coast. Shipyards, oil refineries, and other industrial sites have led to extensive asbestos exposure in Mississippi workers. 



Texas



Texas has a long coastline along the Gulf of Mexico that is heavily industrialized. Oil refineries and shipyards have both contributed to asbestos exposure in local workers. Some of the important sites of exposure in Texas include Todd Shipyards, Kane Shipbuilding, and Brown Shipbuilding. 



Washington



The Puget Sound in Washington has long been home to a shipbuilding industry. Shipyards in Washington, like Duwamish and Lockheed, have caused a lot of asbestos exposure in workers over the years. The Bremerton Naval Shipyard is the largest on the U.S. Pacific coast. 



U.S. Shipyards That Used Asbestos



These are some of the most important shipyards that exposed workers to asbestos: 




Alabama Dry Dock



Albina Shipyard



Barbours Cut Docks



Bethlehem Steel Shipyard



Bremerton Naval Shipyard



Brooklyn Navy Yard



Caddell Dry Dock



Mare Island Naval Shipyard (California Naval Shipyard)



Charleston Naval Shipyard



Consolidated Steel Shipyards



Curtis Bay Coast Guard Yard



Defoe Shipbuilding Company



Duwamish Shipyard



New London Naval Submarine Base (Groton Naval Base)



San Francisco Naval Shipyard at Hunters Point



Ingalls Shipbuilding



The Kane Shipbuilding Company



Willamette Iron and Steel Works



Kaiser Shipyards



Washington Navy Yard



Lockheed Shipbuilding and Construction Company



Moore Dry Dock Company



Brown Shipbuilding



New York Shipbuilding Corporation



Newport News Shipyard



Todd Shipyards



Seward Ship's Drydock



Portsmouth Naval Shipyard (PNS)



Orange Shipbuilding



Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard



San Diego Naval Shipyard



San Francisco Drydock



Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Company



Tacoma Drydocks




Companies That Supplied Asbestos to Shipyards



These are just a few of the many private companies that supplied civilian and Naval shipyards with asbestos and asbestos products: 




National Gypsum



Johns Manville



GAF Corporation



Syd Carpenter Marine Contractor



John Crane, Inc.



McCormick Asbestos Company



Foster Wheeler Corporation



Owens-Illinois Glass



Willman Asbestos




Compensation for Shipyard Workers with Mesothelioma



Anyone who worked in a shipyard and was exposed to asbestos is now at risk for mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses. If you have a mesothelioma diagnosis, you have a couple of options for seeking compensation. 



Mesothelioma and Asbestos Lawsuits



A lawsuit is one option for many people with mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses. Mesothelioma is considered a personal injury because most incidences of asbestos exposure were negligent. 



Most asbestos lawsuits end in settlements, but some go to trial and may result in a large jury award for the victim. These are some examples of legal wins for shipyard workers with asbestos illnesses: 




In 2011, a former shipfitter who worked at Newport News Shipbuilding in Virginia won $25 million in a lawsuit. He also worked on ExxonMobil tankers, another source of asbestos exposure. He claimed ExxonMobil knew of the risks of asbestos but failed to protect him in the shipyard or on ships. The jury agreed. 





The widow of a shipyard worker from Washington won a jury award of $4.25 million in 2019. her husband developed mesothelioma after years of working as an electrician at the Lockheed shipyard on Harbor Island. 




Asbestos Trust Fund Claims



Many asbestos manufacturers have set up asbestos trust funds to compensate claimants after going through bankruptcy. If any companies responsible for your asbestos exposure went bankrupt, you cannot sue them. You can instead file a claim with a trust to seek compensation.



Can Veterans Be Compensated for Naval Shipyard Asbestos Exposure? 



Under the Feres Doctrine, military veterans can't sue the government for damages associated with asbestos exposure. However, veterans may qualify for benefits under the Veterans Administration (VA):




Monthly Disability Compensation



Special Monthly Compensation



Disability and Indemnity Compensation



Specialist Medical Care at VA Facilities




Although veterans can't take the government to court, they can sue the asbestos manufacturers and companies that supplied the military with asbestos-containing products. They can also file claims with asbestos trusts. Any compensation they receive from private actions does not affect their VA benefits. 



Working with a Mesothelioma Lawyer



If you are a civilian or a veteran who worked in shipyards, you are at increased risk for asbestos illnesses. If you are diagnosed with one of these diseases, contact an experienced mesothelioma lawyer for help. 



Mesothelioma lawyers and asbestos law firms have the experience and resources to get you the best results. They can explain your options, provide advice, and gather the evidence needed to make your case or for a successful trust fund or VA benefits claim. 



Additional Resources and Help for Asbestos Victims



Remember, if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you need additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### The Flintkote Company

The Flintkote Company manufactured roofing and other construction materials using asbestos. Flintkote faced thousands of costly asbestos lawsuits. It eventually filed for bankruptcy and set up a trust fund to compensate the claimants. 



If you suffer from mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 





Did Flintkote Use Asbestos? 



The Flintkote Company mined asbestos and used it in their products. Flintkote used asbestos to make roofing materials from the 1930s to the 1980s. Asbestos added strength and insulation to roofing and other construction materials and was very common in the industry during that time. 



The Flintkote Company History




The Flintkote Company was established in 1901. It was incorporated in 1917. Flintkote, headquartered in Massachusetts, focused on roofing materials. Its most well-known product was asphalt roofing shingles. 





As Flintkote grew, it expanded its product line to include cement pipes, siding, and asphalt for roads. In the 1940s, it started making packaging. 





In 1956, Flintkote began buying other businesses, allowing the company to produce more items, including gypsum construction products and other asbestos-containing materials. One product in particular that contained a lot of asbestos was ThermalKote, a water-resistant insulation coating. 





Despite its diversified product line, asphalt roof shingles remained its number one product. The company continued growing through the 1960s and 1970s, opening nearly 150 plants in the U.S. and in other countries. 





Flintkote continued to use asbestos in its products until 1982 and continued to distribute them through 1984.





After facing thousands of asbestos claims, Flintkote and its subsidiary, Flintkote Mines, filed for bankruptcy. They set up an asbestos trust fund to compensate the claimants. 




Flintkote Asbestos Products



Flintkote used asbestos in many of its products through the 1980s, but its roofing materials were its primary asbestos products. Asbestos use was common in the construction industry at the time. It was used to add insulation and strength to materials. 



In addition to asphalt roof tiles, these products made by the Flintkote Company included asbestos:




Adhesives



Antisweat compound



Asphalt



Ceiling tiles



Cement boards



Cement pipe



Cement sheets



Cement shingles



Coatings



Fibrex cement



Floor tile cement



Flooring felt



Hydralt protective coating



Hydrostatic mastic



Joint cement



Pipes



Rexalt roof coating



Shingles



Siding



Thermalkote



Vincor floor tile



Vinyl asbestos floor tile




Occupations Affected By Flintkote Asbestos Products



Flintkote manufactured and distributed various products throughout the U.S. and Canada. These were primarily used in construction.



Many workers from different occupations in the construction industry risked developing illnesses such as mesothelioma and asbestosis due to asbestos exposure. 



Workers affected by Flintkote's asbestos products include:




Construction Workers



Painters



Electricians



Factory Workers



Roofers



Carpenters



Plumbers



Pipefitters



Demolition workers



Maintenance and repair workers




Also at risk of exposure were all those who worked in Flintkote factories making their asbestos products. These workers handled asbestos and were highly likely to have inhaled asbestos fibers. 



The Flintkote Company Asbdsetos Lawsuits 



Flintkote began facing asbestos lawsuits as early as the 1970s. Workers who developed asbestos illnesses after exposure to their products sued for damages. 



The Flintkote Mines, a subsidiary that mined asbestos in Quebec, Canada, also faced claims and ultimately filed for bankruptcy. 



One lawsuit involved two widows of former shipyard workers who developed mesothelioma. The women claimed that Flintkote and other companies were responsible for their husbands' asbestos exopsure and resulting illnesses and deaths. A jury awarded one of the plaintiffs $1 million and the other $550,000. 



Bankruptcy and Asbestos Trust Fund



By the early 1970s, the first of many asbestos-related lawsuits started against Flintkote. In a little over ten years, the company sold numerous manufacturing plants to help cover the string of claims. 



To make matters worse, Flintkote's insurance company, which helped pay the claims for many years, stopped payments in 2001.



As a result, Flintkote filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on May 1, 2004. Its partner company, Flintkote Mines, facing a barrage of asbestos-related lawsuits, also filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. 



At the time, the company listed over $70 million in asbestos-related claims. Although it had already paid 350,000 claims, it still faced more than 150,000 pending cases.



As part of an amended joint reorganization plan, Flintkote created an asbestos trust fund once it emerged from bankruptcy. 



Established on February 9, 2015, the Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization in Respect of The Flintkote Company and Flintkote Mines Limited was created to compensate pending and future asbestos-related claims.



Seeking Compensation if You Were Exposed to Flintkote Asbestos



Contact a mesothelioma lawyer if you worked with Flintkote products before the 1980s. They can help you seek compensation. 



In addition to the trust fund, a lawyer may be able to find other sources of compensation. Workers with asbestos illnesses were often exposed to asbestos through products made by multiple companies. You could be eligible for additional trusts or lawsuits. 



Additional Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you've been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you'll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### Synkoloid Company

Synkoloid Company made joint compounds, paints, and other construction products with asbestos for many years. Thousands of lawsuits against Synkoloid and its parent companies led to bankruptcy and the establishment of a trust fund. 



If you suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did Synkoloid Use Asbestos? 



Synkoloid manufactured joint compounds and other products using asbestos until the 1970s. Asbestos was a common ingredient in construction materials during that time. Asbestos insulated materials and made them stronger. 



Synkoloid History



Synkoloid began in 1894 in Staten Island, New York. It started as a small business, but by 1928, it had created and patented Spackle®, a dry mix paint powder that was new in the construction industry. 




Spackle put Synkoloid on the map as an innovative new product. It came in powder form. When consumers added water, it became a paste that could be used as a joint compound. 





Throughout the 1950s, Synkoloid continued to expand, adding products such as latex emulsion, waterproof paint, and interior and exterior paints. 





Many of Synkoloid's products contained asbestos. This continued for decades despite the risk of life-threatening illnesses caused by asbestos exposure. Synkoloids already saw asbestos-related claims as early as the 1960s. 





The Artra Group bought Synkoloid in 1975 and phased out the use of asbestos. It took over all pending asbestos lawsuits and liabilities. 





Muralo Company bought Synkoloid from The Atra Group in 1981 but did not take on liability for any asbestos claims from before 1981. 





Artra was left with costly asbestos lawsuits and eventually filed for bankruptcy in 2002. This left Muralo liable for claims. It, too, filed for bankruptcy. Both companies reorganized and established a joint trust fund to handle claims. 




A company called PaintSolutions bought some of the Synkoloid product line in 2014. It makes and sells Synkoloid brand products but without asbestos. 



What Synkoloid Products Were Made With Asbestos? 



Nearly all companies that made construction products in the middle of the 20th century used asbestos. Asbestos was prized for its ability to insulate, and it was affordable and readily available. 



Like similar manufacturers, Synkoloid used asbestos in many of its insulation and other construction products: 




Cement patch



EZE-Text texture



Flexi patch



Kool-Kap roof coating



Plastibond



Prime ‘n Fill



Snohide



Stucco ‘n Cement



Surface conditioner



Synko-topping



Tex-Add



Tex-Wall



Triple-duty joint compound



Vinyl condition paste



Vinyl prep mix



Vinyl roof paint




Who Was at Risk for Exposure to Synkoloid Asbestos Products? 



Since Synkoloid primarily manufactured and distributed paint and products, anyone, including workers and consumers, who came into contact with these asbestos-containing products was at risk for exposure. 



Some of the workers who were affected by Synkoloid products include:




Construction Workers



Painters



Drywall Installers



Insulators



Carpenters



Home Renovation Specialists



Roofers



Laborers




Residential homes that used Synkoloid products before 1975 may contain asbestos. If they are well contained, they pose minimal risk. If these products are deteriorating, flaking, or otherwise disturbed, they can cause exposure to anyone in the home.



Synkoloid Asbestos Lawsuits



Synkoloid, and then Artra Group and Muralo, faced many lawsuits from people exposed to asbestos who later got sick. 



One lawsuit involved John Henry Pace. He worked as a self-employed contractor and eventually developed asbestosis. Pace used many asbestos products while working in the 1960s and 1970s, including  Synkoloid joint compound. He successfully sued Synkoloid in 2002, receiving more than $2 million. 



Synkoloid Bankruptcy and Asbestos Trust Fund



In 2002, with numerous pending asbestos-related lawsuits, Artra Group filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. 



Muralo also filed for bankruptcy. Part of the reorganization plan of the companies was to create and establish an asbestos trust fund once the company emerged from bankruptcy.



In 2007, the Artra Asbestos Trust was created and funded by both Artra and Muralo. 



While Artra established the trust fund under its company name, Muralo funded a portion of the trust with over $2 billion. According to the Artra Asbestos Trust official website:



"Claims may be filed with the Trust on or after November 1, 2007.  The Trust has set the initial Claim Filing Date as May 1, 2008.  All claims filed with the Trust between November 1, 2007, and May 1, 2008 will be deemed filed with the Trust on the Initial Claim Filing Date."



The Trust increased the payment percentage from 0.5% to 0.6% in 2021. 



How to File a Claim Over Synkoloid Asbestos Exposure



Contact a mesothelioma lawyer if you worked with or suspect you worked with Synkoloid products that contained asbestos and now have a related illness. They can help you access compensation from the trust. 



An experienced asbestos attorney can also help you find other sources of compensation. The ARTRA Trust payment percentage is very low. You could be eligible for claims with other trusts or to file a lawsuit to seek damages. 



Additional Information and Legal Resources



Remember to fill out our form for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. Keep in mind that if you've been diagnosed with an asbestos-related disease, you may be eligible for considerable compensation. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Shook & Fletcher

Shook & Fletcher is an insulation manufacturing company based in Decatur, Georgia. The company used asbestos in its insulation until the 1970s, which led to illness in many workers. Lawsuits forced the company into bankruptcy and the creation and funding of an asbestos trust fund. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













Did Shook & Fletcher Use Asbestos? 



Shook & Fletcher manufactured insulation products with asbestos until the 1970s. At the time, asbestos was a common choice for insulation. It was inexpensive, abundant, and efficient at insulating and protecting against fire. The company no longer uses asbestos. 



Shook & Fletcher Company History



Shook & Fletcher was founded in 1901 in Birmingham, Alabama. It began as a supplier of iron, coal, and bricks to the regional steel industry. 



Shook & Fletcher began producing insulation products in 1949. It eventually became the largest manufacturer of industrial insulation in the Southeast. 



In 1967, the company's employees bought Shook & Fletcher, which remains employee-owned today. 



Shook & Fletcher used asbestos to make insulation through most of the 1970s. This was around the time the risks of asbestos exposure, including malignant mesothelioma and asbestos-related lung cancer, became more widely known. 



Although the company replaced asbestos with chemicals that provided the same benefits, it came after many people had already worked with the company's asbestos-containing products for decades.



Exposure to asbestos through Shook & Fletcher products led to lawsuits from workers who got sick. Eventually, the company filed for bankruptcy and set up an asbestos trust fund to compensate victims. 



Which Products Did Shook & Fletcher Make With Asbestos? 



Shook & Fletcher created and distributed many different insulating products with asbestos. Insulation was the primary product type it used asbestos to make, but the company also manufactured some other asbestos construction materials. 



Shook & Fletcher's asbestos-containing products included:




Cement



Ceramic fiber



Insulation



Fiber piping and fiberglass



Plastic jacketing



Adhesives



Tapes



Ceramic fiber



Foam




Who Was Exposed to Asbestos in Shook & Fletcher Products? 



The first workers at risk of exposure to Shook & Fletcher asbestos products were the company's employees. They worked in manufacturing facilities handling asbestos and asbestos materials. 



More than 30 other manufacturing companies also helped to produce Shook & Fletcher products. All of these workers were at high risk of exposure. 



Workers in other industries also risked exposure to asbestos by using Shook & Fletcher insulation and other products. The construction industry, in particular, used a lot of asbestos insulation and other products, putting many types of workers at risk of exposure; 




Insulation workers



Drywall workers



Plumbers



Maintenance workers



Renovation and repair workers



Demolition workers



Laborers




Shook & Fletcher insulation went into buildings in many different industries. People in these workplaces were also at risk: 




Chemical plants



Steel mills



Textile mills



Paper mills



Power plants



Factories



Shipyards



Oil refineries




Even after Shook & Fletcher discontinued asbestos in products, workers were still in danger as the old products remained at many commercial and industrial locations.



Shook & Fletcher Asbestos Lawsuits  



Shook & Fletcher stopped using asbestos in the 1970s, but the damage was already done. Injured workers brought lawsuits against the company, often along with many other asbestos companies. 



In one example of a lawsuit against Shook & Fletcher, a widow sued the company and others over her husband's death from mesothelioma. He worked as an insulator for multiple companies, including Shook & Fletcher. The widow received an $8.4 million jury award. 



Shook & Fletcher also lost a lawsuit with its insurer. It sued the insurer in 1993, seeking funds to resolve asbestos claims. The case went to the U.S. Supreme Court. 



Bankruptcy and Trust Fund



By 2002, Shook & Fletcher faced over 55,000 asbestos-related claims and lawsuits. 



Rather than continue to engage in legal battles, the company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection under an agreement that it would establish an asbestos trust fund to pay off pending and future asbestos claims.



The Shook & Fletcher Asbestos Settlement Trust was established once the company emerged from bankruptcy. MFR Claims, Inc. handles the company's asbestos-related claims.



Shook & Fletcher president and CEO Wayne Killion Jr., stated that although the company was financially "healthy," the lawsuits that began shortly after the EPA and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) asbestos regulations led to lawsuits from all over the country.




"We're a strong company with a healthy balance sheet, and we have a large amount of insurance coverage remaining. We've been sued from every area of the country."




While some previous asbestos-related lawsuits against Shook & Fletcher were eventually dismissed, most cases were settled out of court. 



Before filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the company had already paid out over $400 million in mesothelioma lawsuits and other asbestos-related claims.



According to the company's asbestos trust fund page, the current payment percentage is currently set at 50%. This is much higher than most asbestos trusts pay. 



Shook & Fletcher Today



Shook & Fletcher recovered from its 2002 bankruptcy filing. Headquartered in Decatur, Georgia, the company remains in operation today. It does not use any asbestos in its products today. 



Shook & Fletcher continues to focus on commercial and industrial insulation as well as custom products. It has six distribution centers located throughout the Southeast.



If You Were Exposed to Shook & Fletcher Asbestos Products



If you worked with Shook & Fletcher insulation, contact a mesothelioma lawyer to determine your eligibility for compensation through the trust. They can also help you file a claim and ensure you get your fair share. 



An experienced asbestos firm can also review your work history to find other potential sources of compensation. If you have an asbestos illness, it's likely you were exposed by multiple asbestos companies. They can find additional trust funds and help you file a lawsuit against other companies. 



Additional Help and Resources



Remember, if you’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos illness, you may qualify for significant compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form for our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you need additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Rutland Fire Clay Company

Rutland Fire Clay Company made several high-temperature stove products and some construction materials with asbestos until 1978. Rutland asbestos products caused exposure in many workers. This eventually led to asbestos-related claims, bankruptcy, and an asbestos trust fund.  



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did Rutland Fire Clay Use Asbestos? 



Rutland Fire Clay made products for stoves and furnaces as well as some other types of construction materials. Many of its products needed to withstand high temperatures. Rutland used asbestos in these products for decades for its insulating and strengthening properties. 



Rutland Fire Clay Company History




Rufus Perkins founded the Rutland Fire Clay Company in 1883 in Montpelier, Vermont. Perkins started the business after creating a stove patching and lining material he called fire clay. 





Most of Rutland's early products were designed to reduce and decrease soot buildup in wood-burning stoves and fireplaces. It later turned to removing creosote buildup. 





Rutland's stove products included linings, patching compounds and cements, polishes, and cleaners. 





Demand for Rutland's products increased during World War II. Fuel shortages meant that more people turned to wood-burning stoves. 





With the success of its soot and creosote products, Rutland expanded its product line to include construction materials and home repair items.





Many of Rutland's stove and construction products contained asbestos to strengthen them, insulate them, and protect against fire. 





Asbestos use in their products led to exposure. Workers who developed illnesses such as mesothelioma and asbestos lung cancer later filed asbestos-related lawsuits against Rutland. The company filed for bankruptcy and set up an asbestos trust fund. 




Which Rutland Products Contained Asbestos? 



Asbestos was commonly used as an insulating material throughout the 1900s. It was especially heavily used in products that needed to withstand the high temperatures of stoves and fireplaces. Like other companies that made similar products, Rutland 



The following Rutland products have been confirmed to contain up to 10% chrysotile asbestos:




Rutland Boiler Covering



Rutland Furnace Cement



Rutland Ready-Mixed Joint Cement



Rutland Wallboard Joint Cement



Rutland Roofing Cement No. 4



Rutland Roofing Cement No. 7




Who Was at Risk of Exposure to Asbestos in Rutland Products? 



Rutland employees who manufactured the company's asbestos products were first in line to be exposed. They handled asbestos and asbestos materials, which usually leads to asbestos fibers in the air. 



Workers handling the materials or even doing another job in the same area were likely to inhale harmful asbestos fibers. 



Since most Rutland products were created for home improvement or construction projects, many construction workers were affected by the company's asbestos-containing products. This included: 




Fireplace and stove installers and repairers



Masons



Drywallers



Cement workers



Demolition workers and laborers



Chimney sweeps




Many Rutland asbestos products went into residential buildings and homes. When intact, these products posed minimal risks. If they were disturbed—by deterioration over time, unexpected damage, or home repairs and renovations—they could release fibers and expose anyone in the home. 



Rutland Asbestos Lawsuits 



Years of manufacturing and distributing asbestos products led to exposure in workers and homeowners and lawsuits against Rutland, including these: 




Kenneth Cobb developed asbestosis after working as a pipefitter. He handled wallboard, insulation, and other construction materials made with asbestos. Cobb sued Rutland and Owens Corning for his illness and damages. He was awarded almost $700,000. 





Ethel Scheidel filed a lawsuit on behalf of her husband, Victor. He worked as a contractor and was exposed to assets through products made by many different companies. Rutland was one of the companies named in the suit. 




Bankruptcy and Trust Fund



By 1999, with more than 50,000 pending asbestos-related cases, Rutland filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, citing over $67 million in both current and future asbestos claims as the reason. 



As part of the Chapter 11 plan, Rutland agreed to set up an asbestos trust fund to compensate for all asbestos-related lawsuits.



When the company emerged from bankruptcy in 2000, it established the Rutland Fire Clay Asbestos Trust Agreement. 



Along with Rutland, two other companies (M.H. Detrick and Rock Wool Manufacturing) created a trust fund under the Asbestos Resolution Trust.



A total of $8 million was placed into the fund by Rutland. It last accepted claims in 2011 and is not currently active. 



Rutland Today



Now known as Rutland Products, the company sells a line of stove and fireplace maintenance products. 



According to the company website, Rutland offers over 700 products, including fire starters, silicone sealants, chimney cleaning supplies, stove door replacement gaskets, and more. Rutland no longer uses asbestos in any of its products.



What to Do if You Were Exposed to Rutland Asbestos Products



If you worked with Rutland products during the period of asbestos use, talk to an asbestos law firm to find out how you can seek compensation. 



The Rutland Trust is not currently active or taking claims, but you may have other opportunities for compensation. An experienced mesothelioma lawyer can find additional options and give you the best chance of recovering damages. 



Additional Help and Resources for Mesothelioma Victims



Remember, if you’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos illness, you may qualify for significant compensation. Remember to fill out our form for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### Rock Wool Manufacturing Company

The Rock Wool Manufacturing Company produces insulation for construction and maritime industries. Although the company no longer uses asbestos in any of its products, a long history of asbestos use has led to many lawsuits. It eventually filed for bankruptcy, reorganized, and set up a trust fund for victims. 



If you suffer from mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more.













Did Rock Wool Manufacturing Use Asbestos? 



Rock wool is a type of insulation, and most insulation products contained asbestos in the middle of the 20th century. Rock Wool Manufacturing used asbestos in its insulating products until the 1970s. Its modern products do not contain asbestos. 



Rock Wool Manufacturing Company History



Rock Wool Manufacturing Company started in 1943 as a residential blowing wool insulation manufacturing company. It was founded in Leeds, Alabama, by Edward Cusick, Sr. 



By the 1950s, the company expanded considerably and started manufacturing mineral wool boards and insulating cement for the industrial market. 



The company continued to grow throughout several decades, adding numerous construction-related products to its line, such as insulating cement made with asbestos. 



By 1980, Rock Wool stopped using asbestos in its products, but many people had already been affected by the company's products by that time. Rock Wool faced numerous asbestos-related lawsuits and eventually filed for bankruptcy in 1996. 



Rock Wool Manufacturing Company Lawsuits



Rock Wool began facing asbestos lawsuits over exposure and illness in workers who made or worked with their products. 



In one case, seven shipyard workers sued Rock Wool and other asbestos companies in 1994. They worked with numerous asbestos products, especially insulation, that went into ships and developed lung cancer and asbestosis. They won their case with part of the liability assigned to Rock Wool Manufacturing. 



Samuel Jackson and his wife filed a lawsuit in 1995. They sued Rock Wool and other companies over his mesothelioma. Jackson worked in a power plant and handled and worked with and near asbestos insulation. They won compensation from several defendants, including Rock Wool. 



Bankruptcy and Asbestos Trust Fund



By 1996, the amount of asbestos-related cases against Rock Wool was so high that the company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. 



Part of the conditions of filing bankruptcy was to set up an asbestos trust fund once the company emerged from bankruptcy.



Consequently, once Rock Wool emerged, it created the Asbestos Resolution Trust to pay for all current and future asbestos and mesothelioma claims against the company. The trust was founded along with Rutland Fire Clay Company and M.H. Detrick.



The trust fund was intended for both personal injury and property damage asbestos claims. It last accepted claims in 2011. It is not currently active. 



Occupations Affected By Rock Wool Manufacturing Company



Workers in Rock Wool manufacturing facilities faced high risks of asbestos exposure. They handled or worked near asbestos, likely releasing fibers into the air. 



Without appropriate protective gear, workers could easily inhale asbestos fibers. This exposure led to illnesses in some workers, including mesothelioma, asbestosis, and lung cancer. 



Rock Wool distributed its products to different residential and industrial buildings. Not only were former Rock Wool employees affected, but several workers in other occupations risked exposure and illness by working around the company's products, including:




Navy service members



Shipyard workers



Construction workers



Power plant workers



Electricians



Manufacturers



Warehouse workers



Technicians



Painters




Also at risk of exposure were family members of these workers. Workers often brought asbestos fibers into the home on their clothing, unaware of the potential risks. Secondhand asbestos exposure has caused illness in some people. 



Rock Wool Asbestos Products



Rock Wool used asbestos in a variety of its products for numerous years, including the following:




One Shot Insulating Cement



High Temp Insulating Cement



Thermal Pipe Insulation



High Temp Master Cement



AF Cement




Rock Wool Manufacturing Company Today



Rock Wool is still in business, and its headquarters remain in Leeds, Alabama. 



Most of the company's products are under the brand name Delta and include insulation, mesh blankets, fibreboard, and more. Rock Wool no longer uses asbestos in any of its products.



If You Were Exposed to Rock Wool Manufacturing Asbestos Products



If you worked with or around Rock Wool products in the past, you could be at risk for an asbestos illness. A mesothelioma lawyer can help you seek compensation if you receive a diagnosis. 



Unfortunately, the Rock Wool Trust is not currently active. This doesn't mean you can't get compensation, though. An experienced asbestos attorney can review your work history and find other companies that can be held liable. You might qualify for additional trust funds or to file a lawsuit against one or more asbestos companies. 



Additional Information and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you've been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you'll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form for our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area.

### Raymark (Raybestos-Manhattan Industries, Raytech)

Raymark (Raybestos-Manhattan Industries, Raytech) made brakes and other products using asbestos for many years. The resulting lawsuits over mesothelioma and other illnesses forced the company into bankruptcy. Raymark created an asbestos trust fund to compensate victims. 



With more than $30 billion currently set aside in trust funds, you may qualify for substantial compensation if you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did Raymark Use Asbestos? 



Raymark went by many names over the years, including Raybestos, which advertised the fact that it used asbestos. It primarily used asbestos in brakes but also made other asbestos products until the early 1980s. 



Raymark History



The A.H. Raymond Company was founded in 1902 by Arthur H. Raymond, headquartered in Stratford, Connecticut. The company became known for its brakes, including the first model, the Raymond Brake. 



Over many years, Raymond changed hands, acquired other companies, and went by different names: 




Raytech



Raybestos Industries



Raybestos-Manhattan



Raymark Industries




The company's name included Raybestos until 1982, when it changed to Raymark. The company needed to distance itself from asbestos in the face of lawsuits. 



Raymark faced thousands of lawsuits from workers exposed to asbestos from its products. Early lawsuits uncovered evidence that executives at Raymark knew about the dangers of asbestos but did nothing to protect workers until they finally stopped using asbestos in the 1980s. 



Raymark spun off a company called Raytech to hold liabilities. Ultimately, both Raytech and Raymark had to file for bankruptcy. Raytech established an asbestos trust fund, which opened in 2001. 



Raymark Asbestos Products



Raymark and Raybestos were most well-known for automotive brakes that contained asbestos. Most brakes at one time were manufactured with asbestos to protect against overheating. Other products Raymark made with asbestos include: 




Asbestos blankets



Clutches and clutch linings



Felt 



Fire curtains



Packing



Tape



Valves




Who Was at Risk of Asbestos Exposure from Raymark Products? 



Raybestos employees who worked in the factories manufacturing asbestos products faced some of the highest risks of exposure. Although their risk was high, this was a small group in comparison to other at-risk workers. 



Raybestos products were distributed throughout the automotive industry and other industries and workplaces. Some of the many types of workers at risk of exposure to Raybestos products include: 




Automotive assembly plant workers



Automotive parts retail workers



Auto mechanics



Railroad mechanics



Mill workers



Textile workers



Shipyard workers



Industrial workers



Welders



Insulators




Also at risk were home mechanics, people who replaced brakes and clutches on their own vehicles. Even today, hobbyists with vintage cars or who use imported brakes and clutches can be exposed to asbestos in these parts. 



Raymark Hides Asbestos Information



Like many other companies facing asbestos lawsuits, Raymark tried to deny any knowledge of the harms of asbestos. This was rarely true, and most executives had some idea of the dangers. 



According to internal documents, a past president of Raymark suppressed information about the dangers of using asbestos in the company's products. Lawyers in an early case from 1978 found the information in court documents in New Jersey. 



Records also indicate that the president, on several occasions, hid evidence presented to the company that asbestos was indeed dangerous so that the financial gain could continue.



In a letter written by then-president Sumner Simpson, he stated that the company would be better off saying less about asbestos. He had some knowledge of asbestos risks for decades before the company stopped using it. 



Raymark/Raybestos Asbestos Lawsuits 



Raybestos began facing asbestos lawsuits in the 1970s. The company stopped using asbestos and changed its name to Raymark in 1982. 



In one lawsuit, Adella and Claude Cimino represented thousands of workers in a class action. The workers were employed in Texas shipyards, oil refineries, and chemical plants. Both Ciminos worked in a refinery and were later diagnosed with asbestosis. 



The lawsuit involved several defendants, including Raymark. The case took a long time to resolve but ultimately ended in a $178 million settlement for the victims. 



Another case involved a Raybestos employee, James Stevens, who died from an asbestos illness. He received compensation while alive, but his widow also sued Raybestos for funeral and dependent's benefits. She won her compensation on an appeal. 



Bankruptcy and Asbestos Trust



Although the company fought aggressively against the mounting lawsuits, too many people were injured. Raymark filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in 1989. Raytech, the company spun off to hold liabilities, also filed for bankruptcy. 



As part of the bankruptcy process, Raytech set up the Raytech Corporation Asbestos Personal Injury Settlement Trust.



Per court documents, the asbestos trust fund has $52 million in assets meant to handle asbestos-related personal injury claims. The current payment percentage is 0.92%. 



Raymark Environmental Exposure



Raymark and Raybestos caused harm to many individual workers. It also harmed the environment and put residents near their plants at risk of exposure to asbestos and other toxic substances. 



Stratford, Connecticut, Superfund Site



The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) listed the Raymark Stratford location as a Superfund site needing significant cleanup and remediation. 



According to the EPA, Raymark violated many environmental laws, leading to numerous people who never worked for the company developing illnesses. Studies show Stratford residents have higher cancer rates than average, including mesothelioma. 



Over 40 residential homes were affected after decades of Raymark dumping hazardous wastes. Schools, playgrounds, and public buildings were so contaminated due to Raymark's negligence that the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) warned the public that they were at risk from contaminants in clothing, soil, and the air.



Although remediation began in the 1990s, as of 2023, the EPA is still working on the site. In 2023, a proposal was made to spend $11.2 million on an area that has not yet been cleaned of toxins. 



Contamination in Pennsylvania



Raybestos had two manufacturing facilities in Pennsylvania, in Hatboro and Manheim. The Hatboro site is an EPA Superfund and once treated electroplating waste materials. It has been remediated and is still monitored by the EPA. 



The Manheim facility manufactured asbestos brakes and clutches. It is currently listed as a Brownfield site with cleanup under the authority of the state and local governments. The official remediation is complete, and it is no longer monitored. 



Raymark and Raybestos Today



An aftermarket automotive supplier called Echlin bought the Raybestos brand of brakes in 1985. It created a new company called Brake Parts Inc., which still operates and sells Raybestos brand brakes. Modern Raybestos brakes do not contain asbestos. 



What to Do if You Were Exposed to Asbestos in Raymark Brakes



If you worked with Raymark brakes in the past, you could be at risk for malignant mesothelioma and other illnesses. Talk to your doctor about your risk factors and any recommended screenings. 



If you have been diagnosed with an asbestos illness, contact a mesothelioma lawyer or asbestos law firm to help you get compensation through the trust. They can give you the best chance of making a successful claim and find other options for compensation. 



Additional Resources for Asbestos Victims



Remember, if you’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness, there is a good chance you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### Rapid-American Corporation (Philip Carey Manufacturing Corp.)

Rapid-American Corporation's predecessor, the Philip Carey Manufacturing Corporation, used asbestos in its insulation and industrial equipment. Lawsuits related to asbestos exposure led to bankruptcy in 2013. Rapid-American created an asbestos trust and now exists solely to compensate claimants. 



With more than $30 billion currently set aside in trust funds, you may qualify for substantial compensation if you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 













Did Rapid-American Use Asbestos? 



Rapid-American did not use asbestos. It became embroiled in asbestos liabilities because of asbestos use by Philip Carey. Rapid-American was created as a merger that included Philip Carey. It took on its predecessor's asbestos liabilities. 



Philip Carey/Rapid-American History




Established in 1873 in Cincinnati, Ohio, the Philip Carey Manufacturing Corporation was an insulation company that mined and used asbestos for decades.





The company's insulation was used in machinery and products such as boilers, pipes, and generators. It supplied steel mills, refineries, chemical plants, and other industrial workplaces. 





Rapid-American merged with Philip Carey in 1972. Previously, Rapid-American did not use asbestos. It was only the merger with Philip Carey that made it liable for asbestos claims. 





Rapid-American faced its first asbestos lawsuits in the late 1970s. 





Although Rapid-American didn't manufacture asbestos-containing products, its merger with several companies that did, including Philip Carey, eventually led to bankruptcy.




Philip Carey/Rapid-American Asbestos Products



Rapid-American did not make asbestos products, but Philip Carey did. Philip Carey's primary type of product was insulation, which at the time was almost always made with asbestos. 



Philip Carey was also associated with asbestos through mines. Carey Canada owned asbestos mines in Quebec and supplied the company to make its insulation products. 



Philip Carey manufactured numerous asbestos-containing products, including:




Carey Thermo-Board Concrete



Carey Rock Wool



Asbestos Magnesia Diatomite Rock Wool



Fire-Chex Singles



Carey Ceramo Glazed Asbestos Siding



Carey Ceramo Baked-on Ceramic Finish



Carey Hi-Temp No. 19 (asbestos fiber bonded into commercial pipe insulation)



Fibrated Emulsion



Carey Fireclad Jacketing



Careystone Asbestos Cement Roofing




Who Wast at Risk of Exposure to Philip Carey Asbestos Products? 



Philip Carey workers who manufactured asbestos insulation in plants faced high risks of asbestos exposure. By handling and manipulating asbestos and asbestos materials, they were at high risk of inhaling the harmful fibers. 



Workers in many other occupations and at other companies were also at risk of exposure to asbestos insulation. These workers handled asbestos products, installed or repaired them, or even worked near them and were at risk of exposure: 




Machinists



Factory Workers



Electricians



Metal Workers



Insulation Installers and Repairers



Boilermakers



Pipefitters



Plumbers



Chemical Plant Workers



Oil Refinery Workers



Steel Mill Workers



Textile Mill Workers



Power Plant Workers




Rapid-American Asbestos Lawsuits



Rapid-American began facing lawsuits over asbestos exposure and illness as early as the 1970s. These are a few notable examples of Rapid-American asbestos lawsuits: 




Henry Pustejovsky developed asbestosis and mesothelioma after a career as a metal worker. He initially sued Johns Manville over asbestosis. When he received a mesothelioma diagnosis, he sued Rapid-American and other suppliers. A judge initially dismissed the case based on the statute of limitations, but the decision was reversed in the Texas Supreme Court. The decision meant he had a legal right to sue again for a second asbestos illness. 





Julius Novicki died from mesothelioma in 1995. He worked as a welder and used asbestos products supplied by several companies. Novicki's family sued Rapid-American and others for wrongful death in 1997. 





Jesse Domanske made asbestos shingles at a Philip Carey plant. He died from mesothelioma. Domanske's widow filed a lawsuit, but Rapid-American won summary judgment and had the case dismissed. 




Rapid-American Bankruptcy and Asbestos Trust Fund



The accumulation of asbestos-related claims got so high that by 2013, Rapid-American filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy with more than 275,000 claims against it, equaling over $100 million. 



Under 13-10687, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan), the company listed its assets at $86.9 million and cited asbestos-related claims as the reason for bankruptcy.



“Recently, Rapid has experienced an increase in the number of mesothelioma claims being filed against it and an increase in the dollar amount sought to settle claims,” said Rapid-American Vice President Paul Weiner.



In 2021, Rapid-American put forth a plan to liquidate its assets and establish an asbestos trust fund for claimants. Today, claimants can file with the Rapid-American Asbestos Personal Injury Liquidating Trust.



Seeking Compensation for Exosure to Philip Carey Asbestos Products



If you worked with Rapid-American or Philip Carey products and now have an asbestos illness, talk to a mesothelioma lawyer. They can help you get compensation through the trust. 



A lawyer can also review your work history and determine if any other companies could be held liable for your illness. You could be eligible for additional trusts or a lawsuit. 



Additional Resources and Help for Asbestos Victims



Remember, if you’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness, there is a good chance you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form for our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area.

### Porter Hayden Company

The Porter Hayden Company distributed asbestos insulation for many years. This exposed many workers and illness in some, who then sued the company. Porter Hayden filed for bankruptcy and still has an active asbestos trust to compensate claimants. 



With more than $30 billion currently set aside in trust funds, you may qualify for substantial compensation if you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did Porter Hayden Use Asbestos? 



Porter Hayden was in the insulation business. During the middle of the 20th century, nearly all insulation products contained asbestos. While it did not manufacture insulation, Porter Hayden distributed and installed asbestos insulation from the 1960s to the early 1970s. 



Porter Hayden History



Founded in 1966, Porter Hayden began as a merger between Reid Hayden Inc. and H.W. Porter & Co. Inc. 



The combined company sold and installed insulation in industrial and commercial businesses and residences. According to a memorandum provided by the Porter Hayden Asbestos Trust Fund, the company primarily sold asbestos insulation to:




Electrical, plumbing, and welding companies



Residential sites



Retail sites



Low-rise apartment buildings




As with many insulation manufacturers and distributors, Porter Hayden used asbestos in its products because the toxic set of minerals is resistant to high heat, affordability, and ease of use. 



Hayden Porter continued using asbestos insulation until the early 1970s, when laws changed, and awareness of the risks of asbestos grew. 



Even though Hayden Porter didn't make asbestos insulation, it was liable for exposure and illness by distributing it. Hayden Porter filed for bankruptcy in 2002 and created an asbestos trust fund to compensate victims. 



Porter Hayden Asbestos Products



Porter Hayden distributed and installed insulation during a time when nearly all insulation products contained asbestos. Some examples of asbestos products Porter Hayden used include: 




Commercial insulation



Industrial insulation



Pipe insulation



Residential insulation



Ship insulation




Asbestos Lawsuits Against Porter Hayden



The first asbestos lawsuit filed against Porter Hayden came in 1976. Many people exposed to asbestos insulation provided by Porter Hayden successfully held the company liable for their damages. 



In 1992, Porter Hayden and other companies were found liable for asbestos illnesses in thousands of workers in a Baltimore case. Three plaintiffs received $11.2 million in punitive damages. 



A case that was not successful involved Kazimierz Lapka, who worked in a chemical plant in Pennsylvania and later developed mesothelioma. He got sick early but did not receive a definitive diagnosis until 1984. Porter Hayden's lawyers successfully argued that he should have filed sooner and had the case dismissed. 



Another case against Porter Hayden was critical in establishing a statute of limitations for wrongful death asbestos lawsuits. A widow of a worker who died after asbestos exposure sued Porter Hayden in the 1980s, testing the statute of limitations. 



The court decided it was unfair for the time limit to begin at the time of asbestos exposure. Instead, the court ruled that the statute of limitations should start when a person's illness is diagnosed and connected to past asbestos exposure. 



Porter Hayden also faced legal issues related to Commercial Union, the company's insurer. Porter Hayden sued Commercial Union for refusing to pay asbestos claims. The two companies reached a settlement after 14 years, and the insurer contributed $15 million to the trust. 



Bankruptcy and Asbestos Trust Fund



By 2005, more than 60,000 asbestos-related lawsuits had been filed against Porter Hayden, leading to Chapter 11 bankruptcy.



Within two years, however, the company emerged from bankruptcy and reorganized. Part of the reorganization plan included creating an asbestos trust fund to compensate for pending and future cases. 



The Porter Hayden Asbestos Trust Fund, also known as the Porter Hayden Bodily Injury Trust, was created and started accepting claims in 2007.



According to its official site, the asbestos trust fund "was organized to process, liquidate, and pay all valid asbestos personal injury claims for which Porter Hayden Company has legal responsibility."



The trust was initially funded with $40 million and still accepts asbestos-related claims from those affected by Porter Hayden's products. The current payment percentage is 1.8%. 



A list of approved job sites where Porter Hayden delivered asbestos-containing products can be found on the official website. 



States and Occupations Affected By Porter Hayden



The following Mid-Atlantic states were associated with Porter Hayden's products. The company installed asbestos-containing products at numerous businesses in the following states:




New York



New Jersey



Pennsylvania



South Carolina



Maryland



Virginia




Since Porter Hayden acted as a distributor of asbestos products, the company was responsible for diseases and illnesses due to exposure to the delivered products.



For example, the company is liable for its own employees who manufactured the asbestos insulation. It is also responsible for those who worked around the products, which primarily included:




Insulation installers



Insulation repairers



Construction workers



Electricians



Plumbers



Welders




Any worker who came into contact with Porter Hayden's products was at risk of inhaling thin, odorless asbestos fibers. When workers repaired or installed the asbestos-containing insulation, they were close to toxic asbestos fibers.



Porter Hayden Today



After filing for bankruptcy and reorganizing, Porter Hayden closed its manufacturing and sales doors. Although the company is no longer open for business, it still handles asbestos-related claims.



What to Do if You Were Exposed to Porter Hayden Asbestos Insulation



If you worked with Porter Hayden products, first contact your doctor. You could be at risk for an asbestos illness like mesothelioma or lung cancer. They can provide screenings and a diagnosis. 



If you receive a diagnosis, talk to a mesothelioma lawyer about filing a claim with the Porter Hayden Trust. They might also find other sources of compensation. Most people with asbestos illnesses can hold multiple companies liable for their exposure.  



Additional Information and Resources



Remember, if you’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness, there is a good chance you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### Pittsburgh Corning

Pittsburgh Corning is known for glass products, but it got into the asbestos industry with the 1962 purchase of UNARCO's unibestos products. Exposure and asbestos lawsuits followed. Pittsburgh Corning eventually filed for bankruptcy and set up an asbestos trust fund. 



With more than $30 billion currently set aside in trust funds, you may qualify for substantial compensation if you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more.













Did Pittsburgh Corning Use Asbestos? 



Pittsburgh Corning did not use asbestos until it purchased the UNARCO Unibestos line of insulation products. Pittsburgh Corning's Unibestos products were made with asbestos until 1972. Asbestos was a common ingredient in insulation and other construction materials at the time. 



Pittsburgh Corning History




Pittsburgh Corning Corporation began in 1937 as a manufacturer of architectural glass blocks. It was a merger between Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company (PPG Industries) and Corning Glass Works.





For nearly 50 years, the company manufactured and distributed the architectural glass block while adding a few other key products along the way, including the advanced FOAMGLAS® and other glass products.





In 1962, Pittsburgh Corning expanded its business by purchasing the Unibestos product line from UNARCO, a company associated with asbestos use.  





Many of the products from the Unibestos line contained a specific type of asbestos, known as amosite, imported from South Africa. This type of asbestos has been found to be more harmful to human health than others. 





Pittsburgh Corning manufactured Unibestos products at plants in Tyler, Texas, and Alleghany, Pennsylvania. 





A study of health risks at the Tyler plant found high levels of asbestos and serious risks of asbestos exposure in workers. 





Instead of providing safety measures to both plants, Pittsburgh Corning broke the equipment down at the Tyler plant and stopped its operations.





By the time the Tyler plant was discontinued in 1972, many workers were beginning to develop toxic, life-threatening illnesses due to prolonged asbestos exposure. Soon after, asbestos-related claims began pouring in against Pittsburgh Corning.





Pittsburgh Corning filed for bankruptcy in 2000. It emerged in 2013 with an asbestos trust fund. Owens Corning purchased Pittsburgh Corning in 2017 but is not liable for its asbestos claims. All claims go through the trust fund. 




Pittsburgh Corning Asbestos Products



Pittsburgh Corning made innovative glass products without asbestos until it purchased Unibestos. From 1962 to 1972, Pittsburgh Corning made several products with asbestos, including: 




Packing



Gaskets



Textiles



Cement



Block insulation



Pipe covering



Pipe insulation



Tape



Felt insulation




Workers at Risk of Exposure to Asbestos from Pittsburgh Corning



Several Unibestos products contained asbestos. Pipe insulation and pipe coverings were the products that caused the most asbestos exposure and the most harm. Workers who handled, installed, removed, and made repairs to pipes insulated in this way were at high risk for asbestos-related diseases. 



Workers in the Pennsylvania and Texas plants making Unibestos products had some of the highest risks of exposure. The reports on safety at the Texas plant reported that workers sometimes used respirators but that they quickly became clogged with asbestos fibers. 



Pittsburgh Corning sold and distributed Unibestos insulation and other products to many companies and construction sites, putting additional workers at risk of exposure: 




Construction workers



Insulation workers



Boiler workers



Plumbers



Pipefitters



Steamfitters



Power plant workers



Repair and maintenance workers




Pittsburgh Corning Asbestos Lawsuits 



By the late 1970s, Pittsburgh Corning was in the hot seat, facing mounting mesothelioma lawsuits. 



One well-known case involved a class action lawsuit against Pittsburgh Corning and several other companies, filed by hundreds of former workers of the Tyler, Texas, plant. 



The plaintiffs eventually settled the lawsuit for $20 million, but Pittsburgh Corning was only responsible for $8.1 million of the settlement.



Other individual cases involved wrongful deaths. Helen Simpson won a $2.3 million award for her husband's death. He died from mesothelioma after working with pipes insulated with Unibestos coverings. 



Robert Dunham died from lung cancer after working for Pittsburgh Corning. His widow carried on his lawsuit and was awarded $19.3 million for wrongful death. 



Pittsburgh Corning Bankruptcy and Trust Fund



In 2000, Pittsburgh Corning filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, but the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania denied the company's plan for reorganization.



However, in 2013, after a decade in bankruptcy, the company finally won the court's approval to create a reorganization plan to help pay off its mounting debt connected to asbestos claims. 



According to a 139-page opinion, a U.S. Bankruptcy Judge, Judith K. Fitzgerald, determined that the company had successfully addressed the issues that would help carry out plans to pay the claims.



An initial $3.5 billion was placed in the asbestos trust fund to cover over 400,000 pending asbestos lawsuits. Some of the funding came from:




$290 million in either cash or stocks



$1.7 billion from insurance companies



$825 million and 1.4 million stock shares from PPG Industries



Pittsburgh Corning Asbestos Products




The majority of asbestos claims came from Pittsburgh Corning's purchase of the Unibestos product line, which included asbestos in:



What to Do if You Were Exposed to Pittsburgh Corning and Unibestos Products



Contact an asbestos law firm if you worked with Pittsburgh Corning products and now have an asbestos illness. Experienced mesothelioma lawyers can help you seek compensation and give you the best chance of making a successful trust fund claim. 



Additional Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



Remember, if you’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness, there is a good chance you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form for our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area.

### Pacor Incorporated (Philadelphia Asbestos Corporation)

Pacor Incorporated (Philadelphia Asbestos Corporation) is a nationwide leader in insulation products. Its history of asbestos use led to numerous mesothelioma lawsuits. Eventually, Pacor filed for bankruptcy and established an asbestos trust fund to compensate claimants. 



With more than $30 billion currently set aside in trust funds, you may qualify for substantial compensation if you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did Pacor Use Asbestos? 



The construction industry had some of the heaviest use of asbestos in the past. Asbestos in construction was primarily used as insulation. Pacor used asbestos to make insulation products from the 1920s to the 1970s. 



Pacor History




Founded in 1921 as the Philadelphia Asbestos Corporation, Pacor Incorporated started manufacturing asbestos products for the military and industrial businesses. 





Originally headquartered in Philadelphia, Pacor eventually moved to headquarters in Cinnaminson, New Jersey. 





From its earliest days, Pacor used asbestos in its insulation products and continued using it into the 1970s. 





The Johns Manville Company, which would later become well-known for exposing thousands of people to asbestos, was one of the company's partners.





As insulation demands grew, Pacor added additional products and services to its line, and the company grew substantially. 





Pacor began supplying shipyards and the military, especially the U.S. Navy, with asbestos insulation during World War II. It was a major supplier to the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard. 





By the 1970s, Pacor provided products and services to more than 100 companies nationwide. Still, the majority of its products contained asbestos, which would eventually come back to haunt the growing business.





Pacor's heavy use of asbestos in products led to thousands of asbestos-related claims. Employees and contractors who used Pacor insulation developed conditions such as malignant mesothelioma and asbestos-related lung cancer.





Eventually, asbestos victims began filing claims against the company. These led to Pacor's bankruptcy filing in 1986. Pacor emerged from bankruptcy with an asbestos trust fund. Today, Pacor makes insulation products without asbestos.




What Pacor Products Contained Asbestos? 



Pacor made insulation, which for decades was made with asbestos. Pacor was not alone in this. Most manufacturers during the middle of the 1900s used asbestos to make all types of insulation. 



Pacor manufactured asbestos pipe insulation and asbestos cloth. It was also associated with the many asbestos products made by Johns Manville, including insulation, roofing materials, wallboard, and textiles. 



Workers Affected by Pacor Asbestos Products



Many workers risked asbestos-related diseases due to exposure from their products. It began with Pacor employees who handled asbestos and asbestos materials in manufacturing plants. 



In addition to employees of Pacor, workers in construction and related industries faced risks to asbestos products. Pacor distributed its asbestos insulation to many different workplaces. 



Some of the occupations at risk of asbestos exposure from Pacor products include:




Construction workers



Painters



Drywallers



Insulators



HVAC workers



Plumbers



Electricians



Roofers



Repair and maintenance workers



Shipyard workers



U.S. Navy veterans



Oil refinery workers



Factory workers



Boiler workers



Pipefitters




Pacor Asbestos Lawsuits 



Pacor faced thousands of costly lawsuits related to asbestos exposure and resulting illnesses. An early lawsuit from 1984 involved a man who worked with Johns Manville asbestos products distributed by Pacor. 



Another lawsuit was filed by James Simmons, a U.S. Navy veteran. Simmons served in the Navy until 1963. He then worked at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard. He came into contact with Pacor asbestos products in both settings and later developed an asbestos illness. He won a jury award of $350,000. 



Pacor Bankruptcy and Asbestos Trust Fund



In 1986, facing so many costly asbestos-related claims, Pacor filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. 



The company came out of bankruptcy in 1988 and set up an asbestos trust fund, the Pacor Settlement Trust. The company funded the trust to compensate future claimants. 



The trust was set up by the Claims Resolution Management Corporation (CRMC).



Since Pacor had ties as a distributor to the Johns Manville Corporation, it was also included in the Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust, initially funded with over $2 billion.



The Pacor Trust currently has a payment percentage of 5.1% and a 25% cap on attorney fees. 



Pacor Incorporated Today



Pacor currently remains in operation after completely reorganizing itself after bankruptcy. The company still manufactures and distributes insulation products but has since replaced asbestos with a safer substitute.



What to Do if You Worked with Pacor Asbestos Products



You might be at risk for mesothelioma if you worked with Pacor products in the past. Talk to an asbestos law firm to find out how to seek compensation. 



An experienced mesothelioma lawyer can give you the best chance of making a successful claim with the trust fund. They can also help you find other sources of compensation for your asbestos illness. 



Additional Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



Remember, if you’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness, there is a good chance you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our foforget your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### Owens Corning Corporation

Owens Corning Corporation is a global company that manufactures residential and commercial building materials. Decades of asbestos use, primarily in insulation, led to illnesses in workers in many industries. Lawsuits over asbestos exposure eventually led to bankruptcy and an asbestos trust. 



With more than $30 billion currently set aside in trust funds, you may qualify for substantial compensation if you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 













Did Owens Corning Use Asbestos? 



Owens Corning and its subsidiary Fibreboard used asbestos to make construction products for decades. Asbestos was used in construction for its ability to insulate and make materials stronger. Owens Corning does not currently use asbestos. 



Owens Corning Corporation History



Owens Corning was founded in 1935 with a merger of Owens-Illinois and Corning Glass Works.




The newly formed Owens-Corning Fiberglass Company specialized in fiberglass insulation. By 1938, the company already had millions of dollars in sales. 





The need for quality fiberglass insulation increased during World War II and especially during the post-war housing construction boom. During that time, the company became the leading fiberglass and insulation company in the nation.





In 1952, Owens Corning went public, which brought in additional customers and profits. The company continued its success throughout the next several decades. A slowdown in the construction industry affected the company in the 1980s and 1990s. 





Owens Corning bought the Fibreboard Corporation in 1997. Owens Corning and Fibreboard both used asbestos in their products for many years, leading to lawsuits. The first asbestos lawsuit was filed in 1978. 





The influx of asbestos-related lawsuits and declining sales led to Owens Corning filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 1998. As part of the process, Owens Corning established an asbestos trust fund to compensate claimants. 




Owens Corning operates today as a manufacturer of roofing materials, insulation, and other construction products. It does not use asbestos in any products. 



Owens Corning Asbestos Products



Asbestos use in construction products was once common. Owens Corning used asbestos to manufacture its products from the 1950s through 1972. 



Owens Corning manufactured several asbestos-containing products:




Kaylo heat insulating block



Kaylo pipe insulation and covering



Kaylo duct insulation



Kaylo equipment insulation



Kaylo cold storage systems



Kaylo insulating roof tile



Kaylo fiberglass ceiling boards



Kaylo insulating cement



Kaylo finishing cement



One Cote Cement



Fiberglass ready cement



Fiberglass ready mix



Fiberglass mastic




Owens Corning also took on liability for Fibreboard Corporation's asbestos products: 




Floor Coating



Gypsum board



Insulating cement



Insulating tape



Paper insulation



Pipe covering



Roof paint



Roofing felt




Workers Affected by Owens Corning Asbestos Products



Working with and handling asbestos products like those made by Owens Corning and Fibreboard can release fibers into the air. Once in the air, workers can inhale asbestos fibers, which, over time, cause damage and illness in some people. 



Workers in Owens Corning factories faced high risks of asbestos exposure. The handling and manipulation of asbestos to make the products most likely released fibers and caused exposure. 



Exposure risks didn't end with Owens Corning employees. Many workplaces used Owens Corning asbestos products, leading to workers in various occupations in the construction industry: 




Carpenters



Plumbers



Electricians



Drywallers



Painters



Insulators



HVAC workers



Roofers



Laborers



Demolition workers



Repair, maintenance, and renovation workers




Owens Corning asbestos products were also used in ship construction. Workers in shipyards and on ships, both civilian and in the U.S. Navy, faced high risks of asbestos exposure from these and products from other suppliers. 



Today, U.S. Navy veterans have some of the highest rates of mesothelioma due to the heavy use of asbestos materials on ships. 



Owens Corning Asbestos Lawsuits



Owens Corning faced thousands of lawsuits related to asbestos exposure before filing for bankruptcy. The first came in 1978. Two shipyard workers diagnosed with asbestosis filed a class action lawsuit against Owens Corning and other defendants. They worked with pipes insulated with asbestos materials. 



Another example of an asbestos lawsuit against Owens Corning was filed in 1997. Three widows of construction workers filed against Owens Corning and other companies for their husbands' asbestos illnesses. The women won $13 million in damages. 



In another case, a Florida man was awarded more than $32 million in compensatory and punitive damages. He worked with Owens Corning products for decades and was diagnosed with mesothelioma. His lawyers successfully argued that the company failed to warn workers of the risks of asbestos. 



Owens Corning faced controversy over cases filed in Baltimore in the late 1990s. At that time, courts decided if claimants were sick enough to proceed with their lawsuits. Owens Corning requested different, more difficult standards for Black claimants. The courts denied the race-based request. 



Owens Corning Bankruptcy and Asbestos Trust



Facing more than 200,000 asbestos-related cases, Owens Corning filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2000. 



Owens Corning emerged from bankruptcy in 2006 and established the Owens Corning Fibreboard Asbestos Personal Injury Trust. The Trust handles all asbestos-related claims for both Owens Corning and the Fibreboard Corporation with two subfunds.



The company funded the Owens Corning Subfund with $1.5 billion and the Fibreboard Subfund with $3.4 billion. The payment percentage for Owens Corning asbestos claims is 5.9%. The payment percentage for Fibreboard claims is 4.4%. 



If You Were Exposed to Asbestos in Owens Corning Products



If you worked with Owens Corning products, you might have been exposed to asbestos. Talk to your doctor about your health risks and screenings for asbestos illness. 



Contact an asbestos attorney if you receive a diagnosis of mesothelioma or another asbestos illness. An experienced mesothelioma lawyer gives you the best chance of a successful claim with the asbestos trust fund. 



A lawyer can also review your work history to find other sources of compensation. Most people with asbestos illnesses were exposed to products made by many different companies. You could be eligible for additional trusts or to file a lawsuit to seek damages. 



Additional Resources and Help for Asbestos Victims



Remember, if you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, there is a good chance you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### The Nicolet Company (Keasbey & Mattison)

The Nicolet Company was initially called Keasbey & Mattison and produced pipe insulation and other products using asbestos. Resulting asbestos lawsuits led to bankruptcy. Claimants can seek compensation through the Armstrong World Industries Asbestos Trust. 



If you suffer from mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did Nicolet Use Asbestos? 



Nicolet made products with asbestos, including Keasbey & Mattison insulation. Nicolet acquired Keasbey & Mattison in the 1960s and continued making asbestos products until filing for bankruptcy in the 1980s. 



Keasbey & Mattison/Nicolet History




The Nicolet Company dates back to 1873. Founded by Dr. Richard V. Mattison and Henry G. Keasbey, it was originally a pharmaceutical company called Keasbey & Mattison. 





Keasbey & Mattison moved to Ambler, Pennsylvania, in 1881 and continued making patented medications, like their popular invention, Bromo Caffeine.





Mattison discovered that mixing the magnesium carbonate used for the company's laxative milk of magnesia with asbestos made an effective insulating material. Wrapping it around pipes reduced heat loss and saved money. 





With the creation of asbestos pipe insulation, Keasbey & Mattison shifted its focus to creating asbestos products. It became a leading company and employer in the small town of Ambler, helping to revitalize the local economy. 





According to the Historical Society of Pennsylvania, although the company helped people find employment and increased the town's economy, Keasbey & Mattison's asbestos products made Ambler the "asbestos capital of the world."





British asbestos company Turner & Newall acquired Keasbey & Mattison in 1934. In the 1960s, it sold to CertainTeed Corporation and then Nicolet. All of the companies made asbestos products in Ambler. 





In the 1960s, Turner & Newall had an exclusive licensing agreement with Armstrong World Industries that allowed Armstrong to sell the company's asbestos limpet spray insulation in the U.S. Because of how it was applied, limpet was particularly dangerous and put workers at a very high risk of asbestos exposure. 





The licensing agreement added Armstrong to the list of companies associated with asbestos from Keasbey & Mattison and the Ambler factory. 





Armstrong became liable for asbestos claims associated with Keasbey & Mattison and Nicolet. Armstrong filed for bankruptcy in 2000 and opened a trust to compensate claimants. 




Nicolet/Keasbey & Mattison Asbestos Lawsuits



Nicolet and CertainTeed began facing asbestos lawsuits as early as the 1970s. Some of them were related to Keasbey & Mattison pipe insulation. 



Secondhand Asbestos Exposure Lawsuit



According to Riverfront Times-News (RTN), Ambler resident Mary Samsel grew up on Kilgore Drive, a short distance from The Nicolet Company's asbestos-cement plant. 



Her father worked at the plant, and on numerous occasions, she would accompany him to work.



Samsel later became a physician and never worked around asbestos or asbestos-containing products. At the age of 47, she was diagnosed with asbestos-related lung cancer.



Although doctors initially thought Samsel's disease was caused by smoking, a closer look at one of her right lungs revealed asbestos fibers in it.



At the time of her exposure, a manufacturing company, CertainTeed, had taken over the plant. Samsel sued CertainTeed. They settled for an undisclosed amount.



Armstrong Asbestos Lawsuits



An important later case made it possible for more victims of Nicolet and Keasbey & Mattison asbestos products to seek compensation from Armstrong World Industries. 



Keith Edwin Gibson sued Armstrong in 1986 over exposure to asbestos in Keasbey & Mattison insulation. The U.S. District Court of Colorado decided Gibson could sue Armstrong. Because Nicolet bought Keasbey & Mattison and continued to make its asbestos products, asbestos liabilities passed to Armstrong when it acquired Nicolet. 



The decision was a landmark in asbestos cases in the U.S. It set a precedent allowing asbestos exposure victims to sue multiple companies and making businesses liable for the practices of the companies they acquire. 



Bankruptcy and Asbestos Trust Fund



The Nicolet Company was found liable in many other asbestos-related lawsuits. In 1987, facing over 61,000 cases, Nicolet filed for bankruptcy. 



Armstrong World Industries eventually acquired the Nicolet Company. 



When Armstrong took over the company, it also took over all its asbestos-related cases, which the Armstrong World Industries Asbestos Trust handles.



The fund, created in 2006, started with over $2 billion. Over $200 million has already been paid out. The current payment percentage for the Armstrong World Industries Asbestos Trust is 13.5%. 



Occupations Affected by The Nicolet Company



The Nicolet Company's asbestos products were distributed to and used in many industries, affecting numerous occupations and workers, including:




Electricians



Construction workers



Plumbers



Insulation installers



Roof workers and carpenters



Home decorators



Automobile mechanics



Sandblasters



Sheet metal workers



Welders and welder helpers



Yard workers and laborers



Blacksmiths



Engineers



Utility workers



Technicians




The first workers in line to be exposed to asbestos in the company's products were their own employees. Workers in Keasbey & Mattison and Nicolet factories, like the one in Ambler, were likely to be exposed when handling or working near asbestos. 



Some people experienced secondhand exposure to asbestos in Keasbey & Mattison products. Workers often brought asbestos fibers home on their clothing. Not understanding the risks, they unknowingly exposed family members. 



Asbestos Products Manufactured by Nicolet/Keasbey & Mattison



The following are among the many asbestos products made by Keasbey & Mattison and then Nicolet: 




K&M Kolor-Mate Asbestos-Cement Structural Sheets



K&M Hy-Temp Pipe Insulation



K&M Featherweight and Hi-Temp 85 percent Magnesia Pipe and Block Insulation



K&M Bestfelt Pipe Insulation



K&M Hi-Temp Block and Pipe Insulation



K&M Fine Corrugated and Special Fine Air Cell Pipe Insulation



Century Asbestos Corrugated



K&M Century Asbestos Shingles



Range Boiler Jacket



"Featherweight" Pipe Insulation



Hy-Temp Block Insulation



Kaytherm Pipe Insulation



Kaytherm Block Insulation



Asbestos Cement Air Duct



Zebra Pipe Insulation



Bestfelt Lamino Sponge Pipe Insulation



Air Cell Sheets and Blocks



Simplex "Super Shrunk" Pipe Insulation



Special Fine Corrugated Air Cell Pipe Insulation



Duplex Pipe Insulation



Asbestos Cloth Jacket for K&M Pipe Covering



Automobile gaskets




Superfund Site in Ambler



On the western edge of Ambler, Pennsylvania, lies what's known as the "white mountains." For many years, The Nicolet Company dumped wastes in the area at the Wissahickon Creek site. 



In the 1970s, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) noticed and ordered the company to stop dumping toxic wastes. The damage already done resulted in airborne asbestos fibers landing in peoples' homes, cars, and playground equipment.



The EPA eventually fined The Nicolet Company $1.4 million, but because of its bankruptcy, it never paid the fine. 



Extensive cleanup of the site began in 1985. The EPA cleaned up toxic wastes that had reached up to 30 feet.



If You Were Exposed to Keasbey & Mattison/Nicolet Products



A mesothelioma lawyer can help you claim with the Armstrong Trust if you have an asbestos illness related to Nicolet products. 



Experienced asbestos attorneys will review your work history and determine if you are eligible for the trust. They will give you the best chance of making a successful claim. 



Lawyers can also find any other companies that might be liable for your damages. You could be eligible for additional trusts or to file a lawsuit. 



Additional Help and Resources



Use our free Asbestos Attorney Locator Tool to find an experienced mesothelioma attorney in your area. Remember to fill out our form for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### North American Refractories Company (NARCO)

North American Refractories Company (NARCO) manufactured and supplied refractory products made with asbestos. The company's asbestos use led to serious illnesses in some workers and resulting lawsuits. Eventually, NARCO filed for bankruptcy and established an asbestos trust to compensate victims. 



If you suffer from mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













Did NARCO Use Asbestos? 



NARCO manufactured refractory materials, products designed to withstand very high temperatures in industrial settings. NARCO used asbestos in many of its products to provide insulation, strength, and protection against heat and fire. 



NARCO History



Narco was founded in 1929 as a refractory cement manufacturer. For over 50 years, the company remained one of the largest businesses in the refractory industry. 




As the company grew over the years, it added numerous products to its line, including hearths, stove fittings, ceramics, and coatings. 





Many of these products came into NARCO's lineup after merging with other companies, including the Worldwide Glass Industry, Harbison-Walker, RHI Refractories, and others. 





As NARCO expanded, so did its locations. Manufacturing plants were open in several states, including Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. It supplied many industries, especially the steel mills of the Northeast and Midwest. 





In 1979, Honeywell bought NARCO. From this point on, it ceased to be an independent company. NARCO became a subsidiary of ANH Refractories and then HarbisonWalker International. 





Most of the company's products needed heat and fire-resistant materials to work correctly. NARCO chose asbestos due to its affordability, ease of use, and ability to withstand extremely high temperatures and fire. This was before the dangers of asbestos were well known. 




NARCO eventually stopped using asbestos in its products. The long use of asbestos led to thousands of costly asbestos-related claims and lawsuits. NARCO eventually filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection and established a trust fund to compensate claimants.



NARCO Products Made With Asbestos



As a manufacturer of high-temperature refractory materials, NARCO used asbestos in nearly all of its products at one time. These are some of the products and brands of products made by NARCO and known to have contained asbestos: 




Aerogun



BOF-Cote and BOF-Patch



W0-339 MC Gun



Unicote



Anti-Erode Towel



CM Gun Mix (including CM-18 Gun Mix)



Stazon



MC Gun Mix



Narcocrete Trowel



Narcogun CR-346



Narcogun CR-346NN



Narcogun CRD-347



Narcogun MC-339



Narcogun MCD-344



Narcogun P-340



Narcogun PD-345



Narcogun SD-336



Narmag 60 DBRC



Narcolite



Narmag OH Gun Mix



Super 505 Hot Gun C



Narcmag OH Gun Mix




Which Workers Were Affected By NARCO Asbestos Products? 



NARCO employees who manufactured asbestos products faced high risks of exposure. By handling and working near asbestos, they likely disturbed fibers and inhaled them. This can later lead to illnesses like mesothelioma, asbestosis, and lung cancer. 



Workers in other industries were also at risk of exposure to asbestos from NARCO products. The company distributed its products to many different workplaces: 




Aluminum plants



Chemical plants



Incinerators



Oil refineries



Paper mills



Power plants



Railroads



Shipyards



Steel mills




Any workplaces that used industrial furnaces, boilers, and other heat-generating equipment likely used refractory products. Workers at greatest risk of exposure handled these materials, removed or installed them, or made repairs. These activities would have stirred up fibers that they could have inhaled. 



Also at risk of exposure were family members of workers exposed to asbestos. Workers often carried asbestos fibers home on their clothing. Other people in their household could be exposed in this way, which is called secondhand asbestos exposure. 



NARCO Asbestos Lawsuits 



Court documents state that by the early 2000s, NARCO faced nearly 300,000 asbestos-related claims and lawsuits. Both NARCO, as a subsidiary, and Honeywell, the parent company, were held liable for these claims. 



One example of these lawsuits came from two workers, Frederick Moss and Martin Easter, and their wives. They sued NARCO and other asbestos companies in 1999. Moss and Easter worked as engineers at several plants that used NARCO products. 



Both men developed mesothelioma, and Easter was also diagnosed with asbestosis. A jury awarded the four plaintiffs $7 million. NARCO appealed the decision but lost. 



Another lawsuit involved five plaintiffs awarded $130 million by a jury. NARCO and another company were found liable for the plaintiff's asbestos illnesses. 



NARCO Bankruptcy and Asbestos Trust



Facing so many expensive lawsuits, NARCO filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2002. It agreed to set up an asbestos trust fund to compensate future and pending asbestos-related cases.



In 2008, NARCO emerged from bankruptcy and established The NARCO Personal Injury Settlement Trust. The trust fund began accepting claims on October 15, 2013. It was funded with a little over $6 billion.



As of 2021, the NARCO asbestos trust's payment percentage is 100%. This is unusually high. Most asbestos trusts only pay a fraction of each claimant's claim. 



Honeywell and NARCO clashed over the funding and management of the trust. In 2021, Honeywell sued the trust, claiming overpayment on claims and paying unqualifying claims. 



The two sides settled the matter in 2022. Honeywell agreed to pay $1.325 billion into the trust to end its obligations to NARCO asbestos claims. 



How to Seek Compensation if You Were Exposed to NARCO Asbestos Products



If you worked with NARCO asbestos products, talk to a mesothelioma lawyer about your legal rights and how to seek compensation. The trust is open to claimants and pays a nearly unprecedented 100% of valid claims. 



A mesothelioma lawyer is your best guide in making a successful claim. They can also determine if you have any other options for seeking compensation for your past exposure and current asbestos illness. 



Resources for Asbestos Victims



Don't forget to fill out our form for our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### National Gypsum

National Gypsum made Gold Bond wallboard and other construction products with asbestos for many years. The company faced bankruptcy after asbestos exposure in workers led to illnesses and costly asbestos lawsuits. The bankruptcy led to the National Gypsum Company Bodily Injury Trust set up to compensate claimants. 



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds awaiting those who’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did National Gypsum Use Asbestos? 



National Gypsum used asbestos to make many of its construction products for many years. The construction industry used asbestos heavily to provide insulation and to strengthen materials. 



National Gypsum stopped using asbestos in its products, including Gold Bond, in the early 1980s. National Gypsum's current products are free of asbestos. 



National Gypsum History




National Gypsum was founded in 1925 in Delaware by three businessmen: Joseph F. Haggerty, Clarence E. Williams, and Melvin H. Baker. 





The three founders created a special process to make their gypsum board lighter and stronger. The founders were so confident of their gypsum board that they began offering a $5,000 "Gold Bond" certificate with every shipment.





The certificate guaranteed their wallboard would outlast and outperform those of other brands. It was a successful campaign that led to the use of Gold Bond as a trademarked brand name. 





Many other Gold Bond products followed, including tile, plaster, finishing materials, drywall, cement, stucco, acoustic tiles, and adhesives. 





Most of National Gypsum's materials contained asbestos. The use of asbestos led to thousands of asbestos-related lawsuits.





National Gypsum filed for bankruptcy in 1990. It emerged in 1993 with an asbestos trust fund to compensate claimants. National Gypsum continues to operate today and is one of the largest manufacturers of gypsum wallboard in the world. 




National Gypsum Products That Contained Asbestos



Gold Bond was National Gypsum's leading brand and the one with the most asbestos products. Gold Bond products known to have contained asbestos include: 




Exterior Stucco



Asbestos Cement Board



Plaster



Acoustical Plaster



Cement



Joint Cement



Spackling Compound



Adhesives



Tar Paper



Fire-Shielded Plaster



Plastic Acrylic Panels



Texture Paint



Siding



Asbestos Permaboard



Ripple-Tone Panels



Siding and Cement Siding Shingles



Soffit Panels




Other National Gypsum brands with products that contained asbestos include: 




Abestone



Chromatone



Deeptex



E-Z Soak



Flexfelt



Humiguard



Perfo-lyte



Permaboard



Plia-f-lex



Sprayolite



Sussex



Thermacoustic



Thermotex




National Gypsum also acquired several companies that used asbestos in products. The company took on their asbestos liabilities: 




Abestone Corporation



Allentown Portland Cement Company



American Encaustic Tile



Atlantic Gypsum



Austin Company



Huron Portland Cement Company



Murray Tile



National Mortar and Supply Company



Wesco




Workers Affected by National Gypsum Asbestos Products



Many people were exposed to asbestos from construction products, specifically those made by National Gypsum. National Gypsum employees working in factories to manufacture these products faced some of the biggest risks. 



By working with and handling asbestos materials, they risked disturbing fibers. Asbestos fibers in the air can easily be inhaled by workers and anyone else in the area. 



National Gypsum distributed its products to the construction industry, putting many additional workers at risk of exposure:




Construction workers



Sheetrock workers



Plasterers



Drywall installers



Painters



Plumbers



Electricians



HVAC workers



Roofers



Laborers



Cement workers



Demolition workers



Repair and renovation workers



Building maintenance workers




Exposure in the home was also possible. National Gypsum asbestos products went into residential homes. While safe when contained, disturbed asbestos products can expose homeowners and residents. 



Any renovation work, or even regular maintenance and repairs, can expose people to asbestos fibers. Asbestos materials left to deteriorate or decay can also cause exposure. 



National Gypsum Asbestos Lawsuits



Exposure in workers led to illnesses, including mesothelioma, asbestosis, and lung cancer. Many people diagnosed with asbestos illnesses filed lawsuits against National Gypsum and other asbestos companies seeking damages. 



These are just some of the examples of thousands of asbestos lawsuits filed against National Gypsum: 




Mercer University in Georgia sued National Gypsum and other companies in 1985. Rather than suing over illnesses, the University sought damages for the costs of replacing asbestos materials in buildings. Mercer claimed the companies failed to warn them of the presence of asbestos in their construction materials, necessitating costly abatement and replacement with safer products. Mercer was awarded $100,000 from National Gypsum. 





Another case from 1985 was important in determining which companies could be included in asbestos lawsuits. Arthur Roehling worked as a pipefitter and died of mesothelioma. His widow carried on his lawsuit against 18 companies. Her lawyers successfully argued for the inclusion of National Gypsum because Roehling remembered seeing the Gold Bond log on pipes he handled on the job. 




National Gypsum's Asbestos Trust Fund



By 1990, asbestos lawsuits against National Gypsum had grown so significantly that the company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. 



The company was said to be around $1 billion in debt by its filing. Since most of the debt came from asbestos-related claims and lawsuits, National Gypsum set up an asbestos trust three years later after emerging from bankruptcy.



Court documents stated that National Gypsum faced over 40,000 asbestos-related cases when it came out of bankruptcy. It created the NGC Bodily Injury Trust (NGCBIT) to compensate for all pending and future cases. 



The asbestos trust fund was initially implemented on July 1, 1993, but was canceled on April 22, 2003, to establish the second trust fund, NGCBIT, to start on August 6, 2003.



According to the NGC official website, as of 2015, a total of $381,081,652.19 has been paid out to 207,985 people injured by asbestos due to National Gypsum's products. 



What to Do if You Were Exposed to National Gypsum Asbestos



If you worked with National Gypsum and Gold Bond products containing asbestos, contact an experienced mesothelioma lawyer. They can help you seek compensation through the trust. 



They can also review your work history to determine if any other companies can be held liable for your illness and resulting costs. Most people with asbestos illnesses were exposed to asbestos by more than one company's products. 



Additional Help and Resources



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### Mobil Oil Corporation

The Mobil Oil Corporation, today known as ExxonMobil, is one of the largest gas and oil companies in the world. The company's past use of asbestos in refineries and equipment exposed workers, resulting in mesothelioma and other illnesses. The company has faced thousands of asbestos lawsuits. 



If you suffer from mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













Did Mobil Oil Use Asbestos? 



Many industries used asbestos for decades, primarily for its insulating properties. Mobil did not manufacture products with asbestos. Mobil Oil used asbestos as an insulator in its equipment and refineries to prevent heat loss and to protect against heat and fire. 



Mobil Oil Corporation History




Mobil Oil began in 1870 as the Standard Oil Company, founded by John D. Rockefeller and his associates with multiple oil refineries.  





In 1879, Standard Oil acquired Vacuum Oil Company and added lubricants to its line of products. The lubricants were used in Thomas Edison's first central power generation system. 





In 1882, the Standard Oil Trust was formed to include the Standard Oil Companies of New York and New Jersey. 





In a landmark case in 1911, the U.S. Supreme Court found that Standard Oil violated anti-trust laws and was too big. The company broke into 34 individual businesses, including those that would become Mobil Oil and, eventually, ExxonMobil. 





Vacuum Oil and Standard Oil merged in 1931 and took the name Mobil Oil from a Vacuum product. The merger also created a Pegasus icon, which would eventually become the symbol of the Mobil Oil brand.





During the 1950s, Mobil Oil grew and developed overseas success, with plants, gas stations, and oil refineries across Europe. Mobil sold lubricants, motor oil, gasoline, and other products throughout the U.S. and the world. 





Mobil merged with Exxon in 1999, creating ExxonMobil. Today, ExxonMobil is the largest publicly traded oil and gas company in the world. It explores and extracts oil and natural gas and continues to refine oil to make various products. 




How Did Mobil Oil Use Asbestos? 



Unlike many other companies held liable for asbestos illnesses, Mobil did not make asbestos products. Mobil Oil used asbestos in its refineries and the equipment used to extract and refine oil. 



Asbestos was an important insulator for many years in nearly every industrial setting. In oil refineries, asbestos insulated machinery and pipes. It prevented equipment from overheating, minimized heat loss, and protected against fire. 



Mobile Oil refineries contained asbestos in: 




Pipe insulation



Pumps



Tanks



Furnaces



Ovens



Boilers



Heat exchangers



Heat-generating vessels



Dryers



Reactors



Worker protective gear




Mobil Oil also purchased and used asbestos products under two brand names: Armorcote and Dum Dum. These products included adhesive, cement, and caulk. 



Workers Affected by Mobil's Asbestos Use



Many workers at Mobil Oil facilities faced serious risks of asbestos exposure. They worked with or around asbestos materials that could have shed fibers that workers inhaled. This includes workers in Mobil refineries as well as on oil tankers and offshore drilling rigs. 



Examples of workers at risk of exposure to asbestos by Mobil Oil include: 




Offshore workers



Oil tanker crews



Refinery workers



Pipefitters



Steamfitters



Boiler workers 



Metal workers



Electricians



Chemical workers



Engineers



Insulators



Oven and dryer workers




Workers with the highest risks of exposure handled and manipulated asbestos materials. Repairing or maintaining equipment, for instance, could easily disturb asbestos fibers that then contaminated the air in the workspace. 



Family members of Mobil Oil workers also faced asbestos exopsure risks. Before they knew the risks, workers often brought asbestos fibers home on their clothing. This led to many cases of secondhand asbestos exposure. 



Mobil Oil Asbestos Lawsuits



Asbestos exposure at Mobil Oil led to cases of mesothelioma, lung cancer, asbestosis, and other illnesses in workers. Many of these workers took legal action to hold Mobil liable for their damages. These are just a few of the many asbestos lawsuits Mobil Oil has faced. 



Merle Sandy



On February 17, 2006, a California jury ruled in favor of a 60-year-old plaintiff, Merle Sandy, after evidence showed Mobil exposed him to excessive amounts of asbestos, leading to asbestosis and colon cancer. He was awarded a total of $1,083,000.



Court documents indicate that Sandy worked at an oil refinery in Benicia, California, formerly owned by the Exxon Mobil Corporation.



When Sandy worked at an oil refinery in the 1970s, Mobil was still the owner and responsible for providing safe work conditions. During the trial, evidence showed Mobil was clearly aware of the dangers of asbestos.



George R. Smith



On August 3, 2007, Mobil Oil faced lost yet another asbestos-related lawsuit when the wife of the late George R. Smith, a former plumber and pipefitter, was awarded $2.5 million for loss of consortium, $319,500 in economic damages, and $1.5 million in non-economic damages.



According to court documents, many companies were listed as defendants in the lawsuit, filed after Smith developed and subsequently died from malignant mesothelioma. 



Toward the end of the trial, all other companies had either settled or were dismissed, aside from Mobil. The company took its chances in fighting the lawsuit. However, Mobil was found guilty of:




Failure to warn of dangerous existing conditions before Smith went to work



Failure to exercise basic care toward company employees




Mobil unsuccessfully appealed the Smith verdict.



Insurance Lawsuit



ExxonMobil faced a lawsuit brought by Lockheed Martin's insurer in 2016. Lockheed Martin's predecessor, Martin-Marietta, owned and made the Dum Dum brand of asbestos products Mobil Oil used in the past. 



The insurer demanded reimbursement from ExxonMobil for costs associated with asbestos claims. The case settled out of court with an agreement for compensating victims harmed by the Dum Dum products. 



If You Were Exposed to Asbestos Through Mobil Oil



You could be at risk for illness if you worked with Mobil Oil equipment or facilities. If you suspect past exposure, talk to your doctor right away about screenings and diagnosis. 



If you are diagnosed with an asbestos illness, you can seek damages through a lawsuit. An experienced mesothelioma lawyer can determine if you have a case and give you the best chance of receiving compensation for your expenses. 



Additional Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



Remember, if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you may qualify for significant compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form for our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area.

### 3M (Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company)

The Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, known today as 3M, is a successful science-based company and global manufacturer of adhesives and other products. For many years, 3M used asbestos in its operations and products. When 3M workers and consumers began developing life-threatening asbestos diseases, lawsuits against the company followed.



There is currently more than $30 billion available in asbestos trust funds. If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that you may be entitled to substantial compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 













Did 3M Use Asbestos? 



3M was founded to mine natural resources in northern Minnesota and make products from mined materials. Eventually, the company shifted to manufacturing. 



3M used asbestos in many of its products for several years. These include adhesives and caulking materials. 



3M History



3M History



3M was founded in 1902 by Dr. J Danley Budd, John Dwan, William A. McGonagle, Herman W. Cable, and Henry S. Bryan. According to the company’s official website, the five founders all had a single goal in mind for the company at the beginning: to mine corundum, a mineral found in a Crystal Bay mine.




Although the company’s founders didn’t have luck with corundum, a partnership began that would take the company to global proportions.




In its early years, 3M primarily focused on producing sandpaper made from imported Spanish garnet. However, the real transformation began in 1916 when the company invested in its first laboratory, sparking a wave of innovation.




In 1910, the company settled in St. Paul, Minnesota, and within ten years, created the waterproof sandpaper used to repel dust during automobile manufacturing. Among the company's early inventions were also sound-deadening materials for automobiles.



In 1925, the invention of masking tape by Richard G. Drew started the company’s Scotch brand, which grew to include cellophane tape and pressure-sensitive tape. Scotch tape remains one of 3M’s most iconic products.



By World War II, 3M began manufacturing products for the military, including Scotchlite™ Reflective Sheeting and filament adhesive tape, which expanded the company into the graphic arts industry, leading to offset printing plates.



Over the next several decades, the company developed many unique products, such as the world’s first synthetic grass surface. One of its best-known products, Post-It Notes, appeared in 1980, marking a significant milestone in everyday office supplies.



Throughout the next several years, 3M continued to grow substantially. It added various products to its line, including Scotchgard™ products and Thermo-Fax™.




Today, 3M sells more than 60,000 products, showcasing its vast innovation and adaptability over the decades.



The company's diverse product line grew to include unique offerings such as the world's first synthetic grass surface and, in 1980, the introduction of Post-It Notes. Today, 3M sells more than 60,000 products worldwide.




The company’s enormous success led to the opening of several factories worldwide, including locations in Australia, Canada, Mexico, France, and England.




Headquartered in St. Paul, Minnesota, 3M now employs over 93,000 people in 70 countries. The company's products are available in more than 200 countries, and it has maintained a presence on the Fortune 500 list for over 65 years.



By the time the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) placed strict regulations on asbestos, 3M had already used the toxic set of minerals in various products for many years. From the mid-1930s through the late 1980s, the company manufactured a range of asbestos-containing products. This extensive time frame highlights the longevity of asbestos usage before regulatory changes took effect.



Understanding this timeline is crucial. It reflects not only the historical reliance on asbestos for its heat-resistant properties but also underscores the shift in public health policies as awareness of its dangers grew.



Here's a quick overview of the timeline:




Mid-1930s: 3M begins incorporating asbestos into their product line.



Late 1980s: Production of asbestos-containing products ceases, aligning with increased regulatory scrutiny.




This stretch of over five decades marks a pivotal period in industrial history, demonstrating both the widespread adoption of asbestos and the eventual pivot towards safer alternatives.



Global sales total approximately $30 billion annually, with international sales accounting for more than 60% of all sales. 3M’s journey from a small mining venture to a global leader in innovation speaks volumes about its enduring impact on the world.



Today, 3M does not use asbestos in its products. It does make protective gear for asbestos workers, though. This includes respirator kits, eyewear, and body suits. It also provides training and technical support for using these products. 



Which 3M Products Contained Asbestos? 



3M used asbestos in several products over many years: 




Adhesive



Caulk



Cement



Centerlite



Greenlite Powder



Heat Protective Rolls



Heating Elements



Hot Melt Sunset Resin



Laminated Sheets



Rubber Coated Asbestos Cloth



Sandpaper



Sealers



Solid Pavement Material



Sticky Tar Caulking



Wet Adhesives




Asbestos Exposure and 3M Respirators



3M manufactures respirators designed to protect workers from asbestos and other toxic substances. The company faced controversy in the 1960s when some of its respirator models caused asbestos exposure: 




3M 8500 Dust Mask. 3M claimed the 8500 model would protect workers from toxic dust. Later lawsuits contended that the masks failed. Workers who thought they were protected from asbestos were not. Some of these workers developed asbestos illnesses.





3M 8710 Disposable Respirator. The 8710 model was approved for use in workplaces with asbestos. Some workers did not realize that this approval only extended to situations in which asbestos levels were ten times or less than ten times the legal exposure limit. 




3M Asbestos-Related Lawsuits



To date, former employees, contractors, and consumers have filed over 300,000 asbestos-related lawsuits and claims against 3M. These are a few notable cases.



Heather Von St. James



In 2005, Heather Von St. James, of St. Paul, Minnesota, was diagnosed with mesothelioma in her early 40s.



St. James was the daughter of a man who made a living by sanding drywall. He would come from work in asbestos-filled clothing and asbestos in his hair and on his skin each day.



This eventually led to St. James’ second-hand asbestos exposure. St. James filed an asbestos-related claim against 3M, the company responsible for her father’s asbestos exposure.



A confidential agreement wouldn’t allow St. James to confirm her compensation.



Frank Zickert



3M also faced numerous lawsuits for its 3M 8710 mask, which was considered defective.



In 2014, the wife of former worker Frank Zickert, who died of mesothelioma, sued 3M for providing defective face masks that didn’t prevent workers from inhaling asbestos fibers.



Zickert</Last Name>’s job involved making asbestos-containing fire doors and other products, and he relied on the mask to protect himself from the dangers of asbestos fibers.



According to the lawsuit, the masks didn’t work, ultimately leading to Zickert</Last Name>’s death.




“Frank’s job involved making asbestos fire doors with material similar to Kaylo that contained chrysotile amosite asbestos fibers, cleanup, and disposal of the waste and scrap from such doors. At certain times the mixing of asbestos fibers to make the cores for the fire doors was a part of the manufacturing process,” the lawsuit states.




Recent Legal Developments




December 2021: A court of appeals upheld a $4 million verdict awarded to the surviving family of Warren Wright, who succumbed to mesothelioma after exposure in oil refineries. 3M settled before trial, while ExxonMobil proceeded and was held responsible for the verdict.



June 2018: A Wisconsin court allowed a consolidated lawsuit to continue from two mesothelioma plaintiffs. They claimed that 3M’s respirators failed to protect them from asbestos exposure at a factory in Weyerhaeuser, Wisconsin, which manufactured fireproof doors with asbestos cores.



February 2016: Just before the trial commenced, 3M settled four asbestos lawsuits filed by mesothelioma plaintiffs. These suits were brought by former workers at the same Weyerhaeuser factory.



2015: 3M was named in a lawsuit by a mesothelioma plaintiff exposed to asbestos through their products during his tenure in the U.S. Air Force.




Unlike many other companies faced with thousands of asbestos-related lawsuits, 3M never filed for bankruptcy and continues to face asbestos-related claims.



Who Was Exposed to Asbestos Through 3M? 



Workers from various occupations were affected by 3M's asbestos-containing products, as the company made a variety of things shipped worldwide. 



The occupations most affected include:




Drywall sanders



3M employees (manufacturers)



Factory workers



Mechanics



Engineers



Automobile manufacturers




Common 3M products that contained asbestos include caulking materials and adhesives. The company no longer uses asbestos in any of its products.



How To Seek Compensation After 3M Asbestos Exposure



If you or a family member worked for 3M, talk to your doctor about the possibility of asbestos exposure. If you used any of their products that contained asbestos, you are also at risk for illness. 



An asbestos attorney can help you take legal action and seek compensation if you receive a diagnosis of mesothelioma or another asbestos illness. 



You could be eligible to file a lawsuit to seek a settlement. Depending on the source of the asbestos, you might also qualify for a claim with an asbestos trust fund. 



Additional Resources and Help for Asbestos Victims



If you or a loved one are suffering from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that you may be eligible for a substantial amount of compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. For additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 



What is the scale of 3M's global operations and sales today?
3M operates on a massive scale, with its headquarters situated in St. Paul, Minnesota. The company boasts a workforce of over 93,000 employees who contribute to its presence in 70 countries around the globe. This extensive reach ensures that 3M products are accessible in more than 200 nations. The company’s impressive operations have secured it a spot on the Fortune 500 list for over 65 consecutive years, underscoring its stable performance.



In terms of sales, 3M generates an astonishing $30 billion annually. Remarkably, over 60% of these sales originate from international markets, highlighting the company's strong global influence. This strategic international presence not only bolsters their global footprint but also reinforces their position as a leading player in various industries worldwide.



Impact of Asbestos Exposure on Workers and Consumers




Asbestos exposure has serious health implications, particularly for those involved in the manufacturing and usage of certain industrial products. Employees who worked closely with these materials, especially over long periods, faced significant health risks. This extended contact heightens the likelihood of developing severe conditions like mesothelioma, a rare but aggressive form of cancer linked to asbestos fibers.



Health Risks for Employees:




Chronic Exposure: Workers in production facilities where asbestos-containing products were made were exposed to airborne fibers on a daily basis, increasing their risk substantially.



Occupational Hazard: The nature of their work meant that protective measures might not have been sufficient or properly enforced, leading to prolonged inhalation of toxic particles.




Risks to End Users:




Product Usage: Consumers using these products in their homes or workplaces were also exposed, albeit often unknowingly, to asbestos.



Secondary Exposure: Even minimal contact could pose health threats, especially when products deteriorated or were damaged, releasing fibers into the air.




Long-term Consequences



Both workers and end users faced not only immediate risks but also potential long-term health challenges, often manifesting decades later. This latency in asbestos-related diseases makes early detection and treatment challenging, underscoring the critical need for awareness and preventive measures in industries that once widely utilized asbestos.




How has 3M's financial stability affected its handling of asbestos litigation?
3M's robust financial health has played a crucial role in its approach to asbestos litigation. While many companies in the industry have faced bankruptcy due to overwhelming legal battles, 3M has maintained its economic stability. This financial strength allows the company to manage its legal challenges directly through the courts, rather than resorting to bankruptcy or settlements outside the courtroom.



The advantage of financial resilience means 3M can allocate resources effectively to defend its position, engage in prolonged legal processes, and potentially minimize overall liabilities. This stability not only supports sustained defense efforts but also reassures stakeholders of the company's enduring viability despite ongoing litigation.



Additionally, their financial robustness might enable strategic investment in compliance and risk management, further safeguarding against potential legal pitfalls in the future.




Why did 3M use asbestos fibers in its products?
3M incorporated asbestos fibers into its products due to the material's exceptional qualities. Asbestos offers remarkable strength, enhances durability, and provides significant resistance to heat. These properties made it an attractive option for manufacturing robust and long-lasting items.



By utilizing asbestos, 3M sought to ensure their products could withstand various conditions, offering reliability and performance in demanding environments.

### Malleable Iron Range Co.

The Malleable Iron Range Company, known later as Monarch, manufactured appliances from 1896 to 1985. Malleable used asbestos in the insulation and other components of its stoves and ranges. The company faced asbestos lawsuits and eventually closed without establishing a trust fund. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 













Did Malleable Iron Range Use Asbestos? 



Asbestos was once used in many industries as an insulator and to protect against heat and fire. Malleable used asbestos insulation in ranges and stoves for many years. 



Malleable Iron Range Co. History



Silas McClure and A.C. Terrell founded Malleable Iron Range Co. in 1896. The business began as a small stove factory in St. Louis. 




Within three years, the founders named the company Malleable Iron Range Co. and started a line of coal and wood-burning stoves. Monarch became the brand name and signature line of the company's most popular stoves.





The stove line became so popular that the company made a deal with well-known inventor Sam Insull to make electric ranges under the Fedelco brand.





Household appliances and products followed, including washing machines, vacuum cleaners, irons, and more. A Monarch stove, specially designed for the trip, accompanied an expedition to Antarctica in 1934. 





Malleable grew to its greatest extent after World War II. It continued to add products to its line, including refrigerators, furnaces, gas water heaters, and electric water heaters. 





Many of Malleable's products were residential, but the company also sold to public utility companies. By the 1960s, most utility companies stopped purchasing these types of appliances to reduce power consumption.





This and other issues, such as competition from larger companies like General Electric, led to financial troubles for Malleable. 





During the 1970s, oil shortages helped give the company's wood-burning furnace production a boost. Still, it wasn't enough to save it from dire financial loss, especially after asbestos-related lawsuits were filed against the company. 





Until the 1940s, the Malleable used asbestos in the linings of its ranges, resulting in employees, contractors, and consumers developing life-threatening illnesses.




Malleable Iron Range Co. closed its doors permanently in 1985. The company also filed for bankruptcy protection, but it was because of the mounting debt due to low sales, and therefore, it never established an asbestos trust fund.



Malleable Iron Range Co. Asbestos-Containing Products



Malleable Iron Range Co.'s Monarch ranges were the primary product that used asbestos. Asbestos was primarily used in the insulated linings of these products. 



The company stated that the "Triple Asbestos Wall" in its stoves helped battle corrosion and rust. The water heaters and other appliances sold to power companies likely also contained asbestos. 



Who Was Exposed to Malleable Iron Range Asbestos Products? 



Homeowners with Malleable and Monarch ranges were at low risk for asbestos exposure. As long as the linings remained intact, they were unlikely to give off asbestos fibers. 



At greatest risk of exposure to asbestos from Malleable products were the workers who built, installed, or repaired them. Malleable's factory employees could have been exposed to asbestos from handling asbestos materials. 



Workers who installed, removed, and repaired Malleable ranges also faced exposure risks. By manipulating the ranges and stoves, they risked damaging asbestos materials that could release fibers into the air. 



Malleable Iron Range Co. Asbestos Claims and Lawsuits



Most asbestos-related lawsuits and claims against Malleable Iron Range Co. came from workers at the company's manufacturing plants. 



The company's lawsuits and asbestos-related claims aren't as substantial as many of the other manufacturers who used asbestos, as Malleable stopped using asbestos in the 1940s. Most other manufacturers continued to use asbestos until the late 1970s or mid-1980s.



Malleable eventually filed for bankruptcy. It stopped operations in 1985 and never reopened. Its Monarch brand continued for a few more years with other companies. 



Malleable Iron Range Co. Contamination Sites



In 1987, the Metal Ware Corporation of Two Rivers, Wisconsin, bought the former Malleable Iron Range Co. from MAFCO, the company's name formed after Malleable went bankrupt. 



Malleable reportedly left its production plant in such disarray that the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources carried out a hazardous waste investigation.



In addition to discovering numerous other contaminants, asbestos was found throughout the plant's pipes. The EPA assisted with the cleanup, and an allocated $369,000 was provided to assist in removing the damage.



If You Were Exposed to Malleable Asbestos Products



If Malleable Iron Range's products exposed you to asbestos, you could be at risk for mesothelioma. Contact an experienced mesothelioma lawyer to learn about your legal options. Malleable is no longer in business, which makes getting compensation more challenging. 



A lawyer or asbestos law firm can review your work history and find other ways to seek compensation. There were likely several companies that exposed you to asbestos. You could be eligible for a lawsuit or to make claims with asbestos trusts. 



Additional Help and Legal Resources for Asbestos Victims



Don't forget to fill out our form for our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Mergenthaler Linotype Company

The Mergenthaler Linotype Company used asbestos to insulate its machinery. Years of asbestos use exposed workers and repair technicians. Some of these workers got sick and filed asbestos lawsuits against Merghenthaler Linotype. 



If you suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more.













Did Mergenthaler Linotype Use Asbestos? 



Many varied industries used asbestos in the middle of the 20th century. Asbestos was a common choice for insulation because it was effective, abundant, and inexpensive. 



Mergenthaler was one of many companies that used asbestos for years. It used asbestos to insulate its machines, which produced a significant amount of heat. 



Mergenthaler History




Ottmar Mergenthaler designed the linotype machine, revolutionizing the printing industry. His invention made it faster, easier, and less expensive to print. He made his first linotype machine in New York in 1886. 





Mergenthaler established the Mergenthaler Linotype Company in Brooklyn in 1890. The first customer was The New York Tribune. 





Mergenthaler quickly came to dominate the printing industry, selling its innovative machines all over the U.S. and then worldwide. 





By the early 1900s, the company had sold over 10,000 units. With its booming success, Mergenthaler Linotype expanded its business by purchasing several factories around the world.





Linotype machines generated a lot of heat and were insulated with asbestos materials. 





The company's success continued until the 1970s when newer, advanced equipment began to make the linotype machine obsolete. 





Eventually, Mergenthaler Linotype transferred its focus to computerized typesetting systems, which increased business and kept the company afloat.





In the 1990s,  Mergenthaler Linotype started a merger with Hell GmbH, forming the Linotype-Hell AG. The new company moved away from typesetting and began focusing on typographical software. 





Before its merger, the company used asbestos in its products, ultimately leading to asbestos-related lawsuits. These lawsuits never cost enough to force the company into bankruptcy. 




Mergenthaler Linotype Products with Asbestos



Linotype machines helped to automate printing, but the machines generated a lot of heat. They required insulation to prevent overheating and to protect workers. 



For many years, Mergenthaler insulated its linotype machines with asbestos. Asbestos cement was a common type of insulator used in linotypes. It served as an insulating coating on many components, including crucibles. 



Occupations Affected by Asbestos in Mergenthaler Linotypes 



Mergenthaler workers who manufactured the company's products were at risk of asbestos exposure. Handling asbestos materials to install them in the machines put them at risk for releasing and inhaling harmful asbestos fibers. 



Workers who faced even greater risks of asbestos exposure repaired linotype machines. Technicians who worked on the linotype machines would pack asbestos-filled paste between the various parts of the machines. 



When the Linotype needed repair, asbestos was pasted into the empty spaces before replacing the machine parts.



Anyone who worked at a publishing company and handled the repairs of linotype machines was at risk of inhaling dangerous asbestos fibers. A 1922 manual, provided by Mergenthaler Linotype, advised the workers to:




“Break away as much of the asbestos insulating material packed between the crucible and the jacket as is possible.”




As a result, thousands of people suffered due to asbestos exposure from the company's machines. 



The 1922 manual had no warnings regarding the harmful effects of asbestos and how it can lead to life-threatening illnesses, such as mesothelioma, asbestosis, and asbestos-related lung cancer.



Mergenthaler Asbestos Lawsuits



Mergenthaler Linotype faced numerous asbestos lawsuits related to worker exposure and resulting asbestos diseases. 



Many of the sick workers took legal action against Mergenthaler to recover damages. One later lawsuit was filed in 2020. Thomas Pearsons developed mesothelioma after working for decades for the Vermont Standard newspaper. 



Part of Pearsons' job involved maintaining a Mergenthaler Model 8 Linotype machine. Although Mergenthaler stopped using asbestos in the 1940s, many cases arose later because small newspapers and publishers continued to use and maintain linotype machines for decades. 



Mergenthaler Today



Today, the company goes by the name Linotype and creates various fonts and typographic products for individuals and businesses. 



Linotype is based in Brooklyn, New York, and no longer uses asbestos in any of its products.



If You Were Exposed to Asbestos Merganthaler Linotypes



If you worked with Mergenthaler products that contained asbestos, you could be at risk for serious illness. A mesothelioma lawyer can help you seek compensation if you get sick. 



Mergenthaler never filed for bankruptcy and never established an asbestos trust fund. Victims of exposure can still sue the company in its current form and seek damages. 



An experienced lawyer or asbestos law firm can determine if you have a case. They can also review your work history and find any other companies liable for your illness and resulting expenses. 



Additional Information and Resources



Remember to fill out our form for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### M.H. Detrick Company

The M.H. Detrick Company made its industrial refractory products and insulation with asbestos until the 1960s. The company faced numerous lawsuits over asbestos exposure and resulting illnesses. M.H. Detrick filed for bankruptcy in 1998 and set up an asbestos trust fund that is now closed. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













Did M.H. Detrick Use Asbestos? 



M.H. Detrick manufactures refractory and insulation products, materials that must withstand high temperatures or reduce heat losses. M.H. Detrick made these products with asbestos in the past, from the 1930s to the 1960s. 



M.H. Detrick History




Founded in 1925, the M.H. Detrick Company started in Illinois as a heat enclosure manufacturer. 





The company began as a relatively small business. It quickly became an industry leader in heat enclosures and began adding various heat enclosure products to its lines, such as refractory linings and steel.





Refractory tiles helped make M.H. Detrick successful. Refractory tiles (also known as fire bricks) withstand very high temperatures and are used in furnaces, fireplaces, heat enclosures, and kilns. The company used asbestos to make these products resistant to heat and fire.





M.H. Detrick used asbestos in its products, leading to thousands of asbestos-related claims. Court documents indicate that M.H. Detrick relied on asbestos from the 1930s until the mid-1960s.





The lawsuits filed against M.H. Detrick led to its bankruptcy and the foundation of an asbestos trust fund that is now closed. 





Today, M.H. Detrick continues to operate from headquarters in Frankfurt, Illinois. It still makes high-temperature products but no longer uses asbestos. 




M.H. Detrick Asbestos-Containing Products



For over 20 years, M.H. Detrick manufactured numerous products that contained asbestos, including the following:




Mineral wool block



Insulating cement



Finishing cement



Fireproofing cement



Asbestos rope



Detroc asbestos board



Casing cement



Plastic and block insulation



Hitherm (insulation brand)



Asbestolux (wall and ceiling board brand)



Super 711 (sealant brand)



Permiseal (waterproofing brand)



Boiler coatings



Pipe covering



Hilite insulating and finishing cement



Permaseal



Therman coat



Fibrous adhesive



Asbestos rope



Block insulation




Occupations Affected by M.H. Detrick Asbestos Products



Asbestos products cause exposure when they shed fibers that workers handling or working near them can inhale. Inhaled asbestos fibers cause damage inside the body and may cause or contribute to mesothelioma, lung cancer, asbestosis, or other illnesses. 



M.H. Detrick employees who worked in its manufacturing facilities faced high risks of asbestos exposure. They handled or worked near asbestos that likely shed fibers. 



Many other workers in various industries faced exposure risks from M.H. Detrick asbestos products. These workers handled, installed, repaired, or worked near asbestos products. 



Occupations and industries at risk of exposure from M.H. Detrick asbestos products include:




Steelworkers



Construction workers



Boiler workers



Insulators



Metal workers



Chemical plant workers



Power plant workers



Oil refinery workers



Shipyard workers



U.S. Navy




M.H. Detrick supplied the U.S. Navy with asbestos products, putting veterans at risk of exposure and illness. Navy veterans have high rates of mesothelioma because so many asbestos products went into building Navy ships. 



M.H. Detrick Asbestos Lawsuits 



M.H. Detrick's use of asbestos in so many products led to exposure, illnesses, and asbestos lawsuits. Beginning in the 1980s, the company faced thousands of costly lawsuits brought by exposure victims and their families seeking damages. 



In one lawsuit, Wesley Roberts and his wife sued M.H. Detrick and other asbestos companies. Roberts died from mesothelioma due to workplace asbestos exposure. He worked as a pipefitter in oil refineries. His widow received damages through the lawsuit. 



Bankruptcy and Asbestos Trust Fund



M.H. Detrick filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 1998 due to the high costs of asbestos lawsuits. 



Part of the company's bankruptcy agreement included creating an asbestos trust fund to compensate for any pending and future asbestos-related claims. 



On August 21, 2002, after M.H. Detrick emerged from bankruptcy, it established the M. H. Detrick Company Asbestos Trust.



Under Sections 101(5) and 524(g)(5) of the Bankruptcy Code, the asbestos trust assumed all asbestos-related claims against M.H. Detrick. The company placed a total of $3 million in the trust in 2002. The asbestos trust fund closed in 2011 and no longer accepts claims.



M.H. Detrick Today



M.H. Detrick is still in operation today and based out of Mokena, Illinois. The company focuses on refractory heat enclosures and still provides insulation, pre-fired brick, and heat-resistant castings. 



M.H. Detrick no longer uses asbestos in any of its products.



What to Do if You Were Exposed to M.H. Detric Asbestos Products



If you think you were exposed to asbestos, talk to your doctor. Early screenings and diagnosis for asbestos illnesses are essential for the best outcomes. 



Contact a mesothelioma lawyer if you worked with M.H. Detrick products with asbestos. They can help you find options for seeking compensation if you get sick. The M.H. Detrick asbestos trust is closed, but there may be other ways to get compensation, depending on your work history. 



Additional Information for Asbestos Victims



Don't forget to fill out our form for our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Lincoln Electric

Lincoln Electric is a worldwide manufacturer of welding equipment, gear, and tools. Lincoln Electric used asbestos in its welding rods in the past. This caused exposure in many workers, illnesses like mesothelioma, and asbestos-related claims and lawsuits.



If you suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did Lincoln Electric Use Asbestos? 



Lincoln Electric used asbestos in welding products until 1981. Welding is a high-heat process that requires efficient insulating and protective materials. For many years, asbestos was the material of choice. 



Lincoln Electric History



Lincoln Electric was established in 1895 when John C. Lincoln invested $200 to create the company. Lincoln used his own design of electric motors as the primary product when the company opened. 




Within ten years, Lincoln's younger brother, James F. Lincoln, began working as a salesman for the company. The company added more products to its line during this time, including battery chargers and welding sets.





By 1914, Lincoln Electric had grown substantially, leading to a Canada-based operation and the Lincoln Electric Welding School, where more than 100,000 students were trained.





During the next 20 years, its growth continued to expand, and its welding production surpassed its motor production. In turn, welding became the primary focus of Lincoln Electric. 





One of Lincoln Electric's important innovations was the first portable welding machine in the industry. Just one person could operate it. 





The company also created the Fleetweld® 5 coated electrode, known for producing welds with 100% greater flexibility when compared to welds with bare electrodes.





During World War II, Lincoln Electric began welding ship hulls, which led to an entirely new market for this type of welding. The company contributed more welding equipment to the war effort than any other. 





By the 1990s, Lincoln Electric reached global heights and opened an electrode plant in Shanghai, China. The company also acquired several different companies and brands, including  Essen, Germany's Uhrhan & Schwill, and a 50% stake in the Turkish-based company ASKaynak.





By the end of the 1990s, Lincoln Electric added at least 23 new products and services to the market and opened up a distribution center in Johannesburg, South Africa. 




Although the company won many asbestos-related lawsuits, the losses resulted in multi-million dollar verdicts for plaintiffs who developed asbestos illnesses due to Lincoln Electric products. Lincoln Electric never filed for bankruptcy or set up an asbestos trust. It continues to fight asbestos claims today. 



Lincoln Electric Products Made with Asbestos



Welding equipment has to withstand high temperatures, so for many years, manufacturers like Lincoln Electric used asbestos. Asbestos is an efficient insulator that also makes materials stronger and protects against fire. 



Lincoln Electric used asbestos in its welding rods until the early 1980s. The rods contained as much as 15% asbestos. 



Who Was Affected by Lincoln Electric Asbestos Products? 



Anyone who works with or around asbestos can be exposed. Asbestos materials may shed fibers, which enter the air and can be inhaled. When workers inhale asbestos fibers, they are at risk for illnesses later, including mesothelioma, asbestosis, and lung cancer. 



Also at high risk for exposure were welders who used Lincoln Electric welding rods. Welders in many industries used Lincoln Electric products: 




Civilian and Navy shipyards



Railroads



Factories



Power plants



Oil refineries



Steel mills




Welders faced the highest risks of asbestos exposure from using Lincoln Electric welding rods, but other workers faced risks, too. Anyone working around these welders could also have been exposed. 



Lincoln Electric Asbestos Lawsuits



In 2008, a Lincoln Electric representative stated that most of the asbestos-related cases against the company were dismissed. 



However, the statement failed to report a 2003 trial against the company that ended in an over $6 million verdict for the plaintiffs.



Per court documents, two former Lincoln Electric employees, Angel Gomez, and Daniel Tucker, worked for numerous years around the company's welding rod, which contained 5% to 15% asbestos. 



Both Gomez and Tucker developed mesothelioma and filed a lawsuit against Lincoln Electric, as well as Hobart Brothers Company, a subsidiary of Illinois Tool Works, Inc.



Although Lincoln Electric argued that it was impossible to develop mesothelioma or any other asbestos-related disease from their welding rods, a New York State jury disagreed. 



Gomez was awarded $3.19 million, and Tucker was awarded $3.5 million. Unfortunately, neither plaintiff survived long enough to hear of their victories, as they both passed away from mesothelioma complications during the trial.



Another major case against Lincoln Electric took place in 2009. James Nelson worked in steel plants using and working near Lincoln Electric welding rods. He died from mesothelioma. A jury awarded his estate $14.5 million in damages paid by several companies. 



Seeking Compensation After Exposure to Lincoln Electric Products



A mesothelioma lawyer can explain your legal options if you have an asbestos illness. They can investigate your work history and determine which companies could be held liable. 



If you were exposed to Lincoln Electric asbestos products, you can still file a lawsuit. The company is not protected by bankruptcy and never set up an asbestos trust fund. 



Additional Resources and Information for Asbestos Victims



Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Leslie Controls Inc.

Leslie Controls Inc. used asbestos to make industrial products for decades. It supplied the U.S. Navy during World War II, putting sailors and its own workers at risk of asbestos exposure. Lawsuits over asbestos led to bankruptcy and the establishment of a trust fund to process claims. 



If you suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













Did Leslie Controls Use Asbestos? 



Leslie Controls has been manufacturing valves and similar industrial products for more than 100 years. Often used in high-temperature equipment like boilers, these products needed to withstand heat and prevent leaks. 



To insulate their valves and reduce heat loss, Leslie Controls used asbestos for decades until about 1988. Leslie no longer uses asbestos, but past use caused exposure and illness in many workers and Navy veterans. 



Leslie Controls History



Leslie Controls was founded in the early 20th century by John Leslie, a Canadian inventor best known for creating a steam-powered snow plow for locomotives.




At the beginning of the 1900s, the company opened a machine shop in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, where it began manufacturing regulators and steam pressure valves.





When World War I began, Leslie Controls created steam control equipment for the military and U.S. Naval ships. This continued throughout World War II, which helped the company grow significantly.





After the wars, Leslie Controls continued to thrive. It moved its headquarters to Tampa, Florida, and added many new products to its line, including fluid management products, pumps, pipe parts, and additional control valves. 





In 1990, Watt Industries bought Leslie Controls, which expanded the company worldwide and created more than 100 U.S.-based manufacturing plants.





Many of the company's products contained asbestos, which placed workers at risk for exposure and asbestos illnesses. Asbestos-related claims and lawsuits followed.





Leslie filed for bankruptcy in 2010 and created an asbestos trust fund to handle claims. Today, Leslie is a brand of products made and sold by CIRCOR. 




What Products Did Leslie Controls Make with Asbestos? 



Leslie Controls manufactured steam pressure products for several industries, including railroads, shipyards, and the U.S. Navy. These products were designed to be durable, to insulate, and to seal components to reduce the loss of heat and steam. 



Asbestos was an ideal material to meet all these needs. Until 1988, Leslie used asbestos in numerous products, including: 




Pipes



Gaskets



Insulation



Controls



Actuators



Water heaters



Regulators



Control valves



Packing




Workers at Risk of Exposure to Asbestos from Leslie Controls



Employees of Leslie Controls who worked in the manufacturing facilities faced high risks of exposure to asbestos. By handling and using asbestos to make products, they likely disturbed fibers that entered the air of the plant. Anyone working there probably inhaled harmful asbestos fibers. 



Also at risk of asbestos exposure were any workers in industries that used Leslie Controls asbestos products:




Industrial workers



Factory workers



Railway workers



Steam engine workers



Steamfitters



Pipefitters



Boiler workers



Engineers



Insulators



Machinists



Shipyard workers



Navy veterans




Leslie was a major supplier to the U.S. Navy during peak asbestos use. Because of Leslie and other suppliers, Navy veterans now have some of the highest rates of mesothelioma. 



Leslie Controls Asbestos Lawsuits 



By the 2000s, Leslie Controls faced over 1,000 asbestos lawsuits from former employees and workers in other industries exposed to deadly asbestos fibers via the company's products.




John Davis worked with multiple Leslie Controls asbestos products throughout his career. He was later diagnosed with mesothelioma and filed a lawsuit against Leslie and other defendants. He claimed that he inhaled asbestos fibers on the job and that companies that provided asbestos products never warned him and other workers of the risks. A jury awarded Davis $5 million and determined Leslie to be 7.1% liable. 





Richard Merrill was a Navy veteran who was diagnosed with mesothelioma. He worked with products supplied by Leslie Controls and claimed that they exposed him to asbestos. Merrill won $1 million in damages, but Leslie successfully reversed the result during the appeals process. 




Bankruptcy and Asbestos Trust Fund



Leslie Controls filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2010, citing the large amounts of claims against it as the primary reason.



After emerging from bankruptcy, the Leslie Controls Asbestos Personal Industry Trust was created and funded with $75 million.



According to Bloomberg Business, Leslie Controls pre-negotiated establishing an asbestos trust fund before filing bankruptcy to handle the substantial claims.




“The cost of defending and resolving Asbestos PI Claims asserted against Leslie has been and continues to be substantial."
Leslie Control chief restructuring officer, G. Wayne Day.



The trust was primarily funded from money via the company's insurance companies, including $2.6 million from a prior settlement agreement between Leslie Controls and the Continental Casualty Company.



Today, the payment percentage for the Leslie Asbestos Trust is 5%. Current claimants receive just 5% of their total claim amounts to ensure funds exist for future claimants. 



What to Do if You Were Exposed to Leslie Control Asbestos Products



If you worked with Leslie Control products, you could be at risk for developing an asbestos illness. If you know or suspect you were exposed to asbestos in the past, talk to your doctor about the risks and important screenings. 



Contact an experienced mesothelioma lawyer to find out what your legal options are. You could be eligible to make a claim with the Leslie Trust or to make additional claims or file lawsuits against other companies that exposed you to asbestos. 



Additional Information and Resources for Asbestos Victims



Remember to fill out our form for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Kentile Floors

Kentile Floors was a New York-based flooring products manufacturer that used asbestos in several products. Kentile closed after filing for bankruptcy due to the high costs of asbestos lawsuits. As part of its bankruptcy, Kentile created an asbestos trust fund. 



If you suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did Kentile Floors Use Asbestos? 



Asbestos was once used in many industries. It added strength to materials and provided insulation. Kentile used asbestos in many of its flooring products for many years.



Kentile Floors History




Kentile Floors was established in 1898 by founder Arthur Kennedy. Initially, the company mainly focused on rubber and vinyl floor tiles and flooring products. 





By the late 1940s, Kentile Floors began manufacturing asphalt-based floor tiles, which helped boost the company's popularity. Shortly after, the company became an industry leader in asphalt-based floor tiles.





By the 1950s, Kentile Floors' variety of flooring products (coupled with its reputation for high-quality materials) made the company one of the largest flooring manufacturing enterprises in the U.S. 





Large "Kentile Floors" skyscraper signs became well-known in the New York area, particularly a sign that remained in Brooklyn after the company closed. 





The high-quality, resilient products that Kentile Floors sold contained asbestos, especially asphalt-based and vinyl tiles. Research suggests that these products contained as much as 25% asbestos. 





As more and more workers and consumers began developing asbestos-related illnesses such as mesothelioma and asbestos lung cancer, the number of lawsuits against Kentile Floors grew.





In 1992, Kentile filed for bankruptcy and emerged in 1998 as Metex Manufacturing Corporation. Metex went bankrupt in 2012 and opened an asbestos trust fund for Kentile claimants. 




Kentile Products That Contained Asbestos



Many companies that made flooring materials used asbestos in the middle of the 20th century. Asbestos provided insulation from heat and was flexible enough to be used as backing on vinyl floor tiles. Kentile was known for very durable flooring, thanks to asbestos content. Kentile continued using asbestos in products until 1986. 



Brands and types of flooring Kentile made with asbestos include: 




Kencork cork flooring tiles



Kenflex vinyl flooring



Kenlite asphalt/vinyl floor tiles



Kenrubber rubber flooring




Occupations Affected By Kentile Floors



Workers in Kentile Floors manufacturing facilities were at risk of asbestos exposure. They worked directly with or near asbestos materials that went into their products. When handled, asbestos releases fibers that people can inhale. 



Other Workers Exposed to Asbestos By Kentile Floors



In addition to Kentile employees, many other workers were at risk of exposure to asbestos in Kentile flooring. These workers installed, repaired, or worked around Kentile flooring that may have released fibers and caused exposure: 




Construction workers



Carpenters



Flooring installers



Laborers



Painters



Drywallers



Plumbers



Electricians




Secondhand and Home Asbestos Exposure



Consumers were also at risk of asbestos exposure from Kentile floors. Many of the company's products were installed in residential homes. Damaged asbestos flooring could cause exposure. Homeowners could also be exposed if they removed, repaired, or replaced their asbestos floor tiles. 



People who worked with Kentile floors may have unknowingly exposed family members to asbestos. Known as secondhand exposure, this occurred when workers carried asbestos fibers home on their clothing or in their hair. 



Kentile Floors Asbestos Lawsuits 



One of the many lawsuits Kentile faced over asbestos exposure and illness involved Judith Harrell. A Los Angeles jury awarded Harrell $1.6 million. She was diagnosed with mesothelioma and sued several companies. 



The jury found Kentile Floors 6% responsible for Harrell's illness. Other companies found liable included:




Ford - 10%



Navistar - 10%



Exxon Mobil - 18%



Pittsburgh Corning - 17%



Safeway Scaffolding - 17%



Econo Portable Builders - 7%



Georgia-Pacific Corp. - 6%



U.S. Gypsum - 6%



Napa - 1%



Bendix - 1%



Pete Green's Service Station - 1%




Kentile Bankruptcy and Asbestos Trust Fund



By the 1990s, Kentile Floors faced so many asbestos-related lawsuits that it couldn't keep up with the increasing expenses. In 1992, the company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. 



Six years later, Kentile Floors came out of bankruptcy as Metex Manufacturing Corporation. Metex continued to struggle and filed for bankruptcy. It created an asbestos trust fund to compensate claimants. 



The Metex Asbestos Personal Injury Trust currently accepts claims and pays 7.25% of total claim amounts. 



If You Were Exposed to Asbestos in Kentile Floors



If Kentile Floors exposed you to asbestos, talk to an asbestos law firm to find out what you can do to seek compensation. 



Mesothelioma lawyers can help you navigate the process of making a claim and determine if you are eligible for any other trusts. They can review your work history and find other companies that might be considered liable for your asbestos illness. 



Additional Information and Resources



Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Kelly-Moore Paints

Kelly-Moore Paints once used asbestos in several texture and joint compounds. These products caused exposure and illness in some workers. The company has faced over 400,000 asbestos-related claims from people who got sick as a result of asbestos exposure from Kelly-Moore products.  



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds awaiting those who’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













Did Kelly-Moore Use Asbestos? 



Many products used in the construction industry once used asbestos for its ability to insulate and add strength to materials. Kelly-Moore produced several textured paints and joint compounds that contained asbestos through the 1970s.



Kelly-Moore History




Kelly-Moore began in 1946 when William E. Moore and William H. Kelly created a paint manufacturing facility and store based in San Carlos, California. 





Both owners saw a growing need for professional painting services in the U.S., coupled with a price that consumers could afford. Before founding Kelly-Moore, they worked for Glidden Paints. 





Moore bought out Kelly in 1952 and kept the name Kelly-Moore. 





By 1984, Kelly-Moore had 80 stores nationwide, grossing over $100 million. The company also added an additional manufacturing facility in Hurst, Texas.





Kelly-Moore acquired Paco Textures Corporation in 1960. The company made textured paints and related products, many with asbestos. Kelly-Moore continued to make these products with asbestos until 1978. 





The asbestos fibers Kelly-Moore used to make these products came from Carey Canadian, Johns Manville, and Union Carbide. 





Although it began facing asbestos lawsuits as early as 1977, Kelly-Moore has never filed for bankruptcy or set up an asbestos trust fund. 





Flacks Group, an investment firm based in Miami, acquired Kelly-Moore in 2022. 




Which Kelly-Moore Products Contained Asbestos? 



Kelly-Moore made and sold many products made with asbestos throughout the 1960s and 1970s, most under the Paco brand name: 




Bedding cement



Deco-tex ceiling texture



Joint cement



Joint compound



Spray texture



Taping compound



Topping compound



Texture paint



Wall texture




Occupations Affected by Kelly-Moore



Workers in the plants that made Kelly-Moore and Paco asbestos compounds had some of the highest risks of exposure. They handled asbestos fibers or worked near them, putting them at risk of inhaling the fibers. 



Kelly-Moore distributed its products to various businesses and consumers across the globe, numerous workers in different occupations were injured and now face life-threatening diseases. Some of the occupations affected by Kelly-Moore products include:




Shipyard workers



Construction workers



Drywallers



Plasterers



Carpenters



Insulators



Demolition workers



Maintenance and repair workers




Workers with the highest risks of exposure sanded asbestos materials, releasing fibers. Anyone who worked around sanding was also at increased risk of inhaling the airborne fibers. 



Many Kelly-Moore asbestos products went into residential homes. Homeowners who did repairs or renovations could have been exposed to asbestos fibers. Some of the biggest risks occurred when removing textured finishes from ceilings and walls. 



Kelly-Moore Asbestos Lawsuits



Thousands of injured workers and homeowners have filed lawsuits against Kelly-Moore. These are some examples of successful cases against Kelly-Moore: 




Hawaii settled with several companies for a total of $5.8 million in 2001. The state attorney general sued Kelly-Moore and several other companies over the use of asbestos materials in state buildings. This is a rare case of a state recovering damages from asbestos companies. 





Robert Tregget won a $36.6 million jury award in California in 2004. He sued Kelly-Moore and other companies after getting sick from using asbestos-containing joint compound in his own home. Kelly-Moore was held liable for 14% of the damages. 





Alfredo Hernandez developed mesothelioma after working in construction for many years. He used joint compounds that contained asbestos, including those sold by Kelly-Moore. He was diagnosed with mesothelioma at the relatively young age of 47. Hernandez received a $55.5 million settlement. 




Kelly-Moore's Asbestos Lawsuit Against Union Carbide



In 2004, Kelly-Moore filed a lawsuit in Texas against the Union Carbide Corporation after claiming that the company sold numerous asbestos-containing products (which Kelly-Moore used in its own products) without adequate warning of the hazardous risks. 



At the time of the lawsuit, Kelly-Moore already had 480,000 asbestos-related claims against it and wanted to relieve the burden by blaming another company.



According to the Los Angeles Times, Union Carbide sold chrysotile asbestos to Kelly-Moore, used as a thickening agent in paints and paints products. Kelly-Moore claimed the company tricked them into buying chrysotile and reportedly stated Union Carbide presented it as a safe mineral. 



After deliberations, a jury cleared Union Carbide from liability, resulting in Kelly-Moore again facing a string of asbestos-related lawsuits.



"Clearly this was a blatant attempt by Kelly-Moore to duck responsibility for their own customers and legal troubles and shift the blame to a minor fiber supplier," said Union Carbide's attorney.



Kelly-Moore decided against filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, unlike most companies with such high amounts of pending asbestos cases. 



Many workers injured by the company's products have received millions via settlements. In 2005, the company attempted to retry the Union Carbide lawsuit, but a Texas judge denied the motion.



If You Were Exposed to Kelly-Moore Asbestos Products



If you worked with Kelly-Moore asbestos products, you could be at risk for serious illness. Let an experienced asbestos lawyer help you determine your next steps. 



Kelly-Moore did not set up an asbestos trust fund or file for bankruptcy, so they can still be sued. An experienced mesothelioma lawyer can help you find any other companies from your work history that could be held liable for damages. 



Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form for our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Kaiser Aluminum

Kaiser Aluminum manufactured certain products with asbestos in the past. Kaiser asbestos products included refractory materials made from the 1950s to 1970s. Kaiser Aluminum filed for bankruptcy to compensate victims who developed illnesses after handling and working around its asbestos-containing products.



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, awaiting those who’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 













Did Kaiser Aluminum Use Asbestos? 



Aluminum processing did not involve asbestos, but Kaiser also made refractory products and other insulating materials. Kaiser used asbestos in these products from the 1950s through the 1970s.



Kaiser Aluminum History



Kaiser Aluminum was founded in 1946 when Henry J. Kaiser bought three Washington aluminum facilities from the U.S. government and began mining, processing, and manufacturing aluminum products. 




Over several decades, the company grew substantially. It acquired bauxite mines and began transforming bauxite into both fabricated and semi-fabricated aluminum products.





As the company expanded, it began distributing asbestos-containing fireboard to the U.S. Navy for use aboard vessels. Many of Kaiser's products were manufactured with asbestos due to its strong resistance to heat and fire.





From the 1950s until stricter regulations against asbestos were implemented in the 1970s, Kaiser made asbestos-containing products. These included insulation, refractory cement, and construction materials. 





Due to Kaiser's excessive asbestos use in many of its products, employees, contractors, and Veterans began developing toxic illnesses such as malignant mesothelioma, asbestosis, and asbestos-related lung cancer. 





Kaiser faced thousands of asbestos lawsuits, forcing it into bankruptcy in 2002. It reorganized and created a trust fund to compensate victims. 




Kaiser continues to operate today with headquarters in Franklin, Tennessee. It manufactures industrial aluminum products with facilities throughout North America. 



Which Kaiser Products Contained Asbestos? 



Kaiser did not use asbestos in the process of making aluminum products. However, it contained asbestos in its facilities to protect against the high temperatures used. Boilers, furnaces, and pipes were often insulated with asbestos. 



Kaiser also made products in addition to aluminum, many of which contained asbestos: 




Birdsboard



Block castable insulation



Fire bricks



Furnace castable insulating cement



Hardtop finishing cement



Insulation



Mineral wool cement



Plastic chrome ore



Plastic insulation



Refractory cement



Siding



Siding board



Wall panels




Many of Kaiser's asbestos products were made by subsidiaries. The company sold them to numerous industries, including the U.S. Navy. 



In addition to these products, Kaiser sold raw asbestos fibers to various companies in the 1960s. 



Occupations Affected by Kaiser Aluminum Asbestos Products



Since Kaiser distributed asbestos-related products to numerous industries, a variety of different workers in multiple occupations were affected, including:




Shipyard workers



Aerospace workers



Construction workers



Paper mill workers



Refinery workers



U.S. Navy veterans




Workers in the factories that made Kaiser asbestos products had very high risks of exposure. Anyone who handled or worked near asbestos could have inhaled fibers. 



Asbestos in Abandoned Kaiser Plants



Many industrial companies like Kaiser have abandoned plants, leaving behind toxic materials that can contaminate the surrounding area and residents. Kaiser abandoned a facility in Mead, Washington, with asbetos and other toxins. 



The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency began remediating the site in 2020. The project includes removing contaminated soil and preventing the release of toxic materials into a nearby bond. 



Kaiser Asbestos Lawsuits 



Kaiser faced thousands of lawsuits over asbestos exposure and resulting illnesses. These are just a few examples of notable cases won against Kaiser and other companies: 




Henry Barabin filed a lawsuit against the Kaiser Trust and several other companies in 2007. He was diagnosed with mesothelioma after working in a paper mill and a refinery and coming into contact with asbestos materials. Kaiser and others settled the case for approximately $40,000. Barabin had already passed away from mesothelioma, but his widow continued the case. 





Julius Egan worked as a welder for Kaiser Aluminum. He developed mesothelioma and sued the company and others in 1996. Egan worked in and near the carpenter shop where other workers cut into asbestos materials, creating asbestos dust. A jury in Louisiana awarded him over $70,000. 





John Henderson developed mesothelioma after years of working in various industrial plants. He sued Kaiser and other companies over his past asbestos exposure. A Washington court awarded him more than $2.5 million. 




Kaiser Aluminum Bankruptcy



By 2001, asbestos-related claims against Kaiser Aluminum had reached over 10,000. Rather than continue to fight the mounting claims, the company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2002. Kaiser remained in bankruptcy until 2006.



After bankruptcy, the company established the Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation Asbestos Personal Injury Trust to compensate for all pending and future asbestos-related cases.



The trust was funded with $1.2 billion, and within two years of its establishment, it had already paid out over $100 million.



In November 2020, trust administrators dropped the payment percentage from 25% to 18.1%. This move helps ensure funds will still be available for future claimants. 



Kaiser Aluminum Today



Kaiser is still in operations today. The company has 11 United States fabrication facilities, one facility in Canada, and several U.S. service centers. 



The combined facilities ship over 500 million pounds of products each year worldwide. Kaiser no longer uses asbestos in any of its products, but asbestos-related claims from former workers and contractors continue to surface.



How to Seek Compensation if You Were Exposed to Kaiser Aluminum Asbestos



If you worked with or around Kaiser products, you could be at risk for an asbestos illness. Contact an asbestos law firm to find out what you can do about it. 



A mesothelioma lawyer can help you make a successful claim with the Kaiser Trust. They can also find any other companies that may have exposed you to asbestos. You could be eligible for other trusts or for a lawsuit against additional asbestos companies. 



Additional Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Johns Manville

The Johns Manville Corporation was once a major manufacturer of asbestos products. With a long history of hiding the risks of asbestos, Johns Manville has faced thousands of costly asbestos and mesothelioma lawsuits. Today, the company is a leader in engineering materials, roofing products, and insulation, but its past asbestos use harmed many workers. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 













Did Johns Manville Use Asbestos? 



Johns Manville was involved in industries that used asbestos heavily. Many companies used asbestos as insulation, especially in the construction industry. Johns Manville used asbestos in many products for decades, especially in insulation and other construction materials. 



Johns Manville History



Johns Manville traces its roots back to 1858 when 24-year-old Henry Ward Johns created the H. W. Johns Manufacturing Company to make and sell roofing shingles. 




Shortly after the founding of H.W. Johns Manufacturing, the company merged with C.B. Manville's Manville Covering Company.





With the merger of the companies, the H. W. Johns-Manville Company was created in 1901, and in 1926, the name officially changed to the Johns-Manville Corporation. 





In 1927, the company went public and focused on manufacturing fire-resistant roofing and insulation materials.





During the late 1930s, the company began manufacturing and distributing products to help with World War II, including asbestos-containing insulation for U.S. Navy ships.





In addition to roofing and insulation, Johns-Manville manufactured and sold asbestos cement pipes, PVC pipes, and fiberglass products. It also briefly operated asbestos mines in Quebec. 





Quebec asbestos miners complained about the dangers of asbestos dust as early as the 1940s. They went on strike in 1949 to protest unsafe working conditions. 





By the 1980s, Johns Manville faced thousands of asbestos-related claims and lawsuits. They were brought by employees, contractors, and consumers who began developing life-threatening diseases. 





The first record of an asbestos-related case against the company started much earlier when employees filed a lawsuit against Johns Manville in the 1920s.





Johns Manville became the first company to file for bankruptcy over asbestos claims and costs. It filed in 1982, reorganized, and created the Manville Trust to compensate victims. 




Johns Manville is currently a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway and makes insulation without asbestos. 



Johns Manville Asbestos Lawsuits and Bankruptcy



In 1929, eleven employees filed a negligence lawsuit against Johns Manville. According to court documents, the plaintiffs filed the suit after claiming Johns Manville failed to provide adequate safety to employees during work, including the failure to ventilate facilities and the failure to provide proper safety masks.



The case was eventually settled a few years later for $30,000, but it began an onslaught of lawsuits to come.



In 1935, Johns Manville faced another asbestos-related lawsuit brought by 20 former employees. Court documents state that the employees who worked at the Waukegan, Illinois, plant were exposed to harmful working conditions. 



The lawsuit was thrown out under Illinois law, which at the time stated employees didn't have the right to file such claims for workers' compensation.



Another case against Johns Manville proved to be a landmark. Clarence Borel worked with industrial insulation beginning in the 1930s. He was diagnosed with asbestosis in 1969 and became too sick to work. 



Borel sued several companies in 1973, including Johns Manville. A jury awarded him $80,000. It was an early successful case against asbestos companies that paved the way for many more. 



Asbestos-related lawsuits continue to pile up against Johns Manville throughout the next several decades. By 1982, the company, still facing around 17,000 cases, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.



The Johns Manville Bankruptcy Trust



When Johns Manville filed for bankruptcy protection, it was one of the largest insulation providers in the world, accounting for over half of all asbestos-containing insulation across the globe.



The company also had the most asbestos-related claims against it and was one of the first businesses to file bankruptcy due to asbestos lawsuits. This set the model for future defendants of asbestos claims to follow.



Because of the Johns Manville Bankruptcy Trust, Congress enacted section 524(g) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, which created a law that allows companies with large amounts of asbestos-related claims to establish trust funds to help pay all pending and future cases. 



After the enactment of 524(g), hundreds of companies facing large numbers of asbestos-related claims filed for bankruptcy and established trust funds.



After Johns Manville emerged from bankruptcy, it established its trust fund in 1998. According to the official "Manville Trust" website, the trust fund is designated for all pending asbestos-related claims against the company.



Johns Manville placed a total of $2.5 billion into the trust fund when it opened. By 2012, with mounting claims, the trust had already paid out over $4 billion, well over the amount initially placed in the trust.



The Manville Trust served as an early model for other companies that filed for bankruptcy over asbestos claims. Today, the Manville Trust pays 5.1% of claims. 



Occupations Affected by Johns Manville Asbestos Use



Unfortunately, consumers and workers worldwide were affected by Johns Manville's asbestos-containing products. Employees who worked in Johns Manville factories faced very high risks of exposure and illness as they handled asbestos materials and stirred up asbestos dust. 



Other people who could have been exposed to Johns Manville asbestos and are now at risk of illnesses include workers in other industries, homeowners, and residents who lived near the company's factories. 



Workers Exposed to Johns Manville Asbestos Products



Some of these occupations in which workers may have handled Johns Manville asbestos include:




Carpenters



Electricians



Shipyard workers



Boilermakers



Military veterans



Construction workers



Manufacturing plant workers



Painters



Roofers



Pipefitters



Firefighters



Carpenters



Auto mechanics



U.S. Navy veterans




Homeowners and Families of Asbestos Workers



Many of Johns Manville's asbestos construction materials went into residential homes and buildings. This put residents at ongoing risk of exposure. Any renovation work or repairs in the home could stir up fibers and cause exposure. 



Also at risk were family members living in the households of people who worked with or around Johns Manville asbestos products. Before they understood the dangers, workers often brought home asbestos fibers on their clothing. There are many cases of people developing mesothelioma after this kind of secondhand exposure. 



Residents Near Johns Manville Factories



While workers in the factories that made asbestos products faced the highest risks of exposure, their work also affected nearby communities. Asbestos fibers were not always contained by the building, contaminated neighborhoods, and exposed residents. 



One example of this was the town of Manville, New Jersey, a true factory town. Some residents developed asbestos illnesses and recalled watching asbestos "snow" in the neighborhood. 



Manville residents eventually won a jury award of $90.5 million for wrongful deaths. The lawsuit involved factory workers, family members, and residents. 



Which Johns Mansville Products Contained Asbestos? 



Johns Manville manufactured and distributed many products that contained asbestos. These asbestos products, especially insulation, had a worldwide distribution and affected people across the globe.



Products:




Insulation



Roofing



Siding



Shingles



Cement board



Asbestos paper



Felt



Gaskets



Packing



Pipe insulation



Floor tiles



Cloth



Wallboard




Johns Manville's asbestos-containing products were of different brand names:




7M-13 Raw Asbestos Fibers



Asbestoguard Adhesives



Asbestotle Flashing



Corrugated Asbestos Transite Sheets



Fibrocel Insulation



Glasal flex board



Insulkote Weatherproofing



J-M Asbestos Flexboard



J-M Asbestos Wall Board



J-M Building Papers and Felts



7M-13 Raw Asbestos Fibers



J-M Encased Insulating Board



J-M Insulating Cement



J-M MariniteFireproof Sheet



Johns-Manville Colorbestos Shingles



Johns-Manville Rigid Asbestos Shingles



Permastone Asbestos-Cement Flexboard



Stonehedge Architectural Panels



Terraflex Plastic Asbestos Floor Tile



Thermobestos Block Insulation



Thermobestos Cement



Transitop Asbestos Panels



Vitribestos Sheet



Vulcabestos Insulation



J-M Transite



Johns Manville Caulking Putty



Flexstone



Colorbestos Siding Sheets



J-M Builtup Roofs



Salem Asbestos Roof Shingles




Johns Manville Hid Asbestos Risks



Many companies are liable today for past asbestos exposure because they knew of the dangers of asbestos but failed to warn or protect workers. Evidence has shown that Johns Manville was aware of the dangers of asbestos before taking any steps to mitigate the risks. 



Dr. Kenneth Smith warned executives about how harmful asbestos insulation could be in the 1950s. He served as the company's medical director and testified in 1976 that the company knew the dangers. 



Metropolitan Life, Johns Manville's insurer, was also involved in the cover-up. An employee there advised medical officers at Johns Manville not to warn workers of the risks of asbestos. The insurer also discouraged plant inspections even though it knew the workers had high rates of asbestosis. 



If You Were Exposed to Johns Manville Asbestos



Contact a mesothelioma lawyer to determine your legal rights and options if you worked with Johns Manville products. Bankruptcy protects the company from ongoing lawsuits, but qualified claimants can still receive compensation through the trust. 



Your lawyer can also investigate your work history to find other companies that could be held liable for your asbestos illness. You could be eligible for a lawsuit or additional trust fund claims. 



Additional Resources and Information



Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### John Crane Company

The John Crane company made asbestos products for many years. John Crane's asbestos packing and sealing products caused exposure and asbestos illnesses in many workers. The company continues to face asbestos and mesothelioma lawsuits. 



If you have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did John Crane Use Asbestos? 



John Crane used asbestos for many years until 1985. It was a crucial ingredient in the company's seals and packing products that helped prevent leaks and reduce heat loss in machinery and equipment in many industries. 



John Crane History



John Crane's history dates back to 1917 when the company opened in Chicago as the "Crane Packing Company." John Crane started the company after inventing a new flexible type of metal packing. 




The John Crane Company expanded beyond packing to make seals. It introduced the first automotive mechanical seals in the 1940s. It also innovated gas-lubricated seals. 





Among its customers was the U.S. Navy, which used John Crane seal and packing on many of its ships. John Crane received the Navy's "E" award for contributions to the war effort in the 1940s. 





The company continued to expand by acquiring other companies, including the TI Group, Global Energy Products, Fiberod, and CDI Energy Services. 





John Crane merged with Smiths Industries, a London-based global technology corporation, in the 2000s and remains part of the Smiths Group today. 




Although John Crane's products helped revolutionize seals and other products, many contained asbestos that exposed workers. The company's long history with asbestos use in these products led to asbestos-related claims and lawsuits.



John Crane Asbestos Products



Asbestos is lightweight, strong, and flexible, which made it easy to mold into shapes for seals and packing materials. It is also an efficient insulator. This trait helped minimize heat loss from packing and seals. 



John Crane used asbestos in several of its products until the 1980s: 




Braided packing



Ring packing



Molded packing



Hydraulic packing



Rope packing



Gaskets



Yarn



Seals




Workers Affected By John Crane Asbestos Products



Workers in John Crane factories were at high risk of asbestos exposure. They handled asbestos materials and risked inhaling the fibers as they worked. 



John Crane provided seals, gaskets, and mechanical packing to many companies in various industries. Not only were the company's own employees at risk of developing life-threatening illnesses, but workers in these other occupations were at risk as well:




Boilermakers



Plumbers



Pipefitters



Plumbers



Railroad workers



Shipyard workers



Automobile mechanics



Machinists



Maintenance workers



Navy veterans



Railroad workers



Paper mill workers




Asbestos Lawsuits Against John Crane



Since John Crane was such a major leader in manufacturing with asbestos, it became one of the prime targets of mesothelioma lawsuits. Many former employees and contractors began developing diseases such as asbestos-related lung cancer and mesothelioma.



The company never filed for bankruptcy, even when faced with many lawsuits, which included multi-million dollar verdicts in favor of several plaintiffs.



For example, in February 2012, John Crane lost a lawsuit from the family of former shipyard worker John Bristow. According to court documents, Bristow worked around and handled John Crane's asbestos-containing seals and gaskets for decades.



Consequently, Bristow was diagnosed with mesothelioma and died shortly after. Bristow's loved ones filed a mesothelioma lawsuit on his behalf in Newport News, Virginia.  



A jury subsequently found John Crane guilty and 100% responsible for Bristow's illness and death, even though five other companies were named in the lawsuit.



The family won a $9.18 million verdict.



These are examples of other asbestos cases against John Crane that went in favor of the plaintiffs: 




Richard Daciw worked several jobs that involved asbestos and was also exposed through the work he did on his car and home. After developing asbestosis, Daciw sued several companies. He went to trial against John Crane, and the jury awarded him and his wife $25 million. 





Pipefitter Patrick O'Reilly worked for John Crane as a pipefitter from the 1950s through the 1980s. He developed mesothelioma years later. He sued the company but died before the lawsuit concluded. His estate continued the case and was awarded $4.8 million. 





Navy veteran William Mansir was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2011. Navy veterans have high rates of mesothelioma because of the extensive use of asbestos in ships. Mansir worked on boilers, which were insulated with asbestos. He sued John Crane and other asbestos suppliers to the Navy and was awarded $2.4 million. 





Bruce Torgerson was diagnosed with mesothelioma at the age of 77. He served in the U.S. Army and worked as a laborer and engineer. He sued John Crane, testifying before he died that he was exposed to dust from the company's packing. After years of delays, a jury in Cook County, Illinois, returned a verdict of more than $40 million for Torgerson's family. 




What John Crane Knew About Asbestos



Many asbestos companies knew of the risks of asbestos exposure but failed to warn workers or provide adequate protection. In one lawsuit against John Crane, lawyers uncovered information indicating the company had some knowledge of the dangers of working with asbestos. 



The plaintiff in the case was Perry Wilson Adams. He worked in a paper mill and handled asbestos materials, including John Crane products. Adams died from mesothelioma, and his widow continued his case. 



Adams's lawyers found evidence that John Crane intentionally destroyed sales records showing it sold asbestos products to the company where he worked. They also found that the company destroyed many similar documents from the years it used asbestos. This indicated the company knew of the dangers of asbestos and that it was trying to dodge liability. 



John Crane Today



John Crane no longer uses asbestos in any of its products but still faces asbestos-related lawsuits. The company is still based in Chicago and has a global presence in numerous countries.



In addition, John Crane recently acquired several other businesses and created the John Crane Production Solutions (JCPS). The subsidiary specializes in oil and gas production and artificial lift products. John Crane also continues to manufacture gaskets and seals.



If You Were Exposed to John Crane Asbestos Products



You could be at risk for an asbestos illness if you worked for John Crane or with the company's products. An asbestos law firm can help you seek compensation. 



Contact a mesothelioma lawyer to learn more about your legal rights or options. You could be eligible to file a lawsuit against John Crane. You might also qualify to make claims with asbestos trust funds. 



Additional Resources for Asbestos Victims



Remember to fill out our form for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. For questions and assistance, feel free to contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### J.T. Thorpe

J.T. Thorpe is one of the biggest industrial refractory contractors in the U.S. J.T. Thorpe once installed asbestos products in workplaces, resulting in exposure and illness in workers. After facing asbestos lawsuits, the company eventually filed for bankruptcy and set up an asbestos trust fund. 



If you have mesothelioma, asbestos-related cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













Did J.T. Thorpe Use Asbestos? 



J.T. Thorpe provides and installs refractory materials designed to withstand high temperatures. It also provides fireproofing, insulation, coatings, and scaffolding. 



J.T. Thorpe used asbestos materials in its refractory installations in the past. Asbestos was once commonly used as insulation and in refractory materials to resist heat and protect against fire. J.T. Thorpe no longer uses asbestos. 



J.T. Thorpe and Son, Inc. History



J.T. Thorpe was founded in San Francisco in 1906, installing commercial and then large industrial furnaces. 




One of the company's first big jobs was installing equipment for Standard Oil in California. It then began working on projects throughout the Bay Area. J.T. Thorpe installed furnaces and refractory products on ships, in refineries, and in power plants. 





Beginning in the 1930s, J.T. Thorpe supplied shipyards and many U.S. Navy ships. Asbestos products on Navy ships have led to high rates of mesothelioma in veterans. 





During the 1980s, the company developed business in other areas, creating plants and facilities throughout Northern California.





By the 1990s, J.T. Thorpe opened offices in Los Angeles, Salt Lake City, and Tucson. The company also started maintenance work, expanding not only throughout the U.S. but also overseas. 





By the end of the 1990s, J.T. Thorpe had expanded its business considerably, adding numerous new industries and markets.




J.T. Thorpe employees and thousands of people in industries where the company installed products were exposed to harmful asbestos fibers. This led to illnesses, lawsuits, and ultimately, J.T. Thorpe's bankruptcy and asbestos trust fund. 



Asbestos Products Used By J.T. Thorpe



J.T. Thorpe didn't manufacture asbestos products. It installed asbestos products and materials in commercial and industrial workplaces: 




Firebricks



Insulation



Refractory blocks



Refractory cement



Textiles




Occupations Affected by J.T. Thorpe Asbestos Installations



J.T. Thorpe workers had high risks of asbestos exposure. They handled and installed asbestos products on the job, which could release harmful fibers. 



Also at risk were workers in locations that contained asbestos materials installed by J.T. Thorpe, including: 




Oil refinery workers



Steel mill workers



Shipyard workers



Foundry workers



Insulators



Construction workers



Pipefitters



Boilermakers



Steamfitters



Maintenance workers



U.S. Navy service members




J.T. Thorpe Asbestos Lawsuits



J.T. Thorpe's asbestos use in installing refractory and other products led to exposure in many workers, some of whom got sick as a result. Many workers with asbestos illnesses filed lawsuits against J.T. Thorpe, seeking damages. These are just two examples: 




Ervan Groves worked for Masonite Corporation in California. From the 1960s through the 1990s, he installed electrical equipment and pipes insulated with asbestos. After getting sick years later, Groves and his wife sued J.T. Thorpe and others and won a $3 million award. J.T. Thorpe was found 10% liable for the damages. 





Secundino Medina developed mesothelioma in 2009 and died from it in 2010. He worked in factories from the late 1950s through the 1980s. He was exposed to asbestos through many companies. Medina's family sued J.T. Thorpe and others for his asbestos exposure and wrongful death. A jury in California awarded the Medina family $38.9 million. 




J.T. Thorpe Bankruptcy and Asbestos Trust Fund



J.T. Thorpe faced so many asbestos-related claims and lawsuits that it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2002. Before filing for bankruptcy, the company had already faced over 80,000 claims and paid over $100 million.



When J.T. Thorpe emerged from bankruptcy in 2006, it created the J.T. Thorpe Settlement Trust to solve asbestos-related claims and pay future claimants. The trust was funded with $233 million.



As of May 2022, the payment percentage for the asbestos trust is 50%. This means claimants receive half of their full claim amounts. 



It is important to distinguish this trust from others with similar names that are unrelated: J.T. Thorpe Company Successor Trust and Thorpe Insulation Company Asbestos Settlement Trust. 



J.T. Thorpe and Son, Inc. Today



J.T. Thorpe remains in business today and focuses on various services in the refractory contracting field. Although the company is still paying off claims, it no longer uses asbestos in its products.



If you worked with or around J.T. Thorpe products, you could be at risk for an asbestos illness. A lawyer specializing in mesothelioma can help you pursue compensation. 



Additional Information and Resources for Asbestos Victims



Don't forget to fill out our form for our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. For questions and assistance, feel free to contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Honeywell Heating Specialty Co.

Honeywell Heating Specialty Co. began manufacturing water heaters more than 100 years ago. The acquisition of refractory companies that used asbestos led to asbestos liability and lawsuits. Honeywell eventually filed for bankruptcy and established an asbestos trust fund.



If you suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













Did Honeywell Use Asbestos? 



Honeywell has faced billions of dollars in liabilities for asbestos exposure and resulting illnesses. The liabilities come from companies that it acquired. Honeywell subsidiaries AlliedSignal, NARCO, and Bendix used asbestos in their operations and to make products. 



History of Honeywell International



Honeywell traces its corporate roots to 1885, when a Swiss immigrant and businessman named Albert Butz invented the damper flapper, an early version of the modern thermostat.




In 1886, Butz founded the Butz Thermo-electric Regulator Company. After various changes, mergers, and restructurings, Butz’s enterprise became the Minneapolis Heat Regulator Company. 





Meanwhile, Mark Honeywell was developing a heat generator. He founded the Honeywell Heating Speciality Company in 1906 based on his designs. 





In 1927, Honeywell merged with the Minneapolis Heat Regulator Company and renamed it Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Company.





The company became the nation’s biggest maker of high-quality jeweled clocks. As its customer base grew, it expanded its product line to include indicators and various industrial control devices.





Starting in the 1930s, Minneapolis-Honeywell expanded its operations to serve businesses and consumers internationally. By 1941, the company set up offices in Canada and Europe, as well as distributors in South America, Australia, and Africa.





Over time, the company survived and thrived by adapting to technological changes, especially after America’s entry into World War II. The war marked Minneapolis-Honeywell’s involvement with the defense industry as a maker of electronic autopilots.





By the 1960s, when chairman James Binger changed the company name to Honeywell, its military products included landmines, missile guidance systems, and various types of bombs.





Honeywell also broadened its business across several areas, including computers, photographic equipment, security systems, and the aerospace industry.  





As it expanded its operations, Honeywell merged with three companies, Allied Signal, Inc., NARCO, and Bendix, that used asbestos. Honeywell took on liabilities for past asbestos exposure and resulting illnesses related to these companies. 





The costs of lawsuits led to NARCO's asbestos trust fund and a new subsidiary called Garrett Motion that held Honeywell's liabilities. 




Today, Honeywell International is a large, worldwide company focusing on research and development and manufacturing in several industries. 



How Did Honeywell Use Asbestos? 



Honeywell acquired three companies that used asbestos in its products: 




NARCO was a refractory materials company. It made products designed to withstand very high temperatures for workplaces like steel mills and foundries. 



AlliedSignal made friction brake components with asbestos for the automotive industry. 



Bendix came with the acquisition of AlliedSignal and made clutches and brakes with asbestos. 




Occupations Affected by Honeywell and Asbestos



Workers in several industries were at risk of exposure to asbestos through Honeywell subsidiary asbestos products. These include workers in high-heat workplaces and automotive manufacturing workers and mechanics. 




Brake installers



Auto mechanics



Automotive assembly workers



Construction workers



Steel mill workers



Foundry workers



Shipyard workers



Pipefitters



Machine operators



U.S. military veterans




Many people serving in the military (mainly the U.S. Navy) risked exposure to asbestos and developed illnesses because of Honeywell's products with asbestos. The military was a major consumer of asbestos products. 



Honeywell Asbestos Lawsuits 



Honeywell and its subsidiaries faced thousands of asbestos lawsuits from exposed workers who developed mesothelioma and other illnesses. These are just a few examples: 




James Phillips handled Bendix asbestos brakes for many years in his work as a mechanic. He died from mesothelioma in 2013. Phillips's family sued for wrongful death and was awarded $5.8 million by a California jury. Honeywell unsuccessfully appealed the decision. 





Stephen Brown, another auto mechanic, died from mesothelioma in 2000. His widow sued several different companies and won $53.5 million in settlements. Honeywell and Bendix were found to be 2% liable for her damages. 





Yet another mechanic, Ronald Burlie Thomas, died from mesothelioma in 2017. He worked with Bendix asbestos parts. A jury awarded Thomas's estate and family $18.5 million. 




NARCO Bankruptcy and Honeywell Asbestos Trust Fund



Honeywell has never filed for bankruptcy over asbestos lawsuits, but NARCO did. Honeywell also made legal and financial maneuvers to settle its asbestos liabilities. 



Honeywell and its subsidiaries took several steps to deal with the high costs of its liabilities and asbestos claims:




In 2002, the NARCO division filed for bankruptcy. After it emerged from bankruptcy, the division began a reorganization plan. It started formally accepting asbestos trust fund claims on October 15, 2013. At the time, Honeywell stated that it had an estimated $1.1 billion asbestos liability due to NARCO.





Honeywell dealt with more than 40,000 Bendix asbestos claims by selling the unit to Federal-Mogul in 2003. Federal-Mogul had already filed for bankruptcy in 2002 over its own asbestos liabilities. Honeywell agreed to pay claims for four years with a cap on annual amounts paid into Federal-Mogul's trust. Ultimately, Honeywell continued to be responsible for Bendix-related asbestos claims. 





In 2019, Honeywell created a subsidiary called Garrett Motion Inc. in 2019. It put its asbestos liabilities into Garrett, which then sued Honeywell for forcing its liabilities on the new company. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission investigated and found that Honeywell had underestimated its asbestos liabilities by over $1 billion. 




In 2022, Honeywell agreed to pay $1.3 billion to the NARCO trust to end its asbestos liabilities for related claims. Honeywell remains liable for Bendix claims. 



If You Were Exposed to Asbestos Through Honeywell 



Contact a mesothelioma lawyer if you received a diagnosis after working with Honeywell, NARCO, or Bendix products. They can help you seek compensation. 



You could be eligible for a claim with the NARCO Trust. If your exposure came from Bendix, you can still sue Honeywell for damages. A lawyer can help you make the best choice and guide your steps as you get the compensation you need. 



Additional Information and Legal Resources for Asbestos Victims



Don't forget to fill out our form for our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Harbison-Walker Refractories Co.

The Harbison-Walker Refractories Company, today HarbisonWalker International, is one of the world’s largest suppliers of refractory materials. The company heavily relied on asbestos in many of its products in the past. Harbison-Walker later faced many asbestos claims and lawsuits, filed for bankruptcy, and established a trust fund to compensate claimants. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did Harbison-Walker Use Asbestos? 



Harbison-Walker makes refractory materials, which are used in extremely high-temperature settings. Asbestos was long considered the best material for insulating, fireproofing, and resisting high heat. Harbison-Walker used asbestos in its refractory products from the 1950s through the 1970s. 



Harbison-Walker History



Established in 1865 in Pittsburgh, the Star Fire Brick Company manufactured and distributed industrial products to withstand high temperatures. 




The company changed its name to Harbison-Walker Refractories Company in 1875 and continued to manufacture fireproof bricks, refractory cement, and castables.





The industrial revolution of the late 1800s created a huge demand for refractory products. This allowed Harbison-Walker to grow and expand. 





During the 1960s, Harbison-Walker merged with a similar company, Dresser Industries, Inc., a subsidiary of the corporation Halliburton. 





In the 1990s, Halliburton faced numerous asbestos-related claims and lawsuits resulting from the use of asbestos by Dresser and Harbison-Walker.





Halliburton and Harbison-Walker filed for bankruptcy and created an asbestos trust fund with $5.1 billion in 2005. 





In 2003, Harbison-Walker merged with A.P. Green and NARCO, becoming ANH Refractories. The name became HarbisonWalker International (HBI) in 2015. 




Platinum Equity acquired HBI in 2023. It continues to operate today as a manufacturer of refractory products and materials but without asbestos. 



What Products Did Harbison-Walker Make with Asbestos? 



Harbison-Walker used asbestos heavily in products designed to withstand very high temperatures. Nearly everything they made from the 1950s to 1970s contained asbestos, including these examples: 




Asbestos rope



Castable cement



Firebricks



Gunning mix



Refractory bricks



Refractory cement



Rollboard




Harbison-Walker brand names for products that contained asbestos include: 




Chromepak G



Harbison-Walker Lightweight Catable



Metalkase Firebridk



Micracrete




Occupations Affected by Harbison-Walker Asbestos Use



Many workers in several different industries risked asbestos exposure because of Harbison-Walker products. The workers who installed and repaired refractory materials in industrial settings faced some of the highest risks of exposure. 



Workers in Harbison-Walker factories also had high risks of exposure to the asbestos in the materials they handled. 



Other industries and workplaces that used Harbison-Walker refractory materials that placed workers at risk of asbestos exposure include: 




Cement



Chemical plants



Construction



Foundries



Oil refineries



Paper mills



Pipefitting



Power plants



Shipyards



Steel mills




Harbison-Walker Lawsuits



Harbison-Walker began facing asbestos lawsuits over exposure and illness in the 1980s. The company failed to warn workers of the risks of asbestos in its products. Victims of exposure held the company liable for damages. 



A major lawsuit included five plaintiffs harmed by Harbison-Walker products: pipefitters who worked at Bethlehem Steel, a bricklayer who handled asbestos bricks, and the daughter of a pipefitter who worked with asbestos products and exposed her through fibers on his work clothing. 



The lawsuit ended in a $40 million jury award for the victims. This was just one of many lawsuits that led Harbison-Walker and its partners to file for bankruptcy. 



Bankruptcy and Asbestos Trust



More than 200,000 pending claims awaited Harbison-Walker during the early 2000s. Over half of these claims were based on a 1992 indemnification agreement with its merger with Dresser.



Harbison-Walker filed for bankruptcy in 2002, but before filing, it established the DII Industries, LLC Asbestos PI Trust. 



Most companies file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection before setting up an asbestos trust fund. Still, Harbison-Walker made a deal with its insurance underwriters to settle current asbestos claims for 100 pennies on the dollar.



The asbestos trust was funded with $5 billion, with over $570 million of the amount coming from Harbison-Walker's insurance underwriters, London Underwriters. Insurance reserves and company stocks funded the remaining amount.



The DII Industries, LLC Asbestos PI Trust accepts claims today. As of 2022, the payment percentage is 60%, a higher rate than most asbestos trusts offer. 



Five Victims Win $40 Million Against Harbison-Walker



Harbison-Walker faced a lawsuit in 2001, just one year before filing for bankruptcy, in which they lost $40 million to five victims of asbestos-related diseases. 



Along with Harbison-Walker, several other companies were found guilty of contributing to the victims' diseases, including Armstrong Contracting and Supply Company and A.P. Green Industries.



The only way Harbison-Walker could financially survive the lawsuit was to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. It also reorganized and set up another asbestos trust fund to handle any future claims.



The BP Oil Spill



Halliburton, the parent company of Harbison-Walker, had a big part in the Deepwater Horizon oil rig fire, which exploded on April 20, 2010, killing 11 workers and spilling massive amounts of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.



Halliburton played a part because the company provided cementing services on the oil rig. As a result, in Sept. 2011, a federal report indicated that Halliburton was at least partially responsible for the oil spill.



Halliburton was made to pay some of the costs of the $40 billion cleanup efforts.




“BP is required to indemnify Halliburton for third-party compensatory claims that arise from pollution or contamination that did not originate from the property or equipment of Halliburton located above the surface of the land or water, even if Halliburton’s gross negligence caused the pollution."
Judge Barbier of the United States District Court in New Orleans.



Seeking Compensation for Exposure to Asbestos in Harbison-Walker Products



If you used and were harmed by Harbison-Walker products, contact an asbestos law firm to find out how to seek compensation. You could be eligible to make a claim with the asbestos trust fund. 



A mesothelioma lawyer can also investigate your work history to find other companies liable for your exposure. Most people with asbestos illnesses were exposed to asbestos in products made by multiple companies. You could qualify for more than one trust fund or even file a lawsuit to seek damages. 



Additional Resources and Legal Help for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our formfort your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Gold Bond and National Gypsum

Gold Bond was a brand of wallboard made by the National Gypsum Company. Made with asbestos, Gold Bond caused exposure in many workers and even some consumers. National Gypsum faced asbestos lawsuits and eventually filed for bankruptcy due to the resulting costs. 



If you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, remember that you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 







Did Gold Bond and National Gypsum Use Asbestos? 



National Gypsum today is a major manufacturer of gypsum wallboard for the construction industry. In the past, it used asbestos in many of its products. The Gold Bond brand of wallboard contained the most asbestos. 



Gold Bond History



National Gypsum was established in 1925 by Melvin H. Baker, Clarence E. Williams, and Joseph F. Haggerty. They began the company to sell their innovative wallboard product. 




The name Gold Bond came from National Gypsum's flexible, lightweight wallboard. The company sold each batch with a $5,000 "gold bond" guarantee certificate that stated the product was far superior to any other similar product. 





The wallboard became so popular that it spun into its own name and own division in the company: Gold Bond.





The National Gypsum Company was one of the few companies to survive and remain in business after the Great Depression. It expanded considerably, acquiring many subsidiaries and creating new products. Its Gold Bond wallboard and wallboard-related products remain its most popular products.





The success of Gold Bond led to the expansion of National Gypsum's product line to include rock wool, acoustic tiles, siding, adhesives, textured paint, cement, and more. Gold Bond became a separate division in the 1960s. 





Before the risks of asbestos use were widely known, National Gypsum marketed numerous asbestos-containing products under the Gold Bond brand and other names. 





From 1950 until 1970, employees, contractors, and consumers risked developing asbestos illnesses due to Gold Bond products.





Eventually, many people were diagnosed with diseases such as asbestos-related lung cancer, asbestosis, and malignant mesothelioma. Thousands of lawsuits followed, and National Gypsum filed for bankruptcy in 1993. 




National Gypsum emerged from bankruptcy in 1993. Gold Bond was no longer a division but remained a brand name. 



National Gypsum and Gold Bond Asbestos Products 



Construction materials like those made under the Gold Bond name contained asbestos for its ability to insulate, strengthen materials, and protect against fire. 



The following products were once made with asbestos: 




Gold Bond Plasters



Gypsolite



E-Z Soak



All-Purpose Joint Compound



Gold Bond Abestone



Gold Bond Siding



Gold Bond Asbestos Cement Board



Gold Bond Non-perforated Asbestos Panels



Gold Bond Asbestos Permaboard



Gold Bond Plasticrylic Panels



Gold Bond Humiguard Asbestos Panels



Gold Bond Sprayolite



Gold Bond Joint Compounds



Gold Bond Natcor



Gold Bond Texture Paint



Gold Bond Fire-Shield Plaster




Other National Gypsum brands and products with asbestos include: 




Asbestone



Bloc-Fil



Decorite



E-Z Soak



Flexfelt



Gypsolite



Permaboard



Sprayolite




Who Was at Risk of Exposure to Gold Bond Asbestos Products? 



National Gypsum employees who made products with asbestos were at high risk of exposure. By handling and manipulating asbestos materials, they released harmful fibers into the air of the workspace. Anyone in the area could inhale the asbestos fibers. 



The risk of exposure to Gold Bond asbestos extended to many other workers in industries that used the products. At most risk were construction workers and anyone else working on construction sites, including: 




Insulators



Laborers



Carpenters



Electricians



Plumbers



Painters 



Drywallers



HVAC workers




Any construction workers who sanded Gold Bond asbestos products faced very high risks of ongoing exposure to asbestos dust. 



Gold Bond Lawsuits 



The asbestos exopsure Gold Bond products caused led to illness in many people. Some of these workers filed lawsuits against National Gypsum and Gold Bond to hold them liable and recover damages. 



In one case, the widow of a pipefitter sued National Gypsum and other companies after her husband died from an asbestos illness. His work involved cutting into pipes with asbestos insulation. He could identify Gold Bond by its distinctive brand label on products he worked with. The courts determined this was adequate to hold the company liable for his illness. 



In another case, Mercer University sued National Gypsum and other companies for supplying the school with asbestos materials without warnings. Mercer later had to replace all the asbestos materials. It sued the companies for damages related to the costs of abatement and replacement. 



National Gypsum Bankruptcy and Asbestos Trust Fund



With lawsuits beginning in the 1970s and continuing for decades, the National Gypsum Company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 1990.



Now known as NCG, the new company doesn't manufacture asbestos-containing products. Its past use of asbestos made it liable for many mesothelioma cases and similar illnesses. 



A bankruptcy provision was that National Gypsum was required to develop a reorganization plan, which entailed setting up an asbestos trust fund that would compensate all pending and future asbestos-related claims.



Once the company emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the Asbestos Claims Facility took over all National Gypsum asbestos-related claims. 



In 2002, National Gypsum placed $347 million into the NGC Bodily Injury Trust, which protects the company from future asbestos lawsuits and pays off all pending and future claims.



If You Were Exposed to Gold Bond Asbestos Products



If you worked with Gold Bond products, you could be at risk for an asbestos illness. Talk to your doctor about appropriate screenings and any symptoms you experience. 



Contact a mesothelioma lawyer to learn more about your legal options. They can help you make a successful claim with the trust fund if you qualify. They can also determine if you can hold other companies liable for past asbestos exposure. You may have several options for seeking compensation. 



Additional Resources and Legal Information for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### H.K. Porter, Inc.

H.K. Porter, Inc. was once the third-largest manufacturer of locomotives in the U.S. and also the principal builder of small train engines for industrial use. The company used asbestos in parts and products for many years, leading to exposure and illness in some workers. H.K. Porter faced lawsuits over asbestos and eventually filed for bankruptcy. 



Keep in mind that if you or a loved one have been injured by asbestos, you may qualify for considerable compensation. With more than $30 billion available right now in asbestos trust, now is the time to take the first steps in determining what you may be entitled to. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













Did H.K. Porter Use Asbestos? 



Asbestos was long prized in many industries for its insulating properties, abundance, and affordability. H.K. Porter is one of many companies that used asbestos in its processes and products for decades. 



Asbestos was an important material in the locomotives and components H.K. Porter made. These parts had to withstand high heat and protect against fire. In addition to its own products, H.K. Porter acquired several companies that also used asbestos. 



H.K. Porter, Inc. History



Founded in 1866 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, H.K. Porter, Inc. was created when two businessmen opened a small shop and started repairing and machining industrial equipment. The original name of the company was Smith & Porter. 




The two founders, Henry K. Porter and John Y. Smith, built their first industrial locomotive for the New Castle Railroad & Mining Company within a year of opening. The company would become a significant player in the railroad industry. 





The name of the company changed to H.K. Porter & Company in 1878 and H.K. Porter Company in 1899. 





Porter specialized in small light-duty and steam switchers rather than large passenger or freight locomotives, starting with a 42-inch, narrow gauge, 0-4-0T design.





From 1867 to 1950, the company built around 8,000 locomotives for customers in various industries, including small railroad lines and mining enterprises. It manufactured engines and boilers for locomotives. 





Initially, Porter was technologically innovative; it made compressed air-powered engines for mining companies because steam engines caused explosions in coal mines. Later, Porter pioneered fireless locomotives that used pressurized hot water and steam to power pistons and rods.





H.K. Porter made the first gas-powered engine and locomotive in 1911. It created engines that could replace traditional boilers in locomotives. 





Porter began to struggle in the 1930s as trucks became more prevalent in the transportation of goods. It made its last locomotive in 1950. 





World War II was a turning point for H.K. Porter, as was new ownership at the time. The government needed machines and tools that Porter provided. In addition to new business for these products, Porter grew by acquiring other companies. 





Throughout H.K. Porter’s seven decades as a locomotive maker, the company used large amounts of asbestos products to protect machinery and moving parts from the effects of heat and friction. 




How Did H.K. Porter Use Asbestos? 



There is no comprehensive list of Porter-made products that contain asbestos. However, the company manufactured and sold a large selection of items during its prime as a major business enterprise, including:




Locomotives



Gaskets



Steam pipes



Water tanks for steam engines



Pistons and rods



Asbestos cloth



Steam valves



Boilers



Brakes and brake pads




Even though H.K. Porter stopped manufacturing its small industrial locomotives over 60 years ago, several hundred of these long-lasting trains still operate in various countries, particularly in Africa, Latin America, and Europe.



In addition to its locomotive and locomotive parts that contained asbestos, H.K. Porter acquired several companies that also used asbestos: 




Asbestos Manufacturing Company



Carolina Asbestos Company



LaClede Christy Company



Russell Manufacturing Company



Southern Asbestos Company



Southern Textile Company



Thermoid Corporation




Which Workers Were Affected By H.K. Porter Asbestos Products? 



Since the company’s various incarnations were primarily in business when asbestos use was unrestricted, workers in a wide array of occupations were negatively affected.



Porter employees were most at risk between 1867 and the early 1980s. This was when the company made and sold its locomotives and other industrial products using asbestos-containing materials.



In addition, people who worked for the companies that bought Porter products were also exposed to asbestos:




Factory workers



Insulators



Metalworkers



Engineers



Boilermakers



Railroad workers



Miners



Sugar plantation workers



Shipyard workers



Canal company workers




Locomotives and their parts were long the primary focus of H.K. Porter, and many railroad workers were affected. These workers removed, handled, or even repaired asbestos components that stirred up harmful asbestos fibers. They were at high risk for asbestos illnesses. 



A study of several high-risk occupations published in 2018 found that railroad workers had a very high risk of asbestos illnesses. They ranked highest among the eight groups. On average, these workers developed markers for asbestos illnesses 30 years after exposure on the job. 



H.K. Porter, Inc. Lawsuits



H.K. Porter faced its first asbestos lawsuits in the 1980s. Over several years, the company faced close to 2,000 individual asbestos-related cases each month.



In an attempt to recoup at least a portion of the $30 million it had paid to fight and settle so many lawsuits, Porter sued its insurer, Pennsylvania Insurance Guaranty Association (PIGA), in 1993.



PIad refused to become involved in Porter’s asbestos litigation and did not want to pay the $15 million the company requested.



PIGA won the original case in district court. However, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third District overruled that decision in 1996 and ordered PIGA to pay Porter part of the $15 million.



Also in 1993, H.K. Porter was on a list of six co-defendants in Adams Public School District v Asbestos Corporation, Inc. 



In this case, a school district in North Dakota argued that Porter and other asbestos product manufacturers were responsible for asbestos in their school buildings. 



The asbestos companies won the case in a Pennsylvania district court but lost on appeal.



The H.K. Porter Asbestos Trust Fund



As with many large companies that made, distributed, or sold asbestos products in the U.S., H.K. Porter set up a trust fund to pay compensation to victims of asbestos exposure or their survivors. 



The trust fund was set up in 2008 after the company emerged from bankruptcy. Porter’s trust fund is worth an estimated $104 million.



What to Do if You Were Exposed to H.K. Porter Asbestos Products



If you worked for H.K. Porter or with its asbestos products, you could be at risk for asbestos illnesses. Talk to a mesothelioma lawyer about your legal rights and options. They can help you make an asbestos trust fund claim or take other legal actions to seek compensation. 



Additional Resources and Legal Information for Asbestos Victims



Remember, if you or someone you love suffer from mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, there is a good possibility that you will qualify for substantial compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### General Motors

General Motors (GM) is a major automotive company that made, used, and sold asbestos auto parts between the 1920s and 1990s. GM asbestos parts caused exposure and illnesses in many people, some of whom filed lawsuits against the company. GM filed for bankruptcy in 2009 and created an asbestos trust fund to compensate claimants.  



If you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, remember that you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did GM Use Asbestos? 



Asbestos was once a common material used in friction automotive parts, like brakes, clutches, and even body parts. GM used asbestos in many parts from the 1920s to the 1990s. Asbestos reduced the risk of overheating from friction and the potential dangers of fire. 



GM History



The history of GM began when William C. Durant, owner of Buick Motors, formed the General Motors Corporation in 1908. 




Durant bought more than 20 companies and established all of them under the name of GM. At the time, Ford Motor Company was one of the leading vehicle businesses. Durant set up GM to compete directly with it.





A little after 1918, Durant lost control of GM when the market for vehicles crashed. Alfred P. Slogan, a business executive, replaced Durant and acquired seven Chevrolet-managed manufacturing plants. 





GM's business picked up substantially over the next several decades. In addition to vehicles, the company began manufacturing and selling vehicle parts. 





During World War II, GM contributed to the war effort, helping to build ships, weapons, tanks, and airplanes. GM thrived in the years after the war and, for many years, was the world's largest car maker. 





During the 1960s, GM varied its business by adding subsidiaries that included insurance, electronics, trains, banking, and financing. 





During the 1970s, competition with other vehicle manufacturers, such as Japan's smaller, more efficient vehicles, caused difficulties for GM. Other issues at the time included the rising costs of pensions and healthcare. 





The bulkier GM cars became known as "gas guzzlers" and contributors to air pollution. The company lost around 35% in sales and was fined nearly $5 billion for pollution regulations.





GM spent most of the 1980s trying to redesign its models, but by the early 1990s, it had already lost close to $60 billion. 





The company's losses grew when former employees and contractors filed asbestos-related claims. The lawsuits and claims stemmed from GM's use of asbestos in automotive parts. 





GM also faced liability for asbestos in non-automotive products made by some of its acquisitions. These included asbestos-insulated boilers made by Delco Appliance.  




GM filed for bankruptcy in 2009. The company reorganized and benefitted from a bailout provided by the federal government. As part of the reorganization plan, GM set up an asbestos trust fund. 



GM Products That Contained Asbestos



Until the 1990s, GM not only bought asbestos-containing parts from other companies but also used asbestos in many of its own products, including:




Disc and drum brakes



Automatic transmissions



Adhesives



Engines



Gaskets



Manual transmissions



Frigidaire appliances



Delco-Heat appliances and boilers



Clutch linings



Brake linings



Locomotive brake shoes




BorgWarner was one of the leading companies that supplied GM with asbestos products. 



Who Was Affected by GM Asbestos Products? 



The wide use of asbestos by GM and the entire automotive industry put many people at risk for asbestos exposure and resulting illnesses like malignant mesothelioma and lung cancer.



Some of the occupations placed at high risk for developing an asbestos-related disease include:




Vehicle mechanics



Auto parts installers



Factory workers



Warehouse workers



Brake assemblers



Clutch assemblers



Engineers



Machinists




Mechanics had a particularly high risk of exposure to asbestos when working on GM vehicles. They removed, handled, and manipulated asbestos products, which often caused the release of harmful fibers. Mechanics at the highest risk of asbestos exposure worked on clutches and brakes. 



Mechanics continue to be at risk today if they work with older vehicles or aftermarket parts, which often still contain asbestos. Home mechanics who worked on their own GM vehicles also risked exposure and now may be diagnosed with asbestos illnesses. 



GM Plants With Ongoing Asbestos Contamination



Automotive companies often shut down factories and plants, leaving toxic substances in place that can harm communities. In Newport, Delaware, a former GM plant has raised concerns over asbestos exposure. 



There are plans to convert the shuttered factor into a business park, but doing so requires significant asbestos abatement. An abatement company working on the project violated safety regulations, putting workers and nearby residents at risk of exposure. 



Whistleblowers filmed work at the site that showed uncontrolled asbestos fibers swirling in the air. The company was fined for the safety issues. 



Another closed GM plant is causing issues in St. Catharines, Ontario. The factory once made asbestos brakes, and asbestos lingers in the structure. Residents have complained about the dangers since the facility was abandoned in 2018. 



GM Lawsuits and Bankruptcy



GM faced numerous asbestos-related claims, yet most of the cases stemmed from employees and contractors who worked with and around the company's clutch facings and brake linings. As the claims continued to surface, GM faced over $636 million in asbestos-related cases by 2009.



One example of a GM asbestos lawsuit came from auto mechanic Roland Grenier. He worked on GM and other vehicles for over 40 years, often grinding and repairing brake and clutch components. He developed mesothelioma in 2005 and sued GM and others. Grenier won a $2 million verdict. The jury held GM 70% liable. 



The company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy shortly after, which included a reorganization plan and the establishment of an asbestos trust fund to compensate future and pending claimants.



When GM emerged from bankruptcy, debt from all asbestos-related claims was transferred to the Motors Liquidation Company. 



In 2012, The Motors Liquidation Company Asbestos PI Trust was created. Around $625 million was placed into the fund to compensate asbestos claimants.



Does GM Still Use Asbestos? 



GM is still in business today but no longer uses asbestos in automotive parts. Still, older GM vehicles and aftermarket parts may contain asbestos. 



The company has paid back $49.5 billion that it received from the government in 2009 and no longer uses asbestos in any of its products.



If You Were Exposed to GM Asbestos Products



If you suffered harm from GM products with asbestos, contact an experienced asbestos law firm to help you seek compensation. 



A mesothelioma lawyer can help you make a successful claim with the asbestos trust. They can also review your work history and find other companies that exposed you to asbestos. 



You could be eligible for claims with multiple trusts. You may also be in a position to sue companies that exposed you and hold them liable for damages. 



Additional Resources and Information for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### General Electric

General Electric (GE) is a large conglomerate and consumer product, energy, finance, and healthcare company. Many of GE's past operations included asbestos. The company has faced numerous lawsuits after workers developed illnesses related to asbestos exposure. 



If you or a loved one have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that you may qualify for substantial compensation. Right now, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, awaiting those who’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













Did GE Use Asbestos? 



General Electric used asbestos in several products but primarily in turbines. GE installed thousands of turbines that contained asbestos from the 1960s to 1990s. GE's turbines and other products utilized asbestos insulation to reduce heat loss. 



GE History



GE started in 1892 with a merger of two companies: Edison General Electric and Thomas-Houston Electric Company. 




Thomas Edison once sat on the company's board of directors until the end of the company's first year. 





When the company merged, it had strong financial backing from J.P. Morgan Bank, leading to early success early on for GE.





In 1896, GE became one of the first companies to be listed on the Dow Jones Industrial Average. It is not on the Dow today. 





GE quickly grew into one of the largest companies in the world, where it still stands today. By 1980, it already had a total revenue of  $25 billion. 





As the company grew, its products expanded and varied, including electronics, nuclear products, jet engines, and more.





Part of GE's success came from acquiring companies, some of which it later sold. These included NBC, RCA, Employers Reinsurance, and CGR Medical Supplies. Acquisitions led to various industries for GE, including media, power generation, aerospace, and computers. 




As with many prominent manufacturers before the late 1970s, GE used asbestos in some of its products and equipment. GE has faced many lawsuits and resulting costs but has not filed for bankruptcy or set up an asbestos trust fund. 



GE Asbestos Products



GE has been involved in many industries that once used asbestos for its ability to insulate, reduce heat loss, and protect against fire. One of the primary uses of asbestos by GE and other companies was for insulation. 



General Electric sold asbestos-containing wires, cables, and cords under the brand name Deltabeston. They also produced infrared ovens with the brand name Wil-Son Patent-Flex.



Many of the other products GE once made or used that contained asbestos include: 




Consumer electronics



Housewares



Steam turbines and other power-generating equipment



Appliances



Molding compounds



Cables



Furnaces



Wires




Occupations Affected by GE Asbestos Products



GE used asbestos across several industries, which put workers in many different occupations at risk of exposure. When these workers handled asbestos, they risked releasing harmful fibers. Inhaling asbestos fibers can lead to illnesses like mesothelioma, asbestosis, and lung cancer. 



Examples of occupations at risk of asbestos-related diseases due to GE asbestos products include:




Appliance assemblers



Engine assemblers



Electricians



Repair workers



Distribution workers



Installers



Demolition workers



Sailors



Shipyard workers




Men and women who served in the U.S. Navy were also at risk of exposure to GE asbestos products. The Navy used hundreds of asbestos components to build ships. Navy veterans now have high rates of mesothelioma due to asbestos exposure during their time in the service. 



Residential and Secondhand Exposure to GE Asbestos



Most asbestos illnesses result from workplace asbestos exposure. In some cases, a person was exposed at home rather than at work. 



Before they understood the risks, many workers brought asbestos fibers home on their clothing. This led to secondhand asbestos exposure in family members. Some people got sick from secondhand exposure.



The construction industry used hundreds of asbestos products, leading to home exposure. GE mainly supplied industrial workplaces, but there is some evidence that it was responsible for asbestos in homes in Ontario. 



GE once sold scrap materials to their workers. An investigative report found that workers at a GE plant in Peterborough, Ontario, took scrap asbestos materials to use in their homes without knowing the risks. GE has denied liability but has also contributed to abatement in affected homes. 



Closed GE plants have also caused asbestos exposure concerns in some communities. In 2022, GE agreed to demolish an abandoned lightbulb factory in Cleveland. Break-ins at the complex have released asbestos fibers, sparking worries about exposure. Demolition will require careful abatement of asbestos and other toxic materials. 



GE Lawsuits



Due to the sheer size of the corporation and its huge diversification, GE decided to fight over 400,000 asbestos-related claims against it, whereas most companies facing a large number of claims typically claimed bankruptcy and set up asbestos trust funds.



By 2006, the pending claims had risen to 509,000. Most cases against GE were from government employees and military workers exposed to equipment that the company supplied to build government-specified products and equipment. Turbines, in particular, contained an excessive amount of asbestos.



Samuel Scarbrough



On April 13, 2007, a United States District Judge for the Central District of California ruled that GE stand trial against Samuel Scarbrough. He was exposed to asbestos in the Navy and aboard the USS West Virginia.



According to court documents, GE failed to warn sailors of the hazards of working around asbestos-containing machinery and products that the company installed onto vessels. 



Although GE tried to argue the lawsuit and denied responsibility, a judge required the company to stand trial after determining that asbestos was included in condensers, turbines, generators, and more.



Scarbrough eventually developed malignant mesothelioma from GE's products and subsequently died. Although GE argued that asbestos was used under government orders and because the military required it, the court stated that,




"Defendant (General Electric) has submitted numerous exhibits, declarations, and specifications from the United States Navy demonstrating that the Navy exercised control over the design and manufacturing of Defendant's machines…Defendant has not shown that the Navy required it to refrain from issuing warnings nor has it shown that the Navy provided reasonably precise specifications affecting Defendant's provision of Warnings."




Ed Lauter



GE was among the many defendants in former actor Ed Lauter's asbestos-related lawsuit. A professional actor who starred in hundreds of films and television shows, Lauter passed away in October 2013 from mesothelioma. 



Lauter's wife, Mia Lauter, filed a mesothelioma lawsuit on his behalf and named numerous companies, movie studios, and network television stations as defendants.



GE was named in the lawsuit for the asbestos exposure that Ed Lauter experienced during the two decades he worked in television. 



It's been speculated that GE's part in the lawsuit comes from when it previously owned NBC (the network television station where Lautner worked as an actor).



Seeking Compensation if You Were Exposed to GE Asbestos Products



If GE products led to or contributed to your asbestos illness, contact a mesothelioma law firm to help you seek compensation. Mesothelioma lawyers can determine if you have a solid case to make against GE. 



They can also review your complete work history to find all available options for seeking compensation. Most people with an asbestos illness were exposed by several companies. You could be eligible for an asbestos trust fund claim or a lawsuit against multiple defendants. 



Additional Information and Legal Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form for our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### General Aniline and Film (GAF) Corporation

The General Aniline and Film (GAF) Corporation is a roofing manufacturer. GAF used asbestos in many of its products in previous decades. GAF asbestos products exposed workers and consumers to asbestos, resulting in many cases of illness and lawsuits. 



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds awaiting those who’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













Did GAF Use Asbestos?



GAF used asbestos in many of its products for years. It also acquired a company called Ruberoid that used asbestos in construction products. Ruberoid owned an asbestos mine in Vermont that supplied the company. 



GAF History



GAF was established in Germany in 1929 under the company name I.G. Farben-industries, more commonly known as I.G. Dyes. 




In 1939, the company changed its name to General Aniline and Film (GAF) Corporation after purchasing General Aniline Works, a chemical company, and after merging with Agfa-Ansco Corporation, a photography supplies company.





In 1942, the U.S. government seized GAF because of its German origins. The company was then managed by directors appointed by the government up until 1965. During this time, the company languished because the appointed directors poorly marketed its business.





GAF went public in 1965 and shortly after bought the Ruberoid Corporation, a roofing company. The GAF Corporation became the company's official public name in 1968.





In the 1980s, GAF started manufacturing construction products distributed to home-building companies. This was a lucrative move for GAF, resulting in a spin-off roofing business for the building materials corporation.





Despite its growth and success after going public, GAF faced a series of asbestos-related lawsuits, mainly stemming from asbestos Ruberoid products. 





Once GAF purchased Ruberoid, it took on all of its pending and future asbestos cases. These included claims resulting from a Virginia asbestos mine that GAF acquired with the purchase of Ruberoid.




After facing thousands of costly asbestos lawsuits, GAF eventually filed for bankruptcy protection in 2001. 



GAF Lawsuits and Bankruptcy



GAF became one of the biggest companies during the 1980s to face asbestos claims. Before filing for bankruptcy, GAF helped create the Asbestos Claims Facility. The Facility assisted large companies in defending or settling asbestos-related claims. 



The Asbestos Claims Facility didn't last long, but GAF continued with the company after reorganizing and renaming itself the Center for Claims Resolution.



Despite its attempts to settle claims without filing, GAF was eventually forced to declare bankruptcy. By 2000, the company was facing over 70,000 cases. By 2001, GAF had spent over $1 billion in claim settlements. 



The costs of mounting claims proved to be too much, and in 2001, GAF filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.



Under Chapter 11 bankruptcy, a reorganization plan for GAF consisted of establishing an asbestos trust fund. The G-I Holdings Inc. Trust compensates victims pending asbestos-related cases against the company and any future asbestos-related cases. 



The trust fund was created in 2009 after GAF emerged from bankruptcy. The company funded the asbestos trust fund with $770 million.



Occupations Affected by GAF Asbestos Products



Most workers affected by GAF stem from those who worked in the Virginia asbestos mine. 



Once GAF acquired Ruberoid, it became responsible for its properties, including the asbestos mine. Many occupations were affected by GAF's and Ruberoid's asbestos-containing products, including:




Asbestos installers



Miners



Painters



Plumbers



HVAC workers



Power plant workers



Oil refinery workers



Asbestos removers



Workers in the Ruberoid manufacturing facilities



Roofers



Construction workers




In addition, consumers were also placed at risk because of the asbestos-containing construction materials shipped to many companies during the 1980s.



GAF Asbestos-Containing Products



GAF manufactured and sold many asbestos-containing products, including the following:




Aristo and Imperial insulation



Insulation cement



Pipe coverings



Asbestos paper



Roofing felt



Painting products



Vinyl Flooring



Sponge felts



Luran



Ruberoid Air Cell



Woolfelt



Wallocell




What to Do if You Were Exposed to GAF Asbestos Products



You can work with an asbestos lawyer to seek compensation if working with GAF asbestos products led to an asbestos illness. 



Experienced mesothelioma lawyers can help you file a claim with the GAF Trust and give you the best chance of receiving fair compensation. They can also determine if any other companies are liable for your illness and provide other options for seeking compensation. 



Additional Resources and Legal Information for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Garlock Sealing Technologies

Garlock Sealing Technologies manufactures gaskets and other sealing products. Although the company no longer uses asbestos in its products, its use of asbestos resulted in related lawsuits. Garlock filed for bankruptcy and created an asbestos trust fund to handle asbestos liabilities. 



If you have mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds awaiting those who’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 













Do Garlock Products Contain Asbestos? 



New Garlock sealing products do not contain asbestos. Garlock used asbestos in many of its products until about 1980. Sealing materials contained asbestos as an insulator. It helped minimize heat loss. When these products were removed or changed by workers, they often released harmful asbestos fibers. 



Garlock Sealing Technologies History



Garlock was established in 1887 when founder Olin J. Garlock invented a more effective way to seal pistons in steam-powered locomotive engines. 



At the time, Garlock’s invention was considered ground-breaking and unlike any other product of its kind. As a result, his seal became a standard in the locomotive industry.



As the company began to expand, it added new products to its line, including:




Compression packing



Gaskets



Expansion joints



Valves



Pump diaphragms




However, like most manufacturing companies, Garlock used a lot of asbestos in many of these products from 1907 to 1980. 



More specifically, the company’s valves, gaskets, and packing materials contained asbestos. Garlock also acquired Anchor Packing Company, another company that made products with asbestos. 



Garlock employees and workers in companies that bought Garlock products began developing life-threatening diseases such as malignant mesothelioma and asbestos-related lung cancer. 



Garlock faced asbestos lawsuits and liabilities from its own products and those made by Anchor. This led to bankruptcy in 2010 after Garlock was acquired by EnPro Industries. As part of bankruptcy proceedings, Garlock set up an asbestos trust fund to compensate claimants. 



Which Garlock Products Contained Asbestos? 



Companies that made sealing products, like Garlock, relied on asbestos for its many unique properties: lightweight and flexible, strong, insulating, and fire and electricity resistant. 



Some of the Garlock brand names of products that contained asbestos include Blue-Gard, Flexseal, Garfite, Garlock, Gylon, and Plastallic. Specific products Garlock made with asbestos include: 




Asbestos packing



Asbestos tape



Chemiseal jacketed gaskets



Compressed asbestos sheets



Graphite filament packing



High-pressure ring packing



Insulation tape



Lattice braid packing



Pre-cut gasketing



Rope



Seal tape



Spiral wound gaskets



Valve stem packing




Workers Affected by Garlock Asbestos Products



Garlock’s asbestos-containing products reached a wide array of industries. People working in numerous occupations were affected. The following occupations were known to have Garlock’s asbestos-containing products:




Shipyard workers



Factory workers



Steam locomotive engineers



Plumbers



Pipefitters



Steelworkers



Electricians



Insulators



Oil industry workers



Miners



Construction workers



Machinery fitters



Paper mill workers




Garlock was one of many asbestos companies that supplied the U.S. military. Sealing products were particularly important in building ships for the Navy. This led to high exposure rates in the U.S. Navy and higher than average rates of mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses in veterans. 



Garlock Sealing Technologies Lawsuits



As claims continued to mount, Garlock faced thousands of asbestos-related claims and lawsuits, which resulted in extreme financial danger for the company.



Garlock has lost millions in asbestos-related cases. The following lawsuit is one example of the numerous lawsuits against the company.



Wanda Jones



In July of 2006, a Virginia jury awarded $10.4 million to Wanda Jones, the widow of a shipyard worker who died in 2005 from mesothelioma, a deadly type of lung cancer primarily caused by asbestos exposure.



After a three-week trial in Newport News Circuit Court, the jury found that Wanda Jones' husband, Buddy Jones, 60, was exposed to asbestos at Newport News Shipbuilding while making gaskets and sealing pumps.



Buddy Jones worked at the shipyard for four years during the 1960s. Several decades later, he was diagnosed with mesothelioma and died exactly one year before his widow won her case against Garlock and two other companies, Johns Manville and John Crane.



Other Garlock Asbestos Lawsuits



Donald Reynolds worked in oil refineries for decades and eventually developed pleural mesothelioma. He worked with many asbestos products on the job and sued several companies, including Garlock. A jury awarded him $3.75 million with 60% of liability assigned to Garlock. 



James Grumley developed mesothelioma after working on boilers in a paper mill. Boilers used seals and gaskets, which can lead to asbestos exposure when removed or repaired. Grumley won a $12 million jury award, with Garlock being held liable. 



"One of the Most Sued Companies"



With a plethora of lawsuits, several news sources cited Garlock as “one of the most sued companies in American history.” 



Garlock has paid over $1 billion in asbestos-related claims and closed many pending cases.



Garlock Bankruptcy and Trust Fund



In 2010, with more than 900,000 pending asbestos-related claims, Garlock filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The lawsuits stemmed from its own products and those made by Anchor Packing.



Although Garlock denied any wrongdoing before filing for bankruptcy, the company admitted that defending mounting lawsuits proved too difficult.



Once the company filed for bankruptcy, all pending claims were put on hold. As the company reorganized, it also created an asbestos trust fund for pending and future asbestos-related claims.



Lawyers representing asbestos victims tried to convince bankruptcy courts that Garlock should fund the trust with $1.4 billion. Garlock argued the amount was too high. A judge determined that Garlock should fund the trust with $125 million. 



The Garlock Sealing Technologies Settlement Facility is still active today. It accepts claims related to Garlock and Anchor products. 



Garlock Sealing Technologies Today



Garlock is still in business today. It is a wholly-owned EnPro Industries division and has 13 manufacturing plants in the U.S., Canada, Asia, and Europe.  



The company employs over 2,000 people and has a global distribution network encompassing 75 countries.



Garlock’s experience with fluid sealing products gives the company a large industrial customer base. Garlock no longer uses asbestos in its gaskets and other heat-resistant products.



Seeking Compensation if You Worked With Garlock Products



If you worked with Garlock sealing products and now have an asbestos illness, contact a mesothelioma lawyer to determine what you can do about it. 



You may qualify to make a claim with the Garlock Trust. While you can no longer sue the company, a lawyer can ensure you have the best chance of making a successful claim for compensation. 



They can also investigate your work history to find other companies that can be held liable for your asbestos exposure and resulting illness. Many people with asbestos illnesses were exposed by several companies. 



Additional Resources and Information for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form for our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Foster Wheeler

Foster Wheeler supplied products for engineering, power, and power management companies. The company used asbestos in construction and boiler components and later faced lawsuits over related illnesses, like mesothelioma and lung cancer. Many of the people harmed by Foster Wheeler were U.S. Navy veterans. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you may be entitled to significant compensation. Trust funds with more than $30 billion are available for those diagnosed with an asbestos disease. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more.













Did Foster Wheeler Use Asbestos? 



Foster Wheeler supplied the power industry, which used many components with asbestos to insulate and reduce heat loss. Many of Foster Wheeler's products contained asbestos for decades. These included insulating materials for pipes and boilers. 



Foster Wheeler History



Foster Wheeler was established in 1927 as a merger between two companies. The Water Works Supply Company,  later known as the Power Specialty Company, was founded by the Foster family in 1884. The Wheeler Condenser & Engineering Company was founded in 1891. 




After the merger between the Power Specialty Company and Wheeler Condenser & Engineering Company, the new company became Foster Wheeler. 





The merger tied Foster Wheeler directly to asbestos, as the companies it merged with had a long history of using it in numerous products.





For example, Wheeler Condenser & Engineering Company, which supplied heat exchangers, pumps, and steam condensers to the military, used asbestos in most of its products. 





When Foster Wheeler was the Power Specialty Company, it manufactured asbestos-containing boiler components and heaters for the military during World War I.





In the 1920s, Foster Wheeler began designing and building petrochemical plants and oil refineries. It made and supplied the industry with boilers. 





When the oil boom declined, the company created Foster Wheeler Environmental Services, Inc. and Foster Wheeler Power Systems, Inc. 





The company then expanded into Asia and Europe, taking on boiler contracts for China. Soon after, Foster Wheeler opened a plant in the Philippines.





Foster Wheeler faced numerous asbestos lawsuits, putting it at risk for bankruptcy in 2001. By 2006, it had already spent more than $700 million settling claims. 




AMEC acquired Foster Wheeler in 2014. AMEC was then acquired by the John Wood Group in 2017. Foster Wheeler continues to operate today. 



Foster Wheeler Asbestos Products



Not all of Foster Wheeler's products contained asbestos. The following Foster Wheeler products were confirmed to contain asbestos:




Boilers



Marine boilers



Gaskets



Valves



Seals



Pumps



Heaters



Steam generators



Refractory block insulation



Surface condensers



Steam drums




These products were installed in oil refineries, petrochemical plants, and other industries that used boilers. The U.S. Navy used Foster Wheeler boilers in many of its ships. 



Workers Affected By Foster Wheeler Asbestos Products



Occupations in the military, including contractor roles, that were affected by Foster Wheeler include:




Pipefitters



Boilermakers



Shipyard workers



Mechanics



Electricians



Power plant workers



Steamfitters



Engineers



Maintenance workers



Millwrights



Paper mill workers




Since Foster Wheeler sent much of its supply to the armed forces, military personnel have been significantly affected. The U.S. Navy, in particular, used Foster Wheeler boilers, and crew on Navy ships were at risk for exposure and later illness. 



Foster Wheeler Lawsuits



Although Foster Wheeler faced numerous asbestos-related lawsuits, the following is one of the more prominent claims. It's a prime example of what Foster Wheeler faced as employees and contractors came forward after developing fatal illnesses.



In 2002, Alfred Todak, 60, a former Navy electrician, won one of the largest verdicts ever in a California asbestos case after proving the company's negligence caused his battle with pleural mesothelioma.



Per court documents, during a five-week trial, Todak's mesothelioma attorney showed that Todak's occupational exposure to asbestos occurred while he worked at Seattle's Bethlehem Steel Mill and the Lockheed Shipbuilding and Construction Company, also in Seattle.



His work around Foster Wheeler's boilers, in particular, contributed to Tudok's mesothelioma diagnosis. From 1965 until 1972, Tudok's employment with both companies constantly exposed him to asbestos fibers.



Under California's consumer safety laws, a San Francisco county jury found Foster Wheeler's type–D marine boilers defective because the company failed to warn others of the dangers associated with the product.



 Further, the jury also found Foster Wheeler at fault for the negligent supply, manufacture, and design of its boilers.



His verdict amount included $22.7 million in damages. His wife, Stephanie Todak, won $11 million for loss of consortium.



These are a few other lawsuits brought against Foster Wheeler for asbestos exposure and resulting illness: 




Lynda Berry developed peritoneal mesothelioma through secondhand exposure. Her husband worked in a paper mill in Louisiana that used Foster Wheeler boilers. A jury found Foster Wheeler liable for her damages and awarded her $2.25 million. 





Valent Rabovsky died from mesothelioma after working as a millwright for decades. His widow and family sued Foster Wheeler and other asbestos companies. A jury awarded them over $1 million and assigned 20% of the liability to Foster Wheeler. 





Richard Walmach developed and died from mesothelioma after working at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard. He worked around others who removed asbestos insulation from boilers. They used jackhammers, creating asbestos dust. Walmach's family sued Foster Wheeler and others, resulting in $5.2 million in total damages. 




Foster Wheeler Today



In 2001, Foster Wheeler faced bankruptcy due to the overwhelming amount of lawsuits it faced. However, the company slowly recovered and, in 2009, built a biomass-only power plant in Poland, marking it the world's largest power plant of its kind.



The company also relocated its headquarters from the United States to Geneva, Switzerland, resulting in most company sales coming from overseas business. In 2014, Amec plc and Foster Wheeler merged. The resulting company merged with Wood Group in 2017. 



How to Seek Compensation for Foster Wheeler Asbestos Exposure



You have legal options if you suffered asbestos exposure through Foster Wheeler products. An asbestos attorney can explain them and help you seek compensation. 



Because Foster Wheeler never filed for bankruptcy protection, workers with asbestos illnesses can still sue the company for damages. A mesothelioma lawyer can review your work history and outline all the choices available to you for seeking compensation. 



Additional Resources and Information for Asbestos Victims



Remember, if you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Remember to fill out our form for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### Foseco

Foseco once made asbestos foundry products for industrial worksites like steel mills. Many workers were exposed to asbestos through Foseco products and became sick as a result. Foseco faced numerous asbestos lawsuits. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, and asbestos-related lung cancer, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who are victims of asbestos-related diseases. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did Foseco Use Asbestos?



Foseco manufactured foundry products with asbestos for decades. These asbestos products went to numerous industrial worksites involving high temperatures, like steel mills. Asbestos is an effective insulator and fireproofing material, so it was long prized for these types of products. 



Foseco History



Founded in 1932 by Eric Weiss, Fosesco began as a small company in Birmingham, Alabama. However, it didn't take long for the business to gain customers and expand. The name stands for Foundry Services Company. 



Foseco created innovative foundry products, like FEEDEX powder, to reduce cleaning expenses. It also published the Foundryman's Handbook in 1946. 



As the company grew, so did its products. Foseco added many products to its line, including:




Insulating feeding systems



Binders



Electrostatic coatings



Direct pour technologies



Exothermic feeding systems



Iron and steel



Silica



Industrial processes



Aluminum products



Glass products



Cement products




In 1960, Foseco developed and introduced exothermic sleeves. These reduced the amount of metal needed for foundry work. 



Foseco became a subsidiary of Vesuvius in 2008. Vesuvius was founded in 1916 in Pittsburgh. It made crucibles for foundries. 



Both Vesuvius and Foseco used asbestos in many of their products for many years. Neither filed for bankruptcy, although they have faced numerous lawsuits over asbestos exposure and illness. 



Foseco Products That Contained Asbestos



Since Foseco was (and currently remains) in the foundry industry, it used refractory products that contained asbestos. Refractory products are designed to withstand very high temperatures. Asbestos was used for its insulation properties and its resistance to heat and fire. 



The following Foseco products have been confirmed to contain asbestos:




Asbestos boards and compounds



Die castings



Exothermic riser sleeves (Kalminex)



Furnace linings



Hot Top Insulation



Molding sand



Permanent mold coatings



Hot Top metal devices



Core coatings



Ladle lining and liners




Workers Exposed to Asbestos From Foseco Products



Although foundry workers were the most affected by Foseco's asbestos-containing products, many other workers in different occupations were also afflicted. 



Over the course of 15 years, Foseco used tremendous amounts of asbestos in its products, which directly affected many workers in the following occupations:




Metal workers



Steel mill workers



Boiler workers




Metal workers and foundry workers are more likely to develop asbestos illnesses because of exposure. They Were at risk of inhaling asbestos fibers released into the air. 



Did Foseco Know About the Dangers of Asbestos? 



In 1976, Foseco discontinued the use of asbestos in all of its products. Yet, in just one factory alone, reports indicate that the company used at least 18 million pounds of asbestos over the years. 



The company defended its actions when representatives stated that they were unaware of the dangers of asbestos.



However, a report sent to Foseco indicated that company officials were made aware of the hazards of asbestos dust to human health. Yet, the company ignored the warnings and dangers and continued to place employees and contractors at risk daily.



Foseco faced many asbestos-related lawsuits as people began developing life-threatening illnesses such as malignant mesothelioma and asbestos-related lung cancer.



Foseco Lawsuits



Because Foseco knowingly exposed workers to harmful asbestos, it has faced numerous lawsuits over exposure and illness. 



In addition, two Foseco subsidiaries, Foseco Minsep, Inc. and Foseco Canada, Ltd., were also named in numerous lawsuits after they used asbestos in their products. 



In one courtroom alone (the Ohio Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court), Foseco faced more than 5,000 asbestos-related claims and lawsuits.



At least eight former employees of the Foseco Cleveland, Ohio plant died from malignant mesothelioma and other asbestos-related illnesses. The company paid over $13 million to the former workers' surviving families.



Another lawsuit that named Foseco, as well as other companies, resulted in a $40 million jury award. Secundino Medina was an assembly line factory worker and a security guard at a General Motors Facility in California from the 1950s to the 1980s. He died from mesothelioma.



Even with the substantial amount of asbestos-related lawsuits that the company faced, Foseco never filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, unlike most companies that manufactured asbestos-related products on large scales.



Foseco Today



Foseco remains in business today as a developer and manufacturer for the foundry industry, under the Foundry Technologies Division of the Vesuvius Group plc. 



The company no longer uses asbestos in its products and focuses on environmentally-friendly work and promoting health and safety to its employees. Its headquarters is in Cleveland, Ohio.



How To Seek Compensation for Foseco Asbestos Exposure



Contact a mesothelioma lawyer if you or your loved ones were affected by Foseco asbestos materials. A lawyer can explain your rights and help you seek compensation. 



If you have an asbestos illness, you were likely exposed through more than one company. A lawyer can review your work history to identify all the asbestos companies liable for damages in your case. 



You could be eligible for claims with asbestos trust funds or lawsuits against companies like Foseco and Vesuvius. 



Additional Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### The Ford Motor Company

The Ford Motor Company, one of the most famous brands in the world, has been linked to past asbestos use in its products, especially brakes and clutches. Former employees and contractors worked around asbestos-containing products, and many of them developed mesothelioma. Ford continues to fight asbestos lawsuits. 



If you suffer from mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 













Did Ford Use Asbestos? 



Asbestos was once common in automotive parts, especially friction parts like clutches and brakes. Asbestos helped prevent overheating and fires. Ford used asbestos in some of its parts for many years until the 1980s. 



Ford Motor Company History




Henry Ford founded the Ford Motor Company in Dearborn, Michigan, in 1903.





Although many felt that the automobile industry would never be profitable, Henry Ford, along with 12 investors, had already made a profit of over $30,000 at the company's start.





Several years later, Ford revealed the Model T, its first automobile, which quickly became popular in the U.S. It was the first mass-produced vehicle affordable for most working Americans. 





The company then created the world's first automotive assembly line at its Highland Park plant. The assembly line made over 200,000 vehicles in its first year alone.





Less than ten years later, Ford's vehicle production reached over a million. With its rising success, Ford expanded its plants during the 1920s to include factories in numerous different countries.





When World War I started, Ford created several parts and vehicles for the military, including tanks and submarine chasers. Ford continued to manufacture for the government during World War II, including most of the military's B-24 bomber planes.





By 1956, Ford went public with its products and, within the next ten years, released the Mustang, one of its most popular vehicles to date. 





However, during the same period, foreign vehicles began making their way into the nation, which resulted in a decline in interest in Ford's vehicles. Ford continued to make new vehicles, including the Taurus, another of the company's most successful cars. 





Until the 1980s, Ford continued to use asbestos parts in its vehicles. It faced lawsuits and other financial issues but never filed for bankruptcy. Ford was not part of the federal aid package GM and Chrysler received in the 2000s.




Which Ford Products Contained Asbestos? 



 Asbestos was useful in the automotive industry for its ability to insulate against heat and protect against fire. Several Ford parts were made with asbestos: 




Brake linings



Brake pads



Clutches



Gaskets



Engine components



Transmission components



Firewalls



Hood liners




Some of the brand names of Ford asbestos products were Ford, Mercury, Motorcraft, and Ford Authorized Remanufactured. 



Occupations Affected by the Ford Motor Company



Many people were at risk of exposure to asbestos in Ford parts. Mechanics who worked on and installed Ford asbestos products had the highest risk of exposure.  



Many other workers were also affected, including factory workers, warehouse workers, machinists, pipefitters, auto store employees, and more.



In addition, consumers who bought Ford products may also be at risk of developing asbestos illnesses. Many consumers purchased asbestos-filled Ford products from auto parts stores. Home mechanics risked exposure when they worked on the clutches and brakes on their own vehicles. 



Ford Asbestos Lawsuits



Ford has faced thousands of claims of asbestos exposure from their brakes and other products. Ford never filed for bankruptcy and did not set up an asbestos trust. It continues to fight asbestos lawsuits. These are just some examples of claims that went in favor of the plaintiffs: 




Secondhand Asbestos Exposure. Joyce Stockton was diagnosed with an asbestos illness but never worked with asbestos. Her husband was a mechanic and likely exposed her to fibers on his clothing. Stockton sued Ford and other companies. A jury in Tennessee found Ford 71% liable and awarded her $4.6 million. 





Exposure in Manufacturing Plant. Linda Behiling developed mesothelioma and died in 2019. She worked in a manufacturing facility with Ford and other asbestos products. Her family sued for wrongful death and was awarded $6 million. 





USPS Mechanic. Nollie Wood worked for the U.S. Postal Service and was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 1990. In his role as a mechanic, he repaired USPS vehicles that contained Ford brakes and clutches. Wood died shortly after his diagnosis. His wife won $6.3 million in a jury award. 





Widows of Mechanics. Two widows of mechanics who worked with Ford products sued for wrongful death, receiving a jury award of $14 million at trial in 1996. Both men died of mesothelioma before the conclusion of the lawsuit. This was an early case that helped set a precedent for assigning liability to companies that made and used asbestos car parts. 





Mechanic with Mesothelioma. William Trokey was a mechanic in the 1960s, a time of peak asbestos use. He worked with Ford brakes that contained asbestos and eventually was diagnosed with mesothelioma. Trokey and his wife sued several companies. A jury awarded $10 million to each of them to be paid by Ford. 




Asbestos lawsuits against Ford continue to this day. In 2022, the widow of a mechanic who died from mesothelioma sued for wrongful death. Ford tried to have the case dismissed, but a judge ruled that it could proceed. 



OSHA Cites the Ford Motor Company



In 2013, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) cited Ford for at least eight severe violations of the asbestos and respiratory protection standards. The violations occurred at Ford's Lakeshore Road plant in Buffalo.



According to OSHA, a serious violation entails probable cause to believe that a severe injury or death can occur from employer negligence.




"Workers deserve to perform their duties in a safe environment knowing they are protected from unsafe exposure to asbestos and other hazardous materials. It is the employer's responsibility to ensure that proper and effective safeguards are in place and in use at all times."
OSHA Buffalo area director, Art Dube



The violations that Ford was cited for included allowing employees to work in a hazardous environment, including, but not limited to:




A pipefitter working on a steam line that was filled with asbestos-containing insulation



Workers were not given respirator masks when working around asbestos-filled products



No unauthorized area signs in asbestos-filled working areas



Failure of employers to monitor airborne asbestos and protect workers





"To prevent incidents like this from occurring, employers should implement and maintain an effective illness and injury prevention program. Employers should aim at working with their employees to identify, address and eliminate hazards before they occur."
OSHA's New York regional administrator, Robert Kulick



Ford Covered Up Asbestos Dangers



Like other companies facing lawsuits, Ford has tried to dodge or limit liability. An investigative report found that Ford spent about $40 million to cover up the dangers asbestos parts posed to mechanics. 



The company spent money on consulting firms and studies that would cast doubt on the link between mesothelioma and mechanics who worked on asbestos brakes. 



The studies Ford funded had mixed results. Scientists and researchers who have testified on the connection between illness and asbestos exposure in mechanics criticized Ford's studies. They confirmed there is a definitive link. 



What to Do if You Used Ford Asbestos Products



If you worked with Ford products that contain asbestos, talk to your doctor about the risks and screenings. The earlier you get a diagnosis of an asbestos illness, the better the outcome will be. 



Contact a mesothelioma lawyer to determine your legal options if you are diagnosed with mesothelioma or another asbestos disease. Experienced asbestos attorneys give you the best chance of recovering damages through an asbestos trust fund, a lawsuit, or both. 



Additional Resources for Asbestos Victims



Remember, you may be eligible for considerable compensation if you've been injured by asbestos. Don't forget to fill out our form for our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area.

### Flexitallic

The Flexitallic Group, formerly known as Flexitallic Gasket Company, manufactures gaskets, fiber sheets, and other static sealing materials. Flexitallic used asbestos in its gaskets in the past, exposing workers to asbestos and putting them at risk for mesothelioma. Flexitallic reorganized in bankruptcy and set up an asbestos trust fund. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, and asbestos-related lung cancer, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 













Did Flexitallic Use Asbestos? 



Flexitallic is known for its innovative gaskets, components used as seals in numerous industries. It invented the spiral wound gasket, which contained asbestos for much of the company's history. Flexitallic used asbestos in gaskets through the early 1990s. 



Flexitallic History



Henry Bohmer, a German immigrant, founded Flexitallic Gasket Company in Camden, New Jersey, in 1912. 




Flexitallic invented and manufactured the spiral wound gasket in response to the industrial need for effective seals. 





During World War II, Flexitallic supplied the U.S. Navy with gaskets. The gaskets helped reduce the steam loss that limited power on vessels. 





Turner & Newall Ltd., a United Kingdom-based asbestos and construction products company, bought Flexitallic in the 1960s. Flexitallic relocated to Connecticut and was renamed Flexitallic, Inc. The name changed again a few years later to Gasket Holdings, Inc.





In 1997, Turner & Newall sold the company to Dan-Loc Bolt and Gasket. The company's name was changed to its final name, The Flexitallic Group. 





Although Turner & Newell sold the company, it promised to protect the new owners, Dan-Loc Bolt and Gasket, from asbestos claims and lawsuits. Since Flexitallic used asbestos in its products, it expected future lawsuits.





Federal-Mogul acquired Turner & Newall in the 1990s, taking on its asbestos liabilities, including those associated with Flexitallic. The Federal-Mogul asbestos trust fund includes a subfund for Turner & Newall and Flexitallic asbestos claims. 




How Did Flexitallic Use Asbestos? 



Flexitallic manufactured gaskets. Many industries use gaskets to create a tight seal between parts, such as in machinery or pipes. Asbestos in gaskets provided insulation to reduce heat loss. 



Flexitallic made gaskets with asbestos for several decades through the early 1990s. Many other companies used the company's gaskets in various industries. 



Although other companies used asbestos to make gaskets, Flexitallic's trademark spiral wound gasket contained more asbestos than many similar products. 



Who Was at Risk of Exposure to Asbestos in Flexitallic Products? 



Since Flexitallic's asbestos-containing products were distributed to numerous companies, people were affected in many different occupations and industries. 



The following are the most common occupations affected by asbestos and at risk for developing malignant mesothelioma and other illnesses:




Flexitallic product manufacture workers



Refinery workers



Boiler workers



Shipyard workers



Pipefitters




The most typical product made by Flexitallic that affected workers the most was the spiral-wound industrial gasket, which was filled with asbestos. 



In addition to civilian workers, U.S. Navy service members risked exposure to asbestos in Flexitallic gaskets. Flexitallic supplied the Navy with gaskets for use throughout ships. Navy veterans now have high rates of mesothelioma because of heavy asbestos use in ships. 



Flexitallic Asbestos Lawsuits



Flexitallic and its parent companies faced numerous asbestos lawsuits brought by workers exposed through their products. Turner & Newall and then Federal-Mogul were responsible for handling these lawsuits until the latter filed for bankruptcy. 



These are a few examples of lawsuits related to Flexitallic asbestos products: 




Earlon Nunez worked on boilers during his time in the U.S. Navy. He died from mesothelioma at the age of 49. His widow sued several companies for damages. A jury found Flexitallic 10% liable for Nunez's damages because he handled its asbestos gaskets used in boilers. His widow received a total of $1.2 million in damages. 





Twenty-two oil refinery workers at Texaco in Port Arthur, Texas, sued several companies in 2001. They developed asbestosis and other illnesses after working with asbestos parts supplied by Flexitallic and others. The jury award amounted to $35.2 million and $1.6 million to each plaintiff. 





Calvin R. Lane, a Navy veteran, worked with Flexitallic gaskets as a boiler worker on U.S. Navy ships. He developed mesothelioma as a result of his work. He sued Flexitallic and was awarded $4.2 million by a jury in California. 




Bankruptcy and Asbestos Trust Fund



By 2001, Federal-Mogul filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. As part of the reorganization plan, it created an asbestos trust fund to compensate claimants. 



 The Turner & Newall Subfund of the Federal-Mogul US Asbestos Personal Injury Trust handles Flexitallic asbestos claims. Established in 2007, the fund is still active and accepting claims. The payment percentage was set at 5.9% in 2022. 



For more information on the Federal-Mogul asbestos trust fund, refer to our article, Federal-Mogul Corporation.



Flexitallic Today



The Flexitallic Group is still operating, with its headquarters in Houston, Texas. The company focuses on manufacturing numerous types of gaskets and numerous static sealing products.



How to Seek Compensation After Asbestos Exposure



If you worked with Flexitallic products that contained asbestos, contact a mesothelioma law firm to help you get compensation. They can help you make a successful claim with the Turner & Newall subfund or find other sources of compensation, such as lawsuits and other asbestos trusts. 



Additional Resources and Legal Information for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area.

### Federal-Mogul Corporation

The Federal-Mogul Corporation acquired numerous companies in the past that used asbestos to make automotive parts and other products. Federal-Mogul became liable in many asbestos lawsuits and claims. It filed for bankruptcy, reorganized, and established an asbestos trust fund. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did Federal-Mogul Use Asbestos? 



Federal-Mogul didn't use asbestos in its original products. Federal-Mogul's connection to asbestos came when it acquired companies that made asbestos products. 



These other companies made construction materials and automotive parts with asbestos. Asbestos was used in both industries for its ability to insulate and protect against heat and fire. 



Federal-Mogul Corporation History



Federal-Mogul was created in 1899 by J. Howard Muzzy and Edward Lyon. The founders formed two companies together to create the Muzzy-Lyon Company. 




Muzzy-Lyon acquired Mogul Metal Company and began manufacturing diecast bearings for engines. In 1910, the company's first significant order came when Buick asked for 10,000 bearings.





In 1924, Mogul Metal Company merged with Federal Bearing and Bushing and became known as Federal-Mogul Corporation. 





The company continued to expand slowly, but the years 1941 through 1945 provided the biggest growth after Federal-Mogul began producing products to help during World War II. Metal bearings were in high demand for the duration of the war. 





After the war, Federal-Mogul underwent a series of acquisitions to grow the company. These included National Motor Bearing Company, Sterling Aluminum Products, Flexitallic, Fel-Pro, and more. 





Several of Federal-Mogul's acquisitions were companies that made products using asbestos. After facing thousands of resulting lawsuits, Federal-Mogul filed for bankruptcy in 2001. It emerged reorganized and with an asbestos trust fund in 2007. 




Today, Federal-Mogul consists of two divisions owned by Tenneco: Federal-Mogul Powertrain and Federal-Mogul Motorparts. 



Federal-Mogul Asbestos Products



While Federal-Mogul didn't initially make asbestos products, it acquired companies that used asbestos. It acquired them knowing that these businesses manufactured asbestos-containing materials.



Two manufacturers, in particular, Turner & Newall and Fel-Pro, were known for their heavy use of asbestos in seals, gaskets, construction materials, and more.



Federal-Mogul subsidiaries that used asbestos made a variety of construction and automotive products, including: 




Brakes



Clutches



Gaskets



Insulation



Concrete



Pipe covering




Who Was Affected by Federal-Mogul Asbestos Products? 



The manufacturing and distribution of asbestos-containing products placed workers in many occupations in danger of exposure and related illnesses. The following jobs are among the most common that were affected by Federal-Mogul subsidiaries' products:




Construction workers



Auto mechanics



Automotive factory workers



Shipyard workers



Oil refinery workers



Refractory plant workers



Other industrial and manufacturing workers




Many people who worked for Federal-Mogul's subsidiaries also risked asbestos exposure. The workers who handled asbestos while manufacturing these products were likely to have inhaled asbestos fibers. 



Federal-Mogul Asbestos Claims and Lawsuits



Although Federal-Mogul tried earnestly to avoid filing for bankruptcy, nothing could prevent the company from facing the overabundant and growing amount of asbestos-related claims and lawsuits. 



By the time Federal-Mogul filed for bankruptcy, there were already over 300,000 claims. One major case involved Texaco workers who used asbestos products made by a Federal-Mogul subsidiary. 



In 2001, 22 former Texaco employees and contractors won $35.2 million in an asbestos-related lawsuit against Federal-Mogul's former owners. 



According to court documents, the workers were employed at one of Texaco's refineries, where they worked with and around Flexitallic gaskets that contained excessive amounts of asbestos.



The plaintiffs were eventually diagnosed with asbestosis after working at the refinery from the 1940s through the 1970s.



The former owners of Federal-Mogul that were found liable for damages included U.S. Gypsum Co. and Gasket Holdings (the owners of Flexitallic). Individual plaintiffs were awarded $1.6 million each.



Federal-Mogul Bankruptcy and Asbestos Trust



By 2001, the sheer amount of asbestos-related against Federal-Mogul reached a point where they filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. It took six years for the company to come out of bankruptcy fully.



Once it emerged from bankruptcy, the company created an asbestos trust fund for a reorganization agreement. 



In 2007, the amount funded to the trust fund, which will be used to compensate pending and future claims, was around $635 million.



The Federal-Mogul U.S. Asbestos Personal Injury Trust includes subfunds to cover claims related to three subsidiaries: 




Fel-Pro



Turner & Newall



Vellumoid




The Federal-Mogul Corporation Today



Federal-Mogul still operates. Known as Federal-Mogul Holdings Corporation, the company focuses on supplying various automotive and equipment parts to the world. 



It also designs, creates, and manufactures original equipment powertrain components, as well as systems protection products, which are used for transportation applications.



Contact a mesothelioma lawyer if Federal-Mogul asbestos products harmed you or your family. They can help you seek compensation. 



Seeking Compensation From Federal-Mogul



If you were exposed to asbestos through Federal-Mogul, you could be entitled to compensation through the trust. Contact an experienced mesothelioma lawyer to help you make a successful claim. 



An asbestos attorney or law firm can also look through your work history to determine if you are eligible for other types of compensation. Most people with asbestos illnesses were exposed through several companies. 



You could be eligible for a claim with one or more trusts or even for a lawsuit against companies that are still operational. 



Additional Information and Legal Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you may qualify for significant compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### Ehret Magnesia Manufacturing Company

Ehret Magnesia Manufacturing Company made asbestos pipe insulation and other asbestos-containing products for decades. Asbestos exposure in workers led to illnesses like mesothelioma and resulting lawsuits. Keene Corporation, which acquired Ehret, eventually filed for bankruptcy and set up an asbestos trust fund. 



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













Did Ehret Magnesia Use Asbestos? 



Ehret Magnesia Manufacturing used asbestos for several decades, incorporating it into insulation and other construction products. Ehret mined its own asbestos for many years, extracting both magnesia and asbestos from limestone in the Valley Forge area of Pennsylvania. 



Ehret Magnesia History



Ehrent Magnesia Manufacturing Company dates back to the 1890s purchase of several limestone quarries in and around Valley Forge, Pennsylvania. 




Ehret mined magnesium-rich limestone and asbestos to use in its 85% magnesia products: 85% magnesia and 15% asbestos for insulating. 





Ehret Magnesia created two brand names for its asbestos pipe insulation: Durocel and Thermalite. The company's two insulation products became so popular that both became signature brands. 





As the company expanded, so did its product line, including adding thermal insulation and construction supplies that continued to be made with asbestos. 





Until the late 1960s, Ehret Magnesia continued making asbestos-containing products even though documents show that the company was fully aware of the dangers of ingesting asbestos fibers. 





In fact, in 1959, Ehret Magnesia merged with another company that created asbestos-containing products, Baldwin-Hill. 





The merger formed Baldwin-Ehret-Hill and lasted until 1968 when Keene Corporation bought out the company.





No asbestos-containing products were manufactured under Keene's ownership, but the company continued to sell Ehret Magnesia's products. 





The National Park Service bought the Valley Forge Ehret plant and surrounding land in 1976. 




In addition to acquiring Ehret Magnesia's products, Keene Corporation also took on thousands of asbestos-related claims. It is now solely responsible for Ehret Magnesia asbestos liabilities, processed through a trust fund. 



Asbestos-Containing Products Made by Ehret Magnesia



Although asbestos pipes were the company's most-used product, Ehret Magnesia had several asbestos-containing products, including:




Ehret Air Cell



Ehret Fiberkote



Ehret Enduro High Temperature Blocks



Ehret  Asbestos Sponge Felt



Ehret Asbestos Paper



Ehret Asbestos Millboard



Ehret Asbestos Wick and Rope



Baldwin  Mono-Block (asbestos covering)



Valley Forge asbestos sheets



Valley Forge asbestos packing



Valley Forge asbestos gaskets



Thermasil insulation



Thermacil cement



Thermacil asbestos block



Number One insulating cement



Mono-block insulating cement




Who Was at Risk for Exposure to Asbestos from Ehret Magnesia Products? 



Anyone who handled, worked with, or worked near Ehret asbestos products risked exposure. Workers in the Ehret mines and manufacturing facilities were at high risk of asbestos exposure. 



When these workers handled asbestos, they likely released fibers. Asbestos fibers in the air can easily be inhaled by anyone working in the area. 



Other workers who used Ehret abestos products were also at risk of exposure: 




Construction workers



Insulators



Industrial workers



Power plant workers



Pipefitters



Plumbers



Steamfitters



Boiler workers



Demolition workers




These workers may have been exposed to asbestos fibers when handling the products, installing them, and making repairs. 



The U.S. Navy used asbestos products from several companies, including Ehret. These products went into ships. Shipyard workers risked exposure, as did the Navy service members who crewed ships with asbestos products. Navy veterans today have high rates of asbestos illnesses. 



What Ehret Magnesia Knew About Asbestos Dangers



Records from Ehret Magnesia indicate that executives in the company knew at least some of the risks of using asbestos in their products. 



They knew as soon as the 1930s that their workers had unusual rates of respiratory illnesses, including lung cancer. In spite of this knowledge, the company did nothing to protect workers or stop using asbestos.



Ehret Magnesia/Keene Corporation Lawsuits



In 1971, Keene Corporation began the process of fighting asbestos-related claims. Most of the claims came from employees and contractors who worked decades ago for Ehret Magnesia. 



Since Keene acquired Ehret Magnesia, it also took on all its asbestos claims. By the end of 1991, the company had resolved over 2,400 asbestos-related claims.



The numbers quickly increased to over 100,000. In 1996, Keene filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, still facing an overwhelming number of cases.



The company came out of bankruptcy in 1996 and soon after created an asbestos trust fund entitled the Keene Creditors Trust. The asbestos trust was set up to pay all pending and future asbestos-related claims.



Ehret Magnesia Faces Fines for Illegal Dumping



In January 1997, workers at Pennsylvania's Valley Forge State Park found that an asbestos-containing fiber optic cable had contaminated soil in the park. 



The cable was located close to the site where Ehret Magnesia once manufactured its products.



Upon further investigation, it was discovered that Ehret Magnesia had been illegally dumping their waste materials into the Schuylkill River and abandoned pits. The illegal activity had gone on for decades.



The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) declared the area an emergency hazardous territory for immediate clean-up. 



Shortly after, the area was cordoned off, and the asbestos was wetted to reduce the chance of people ingesting airborne asbestos fibers.



In 2013, the clean-up began, including excavating and transporting contaminated soil over a 112-acre area in the Valley Forge National Historical Park. The clean-up was completed in 2014, and the park re-opened.



If You Were Exposed to Ehret Magnesia Asbestos Products



Contact an asbestos attorney if you were exposed to asbestos through Ehret products. They can explain your legal options and help you seek compensation. You could be eligible for compensation from the asbestos trust. 



A mesothelioma lawyer will guide you through the claims process and ensure you have the best chance of getting compensation. They can also find other companies responsible for your past asbestos exposure. These could lead to additional claims or lawsuits to help you recover damages. 



Additional Information and Legal Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form for our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### EaglePicher Industries Inc.

EaglePicher Industries Inc., known today as EaglePicher Technologies, LLC, manufactures battery, electronics, and energetic devices. The company faced thousands of asbestos-related lawsuits after using asbestos in cement and insulation products. EaglePicher eventually filed for bankruptcy and created an asbestos trust fund. 



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more.













Did EaglePicher Use Asbestos? 



EaglePicher has long focused on making batteries that did not contain asbestos but also made some construction products. 



The construction industry was one of the heaviest users of asbestos for decades. EaglePicher made cement and insulation construction products with asbestos for many years. 



EaglePicher Industries Inc. History



EaglePicher's founding dates back to 1843 with the E. & S.J. Conkling Company. That company would become Eagle White Lead Works in 1858. Picher Zinc Company was founded in 1876. 




Eagle White Lead and Picher Zinc merged in 1906 to form Eagle-Picher Lead, which would become EaglePicher Industries. 





Soon after the merger, EaglePicher expanded its operations to include battery manufacturing. The company mined zinc and diatomaceous earth to make the batteries.





The U.S. military bought many EaglePicher batteries during World War II. Its distribution of the batteries throughout the war made EaglePicher a popular company that quickly expanded.





EaglePicher added more products to its line during its expansion and began manufacturing them with asbestos that it mined. 





The military was still a leading customer when EaglePicher made asbestos-containing products. The company was responsible for exposing many military servicemen and servicewomen to asbestos. 





EaglePicher continued to use asbestos until around 1975. A string of asbestos-related claims and lawsuits filed against EaglePicher followed. It filed for bankruptcy in 1991 and emerged with an asbestos trust fund. 




EaglePicher went bankrupt again in 2005 and emerged in 2009 as EaglePicher Technologies, LLC. OM Group, Inc. acquired EaglePicher in 2010. 



What EaglePicher Products Contained Asbestos?



EaglePicher insulation was the main product that contained asbestos. The cement that the company manufactured also contained asbestos. Three brand names of EaglePicher cement contained asbestos: 




One Cote



Hylo



Super 66




EaglePicher brands of weatherproofing products that contained asbestos include: 




Insulseal



Spray-Mastic



Stalastic



Swetcheck B




Other specific products EaglePicher made with asbestos include: 




Hylo pipe covering



Hylo and Supertemp block insulation



Paint



Windows



Fireproofing materials




Industries and Occupations Affected by EaglePicher Industries Inc.



Numerous types of workers came into contact with asbestos via EaglePicher products. Workers exposed to EaglePicher asbestos were employed in different occupations across several industries and included:




Insulators



Drywall installers



Bricklayers



Mechanics



Shipbuilders



Shipyard workers



Navy service members



Construction workers




Many of EaglePicher's products with asbestos went into Navy ships. The Navy used asbestos heavily in ship construction, leaving veterans with high rates of mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses. 



Asbestos Lawsuits Against EaglePicher



Throughout the 1970s and 1980s, asbestos-related claims began mounting against EaglePicher. The company battled these claims and lawsuits for years.



One example was a case brought by Charles Press, who served in the Navy as a sheet metal worker. He served in the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard from the 1940s to the 1970s, peak years of asbestos use. 



Press filed one of the first asbestos lawsuits against EaglePicher in 1979 after getting sick from exposure. He died from mesothelioma in 1984. His widow eventually recovered damages in a settlement. 







In 1982, Tom Petry, President of EaglePicher, created a reserve fund specifically for those affected by the company's asbestos-containing products. 



This lasted until 1990 when U.S. District Judge Jack B. Weinstein stopped asbestos claims and ordered EaglePicher to pay $45 million to all pending cases.



EaglePicher Bankruptcy and Trust Fund



In 1991, EaglePicher filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Part of the bankruptcy agreement included the company creating a reorganization plan to set up an asbestos trust fund. 



EaglePicher funded the asbestos trust fund with 10 million shares of its stock, tax refund notes, and $387 million cash. The year it filed for bankruptcy, EaglePicher faced more than $2.5 billion in asbestos-related claims.



The EaglePicher Industries Personal Injury Settlement Trust has paid out millions of dollars to asbestos exposure victims. 



In 2005, EaglePicher once again filed for bankruptcy after the company accumulated too much debt, equaling around $500 million. It took until 2009 for the company to fully exit Chapter 11 reorganization.



Contamination at the EaglePicher Superfund Site



The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) listed an EaglePicher battery manufacturing facility in New Mexico as a Superfund site. The factory operated from 1964 to 1976 and left behind numerous contaminants, including asbestos and lead. 



EaglePicher contributed $4 million to the EPA's effort to study the site and create a cleanup plan. The government provided $22 million. The cleanup project finally began in the summer of 2023. It is a collaboration between the EPA and the New Mexico Environmental Department. 



Part of the project includes asbestos abatement in the remaining structures. Soil with lead and asbestos will be removed to approved hazardous waste disposal facilities. 



EaglePicher Industries Today



EaglePicher remains in operations today as EaglePicher Technologies. It no longer uses asbestos in any products. 



Currently, the company focuses on numerous types of batteries, battery cells, electronics, and energetic devices such as igniters, pyrotechnic switches, gas generators, and cutters. EaglePicher is headquartered in Dearborn, Michigan.



You can work with a mesothelioma lawyer to take legal action and seek compensation if you were exposed to asbestos through EaglePicher.



Additional Resources and Legal Information for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### Dana Corporation

The Dana Corporation, now known as the Dana Holding Corporation, is an automotive parts manufacturer and supplier based in Maumee, Ohio. Dana has a long history of asbestos use in manufacturing vehicle components. Lawsuits over asbestos exposure brought by employees, contractors, and consumers led to Dana's bankruptcy filing. 



We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. With over $30 billion currently available in asbestos trust funds, if you or a loved one have a serious asbestos illness, such as mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant financial compensation. 







Did Dana Use Asbestos? 



Dana Corporation used asbestos in the auto parts it manufactured for many years. Most automotive companies used asbestos, primarily in friction parts like clutches and brakes. 



Dana Corporation History



A young engineering student, Clarence Spicer, established the Dana Corporation in 1904 after he invented and patented an encased universal joint. 




Spicer created the joint while attending Cornell University. He moved to Plainfield, New Jersey, shortly after to set up and market his business. 





The first universal joints, "u-joints," were shipped to Connecticut's Corbin Motor Company. 





By 1906, business began to grow and acquire others, including American Motors, Kelly-Springfield Motor Truck Co., Buick Motor Co., Olds Motor Works, and more. 





Four years later, as his business grew, Spicer renamed it the Spicer Manufacturing Company.





After many years of success, the company struggled financially in 1914. In 1928, the company relocated to Toledo, Ohio, to boost business. 





The company's name was changed again to Dana Corporation, and the company once again began to grow.





Dana Corporation then expanded its line to include more products. The company also purchased a few auto suppliers, including the Victor Gasket Manufacturing Company and the Perfect Circle Corporation.





By 2006, Dana Corporation again faced financial troubles as numerous asbestos-related lawsuits and claims against it mounted. The lawsuits led Dana Corporation to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.




Dana reorganized after bankruptcy with a trust to compensate claimants. The trust is only for former Dana employees exposed to asbestos on the job. 



Asbestos Products Made by Dana Corporation



Most companies that made automotive companies used asbestos in the past. Asbestos is an efficient insulator and effective at fireproofing. These were important qualities for making friction car parts, like brakes and clutches. 



Some body parts were also made with asbestos to manage heat and lower the risk of fires. 



Dana Corporation manufactured numerous products that contained asbestos, including the following:




Brake pads



Brake linings



Gaskets



Seals



Universal joints



Driveshafts



Transmissions



Axles



Thermal management products




Who Was Affected by Dana's Asbestos Products? 



Dana employees were at risk of exposure to asbestos. Workers in Dana manufacturing facilities handled or worked very near asbestos. When handled, asbestos releases small fibers that contaminate the air and cause exposure. 



Once Dana products left the plant, they traveled far and wide to other companies and vehicle owners, putting many more people at risk of asbestos exposure: 




Automotive assembly plant workers



Auto mechanics



Home auto hobbyists




Workers in other industries also used Dana asbestos seals, gaskets, valves, and other components. These included pipefitters, plumbers, steamfitters, boiler workers, and others. 



Asbestos Lawsuits Against Dana Corporation



Dana Corporation faced thousands of asbestos-related lawsuits from former workers and others exposed to asbestos in their products. Many of these people later developed illnesses like mesothelioma and sued to recover damages. 



Louis Hicks



In Sept. 2002, Louis A. Hicks, a rope packer and construction laborer, filed an asbestos-related lawsuit against Dana Corporation and 11 other companies. He was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma.



According to court documents, during his 40-year career, Hicks was exposed to asbestos that stemmed from Dana Corporation's products.



 In addition to working around pipefitters who installed asbestos-containing gaskets, he cut and packed rope filled with asbestos.



Hicks also handled the same type of gaskets that pipefitters installed, including four different kinds of gaskets manufactured by Dana Corporation.



During the trial, Dr. James C. Giudice, a board-certified internal medicine and pulmonary physician, testified that the three types of asbestos found in Dana Corporation's products (chrysotile, amosite, and crocidolite) were all dangerous to human health.



Hicks passed away in 2003 from mesothelioma, but his daughter carried on with his trial. The Superior Court of Pennsylvania found Dana Corporation and the additional 11 manufacturers liable for Hicks' illness in the lawsuit.



Dana Corporation was ordered to pay $464,605.650 for Hicks' asbestos exposure via gaskets. The other manufacturers were ordered to pay $5,000,000.



Marlena Robaey



Marlena Robaey developed peritoneal mesothelioma, a rare form of this type of asbestos cancer. She and her husband worked on cars for many years. 



Robaey's husband also worked with boilers and brought asbestos fibers home on her clothing. She was exposed to asbestos secondhand and also through her own work with asbestos car parts. 



Robaey filed a lawsuit against Dana and other companies whose products contained asbestos and contaminated her. A jury in the trial found Dana to be 40% liable for the expenses resulting from her illness. She received $75 million in total damages. 



Dana Bankruptcy and Reorganization



The costs of these and other lawsuits forced Dana Corporation to seek bankruptcy protection in 2006. The company emerged in 2007 while continuing to resolve cases. 



In 2007, the Ad Hoc Committee of Asbestos Claimants appealed the Dana Corporation reorganization plan. The plan included the creation of a subsidiary, Dana Companies, LLC, to which Dana would transfer its liabilities and $240 million to resolve them. 



The Ad Hoc Committee felt that Dana Corporation didn't set aside enough funds to compensate asbestos victims. The list of victims had reached over 80,000 claimants. Initially, the Dana Corporation said asbestos-related claims only equaled 3% of their total debt. 



However, when replying to the Ad Hoc Committee, Dana Corporation said there was $240 million set aside in the trust fund for current and future asbestos-related claims. Ultimately, Ad Hoc's appeal did not affect Dana Corporation's emergence from bankruptcy. 



Even after reorganization, Dana continued to face lawsuits over asbestos exposure. In 2016, Enstar Group acquired Dana Companies, LLC, and the asbestos liabilities. Enstar is now responsible for Dana's asbestos liabilities and claims. 



Dana Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association



The company has never established an asbestos trust fund for claimants, but it did create the Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association (VEBA). The fund is only for former Dana employees. 



VEBA is a fund that covers long-term disability as well as medical expenses, including asbestos-related costs. The Dana Corporation placed around $800 million into the VEBA fund, as well as $80 million from the company stock.



If You Were Exposed to Dana Asbestos Products



Many people have been injured by Dana Corporation's products, including car mechanics, pipefitters, maintenance workers, boiler workers, engine room workers, steamfitters, automobile production workers, and more. If this includes you, talk to a mesothelioma lawyer about your rights. 



An experienced lawyer can help you find options for compensation if you do not qualify for VEBA. Other companies could be held liable. You might be eligible for a lawsuit or a trust fund set up by another asbestos company. 



Legal Resources and Additional Information for Asbestos Victims



There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who are victims of asbestos-related diseases. Don't forget to fill out our form for our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Chrysler

Chrysler once manufactured automotive parts with asbestos, exposing workers and home mechanics. A 2009 bankruptcy shielded Chrysler from ongoing asbestos lawsuits, but the company set up a trust to compensate victims. Chrysler is now part of Stellantis. 



There is currently more than $30 billion available in asbestos trust funds. If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, and asbestosis, keep in mind that you may be entitled to compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













Did Chrysler Use Asbestos? 



Like other automotive companies in the 1900s, Chrysler used asbestos in some components for many years. Asbestos is an excellent insulator and fireproofing material. It was useful in cars to prevent overheating from friction and reduce the risks of fires.



Chrysler History



Walter P. Chrysler founded the Chrysler Corporation in 1925 as a reorganization of Maxwell Motor Company in Highland Park, Michigan. 




The company's first automobile was the Chrysler 6. At a selling price of $1,565, the Chrysler 6 contained four-wheel hydraulic brakes and a six-cylinder engine. 





Chrysler soon acquired Plymouth to offer a lower-cost alternative to the Chrysler 6. 





In addition to making automobiles, the company made replaceable oil filters and windshields. Chrysler bought the Dodge Brothers in the 1930s, adding Dodge brand vehicles to its automotive line. 





During World War II, Chrysler manufactured vehicles for the military. Its factories also produced aircraft engines, air raid sirens, and other equipment for the war effort. 





Chrysler began to struggle during the oil crisis of the 1970s. Americans wanted smaller, more fuel-efficient cars, and Chrysler had a hard time competing with Ford, GM, and Japanese companies. In 1980, Chrysler received a $1.5 billion loan from the federal government. 





In 1998, the Chrysler Corporation Daimler-Chrysler, after partnering with German automaker Daimler-Benz. The company then experienced decades of financial troubles over the next several years, selling its shares.





In 2007, Cerberus Capital Management bought 80.1% of Daimler's stake in Chrysler for a little over $7 billion. 





Chrysler filed for bankruptcy in 2009 and received a $6 billion government handout. This led to the creation of a trust that would compensate United Auto Workers (UAW) Chrysler employees. It covered asbestos exposure but only for former Chrysler workers. 




Italian automaker Fiat merged with Chrysler in 2014 to create Fiat Chrysler. In 2019, it merged with PSA Group and was renamed Stellantis. 



How Did Chrysler Use Asbestos? 



Daimler Chrysler was responsible for many asbestos-containing products, often bought from other companies, including disk brakes, linings, and clutches from:




Bendix Corporation



Abex Corporation



BorgWarner



The Johns Manville Corporation



Luk, Fichtel & Sachs



Raybestos-Manhattan




Chrysler manufactured its own drum brake components with asbestos from the 1960s to the 1980s. Automotive parts made or used by Chryser that contained asbestos included: 




Brakes



Clutches



Engine components



Heat seals



Hoodliners



Gaskets



Some body parts




Clutches and brakes contained the most asbestos for the longest period of time throughout the automotive industry. These components were at high risk of overheating due to friction. Asbestos reduced the risk. 



Who Was Exposed to Asbestos Through Chrysler Vehicles? 



Asbestos automotive parts posed risks to workers because handling them released harmful fibers. Asbestos fibers in the air could easily be inhaled by any workers in the area. 



Workers in different occupations were exposed to asbestos via Chrysler's products, including:




Brake mechanics and assemblers



Employees of auto parts and manufacturing stores



Clutch mechanics and assemblers



Factory workers



Machine Operators



Warehouse workers




Also at risk for exposure to asbestos from Chrysler parts were home mechanics. People who worked on their own vehicles may have removed and replaced clutches and brakes, exposing themselves to asbestos fibers. 



Asbestos in Old Chrysler Factories



Shuttered automotive factories in Detroit and other locations pose risks to residents. Many have lingering toxic materials, including asbestos, that can expose anyone living nearby. 



One problematic facility belonged to Chrysler and was in use until 2009. The company that purchased the site from Chrysler exposed community members to asbestos and other substances when it scrapped the buildings for copper and other valuable materials. 



Chrysler Bankruptcy



In 2009, Chrysler filed for bankruptcy. The U.S. government agreed to provide $6 billion, stipulating that Chrysler partnered with Fiat. Within months, Chrysler emerged from bankruptcy.



Although the company emerged from bankruptcy quickly, it faced numerous asbestos-related claims and lawsuits. 



Starting in the early 1980s, Chrysler handled many asbestos-related claims due to manufactured automobile parts that contained asbestos.



Thousands of plaintiffs developed asbestos-related diseases after working around Chrysler's products or purchasing the products as consumers.



Chrysler Asbestos Lawsuits



Internal documents indicate that Chrysler was well aware of the dangers that asbestos posed yet gave no warnings to workers or consumers.



As a result, the company faced numerous lawsuits and controversies related to asbestos use. 



$25 Million for Mechanic



In 2006, a New York County jury awarded Alfred D'Ulisse, 73, $25 million in his lawsuit against Chrysler. D'Ulisse developed malignant mesothelioma after working on asbestos-containing brakes manufactured by Chrysler while working at Brooklyn's Morak Brakes.



From 1960 to 1964, D'Ulisse stripped linings from worn linings from old brakes and replaced them.



He became a city police officer afterward but still worked part-time at Chrysler during his 36-year employment as a police officer.



Lawyers presented evidence that Chrysler knew about the dangers of asbestos and failed to place warnings on its products. 



The jury found that the defendant was 10% liable for damages. Still, because it acted "with reckless disregard for the safety of others," the company was responsible for the full verdict amount.



Before developing mesothelioma, D'Ulisse was an active participant in his grandchildren's lives and in several sports, including baseball, paddleball, dancing, and handball. Yet, the symptoms of his disease were so severe that he could no longer enjoy any activities.



Chrysler Exhibits Poor Conduct During Mesothelioma Victim's Burial



In 2009, Harold St. John, 67, filed an asbestos-related lawsuit against Chrysler. St. John said he developed malignant mesothelioma due to working with Chrysler brakes. St. John passed away before his trial began.



According to court documents, Chrysler sent one of its representatives to St. John's funeral service to stop him from being buried. 



The Chrysler representative ordered St. John's body to be taken back to the funeral home to perform an autopsy.



Superior Court Judge Phillip denied Chrysler's request for an autopsy based on St. John's family's objections.



Chrysler appealed and ordered a stay on St. Johns's body while the case was appealed. Appellate judges upheld Judge Paley's decision and allowed St. John to be buried. 



Had he not passed away, the defendants would have still fought the lawsuit without an autopsy, the judge said, explaining the decision.



“We are relieved that Harry St. John can finally rest in peace,” said the family's lawyer.



Many people thought that Chrysler acted in poor taste. However, the company issued a public statement, saying that Chrysler did not intend any disrespect.




“At no time did Chrysler intend any disrespect to the late Mr. St. John or to his family at this difficult time. Numerous epidemiological studies have refuted the link between automotive products and asbestos-related disease. We expect to prevail when this matter goes to trial.”
Chrysler spokesperson, Michael Palese



How to Get Compensation for Exposure to Chrysler Asbestos Parts



If you came into contact with asbestos through Chrysler vehicles or products, talk to a mesothelioma law firm about your legal rights and options. 



UAW members can seek compensation through the established trust fund. If you were not a UAW or Chrysler employee, a lawyer can help you seek other compensation options. There are likely other companies that exposed you to asbestos and that can be held liable for damages. 



Additional Information and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you or a loved one are suffering due to an asbestos-related illness, keep in mind that you may be eligible for a substantial amount of compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. For additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Crown Cork & Seal

Crown Cork & Seal, now known as Crown Holdings, is a packaging products manufacturer with more than 139 plants across several continents. Crown has been held liable for asbestos exposure and asbestos illnesses from asbestos products made by a company it acquired, Mundet Cork. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did Crown Holdings Use Asbestos? 



Crown Cork & Seal never used asbestos in its own products. It acquired and owned a company that used asbestos in its products for a short period. Mundet Cork made several insulation products with asbestos, which led to exposure and illness in some workers. 



Crown Cork & Seal History



In 1882, Crown Cork & Seal founder William Painter invented an improved way to store containers such as beer, soda, and tea. 




This simple invention revolutionized the industry of sealing bottles. Crown became one of the largest manufacturing companies in the world and eventually added other products. 





Crown Cork & Seal had manufacturing facilities worldwide by 1906. Locations included France, Germany, Japan, Brazil, and the United Kingdom. By the 1930s, Crown produced half of the world's bottle caps. 





During World War II, the company developed a gas mask canister to help the service members. However, the company received a citation from the government for creating and distributing the product. 





After the war, the company created and developed several other products, including Pour-N-Seal, Merit Seal, and  Kork-N-Seal.





Crown acquired several businesses over the years. One of these was Mundet Cork, a bottle cap company acquired in 1963. 





In addition to its caps, Mundet made asbestos construction products. Crown only owned Mundet for a few months, but it took on its asbestos liabilities. 




Today, Crown Cork & Seal is Crown Holdings, Inc. Crown manufactures packaging for a variety of industries and is a leading global company. It does not use asbestos in products today. 



Mundet Cork Asbestos Use



Crown Cork & Seal never used asbestos in its own products. The acquisition of Mundet Cork made the company vulnerable to asbestos liabilities. In addition to cork bottle caps, Mundet manufactured construction materials, which were often made with asbestos at the time. 



Some examples of Mundet Cork products made with asbestos include: 




Block insulation



Magnesia asbestos insulation



Mundetcork



Mundetblock



Pipe covering



Wool finishing cement



Wool insulating cement




Who Was at Risk of Asbestos Exposure from Mundet Products? 



Crown employees were never at risk of asbestos exposure because they didn't use asbestos. Anyone who worked in Mundet manufacturing facilities that used asbestos was at high risk for exposure. Handling the materials can cause the release of asbestos fibers that workers likely inhaled. 



The risk of exposure went well beyond Mundet plants. Workers who used Mundet asbestos products also risked exposure: 




Construction workers



Insulators



Cement contractors



Painters



Plumbers



Renovation and repair workers



Demolition workers



Laborers




Crown Cork & Seal Lawsuits



Since Crown Cork & Seal bought Mundet Cork, the company faced asbestos lawsuits, generally from former Mundet Cork employers, contractors, and consumers. 



These are just some examples of the many asbestos-related lawsuits that Crown & Cork faced.



$12 Million for Shipfitter 



In June 2012, Frederick Schulte, a shipfitter and iron worker for the McDermott Incorporated Shipyard, won a $12 million verdict after a Louisiana jury found Crown & Cork and other companies responsible for his asbestos-related illness. 



Although Schulte didn't work for Mundet Cork, he was affected by the company's asbestos-containing pipes used at his workplace.



Schulte was diagnosed with mesothelioma after numerous years of asbestos exposure in 2011. 



According to court documents, the airborne asbestos fibers he ingested while working on and around Mundet Cork products contributed to his illness.



Other companies that manufactured asbestos were also found liable, including Westinghouse Electric Corp., Reilly Benton, International Paper Company, Crosby Valve, McDermott, and Avondale. 



The defendants were also found responsible for withholding information on the dangers of asbestos exposure.



It took only ten months from the time of Schulte's mesothelioma diagnosis to win his mesothelioma lawsuit.



$5.1 Million for Insulation Exposure



William Saller died from mesothelioma in 2006. He worked at Standard Oil and claimed to have been exposed to asbestos in pipe insulation made by Mundet. He also used a joint compound at home that contained asbestos. 



Saller never worked directly with asbestos products, but he worked near them. He worked near people who cut into asbestos pipes that created asbestos dust. 



Saller's family continued his lawsuit after his death and won $5.1 million, an award that included compensatory and punitive damages. 



Crown Cork & Seal Today



As mentioned earlier, Crown Cork & Seal is still in operation today under the name Crown Holdings. The company now remains the biggest metal manufacturing business in the world. 



Crown Holdings packages food, drinks, household products, industrial products, and health and beauty products for various businesses.



If You Were Exposed to Mundet Cork Asbestos Products



If you came into contact with asbestos through Mundet products, talk to a mesothelioma lawyer about your legal options. Crown never filed for bankruptcy and did not set up an asbestos trust fund, but you may be eligible to file a lawsuit against the company to recover damages. 



An asbestos attorney or law firm can also review your work history to find other defendants. Most people with asbestos illnesses were exposed by several asbestos companies. You could be eligible for trusts or to seek damages from multiple companies. 



Legal Help and Additional Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Congoleum Corporation

The Congoleum Corporation is a flooring manufacturer that once used asbestos in its products. Congoleum faced numerous asbestos lawsuits after workers and others developed mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses. Congoleum filed for bankruptcy to help compensate for the mounting asbestos claims.



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds awaiting those who’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 













Did Congoleum Use Asbestos? 



Congoleum used asbestos in the flooring materials it manufactured between the late 1940s and the early 1980s. Many flooring manufacturers used asbestos because it added strength and durability. It also insulated flooring, which made homes more energy efficient. Congoleum does not use asbestos in its products today. 



Congoleum Corporation History



Congoleum's history dates back to the 1800s in Scotland. Founder Michael Nairn painted sailcloths to sell as coverings for dirt floors.  




The first headquarters were in Nairn's home of Kirkcaldy, Scotland. Nairn's son, Sir Michael Nairn, purchased the company from his father in 1886 and moved its headquarters to Mercerville, New Jersey.





Nairn began manufacturing linoleum flooring in the U.S. under the name Nairn Linoleum. 





Nairn Linoleum acquired a company that developed novel roofing and flooring products called Congo. The name came from the materials imported from the Congo. The new name of the company combined the two previous companies: Congoleum. 





During the 1950s, the company added vinyl flooring for its stylish looks and low price. The business began to expand rapidly, and in the 1960s, the company changed its name once again to Congoleum Corporation.





In 1993, Congoleum began a merger with Amtico Floors and bought a 513,000-square-foot building to manufacture and distribute its products throughout the U.S. and Canada.





As with most manufacturers in the past, Congoleum heavily relied on asbestos for its fire and heat-resistance properties. This led to exposure in many workers and thousands of resulting lawsuits. 





Congoleum filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2003 and emerged with an asbestos trust fund in 2010. 




Today, Congoleum continues to manufacture and sell flooring, sometimes through partnerships with other companies. Congoleum manufactures its products in Maryland, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. 



Congoleum Products Made with Asbestos



From 1943 to 1987, Congoleum manufactured the following asbestos-containing products:




Asphalt tiles



Sheet flooring



Countertops



Corkboards



Vinyl flooring



Cushioned vinyl



Wall coverings




Several brand names of Congoleum products included asbestos: 




Builderflor



Cushionflor



Dynasty



Fashionflor



Flor-Ever



Gold Seal



Highlight



Pacemaker



Peerless



Spacemaker



Sparklewood



Ultraflor



Vinylbest




Who Was Exposed to Congoleum Asbestos Products? 



Anyone who could have been exposed to asbestos through Congoleum flooring and other products should be aware of the risks. Past exposure can lead to illnesses like mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis many years later. 



Congoleum workers who manufactured asbestos products had high risks of exposure. They worked with or near asbestos that shed fibers and entered the air where they could be inhaled. 



The exposure risk is also high in workers who handled and used Congoleum products in the construction, repair, and renovation of buildings: 




Construction workers



Contractors



Flooring installers



Renovation workers



Demolition workers



Laborers




The risk of exposure to asbestos in Congoleum flooring extends to homeowners. Anyone living in an older home with asbestos flooring could be exposed. The risk is highest if the flooring is damaged or deteriorating and during renovation work when the flooring is replaced. 



Congoleum Asbestos Lawsuits



After an influx of asbestos-related lawsuits against the company, Congoleum attempted to file for bankruptcy in 1993. However, it wasn't until 2010 before the company was allowed a reorganization plan. 



According to court documents, some people who filed claims said they were aware of asbestos since the products were labeled with a warning. Yet, most employees, customers, and installers never received any warnings about the risks of asbestos. 



One of the many Congoleum asbestos lawsuits involved Robert Ehret, a flooring contractor who developed pericardial mesothelioma, a very rare form of the disease that affects the heart. 



After Ehret died, his widow sued Congoleum and other companies. She and her family were awarded over $3 million for the wrongful death. 



Since its insurance company refused to compensate the claimants, Congoleum was forced to handle and fight all asbestos-related claims.



Congoleum Asbestos Trust



Due to the costs of lawsuits, Congoleum sought protection in Chapter 11 bankruptcy. In July 2010, the New Jersey District Court approved a reorganization plan for Congoleum. 



The company placed around $270 million into an asbestos trust fund. Over 50% of Congoleum's stock was put into the trust to pay claimants' medical costs and death benefits to those who passed away from asbestos illnesses.



As of 2023, the Congoleum Plan Trust proposed lowering its payment percentage from 12.5 % to 8.42%. This is the percentage of a total claim that claimants receive. 



Do Congoleum Floors Contain Asbestos? 



Congoleum Corporation still operates, but none of its current products contain asbestos. It continues to make a variety of flooring products with safer materials. Older homes with old Congoleum flooring might contain asbestos. 



How to Seek Compensation for Exposure to Congoleum Asbestos Products



If you worked with or were exposed to asbestos through Congoleum products, contact an asbestos law firm to determine what legal actions you can take. You may be eligible to make a claim with the Congoleum Trust. 



You could have other options as well. A mesothelioma lawyer can review your work history to find all the companies that exposed you to asbestos. They will provide advice and guidance if you choose to take legal action to seek compensation. 



Additional Resources and Legal Help for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area.

### Combustion Engineering

Combustion Engineering (CE) was an engineering company that focused on fossil fuel, engineering, and nuclear power products. Over several decades, CE manufactured and distributed asbestos-containing products to various companies. This led to asbestos lawsuits, bankruptcy, and the creation of an asbestos trust fund. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did Combustion Engineering Use Asbestos? 



Asbestos was once abundant and inexpensive. Many companies used it for its insulating properties. Asbestos was very common in boilers. Combustion Engineering used asbestos in boilers and other products from the 1930s through the 1980s. 



Combustion Engineering History



Combustion Engineering started as a boilers, boiler fuel systems, and dryers manufacturer. It was a merger between Grieve Grate Company and American Stoker Company.




CE was founded in 1912 in Manhattan. The company soon moved its headquarters to Stamford, Connecticut. 





The company continued manufacturing throughout the 1920s, but in the 1930s, CE added other services and began repairing and improving steam engines and power plant assemblies.





Combustion Engineering began using asbestos in its boilers in the 1930s. 





It merged with Superheater Company in the 1930s and began building boiler assemblies for oil and coal power plants. 





During World War II, CE contributed to the war effort by making and providing boilers for U.S. Navy ships.





After the war, CE continued to expand its products, many with asbestos. These included cement, plastics, and nuclear power components.  





In 1990, Asea Brown Boveri (ABB Group) acquired CE. Part of the purchase agreement included ABB taking responsibility for the influx of asbestos-related lawsuits against CE. 





By 2003, the company faced so many costly lawsuits that it was forced to enter into Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. A trust was established in 2005 to compensate victims of asbestos exposure. 




Combustion Engineering ultimately became a subsidiary of Alstom, which was then partly bought by General Electric in 2015. GE does not make Combustion Engineering products but does service CE boilers. 



Combustion Engineering Asbestos Products



The majority of CE's products were manufactured and distributed to other companies. 



Since most of CE's products contained asbestos, thousands of people who worked around CE's materials began to develop serious illnesses such as malignant mesothelioma and asbestos-related lung cancer.



The following products have been verified as containing asbestos:




Boilers



Block sticks



Ropes



Cement



Joint material



Fibrous adhesive



Wool Blocks



Kaiser cement and blocks



Lite Wate 22



Lite Wate 50



Permaseal Weathercoating



WeatherKote Protective Air-Check, Coating, Duriseal, and Thermal Coat




Workers Exposed to Asbestos in Combustion Engineering Products



Handling or working around asbestos materials can lead to harmful exposure. Asbestos releases small fibers into the air that can be inhaled. Workers in CE plants faced high risks of this kind of exposure. 



Workers for other companies and other industries also faced exposure from working with and around CE asbestos products: 




Construction workers



Boiler workers



Plumbers



Pipefitters



Shipyard workers



Power plant workers



U.S. Navy service members




Combustion Engineering Lawsuits



By 2002, CE faced 111,000 asbestos-related claims filed after exposed workers developed deadly illnesses from working around the company's products. 



By 2004, ABB settled around 94,000 cases. However, ABB was still close to business failure due to many pending asbestos-related lawsuits.



These are just some of the many lawsuits involving Combustion Engineering and asbestos exposure: 




Jerold Anderson died from mesothelioma. He worked with CE boilers in his position at the Wisconsin Electric Power Company. Anderson's wife filed a wrongful death lawsuit naming several companies, including Combustion Engineering. She took CE to court, and a jury found the company 29% liable for Anderson's death. 





Wayne Jackson worked for Combustion Engineering from the 1950s through the 1980s. He died from mesothelioma, and his wife filed a wrongful death lawsuit. Her lawsuit included several defendants, most of whom settled. She took one defendant to court and received a jury award of $1.4 million. 





Shipfitter Glenn Taylor developed mesothelioma in the early 1980s. He sued several companies, including Combustion Engineering. He won several settlements. CE settled for $17,500 for its part in causing his asbestos exposure and illness. 




Combustion Engineering Asbestos Personal Injury Trust



ABB filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, including a reorganization plan and trust fund to compensate current and future plaintiffs. The company stayed in bankruptcy for three years.



Afterward, the company set up the asbestos trust fund under the reorganization plan. Over $900 million has already been paid out to plaintiffs. 



The company placed an estimated $1.4 billion into its asbestos trust fund. As of 2020, the payment percentage to claimants is 18.5%. 



In addition to the asbestos trust fund, ABB also offered company stock and cash as forms of compensation. Around $350 million in company stock and cash payments were made from 200-2009.



Seeking Compensation if You Have an Asbestos Illness



If you worked with any CE asbestos products, talk to a mesothelioma lawyer about your legal rights. They can determine if you are eligible to file a claim with the trust and take you through the process. 



An asbestos attorney can also investigate your work history to determine which companies can be held liable for your exposure. In most cases, more than one company is liable. You could qualify for additional trust funds or a lawsuit. 



Legal Information and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Celotex Corporation

The Celotex Corporation used asbestos to make insulation for decades and also operated an asbestos mine. Celotex put many workers and consumers at risk of asbestos exposure and related illnesses. As a result, it faced numerous lawsuits and filed for bankruptcy. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did Celotex Use Asbestos? 



Celotex made several construction products with asbestos for many years. Asbestos was once prevalent in construction and especially in insulating products. It is highly effective at resisting heat and fire. Carey, a company Celotex acquired, mined asbestos in Canada until 1986. 



Celotex Corporation History



The Celotex Corporation was founded in the 1920s in Chicago as the Celotex Company of America, a subsidiary of Philip Carey Corporation.




Celotex began by manufacturing insulating fiberboard. In its early years, the company expanded to several states and the UK as a subsidiary called the Celotex Company of Great Britain. 





Philip Carey Corporation spun off its Celotex subsidiary in 1932. Celotex Corporation became an independent company making insulation and other construction products. 





The Jim Walter Corporation acquired Celotex in 1961 and moved its headquarters to Florida. 





Celotex acquired subsidiary Carey Canada Inc., which mined and manufactured asbestos for use in Celotex products.





Celotex began facing asbestos lawsuits in the 1980s. Some employees of the mine and manufacturing plants, as well as construction workers who handled Celotex insulation, became sick from asbestos exposure. 





Over 300,000 asbestos lawsuits forced Celotex to reorganize under Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The proceedings began in 1990, and the company emerged in 1996. 




The only version of Celotex that exists today is a brand name of insulation products owned by Saint-Gobain. 



Celotex Products That Contained Asbestos



The construction industry used asbestos in hundreds of products. Celotex began making insulation but eventually expanded its product line. These are some examples of Celotex products made with asbestos: 




Sheathing and baffles



Thermalit



Flexboards



Roofing and siding materials



Firefoil board and panel materials



Insulated brick siding



Carey Cenesto board



Thermalite



Marine panel



Asbestos sheets



Celobric textured buff blend



Acoustical ceiling tiles and panels




Who Was at Risk of Asbestos Exposure From Celotex Products? 



Employees of Carey and Celotex risked asbestos exposure. Miners and other workers for Carey dealt directly with raw asbestos. Celotex factory workers handled asbestos when making construction products like insulation. 



Although these workers had high risks of exposure, the distribution of Celotex products put many more workers in other companies at risk, too. Workers in the construction industry had to install, remove, and repair asbestos Celotex products, risking exposure: 




Carpenters



Drywallers



Insulators



Plumbers



Electricians



Contractors



Roofers



Painters



Renovation and repair workers



Demolition workers




Celotex products also went into some industrial sites, including shipyards. Workers like shipbuilders, pipefitters, and boiler workers risked exposure in industrial settings. 



Celotex Corporation Asbestos Lawsuits



Celotex and its subsidiary Carey Canada Inc. faced 380,000 asbestos-related claims equaling over $200 billion by 1998, even though they tried to deny responsibility. 



The following cases are among a few of the many asbestos claims against the company:



Haskel and Mattie McNair



Haskel Shelton McNair and Mattie Erlene McNair filed a lawsuit against Celotex and 12 other companies after Haskel developed asbestos-related lung cancer from working with and around asbestos products.



According to court documents, the lawsuit went to trial, with the jury returning a verdict in favor of the McNair family. 



Celotex was required to pay 30% of a total of $125,000, while another liable company, Raymark, was responsible for 10%.



The other companies settled with the plaintiffs and were responsible for the remainder of the compensation. 



In addition, the McNair family won an additional cash settlement of $53,800 against the companies that agreed to settle the case.



Marion George



In 1989, plaintiff Marion George won $588,000 for her late husband, Stuart George, who worked around Celotex products containing asbestos for many years.



Per court documents, Stuart George worked for 58 years as a purchasing agent for Keasbey, an insulation distributing and contracting company. 



From 1931 until 1975, Stuart George frequently visited warehouses where asbestos was unpacked and stored. The Celotex subsidiary, Carey Canada Inc., distributed most of the asbestos products used in the warehouse.



In 1976, George died from malignant mesothelioma caused by asbestos exposure.



Out of the 16 defendants that Marion George filed her lawsuit against, Celotex was the only company that refused to settle. Consequently, the case went to trial. Celotex was found liable for damages. 



The plaintiff won $700,000, of which Celotex was responsible for 90%. In 1989, after a reduction to factor in the settlement amount from the other defendants, the compensation was reduced to $588,000.



Celotex Files for Bankruptcy



In 1990, Celotex filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, which included a reorganization plan. In 1996, the reorganization plan was approved, and in turn, the Celotex Asbestos Settlement Trust was created, which handled all pending and future asbestos-related claims.



The claims covered include both Celotex and its subsidiary company, Carey Canada Inc. The trust fund officially opened in 1998, with around $1.246 million included for claims.



In 2003, the Celotex Asbestos Settlement Trust settled over 400 claims with New York City. The company paid the city over $40 million in property damage to schools and buildings.



Celotex Today



The Celotex brand of Saint-Gobain insulation operates in the United Kingdom. Saint Gobain sells and manufactures thermal PIR (polyisocyanurate) insulation boards as Celotex products. 



How to Seek Compensation if You Were Exposed to Celotex Products



If you worked for Celotex or used their products, consider contacting an asbestos law firm to seek compensation. You could be eligible to make a claim with the Celotex asbestos trust. A mesothelioma lawyer can give you the best chance of a successful claim. 



Additional Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### C. E. Thurston & Sons, Inc.

Insulation contractor C. E. Thurston & Sons, Inc. once used asbestos products. C.E. Thurston distributed these asbestos-containing to many different industries and workplaces. Asbestos exposure and resulting illnesses led to lawsuits, bankruptcy, and an asbestos trust fund. 



With more than $30 billion currently set aside in trust funds, you may qualify for substantial compensation if you’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos-related disease. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more.













Did C.E. Thurston Use Asbestos? 



C.E. Thurston & Sons never made asbestos insulation. It distributed and installed asbestos insulation for many years. Because it used asbestos materials, the company has been held liable for asbestos exposure and resulting illnesses in workers and others. 



C.E. Thurston History



Established in 1919, C.E. Thurston started as a mechanical packing and manufacturing company in Virginia. 




Later, the company added insulation contracting to its business and began offering services to numerous companies. This work included insulation removal, repair, and installation.





Although C.E. Thurston was not personally responsible for manufacturing asbestos products, many companies it worked with did make asbestos products.





In the 1970s, the company phased out asbestos in the products it used for contracting services. It stopped using asbestos altogether by the end of the decade.  





In 1991, C.E. Thurston bought Mechanical Insulation Services, Inc., an insulation contractor. It bought other companies during the 1980s and 1990s to expand its services to more states and regions. 





C.E. Thurston eventually faced thousands of lawsuits through its own use of asbestos and asbestos use by companies it acquired. It created the Asbestos Claims Facility to resolve these lawsuits, but it eventually went defunct. 




Ultimately, C.E. Thurston was forced to seek protection in Chapter 11 bankruptcy. It emerged and reorganized in 2006. Today, it continues to provide insulation contracting services as well as asbestos abatement and safety training. 



Who Was Affected by C.E. Thurston's Asbestos Use? 



C.E. Thurston did not directly manufacture asbestos, but they hired workers to distribute and install asbestos-containing insulation.



Insulation installation workers face the highest risks of developing mesothelioma, asbestosis, and other forms of illnesses caused by asbestos exposure. 



None of the workers were required to wear protective gear and clothing to help reduce the risk of asbestos fibers inhalation.



Further, people who never worked for C.E. Thurston but were around the products that the company distributed are also at risk for developing life-threatening diseases, including:




Repair workers



Construction workers



Painters



Shipbuilders



Ship mechanics



Power plant workers




U.S. Navy veterans have higher rates of mesothelioma than other populations, mostly due to the extensive use of asbestos insulation on ships. C.E. Thurston was one of several contractors that worked with the Navy to build and insulate vessels. 



C.E. Thurston Asbestos Lawsuits 



Beginning in the 1980s, C.E. Thurstan faced thousands of lawsuits over asbestos exposure and resulting illnesses. The company entered into the Wellington Agreement in 1985 to resolve the lawsuits with 33 other companies. 



According to the Duke University School of Law, the Wellington Agreement was a signed agreement created for select companies to handle massive amounts of asbestos-related claims.



It was named after Harry Wellington, the former Dean of Yale University Law School. Unfortunately, the agreement was suspended only a few short years later after several companies withdrew.



The C.E. Thurston & Sons Asbestos Trust



Afterward, C.E. Thurston attempted another agreement known as the Center for Claims Resolution (CCR). It started in 2001, but in 2003, the company decided to handle asbestos-related claims alone and filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.  



As a result, the C.E. Thurston & Sons Asbestos Trust was created, which remains open today.



As of 2006, around $53 million was in the company's trust fund. In 2012, it was temporarily suspended while the payment percentage for each claim was investigated. 



A few months later, the trust fund opened again with a new payment percentage for claimants: 25%.



Although the percentage revision lowered the payment amount for claimants, it was necessary to compensate for future asbestos claims.



C.E. Thurston Today



C.E. Thurston remains in operation. Instead of working with companies associated with asbestos use, the business is now a leading company in asbestos abatement and lead abatement.



The company still offers insulation contracting services but focuses on customers in the commercial and industrial sectors.



How to Get Compensation if You Worked with C.E. Thurston Products



If you think C.E. Thurston exposed you to asbestos, contact a mesothelioma lawyer to seek compensation. They can investigate your work history to find all of the companies that could be held liable for your asbestos exposure. 



They can help you make a claim with the C.E. Thurston trust or others. They can also determine if a lawsuit makes sense, and if so, will file for you and give you the best chance of receiving compensation. 



Additional Resources for Asbestos Victims



Remember, if you’ve been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness, there is a good chance you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area.

### BorgWarner Incorporated

BorgWarner is an automotive parts manufacturing company based in Auburn Hills, Michigan. BorgWarner used asbestos in several of its products, specifically clutches and brake pads, for years. Mesothelioma and other asbestos-related lawsuits followed when workers exposed to asbestos through BorgWarner products became ill. 



If you or a loved one have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did BorgWarner Use Asbestos? 



BorgWarner used asbestos to manufacture automotive parts for several years. It manufactured asbestos brake pads and clutches until the 1980s. Asbestos was often used in friction car parts to reduce the risks of overheating and fire. 



BorgWarner Inc. History



BorgWarner was established in 1928 after a merger between four different companies: 




Mechanics Universal Joint



Borg & Beck



Marvel-Schebler



Warner Gear. 




The company started out producing an automobile transmission part, a turbocharger, and automatic and manual transmissions.



Later, BorgWarner created and patented their clutch technology, which helped automobile gears change more smoothly. 



BorgWarner continued to expand throughout the next several decades and into the late 1970s. Numerous subsidiaries branched off from BorgWarner, creating many different products. 



BorgWarner continues to manufacture automotive parts, specifically drivetrain and engine components. Its headquarters is in Auburn Hills, Michigan, but there are locations in 19 other countries worldwide.



Currently, BorgWarner doesn't use asbestos in any of its products. But for many years, the company relied heavily on asbestos for fire and heat-resistant properties. 



BorgWarner faced numerous lawsuits over asbestos exposure and resulting illnesses, including mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis. 



BorgWarner never filed for bankruptcy over these lawsuits, unlike many other asbestos companies. In 2019, BorgWarner transferred its asbestos liabilities to Enstar Holdings LLC. 



How Did BorgWarner Use Asbestos? 



BorgWarner used asbestos as a heat-resistant material to prevent overheating and fire in friction components in vehicles: 




Brake pads



Clutch facings 



Some transmission parts




Who Was at Risk of Asbestos Exposure from BorgWarner Products? 



Workers who made, handled, replaced, repaired, or inspected BorgWarner asbestos clutches and brakes risked exposure to asbestos fibers. 



BorgWarner conducted its own research to determine the dangers of asbestos in its products. The research showed that the clutches, in particular, generated asbestos fiber concentrations higher than the acceptable limits set by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 



Among the jobs most likely to cause exposure, according to the study, was the clutch-facing inspector. Any worker who had to handle these parts was likely exposed. This includes home hobbyists doing work on their vehicles. 



BorgWarner Incorporated Lawsuits



One of the most well-known lawsuits against BorgWarner began in the early 2000s when a former General Motors (GM) employee died from asbestos-related complications at t0. 



Mark Buttita: Lifelong Asbestos Exposure



According to court documents, Mark Buttitta died from malignant mesothelioma in December 2002, only a few days before the holidays.



Buttitta was survived by a wife and three children. His wife, acting on his behalf, pursued damages against BorgWarner and various other companies that exposed her husband to asbestos. Yet, it was not Buttitta's asbestos exposure at work that caused the most damage.



While Buttitta was a sales executive at GM during his adult years, his father worked as a parts picker while Buttitta was a child, where he handled asbestos brakes and clutches daily. 



Buttitta's father would then come home in clothes with asbestos fibers embedded in them.



As a teen, Buttitta worked part-time at the GM warehouse, where he was in constant contact with asbestos. His brother also worked at the warehouse, contributing even more asbestos to the family home. 



GM used a variety of automotive parts that BorgWarner distributed.



One of the Largest Mesothelioma Verdicts



In February 2008, a Hackensack, New Jersey, jury returned a verdict in favor of Buttitta. His family was awarded $30.8 million, one of the highest mesothelioma verdicts ever in the state of New Jersey.



A few years before the verdict, Buttitta's wife established the Mark Buttitta Memorial Foundation for Research to bring awareness to how people can be exposed to asbestos.



Although the primary way of exposure is via work-related activities, many people who live with parents who worked around asbestos have developed life-threatening illnesses through secondhand exposure.



"While most mesothelioma victims are employed in the construction or automotive manufacturing industries, Mark did not fit this typical profile," the foundation said. 



"Mark Buttitta's sad case shows convincingly how blue-collar workers from the automotive, construction, and other asbestos-using industries are not the only potential victims of mesothelioma.




"In Bloomfield, Englewood, and all across New Jersey, men and women who wouldn't know a brake shoe from a horseshoe can be struck down by this horrible disease decades later from simply living with someone who dealt with asbestos in his daily occupation. In Mark Buttitta's case we were able to get justice for him and his young family."




By 2006, BorgWarner had already faced over 60,000 asbestos-related claims. Towards the end of 2006, around 45,000 cases remained pending. 



The company paid over $16 million in litigation, with an estimated $40 million in liability awaiting. 



Yet, unlike many other companies faced with numerous lawsuits, BorgWarner never filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.



Asbestos Liabilities Divestiture and SEC Fine



In 2019, BorgWarner decided to deal with ongoing asbestos lawsuits by divesting the company of asbestos liabilities. It transferred asbestos liabilities to Enstar Holdings along with $172 million. This put Enstar in charge of managing claims. 



The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) investigated BorgWarner for falsifying financial statements in the divestiture. The SEC found that BorgWarner undercounted the liabilities by $700 million. The SEC fined the company $950,000. 



Asbestos in Automotive Parts Today



Although the EPA placed strict regulations on asbestos use, it's still not completely banned. Therefore, some automotive parts may still contain the toxic mineral.



The Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OHSA) recommends that all automotive mechanics and technicians should always wet asbestos and work in pressurized enclosures. 



There is no safe amount of asbestos exposure, but the recommendations above can help reduce the risk of exposure.



If BorgWarner products exposed you to asbestos, a mesothelioma law firm could help. They can explain your options and help you seek compensation. 



Resources for Asbestos Victims



Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Bell Asbestos Mines

Bell Asbestos Mines, also known as Bell's United Asbestos Company, Ltd., was an asbestos mining business headquartered in Quebec, Canada. The company changed hands a few times but continued mining and manufacturing asbestos, putting workers and consumers at risk for mesothelioma and other illnesses for decades. 



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













History of Bell Asbestos Mines



In 1936, the Turner & Newall Company acquired Keasbey and Mattison Company, the owners of Bell Mines, which extracted and mined raw chrysotile asbestos.




A year later, Turner & Newall created a fully-owned subsidiary and named it Bell Asbestos Mines, Ltd. The new company, a spin-off of Bell Mines, also extracted and mined asbestos.





J.W. Roberts Ltd., a company that merged with Turner & Newall, began using the mined asbestos to create products such as Limpet, a spray-on product used for its insulation properties. Although Limpet was manufactured in England, it was distributed worldwide, including in the U.S.





As a spray-on product, Limpet caused high asbestos exposure rates. The spray material released more fibers into the air than non-spray products. 





In 1962, Nicolet Industries and the CertainTeed Corporation bought out the company. The licensing to Limpet, also known as Sprayed Limpet Asbestos, was given to the Armstrong Contracting and Supply Company.





The Armstrong Contracting and Supply Company transferred the Limpet licensing to the Atlas Asbestos Company in 1967. Atlas Asbestos Company was part of an internal department of Bell Asbestos Mines. 





When the licensing for Limpet transferred, people affected by it started filing claims against the Bell.




Federal-Mogul, a Michigan automotive parts company, acquired Turner & Newall and its subsidiary Bell. Federal-Mogul filed for bankruptcy in 2001 after facing asbestos liabilities and lawsuits from Bell and other Turner & Newall subsidiaries and products. 



Products Made with Bell Mines Asbestos



Turner & Newall used asbestos from the Bell mines in many products. The most harmful was the Limpet spray-on asbestos insulation. Sprayed asbestos materials cause more exposure because the spraying action releases more asbestos fibers into the air. 



Other products made with asbestos from the Bell mines include: 




Other types of insulation



Adhesives



Cement



Paper



Textiles




Occupations Affected by Bell Asbestos Mines



Bell Asbestos Mines faced lawsuits from various workers, including those who transported the asbestos to those who built and worked around asbestos-containing products.



The most direct harm occurred in and around the mines. Workers at the mines and people who lived nearby risked exposure to the fibers of asbestos released during mining activities. The mine was located in Thetford, Quebec, Canada. 



More widespread exposure occurred in other industries where workers used products containing asbestos from Bell mines. Many workers in various occupations were affected by asbestos mined at Bell, including:




Insulation workers



Carpenters



Electricians



Painters



HVAC workers



General maintenance workers



Miners




Further, over 200 tons of waste was dumped by Bell Asbestos Mines. Thetford, Quebec, was severely polluted, placing workers at risk and residents in danger of developing asbestos-related illnesses.



Bell Asbestos Mines Lawsuits



Starting in 1932 and lasting throughout the 1970s, Bell Asbestos Mines was responsible for supplying raw asbestos fibers to numerous manufacturing companies throughout the U.S. 



Turner & Newall Company faced asbestos-related lawsuits started by workers who transported the materials or worked at companies that manufactured asbestos-containing products. These are some examples: 




Fletcher McDaniel used Limpet spray-on asbestos for decades in his career as a plasterer. He got sick as a result and sued Bell, Turner & Newall, and other responsible companies. This was an early case from 1985 that helped establish a more reasonable statute of limitations for asbestos-exposure victims who didn't get sick until many years later. 





James Fischer died from lung cancer after working with products made with asbestos that came from Bell Asbestos Mines. In a lawsuit, the court found Bell to be 20% liable for Fischer's death and was ordered to pay $60,000. 





Robert Truitt used Limpet asbestos as an employee at DuPont in Delaware. He developed asbestosis and lung cancer and sued Bell Asbestos Mines and other companies. Truitt settled out of court. The amount was not disclosed. 




The Turner & Newall Subfund Asbestos Trust



Federal-Mogul Corporation filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2001. To complete the requirements for bankruptcy, Federal-Mogul was required to set up an asbestos trust fund to compensate claimants. 



The trust fund handled all claims against Turner & Newall, including any claims against Bell Asbestos Mines.



In 2011, the trust fund began accepting claims under the name of T&N Sub Fund Trust. The trust fund offers claimants two options when filing for compensation: an expedited claim or an individual claim. In 2022, the trust administrators reduced the payment percentage for claims to 5.9%. 



For more information on the differences between an expedited and an individual claim, refer to our article, Mesothelioma Trust Funds.



If you worked with or around asbestos or for Bell Asbestos Mines, you are at risk for mesothelioma and other illnesses. Contact a mesothelioma lawyer to find out what your legal rights are. You could be eligible for compensation from the T&N trust subfund. 



Legal Resources and Additional Information



Remember to fill out our form for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Bestwall Gypsum

Bestwall Gypsum was a manufacturer of building products, many of which contained asbestos. The company is still in operation today as part of Georgia-Pacific in Atlanta. Although the company no longer uses asbestos to make its products, Bestwall Gypsum exposed and harmed workers for decades. 



If you or a loved one have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













Did Bestwall Gypsum Use Asbestos? 



The construction industry used asbestos more heavily than almost any other. Hundreds of products that went into building homes contained asbestos in the mid-1900s. 



Bestwall Gypsum was one of many companies that made construction materials and products with asbestos for decades. This put workers and homeowners at risk of asbestos exposure and illness. 



Bestwall Gypsum History



Bestwall Gypsum was founded in 1961, but its origins began with Beaver Products’ Bestwall, a gypsum wallboard. 



In 1928, CertainTeed Corporation bought Beavers Products' Bestwall. At the time, CertainTeed Corporation was one of the largest distributors and manufacturers of gypsum-related products.



The company's success continued growing throughout the 1950s, and stockholders created a spin-off named Bestwall Gypsum. 



Along with gypsum products, the company added products to its line, including joint and spackling compounds.



In 1965, Georgia-Pacific, a paper product manufacturing company, purchased Bestwall Gypsum. At the time, both Georgia-Pacific and Bestwall continued to use asbestos in products and knew of its health dangers. It hid the information from consumers and workers.



In fact, Bestwall Gypsum continued asbestos use until the late 1970s, after the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) placed strict regulations on its use.



Asbestos-Containing Products Manufactured by Bestwall Gypsum



Bestwall Gypsum manufactured numerous different types of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs). 



The following ACMs were manufactured and sold by Bestwall Gypsum between 1950 through 1977:




Drywall adhesive



Kalite acoustical plaster



Dry, triple-duty, and all-purpose joint compound



Spackling compound



Topping compound



Bedding compound



Texture compound



Cement



Patching plaster



Wet-mixed joint compound




Occupations Affected by Bestwall Gypsum Asbestos Products



Not only were Bestwall Gypsum employees placed at risk for life-threatening asbestos illnesses, but many workers in different companies worked with and around products that the company distributed. 



The following occupations are among the many that were placed at direct risk because of Bestwall Gypsum:




Construction workers



Insulation installers



Plumbers



Painters



Drywallers



Electricians



Home maintenance and repair workers



Laborers



Demolition workers




Because Bestwall and other asbestos construction products linger in many older buildings, they continue to pose a risk. Residents and workers in older buildings are still at risk of exposure to Bestwall Gypsum asbestos products. 



What Did Georgia-Pacific Know About Asbestos Dangers? 



Many companies were found to have known about some of the dangers of asbestos exposure while failing to warn workers or remove products from the market. These include Georgia-Pacific. 



A 2013 Center for Public Integrity report outlined how Georgia-Pacific funded a secret research program to disprove the connection between asbestos in its products and illness. 



Georgia-Pacific funded this research as it began facing lawsuits over mesothelioma and other illnesses. The company paid scientists a total of $16 million to prove their joint compound and other products didn't cause harm. 



Bestwall Gypsum Mesothelioma Lawsuits



During the 1980s, the first signs of illness began to surface in many of Bestwall Gypsum's former employees.



Customers were also being diagnosed with asbestos-related illnesses, which were traced back to the use of both Bestwall Gypsum and Georgia-Pacific's products. Former employees and consumers began filing asbestos and mesothelioma lawsuits. 



Former television star and NFL football player Merlin Olsen was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma in 2009. 



After in-depth investigations, his asbestos attorney discovered that Olsen was exposed to asbestos while working as a broadcaster for NBC, which used Bestwall Gypsum products.



While working at age 11, Olsen was also exposed to asbestos when performing general maintenance duties for a Bestwall Gypsum product company.



In 2010, Olsen died of complications surrounding malignant mesothelioma. His wife, June Olsen, pursued a lawsuit on his behalf against Georgia-Pacific, CertainTeed Corporation (in connection with Bestwall Gypsum), and numerous other companies.



Although NBC was eventually dropped from the lawsuit in 2011, the lawsuit was settled for an undisclosed amount by the remaining companies, including Georgia-Pacific.



By 2005, Georgia-Pacific had already faced over 300,000 asbestos-related claims, equaling a total of $830 million.



Bestwall Bankruptcy and Asbestos Claims



Georgia-Pacific was the first company to use a controversial legal maneuver known as the 'Texas Two-Step' to avoid or minimize asbestos liabilities. Step one of the move was to spin off a subsidiary called Bestwall and headquarter it in Texas. G-P moved all of its asbestos liabilities to Bestwall. 



In step two, Bestwall filed for bankruptcy in North Carolina, a state often favorable to asbestos companies. The bankruptcy protects the company's assets from asbestos lawsuits. The parent company, Georgia-Pacific, then commits funds to an asbestos trust fund to compensate claimants. 



G-P began this maneuver in 2017, which has been controversial and tied up in courts ever since. As part of the bankruptcy, Georgia-Pacific pledged $1 billion for an asbestos trust fund. 



Asbestos victims and their lawyers have fought against Georgia-Pacific's move, claiming it unfairly limits the victims' rights to seek compensation. The most recent court decision, from June 2023, went in favor of Georgia-Pacific, extending a stay on asbestos lawsuits. 



What to Do if You Were Exposed to Bestwall Gypsum Asbestos Products



The current legal situation involving Georgia-Pacific and Bestwall makes it difficult for asbestos victims to get the compensation they deserve. 



Contact a mesothelioma lawyer to learn about any alternative options you might have. Most people with asbestos illnesses were exposed to asbestos by multiple companies. You could be entitled to file a lawsuit against other defendants. You might also be eligible for one or more asbestos trust funds. 



Additional Information and Legal Resources



Remember, if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area.







Asbestos in Sheetrock and Insulation: What You Need to Know Before Renovating





https://youtube.com/shorts/i5vmw57CHkY




Many homes built or renovated before the 1980s still contain asbestos—especially in materials like sheetrock (drywall) and insulation. In this video, David Foster explains how these once-common building materials can pose serious health risks when disturbed during remodeling or demolition.You’ll learn how asbestos fibers become airborne, why even small-scale renovations can be dangerous, and why professional inspection and testing should be your first step. Whether you're a homeowner or contractor, knowing where asbestos hides—and how to handle it safely—can help prevent life-threatening exposure.

### Babcock & Wilcox

Babcock & Wilcox (B&W) used asbestos for many years to manufacture boilers and other power generation equipment. This caused exposure and illness in many workers, some of whom filed mesothelioma lawsuits against the company. B&W eventually filed for bankruptcy and set up an asbestos trust fund. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 













Did Babcock & Wilcox Use Asbestos? 



Babcock & Wilcox has been designing and building boilers and similar equipment for over 100 years. For many of those years, Babcock & Wilcox used asbestos as an insulating material in its products. 



Peak asbestos use in many industries occurred in the middle of the 20th century. Asbestos was cheap, abundant, and an excellent insulator. Companies that made equipment to withstand high temperatures typically used asbestos. 



History of Babcock & Wilcox



B&W was founded in 1867 as a boiler manufacturer. Founders George Babcock and Stephen Wilcox started the company after Wilcox invented the water-tube boiler. 




Within a little over ten years, the company installed its first utility boiler. It installed the boiler at the Pearl Street Power Station in New York City, the first in the U.S. 





By 1902, it began manufacturing boilers that helped power the first subway built in New York City.





Shortly after, B&W began manufacturing boilers for projects funded by the U.S. government, including a fleet of Navy battleships. 





In addition, B&W manufactured nuclear submarine components,  fabricated components, and a coal-fired boiler for Nimitz airline carriers.





Babcock & Wilcox expanded its services to include boiler cleaning, emission control systems, and power plant construction. 





B&W used asbestos in its boilers for decades. Many workers who built or repaired the boilers developed deadly diseases, including malignant mesothelioma and asbestos-related lung cancer. As a result, over 300,000 lawsuits were filed against the company.





Babcock & Wilcox filed for bankruptcy in 2000 due to the expense of the lawsuits. It emerged as Babcock & Wilcox Company in 2006. 




How Did Babcock & Wilcox Use Asbestos? 



Many industries used asbestos in the middle of the 20th century, but it was most important in high-heat industries. B&W made boilers and other products for power generation. This equipment needed a good insulator. B&W used asbestos as an insulator for decades in numerous boiler parts and other equipment. 



Some of the B&W products made with asbestos include:




Marine boilers



Furnace boilers



Seals



Gaskets



Rope backing



Coal pulverizers



Insulating firebricks and millboard




Workers Affected by Babcock & Wilcox Asbestos Products



Since B&W boilers were used in various settings, many types of workers were exposed to asbestos and affected. The following are among just a few of the many occupations affected by asbestos in B&W products:




Boiler workers



Insulators



Power plant workers



Shipyard workers



Welders



Firefighters



Plumbers



Pipefitters



Machinists



Maintenance workers



Navy service members




B&W supplied the U.S. Navy with boilers and related equipment. Navy veterans now have high rates of mesothelioma because of the asbestos used on Navy vessels. 



Babcock & Wilcox Asbestos Lawsuits 



B&W's first asbestos-related lawsuit was filed in 1982. By 2000, the number of asbestos claims had risen to 340,000. These are just a few examples. 




Martin McPadden was a Navy fireman striker who handled various products that contained asbestos, including the boilers manufactured by B&W. McPadden passed away after a battle with malignant mesothelioma, but his loved ones pursued justice on his behalf. B&W, along with several other companies named in the lawsuit, settled with the family for a little over $1.6 million.





Cleo Elmore served in the U.S. Navy as a pipefitter. He was eventually diagnosed with mesothelioma and sued companies that supplied the Navy with asbestos products. His lawsuit included Babcock & Wilcox, among others. A jury awarded Elmore $3 million. 





Adrienne Sweeney died of mesothelioma in 2015. Her husband made B&W boilers and inadvertently exposed her to asbestos fibers brought home on his clothing. The case, which was filed in Scotland in the United Kingdom, resulted in £250,000 for the Sweeney family. 




Babcock & Wilcox Asbestos Cover Up



Many companies were later found to have known about the risks of asbestos without warning or protecting workers. Evidence of what B&W knew surfaced in a 1978 memo. 



In that memo, a company executive described knowledge of asbestos risks and an unwillingness to warn workers. The memo mentioned the company's investigation to determine how dangerous asbestos was. The company failed to protect its workers and those in other industries that used its products. 



Babcock & Wilcox Asbestos Personal Injury Settlement Trust



That negligence would lead to thousands of asbestos lawsuits against Babcock & Wilcox, forcing the company to seek Chapter 11 protection in 2000. 



The company created an asbestos trust fund as part of its reorganization. The trust was designed to compensate claimants for years to come. 



The trust has since faced criticism after several state attorneys general began investigating it and other asbestos trusts. They suspected lawyers are paying claims before reimbursing states for Medicaid costs, which is illegal and an abuse of the trust. 



The Babcock & Wilcox Asbestos Personal Injury Settlement Trust is active today. Its current payment percentage for claims is 6.3%. 



B&W Today



B&W emerged from bankruptcy and is still in business today. The company no longer uses asbestos in products and remains headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina. 



Currently, the company works with the research and development of alternative energy and with several departments of the United States Department of Energy National Laboratories.



How to Get Compensation if You Were Exposed to B&W Asbestos Products



If you suffered asbestos exposure and illness from B&W products, contact a lawyer to help you seek compensation. The trust is open for claims, but it can be complicated. An experienced mesothelioma lawyer can give you the best chance of making a successful claim. 



They can also investigate your work history. There are likely multiple companies that exposed you to asbestos if you have a related illness. You could be eligible for multiple trusts or even to file a lawsuit to seek damages. 



Resources for Asbestos Victims



Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. For additional assistance or questions, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Armstrong World Industries

Armstrong World Industries remains one of the leading manufacturing businesses in the world. The company once used asbestos in many of its products. Many past workers developed life-threatening asbestos illnesses and sued Armstrong for damages.



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.







Armstrong World Industries History



Founded in 1860 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Armstrong World Industries started making and distributing wine cork bottles. Within the next 30 years, the company became one of the world's leading wine cork manufacturers.



Once business started to expand, Armstrong incorporated many other products into their line, including linoleum, vinyl flooring, cork boards, and fiberboards. 



Over the following decades, Armstrong continued to make these products while using asbestos. Consequently, people started developing asbestos-related diseases, resulting in the company filing for bankruptcy in 2000 after losing millions in lawsuits.



Armstrong World Industries Lawsuits and Bankruptcy



In 1970, the first asbestos-related lawsuit against Armstrong began when Clarence Borel, an industrial insulation worker, filed a claim against the company (along with several other manufacturers) after developing asbestosis, which eventually led to mesothelioma.



According to court documents, Borel complained to Armstrong on many occasions about inhaling dust and asbestos fibers while working. He also said that although some workers were given respirators to use while working, he was never offered one during his career, which lasted until the late 1960s. 



Borel said he had to resort to using handkerchiefs and cloths when working to avoid excessive dust.



In February 1970, Borel underwent surgery on his right lung. His doctors discovered that he had also developed malignant mesothelioma due to his asbestosis. He passed away just before his trial went into its final stages.



Justice for Family



The jury rendered a verdict in Borel's favor, awarding his family $79,436.24. It also marked one of the first lawsuits where asbestos manufacturers were held responsible for negligently harming workers.



Following the Borel Case, thousands of additional lawsuits followed, forcing Armstrong World Industries into bankruptcy.



Asbestos Trust Fund



By 2006, the company emerged from bankruptcy, but part of its obligation was to set up the Armstrong World Industries Asbestos Trust. The company trust fund compensated for all current cases. 



The trust fund was also set up to compensate future asbestos claims against Armstrong. In the first few years after the trust opened, more than 200,000 claims were filed.



Armstrong Asbestos Products



Armstrong used a wide variety of its products to resist heat and fire. Limpet, an insulation spray primarily containing asbestos, was particularly popular and widely used.



Since workers sprayed Limpet onto products, asbestos fibers were released into the air throughout each workday, placing anyone in the vicinity in danger.



Armaspray was also used frequently by Armstrong. Like Limpet, Armaspray was also an asbestos-filled spray-on application, and although it didn't contain as much asbestos as Limpet, it was found to have unsafe levels.



Anyone who worked with these sprays or around any products made with asbestos faces risks of developing life-threatening diseases, including installers, construction workers, technicians, painters, and more.



Armstrong Hides Evidence of Asbestos Dangers



One of the reasons that Armstrong lost many mesothelioma lawsuits is that the company knew and understood that asbestos is dangerous yet did nothing to protect their workers. 



From the 1930s until the 1970s, Armstrong continued to use asbestos in its products, well after they were aware of the hazards. In addition, they failed to place warning signs on any of their products, putting consumers at risk as well.



If you worked with Armstrong asbestos products, an asbestos attorney can help you seek justice and compensation. 



Additional Information and Legal Resources



Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Amatex Corporation

Amatex Corporation made asbestos textiles until the early 1980s. The company filed for bankruptcy after facing numerous asbestos lawsuits. Amatex put its own workers and workers in other industries at risk of exposure to asbestos and resulting illnesses like mesothelioma. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma or any other illness due to asbestos exposure, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













Did Amatex Use Asbestos? 



Amatex made heat-resistant textiles with asbestos for decades. Asbestos was long a prized material for insulation and for strengthening various products and making them more heat- or fire-resistant. 



Amatex began using asbestos in textiles in the 1950s and continued this practice through the early 1980s. Now owned by a different company, the products it makes today do not contain asbestos. 



Amatex Corporation History



Established as the American Asbestos Textile Corp in the 1950s, Amatex started as a textile manufacturer in Norristown, Pennsylvania. 




Most of the company's products were made to resist hot temperatures and fire, including insulation, ropes, gaskets, wicks, and cloth.





Amatex purchased a second manufacturing facility in Meridith, New Hampshire, from Keasbey & Mattison in 1962. 





To make their products fire and heat-resistant, Amatex used asbestos. It was affordable and easy to mix into materials.





Amatex stopped using asbestos in its products, but this was many years after the company already knew how dangerous it was to expose workers to toxic asbestos fibers. 





Today, it operates in Laconia, New Hampshire, making high-temperature materials with fiberglass instead of asbestos. 




Amatex faced numerous asbestos-related lawsuits, resulting in more than 9,000 claims. Davlyn Group, a global textile manufacturer, acquired Amatex in 2020. 



How Did Amatex Use Asbestos? 



Asbestos was once a highly desirable material for many industrial applications. For companies like Amatex that made heat-resistant fabrics, asbestos was inexpensive, efficient, and readily available. 



Amatex used asbestos in textiles from the early 1950s through the early 1980s. Many other industries used Amatex asbestos products, including heat-protective safety gear, furnace seals, heat-resistant tapes, and more. Examples of Amatex products that contained asbestos include: 




Carded fiber



Cloth



Cords



Lap



Rope



Roving



Tape



Tubing



Wick



Yarn




Amatex asbestos textile brands included Quietline, Safecote, Thermalon, and Titegrip. 



Who Was at Risk of Exposure to Amatex Asbestos Textiles? 



Amatex workers who manufactured asbestos textiles were at high risk for exposure. By handling and being around asbestos, they were at risk of inhaling asbestos fibers. 



Amatex textiles were used in many other industries. Anyone working with their products in other workplaces risked exposure to asbestos. Some of the types of workers who may have handled Amatex asbestos products include: 




Automotive plant workers



Boiler workers



Chemical plant workers



Construction workers



HVAC installers and repairers



Insulation workers



Oil and petroleum workers



Pipefitters



Shipyard workers




Amatex Asbestos Lawsuits



After decades of using asbestos in its products, Amatex faced numerous lawsuits. Some workers exposed to asbestos fibers through Amatex textiles developed illnesses like mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis and sued the company for damages. 



One example was a lawsuit brought by Ernest Cleveland. He worked in a shipyard and handled asbestos products from many different companies. He developed asbestosis in the early 1980s and sued Amatex and other companies involved in his asbestos exposure. 



Amatex settled with Cleveland, but his case went forward with other defendants, resulting in a $1.5 million award. 



Cleveland's was one of nearly 10,000 asbestos lawsuits against Amatex that would ultimately send the company to Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. 



Amatex Settlement Trust



With the sheer amount of asbestos-related lawsuits, Amatex filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the 1980s. 



Stipulations under the company's Chapter 11 bankruptcy mandated they create a Creditors’ Committee of Asbestos Litigants to compensate current plaintiffs.



The Amatex Asbestos Disease Trust Fund was also created to handle future asbestos claims. Although the trust fund is now inactive, the company paid out more than $11 million in settlement amounts during the first decade alone.



In 1990, Amatex came out of bankruptcy and re-established the company. Even though they no longer use asbestos, Amex continues to manufacture heat and fire-resistant materials.



What to Do if You Used Amatex Asbestos Products



Talk to your doctor if you were exposed to asbestos through Amatex or other companies. Early diagnosis is the best way to improve your prognosis for an asbestos illness. 



A mesothelioma lawyer can help you seek compensation. Because it reorganized under bankruptcy, Amatex cannot be sued. A lawyer can help you find other ways to seek compensation, including asbestos trusts or lawsuits against other companies that exposed you to asbestos. 



Additional Help and Legal Resources for Asbestos Victims



Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### The Abex Corporation

The Abex Corporation, a Virginia-based company that specialized in asbestos brakes, faced many mesothelioma lawsuits over the years. Ownership of Abex changed hands a few times, and the parent companies eventually set up an asbestos trust fund to compensate claimants. 



If you suffer from mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related lung cancer, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













Did Abex Use Asbestos? 



Abex Corporation used asbestos in many of its products until the 1980s. Like similar manufacturers, Abex relied on asbestos for its insulating properties. In friction products, like brakes, asbestos was used to prevent overheating and fire. 



History of The Abex Corporation




The Abex Corporation began as the American Brake Shoe and Foundry, founded in 1902 when five railroad brake show manufacturers consolidated. 





In addition to manufacturing asbestos railroad brakes, the company produced wheels and other parts for railroad cars. It eventually expanded its product line to include friction parts and hydraulic systems for the automotive, railroad, and aerospace industries. 





To reflect its more diverse product line, American Brake Shoe and Foundry changed its name to Abex in 1966. 





In 1968, Illinois Central Industries Inc. purchased Abex and, ten years later, merged it with the Pneumo Corporation. 





Cooper Industries acquired the Abex Friction Products division in 1994. Federal-Mogul Corporation acquired both the friction products line and Abex Corporation in 1998. 





Abex first began to use asbestos in the 1920s. A subsidiary called American Brake Materials Corporation introduced a new brake product that contained asbestos. The company continued using asbestos throughout the 1980s. 





This led to exposure and workers over many years and eventually asbestos-related illnesses in some. Many of these workers filed lawsuits that eventually led to Federal-Mogul's bankruptcy and the funding of a trust to compensate victims. Today, Federal-Mogul still owns the Abex brand. 




What Abex Products Were Made With Asbestos? 



Abex made many items that contained asbestos because it specialized in friction products. These are products that must be able to withstand the heat generated by friction to avoid overheating and fire. 



Some of the products Abex made with asbestos include: 




Brakes



Brake linings



Brake shoes




It is likely that Abex also used asbestos in some of its hydraulic systems, control systems for aircraft, and railroad car components. 



Who Was at Risk of Exposure to Asbestos in Abex Products? 



Abex employees involved in the manufacturing of the company's products had very high risks of asbestos exposure. They handled asbestos directly or worked near others who did. Handing asbestos releases fibers, which workers are likely to inhale.  



Thousands of workers across many different companies were also affected, including those who installed Abex products into automobiles, aircraft, and trains and mechanics who repaired and replaced asbestos-containing parts.



Abex Asbestos Lawsuits



Abex and its parent companies began facing lawsuits over asbestos exposure in the 1990s. Workers who developed mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses sued for damages:




Charles Gillenwater worked as a pipefitter in the 1970s. He inhaled asbestos fibers and later developed mesothelioma. He sued several companies, including Pneumo Abex. A jury awarded him $9.6 million in compensatory damages and $80 million in punitive damages. The companies held liable included Pneumo Abex, Honeywell, and Owens-Illinois. An appeals court threw out the punitive award. 





Gary Hampton died from peritoneal mesothelioma after working as a mechanic for many years. He worked with and handled Abex brakes and other parts that contained asbestos. Hampton's family sued in 2014 and received a $37 million jury award. 





Another mechanic, Gordon Bankhead, worked with Abex automotive products and was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2010. He died within a year, and his family continued his lawsuit against Abex. They won $11 million in 2014. 




Bankruptcy and Abex Asbestos Trust Fund



Federal-Mogul filed for bankruptcy in 2001. The company faced lawsuits over Abex products and asbestos products made by several other companies it acquired. 



Cooper Industries also took responsibility for the liabilities associated with Abex asbestos products. Together, the companies set up the Pneumo Abex Asbestos Claims Settlement Trust in 2011 with $307 million. 



The trust faced legal issues in 2018 when companies that had acquired Cooper Industries in 2012 tried to avoid paying into the trust. Eaton Corporation was ordered to contribute $293 million. 



Abex Conceals the Dangers of Asbestos



Although many lawsuits surfaced after Abex closed its doors, one particular case resulted in information that the company willingly withheld information on the dangers of asbestos.



Abex knew of the life-threatening hazards that can occur after inhaling asbestos fibers, but they concealed the details from employees and contractors. 



A jury found the company guilty of knowingly and willingly concealing asbestos hazards. The plaintiff won $20 million.



EPA Names Abex a Superfund Site



A Superfund site is an abandoned or closed area contaminated by hazardous materials. The hazardous wastes are so severe that the ecosystem and local residents are affected.



After investigating the site, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) named Abex as one of the most hazardous waste sites in the nation, containing not only asbestos but excessive amounts of lead. 



In 1992, the federal government ordered the company to clean up the site and remove the soil.



If you worked for Abex or used the company's asbestos products, a mesothelioma lawyer can help you seek compensation. 



What to Do if You Were Exposed to Abex Asbestos Products



If you worked with Abex products, you could be at risk for mesothelioma and other illnesses. If you receive a diagnosis, contact an experienced mesothelioma lawyer. 



Asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers can explain your options for seeking compensation. They can guide your next steps and ensure you get the best chance of recovering damages, either through asbestos trust funds, a lawsuit, or both. 



Legal Resources For Those Affected By Asbestos



Remember, if you or a loved one have been injured by asbestos, there is a good chance that you'll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out the form for our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area.

### A.P. Green Industries and Asbestos

A.P. Green Industries relied heavily on asbestos to make high-heat refractory products. This led to exposure and asbestos illnesses in many workers. Some filed lawsuits, forcing the company to set up an asbestos trust fund to ensure future claimants received compensation.



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 













Did A.P. Green Use Asbestos? 



A.P. Green Industries manufactured refractory materials, like fireproof bricks, that had to withstand very high temperatures. The products were used in many industries that generated a lot of heat, such as steel and metal working. 



A.P. Green used asbestos in its refractory products for decades. Asbestos effectively resists high heat and temperature and fireproofs materials. 



A.P. Green Industries History



A.P. Green Industries started as a small brick-making company in Mexico, Missouri. Allen Percival Green founded the company in 1910. 




Green more than doubled his investment within five years as his business expanded. He purchased a larger factory and began specializing in refractory products that could withstand fire and extremely high temperatures.





To withstand such extreme temperatures, A.P. Green Industries relied on asbestos. 





U.S. Gypsum acquired A.P. Green in 1967. The company merged with Global Industrial Technologies, another refractory company, in 1998. 





The new company was investigated by the Federal Trade Commission for antitrust violations. In response, it sold a division to RHI Refractories American. 





ANH Refractories Company was formed in 2002 when A.P. Green, NARCO (North American Refractories Company), and Harbison-Walker left RHI. A.P. Green no longer exists independently. 




A.P. Green filed for bankruptcy due to asbestos lawsuits when ANH was formed. It created an asbestos trust fund to compensate victims. 



Which A.P. Green Products Contained Asbestos? 



A.P. Green made refractory products, materials designed to withstand very high heat. Asbestos was ideal for these products, so the company used it for decades until the 1970s. 



Asbestos was used in several A.P. Green Industries products, including:




A. P. Green Insulating Cement



Kast-O-Lite



Greencast



SK-7 Insulating Castables



Green PC



Castable Block Mix



Insulation Adhesive



Insulation Coating



Mizzou GR




Workers from different occupational fields began developing malignant mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, and other asbestos injuries due to the asbestos fibers from the company's products.



A.P. Green Industries Asbestos Lawsuits



In just a little over 12 years, from 1995 to 2007, A.P. Green Industries faced over 350,000 asbestos-related lawsuits. Workers and contractors who fell ill from constant asbestos exposure brought these suits against the company. 



Five plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against A.P. Green, Harbison-Walker, Armstrong Contracting and Supply, and other companies for asbestos exposure. They won a verdict of $40 million against the defendants. 



In 2002, the company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. They cited an economic recession as the reason behind filing for bankruptcy. The primary reason stemmed from the many asbestos-related lawsuits brought against them.



To file for bankruptcy, however, A.P. Green Industries was required to set up an asbestos trust fund to handle all future claims. 



Since the U.S. Gypsum Company acquired A.P. Green Industries in 1967, the asbestos trust fund is set up under the United States Gypsum (USG) Asbestos Personal Injury Trust.



Currently, A.P. Green Industries has paid over $400 million to asbestos victims.



Who Was Affected By A.P. Green Industries Asbestos? 



Refractory companies created products used in several industries. Workers from all types of industries were placed at risk.



For instance, installers and technicians were constantly exposed to cement and adhesives containing asbestos, while repair workers and plant workers were exposed to asbestos in machinery and equipment. 



According to estimations, most A.P. Green Industries' products contained around 15% or more asbestos.



The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) suggests that no amount of asbestos is safe, regardless of how little or how much a product contains. 



The A.P. Green Asbestos Trust



Hundreds of thousands of lawsuits against A.P. Green led to the formation of an asbestos trust fund during bankruptcy proceedings. 



The A.P. Green asbestos trust exists under the U.S. Gypsum Asbestos Personal Injury Trust. This is because U.S. Gypsum acquired the company in the 1960s. The trust began taking claims in 2013. The A.P. Green Asbestos trust fund's initial payment percentage was 4.5%. 



Compensation for Workers Exposed to A.P. Green Asbestos



If you've been exposed to asbestos or think you may have been, contact your physician immediately for a medical checkup. Then, talk to a mesothelioma lawyer to learn about your legal and compensation options. 



You cannot sue A.P. Green for damages, but you may be able to get compensation through an asbestos trust fund. A lawyer can investigate your work history to determine which companies exposed you to asbestos and which trusts you qualify for. 



Additional Information and Legal Resources



Fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Armstrong Cork Company (Armstrong Contracting and Supply, ACandS)

The Armstrong Cork Company, also known as the Armstrong Contracting and Supply Company (ACandS), sold and installed insulation products using asbestos for many years. Asbestos use led to exposure, and many workers who later got sick filed lawsuits against the company. 



There is currently more than $30 billion available in asbestos trust funds. If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that you may be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Did ACandS (Armstrong Cork) Use Asbestos? 



As Armstrong Cork Company, and for a period of time as ACandS, Armstrong used asbestos products. It did not make asbestos insulation. ACandS bought, sold, and installed asbestos insulation for many years. 



The distribution of asbestos insulation to many other industries and workplaces put both ACandS workers and workers at other companies at high risk for asbestos exposure. 



ACandS History



The history of ACandS dates back to the founding of the Armstrong Cork Company in the 1860s. 




Armstrong grew into a nationwide insulation company for cold storage facilities in the 1920s and 1930s. It expanded by buying out numerous other insulation companies.





When business began to decline after World War II, Armstrong created two different companies offering different products in an attempt to expand. 





It spun off a subsidiary, Armstrong Contracting and Supply Corporation, to focus on contracting. This remained separate from the insulation contracting part of the business. 





The spin-off worked, but it also meant that the company shifted from cork insulation to asbestos insulation.





In the 1960s, Armstrong decided to change its focus to home interiors. It changed the name of Armstrong Contracting and Supply to ACandS. The company sold ACandS to a group of its employees. 





Irex Corporation helped facilitate the transition to ACandS as an employee-owned business. It acquired all of ACandS's stock and then offered it to employees in 1970. 




Irex became the parent company of ACandS. After facing lawsuits over asbestos exposure, ACandS filed for bankruptcy in 2002 and opened an asbestos trust fund. Irex continued insulation work but stopped using asbestos and added an asbestos abatement service.  



What Asbestos Products Did ACandS Use? 



Although it never made asbestos products, Armstrong supplied asbestos products to other companies. ACandS used a wide array of asbestos-containing products in its contracting work, including the following:




Cement



Pipe insulation



Rollboards



Paper



Tiles



Limpet spray



Armabestos




Armstrong Cork/ACandS used asbestos products from 1958 through 1985. It stopped using friable asbestos in 1974. Friable asbestos is the most harmful type of asbestos because it readily sheds fibers increasing exposure risks. 



Who Was at Risk of Asbestos Exposure from ACandS? 



Different types of workers for various companies risked asbestos exposure because of ACandS. The company supplied and installed asbestos insulation and some other construction products. 



Some of the workers with the highest risks of exposure installed the insulation. Any workers who repaired or replaced asbestos insulation were also at risk. 



Other types of construction workers risked exposure, including pipefitters and plumbers who handled asbestos pipe insulation. Shipyard workers also used asbestos insulation supplied by ACandS. 



ACandS Mesothelioma Lawsuits



Over more than 20 years, starting in the early 1980s throughout 2002, ACandS dealt with over 200,000 mesothelioma and asbestos lawsuits. The company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection and set up an asbestos trust to handle future claims.



At first, ACandS was denied bankruptcy protection in 2002 after a judge ruled that they did not give enough compensation to future victims. In 2007, ACandS applied again, but with a much higher trust fund amount than their previous attempt: $400 million.



Numerous people have already won their lawsuits against ACandS, including many who worked for other companies that used ACandS products for insulation: 




In 2001, before filing for bankruptcy, ACandS lost a mesothelioma trial filed by five different plaintiffs. All five plaintiffs worked around products and equipment that contained asbestos-containing parts supplied by ACandS. The company was mandated to pay $40 million.





William Roberts developed peritoneal mesothelioma after working for PSI Energy, Inc. He handled asbestos insulation supplied by ACandS. Roberts won a jury award of $2.8 million. His wife received $1 million. The case went to the Indiana Supreme Court, which upheld the decisions and denied ACandS's appeals. 





Ramona Stegemoller and her husband Lee sued ACandS and other companies after she developed an asbestos illness. Lee worked as an insulator and inadvertently exposed Ramona to asbestos fibers on his clothing. She got sick from secondhand asbestos exposure. 




Some people who worked for the military were compensated after it was determined that ACandS products used on vessels and equipment led to their life-threatening illnesses.



ACandS Bankruptcy and Asbestos Trust Fund



Under their bankruptcy plan, ACandS had to agree never to use asbestos in any products. In 1974, the company claimed that it stopped using asbestos. This wasn't entirely true. 



The company used non-friable asbestos for another decade, according to a statement. Currently, the company claims that asbestos in any form is never used.



Because of all the lawsuits resulting from asbestos use, ACandS set up the ACandS Asbestos Settlement Trust. It became active in 2008 and began paying claims to victims of asbestos exposure. ACandS funded the trust with $527.6 million. 



As of summer 2023, the payment percentage for the ACandS Asbestos Settlement Trust is 4%. This means claimants get 4% of the value of their claim to ensure funds exist for future claimants. 



How to Get Compensation for ACandS Asbestos Exposure



If you received a mesothelioma diagnosis or worked for ACandS or with their products, consider talking to an asbestos law firm. They can go over your options and help you seek compensation. 



The ACandS Asbestos Settlement Trust is currently active and accepting claims. A lawyer can help you go through the process and improve your chances of making a successful claim. 



A mesothelioma lawyer can also review your work history and find other sources of compensation. You might be eligible to file a lawsuit against other companies that exposed you to asbestos. 



Additional Resources and Legal Help



If you or a loved one are suffering from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a substantial amount of compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. For additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### ABB Lummus Global, Inc.

ABB Lummus Global, Inc. used asbestos to manufacture industrial and electrical equipment for decades. This resulted in harmful asbestos exposure in countless workers. ABB faced many lawsuits because of exposure and asbestos illnesses, and eventually, it created an asbestos trust fund. 



There is currently more than $30 billion available in asbestos trust funds. If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that you may be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more.













Did ABB Lummus Global Use Asbestos? 



ABB Lummus Global once used asbestos in many of its products. Asbestos was used in many industries to provide insulation. ABB used asbestos in gaskets, valves, wire insulation, turbines, switch gears, electrical systems, and more. 



ABB Lummus Global, Inc. History



ABB Lummus Global, Inc., part of ABB Ltd., started as a high-capacity transformers and electrical systems manufacturer. Its history begins in 1883. 




ASEA, a Swedish electrical company, formed in 1883. BBC, Boveri & Cie formed in Switzerland around the same time.





ASEA made transformers, cables, and electrical systems. BBC made locomotives, switch gears, and steam turbines. 





In 1988, BBC and ASEA merged. Under the name ABB, it established its headquarters in Switzerland and focused on manufacturing automation and petrochemical equipment and machinery. 





ABB Global Engineering and ABB Lummus Crest merged to form ABB Lummus Global in 1995. CB&I bought the company in 2007. 





ABB Lummus Global faced lawsuits over asbestos use and exposure. It was forced to reorganize and create an asbestos trust fund. 




McDermott International acquired CB&I in 2018. The new company was called Lummus Technology. The current company does not use asbestos in any products. 



How Did ABB Lummus Global Use Asbestos in Products? 



Many industries used asbestos for its ability to insulate. ABB Lummus Global relied on asbestos in the materials and products it used to build plants. For many years, ABB used many asbestos-containing products, including:




Gaskets



Valves



Reactors



Insulation



Generators



Wire insulation



Electrical systems



Transformers



AC cables



Steam turbines



Switch gears




Who Was at Risk of Asbestos Exposure Through ABB Lummus Products? 



People at risk of exposure to asbestos from ABB include the company's own workers who handled asbestos products. Workers in plants that ABB built were also at risk. Employees and contractors placed at risk for asbestos exposure at ABB included:




Factory workers



Engineers



Metal workers



Machine mechanics



Machinists




ABB Asbestos Lawsuits



By 2006, the number of mesothelioma lawsuits against ABB was so large that the company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. 



The company reorganized. It also could pay out future asbestos claims without facing additional lawsuits.



ABB placed around $1.5 billion into an asbestos trust fund under its chapter 11 bankruptcy to help compensate former employees and their families diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Not only does this help future plaintiffs, but the claims are also processed more efficiently.



Over 100,000 people have filed against ABB for asbestos injuries in the U.S. alone, including former employees and contractors. 



In 2007, in an attempt to further remove the asbestos claims from the company, ABB was sold to CB&I, a Texas-based engineering company, for $950 million.



Compensation for Workers Exposed to ABB Asbestos Products



If you were affected by ABB asbestos products, ensure your doctor knows you could have been exposed to asbestos. You might also want to talk to an asbestos law firm to find out how to access the trust fund. 



The ABB Lummus Global Inc. 524(g) Asbestos PI Trust handles claims associated with ABB Lummus Global and Combustion Engineering, an ABB subsidiary. 



ABB began its trust by funding it with $33 million. It paid $2 million in claims in 2017. By the end of 2020, the trust still contained over $18 million to settle claims. The payment percentage is 11.7%. 



Legal Resources and Additional Information



If you or a loved one are suffering from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a substantial amount of compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. For additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Asbestos Manufacturers

Asbestos manufacturers made products for decades that contained this harmful mineral. Asbestos products included insulation, machinery, construction materials, and shipbuilding components. Exposed workers and their families continue to hold these manufacturers accountable through lawsuits and other legal actions. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 













The History of Asbestos Manufacturing and Asbestos Companies



Asbestos is a natural mineral that has been mined and used for thousands of years. Its use increased during the Industrial Revolution of the 1800s and later. Industrial use of asbestos in the U.S. peaked in the middle decades of the 1900s. 



Asbestos became important to many industries because it was cheap, abundant, and an excellent insulator. It can also protect against fire and resist electricity and many chemical reactions. 



Many companies began making asbestos products to insulate and fireproof and to make certain materials stronger. 



Several types of companies were involved in the manufacturing and use of asbestos products: 




Mining companies mined asbestos from natural deposits, including several in the U.S. and Canada. 



Asbestos suppliers provided raw, mined asbestos to manufacturers. 



Asbestos product manufacturers used asbestos to make products like insulation and automotive parts. 



Distribution and retail companies sold asbestos products to other companies. 



Many companies in a wide range of industries bought asbestos products to use in their own products, such as buildings, ships, vehicles, and more. 




Some health experts, companies, and manufacturers knew about the health risks of asbestos by the early 1900s. It wasn't until the 1970s that the dangers of asbestos exposure became widely known. 



In the 1970s, laws began to pass that would limit asbestos exposure and even asbestos use. Many companies stopped or began to phase out using asbestos. 



The Clean Air Act and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency were instrumental in protecting people from asbestos and ensuring companies would begin to phase out its use. 



Thousands of lawsuits followed the widespread knowledge of asbestos dangers. Workers sued companies that exposed them to asbestos and caused their mesothelioma and other illnesses. Several asbestos companies filed for bankruptcy after facing so many costly lawsuits. 



Which Companies Made Asbestos and Asbestos Products? 



A myriad of asbestos manufacturers played a part in contributing to dangerous illnesses such as malignant mesothelioma and asbestos-related lung cancer:




3M



ABB Lummus Global, Inc.



Armstrong Cork Company (AC&S)



A.P. Green Industries



The Abex Corporation



Amatex Corporation



Armstrong World Industries



Babcock, Wilcox & Company



Bell Asbestos Mines



Bestwall Gypsum



BorgWarner Incorporated



C. E. Thurston Company



Celotex Corporation



CertainTeed Corporation



Combustion Engineering (CE)



Congoleum Corporation



Crown Cork & Seal



Daimler-Chrysler



Dana Corporation



EaglePicher Industries Inc.



Ehret Magnesia Manufacturing Company



Federal-Mogul Corporation



Flexitallic



The Ford Motor Company



Foseco



Foster Wheeler



General Aniline and Film (GAF) Corporation



Garlock Sealing Technologies



General Electric



General Motors (GM)



Georgia-Pacific



Gold Bond



H.K. Porter Inc.



Harbison-Walker Refractories Company



Honeywell Heating Specialty Co. 



J.H. France Refractories Co., Inc.



J.T. Thorpe and Son, Inc.



John Crane Company



Johns Manville



Kaiser Aluminum



Kelly-Moore



Kentile Floors



Leslie Controls



Lincoln Electric Company



M.H. Detrick Company



Malleable Iron Range Co.



Mergenthaler Linotype Company



Mobil Oil Corporation



National Gypsum



The Nicolet Company



North American Refractories Company (NARCO)



Owens Corning Corporation



Philadelphia Asbestos Corporation



Pittsburgh Corning



Porter Hayden Company



Rapid American Corporation (Philip Carey Manufacturing Corp.)



Raybestos Industries



Rock Wool Manufacturing Company



Rutland Fire Clay Company



Shook and Fletcher



Synkoloid Company



The Flintkote Company



Union Asbestos and Rubber Company (UNARCO)



Union Carbide



W.R. Grace & Co.



Western MacArthur Company



Westinghouse Electric Company




Although these companies were regulated many years ago, former workers, spouses, and adult children of people who worked around asbestos are still being diagnosed with asbestos-related illnesses at an alarming rate. 



Experts speculate that the worst has yet to happen and that the rate of mesothelioma will continue to rise.



Due to the sheer amount of deaths and illnesses caused by asbestos, many of the companies above have set up asbestos trust funds to help compensate future victims. 



Other companies were sued for millions. In 2002 alone, over 700,000 plaintiffs filed asbestos lawsuits against more than 8,000 asbestos manufacturers.



What Products Contained Asbestos? 



Some asbestos companies provided raw asbestos mineral, but most made products that contained asbestos. Asbestos went into automotive and machinery parts, ships, and equipment used in manufacturing and other industrial workplaces. 



Some of the heaviest use of asbestos occurred in the construction industry. Hundreds of products that went into commercial, industrial, and residential buildings contained asbestos, including: 




Insulation



Drywall



Joint compound



Cement



Soundproofing



Roofing materials



Vinyl flooring and adhesives



Siding



Textured paint



Boiler and woodstove components




Did Asbestos Companies Know About the Dangers? 



Many asbestos companies knew about the dangers and risks of asbestos for years without warning employers and their workers. 



There is plenty of evidence of companies that knew about the illnesses asbestos could cause. One of the worst offenders in hiding asbestos safety information was construction product manufacturer Johns Manville:




Johns Manville conducted internal investigations of asbestos and its dangers. After the results proved that asbestos was causing injuries and dangerous illnesses, the company hid the evidence and continued business as usual. 





Decades would pass before their hidden internal investigations would surface.





By the 1960s, physicians and scientists were gathering information on asbestos risks, and by 1964, they had identified a clear link between asbestos exposure and cancer.





According to research, numerous people died from asbestos exposure from 1943 to 1962 after working around asbestos and ingesting its harmful fibers.





Yet, there were still no regulations in place, and asbestos manufacturers continued to supply it to various companies across the world.





This allowed Johns Manville to keep using asbestos in spite of knowing about the dangers as early as 1934. 




It wasn't until the 1970s that strict regulations were finally placed on asbestos manufacturing. Under the Clean Air Act of 1970, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) created the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), which prohibited many of the ways that asbestos was manufactured and used.



Over the next several years, companies began to phase out asbestos use, but workers had been exposed for so long that many had already developed life-threatening diseases.



Do Any Companies Still Use Asbestos Today? 



Old asbestos lingers in many buildings and some ships, equipment, and vehicles. Most companies stopped actively using asbestos decades ago. 



The U.S. no longer mines asbestos, but can be imported and used in certain applications. One industry that still uses asbestos products is chemical manufacturing. Chlor-alkali plants use asbestos diaphragms in the process of making chlorine. Most of the companies still using it are now phasing out asbestos. 



It's also important to note that companies are still allowed to use asbestos. There is no ban on asbestos in the U.S. Manufacturers are only required to label products as containing asbestos if the total content is 1% or more. Other countries that have not banned asbestos include: 




China



India



Mongolia



Russia



Singapore



Ukraine




Can Asbestos Companies Be Held Accountable for Asbestos Exposure? 



Yes, victims of asbestos exposure and those diagnosed with an asbestos illness can hold asbestos manufacturers accountable and liable for damages. 



You can file a lawsuit to recover damages if the companies responsible still exist. Most asbestos lawsuits end in settlements, but they ocassionally go to trial and sometimes result in large jury awards. 



You cannot sue companies protected by bankruptcy. Many asbestos companies that went bankrupt set up asbestos trust funds to compensate victims. You could qualify to make a claim for compensation. 



If you worked for an asbestos company or with their products, talk to your doctor about screenings for cancer. Talk to a mesothelioma law firm about your legal options. 



Legal Resources For Asbestos Victims



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Asbestos and Mesothelioma Case Values

One of our case value experts will be in touch with you shortly to better determine your specific case value.



The value of an asbestos or mesothelioma lawsuit depends on individual factors, like medical expenses and the defendants involved. Average amounts and actual case settlement and verdict amounts can give you an idea of the potential worth of your case. 



About Mesothelioma and Asbestos Case Values



If you have mesothelioma or another asbestos illness, you have a right to seek compensation. There are two main sources of compensation for asbestos victims: 




Lawsuits. If you have mesothelioma, you can file a personal injury lawsuit. If you lost a loved one to mesothelioma, you may be eligible to file a wrongful death lawsuit. These lawsuits usually end in settlements. Some cases go to trial. Jury awards in trials are typically higher than settlement amounts, but trials can also result in no compensation. 





Asbestos Trust Funds. Bankrupt asbestos companies cannot be sued. Most of these companies set up trust funds to compensate future claimants. You might be eligible for an asbestos trust fund claim, which typically pays out less than a lawsuit settlement or verdict. 




An expert mesothelioma or asbestos lawyer can help you decide what type of claim is best for your situation. They will give you the best chance of recovering maximum damages. 



What Is the Average Mesothelioma Lawsuit Worth? 



Mesothelioma and asbestos lawsuits vary significantly by individual case. However, looking at averages can be useful in understanding what to expect in your situation:  




The average settlement amount for a mesothelioma lawsuit is between $1 million and $1.4 million. 



Trial verdicts average between $5 million and $11 million. 



Asbestos trust fund claims average around $180,000. 




How Much Is My Mesothelioma Case Worth? 



An experienced lawyer can give you the best estimate of your case's value, but they cannot guarantee you a specific amount. Factors used to calculate the amount a lawyer will seek for an asbestos settlement or verdict include: 




The number of defendants involved



The degree of liability and negligence of the defendants



The strength of the evidence against the defendants



The severity of the asbestos illness



The plaintiff's age and medical history



Current and past medical expenses



Estimated future medical expenses



Costs of home care or medical equipment



Travel costs associated with medical treatment



Lost wages or lost future earning potential



Family and number of dependants of the plaintiff



Emotional and physical pain and suffering




Where you make a claim can also affect your compensation. Some states cap non-economic damages, for instance. This limits how much you can recover for intangible costs like pain and suffering. 



Should I Settle or Take My Mesothelioma Case to Court? 



This is a decision best made between you and your legal team. Many people with mesothelioma choose a settlement. A settlement is less risky. Your lawyer should be able to negotiate a settlement for you. If you lose a trial, you end up with nothing. 



Even if you do win a trial, getting compensation through a jury award often takes much longer than a settlement. A settlement is a faster, more likely way to get compensation, which is important for someone living with a terminal illness like mesothelioma. 



Talk to your lawyer about your options and listen to their advice on which step to take next. 



Mesothelioma Compensation Examples



Mesothelioma is a devastating and expensive illness. It is almost always caused by negligent asbestos exposure in the workplace. Because of these factors, case values are relatively high for mesothelioma. 




An industrial laborer developed mesothelioma after working around Chrysotile and Amphibole asbestos for over 20 years. He filed a mesothelioma lawsuit against his employer but died just five months later. His case, however, still went to trial. His spouse and six children carried on the case on his behalf and were awarded $2.4 million, including punitive damages, against his employer.





A 70-year-old male who served in the United States Navy and worked as a boiler for ten years, developed mesothelioma due to asbestos exposure while on the job. After negotiations, a settlement was reached between the plaintiff’s asbestos lawyer and the manufacturers that supplied asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) to the Navy. The former boiler worker received $2.4 million.





In May 2014, a Fresno, California jury awarded a former plumber’s family $10.9 million, stemming from his pleural mesothelioma that developed due to occupational exposure. A total of $7.4 million was awarded for compensatory damages. An additional $3.9 million was awarded in punitive damages after it was proven that the plumber’s employer, Bendix, acted willfully and recklessly by hiding the fact that they used asbestos in their job sites.




Asbestos-Related Lung Cancer Cases




In New York, two former boilermakers were awarded significant compensation amounts after developing asbestos-related lung cancer. The first former boilermaker won $3.8 million awarded by a New York jury. A second boilermaker was awarded $3.7 million in a settlement.





In March 2015, the family of Nicholas D., a former New York plant worker, won a $4 million verdict against Pacemaker Steel & Piping Company. After the company continuously used asbestos-containing products, Nicholas developed asbestos-related lung cancer.





In August 2007, the family of former insulator, Edward Hill, won a $1 million verdict against Honeywell International, Inc. After working around asbestos from 1947 to 1981, Hill developed asbestos-related lung cancer. He died from lung cancer complications in 2003.




Asbestosis Case Values




In 2014, a New York jury awarded $15 million to Ivan and Laraine Sweberg. Ivan, a former electrician, was diagnosed with asbestosis in 1997 after working around asbestos products provided by the Crane Company. From 1962 to 1972, the plaintiff worked around asbestos-containing products found in NYC schools, structures, and high-rise buildings.





In 2001, a Texas jury awarded $35.2 million in damages to a total of 22 refinery workers who were all diagnosed with asbestosis. The compensation was divided evenly between the workers.





In San Francisco County, California, a former boilermaker who served in the Navy won a $1 million verdict after developing asbestosis while working around asbestos products. The defendants, Foster Wheeler and Asbestos Corporation Limited were found guilty of supplying asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) to the United States military job sites.




Mesothelioma and asbestos case values are highly variable. They depend on the particulars of each case. Only an experienced asbestos law firm can provide a reasonable estimate of case value and maximize the damages you recover. 







How to File a Mesothelioma Lawsuit



Filing a mesothelioma lawsuit can help secure compensation for medical expenses, lost income, and pain and suffering caused by asbestos exposure. 



Step 1: Consult an Attorney: Contact a lawyer specializing in asbestos litigation to evaluate your case. 



Step 2: Gather Evidence: Provide proof of asbestos exposure, such as employment records, medical reports, and witness statements. 



Step 3: File the Claim: Your attorney will file the lawsuit on your behalf against responsible parties, such as manufacturers or employers. 



Step 4: Settlement or Trial: Many cases are settled out of court, but some proceed to trial if a fair settlement isn’t reached. 



Time Sensitivity: Act quickly, as statutes of limitations may limit how long you have to file a claim.



How Long Does It Take to File and Resolve a Mesothelioma Lawsuit?



1. Filing the Lawsuit:Once you consult an attorney and gather the necessary evidence, filing the lawsuit typically takes a few weeks to a few months, depending on the complexity of your case.



2. Pre-Trial Phase:This includes discovery, depositions, and negotiations. It can last several months to over a year, depending on the number of parties involved and the court's schedule.



3. Settlement Timeline:Most mesothelioma cases are resolved through settlements, which can occur within 6 to 12 months after filing. However, the timeline may vary based on the willingness of the defendants to settle.



4. Trial Duration:If your case goes to trial, it may take one to two years to reach a verdict. However, trials can extend longer if appeals are involved.



5. Factors Affecting Time:The duration depends on the strength of evidence, the complexity of the case, and the court system's backlog. Hiring an experienced asbestos attorney can help expedite the process.



Contact us to get started and we will connect you with the right lawyer in your area today!

### Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Asbestos

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a respiratory illness that can be related to asbestos exposure. It can develop as a complication of asbestosis, a chronic lung disease caused by asbestos exposure. COPD is one of the most common pulmonary diseases and manifests in chronic bronchitis and emphysema.



If you were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you might be entitled to considerable compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













What Is COPD? 



Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is really a group of respiratory diseases. It is chronic and is characterized by reduced airflow, which causes respiratory symptoms. 



COPD is chronic and progressive. It gets worse over time, and there is no cure. Treatments help slow the progression of COPD and manage symptoms. There are two main types of COPD: 




Chronic bronchitis 



Chronic emphysema




Regardless of type, COPD is characterized by factors that make breathing more difficult: 




Damaged and scarred tissue



Loss of elasticity



Increased mucus



Inflammation and thickening of tissue




Asbestos and COPD: Does Asbestos Cause COPD?



Asbestos exposure can cause several serious illnesses. Mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis are the diseases most associated with asbestos. 



Long-term asbestos exposure is a secondary cause of COPD, typically after someone develops asbestosis. Asbestosis is a progressive but non-malignant disease caused by asbestos exposure. It is characterized by scarring of lung tissue. 



People diagnosed with mesothelioma can also develop COPD, although asbestosis and COPD are more common. 



The top direct cause of COPD is smoking, whether through cigarettes, cigars, or pipes, but many people have developed COPD after prolonged asbestos exposure.



Asbestos exposure alone does not directly cause COPD. However, people with COPD risk further lung damage around asbestos fibers.  



Studies Link Asbestos and COPD



Studies have found that COPD rates are higher among people who worked with asbestos. For instance, COPD prevalence is nearly 19% in insulation workers who handled asbestos insulation. 



Research has also found an increased rate of COPD in nuclear workers with the Department of Energy. These workers were also likely to be around asbestos materials. 



Who Is at Risk for Asbestos-Caused COPD? 



Workers in the shipbuilding, construction, and energy-generating industries, in particular, are at a heightened risk of developing asbestos illnesses, placing them at risk for COPD.



Veterans who served in the armed forces throughout much of the 20th Century are also at risk of developing COPD and other serious life-threatening illnesses caused by asbestos exposure.



Since asbestos-derived products were used extensively in the United States across a broad range of products until the 1980s, millions of Americans were exposed to asbestos fibers. 



If someone constantly inhales or swallows asbestos, the resulting buildup of its fibers may lead to blocked airways and extensive damage to lung tissue that triggers emphysema or chronic bronchitis.



Can Asbestosis Be Mistaken for COPD? 



Because asbestos illnesses are much less common, COPD is a possible misdiagnosis for asbestosis and other asbestos illnesses. Other typical misdiagnoses include pulmonary fibrosis and pneumonia. 



Anyone with a COPD diagnosis and a history of asbestos exposure should seek a second opinion to rule out asbestos illnesses. 



Symptoms of COPD



COPD usually manifests itself in forms that restrict airflow in the lungs and bronchial tubes:




Chronic bronchitis, which is characterized by a long-term cough with sputum (mucus discharge)



Emphysema, which is characterized by a progressive and irreversible  breakdown of lung tissue




According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), most patients with COPD suffer from a combination of chronic bronchitis and emphysema.



One of the first indicators of COPD is a persistent, permanent cough. The cough is often accompanied by sputum, a liquid substance discharged from the respiratory system. 



Sputum consists mainly of mucus but also includes pus, bacteria, cell fragments, and, in severe cases, blood. Another common symptom of COPD is shortness of breath.



Other symptoms of COPD include:




Difficulty with inhaling/exhaling



Wheezing



Respiratory infections



Unexplained weight loss



Tightness in the chest



Fatigue



Apnea (shortness of breath)




Since COPD is a progressive disease, many people are unaware they are sick.



How COPD is Diagnosed: Exams and Tests



Although COPD is an insidious disease that develops slowly, it can be detected through various exams and tests.



Spirometry is the principal diagnostic method used by doctors to determine COPD. It is the most common pulmonary function test and involves using a spirometer to measure the volume and flow of air a person breathes in and out.



A patient blows a breath of air as hard as possible into the spirometer, which tests lung capacity. The results are instantaneous.



These types of tests do not involve physical exertions, chemical tests, or drawing of blood or tissue samples.



A physician can also use a stethoscope to listen to the lungs. However, COPD often does not manifest with audible signs, even in the respiratory system.



Visual detection methods, such as X-rays and computerized tomography (CT) scans, are more effective than using stethoscopes.



In most instances, X-rays and CT scans may detect damage to lung tissue. However, the imagery doesn’t help identify other symptoms and signs of COPD. Therefore, additional tests and exams usually accompany X-rays and CT scans.



Doctors may also order arterial blood tests to measure oxygen levels in the patient’s circulatory system.



Risk Factors For COPD



As noted earlier, the leading cause of COPD is smoking. However, other risk factors can trigger the condition. The risk factors for COPD are:




Exposure to dangerous levels of air pollution and second-hand smoke from cigarettes and other tobacco products



Exposure to toxic gases, fumes, and airborne asbestos particles



Frequent use of cooking fire in a poorly ventilated space




COPD Treatment Options



There is currently no cure for COPD. However, COPD can be managed through various medicines and therapies. 



These treatments not only slow down the progress of COPD’s destructive effects on the respiratory system, but they also alleviate the disease’s symptoms and help improve the patient’s quality of life.



According to the ALA, there isn’t the best method to treat COPD. Each patient’s condition is unique, and the attending physician will work closely with the patient to set up an individualized plan based on specific symptoms and needs.



Doctors have several options regarding which medicines to prescribe to patients with COPD. These options include:




Bronchodilators are medications distributed by inhalers. These medications relax the muscles around the tubes and allow a patient to breathe more easily. They come in either short-acting or long-acting types and include ipratropium, salmeterol, formoterol, or albuterol.



Anti-inflammatory medications, such as montelukast and roflumilast, reduce swelling and the production of mucus in the breathing tubes.



Steroids delivered by inhalers are sometimes prescribed to reduce inflammation in the lung tissue.



Combined therapy mixes two or more of the above medications.




In extreme cases of COPD, or if a patient is suffering from a flare-up, a doctor may order other types of treatment, including:




Oxygen therapy



Delivery of bronchodilators through a nebulizer



Machine-assisted respiratory therapy



Steroids delivered in pill form or intravenously




Another form of treating COPD is implementing a medically-approved exercise plan and physical therapy. While physical exercise does not reverse the effects of the condition, it can help patients learn to breathe differently and maintain the strength of leg muscles. 



Patients with COPD should make an exercise plan with their doctor or a physical therapist to determine how far to walk, the proper breathing methods to use while exercising, and avoiding habits such as speaking while walking.



COPD patients who smoke tobacco products must cease smoking. Per the ALA and NIH, smoking is the leading cause of COPD. Quitting right away will slow down the destructive effects of COPD on lung tissue.



Legal Help for COPD



Keep in mind that if you have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### Interstitial Lung Disease and Asbestos

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a group of medical conditions characterized by lung scarring. Several factors can cause ILD, including exposure to toxic substances. Asbestosis is an interstitial lung disease caused by asbestos exposure and inhalation of asbestos fibers. 



If you suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim and much more. 













What Is Interstitial Lung Disease? 



Interstitial lung disease is a term used to describe a group of diseases that cause scar tissue to form in the lungs. Another term for this scarring is fibrosis. Fibrosis makes lung tissue stiff and less elastic. This makes it more difficult for the lungs to expand and for a person to breathe. 



The fibrosis in ILDs occurs around the air sacs in the lungs, known as alveoli. This is also known as the interstitial space. This is the space in which oxygen exchange occurs. Scarring makes it more difficult for this process to occur. ILDs are progressive, meaning they get worse with time. 



There are more than 100 ILDs with various causes, or in some cases, no known cause. Some examples of ILDs include:




Asbestosis, caused by asbestos exposure



Silicosis, caused by exposure to silica dust



Pneumoconiosis, also known as black lung disease, caused by coal dust and common in miners



Desquamative interstitial pneumonitis, often caused by smoking



Sarcoidosis, caused by inflammation 




What Causes Interstitial Lung Disease?



ILD is often caused by exposure to toxins like asbestos, typically prolonged exposure. In addition to asbestos fibers, ILD has been associated with bird feces, grain dust, and silica dust.



Some medical conditions can also cause ILD. Along with asbestosis, other conditions associated with ILD include rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, sarcoidosis, and scleroderma. 



Further, certain medications have been linked to ILD, including:




Antibiotics: Certain antibiotics, such as sulfasalazine and nitrofurantoin, can lead to lung damage 



Heart Medicine: Heart medication, such as propranolol and amiodarone have been associated with harming lung tissue 



Chemotherapy Medication: Chemotherapy drugs, including cyclophosphamide and methotrexate, have been linked with lung damage 




Sometimes, the cause of ILD is unknown. When the cause is unknown, physicians call it idiopathic interstitial lung disease or sometimes idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.



Once the lung scarring begins, it's difficult for physicians to cure it. Medication and other treatments slow down the condition, but the existing damage is irreversible. 



This is unfortunate for those with asbestosis, as it generally takes 30 to 50 years before an asbestos-related disease is diagnosed, and lung damage is usually always severe.



Asbestosis



Asbestosis is ILD caused by asbestos exposure. Asbestos releases tiny fibers that, when inhaled, get stuck in tissue in the respiratory system. This can lead to cancer or non-malignant scarring that causes asbestosis. 



Not everyone exposed to asbestos will get sick, but repeated, prolonged exposure is more likely to cause asbestosis. Workers who handled or worked around asbestos for years are at high risk for developing asbestosis. 



What Are the Symptoms of Interstitial Lung Disease?



ILD symptoms are essentially the same symptoms of asbestosis and other lung-related disorders:




Coughing and chest pain



Coughing



Shortness of breath, more pronounced with exertion



Fatigue and a general feeling malaise



Clubbed fingers or toes



Unexplained weight loss




Complications of Interstitial Lung Disease



The most common symptom of ILD is difficulty breathing. This results in inadequate oxygen intake and absorption. ILD can also cause other serious complications, especially when not treated or managed well: 




Pulmonary hypertension



Heart failure



Respiratory failure



Pleural plaques



Pleural effusion




Interstitial Lung Disease Risk Factors



Although ILD can affect anyone exposed to toxins or via other conditions, certain risk factors make people more susceptible:




Oxygen Therapy: Oxygen therapy is a risk factor, but only when continuously inhaling high levels of therapeutic oxygen for 48 hours or more.



Smoking: Smoking can increase the likelihood of developing ILD, but usually when another underlying condition exists.



Age: Although ILD can affect anyone at any age, adults are more likely to develop the disease.




Can Interstitial Lung Disease Be Prevented? 



Past exposure to toxins that cause ILD cannot be reversed. But, reducing ongoing risk factors reduces the chances of developing an ILD. Protective gear and following safety guidelines when working around substances like asbestos are the best ways to prevent an ILD. 



Also vital is not smoking. Smoking can cause an ILD. It can also worsen interstitial lung disease, causing it to progress further. 



Exposure to substances that cause ILDs most often occurs at work, but residential buildings can cause exposure, too. Be aware of potential toxins in your home, work with professionals to test for them, and manage these substances as needed. 



How Is Interstitial Lung Disease Diagnosed? 



Diagnosing ILD has proven difficult and often tricky for physicians. Since it mimics so many other lung-related disorders, doctors usually perform a series of scans, tests, and physicals to diagnose it, including:



Chest X-rays and Imaging Tests 



Doctors use chest X-rays to rule out other lung-related conditions, such as COPD, emphysema, and asthma. Chest X-rays cannot diagnose ILD alone, but they allow doctors to move to the next step in diagnosis if other lung diseases are eliminated.



A CT scan is administered to determine the amount of damage to the lungs, but a CT scan alone cannot provide a 100% accurate diagnosis.



In some cases, an echocardiogram, which evaluates the heart's pressure via imaging, is conducted to determine the amount of pressure on the right side of the heart. 



Lung Tissue Samples



Doctors must analyze a lung tissue sample to diagnose ILD after ruling out other lung diseases. Lung tissue analysis is most often performed via bronchoscopy. 



A bronchoscopy allows doctors to remove a small tissue sample by inserting a tiny tube down the patient's nose or mouth and into the lungs. A bronchoscopy is considered a safe procedure, but the sample lung tissue is sometimes too small to get an accurate diagnosis.



A surgical biopsy may be performed if there isn't enough lung tissue to get an accurate diagnosis from a bronchoscopy. However, a surgical biopsy is much more invasive when compared to bronchoscopy and is usually a last resort.



During a surgical biopsy, surgeons insert a small camera and surgical tools in the patient's chest via incisions around the ribs. This allows doctors to collect a large sample of lung tissue, providing a better chance of getting an accurate diagnosis.



Treatment Options for Interstitial Lung Disease



Keep in mind, as mentioned earlier, that there is no way to reverse the damage already done to the lungs.



Instead, treatment is often about relieving the symptoms, preventing further damage, and reducing the risk of additional medical complications. The most common forms of treatment include:



Oxygen Therapy



Oxygen therapy helps patients breathe better and reduces breathing problems when exercising.



In addition, it also reduces blood pressure, promotes better sleeping, and helps prevent low oxygen level conditions.



Medicine



Corticosteroids and medications that help suppress the immune system are usually prescribed to patients with ILD. 



Although these medications help ease symptoms, they don't cure the disease and aren't as effective as a long-term solution. 



Surgery



Lung transplant surgery is usually a last resort reserved for younger people in optimal health. It's typically considered only when other forms of treatment haven't helped.



Pulmonary Rehabilitation 



Pulmonary rehabilitation focuses on improving the patient's quality of life through various exercises, breathing techniques, and a diet plan that centers on proper nutrition.



Prognosis for Asbestosis



For asbestosis and ILD, the prognosis is good as long as the disease is caught early. Since asbestosis is not cancer, the chances of recovery are higher, even though the scarring will be permanent.



However, it will also depend upon the extent of scarring that asbestos fibers left in the lungs, the amount of asbestos lodged in the system, age, and overall health.



On average, patients can live decades with the disease if the correct treatment has been utilized.



Interstitial Lung Disease Lawsuits and Legal Assistance



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Pleural Effusion and Asbestos

Pleural effusion, a buildup of fluid in the pleural cavity, is a typical complication of pleural mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases. Pleural effusion can be uncomfortable and limit mobility. Treatment includes draining the fluid from the chest cavity. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













What Is Pleural Effusion? 



In medical terms, effusion refers to a buildup of fluid in the body. The pleura is a thin, double layer of tissue around the lungs. Pleural effusion is a buildup of fluid between the two layers of the pleura. 



There are many causes of pleural effusion, affecting about 1.5 million people in the U.S. annually. Pleural effusion is painful and makes breathing difficult. Treatment includes addressing the underlying cause and treating the symptoms. 



Can Asbestos Cause Pleural Effusion? 



Many underlying conditions can cause fluid to collect in the pleural tissue. Asbestos exposure and asbestos illnesses can cause pleural effusion. 



Asbestos fibers in lung and pleural tissue cause inflammation, which can trigger fluid buildup. This inflammation can cause blood vessels and other nearby tissue to leak fluid into the pleural space. 



Mesothelioma, the cancer of the pleural tissue, can also cause pleural effusion. Pleural effusion related to asbestos can be either malignant or non-malignant. 



Pleural Effusion Symptoms



Sometimes, people with pleural effusion exhibit only one to two symptoms, whereas another person may have multiple symptoms. The possible symptoms of pleural effusion include:




Chest pain that increases when inhaling



Dry, hacking cough



A general feeling of uneasiness and discomfort



Frequent hiccups



Rapid, short breaths



Orthopnea, the inability to breathe normally unless sitting upright




How Does Pleural Effusion Develop? 



Mesothelioma or asbestosis, conditions resulting from asbestos exposure, are two causes of pleural effusion. 



When someone inhales asbestos fibers, they reach the pleural lining of the lungs. While some fibers are excreted naturally from the body, it's impossible to eliminate every asbestos fiber entering the body. Over time, the microscopic asbestos fibers cause pain, swelling, and inflammation.



What Are the Types and Causes of Pleural Effusion? 



Pleural effusion can be transudative (a watery fluid buildup caused by pressure on organs) or exudative (protein fluid buildup caused by inflammation and infections). Aside from asbestos exposure, other common reasons that pleural effusion develops include:



Exudative:




Pneumonia



Kidney diseases



Pulmonary diseases




Transudative:




Open-heart surgery



Pulmonary diseases



Cirrhosis



Heart failure




Sometimes, pleural effusion is caused by certain medications, radiation therapy, and stomach surgery. 



Other causes, although rare, include tuberculosis, autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, and chest bleeding due to trauma.



What Type of Pleural Effusion Is Associated with Mesothelioma?



Mesothelioma is associated with exudative pleural effusion. The tumors in the pleural tissue and the resulting inflammation cause fluid to develop. This type of effusion also results from poor drainage of lymph nodes around the pleura.



Pleural Effusion Diagnosis



Pleural effusion is easy to detect. More complicated is a diagnosis for the underlying cause. Identifying pleural effusion early can help patients get a diagnosis of mesothelioma sooner. This improves treatment options and prognosis. 



The starting point in diagnosing pleural effusion is usually X-ray imaging, which allows physicians to view the fluid accumulation in the pleura. Other ways of viewing the fluid buildup may include a CT scan or chest ultrasound. 



A thoracoscopy is performed if there isn't enough fluid for a proper diagnosis via imaging. A thoracoscopy is a procedure that involves inserting a thin tube, known as a thoracoscope, into the chest via a small incision. 



The thoracoscope allows doctors to view the lungs, pleura, and surrounding areas more in-depth. In most cases, a sample of the fluid is taken to analyze it for cancer cells or bacterial infections. Pleural fluid may contain cancer cells or biomarkers to help diagnose mesothelioma. 



Doctors will also look for physical signs when diagnosing, such as abnormal breathing sounds, reduced chest movement, and diminished vocal resonance.



Does Pleural Effusion Have to Be Treated? 



Minor cases of pleural effusion may go away without treatment. These are cases that result from minor infection or inflammation. Pleural effusion related to asbestos and mesothelioma is usually chronic. It keeps returning and requires ongoing treatment. 



How Do You Treat Pleural Effusion From Asbestos? 



The type of treatment for pleural effusion depends on individual factors in each case and may include:



Medication



People with heart failure may require diuretics, heart medication, and, in severe cases, a combination of radiation therapy and chemotherapy.



Thoracentesis



For patients with a respiratory illness, the fluid is normally drained via therapeutic thoracentesis. This involves using a needle to draw fluid out of the pleural space. 



Uncontrollable fluid buildup after drainage may require thoracentesis and a sclerosing-type drug, which helps to reduce and heal scarring.



Indwelling Catheter



For people with mesothelioma and other asbestos-related illnesses, there is a chance that, along with repeated thoracentesis treatments, patients may need a catheter if the fluid fails to drain on its own or returns continuously.



The catheter is a small tube inserted into the pleural space. It connects to the outside of the body for constant drainage. This can be done short-term in the hospital or more permanently for patients to drain fluid at home. An indwelling catheter always comes with a risk of infection. 



Pleurodesis



Pleurodesis is a form of therapeutic surgery reserved for those with lung cancer and other similar conditions, including mesothelioma. 



Although it doesn't cure pleural effusions, it helps ease symptoms and reduce pain.



A pleurodesis procedure involves draining the excess fluid buildup from the pleura areas. The fluid should be emptied as much as possible for the best results. 



Then, a surgeon or doctor administers either a chemical or mechanical pleurodesis: 




Mechanical pleurodesis is the most invasive of the two, which involves fusing the linings of both lungs together to prevent additional buildup. 



Chemical pleurodesis is much more common and less invasive. It involves inserting talc chalk into the chest via a tube and a small incision.




Once the talc is in the patient's chest, they lie down for several hours, allowing the chalk to be distributed evenly. The talc is removed after its distribution, allowing the affected pleural areas to seal up.



Pleurectomy



A pleurectomy is surgery to remove some or all of the pleural tissue. Many patients with mesothelioma undergo this procedure as treatment for the cancer, but it can also resolve pleural effusion. It is an invasive procedure with many potential complications. 



Pleural Effusion Prognosis



Pleural effusion is almost always the result of another, usually more severe, underlying condition, such as mesothelioma. 



Although mesothelioma is treatable, there is currently no cure, and if it has progressed to the point of pleural effusion, the disease is usually in an advanced stage. 



Consequently, the prognosis is typically poor. The treatments for pleural effusion are palliative rather than curative, meaning the main goal is to help reduce inflammation and pain and help the patient live more comfortably.



According to John E. Heffner, MD, FCCP, the average survival rate for patients with malignant pleural effusions involved in research on the disease was around four months. In a study of over 417 patients, only 13% survived a year after treatment.



Studies on minimal pleural effusion (less than 10 mm of fluid buildup) are ongoing. The Journal of Clinical Oncology suggests it is an early phase of the inevitable malignant pleural effusion.



Talk to your doctor as soon as possible if you have symptoms of pleural effusion, especially if you had contact with asbestos in the past. You may also want to contact an asbestos law firm to discuss your legal rights. 



Legal Help with Pleural Effusion



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Papillary Mesothelioma

Papillary mesothelioma is an uncommon form subtype of epithelial mesothelioma. Also known as well-differentiated papillary mesothelioma (WDPM), it is marked by a slow growth pattern. It most often forms in the peritoneum in the abdomen and is usually benign with a good prognosis. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.









What Is Papillary Mesothelioma? 



Papillary mesothelioma, or WDPM, is a rare cell subtype of epithelial mesothelioma. All cases of mesothelioma are diagnosed with a cell type: epithelial or sarcomatoid (or biphasic, a mix of the two). 



There are also many subtypes within these primary cell types. WDPM is an epithelial mesothelioma. Epithelial cells are cells that line tissues and organs. Compared to sarcomatoid or biphasic mesotheliomas, epithelial mesothelioma is less aggressive and has a better prognosis.               



WDPM Characteristics and Facts



Because it is so rare, information about WDPM is limited. This is some of what the experts know about papillary mesothelioma from patients studied: 




Cells in papillary mesothelioma are round and form finger-like projections called papillae. 



Most cases of WDPM have been diagnosed in women. 



Most cases of WDPM are peritoneal mesothelioma, the type of mesothelioma that develops in the abdomen. 



Most people who develop WDPM are women between 30 to 40 years of age who've never been exposed to asbestos.



The age of WDPM patients ranges from mid-20s to 70s. 



WDPM is almost always benign, or noncancerous. 



A few cases of pleural and testicular WDPM have been recorded. 



In very rare cases, WDPM tumors form psammoma bodies, areas of calcification. 



Recent studies have found that WDPM is genetically different from malignant mesothelioma. 




Is Papillary Mesothelioma Always Benign? 



WDPM is almost always benign, meaning the tumors are not cancerous. They may grow large and cause issues but do not spread to other tissues or organs. 



Some cases of WDPM that were diagnosed as malignant might be misdiagnosed. It is difficult to diagnose rare mesotheliomas accurately. 



WDPM can also become malignant over time. This is a rare occurrence but always possible, so diagnosis and treatment are important.



What Causes Well-Differentiated Papillary Mesothelioma? 



Studies of groups of patients with WDPM find that most have no known history of asbestos exposure. In one study, six of 27 patients were exposed to asbestos. This included male patients, who have a higher chance of past asbestos exposure in the workplace than women.                 



Because there is no strong connection between WDPM and asbestos exposure, no one knows for sure what causes it.



WDPM Symptoms



Symptoms of this type of mesothelioma vary according to each person and where the tumors are. The majority of WDPM patients report there aren't any symptoms. The few symptoms reported include:




Pain in the abdomen or pleura due to fluid build-up



Pelvic pain




Since symptoms are so rare, WDPM is typically found during surgery for other medical conditions unrelated to papillary mesothelioma.



Diagnosing WDPM 



Since symptoms are so rare, WDPM is usually found during surgery or an exam for other conditions unrelated to papillary mesothelioma, such as a pelvic exam or an unrelated CT scan. 



Although the tumors can be detected via a pelvic exam or CT scan, a biopsy is the only accurate way to diagnose papillary mesothelioma.



A biopsy entails a surgeon removing a piece of tissue from the area of the body where the tumor was detected. Once the tissue is removed, it's sent to a lab, where a pathologist views the cells in the tissue under a specialized microscope.



Pathologists look for papillary (finger-like) structures when diagnosing papillar mesothelioma. They can also perform immunohistochemical tests to look for biomarkers. Because WDPM is so rare, no definitive markers are used for diagnosis. 



WDPM is rare and difficult to diagnose. It is easy to misdiagnose it as other conditions, with similar characteristics and more common than WDPM: 




Adenoid tumors



Tuberculosis peritonitis



Other papillar carcinomas



Peritoneal carcinomatosis



Reactive mesothelioma hyperplasia




How Is WDPM Treated? 



Doctors usually approach any type of mesothelioma with multimodal treatment. This means they use a combination of therapies that may include standard and emerging treatments. 



If WDPM is benign, treatment is often straightforward, with surgery followed by chemotherapy to reduce the risk of a recurrence. 



Cytoreductive Surgery



Cytoreductive surgery is a standard treatment for many patients with peritoneal mesothelioma. Surgeons remove as much of the tumor tissue as possible during this procedure. 



Exploratory laparotomy is sometimes performed before a patient undergoes cytoreductive surgery. 



Exploratory laparotomy allows physicians to determine the extent and location of the tumors and, if necessary, schedule a cytoreductive surgery to remove the tumors.



Some physicians feel that an exploratory laparotomy is too risky to perform on a disease that's still considered benign.



Cytoreductive surgery typically takes 10 to 12 hours, but most patients are admitted a day before testing, X-rays, and preparation.



Surgery might be the only treatment for some patients, but most benefit from chemotherapy afterward. 



Chemotherapy



Surgery alone usually isn't enough to effectively battle cancer cells, even with a disease considered less invasive than other forms of mesothelioma. In some cases of WDPM, chemotherapy alone has been successful.



Carboplatin is the most common medication used for chemotherapy for those with WDMP and has proven to be effective in many instances. Some studies show that the disease never resurfaced after patients underwent chemotherapy with carboplatin.



Some patients receive a combination of surgery and chemotherapy, typically heated chemotherapy. This involves heating the medication to a little higher than the patient's body temperature. 



Known as the hot chemo approach (HIPEC), this chemotherapy works best for those with cancerous cells around the abdomen.



What Is the Prognosis for Papillary Mesothelioma? 



The prognosis for papillary mesothelioma is generally positive. People with WDPM generally have a better prognosis than those with any other type of mesothelioma because it is usually benign. 



According to the Journal of Medical Case Reports, several patients who underwent chemotherapy survived and have no trace of the cancer today.



In rare cases, some patients passed away within a few years after treatment. This is a striking difference between the survival rates of other types of mesothelioma, in which there is only a 5 to 50% chance that the patient will survive five years past diagnosis.



Since WDPM has a slow growth rate and typically doesn't spread to other areas of the body, the outcome is favorable. 



Even if cancer resurfaces, most people still have a strong chance of long-term survival, as papillary mesothelioma's subtype is epithelial mesothelioma, which is the easiest to treat. 



Talk to your medical team about the best treatment options and have all your questions about your diagnosis answered. A lawyer can also help if you believe you were exposed to asbestos in the past. 



WDPM Legal Help



Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Lung Cancer and Asbestos

Lung cancer and asbestos are sometimes connected if a person came into contact with asbestos for an extended period. Lung cancer has many causes, including prolonged asbestos exposure. Treatment involves chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy, but the prognosis is not usually favorable. 



If you've developed mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to significant compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 











About Asbestos and Lung Cancer



Lung cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed types of cancer. Only a small percentage of these diagnoses are related to asbestos exposure. Smoking is the primary cause, but asbestos can also cause lung cancer. 



Asbestos was used for many years in several industries, exposing thousands of workers. Workers who inhaled asbestos fibers year after year were at risk for lung cancer, mesothelioma, and other illnesses. 



How Does Asbestos Cause Lung Cancer? 



The primary cause of asbestos-related diseases is prolonged exposure to asbestos dust in materials that contain either chrysotile or amphibole asbestos fibers. 



Asbestos usually enters the body when inhaled or swallowed. Inhalation is the most common method of infiltration because the fibers are small and are easily introduced into the air by human activity.



Most asbestos exposure cases occur during the mining and processing of raw minerals, the constant handling of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs), or when older buildings made before the early 1980s are renovated or torn down. 



Sometimes, asbestos is transferred secondhand to family members via clothing and protective gear.



No matter how asbestos becomes lodged in the body, asbestos fibers can build up in the lungs, causing damage that may lead to cancer. 



Over time, the asbestos fibers cause scarring and inflammation in the tissue where they lodge. Eventually, these inflammations may mutate into cancerous growths that can cause lung cancer.



According to the American Cancer Society (ACS), there is no “safe” asbestos. However, people exposed to asbestos for prolonged periods are at the highest risk for lung cancer.



How Long Does it Take to Develop Lung Cancer After Asbestos Exposure? 



Asbestos lung cancer has a long latency period. The latency period is the time between asbestos exposure and the onset of symptoms that lead to a diagnosis. 



The latency period must be at least ten years for lung cancer to be connected to asbestos exposure. It can be even longer, with several decades between exposure and illness. 



How Much Asbestos Exposure Causes Lung Cancer? 



There is no safe amount of asbestos exposure. A one-time exposure can cause harm but is unlikely to lead to lung cancer. People at the highest risk for asbestos lung cancer were exposed to asbestos repeatedly in their workplace for many years. 



What Is the Most Common Cancer Associated With Asbestos? 



Lung cancer is much more common than mesothelioma, but mesothelioma is more often associated with asbestos exposure. This is because there are other, more likely, causes of lung cancer, like smoking. The only known cause of mesothelioma is asbestos exposure. 



What Is the Difference Between Asbestos Lung Cancer and Mesothelioma? 



Mesothelioma is another type of cancer caused by asbestos exposure. It is very rare, accounting for about 3,000 diagnoses of cancer per year in the U.S. Lung cancer is much more common, with more than 200,000 new cases every year. 



Mesothelioma is sometimes referred to as a type of lung cancer, but this is inaccurate. Lung cancer forms in the lung tissue. Mesothelioma forms in the mesothelium, a double layer of tissue that lines body cavities and organs. 



The most common type of mesothelioma is pleural mesothelioma. It develops in the tissue around the lungs, which makes it easy to confuse with lung cancer. Pleural mesothelioma often spreads to the lungs, which further complicates diagnosis. 





                
                        
                            Calculate Case Value
                            
                        
                        Diagnosis-- Select --MesotheliomaAsbestosisAsbestos-Related Lung CancerIs Diagnosed Person Alive?-- Select --YesPassed away under 2 years agoPassed away over 2 years agoAge of Diagnosed Person-- Select --Under 6565-8485 or olderExposure-- Select --MilitaryOccupationalSecond-HandOther / UnknownMain Job Site-- Select --ShipyardsBoiler RoomsPowerhousesPaper MillsConstruction SitesAutomotiveFirefightingRailroadsRefineriesOther / UnknownMain Asbestos Product Used-- Select --Fire Protection ProductsBrake Pads / LiningsCeiling Textures / Tile / PlasterElectrical ProductsTransite ProductsHeating & Cooling ProductsVermiculiteRoofing ProductsPaints / Plasters / Wall CoveringsOther / UnknownState-- Select --AlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaNorthern Mariana IslandsOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahU.S. Virgin IslandsVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces EuropeArmed Forces PacificPhone(Required)Email(Required)First Name(Required)Last Name(Required)PhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
         Any information you send is secure and will never be sold or released.This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
        
                        Δ
                        





What Types of Lung Cancer Are Caused By Asbestos? 



Two main types of lung cancer can both be caused by asbestos exposure: 




Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. (NSCLC). NSCLC is the most common type of lung cancer with several subtypes. Adenocarcinoma develops in glandular cells and the alveoli of the lungs. It is most common in non-smokers. Squamous cell carcinoma develops in cells in the lining of the lungs. Large cell carcinoma forms in any part of the lungs and spreads more rapidly than other types. 





Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC). SCLC only accounts for 10% to 15% of lung cancer diagnoses. It is more difficult to treat than NSCLC and often spreads or metastasizes before showing any symptoms. Chemotherapy is the most common treatment for SCLC, as many patients are not candidates for surgery. 




Who Is at Risk of Getting Lung Cancer From Asbestos Exposure? 



Even though asbestos use in the U.S. has declined sharply over the past 40 years, its widespread use in many industries throughout much of the 20th Century places everyone at some level of risk of asbestos exposure. 



In addition, homes, schools, public buildings, and other structures built before the early 1980s still contain large amounts of asbestos in insulation, vinyl flooring, roofing materials, and various types of pipes. 



Also, since asbestos occurs naturally, people can be exposed to small amounts if they live near abandoned mines or rocky deposits that undergo wind and water erosion.



Per the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the risk factors for getting sick from asbestos exposure are:




Dose (the amount of asbestos a person is exposed to regularly)



Duration (the amount of time a person undergoes exposure to asbestos)



Shape, size, and chemical composition of the asbestos fibers



Exposure source (if it occurs in nature or if it is caused by human activity)



Individual risk factors (pre-existing lung illnesses or smoking tobacco products)




People who smoke regularly also increase their chances of developing lung cancer. 



How Do Doctors Prove Asbestos Caused Lung Cancer? 



Workplace asbestos exposure is most often negligent. Victims who get sick later often sue for damages or make claims with asbestos trust funds for compensation. 



Proving that asbestos contributed to lung cancer is vital for getting compensation. Doctors can show asbestos was involved in the development of lung cancer in a few ways: 




A previous diagnosis of an asbestos illness or signs of another asbestos illness, such as asbestosis



The presence of pleural plaques, areas of thickened tissue caused by asbestos exposure



The presence of asbestos fibers in lung tumors



A period of ten years or longer between asbestos exposure and lung cancer 




A history of smoking does not necessarily mean asbestos wasn't a primary cause of lung cancer. It does not automatically disqualify a person from collecting compensation. 



Smoking and Asbestos Lung Cancer



Asbestos exposure can cause lung cancer in non-smokers. Heavy smokers are more likely to develop cancers in the respiratory system, including the throat and lungs.



The combination of smoking and asbestos exposure is particularly dangerous. Studies show that the combination of smoking and asbestos is more harmful than the risks of either added together. This means they somehow work together to significantly increase the risk of developing cancer. 



Studies also indicate that quitting smoking reduces the risk of developing lung cancer in people exposed to asbestos. There is no evidence that smoking increases the risk of developing mesothelioma in asbestos-exposed workers. 



Signs and Symptoms of Asbestos Lung Cancer



Although there is some variation by individual, the symptoms of lung cancer are generally the same regardless of the cause: 




A cough that does not go away



A cough that gets worse over time



Coughing up blood



Difficulty breathing



Wheezing



Chest pains that get worse with coughing, laughing, and deep breaths



Unexplained weight loss



Chronic tiredness



Hoarseness



Frequent lung infections




How Is Asbestos Lung Cancer Diagnosed? 



After undergoing a physical exam and medical history, the next step in diagnosing lung cancer involves imaging scans. X-rays, CT scans, PET scans, and MRIs can give doctors a good view of lung tissue and any potentially cancerous tumors. 



The next step is a biopsy. Typically, a needle biopsy is adequate to remove some tissue for study. Pathologists examine the tissue for cancer cells and identify the type of cancer. Another option for a lung biopsy is a bronchoscope, a tube that goes into the airways from the lungs. 



With a diagnosis of lung cancer, doctors will then assign a stage. The stage depends on how far the cancer has spread regionally or to distant parts of the body. 



Treatment for Asbestos Lung Cancer



Treating asbestos lung cancer is challenging. Medical intervention can relieve a patient’s symptoms, slow the development of lung cancer, and stave off complications.



Patients with small-cell lung cancer have several options for treatment. Currently, there are three major types of treatment: 




Surgery 



Chemotherapy 



Radiation therapy 




These treatments can slow down the progress of cancer by surgically removing affected tissue or killing off cancer cells with radiation or chemicals.



Sometimes, a combination of two or more of these treatments can prevent, or at least delay, the onset of complications caused by cancer. They can also potentially extend a patient’s life expectancy by months, even years.



New treatments available to some patients include immunotherapy, targeted therapies, and gene therapy. 



What Is the Prognosis for Asbestos Lung Cancer? 



The prognosis for asbestos lung cancer is often poor. This is usually because of a late diagnosis later in the disease. Individual factors determine a different prognosis for every patient: 




The stage of the cancer



Patient age and overall health



Treatment choices



Smoking status




The five-year survival rate is a useful prognosis statistic describing how many people live five years after their diagnosis. The five-year survival rates for the different stages of non-small cell lung cancer are: 




Localized - 65%



Regional - 37%



Distant - 9%



Combined - 28%




The five-year survival rates for the different stages of small cell lung cancer are: 




Localized - 30%



Regional - 18%



Distant - 3%



Combined - 7%




If you have a diagnosis of lung cancer and believe you were exposed to asbestos, talk to your doctor about it. Then, contact a mesothelioma lawyer to find out how to seek compensation. 





Additional Help with Asbestos Lung Cancer



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area.

### Contact Us

Contact Us



Our Top Rated mesothelioma and asbestos legal professionals are happy to help answer any questions you have. 



We offer free online appointments and can arrange for representatives to meet you within just one mile of your home. Open Now.



Fill out our contact form, or call us toll free at 800-793-4540.

### MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org Privacy Policy

Effective Date: August 25, 2020



This privacy policy (“Privacy Policy”) applies to Mesotheliomalawyercenter.org. We respect your privacy rights and value your trust. This Privacy Policy describes how we collect, receive, use, store, share, transfer, and process your personal information, as well as your rights in determining what we do with the information that we collect or hold about you.



Mesotheliomalawyercenter.org is responsible for the processing of your personal information when you interact with our website. You may contact us at any time via the methods described below.



What is Personal Information?



Personal information is any information that you provide to us that identifies you, personally, or that can be logically associated with you. This information may include your name, email and physical address and your telephone number. Depending upon the product or service you request, you may also be asked to provide additional information such as whether you have been diagnosed with a particular asbestos related illness.



Collections of Personal Information



For purposes of this Privacy Policy, “personal information” refers to information that relates directly or indirectly to an identified or identifiable individual (“you”). The personal information that we collect about you varies depending on your interactions and touchpoints with us, as follows:



Information You Voluntarily Provide Us



While you interact as a visitor or user of our website we may ask, or you may volunteer, certain personal information, as follows:




Blood pressure



Health symptoms



Health treatment



Medical record number



Other health information



Health insurance policy number



Heart rate



Diagnosis



Medication



Height



Weight



Eye color



Physician or Healthcare Professional Practice Specialty



Hair color



Initials



Job level



User name



Signature



Job title



Profession



Social media account name



Name



Email Address




Information We Collect Automatically



We and our service providers use technologies on our sites to collect information that helps us improve the quality of our sites and the online experience of our visitors and users. In this Privacy Policy, we refer to these technologies, which include cookies– small text files stored on your computer or mobile device to remember your actions or preferences over time, and similar technologies from third party providers, collectively as “cookies.” Cookies allow us to personalize your return visits to our sites and to save you time during certain activities, such as remembering your user preferences. Most web browsers support cookies, and users can control the use of cookies at the individual browser level. Please note that if you choose to disable cookies, it may limit your use of certain features or functions on our sites.



Third-party advertisers and other organizations may use their own cookies to collect information about your activities on our sites and/or the advertisements you have clicked on. This information may be used by them to serve advertisements that they believe are most likely to be of interest to you based on content you have viewed. Third-party advertisers may also use this information to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements. We do not control these cookies and to disable or reject third- party cookies, please refer to the relevant third party’s website.



If you would prefer to not receive personalized ads based on your browser, you may generally express your opt-out preference to no longer receive tailored advertisements. Please note that you will continue to see advertisements, but they will no longer be tailored to your interests.



To opt-out of interest-based advertising by participating companies in the following consumer choice mechanisms, please visit:




Digital Advertising Alliance (DAA)’s self-regulatory opt-out page (http://optout.aboutads.info/) and mobile application-based “AppChoices” download page (https://youradchoices.com/appchoices)



European Interactive Digital Advertising Alliiance (EDAA)’s consumer opt-out page (http://youronlinechoices.eu)



Network Advertising Initiative (NAI)’s self-regulatory opt-out page (http://optout.networkadvertising.org/)




Any information you provide to us is considered confidential. We do not share information with any third parties. Visitors to our web page are recognized by our web server by domain name only; our web server does not recognize email addresses (where possible).



We collect email addresses of individuals who send us email, collect and combine information on which pages individuals visit, including information specific to the user, as well as information shared voluntarily by the individual, including information collected via survey or site registration, name, phone number, and/or address.



Why Do You Need To Collect My Personal Information?



We use the personal information you supply to us to provide to you the service(s) or product(s) that you request. We may also use your personal and other information to enhance your experience on our website(s) by displaying content based on your preferences. We may “depersonalize” your personal information to enable us to use that information, aggregated with the information of others, for research, analysis and modeling purposes.



With Whom Do You Share My Information?



We do not sell, share, rent or trade your personal information with third parties other than as disclosed within this privacy policy.




We may provide your personal information to companies that provide services to help us with our business activities such as an email service provider to deliver our monthly newsletter. This company is authorized to use your personal information only as necessary to provide these services to us.



We may also disclose your personal information as required by law, such as to comply with a subpoena, or similar legal process, applicable regulations, governmental and quasi-governmental requests, judicial proceedings, court orders and to enforce our Legal Notices or other agreements.



When we believe in good faith that disclosure is necessary to protect our rights, protect your safety or the safety of others, investigate fraud, or respond to a government request.



If MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org is involved in a merger, acquisition, or sale of all or a portion of its assets, you will be notified via a prominent notice on our website of any change in ownership or uses of your personal information, as well as any choices you may have regarding your personal information.



If you indicate to MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org that you would like to speak with a law firm for a free attorney consultation, your information will be provided to the law firm indicated.




How Do You Safeguard The Information You Collect?



The security of your personal information is a very high priority for us and we take a number of steps to safeguard it. Some of the measures we take are:




Limiting access to personal information to those employees who are critical to the delivery of products and services to you.



Implementing appropriate physical, electronic and managerial procedures to guard against unauthorized access or use.



Requiring appropriate consents and protections from our business partners before we share personal information with them.




MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org and its affiliates use commercially reasonable physical and technical security measures to protect all personal information in our possession. We cannot, however, guarantee or warrant the absolute security of any system or that any information we hold will not be accessed, disclosed, altered or destroyed.



Security measures are in place to protect against theft, loss or misuse of information sent through the website, and MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org strives to maintain the integrity of these security measures. In the event, however, of a system compromise, MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org will take all reasonable steps to protect the integrity of its databases. No method of transmission over the Internet, or method of electronic storage, is 100% secure, however. Therefore, we cannot guarantee its absolute security.



How Long Do You Retain My Personal Information?



We will retain your information for as long as needed to provide you with services and as necessary to comply with our legal obligations. Non-personal information may be retained indefinitely. Under certain circumstances, Federal and/or state law may require us to retain your personal information for different periods of time. Accordingly, we may not be able to delete or otherwise remove your personal information from our systems.



What Choices Do I Have?



You can always elect not to provide personal information to us, although if you do not complete and submit the information we ask for we may not be able to provide you with the most complete responses or you may not be able to access all the available features. If you wish to request access to your information so that you may update, delete inaccuracies or request that we no longer use your information to provide you services, contact us at https://www.mesotheliomalawyercenter.org/contact-us/. We will respond to your access request within 30 days. To request removal of your personal information from our testimonials, contact us at https://www.mesotheliomalawyercenter.org/contact-us/. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why.



Testimonials



If you submit a testimonial to us, we will ask for your permission to post your testimonial prior to any public use. We will post your name as given to us in your testimonial. Please be aware that any personally identifiable information you submit as a testimonial to be posted can be read, collected, or used by the general public, and could be used to send you unsolicited messages. We are not responsible for the personally identifiable information you choose to include in any testimonial you choose to submit. If at any time you decide to remove your testimonial, please contact us via e-mail or postal mail.



Social Media (Features) and Widgets



Our website includes Social Media Features, such as the Facebook Like button and Widgets, such as the Share this button or interactive mini-programs that run on our site. These Features may collect your IP address, which page you are visiting on our site, and may set a cookie to enable the Feature to function properly. Social Media Features and Widgets are either hosted by a third party or hosted directly on our Site. Your interactions with these Features are governed by the privacy policy of the company providing it.



Links to Other Sites



This website contains links to other websites that are not owned or controlled by MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org. Please be aware that we, MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org, are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites.



We encourage you to be aware when you leave our website and to read the privacy policies of each and every website that collects personally identifiable information.



This privacy policy applies to only information collected by this website.



A Special Note about Children’s Privacy



You must be at least 18 years old to use this website. We encourage parents and guardians to spend time with their children online and to be fully familiar with the websites visited by their children. We recognize the particular importance of protecting privacy where children are involved. We do not knowingly collect personally identifiable information online from children under the age of 13. If a child under the age of 13 has provided us with personally identifiable information online, we ask that a parent or guardian contact us at https://www.mesotheliomalawyercenter.org/contact-us/. Visit the Federal Trade Commission website for more information about the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA).



If you are between the ages of 13 and 18, please be sure to read this Privacy Policy with your parent and obtain his or her permission before you submit or post any Personal Information, and before you use any features of this website.



Contacting You



By filling out and submitting information on our website, you give us or one of our affiliates, affiliated law firms, or business associates permission to contact you. We consider this permission not to be specific to legal benefits, but also to other applicable products and services we may market and advertise in the future.



Removing Your Information



We will retain your information for as long as your account is active or as needed to provide you services. If you wish to request that we no longer use your information to provide you services or updates on additional products, contact us. Additionally, we will retain and use your information as necessary to comply with our legal or regulatory obligations, resolve disputes, and enforce our agreements.



If your personally identifiable information changes or if you no longer desire our service, you may update or amend your information with us or ask to have it removed from our database lists or production directory. Simply contact us by email or traditional mail. We will respond to your request to access within 30 calendar days.



Contact Us



If you have any questions, concerns or suggestions about our Privacy Policy or anything else about MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org, you may contact us in several ways. You can:



Call:  800-793-4540



Send an email to:https://www.mesotheliomalawyercenter.org/contact-us/



Any information sent to us through email is not encrypted by us.



Notice to California Residents:



Residents of the State of California may request a list of all third parties to which this website has disclosed certain information during the preceding year for those third parties' direct marketing purposes. If you are a California resident and want such a list, please contact us at https://www.mesotheliomalawyercenter.org/contact-us/.



For all requests, you must put the statement "California Shine the Light Privacy Request" in the body of your request, as well as your name, street address, city, state, and zip code. Please note that we are not responsible for requests that are not labeled or sent properly, or that do not have complete information.



Notice to Vermont Residents



We will not share any personal information about you with other businesses to the extent prohibited by applicable Vermont law or to the extent your prior consent to share is required by applicable Vermont law. For purposes of compliance with the Vermont Consumer Protection Act, if you are a resident of the State of Vermont and would like to opt-out from the disclosure of your personal information to any third-party for marketing purposes, please contact us at https://www.mesotheliomalawyercenter.org/contact-us/.



Notice to Users Outside of the United States



This Privacy Policy is intended to cover collection of information on our websites from residents of the United States. If you are visiting our websites from outside the United States, please be aware that your information may be transferred to, stored and processed in the United States where our servers are located and our central database is operated. The data protection and other laws of the United States and other countries might not be as comprehensive as those in your country. By using our services, you understand that your information may be transferred to our facilities and those third parties with whom we share it as described in this Privacy Policy.



Changes to Privacy Policy



MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org updates or modifies this Privacy Policy from time to time. If we make material changes to this Privacy Policy or to how MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org will use your personal information, we will post those changes here. We reserve the right to make changes in this policy at any time. Please check the policy each time you use our website to ensure that you are aware of any changes in our privacy practices. Our Privacy Policy will indicate the date when it was updated. Your continued use of our website will signify your acceptance of the changes to our Privacy Policy. If you do not agree with the changes to how your information will be used, please do not continue to use our website. By using this website, you signify your consent to the MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org Privacy Policy. If you do not agree to this policy, please do not read or use MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org. When you request rate quotes or other information through MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org, you are authorizing us to share your information with our business partners, affiliates or associates who will contact you by phone, email, or mail. If you do not want further communication from them, please notify the business associates directly.



From time to time, we may add new websites that may or may not be listed in this Privacy Policy. Please note that this policy applies only to the information collected through this website and not to websites maintained by other companies or organizations to which we link. In addition, this policy applies only to information collected by MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org online or offline.



PLEASE PRINT AND RETAIN A COPY OF THIS PRIVACY POLICY FOR YOUR RECORDS.

### MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org Disclaimer, Terms and Conditions of Use

PLEASE READ THIS DISCLAIMER AS WELL AS TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF USE CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.



By using this website, you signify your assent to the Disclaimer as well as Terms and Conditions (the “Terms and Conditions”). If you do not agree to all of these Terms and Conditions of use, do not use this website.



MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org is an informational resource that educates people who have been exposed to asbestos, or diagnosed with mesothelioma or another asbestos-related disease of their legal rights. The website itself is privately owned and is a for-profit organization and your agreement to be bound by the Terms and Conditions. MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org is sponsored by Paul Danziger, Attorney. MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org is not responsible for any third-party content that may be accessed through this website. Further, MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org does not endorse any of the companies or opinions listed in or linked to or from the website.



This page spells out the disclaimers for MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org and the terms and conditions for any user of the website. This includes the purpose of the website and also restrictions on use, limited liabilities and issues with disputes and specific state-by-state disclosure information. You can find information about security of your personal information on our Privacy Policy page.



The terms and conditions listed herein spell out the website-user agreement for MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org. If any provision of these Terms and Conditions is unlawful, void or unenforceable, then that provision shall be deemed severable from the remaining provisions and shall not affect their validity and enforceability.



If you do not agree with these Terms and Conditions or they are not acceptable to you in full, you must stop using MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org immediately.



Please review the Legal Disclosures that may pertain to your particular state of residence below.



General Website Disclaimer



The information provided on MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org is not legal or professional medical advice, MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org is not a lawyer or doctor referral service, and no attorney-client privilege or relationship nor doctor-patient relationship is or should be formed by the use of this website.



The content of this website is not intended to be a substitute for professional legal or medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your lawyer, physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a legal or medical condition. Never disregard professional legal or medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org!



Reliance on any information provided by MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org, MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org employees, others appearing on this website at the invitation of MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org, or other visitors to the website is solely at your own risk.



MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org Support Services



By filling out a form on this website, you are requesting to be contacted by a MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org sponsor law firm, and / or a MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org affiliated employee. These individuals may assist you with a variety of issues affecting those suffering from asbestos-related diseases, including:




providing free informational literature;



facilitating social security or veterans' benefits for asbestos-related diseases;



discussing your potential case as it related to asbestos exposure, mesothelioma, and related illnesses; and



recommending law firms to discuss your legal rights as they relate to asbestos exposure and related illnesses.




MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org’s affiliated employees are not legal or medical professionals and, accordingly, any advice provided should not be deemed legal or medical advice.



MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org strives to maintain current information on asbestos exposure and related injuries. The information provided on MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between a patient and his/her healthcare provider.



The information contained in the website should not be construed as legal advice, an offer to perform legal services, or an offer to create an attorney-client relationship. The content of this website contains general information and may not reflect current legal developments or issues pertaining to a visitor's specific circumstances. Recipients of content from this website should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the website without seeking appropriate legal advice from an attorney licensed in the recipient's state. Further, retention of legal services cannot be achieved through any contact with MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org. In order to retain legal services, you must directly contract with an attorney licensed to practice law in your state.



MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org is sponsored by Paul Danziger, Attorney, who is licensed in Texas. Paul Danziger, Attorney office is located at 1225 North Loop West Houston, Texas 77008. MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org is sponsored by Paul Danziger, Attorney, however, Paul Danziger, Attorney has no day to day involvement with the activities of MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org nor direct communication with its visitors.



If you indicate your desire to speak with an attorney about your legal rights, he or she may recommend various law firms. Recommendations may include law firms from around the country including Paul Danziger, Attorney, however, you are under no obligation to retain Paul Danziger, Attorney or any other law firm. If you decide to retain Paul Danziger, Attorney for the handling of your legal claims, Paul Danziger, Attorney may utilize experienced co-counsel (at no additional cost) to assist in the prosecution of your claims. Paul Danziger, Attorney handles cases on a contingency fee basis, and there are no costs or fees charged to the client unless a recovery is made.



Transmissions to MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org, in part or in whole, and/or communication with MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org via Internet or e-mail through this website does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship between a law firm and any recipients. Contact through MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org is not an offer to represent you, nor is it intended to create an attorney-client relationship.



Disclaimers



MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org IS PROVIDED ON AN “AS IS” AND “AS AVAILABLE” BASIS. WE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org DISCLAIMS ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY LOSS, INJURY, CLAIM, LIABILITY OR DAMAGE OF ANY KIND RESULTING FROM, ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY RELATED TO (A) ANY ERRORS IN OR OMISSIONS FROM OUR WEBSITE AND ITS CONTENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO TECHNICAL INACCURACIES AND TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS; (B) ANY THIRD-PARTY WEBSITES OR CONTENT ON THOSE WEBSITES DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ACCESS THROUGH LINKS ON OUR WEBSITE, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY ERRORS IN OR OMISSIONS THEREFROM; (C) THE UNAVAILABILITY OF OUR WEBSITE OR ANY PORTION OF IT; (D), THE USER’S USE OF OUR WEBSITE; OR (E) THE USER’S USE OF ANY EQUIPMENT OR SOFTWARE IN CONNECTION WITH OUR WEBSITE.



Limitation of Liability



MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org, their affiliates, listees and any officer, director, employee, subcontractor, agent, successor or assignee of MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org its affiliates and sponsors, shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special or consequential damages of any kind pertaining to your use of this website, including your engagement of an attorney, advocate, or medical professional located through MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org, regardless of any negligence of MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org. That includes, without limitation, attorneys’ fees and lost profits or savings in any way because of, resulting from or arising in connection with MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org.



More specifically, MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org is not and shall not be liable for any claim, loss, cost or liability that arises out of, or relates to a user's use of (1) MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org, (2) any attorney that provides or fails to provide legal services to the user, (3) any advocate that provides or fails to provide services to the user, (4) the provision by an attorney of false or misleading information to MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org, (5) the provision by an advocate of false or misleading information to MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org (6) the failure of an attorney to meet its responsibilities under the rules and regulations of the state(s) in which the attorney is licensed to practice law, (7) any medical professional that provides or fails to provide services to the user, (8) the provision by medical professional of false or misleading information to MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org, (9) the provision by medical professional of false or misleading information to MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org or (10) the failure of a medical professional to meet its responsibilities under the rules and regulations of the state(s) in which the medical professional is licensed to practice medicine. MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org fully disclaims any and all liability directly or indirectly arising out of or relating to the information contained in, use of or services available through MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org or for the results or consequences of any representation or treatment of a user of MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org by an attorney, advocate, or medical professional with whom MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org put the user in touch.



Any information provided through this website or through links to other websites are provided for educational and general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal or medical advice nor substituted for legal or medical advice provided by a competent attorney or medical professional.



MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org is not and shall not be liable for any claim, loss, cost or liability that arises out of, or relates to a user's use of links provided by MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org to other websites. A user of MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org assumes total responsibility for any damages that may result from the use of any links, including damages which may result from viruses or computer problems associated with such links or repair and replacement of computers or server information, and for any time lost as the result of such damages.



Website Contents, Ownership, and Use Restrictions



The information contained in this website including all images, illustrations, designs, photographs, video clips, writings and other materials (collectively referred to as "Content") that appear herein are copyrights, trademarks, trade dress or other intellectual property owned, controlled, or licensed by Imperial or are the property of their respective owners. The name MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org as well as its logos are registered marks of MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org and its owner and may not be used in any way, including in advertising or publicity without our prior written permission.



You may print a copy of the information contained herein for your personal use only, but you may not copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, download, display, post electronically or mechanically, transmit, record, in any manner mirror, photocopy, or reproduce the same without the prior written permission of MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org or the applicable copyright owner.



Laws in Case of Dispute



These Terms and Conditions are governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of Washington DC as they apply to agreements made and solely performed therein. Disputes between users of our website and MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org shall be subject to the jurisdiction of Washington DC and U.S. the federal courts.



Changes to Terms and Conditions



We reserve the right to change the Terms and Conditions of MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org at any time and without notice. Users should review this page on a regular basis for any changes. Use of this website following any changes constitutes a user’s acceptance of changes.



Notice and Takedown Procedures; and Copyright Agent



If you believe any materials accessible on or from this website infringe your copyright, you may request removal of those materials (or access thereto) from this website by contacting MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org's copyright agent (identified below) and providing the following information:




Identification of the copyrighted work that you believe to be infringed. Please describe the work, and where possible include a copy or the location (e.g., URL) of an authorized version of the work.



Identification of the material that you believe to be infringing and its location. Please describe the material, and provide us with its URL or any other pertinent information that will allow us to locate the material.



Your name, address, telephone number and (if available) e-mail address.



A statement that you have a good faith belief that the complained of use of the materials is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.



A statement that the information that you have supplied is accurate, and indicating that "under penalty of perjury," you are the copyright owner or are authorized to act on the copyright owner's behalf.



A signature or the electronic equivalent from the copyright holder or authorized representative.




MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org's agent for copyright issues relating to this website is as follows: https://www.mesotheliomalawyercenter.org/contact-us/



Complete Agreement



Except as expressly provided in a particular "legal notice" on the MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org website, these Terms and Conditions and the MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org Privacy Policy constitute the entire agreement between you and MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org with respect to the use of the MesotheliomaLawyerCenter.org website, and content.



Contact Us



If you have any questions or concerns regarding any information found on this website we invite you to fill out our contact form at https://www.mesotheliomalawyercenter.org/contact-us/



General Disclaimer: THIS IS AN ADVERTISEMENT



Some states require additional disclaimers concerning specialty areas of practice. Those are as follows:



Alabama: No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.2(e)



Colorado: Colorado does not certify attorneys as experienced in any field. Colo. RPC 7.4(e).



Delaware: A lawyer shall not state or imply that a lawyer is certified as a specialist in a particular field of law. Delaware Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.4 (d).



Illinois: The Supreme Court of Illinois does not recognize certifications of specialties in the practice of law, nor does it recognize certifications of expertise in any phase of the practice of law by any agency, governmental or private, or by any group, organization or association. Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.4(c).



Iowa: ADVERTISEMENT ONLY. Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 32:7.3(d).



Kentucky: THIS IS AN ADVERTISEMENT. Kentucky Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.09 (3).



Massachusetts: If a Massachusetts lawyer holds himself or herself out as “certified” in a particular service, field or area of law by a non-governmental body, the certifying organization is a private organization, whose standards for certification are not regulated by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct 7.4(b).



Minnesota: A lawyer may not state or imply that the lawyer is a specialist or certified as a specialist in a particular field of law. Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.4(d).



Mississippi: The Mississippi Supreme Court advises that a decision on legal services is important and should not be based solely on advertisements. FREE BACKGROUND INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST to a Mississippi attorney. The listing of any area of practice by a Mississippi attorney does not indicate any certification of experience therein. See Mississippi Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.2(d), Rule 7.4(a), and Rule 7.6(a).



Missouri: Neither the Supreme Court of Missouri nor the Missouri Bar reviews or approves certifying organizations or specialist designations. Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.4.



New Jersey: Any certification as an experienced, or any certification in a field of practice, that does not state that such certification has been granted by the Supreme Court of New Jersey or by an organization that has been approved by the American Bar Association, indicates that the certifying organization has not been approved, or has been denied approval, by the Supreme Court of New Jersey and the American Bar Association. See New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.4(b).



New Mexico: Any certification by an organization other than the New Mexico Board of Legal Specialization does not constitute recognition by the New Mexico Board of Legal Specialization, unless the lawyer is also recognized by the board as an experienced in that area of law. See New Mexico Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 16-704(D).



Ohio: ADVERTISEMENT ONLY. Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.4(c).



Oregon: THIS IS AN ADVERTISEMENT. Oregon Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.3(c).



Rhode Island: The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law. The court does not license or certify any lawyer as an experienced in any field of practice. Rhode Island Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.4 (d).



Vermont: A lawyer may communicate the fact that the lawyer has been certified as a specialist in a field of law by a named organization, provided that the communication clearly states that there is no procedure in Vermont for approving certifying organizations. If, however, the named organization has been accredited by the American Bar Association to certify lawyers as specialists in a particular field of law, the communication need not contain such a statement. Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.4 (c).



Virginia: A lawyer may communicate the fact that the lawyer has been certified as a specialist in a field of law by a named organization, provided that the communication clearly states that there is no procedure in the Commonwealth of Virginia for approving certifying organizations. Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.4 (d).



Washington: The Supreme Court of Washington does not recognize certification of specialties in the practice of law and that the certificate, award, or recognition is not a requirement to practice law in the state of Washington. Washington Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.04 (d)(3).



Wyoming: The Wyoming State Bar does not certify any lawyer as a specialist or expert. Anyone considering a lawyer should independently investigate the lawyer's credentials and ability, and not rely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. The disclaimer must appear within the advertisement itself, or in the instance of a telephone or other directory, upon the same or the facing page as the advertisement appears. The disclaimer shall be in a type size at least as large as the smallest type size appearing in the advertisement. Wyoming Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.2 (g).



NOTICE: While this website was not exclusively created for the purpose of legal referrals or advertising, to the extent that any users inquire about assistance with a particular legal issue, as a precaution, these disclosures are included for the consumer’s consideration when considering any possible attorney choices they make and, in some cases, as a matter of precaution for the attorneys to whom users may be directed state that this is an advertisement.



PLEASE PRINT AND RETAIN A COPY OF THIS NOTICE FOR YOUR OWN RECORDS

### Mesothelioma Blog



### The Dangers of Asbestos in Older Homes

The dangers of asbestos in older homes are significant, especially during renovation or repair work. Homes built before the 1980s may still contain asbestos in siding, vinyl flooring, insulation, and many other materials. Exposed or damaged asbestos in older homes can cause exposure and put residents at risk for asbestos illnesses like mesothelioma. 



If you or a loved one have mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related cancer, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in trusts set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 







Where Asbestos Hides: Floor Tiles, Sheetrock, and Texas Wool Insulation





https://youtube.com/shorts/KDDqMkkx4cA




Asbestos isn’t just a relic of the past—it still lurks in many older homes and buildings. In this video, David Foster sheds light on common materials that may contain asbestos, including floor tiles, sheetrock, and insulation products like Texas Wool.Disturbing these materials without the right precautions can release dangerous fibers into the air, increasing the risk of mesothelioma and other serious health conditions. This video explains the importance of using proper personal protective equipment (PPE) and knowing when to call in professionals. If you're planning renovations or managing an older property, understanding asbestos safety is essential.










Asbestos in Older Homes



Many industries used asbestos widely for decades. The construction industry used asbestos more heavily than almost any other industry. It used asbestos for its ability to insulate, protect against fire, and add strength to materials. 



Millions of houses, apartment buildings, and other dwellings built between 1940 and the early 1980s were built with components and materials made with asbestos.



Asbestos use by the construction industry decreased sharply in the late 1970s after the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reported that exposure to asbestos posed severe health risks. Since then, products such as roofing panels, cement, and insulation have been made with alternatives to asbestos.



Industries were given a “phase out” period, meaning they had a certain amount of years to stop using asbestos. Although the EPA placed regulations on asbestos use in the late 1970s, many homes were still built with it over the next few years before companies stopped using it.



Many Americans still live in older houses built before the construction industry stopped using asbestos. If you live in a house or apartment built between the 1940s and 1980s, it’s important to know what to do if asbestos is present in your home.



Is Asbestos in Your Home Dangerous? 



If you live in an older home, you might be living with asbestos. Many homes were built with asbestos, but some were renovated to remove asbestos materials. 



Asbestos is harmful because it sheds tiny fibers that can be inhaled or ingested. Asbestos fibers cause damage inside the body that can lead to serious illness. Not everyone exposed to asbestos will get sick, but it is always a significant risk, and no amount of asbestos exposure is safe. 



Asbestos in older homes that are well-contained poses minimal exposure risks. The danger occurs when asbestos materials deteriorate, are damaged, or are disturbed by repairs or renovations. These activities can release fibers into the air, causing exposure. 



Where Is Asbestos Found in Older Homes? 



It is important to note that not all older homes contain asbestos. If you don't know if your home has asbestos, it's best to get a professional inspection. This is especially important if you are planning to do any renovations. 



It is best to treat your home as if it contains asbestos until a state-certified asbestos professional can inspect the residence thoroughly. 



In the meantime, it’s crucial to understand where asbestos could be in an older home:




Attic insulation (typically vermiculite insulation)



Corrugated cement roofing



Vinyl floor tiling



Window glazing and caulking



Plasters and siding materials



Old appliances such as furnaces and air conditioners



Heating duct insulation



Ceiling tile



Hot water and steam pipes



Flue pipes



Cement, paper, and millboard sheets



Textured paint



Architectural cement pipe columns



Artificial brick cladding



Cement tile underlay



Bathroom linings



Eave linings



Old electrical wiring insulation




Sources of Asbestos Exposure in Older Homes



While many older materials in a home can contain asbestos, certain areas and scenarios pose the greatest risks: 




Vinyl Flooring. Vinyl floor tiles and adhesives often contained asbestos to make them stronger, fire resistant, and insulating. Removing and replacing flooring is a home improvement task many people take on themselves, not realizing asbestos could be an issue. Exposure can occur when scraping up the decaying tiles and adhesive. This stirs up asbestos fibers. 





Textured Paint. Many homeowners also tackle the removal of textured paint, like popcorn ceiling treatments. These materials were once made with asbestos. As with flooring, scraping off paint creates dust that could be contaminated with asbestos. 





Attic Renovations. Many homeowners want to replace attic insulation to save on energy costs, but older homes often used vermiculite insulation that contained asbestos. Removing this without professional guidance can be dangerous. 





Asbestos-Wrapped Pipes. Many older pipes were wrapped in asbestos lagging to insulate them and reduce heat loss. Not many homeowners do their own plumbing work, but they can be exposed if these older pipe materials begin to deteriorate over time and release fibers. Plumbers who don't take precautions can disturb the fibers and contaminate the home. 





Home Mechanics. Asbestos can be present in the garage as well, and home mechanics risk exposure. Older cars may have asbestos brakes or clutches. Hobbyists who remove and replace these parts without proper precautions can be exposed to asbestos. 




These are just some of the more common situations in which a homeowner might come into contact with harmful asbestos fibers. 



How Can I Identify Asbestos? 



This is tricky for typical homeowners, so it's best to have a professional inspection done. 



What Does Asbestos Look Like? 



Asbestos is a fibrous material that is usually white but might be other colors. It isn't easy to identify it just by looking at it, especially if it is bound up in another material. Some products might have the word asbestos on them, but many don't. 



Is There a Test for Asbestos? 



The only way to know for sure if something is asbestos is to test it. You can get a home asbestos test kit. To use it, you will gather a sample of the material and send it to a lab. Testing can cost $100 or more per sample. 



Collecting and testing your own samples is risky. You can create exposure risks if you don't take the right precautions. It's always better to work with a professional, licensed asbestos professional or company. 



What to Do if Your Home Contains Asbestos



If you suspect your home may contain asbestos, contact a qualified asbestos professional for assistance. In the meantime:




Don’t work around, repair, or renovate any areas that may contain asbestos.



If you have children, make sure they don’t play or roughhouse near any areas that may contain asbestos.



Don’t load any boxes, clean up, or walk around in the attic.



Don’t sweep up or vacuum around areas that may contain asbestos.



Don’t saw, sand, or scrape around areas that may contain asbestos, and never drill holes in the walls for any reason.




An inspector can recommend an asbestos abatement company to have the materials safely removed. Or, they might suggest that you keep it in place. If asbestos materials are well-contained and in good condition, they pose little risk of exposure. 



The Dangers of Asbestos When Disturbed



If asbestos is crushed, drilled, excavated, or otherwise disturbed, even by natural erosion, the fibers become airborne.



When released into the air, the fibrous dust can enter the body by inhalation or swallowing. The risk is particularly high in enclosed areas with poor ventilation. 



Once inside the body, these microscopic fibers can become firmly lodged inside the lining of the chest, heart, or abdomen.



Once ingested, the body can’t expel all of the fibers. Over time, asbestos fibers cause lesions in several tissues in the system. The lesions fester and can eventually mutate into cancers of the lung or the mesothelium.



By the time asbestos fibers start damaging the body, many years may have already passed.



The dormancy period of asbestos-related diseases can last for decades. Some of the early signs of asbestos illness include: 




Chest pain



Difficulty swallowing



Pain when inhaling



Fluid effusion



Nausea



Reduction in chest expansion



Dry coughs that may be accompanied by wheezing



Unexplained weight loss



Fever




If You Have Been Exposed to Asbestos in an Older Home



If you think you were exposed to asbestos in your home or other older buildings, talk to your doctor right away. They can discuss your risks of developing an asbestos illness and offer screenings for earlier detection. 



If you have an asbestos illness, contact a mesothelioma lawyer to help you determine the source of exposure and to seek compensation. Many of the companies that supplied asbestos to the construction industry can still be held accountable for damages through lawsuits or asbestos trust fund claims. 



More Information



Remember, if you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma or asbestos-related cancer, you may qualify for significant compensation. Remember to fill out our form for your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you need additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540.

### Mesothelioma Verdicts

Mesothelioma verdicts average millions of dollars, but every case is different. Most asbestos lawsuits end in settlements, while a handful of cases continue to trial and a jury verdict. Verdicts typically result in higher compensation amounts to victims. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 






 




What Is a Mesothelioma Verdict? 



Many victims of asbestos exposure and resulting illnesses file lawsuits against the companies responsible. An asbestos lawsuit can be resolved in one of two ways: 




Settlement. A lawsuit ends in a settlement when both sides agree to negotiate on an amount of compensation for the defendants to pay the plaintiffs. 



Verdict. A case ends in a verdict if there are no settlement negotiations or if negotiations fail and the case goes to court. At trial, the legal teams for each side argue their case for or against a damages award. The jury verdict determines if the defendants owe the plaintiff damages. The jury verdict also includes an amount. 




Is a Verdict Better Than a Mesothelioma Settlement? 



Most mesothelioma cases end in settlements. This conclusion is generally better for the patient because it results in compensation sooner. 



You may be able to get more compensation from a verdict, but it can take years that you don't have left. 



Another downside to seeking a verdict is the risk of getting no compensation. The jury could decide in favor of the defendants. In this case, the plaintiff receives nothing. 



What Is the Average Mesothelioma Settlement and Verdict? 



Mesothelioma verdicts are usually much larger than settlement amounts, between $5 million and $11 million on average. Mesothelioma settlements average between $1 million and $1.4 million. 



What Are the Highest Mesothelioma Verdict Amounts? 



Mesothelioma and asbestos verdicts are much less common than settlements. They are also higher. These are some of the biggest cases and verdicts in asbestos lawsuits: 



$117 Million for Asbestos in Talcum Powder



Stephen Lanzo III and his wife received a jury verdict of $117 million in New Jersey in 2018. Lanzo sued Johnson & Johnson and its talc supplier over asbestos-contaminated talcum powder, which he claimed led to his mesothelioma diagnosis. The award included $80 million in punitive damages. 



$26.6 Million for Drywaller



A jury awarded a $26.6 million verdict to Michael and Suzi Sutherland after a California jury determined that the county of San Diego was responsible for Michael’s exposure to asbestos and malignant mesothelioma. 



Michael worked as a drywaller for the city of San Diego during the 1970s, a time when many construction materials contained asbestos. 



According to Michael, he was always rushing to complete one job and move on to the next. As a result, it was almost always dusty at his job sites, with asbestos fibers flying airborne as he completed his work. 



$322 Million from Union Carbide



In May 2011, a Mississippi jury awarded plaintiff Thomas Brown $322 million in his compensation suit against Union Carbide. At the time, this was the largest asbestos verdict in U.S. history and included $300 million in punitive damages against the multinational company. 



However, another court in Mississippi overturned the verdict when Judge Eddie Bowen, who had presided over the trial, admitted to Union Carbide lawyers that his father had sued the company’s Dow Chemical division in an asbestos-related case. 



The elder Bowen had tested for asbestosis, but Judge Bowen had not revealed this fact or named his father before presiding over Brown’s case. As a result, the state Supreme Court ordered the judge to remove himself from the trial. 



$8.5 Million for Lung Cancer



Eugene Mccarthy, a three-pack-a-day smoker, won a verdict of $8.5 million in 2011. A New York judge determined that asbestos rather than smoking caused his lung cancer, which eventually killed him. Mccarthy worked on gaskets provided by Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. in Canada, which contained excessive amounts of asbestos. 



In addition, another plaintiff who worked with products manufactured by Goodyear, Walter Koczur, was awarded a $13 million verdict after the same judge determined that his lung cancer also resulted from asbestos exposure. The cases marked the first time that Goodyear fought against the charges. 



$9.8 Million for Shipyard Worker



In February of 2012, a Newport News, Virginia, jury handed down a $9.8 million verdict to a former shipyard worker who died the previous year from an asbestos-related disease. John K. Bristow was 68 when he passed away. He worked at Newport News Shipbuilding for over 30 years. 



Bristow’s mesothelioma attorneys filed the lawsuit against John Crane Inc., the company responsible for supplying asbestos-containing products used at the shipyard during the time period Bristow was employed there. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Bristow’s survivors, including a wife and two children. 



$48 Million for Construction Worker



Another large verdict came in 2012 when a jury awarded Bobbi Izell, a former construction worker, $48 million against ten different companies. Izell was diagnosed with mesothelioma at 85 after working around asbestos throughout the 1960s and 1970s. 



The main party responsible, at 65%, was Union Carbide, the manufacturer of the asbestos used in products that Izell used. Although other companies were responsible, jurors decided that Union Carbide acted with malice when they kept the health risks of asbestos confidential and allowed their workers to suffer exposure for decades. 



$33.7 Million for Navy Electrician



In 2002, one of the largest asbestos lawsuit verdicts in California was handed down when Alfred Todak was awarded $33.7 million. 



Todak, a former U.S. Navy electrician from San Francisco, was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2001. The defendant, Foster Wheeler Corporation, was responsible for manufacturing, supplying, and designing several components that contained asbestos, including insulation, gaskets, and boilers used by the United States Navy. 



Todak was exposed to asbestos at several different job sites while working for the Navy, including the Bethlehem Steel Mill in Seattle, and the Lockheed Shipbuilding and Construction Company, also in Seattle. 







Am I Eligible to File an Asbestos Lawsuit and Get a Verdict? 



You can file an asbestos lawsuit if you got sick after asbestos exposure. Nearly all instances of asbestos diseases, like mesothelioma, are preventable. Companies that made and supplied asbestos materials can be held accountable for harmful exposure. 



If you lost a loved one to mesothelioma, you may also be eligible to file a lawsuit. Mesothelioma wrongful death settlements and verdicts compensate family members for medical and funeral expenses as well as intangible costs. 



How Do I Get a Mesothelioma Verdict? 



The first step in getting a mesothelioma or asbestos verdict is hiring the right lawyer. Asbestos law firms specialize in these cases and give you the best chance of winning compensation. 



A verdict is never guaranteed, but the right lawyer will take you through these steps and advocate for your compensation:




Filing a lawsuit. To get compensation, you must file a lawsuit against defendants. Your lawyer will determine which companies are liable for your asbestos exposure and file a lawsuit against them. 



Discovery. Once the defendants have responded to your claim, the discovery period begins. This is when both sides gather information and evidence and build a case.



Settlement negotiations. Most defendants will agree to negotiate a settlement. Even if they deny any liability, a settlement provides a quicker resolution and is often less costly than going to trial. 



Trial and verdict. If one side refuses to negotiate or a settlement cannot be reached, your lawsuit will go to trial. Both sides present evidence to the jury, which delivers a verdict. If the verdict is in your favor, the jury will also assign a monetary award to be paid by the defendants. 



Appeals. If you win a verdict, your legal battle is likely not over. The defendants will probably appeal the verdict to get it overturned or to reduce the amount. 




What Is My Mesothelioma and Asbestos Lawsuit Worth? 



Verdict and settlement amounts vary significantly by case. There is no way to predict exactly how much you can get when you file. An experienced asbestos attorney can provide you with a reasonable estimate. Settlements and verdict amounts depend on: 




The strength of the evidence you have against the defendants



The number of companies involved



The extent of your past asbestos exposure



Your medical expenses



Expected future medical and care costs



Lost wages if you can no longer work



Emotional and physical pain and suffering



Losses to your dependents




Getting Legal Help



Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Raleigh, Mississippi Mesothelioma, Lawyer

Experienced Raleigh, Mississippi, mesothelioma lawyers are now helping victims of asbestos-related diseases fight for justice. Asbestos in the oil industry has been a major issue for workers and residents in Raleigh for years. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Raleigh, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 





Raleigh, Mississippi Asbestos Facts




Nearly 2,400 people died in Mississippi from asbestos diseases between 1999 and 2017.



Mississippi's oil industry contributed significantly to worker asbestos exposure. 



Raleigh was home to a record-breaking trial for asbestos diseases, with a $322 million jury verdict in 2011. 




When Do I Need a Raleigh, MS, Mesothelioma Lawyer? 



Talk to a lawyer as soon after getting a mesothelioma diagnosis as possible. There is no time to lose taking legal action or making a claim to seek compensation. Mesothelioma is a deadly cancer, and statutes of limitations put a deadline on when you can file. Don't miss your opportunity. 



Why Do I Need a Mesothelioma Lawyer? 



If you have a mesothelioma diagnosis, you were probably negligently exposed to asbestos at work. Raleigh workplaces that used asbestos, and the companies that supplied them, can be held accountable. They can be held liable for the expenses related to your illness. 



An experienced mesothelioma lawyer in Mississippi will explain your options and ensure you have the best chance of recovering damages. 



How to Make a Mesothelioma Claim in Raleigh



A lawyer will explain your legal options for past asbestos exposure and help you through the filing process. You could be eligible for one or more of the following: 




Personal injury lawsuit



Wrongful death lawsuit



Asbestos trust fund claim



VA benefits




Let your lawyer take the steps necessary to file a lawsuit, make a claim, seek benefits, and get the results you need. 



Choosing a Raleigh, Mississippi Mesothelioma Lawyer



Asbestos lawsuits and claims are complicated. Don't settle for just any lawyer. You need a Mississippi lawyer specializing in mesothelioma and asbestos cases. 



They should be convenient to you in Raleigh but have broad jurisdiction, including in other states. Asbestos lawsuits often involve multiple defendants in different states. 



Find a lawyer backed by a large firm. They need the resources of a bigger firm to investigate and build your case. They should offer you a free initial consultation and contingency payment plans. 



The Oil Industry and Asbestos in Raleigh, MS



Oil drilling and refining is a significant industry in Mississippi. Unfortunately, many of these job sites used a lot of asbestos. 



A lawsuit brought by a former oil worker with asbestosis highlighted the risks and consequences of that asbestos use. 



Thomas Brown worked in Mississippi and offshore in the Gulf of Mexico in the 1970s and 80s. He developed asbestosis after years of mixing drilling mud made by Union Carbide and sold by Chevron Phillips. He claimed asbestos in this product caused his illness. 



During the trial, attorneys representing Union Carbide denied that the company's products had anything to do with Brown's illness.



Instead, the defense attorney tried to pin the man's disease on being obese, claiming that his weight caused his breathing problems. However, the physician who diagnosed Brown said it was caused by direct asbestos exposure. 



In 2011, a Raleigh jury awarded 48-year-old Brown $322 million for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Brown was placed on an oxygen tank 24 hours a day after his asbestosis diagnosis.



In 2012, the verdict was overturned. The retrial, unfortunately, ended in a loss for Brown. The judge that presided over the case had a personal history with asbestos litigation, creating a conflict of interest. 



Anyone in or around Raleigh who worked in the oil industry could also have been exposed to asbestos. These workers are still at risk of developing asbestos-related illnesses.



Cancer Treatment in Raleigh



Although there are no comprehensive cancer centers in Raleigh, there are a few options in nearby areas. It is important to work with specialists who have expertise in asbestos illnesses. 




The Mississippi Cancer Institute215 Marion AvenueMccomb MS, 39648601-279-5500



University of MississippiMedical Center:2500 N. State StreetJackson, MS, 39216888-815-2005




Getting Legal Help in Raleigh



If you’ve been exposed to asbestos and developed mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis,  keep in mind that you may qualify for significant compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### About Us

Our Mission



At the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, we are dedicated to empowering individuals diagnosed with mesothelioma and their families to take action. Our mission is to connect you with top-tier mesothelioma attorneys in your area who specialize in securing the justice and financial compensation you deserve. With access to trusted resources and expert legal support, we help you fight for a brighter future, turning your diagnosis into a pathway for hope and healing. Take the first step today—because you and your loved ones deserve more than just answers; you deserve results.









How We Help



For decades, we have built a trusted nationwide network of mesothelioma lawyers dedicated to securing justice and maximum compensation for asbestos victims. These attorneys specialize in uncovering the details of your unique work history and exposure to fight for the compensation you deserve.



If you or someone you love has been diagnosed with mesothelioma or another asbestos-related disease, don’t wait. Call us today at 1-800-793-4540. Your case will be handled with urgency and care, connecting you with a seasoned mesothelioma lawyer in your area. Justice starts with a single call—take action now.









Your Team




Mesothelioma Lawyer Center is a team of the top rated and most experienced mesothelioma attorneys coming together to fight for compensation for mesothelioma patients



Decades of asbestos litigation experience



Significant compensation recovered for thousands of asbestos victims and their families



We have the knowledge and experience to handle cases in all 50 states



We offer free online appointments and can arrange for representatives to meet you within just one mile of your home.















Office Address:7271 Wurzbach Pkwy, Suite 1002 San Antonio, TX 78240



(Headquartered in Texas, but handling cases throughout the United States)



Phone: 800-793-4540Email: use our Contact Us form




Calculate Your Case Value

### The Marines, Asbestos Exposure, and Mesothelioma

U.S. Marine Corps veterans are at high risk for mesothelioma due to the use of asbestos in the military. Many veterans were exposed to asbestos during their time in the service and now may develop mesothelioma and other related illnesses. If you are a Marine veteran with mesothelioma, you may qualify for benefits and compensation. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you might be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim and much more. 













Why Are U.S. Marine Veterans at High Risk for Mesothelioma? 



All military veterans are at a higher risk for developing mesothelioma than the general population. Approximately 30% of all diagnoses each year in the U.S. are in veterans of any military branch. 



The Marine Corps' problems with mesothelioma and other related diseases stem from the U.S. government’s use of asbestos in the past. The military used asbestos in insulation and fireproofing materials in both land installations and naval vessels. 



Throughout much of the 20th Century, the Navy and Marines carried out their missions on ships that contained tons of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs). Federal regulations and the Bureau of Ships required the use of ACMs as insulation and fireproofing. 



Though asbestos was used by the Navy and other armed services as early as the mid-1800s, the largest exposure occurred in the 40 years between World War II and the midpoint of the Cold War. 



Which Marines Are Most at Risk for Mesothelioma? 



Asbestos exposure is a known cause of mesothelioma, but not everyone exposed will be diagnosed with mesothelioma. Even among veterans with high exposure rates, mesothelioma is rare. 



No amount of asbestos exosure is safe, but the Marine veterans with the highest risk for mesothelioma were repeatedly exposed to asbestos. Some of the military roles that put veterans at the greatest risk for mesothelioma include: 




Construction



Demolition



Insulation repair and installation



Boiler work



Engine work



Mechanics



Work on ships or in shipyards




What Are the VA Benefits for Marines Exposed to Asbestos? 



The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) offers benefits to Marine veterans who meet two main qualifications: 




They have an illness caused by asbestos exposure. 



They were exposed to asbestos during their time in the service. 




Veterans who qualify are entitled to various types of VA benefits: 




Monthly Disability Compensation. Mesothelioma and asbestos lung cancer have a 100% VA disability rating. Veterans with these illnesses can get full disability compensation. 



Special Monthly Compensation. Veterans whose illnesses require them to hire in-home care may qualify for this additional compensation. 



Healthcare. Veterans with mesothelioma benefit from specialist cancer and mesothelioma care at VA medical facilities across the country. 




Families of Marine veterans may also qualify for VA benefits. Monthly disability amounts account for spouses, dependent children, and, in some cases, parents. 



Families can also claim Dependency and Indemnity Compensation after a veteran dies from mesothelioma. Funeral benefits are also available. 



How to File a Claim for VA Benefits



If you qualify for VA benefits for mesothelioma, you must file a claim. It can take a few months to process a VA benefits claim and receive compensation, so it's important to start immediately. 



Veterans can file in person or online and must submit three critical pieces of information: 




Service records showing a position in the military that could have exposed you to asbestos



Medical records indicating a diagnosis of an asbestos illness



A signed statement from a doctor indicating that your illness is connected to asbestos exposure




A VA claim can be complicated. You can rely on a VSO (Veterans Service Organization) representative to help you or contact an experienced asbestos attorney to help you file. 



Filing and getting benefits should be straightforward, but proving your past asbestos exposure can get complicated. These professionals will help you present the evidence necessary to get your benefits. 



Can You Sue the MIlitary for Asbestos Exposure?



Veterans cannot sue the military or the federal government over past asbestos exposure. You do have other options in addition to VA benefits to receive additional compensation: 




Mesothelioma Lawsuit. Marine Corps veterans can sue the companies that supplied the military with asbestos. These lawsuits often end in settlements for the veteran. 



Asbestos Trust Fund Claim. Asbestos companies that went bankrupt created asbestos trust funds to compensate victims. You may qualify for one or more of these trusts.




Contact a mesothelioma law firm or lawyer to discuss these options. They do not impact your VA claims or lower your benefit amounts. 



Where Did the Marine Corps Use Asbestos? 



U.S. Marines have always been deployed for a wide range of missions, often working with other military branches. This put them at risk of exposure to asbestos in all types of equipment, vehicles, ships, aircraft, and buildings. 



Two of the most important sources of asbestos exposure in Marines were on ships (and in shipyards) and in buildings on bases. 



Asbestos in Ships and Shipyards



U.S. Navy veterans have the highest rates of asbestos illnesses of any military branch because of how much asbestos was used in ships. Marines often served on or were transported on these ships, putting them at risk. 



During the decades that the military used asbestos, nearly every component of vessels contained asbestos materials. Asbestos was so important on ships because it is lightweight and excellent at insulating and protecting against fire. 



Some of the components of ships that contained asbestos include: 




Insulation in boilers, turbines, and engines



Pipe wrapping



Wall panels



Ceiling tiles



Fireproofing 



Firefighting gear



Gaskets



Valves




Asbestos in Marine Corps Bases



Marines were also exposed to asbestos in onshore installations, especially those built during the Corps’ wartime expansion. Once again, government regulations required the use of asbestos as fireproofing and insulation materials. 



In both military and civilian industries, construction used asbestos more than any other. Buildings on many bases were constructed with asbestos in insulation, drywall, flooring, roofing materials, siding, and more.



Some Marine Corps bases continued to pose risks long after asbestos use stopped. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency listed Arizona's Yuma Marine Corps Air Station as a Superfund site in 1990 due to asbestos and other contaminants. 



Marine Corps Bases Known to Have Asbestos 




Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, Oceanside, California



Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, Jacksonville, North Carolina 



Marine Corps Air-Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms, Twentynine Palms, California 



Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, Havelock, North Carolina 



Marine Corps Recruit Depot San Diego, San Diego, California 



Marine Corps Recruit Depot Parris Island, Beaufort, South Carolina 



Marine Corps Base Hawaii, Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii 



Marine Corps Base Quantico, Quantico, Virginia 



Mountain Warfare Training Center, Bridgeport, California 



Marine Corps Detachment, Guantanamo Naval Base, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba 



Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni, Iwakuni, Japan 



Marine Corps Base Camp Smedley Butler, Okinawa 



Marine Corps Air Station Yuma, Yuma, Arizona 



Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, Miramar, California 



Camp H.M. Smith, Marine Corps Base Hawaii, Aiea, Hawaii 



Marine Barracks, Washington, D.C. 



Henderson Hall, Arlington, Virginia 




Are Current Marines at Risk of Asbestos Exposure? 



The military used asbestos so heavily that it remains a risk to Marines today. It lingers mostly in older buildings on bases. When disrupted for repairs or due to deterioration over time, these asbestos materials pose an exposure risk. 



The Marine Corps has several programs in place to protect current service men and women from asbestos and its dangers: 




The Marine Corps Asbestos Safety Program. This program institutes projects to abate asbestos from many Marine Corps installations. It provides training and safety gear for the men and women doing the work. 



The Marine Corps Environmental Compliance and Protection Program. The Marine Corps must comply with federal and state environmental and safety regulations. This program ensures compliance with asbestos and other regulations. 



The Asbestos Medical Surveillance Program. This U.S. Navy program includes the Marine Corps and keeps a record of asbestos exposure in service men and women. It also gives them access to medical screenings for asbestos illnesses. 




Additional Information and Legal Assistance



Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. Keep in mind that if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for considerable compensation. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Asbestos Abatement and Safety Regulations

Safe asbestos abatement is the removal of asbestos materials that could cause exposure and illnesses, like malignant mesothelioma. Asbestos abatement is regulated by federal, state, and local laws. Always hire a licensed professional to inspect, test, and remove asbestos. 



If you suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













The Dangers of Asbestos and Exposure



Asbestos is a natural but harmful mineral. It has long been mined and used in multiple industries, primarily as an insulator. In the U.S., asbestos was heavily used in construction. As a result, many buildings today still contain older asbestos materials. 



When asbestos is properly contained, it poses little risk. When asbestos is disturbed by repairs, renovations, demolition, or simply deteriorates over time, it becomes dangerous. 



Disturbed asbestos releases tiny fibers that anyone in the area can inhale or even ingest. Inside the body, asbestos fibers cause damage to tissue and cells. In some people, asbestos exposure causes illnesses years later: 




Mesothelioma



Lung cancer



Asbestosis



Other respiratory illnesses




Safe asbestos abatement is necessary to minimize the risk of disturbing asbestos materials in buildings and causing exposure. 



About Asbestos Abatement



Asbestos abatement isn't always necessary if you find asbestos in your home. Even if an inspector says abatement is unnecessary, you can hire a professional to do it anyway for peace of mind. But keep in mind that abating asbestos poses its own risks. It is often safer to leave secure asbestos in place. 



What Is Asbestos Abatement? 



Asbestos abatement is the safe, professional removal of asbestos from a building. Abatement is often the last option in dealing with asbestos in the home. Disturbing asbestos can be more dangerous than leaving it alone in certain situations. 



Before deciding to remove asbestos in your home, listen to the advice of a professional, licensed inspector. 



How to Hire an Asbestos Abatement Company



Asbestos abatement should only be done by licensed professionals. They are trained to complete the job safely and are licensed by the state to ensure they have met training and safety requirements. Never try to remove asbestos from your home, and never hire a professional who is not licensed. 



Keep these tips and considerations in mind when hiring an asbestos abatement professional: 




It's best to hire different companies for asbestos inspection and removal. This prevents conflicts of interest. 



Request licensing credentials before hiring a company. It's also a good idea to check with local agencies and the Better Business Bureau to find out if a company has committed any safety violations or has any legal actions against them. 



The company should give you a written contract detailing the project plan and how it adheres to federal and state asbestos regulations. 



Talk to the company about their cleanup plan. Residual asbestos fibers from an abatement project pose a serious risk. They should follow best practices, including wetting asbestos materials and using HEPA vacuums to clean the area. 




Where Is Asbestos in Homes? 



While asbestos is very harmful to human health, having it in your home does not necessarily pose an urgent risk. Asbestos becomes dangerous when it deteriorates or is damaged. 



If you have asbestos in good condition in your home, it is safe to leave it alone. Some of the areas, materials, and products in your home that might contain asbestos include: 




Boilers, pipes, and duct insulation



Vinyl flooring and adhesives



Cement sheet, paper, and millboard insulation around furnaces or woodburning stoves



Gaskets in woodburning stoves and furnaces



Joint compounds and patching materials



Textured pains



Spray-on soundproofing or decorative material



Roofing and siding shingles



Artificial embers used in gas fireplaces



Stovetop pads




The safest way to manage these asbestos materials in good condition is to leave them alone. Asbestos materials become dangerous when disturbed or damaged. This is when they can release harmful fibers. 



When Is it Important to Test for Asbestos in the Home? 



Many homes do not contain asbestos and never need to test for it. It can be difficult for non-professionals to identify materials in their homes that might contain asbestos. Consider testing for asbestos in these situations: 




Your house was built before 1980, and you don't know if it contains asbestos materials. 



You are planning to do some home remodeling or renovations. 



A disaster has damaged your home, damaging materials that might contain asbestos. 



You find old, crumbling materials in the home that have deteriorated over time and that might contain asbestos. 




Testing for Asbestos in the Home



Many, but not all, homes constructed before the 1980s contain asbestos in these materials. The only way to be certain you have asbestos is to have a professional confirm its presence. 



Licensed asbestos professionals perform visual inspections of suspected asbestos materials. They then remove small samples to send to a lab for testing. Lab workers examine the samples and determine the asbestos content in them. 



What if I Have Damaged Asbestos in the Home?



Disturbed asbestos materials are dangerous. If you find damaged materials in the home that you suspect might contain asbestos, follow these steps:




Keep as many people out of that area as possible, including all children. 



Limit activity in that area of the home. 



Leave the materials alone. Avoid sweeping or vacuuming. 



If you can close off the area, do so. 



Call an inspector or abatement professional immediately. 




If you have asbestos, the professional inspector will recommend next steps. If it is encapsulated, they will likely recommend leaving it in place and avoiding disturbing it. 



If the asbestos is damaged, they can recommend encapsulation or abatement. Encapsulation means sealing the material to bind asbestos fibers together. This prevents them from releasing and causing harm. 



What Happens During Asbestos Abatement Projects?



The first step in asbestos abatement is to hire an inspector. Once the inspector confirms the presence of asbestos, an abatement team takes over with the following steps: 




The abatement professional surveys the area to create a plan for removing asbestos materials. 



The team establishes a work area and prepares it for safe removal. 



They enclose the area with plastic sheeting to create a seal and post warning signs outside. They also cover anything in the work area that will not be abated. 



The team sets up negative air pressure units to further prevent asbestos fibers from leaving the work area and contaminating the rest of the house or the outdoors. 



They then wet all asbestos materials to keep fibers from becoming airborne. 



The abatement team removes asbestos materials and seals them in approved, air-tight containers. The containers are also leak-proof, as the asbestos materials should be wet when contained. 



Specially designated vehicles take the containers to a landfill qualified to handle asbestos waste. 



The asbestos team cleans the work area using wet wipes and HEPA filter vacuums. 



The team removes and disposes of their protective clothing and plastic used to seal the area. 




Asbestos Today



According to the September 2004 issue of the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, asbestos is still a threat to over a million U.S. workers. Workers today at the greatest risk of exposure are construction workers and those who repair and maintain equipment and buildings with asbestos. 



Although most buildings and structures built after the 1980s do not contain asbestos, there is still a small possibility that some may. 



Further, asbestos is still in many imported and aftermarket automotive products, such as brake pads, clutches, and gaskets. These put mechanics and hobbyists at risk of exposure. 



If you have been exposed to asbestos, contact a mesothelioma lawyer to learn about your rights and legal options. You could be entitled to compensation. 



Getting Legal Help for Exposure to Asbestos



Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Mesothelioma Settlements

Mesothelioma settlements average from $1 million to $1.4 million in compensation for victims of asbestos exposure. Companies that exposed workers to asbestos pay settlements to avoid going to trial. A trial takes longer, while a settlement compensates victims and families more quickly.  



If you were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you might be entitled to considerable compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.






 




What Are Mesothelioma Settlements?



Mesothelioma and asbestos lawsuits rarely go to trial. They usually end in settlements. A mesothelioma settlement is an amount of compensation the defendants agree to pay the plaintiffs. 



To get a settlement, the victim of asbestos exposure files a lawsuit against the companies that made or provided the asbestos materials. Once their lawyers build a strong case, they negotiate with the defendants' lawyers to get a fair amount. 



If a lawsuit stalls during settlement negotiations, it might go to trial. In that case, instead of a settlement, the plaintiff has a chance of getting a jury award. If they lose the trial, they get no compensation. 



Even after a win in a trial, the defendants can appeal, attempt to reduce the verdict amount, or have the verdict overturned.



How Do I Know if I’m Eligible for a Mesothelioma Settlement?



The best way to determine your eligibility is to consult with an experienced mesothelioma cancer lawyer or law firm. You can seek a mesothelioma settlement if you are diagnosed with an asbestos illness. 



Nearly all cases of asbestos illnesses, like mesothelioma, are preventable. Your lawyer can find one or more companies to hold liable for your resulting expenses. Identifying these responsible entities is crucial in mesothelioma cases because it can significantly impact the compensation you receive. If your exposure involved multiple companies or asbestos products, pinpointing each liable party can strengthen your case.



An experienced mesothelioma attorney plays a vital role in this process. They conduct thorough investigations, reviewing employment records, military service history, and residential details to identify all accountable entities. This comprehensive approach not only bolsters your claim but also enhances the potential for a higher settlement.



Gathering extensive evidence is key. By linking specific companies to your asbestos exposure, your attorney can effectively negotiate for a fair settlement or build a compelling court case. Legal expertise in mesothelioma litigation is essential, as specialized lawyers navigate the complexities of the legal landscape, ensuring that all responsible parties are held accountable.



Partnering with a qualified attorney maximizes your chances of securing the maximum compensation available for your mesothelioma claim. This strategic approach ensures that you are not just seeking justice but also mitigating the financial burdens associated with your condition.



Loved ones are also often eligible to file a lawsuit and get a settlement. You can file a wrongful death lawsuit if you lost a loved one to asbestos exposure. 





Mylon B.



“The doctors I met said there was nothing that could be done for me. One said I should make funeral arrangements. You directed me to the right doctor and so here I am. You guys were my life saver. Without your firm, I would not have had the financial resources or medical assistance I needed so badly.”





How Do I Get a Mesothelioma Settlement?



If you’re eligible for a settlement, you must work with an experienced lawyer. The process involves many steps and complicated laws. For the best results, you need a good asbestos attorney. 



Filing a Lawsuit



To get a settlement, you have to file a lawsuit against one or more defendants. Your lawyer will do the research to identify defendants and will then file on your behalf. You will then wait for a response. Some defendants will immediately offer a settlement.



Discovery



Most defendants will not immediately settle but will respond to the suit with a denial of negligence. This opens a discovery period. Both sides gather information to build a case.



Settlement Negotiations



Most defendants are prepared to negotiate a settlement, even if they still deny negligence. Your lawyer will represent you in these negotiations to get the maximum amount you are entitled to.



Trial



If both sides disagree on a settlement, you can take the case to trial. A jury listens to and gives a verdict based on evidence from each side. Sometimes, a defendant will agree to settle during the trial, ending it.



If you, as the plaintiff, win the trial, the jury will award you an amount of damages to be paid by the defendants. This is not always the end, though. They can and often do appeal to reduce the amount or to overturn the verdict.



How Are Settlement Amounts Decided?



The amount you get from a settlement is essential. This money covers costly medical expenses, ongoing care, and your lost wages and support for dependents. 



Multiple factors help determine mesothelioma settlement amounts: 




Companies Involved. You may be entitled to more compensation if multiple companies exposed you to asbestos. Those companies' actions also count. The more negligent their actions, the more they may compensate you. 



Extent of the Exposure. The longer you were exposed to asbestos and the greater the amount, the more compensation you may receive. 



Severity of the Illness. Your diagnosis and extent of illness are very important in determining a settlement amount. The sicker you are, the more compensation you need. 



Medical Expenses. During negotiations for a settlement, both sides will consider how much you have paid in medical bills, outstanding bills, and expected future expenses for treatment, support, and home care. 



Lost Wages. If you can no longer work, your settlement should cover lost wages. 



Dependents. Your dependents also come into consideration because you may be unable to support them because of your illness. 



Pain and Suffering. Negotiations also consider non-economic damages, often called pain and suffering expenses. These are the costs that cannot be monetized, like physical pain, emotional distress, and loss of companionship for loved ones. 




How Much Can I Get for a Mesothelioma Settlement?



Because settlement amounts vary so much by case, there is no way to predict an exact amount you might get. Your lawyer will go through all the details of your situation to determine a fair amount. They will then seek that amount through negotiations with the defendants' lawyers.



What Is the Average Mesothelioma Settlement?



Mesothelioma and asbestos lawsuits most often end in settlements. Very few go to trial, where a jury determines the damages amounts. Settlement amounts average between $1 million and $1.4 million. 



The highest payouts for mesothelioma lawsuits are typically jury awards. When a case goes to trial, there is a risk that the plaintiff will lose. On the other hand, if they win, the jury will often award a large amount, often tens of millions of dollars. 




 




FAQs About Mesothelioma Settlements



If you have more questions about mesothelioma settlements, contact an experienced asbestos law firm in your area. 



Do I Have to Work with a Lawyer to Get a Mesothelioma Settlement?



Legal representation is not required for seeking a settlement, but it is strongly recommended. Asbestos lawsuits are complicated. The defendants will have big legal teams behind them. You need experienced lawyers who have helped other asbestos victims for the best chance of getting a settlement.



What if I Can't Afford a Lawyer? 



Reputable asbestos attorneys never charge clients a fee until they win a settlement. You should not have to pay anything until they win your case. A law firm that requires up-front fees doesn't have the resources to investigate and pursue your claim.



Does Everyone with Mesothelioma Get a Settlement? 



A mesothelioma diagnosis is almost always caused by negligent asbestos exposure. If you have mesothelioma, you are likely eligible to receive compensation of some type. 



How Does the Age of Diagnosis Affect Mesothelioma Settlement Amounts?



The age at which an individual is diagnosed with mesothelioma plays a pivotal role in determining settlement amounts. Here's a breakdown of how different age groups might experience varying settlement outcomes:




Younger Individuals (Ages 45-50): Younger individuals often receive higher settlements. This is primarily due to the longer duration of their potential exposure to asbestos and the significant impact on their future earning capacity. With many working years ahead of them, the financial losses and emotional toll are deemed greater.



Older Adults (Ages 70s and 80s): For older adults, settlements might be comparatively lower. This is typically because their earnings may decrease or cease due to retirement. Furthermore, any settlement negotiation could incorporate considerations of existing health issues common in older age, which may not be directly tied to asbestos exposure.




In essence, the settlement process evaluates both the economic impact and life expectancy factors, resulting in variances based on age at diagnosis.



If My Family Member Died of Mesothelioma, Can I Get a Settlement? 



Yes, you can file a wrongful death lawsuit to seek compensation. If your loved one filed a personal injury lawsuit but passed away before it concluded, you can continue the case, begin a wrongful death suit, or let their estate continue. 



Is it Better to Settle or Go to Trial?



Your lawyer can advise you on this, but a settlement is the better choice for most people. Jury verdicts usually award more money than settlements, but they take much longer. With mesothelioma, time is limited, so a settlement makes sense. Also, when going to trial, you run the risk of getting nothing at all. 



Will My Mesothelioma Settlement Be Taxed? 



Most of your settlement is unlikely to be taxed. You may need to pay taxes on a portion of the settlement covering lost wages. 



How Long Does it Take to Get an Asbestos Mesothelioma Lawsuit Settlement? 



A settlement may take just a couple of months but could take a year or more to resolve. A settlement typically takes much less time to resolve than a lawsuit that goes to trial.



How Does the Jurisdiction Where a Claim is Filed Influence Mesothelioma Settlements?



Jurisdiction plays a critical role in shaping the outcomes of mesothelioma settlements due to its influence on legal precedents and trial dynamics. Different states have varying legal landscapes, which can lead to significantly different settlement amounts.



Factors That Affect Settlement Amounts:




State Laws and Precedents: Some states have historical precedents that favor plaintiffs, including those in personal injury and toxic exposure cases. These states might have more empathetic juries and lenient laws that facilitate higher settlements in asbestos-related cases.



Court Congestion: The backlog of cases in a state's court system can also impact the speed and nature of settlements. In congested courts, defendants might prefer to settle quickly to avoid lengthy legal battles, potentially increasing the settlement amount.



Trial Conditions and Local Legal Norms: Trial procedures and local customs can vary widely. Jurisdictions known for thorough and lengthy trials might encourage defendants to opt for settlements to reduce costs and legal exposure.




Strategic Considerations:




Legal Navigability: Attorneys experienced in mesothelioma lawsuits will analyze differing historical outcomes and current caseloads as part of their strategy to enhance compensation potential. They will select the jurisdiction carefully, aiming for an environment conducive to favorable outcomes.



National Versus Local Expertise: Leveraging a law firm with a national presence often enhances representation. These firms navigate state-specific legal complexities efficiently, as they are familiar with how different jurisdictions can impact settlement negotiations.




In essence, where you file your mesothelioma claim can markedly influence the settlement you receive. By understanding jurisdictional nuances and selecting the right legal support, you enhance your chances of securing a compensation package that reflects your case's merits.



Examples of Large Asbestos Settlements



Asbestos lawsuits vary widely in how they end for victims. Many of the most important cases have resulted in significant settlements for plaintiffs:



Union Carbide



In 2006, former plastic molder David Bakkie was awarded $18.5 million by a California jury in his lawsuit against Union Carbide. 



The 49-year-old Sacramento resident developed mesothelioma as a result of on-the-job asbestos exposure. He died of asbestos cancer on July 17, 2007.



In June of 2012, a jury in Los Angeles awarded $48 million to the family of Bobbie Izell, a former contractor who developed mesothelioma after inhaling asbestos fibers while performing home inspections throughout his career. 



His family filed a lawsuit against Union Carbide, which made many asbestos-containing home construction materials.



U.S. Engineering Co.



Nancy Lopez, a former Jackson County, Missouri, court employee, received $10 million after being exposed to asbestos during the courthouse renovations while working as a judicial administrative assistant.



The U.S. Engineering Co. started renovating the courthouse in 1983. Lopez was continuously exposed to asbestos each day she reported to work.



Decades later, she was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma. Lopez passed away in 2010, but her surviving family continued her lawsuit and won the settlement amount.



Johns Manville and Travelers Insurance Corporations



A federal judge ordered the Travelers insurance corporation to pay $500 million to several victims exposed to asbestos while working for Johns Manville. 



It is one of the largest settlement amounts in asbestos litigation history. The Travelers Indemnity Company and the Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America were the insurers for Johns Manville.



The Crane Company



In 2012, Doris K. Dummit, the widow of Robert Dummit, won a settlement of $8 million after her husband died from mesothelioma due to prolonged exposure at work. 



A United States Navy veteran, Robert worked around asbestos for decades while employed by Crane Company.



Crane denied any wrongdoing and argued they were not liable due to the government contract defense. Still, it was decided that the company was 99% responsible for Ronald’s health complications after hiding known information about asbestos's hazardous effects.



W.R. Grace & Co.



In 2011, a judge in Montana approved one of the largest settlements in history against W.R. Grace & Co. in Libby, Montana. The settlement was $43 million, and the individual settlement amounts ranged from $500 to around $60,000 per plaintiff.



A few years earlier, in 2009, the company was also fined $54 million by the United States government for cleanup costs. The mine was littered with vermiculite, asbestos, and other dangerous products that put the public at risk.



Dana Corporation and Felt Products MFG Co.



The largest payout to asbestos victims in New York occurred in 2017. Edward Robaey and his wife Marlena started a lawsuit against Dana, Fel-Pro, and a few other companies after Edward was diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma in 2012. 



Edward spent decades working on cars and encountered asbestos in car parts made by these and other companies.



Dana was 40 percent liable for his illness, having made the gaskets Edward used in car repairs. The gaskets were made with asbestos. Fel-Pro was determined to be 30 percent liable. 



The award given to the Robaeys was $75 million, including $50 million for pain and suffering and $25 million for loss of consortium.



Help with Your Settlement



Don’t forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. This packet is a crucial step towards understanding your legal rights and pursuing the compensation you deserve.



For additional legal assistance or questions, contact us at 800-793-4540. Our dedicated team is here to provide you with the support and guidance you need.



In addition to legal resources, we understand the importance of emotional support during this challenging time. Our comprehensive guides are designed to offer not only legal advice but also emotional and informational support tailored to your specific situation. Whether you have questions about treatment options or need someone to talk to, we're just a phone call away.



Feel empowered to reach out at any time—our experts are committed to helping you navigate both the legal and emotional aspects of your journey.



Understanding the Emotional Challenges of a Mesothelioma Diagnosis



Patients and their families encounter a range of emotional challenges when faced with a mesothelioma diagnosis.



Grief and Anger



The initial reactions often include shock and disbelief, swiftly followed by grief and anger. This anger may stem from the sudden disruption of plans and dreams, or from the perceived injustice of the illness.



Anxiety and Fear



Anxiety is a common companion, as both patients and families grapple with the uncertainty of treatment outcomes and possible financial burdens. Fear of the unknown can be paralyzing, creating an emotional rollercoaster as they navigate this difficult journey.



Depression and Isolation



Feelings of depression may arise, driven by the sense of isolation that such a diagnosis can induce. Patients and their families may feel cut off from their normal lives, which often leads to a profound sense of loneliness.



Coping and Legal Processes



Navigating the legal process, especially in pursuit of any due compensation, adds another layer of stress. It becomes imperative to find emotional balance while handling legal matters, which are often complex and time-consuming.



Support Systems



Fortunately, many find solace in dedicated mental health support networks. Connecting with specialized resources such as mental health professionals and support groups can provide much-needed relief and companionship. These resources, accessible through healthcare providers and legal advisors, help manage the emotional upheaval brought on by a mesothelioma diagnosis.



Take Action Now: Secure Your Future with Expert Legal Help



If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to significant financial compensation. Our dedicated team of mesothelioma lawyers is here to guide you through every step of the legal process, ensuring your rights are protected and you receive the justice you deserve.



📄 Get Your Free Financial Compensation Packet!Fill out our simple form today to receive a comprehensive packet with details about experienced asbestos and mesothelioma law firms and lawyers in your area [near me], along with essential resources to help you make informed decisions about your case.



💡 Why Choose Us?




Decades of experience handling asbestos-related cases.



No upfront fees – you only pay if we win your case.



Personalized, compassionate support to help you focus on your health.




📞 Contact Us Today for Additional Legal Assistance and Advice!Call us at 800-793-4540 to speak with our team. Don’t wait—your time to file a claim is limited, and your family’s financial future could depend on taking action now.



You’re not alone in this fight. Let us help you secure the justice and compensation you deserve.

### The Asbestos Industry Cover-ups

Many companies used asbestos and made asbestos products in the past, putting workers and consumers at risk for mesothelioma and other illnesses. Court documents in lawsuits have proven over and over again that companies covered up the dangers of asbestos to save costs and avoid litigation. 



If you or a loved one have mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related cancer, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in trusts set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













A Long History of Hiding Asbestos Risks




Asbestos was first found to be detrimental to human health in the 1800s. In 1928, physicians coined the medical term asbestosis to describe the lung symptoms resulting from asbestos exposure.





In the 1930s, doctors and researchers began to connect asbestos exposure to lung cancer. At the same time, they began to identify more cases of mesothelioma, a rare cancer only caused by exposure to asbestos. 





It would still be many more years before regulations protected workers from the asbestos dust that caused asbestosis and other illnesses. 





Many companies, but especially those that mined, produced, and supplied asbestos, had a vested interest in hiding the known dangers of asbestos exposure. 





Executives in asbestos companies actively covered up health information related to asbestos. Some companies even altered the insurance documentation that warned of the dangers of asbestos exposure. 





These companies hid the evidence and knew of the inherent risks. Many didn’t even reduce the production and use of asbestos in the slightest bit.





As early as the 1930s, victims started filing lawsuits against their employers after being diagnosed with asbestosis. Companies began settling the lawsuits on the condition that no more lawsuits would come about regarding asbestos.





After the initial asbestos lawsuits, employees underwent health screenings with their employers' consent. It has been documented that many employers once again covered up the evidence by altering the health study results.





The issues didn’t go unnoticed by physicians, who then were discovering that not only did asbestos cause lung issues and difficulty with breathing, but also lung cancer. 





Eventually, after decades, the complete truth about asbestos came to light. Workers began suing companies for damages and winning millions in compensation. Many companies went bankrupt and set up asbestos trust funds to compensate victims. 




Companies That Knew About and Hid Asbestos Dangers



Many companies hid the risks of asbestos exposure from workers and consumers. Some of the biggest cover-ups occurred in companies that supplied asbestos and made asbestos products. Insurance companies that stood to lose a lot of money were also involved in cover-ups. 



Johns Manville 



Johns Manville was once the largest producer of asbestos materials, mostly made for the construction industry. It also mined and supplied asbestos to other companies. 



In 1943, after a six-year study and research on asbestos, Dr. LeRoy Gardner of the Saranac Laboratory in New York provided the Johns-Manville Corporation with the detailed results of his research. He found asbestos to be carcinogenic, meaning that it causes cancer.



At the Johns-Manville Corporation’s request, none of the findings were made public nor available to any workers employed at Johns-Manville. In addition, the asbestos industry ensured that Dr. Gardner’s results were suppressed by altering and creating a false report.



Lewis H. Brown, who became company president in 1929, played a big role in Johns Manville's asbestos cover-up. In a deposition that took place in the 1980s, evidence came to light that he actively and callously disregarded worker health to save money. 



More than one doctor notified Brown and other company executives of asbestos dangers and illnesses in workers. They ignored, covered up, and hid this information from workers for decades. 



Raybestos-Manhattan



Raybestos-Manhattan made asbestos textiles and friction products, like automobile brakes and clutches. The company was found to have collaborated with Johns Manville in the asbestos cover-up. 



The information came from the Sumner Simpson Papers. Simpson was the president of Raybestos-Manhattan in the 1930s and 1940s. Simpson and his company worked with Johns Manville to convince an insurance company to alter a study that showed asbestos exposure could cause fatal asbestosis. 



The papers, which came to light during lawsuits, also showed that Simpson pressured magazine journalists to avoid publishing articles that showed asbestos in a bad light. 



Bendix Corporation



Bendix, which is today a subsidiary of Honeywell, made brakes and clutches with asbestos for decades, beginning in 1939. A Bendix executive communicated with an executive at Johns Manville's Quebec asbestos mine about a report outlining the dangers of asbestos. 



The Johns Manville executive encouraged him not to take it seriously. The mine also sent Bendix misleading reports about asbestos dangers. 



Bendix did not follow up on the concerns about asbestos coming from Johns Manville mines. It was misled by the larger company but also played its own role in the cover-up. Bendix still made auto parts with asbestos as late as the 1990s. 



Metropolitan Life



The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company insured several companies that supplied or used asbestos. It participated with many of those companies in covering up information about asbestos health risks. 



As early as 1932, Metropolitan Life knew about the high levels of asbestos fibers in the Johns Manville plant in Manville, New Jersey. It helped block inspections at the facility that might have brought the dangers to light. It also actively lied to government officials, downplaying the degree of asbestosis in workers at the plant. 



A physician working at an Illinois Johns Manville plant suggested to Metropolitan Life that the company hang signs warning workers of the dangers of asbestos. The company's employee, Dr. Anthony Lanza, objected to the idea, wanting to avoid legal problems. 



Dr. Lanza already knew about the dangers at that time due to his research. His study from the 1930s found that half of workers exposed to asbestos had signs of asbestosis. He found that 87% of workers exposed for longer had signs of lung diseases. 



Babcock & Wilcox



Even later, in the 1970s, companies were still covering up vital information about asbestos in their products and its risks. Babcock & Wilcox made boilers and related products with asbestos insulation. 



A memo from the company written in 1978 shows that the company knew about the dangers of asbestos and that it actively violated OSHA safety guidelines for workers. In the memo, the company acknowledged the violations and stated it would investigate but also decided not to warn workers. 



Johnson & Johnson



A more recent example of asbestos health cover-ups comes from Johnson & Johnson, which makes products with talc. Talc is a natural mineral that is often contaminated with asbestos when mined. The company is supposed to refine the talc to remove any asbestos and make it safe for consumers. 



Many people who used Johnson & Johnson talcum powder products for years have come forward with allegations that asbestos in them caused cancer. Many of these victims are women who developed ovarian cancer. 



An investigative report published in 2018 found that Johnson & Johnson knew about asbestos in its products as early as the 1970s. Company documents show that executives knew about testing that found asbestos in talcum powder but did not report the results.



The company eventually ended sales of talcum powder products, but not before facing thousands of lawsuits over asbestos exposure and cancer. 



Regulating Asbestos



By 1971, it had already been over 40 years since the first asbestos-related lawsuits. 



Because of covert actions, like companies persuading publications not to write about the dangers of asbestos, it took too long for asbestos to be recognized as a dangerous product.



The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) finally took notice and regulated the use of asbestos.



At first, OSHA mandated an emergency temporary standard (ETS) for exposure to asbestos dust in December of 1974. Shortly after, the temporary standard became a permanent standard.



Ultimately, the details regarding the dangers of asbestos became widespread, and it became obvious that businesses had been suppressing this information for decades.



The dangers of asbestos became so prevalent that in 1979, the EPA announced it would regulate asbestos under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). 



Yet, after a stampede of protests stating that too many people would be out of a job, the EPA decided not to pursue the regulations.



Nonetheless, after a 10-year study on the dangers of asbestos and how it affects humans, the EPA finally banned the use of all asbestos in 1989. 



However, asbestos industry members appealed the ban, and unfortunately, they won. Asbestos is not completely banned in the U.S.



Companies Put Profits Over Worker Health



Although it was established that asbestos was dangerous decades before the EPA’s regulation, companies continued to stifle any information regarding the hazards of the mineral. 



Even after physicians, scientists, and even asbestos companies provided details of the dangers after conducting studies, companies still wouldn’t scale back on asbestos usage or inform workers of the dangers. The reason behind the great cover-ups comes down to money.



When Lewis Brown, the president of Johns Manville, was asked if he would let his workers die if it meant continuing to use the mineral, he replied, “Yes; we save a lot of money that way.” This statement came out in a 1984 deposition. 



Records show that in 1966, the director of purchasing at Bendix, an asbestos manufacturing company, stated, “If you have enjoyed a good life while working with asbestos, why not die from it?”



Many of these companies have had to pay for the harm they caused workers. If you have an asbestos illness, a mesothelioma lawyer can help you take legal action and seek compensation. 



Getting Legal Help for Asbestos Exposure



Keep in mind that you may be eligible for considerable compensation if you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related cancer. Don't forget to fill out our form for our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area.

### Mesothelioma Stages

There are four stages of mesothelioma that describe how far the cancer has spread. Patients diagnosed with mesothelioma also receive a stage. The stage informs treatment and helps doctors estimate a prognosis and life expectancy. 



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, awaiting those who've been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













What Are the Four Stages of Mesothelioma? 



All types of cancer have four stages. A stage describes the location of the tumors in the body. The four stages of mesothelioma include: 




Stage 1 - The tumors are in the mesothelium of one lung. 



Stage 2 - The tumors have spread beyond the mesothelium to other organs, such as nearby lymph nodes. 



Stage 3 - The tumors have spread deeper into nearby tissues and more distant lymph nodes. 



Stage 4 - The tumors have spread to distant parts of the body. This is called metastasis. 




About Cancer Staging



Mesothelioma and other cancers are staged to describe the extent of the cancer. TNM is the most commonly used staging system for all cancers. There are also alternative staging systems used for mesothelioma: 




Brigham Staging System



Butchart Staging System




Also important in mesothelioma is the classification of resectable or non-resectable. This broad classification refers to cancer that can be treated with surgery and cancer that has spread too far for surgery. 



Why Do Doctors Stage Mesothelioma? 



Staging is a standard part of mesothelioma diagnosis. It provides important and detailed information about where the cancer is in the body. Reassessing the stage over time helps doctors determine how fast the cancer is spreading and how effective treatments are. 



The cancer stage also helps the medical team estimate a patient's prognosis. The stage is one important determining factor in life expectancy. 



TNM Staging for Mesothelioma



Doctors created a staging system known as the TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors in the 1990s. TNM stands for Tumor Node Metastasis.



Although there are other accepted staging systems, the TNM staging system is the most widely accepted and used by mesothelioma doctors. It helps classify the following stages:



Stage 1: Localized Mesothelioma



Stage 1 is the first stage of mesothelioma. It’s broken up into either stage IA or stage IB. At this point, the cancer is still localized, and patients have the best chances of successful treatment.



Stage 1A is diagnosed when the cancer is located in either the lining of one side of the chest wall or the chest cavity lining between the lungs. Cancer has not yet spread at this stage from these points in the body.



Stage 1B is diagnosed when the cancer is found in both the lining of the chest walls and the lining of the chest cavity. Again, cancer has not yet spread from these points.



Stage 2: The First Advanced Stage



When patients are in stage 2, the cancer is no longer localized, and they are now in the first phase of the advanced stage of the disease. 



During this stage, the cancer is not only in the lining of the chest wall and chest cavity but also in the lining that protects the lungs and the diaphragm. 



However, keep in mind that cancer can be in the lining of either the lungs, the lining of the diaphragm, or both.



Stage 3: Advanced Mesothelioma



During stage 3, cancer is found in the lining of one side of the chest wall and may have also spread to the chest cavity lining, the diaphragm lining, and the lung lining. Cancer has now spread to the lymph nodes close to the victim’s esophagus and trachea.



Stage 4: Metastatic Mesothelioma



Stage 4 is the most advanced stage of the disease, and cancer can no longer be removed surgically. During this stage, the cancer has metastasized. This means it has spread to more distant parts of the body. 



Examples of locations of metastasis include the stomach, liver, kidneys, bones, heart, and brain. Stage 4 mesothelioma is always terminal. 



How Quickly Does Mesothelioma Progress? 



From the time of asbestos exposure to the symptoms that lead to a diagnosis, mesothelioma takes a long time to progress. This period of time is called the latency period, and it is decades on average. 



Once a patient is diagnosed with mesothelioma, the cancer usually progresses rapidly through the stages. Mesothelioma is aggressive and tends to spread quickly. There are individual factors to consider, such as treatment choices, but compared to other types of cancer, mesothelioma spreads aggressively and rapidly. 



What Are the Symptoms of Pleural Mesothelioma By Stage? 



Every patient is different, but there are common symptoms that occur in each stage of mesothelioma. 



Symptoms of stage 1 mesothelioma: 




Mild chest pains



Coughing



Shortness of breath




Symptoms of stage 2 mesothelioma: 




Mild chest pains



Coughing



Shortness of breath



Unexplained weight loss




Symptoms of stage 3 mesothelioma: 




Chest pains



Chest tightness



Lumps under the skin of the chest



Wheezing and difficulty breathing



Coughing, sometimes with blood



Fever



Fatigue



Unexplained weight loss




Symptoms of stage 4 mesothelioma: 




Chest pains



Extreme shortness of breath and difficulty breathing



Coughing with blood



Fever



Fatigue



Night sweats



Weight loss 



Muscle wasting



General malaise




Staging Peritoneal Mesothelioma 



Pleural mesothelioma accounts for nearly 80% of mesothelioma diagnoses. Staging is also important for peritoneal mesothelioma, a less common form of mesothelioma. It first develops in the peritoneum, the tissue lining the abdominal cavity, and spreads from there. 



There is no standardized staging system for peritoneal mesothelioma. Some doctors use the Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI), but it is imperfect. The PCI was developed to stage metastases of gastric cancer. 



Some doctors adapt the TNM system to describe the different stages of peritoneal mesothelioma. Many believe this is a better way to predict prognosis for patients. A group of researchers suggested a new staging system for peritoneal mesothelioma based on: 




The extent of tumors using the PCI



Tumor spread within the abdomen



Metastasis, or the spread of tumors outside the abdomen




Resectable and Unresectable Mesothelioma



TNM stages the development of mesothelioma so that doctors will have a better understanding of the victim’s prognosis. However, when determining which treatments are best according to each stage, doctors often refer to the cancer as either resectable or unresectable. 



If the tumors are resectable, they can be surgically removed. Likewise, if the tumors cannot be removed, they are considered unresectable.



In most cases, the first three stages of mesothelioma are considered resectable. However, there are always a few exceptions. The subtype of the cancer, along with how far it has grown into the body’s tissues, will determine if it can be removed.



Doctors also take into account the patient’s health. Unhealthy people generally are not candidates for surgery and removal.



Alternative Mesothelioma Staging Systems



TNM staging is the most widely used staging system by most physicians, other systems have also helped diagnose stages of mesothelioma, including:



The Brigham System



Created by Dr. David Sugarbaker, one of the leading mesothelioma physicians at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital at Harvard, the Brigham System uses both clinical and radiological advances to find the development of the disease and the diagnosis. 



Similar to TNM staging, the Brigham System utilizes four stages to determine cancer development:




Stage I: Lymph nodes are not involved during this stage, and the cancer is only in the pleural area. 



Stage II: The cancer is still locked in the pleural area but may have also spread to the lymph nodes. 



Stage III: The cancer has now transferred into the diaphragm, structures in the thorax, or the diaphragm. 



Stage IV: The cancer has spread to various parts of the body and is now considered unresectable. 




The Butchart Staging System



The Butchart staging system is the original staging system used to stage pleural mesothelioma. As with other systems, the Butchart staging system classifies mesothelioma into four stages, with the final stage being the most severe.



This particular staging system was created in 1979 by Dr. Eric Butchart, a cardiothoracic surgeon at the University Hospital in Wales, United Kingdom. 



Dr. Butchart created the staging system to determine which mesothelioma patients were ideal candidates for different types of treatments.




Stage I: The cancer is on one side of the lining of the lungs or one side of the lining of the heart. 



Stage II: Tumors are now on both sides of the lining of the lungs in addition to either the chest wall, heart, or esophagus. Mesothelioma cells have also reached the lymph nodes. Radiation therapy is advised during this stage as long as the patient is healthy enough. 



Stage III: Tumors have invaded either the lining of the stomach or the diaphragm. In addition, the mesothelioma cells have now made their way outside of the chest and into the lymph nodes. Dr. Butchart suggests cytotoxic drugs in combination with drainage via tubes during this stage.



 Stage IV: Tumors have now transferred across the body and into the patient’s bloodstream. They can be found in several body organs, including the liver, brain, and even the bones. At this point, Dr. Butchart advises palliative mesothelioma treatment only as the tumors are too advanced to be removed.




How Does Mesothelioma Staging Affect Treatment and Prognosis? 



The two main reasons staging is so important is that it provides valuable information for planning treatment and estimating prognosis. 



Mesothelioma Treatment By Stage



There is no single treatment plan for each stage of mesothelioma because doctors must consider multiple, individual factors for each patient. Stage is one of the most important factors, though, and plays a significant role in determining a general treatment plan: 




Stage 1 Mesothelioma Treatment. Surgery is usually recommended during stage 1, while the tumors are still highly localized. Surgery at this time is much more likely to be successful than at later stages. It is typically used along with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or both. 



Stage 2 Mesothelioma Treatment. Patients in stage 2 might still be eligible for surgery, but it depends on individual factors and the exact locations of tumors. Stage 2 treatment usually also includes chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and immunotherapy. 



Stage 3 Mesothelioma Treatment. Treatment goals at stage 3 typically include extending a patient's life and making them more comfortable. Surgery is not usually an option unless it is for palliative care. Patients benefit from chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and immunotherapy. 



Stage 4 Mesothelioma Treatment. Stage 4 treatment is mostly palliative and includes minor palliative procedures, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. 




Mesothelioma Prognosis By Stage



Prognosis and survival time are also highly individualized. They depend on individual patient factors and characteristics, like age, health, and treatment preferences. Looking at large numbers of patients, researchers have generalized life expectancy for mesothelioma patients by stage: 




Stage 1 - 22.2 months



Stage 2 - 20.0 months



Stage 3 - 17.9 months



Stage 4 - 14.9 months




Staging is an integral part of the diagnostic process for mesothelioma. Talk to your medical team about your stage and what it means for your treatment options and prognosis. 



Getting Legal Assistance



Regardless of which stage of mesothelioma you are in, you may be entitled to financial compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Mesothelioma Life Expectancy Guide

The average life expectancy for mesothelioma is between 12 and 21 months. Mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer, and every case is different. How long a patient lives after a diagnosis depends on health, age, treatment choices, and more. 



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds awaiting those who've been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about qualified mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 













What Is Mesothelioma Life Expectancy? 



Generally, the life expectancy after a mesothelioma diagnosis is one to two years. It is important to understand that life expectancy varies significantly and depends on individual factors in each case. 



Here are some important facts about survival and life expectancy in people diagnosed with mesothelioma: 




Although survival rates in mesothelioma patients depend on a wide range of factors, a patient can expect a post-diagnosis survival time between 12 and 21 months.





After aggressive treatment, the five-year survival rate for pleural mesothelioma is nearly 10%. This means that nearly 10% of patients are still alive five years later. Without treatment, life expectancy is less than eight months. 





The five-year survival rate for peritoneal mesothelioma after HIPEC treatment is nearly 50%. 





The life expectancy for any type of mesothelioma and any treatment at stage I is 22.2 months.





Some patients live for less time, and others live years after a diagnosis. Each patient should talk to their physician about their own personal health and expectations.




Factors That Affect Mesothelioma Life Expectancy



Generally speaking, it is typically difficult, if not impossible, to predict accurate life expectancy after a patient is diagnosed with mesothelioma. 



Studies suggest that a patient’s post-diagnosis life expectancy depends on a combination of several factors:



The Stage



Victims in Stage I or II of the disease have a much better survival rate than those diagnosed in later stages. Unfortunately, many people with mesothelioma are already in stage 3 or 4 by when diagnosed. Life expectancy by stage for any type of mesothelioma is: 




Stage 1 - 22.2 months



Stage 2 - 20 months



Stage 3 - 17.9 months



Stage 4 - 14.9 months




Type of Mesothelioma



Mesothelioma is primarily classified by the location of the original tumor, which affects life expectancy. 



Pleural mesothelioma develops around the lungs and is the most common type of mesothelioma. It has the second longest life expectancy. Treatment can be difficult in the chest cavity, and surgery isn't always an option. 



Peritoneal mesothelioma develops in the abdomen and is the second most common type of mesothelioma. Peritoneal mesothelioma has the longest average life expectancy. Most people with abdominal cancers can tolerate more aggressive treatments than those with cancer in the chest cavity. This leads to a longer life expectancy. 



Pericardial mesothelioma develops around the heart and is very rare. Treating cancer near the heart is difficult, so this type has a shorter life expectancy. 



Cell Type



Mesothelioma can also be classified by cell type, which affects prognosis and life expectancy: 




Epithelioid Mesothelioma. Mesothelioma of epithelial cells is the most common and responds best to treatment. It has the longest life expectancy. 



Sarcomatoid Mesothelioma. Sarcomatoid cells are more likely to metastasize. This type of mesothelioma is less common and has a lower life expectancy because it is more aggressive. 



Biphasic Mesothelioma. A mix of both cell types is classified as biphasic and has a life expectancy between the other two. 




Treatment



Treatment has a major impact on life expectancy. The earlier treatment begins and the more aggressive the treatments, the longer the life expectancy. Patients who are candidates for and choose surgery generally have longer life expectancies, for instance. 



Cytoreduction with HIPEC treatment also offers longer life expectancies. This is a treatment for peritoneal mesothelioma. It involves surgically removing as many of the tumors as possible. This is followed by circulating heated chemotherapy drugs throughout the abdomen. 



Patients who do not get treatment for mesothelioma have life expectancies of just six to eight months. 



Age, Gender, and Overall Health



Younger patients generally have a better life expectancy for mesothelioma. This is probably because they are in overall better health and can tolerate more aggressive treatment. 



The same is true for overall health. Healthier patients can choose more aggressive treatment options. Smoking is a lifestyle factor that greatly impacts health and cancer prognosis. Smokers are likely to have a shorter life expectancy. 



The Role of Age and Gender in Life Expectancy



Male patients between 25 and 34 years of age and in good physical condition with no preexisting conditions have a good chance of surviving longer than 18 months.



Patients such as these benefit from early detection and surgical treatment of the disease. However, keep in mind that this age group is one of the least affected by asbestos-related cancer.



The average survival rate for older patients is bleaker. According to the American Cancer Society (ACC), even though 5% to 10% of patients diagnosed with mesothelioma can live for five years or more after the initial diagnosis, these individuals are usually young with cancers that can be surgically treated.



Since the average mesothelioma patient tends to be males aged 60-70 who were heavily exposed to asbestos during active work years, the cancer is already well-developed. These patients aren't typically eligible for surgery. 



Older patients also may have chronic health issues, such as cardiopulmonary diseases and hypertension, which reduce life expectancy. 



Patients in these two age brackets (65-74 and 75-84) have the highest death totals. From 1999 through 2005, 12,150 out of the 18,068 recorded mesothelioma deaths occurred in patients aged 65 to 84.



What Is the Longest Someone Has Lived With Mesothelioma? 



Although the grim facts of survival rates of mesothelioma can be discouraging, these statistics do not reflect everyone’s situation.



For instance, an Australian man named Paul Kraus has been living with mesothelioma since first receiving a diagnosis in 1997. This is just one of the several instances in which victims have gone on to defy the odds and live much longer than the average life expectancy of a mesothelioma victim.



Remember that current statistics are based on patients treated many years ago. As science progresses, the life expectancy and survival rate may improve for more victims as mesothelioma treatment options advance.



Can I Improve My Life Expectancy? 



If you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, there are steps you can take for a better prognosis and to live longer: 




Start treatment as soon as possible. Choose the most aggressive treatments you can tolerate and qualify for, including surgery. 



Work with mesothelioma specialists. This is a rare cancer, and many oncologists have never treated a patient with mesothelioma. Specialists can provide the best care. 



Improve your overall health with lifestyle changes. It's never too late to improve your health with changes like losing weight, exercising, and quitting smoking. Talk to your medical team before making any big changes. 



Enroll in clinical trials if available. Clinical trials offer the latest treatment advances, which could help you live longer. 




Mesothelioma Remission and Life Expectancy



Complete remission is uncommon in mesothelioma. Some patients achieve partial remission, which means the signs of cancer have reduced with treatment. In rare cases, a patient with mesothelioma achieves complete remission, with no signs of cancer. 



Patients able to achieve some degree of remission with treatment can expect to enjoy a longer life expectancy. 



Coping With a Poor Mesothelioma Prognosis



While there is some hope with a mesothelioma diagnosis, the prognosis is poor for most patients. Some patients find that taking on aggressive treatments and making other changes to improve their prognosis helps with coping. 



Other ways to deal with a mesothelioma diagnosis include: 




Relying on family and friends



Joining cancer and mesothelioma support groups



Using palliative care to relieve symptoms



Embracing faith or spirituality




Getting Legal Help



If you've been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you'll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Common Mesothelioma Misconceptions

Mesothelioma misconceptions are common and damaging. Mesothelioma is a rare type of cancer, only affecting a few thousand Americans per year. Although science continues to progress, there is still less information available for mesothelioma than for more common cancers, leading to misinformation. 



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, awaiting those who've been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on seasoned mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Myth 1: Smoking Causes Mesothelioma



Smoking does not cause mesothelioma. Smokers are also not at any higher risk of developing mesothelioma when compared to non-smokers. 



However, lung cancer risk is greater for smokers exposed to asbestos. This is because smoking weakens the lungs, allowing asbestos to cause lung damage more easily.



Myth 2: Only Older People Get Mesothelioma



Although it's true that older adults develop mesothelioma more than any other age group, the disease, in general, is usually not detected until 30 years or more after asbestos exposure. The average age of mesothelioma diagnosis is over 60. 



People of all ages, including children, can get mesothelioma. Children are usually diagnosed much earlier because their immune systems aren’t fully developed. The most common way they get mesothelioma is through secondary exposure.



In rare instances, children can get mesothelioma from old school buildings built using asbestos. They can also be exposed to asbestos by playing in attics with asbestos-containing insulation or around old, abandoned buildings built with asbestos.



Myth 3: Mesothelioma Is Contagious



Mesothelioma has never been nor will ever be contagious. The only instance that even remotely resembles mesothelioma being contagious is secondary exposure from a family member who was exposed to asbestos while working around it.



Myth 4: Mesothelioma Is Like Other Cancers



Mesothelioma is rare and also unusual in several ways. Many cancers either have no known causes or are thought to be largely genetic. Mesothelioma has one known cause, which is asbestos exposure. 



Mesothelioma also differs from many cancers in that it develops as many small nodules in mesothelial tissue rather than large tumors. This makes it more difficult to treat. 



Myth 5: Mesothelioma Is the Only Disease Caused by Asbestos



Asbestos can cause several illnesses, including non-malignant diseases and other types of cancers. Non-cancerous illnesses asbestos can cause or contribute to include: 




Pleural thickening



Pleural plaques



Asbestosis



Chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder




Asbestos can also cause or contribute to lung cancer. It has been found to be associated with some cases of ovarian cancer, breast cancer, kidney cancer, laryngeal cancer, and esophageal cancer. 



Myth 6: You Must Have Prolonged Exposure to Asbestos to Get Mesothelioma



In most cases, mesothelioma results from long-term, prolonged exposure to asbestos.



However, according to recent medical studies, even limited exposure for a short amount of time can result in mesothelioma. Although rare, it can happen. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) suggests that there is no safe level of asbestos exposure.



Myth 7: Only People Who Worked with Asbestos Get Mesothelioma



Occupational asbestos exposure is the leading but not only cause of mesothelioma. Asbestos was once used heavily in many industries, such as manufacturing and construction. This led to many cases of mesothelioma in men who worked in those jobs. 



Asbestos exposure can also occur in other settings: 




Natural deposits of asbestos can cause exposure when disturbed, for instance, by a natural disaster or mining. 



Some people are exposed to asbestos after living near industrial workplaces that used asbestos. 



Secondhand exposure occurs when someone who works with asbestos inadvertently brings asbestos fibers home on their clothing, exposing family members. 




Myth 8: If I Was Exposed to Asbestos, I Will Get Mesothelioma



Asbestos exposure increases your risk of being diagnosed with mesothelioma, but it does not guarantee you will get this cancer. In fact, most people exposed to asbestos never get mesothelioma. Even among asbestos workers, mesothelioma is rare. 



This doesn't mean you shouldn't take precautions. If you worked with or around asbestos, you are at risk for mesothelioma and other illnesses. Talk to your doctor about symptoms, risk factors, and health screenings. 



Myth 9: Mesothelioma Is Lung Cancer



Mesothelioma is commonly confused with lung cancer. Even physicians and oncologists sometimes misdiagnose mesothelioma as lung cancer. 



Although the most common form of this cancer, called pleural mesothelioma, develops around the lungs, mesothelioma is not lung cancer. This is a common myth and mistake because pleural mesothelioma develops along the lining of the lungs, called the pleura.



Another reason for the confusion is how the cancer spreads. Because the pleural tissue is right next to the lungs, tumors often spread to the lungs first. When a patient is diagnosed, they may already have tumors in the lungs, even though the cancer started in the pleura. 



Several other types of mesothelioma affect other parts of the body, such as ovarian, peritoneal, testicular, and laryngeal mesothelioma.



Myth 10: Only Men Get Mesothelioma



This myth started because most workers in factories, plants, oil refineries, and ships where prolonged exposure to asbestos occurred were men. 



Even though men are diagnosed four times more often, women do get mesothelioma. In fact, one form of mesothelioma is more common in women: peritoneal mesothelioma. This is the form of mesothelioma that develops in the abdomen. 



Myth 11: Mesothelioma Is Untreatable



While it’s true that there is no cure yet, people can still go on to live successful lives while battling mesothelioma. With a vast array of treatment options that keep improving as science and technology progresses, victims live longer with a better quality of life.  



Every case of mesothelioma is unique, and the outcome greatly depends on how advanced the stage of the disease is, how soon the symptoms of mesothelioma start to surface, and how effective the treatment works on each patient.



Myth 12: Asbestos is Now Banned in the U.S. 



Asbestos is used much less frequently than in the past, but asbestos is not completely banned in the U.S. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) began banning asbestos products in the 1970s. The first ban was spray-on asbestos insulation and fireproofing in 1973. 



Several additional rules followed, and in 1989, the EPA issued a final rule that would ban nearly all asbestos products. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned that ban in 1991. Today, most uses of asbestos are banned, but it is not totally outlawed. 



One of the last remaining uses of asbestos is in chlor-alkali manufacturing plants and some other chemical plants. The EPA is currently working on a ban on this usage. Asbestos can also be found in aftermarket automotive parts and some imported products. 



In addition to the uses that are still legal, asbestos lingers in older buildings. It was used so heavily in construction and industry that asbestos materials have never been completely abated. 



If You’ve Been Diagnosed with Mesothelioma



If you've been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you'll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on qualified asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Mesothelioma Cancer Symptoms Guide

Common symptoms of mesothelioma are chest pains, shortness of breath, and coughing. The less common peritoneal form of mesothelioma causes gastrointestinal symptoms. Symptoms worsen as the cancer progresses and may include fatigue, fever, and weight loss. 



If you or a loved one have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about trustworthy mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, and more.













About Mesothelioma



Mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive cancer caused by asbestos exposure. It is difficult to treat and has a poor prognosis. 



One of the many issues that makes this a deadly cancer is the symptoms. Mesothelioma symptoms often do not become evident until decades after asbestos exposure. They are also similar to the symptoms of many other illnesses. These factors make it difficult to get a diagnosis and start treatment early. 



If you know or suspect you have been exposed to asbestos in the past, know the signs of mesothelioma. Talk to your doctor about screenings and any symptoms that trouble you. The earlier you get a diagnosis, the better your outcome will be. 



Pleural Mesothelioma Symptoms Mimic Common Illnesses



Most victims do not seek help even after the first symptoms of mesothelioma begin. This is because pleural mesothelioma symptoms loosely mimic common respiratory illnesses: 




The common cold



The flu



Bronchitis



Chronic pulmonary obstructive disease (COPD)



Asthma



Pneumonia




To complicate matters even worse, pleural mesothelioma victims are prone to pneumonia. Yet, instead of connecting pneumonia to mesothelioma, the victim is often treated for pneumonia only.



In addition to cold and flu-like symptoms, some of the earliest indications and warning signs of mesothelioma cancer are lethargy, coughing, body aches, and shortness of breath.



Tell your doctor and ask about cancer screenings if you know you encountered asbestos at work or in your home. 



Symptoms of Pleural Mesothelioma



Pleural mesothelioma is the most common form of mesothelioma. It develops around the lungs, which results in respiratory and chest symptoms. Warning signs of pleural mesothelioma include: 




Chest pains



Coughing



Difficulty breathing



Shortness of breath



Difficulty swallowing



Wheezing




In addition, close to 60% of mesothelioma victims have complained of back pain, usually in the lower area of the back. Sometimes, the pain will spread from the chest into the shoulder area.



Some of the symptoms of pleural mesothelioma result from complications. A common complication is pleural effusion. This buildup of fluid around the lungs causes pain and difficulty breathing. 



Pleural plaques are another common sign of pleural mesothelioma but usually go undetected unless medical treatment is sought. Pleural plaques appear in clusters scattered throughout the victim’s chest area, ranging in size up to 6 cm and more.



Less common and later-stage symptoms of pleural mesothelioma may include: 




Tumor masses



A collapsed lung



Coughing up blood



Blood clots in the veins



Blood clots in the lung’s arteries (pulmonary emboli)



Extreme swelling in the face and arms



Dysphagia (difficulty with swallowing)




Symptoms of Peritoneal Mesothelioma



Peritoneal mesothelioma develops in the tissue that lines the organs of the abdomen. This is the second most common type of mesothelioma. 



Common and early symptoms of peritoneal mesothelioma include: 




Abdominal Pain and Swelling



Abdominal discomfort



Lumps of tissue clumped together in the abdominal area (usually under the skin)



Loss of appetite and weight loss



Changes in bowel movements, including bouts of constipation or diarrhea




A common complication of peritoneal mesothelioma is ascites. This buildup of fluid in the abdomen causes swelling, pain, and other symptoms. Other potential complications of peritoneal mesothelioma include: 




Bowel obstruction



Hernia



Indigestion




As with pleural mesothelioma, symptoms of peritoneal mesothelioma can be very similar to more common illnesses, including: 




Crohn's disease



Food allergies



Irritable bowel syndrome



Ulcerative colitis




Symptoms of Pericardial Mesothelioma



Pericardial mesothelioma develops in the tissue that surrounds the heart. It's one of the rarest forms of mesothelioma. How asbestos fibers reach the lining of the heart is still unknown, but scientists said that since the fibers are so small, there's a chance they move through the body’s bloodstream. 



Also, mesothelioma tumors that develop in the pleural tissue can eventually grow and spread to the pericardial space.



Symptoms of pericardial mesothelioma include: 




Chest pains



Wheezing



Shortness of breath



Heart murmurs




Fluid buildup in the pericardium around the heart is a typical complication of pericardial mesothelioma. It is responsible for many of the characteristic symptoms. 



Because of the symptoms, pericardial mesothelioma can easily be confused with and misdiagnosed as: 




Heart disease



Heart failure



Pericarditis



Cardiomyopathy




Testicular Mesothelioma



Testicular mesothelioma is the rarest type of this cancer. Because it is so rare, there is no comprehensive symptom list. As science progresses, more information on this type of mesothelioma will become available.



No one knows exactly how testicular mesothelioma develops. One possibility is that cancerous growth from other areas of the body somehow amass to a point in which the testicles are affected. Another theory suggests that nodules on the serosal surface of the testicles eventually develop into mesothelioma. 



The known symptoms of testicular mesothelioma are: 




Fluid buildup and swollen testicles



Pain in the testicles



A lump under the scrotum




Mesothelioma Symptoms By Stage



Each type of mesothelioma has characteristic symptoms that worsen as the disease develops. For instance, in pleural mesothelioma, coughing and wheezing might be mild or non-existent in stage 1 or 2. By stage 3 or 4, these symptoms can be severe and debilitating. 



All types of mesothelioma have some symptoms in common that often develop during the later stages: 




Loss of appetite



Weight loss



Cachexia, muscle wasting



Fatigue



Anemia



Severe and chronic pain



Fever



Night sweats




Symptoms of Metastatic Mesothelioma



Metastasis occurs when tumors spread to distant locations in the body from the original area of development. Depending on where the cancer spreads, this late stage of mesothelioma can cause various symptoms. Common sites of metastasis in mesothelioma include: 




Liver



Spleen



Adrenal glands



Kidneys



The lung opposite the original tumor



Heart



Thyroid




Less common is metastasis to the brain and bones. One of the most common symptoms of late-stage mesothelioma is pain at the metastasis site. There can also be specific symptoms based on where the tumors spread. 



The liver is one of the most common sites of metastasis in mesothelioma. Symptoms of liver metastasis include: 




Jaundice



Nausea



Loss of appetite



Weight loss



Pain in the upper right abdomen



Fever and sweating



Confusion




When Do Mesothelioma Symptoms Begin? 



Mesothelioma has a long latency period. It can take 30 to 50 years after the exposure to asbestos for the first mesothelioma symptoms to appear.



This goes for all types of mesothelioma, although symptoms for peritoneal mesothelioma tend to show up slightly sooner, at anywhere from 20 to 30 years. 



If you’ve been exposed to asbestos or think you’ve been exposed, it’s imperative that you not only inform your doctor but also have regular health check-ups.



A National Center for Biotechnology Information study determined that the average period before mesothelioma detection is around 32 years. Since the symptoms are mild at first, most victims don’t get diagnosed until much later, when the disease has progressed and the symptoms have become much worse.



How Are Mesothelioma Symptoms Treated? 



There are two main types of treatment for cancer: treatments that target the cancer to slow or stop its growth and treatments to manage symptoms. 



The goals of these treatment types are different, but they often overlap. For instance, treating the tumors with surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy reduces their size, which helps relieve symptoms. 



While treating the cancer itself might be your primary and most immediate goal, treating symptoms can help you feel better and tolerate more aggressive treatments. 



Palliative Care



Palliative care is any treatment used to manage symptoms rather than to treat the illness directly. Surgery can be palliative, for instance, removing tissue bulk to relieve pain. 



For mesothelioma, the removal of fluid is a standard palliative procedure. A thoracentesis removes fluid from the chest cavity, and a paracentesis removes fluid from the abdomen. These procedures reduce swelling, discomfort, and pain. 



Managing Pain



Pain is a very common symptom of mesothelioma that worsens with the progression of the disease. Treating pain is essential for improving quality of life. Treatments for mesothelioma pain include: 




Over-the-counter or prescription pain medications



Nerve blocking injections



Cervical cordotomy




Complementary and Alternative Therapies



Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) cannot treat or cure cancer but can help relieve symptoms. Some patients benefit from : 




Massage therapy



Acupuncture



Acupressure



Herbal supplements



Aromatherapy




If you are interested in CAM, talk to your medical team first. Only work with trained, licensed practitioners. 



Support and Mental Health



Mental health symptoms of mesothelioma often go overlooked and include stress, anxiety, and depression. You can find some relief from these symptoms with therapy, cancer counseling, and by joining cancer support groups. 



Supporting Good Health



Maintaining your health as well as you can while going through mesothelioma treatment can help minimize symptoms. Talk to your medical team about working with a nutritionist, starting a safe exercise plan, or quitting smoking. 



When to See Your Doctor



Most mesothelioma victims wait until they begin having severe symptoms before consulting a physician. It's extremely important to make an appointment and have a check-up as soon as possible if you’ve been exposed to asbestos. 



Letting your doctor know you’ve been exposed can help you get a diagnosis more quickly, which can help you start mesothelioma treatments as soon as possible.



It’s also important to remember that not all victims will experience the same symptoms. While some victims may only exhibit a few common symptoms, others may experience the full range of symptoms. 



Regardless, even the first hint of a cold or respiratory illness should be considered serious by anyone who has been exposed to asbestos.



Where to Get Medical Help



When dealing with an asbestos-related illness, it’s essential to seek medical help from doctors and clinics specializing in these forms of cancer. Mesothelioma is a rare disease, but you can find specialists with in-depth training and research on asbestos-related illnesses.



In addition, medical centers backed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) are at the forefront in dealing with all types of cancers, including malignant mesothelioma, asbestosis, lung cancer, and more. It’s recommended that victims of asbestos diseases seek treatment at an NCI-designated medical facility.



To learn more about services and treatment and find an NCI-designated facility in your area, call the National Cancer Institute to inquire about treatment centers close to you.



Additional Information



Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on qualified asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Sarcomatoid Mesothelioma Cancer Guide

Sarcomatoid mesothelioma cancer is a subtype of mesothelioma, a cancer caused by asbestos exposure. Only 10% to 20% of mesothelioma diagnoses are sarcomatoid. This is a more aggressive subtype with a worse prognosis and fewer treatment options than other types. 



If you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to a significant amount of compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 





What Is a Sarcomatoid Mesothelioma?



Sarcomatoid mesothelioma is one of two main mesothelioma cell types. The tumors contain cells that resemble sarcomas, cancerous cells of connective tissues. 



Sarcomatoid mesothelioma is less common than the other cell type, epithelial. It is also more aggressive than epithelial mesothelioma. 



About the Mesothelioma Cell Types



Doctors classify malignant mesothelioma as one of three histological, or cell, types:




Epithelioid mesothelioma is the most prevalent cell type, accounting for 50-60% of all mesothelioma cases. 



Sarcomatoid mesothelioma is the least common of the three histological varieties of mesothelioma cancer. It is also the most aggressive. 



Biphasic mesothelioma occurs when tumor cells are a mix of epithelioid and sarcomatoid. 




Doctors identify a cell type at the time of mesothelioma diagnosis. It helps them determine a treatment plan and estimate a patient's prognosis. 



Characteristics of Sarcomatoid Mesothelioma



Sarcomatoid cells are naturally present in connective tissue, like bone and cartilage. They are also found in the circulatory system and the lymphatic system. They have several distinguishing characteristics that help pathologists diagnose sarcomatoid mesothelioma: 




A spindle-like shape



Elongated nuclei



Sometimes more than one nuclei per cell



Minimal attachment to other cells




The fact that sarcomatoid cells do not attach strongly to each other makes sarcomatoid mesothelioma more aggressive than epithelial mesothelioma. The cells readily detach and spread to other parts of the body. 



Sarcomatoid Mesothelioma Cell Subtypes



Both sarcomatoid and epithelial mesothelioma can be further subdivided by cell subtypes. Some of the possible subtypes of sarcomatoid mesothelioma include: 




Desmoplastic. Desmoplastic tumors are densely fibrous with cells from collagen tissue. The cells don't have many distinguishing characteristics, which makes this subtype difficult to diagnose. It is easy to misdiagnose as a benign condition. 





Heterologous. This is a rare subtype with tumors that include cells from other types of tissue, often bone or collagen. 





Lymphohistiocytoid. These cells are large and have characteristics of immune cells and white blood cells. This subtype is extremely rare and very difficult to diagnose. 





Rhabdomyoblastic. Also rare, this subtype of sarcomatoid mesothelioma has tumors with muscle cells known as rhabdomyoblasts. 




What Causes Sarcomatoid Mesothelioma? 



As with other types of mesothelioma, asbestos exposure is the leading cause of sarcomatoid mesothelioma. Some people with mesothelioma have no known past asbestos exposure, so there are likely other causative factors, such as genetics. 



Most people with mesothelioma were exposed to asbestos on the job decades before they received a diagnosis. These workers inhaled asbestos fibers in the air. The fibers caused damage inside the body, leading to cancer in some people. 



What Are the Symptoms of Sarcomatoid Mesothelioma?



Most cases of sarcomatoid mesothelioma are pleural, occurring in the tissue surrounding the lungs. Early peritoneal sarcomatoid mesothelioma symptoms include: 




Difficulty breathing



Shortness of breath



Chest pains



Coughing




Sarcomatoid mesothelioma rarely occurs in the peritoneum, the tissue surrounding abdominal organs. When it does occur as peritoneal mesothelioma, it causes: 




Abdominal pain



Abdominal swelling



Diarrhea and constipation



Unintentional weight loss or weight gain




Symptoms of both types of sarcomatoid mesothelioma worsen as the cancer progresses and spreads. Advanced sarcomatoid mesothelioma can also cause additional symptoms: 




Fatigue



Fever



Weight loss



Muscle wasting



General malaise



Anemia



Pain



Symptoms associated with metastasis




Diagnosing Sarcomatoid Mesothelioma



Patients diagnosed with mesothelioma usually begin by going to their doctor with worrying symptoms. They undergo a physical exam and medical history. Doctors may also ask about a patient's work history to determine if they might have been exposed to asbestos. 



To diagnose any type of mesothelioma, doctors typically follow these steps: 




Performing imaging scans, such as X-rays, MRIs, and CT scans, to look for areas of tissue that are abnormal



Performing a biopsy to take a sample from any abnormal areas of tissue



Examining biopsied tissue to identify cell types and signs of malignancy



Immunohistochemical testing to identify cell types and subtypes




Pathologists who examine and test biopsied tissues look for characteristics of malignancy first. They then determine the primary tumor type, such as pleural or peritoneal. 



Next, they examine the cells to determine if they are epithelial or sarcomatoid. To diagnose sarcomatoid mesothelioma, they look for the characteristic spindle shape. Finally, they look for visual clues and immunohistochemical markers to identify a cell subtype. 



The Risks of Misdiagnosing Sarcomatoid Mesothelioma



Because sarcomatoid mesothelioma is so aggressive, patients benefit from immediate treatment. Unfortunately, many patients are already in the late stages of cancer when they receive a diagnosis, limiting treatment options. This happens because sarcomatoid mesothelioma is easy to misdiagnose. 



Any rare cancer is at risk of being misdiagnosed because doctors first look for more common conditions. Some of the common misdiagnoses for sarcomatoid mesothelioma include: 




Fibrosarcoma



Fibrous histiocytoma



Fibrous pleurisy



Localized fibrous tumors



Lymphoma



Pleural liposarcoma



Renal cell carcinoma



Sarcomatoid carcinoma




A misdiagnosis is dangerous for sarcomatoid mesothelioma patients because it delays the accurate diagnosis and delays treatment. 



What Is the Prognosis for Sarcomatoid Mesothelioma? 



The prognosis for sarcomatoid mesothelioma is, unfortunately, not very positive for most patients. Doctors rarely diagnose sarcomatoid mesothelioma until the disease is advanced. This delays treatment and makes it more difficult to control the cancer. 



What Is the Survival Rate for Sarcomatoid Mesothelioma? 



The average survival rate for all types of mesothelioma patients is less than two years. It is lower for patients with aggressive sarcomatoid mesothelioma. 



The average survival time for patients diagnosed with sarcomatoid mesothelioma is just four months. Every patient is different, and some live longer with an early diagnosis and aggressive treatment. 



Can Sarcomatoid Mesothelioma Be Cured? 



Mesothelioma is generally considered incurable. Specialists talk about managing mesothelioma rather than curing it. 



It is possible, however, for some mesothelioma patients to achieve remission. This occurs when there is no sign of cancer in the body. Remission is not considered cured, as cancer can always recur. Remission is very rare with sarcomatoid mesothelioma. 



Can I Improve My Prognosis? 



A diagnosis of sarcomatoid mesothelioma might seem hopeless, but you have some control over your outcome. The prognosis depends largely on cell type, tumor locations, and the stage of the cancer. 



The earlier you can get a diagnosis, the better your outcome will be. Advocate for yourself with doctors and seek additional opinions if you feel your concerns are being dismissed. 



If you get a diagnosis of sarcomatoid mesothelioma, contact specialists and begin treatment right away. Choose the most aggressive therapies you qualify for, and consider enrolling in clinical trials. 



These steps are most important for improving your prognosis. Also, consider palliative care, mental health treatment, and alternative therapies to help you feel better. 



Treatments for Sarcomatoid Mesothelioma



Treatment for sarcomatoid mesothelioma depends on multiple factors: 




The location of tumors



The extent of the cancer's spread



The patient's symptoms



The patient's preferences and goals




The most common approach for treating any type of mesothelioma is multimodal, a combination of two or more therapies. 



Surgery



Surgery is rarely used as a treatment for sarcomatoid mesothelioma. The cancer is often widespread, disqualifying patients from any curative surgery. 



Sarcomatoid mesothelioma patients can benefit from surgical procedures as part of palliative care. For instance, procedures to drain fluid from the chest cavity can make patients more comfortable. 



Chemotherapy



Chemotherapy is a more common treatment for sarcomatoid mesothelioma. Systemic chemotherapy can reduce tumor sizes, extend life expectancy, and reduce some symptoms caused by tumors. 



Official mesothelioma treatment guidelines recommend chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for sarcomatoid mesothelioma, using some or all of these medications: 




Pemetrexed



Cisplatin



Carboplatin



Gemcitabine




Another option is to add a targeted drug called bevacizumab to chemotherapy drugs. It prevents the formation of blood vessels going to the tumors, which slows their growth. 



Immunotherapy



Immunotherapy drugs use the patient's immune system to target and kill cancer cells. Immunotherapy is increasingly common as a treatment strategy for sarcomatoid mesothelioma. 



The results of a clinical trial published in 2022 showed that sarcomatoid mesothelioma patients had the best results from a combination immunotherapy treatment. The patients received nivolumab (Opdivo) and ipilimumab (Yervoy).



Sarcomatoid mesothelioma patients had an overall survival time of 18.1 months with immunotherapy. Those who received standard chemotherapy had an overall survival of just 8.8 months. 



Radiation Therapy



Radiation involves the destruction of cancer cells with doses of high-energy rays. This treatment is used exclusively in cases of pleural mesothelioma due to the adverse side effects possible in cases of peritoneal mesothelioma.



Radiation can be used either to prevent cancer from returning to surgically treated areas or to slow down cancer’s progress in cases where surgery is not a viable option. Targeted radiation treatments also help to relieve a patient’s pain.



Clinical Trials



Clinical trials are important for developing and testing new medical treatments. They are also important for individual patients with terminal illnesses like sarcomatoid mesothelioma. 



Patients who qualify can enroll in clinical trials to access emerging treatments not otherwise available. There are risks but also potential benefits. 



Sarcomatoid mesothelioma has a grim prognosis, but specialists can provide you with treatment options. If you think you might have been exposed to asbestos in the past, contact a mesothelioma law firm to find out how you can take legal action against those responsible. 



Additional Resources and Assistance



Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you need additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Pericardial Mesothelioma Cancer Guide

Pericardial mesothelioma is a rare cancer that develops in the pericardium around the heart. Pericardial mesothelioma is associated with asbestos exposure. Symptoms include chest pains, irregular heartbeats, and shortness of breath.



If you or a loved one have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more.









What Is Pericardial Mesothelioma? 



Pericardial mesothelioma is a rare form of mesothelioma that develops in the tissue around the heart. It is an aggressive cancer that is difficult to diagnose and treat. 



Pericardial mesothelioma gets its name from the part of the body where it is found, the pericardium. The pericardium is the protective double-walled sac that surrounds the heart. 



This sac contains pericardial fluid, protecting the heart and its associated veins and arteries from external jolts or shocks.



How Rare Is Pericardial Mesothelioma? 



According to a study published in the Texas Heart Institute Journal, pericardial tumors account for less than one percent of all types of mesothelioma. Mesothelioma itself is rare. There have been fewer than 200 cases of pericardial mesothelioma ever reported. 



What Are the Symptoms of Pericardial Mesothelioma? 



In general, the cancer forms on the outer lining of the pericardium. As a tumor grows over a period, it can take as long as five decades before symptoms of mesothelioma become apparent.



The problem with diagnosing this disease is that symptoms are similar to other diseases of the heart, which are much more common. Typical early symptoms of pericardial mesothelioma include: 




Shortness of breath, especially when lying down



Persistent coughing



Chest pains



Heart palpitations



Heart murmur




As pericardial mesothelioma advances, these symptoms worsen, and new ones may appear: 




Unintentional weight loss



Fatigue



Muscle wasting



Fever



Night sweats




Complications of Pericardial Mesothelioma



Many of the symptoms of pericardial mesothelioma arise from the common complications of tumors in the pericardium. 



The most common of these is pericardial effusion, the buildup of fluid between the layers of the pericardium. This causes pain, shortness of breath, and pressure in the chest. 



Pericardial mesothelioma can also lead to heart failure, which occurs when the heart's pumping begins to weaken. This can be the ultimate cause of death for a patient with pericardial mesothelioma.



Diagnosing Pericardial Mesothelioma



Diagnosing pericardial mesothelioma begins with a physical exam and a medical history. If you have any history of asbestos exposure, tell your doctor. The next steps in making a diagnosis include: 




Echocardiogram. An echocardiogram is an ultrasound performed on the heart. This gives doctors an image of the heart and detects fluid around it. 



CT scan. Doctors can also order a CT scan to get a better image of the heart. It helps doctors identify abnormal areas of tissue that might be cancerous. 



Biopsy. If the imaging scans show abnormal tissue, the next step is to biopsy it. This means removing a small amount of fluid or tissue. A pathologist then examines the tissue sample to look for signs of cancer cells and to identify cell types as part of the diagnosis. 




Common Misdiagnoses for Pericardial Mesothelioma



A study of 120 cases of pericardial mesothelioma found that three-quarters of the diagnoses were made after the patients died. This fact highlights how difficult it is to diagnose this rare cancer accurately. 



Because it is so rare, doctors are likely to misdiagnose pericardia mesothelioma as a more common condition, such as: 




Heart disease



Heart failure



Cardiac tamponade



Cardiomyopathy



Constrictive pericarditis



Coronary artery disease



Tuberculosis pericarditis




By the time a patient gets a diagnosis of pericardial mesothelioma, the cancer has likely spread beyond the pericardium and metastasized to the lymph nodes or the lungs. It is difficult to treat, and life expectancy is short. 



For these reasons, it is important to seek a second opinion if you are not satisfied with your diagnosis or don't feel a doctor is taking your concerns seriously. 



What Causes Pericardial Mesothelioma? 



The majority of cases of mesothelioma resulted from workplace asbestos exposure. Most of those diagnoses are pleural mesothelioma. 



When workers breathed in asbestos fibers, they caused lesions in healthy tissue. The tissue became cancerous over time and created malignant tumors.



Pericardial mesothelioma can develop as a result of exposure to asbestos. Researchers have also linked pericardial mesothelioma to other contributing factors.



These risk factors include: 




Family history



Conditions that affect the immune system



Exposure to radiation



Infections




How Is Pericardial Mesothelioma Treated? 



Treatment for any type of mesothelioma is usually multimodal. This means doctors use a combination of therapies. Typical options include surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and immunotherapy. Surgery and chemotherapy are the most common treatment strategies for pericardial mesothelioma. 



Surgery for Pericardial Mesothelioma



Surgery to remove tumors is one of the most effective ways to treat cancer. Unfortunately, many patients with pericardial mesothelioma are not eligible for surgery. The tumors are too advanced and widespread. 



Those who do qualify can benefit from a surgery called pericardiectomy. It involves the removal of part or all of the pericardium. Surgeons can also remove tumors that have spread to other tissues in the area.



Surgeons can also use a pericardiectomy as a palliative treatment. It removes fluid and pressure from the heart, which helps relieve symptoms. 



Chemotherapy



Patients who undergo surgery will likely also receive chemotherapy, either to shrink tumors before the procedure or to eliminate cancer cells the surgeon could not remove. 



Patients ineligible for surgery can benefit from chemotherapy to shrink tumors, relieve symptoms, and extend life expectancy. The standard chemotherapy combination is pemetrexed with cisplatin. 



Studies have shown that chemotherapy is the best treatment for extending survival times for patients with pericardial mesothelioma. 



What Is the Prognosis for Pericardial Mesothelioma? 



According to the Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation (MARF), around half of all mesothelioma patients can expect to live for a period that ranges from eight months to around a year and a half. 



The life expectancy of a person with pericardial mesothelioma is less than six months on average. One of the most critical factors in prognosis is the cancer's stage. Pericardial mesothelioma is almost always diagnosed in later stages when the cancer has spread, and treatment options are limited. 



Each patient’s prognosis is unique and depends on age, general health, diet, and other lifestyle issues like smoking. Also vital is treatment. Patients who get treated sooner and choose the most aggressive treatments available generally have a longer survival time. 



If you received a diagnosis of pericardial mesothelioma, find out what you can do to improve your outcome. Talk to your medical team about treatment options and get started as soon as possible. 



Getting Help



Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Peritoneal Mesothelioma Cancer Guide

Peritoneal mesothelioma is a type of cancer that develops in the peritoneum, the lining of tissue in the abdominal cavity. It is caused by asbestos exposure and is the second most common type of mesothelioma. Peritoneal mesothelioma causes abdominal swelling, pain, and gastrointestinal symptoms. 



If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to considerable compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area.









What Is Peritoneal Mesothelioma?



Peritoneal mesothelioma is a form of asbestos cancer that attacks the cell walls in the peritoneum, the thin membranes that lubricate and protect the abdominal cavity. 



Only 500 people each year are diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma, which is around 20% of all cases of mesothelioma. It is the second most common form of mesothelioma and has the best prognosis. 



What Is the Difference Between Peritoneal Mesothelioma and Pleural Mesothelioma? 



Both peritoneal and pleural mesothelioma are cancers caused by asbestos that develop in the mesothelium. The mesothelium is a thin, double layer of tissue that surrounds organs and lines cavities in the body. 



The pleura is the part of the mesothelium in the chest cavity and around the lungs. The peritoneum, where peritoneal mesothelioma develops, is the mesothelium in the abdomen. 



Pleural mesothelioma is more common than peritoneal mesothelioma. Both are malignant, aggressive, and difficult to treat. The prognosis is poor for both types but better for peritoneal mesothelioma. 



Who Is at Risk for Peritoneal Mesothelioma?



Anyone who worked with or around asbestos is at risk for peritoneal mesothelioma. Also at risk are family members or others who lived with people who worked with asbestos. Most people diagnosed with any type of mesothelioma are older men, but anyone can develop this cancer. 



Women are more likely to have peritoneal mesothelioma than pleural mesothelioma. The peritoneal form is also more common in younger people. No one knows why women are at greater risk for peritoneal mesothelioma. 



How Does Asbestos Cause Peritoneal Mesothelioma? 



The leading cause of peritoneal mesothelioma is past asbestos exposure. Most people with any type of mesothelioma were exposed to asbestos at work. The most common route of exposure is inhalation of fibers, which is why pleural mesothelioma is more prevalent than other mesothelioma types. 



Workers inhaled asbestos fibers, which lodged in the pleural tissue around the lungs. There, the fibers caused damage and led to pleural mesothelioma in some people. How asbestos fibers get to the peritoneum and cause mesothelioma is not perfectly understood. 



The peritoneum has two layers, which include the parietal layer and the visceral layer. The visceral layer protects the abdominal organs. 



The parietal layer protects and covers the abdominal cavity in the same manner. With so many layers, it isn’t easy to understand exactly how asbestos reaches the peritoneum in the first place. Scientists have theorized that this can happen in two different ways:




Since asbestos fibers are so small, they can easily be swallowed. The fibers then lodge in the peritoneal tissue in the abdomen. 



Inhaled fibers may migrate to the lymphatic system, which circulates fluids through the body. This could be how asbestos fibers end up in the abdomen. 




The human body cannot eliminate the small fibers from the system. They cause inflammation and damage that can lead to tumor growth and malignancy. 



Symptoms of Peritoneal Mesothelioma



Not everyone will experience the same symptoms. In addition, most symptoms will not surface until decades after asbestos exposure. Possible symptoms of peritoneal mesothelioma are:




Unusual and rapid weight loss



Nausea with or without vomiting



Abdominal pain



Abdominal swelling



Diarrhea and/or constipation



Small lumps under the abdomen skin



Night sweats



Anemia



Fever



Inflamed, thickened peritoneum



Breathing difficulties



Fatigue and lethargy



Energy loss and weakness




How Is Peritoneal Mesothelioma Diagnosed? 



Diagnosis of peritoneal mesothelioma begins with a complete physical exam, description of symptoms, and review of medical history. A doctor will then do tests to look for a cause of the symptoms and to rule out more common illnesses:




Imaging Scans. An MRI or CT scan helps doctors see soft tissues in the body. A scan of the abdomen can show masses, thickened tissues, or other signs of suspected tumors. 



Biopsy. If a doctor finds an area of tissue that looks abnormal, they will perform a biopsy to remove a small sample of tissue. They might also draw out some abdominal fluid for testing. 



Pathology. A pathologist examines the biopsied tissue to look for signs of malignancy. They also identify the cell type and subtype. 



Immunohistochemistry. Pathologists may also use this type of test that relies on antibodies to identify markers of specific cell and tumor types. 




Staging Peritoneal Mesothelioma



When doctors diagnose peritoneal mesothelioma, they also include a stage designation. The stage describes the extent and spread of the cancer. It is useful for planning treatment and estimating a patient's life expectancy. 



Because it is so rare, there is no standard staging system for peritoneal mesothelioma. Doctors typically use a combination of the TNM system used for most other cancers and the Peritoneal Cancer Index, which is used to stage metastasis of gastric cancer. 



There are four stages of peritoneal mesothelioma: 




Stage 1. In the earliest stage, the tumors are localized to the peritoneal tissue and possibly additional tissue near the primary tumor. 



Stage 2. By stage 2, the tumors have spread further and may have invaded nearby lymph nodes. 



Stage 3. In stage 3, tumors have spread to more lymph nodes and to other organs and tissues in the abdominal cavity. 



Stage 4. Stage 4 is metastatic cancer, which means the tumors have spread to distant areas of the body. 




Misdiagnosis of Peritoneal Mesothelioma



Peritoneal mesothelioma is rare, which means that misdiagnosis is common. Another reason it is often misdiagnosed is because the symptoms are similar to those of more common illnesses. Some common early misdiagnoses for peritoneal mesothelioma are: 




Colitis



Crohn's disease



Ovarian cysts



Ovarian cancer



Colon Cancer



Tuberculous peritonitis




Being diagnosed early and starting treatment immediately is the best way to get a better outcome with peritoneal mesothelioma. Misdiagnosis delays treatment. Always push for a second opinion or more tests if they are unsatisfied with an initial diagnosis.



Treatments for Peritoneal Mesothelioma



Specialists treat peritoneal mesothelioma with a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and other treatments. Some patients may not be good candidates for surgery, especially if the cancer is in later stages and has metastasized. 



Unfortunately, catching the disease in its early stage is rare at this time, as it typically takes decades before the first symptoms start to show up.



Surgery may still be performed during the disease’s advanced stages, but physicians almost always remove only parts of the tumor instead of removing it in its entirety. Once the disease has progressed, it is too dangerous and poses too many risks to remove.



Surgery for Peritoneal Mesothelioma



Surgery is one of the most common treatment strategies for peritoneal mesothelioma. Not all patients qualify if the cancer is too widespread or if their health is too poor. Some of the surgical procedures used to treat peritoneal mesothelioma include: 




Peritonectomy: This form of surgery entails removing the lining of the abdomen in an attempt to eliminate as many cancerous cells as possible. Peritonectomy surgery is usually performed in conjunction with cytoreductive surgery.





Cytoreductive Surgery: Cytoreductive surgery is an invasive and long procedure, usually lasting up to 12 hours. Cytoreductive and peritonectomy surgery is combined so that cancerous cells can be removed while providing the patient with as much relief as possible. 





Paracentesis: Paracentesis is a form of surgery that involves removing fluid from the peritoneal area (the area around the abdomen). The fluid is withdrawn using a long, hollow needle inserted through the stomach. Once the fluid is collected, victims experience relief from pain and bloating. The bowels usually begin to work better, and patients find that breathing is not as difficult as before.




Chemotherapy



Surgery is rarely used alone to treat mesothelioma. It is commonly combined with chemotherapy. Types of chemotherapy used to treat peritoneal mesothelioma include:




Systemic Chemotherapy: Systemic chemotherapy involves chemotherapy entering the bloodstream intravenously. It’s most often used on patients experiencing widespread cancers across the body. Almost all chemotherapy treatments utilize systemic chemotherapy for peritoneal patients.





Heated Chemotherapy: With heated chemotherapy (HIPEC), drugs are dispensed into the patient’s abdominal area. The drug is typically heated just above the patient’s body temperature before administering it. This form of chemotherapy is almost always used after surgery, and the heat is used to kill off any cancerous cells that were left behind. Candidates for heated chemotherapy must be in good overall physical shape. 





Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is used as a prior treatment before another form of treatment is given to the patient. For example, a patient undergoing surgery may be given neoadjuvant chemotherapy beforehand to reduce the size of the cancerous tumors. Most patients start neoadjuvant chemotherapy around three months prior to surgery.  




Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC



Cytoreductive surgery (CRS), followed by HIPEC, has become a standard treatment strategy for peritoneal mesothelioma. It has a high success rate and has been proven to significantly extend life expectancy in many patients. 



One study compared CRS and HIPEC with a control group of patients who received surgery and more traditional chemotherapy. The three-year survival rate was 33% for the control group and 65% for the experimental group. CRS with HIPEC doubled survival time. 



Immunotherapy for Peritoneal Mesothelioma



Another type of treatment gaining traction is immunotherapy. It uses drugs that harness the patient's immune system to target and kill cancer cells. While it is more commonly used to treat pleural mesothelioma, some peritoneal mesothelioma patients might benefit from immunotherapy. 



Additional Treatments for Peritoneal Mesothelioma



Surgery and chemotherapy are standard treatments for peritoneal mesothelioma, but every treatment plan is different and depends on individual factors. Some other types of treatment doctors may consider for peritoneal mesothelioma patients include: 




Targeted Therapies. Targeted therapies are drugs that use a specific strategy to kill cancer cells or target specific genetic mutations. 



Clinical Trials. Patients who qualify for a clinical trial get access to emerging treatments not yet widely available. There are risks but also potential benefits. 



Palliative Care. Palliative treatments are used to manage symptoms of cancer and the side effects of treatment. They help patients feel more comfortable and improve their quality of life. 




What Is the Prognosis for Peritoneal Mesothelioma? 



Recently, doctors have begun to catch peritoneal cancer in its early stages more often than ever before. However, the average life expectancy is still around a year. Remember, though, that every situation is unique, and patients may go on to live years longer.



In addition, new treatment methods are being introduced as researchers make breakthroughs, which can further expand patient lifespans in the future.



What Is the Survival Rate for Peritoneal Mesothelioma? 



Survival rate measures the percentage of people still living at a specified point after their diagnosis. Five-year survival rates for peritoneal mesothelioma are higher than for pleural mesothelioma: 




Stage 1 - 87%



Stage 2 - 53%



Stage 3 - 29%




These are averages based on a large number of patients. Every case is different, but averages can be useful in estimating the prognosis for each individual patient. 



How Long Can You Live With Peritoneal Mesothelioma? 



Life expectancy is another measurement or estimate that describes a patient's prognosis. In general, peritoneal mesothelioma patients live longer after diagnosis than those with other types of mesothelioma. 



Again, this varies and depends on the individual factors in each patient's case. Life expectancy for peritoneal mesothelioma can be anywhere from six months to several years. Six months is a typical prognosis for patients who do not receive any treatment. 



Is Peritoneal Mesothelioma Always Fatal? 



Experts consider all types of mesothelioma to be incurable. Specialists treat mesothelioma as a condition to be managed. They try to extend life expectancy and do not focus on curing it. 



Remission is rare but possible with mesothelioma. Peritoneal mesothelioma patients who are in the early stages and undergo cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC have the best chance of remission. Even with remission, the cancer can always return. 



Can I Improve My Prognosis? 



Yes, you can improve your prognosis after being diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma. The best way to improve prognosis is to get treated immediately. Assemble a team of specialists and begin treatment as soon as possible. 



Choose the most aggressive treatments you qualify for. These treatments are most likely to extend your life expectancy. Also important is staying in good overall health, following your doctors' advice, and managing symptoms with palliative care. 



How to Find a Peritoneal Mesothelioma Specialist



Peritoneal mesothelioma is very rare. Most oncologists never encounter a patient with this diagnosis. For the best care, seek out treatment from a physician who specializes in treating it. These are some of the most noteworthy peritoneal mesothelioma specialists across the U.S.:




Dr. David Bartlett, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA



Dr. John Chabot, Columbia University Medical Center, New York City, NY



Dr. W. Charles Conway, Ridley-Tree Cancer Center, Santa Barbara, CA



Dr. Sophie Dessureault, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL



Dr. Hedy Lee Kindler, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL




Getting Help



If you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, there is a good chance that you'll be entitled to significant financial compensation for medical expenses, pain, suffering, and much more. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area.

### Pleural Mesothelioma Cancer Guide

Pleural mesothelioma is the most common type of mesothelioma, a cancer caused by asbestos exposure. About 75% of all diagnosed patients have pleural mesothelioma, which develops in the tissue around the lungs. Symptoms include coughing, difficulty breathing, and chest pains. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













What Is Pleural Mesothelioma?



Pleural mesothelioma is a cancer of the pleural tissue that surrounds the lungs and lines the chest cavity. All types of mesothelioma affect the mesothelium, the tissue that lines organs in the body. 



Mesothelioma is rare, with about 3,000 people diagnosed in the U.S. yearly. Pleural mesothelioma is the most common form of mesothelioma, accounting for approximately 80% of diagnosed cases. Other types of mesothelioma develop in the abdomen (peritoneal) and around the heart (pericardial). 



Is Pleural Mesothelioma Lung Cancer?



Pleural mesothelioma is not the same as lung cancer or a type of lung cancer. Lung cancer occurs when tumors develop in the lungs first. Pleural mesothelioma occurs when tumors first develop in pleural tissue. 



It is easy even for experts to confuse pleural mesothelioma with lung cancer when making a diagnosis. Pleural tumors often spread to lung tissue, making it difficult to determine which came first. 



Types of Pleural Mesothelioma



Pleural mesothelioma is one type of mesothelioma based on the location where the tumors develop. It can be further categorized by cell type: 




Epithelioid. Epithelial cells are cells that line organs and cavities in the body. Most cases of pleural mesothelioma (up to 80%) consist mostly of epithelial cells. It is the least aggressive type of mesothelioma and the easiest to treat. 



Sarcomatoid. Less common is sarcomatoid pleural mesothelioma. Sarcomatoid cells are the cells of connective tissue. This type of mesothelioma spreads more readily and is more difficult to treat. It accounts for about 10% of pleural mesothelioma diagnoses. 



Biphasic. When the cells are a mix of epithelial and sarcomatoid, the diagnosis is biphasic. These account for approximately 10% of cases. 




Cell type is important in pleural mesothelioma diagnoses. It helps doctors plan effective treatment strategies and estimate a prognosis. 



Is Pleural Mesothelioma Curable? 



This is an aggressive, fast-spreading cancer. Pleural mesothelioma is considered incurable. Specialists treat it as a condition to be managed rather than cured. They plan treatments to help patients live longer and to manage symptoms to improve their quality of life. 



Remission might be possible for patients in good health, with an early-stage diagnosis, and with aggressive treatment. 



What Causes Pleural Mesothelioma? 



Asbestos exposure is the leading cause of pleural mesothelioma. Most people with this diagnosis worked with or around asbestos decades before their diagnosis. 



Asbestos sheds small fibers that workers inhaled because they were often not provided with adequate protection. Asbestos fibers inside the body lodge in tissue, causing inflammation and damage that can lead to mesothelioma. 



While not all workers exposed to asbestos developed pleural mesothelioma, many people were put at risk. Some of the workers most at risk for a pleural mesothelioma diagnosis include: 




Construction workers



Renovation and demolition workers



Shipbuilders and repairers



Shipyard workers



U.S. Navy veterans



Transportation workers



Insulation workers



Industrial manufacturing workers



Automotive mechanics



Miners



Firefighters




Also at risk are people who lived with someone in an at-risk job. People who lived near a facility that used asbestos or near mines and natural deposits could also have been exposed. 



Not everyone with mesothelioma worked with asbestos. Some people have no known history of asbestos exposure. No other causes of mesothelioma have been confirmed, but contributing factors could include genetics or radiation exposure. 



Symptoms of Pleural Mesothelioma



Pleural mesothelioma often does not exhibit symptoms until decades after asbestos exposure. It can sometimes take up to 50 years for symptoms of pleural mesothelioma to surface.



Further, its symptoms can be easily confused with common respiratory ailments such as influenza, bronchitis, or pneumonia. Early and common symptoms of pleural mesothelioma include: 




Shortness of breath 



Coughing



Chest pains



Difficulty swallowing



Lumps under the skin on the chest




Other symptoms associated with the disease in its later stages include fatigue, lack of appetite, unintentional weight loss, fever, and muscle wasting.  



Complications of Pleural Mesothelioma



Cancer in the pleural tissue can lead to many complications. Some of these cause the symptoms of pleural mesothelioma, while others might go unnoticed. 




Pleural Plaques. These are areas of pleural tissue that have thickened. They are not cancerous and usually do not cause symptoms. 



Pleural Thickening. Larger, thickened areas of pleural tissue can be cancerous or benign and may cause symptoms. 



Pleural Effusion. Pleural effusion is very common in pleural mesothelioma patients. It is a buildup of fluid between the two layers of pleural tissue. It causes pain and difficulty breathing. 



Asbestosis. Asbestosis is the development of scar tissue in the lungs. It can occur separately or with pleural mesothelioma and makes breathing difficult. 




How Is Pleural Mesothelioma Diagnosed? 



Diagnosis of any type of mesothelioma is complicated. The symptoms are often very similar to other common illnesses or even lung cancer. This makes misdiagnosis common. 



Diagnosis begins when a patient goes to their doctor because of concerning symptoms. The doctor performs a physical exam and goes through their medical history. The next steps in the diagnosis include: 




Imaging Scans. Imaging scans, including X-rays, CT scans, MRIs, and PET scans, help doctors rule out specific conditions. They also help doctors look for areas of abnormal tissue that might be cancerous. 



Biopsy and Thoracentesis. If doctors find abnormalities on imaging scans, they remove cells to examine. This might include a thoracentesis to remove fluid from around the lungs. More important is a biopsy, a minor procedure to remove a section of a suspected tumor. 



Blood Tests. Doctors may also use blood tests to look for markers characteristic of mesothelioma or other cancers. There are no definitive tests, but these markers can help confirm a diagnosis. 




Pathologists use biopsied tissue to examine cells and identify them. They determine if the cells are malignant or benign; they identify the cancer type and the cell type. 



The Stages of Pleural Mesothelioma



A critical part of diagnosing pleural mesothelioma is assigning a stage from 1 to 4. The stage describes the extent of the spread of the cancer and helps doctors determine the prognosis and the best treatment approach. 



Stage 1 Pleural Mesothelioma



Stage 1 pleural mesothelioma can be further divided into two substages: 




Stage 1A. In this earliest stage, the tumors are localized to the pleural tissue on just one side of the chest. 



Stage 1B. In stage 1B, tumors have spread to the chest wall, lung tissue, or diaphragm on the same side of the chest. 




Patients are rarely diagnosed with stage 1 mesothelioma. Because it is difficult to diagnose, most people are already in later stages at the time of diagnosis. Stage 1 gives patients the best chance of remission and the most treatment options. 



Stage 2 Pleural Mesothelioma



In stage 2 pleural mesothelioma, the tumors have spread more in the localized area. This can include the diaphragm, chest wall, lung tissue, and the tissue between the lungs. The tumors may also have spread to nearby lymph nodes. 



Stage 3 Pleural Mesothelioma



Stage 3 is considered late-stage mesothelioma. At this stage, the cancer has spread throughout the pleural tissue, into the lungs and chest wall, and potentially into the pericardium around the heart. 



In stage 3 mesothelioma, the tumors have also spread to nearby lymph nodes and often to lymph nodes on the opposite side of the chest. 



Stage 4 Pleural Mesothelioma



Stage 4 pleural mesothelioma is metastatic mesothelioma. This means that the cancer is widespread and has traveled through lymph nodes to distant parts of the body. 



The most common sites of metastasis for pleural mesothelioma are the lung on the other side of the chest, the liver, the kidneys, and the adrenal glands. Less common is spread to the heart, bones, and brain. 



What Is the Survival Rate for Pleural Mesothelioma?



Pleural mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer with a poor prognosis. Every patient and case is different, but it is generally considered incurable, and remission is rare. Survival times for pleural mesothelioma patients by stage are: 




Stage 1 - 21 months



Stage 2 - 19 months



Stage 3 - 16 months



Stage 4 - 12 months




How to Improve Your Prognosis



Several factors determine the prognosis for each patient. Some of these are out of your control, but some provide the opportunity to take action and improve your prognosis: 




Age and gender. Older patients have shorter survival times. Women respond better to treatment than men and generally have a better prognosis. 



Stage. The stage is a major factor in determining prognosis. If you have a history of asbestos exposure or symptoms of mesothelioma, seek a diagnosis as soon as possible. The earlier you get a diagnosis, the better your prognosis will be. 



Overall health. Your health at the time of diagnosis contributes to prognosis. Healthier patients can withstand more aggressive treatments. Do what you can to maintain or improve your health with healthy lifestyle choices, including diet, exercise, and quitting smoking. 



Treatment choices. Get treatment as soon as possible and choose the most aggressive treatments for which you qualify to extend your life expectancy. Work with mesothelioma specialists for the best treatment options.  




Treatment Options



There are three primary treatment options for pleural mesothelioma: surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. The best option is typically to use multiple treatment types, which can add months, even years, to a mesothelioma patient’s life. 



Newer treatments for pleural mesothelioma show great promise: immunotherapy, targeted therapies, Tumor Treating Fields, and other therapies used in clinical trials. 



Surgery



Currently, there are two main types of surgical procedures: pleurectomy/decortication (the removal of the pleural lining) and the more radical extrapleural pneumonectomy (surgical resection of the affected lung and the surrounding parietal and visceral pleura).



Patients must be in good physical condition to endure surgery. As a result, most patients in the advanced stages of pleural mesothelioma typically do not qualify.



Risks of surgery can include:




Blood clots and bleeding



Fatigue



Fever



Pneumonia



Lung Malfunction



Death




Chemotherapy



Chemotherapy is less invasive than surgery and reduces the size of malignant mesothelioma tumors in the pleural lining. 



Chemotherapy helps to relieve some of the symptoms and extend a patient’s life expectancy. It is also used to eliminate any other cancerous cells left behind after surgery.



Side effects of chemotherapy can include:




Patients can easily bleed or bruise because of reduced blood platelets



Hair loss from the chemotherapy drugs attacking healthy hair follicle cells



Mouth sores and cuts



Nausea, which may also include episodes of vomiting



Low white blood cell count, which results in possible infections



Lack of energy and feeling lethargic




An emerging type of chemotherapy for pleural mesothelioma patients is known as HITHOC. Patients first undergo surgery to remove tumors. Doctors then circulate heated chemotherapy drugs throughout the chest cavity. 



This approach is more common and effective in peritoneal mesothelioma treatment. Researchers continue to develop it as an effective treatment for pleural mesothelioma. 



Radiation Therapy



Radiation therapy is rarely used alone. Radiation can be an effective form of treatment in mesothelioma when combined with surgery, chemotherapy, or both. 



Radiation therapy involves the killing of cancer cells with doses of high-energy rays.



Radiation therapy can either prevent cancer from returning to surgically treated areas or slow down cancer’s progress in cases where surgery is not a viable option. Targeted radiation treatments also help to relieve a patient’s pain.



Side effects of radiation therapy can include:




Hair loss



Skin rashes and burns



Lethargy and fatigue



Vomiting



Diarrhea



Trouble with breathing



Loss of appetite




It's important to note that while these treatments help to control the spread of asbestos-related cancer in the pleural region, there is currently no cure for any form of mesothelioma. 



However, with the right kind of treatment, the prognosis can be extended, and painful symptoms can be reduced. If you have received a diagnosis of pleural mesothelioma, contact specialists immediately and start treatment as soon as possible. 



Immunotherapy



The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved a combination of immunotherapy drugs as a treatment for pleural mesothelioma in 2020. This was the first new approved treatment for mesothelioma in decades. 



The combination of nivolumab (Opdivo) and ipilimumab (Yervoy) is an immunotherapy. They use the patient's immune system to attack and kill cancer cells. Immunotherapy is particularly useful for patients not eligible for surgery. 



Clinical Trials



Another option for pleural mesothelioma patients is to enroll in a clinical trial. Clinical trials test new treatments and therapies using human patients. There are some risks, but clinical trials are generally considered safe and provide patients with access to otherwise unavailable treatments. 



Finding a Pleural Mesothelioma Doctor



One of the most important things you can do after receiving a pleural mesothelioma diagnosis is to find a specialist for treatment. As a rare cancer type, mesothelioma specialists are limited. It's worth seeking out a specialist for the best care and outcomes. 



Your doctor or diagnosing oncologist is a good place to start. They can help you find the best treatment in your area or help you find a treatment center or specialist you can travel to for care. 



Top Pleural Mesothelioma Specialists



Pleural mesothelioma specialists work at some of the best cancer treatment centers in the U.S. and in the world: 




Dr. Raphael Bueno, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA



Dr. Robert Cameron, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, CA



Dr. Marceo DaSilva, AdventHealth, Orlando, FL



Dr. Raja Flores, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY



Dr. Jacque P. Fontaine, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL



Dr. Abraham Lebenthal, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA



Dr. Harvey Pass, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY



Dr. David Rice, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX



Dr. Valery Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY



Dr. Anne Tsao, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX



Dr. Elliot Wakeam, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON




Veterans with mesothelioma can access specialist care at the VA Boston Healthcare System and the West Los Angeles VA Medical Center. 



Questions to Ask Your Medical Team



Getting diagnosed and starting treatment can be overwhelming. Your specialist and other members of your treatment team should be available and willing to answer all your questions so you feel comfortable making decisions. 



Be prepared for appointments with a list of questions. Here are some important questions you might want to ask your pleural mesothelioma treatment team: 




Is my diagnosis certain, or do I need a second opinion? 



What does my stage mean? 



What is my prognosis? 



Where are my tumors located? 



What are my treatment options? 



What do you recommend for treatment? 



Do I have a chance at remission? 



What can I do to improve my prognosis? 



What can you do to help me manage symptoms? 



What are the risks and side effects of treatment? 



What will happen after treatment?



How will you track my progress or determine if treatment is effective? 




A diagnosis of pleural mesothelioma can be devastating. Learn more about your diagnosis, work with specialists, make your treatment goals clear, and follow your doctors' recommendations for the best outcomes. 



Getting Help



If you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to significant financial compensation.  Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Multimodal Therapy for Mesothelioma Cancer

Multimodal therapy for mesothelioma treatment combines two or more different treatment types. Researchers have found that using more than one therapy provides better patient outcomes. The most commonly used treatments are chemotherapy, surgery, radiation therapy, and immunotherapy. 



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, awaiting those who've been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













What Is Multimodality Treatment for Mesothelioma?



Multimodal therapy is a combination of two or more different therapies used to increase the effectiveness of malignant mesothelioma treatment. Multimodality is considered the best strategy for extending survival time for mesothelioma patients. 



Oncologists usually choose a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy for treating mesothelioma. More recently, targeted therapy, gene therapy, immunotherapy, and other newer treatments have also been used.



Medical teams choose treatment types and combinations based on each individual patient's needs. Some patients, for instance, are not good candidates for surgery but benefit from combining chemotherapy with immunotherapy or targeted drugs. 



Studies suggest that trimodal therapy is particularly helpful for treating mesothelioma. Trimodal therapy usually involves combining radiation therapy and chemotherapy along with surgery. 



What Are the Steps in Multimodal Therapy?



Multimodal therapy for mesothelioma often includes three steps: 



1. Neoadjuvant Therapy



The first treatment in a multimodal approach is known as the neoadjuvant therapy. The purpose is usually to shrink the tumor before applying the primary treatment. For example, a patient might receive chemotherapy to make the tumors smaller before surgery. 



2. Primary Treatment 



The second step is the primary treatment, in which physicians attempt to remove the main tumors and cancerous cells. The primary treatment is usually surgery, but it can also be chemotherapy for those patients who don’t qualify for surgery.



3. Adjuvant Therapy



In many examples of multimodal mesothelioma therapy, the primary treatment is surgery. The adjuvant therapy is typically used to kill cancer cells that the surgeon could not remove. Radiation therapy is a common adjuvant, but it can also be chemotherapy. 



Benefits of Multimodal Therapy



Multimodal therapy is the best choice for most mesothelioma patients because the combination of multiple therapies provides better outcomes. 



Patients who do not receive treatment after a mesothelioma diagnosis only live an average of six to nine months. Treatment extends life expectancy. According to research, multimodal treatment gives most patients the longest possible life expectancy. 



A study of 21 mesothelioma patients undergoing chemotherapy and surgery found that the multimodal approach extended survival time to about 26 months. 



One study found that patients with mesothelioma who underwent trimodal treatment—radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and surgery—had a median survival time of nearly 40 months. 



How Do Doctors Choose Multimodal Therapies? 



While there are treatment guidelines for mesothelioma, no standard approach exists. Every patient is different. The choice of treatments depends on individual factors, like age, patient health, and patient preferences. 



Multimodal Treatments by Type of Mesothelioma 



The type of mesothelioma is one of the most critical factors in choosing treatments. Pleural mesothelioma, which is the most common type, develops around the lungs. Typical multimodal treatment for pleural mesothelioma is trimodal and includes surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. 



Chemotherapy with immunotherapy drugs is a common approach for patients who cannot undergo surgery. 



Peritoneal mesothelioma patients, those with mesothelioma in the abdominal cavity, often benefit from surgery and chemotherapy. 



Multimodal Treatments by Mesothelioma Stage



The stage of mesothelioma is another important consideration. It is most important in determining if a patient qualifies for surgery. 



If the cancer is too widespread, surgery is not an option. This is known as non-resectable mesothelioma. These patients typically receive a different combination of therapies, like chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and immunotherapy. 



What Are the Side Effects of Multimodal Treatment? 



Patients undergoing multimodal treatment might experience more side effects. Each individual treatment has the potential to cause unique side effects that range from mild to severe. 



Common side effects of chemotherapy include: 




Nausea



Vomiting



Lowered immunity



Hair loss



Fatigue



Changes in taste and appetite



Mouth sores



Pain




Common side effects and risks of surgery include: 




Bleeding



Blood clots



Infection



Collapsed lung



Pneumonia



Organ damage




Common side effects of radiation therapy include: 




Fatigue



Skin rashes at the treatment site



Hair loss at the treatment site




Multimodal Treatment for Peritoneal Mesothelioma



Because it is much more common, a lot of treatment research focuses on pleural mesothelioma. Peritoneal mesothelioma is the second most common type of this cancer. It develops in the abdominal cavity. 



Peritoneal mesothelioma patients generally have better survival times than pleural mesothelioma patients. One of the main reasons is that they benefit from a special type of multimodal therapy with two steps: 




The therapy begins with cytoreductive surgery, a surgery that aims to remove as much of the cancerous tissue as possible. 



The second step is HIPEC (hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy). This special kind of chemotherapy is different from the standard systemic type. Doctors heat the chemotherapy drugs and circulate them throughout the abdominal cavity. 




Studies have found that patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC can extend their life expectancies by years. 



What Are the Newest Treatments Used in Multimodal Therapy? 



Most physicians still rely on combinations of radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery. As science progresses, more options are becoming available. Some of the emerging treatments doctors use in multimodal mesothelioma therapy include: 




Immunotherapy is becoming increasingly common in mesothelioma treatment. In fact, a combination of two immunotherapy drugs—nivolumab and ipilimumab—was the first new mesothelioma treatment to be approved in many years. These drugs harness the patient's immune system to fight cancer. They have been shown to extend survival times in many mesothelioma patients. Pembrolizumab (Keytruda) is another immunotherapy drug with good potential for mesothelioma patients. 





Bevacizumab is another newer medication that is increasingly common in mesothelioma multimodal therapy. This targeted drug is an antiangiogenesis medication. It blocks a tumor's ability to create blood vessels, reducing blood flow to the tumor. Bevacizumab is now often used in combination with chemotherapy. 





Tumor Treating Fields (TTF) is an approved medical device that delivers low-intensity electric fields at tumors to kill cancer cells. It is non-invasive and can be applied outside the body. As a new device, research is limited but suggests that when combined with chemotherapy, TTF can extend survival time in mesothelioma patients. 





Photodynamic therapy uses light-activated anti-tumor drugs. It is a targeted treatment with greater precision than chemotherapy, and, therefore, fewer side effects. It could help patients undergoing surgery survive longer, but more research is needed. 





Cryotherapy consists of killing cancerous cells by freezing them via a needle. This type of treatment typically eliminates radiation therapy so that patients aren’t exposed to the harmful side effects of radiation. 





The SMART Protocol is a newer multimodal strategy for pleural mesothelioma patients that has shown positive outcomes. It stands for Surgery for Mesothelioma after Radiation Therapy. It does not use any emerging treatment but is a novel protocol. Patients undergo radiation therapy first to shrink tumors. They then undergo surgery. Research has shown that SMART can extend survival times significantly. 




Getting Help



Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. For questions and assistance, feel free to contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Radiation Therapy for Mesothelioma

Radiation therapy is one of three standard mesothelioma treatments doctors typically use with patients. Mesothelioma radiation therapy uses energy to kill cancer cells, usually from an external beam. Radiation is used as part of multimodal therapy, along with surgery and chemotherapy, not as a stand-alone treatment. 



Currently, over $30 billion is available in asbestos trusts for victims of asbestos-related diseases. If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.













What Is Radiation Therapy? 



This type of cancer treatment uses high-energy radiation to target and kill cancer cells. The high amount of energy damages DNA inside cells, causing them to die. 



Radiation therapy kills healthy cells as well as cancer cells, which can lead to some side effects. Advances in technology allow doctors to target the radiation beam more specifically to tumors to protect healthy cells. 



There are two main types of radiation therapy used in cancer treatment: brachytherapy, which involves placing a radioactive device inside the body, and external radiation therapy, which uses an external beam to target the tumor. 



How Is Radiation Therapy Used to Treat Mesothelioma? 



Mesothelioma patients rarely receive radiotherapy alone. They may receive radiation therapy as part of multimodal treatment, a combination of multiple treatment types. 



Radiation therapy can be part of a curative treatment plan. It can also be used in palliative care to relieve symptoms. There are several ways radiation therapy benefits mesothelioma patients as part of a treatment plan:  




Increasing survival time. Radiation therapy can be used to reduce tumors and as part of a multimodal treatment plan that increases life expectancy. 



Managing pain. As a palliative procedure, radiation therapy can help reduce pain by shrinking large tumors that press on nerves or organs. 



Preventing cancer seeding. Seeding occurs when cancer cells spread along an incision after surgery. Radiation along the incision might prevent this from occurring. How effective this is remains uncertain, and the practice is controversial. 




How Is Radiation Used in Multimodal Mesothelioma Treatment? 



The most common use of radiation therapy in mesothelioma patients is as one component of multimodal treatment. Multimodal means using more than one therapy to treat the cancer. Radiation is most often used along with surgery. 



Post-Surgery Radiation Therapy



Radiation therapy is most often used after surgery to remove mesothelioma tumors. Radiation kills cancer cells the surgeon was unable to remove. It can also be used to prevent seeding, the spread of cancer cells along surgical incision sites. 



The SMART Protocol



A newer use of radiation therapy is before surgery. Mesothelioma specialists in Toronto developed the SMART protocol (surgery for mesothelioma after radiation therapy).



Reversing the standard order of procedures, SMART uses radiation first to shrink tumors. Then, the surgeon removes the tumors. Research has indicated this can be an effective protocol. 



A 2021 publication of a SMART study involving 96 patients showed a median survival time of nearly 66 months, a huge improvement over most other treatments. 



Intraoperative Radiation



Some patients benefit from radiation therapy during surgical procedures. Before the incision is closed, the medical team applies radiation beams to the area of concern. This might eliminate radiation sessions later and might prevent seeding. 



Radiation Therapy with Immunotherapy



One of the most recent areas of study involving radiation and mesothelioma is combining the treatment with immunotherapy. Immunotherapy drugs harness the patient's immune system to fight cancer cells. 



There is some evidence from research that radiation therapy could enhance the effectiveness of immunotherapy in mesothelioma patients. The radiation might help boost the immune system as it kills cancer cells, helping the immunotherapy drugs work more effectively. 



What Are the Official Guidelines for Radiation Treatment for Mesothelioma? 



Mesothelioma treatments vary significantly by individual patient. Teams of specialists evaluate each patient to determine the best combination and order of treatments. However, there are recommended guidelines that specialists keep in mind. 



Mesothelioma treatment guidelines are set by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). These are some of the recommendations the NCCN has for radiation therapy and mesothelioma patients: 




Radiation therapy should not be used as a stand-alone treatment for mesothelioma. 



Radiation can be used as part of multimodal treatment for mesothelioma. 



Radiation to prevent seeding is not recommended except for some patients. 



Radiation can be used for palliative care, to reduce pain from tumors, and to shrink tumors that block the esophagus or airways. 




External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT)



EBRT is the type of radiation therapy most often used in cancer treatment. EBRT applies X-rays or other types of radiation externally (from outside the body) and aimed at a tumor to eliminate cancerous cells.



A machine is programmed to aim the high-energy beams very precisely at the location of the tumor. This maximizes the dosage of radiation to the tumor while minimizing the amount of healthy tissue affected. 



Types of External Beam Radiation Therapy



Radiation therapy for mesothelioma can be categorized by the type of beam used: 




Photon beam radiation uses X-rays at a much higher intensity than those used in diagnostic procedures, like chest X-rays. Photons are produced by a linear accelerator and do not feel like anything when they penetrate the skin during treatment. 



Particle beam radiation is produced by a particle accelerator and includes protons and neutrons. It must be applied closer to the tumor than photon beam radiation. It can deliver more energy to a tumor and limits the amount of damaging radiation affecting healthy tissue. 




EBRT can also be divided into various types based on how the radiation is delivered: 



Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3D-CRT)



3D-CRT aims radiation beams at the tumor from different positions. This allows it to conform to the three-dimensional shape of the tumor. It more precisely targets the tumor while reducing contact with healthy tissue. 



Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT)



IMRT is a newer development in radiation therapy that even further limits the damage to healthy tissue. It uses both a 3D conformation and variations in radiation intensity to protect healthy areas around the tumors. 



Helical tomotherapy is a special type of IMRT that uses various positions around the patient's body to deliver radiation even more precisely. 



Image-Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT)



IGRT uses MRI or CT images taken before the treatment to aim the radiation beams precisely. The exact location of a tumor can shift a little bit between treatment sessions. Imaging used before each session helps target it as accurately as possible. 



What to Expect When Undergoing External Beam Radiation Therapy



Radiation therapy can cause side effects later but is painless during treatment. A session generally takes just 15 to 30 minutes. A radiation therapist positions the patient on a treatment table. 



The machine being used, often a linear accelerator, has an arm that aims a beam of radiation at the patient. The patient lies still while the machine moves around them. The therapist works from a different room to stay safe from radiation beams. 



External beam radiation therapy does not make patients radioactive. If you undergo this treatment, you will be able to go home right away, and it is safe for others to be around you. 



What Are the Side Effects of External Beam Radiation Therapy? 



Radiation therapy causes side effects because it causes damage to healthy cells and tissue. Side effects from EBRT include:




Lethargy



Fatigue



Skin rashes



Dry skin



Skin burns



Hair loss




Patients administered abdominal radiation may also experience: 




Stomach cramps



Nausea



Loss of appetite




Pleural mesothelioma and lung cancer patients may experience: 




Shortness of breath



Wheezing



Difficulty breathing




Talk to your medical team about the risks and benefits of radiation therapy to treat your mesothelioma. This type of treatment is not suitable for every patient. 



Brachytherapy



Brachytherapy is a type of radiotherapy in which the radiation is placed directly next to or inside the area of the body that requires treatment. Brachytherapy is also known as internal radiotherapy or sealed source radiotherapy because of its positioning.



Once the radiation source, typically a tiny radioactive seed, is placed in or near the affected area, radiation kills cancerous cells while preserving healthy areas of tissue. Sometimes, the radioactive seeds remain in the body indefinitely, while at other times, they are removed shortly after treatment.



Oncologists do not often use brachytherapy to treat mesothelioma, but it can be useful for some patients. 



Side effects of brachytherapy may include: 




Fatigue



Dry mouth



Inflammation of the mouth



Dry and burning skin



Rash




Because it involves a surgical procedure, brachytherapy is generally more painful and uncomfortable than EBRT. Most procedures for brachytherapy are minimally invasive. 



Patients undergoing brachytherapy may give off some radiation. If the device is temporary, you may have to stay in the hospital for the duration. Permanent implants eventually stop giving off radiation. Your surgeon will explain any precautions you need to take to protect people around you from radiation. 



Getting Help



Remember, if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you need additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Surgery for Mesothelioma Cancer

Surgery for mesothelioma is used to remove tumors and also to relieve symptoms. The most common surgeries for mesothelioma patients are pleurectomy/decortication and extrapleural pneumonectomy. Patients most often receive chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radiation therapy before or after surgery. 



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, awaiting those who've been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more.













How Is Surgery Used for Mesothelioma? 



Surgery is one of several treatment options for many patients with mesothelioma. It is also a diagnostic tool and a strategy for managing symptoms in some patients. 



The goals of surgery for mesothelioma include: 




Treating or curing mesothelioma. For patients eligible for a procedure, surgery can reduce tumor size and be part of a plan to achieve remission. This is rare in mesothelioma, but even when a cure isn't possible, surgery can help extend life expectancy. 



Managing the symptoms of mesothelioma. Palliative care is any treatment offered not to treat or cure the cancer but to relieve symptoms. Surgery can provide symptom relief for many patients with mesothelioma. 



Diagnosing mesothelioma. Doctors often use one of several biopsy procedures to remove abnormal tissue for a diagnosis. These procedures are typically minimally invasive. 




Surgery as Part of Multimodal Mesothelioma Treatment



Mesothelioma is almost always treated with a multimodal approach. This means that doctors use two or more types of treatment to manage the cancer. 



Patients who qualify for surgery will not undergo surgery alone. They might receive chemotherapy first to shrink tumors before surgery. Or, they could get chemotherapy or radiation therapy after surgery to remove any cancer cells the surgeon missed. 



Can Mesothelioma Be Cured by Surgery? 



Curing mesothelioma is very rare. In fact, most specialists do not use the term cure. They refer to a possibility of remission when cancer is no longer detected. Even with remission, the cancer can return years later. 



Mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer that spreads rapidly and is often diagnosed in the later stages when surgery is no longer an option. In stages 3 or 4, the cancer has spread too far to make curative surgery a possibility. 



For patients diagnosed in stages 1 or 2, aggressive surgery combined with other treatments could lead to remission. 



Although a cure is rarely possible, aggressive surgery can extend life expectancy in many patients, according to research: 




Chemotherapy and no surgery - 18.6 months



Extrapleural pneumonectomy surgery - 20.9 months



Pleurectomy/decortication surgery - 24.6 months




Am I Eligible for Mesothelioma Surgery? 



Your medical team will evaluate you and determine your eligibility for a surgical procedure. Doctors consider several factors when deciding if a mesothelioma patient can or should have surgery: 




Cancer Stage. The stage of mesothelioma is one of the most important factors. Many patients diagnosed at an early stage qualify for surgery. If the cancer has spread too far from its original location, surgery is not possible. 



Cancer Cell Type. Patients with sarcomatoid mesothelioma are generally not good candidates for surgery because of the aggressive nature of the cells. Patients with early-stage epithelioid cell type may qualify. 



Lung Function. Curative surgery for mesothelioma is aggressive and very hard on the body. Doctors must ensure patients have adequate lung function before proceeding. 



Age and Overall Health. Patients who are younger and in good overall health can better withstand the risks of radical surgery. They are more likely to be eligible. 




Potentially Curative Surgery for Mesothelioma



Surgery is one of the most common and reliably effective treatments for mesothelioma. Most medical teams use it in combination with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or both.



Potentially curative surgery is the most extensive type of surgery available for mesothelioma patients. Qualifications for this type of surgery are stricter than other surgeries. 



Since it is a major surgery, mesothelioma patients must be in good physical shape and health to successfully recover from such an invasive procedure.



Extrapleural Pneumonectomy (EPP)



This form of surgery is most likely to remove the cancer completely. Candidates are those whose cancer has not spread too far. The procedure is extensive, so the patient must also be in optimal health. 



EPP consists of removing the lining of the lungs, part of the diaphragm, close lymph nodes, the pericardium, and one lung. Once the procedure is completed, an artificial diaphragm and pericardium are inserted into the patient’s body. 



Pleurectomy/Decortication (P/D)



Pleurectomy/decortication is not as invasive as an EPP. It removes the entire pleural tissue from one or both lungs. This form of surgery can also be part of palliative care. 



The side effects of these types of surgery will differ depending on the patient. The common side effects include:




Blood clots 



Bleeding



Fatigue



Fever



Pneumonia



Lung Malfunction




Surgery for Peritoneal Mesothelioma



Patients with peritoneal mesothelioma are more likely to be able to achieve remission with surgery. There are a few options: 




Cytoreduction. Also known as debulking surgery, this procedure removes the peritoneum and any other visible tumors in the abdomen. 



Peritonectomy. Often a part of cytoreduction, peritonectomy refers to the removal of the peritoneum. 



Omentectomy. The omentum is a layer of fatty tissue that covers the abdomen. Surgeons might remove this to remove any tumors that spread there or to prevent additional spread. 




Many patients with peritoneal mesothelioma qualify for a procedure known as HIPEC that is most likely to lead to remission. A surgeon first performs cytoreduction surgery and then circulates heated chemotherapy drugs throughout the abdominal cavity. 



Cytoreduction with HIPEC is now considered a standard therapy for many patients with peritoneal mesothelioma. Some patients live years after receiving this treatment. 



Surgery for Pericardial Mesothelioma



Pericardial mesothelioma is a very rare form of mesothelioma that develops around the heart. It is even more difficult to treat than other types because of the location of tumors. 



Some patients might benefit from a pericardectomy, a surgery to remove the pericardium. This is a risky procedure, and not all patients qualify. 



Another option is a tumor resection, a less extensive procedure to remove some of the diseased pericardium. This will not lead to remission but might extend life expectancy. 



Palliative Surgery for Mesothelioma



Palliative surgery is less intrusive than potentially curative surgery. Palliative procedures are used to relieve symptoms and to improve quality of life. 



Keep in mind that, like other forms of surgery, palliative surgery is not a cure, nor does it completely remove cancer. Undergoing this type of surgery helps patients live more manageable lives with less pain and fewer symptoms.



There are different types of palliative surgery options for mesothelioma patients:



Pleurodesis



Pleurodesis removes uncomfortable fluid buildup in the lungs. The surgeon makes a tiny incision on the patient’s chest wall and inserts a hollow chest tube. The chest tube allows the harmful fluid to drain out. 



Next, physicians insert a talc-like substance into the chest area, which helps seal the lungs to prevent fluid buildup. The chest tube is then left in the chest area for a few days to drain any excess fluid.



Thoracentesis



This form of palliative surgery is similar to pleurodesis as it drains fluid buildup from the chest. The difference is that a needle or catheter is placed into the chest instead of a chest tube. 



Talc is also not injected into the chest during thoracentesis surgery. The procedure is typically quick and can be repeated several times. 



Paracentesis



Paracentesis is a surgery performed on patients with fluid buildup in the peritoneum (the tissue around the abdominal organs). A needle inserted into the peritoneal tissue drains fluid. 



Pericardiocentesis



This procedure drains fluid from around the heart in patients with pericardial mesothelioma. A small inserted needle is used to remove fluid. 



Diagnostic Surgery



Typically performed with biopsies, physicians perform diagnostic surgery to identify the location and presence of cancer. Once cancer has been determined, the harmful tissues are removed with a hollow biopsy needle or other instruments.



Diagnostic surgery removes a small portion of tissue for a pathologist to examine.



Biopsies can be performed in several different ways. Your physician will ultimately decide which method works best for you:




Incisional Biopsy: A fragment of the cancerous tissue is removed and sent to diagnostics for testing.



Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy: Also known as needle biopsy, this method is used to remove samples of fluids and tissues via a fine needle that’s inserted into the affected area.



Excisional Biopsy: The entire cancerous tissue, or a large portion of the tissue is removed and sent to diagnostics for testing. 



Core Biopsy: A core biopsy is similar to a fine needle aspiration biopsy as both procedures use needles to remove samples from the body. The difference, however, is that a core biopsy entails using a much larger needle so that the actual tissue is removed instead of just samples. 





Endoscopic biopsy: An endoscope is inserted into the area of the body that’s infected, which allows physicians to view the cancerous cells.




The type of biopsy performed will depend upon several factors, including:




The shape, size, and location of the tumor



Patient preference (if applicable)



Patient medical history



The experience and training of the performing physician



The number of tumors/cancerous cells present



The stage of the cancer




Doctors will weigh various factors before determining which type of surgery is most suitable. In some cases, surgery is not suitable, and doctors will move on to other treatment plans. 



Almost all malignant mesothelioma surgery patients use a combination of different treatments to get the maximum benefits while battling mesothelioma.



Risks and Complications of Mesothelioma Surgery



Any kind of surgery poses risks. The more extensive and invasive the surgery, the bigger the risks. If the patient is in poor health or is older, these factors can also make surgery more risky. 



Mesothelioma patients and their doctors must weigh the risks of surgical treatments against the potential benefits when deciding on treatment. 



Some of the potential complications of undergoing mesothelioma surgery include: 




Excessive bleeding



Blood clots



Infection



Pain



Collapsed lung



Organ damage



Fluid buildup



Reduced lung function



Heart arrhythmia




There is always a risk of death with surgery as well. EPP surgery for mesothelioma patients is the riskiest and most likely to be fatal. 



Getting Help



If you've been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you'll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Types of Mesothelioma

Mesothelioma is a rare cancer that develops in the mesothelium, the tissue that lines various parts of the body. The four main types of mesothelioma are pleural (lungs), peritoneal (abdomen), pericardial (heart), and testicular mesothelioma. Mesothelioma can also be categorized by cell type, stage, and more. 



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds awaiting those who've been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more.













What Are the Four Mesothelioma Types?



Mesothelioma is a rare cancer that affects the mesothelium. The mesothelium is a double layer of tissue that surrounds organs and lines cavities of the body. Mesothelioma is most often caused by asbestos exposure. 



There are four types of mesothelioma characterized by the location of the primary tumor: 




Pleural Mesothelioma



Peritoneal Mesothelioma



Pericardial Mesothelioma 



Testicular Mesothelioma 




Pleural Mesothelioma



Accounting for 75% to 80% of all mesothelioma diagnoses, pleural mesothelioma is the most common type. It develops in the pleura, the double layer of tissue that surrounds the lungs. 



Pleural mesothelioma is prevalent because inhalation of asbestos fibers is the primary cause of mesothelioma. Asbestos fibers lodge in the pleural tissue, causing inflammation and damage. 



Common pleural mesothelioma symptoms are: 




Coughing 



Chest pains



Shortness of breath




Because it occurs so close to the lungs, pleural mesothelioma is sometimes misdiagnosed as lung cancer. It often spreads to lung tissue eventually. 



Treatment for pleural mesothelioma typically involves multiple therapies, including surgery for eligible patients. Other options for mesothelioma that cannot be treated surgically include chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and immunotherapy. 



Peritoneal Mesothelioma



Peritoneal mesothelium develops in the peritoneum, the tissue that lines the abdomen and surrounds abdominal organs. It is the second most common type and accounts for 20% or fewer cases. 



Peritoneal mesothelioma probably develops after people unintentionally ingest asbestos fibers. It might also form as fibers migrate from the airways to the abdomen. 



Symptoms of peritoneal mesothelioma include: 




Abdominal pain



Abdominal swelling



Diarrhea



Constipation




Peritoneal mesothelioma usually has a better prognosis than pleural mesothelioma, in part because it is easier to treat. Patients are more likely to qualify for surgery and can also benefit from an effective type of chemotherapy called HIPEC. 



HIPEC is the regional circulation of heated chemotherapy drugs throughout the abdominal cavity. Surgery followed by HIPEC helps extend patient life expectancy significantly. 



Pericardial Mesothelioma



Pericardial mesothelioma is extremely rare, accounting for about 1% of diagnoses. It develops in the pericardium around the heart. It probably results from asbestos fibers moving from the airways into the pericardium. 



Symptoms of pericardial mesothelioma include: 




Chest pains



Difficulty breathing



Irregular heartbeat



Coughing




Because it is so rare, it is easy for doctors to misdiagnose pericardial mesothelioma as something more common, like heart failure.



It is difficult to treat pericardial mesothelioma because it is so close to the heart. Doctors may remove the pericardium in a procedure called a pericardiectomy. Chemotherapy is another treatment option for patients who cannot have surgery. 



Testicular Mesothelioma



Testicular mesothelioma grows in the lining around the testes. It is extremely rare, with fewer than 100 cases ever reported. It is also known as tunica vaginalis testis mesothelioma. 



The most common and obvious symptom of testicular mesothelioma is a lump on the testes, which is often mistaken for a hernia. Treatment is a simple surgical procedure if the cancer is caught before it has spread. 



Malignant vs. Benign Mesothelioma



Any tumor is a collection of cells. If it is benign, it is not cancerous. It does not spread to other tissues. A malignant tumor grows faster, invades other tissues, and spreads to other tissues and organs. 



Most cases of mesothelioma are malignant. In very rare cases, mesothelioma is benign. Some experts would not even call this type of tumor a true mesothelioma. It might more accurately be called a fibrous tumor of the mesothelium. 



Benign tumors are much less serious than malignant tumors, but they can still cause problems. They can grow large enough to cause symptoms by pressing on other tissues or organs. Some benign tumors become malignant over time. 



Is All Mesothelioma Caused by Asbestos? 



Asbestos exposure is the only confirmed cause of mesothelioma. Most people with mesothelioma worked with or around asbestos decades before their diagnosis. 



Still, some people have this diagnosis and no known history of asbestos exposure. This happens more commonly in peritoneal mesothelioma, the type women are most likely to have. 



No one knows for sure what else could cause asbestos. There are likely genetic factors. Another mineral similar to asbestos, called erionite, could be responsible for some cases of mesothelioma. 



Mesothelioma Cell Types



One of the reasons why mesothelioma is so difficult to diagnose and treat effectively is that its histology (the microscopic characteristics of cells and tissue) divides asbestos cancer cell types into three primary groups. There are also many rare cell types. 



Primary Mesothelioma Cell Types



Most people diagnosed with mesothelioma fall into these three primary cell type categories: 



Epithelioid Mesothelioma



Epithelioid mesothelioma, or epithelial mesothelioma, accounts for 60-70% of all diagnosed cases. Epithelial cells cover the surfaces of tissues and organs in the body. They have prominent papillo-tubular structures.



Patients with epithelioid mesothelioma usually have the best outcomes with treatment as compared to the other cell types. This is because epithelial cells tend to adhere more strongly to each other, so the cancer spreads more slowly. 



Sarcomatoid Mesothelioma



This form of mesothelioma accounts for 10-15% of cases and is more aggressive. Sarcomatoid cells are spindle-shaped and closely resemble sarcomas, cancers of connective tissues. 



Diagnosis for sarcomatoid mesothelioma is especially challenging as the healthy cells are complicated to differentiate from the cancerous cells.



The spindle shape of sarcomatoid mesothelioma cells makes it more difficult for them to stick together. They are more likely than epithelioid cells to break apart and spread. Sarcomatoid mesothelioma is the most aggressive type and most likely to metastasize rapidly. 



Biphasic Mesothelioma 



Biphasic mesothelioma is a mix of sarcomatoid and epithelial cancer cells. Doctors diagnose patients with biphasic mesothelioma when 10% or more of the cancer cells are of one type. For example, a patient with 11% epithelial cells and 89% sarcomatoid cells is diagnosed as biphasic. 



Biphasic mesothelioma accounts for 10% to 15% of cases. In terms of outcome, the prognosis varies depending on the proportion of cell types. The higher the proportion of epithelial cells, the better the prognosis. 



Rare Mesothelioma Cell Types



Epithelioid and sarcomatoid mesothelioma can be broken down into more distinct categories in some patients who have these rare cell types: 




Papillary Mesothelioma. This form of mesothelioma is most often diagnosed in female victims. It is a rare type of epithelioid mesothelioma that develops in the lining of the abdomen. Most cases of papillary mesothelioma are benign, and the tumors are painless. Since this type of mesothelioma is so rare, there is currently no standard medical treatment.



Cystic Mesothelioma. This type of mesothelioma is considered rare and benign and occurs mostly in females. Unlike other forms of the disease, cystic mesothelioma is generally not caused by asbestos exposure.



Small Cell Mesothelioma. The small cell form of mesothelioma is a rare cell subtype, but it also comes with a grim prognosis. More studies are needed to understand the best course of treatment.



Heterologous Mesothelioma. This form of mesothelioma is so rare that treatment options at this point are difficult. Scientists and physicians continue to research in order to get more information on the causes and formation of heterologous mesothelioma.



Deciduoid Mesothelioma. This is an extremely rare subtype with distinct yet extremely different characteristics of the other subtypes. The prognosis for deciduoid mesothelioma is grim, with an average survival rate of around six months.



Lymphohistiocytoid Mesothelioma. This is another rare subtype of mesothelioma, accounting for less than 1% of all diagnosed cases. Studies indicate that prognosis varies according to treatment and each patient's individual medical history.



Desmoplastic Mesothelioma. Desmoplastic mesothelioma is another subtype of mesothelioma that is generally of the sarcomatoid variety. Like many other subtypes, the prognosis is typically poor.




This division of cell types is complicated. Pathologists must perform many tests to identify them, but it isn't foolproof. 



Medical teams and pathologists use a variety of diagnostic and histological tests to try to determine cell type. This is important because it helps them determine the best course of treatment and a patient's likely prognosis. 



Mesothelioma Types By Stage



Although there are different types of mesothelioma, all forms of the cancer are classified in stages, ranging from stage one through four. 



Staging categorizes cancer based on how much of the disease is present in the body. It also measures the spread of cancer from its point of origin to other tissues or organs.



Malignant mesothelioma staging is useful to doctors because it allows them to choose suitable treatment options, such as palliative or curative.



Malignant mesothelioma is classified as a Stage Ia-IV cancer, regardless of subtype:




Stage 1A: Tumor is in the outer layer of the pleura (parietal pleura). It is not in the pleura covering the lung (visceral pleura)



Stage 1B: Tumor is in both the parietal and visceral pleura



Stage 2: Tumor has spread into the lung or diaphragm.



Stage 3: Tumor has spread to one or more of these organs or areas: the pericardium, part of the chest wall, or lymph glands inside the chest



Stage 4: Tumor has spread to one or more of the following: across the chest wall or pericardium, various areas of the chest wall, the heart, liver, windpipe or esophagus, or the opposite lung




Since the symptoms of mesothelioma develop slowly and mimic other respiratory or abdominal diseases, it is difficult to detect and diagnose. In many cases, the tumors are not detected until they have reached Stages Ia or II. This makes effective treatment of mesothelioma difficult and reduces the patients’ post-diagnosis survival time significantly.



Your medical team will give you a detailed description of the type of mesothelioma you have when you receive a diagnosis. The type helps inform treatment and prognosis. 



Getting Help



If you've been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you'll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Stage 4 Mesothelioma Cancer

Stage 4 mesothelioma is the most advanced stage of mesothelioma. In stage 4, tumors have metastasized and spread to distant parts of the body. Treatment for stage 4 mesothelioma focuses on relieving symptoms, and the median survival time is around 14 months. 



If you or a loved one have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. Over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds is available right now for those who are dealing with an asbestos disease. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.





What Is Stage 4 Mesothelioma? 



Stage 4 is the final stage of mesothelioma. Once a patient enters the final stage of mesothelioma, the tumor has spread significantly throughout the body. Symptoms are more intense, widespread, and uncomfortable. 



The most significant characteristic of stage 4 mesothelioma is metastasis, the distant spread of cancer cells beyond the primary tumor. At this point, physicians usually look for ways to alleviate symptoms and improve a patient's quality of life. 



TNM Designations for Stage 4 Mesothelioma



Doctors stage mesothelioma at the time of diagnosis. The stage designation is important for planning treatment and estimating a patient's survival time. 



Doctors use the TNM (Tumor, Node, Metastasis) system for staging mesothelioma. T describes the primary tumor, N describes the spread of cancer to lymph nodes, and M describes the spread of tumors to distant parts of the body. 



There are several possible combinations of TNM designations that describe stage 4 mesothelioma: 




T1 to T4. The T designation can be anywhere from 1 to 4. This means the primary tumor might still be localized in the chest cavity or might have spread within the region. 



N0 to N2. The spread of cancer to the lymph nodes could be minimal or extensive. 



M1. M1 is the most important designation for this stage. It means the cancer is metastatic and has spread to areas of the body distant from the primary tumor. 




Stage 4 Peritoneal Mesothelioma



Peritoneal mesothelioma is less common than pleural mesothelioma. It develops in the abdominal cavity rather than the chest. There is no standard staging system for peritoneal mesothelioma. Most doctors use a modified combination of TNM and the Peritoneal Cancer Index. 



As with stage 4 pleural mesothelioma, stage 4 peritoneal mesothelioma is characterized by metastasis. There could be any degree of local spread within the abdomen, but the cancer has also spread to distant organs and tissue. 



What Are the Metastasis Sites in Stage 4 Mesothelioma? 



Every patient is different, and tumors can potentially spread to any location in the body. The most common sites of metastasis for pleural mesothelioma include: 




Lung on the other side of the chest



Liver



Kidneys



Adrenal glands




Less commonly, tumors may spread to bone tissue, the brain, the heart, and the spinal cord. 



Typical sites of peritoneal metastasis include: 




Liver



Lungs



Kidneys



Adrenal glands



Heart



Thyroid



Skin



Bones



Brain




Can You Survive Stage 4 Mesothelioma? 



Survival times for stage 4 mesothelioma are usually short, around a year or a little more, with good treatment. Mesothelioma at any stage is generally considered incurable, although some patients achieve remission. Remission is very unlikely for stage 4 mesothelioma patients. 



The best way to extend life expectancy with stage 4 mesothelioma is with multimodal treatment. This is a combination of treatment types that target the cancer. 



Stage 4 Mesothelioma Symptoms



Stage 4 pleural mesothelioma symptoms are often more severe and painful than in previous stages. The early-stage symptoms of coughing, shortness of breath, and chest pains typically worsen. Other symptoms of stage 4 mesothelioma include: 




Coughing with blood



Difficulty swallowing and eating



Night sweats



Fever



Unintentional weight loss



Muscle wasting



Fatigue



Malaise




Typical symptoms of stage 4 peritoneal mesothelioma include: 




Abdominal pain and swelling



Fluid buildup in the abdomen



Constipation



Diarrhea



Intestinal blockage



Unintentional weight loss



Muscle wasting



Fatigue and malaise



Fever



Night sweats




Stage 4 mesothelioma patients also experience symptoms related to sites of metastasis. For example, if tumors have spread to the bone, it can cause significant pain. Tumors in the brain can cause headaches, dizziness, and seizures. 



How Is Stage Mesothelioma 4 Treated?



Patients in stage 4 have limited treatment options. The main focus of treatment at this late stage is palliation to make the patient feel better. Treatment can also extend life expectancy. 



Surgery and Palliative Treatments for Stage 4 Mesothelioma



Surgery to remove significant cancerous tissue and to extend life expectancy is not always an option for stage 4 mesothelioma patients. Often, the cancer is too widespread for this to be a good treatment option. 



Some patients with stage 4 mesothelioma might qualify for and choose a curative type of surgery, typically pleurectomy/decortication. This procedure removes an extensive amount of tissue from the chest cavity. 



According to one study, this surgery, combined with photodynamic therapy and chemotherapy, extended life expectancy for several late-stage mesothelioma patients. Even for patients with extensive cancer spread, this multimodal treatment strategy prolonged life to between one and three years. 



Palliative surgical procedures are also available to patients not eligible for or who do not want to undergo radical surgeries: 




Thoracentesis is a procedure that drains uncomfortable fluid from the chest cavity. 



Paracentesis drains fluid from the abdominal cavity in patients with peritoneal mesothelioma or abdominal metastases. 



Pericardiocentesis removes fluid from the area around the heart. 



Pleurodesis is a procedure that seals the two layers of the pleura to prevent fluid from building up again. 




Some patients benefit from surgery to remove some metastatic tumors that cause significant symptoms. For instance, a tumor pressing on nerves can cause a lot of pain. Surgery to remove it or reduce its size can be helpful. 



Chemotherapy and Radiation



Chemotherapy helps shrink the tumors to provide symptom relief. Radiation therapy can do the same and, for some patients, causes fewer side effects. In some instances, chemotherapy and radiation are combined, depending on the patient’s overall health and ability to sustain both treatments.



The standard chemotherapy combination for mesothelioma is pemetrexed with cisplatin. Some patients might also receive bevacizumab, a targeted drug, which might help extend survival time. 



Additional Treatment Options for Stage 4 Mesothelioma



Surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy are the standard treatments for mesothelioma, but there are other options and emerging treatments: 




Immunotherapy. Immunotherapy is becoming more common. It is a treatment that uses medications to harness the patient's immune system to kill cancer cells. Results from a recent clinical trial found that treatment with two immunotherapy drugs extended survival times for patients who were ineligible for surgery. This was compared to chemotherapy. 



Cryotherapy. Cryotherapy is an emerging treatment that uses cold temperatures to kill cancer cells. 



Tumor Treating Fields. This is another emerging treatment that might be available to some patients. It uses electric fields outside the body to target and kill cancer cells. 



Clinical trials. A clinical trial might also be an option for a stage 4 patient. Clinical trials test emerging therapies and new medication combinations with human subjects. It can be a good way to access treatments not yet widely available. 




Stage 4 mesothelioma patients have more treatment options than they might realize. It's essential that you talk to your medical team about these options and discuss which might be best for your treatment goals. 



What Is the Prognosis for Stage 4 Mesothelioma? 



In general, the prognosis for stage 4 mesothelioma is not positive. Because the cancer is so widespread, eliminating all tumors is unlikely. Treatment is still important. It provides symptom relief and extends survival time. 



What Is the Survival Time for Stage 4 Mesothelioma? 



The median survival time for stage 4 mesothelioma patients is 14.9 months. This statistic comes from a large group of patients who underwent treatment. The survival time is much less, about six months, for patients who do not receive treatment. 



What Factors Influence Stage 4 Survival Time? 



Estimates of survival time or life expectancy are highly individualized. The statistics that include many patients are important, but individual factors also play a major role in prognosis: 




Women have better survival rates than men



Younger patients in better overall health have better survival rates



Patients with the epithelioid cell type have better outcomes than those with the rarer and more aggressive sarcomatoid cell type. 



Peritoneal mesothelioma patients generally have a better prognosis than pleural mesothelioma patients. 




How to Improve Your Stage 4 Mesothelioma Prognosis



A diagnosis of stage 4 mesothelioma might seem overwhelming, but it is not hopeless. The best thing you can do to improve your outlook is to get treatment. You'll get the best outcome from working with mesothelioma specialists, choosing the most aggressive treatments possible, and starting treatment right away. 



Living With Stage 4 Mesothelioma



Living with advanced, terminal cancer presents many challenges. Patients with end-stage cancer cope with physical discomfort, treatments, and mental health issues. They have to make important practical decisions and often worry about loved ones they will leave behind. 



If you are facing a stage 4 mesothelioma diagnosis, take these steps to cope better: 




Set Treatment Goals. Patients too often let their doctors take over treatment, but you have control over what happens. Talk to your doctors about what you want to get out of treatment and take charge of the plan. 



Choose Palliative Care. Palliative treatments are so important for helping you feel more comfortable and improving your quality of life for the time you have left.



Choose Mental Health Care. Mental health is too often neglected but is an important aspect of living with cancer. Talk to your medical team about working with a trained mental health specialist with cancer experience. 



Rely on Your Support Network. Let your friends and family help you during this difficult time. They can support you with practical help and by being there to listen. Cancer support groups can also provide comfort. 



Make End-of-Life Plans. Let your closest loved ones help you make important end-of-life decisions. These include legal, financial, and healthcare decisions. Make your preferences known now, so your loved ones can implement them later. 




Getting Legal Help



Remember, if you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, regardless of what stage, there is a good chance you qualify for significant compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Stage 3 Mesothelioma Cancer

Stage 3 mesothelioma is an advanced stage of mesothelioma in which tumors have spread far throughout the chest cavity. The prognosis at this later stage is poor. Most patients in stage 3 are not eligible for surgery, but other treatments can extend life expectancy. 



Regardless of what stage of mesothelioma you are in, you may be entitled to substantial financial compensation. Trust funds with more than $30 billion are available right now for mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis victims. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Facts About Stage 3 Mesothelioma



Stage 3 mesothelioma is considered late-stage mesothelioma. A diagnosis at stage 3 can be overwhelming and upsetting, but treatments are available and can help. Learn more about your diagnosis to make informed choices about care. 




Symptoms of mesothelioma during stage 3 become much more frequent and severe. 



The prognosis for stage 3 mesothelioma is poor, but treatment can extend life expectancy. 



Tumors in stage 3 mesothelioma have spread significantly throughout the chest cavity. 



The average life expectancy for stage 3 mesothelioma patients is 17.9 months. 



Participation in a clinical trial to access innovative treatments is an option for some stage 2 patients. 




How Is Mesothelioma Staged? 



Staging is a system that describes the locations of tumors in the body and how far they have spread from the primary tumor. Doctors assign patients a cancer stage at the time of diagnosis. Using diagnostic tools, such as biopsies and imaging scans, they can describe where the cancer has spread. 



Staging mesothelioma is important for two main reasons: 




The stage of mesothelioma helps doctors and patients plan treatment. 



The stage contributes to a life expectancy estimate, which is important for patients. 




The most common cancer staging system is TNM (Tumor, Node, Metastasis). It describes the primary tumor, regional tumors, the spread of cancer to lymph nodes, and metastasis, the spread of cancer to distant parts of the body. 



Mesothelioma specialists most often use TNM to stage pleural mesothelioma. Peritoneal mesothelioma is much rarer and does not have a standardized staging system. Most doctors use a modified version of TNM with the Peritoneal Cancer Index. 



What Are the Characteristics of Stage 3 Mesothelioma? 



Stage 3 mesothelioma is characterized by extensive regional spread of tumors. This means the tumors have not spread to distant parts of the body but are found throughout the chest cavity. 



There are three different TNM designations for stage 3 mesothelioma: 




Stage 3A with T3, N1, M0. The primary tumor has spread throughout the pleural tissue around the lungs. It has also spread to the lung, diaphragm, and mediastinum (tissue between the lungs) on one side of the chest. Tumors have spread to either the chest wall or the pericardium surrounding the heart. It has spread to nearby lymph nodes on just one side of the chest. There is no metastasis. 





Stage 3B with T1-T3, N2, M0. Stage 3B is a little more advanced with any degree of local spread. Tumors have spread to nearby lymph nodes and lymph nodes on the other side of the chest. There is no metastasis. 





Stage 3B with T4, any N, M0. 3B can also be described as extensive spread of the primary tumor throughout the chest cavity, including the chest wall and the peritoneum toward the abdomen. The spread is extensive enough that surgery could not possibly remove all the tumors. There is no spread to lymph nodes and no metastasis. 




What Is Stage 3 Peritoneal Mesothelioma? 



With no standardized system for peritoneal mesothelioma, individual specialists might describe the characteristics of stage 3 a little differently. Generally, stage 3 means there is either extensive spread throughout abdominal tissues and organs, to lymph nodes, or both. 



Stage 3 Is a Common Diagnosis for Mesothelioma



Mesothelioma is a rare cancer that is difficult to diagnose. The early symptoms are often similar to more common and less serious illnesses. Many people don't seek a diagnosis until the cancer is already advanced. 



For these reasons, a diagnosis of mesothelioma in stages 1 or 2 is rare. A diagnosis of stage 3 or stage 4 mesothelioma is much more common than an early-stage diagnosis. Unfortunately, this limits treatment options and worsens the prognosis, but patients still have options and reasons to hope. 



Is Stage 3 Mesothelioma Curable? 



Mesothelioma specialists do not like to talk in terms of curing this disease. Most experts agree there is no cure for mesothelioma at any stage. 



Some patients might achieve remission with treatment, but there is always a chance the cancer will return. Remission is more likely in the earlier stages and less likely at stage 3. 



Rather than trying to cure stage 3 mesothelioma, specialists manage it as a chronic illness. They respect a patient's treatment goals, such as extending life expectancy. 



Stage 3 Mesothelioma Symptoms



The symptoms of stage 3 mesothelioma are more severe and numerous than in earlier stages. Stage 3 pleural mesothelioma symptoms include: 




Severe difficulty breathing and shortness of breath



Chest pains and tightness



Lumps under the skin on the chest



Wheezing



Severe cough, sometimes with blood



Fever



Fatigue



Unintentional weight loss




Symptoms of stage 3 peritoneal mesothelioma include: 




Abdominal fluid buildup and swelling



Abdominal pain



Nausea



Vomiting



Diarrhea



Constipation



Fatigue



Fever



Changes in weight



Night sweats




Symptoms vary by individual. These common and general symptoms are experienced by many patients but to different degrees. Some patients may have additional symptoms based on the locations of tumors. 



How Is Stage 3 Mesothelioma Treated? 



With the tumor spreading during this stage of mesothelioma, treatment options are limited. Surgery and radiation therapy usually have minimal success since the tumors have spread to too many locations to eliminate them effectively. 



While during stages 1 and 2, the goal of treatment might be remission, treatment during stage 3 usually focuses on extending life expectancy and relieving symptoms. 



Surgery for Stage 3 Mesothelioma



Surgery at stage 3 is uncommon unless there is a single mass of tumors that can be removed relatively easily. 



Another reason to use surgery at stage 3 is to relieve symptoms. A surgeon can remove a tumor pressing on the spine, for instance. Reducing overall tumor mass can help a patient feel better. 



Although not typical, some stage 3 patients do qualify for a more extensive procedure. Patients in stage 3A with less extensive tumor spread may be eligible for a pleurectomy/decortication. This surgery removes a significant amount of tissue from the chest cavity and can significantly extend life expectancy. 



Another potential option is an extrapleural pneumonectomy. This procedure removes extensive tissue and one entire lung. It is risky, and not many stage 3 patients qualify for it. 



Other Treatment Options for Stage 3 Mesothelioma



While surgery is not always an option, stage 3 patients can benefit from several other therapies: 




Chemotherapy



Radiation therapy



Immunotherapy



Emerging or experimental treatments




Chemotherapy is the most common treatment for stage 3 mesothelioma patients. Increasingly, it is combined with immunotherapy or the targeted drug bevacizumab. 



Another option is to enroll in a clinical trial for access to an experimental treatment. Many cancer centers run clinical trials for human studies of new therapies. These can benefit patients with few treatment options, but there are risks, too. Patients can talk to their medical teams about qualifying for a clinical trial. 



Palliative Care for Stage 3 Mesothelioma



Stage 3 mesothelioma patients can benefit from palliative treatments. The goal of palliative treatment is to bring the patient relief rather than to treat the cancer or extend life expectancy. Some of the palliative treatments available to stage 3 patients include: 




Surgery to remove specific tumors or areas of cancer that are causing pain and other symptoms. 



Surgical procedures that drain fluid from the chest or abdominal cavities, known as thoracentesis and paracentesis



Medications that relieve symptoms



Complementary and alternative therapies that bring patients relief and improve quality of life



Mental health care



Medical marijuana to relieve side effects of treatment, such as nausea caused by chemotherapy




What Is the Prognosis for Stage 3 Mesothelioma? 



The prognosis for stage 3 can be anywhere from a few months to more than a year, depending on the patient and the circumstances. In most cases, the prognosis is unfavorable. Available treatments do little to remove the tumors when they have spread during this stage.



How Long Can You Live With Stage 3 Mesothelioma? 



Life expectancy at any stage of mesothelioma varies significantly from one patient to another. It depends on the patient's age, overall health, treatment choices, and other factors. 



The stage of the cancer is one of the most important factors in determining life expectancy. It helps to look at statistics based on large groups of patients to make an estimate. 



The median life expectancy for patients with stage 3 mesothelioma is 18 months from the time of diagnosis. The five-year survival rate is 12%. 



Can I Improve My Stage 3 Mesothelioma Prognosis?



Many patients feel defeated by a stage 3 mesothelioma diagnosis, but they do have options and some control over their prognosis. Mesothelioma may not be curable, but you can take steps to improve your outlook and live longer and more comfortably: 




Consult with mesothelioma specialists. They have the most experience, expertise, and access to the best treatments and technologies. 



Start treatment right away. The sooner you start treatment, the sooner you can slow the progression of this aggressive and rapidly spreading cancer. 



Choose aggressive treatments. If your goal is to extend life expectancy, choose the most aggressive treatments you can tolerate. 



Choose palliative care. If your goal is to be more comfortable, talk to your doctors about palliative treatments to improve your quality of life. 



Make healthy lifestyle choices. The more you can keep up your overall health, the better you will respond to treatments. Talk to your medical team about nutrition advice, exercise guidance, and mental health care. 




Stage 3 mesothelioma is not a good prognosis, but you still have control. Let your doctors know your treatment goals, and rely on close friends and family to ensure your preferences are taken seriously. 



Getting Help



Keep in mind that if you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### Stage 2 Mesothelioma Cancer

In stage 2 mesothelioma cancer, malignant cells have spread from the original site and may even be in the nearby lymph nodes. Patients in stage 2 don't always have a good prognosis. Their treatment options might include surgery or be limited to chemotherapy and other non-surgical therapies. 



Over $30 billion is currently available in asbestos trust funds for mesothelioma victims. If you’ve been affected by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 













What Is Stage 2 Mesothelioma? 



Mesothelioma and other cancers are assigned a stage during the diagnostic process. Using imaging scans, biopsies, and additional information, doctors assign a stage based on where the cancer originated and how far it has spread. 



Stage 2 mesothelioma is the second of four stages, from early to late. This is still considered an early stage, but the cancer is farther than in stage 1, including to nearby lymph nodes. 



During stage 2, patients start to experience mild symptoms of mesothelioma, but these symptoms are not always severe enough to cause concern or lead a patient to seek a diagnosis. If a patient can get a diagnosis during this stage of mesothelioma, the prognosis is typically above average.



Doctors most often use the TNM (Tumor, Node, Metastasis) system to stage pleural mesothelioma from 1 to 4. There is no standard system for staging peritoneal mesothelioma. Doctors usually use a modified form of TNM. 



What Are the Characteristics of Stage 2 Mesothelioma? 



Stage 2 mesothelioma is a rare diagnosis, but not as rare as stage 1. Most people are diagnosed during the later stages, 3 or 4. During stage 2, patients likely have troubling symptoms, but they might be very similar to more common and less serious illnesses. 



There are two scenarios for stage 2 mesothelioma. The first is that the tumors have spread to nearby lymph nodes, to the chest wall near the original tumor, and to one or more of the following areas: 




The pleural tissue around the lungs



The mediastinum in between the lungs



The tissue at the top of the diaphragm underneath the lungs




The second scenario is that the tumors are in the chest wall, the pleural tissue, the area between the lungs, and the top layer of the diaphragm on one side of the chest. The tumors have also spread to the diaphragm or lung tissue on just one side of the chest and nearby lymph nodes. 



What Are the TNM Designations for Stage 2 Mesothelioma? 



Stage 2 mesothelioma can have a combination of TNM designations to describe its characteristics: 




T, for the primary tumor, can be T1 or T2. This means that it has spread within the pleura on one side or, for T2, into lung tissue, the mediastinum, or the diaphragm on the same side of the chest. 



N, to designate lymph node spread, is N1 for stage 2. This means the cancer has spread only to lymph nodes near the primary tumor. 



M, for metastasis, is M0, meaning the cancer has not spread to distant tissues or organs. 




Stage 2 Peritoneal Mesothelioma



Doctors may use the Peritoneal Cancer Index, TNM, or a modified combination of the two to stage peritoneal mesothelioma. There are very few cases of this rare mesothelioma type that develops in the abdomen, so there is no official staging system. 



Generally, stage 2 peritoneal mesothelioma has primary tumors in the peritoneum, some nearby tissues or organs, and nearby lymph nodes. 



Is Stage 2 Mesothelioma Curable? 



Pleural mesothelioma is usually considered incurable. Some patients in the early stages achieve remission with aggressive treatment, but there is always a chance the cancer will recur. 



The chance of remission in stage 2 is limited but possible. Patients have the best chance of remission if they choose aggressive surgery that removes a lot of tissue along with adjunctive therapies. 



Peritoneal mesothelioma patients have a better chance of remission. A standard therapy that involves removing tumors surgically and using regional chemotherapy is effective for many patients in the early stages. 



Stage 2 Mesothelioma Symptoms



Symptoms during stage 2 mesothelioma are often more pronounced than in stage 1. They might still seem like the symptoms of something more common and less serious. This is one reason few patients are diagnosed during an early stage. Doctors can easily mistake early-stage mesothelioma for another illness. 



In stage 2 of the disease, if the patient has pleural mesothelioma, symptoms may include: 




Chest pains



Coughing



Difficulty breathing



Shortness of breath



Unexplained weight loss 



Fever




For those with peritoneal mesothelioma, symptoms include:




Stomach pain



Bloating



Irregular bowel movements



Unusual weight fluctuations




Patients with other types of mesothelioma, such as pericardial, may experience a combination of all of the above, along with sweating and fevers. As the stages increase, these symptoms become more pronounced.



If you’ve been exposed to asbestos, seek medical assistance right away, even if you think your symptoms seem minor. 



Mesothelioma symptoms mimic the common cold and flu, so it’s imperative to be proactive instead of assuming that your ailments aren’t dangerous. 



Provide your physician with your work history, including all occasions you were exposed to asbestos.



Stage 2 Mesothelioma Treatments



Stage 2 mesothelioma patients still have several treatment options. Many patients qualify for surgery. Even with surgery, most patients receive multimodal treatment, combining one or more therapies. 



Surgery for Stage 2 Mesothelioma



Treatment teams almost always recommend surgery as long as the tumor is in one area and the stage 2 patient is in good health. Multimodal treatment with surgery is the best way to extend a patient's life expectancy. There are a few options for mesothelioma surgery: 




Extrapleural Pneumonectomy (EPP). EPP is the most radical procedure that is not recommended for many patients. It involves removing a lot of tissue, including one lung. It is a risky procedure, and patients must be in good health to be eligible. 



Pleurectomy/Decortication (P/D). P/D is also known as lung-sparing surgery because the surgeon removes all of the pleural tissue but does not remove a lung. They remove a lot of other tissue, so this can still be a risky procedure. 



Cytoreductive Surgery. This type of procedure means that the surgeon removes as much of the cancerous tissue as possible. 




Stage 2 Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy



Surgery for stage 2 of mesothelioma is used along with chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Doctors may also use other emerging treatments, like targeted drugs or immunotherapy. 



The other treatments can be used to shrink tumors before surgery or eliminate cancer cells the surgeon could not remove. 



Stage 2 mesothelioma patients who do not qualify for surgery due to age, overall health, or other reasons benefit from these other treatments. The standard approach is to use chemotherapy with immunotherapy or radiation therapy. 



What Is the Prognosis for Stage 2 Mesothelioma? 



The prognosis for any stage of mesothelioma is usually not positive. It is better for patients in stages 1 or 2, but is usually still considered terminal. 



How Long Can You Live with Stage 2 Mesothelioma? 



Life expectancy is highly variable with mesothelioma. Each patient's estimated life expectancy is based on individual factors like age, health, and treatment choices. 



The stage is one of the most important factors in estimating life expectancy for mesothelioma patients. According to the American Cancer Society (ACS), stage 2 patients have a life expectancy, on average, of about 20 months. 



These statistics are not set in stone; each individual’s life expectancy can vary. While some patients may be given a life expectancy of months, they may go on to live many years.



Patients in stage 2 mesothelioma have reason to hope. They still have many treatment options and a decent prognosis. It's important to start treatment as soon as possible. 



What Is the Survival Rate of Mesothelioma at Stage 2? 



Another useful statistic for determining prognosis is the survival rate. The five-year-survival rate is the percentage of patients from a large group still alive five years after their diagnosis. 



The five-year survival for stage 2 mesothelioma of all types is between 16% and 24%. Survival rates are higher for peritoneal mesothelioma patients. 



How Quickly Does Stage 2 Mesothelioma Progress? 



Mesothelioma initially progresses slowly. The latency period, the time from asbestos exposure to diagnosis, is usually several decades. Once symptoms are obvious, however, mesothelioma progresses rapidly. 



Stage 2 mesothelioma can progress to stage 3 within months or even weeks. This is why getting diagnosed and beginning treatment as soon as possible is so important. 



How to Improve Your Stage 2 Mesothelioma Prognosis



Being diagnosed with mesothelioma often feels like you have no control over how your disease progresses, but this isn't true. Stage 2 still gives you a lot of treatment options. To improve your prognosis, do the following: 




Start treatment as soon as possible to slow the spread of this aggressive cancer. 



Choose the most aggressive treatments you are qualified for and can tolerate. 



Work with mesothelioma specialists, who have the most experience helping mesothelioma patients. 



Work with a team of specialists, who can provide a range of complementary treatment options. 



Ask your medical team about alternative and mental health therapies that can help you manage symptoms and cope with treatments. 



Make lifestyle choices that optimize your health, like eating well and getting enough sleep. Patients in better overall health have better outcomes. 




It is important that you talk to your medical team about your treatment goals. They can help you choose the right treatment plan if you want to extend your life. You do not have to choose aggressive treatments with a lot of side effects. The choice is yours, so make sure your doctors understand your goals to help you achieve them. 



Getting Help



Remember, if you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, there is a good chance you qualify for significant compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. 

### Stage 1 Mesothelioma Cancer

Stage 1 mesothelioma is the earliest and least widespread of the four disease stages. Patients with a stage 1 diagnosis have the most treatment options, including potentially curative surgery. They also have the best prognosis and a life expectancy of at least 21 months. 



Whether you are in the early stages or final stages of mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to significant compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













What Is Stage 1 Mesothelioma? 



Mesothelioma, like other cancers, is staged at the time of diagnosis. Cancer staging describes where the tumors are in the body and how far they have spread from the initial site. Staging is important for planning treatment and estimating a patient's life expectancy. 



Stage 1 mesothelioma is the earliest stage. The tumors are restricted to the initial site of cancer development: the pleural tissue on one side of the chest cavity in pleural mesothelioma and the peritoneum in peritoneal mesothelioma. 



Most cancers are staged using a system called TNM, which stands for Tumor, Node, Metastasis. TNM assigns a stage of 1 through 4. This is the most widely accepted staging system for pleural mesothelioma and is often adapted to stage peritoneal mesothelioma. 



Characteristics of Stage 1A Mesothelioma



In the TNM system, stage 1 mesothelioma can be divided into two substages: 1A and 1B. Characteristics of stage 1A include: 




Tumors in one or both layers of pleural tissue 



Tumors in the pleural tissue on only one side of the chest




In stage 1B, mesothelioma tumors are found in: 




The pleural tissue on one side of the chest



The chest wall on the same side as the pleural tumors, or



The lung tissue near the tumors, or



The diaphragm under the lungs




TNM Designations for Stage 1 Mesothelioma



Using the TNM system, stage 1A mesothelioma is designated T1, N0, M0. This means the tumors are in the original location. There are no tumors in lymph nodes, and the cancer has not metastasized. 



Stage 1B mesothelioma is designated as T2 or T3 and N0, M0. There is no cancer in the lymph nodes and no metastasis. T2 and T3 describe the spread of the original tumors to nearby tissues, like the diaphragm, chest wall, mediastinum, or lung. T3 designates a more extensive local spread. 



Stage 1 Peritoneal Mesothelioma



Peritoneal mesothelioma develops in the peritoneum, tissue around the abdomen. It is less common than pleural mesothelioma and has no standard staging system. Many doctors use a modified form of the TNM system to stage peritoneal mesothelioma. 



Generally, peritoneal mesothelioma is considered to be when the cancer is restricted to the peritoneum and isolated local areas near the original tumor. 



Stage 1 Mesothelioma Is Rare



Most people with mesothelioma are diagnosed in later stages. A stage 1 diagnosis is rare for many reasons: 




The latency period for mesothelioma is very long, often decades. 



The symptoms of mesothelioma are often not worrying until the cancer has progressed. 



Mesothelioma symptoms are similar to symptoms of more common illnesses, so misdiagnosis is common. 



It can take a long time to get an accurate diagnosis of mesothelioma. 




How Does Stage 1 Mesothelioma Develop? 



Mesothelioma is nearly always caused by asbestos exposure. Fibers of asbestos can accumulate in tissue in the body, causing damage over many years. Eventually, in some people, this leads to cancer in the mesothelium, the tissue that lines organs in the body. 



It can take many decades for stage 1 mesothelioma to develop after asbestos exposure. Many people do not have worrying symptoms for 30 to 50 years. 



Is Stage 1 Mesothelioma Curable? 



Mesothelioma is generally considered incurable. Doctors prefer to use the term remission, a state in which they can no longer detect cancer in a patient. It is possible to achieve remission during stage 1 mesothelioma with aggressive treatment. 



Surgery to remove a lot of tissue, along with other therapies, like chemotherapy or radiation therapy, give stage 1 patients the best chance of remission. 



Stage 1 Mesothelioma Symptoms



Symptoms of mesothelioma are minimal and mild during this stage. Yet, some indications may help doctors get an early diagnosis. 



If you’ve been exposed to asbestos and experience any chest, abdominal, or lung pain, you should immediately consult your physician. 



Bringing your complete medical and work history, including the periods in which you were exposed to asbestos, will significantly increase your chances of getting an early diagnosis.



Signs that may begin during stage 1 but which are more likely in later stages are: 




Difficulty breathing and shortness of breath



Coughing



Wheezing



Pain in the chest or abdomen




Early symptoms patients with stage 1 peritoneal mesothelioma might experience include: 




Abdominal swelling



Abdominal pain



Gastrointestinal symptoms, like constipation, indigestion, and diarrhea. 




Treating Stage 1 Mesothelioma



Surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy are effective treatments for stage 1 malignant mesothelioma. Most mesothelioma doctors recommend that the patient use a combination of two or more treatments for the best results. 



For example, surgery followed by chemotherapy may make the success rate of the patient much higher. Combining two or more treatments is most commonly known as multimodal therapy.



Multimodal therapy is more effective than a single type of mesothelioma treatment because, after surgery, there is a chance that some cancerous cells will linger behind. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy help eliminate any remaining cancerous cells.



Surgery for Stage 1 Mesothelioma



Many patients at stage 1 are good candidates for surgery to remove as much cancerous tissue as possible. The most aggressive option is extrapleural pneumonectomy, which removes an entire lung. It is risky but has led to remission in some patients. 



A lung-sparing surgery called pleurectomy/decortication is another option that still removes a lot of tissue and can lead to remission. The chances of surgery leading to remission increase with a multimodal approach. 



Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy for Stage 1 Mesothelioma



Patients in stage 1 with poor health or who are elderly might not be eligible for surgery. In these cases, chemotherapy and radiation therapy may be used in combination instead. Some patients also benefit from the addition of immunotherapy. 



The standard chemotherapy drugs for mesothelioma are pemetrexed with cisplatin. Radiation therapy is rarely used alone. It is more commonly used after surgery to prevent local recurrences. 



How Long Can You Live With Stage 1 Mesothelioma? 



Since mesothelioma is in its earliest stages of development during stage 1, the prognosis for patients is favorable. The younger the patient and the better the patient's health, the chances of survival increase. 



Young and healthy patients respond the best to treatment, making their prognosis stronger than any other group.



You'll need a personal assessment from your own physician to determine what’s best for you and what treatments will prolong your survival rate. Even in its earliest stages, each mesothelioma case is different, and your situation may not be the same as another patient in the same stage.



According to research and studies of groups of people with mesothelioma, the five-year survival rate for stage 1 mesothelioma is almost 20%. This means 20% of patients are still alive five years after diagnosis. 



Stage 1 diagnoses are rare for mesothelioma patients. The best way to get an early diagnosis is to be aware of and talk to your doctor about any past asbestos exposure. 



How to Improve Your Prognosis if You Have Stage 1 Mesothelioma



If you have been diagnosed with stage 1 mesothelioma, you have a unique opportunity that most mesothelioma patients do not. Most people with this cancer are diagnosed in later stages when the prognosis is poor, and treatment options are limited. 



At stage 1, you have a chance to make a significantly positive impact on your prognosis and life expectancy: 




Begin treatments as soon as possible. Earlier treatments lead to better outcomes. 



Work with mesothelioma specialists, who have the most experience treating this rare cancer. 



Choose the most aggressive treatments for which you qualify. 



Manage your health through lifestyle choices, like nutrition, exercise, and sleep. 



Consider trying alternative therapies and mental health care to manage symptoms and mental health. 




Everyone's goals for treatment are personal, but if yours are to extend your life expectancy as much as possible, you have options at stage 1. Talk to your medical team about your goals so they can help you make the right treatment choices. 



Getting Legal Help



Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. Keep in mind that if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for considerable compensation. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Mesothelioma Treatment Guide

Mesothelioma treatment is usually a combination of two or more therapies, including chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy. Palliative treatments are also important, as are novel therapies currently under investigation in clinical trials. Alternative medicine can be used to treat symptoms. 



If you or a loved one have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about qualified mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 






 




About Mesothelioma



Mesothelioma is a rare, aggressive cancer that develops in the mesothelium, a layer of tissue that lines organs and cavities in the body. Pleural mesothelioma is the most common form and occurs in pleural tissue around the lungs. Peritoneal mesothelioma is less common and develops in the abdomen. 



Asbestos is the only known cause of mesothelioma. Most people diagnosed with mesothelioma were exposed to asbestos in the workplace. Not everyone exposed to asbestos will develop mesothelioma. 



Warning signs and symptoms of mesothelioma may include: 




Difficulty breathing



Coughing



Chest pains



Lumps under the skin of the chest



Abdominal pain and swelling



Diarrhea or constipation



Weight loss



Fatigue




Doctors often diagnose mesothelioma by first ruling out more common illnesses. They do this with a physical exam, chest X-rays, and imaging scans, like CT or MRI. 



If imaging scans show abnormalities, doctors perform a biopsy to remove a tissue sample. A pathologist examines the tissue to look for cancer cells and to identify their type. 



If mesothelioma is diagnosed, doctors will then stage it, assigning a stage of 1, 2, 3, or 4 depending on how far the cancer has spread. 



Staging and other information help a patient's medical team determine the best treatment plan. If you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, starting treatment as soon as possible is best. Earlier, more aggressive treatment will give you a better outcome. 



Mesothelioma Treatment Basics



There are many treatment options for cancer. For mesothelioma, in general, chemotherapy is the primary treatment. 



However, there is no single accepted treatment plan for everyone with mesothelioma. Treatment depends on individual factors. 



The patient’s information is the starting point for mesothelioma treatment, including age, medical history, previous occupations, weight, symptoms of mesothelioma, and more. Next, the patient’s diagnosis will determine what type of treatment will work best.



For most patients with mesothelioma, chemotherapy is the first-line treatment. This is most often followed by other treatments for a multimodal approach. 



How Does Mesothelioma Treatment Affect Life Expectancy? 



Life expectancy after a mesothelioma diagnosis is better with treatment. Patients who forgo treatment have a life expectancy of less than a year. With treatment, life expectancy averages between 12 and 21 months. 



Can Mesothelioma Be Cured? 



There is no cure for mesothelioma. Rarely, do patients go into remission with treatment. A handful of people even live many years after remission. For most patients, remission is unlikely or leads to recurrence later. 



It's important to view mesothelioma treatment as something that can extend your life. Mesothelioma is like a chronic illness that will never truly resolve, but treatment helps. 



Is There a Standard Treatment for Mesothelioma? 



Treatment for mesothelioma is on a case-by-case basis. However, there are standards that guide mesothelioma treatment plans: 




First-line chemotherapy drugs are pemetrexed with cisplatin or carboplatin. 



Some patients benefit from adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy treatment. 



Patients in the early stages may benefit from extensive surgery. 



Surgery should not be used alone. It should be preceded by or followed by radiation, chemotherapy, or both. 



Stage 4 mesothelioma patients should not undergo curative surgery. 




The guidelines are set by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and contributing specialists. They serve as a guide to help doctors develop the best individualized treatment plan for each patient. 



Mesothelioma Surgery



Patients diagnosed before the disease has spread too far are often candidates for surgery. Patients in more advanced stages might not be eligible for surgery. 



Resectable Mesothelioma



When surgery is a good option, the cancer is considered resectable. The goal of surgery is usually to remove as much of the cancerous tissue as possible. 



Surgery is usually followed or preceded by chemotherapy, radiation, or both. If the disease has spread too far, it will be at the physician’s discretion as to whether surgery is a viable option. 



Some of the surgical options for mesothelioma include: 




Wide Local Excision. If the tumors are highly localized, the surgeon may remove them and some of the healthy tissue around them. 



Pleurectomy/Decortication. P/D is a more extensive procedure that removes the pleural tissue and some of the lung tissue. 



Extrapleural Pneumonectomy. The most aggressive surgery for mesothelioma is an EPP. It includes the removal of an entire lung on the side of the chest where the mesothelioma developed. 




Non-Resectable Mesothelioma



Although there are always exceptions to the rule, most victims in the later stages of asbestos-related diseases are not healthy enough to withstand surgery. These are cases of non-resectable cancer. Tumors have spread throughout the body at this point and are difficult to remove.



Sarcomatoid mesothelioma is a rare but very aggressive cell type of mesothelioma. Because it tends to spread so rapidly, it is usually considered non-resectable. 



Palliative Surgery



Surgical procedures for mesothelioma can be palliative. The goal is not to treat the cancer. It is to make the patient more comfortable. An example is pleurodesis. This is a procedure that seals the two layers of the pleural to prevent fluid buildup that can be painful. 



Chemotherapy



Chemotherapy is the least intrusive form of treatment and also the most practical way of increasing a patient’s life expectancy rate. 



Chemotherapy usually includes a combination of chemotherapy drugs for an increased chance of success. The goal of chemotherapy is to reduce tumors and eliminate cancer cells.



Keep in mind that the type of chemotherapy and how long it will take will depend on the patient’s disease and how advanced it is. Options include systemic chemotherapy or direct chemotherapy into the infected areas.



If a patient undergoes systemic chemotherapy, medicine is typically either swallowed or injected. The most widely used chemotherapy drugs are:




Navelbine



Onconase



Carboplatin



Alimta



Gemcitabine



Cisplatin




Chemotherapy causes various side effects, including hair loss, fever, fatigue, rashes, anemia, body aches, and more. Undergoing chemotherapy is a viable option to extend life expectancy for qualifying patients.



Patients with peritoneal mesothelioma may have the option to benefit from one of the most effective mesothelioma treatments: cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. 



Cytoreductive surgery removes as much of the cancerous tissue as possible from the abdomen. It is followed by HIPEC, the circulation of heated chemotherapy drugs in the abdomen. 



Radiation Therapy



Radiation therapy is a type of therapy in which direct radiation is applied to the cancer cells in the body. Doctors rarely use radiation alone for mesothelioma.



Radiation therapy is typically used in combination with other forms of treatment and has been proven to help patients in all stages of cancer.



Patients who qualify for radiation therapy can usually expect the pain and the severity of the disease to lessen. However, not all patients will be eligible for combination treatments.



There are different types of radiation therapy for mesothelioma patients. Depending upon the severity of the disease, patients may receive the following forms of treatment:




Brachytherapy: Brachytherapy is used less than all other forms of radiation therapy as it is still being researched. It involves tiny, radioactive seeds being inserted into the affected area. The seeds then send out doses of radiation to the cancerous cells. 



Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT): IMRT is a form of radiation therapy that uses beams of radiation to target cancerous cells. The radiation beams are monitored and controlled so that healthy tissue is not affected.  The more severe the cancer is the higher beams of radiation. 



Three-Dimensional Radiation Treatment (3D-CRT): 3D-CRT is similar to the other forms of radiation therapy in that it sends beams of radiation to cancerous cells. However, what sets this form of radiation therapy apart is that the tumors can be seen in 3D, making it easier for physicians to target. 




Radiation side effects include fatigue, nausea, cardiac damage, and skin redness.



Multimodal Treatment for Mesothelioma



Multimodal therapy combines two or more kinds of treatment together so that patients can extend their life expectancy. 



Before starting multimodal therapy, physicians will factor in the patient’s history along with any risk factors.



There are no guarantees of success with multimodal therapy. However, multimodal therapy usually provides the best prognosis for mesothelioma.



Multimodal therapy began when scientists discovered that combining therapy can help prolong the survival rate compared to single forms of therapy alone. 



After studying a group of patients in the 1980s, scientists and researchers determined that qualified patients stand a much better chance of an extended life expectancy when the top forms of treatment are combined.



When determining candidacies for multimodal therapy, physicians look at:




The stage of the cancer



The cell type of the cancerous tumor



Patient medical history



Complications that may arise



The lung health of the patient




Emerging Treatments



Researchers continue to seek out and test new treatments for mesothelioma. Some of the most promising include: 



Immunotherapy



Immunotherapy drugs are already on the market, with at least two approved for mesothelioma. These drugs harness the patient's immune system to attack cancer cells. 



The FDA approved a combination of Obdivo and Yervoy in 2020, the first new treatment approved for mesothelioma in years. Researchers continue to investigate other immunotherapy drugs in clinical trials. 



Tumor Treating Fields



Also newly approved is a therapy called tumor treating fields, or TTFields. It uses electric fields externally to kill cancer cells. Studies show it can extend life expectancy for mesothelioma patients. 



Targeted Therapies



Researchers continue investigating medications, including chemotherapy drugs, immunotherapy, and gene therapies, targeting cancer cells. Targeted therapies are more specific than standard chemotherapy drugs. They may provide better results and limit side effects. 



Vaccine Therapy



The CRS-210 vaccine is another new treatment option in its clinical trial stages. Physicians injected a weakened form of Listeria monocytogenes into the mesothelioma patient’s system to have the immune system attack the disease and prevent cells from producing mesothelin. 



In clinical studies, the vaccine is usually used with traditional treatment medications, such as cisplatin and pemetrexed.



Can I Benefit From Mesothelioma Clinical Trials? 



Another treatment option for some mesothelioma patients is participation in a clinical trial. Clinical trials are tests of novel treatments and therapies using human subjects. 



You might want to participate in a trial to get access to a treatment your doctors would otherwise be unable to provide. 



New treatments undergo a lot of testing to get to the clinical trial stage and are considered generally safe. Still, there are always risks associated with new therapies. Your doctors can help you determine if you qualify for any trials and if the potential benefits outweigh the risks. 



Complementary and Alternative Medicine



Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), also known as complementary and integrative medicine, is a non-traditional approach to medical care. CAM treatments do not target cancer or treat it directly. 



CAM can be good for relieving symptoms and side effects of treatment. It can improve your quality of life and help you better tolerate traditional treatments and get the most out of them. Some common CAM therapies generally considered safe for cancer patients include: 




Acupressure



Acupuncture



Aromatherapy



Biofeedback



Massage therapy



Meditation



Nutrition therapy



Tai chi



Yoga




Talk to your medical team before trying any alternative therapies. They can recommend qualified practitioners. They can also tell you if any of these therapies are not appropriate for you. 



Palliative Treatment



Palliative therapies aim to improve a patient's quality of life. They are not designed to treat cancer and are not curative or life-extending. Like CAM, palliative treatments address your symptoms, including physical symptoms and mental health. 



Your medical team can discuss palliative options that are best for you. They might include traditional treatments, like radiation therapy to shrink a painful tumor. They could also include alternative therapies, counseling, medications, medical cannabis, and more. 



Where Should I Get Treatment for Mesothelioma? 



Your doctor can help you find the right specialists for your treatment. Mesothelioma is both rare and complicated. Effective treatment requires a team of specialists in oncology, radiation therapy, surgery, and more. 



For the best results, the specialists you work with should have experience treating mesothelioma. Major cancer centers typically have specialists on staff, but you might have to travel to benefit from their care. 



The Costs of Mesothelioma Treatment



The expense of treatments plays a significant factor in deciding which form of treatment will be used and how. The patient’s location, the ability to consistently travel for treatment if needed, and financial stability all play prominent roles in mesothelioma treatment.



Remember that aside from surgery, therapy, and other forms of treatment, the cost of equipment, special foods, and other options should be factored in. Assistance may be available through federal government programs and other forms of financial assistance for those who qualify.



If you received a mesothelioma diagnosis, you might qualify for a settlement or asbestos trust fund payout. Contact an asbestos attorney to learn about your rights and options. 





                
                        
                            Calculate Case Value
                            
                        
                        Diagnosis-- Select --MesotheliomaAsbestosisAsbestos-Related Lung CancerIs Diagnosed Person Alive?-- Select --YesPassed away under 2 years agoPassed away over 2 years agoAge of Diagnosed Person-- Select --Under 6565-8485 or olderExposure-- Select --MilitaryOccupationalSecond-HandOther / UnknownMain Job Site-- Select --ShipyardsBoiler RoomsPowerhousesPaper MillsConstruction SitesAutomotiveFirefightingRailroadsRefineriesOther / UnknownMain Asbestos Product Used-- Select --Fire Protection ProductsBrake Pads / LiningsCeiling Textures / Tile / PlasterElectrical ProductsTransite ProductsHeating & Cooling ProductsVermiculiteRoofing ProductsPaints / Plasters / Wall CoveringsOther / UnknownState-- Select --AlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaNorthern Mariana IslandsOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahU.S. Virgin IslandsVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces EuropeArmed Forces PacificPhone(Required)Email(Required)First Name(Required)Last Name(Required)NameThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
         Any information you send is secure and will never be sold or released.This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
        
                        Δ
                        





Take Action Now: Secure Your Future with Expert Legal Help



If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to significant financial compensation. Our dedicated team of mesothelioma lawyers is here to guide you through every step of the legal process, ensuring your rights are protected and you receive the justice you deserve.



📄 Get Your Free Financial Compensation Packet!Fill out our simple form today to receive a comprehensive packet with details about experienced asbestos and mesothelioma law firms and lawyers in your area [near me], along with essential resources to help you make informed decisions about your case.



💡 Why Choose Us?




Decades of experience handling asbestos-related cases.



No upfront fees – you only pay if we win your case.



Personalized, compassionate support to help you focus on your health.




📞 Contact Us Today for Additional Legal Assistance and Advice!Call us at 800-793-4540 to speak with our team. Don’t wait—your time to file a claim is limited, and your family’s financial future could depend on taking action now.



You’re not alone in this fight. Let us help you secure the justice and compensation you deserve.

### Mesothelioma Statistics

Mesothelioma statistics can help people diagnosed with this rare cancer better understand what they're up against. Only about 3,000 people receive a diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma every year in the U.S. Most people get diagnosed with mesothelioma after years of working with or around asbestos.



 If you or a loved one suffers from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that you may qualify for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













Key Facts About Mesothelioma




Approximately 3,000 people in the U.S. receive a mesothelioma diagnosis every year. 



Demographically, mesothelioma is most common in white or Hispanic men. 



The average age of mesothelioma diagnosis is 72. 



United States veterans, especially those who served in the Navy, have higher rates of asbestos-related diseases than the general population. 



When mesothelioma is diagnosed, it’s usually in an advanced stage because mesothelioma symptoms typically do not surface until 15 to 50-plus years after exposure. This is called the latency period. 



There are four types of mesothelioma based on the location in the body: pleural, peritoneal, pericardial, and testicular. 



Smoking does not cause mesothelioma despite large rumors. However, studies suggest that smoking may increase the risk of certain types of lung cancers when in combination with asbestos exposure. 



Per the American Society of Clinical Oncology, radiation may cause mesothelioma. Although rare, some patients who received radiation for lymphoma ended up developing mesothelioma. 



Childhood mesothelioma is rare but occasionally happens. Children can be exposed while in school buildings built with asbestos, but it usually happens through secondhand contact with a parent or family member who worked around asbestos. 




Additional Mesothelioma Facts




Pleural mesothelioma is the most common form of mesothelioma, accounting for more than 70% of diagnoses. 



Peritoneal mesothelioma is the second most common form and occurs in the abdomen. 



Pericardial and testicular mesothelioma each account for fewer than 1% of annual mesothelioma diagnoses. 



Between 2% and 10% of people exposed to asbestos develop mesothelioma. 



The rate of mesothelioma diagnoses in the U.S. is dropping. 



California, Texas, Florida, Pennsylvania, and New York have the highest rates of mesothelioma in the U.S. 



The most effective treatment approach for mesothelioma is multimodal, a combination of treatments that might include surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and immunotherapy. 




Mesothelioma Survival Statistics




There is currently no cure for mesothelioma. Doctors strive to provide individualized medical plans and the latest mesothelioma treatment options for victims so that they can live longer and in the most healthy way possible. 



Mesothelioma is not necessarily a death sentence, but it is most often terminal. 



The best way to extend life expectancy is to undergo aggressive treatment as soon as possible. 



The overall average five-year survival rate for all types and stages of mesothelioma is 12%. 



The average five-year survival rate for early-stage, localized mesothelioma is 18%. 



The average life expectancy for all mesothelioma cases is between 12 months and 21 months. 



The average life expectancy for stage 1 mesothelioma is 22.2 months.



The average life expectancy for stage 2 mesothelioma is 20.0 months. 



The average life expectancy for stage 3 mesothelioma is 17.9 months. 



The average life expectancy for stage 4 mesothelioma is 14.9 months. 



Women respond better to mesothelioma treatment than men and have higher average life expectancies. 



A handful of mesothelioma patients have lived many years after a diagnosis. 




Facts About Other Asbestos Illnesses




According to the National Cancer Institute (NCI), 4% of all lung cancer diseases in the United States are directly from asbestos exposure.



Although studies are still inconclusive, there are strong suggestions that asbestos can cause cancer in the esophagus, kidneys, and other body parts. 



Developing lung cancer triples for those who smoke and who were exposed to asbestos. 



Ovarian cancer has been directly related to asbestos. Women who used talcum powder containing asbestos are at an increased risk of developing ovarian cancer. 



According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, asbestos exposure causes laryngeal cancer. 



There are a total of four confirmed cancers that are caused by exposure to asbestos: asbestos-related lung cancer, ovarian cancer, mesothelioma, and laryngeal cancer. 



Asbestos exposure can also cause non-malignant diseases, most commonly asbestosis. 




Asbestos Facts and Statistics




The largest use of asbestos occurred between 1930 through the 1970s. Old homes, factories, and plants built during this time may possibly contain asbestos. 



The military used asbestos heavily, and the U.S. Navy, in particular, used a lot of asbestos. 



Although asbestos is now used much less than in the past, it is not completely banned in the U.S.



There is no safe amount of asbestos exposure. 



In 1964, mesothelioma was directly linked to asbestos exposure. It was determined that asbestos exposure is the exclusive cause of mesothelioma. 



Although the use of asbestos during employment is much less than decades ago, many current employees are still exposed. For example, workers may have the task of removing insulation that has asbestos in it while other workers may need to repair building parts that contain asbestos. Fortunately, there are both state and federal laws that now protect those who work around asbestos. 



Today, employees must not be exposed to more than 0.1 fibers of asbestos per cubic centimeter over a typical 8-hour shift. Employers must not rotate employees in order to stay within the limits of exposure. 



Employers are required to monitor workers daily who are at risk for even minute exposure to asbestos. 



Employers must also provide medical examinations every 30 days for employees who work around asbestos. 



Protective clothing and hygiene facilities must be available to any employee who works around asbestos. 




International Mesothelioma Statistics




About 30,870 people worldwide were diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2020. 



About 26,278 people died from mesothelioma in 2020. 



The countries with the highest rates of asbestos illnesses are the United Kingdom and Australia. 




Mesothelioma Compensation Statistics




Most cases of mesothelioma resulted from negligent workplace asbestos exposure. Victims can sue for compensation or make an asbestos trust fund claim. 



Most mesothelioma lawsuits end in settlements, which average between $1 million and $1.4 million. 



Mesothelioma lawsuit verdicts average around $2.4 million



Asbestos trust funds have paid out nearly $20 billion. 



Asbestos trust funds still have approximately $30 billion available for claimants.




Getting Help



If you've been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you'll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on knowledgeable asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Asbestos Cancer Guide

Asbestos cancer is a type of malignancy that develops after continuous exposure to asbestos. When the small fibers of asbestos become lodged in the lining of the lungs or abdominal cavity, it irritates the tissue. This causes cellular damage that may lead to mesothelioma, lung cancer, or other types of cancer. 



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 











What Cancers Are Caused By Asbestos? 



Mesothelioma is the type of cancer most associated with asbestos, but it is not the only type of cancer caused by asbestos exposure. Mesothelioma is a cancer of the mesothelium, a thin, double layer of tissue that surrounds organs and lines cavities. 



Mesothelioma most often develops in the tissue around the lungs. This is called pleural mesothelioma. Less often, mesothelioma forms in the abdomen, called peritoneal mesothelioma. 



Because asbestos exposure most often occurs through inhalation of fibers, pleural mesothelioma is more common. Asbestos-related lung cancer can also develop after inhaling asbestos fibers. 



Cancers other than mesothelioma found to be associated with asbestos exposure include: 




Lung cancer



Laryngeal cancer



Pharyngeal cancer



Stomach cancer



Colorectal cancer



Ovarian cancer



Breast cancer




How Common Is Asbestos Cancer? 



Asbestos cancers are not very common. Most people do not encounter asbestos and never develop these illnesses. Even among people who are exposed to asbestos, cancer is not typical. Some people exposed may have genetic factors that make them more likely to develop cancer. 



Mesothelioma is a rare cancer, with only about 3,000 cases diagnosed yearly. That number is expected to decrease as fewer people are exposed to asbestos. 



Mesothelioma



Malignant mesothelioma differs from other types of lung-related cancers in that it is the only one primarily caused by exposure to asbestos. People develop mesothelioma by inhaling or ingesting asbestos fibers.



After the fibers are in the body’s system for a while, DNA damage occurs, which leads to tumors in the lungs, abdomen, and other parts of the body, with the lungs being the most common part of the body for mesothelioma development.



Mesothelioma can also develop from some forms of radiation therapy and through second-hand contacts, such as the clothing worn by a family member who worked around asbestos. 



Direct and prolonged asbestos exposure remains the leading cause of mesothelioma.





                
                        
                            Calculate Case Value
                            
                        
                        Diagnosis-- Select --MesotheliomaAsbestosisAsbestos-Related Lung CancerIs Diagnosed Person Alive?-- Select --YesPassed away under 2 years agoPassed away over 2 years agoAge of Diagnosed Person-- Select --Under 6565-8485 or olderExposure-- Select --MilitaryOccupationalSecond-HandOther / UnknownMain Job Site-- Select --ShipyardsBoiler RoomsPowerhousesPaper MillsConstruction SitesAutomotiveFirefightingRailroadsRefineriesOther / UnknownMain Asbestos Product Used-- Select --Fire Protection ProductsBrake Pads / LiningsCeiling Textures / Tile / PlasterElectrical ProductsTransite ProductsHeating & Cooling ProductsVermiculiteRoofing ProductsPaints / Plasters / Wall CoveringsOther / UnknownState-- Select --AlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaNorthern Mariana IslandsOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahU.S. Virgin IslandsVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces EuropeArmed Forces PacificPhone(Required)Email(Required)First Name(Required)Last Name(Required)NameThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
         Any information you send is secure and will never be sold or released.This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
        
                        Δ
                        





How Long Does it Take to Get Cancer From Asbestos? 



Mesothelioma has a very long latency period. Most people go anywhere from 20 to 50 years before experiencing the first warning signs of mesothelioma. In many cases, mesothelioma has already moved into a later stage of the disease before victims get a proper diagnosis.



Since the first signs of mesothelioma are often confused with the flu or pneumonia, mesothelioma can go undiagnosed for a long time, making the prognosis grim once it's diagnosed.



In addition, many victims may actually have recurring pneumonia or bronchitis because of mesothelioma, which further confuses a proper diagnosis with more common diseases.



How Much Asbestos Exposure Causes Cancer?



No amount of asbestos exposure is safe, but a one-time incident is very unlikely to cause cancer or another illness. 



The majority of malignant mesothelioma patients have been subjected to long-term asbestos exposure. In certain situations, victims have been exposed to asbestos for a short time before contracting mesothelioma or other asbestos-related diseases.



Some studies have also suggested, as previously mentioned, that people risk asbestos exposure just by washing the clothes of someone who has been around asbestos.



Teachers, staff members, and students also risk developing mesothelioma in school buildings built with asbestos-containing materials (ACMs). 



This type of exposure is rare, though, as state and federal laws are set up to ensure each school maintains an asbestos management plan at all times.



Mesothelioma also differs from other types of lung cancers in that victims never contract the disease from tobacco products.



Symptoms of Mesothelioma



The symptoms of mesothelioma include: 




Severe chest pain



Rough breathing sounds



Reduction in chest expansion when inhaling



Dyspnea



Hacking, dry coughing, or wheezing



Unusual weight loss



Fatigue and lethargy



Nausea and vomiting




Mesothelioma Prognosis



Since there is currently no cure for mesothelioma, the prognosis for victims is not favorable. However, with the advancement of several treatment options, many patients can go on to live many years after diagnosis.



Each case is unique and will depend upon the stage of the disease and the physical and mental health of the patient. Adherence to an aggressive treatment plan is the best way to improve prognosis. 



Asbestos-Related Lung Cancer



According to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), lung cancer, one of the most prevalent types of cancer globally, is also one of the greatest risks for American workers exposed to asbestos.



Thousands of workers die each year due to asbestos-related lung cancer, and these numbers are expected to increase as more people begin to hit the timeline in which asbestos-related symptoms start to show up.



One of the most significant differences between asbestos-related lung cancer and mesothelioma is that individuals who smoke cigarettes, pipes, or cigars are much more likely to develop asbestos-related lung cancer. Still, smoking doesn’t factor into an increased risk of mesothelioma.



Symptoms of asbestos-related lung cancer consist of:




Dry coughs and hacking



Difficulty in breathing



Lung and chest pain



Fatigue



Fever, chills, and throat pain



Frequent episodes of pneumonia or bronchitis



Face and neck swelling



Unusual weight loss



Pain that worsens when inhaling



A gargling-type sound when inhaling, accompanied by pain




Ovarian Cancer Caused by Asbestos



Ovarian cancer has recently been linked to asbestos exposure through talcum powder products. Talc is a natural mineral that often contains some asbestos. That asbestos can make it into products that some women use on their genital areas. Decades of talcum powder use led to ovarian cancer in some women.



Most ovarian cancer diagnoses are unrelated to asbestos, but some cases are connected to exposure. Early studies that found a link between talcum powder and ovarian cancer date to the 1980s and 1990s. Later, these findings were found to be related to asbestos in talc. 



Common Occupations at Risk for Asbestos Cancer



The most common occupations in which workers were exposed to asbestos include: 




Engineers



Mechanics



Carpenters



Maritime workers



Construction workers



Firefighters



Plumbers



Roofers



HVAC workers



Factory workers



Papermill workers



Military personnel before the early 1980s.




Almost all mesothelioma victims had prolonged exposure at work, and usually for extended periods of time on a daily basis.



Moreover, victims are typically older males ages 60 and older, although mesothelioma can affect anyone at any age. 



For example, as mentioned earlier, teachers and even students are at a slight risk if the school building was created before the asbestos ban.



Older males are more apt to develop mesothelioma because of the occupations associated with asbestos use. Most job sites were male-dominated when exposure occurred.





Naturally-Occurring Asbestos



Sometimes, those who’ve never worked around asbestos but live close to naturally occurring asbestos will develop asbestos cancer. 



For example, citizens of three villages in Turkey were dying at an alarming rate due to exposure to natural asbestos that was scattered around the small towns of Karain, Sarıhıdır, and Tuzköy. 



Around 50% of all deaths occurring in these villages were from asbestos cancer.



Diagnosing Asbestos Cancer



Diagnosing asbestos cancer can be problematic as the signs and symptoms tend to mimic various other common diseases. Therefore, a complete medical history and your entire work history should be provided to your physician immediately. 



If a doctor knows you have a history of asbestos exposure right away, it can speed up the diagnosis process.



X-rays, a CT scan, or an MRI scan are usually performed next, which gives doctors a detailed look around the chest cavity and other internal body parts. 



If abnormal cells or a thickened pleura are found, a syringe or a chest tube is inserted into the patient’s body. It’s used to gather the fluid in the infected areas of the body, which will then be evaluated for cancerous cells and tumors.



If malignant cells are found, a biopsy usually follows. A biopsy allows the physician to remove a small part of the infected area for a pathologist to study it. 



A biopsy is always needed to confirm a positive diagnosis of mesothelioma.



Screening for Asbestos Cancer



There is no official or universal screening method for asbestos cancer, even though an early screening would help doctors diagnose the disease much earlier than the methods used today. 



However, some physicians are testing the Mesomark assay screening, an in-vitro test that measures soluble mesothelin proteins. Mesothelin-related proteins are released by infected mesothelioma cells.



Mesothelioma and other asbestos-related cancers are considered new in the medical world, but a better, more successful screening method could surface as more research continues.



If You’ve Been Diagnosed



Remember, if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you need additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Asbestos Laws & Exposure Regulations Guide

Federal asbestos laws aim to protect Americans from asbestos exposure and resulting illnesses like mesothelioma. There is no complete ban on asbestos, but the EPA and OSHA are responsible for protecting residents and workers from exposure to existing asbestos materials. 



If you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for victims of asbestos-related diseases. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 













Timeline of Asbestos Risks and Regulations




In 1889, an annual report produced for factories suggested that asbestos had shown signs of health risks. 



During the 1900s, Dr. H. Montague Murray connected a young factory worker’s death with asbestos after finding fibers of the mineral in his lungs. 



In 1924, a British pathologist, Dr. Cook, connected several victims of lung illnesses with prolonged exposure to asbestos. In 1927, he named the disease “asbestosis.” 



After Dr. Cook’s findings, the dangers of asbestos became widespread, followed by an influx of health investigations. After findings determined that at least 25% of textile workers had developed pulmonary fibrosis, asbestos-use regulations were updated and improved. 



In the U.S., the first reported asbestos-related death occurred in 1930. However, although the victim’s autopsy findings were presented to the Mayo Clinic, the death occurred in South America, and the victim was a minor. 



In 1930, the Johns-Manville Corporation saw first-hand the risks of asbestos as worker after worker began falling ill. The company requested a confidential medical report to be used internally only. The findings, which were later made public, stated that asbestos dust is extremely dangerous to humans. 



In 1933, life insurance determined that at least 29% of the plant workers at Johns-Manville had developed asbestosis. Lawsuits against the company followed. 



Several medical brochures, information, and warnings were given to an array of companies in the 1940s. Many companies either ignored the warnings or altered the information. One company, in particular, Owens-Corning, had at least 42 workers fall victim to asbestos yet did nothing to prevent these illnesses. 



In the 1950s, many companies began removing any reference to asbestos being linked to cancer. Although the medical director of Johns Manville suggested leaving warning labels on products that contained asbestos, his efforts were unsuccessful. 



Cover-ups continued until the 1970s when the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) took notice. 



The EPA issued a ban on asbestos, but this was overturned two years later, in 1991. Today, imported asbestos is still legal to use in small amounts in many products. 




Which Agencies Regulate Asbestos Exposure? 



Safety regulations play an essential role in protecting people because asbestos is not banned in the U.S. Two federal agencies are primarily responsible for regulating and enforcing asbestos safety standards: 




The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The role of the EPA is to protect the environment and human health. In terms of asbestos, it regulates safety standards in non-occupational settings. 



The Occupational Safety and Health Administration. OSHA is responsible for regulating workplace safety. It sets standards for asbestos exposure levels on the job and enforces these standards. 




States also have laws that regulate how asbestos can be handled and abated in residences and public and commercial buildings. 



EPA Asbestos Environmental Standards



The EPA wasn't created until 1970. Its creation followed public concerns about environmental disasters, pollution, and contamination of air, water, and land with toxins. The Clean Air Act was the first law to allow the EPA to regulate asbestos. 



1971 Clean Air Act



On March 31, 1971, the EPA announced that asbestos is a dangerous and hazardous pollutant. The EPA named asbestos as one of the pollutants in the Clean Air Act (CAA). 



With the new rules, asbestos and its handling came with stricter requirements. 



For example, any building under demolition containing asbestos must be monitored at all times while following work-related practices such as wetting and removing all asbestos-containing materials. The materials then had to be sealed in tight containers.



1973 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)



As part of the Clean Air Act and after the EPA determined asbestos to be hazardous and dangerous to health in 1971, it created NESHAP. The EPA has amended NESHAP several times before releasing its latest version in 1995.



In addition to asbestos, NESHAP also regulates six other hazardous air pollutants, including:




Mercury



Beryllium



Vinyl Chloride



Arsenic



Benzene



Radon




In regards to asbestos, NESHAP laws apply to all buildings that were created using asbestos-containing materials, including schools, office buildings, apartments, department stores, auto repair shops, churches, hospitals, and more.



The only exception to NESHAP regulations is residential homes and buildings with less than four dwellings. 



Otherwise, all housing complexes must abide by NESHAP and other state asbestos regulations. In addition, NESHAP rules apply to any industrial, institutional, or commercial buildings:



1974 Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)



The SDWA led to the regulation of contaminants in drinking water. The EPA sets standards for the quality of drinking water. This includes limits on asbestos contamination. The EPA oversees agencies and groups that supply drinking water. 



The drinking water limit for asbestos is currently 7 million fibers per liter. Asbestos gets into drinking water through erosion of natural deposits and decaying water mains. Many water mains were made with asbestos cement. 



1986 Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA)



In 1986, the AHERA passed to regulate asbestos in schools. The law requires that school districts perform regular inspections of buildings for asbestos. This law also applies to nonprofit private schools. 



Schools do not have to remove asbestos but must create management plans that minimize risks to staff and students. The EPA created a model for states to meet these requirements. 



1990 Asbestos School Hazard Abatement Reauthorization Act (ASHARA)



ASHARA provided additional funding for schools to abate asbestos. Under this law, the EPA increased the training hours required for school abatement workers. It also expanded the requirements for abatement professionals to all public and commercial buildings, not just schools. 



1989 Asbestos Ban and Phase-Out Rule



The EPA issued a final rule in 1989 that would ban most products containing asbestos, including:




Commercial Paper



Specialty Paper



Corrugated Paper



Rollboard



Flooring Felt




In addition, any new products that didn't previously contain asbestos cannot be produced with the mineral in the future.



The 1989 asbestos ban and phase-out was overturned by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in 1991. Because of this court decision, asbestos is not banned in the U.S. 



Revised Clean Air Act of 1990



NESHAP was revised in 1990 to include the ban on the following asbestos-containing products:




Spray materials that contain more than 1% asbestos used on pipes, conduits, structures, and buildings (spray materials containing more than 1% asbestos can only be used if the material is coated with either a resinous or bituminous binder at that time the spray is applied)



Wet-applied and pre-formed asbestos block or pipe insulation 




NESHAP rules also include regulations specific to asbestos in the demolition and renovation of buildings. These activities can release a lot of asbestos fibers. The regulations are designed to limit exposure in these situations. They do not apply to residences with four or fewer units. 



2019 Final Rule on Asbestos



The EPA issued another final rule on Restrictions on Discontinued Uses of Asbestos in 2019. It followed a more general rule from 2018 that required companies to notify the EPA of any chemical substances that will be used in a new way, and that might cause harm. 



The 2019 final rule serves to close a loophole. It is supposed to prevent discontinued asbestos products from returning to the market without the EPA's review. 



Discontinued asbestos products that must be reviewed before use according to the rule include: 




Acetylene cylinder filler



Adhesives



Arc chutes



Beater-add gaskets



Building materials other than cement



Coatings



Extruded sealant tape



Felt for roofing



High-grade electrical paper



Millboard



Missile liner



Pipe wrap



Reinforced plastic



Separators in batteries and fuel cells



Vinyl floor tiles




OSHA Workplace Asbestos Safety Regulations



OSHA was created in 1971 to make workplaces safer. Among the many safety conditions OSHA addresses is asbestos exposure. OSHA has created many standards and regulations to protect workers from the harms of asbestos.



OSHA established the current workplace asbestos exposure limit in 1986. The permissible exposure limit (PEL) is 0.1 fibers per cubic centimeter. 



Employer Responsibilities



For workers in positions that involve asbestos levels over the PEL, OSHA requires that employers: 




Provide safety training for working around asbestos



Provide appropriate safety gear and ensure it is used correctly



Offer training before work begins and every year



Educate workers about how asbestos exposure affects health



Educate workers about the added risk of smoking and provide resources for quitting



Provide medical surveillance to identify workers with early signs of asbestos illnesses



Document worker injury claims




2002 Asbestos Fact Sheet



In 2002, OSHA released a detailed asbestos fact sheet nationwide depicting the hazards and dangers of asbestos. 



OSHA distributed the fact sheet to schools, job sites, hospitals, doctors’ offices, and communities nationwide.



How Asbestos Laws Apply to Schools



Before the 1970s, most schools in the U.S. were built using asbestos-containing materials (ACMs). 



Many of these schools still exist today. Federal laws mandate that each of these buildings follow a series of required asbestos management plans, which include:




The Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA): AHERA requires all schools that were built using asbestos materials to inspect each building for asbestos materials and to come up with a proper management plan to prevent any asbestos hazards.



Any employee, contractor, or worker in school buildings built with asbestos materials must become accredited with The Asbestos Model Accreditation Plan.



If the renovation of a school results in stirring large deposits of friable asbestos fibers, the school must be demolished.



School districts must provide annual notifications to parents, employees, and others who are in the building for long periods that give updates on management plans and any actions that will be taken against asbestos.



There must be a qualified and designated individual who ensures that notifications and management plans are implemented correctly.



Areas in the school buildings that contain asbestos must be periodically inspected.



Custodians and school janitors must be provided with and complete asbestos-awareness training.



Both public and nonprofit schools must comply with all regulations and rules of NESHAP.




Asbestos Laws For Building Managers and Owners



State and federal laws also require building owners and managers to follow specific asbestos safety procedures: 




If any business owner or manager plans to renovate or demolish their building, they must first get it approved by their state’s agency.



Any worker hired to help renovate or demolish a building must be certified and accredited through a program such as the EPA Model Accreditation Plan (MAP).



Owners, managers, and anyone who works in a building containing asbestos must take advantage of EPA’s Operation and Maintenance Program (O&M). O&M is a plan that provides training on cleaning, inspections, and work practices for those who are in the building for long periods that contain asbestos.



Under the Clean Air Act of 1970, NESHAP mandates that building managers and owners must follow a certain set of guidelines to control the asbestos in their buildings. These laws differ from school laws as school laws have their own unique requirements.




Laws for Asbestos Professionals



In any instance that a site, building, school, home, or any other entity containing asbestos needs to be repaired, remodeled, or destroyed, a certified asbestos professional must be the one to do the job. 



Asbestos professionals have the required knowledge and training to work around asbestos-laden materials.



Workers, contractors, inspectors, planners, and designers must all undergo strict asbestos training before working on sites that contain asbestos.



Once they have completed training, asbestos professionals follow strict rules: 




Anyone working around asbestos must always be allowed proper ventilation.



Any worker exposed to asbestos while renovating, repairing, or remodeling must be allowed several breaks without being exposed for too long.



 The employer must also provide hygiene products and protective clothing to each worker.



Warning signs and instructions must always be visible around work areas containing asbestos.



Along with protective clothing, workers must have access to other protective equipment, such as respirators.



Medical examinations must be provided to all workers who are in contact with asbestos and asbestos-containing materials.



Showers with hot water and other post-asbestos exposure safety precautions must be provided.




Most of these laws were implemented years after millions of workers had already been exposed to asbestos daily. 



As a result, many workers have already been diagnosed with asbestos-related diseases, such as asbestos-related lung cancer, asbestosis, or asbestos cancer. More people are expected to be diagnosed in the future.



According to state and federal laws, if you’ve been exposed to asbestos and diagnosed with a disease after working in a place that contained asbestos, the responsible party could be one or any of the following:




The business that manufactured the asbestos and the business that manufactured faulty protective gear and clothing



The owners of the facility where the work was done and the contractors or subcontractors involved




A trust fund may already be set in place for future cases, especially if a business or manufacturer has gone bankrupt. 



These types of lawsuits are almost always settled out of court before trial. An asbestos lawyer will be able to investigate and provide this information.



These are some of the job sites and occupations that used the most asbestos:




Shipbuilding and ship repairs



Asbestos distribution plants



Commercial businesses



Heating and Cooling repair professionals



Brake and clutch repair (automotive repair)



Paper mills



Breweries (built before 1980)



Pipefitting companies



Sawmills



Manufacturing plants



Airports and military airfields



Power plants



Oil and chemical plants



Steel plants



Mining companies



Roofing



Construction



Electrical repair jobs



Insulation installation or removal



Custodial jobs



Welding




For more information, see our articles on Asbestos Abatement and Asbestos Disposal.



Talk to your doctor as soon as possible if you believe you were exposed to asbestos. Then, contact an asbestos lawyer to determine your legal options. 



Getting Help



If you’ve been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Mesothelioma Claims

"Mesothelioma claims are legal actions that provide asbestos exposure victims compensation to cover medical and other expenses. Mesothelioma and asbestos claims include lawsuits, asbestos trust fund claims, and benefits claims.



When facing a mesothelioma diagnosis, there are two main avenues to pursue compensation:




File a Personal Injury or Wrongful Death Lawsuit: This option is available against asbestos companies that have not declared bankruptcy. By pursuing legal action, victims or their families can hold these companies accountable for negligence and seek financial compensation for damages.



File a Claim Through an Asbestos Trust Fund: These trust funds are set up by now-bankrupt asbestos companies to provide compensation to those suffering from asbestos-related illnesses. The funds ensure that victims can still receive financial support even if the original companies are no longer operational.




By understanding these options, individuals affected by mesothelioma can make informed decisions on how to seek the compensation they deserve. It's crucial to explore all available legal routes to ensure that medical and other expenses are adequately covered."






 




What Is a Mesothelioma Claim? 



A mesothelioma claim is a legal action someone with mesothelioma takes to receive compensation. Mesothelioma is a rare cancer most often caused by asbestos exposure in the workplace. 



Because many workers had no idea of the risks of working with or around asbestos, they are now entitled to make claims for compensation if they get sick later. 



How Does Asbestos Lead to Mesothelioma Claims? 



Asbestos is a mineral that many industries used for decades. It is made up of tiny fibers that easily become airborne, where workers inhale them. Once in the body, asbestos fibers cause damage, leading to cancer and other illnesses. 



Not everyone exposed to asbestos needs to make a claim later because not all get sick. Those who do get ill face significant expenses and a shortened life expectancy. 




Asbestos exposure is the leading cause of mesothelioma, a rare but aggressive and deadly cancer.



Most people who are now suffering from mesothelioma experienced asbestos exposure at work.



Some of the heaviest use of asbestos occurred at military, shipping, and construction sites.



Nearly all types of manufacturing and other types of industrial job sites used asbestos.



The U.S. government placed regulations on the use of asbestos in the 1970s. It also enacted laws to protect workers with safety training.



Asbestos still lingers in many workplaces and older buildings, potentially causing more harm.



The symptoms of asbestos illnesses often don’t appear until decades after the exposure.






“My family will forever be grateful to you for your care, compassion, understanding and support during our crisis. Thank you for your words of comfort and encouragement, and for making it possible for us to gather with family and seek help without any worry about work responsibilities. You have such an exemplary and kind heart and we cannot thank you enough for all you did (and continue to do) to help us get through a difficult time.”
Nellie




Who Is Eligible to File Mesothelioma Claims?



You may be entitled to compensation if you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma. As a victim of asbestos exposure, you have a legal right to seek compensation and to:




File a claim against the company that exposed you to asbestos



Retain the services of an asbestos attorney



Seek compensation for costs incurred from your exposure to asbestos




You might also be eligible to claim if you lost a loved one to mesothelioma. The estates of people who passed away from asbestos diseases can also take legal action. 



Why Should I File a Mesothelioma Claim? 



The primary reason victims of asbestos exposure file a claim is to seek compensation. Mesothelioma is an expensive illness. In addition to costly medical care, most patients can no longer work and lose their income. A successful mesothelioma claim can compensate you and your family. It provides peace of mind. Instead of worrying about money, you can focus on treatment and spending time with family. For the loved ones of someone who passed away from asbestos exposure, a claim provides a sense of justice. It also provides compensation for all the related expenses.



To achieve this compensation, there are two main avenues:




File a Personal Injury or Wrongful Death LawsuitThis option involves taking legal action against an asbestos company that remains operational and has not declared bankruptcy. The lawsuit is processed through the court system, aiming to hold the responsible company accountable for the harm caused.



File a Claim Through an Asbestos Trust FundWhen a company has declared bankruptcy, they may have set up an asbestos trust fund. These funds are specifically designed to compensate individuals with asbestos-related illnesses. By filing a claim with these trusts, victims can access the financial support set aside for their situation.




The choice between these methods depends largely on the status of the asbestos company involved. In some cases, if multiple companies are responsible, you may pursue both options, tailoring your approach to maximize compensation.



By understanding these pathways, you can better navigate the process, securing the financial aid needed to focus on healing and spending cherished moments with family.



What Types of Mesothelioma Claims Can I File?



You may be eligible to file several types of claims as a victim of asbestos exposure. Rely on the advice of an experienced mesothelioma law firm or lawyer before deciding how, when, and where to file.



Personal Injury Lawsuit



Companies that made and provided asbestos materials to your workplace are likely liable for the expenses related to getting sick. If you become ill because of asbestos exposure, you can file a personal injury lawsuit to claim compensation. In some cases, it also makes sense to sue a former employer in addition to asbestos manufacturers. 



Most personal injury asbestos lawsuits end in settlements, while a few go to trial and end in a jury verdict. Either way, you can claim compensation for the following:




Past, present, and future medical expenses related to your illness



Past, present, and future lost wages



Physical and emotional pain related to your illness




You can claim for as much as you feel is fair, but ultimately what you receive comes down to negotiations or a jury verdict. An asbestos attorney has the experience to maximize damages recovered. 



Wrongful Death Claim



If you lost a loved one to asbestos, you can file a wrongful death lawsuit to seek compensation for:




Medical expenses associated with the illness



Funeral and burial expenses



Loss of consortium



Pecuniary damages, which include loss of financial support to dependents and spouses



Damages for loss of parental guidance



Damages for emotional and physical pain




An example of a successful wrongful death lawsuit over asbestos is the family of a man named Gordon Bankhead. 



He died from mesothelioma at 68 after asbestos exposure from decades of working on vehicles. 



Bankhead's widow and two daughters won $11 million from his employer Pneumo Abex, which made asbestos brakes.



Asbestos Trust Fund Claims



Some companies liable for asbestos exposure went through bankruptcy because of the costs of lawsuits. As part of the process, most had to create trust funds. They set up these funds to compensate future claimants with asbestos diseases. 



Insurance and Disability Claims



Regardless of who caused your exposure, you may be entitled to make benefits claims. For instance, you can claim for medical expenses if you have health insurance. 



You may also have disability insurance to help cover lost income. Social Security Disability Insurance provides monthly benefits to people unable to work due to workplace injuries or illnesses. 



Veteran Benefits Claims



The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) offers benefits to qualifying veterans. If you encountered asbestos during military service and later became ill, you may be eligible for benefits: disability compensation, special monthly compensation, and medical care at VA facilities.



Filing Your VA Claim



To initiate the process, veterans need to file a claim through the VA specifically for asbestos-related illnesses. The viability of these claims often depends on key factors such as your employment history in the military and the duration of your service. Ensuring all relevant service records and medical documentation are in order can significantly enhance your claim’s success.



Exploring Additional Compensation Options



Beyond the VA claims, veterans may also consider pursuing individual lawsuits or seeking compensation from asbestos trust funds. These alternatives can provide further financial relief, especially if the exposure led to conditions like mesothelioma.



For comprehensive guidance on filing a VA claim or exploring other compensation routes, additional resources are available to support veterans through each step of the process.



Which Type of Mesothelioma Claim is Right for Me? 



This depends on eligibility requirements and your personal preferences. Some people don't want to file a mesothelioma lawsuit and only file asbestos trust claims. Others want to try for every claim for which they qualify. 



A lawyer experienced with asbestos lawsuits is most qualified to help you make this choice. Also, remember that you may be eligible for more than one type of claim. 



How Do I File a Mesothelioma Claim?



The process varies depending on the type of claim. The best way to get started is to consult an experienced asbestos attorney.



A mesothelioma lawyer can explain your options and get you started on one or more claims. In general, you’ll follow these steps when filing for mesothelioma compensation:




Investigations and Evidence. This is just one important reason you need a law firm behind you. They have the resources to track down the source of your asbestos exposure and evidence that it caused your illness. Medical proof is crucial here; typically, the results of a needle biopsy are necessary to confirm a mesothelioma diagnosis, forming the medical backbone of your claim.



Eligibility. With more information, your lawyer can determine which claim types you can file. For instance, if you want VA benefits, you must be able to show that active service caused your exposure and illness. Similarly, proving exposure to specific asbestos products and identifying the companies responsible is essential. This can be challenging if you can't remember the exact products, but your lawyer can utilize a comprehensive database of asbestos-containing products to aid in this process.



Filing the Claim. With evidence in place and a decision on the types of claims, you can file. Your lawyer will file a lawsuit on your behalf, notifying the defendants and beginning the claim.



Settlement or Trial. If you file a lawsuit, your lawyer will negotiate with the defendants’ legal teams for a fair settlement. If this process fails, they can take your case to trial to seek compensation from a jury award. During this phase, having proof of exposure linked to specific asbestos products strengthens your position significantly.



Review of Claims. There is no settlement or trial for a trust fund or benefit claims. Instead, the appropriate agency will review your claim and make a decision.



Compensation. By the end of the process, you should be awarded compensation. Your lawyer will follow up and make sure you receive it. Remember, you are not alone in this journey; a team of product experts and legal professionals is available to support you every step of the way.




Is it Worth Filing a Claim? 



The process may seem daunting and overwhelming, but the benefits are well worth the effort with the right lawyer guiding you. Mesothelioma is a costly disease, and getting funds is essential for many victims. Compensation from a claim covers:




Medical bills



Future medical and care expenses



Home healthcare workers



Lost wages when you can no longer work



Support for dependents



Therapy and support for mental health issues




Filing a mesothelioma claim might sound complex, but with the right legal support, it's more straightforward than you might imagine. There's no need to worry about lengthy court appearances or intimidating trials. Typically, your involvement is minimal, often requiring just a single day to provide your statement.



Here's what you should keep in mind:




Attorney Assistance: A specialized attorney will handle the heavy lifting, often coming to you to gather necessary information and ensure your case is represented effectively.



Timeline Expectations: The resolution of your claim may take several months, but rest assured, your active participation is limited.



Your Right to Compensation: If you've been exposed to asbestos and are now facing a diagnosis of mesothelioma or another related illness, you have a right to seek compensation. Don't hesitate to request a free case evaluation to connect with a lawyer who understands your situation.




The bottom line is that taking action is crucial. With professional guidance, you can focus on your health while your attorney works to secure the financial support you deserve.



How Much Compensation Can I Get from Mesothelioma Claims? 



Mesothelioma claims are worth varying amounts depending on the situation. An asbestos attorney can reasonably estimate what defendants owe you. They cannot make promises or guarantees. 



The average amount claimants of asbestos trust funds receive is $180,000. Settlements for personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits average between $1 million and $1.4 million. Jury verdict awards are higher but can also result in no compensation. 



How much you may receive depends on many factors: the severity of your illness, the number of defendants, the extent of your asbestos exposure, your medical expenses and expected future costs, lost wages, the number of dependents, and intangible costs like pain and suffering. 



How Long Does an Asbestos Claim Take? 



The time it takes to resolve a claim depends on the type and complexity. Many people receive compensation within a few months. A lawsuit potentially takes the most time. If it goes to trial, it can take years to resolve.



However, mesothelioma claims often require a bit more patience due to their intricate nature. Typically, gathering all necessary information can take at least six months. This isn't just about providing a medical diagnosis; it involves tracing the length and intensity of asbestos exposure, questioning witnesses, and incorporating expert testimonies.



Several factors can influence the duration of the claims process:




Patient Age at Diagnosis: Older patients might face different timelines compared to younger ones.



Exposure History: Detailed documentation of exposure can either streamline or complicate the process.



Legal Venue: The location where the case is heard plays a significant role. Some venues expedite mesothelioma cases, especially if the patient is still living, while others may not, potentially prolonging the process to over a year.




Understanding these variables can help set realistic expectations for the timeline and outcome of a mesothelioma claim.




 




Is There a Deadline for Filing a Mesothelioma Claim? 



You must begin the claims process as soon as possible. Every state sets a statute of limitations for asbestos lawsuits, and you must file within this time limit.



The statute that applies to your case may be the state where you worked. A lawyer who works in your state will determine where and when to file.




Alabama: 2 years from diagnosis or 2 years from death for wrongful death statute



Alaska: 2 years from diagnosis or 2 years from death for wrongful death statute



Arizona: 2 years from diagnosis or 2 years from death for wrongful death statute



Arkansas: 3 years from diagnosis or 3 years from death for wrongful death statute



California: 1 year from diagnosis or 1 year from death for wrongful death statute



Colorado: 2 years from diagnosis or 2 years from death for wrongful death statute



Connecticut: 3 years from diagnosis or 3 years from death for wrongful death statute



Delaware: 2 years from diagnosis or 2 years from death for wrongful death statute



District Of Columbia:  3 years from diagnosis or 1 year from death for wrongful death statute



Florida: 4 years from diagnosis or 2 years from death for wrongful death statute



Georgia: 2 years from diagnosis or 2 years from death for wrongful death statute



Hawaii: 2 years from diagnosis or 2 years from death for wrongful death statute



Idaho: 2 years from diagnosis or 2 years from death for wrongful death statute



Illinois: 2 years from diagnosis or 2 years from death for wrongful death statute



Indiana: 2 years from diagnosis or 2 years from death for wrongful death statute



Iowa: 2 years from diagnosis or 2 years from death for wrongful death statute



Kansas: 2 years from diagnosis or 2 years from death for wrongful death statute



Kentucky: 1 year from diagnosis or 1 year from death for wrongful death statute



Louisiana: 1 year from diagnosis or 1 year from death for wrongful death statute



Maine: 6 years from diagnosis or 2 years from death for wrongful death statute



Maryland: 3 years from diagnosis or 3 years from death for wrongful death statute



Massachusetts: 3 years from diagnosis or 3 years from death for wrongful death statute



Michigan: 3 years from diagnosis or 3 years from death for wrongful death statute



Minnesota: 4 years from diagnosis or 3 years from death for wrongful death statute



Mississippi: 3 years from diagnosis or 3 years from death for wrongful death statute



Missouri: 5 years from diagnosis or 3 years from death for wrongful death statute



Montana: 3 years from diagnosis or 3 years from death for wrongful death statute



Nebraska: 4 years from diagnosis or 2 years from death for wrongful death statute



Nevada: 2 years from diagnosis or 2 years from death for wrongful death statute



New Hampshire: 3 years from diagnosis or 3 years from death for wrongful death statute



New Jersey: 2 years from diagnosis or 2 years from death for wrongful death statute



New Mexico: 3 years from diagnosis or 3 years from death for wrongful death statute



New York: 3 years from diagnosis or 2 years from death for wrongful death statute



North Carolina: 3 years from diagnosis or 2 years from death for wrongful death statute



North Dakota: 6 years from diagnosis or 2 years from death for wrongful death statute



Ohio: 2 years from diagnosis or 2 years from death for wrongful death statute



Oklahoma: 2 years from diagnosis or 2 years from death for wrongful death statute



Oregon: 3 years from diagnosis or 3 years from death for wrongful death statute



Pennsylvania: 2 years from diagnosis or 2 years from death for wrongful death statute



Rhode Island: 3 years from diagnosis or 3 years from death for wrongful death statute



South Carolina: 3 years from diagnosis or 3 years from death for wrongful death statute



South Dakota: 3 years from diagnosis or 3 years from death for wrongful death statute



Tennessee: 1 year from diagnosis or 1 year from death for wrongful death statute



Texas: 2 years from diagnosis or 2 years from death for wrongful death statute



Utah: 3 years from diagnosis or 2 years from death for wrongful death statute



Vermont: 3 years from diagnosis or 2 years from death for wrongful death statute



Virginia: 2 years from diagnosis or 2 years from death for wrongful death statute



Washington: 3 years from diagnosis or 3 years from death for wrongful death statute



West Virginia: 2 years from diagnosis or 2 years from death for wrongful death statute



Wisconsin: 3 years from diagnosis or 3 years from death for wrongful death statute



Wyoming: 4 years from diagnosis or 3 years from death for wrongful death statute




FAQs about Asbestos and Mesothelioma Claims



1. Do I need a mesothelioma lawyer to file a claim?



You do not have to hire a lawyer, but it is strongly recommended. Lawsuits are complex and require expert knowledge for the best outcome. The defendants have powerful legal teams that will fight to deny you compensation.



2. Can family members file claims on behalf of living mesothelioma patients?



Yes, family members can file claims on behalf of the mesothelioma victim if they are very sick. Family members may also be eligible for damages, including compensation, in the event of wrongful death.



3. Who pays the compensation if I win?



The manufacturer or business responsible for asbestos exposure pays the claim. This may be one or more companies.



Many companies have been held liable for asbestos exposure. These include asbestos suppliers, asbestos manufacturers, mining companies, and many companies that supplied, used, or repaired products with asbestos. 



4. How can a lawyer prove I was exposed to asbestos decades ago?



Asbestos lawyers have experience investigating companies and asbestos use, even from decades ago. They understand the process of finding information on asbestos exposure regardless of how much time has elapsed.



5. How much compensation am I entitled to?



There is no specific formula for the amount of compensation any individual will get, but companies have already paid billions. There are variables to consider, such as your health and how long you’ve been sick.



6. What is the average payout for mesothelioma claims? 



In mesothelioma cases, the average settlement amount is between $1 and $1.4 million. Asbestos trust fund claims are usually less, while verdicts in jury trials are often much more. 



7. I was exposed to asbestos, but I have not been diagnosed with an asbestos-related disease. Do I have any legal options?



Laws for filing an asbestos-related lawsuit vary according to state. While some states allow people to file at any time, others require that victims be diagnosed with an asbestos-related disease first.



The best option is to consult an experienced mesothelioma lawyer in your state. In the meantime, talk to your doctor about your exposure and getting screened for cancer and lung diseases.



8. How long does an asbestos lawsuit take to reach a conclusion?



The amount of time it takes depends on individual factors. However, some lawsuits have been settled within a few months, while others have taken a few years.



9. Can I file for punitive damages in a wrongful death claim? 



Some states may allow you to file for punitive damages, but most states do not. Your lawyer will help you understand what you can and cannot recover.



10. Can I file a wrongful death claim even if my spouse didn't start a personal injury claim before they died?



Most states allow spouses and dependents to file a wrongful death claim even if the victim never started a personal injury claim. Remember, however, that you'll need to refer to your state's statute of limitations associated with wrongful death cases.







Take Action Now: Secure Your Future with Expert Legal Help



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, COPD, you might be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more.



We offer free online appointments and can arrange for representatives to meet you within just one mile of your home. Open Now.



FREE Financial Compensation Packet




Info on law firms that will recover your HIGHEST COMPENSATION



Learn how to get paid in 90 days



File for your share of $30 billion in trust funds




Send My Free Packet



Comprehensive Support for Mesothelioma Claims



Navigating a mesothelioma diagnosis can be overwhelming, but you don’t have to face it alone. Our team is dedicated to providing you with the information, support, and advice you need at every step. Whether you're seeking legal assistance or emotional support, we are here to help you explore all available options.



How Do I File a Mesothelioma Claim?



The process varies depending on the type of claim. The best way to get started is to consult an experienced asbestos attorney.



A mesothelioma lawyer can explain your options and get you started on one or more claims. In general, you’ll follow these steps when filing for mesothelioma compensation:




Investigations and Evidence. This is just one important reason you need a law firm behind you. They have the resources to track down the source of your asbestos exposure and evidence that it caused your illness.



Eligibility. With more information, your lawyer can determine which claim types you can file. For instance, if you want VA benefits, you must be able to show that active service caused your exposure and illness.



Filing the Claim. With evidence in place and a decision on the types of claims, you can file. Your lawyer will file a lawsuit on your behalf, notifying the defendants and beginning the claim.



Settlement or Trial. If you file a lawsuit, your lawyer will negotiate with the defendants’ legal teams for a fair settlement. If this process fails, they can take your case to trial to seek compensation from a jury award.



Review of Claims. There is no settlement or trial for a trust fund or benefit claims. Instead, the appropriate agency will review your claim and make a decision.



Compensation. By the end of the process, you should be awarded compensation. Your lawyer will follow up and make sure you receive it.




Take Action Now: Secure Your Future with Expert Legal Help



If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to significant financial compensation. Our dedicated team of mesothelioma lawyers is here to guide you through every step of the legal process, ensuring your rights are protected and you receive the justice you deserve.



Get Your Free Financial Compensation Packet!Fill out our simple form today to receive a comprehensive packet with details about experienced asbestos and mesothelioma law firms and lawyers in your area [meso lawyers near me], along with essential resources to help you make informed decisions about your case.



Why Choose Us?




Decades of experience handling asbestos-related cases.



No upfront fees – you only pay if we win your case.



Personalized, compassionate support to help you focus on your health.



Access to a network of support services, including counseling and community resources.




Contact Us Today for Additional Legal Assistance and Advice!Call us at 800-793-4540 to speak with our team. Don’t wait—your time to file a claim is limited, and your family’s financial future could depend on taking action now.



You’re not alone in this fight. Let us help you secure the justice and compensation you deserve. Reach out any time for information, support, and advice.

### Frequently Asked Questions About Mesothelioma and the Military

Veterans account for nearly 30% of all mesothelioma diagnoses. Veterans diagnosed with mesothelioma have a lot of questions. Get answers to the most pressing FAQs about mesothelioma in the military, asbestos exposure, symptoms, treatment options, benefits, and more. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds set up for those who are victims of asbestos-related diseases. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













What Is Mesothelioma?



Mesothelioma is a cancer of the mesothelium, the tissue surrounding organs and cavities in the body. The most common form is pleural mesothelioma, cancer of the tissue around the lungs. 



The second most common is peritoneal mesothelioma, which affects tissue in the abdomen. Mesothelioma sometimes affects the sac that surrounds the heart (pericardium), although this is very rare.



What Are the Symptoms of Mesothelioma?  



Symptoms of mesothelioma can take up to 50 years to become apparent. Symptoms of pleural mesothelioma include shortness of breath, chest pain, coughing, abdominal pain, and abdominal swelling. 



Symptoms of peritoneal mesothelioma include abdominal pain and swelling, diarrhea and constipation, and unintentional weight gain or weight loss. 



What Causes Mesothelioma? 



Asbestos exposure is the only known cause of mesothelioma. Asbestos enters the human body chiefly through the respiratory system. Mesothelioma patients usually breathe the fibrous minerals when they come into contact with asbestos. 



These fibers then find their way into the lungs or chest cavity and irritate the tissue there. Over time, the irritated tissue cells can mutate into cancerous growths.



Does Asbestos Cause Other Illnesses? 



Asbestos is the only known cause of mesothelioma and also a non-cancerous type of lung scarring called asbestosis. 



Asbestos exposure can also cause lung cancer. It may cause other types of cancer, especially those that occur in the airways or abdomen. 



Asbestos may cause or contribute to respiratory illnesses like chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD). 



Why Do So Many Veterans Have Asbestos Illnesses? 



Veterans are overrepresented in mesothelioma diagnoses because the military used asbestos extensively. All military branches used asbestos, with the peak years of use between the 1930s and 1970s. 



Asbestos was useful because it was cheap, abundant, and excellent at resisting heat and fire. The military used it in insulation, ships, equipment, machines, vehicles, and aircraft. 



It wasn’t until the late 1970s that the Environmental Protection Agency began to regulate the use of asbestos. By then, large numbers of members of the armed forces had been exposed.



The federal government, the medical community, and many veterans are now aware that long-term exposure to asbestos fibers may cause malignant mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases.



Which Veterans Are at Greatest Risk for Mesothelioma? 



All veterans are at greater risk for mesothelioma than the general population. Veterans of the U.S. Navy have the highest risk of asbestos illnesses like mesothelioma. 



While all branches of the military used asbestos, the Navy used it the most extensively. For several decades, asbestos went into nearly every component of ships. 



Specific jobs in the military put service members at an increased risk of asbestos exposure and later risk of developing mesothelioma: 




Navy boiler and engine room workers



Insulation installers or repairers



Construction workers



Demolition workers



Mechanics



Electricians



Pipefitters




Is Mesothelioma a VA Disability? 



According to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), mesothelioma caused by asbestos exposure during military service is a qualifying disability. Veterans with mesothelioma can apply for disability compensation benefits and healthcare.



Veterans are eligible for disability compensation if the mesothelioma is found to be service-related and if their discharge from the armed forces was honorable. 



The VA also recognizes other asbestos illnesses that may be eligible for compensation depending on individual factors: 




Lung cancer



Other cancers, including gastrointestinal cancers, larynx or pharynx cancer, bronchus cancer, and urogenital cancer



Asbestosis



Pleural effusion



Pleural plaques




How Much Compensation Can Veterans With Mesothelioma Get? 



Disability benefit amounts depend on the disability rating assigned to a veteran. Mesothelioma and lung cancer caused by asbestos exposure are both considered 100% disabling. 



The 2023 disability amount for a single veteran with no dependents and a 100% disability rating is $3,621.95 per month. Other asbestos illnesses are assigned a disability rating from 10% to 100%, depending on individual factors. 





                
                        
                            Calculate Case Value
                            
                        
                        Diagnosis-- Select --MesotheliomaAsbestosisAsbestos-Related Lung CancerIs Diagnosed Person Alive?-- Select --YesPassed away under 2 years agoPassed away over 2 years agoAge of Diagnosed Person-- Select --Under 6565-8485 or olderExposure-- Select --MilitaryOccupationalSecond-HandOther / UnknownMain Job Site-- Select --ShipyardsBoiler RoomsPowerhousesPaper MillsConstruction SitesAutomotiveFirefightingRailroadsRefineriesOther / UnknownMain Asbestos Product Used-- Select --Fire Protection ProductsBrake Pads / LiningsCeiling Textures / Tile / PlasterElectrical ProductsTransite ProductsHeating & Cooling ProductsVermiculiteRoofing ProductsPaints / Plasters / Wall CoveringsOther / UnknownState-- Select --AlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaNorthern Mariana IslandsOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahU.S. Virgin IslandsVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces EuropeArmed Forces PacificPhone(Required)Email(Required)First Name(Required)Last Name(Required)CommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
         Any information you send is secure and will never be sold or released.This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
        
                        Δ
                        





Can Families Get VA Benefits After a Veteran Dies From Mesothelioma? 



The VA provides a $2,000 burial benefit to families of deceased veterans. The family or individual must show that they paid the funeral expenses to get the benefit. They must also prove that the veteran died from a service-related condition. 



How Do I Qualify for VA Benefits? 



To qualify for VA benefits for mesothelioma, you must prove two things: 




You have a health condition that was caused by asbestos exposure.



You were exposed to asbestos while serving in the military.




How Do You Prove Asbestos Exposure in the Military? 



The VA lists several documents a claimant must submit to qualify for benefits related to asbestos and mesothelioma: 




Medical records that prove you have mesothelioma or another asbestos-related condition



Service records to show your role and area of specialty in the military



A statement from a doctor that your role in the military is connected to your current illness




How Do I File a Claim for VA Asbestos Benefits? 



The VA provides several ways to file a claim. You can file online, file by mail, or file in person. You can use a Veteran Service Organization (VSO) representative to help you file. You can also work with a lawyer experienced in helping veterans and in asbestos cases to gather evidence and make a claim. 



How Long Does it Take to Get Benefits From a VA Claim? 



On average, it takes about 100 days to process a VA disability claim. Every case is different. The timing varies depending on how long it takes to gather the needed evidence, the complexity of the disability or illness, and the type of claim filed. 



Can You Sue the Military for Asbestos Exposure? 



Veterans cannot sue the military or the federal government for past asbestos exposure. The VA provides an avenue for getting the compensation you need for your disability. 



Veterans can sue asbestos companies that supplied the military. Most asbestos lawsuits end in settlements, but some go to trial. Veterans can also make claims with asbestos trust funds set up by companies that went bankrupt. 



Does a Lawsuit Against Asbestos Companies Affect VA Benefits? 



A lawsuit or asbestos trust fund is a valid way to seek additional compensation for past asbestos exposure. Any compensation you receive this way will not affect the compensation you get through the VA. 



Where Can I Get Treatment for Mesothelioma as a Veteran?



In addition to disability benefits, the VA provides qualifying veterans with medical care. Because mesothelioma is so prevalent in veterans, some VA medical facilities offer mesothelioma care and access to specialists: 




Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX



VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA



VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA



Miami VA Healthcare System, Miami, FL




Where Can I Get More Information on Legal Help?



Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. Keep in mind that if you have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for considerable compensation. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Chemotherapy for Mesothelioma

Chemotherapy for mesothelioma is a standard treatment for most patients. It usually involves a combination of medications that circulate through the body and kill cancer cells. Chemotherapy shrinks tumors, extends life expectancy, and improves the quality of life for mesothelioma patients. 



Any form of treatment for mesothelioma can get extremely expensive. With chemotherapy, treatment sessions (along with medication) can quickly add up to prices that are usually above the average family’s budget. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 













What Is Chemotherapy? 



Chemotherapy is a cancer treatment that uses cytotoxic drugs. Chemotherapy drugs circulate in the body, killing cells that grow and divide rapidly, like cancer cells. This shrinks tumors. In some cases, it can even eliminate tumors. 



While this can be a very effective treatment, most cytotoxic drugs also target healthy cells that grow quickly. This is why chemotherapy causes so many side effects. Patients must be able to withstand the side effects to get the benefits of chemotherapy. 



Chemotherapy advancements have made this treatment more effective and safer, but it can still be very uncomfortable for patients. Patients and their doctors must weigh the benefits and risks when choosing specific drugs and how to administer chemotherapy. 



How Is Chemotherapy Used to Treat Mesothelioma? 



Years ago, physicians used only single chemotherapy as a form of mesothelioma treatment for patients. The success rate, around 15%, was extremely low. 



Since then, physicians have begun combining chemotherapy drugs to extend the success rate and help mesothelioma patients handle the disease more efficiently.



Chemotherapy is now a common, first-line treatment for mesothelioma, especially for patients who are not eligible for surgery. It is also often combined with other therapies and can be used for all types of mesothelioma. 



Chemotherapy as Part of Multimodal Treatment



Multimodal treatment is the most effective approach to managing mesothelioma. It means using more than one type of treatment. Chemotherapy is a standard treatment for mesothelioma, but it is rarely used alone. 



As part of a multimodal treatment strategy, chemotherapy can be used in several ways in mesothelioma patients: 




As the primary and first-line treatment



Before surgery to shrink tumors



With radiation therapy to shrink tumors



With immunotherapy to improve treatment effectiveness



With a targeted drug to improve effectiveness



After surgery to kill any remaining cancer cells




Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Mesothelioma



Pleural mesothelioma is the most common form of mesothelioma. Peritoneal mesothelioma accounts for less than 20% of diagnoses and develops in the abdomen. Chemotherapy is also a common treatment for this type. 



Patients with peritoneal mesothelioma can often benefit from a particular type of chemotherapy called HIPEC (hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy). It involves circulating heated chemotherapy drugs throughout the abdomen. This is done after cytoreductive surgery to remove as much of the cancerous tissue as possible. 



Palliative Chemotherapy



Chemotherapy is often used to extend life expectancy and as part of a plan to achieve cancer remission. It can also be used as a palliative treatment. This means the goal is not curing the cancer but helping the patient feel more comfortable. 



If the patient can manage the side effects, chemotherapy reduces tumor size. This, in turn, reduces symptoms of the cancer and improves the patient's quality of life. 



How Does Chemotherapy Affect Mesothelioma Life Expectancy? 



Treatment with chemotherapy extends life expectancy for most patients as compared to receiving no treatment. Chemotherapy cannot cure mesothelioma but extends survival time and often reduces cancer symptoms. 



Chemotherapy Drugs Used for Mesothelioma



Oncologists can choose from many different types of chemotherapy drugs. Those they use most often for mesothelioma include: 



Alimta (Pemetrexed)



Alimta is used to treat mesothelioma more than any other type of chemotherapy medication currently used. Typically administered once every 21 days intravenously, Alimta is a systematic drug manufactured by Eli Lilly and Company. 



Along with the medication, patients are advised to take vitamins and supplements, such as folic acid and B12. Patients are also usually given corticosteroids with Alimta to reduce skin reactions. 



Alimta has been recommended for patients in advanced stages of mesothelioma treatment by the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Patients in advanced stages usually do not qualify for surgery. Pemetrexed is the best alternative for most of these patients.  



Carboplatin



Carboplatin is typically reserved for ovarian, head and neck, and lung cancer patients. It’s administered intravenously and usually takes about 60 minutes. 



Patients typically go through several sessions every month; sometimes, treatment may require an inpatient stay at a medical facility. Patients are susceptible to infection after treatment and are advised to avoid other people who have colds, cases of flu, and other types of infections. 



Cisplatin



Cisplatin is usually not effective enough on its own, but when combined with Alimta, the success rate is much higher. Just like other chemotherapy medications, cisplatin is administered intravenously every 21 days. Alimta is typically administered first, followed by cisplatin when combining the two drugs. 



In other instances, cisplatin may be combined with doxorubicin, which helps put mesothelioma in slight remission. 



Gemcitabine



Gemcitabine may be used with pemetrexed as an alternative to using carboplatin or cisplatin. Some people do not tolerate the platinum-based chemotherapy drugs very well. 



Studies have found that this combination has a disease control rate of about 50%. 



Onconase



Onconase works like most typical chemotherapy drugs by targeting and eliminating cancerous cells. The difference between Onconase and other drugs is that it causes more manageable side effects. 



Patients have to go in for treatment at least once a week. Treatment is given intravenously and lasts around 30 minutes for each session. Candidates for Onconase are screened thoroughly, as it works best for those in good health. 



Doctors often administer doses of both folic acid and vitamin B12. These vitamins work to help reduce the typical side effects of chemotherapy drugs while at the same time not affecting the strength of the treatment.



Bevacizumab



Bevacizumab is not technically a chemotherapy drug but is increasingly given along with chemotherapy. Bevacizumab is a targeted drug that prevents the formation of blood vessels supplying tumors with nutrients. 



Studies have measured a median survival time of 18.8 months in patients treated with pemetrexed, cisplatin, and bevacizumab. This improves survival time in patients with just pemetrexed and cisplatin. 



Other Mesothelioma Chemotherapy Drugs



Oncologists may choose other chemotherapy drugs to treat patients if the standard treatments are not effective or are poorly tolerated: 




Doxorubicin



Methotrexate



Mitomycin



Navelbine



Vinorelbine




Chemotherapy With Immunotherapy for Mesothelioma



Adding immunotherapy drugs to chemotherapy is an increasingly common multimodal approach to treating mesothelioma. 



Immunotherapy drugs harness the patient's immune system to encourage it to attack and kill cancer cells. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved two immunotherapy drugs in 2020, the first new approved treatment for mesothelioma in many years: 




Nivolumab (Opdivo)



Ipilimumab (Yervoy)




Clinical trials showed that this combination was more effective in extending patient survival times than chemotherapy. Some patients now receive chemotherapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab.  



More recently, clinical trials have shown good results for patients receiving chemotherapy with Keytruda (pembrolizumab). The combination of chemotherapy with this immunotherapy drug resulted in improved survival times. 



What to Expect When Getting Chemotherapy for Mesothelioma



Getting chemotherapy for the first time can be scary. Your doctors will talk to you about what you need to do to prepare and what to expect during and after treatment. There are different ways to administer chemotherapy, different drug combinations, and varying durations, so every patient has a unique experience. 



How to Prepare for Chemotherapy



Your doctors will give you specific and personalized information about getting ready for chemotherapy treatment. Here are some general guidelines: 




Talk to your medical team about the kind of treatment you'll be getting, how it will be administered, and anything else you need to know. Ask a lot of questions so you feel ready. 



Your doctors might tell you to see your dentist before treatment. Treating any dental issues now can reduce complications of chemotherapy, such as infections. 



Find out what side effects to expect and what you can do to manage them. 



Stay hydrated before treatment. 



Have a ride ready, so you don't have to worry later about getting to your appointment and back home again. 



Arrange an area in your home where you can rest comfortably and easily access the things you need. 



Talk to family and friends about what you'll be going through and tell them if you need help or support in the days following treatment. 




How Is Chemotherapy Given? 



One of the most important things you'll need to know is the type of chemotherapy you are receiving and how it is administered. 



Systemic Chemotherapy



The most common form of chemotherapy is systemic. You will receive intravenous fluids containing chemotherapy drugs. The drugs circulate through your whole body, targeting fast-growing cells. 



Injected Chemotherapy



Another way to deliver chemotherapy drugs is to inject the drugs into the area of the body with the tumors. This is not quite systemic but more specific than intravenous chemotherapy. 



Regional Perfusion/Intraoperative Chemotherapy



A more specific type of chemotherapy involves applying the drugs directly to the area of the body where the tumors developed. This is often done after surgery. Before the surgeon closes incisions, the drugs are circulated in the chest cavity (pleural mesothelioma) or abdomen (peritoneal mesothelioma). 



How Many Chemotherapy Treatments Will I Need? 



Chemotherapy is often given in cycles. One cycle of drugs is not typically adequate to treat mesothelioma effectively. Each cycle of chemotherapy lasts a few weeks. Most patients get a break between cycles to allow the body to recover. The number of cycles you need depends on individual factors. 



Chemotherapy Side Effects



Keep in mind that chemotherapy drugs work by attacking cancerous cells. Unfortunately, the medications can affect healthy cells in the body, such as cells in the hair, bone marrow, mouth, and intestines. Because of this, the side effects of chemotherapy can be quite extensive. 



Yet, every person reacts differently, and some may experience more side effects than others. Typical side effects of chemotherapy include:




Patients can easily bleed and bruise because of reduced blood platelets



Hair loss from the chemotherapy drugs attacking healthy hair follicle cells



Mouth sores and cuts



Nausea, which may also include episodes of vomiting



Low white blood cell count, which results in possible infections



Lack of energy and feeling lethargic




In some rare instances, chemotherapy drugs can cause significant damage. According to the American Cancer Society (ACS), drugs such as carboplatin and cisplatin have been shown to produce nerve damage, which can lead to hearing loss, severe pain and burning in the hands and feet, and extreme sensitivity to heat and cold.



How to Manage Chemotherapy Side Effects



Many chemotherapy side effects are temporary. The side effects usually clear up once the drugs have left the body. Meanwhile, you can alleviate symptoms with additional medications and other treatments.  




Nausea and Vomiting. These are some of the most common side effects of chemotherapy. Try eating bland foods, small meals, and foods that are easy to digest. Anti-nausea medications or medical cannabis can also help. 



Hair Loss. Hair loss is also common. For many patients, this is unavoidable. A cooling cap may slow the process of hair loss. It slows the flow of blood to the scalp, slowing down the drugs' effects on hair follicles. 



Fatigue. This is a tough side effect that makes it difficult to do ordinary tasks. Get plenty of rest throughout the day, sleep enough at night, and get light exercise to combat fatigue. 



Mouth Sores. Painful mouth sores are uncomfortable and make it difficult to eat. Focus on eating soft foods, like meal-replacement shakes. Avoid spicy or hot foods that will irritate sores. 



Lowered Immunity. You are more likely to get sick while on chemotherapy. Avoid large crowds and anyone who is sick. Get any vaccines your doctors recommend. 




Speak up about chemotherapy side effects. Tell your doctors about them and be as specific as possible. They can help you manage them safely. They may also want to change your treatment plan if you have unbearable or serious side effects. 



Getting Help



Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on qualified asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. Keep in mind that if you have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for considerable compensation. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Complementary and Alternative (CAM) Mesothelioma Treatments

Mesothelioma patients may choose complementary and alternative mesothelioma treatments to supplement traditional medical care. The goals of these supplemental therapies and treatments are to improve the quality of life, relieve symptoms, and manage treatment side effects. 



Keep in mind that if you’ve been exposed to asbestos and have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to considerable compensation. Right now, more than $30 billion is available in trust funds for those affected by asbestos. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on knowledgeable mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more.













About Complementary and Alternative Medicine



Many experts recognize complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) as a valid supplement to traditional medicine. It is not generally considered a substitute for standard care.  



Most non-traditional treatments are individual choices and are not a part of the conventional standard of medical treatment. 



Some of the more popular CAM treatments for mesothelioma patients are acupuncture, massage, meditation, and chiropractic care.



These natural techniques may provide relief from symptoms of mesothelioma and its treatments: 




Chronic pain



Inflammation



Body tension



Stress



Headaches



Nausea and GI distress




Although some benefits and therapy types are unproven, many patients get a beneficial sense of relief from trying them. 



What Is Integrative Medicine? 



You might also hear the term integrative used when referring to CAM therapies. Integrative medicine is the practice of integrating CAM therapies with traditional medicine to support it. It provides a more holistic approach to patient care, addressing all of their needs, not just direct treatment of the cancer. 



Integrative oncology is the specific use of CAM therapies in cancer treatment. Some cancer treatment centers have integrative oncology programs available to patients. 



Is CAM Treatment Right for Me? 



Using CAM treatments is a personal choice for mesothelioma patients. Check with your medical team before you try any of these CAM therapies. There might be some treatments or therapies that you should not use for specific reasons. 



Your medical team can also help you find qualified, licensed practitioners. You should only ever work with professionals who are appropriately licensed and have experience working with cancer patients. 



Get to know some of the options for CAM therapies, what they entail, and benefits and risks, and then make an informed decision with your doctors. 



Do Complementary and Alternative Therapies Work? 



Always remember that CAM therapies are meant to be supplements to traditional cancer treatment. They should not replace your primary cancer treatments and do not treat cancer. They will not slow the progression of your cancer or cure you. 



Many CAM therapies can be effective as palliative treatments designed to relieve symptoms. If they are considered safe, there is no harm in trying a therapy. If it does not work for you, you can stop. Many CAM therapies are effective in relieving some symptoms and improving quality of life. 



Vitamins, Herbs, and Supplements



Although most vitamins and herbal treatments are not recognized by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), mesothelioma patients may benefit from them. 



For example, Cat’s Claw is a popular natural herbal remedy that stimulates the immune system. Some people believe enhancing the immune system can support cancer treatments. 



Vitamin C, if taken consistently, can help prevent cancer cells from growing, as well as strengthen bones and help the body produce collagen.



An emerging supplementary treatment in cancer care is the fiber beta-glucan. It is found naturally in some grains, mushrooms, and seaweed. It might boost the immune system and trigger it to attack cancer cells. Clinical trials are currently investigating the use of beta-glucan as a cancer treatment. 



Nutrition and Exercise



Following a good nutrition plan is also useful in fighting mesothelioma and other cancers. Consider working with a registered dietician to build a healthy meal plan to support your treatment and quality of life. 



You will enjoy better overall health when you eat well, maintain a healthy weight, and address any nutrient deficiencies. This helps you feel better but also allows you to tolerate more aggressive cancer treatments. 



Exercise has similar benefits and is also good for mental health. As a mesothelioma patient, your ability to exercise might be limited, but you should be able to be active to some degree. Talk to your doctors about a type of gentle exercise that would be appropriate. 



Mental Health Therapies



Mental health is as important as physical health for patients coping with a mesothelioma diagnosis and undergoing treatment. Your medical team can help you find a therapist trained to work with cancer patients. Support groups can also be useful. 



Patients benefit from traditional mental health therapy, but also alternatives, including: 




Animal/pet therapy



Art therapy



Dance therapy



Journaling/writing therapy



Music therapy




Medical Marijuana



There have been several studies on marijuana and lung cancer patients, and the results have been positive so far. Most cancer patients who've taken medical marijuana reported that they experienced positive benefits:




Pain relief



Better sleep quality and the need for less sleep



Increase in appetite and decrease in nausea



Less stress and anxiety




More studies are needed since medical marijuana is still not legal in all states, and research is inhibited due to strict guidelines. 



Cancer patients who use medical marijuana have reported a few side effects. Most patients said that the side effects were so minor that they outweighed the benefits. The most common side effects reported include:




Red eyes



Paranoia



Dizziness



Low blood pressure and increased heartbeat



Hallucinations



Difficulties with food digestion




Side effects tend to vary from one person to another. Before trying medical marijuana to help with pain, consult your physician first, and most importantly, check your state laws to determine if it's legal in your state.



Homeopathic Treatments



Homeopathy is an alternative type of medicine in which patients take diluted natural substances to bring their bodies to the same level as a healthy person. This natural approach gives patients natural medications that counteract everyday body actions.



For example, even though an onion causes your eyes to water, a patient with allergies who has watery eyes can be given a diluted onion to counteract the effect.



Other examples include a system of diluted natural therapies consisting of plants, animals, or minerals that are used, such as nettle, red onions, poison ivy, mountain herbs, and more. 



However, keep in mind that there are no set standards for homeopathic remedies, and you should always consult with your physician first. Evidence that homeopathy works is also limited. 



Chiropractic Care



Chiropractic care is a form of alternative medical care proven to be beneficial in numerous ways to mesothelioma patients. 



Trained, licensed chiropractors perform a number of techniques to help patients overcome pain, which in turn can help decrease the need for additional pain medications. 



Other benefits of chiropractic care include:




Reduction in stress and anxiety



An increase in mobility and flexibility



Help with indigestion and nausea




Massage Therapy



Massage therapy helps reduce painful mesothelioma symptoms and treatment side effects, reduce stress, and improve recovery time.



Professional massage therapy differs from a basic massage given by a friend or family member. 



Massage therapists are highly-trained professionals who generally work with physicians and chiropractors to offer mesothelioma patients the best forms of massage techniques to match individual needs.



Reiki



Reiki is a type of mind-body therapy based on the idea that a healer uses their hands to manipulate the energy running through the body to bring about balance and healing.



Reiki does not necessarily involve touch. The practitioner may either gently rub the hands over the patient’s body or move them over the body, hovering just over the patient and not touching them.



Studies of reiki with cancer patients have found that the practice helps reduce stress, makes patients more relaxed, reduces fatigue, and even relieves pain to some degree. 



Reiki is not a cure for any illness, but it is thought to promote healing and is often used as a supplement to traditional medicine for this reason. 



Whether reiki really promotes healing or makes traditional treatments more effective remains unproven, but the practice of reiki seems to help cancer patients feel better.



Yoga



As an ancient practice, yoga has long been known to provide physical and mental health benefits. It is a mind-body practice that merges physical exercise with mental wellness. 



Yoga has been proven to help cancer patients feel better in several ways:




It reduces pain by increasing tolerance to it.



It reduces stress and improves mood.



It fights fatigue by providing a boost of energy. 



Cancer patients who practice yoga regularly report better quality of life than patients who do not.




Yoga for cancer patients should be gentle and taught by someone who understands the unique needs and the limitations of living with cancer.



Tai Chi and Qigong



Tai chi and qigong are mind-body practices and provide a gentle exercise that works for many cancer patients. They utilize slow, flowing movements along with breathing and mindfulness. 



Studies have found that these practices improve the quality of life in cancer patients. They can reduce fatigue, reduce inflammation, and boost mental health. 



Meditation



Meditation is yet another ancient practice that benefits mesothelioma and other cancer patients. Meditation involves sitting still and focusing on the present moment, often a body sensation like breathing. 



Studies show that meditation can help cancer patients manage anxiety and stress, sleep better, combat fatigue, and improve overall mental health and quality of life. 



Acupuncture and Acupressure



Acupuncture is a practice from traditional Chinese medicine and is today considered complementary and alternative medicine, often used in conjunction with traditional treatments for various conditions. The practice involves the insertion into the skin of thin needles. Acupressure is a similar practice that uses pressure rather than needles. 



Acupuncture practitioners place needles in strategic points that help direct the body's energy for greater balance and relief from symptoms or illness.



They target the needles at specific pressure points on the body, and knowing where and how to place them requires training and practice.



Acupuncture is not a replacement for cancer treatments and is ineffective at treating cancer or reducing tumors. 



However, medical research has proven that acupuncture can have some benefits when used to complement treatment.



For example, one study found that acupuncture reduces nausea and vomiting associated so often with chemotherapy. Acupuncture may also reduce pain and other side effects of treatment.



Hypnotherapy



Hypnotherapy may seem like nothing more than a magic trick. Still, it is a proven alternative and complementary medical practice that can benefit many types of patients, including those living with and fighting mesothelioma. 



Hypnotherapy is the practice of helping a person come into a state of deep focus and intense relaxation. When in this state, the hypnotherapists can make suggestions to the patient, who will be more responsive to them.



Studies have been conducted to determine if this type of therapy has real benefits for cancer patients, and the results are promising. Hypnotherapy can help a patient manage pain, even reducing the need for prescription painkillers.



It has also been proven to reduce stress and negative emotions like anxiety, specifically before undergoing a surgical procedure for cancer treatment. 



Hypnotherapy may also be effective at reducing the side effects of chemotherapy and boosting mood for patients experiencing fatigue.



What the Medical Community Says About Natural and Alternative Treatments



Although most natural and alternative treatments are not considered the mainstream way of battling diseases, many professionals in the medical community are beginning to see the benefits of CAM for their patients. 



Today, more and more physicians are beginning to embrace complementary and alternative medicines and even incorporate certain natural treatments with their standard medical care.



The Mayo Clinic, for example, believes in holistic and natural approaches combined with traditional treatment. 



As the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine continues to research and provide scientific evidence regarding these types of treatments, more members of the professional medical community are beginning to see the major advantages.



Talk to your medical team before trying any CAM treatment. There may be good reasons you should not use particular therapies or supplements. If given the go-ahead, it's safe to try these alternatives. 



Getting Help



Remember, if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you need additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540.  


## Blogs

### Minnesota Couple Succeeds Against Former Employer in Mesothelioma Case

A Minnesota appeals court recently ruled in favor of a mesothelioma victim and his wife in their personal injury claim against the man’s previous employer. Though the company sought dismissal from the proceedings based on the state's Workers' Compensation Act, the couple effectively argued that his asbestos exposure in their facility occurred years before the company employed him. Based on evidence of his work history with different employers, the court upheld a previous trial court ruling and allowed the claim to move forward.







Individual's Mesothelioma Attributed to Decades of Workplace Exposure



After Allan N. Anderson Jr.'s malignant mesothelioma diagnosis in 2023, he and his spouse initiated an injury lawsuit targeting 34 defendants they held responsible for his asbestos exposure. From the 1960s through the mid-1990s, Mr. Anderson had progressive worked progressively as a pipefitter apprentice, pipefitter, journeyman welder, and supervisor. He additionally oversaw asbestos removal projects conducted by external contractors.



The defendants in the Anderson family's mesothelioma case included Waldorf Corporation, a company that he’d worked for over a five-year period. In response to being named, the corporation asked to be dismissed from the case, arguing that they were protected from legal action under the state's Workers' Compensation Act. In response, the couple demonstrated that Mr. Anderson had only been employed by the company between 1985 and 1988, and asserted that his exposure to Waldorf's asbestos occurred during the years he’d been in their facility while working for others, before his employment with them.



Appeals Court Affirms Trial Court's Ruling on Mesothelioma Case



The trial court that originally heard the case had sided with the couple, agreeing that Waldorf was not entitled to Workers' Compensation Act protection because of the brief duration of the mesothelioma victim’s employment with them. Following this decision, the company filed an appeal, but the appellate court concurred with the lower court that substantial factual disputes existed that prevented summary judgment. The case will move forward for a jury to hear.

### Railroad Asbestos Claims & Settlements

A history of asbestos exposure for railroad workers has led to thousands of cases of mesothelioma, lung cancer, and other asbestos-related diseases. For decades, asbestos was hidden in train engines, brake systems, insulation, and construction materials, putting employees and their families at risk. Learning how railroad asbestos claims and settlements work can help victims understand their legal rights and pursue the compensation they deserve.
Asbestos Exposure Risks for Railroad Workers

Railroad workers were routinely exposed to asbestos in brake systems, insulation, engine rooms, and construction materials. Prolonged exposure often led to mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis decades later. Awareness of these risks is essential when considering filing a claim, understanding how much an asbestos claim is worth, and to compare the top asbestos lawyers nation-wide.
Sources of Railroad Asbestos Exposure

Train engine insulation and boilers
Brake pads, clutch systems, and mechanical components
Railroad construction and maintenance materials
Shipments of asbestos-containing goods transported on trains

Suing for Railroad Asbestos Exposure
Railroad workers and their families can pursue compensation through personal injury lawsuits, wrongful death claims, or asbestos trust fund claims. Hiring a knowledgeable attorney who specializes in asbestos cases ensures claims are filed correctly and all exposure evidence is properly documented.

"Railroad workers face a higher risk of mesothelioma due to asbestos exposure in train engines, brake systems, and insulation materials."
— Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

How Much Is an Asbestos Claim Worth?
Determining how much an asbestos claim is worth depends on several factors, including the severity of the disease, medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis claims may also consider the duration and level of exposure, the specific companies responsible, and applicable state laws. Claims can be resolved through settlements, trust funds, or court verdicts, and amounts vary widely. Consulting an experienced asbestos attorney is essential, as they can assess evidence, calculate potential compensation, and guide families through the legal process to maximize the value of what is your asbestos claim worth?
Top Railroad Asbestos & Mesothelioma Settlements

While every case is unique, below are some reported high-value settlements for railroad asbestos claims:

$12 million: Settlement for a locomotive engineer diagnosed with mesothelioma from asbestos in train engines.
$8.5 million: Railroad mechanics received compensation after exposure to asbestos in brake systems over decades.
$7 million: Family of a track maintenance worker awarded a wrongful death settlement following mesothelioma diagnosis.
$5 million: Settlement for a conductor exposed to asbestos insulation materials in railcars.
$3.5 million: Settlement for a switch operator suffering from asbestos-related lung disease.

These figures demonstrate the potential value of a claim but are not guaranteed. Results depend on exposure evidence, medical documentation, responsible parties, and jurisdiction.
Hire a Trusted Asbestos Lawyer
Experienced attorneys can identify all potential asbestos exposure sources during a railroad career, access railroad company records and employment history, file claims against multiple defendants or asbestos trust funds, and provide guidance on how much an asbestos claim is worth based on past settlements. Families should also work with a reliable law firm focused on asbestos cases to ensure their claim is handled by experienced professionals and maximize the chance of receiving fair compensation.
Steps to File a Railroad Asbestos Claim

Gather medical records and employment history related to railroad work
Document any known asbestos exposure locations and products
Consult a trusted asbestos lawsuit attorney with experience in railroad cases
File claims promptly, statutes of limitations vary by state and type of claim

Trusted Guidance for Railroad Asbestos Claims
At Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, we understand the challenges families face when a loved one is diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness from railroad work. Our mission is to provide clear guidance, trusted resources, and experienced legal support. From evaluating exposure history to filing claims and pursuing compensation, our dedicated team is committed to protecting your rights and helping you secure the justice and financial support your family deserves.
Stat: According to the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), railroad workers historically had some of the highest occupational asbestos exposure rates in the U.S.
Legal DisclaimerThe information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### Mesothelioma Lawsuit Put on Hold Following Bankruptcy Filing

Before her death from pleural mesothelioma, Irma Lee LaGrange filed suit against the companies she blamed for the secondary exposure to asbestos that she blamed for her illness. Ms. La Grante pointed to her years of handling her husband Allen’s asbestos-covered work clothing. Though the suit was filed years ago, the legal proceedings were recently stalled when one of the defendants named in her claim sought bankruptcy protection.







Bankruptcy of Defendant Stalls Mesothelioma Litigation



LaGrange named multiple companies as defendants in her mesothelioma lawsuit, all of whom were connected to her husband’s work as a laborer, welder, and pipefitter throughout their marriage. Among them were Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, the corporate successor to Avondale Shipyards, where Mr. LaGrange had been employed from 1973 through 1996, and the subcontractor Hopeman Brothers. All of the defendants somehow exposed him to asbestos that he carried home on his clothing, which she washed.



As part of the proceedings in the mesothelioma lawsuit, the case was transferred to federal court under federal officer jurisdiction. After Mrs. LaGrange lost her battle with the rare and aggressive cancer, her surviving children were substituted as plaintiffs and expected the case to proceed, but soon after, Hopeman filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. That filing led the federal court to stay the case against Hopeman until the proceedings related to its bankruptcy case are completed.



Other Defendants Seek Extension of Mesothelioma Stay



In response to being notified that Hopeman Brothers’ portion of the lawsuit had been paused, the remaining defendants in the mesothelioma claim asked the court to extend the stay to cover the entire case, arguing that doing so would prevent an imbalance among the parties.



Although the LaGrange family opposed the delay and pressed for their mesothelioma claim to move forward, the judge determined that a limited stay was appropriate. The ruling emphasized that temporarily halting the case would allow the bankruptcy court to clarify the standing of the co-defendants, avoid inconsistent outcomes, and preserve judicial efficiency.

### Largest Asbestos Lawsuit Settlements in California

Recent asbestos verdicts across the U.S. show how seriously courts view occupational exposure cases. One of the largest asbestos lawsuit settlements in California awarded $48 million to a construction worker diagnosed with mesothelioma. Other significant payouts include $32.8 million for a Navy veteran and $26.6 million for a janitor exposed in the workplace. While California leads in high-value verdicts, the California man awarded $18.8 million in mesothelioma claim underscores the growing national recognition of asbestos-related illnesses and the compensation victims deserve.
If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, speaking with top-rated asbestos lawyers in California can help you understand your legal options. A California mesothelioma lawsuit may provide critical financial relief for medical treatment, lost income, and long-term care.
Top Mesothelioma Settlements in California


$48 million – Awarded in Los Angeles to a former construction worker exposed over decades.
$32.8 million – Granted to a Navy veteran in San Diego after asbestos exposure at a shipyard.
$26.6 million – Secured by a janitor exposed through deteriorating asbestos in office ceilings.
$18.6 million – Awarded to a refinery worker’s family after a wrongful death claim.

Why Asbestos Lawsuits Succeed in California Courts
California is one of the best states for asbestos and mesothelioma litigation due to:

Lenient filing deadlines for occupational disease cases, which allow victims to file claims even years after exposure; 
large juries that often favor victims and award substantial compensation
high rates of industrial asbestos exposure across shipyards, construction, oil refineries, and factories. 

Additionally, the state’s history of worker protections and a well-established legal framework make it easier for plaintiffs to pursue justice against negligent companies.
Who Can File an Asbestos Lawsuit in California?
You may qualify if you:

Were diagnosed with mesothelioma or another asbestos-related disease
Worked in construction, shipbuilding, oil refining, or manufacturing in California
Were exposed to asbestos secondhand from a family member’s work clothes

Consulting with the best mesothelioma lawyers in California ensures your case is filed properly and within deadlines and backed by the strongest available evidence to maximize your potential compensation. These legal professionals can help identify all liable parties and guide you through the complex claims process with confidence.
How Much Are Asbestos Settlements Worth in California?
Mesothelioma lawsuit settlements in California commonly range from $1 million to $10 million, depending on the severity of the illness, the extent of asbestos exposure, and the strength of the evidence. Larger verdicts may exceed $20 million in cases where employers are found grossly negligent, failed to provide protective equipment, or knowingly exposed workers to asbestos. 
Settlements can also increase significantly when multiple defendants are involved, as each company may be held partially responsible for a victim’s illness. These high-value outcomes reflect the devastating impact mesothelioma has on workers and their families.
Average Payout for California Asbestos Claims
While every case is different, average payouts in California can be summarized as:

$1M – $2M for straightforward cases with clear exposure history
$5M – $10M+ in cases involving prolonged exposure or corporate negligence
$10M+ for high-profile cases that go to jury trial


“While mesothelioma is rare, its connection to workplace asbestos exposure makes it one of the most preventable occupational cancers in the U.S.”
— American Cancer Society
How to File a Mesothelioma Lawsuit in California

Follow these four steps:

Get a Diagnosis: Confirm mesothelioma or asbestos-related illness.
Hire an Attorney: Choose a lawyer experienced in asbestos lawsuits in California.
Gather Evidence: Document asbestos exposure, work history, and medical records.
File Your Lawsuit: Act quickly—California courts allow fast-tracking for terminal illness cases.

Top Asbestos Exposure Sites in California
Major asbestos exposure occurred in locations such as:

Naval shipyards in San Diego and Long Beach
Oil refineries in Bakersfield and Los Angeles
Old schools, factories, and apartment buildings statewide

Get Help from a Mesothelioma Law Firm
Whether you're a Navy veteran, factory worker, or family member affected by secondhand exposure, you may be eligible for compensation. A mesothelioma lawsuit in California could help you cover treatment and provide for your loved ones.
We understand how devastating a mesothelioma diagnosis can be, for both victims and their families. At Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, we’re committed to helping you get the justice and compensation you deserve. Our team of experienced asbestos attorneys will guide you through every step of the legal process with compassion and expertise. You don’t have to face this fight alone—we’re here to stand with you and protect your future.
Stat: More than $30 billion has been set aside in U.S. asbestos trust funds to compensate victims and families.
 
Legal DisclaimerThe information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### Largest Wrongful Death Settlements for Asbestos & Mesothelioma Claims

Asbestos Death Compensation Guide
When a loved one dies because of asbestos exposure or mesothelioma, families often have legal options to seek wrongful death compensation, learn more about filing asbestos claims after a death. Understanding typical payouts for wrongful death in asbestos and mesothelioma claims and how top law firms pursue those claims helps survivors make informed choices during a very difficult time.
Asbestos Wrongful Death Settlement Factors

Severity and medical records documenting the diagnosis and cause of death
Work history and proven exposure to asbestos-containing products
Liability evidence showing employer or manufacturer negligence
Whether the case settles or goes to trial (trial verdicts can be larger but take longer)
State wrongful death statutes and caps on damages

Average Payouts for Asbestos Wrongful Death

While average mesothelioma wrongful death settlement amounts often range in the low millions, large wrongful death settlements can be significantly higher when liability is clear and damages (lost income, medical expenses, pain & suffering) are substantial, see what your asbestos or mesothelioma claim is worth. Experienced attorneys can help maximize compensation, explain asbestos wrongful death settlement amounts, and guide families through complex legal processes.
Largest wrongful death settlements & notable examples
Below are some high-profile asbestos/mesothelioma payouts and verdicts (examples drawn from public records and case summaries):

$250 million: Large verdict for a steelworker exposed to asbestos (trial verdict reported by legal case summaries). This remains one of the largest recorded mesothelioma verdicts.
$75+ million: Multi-defendant verdicts in cases where manufacturers and employers were held responsible for prolonged exposure.
$30–50 million: Several multimillion-dollar settlements for families where corporate negligence was well documented.
$10–25 million: High-value settlements typically involving catastrophic exposures and clear employer liability.
$5–10 million: Common for strong cases that avoided trial but involved significant economic and non-economic damages.
$1–5 million: Many mesothelioma wrongful death settlements fall into this range, especially in negotiated settlements.
$500k–$1M: Smaller settlements for cases with weaker exposure documentation or jurisdictional caps on damages.

These figures are examples and not guarantees, every case is unique. For more information about settlement ranges and how claims are valued, families often consult experienced mesothelioma attorneys who specialize in asbestos wrongful death claims and can guide families through the process of filing asbestos claims after death.

"Mesothelioma is fairly rare in the United States. About 3,000 new cases are diagnosed each year."
— American Cancer Society

Pursuing Asbestos Wrongful Death Compensation
Survivors and executors typically pursue compensation through one or more of the following:

Wrongful death lawsuit against responsible companies and employers
Survival action to recover the decedent’s pain, suffering, and pre-death losses
Trust fund claims (many asbestos defendants established bankruptcy trust funds to pay present and future claims)
Workers’ compensation or VA claims (for veterans exposed during service)

Choosing the Right Mesothelioma Lawyer

When you compare top mesothelioma lawyers and firms, consider:

Experience specifically with asbestos wrongful death and mesothelioma claims
Track record of large settlements and verdicts
Resources to investigate employer and product histories
Willingness to pursue trials when necessary vs. aggressive settlement negotiation
Client reviews, peer recognition, and published results
A featured mesothelioma law firm Danziger & De Llano with decades of experience helping families secure compensation

How quickly can families get paid?
Settlement timelines vary: trust fund or negotiated settlements may pay within months, while trials can take years. Many firms will pursue expedited settlements in mesothelioma wrongful death claims when a deceased worker’s survivors need immediate assistance to cover funeral costs, medical bills, and other expenses related to asbestos exposure.
Next Steps After an Asbestos-Related Death

Collect medical records, death certificates, and employment history (employers, job titles, job sites).
Preserve any physical evidence (old uniforms, equipment) and document exposure locations.
Contact an experienced mesothelioma wrongful death lawyer, many offer free consultations and can advise whether to file suit or trust claims.
Act promptly, statutes of limitations vary by state and may limit the time to file a wrongful death claim.

Stat: According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2,803 mesothelioma cases were reported in the United States in 2021.






At Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, we understand the devastation families face after losing a loved one to an asbestos-related illness. Our mission is to provide trusted information, resources, and legal guidance to help you pursue justice and financial compensation. From investigating exposure history to negotiating or litigating claims, our experienced network of attorneys is committed to protecting your family’s rights and securing the support you deserve during this difficult time.



Legal DisclaimerThe information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### Can I Sue for Asbestos Exposure? Asbestos Lawsuits & Payouts

If you have been exposed to asbestos and later developed mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may have the right to pursue a legal claim. Victims often ask, can I sue for asbestos exposure, and the answer depends on factors like diagnosis, work history, and responsible companies. 
You’ll find guidance on who qualifies, how the asbestos claims process works, how long these cases usually take, and what kinds of payouts victims may receive. Some of the largest asbestos lawsuit settlements also provide perspective on the potential compensation available.

“There is no ‘safe’ level of asbestos exposure for any type of asbestos fiber.”
— Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA)
Who Can File? Asbestos Lawsuits Requirements

Diagnosis linked to asbestos: Mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis confirmed by medical records.
Documented exposure: On-the-job (construction, shipyards, manufacturing, refineries, power plants), military service, or secondary (“take-home”) exposure.
Identifiable defendants: Companies that made, installed, sold, or failed to warn about asbestos-containing products.

How to Sue for Asbestos Exposure (Step-by-Step)

1) Confirm Your Medical Basis
Gather imaging, pathology, and treating-physician notes that connect your disease to asbestos exposure.
2) Build Your Exposure Timeline
List job sites, products, dates, unions, coworkers, and any safety data sheets. This anchors liability and defendant identification.
3) Choose Experienced Counsel
Best asbestos exposure attorneys combine national reach with local insight. Firms like Danziger & De Llano, LLP mesothelioma lawyers regularly handle asbestos exposure lawsuits and trust fund claims. Nationally recognized law practices (e.g., large plaintiff-side firms with asbestos teams) may also assist, depending on your jurisdiction and facts.
Asbestos Exposure Settlement Amounts
Values vary by diagnosis, age, work history, jurisdiction, and number of responsible companies. Recoveries may include medical costs, lost wages, pain and suffering, and in some cases punitive damages. Some claims resolve through bankruptcy trust funds; others settle pre-trial or go to verdict. 
Results depend on the evidence and venue; no lawyer can promise a specific amount, though experienced attorneys can often provide a reasonable range of expectations for compensation for asbestos exposure based on prior verdicts, settlements, and the unique circumstances of your asbestos exposure case. It is also important to compare the top-rated asbestos exposure lawyers to ensure you choose experienced legal counsel capable of maximizing your claim.
Statute of Limitations for Asbestos Cases
Deadlines differ by state and claim type:

Personal injury: Often runs from the date you were diagnosed or reasonably discovered the disease was caused by asbestos.
Wrongful death: Usually runs from the date of death.

These windows can be short, and many asbestos exposure lawsuits are dismissed if they are filed too late. Speak with counsel promptly to protect your right to file.
Asbestos Claims Process & Timeline
Investigation & Intake (Weeks)
The attorney reviews your medical records and builds your exposure history. Defendants are identified.
Filing & Discovery (Months)
Complaint is filed; both sides exchange evidence. Some cases fast-track due to medical need.
Resolution (Months to >1 Year)
Cases may settle, qualify for trust funds, or proceed to trial. How long asbestos lawsuits take depends on court schedules, number of defendants, and your health.
FAQ: People Also Ask

What to do if exposed to asbestos at work?
Report the exposure, request industrial hygiene testing, and speak to your doctor about monitoring. Document dates, tasks, and materials. Contact an attorney to discuss preserving evidence.
Suing a Landlord for Asbestos
Possibly, if negligence can be shown, e.g., failure to disclose or safely manage asbestos in common areas or during renovations. Landlord-tenant and premises liability laws vary by state.
Can I be tested for asbestos exposure?
Doctors can’t detect asbestos fibers in the lungs easily, but they can monitor for asbestos-related disease via imaging, pulmonary tests, and specialist evaluation.
Work With Reliable Asbestos Exposure Lawyers
At Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, we believe every asbestos victim deserves access to experienced attorneys who know how to build strong cases and pursue maximum compensation. Our team has the resources to investigate job sites, identify responsible companies, and guide families through both lawsuits and trust fund claims. With decades of focus on asbestos litigation, we are committed to protecting your rights and helping you understand your options with clarity and compassion.

STAT: U.S. surveillance data recorded 2,803 new malignant mesothelioma cases in 2021.
Legal DisclaimerThe information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### Illinois Supreme Court Opens Door for Mesothelioma Workers' Compensation Claims

Victims diagnosed with mesothelioma after workplace asbestos exposure can seek financial compensation through many avenues, including workers' compensation benefits, but some state’s laws have prevented these particular types of claims from moving forward. In a significant development, when an Illinois woman challenged the rejection of her claim against her deceased spouse's former employer, the state's highest court sided with her position, determining that illnesses manifesting years beyond standard statutory deadlines remain eligible for coverage.







Ruling Provides Hope for Families of Mesothelioma Victims



The case brought by Candice Martin against B.F. Goodrich immediately drew widespread attention from Illinois mesothelioma patients who had previously seen their workers' compensation petitions denied. Martin's spouse had succumbed to angiosarcoma, a particularly aggressive form of liver cancer, which she attributed to his workplace contact with carcinogenic substances in 1974 during his extended employment with the corporation.



Martin's legal challenge referenced two key Illinois statutes - the Wrongful Death Act and the Survival Act - alongside an exclusivity clause within the state's Occupational Disease Act. This provision specifically exempted conditions such as mesothelioma from the standard two-year filing deadline, recognizing that the designated time limit, or repose period, would be inappropriate for such diseases. B.F. Goodrich sought dismissal of the case, contending that the two-year limitation did not constitute a "period of repose" designed to circumvent legal obligations. The court firmly rejected this position.



Court References Earlier Case to Justify Ruling



In reaching their landmark conclusion, the Illinois Supreme Court referenced a 2019 modification to existing workers' compensation statutes. This legislative change had been put in place following what the court described as an unfair outcome in a mesothelioma case involving a shipping employee whose condition didn't manifest until four decades after his employment ended.



Referencing that previous mesothelioma patient, the justices stated, "Reading the plain language of [the two rulings] together, we find that the legislative intent was to ensure that employees like the one in Folta were able to seek compensation even if they did not discover their injury within the time limits provided under the Workers' Occupational Diseases Act." This decision represents a crucial victory for mesothelioma victims and their families throughout Illinois, potentially opening pathways for compensation that were previously blocked by restrictive timing requirements.

### Johnson & Johnson Argues Against $30M Jury Award for Mesothelioma Punitive Damages

After hearing extensive evidence that Johnson & Johnson had failed to warn of the dangers of asbestos in their iconic talc powder products, a Connecticut jury ordered the company to pay a mesothelioma victim $15 million in compensatory damages. Now the victim has suggested that the company pay him $30 million in punitive damages, and Johnson & Johnson is challenging that request, arguing that the dollar figure was purposely set at the state’s maximum and that the high amount was not justified.







$15 Million Compensatory Award for Mesothelioma Victim



Johnson & Johnson has been named in thousands of mesothelioma cases and ovarian cancer lawsuits. Victims’ accusations have included negligence, product liability, and fraud, and many have received significant awards from juries hearing evidence at trial. In the trial filed by Evan Plotkin in Connecticut, the jury ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay the victim and his wife $15 million in damages, with the next phase of the trial oriented towards identifying an appropriate amount to be paid in punitive damages.



As part of the legal process, the mesothelioma victim’s attorneys suggested that $30 million would be an appropriate punishment for the company’s recklessness, conspiracy, and fraudulent misrepresentation. The amount named represents the maximum that the state of Connecticut permits. Johnson & Johnson is arguing against the consideration of that amount, asserting that the company had consistently worked to ensure that its talc was safe.



Johnson & Johnson Requests Consideration for Mesothelioma Punitive Damages



Claiming that they had “engaged in extensive safety efforts” and had been driven by “safety, not profit,” Johnson and Johnson has requested that the court deny the victim’s request for a $30 million mesothelioma punitive damages award. In response, the victim’s attorneys have argued that evidence submitted in the case warrants the assignment of a significant punishment.  The court is considering what is most appropriate for the situation.

### Second-Hand Mesothelioma Lawsuit to Return to State Court

Mesothelioma victims who file lawsuits against the companies that exposed them to asbestos encounter numerous detours on their path to justice and compensation. One of the most common of these is an argument about what court will hear the case; while defendants generally prefer federal courts, victims prefer state courts. In one ongoing case, a couple who blame the wife’s mesothelioma on second-hand exposure won the right to have her case returned to the jurisdiction of her choice.







Mesothelioma Victim Sues The Boeing Company



Mary and Kenneth Holste filed a mesothelioma lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court. The Boeing Company was one of the defendants named in their claim because the organization is successor in interest to Hughes Helicopters, which had been Mr. Holste’s employer. The complaint against Boeing cited asbestos carried home on Mr. Holste’s work clothes after he’d worked on parts for guns mounted on helicopters made by the company.



The reference to military guns on helicopters led Boeing to remove the mesothelioma claim to federal court based on the statute that applies when a company is following government orders for its product. But the couple pushed back on this move by filing a Notice of Waiver, indicating that they were not pursuing compensation against the company for any exposure to military equipment. They said that the case was specifically about “asbestos exposures sustained from civilian products and equipment at civilian work sites.”



Judge Reviews Claim and Agrees with Mesothelioma Victim



Many plaintiffs in civil litigation, including mesothelioma victims, prefer to have their cases heard by judges and juries in their local jurisdiction rather than in federal court. There are several reasons for this, ranging from better procedural rules to more sympathetic juries to more generous rules surrounding damages awards.



In reviewing the mesothelioma victim’s request to keep the case in local court, the Honorable Josephine L. Staton, United States District Judge of the Central District of California, noted that though it might be difficult for the victim to prove exposure to asbestos for civilian uses rather than military uses, the waiver was appropriately filed and would be honored. The case was remanded back to the Los Angeles Superior Court, as the victim requested.

### Largest Navy Asbestos & Mesothelioma Settlements

Many Navy veterans and mesothelioma victims were exposed to asbestos on Navy ships, where asbestos was extensively used for insulation, fireproofing, and other critical purposes. The history of asbestos exposure in the navy shows how these Navy ships with asbestos created hazardous environments, releasing dangerous asbestos fibers that caused fatal diseases years later. 
Understanding this history of asbestos exposure in the navy and the risks involved is essential for pursuing Navy asbestos settlements effectively. Veterans suffering from mesothelioma and related illnesses need to be aware of their legal rights and available VA benefits for mesothelioma and asbestos exposure to secure the compensation they deserve.
Largest Navy Asbestos & Mesothelioma Settlement Cases

The amount an asbestos or mesothelioma claim is worth for Navy veterans can vary widely depending on factors such as the severity of the illness, the level of asbestos exposure, and the specifics of the individual case. For those wondering how much is an asbestos or mesothelioma claim worth for Navy veterans, here are some of the most notable largest Navy asbestos settlements:

$7.2 million: Awarded to the family of a Navy veteran who died from mesothelioma after exposure aboard an aircraft carrier.
$6.5 million: Settlement for a submariner exposed to asbestos insulation over several years.
$5.8 million: Compensation for a Navy shipyard worker who developed pleural mesothelioma.
$5 million: Awarded to a veteran exposed while working on naval destroyers.
$4.3 million: Settlement for a sailor with lung cancer linked to asbestos exposure on Navy vessels.
$3.9 million: Case involving a Navy mechanic exposed to asbestos-containing brake pads and gaskets.
$3.5 million: Awarded to a Navy veteran who served on ships built before asbestos regulations.
$3 million: Compensation for a shipyard worker who contracted mesothelioma during repair work on naval vessels.

These settlements demonstrate the substantial legal recognition of the harm caused by asbestos exposure in naval service.

“Asbestos exposure is the primary cause of mesothelioma, a rare and aggressive cancer, and Navy veterans are among the highest risk groups due to shipboard asbestos use. Early legal action can help secure compensation and benefits for affected individuals.” – CDC

How to Claim VA Benefits
Navy veterans diagnosed with mesothelioma may qualify for VA benefits for mesothelioma and asbestos exposure. To file a claim, veterans should:

Gather military service and medical records documenting asbestos exposure and diagnosis.
Consult with specialized mesothelioma or asbestos lawyers familiar with navy asbestos settlements and VA claims.
Submit a VA claim for disability compensation or pensions related to asbestos-related illnesses.
Explore eligibility for other programs, such as the Navy’s Asbestos Claims Fund or trust funds set up by asbestos manufacturers.

Working with experienced attorneys can increase the chances of maximizing compensation through legal settlements and VA benefits.
Challenges for Navy Veterans in Asbestos Claims

Navy veterans often encounter several obstacles in asbestos litigation. Establishing a clear connection between asbestos exposure on Navy ships and a mesothelioma diagnosis can be complicated. The legal process is complex, and accessing complete military records may be difficult.
Additionally, strict deadlines for filing claims and the need for experienced legal representation make navigating these cases challenging. Veterans may also need to get help filing a VA claim for asbestos to ensure they receive all the benefits available. Being aware of these hurdles can help veterans better prepare and pursue the compensation they deserve.
Top Law Firms for Navy Asbestos VA Claims
Veterans seeking justice for asbestos-related diseases often benefit from representation by law firms specializing in asbestos and VA claims. These firms understand the complexities of navy asbestos settlements and can help veterans get help filing a VA claim for asbestos as well as guide them through pursuing lawsuits against asbestos manufacturers. One featured mesothelioma law firm is Danziger & De Llano, known for their expertise in handling Navy asbestos cases and securing compensation for affected veterans.
Get Help With Navy Asbestos Settlements
At Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, we understand the unique challenges Navy veterans face when dealing with asbestos-related illnesses. Our commitment is to help you navigate the complex legal and VA claim processes to secure the compensation you deserve. 
If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, trust us to fight tirelessly on your behalf. Your fight is our fight, we’re here to support you every step of the way.

Statistical Insight: Approximately 30,000 veterans have been diagnosed with mesothelioma linked to asbestos exposure, with Navy veterans representing the largest affected group.

Legal DisclaimerThe information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### Citing Cringe-Invoking Testimony, Louisiana Judge Orders New Mesothelioma Trial

Vita Chenet’s family was close to getting justice following her 2019 mesothelioma death when something unexpected occurred: An expert witness providing testimony for the defendant, Colgate-Palmolive, introduced new information that confused the jury and led to them deciding in favor of the talc company. Calling what the witness had done “entirely improper,” the judge ordered a new trial.







Expert Witness Improperly Offers Alternative Theory for Mesothelioma Death



The mesothelioma trial, which was heard in Louisiana’s Orleans Parish Civil District, saw Colgate-Palmolive accused of negligence in failing to warn of asbestos in its Cashmere Bouquet talcum powder product. The jury had heard significant testimony about the victim’s lifelong use of the product and the connection between it and her asbestos-related disease when experienced expert witness Dr. Richard Attanoos was called to the stand.



Dr. Attanoos is a pathologist who has been called on for expert witness testimony by mesothelioma defendants for years. For this trial, he answered a question from Ms. Chenet’s family’s attorney by introducing entirely new information that the judge agreed had confused the jury and was inappropriate: He spoke of his certainty that the woman’s father had died of an asbestos-related disease following having worked in contaminated shipyards during World War II, suggesting that it was secondary childhood exposure to asbestos that was responsible for her death.



Unexpected Testimony Leads to Order for Retrial



Though Colgate-Palmolive had countered the family’s claim by suggesting that the mesothelioma diagnosis was a result of having grown up in the shipyard’s asbestos-contaminated shipyard, no mention had been made of her father’s death before the pathologist volunteered the information. Following this, the jury decided in favor of the talc company, and the victim’s family argued that a new trial was needed because the witness had sabotaged the trial by introducing information that had confused the jury. Judge Kern Reese agreed.



In handing down his decision, the judge said that the unsolicited testimony in the mesothelioma trial had shocked him enough to make him cringe and had left him “unequivocally floored.” He described it as having been “unsolicited, it was a new opinion, it was never previously disclosed in any expert report or deposition.”  He ordered that a new trial be held.

### Asbestos-Containing Cement Pipes Blamed for Mesothelioma Death

Peter A. Lowe, Sr. died of malignant mesothelioma before he could get justice from the companies whose products exposed him to asbestos, but his widow and son are pursuing the case on his behalf. Their suit names several companies whose cement pipe he worked with for years while performing “all types of excavation and water/sewer connection” work. Though one of the companies attempted to have the case against it dismissed, the victim’s deposition testimony was enough to persuade the judge to allow the claim to stand.







Multiple Asbestos Pipe Companies Named in Mesothelioma Claim



Mr. Lowe died of his mesothelioma in 2019, sixty years after he began working for his father’s excavating and construction company and forty-one years after he took over his father’s business.  In testimony provided before he died, he explained that much of his work involved sizing and cutting concrete pipes, and that in the years between 1965 and the late 1970s, those pipes were heavily infused with asbestos.



His mesothelioma lawsuit named three companies whose brands of pipe he purchased and worked with: Johns-Manville, CertainTeed, and Italit. He was certain of the company names because they were stamped onto the pipes themselves. He also noted that none of the suppliers of the pipes had provided any type of warning about the dangers of inhaling asbestos dust.



Pipe Supplier Files Motion to Evade Liability for Mesothelioma Death



Colony Lumber was one of the companies that supplied asbestos to the mesothelioma victim’s company, and its successor, Kamco, was named in the suit. Kamco filed a motion to have the mesothelioma claim against it dismissed, asserting that though it had merged with Colony Lumber in 1998, a fire had destroyed Colony Lumber’s records in the 1970s, and therefore there was no proof that Colony had sold asbestos-containing pipes to the victim.



Though the Rhode Island judge hearing the case agreed that no evidence had been submitted, he ruled that the deposition testimony provided by the mesothelioma victim before his death was consistent with other supporting evidence pointing to the sale of the asbestos-containing pipes. Therefore, the case against the company will be allowed to continue.

### Largest Asbestos Lawsuit Settlements in the US

The largest asbestos settlements, including a staggering $797.5 million asbestos lawsuit, highlight the devastating impact of long-term exposure to this toxic material. Average asbestos lawsuit settlement awards in U.S. history have reached up to $250 million for a single victim. These massive payouts are often awarded in cases of mesothelioma, a deadly cancer caused by asbestos exposure. Families of retired blue-collar workers and navy veterans have successfully filed claims to recover compensation for medical expenses, lost income, pain, and future financial security during terminal illness.
Top 10 Largest Asbestos Lawsuit Settlements

1. $250 Million – Indiana Steel Mill Worker
A former steelworker at U.S. Steel was awarded $250 million after a mesothelioma diagnosis. This case remains the largest single-plaintiff asbestos verdict in U.S. history, setting a powerful legal precedent.
2. $190 Million – New York Naval Shipyard Workers
Five men received a combined $190 million after years of asbestos exposure at the Brooklyn Navy Yard. This landmark case highlights the risk faced by Navy veterans with mesothelioma.
3. $106 Million – St. Croix Mesothelioma Lawsuit
One of the largest asbestos verdicts in a U.S. territory, the $106 million mesothelioma lawsuit in St. Croix awarded compensation to victims exposed at industrial facilities. The case demonstrated the ongoing dangers of asbestos outside the mainland U.S.
4. $100 Million – BASF Asbestos Lawsuit
The $100 million BASF asbestos lawsuit resulted in a massive payout after the company was found to have hidden evidence of asbestos contamination. It became a national example of corporate negligence and cover-up.
5. $90 Million – Florida Construction Workers
Florida construction workers secured $90 million in damages for asbestos exposure dating back to the 1970s. Manufacturers were held liable for failing to warn workers about the toxic products used on job sites.
6. $75 Million – California Power Plant Laborer
A 66-year-old man received $75 million after being exposed to asbestos in California’s utility plants. The verdict reflected the serious health risks tied to industrial insulation materials. Resource: Compare the top mesothelioma lawyers in California.
7. $60 Million – Auto Brake Mechanic in Texas
In a major asbestos lawsuit in Texas, the family of a brake mechanic who died from mesothelioma was awarded $60 million. He was exposed while working on vehicles with asbestos brake pads and gaskets. Resource: Compare the best mesothelioma lawyers in Texas.
8. $48 Million – Industrial Pipefitter in Illinois
An Illinois pipefitter received $48 million after decades of exposure to asbestos insulation. His case was successfully handled by top-rated national mesothelioma lawyers who proved long-term workplace exposure.
9. $40 Million – Louisiana Refinery Workers
Refinery employees in Louisiana won $40 million in damages after being exposed to asbestos in petrochemical plants. The case highlighted risks in the Gulf Coast’s energy sector.
10. $36 Million – New Jersey School Teacher
A schoolteacher developed mesothelioma after years of exposure to asbestos in public school buildings. She received a $36 million settlement, showing that even non-industrial workers face serious asbestos-related risks.
What Makes These Asbestos Settlements So Large?
The biggest asbestos verdicts involve clear evidence that manufacturers or employers knew about asbestos dangers and failed to protect workers. Many of these cases result in high punitive damages to hold companies accountable for negligence. Victims often face costly treatment, limited work ability, and shortened life expectancy.
Can I Get a Settlement for Mesothelioma Today?
Yes. Thousands of people still qualify for mesothelioma settlements. Even if your case doesn’t make headlines, you may still be entitled to compensation. Texas mesothelioma lawsuits and others nationwide continue to deliver results through legal claims and asbestos trust funds. Don’t assume you waited too long—many claims succeed decades after exposure.

“Asbestos is the main cause of mesothelioma in the United States. Symptoms often appear 20–50 years after exposure.” – American Cancer Society

Who Qualifies for an Asbestos Lawsuit Settlement?

If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma or another asbestos-related illness, you may qualify for a claim. This includes:

Retired Navy veterans exposed on ships or in shipyards
Construction, refinery, steel, or manufacturing workers
Auto mechanics exposed to asbestos brakes and gaskets
Family members who lived with someone who brought asbestos home on their clothing

Starting an Asbestos Claim
Time is critical after a mesothelioma diagnosis. An experienced attorney can help you gather work records, medical documentation, and exposure history. Legal teams can file claims against active companies or file through asbestos trust funds for bankrupt manufacturers.
At Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, we understand the life-changing impact a mesothelioma diagnosis has on families. Our mission is to connect victims, especially retired workers and Navy veterans, with top-rated mesothelioma attorneys nationwide. We help you pursue the compensation you deserve for treatment, lost wages, and peace of mind. Let us handle the legal burden so you can focus on your health and time with loved ones. We’re here to fight for you.


Stat: The average mesothelioma settlement ranges from $1 million to $1.4 million, with some trial verdicts exceeding $10 million.



Legal DisclaimerThe information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### Can You Sue Your Landlord for Asbestos Exposure?

Yes, tenants can sue their landlord for asbestos exposure if the landlord failed to disclose the presence of asbestos or did not take reasonable steps to protect residents from exposure. The recent California landlord lawsuit for asbestos highlights how landlords can be held legally accountable for endangering tenants' health. Under both federal and state housing laws, renters are entitled to live in safe, habitable conditions, and that includes protection from asbestos-related risks.
If you've developed mesothelioma or another asbestos-related illness after renting in an older property, you may be eligible for significant compensation. This can include medical expenses, lost wages, emotional distress, and financial support for long-term care. Top-rated mesothelioma lawyers can help evaluate your case, identify liable parties, and guide your family through the legal process, making it easier to secure the justice and compensation you deserve.
Tenant Legal Rights After Asbestos Exposure

Landlords must follow strict regulations when asbestos is present in a rental unit. This includes:

Disclosure: Informing tenants in writing if asbestos is present
Prevention: Avoiding renovations that disturb asbestos materials
Remediation: Hiring certified professionals for safe removal

If your landlord ignored these rules and you became sick, you may be entitled to compensation. Learn about tenants rights and asbestos exposure to protect your family and legal future. These protections are especially important for older tenants and veterans who may be more vulnerable to long-term health effects. Legal action can help cover treatment costs and hold negligent landlords accountable.
Symptoms of Asbestos Exposure in Tenants
Asbestos-related diseases often take 10–50 years to appear. Symptoms include:

Chronic cough or chest pain
Shortness of breath
Fatigue or weight loss
Diagnosed mesothelioma or lung disease

These symptoms may seem minor at first but often worsen over time, making early detection difficult. Many retired workers and veterans only receive a diagnosis decades after their exposure. If you've experienced these symptoms and lived in older rental housing, consult your doctor and an attorney immediately.

“There is no safe level of asbestos exposure. Even short-term exposure can increase the risk of mesothelioma.” — National Cancer Institute

When Can You Sue Your Landlord for Asbestos Exposure?

You can sue your landlord if:

They knew or should have known asbestos was present
They failed to notify you or take proper action
You or a loved one developed a serious asbestos-related illness

These conditions form the legal basis for a premises liability or negligence lawsuit. Tenants, especially those with high-risk occupations or military service, may have been unknowingly exposed for years. A successful lawsuit can provide financial relief for medical bills, lost income, and long-term care expenses.
How to Sue a Landlord for Asbestos Exposure
To sue, you should:

Document your diagnosis and past rental history
Gather proof your landlord knew or ignored asbestos risks
Work with an experienced attorney who handles asbestos lawsuits

Many tenants have worked with top-rated mesothelioma lawyers to secure compensation for medical bills, loss of income, and end-of-life care. An attorney can also help navigate complex legal deadlines, identify all liable parties, and access asbestos trust funds where available. Acting quickly is crucial, especially for families facing the emotional and financial toll of a mesothelioma diagnosis.
Is My Landlord Required to Disclose Asbestos?
Yes. In many states, landlords are required by law to provide asbestos disclosure for any known hazards. If they fail to inform you, this may be considered negligence, especially if it leads to illness. Tenants have the right to safe housing, and withholding this information can result in serious legal consequences. Failure to disclose may also violate local building codes and rental regulations, further strengthening your legal claim. Victims may be entitled to compensation for medical costs, pain and suffering, and other damages related to asbestos exposure.
Mesothelioma Help for Veterans & Retirees
Veterans and retired blue-collar workers are among the most affected by asbestos exposure, especially when living in aging rental housing. If you’ve received a mesothelioma diagnosis, your family may be entitled to financial help through a lawsuit or asbestos trust fund claim.
Stat: Over 30 million homes in the U.S. still contain asbestos materials, according to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
You deserve answers, support, and justice if asbestos exposure in a rental property has impacted your life. The Mesothelioma Lawyer Center is here to guide you through every step. From understanding your rights to pursuing full compensation, our experienced team is dedicated to standing up for tenants and families nationwide. Let us help you hold landlords accountable and secure the financial relief you and your loved ones need.
Legal DisclaimerThe information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### Largest Asbestos Lawsuit Settlements in Texas

Recent asbestos lawsuits in Texas have led to some of the largest settlements in the country, with families receiving millions in compensation after devastating diagnoses. One standout case is the recent $18.6 million asbestos settlement in Texas, awarded to the family of a pipefitter who developed mesothelioma after decades of occupational exposure. These outcomes underscore how seriously Texas courts address corporate negligence and the life-altering impact of asbestos exposure.
Behind many of these victories are the efforts of top-rated asbestos lawyers in Texas, who specialize in navigating complex legal claims and holding negligent companies accountable. With decades of combined experience, these legal professionals have helped secure justice for countless families across the state, ensuring victims get the support they need.
How Much Are Texas Asbestos Settlements Worth?

The largest asbestos settlements in Texas range from $8 million to nearly $20 million. The value of each case depends on the extent of exposure, the company’s liability, and the health impact on the victim.
Some recent verdicts include:

$18.6 million – For a Houston-area pipefitter who died of mesothelioma
$12 million – For a Beaumont refinery worker exposed in the 1980s
$9.1 million – For a Houston construction worker exposed to insulation products
$8.2 million – For a Galveston shipyard worker exposed while servicing Navy vessels

Who Can File an Asbestos Lawsuit in Texas?
Any person diagnosed with mesothelioma or another asbestos-related illness may qualify to file a lawsuit in Texas. This includes former workers in industries like oil refineries, shipyards, construction, and power plants, where asbestos exposure was common and often undocumented for years.
Surviving spouses or children may also pursue wrongful death claims. Working with the best asbestos lawyers in Texas improves your chances of receiving compensation, as experienced attorneys understand the nuances of state-specific asbestos laws, court procedures, and how to maximize settlement outcomes for affected families through a Texas mesothelioma lawsuit.
What Is the Recent $18.6 Million Asbestos Settlement in Texas?
In a landmark 2023 case, a jury in Harris County awarded $18.6 million to the family of a deceased pipefitter. He was exposed to asbestos over decades while working at industrial sites. The court found multiple companies liable for failing to warn or protect workers.

“Despite regulatory efforts, mesothelioma continues to cause nearly 2,500 deaths annually in the United States, underscoring the long-term health impact of past asbestos exposure.”– Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

Why Are Verdicts So High in Texas Asbestos Cases?

Texas courts take asbestos exposure seriously. Many companies knowingly hid the risks of asbestos to save money. Juries have awarded large verdicts not only to compensate victims but also to hold companies accountable. Recent lawsuits have exposed decades of corporate negligence, highlighting a pattern of misconduct, inadequate safety protocols, and failure to warn employees about long-term health consequences.
Jobs Linked to Asbestos Exposure in Texas

Oil refinery workers in Beaumont, Port Arthur, and Houston
Shipyard workers in Galveston and Corpus Christi
Construction and demolition crews statewide
Military veterans, especially U.S. Navy

Filing an Asbestos Lawsuit in Texas
The first step is consulting with an attorney who handles mesothelioma lawsuit and asbestos lawsuits in Texas. An experienced lawyer can help collect records, identify liable companies, and file claims on your behalf, even decades after exposure occurred.
Many victims also qualify for compensation through asbestos trust funds. These funds were set up by bankrupt companies to pay current and future victims.
Where Can I Learn More About Mesothelioma Claims?
Understanding your rights after a diagnosis can be confusing and stressful. Fortunately, there are trusted resources available that explain legal options, eligibility, and how to pursue compensation. These platforms provide guidance on filing lawsuits, accessing asbestos trust funds, and connecting with experienced legal professionals. Whether you're seeking justice for yourself or a loved one, having reliable information and expert support is essential. 
At Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, we understand the emotional and financial toll that asbestos-related illnesses can have on families. That’s why we’re dedicated to helping victims in Texas get the compensation they deserve. From explaining your legal options to connecting you with top-rated asbestos lawyers in Texas, our goal is to make the process as clear and supportive as possible. 

Stat: According to the CDC, over 2,400 Americans died from mesothelioma in 2022—nearly all linked to prior asbestos exposure.
Legal DisclaimerThe information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### West Virginia College Responds to Asbestos Lung Cancer Lawsuit

Donna Spurling filed a negligence lawsuit against West Virginia's Fairmont State University after being diagnosed with lung cancer she blamed on asbestos exposure suffered on the school property. Several months later, the school submitted a response defending itself. The academic institution asserted that sovereign immunity protects it from personal injury lawsuits involving insurance claims due to its status as a state entity. At the same time, it attempted to shift responsibility to other parties who might have been responsible for the woman’s asbestos exposure, including West Virginia state authorities.







School’s Inconsistent Response Noted by Asbestos Lung Cancer Victim’s Representative



The asbestos lung cancer litigation took a new turn on January 9th when the school submitted what lawyers call a notice of non-parties wholly or partially at fault. This is a type of legal document that attempts to shift the blame to entities beyond the named defendants that could be responsible for the plaintiff's condition. The school’s notice of non-parties identifies 143 separate organizations whose products Ms. Spurling might have encountered through occupational exposure or when she served with the U.S. military, including broad references to different types of equipment or insulation that may have been present in those locations.



The attorneys representing Ms. Spurling responded to the filing by highlighting how contradictory the school's position was: At the same time that the university argued that it had a protected government status and pointed to state authorities as bearing responsibility for her asbestos-related illness, they also submitted a voluminous, comprehensive list of other potentially responsible parties.



University Seeks State Protection Against Asbestos Lung Cancer Liability While Also Blaming State



Asbestos exposure cases often involve complex liability questions, and Fairmont State University's filing specifically references a 1986 legal action that resulted in West Virginia’s state government setting aside $20 million for asbestos cleanup at government-owned properties. The university argues that all parties and non-parties connected to that earlier case bear full or partial responsibility for the asbestos contamination that remained at the facility and allegedly caused Ms. Spurling's disease.

### Mesothelioma Victim Files Lawsuit Against Clubman Talc

A mesothelioma lawsuit filed in New York’s Asbestos Litigation court accuses multiple companies of negligently exposing Corey Tippin to asbestos, leading to his diagnosis with the rare and fatal form of cancer. Among the named defendants is American International Industries, the manufacturer of Clubman Talc. The consumer products company has repeatedly been included among defendants in contaminated powder claims. Though the company was successful in having the victim’s claim for punitive damages dismissed, the talc manufacturer will still need to defend itself against negligence claims.







Talc Manufacturer Accused of Negligence in Mesothelioma Case



Mr. Tippin’s mesothelioma filing had originally requested the inclusion of punitive damages against Clubman Talc based on reports that the company was aware of the risk that their products carried. In response, American International Industries submitted testimony from a corporate representative asserting that the product had never contained asbestos and could not have been responsible for the victim’s fatal diagnosis.  



The company also offered studies concluding that their employees had not demonstrated an increased risk of mesothelioma, and that their talc was of a higher grade and therefore would not have posed a risk.



Judge Allows Talc Mesothelioma Case to Move Forward



Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York County rejected the company’s argument against the possibility of its talc causing his illness. His decision on the motion for summary judgment allowed the rest of the case to proceed to a jury.  However, the decision was not a total win for the mesothelioma victim.



On reviewing Mr. Tippin’s request for punitive damages, the judge disagreed with the mesothelioma victim’s assertion that the company knew or should have known of the risks posed by its product. He gave significant weight to the company’s submission of evidence of a safety department whose responsibilities included overseeing the safe handling of the toxic material. He also noted certifications that the company’s talc was free of asbestos that the company had pursued, and concluded that the victim’s arguments for penalizing the talc manufacturer were insufficient for punishment to be imposed.  The next step for the case is for its evidence to be presented to a jury to decide whether negligence existed or not.

### Rhode Island Woman’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos in Talc Products

In October 2023, Susan Soares of Rhode Island was diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma. With no history of occupational asbestos exposure, she and her husband, Brian, worked to identify the source of her illness, only to find that cosmetics and talc she had used for decades were contaminated with the toxic mineral. The couple filed suit against fifty-six defendants responsible for manufacturing, distributing, and selling the baby powder, eyeshadows, blushes, bronzers, foundation, and other products that they assert contained the asbestos-containing talc that she’d inhaled.







Defendants in Mesothelioma Case File Motions to Dismiss or Amend Case Against Them



In response to the Soares’ mesothelioma lawsuit alleging negligence, several of the companies named as defendants filed motions to be dismissed from the claim, with some asserting that the court had no jurisdiction over them based on having insufficient contacts with the state of Rhode Island, and others attempting to substitute different corporations for themselves.



While Presiding Justice Alice Bridget Gibney allowed that some of the talc companies had too tenuous a connection to the state of Rhode Island to be included in the mesothelioma claim, she also found that talc manufacturer IMI Fabi had entered into a distribution agreement with Cosmetic Specialty, Inc. that specified Rhode Island as one of the territories covered by the agreement. As a result, the company’s motion to be dismissed from the case was denied.



Johnson & Johnson Subsidiaries Request Substitution in Mesothelioma Claim



Two other defendants named in the Soares’ mesothelioma claim are LLT and Old Holdco, both subsidiaries of Johnson & Johnson, the consumer giant currently facing over 60,000 asbestos talc claims. The parent company and its subsidiaries requested that two other Johnson & Johnson subsidiaries be substituted as defendants in keeping with corporate restructuring, but the Soares accused the defendants of acting in bad faith, claiming that the two new subsidiaries had only been created as a strategy to avoid liability for the thousands of claims against it. They asserted that they had a right to decide who they named in their lawsuit.



Justice Gibney’s review of the motions from both sides concurred with the mesothelioma victim, pointing to Superior Court rules of civil procedure that said that plaintiffs are “the master of their complaint,” so that liability is not transferred away. The case is ongoing.

### “Reckless Disregard” Leads to $7.5 Million Punitive Damages Mesothelioma Award

A year after Nicholas Barone died of malignant mesothelioma, his widow, Kathryn, filed a lawsuit against talc supplier Vanderbilt Minerals LLC, arguing that his illness was caused by exposure to the talc mined by the company. In finding the company guilty of negligence, the jury found the company liable for $15 million in damages and also ordered that punitive damages be assigned. On reviewing arguments from both sides as to whether punitive damages were appropriate and how much they should be, the Connecticut judge hearing the case ordered the company to pay the widow an additional $7.5 million.







Mesothelioma Widow Calls Company’s Actions Reprehensible



Mr. Barone’s mesothelioma was blamed on the asbestos exposure he suffered while working at a General Electric plastics plant. The widow presented evidence during the jury trial that R. T. Vanderbilt’s predecessor, International Talc, had supplied the plant with asbestos-contaminated talc, that Vanderbilt had continued the product line after its purchase, and that the company had “concealed and ignored the presence of potent carcinogens in their products.”  It was on the strength of this evidence that the jury unanimously decided that punitive damages should be awarded against the company.



In post-trial motions and briefs, Vanderbilt asked that the court deny the order for punitive damages, denying that the conduct that led to Mr. Barone’s death had been reckless. The widow asked the court to order the company to pay $30 million in punitive damages, in keeping with a 2:1 ratio of punitive to compensatory damages and pointing out that the amount would not lead to Vanderbilt’s financial ruin. After considering both arguments, the judge arrived at the $7.5 million damages amount.



Judge Notes Talc Company’s Intentional Conduct in Assigning Mesothelioma Punitive Damages



In his comments supporting the $7.5 million punitive damages award, Superior Court Judge William F. Clark noted that despite the jury’ already making its decision, Vanderbilt continued to try to litigate its own liability in Mr. Barone’s mesothelioma death. He also said that the evidence clearly demonstrated the company’s profit motive, its lobbying of government officials, and other strategies meant to avoid detection of the dangers of its products. Combining that with the suffering that Mr. Barone experienced and the company’s knowledge of the potential of such suffering all supported the jury’s decision.

### Mesothelioma Lawsuit vs. Asbestos Trust Fund: Which Is Right for You?

Deciding between a mesothelioma lawsuit and an asbestos trust fund claim can be a critical step in securing the compensation you deserve after an asbestos-related diagnosis. Each option serves a specific purpose: lawsuits often pursue higher compensation through the court system, while asbestos trust funds provide quicker payouts from companies that have filed for bankruptcy. Knowing how these options work, who qualifies, and what to expect can help you make the best decision for your circumstances. 
Difference Between Lawsuit and Asbestos Trust Claim

Pursuing compensation for asbestos exposure can take different legal paths, including a mesothelioma cancer lawsuit or filing a claim through an asbestos trust fund. Both options are designed to provide financial support to individuals suffering from mesothelioma, but they differ significantly in how they work and what they offer.

A mesothelioma lawsuit is typically filed against companies that are still operating and can be held legally responsible in court. This route may result in higher compensation amounts, especially if the case goes to trial or results in a negotiated settlement. However, it often involves a longer legal process, which may include discovery, depositions, and even court appearances.
An asbestos trust fund claim, on the other hand, is filed with a fund established by companies that have filed for bankruptcy but were still found liable for asbestos exposure. These claims are usually processed more quickly and have set payout values based on disease severity and exposure history.

Deciding which option is right depends on several factors: whether the responsible company is still in business, the urgency of your financial needs, your current health condition, and your overall legal goals.
When Is a Mesothelioma Lawsuit the Better Option?
You should consider a mesothelioma lawsuit if the company that exposed you to asbestos is still active. A lawsuit allows you to pursue damages for:

Medical expenses
Lost income
Pain and suffering

Lawsuits may result in higher payouts, especially if a jury awards punitive damages. However, they may take several months or longer to resolve.
Right Time to File Asbestos Trust Fund Claim
If the responsible company declared bankruptcy, you can file through an asbestos trust fund. These trusts were created to pay out claims to victims without litigation, providing a faster and less burdensome process. Trust funds operate independently and follow specific guidelines for eligibility, documentation, and compensation tiers.
Asbestos trust claims are generally resolved quickly, but payout amounts are usually standardized. This option is often best for individuals in poor health or who need immediate assistance, especially when facing mounting medical expenses and limited income. Trust fund claims also avoid lengthy court battles, making them a practical choice for many families.
Can You Pursue Both Claim Options?

Yes. Some individuals are eligible for both types of claims. If multiple companies were responsible for your asbestos exposure, an attorney can help you pursue both a trust fund claim and a personal injury lawsuit, maximizing your compensation potential. This dual-claim approach can address different sources of exposure, helping ensure no liable party is overlooked.
Top Factors That Help Determine the Right Legal Option
To decide between a lawsuit and an asbestos trust fund, consider these key factors:

Is the responsible company bankrupt?
Do you need compensation quickly?
How severe is your diagnosis?
Do you qualify for more than one trust?
Have you missed any state filing deadlines?

How an Attorney Supports Mesothelioma Victims
An experienced mesothelioma lawyer will review your exposure history, identify liable companies, and determine if you qualify for trust funds, a lawsuit, or both. Legal professionals can often fast-track urgent claims and improve the final compensation amount.
Statistics: According to the U.S. Government Accountability Office, more than $17 billion in asbestos trust fund payouts have already been distributed, with over $30 billion still available. 
 
Choosing between an asbestos trust fund claim and a mesothelioma lawsuit can feel overwhelming, but you're not alone. At the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, we’re here to guide you through every step, helping you understand your options and pursue the maximum compensation available. Our team is committed to protecting your rights and securing the justice you deserve—because your health, your future, and your family matter most to us. Contact us today to get the support you need.
Legal DisclaimerThe information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### Virginia Mesothelioma Widow Awarded $3.45 Million

When Patricia Katcham’s husband, James, died of malignant mesothelioma, she accused John Crane, Inc. and other companies of having negligently exposed him to asbestos in his workplace at DuPont’s Spruance plant in Chesterfield, New Jersey. Though her claims against the other defendants she’d named were resolved, the notorious gasket manufacturer chose to face her in court. A Newport News, Virginia Circuit Court jury heard the details of the claim and ordered the company to pay her $3.45 million for her loss.







Millwright’s Mesothelioma Death Blamed on Occupational Exposure to Asbestos



Over the course of eleven days, the jury learned of Mr. Katcham’s 18 years of having worked at the DuPont plant, and of the John Crane gaskets, packing, and other products that he had worked with, none of which were provided with any safety instructions or warnings about the dangers of inhaling asbestos fibers. Mrs. Katcham’s attorneys made a strong argument about the unreasonable level of danger that the product posed, and of the company’s duty to warn.



Expert witnesses, including doctors and industrial hygienists, spoke to the jury about the link between asbestos exposure and malignant mesothelioma, as well as how long executives at John Crane, Inc. were aware of the dangers. They also heard specifics about the way that Mr. Katcham had worked with each asbestos-containing item, and how that would have contributed to his risk of inhaling asbestos fibers at his job.



Jury Hears Company Knew Dangers While Mesothelioma Victim Was Exposed



Among the factors that convinced the jury of John Crane, Inc.’s negligence was evidence that the scientific community had confirmed the dangers of asbestos as early as the 1960s, and that the company had received documents from the Illinois Pollution Control Board in 1972 that showed that mesothelioma could be triggered by minimal exposure to asbestos, yet they did nothing to warn the victim of his risk. Mr. Katcham’s exposure occurred between 1961 and 1979.

### Top Mistakes to Avoid When Pursuing a Mesothelioma Claim

Filing a mesothelioma claim isn’t just paperwork—it’s a critical opportunity to hold negligent companies accountable and secure justice for years of asbestos exposure. But even strong claims can fall apart due to preventable missteps. From missed deadlines to the wrong legal guidance, these oversights can cost victims and their families dearly. 
If you or a loved one has been diagnosed, knowing what not to do is just as important as understanding your legal rights. With the help of an experienced mesothelioma attorney, you can sidestep these common errors and build a powerful case for the compensation you deserve. 
What Are the Most Common Mistakes People Make When Filing a Mesothelioma Claim?

The most frequent errors include missing filing deadlines, hiring the wrong lawyer, and providing incomplete work or medical histories. These mistakes can reduce your compensation or lead to claim denial, often leaving families without financial support. Additionally, failing to gather proper evidence or misunderstanding the legal process can cause delays, increasing stress during an already difficult time.
1. Waiting Too Long to File Your Mesothelioma Claim
Every state has a time limit called a statute of limitations for filing asbestos-related claims. Missing this deadline can permanently bar your ability to recover damages. File as soon as possible after diagnosis to preserve your rights and maximize your claim’s strength.
2. Choosing a Lawyer Without Mesothelioma Experience
Not all attorneys understand asbestos litigation. It’s critical to hire a mesothelioma attorney who specializes in these claims. They know how to track exposure sources, gather medical evidence, and negotiate with asbestos trust funds or defense attorneys.

“Mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive form of cancer that most often occurs after asbestos exposure. Legal claims related to asbestos exposure are often necessary to help cover the high costs of treatment.”— National Cancer Institute

3. Providing Incomplete Medical Records
To file a successful claim, you must have a confirmed mesothelioma diagnosis linked to asbestos exposure. Inadequate medical documentation is a leading reason claims are delayed or denied. Work with your physician and legal team to ensure your records are accurate and complete.
How Important Is Medical Evidence in a Mesothelioma Lawsuit?

Medical documentation is one of the strongest pieces of evidence in a mesothelioma lawsuit. It verifies diagnosis, links asbestos exposure to the illness, and helps determine the value of your claim. Thorough records also support your mesothelioma attorney in proving causation, establishing timelines, and presenting a compelling case in negotiations or court. Without detailed medical evidence, even valid claims may face delays or denials.
4. Not Disclosing Your Full Work History
Since mesothelioma develops from past asbestos exposure, your full job history is critical. Omitting employers or exposure sites can lead to an incomplete claim. Provide your lawyer with every detail even jobs from decades ago.
5. Accepting a Quick Settlement Without Understanding Its Value
Fast settlement offers may seem tempting, especially during a health crisis. However, they often undervalue your future medical costs and pain and suffering. Speak with your lawyer before agreeing to any compensation amount. A properly negotiated claim should cover treatment, lost wages, and long-term care needs.
Can I Reopen My Mesothelioma Claim After Accepting a Settlement?
In most cases, no. Once a claim is settled, it is legally binding. This is why it’s essential to evaluate all potential damages before agreeing to a payout, including future medical expenses, lost income, emotional suffering, and caregiver costs. Consulting with an experienced mesothelioma attorney ensures you don’t accept less than you deserve.
How to Avoid These Mistakes and File a Strong Claim

Act promptly after your diagnosis to meet filing deadlines.
Hire an attorney with a proven track record in asbestos claims.
Provide detailed medical records and confirm your diagnosis with a specialist.
Disclose your full work history, including all employers and job sites.
Carefully evaluate any settlement offer before signing.

We understand how overwhelming a mesothelioma diagnosis can be, not just emotionally, but legally. At the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, our mission is to help you avoid costly mistakes and secure the full compensation you’re entitled to. With decades of experience and a deep focus on asbestos-related claims, we stand by your side every step of the way. Let us help you navigate the legal process with confidence, clarity, and compassion.
Statistic: About 3,000 new mesothelioma cases are diagnosed annually in the U.S., with most linked to long-term occupational asbestos exposure.(American Cancer Society)

Legal DisclaimerThe information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### What to Expect in a Mesothelioma Cancer Lawsuit: Timeline, Process & Payouts

Filing a mesothelioma cancer lawsuit can feel like a daunting and emotional journey for victims and their loved ones. The legal process involves several steps, each requiring careful attention and preparation. From gathering medical records to identifying liable parties and navigating negotiations, the entire process can seem complex. 
However, having a clear understanding of what to expect from initial consultation to final compensation can ease the burden. This comprehensive guide walks you through the lawsuit timeline, outlines what occurs at each stage, and explains the types of compensation that may be available to help you make informed decisions during this difficult time.
Understanding the Mesothelioma Lawsuit Timeline

The timeline for an asbestos-related lawsuit can vary depending on several factors, such as the state you file in and whether the case settles or goes to trial. Most cases follow a similar structure, starting with an initial consultation and culminating in either a settlement or trial verdict. 
Additional elements like the complexity of the case, the number of defendants involved, and the availability of key evidence can significantly influence how long the process takes. While some cases may resolve in a matter of months, others may take years, especially if they proceed to trial or involve appeals.
Initial Consultation and Case Evaluation
Once diagnosed with mesothelioma, it’s crucial to consult a qualified asbestos attorney. They’ll evaluate your case, review medical records, and determine eligibility to file a lawsuit. An experienced lawyer can also identify liable companies, estimate potential compensation, and guide you through legal deadlines, ensuring your rights are protected every step of the way.
Filing the Lawsuit
If your case qualifies, your legal team will draft and file a formal complaint in the appropriate court. The defendants—usually asbestos manufacturers, suppliers, or employers—will be notified and have a set time to respond.
Discovery Phase
During discovery, both parties exchange information. This includes depositions, document reviews, and expert testimonies. Attorneys gather critical details to support claims and defenses, often involving medical records, work history, and corporate documentation. This phase can last several months and plays a pivotal role in shaping the direction and strength of the case.
Settlement Negotiations or Trial
Many mesothelioma lawsuits settle out of court, allowing victims to receive compensation more quickly and avoid the emotional toll of a trial. If a settlement isn’t reached, the case proceeds to trial, where a judge or jury determines the outcome. 
Trials may lead to higher compensation but take more time, involve greater legal complexity, and come with the uncertainty of a verdict. An experienced attorney will help weigh the risks and benefits of each option based on your specific case.
Key Steps in the Mesothelioma Legal Process

Free consultation with a mesothelioma attorney
Filing a legal complaint
Evidence gathering during discovery
Negotiations and possible settlement
Trial and verdict, if necessary


“Many people with mesothelioma have legal rights due to asbestos exposure. Legal options may include lawsuits or trust fund claims.”– American Cancer Society

How Much Are Mesothelioma Settlements and Payouts?

Compensation in a mesothelioma lawsuit varies by case. Settlements typically range from $1 million to $1.4 million, while jury awards can exceed $2 million. Factors affecting payouts include the extent of exposure, medical expenses, and emotional suffering.
Factors That Impact Settlement Amounts

Type and severity of mesothelioma diagnosis
Lost wages and future earning potential
Medical bills and ongoing treatment costs
Evidence strength and number of defendants
Whether the case settles or goes to trial

Should You Settle or Go to Trial?
Most victims opt to settle to avoid lengthy trials. However, if a fair settlement can’t be reached, a trial may yield higher compensation. An experienced attorney can help evaluate the best path based on your unique circumstances, considering factors like case strength, potential payout differences, emotional stress, and the time commitment required for courtroom litigation.
Next Steps: Filing Your Mesothelioma Lawsuit
At the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, we understand how overwhelming a mesothelioma diagnosis can be for both victims and their families. That’s why we’re here to guide you through every step of the legal process with compassion, clarity, and experience. 
Our dedicated team has helped countless individuals secure the justice and compensation they deserve after being exposed to asbestos. If you’re considering legal action, don’t wait to contact us today to learn your options and take the first step toward holding the responsible parties accountable. Your fight is our mission, and we’re ready to stand by your side.
STAT: According to the RAND Institute for Civil Justice, more than 730,000 personal injury claims related to asbestos exposure have been filed since the early 1980s, resulting in over $70 billion in total compensation paid to victims and their families.Source: RAND Corporation
 
Legal DisclaimerThe information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### Despite Oil Company’s Arguments. Lung Cancer Victim’s Lawsuit Will Proceed

A welder diagnosed with asbestos-related lung cancer has filed a lawsuit against multiple companies, asserting different causes of action against each: negligence claims against certain defendants, product liability claims against manufacturers, and premises liability claims against property owners. One defendant filed a petition for dismissal of the case against them, but the district court judge for the Eastern District of Louisiana denied their request.







Long-Time Welder Blames Asbestos Exposure for Lung Cancer



The lawsuit was filed by Mallory Ware, who points to asbestos exposure during his years working as a welder and hammer operator between 1973 and 1989 for his illness. One of his employers was Marathon Oil Company, and when he included them as a defendant in his claim, the company’s attorneys argued that he had not provided enough evidence of exposure in their environment to justify their inclusion. They called his complaint a “shotgun pleading,” arguing that they had been included with other defendants without sufficient facts to substantiate the claim.



In the face of the oil company’s petition for dismissal of the asbestos lawsuit, Mr. Ware’s attorneys countered that the facts they’d provided about exposure on the oil company’s site were enough for the early stage of the process. The claim that the oil company objected to had included accusations of asbestos-containing dust and welding fumes within the victim’s work environment.



Lung Cancer Victim Prevails in Early Stage of Litigation



The lung cancer victim’s attorneys noted that only a minimal amount of evidence is required at the early stage of the victim’s litigation, and U.S. District Judge Darrel James Papillion agreed. He noted that the victim’s claim had included a period of exposure, a legal theory behind the lawsuit, the activity alleged to have caused his lung cancer, and the damages the victim was seeking. With those aspects all included, he rejected the idea that they had been included indiscriminately and ordered the oil company to prepare an answer and prepare for a discovery process.

### 82-Year-Old With Mesothelioma Files Claim Against Asbestos Companies

In November 2023, James Blair Sarjeant and his wife filed a lawsuit accusing multiple companies of negligently exposing him to the asbestos that caused his malignant mesothelioma. Among the products the 82-year-old specifically blames for his illness are Kaiser Gypsum joint compound and other items he used during home remodeling projects and personal home construction he performed from the late 1960s through about 1980.  







Mesothelioma Victim Recalls Dusty Work



According to his deposition testimony, the mesothelioma victim recalled that working with Kaiser Gypsum’s products was the dustiest work he had ever encountered. He recalled handling, applying, sanding, and cleaning up the products in 1969 during the installation of drywall on the ceiling of his personal residence, and being present when drywall was hung during the construction of a new home in the early 1970s. He said that he had personally swept the dust created by the work and disposed of it.



Mr. Sarjeant recalled additional exposures to Kaiser Gypsum products that he blames for his mesothelioma, including trips to his vacation property in Baja, Mexico, where he put up walls and ceilings using Kaiser Gypsum materials that he purchased in California to take with him and then drove to Baja to do the work. During this time, Mr. Sarjeant both personally handled, mixed, applied, sanded, swept, and cleaned up, or was near others doing this work in his presence. He said he was left with visible dust on his hair, clothing, the floor, and all other surfaces, which he breathed.



Failure to Warn At the Heart of Mesothelioma Claim



In pursuing his mesothelioma claim against Kaiser Gypsum, Mr. Sarjeant notes that he had no way of knowing he was being exposed to asbestos because the company provided no notice that their products contained the material. They also did not warn of its dangers or that he should not breathe in dust from their products.



In presenting his case, Mr. Sarjeant noted the toll that his mesothelioma diagnosis had taken on him, which was exacerbated by the sudden death of his wife in July 2024. He is claiming that the company was negligent in its design, marketing, sale, and supply of the products and of its failure to warn about its dangers or to recall it upon learning of the hazards it posed to human health.

### How to File a Mesothelioma Claim: Step-by-Step for Families and Victims

Filing a mesothelioma claim is the legal process used by victims or their families to seek compensation for asbestos exposure. This step-by-step guide outlines everything you need to know, from diagnosis to settlement, helping you navigate the process efficiently. Whether you're pursuing a lawsuit, trust fund payout, or veterans' benefits, understanding your rights can significantly impact the outcome. Mesothelioma compensation can help cover medical bills, lost wages, and provide long-term financial support for affected families.
What Is a Mesothelioma Claim?

A mesothelioma claim is a legal action that helps individuals with mesothelioma recover financial compensation from companies responsible for their asbestos exposure. These claims hold negligent parties accountable and help cover costs like treatment, lost income, and related damages. Depending on the situation, several types of claims may apply:

Personal injury lawsuits – Filed by individuals diagnosed with mesothelioma to seek compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering.
 

Wrongful death claims – Filed by family members after a loved one passes away from mesothelioma, covering funeral costs, lost support, and more.
 

Asbestos trust fund claims – Many bankrupt companies established trust funds to pay victims. These claims offer compensation without going to court.
 

VA claims for veterans – Veterans exposed to asbestos during service may be eligible for VA benefits and financial support.

Each claim type has its own rules and deadlines, so it’s important to work with an experienced mesothelioma attorney to choose the right path.
How Do You File a Mesothelioma Claim?
Step 1: Confirm a Mesothelioma Diagnosis
See a specialist to get an official diagnosis. You’ll need pathology reports, imaging, and medical records to support your case.
Step 2: Determine Where Asbestos Exposure Happened
Workplace history, military service, or contaminated products may be the source. Your lawyer can help investigate these details.
Step 3: Choose an Experienced Mesothelioma Attorney
Hire a lawyer who specializes in asbestos litigation. They’ll guide you through the process and file the claim on your behalf.
Step 4: Gather Supporting Evidence
Documents may include medical records, employment history, military service files, and statements from co-workers or family members.
Step 5: File Your Mesothelioma Lawsuit or Trust Fund Claim
Your lawyer will submit the paperwork to the court or asbestos trust fund. Timeliness matters, so file before the statute of limitations expires.
Step 6: Receive a Settlement or Go to Trial
Most cases settle out of court. If not, your attorney will represent you at trial to seek full compensation.

"Asbestos is the main cause of mesothelioma. Most people with mesothelioma have been exposed to asbestos at some point in their lives, often through jobs where they inhaled asbestos fibers."– American Cancer Society

FAQs About Filing a Mesothelioma Claim

How long does it take to file a mesothelioma claim?
The filing process can begin within days, but cases often take several months to a year to resolve, depending on the complexity.
What compensation can mesothelioma victims receive?
Compensation may include medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and funeral costs in wrongful death cases.
What if the company responsible is no longer in business?
You may be eligible to file a claim with an asbestos trust fund, which compensates victims even if the original company is bankrupt.
Do veterans qualify for compensation?
Yes. Many veterans were exposed to asbestos during military service and may be eligible for VA mesothelioma benefits.
What is the deadline to file a mesothelioma lawsuit?
This depends on the state. Most statutes of limitations range from 1 to 3 years after diagnosis or death. Learn more about mesothelioma filing deadlines.
Why Legal Help Is Crucial
Mesothelioma law is complex. Hiring an experienced attorney ensures your claim is filed correctly, includes all required documentation, and meets state deadlines. Legal experts also know how to maximize your compensation through settlement or trial.
To get started, connect with us at the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center. Our experienced team specializes in asbestos litigation and is here to help you understand your legal rights and take action quickly. We provide compassionate, personalized guidance and are committed to helping you pursue the mesothelioma compensation you deserve. Whether you're filing for yourself or on behalf of a loved one, we’ll support you through every step of the legal process with care and expertise.
STATISTIC: Approximately 3,000 people are diagnosed with mesothelioma each year in the United States, most of whom were exposed to asbestos decades earlier.[Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]
Legal DisclaimerThe information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### New York Jury Delivers Unanimous Mesothelioma Verdict Against Honda Motors

For years, automobile manufacturers continued selling asbestos-containing parts despite knowing that exposure to the toxic mineral could cause mesothelioma and other cancers. Many mechanics and other auto workers have been diagnosed with asbestos-related diseases as a result. Recently, a New York man filed suit against Honda Motors, blaming the auto giant’s failure to warn of these dangers for his fatal illness. The New York jury hearing the case reached a unanimous decision in the victim’s favor.







Multiple Asbestos Companies Named in New York Mesothelioma Lawsuit



The plaintiffs in the mesothelioma claim were Michael C. Wagner and his wife. The New York man filed suit against multiple companies, accusing them of negligently exposing him to asbestos without providing any warning of the dangers posed by the carcinogenic mineral hidden within their products. Though his original claim named Amchem Products, American Biltrite, BMW of North America, Westinghouse Electric, Ford Motor Company, General Electric, and many others, at the time of the trial, only North American Honda Motor Company (Nissan) remained; the rest had either been dismissed or settled out of court.



The six-person New York jury seated in Mr. Wagner’s claim listened to weeks of testimony about his exposure to American Honda’s products, how asbestos causes mesothelioma and other illnesses, what the company had known about the dangers of its products, and how the diagnosis had impacted the Wagners’ lives. At the end, they unanimously decided in the couple’s favor, awarding him $300,000 for his past pain and suffering and an additional $300,000 for the pain and suffering it is anticipated he will suffer in the future.



Mesothelioma Jury’s Decision Reflects Failure to Warn of Asbestos Dangers



The jury’s decision in the mesothelioma case rested on Nissan’s failure to exercise reasonable care in the use of its asbestos-containing products. The company’s failure to warn that its parts contained asbestos and that those exposed to them were at risk of deadly diseases was viewed as a substantial factor in Mr. Wagner’s diagnosis and negligent, thus justifying the significant damages award.



Interestingly, though the jury only decided the case involving Nissan, they also determined that he had been exposed to asbestos from products made, sold, and/or distributed by other companies as well, though those companies were not present as defendants in the trial.

### The Role of Medical Records in a Talcum Powder Lawsuit

If you're filing a talcum powder lawsuit, your medical records are one of the most powerful tools for proving your case. These documents show when symptoms began, how you were diagnosed, and whether your condition may be linked to asbestos exposure through talc products. 
They also provide a detailed timeline of your treatment, highlight any patterns consistent with asbestos-related illnesses, and help medical experts support your legal claim with credible, evidence-based testimony. Comprehensive medical records can significantly impact the strength of your case and your chances of receiving financial compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, and emotional distress.
Why Are Medical Records Important in a Talcum Powder Lawsuit?
Medical records are used to prove your illness and connect it to your use of talcum powder. They include pathology reports, imaging scans, biopsy results, and doctor’s notes that support your claim. If you were diagnosed with mesothelioma or ovarian cancer, medical records provide the timeline and treatment history needed to link the diagnosis to prolonged exposure to talcum powder products.
This documentation helps lawyers and experts show the court that:

You consistently used talc-based products over time
You developed an asbestos-related illness
There are no stronger alternative explanations for your condition

How Do Medical Records Help Prove Exposure to Asbestos in Talc?

Medical records support the connection between asbestos-contaminated talcum powder and serious illnesses like mesothelioma and ovarian cancer. Many of these cancers are rare and aggressive, and asbestos exposure is a known cause. When your medical documents align with known symptoms of asbestos-related diseases, it strengthens your legal claim and may increase your chances of receiving compensation.

"The presence of asbestos in talc-based body powders and its potential link to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma is a growing concern backed by emerging scientific studies."
— American Cancer Society

What Kind of Medical Records Are Needed for a Talcum Powder Claim?
To support your talcum powder lawsuit, your legal team will need a complete and well-documented set of medical records. These include:

Diagnostic imaging (CT scans, X-rays, MRIs) to reveal the extent and location of tumors or abnormalities.
Biopsy and pathology reports that confirm the presence and type of cancer, such as mesothelioma or ovarian cancer.
Doctor’s notes and oncology reports, which provide clinical observations, treatment decisions, and expert insights into the progression of your illness.
Hospital admission and discharge summaries that document emergency visits, surgeries, hospital stays, and recovery outcomes.
Specialist referrals and treatment plans showing how your condition has been managed and which specialists were involved in your care.

These records help establish a clear and chronological medical timeline, allowing your attorneys and medical experts to demonstrate that your diagnosis is consistent with diseases linked to asbestos exposure found in contaminated talcum powder. They also help eliminate alternative causes by showing a lack of other risk factors. This comprehensive documentation is critical when presenting your case in court or negotiating a settlement, as it forms the medical backbone of your claim.
Can Medical Records Affect the Outcome of a Talcum Powder Lawsuit?
Yes — accurate, complete medical records often determine the strength of a talcum powder lawsuit. Courts rely on this documentation to assess whether your condition can reasonably be tied to talcum powder use. In many successful lawsuits, medical evidence has played a key role in securing compensation.
How to Collect and Organize Medical Evidence

If you're pursuing a legal claim, your attorney can help you obtain your medical records from hospitals, clinics, and specialists. You may need to sign a release form, and it's helpful to request:

All diagnostic testing results
Oncology notes and treatment summaries
Records from your primary care doctor

Properly organizing these records can speed up the legal process and give your legal team a better chance of negotiating a fair settlement.
What Other Evidence Can Support a Talcum Powder Lawsuit?
Along with medical documentation, other forms of evidence include:

Product receipts or photos of talcum powder containers
Witness statements from family or caregivers
Workplace records if exposure occurred on the job
Expert testimony from oncologists or industrial hygienists

Medical Evidence Can Make or Break Your Talcum Powder Lawsuit
At the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, we understand how overwhelming it can be to gather the medical documentation needed for a talcum powder lawsuit. From our perspective, strong medical records aren’t just evidence—they’re the foundation of your case. We work closely with clients to help collect, organize, and present this information effectively, ensuring every detail supports your claim and increases your chances of receiving the compensation you deserve.

Did you know? As of 2020, over 6,600 lawsuits have been filed against Johnson & Johnson alleging that their talcum powder products caused cancer due to asbestos contamination.[Source: Reuters]
Legal DisclaimerThe information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### How to Choose the Best Talcum Powder Lawsuit Attorney

Looking for the best talcum powder lawsuit attorney? Choosing the right legal expert is critical if you’ve been diagnosed with ovarian cancer or mesothelioma after long-term talc use. The attorney you hire can directly impact your compensation, legal outcome, and peace of mind. 

An experienced lawyer understands the complex medical evidence, can build a strong case, and knows how to take on large corporations like Johnson & Johnson. They can also guide you through every legal step, ensuring your claim is filed correctly and within deadlines. With the right support, you can focus on healing while they fight for justice.
What Should You Look for in a Talcum Powder Lawsuit Attorney?
The best talcum powder attorneys specialize in product liability and asbestos-related claims. They understand the medical science behind these cases and know how to prove a link between talcum powder use and serious illness. These lawyers are skilled at gathering expert testimony, analyzing medical records, and negotiating substantial settlements for victims and their families.
“A personal injury lawyer will help you navigate the complex legal system, gather evidence, negotiate with insurance companies, and fight for the compensation you deserve.”

— Nolo Legal Encyclopedia
How Do You Choose the Best Talcum Powder Lawyer?
1. Choose a Lawyer with Talc and Asbestos Experience


Not all personal injury lawyers are qualified. You need one who’s handled talcum powder lawsuits and understands asbestos-related cancer claims like mesothelioma or ovarian cancer. Experience in mass tort litigation, court procedures, and settlement negotiations is essential.
2. Ask About Case Results and Settlements
The best talc lawyers have won multi-million-dollar settlements. Ask for case examples and success rates in talcum powder litigation. Proven results reflect their skill, experience, and ability to handle complex legal battles.
3. Confirm They Work on Contingency
A good talc attorney won’t charge you upfront. They only get paid if you win your case—this is called a contingency fee agreement. This arrangement makes legal help accessible without financial risk, ensuring justice is available regardless of your current financial situation. It also motivates your attorney to work harder on your behalf.
4. Make Sure the Firm Has National Reach
Many talcum powder claims are federal cases. A firm with national resources and experience in multidistrict litigation (MDL) is a major advantage. They can navigate complex court systems, coordinate with other firms, and access top-tier expert witnesses to strengthen your case.
5. Check Reviews and Communication Style
Look for a lawyer who responds quickly, explains your options clearly, and has strong client testimonials or Google reviews. Clear communication and a solid reputation are key indicators of reliability and professionalism. 

Questions to Ask a Talcum Powder Attorney

Before hiring, ask the following:

 	Have you handled talcum powder and asbestos-related lawsuits?
 	What is your win rate or average settlement?
 	Do you offer free consultations?
 	Will you personally handle my case?
 	What are the next steps if I hire you?

Why the Right Talcum Powder Lawyer Matters


Hiring the wrong attorney could delay your case or reduce your payout. But the right talcum powder lawsuit attorney will move quickly, gather strong evidence, and fight for maximum compensation. They’ll also ensure your case is filed before deadlines expire, protect your rights throughout the legal process, and provide personalized support during this difficult time. A skilled attorney increases your chances of receiving the justice and financial relief you deserve.
How Can a Talcum Powder Lawsuit Attorney Help You?
They will:

 	Investigate your medical and product use history
 	Connect your diagnosis to talc exposure
 	Handle all legal paperwork and deadlines
 	Negotiate settlements or represent you in court

At the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, we understand how overwhelming it can be to face a cancer diagnosis linked to talcum powder use. That’s why we’re here to help you every step of the way. Our experienced legal team has supported thousands of individuals and families seeking justice in talcum powder and asbestos-related cases. 

We’ll review your situation, explain your legal options, and fight for the maximum compensation you’re entitled to. Don’t wait—every case has a time limit. Contact us today to speak with a knowledgeable attorney who truly cares. Let the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center be your advocate for justice.
Did You Know?
As of 2024, over 38,000 lawsuits have been filed against Johnson & Johnson for talcum powder-related cancers. The company has proposed a $6.1 billion settlement to resolve these claims. Source: Reuters

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### Widow’s Increased Mesothelioma Verdict Upheld by South Carolina Supreme Court

It’s unusual, but not unheard of, for a judge to increase the award given to a mesothelioma victim. It’s what happened in the case involving the death of Beverly “Dale” Jolly of South Carolina. When the asbestos companies sued by his widow objected to being ordered to pay more than the jury decided, they appealed the decision. When they lost at the appellate level, they took their argument to the state’s Supreme Court, but they lost there too.







Original Mesothelioma Award Did Not Reflect Damages Presented in Court



While many defendants settled out of court with the mesothelioma victim and his family, Fisher Controls International, LLC, and Crosby Valve, LLC did not. The jury heard evidence that Mr. Jolly’s mesothelioma was caused by asbestos exposure during his years working for Duke Power Company and found the two companies guilty. However, their verdict was accompanied by extremely low damages of just $200,000 for Mr. Jolly and $100,000 for Mrs. Jolly.  Determining that those awards did not reflect the harm Mr. Jolly had suffered, the judge overseeing the cases adjusted the verdict to significantly higher amounts.



The judge’s significant increase of mesothelioma damages to $1,580,000 for Mr. Jolly and $290,000 to Mrs. Jolly provoked an appeal from the asbestos companies. When the appeals court upheld the trial judge’s decision, they took their argument to the South Carolina Supreme Court, which also held that the trial court judge had acted within the scope of what is reasonable.



Verdict in Mesothelioma Cases Must Be Reasonable



Over the objections of the asbestos companies, the justices of the South Carolina Supreme Court’s review of the case noted that when a trial court judge determines that a verdict is either excessive or inadequate, they can offer to order a new trial, and if that offer is rejected, they can change the jury’s award. Their review showed that the trial judge’s decision was reasonable and left the victim’s new award in place.

### Who Is Eligible to File a Talc Powder Lawsuit in 2025?

Individuals who have been diagnosed with ovarian cancer or mesothelioma after long-term use of talcum powder products may be eligible to file a talc powder lawsuit in 2025. These lawsuits are aimed at holding manufacturers accountable for exposing users to asbestos-contaminated talc, which has been linked to serious health conditions.
Health complications linked to prolonged talc powder use have raised serious concerns for thousands of individuals and families. Many are now turning to the legal system to seek accountability and financial compensation. By filing a talc powder lawsuit, eligible individuals may recover damages for medical costs, lost wages, and the physical and emotional suffering caused by cancer diagnoses related to asbestos-contaminated talc.
Who Can File a Talc Powder Lawsuit?

Individuals diagnosed with ovarian cancer or mesothelioma after using talc-based products may be eligible to file a lawsuit. Legal eligibility is determined by several factors, including your medical history, the frequency and duration of talc product use, and the timeline of your diagnosis. If you can establish a clear link between your illness and talcum powder exposure, you may qualify for compensation through a product liability or personal injury lawsuit.

Women diagnosed with ovarian cancer after genital talc use
Individuals diagnosed with mesothelioma linked to asbestos in talc
Family members filing wrongful death claims for loved ones

What Are the Legal Requirements to File a Talcum Powder Lawsuit?
You must show a clear connection between your cancer diagnosis and regular talcum powder use. Required documentation includes medical records, proof of product use, and a formal diagnosis from a licensed physician. Additional supporting evidence, such as witness statements, product packaging, or scientific studies linking talc to your specific illness, can further strengthen your case and improve your chances of receiving fair compensation in a talc powder lawsuit.
Key Eligibility Criteria:

Medical diagnosis of ovarian cancer or mesothelioma
History of talc product use, especially for personal hygiene
Filing within the statute of limitations (varies by state)

How Do I Know If My Illness Is Related to Talcum Powder?
Studies have linked long-term talc use to ovarian cancer and asbestos exposure to mesothelioma. Regular use over many years significantly increases health risks, and if you used talc regularly and were later diagnosed, you may qualify for compensation.

"Some studies have suggested a possible link between the use of talcum powder in the genital area and an increased risk of ovarian cancer." – American Cancer Society

Is There a Time Limit to File a Talc Powder Lawsuit?

Yes. The time to file a lawsuit—called the statute of limitations—ranges from 1 to 3 years depending on your state. The clock starts at the time of diagnosis or discovery of the illness.
Can Families File a Talcum Powder Wrongful Death Claim?
Yes, immediate family members can file a wrongful death lawsuit if a loved one passed away due to a talc-related illness. These claims can cover medical bills, lost income, emotional suffering, funeral expenses, loss of companionship, and other damages resulting from the tragic and preventable loss of life.
What Evidence Do I Need to File a Talc Lawsuit?
You’ll need:

Official cancer diagnosis
Medical history records
Proof of talcum powder use (receipts, photos, etc.)
Statements from doctors or experts

Lawyers with experience in product liability lawsuits can help gather and present this evidence for your case.
What Types of Compensation Are Available?
Eligible claimants may receive financial compensation for:

Medical expenses
Lost wages
Pain and suffering
Funeral and burial costs (for wrongful death cases)

How Do I Get Started with a Talc Lawsuit in 2025?
Begin by reaching out to a reputable law firm with proven experience in handling talc powder and asbestos-related claims. These specialized attorneys understand the complexities of product liability cases and often provide free consultations.
Many operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning you won’t pay unless your case is successful. If your diagnosis is connected to talcum powder use, partnering with a knowledgeable legal team can significantly improve your chances of receiving rightful compensation and holding negligent manufacturers accountable.
Are There Resources for Talc Victims?
At Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, we are committed to supporting victims and families affected by talc-related cancers, including ovarian cancer and mesothelioma. Our experienced legal team understands the challenges you face and is here to help you navigate every step of the claims process. You deserve answers, justice, and compensation. To learn more about your legal options or to speak directly with an expert, contact us.
According to Drugwatch.com, over 38,000 lawsuits have been filed against Johnson & Johnson as of 2024 related to talcum powder causing cancer. Source
Legal Disclaimer
The information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### Long-Ago Work at World Trade Center Blamed for Man’s Lung Cancer and Asbestosis

After serving in the U.S. Navy from 1955 to 1959, James Petro embarked on a 35-year career as a steamfitter, never dreaming that his career would eventually lead to a life-threatening diagnosis of asbestos-related lung cancer and asbestosis. When he was diagnosed, he filed a personal injury lawsuit against dozens of companies whom he accused of negligently exposing him to asbestos-containing products, particularly while he was part of a crew constructing New York’s famed World Trade Center. After those asbestos companies were ordered by a New York jury to pay him $28.5 million in damages, they filed an objection and requested a review of the case, but the Supreme Court of New York County rejected their petition.







$28.5 Million Awarded After Asbestos Exposure Was Blamed for Lung Cancer



When Mr. Petro was first diagnosed with lung cancer and asbestosis, he filed a personal injury claim with the New York courts. Several of the companies that he blamed for having exposed him to asbestos agreed to settle with him out of court, but others opted to fight against the victim. A jury trial resulted in him being awarded $13.5 million in damages for past pain and suffering and another $15 million for future pain and suffering.



The Port Authority of New York was one of the defendants in the claim, and the agency objected to the verdict on multiple grounds. They argued to the Supreme Court of New York County that the asbestos-containing fireproofing spray that the victim blamed for his illness could not have been responsible for his exposure, because they had discontinued its use before his starting work at the World Trade Center, the victim’s attorneys showed that a different asbestos-containing spray had continued to be used.



New York Supreme Court Denies Asbestos Company’s Appeal



In reviewing arguments from both sides as well as the notes from the case, the judge of the Supreme Court of New York County who heard the case denied the petition, noting that the jury and trial court’s decisions had been appropriate and that the verdict that was awarded to the victim was reasonable and “did not materially differ from comparative cases.”

### What to Expect from a Talcum Powder Lawsuit Settlement in 2025

Victims of asbestos-contaminated talcum powder products continue to seek justice in 2025, and understanding the process of a talcum powder lawsuit settlement is more important than ever. With recent court rulings and high-profile verdicts, the landscape is shifting. Settlements have become more nuanced, and compensation amounts may vary widely based on individual circumstances, including diagnosis, duration of exposure, and state-specific legal standards.

If you or a loved one has developed cancer due to prolonged talc use, knowing what to expect from a settlement can help you make informed legal decisions. Victims now face a more complex legal process, with many turning to specialized attorneys to navigate multidistrict litigation and aggressive corporate defense strategies.
Understanding the 2025 Talcum Powder Settlement Landscape
As of 2025, thousands of cases are still pending against major manufacturers of talcum powder products, including Johnson & Johnson. Plaintiffs allege that long-term exposure to talc, especially when contaminated with asbestos, contributed to cancers such as talcum powder lawsuit settlement. 

These lawsuits highlight growing public awareness and increasing scrutiny of corporate accountability, as more individuals come forward with claims linking daily talc use to serious illnesses. Legal experts anticipate continued litigation, new evidence, and potentially larger settlement offers as court pressure mounts.
Key Legal Developments Impacting Settlements


Recent mass tort litigation has led to several significant verdicts, some exceeding tens of millions of dollars per plaintiff. Settlement amounts can vary based on:

 	Strength of medical evidence linking talc use to diagnosis
 	Manufacturer's liability
 	Jurisdiction of the lawsuit
 	Extent of damages, including medical bills, pain, and suffering

“A proposed $8.9 billion settlement from Johnson & Johnson continues to face challenges from plaintiffs and legal experts, who argue the figure may not fully account for future claims.” — Forbes

How Much Can Victims Expect in Compensation?
The average talcum powder cancer settlement may range from $100,000 to over $1 million depending on the circumstances. Some mesothelioma and ovarian cancer victims have received significantly higher payouts, particularly in cases with compelling evidence and jury sympathy. 

Factors like corporate negligence, internal documents proving product awareness, and strong medical testimony can substantially influence settlement amounts. In recent years, several landmark verdicts have exceeded expectations, reflecting the courts' acknowledgment of the devastating impact these cancers have on victims and their families.
Factors That May Increase Your Payout
Certain elements can strengthen your case and potentially increase your settlement, including:

 	Detailed medical records showing diagnosis and treatment
 	Proof of prolonged talcum powder use
 	Expert medical and occupational testimony
 	Involvement in a larger class action or multidistrict litigation (MDL)

The Role of Legal Representation in Talc Settlements


Hiring an attorney experienced in talcum powder and asbestos-related litigation is crucial. A well-prepared legal team can negotiate stronger settlements and navigate the complexities of class action or individual suits. 

Before choosing a lawyer, look for firms that specialize in asbestos litigation and have a history of successful verdicts in product liability cases. A skilled lawyer will understand the intricacies of talc-related cancers and work relentlessly to secure the best possible outcome for your case.
Preparing for the Settlement Process
Once your case is filed, the following steps may occur:

 	Filing and service of the complaint
 	Pre-trial discovery and document exchange
 	Settlement negotiations or trial proceedings
 	Disbursement of awarded compensation

The process can take several months to years, depending on the complexity of the case and the court backlog. Throughout this time, your legal team will work diligently to gather evidence, communicate with opposing counsel, and advocate for your rights. While the timeline can be lengthy, staying patient and informed is crucial for securing a fair and just settlement or verdict.
Start Your Legal Journey
At the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, we are committed to helping victims of asbestos-contaminated talcum powder pursue the justice and compensation they deserve. If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with cancer linked to talc exposure, our experienced legal team is here to guide you every step of the way. Don’t wait, contact us today to discuss your case and explore your legal options with compassion, expertise, and a proven record of results.
Did You Know?
More than 38,000 talcum powder-related lawsuits have been filed in the U.S. as of 2024, with billions in compensation awarded or proposed.
Source: Reuters
Legal Disclaimer
The information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### Woman’s Mesothelioma Death Blamed on Laundering Asbestos-Laden Clothes

In 2018, 70-year-old Bonnie J. Bonito died of malignant mesothelioma despite never having worked with or near asbestos. The family’s investigation of how the Rhode Island woman had contracted the rare form of cancer, they found she’d spent decades laundering her ex-husband’s asbestos-laden clothes. They filed suit against dozens of companies whose products he’d been exposed to at his construction job.







Washing Asbestos-Covered Work Clothes Is a Common Cause of Mesothelioma in Women



Though most people diagnosed with mesothelioma can trace their asbestos exposure to their workplace, many women diagnosed with the rare form of cancer have never worked with the material. Though the source of their exposure was once a mystery, it is now understood that these women breathed in the carcinogenic fibers when they laundered their husbands’ asbestos-dust-covered work clothes at the end of each day. That is what Bonnie Bonito’s family says happened to her.



Though the mesothelioma victim’s family originally named seventy defendants in their wrongful death claim, many of those cases were settled out of court, leaving twelve companies to face the evidence of Mrs. Bonito’s exposure from 1966 until 1990, when she’d been married to Mr. Bonito and had cleaned his work clothes and shoes several times each week. Those companies objected to two of the expert witnesses being called to testify in the case — a pulmonologist and an industrial hygiene expert prepared to discuss the steps that need to be taken to protect family members of asbestos workers.



Superior Court Judges Reject Asbestos Companies’ Argument in Mesothelioma Claim



After careful review and consideration, the judges of the Superior Court of Rhode Island denied the companies’ requests for the witnesses to be barred from testifying in the mesothelioma case. Though they agreed that the industrial hygienist could not offer an opinion on whether a warning label about the dangers of asbestos on the companies’ products would have made a difference, he allowed the expert to testify about how asbestos spreads onto clothing.

### $3.45 Million Awarded to Family of Virginia Mesothelioma Victim

In 2022, Jim Ketcham died of malignant mesothelioma. Following his death, his grieving family decided to seek justice on his behalf. Blaming John Crane, Inc. for having exposed him to asbestos, they filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the company. After hearing extensive testimony in the case, a Virginia jury agreed with the victim’s survivors and ordered the notorious asbestos manufacturer to pay $3.45 million in damages.







Occupational Exposure to Asbestos Led to Millwright’s Death



Over the course of eleven days, a Newport News, Virginia jury heard details of how the mesothelioma victim’s work as a millwright had exposed him to asbestos in John Crane, Inc.’s products. While working at the DuPont Spruance plant in Chesterfield County from 1961 to 1979, he had been assigned responsibility for maintaining and repairing pumps, valves, and other equipment. That work required cleaning, removing, and replacing John Crane, Inc. gaskets and packing.



Expert witnesses testified that when the mesothelioma victim had manipulated these asbestos-containing parts, it generated dust that was filled with microscopic particles of the toxic mineral. When Mr. Ketcham inhaled that dust, it started a biological process of inflammation and genetic damage within his cells that ultimately led to his death.



Jury Hears Details of Mesothelioma Victim’s Work Process



Though John Crane, Inc.’s attorneys argued that they had no responsibility for Mr. Ketcham’s mesothelioma death, the victim’s attorneys presented evidence that the company knew of the dangers of asbestos at the time that he worked with their products, but had chosen not to take action to warn the public of its dangers until 1983. This information, combined with Mr. Ketcham’s deposition testimony before his death describing how he’d removed asbestos gaskets using wire brushes and hammers and testimony from his survivors about the impact of his death, led the jury to the significant monetary award.



The jury, hearing of the family’s loss and the suffering the mesothelioma caused Mr. Ketchum before his death, agreed that the company had breached its duty of care “by selling unreasonably dangerous products without warning” and ordered the company to compensate the victim’s family.



If you or someone you love has been diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, the Patient Advocates at Mesothelioma.net have the resources you need. Contact us today at 1-800-692-8608 to learn more.

### Mesothelioma After Talc Use: Understanding Your Legal Rights

A cancer diagnosis changes everything, especially when it’s something as rare and aggressive as mesothelioma. For many people, the shock deepens upon learning that everyday talc-based products they once trusted may have exposed them to harmful asbestos fibers. Products like baby powder, cosmetic powders, and industrial talc have faced intense scrutiny for their hidden dangers, leaving families blindsided, searching for answers, and in need of a knowledgeable mesothelioma lawyer.
If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma after years of using talcum powder products, it’s important to know you’re not alone and you have legal options. Victims of asbestos exposure through contaminated talc may be entitled to compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, emotional suffering, and more. Understanding your legal rights is the first step toward justice, and working with an experienced mesothelioma lawyer can help you hold companies accountable while providing peace of mind in a difficult time.
The Hidden Risk of Talc and Mesothelioma

Most people associate talcum powder with hygiene and personal care, but few realize the hidden danger some of these products once carried. In the past, talc was often mined near asbestos deposits, increasing the risk of contamination. When asbestos fibers are inhaled, they can silently settle in the lungs and tissue, remaining unnoticed for years. Only decades later do illnesses like mesothelioma develop, catching victims and their families off guard.
The Long-Term Effects of Asbestos Exposure from Talc Products
Asbestos exposure from talc products can remain dormant in the body for decades before symptoms of mesothelioma or other asbestos-related diseases appear. The long latency period makes diagnosis challenging, often leading to late-stage discoveries. Early detection is crucial, but many victims only learn of their exposure years after it occurs, complicating treatment options, prolonging suffering, and making legal claims more difficult to pursue successfully.
What Consumers Should Know About Talc Exposure
Today, awareness about the connection between talc and asbestos is growing, but for many it’s too late. People exposed through everyday routines — applying powder after a shower, using certain cosmetics, or working in environments where talc dust was common — may now be facing serious health consequences. Understanding these risks and knowing your legal rights is crucial for those impacted by asbestos-related diseases like mesothelioma.
Your Legal Rights If Diagnosed with Mesothelioma After Talc Use

Victims of asbestos exposure from talc products may be eligible to file a legal claim or lawsuit against the companies responsible. By seeking experienced legal counsel, you can pursue compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, emotional distress, and other related damages. A qualified mesothelioma attorney can thoroughly review your history of talc use, medical records, and exposure details to determine if your case qualifies for a talcum powder lawsuit or asbestos trust fund claim.
Why You Need an Experienced Mesothelioma Attorney
Hiring an experienced attorney who specializes in mesothelioma and asbestos cases ensures you have expert guidance through the complex legal process. A skilled lawyer can help identify liable parties, gather necessary evidence, file claims, and negotiate settlements on your behalf. With their expertise, you’ll be better equipped to navigate the challenges of seeking justice and securing the compensation you deserve for your suffering and financial losses.

“Asbestos is a group of minerals that occur naturally as bundles of fibers. These fibers are found in soil and rocks in many parts of the world. When disturbed, they can break down into fibers up to 1,200 times thinner than a human hair and remain suspended in the air.” — American Cancer Society

How to File a Talc Mesothelioma Lawsuit
At Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, we recommend starting your case by consulting with one of our experienced mesothelioma lawyers who can assess your situation and determine the best course of action. We will assist you in gathering medical records, evidence of product use, and a detailed history of exposure. While most cases settle outside of court, we are fully prepared to take your case to trial, ensuring you receive the compensation and justice you deserve.
Statistic: According to the American Cancer Society, about 3,000 new cases of mesothelioma are diagnosed each year in the United States.
Legal DisclaimerThe information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### $3.8 Million Awarded to Pennsylvania Mesothelioma Victim and His Wife

After several decades working as a boiler maker, Harry Chirdon was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma. The Pennsylvania man and his wife, Rae, filed suit against the Foster Wheeler Corporation, asserting that during the time he worked for the company, they negligently and knowingly exposed him to asbestos. Last year, an Allegheny County jury agreed with the couple that the company was at fault for his illness and awarded them almost $4 million in compensatory and punitive damages.







Boiler Maker’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Foster Wheeler’s Negligence



After a week-long trial, the jury awarded the mesothelioma victim and his wife $2.3 million in compensatory damages plus an additional $1.5 million in punitive damages after hearing details of the ten weeks that he worked for Foster Wheeler. The company, which provides engineering services as well as manufacturing and servicing boilers throughout the United States and globally, called no expert witnesses to testify on its behalf. They simply denied that asbestos was present at the site where Mr. Chirdon had worked and blamed other companies that owned the site for any safety issues that may have been present.



While Foster Wheeler’s defense was limited, the mesothelioma victim and his wife presented evidence that the company had failed to adhere to rigorous safety requirements established by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration for handling asbestos. This lack of attention to regulations played a large part in the jury’s choosing to award the couple punitive damages in addition to compensatory damages.



Jury Hears of Mesothelioma Victim’s Medical Needs and Charitable Works



In addition to hearing testimony about the company’s negligence, the jury was told of the significant amount of medical intervention that Mr. Chirdon had endured in the face of his mesothelioma diagnosis, including a surgical resection of his left lung. They also heard of his many good works since having retired at the age of 76, including volunteering to drive children from Amish communities to the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia for treatment.

### How Asbestos-Contaminated Talc Puts Users at Risk for Mesothelioma

Consumers have long trusted talcum powder for personal hygiene and cosmetic use. Its smooth texture and moisture-absorbing properties have made it a staple in households for generations. However, asbestos-contaminated talc has emerged as a serious public health concern, especially due to its link to asbestos lawyer claims related to mesothelioma.
Asbestos, a known carcinogen, can infiltrate talc deposits during mining, posing a silent threat to users over time. When asbestos fibers are inhaled or absorbed through the skin, they can lead to devastating long-term health consequences. Despite efforts to regulate talc-based products, hidden exposure remains a danger.
Understanding the Connection Between Talc and Asbestos Exposure

Talc is a naturally occurring mineral often found near asbestos in the earth. During mining, it's possible for asbestos fibers to contaminate talc, especially when safety standards are lacking or outdated. Without proper testing and regulation, contaminated talc can easily enter consumer products. When this contaminated talc is used in powders, makeup, or other products, people may inhale or apply these microscopic fibers to their skin, unknowingly increasing their risk of developing mesothelioma, ovarian cancer, and other asbestos-related diseases over time, even with minimal or repeated low-level exposure.
What Is Mesothelioma and Why Is It So Dangerous?
Mesothelioma is a rare but aggressive form of cancer that affects the lining of the lungs, abdomen, or heart. It is primarily caused by inhaling asbestos fibers, which settle in the body and cause long-term cellular damage. Because of its long latency period, often 20 to 50 years, diagnosis frequently occurs in advanced stages, limiting treatment options and life expectancy. Early symptoms can be vague, including chest pain, shortness of breath, and fatigue, which often leads to delayed detection and a more difficult prognosis for patients.
Consumer Products and the Hidden Danger of Talcum Powder
While many companies have reformulated their products or removed talc altogether, numerous lawsuits have revealed that some popular talcum powders were contaminated with asbestos for decades. Despite internal testing and reports, manufacturers continued distribution. Victims claim they were never warned about the risks, and are now facing life-threatening illnesses as a result of prolonged exposure.

"The FDA continues to find asbestos in some talc-containing cosmetic products, despite industry claims of safety." — U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

Legal Options for Victims of Asbestos in Talc
For those diagnosed with mesothelioma due to asbestos exposure from talc-based products, pursuing legal action may be a path to compensation. Victims often face overwhelming medical bills, emotional distress, and loss of income. Specialized mesothelioma attorneys can help determine the source of exposure, gather crucial evidence, and build a strong case against negligent manufacturers to seek justice and financial recovery.
Steps You Can Take to Protect Yourself


Avoid using talc-based cosmetic or personal care products unless they are labeled “talc-free.”
Review ingredient labels carefully and research brands that prioritize safety and transparency.
If you have a history of talc product use and develop respiratory symptoms, consult a medical professional.
Stay updated with information on asbestos exposure risks from reliable health organizations.

Recent Lawsuits Highlight Ongoing Risks
High-profile cases, including those against major pharmaceutical companies, have drawn attention to the link between talcum powder and mesothelioma. These legal battles have sparked public outrage and regulatory reviews. Plaintiffs have successfully argued that companies failed to warn consumers about the dangers of asbestos in talc, resulting in multi-million dollar settlements and verdicts across various courts.
Take Action: Know Your Rights and Seek Help
If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma as a result of using asbestos-contaminated talc products, we at the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center are here to help. We understand the emotional and financial burden this diagnosis brings, and we're committed to standing by your side every step of the way. Our experienced legal team works tirelessly to investigate exposure sources, hold negligent companies accountable, and secure the compensation you deserve for medical bills, lost income, and pain and suffering.
At the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, your fight is our fight — and we’re ready to help you take the next step toward justice.

Did you know? According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), there were approximately 2,900 new cases of mesothelioma diagnosed in the United States in 2017, and asbestos exposure remains the primary cause.

Legal DisclaimerThe information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### Talcum Powder Lawsuits: What Mesothelioma Victims Need to Know

Recent talcum powder lawsuits have brought to light a serious legal issue: the contamination of talc-based consumer products with asbestos, a known carcinogen. This revelation has exposed millions to potential harm and has prompted a wave of litigation. For individuals with documented talcum powder use who have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, understanding the legal connection between asbestos exposure and product liability is essential. This guide provides critical legal insight into filing a mesothelioma lawsuit against manufacturers of asbestos-contaminated talcum powder.
How Talcum Powder Exposure Can Lead to Asbestos-Related Illnesses
Talc, a naturally occurring mineral, is widely used in cosmetic and personal hygiene products. However, talc is often found near asbestos in the earth, and contamination during mining is a well-documented risk due to the close geological proximity. When asbestos fibers are inhaled, they can lodge in the lungs and cause mesothelioma, a rare and aggressive form of cancer that often takes decades to develop after exposure.
This dangerous link has prompted thousands of legal claims from individuals who developed mesothelioma after using contaminated talc products, particularly long-term users of baby powder and body powders manufactured without adequate safety testing or consumer warnings.

"Talc that contains asbestos is generally accepted as being able to cause cancer if it is inhaled."
— American Cancer Society
Who Can File a Talcum Powder Mesothelioma Lawsuit?

If you or a loved one was diagnosed with mesothelioma and has a history of using talcum powder, you may be entitled to financial compensation through a personal injury or product liability claim. Successful asbestos exposure lawsuits rely on proof of consistent product use and strong medical evidence directly linking the exposure to the mesothelioma diagnosis.
Key eligibility criteria include:

A confirmed diagnosis of mesothelioma by a licensed medical professional
Regular or long-term use of talcum powder products, especially those manufactured before the year 2000
Medical documentation showing an asbestos-related illness or history of exposure
Evidence linking the product to a specific brand, manufacturer, or distributor (such as receipts, packaging, or testimony)

In many cases, plaintiffs have been awarded significant compensation for medical expenses, lost income, emotional suffering, and future care. If you meet these qualifications, speaking with a knowledgeable mesothelioma lawyer can help determine your legal options and guide you through the claims process.
Why Talcum Powder Lawsuits Are on the Rise
Over the last decade, internal company documents and scientific studies have exposed that some manufacturers were aware of asbestos contamination in their talc-based products but failed to warn consumers. This has led to a surge in talc-related mesothelioma lawsuits and high-profile jury verdicts holding corporations accountable.
One of the most notable cases involved Johnson & Johnson, which was ordered to pay billions in damages after plaintiffs proved their mesothelioma diagnoses were linked to the company's talcum powder products.
Understanding the legal landscape of these lawsuits is crucial, especially as victims face strict filing deadlines, known as the statute of limitations. Waiting too long to file could result in a forfeiture of your rights to compensation.
What Victims Can Expect During the Legal Process

Filing a talcum powder lawsuit involves several steps. A skilled attorney will help guide you through the following:

Initial consultation and case evaluation
Gathering evidence of product use and medical history
Filing the complaint against the responsible company
Negotiating a settlement or preparing for trial

Many mesothelioma victims receive settlements without going to trial. These funds can ease the financial burden of treatment costs, lost income, and emotional suffering, providing peace of mind for the future. Some victims may also qualify for compensation through asbestos trust funds, which are set up to help those harmed by asbestos exposure.
Did You Know?A 2020 FDA study found asbestos in 9 out of 52 talc-containing cosmetic product samples tested.Source: FDA
 
Take Action Today with Mesothelioma Lawyer Center
At the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, we understand the devastating impact of mesothelioma and are here to help you navigate the legal process. Our team of experienced attorneys is committed to fighting for the justice and compensation you deserve. Start your asbestos lawsuit today.
Legal Disclaimer
The information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### Mesothelioma Victim’s Punitive Damages Award Stands

A New York judge has denied an asbestos company’s request to dismiss a mesothelioma victim’s punitive damages claim against them. Burnham, LLC, a company long known for having manufactured boilers containing asbestos, offered multiple reasons why the punitive damages claim filed by Anthony Fleischman and his wife was not appropriate and should be removed from their personal injury lawsuit, but Justice Suzanne Adams of the Supreme Court of New York County said that the company’s arguments fell short of making their case.







Boiler Worker Diagnosed with Mesothelioma After Years of Asbestos Exposure



According to the claim filed by the Fleischmans, Anthony Fleischan’s pleural mesothelioma diagnosis followed years of working with numerous products and pieces of equipment known to have been contaminated with asbestos, including Burnham boilers. They named multiple defendants and specified a request for punitive damages, generally used to punish reckless disregard for a plaintiff’s wellbeing, to be assigned to the boiler manufacturer.



 In response, Burnham LLC filed a petition for summary judgment, asking the court to dismiss that part of the couple’s mesothelioma filing. To support their petition, the company asserted that they had never had a workers’ compensation claim filed against them for asbestos-related disease and that the asbestos exposure he would have experienced from their boilers would have fallen below TLV or PEL/OSHA limits. They argued that these two facts were an indication that they had not demonstrated reckless disregard for safety.



Mesothelioma Victim Points to Company’s Knowledge of Dangers of Asbestos



In response to the company’s motion to dismiss, Mr. Fleischman’s attorney noted that the company had never taken action to warn about the hazards of asbestos despite knowing that it was dangerous. The judge reviewed the evidence and agreed that Burnham LLC had fallen short of the requirement to show that punitive damages were not warranted in the case. She also found that a reasonable juror could review the evidence and decided that the company had prioritized its own profits over the plaintiff’s wellbeing, and said that it was up to a jury to determine whether punitive damages should be assigned.

### Mesothelioma Victim’s Family Able to Continue Claim Against DAP

For years, DAP, Inc.’s caulking and glazing products were made using asbestos, the mineral that is today known to cause malignant mesothelioma and other serious illnesses. The company has been named as a defendant by many people who’ve suffered harm from exposure to their products, including a recent claim filed by the family of Anna M. Buczynski, who died of the rare asbestos-related disease after years of secondary exposure to the product.







Secondary Exposure to Asbestos in DAP Products Blamed for Woman’s Mesothelioma



According to her estate’s wrongful death claim, Mrs. Buczynski’s mesothelioma is a result of years of exposure to the product on the work clothing worn by her then-husband. Her spouse had owned a hardware business and also used DAP’s products around their home, and she laundered his dust-covered work clothes regularly.



In response to the mesothelioma lawsuit, DAP Products’ attorneys filed a motion for summary judgment, asserting that there was no proof that it was their products that had exposed the woman to asbestos, but Mrs. Buczynski’s family pointed out that the company had failed to meet the requirement for having their case dismissed: They did not establish that their caulk and glazing products did not contain asbestos or, for any other reason, could not have caused her illness.



DAP’s Argument Against Mesothelioma Liability Denied



Though the caulk manufacturer proffered testimony from an ex-employee who said asbestos was no longer used in their products after 1978, the judge agreed with the victim’s family that the woman’s exposure could have come from products that were still in circulation from before that date. With that notable shortcoming in the company’s defense combined with Mr. Buczynski’s testimony about the dust that was raised when he “applied, chiseled, removed, and sanded asbestos-containing DAP caulking,” the judge hearing the case agreed that the case should continue moving ahead for a jury to decide.

### Appeals Court Denies Attempt to Overturn $2.3 Million Mesothelioma Verdict

Thomas Constantine’s family blamed his mesothelioma diagnosis and death on asbestos he was exposed to at his job, and a Philadelphia jury agreed. Though they ordered his former employer, Lenox Instrument Company, to pay his survivors $2.3 million in damages, the company objected and appealed. Two years later, an appeals court denied the company’s motion and ordered them to pay the victim’s survivors what they were owed.







Asbestos Exposure on the Job Led to Draftsman's Mesothelioma



Years before his mesothelioma death, Mr. Constantine had worked for seven years as a draftsman and designer for Lenox Instrument. When he was diagnosed with the asbestos-related disease, he identified significant exposure from the company’s manufacturing process, which involved cutting, drilling, and milling heat shields. His proximity to this work led to him inhaling asbestos-filled air, and his eventual illness.



Following the mesothelioma jury’s decision, the company filed a motion with the Superior Court of Pennsylvania requesting a new trial or entry of verdict, maintaining that the evidence submitted to the court had not warranted the verdict. They asserted that the awarding of $818,444.74 to the man’s estate for injuries suffered before his death, $700,000 in wrongful death damages to his widow and children, and $700,000 more to his widow for loss of consortium represented an abuse of the court’s discretion.



Superior Court Denies Asbestos Company’s Appeal of Mesothelioma Verdict



Following a review of Lenox Instrument Company’s appeal, the judges of the Superior Court found that the jury’s decision had been based on a significant amount of supporting evidence, including the mesothelioma victim’s own testimony, corroboration from his former colleagues, and expert witnesses.



They also noted that the jury had been shown unequivocal evidence that the company had access to publicly available materials about the dangers of asbestos, writing that “Lenox either should have known of the dangers that asbestos posed or in fact did know, as evidenced by the experiences recounted by the decedent’s co-worker.”  The court found that Lenox Instrument’s lack of action was appropriately weighed by the jury.

### The Hidden Link: Can Talcum Powder Cause Mesothelioma?

When discussing mesothelioma causes, most people think of occupational asbestos exposure—construction workers, shipbuilders, and factory employees. However, research now suggests that talcum powder may also be a hidden risk.







For decades, talc-based powders have been a common household product, used for personal hygiene and skincare. But investigations have found that some talc products contained asbestos, a known carcinogen linked to mesothelioma. This raises a serious question: Can talcum powder exposure cause mesothelioma?



How Is Talcum Powder Linked to Asbestos?



Talc and asbestos are naturally occurring minerals that often form near each other in the earth. If talc is mined from asbestos-contaminated deposits, asbestos fibers can make their way into talc-based products, including talcum powder, putting consumers at risk. Despite efforts to refine and test talc, contamination has been found in various cosmetic and personal care products over the years.



Even small amounts of asbestos can be hazardous. When inhaled or ingested, these microscopic fibers become lodged in the lining of the lungs, abdomen, or heart, triggering chronic inflammation, cellular damage, and scarring. Over time, these conditions can lead to tumor formation and mesothelioma, a deadly and aggressive form of cancer. Because symptoms often take decades to appear, many individuals don’t realize their exposure until it’s too late.



How Can Talcum Powder Exposure Cause Mesothelioma?







Using asbestos-contaminated talcum powder can release microscopic airborne fibers, which are easily inhaled or ingested, increasing the risk of long-term asbestos exposure. Once inside the body, these fibers embed themselves in tissue linings, triggering chronic inflammation and cellular damage that can develop into mesothelioma and other serious diseases.



Those at highest risk include:




Infants and children exposed to baby powder during diaper changes



Women who regularly used talc-based powders for personal hygiene



Barbers and hairdressers who applied talc products to clients daily



Athletes and dancers who used talcum powder to reduce moisture and friction




Because mesothelioma symptoms can take 20 to 50 years to appear, many victims are diagnosed decades after their initial exposure. This delayed onset makes it challenging to pinpoint the exact cause, but scientific research and legal battles continue to highlight the link between talcum powder exposure and asbestos-related illnesses.



Scientific Studies and Talcum Powder Lawsuits



Extensive research and lawsuits have investigated whether talc products can be a direct cause of mesothelioma. Studies have found:




Asbestos fibers in the lung tissue of individuals who regularly used talcum powder



Talcum powder samples testing positive for asbestos contamination



Internal company documents showing manufacturers knew about asbestos risks but failed to warn consumers




Due to these findings, thousands of lawsuits have been filed against talcum powder manufacturers. Many victims argue they were unknowingly exposed and are now battling life-threatening illnesses as a result. Courts have ruled in favor of many plaintiffs, awarding millions in settlements.



Not Just a Workplace Hazard: Talc and Household Exposure







When people think of asbestos exposure, they often picture industrial sites like Pennsylvania’s steel mills or New York’s shipyards. However, asbestos exposure extends far beyond at-risk jobs. Many victims never worked in construction or manufacturing but were unknowingly exposed to asbestos-contaminated talc in common household products like baby powder, cosmetics, and deodorants.



Legal action has helped hold negligent companies accountable, and courts are recognizing the dangers of asbestos-tainted talcum powder. While financial compensation can’t undo the damage, it can help cover medical bills, lost wages, ongoing treatments, and long-term care, providing much-needed relief for affected families.



What You Can Do If You’ve Been Exposed to Talcum Powder



If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma and suspect talcum powder exposure, take these steps:



1. Seek Medical Attention



If you’ve used talcum powder regularly and are experiencing symptoms like persistent cough, chest pain, or difficulty breathing, consult a mesothelioma specialist. Early diagnosis improves treatment options.



2. Preserve Evidence



If you have old talc-based products, keep them. These can be tested for asbestos contamination and used as evidence in legal claims.



3. Contact a Mesothelioma Lawyer



Legal experts specializing in asbestos-related lawsuits can help determine if you qualify for compensation. Many mesothelioma victims have received substantial settlements to cover medical expenses and provide financial relief.



At Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, we help victims and families navigate their legal rights and seek justice. If you or a loved one has been affected by asbestos-contaminated talcum powder, contact us today to explore your legal options.



Legal Disclaimer



The information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### The Role of OSHA in Protecting Workers from Asbestos Exposure: How Effective Are Regulations?

Asbestos exposure remains a significant workplace hazard in the U.S., with thousands of workers still at risk despite strict regulations. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is responsible for enforcing asbestos safety standards, aiming to protect workers in industries like construction, shipbuilding, and manufacturing. However, gaps in enforcement and employer negligence continue to put lives at risk. If you've been exposed to asbestos on the job, seeking help from an asbestos law firm can be crucial in securing compensation and justice.



OSHA and Its Role in Asbestos Regulation



OSHA was established in 1970 to enforce workplace safety standards, including protections against asbestos exposure. Over the decades, it has introduced strict guidelines to limit asbestos exposure, requiring employers to monitor air quality, provide protective equipment, and train workers on asbestos hazards.



Historically, OSHA’s asbestos regulations evolved in response to mounting evidence linking asbestos to mesothelioma, lung cancer, and other deadly diseases. Regulations were strengthened in the 1980s and 1990s, setting permissible exposure limits (PEL) and mandating employer responsibilities. Despite these efforts, cases of workplace asbestos exposure persist, often due to weak enforcement and corporate negligence.



Current OSHA Asbestos Regulations and Workplace Standards







OSHA enforces asbestos standards in high-risk industries, including construction, shipbuilding, manufacturing, and auto repair, where workers face exposure from older buildings, ship insulation, industrial materials, and vehicle parts.



Key safety standards include:




Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL): No more than 0.1 fiber per cubic centimeter over an 8-hour shift.



Exposure Monitoring: Employers must regularly test air quality.



Training & Protective Gear: Workers must receive asbestos safety training and proper protective equipment.




Despite these regulations, inconsistent enforcement continues to leave workers at risk.



How Effective Are OSHA’s Asbestos Regulations?



Despite OSHA’s regulations, asbestos-related diseases continue to emerge, often decades after exposure. Loopholes and lax enforcement leave workers at risk, as seen in:




New York construction sites, where contractors ignore asbestos removal rules.



Virginia shipyards, where workers still develop mesothelioma despite safety measures.



California auto shops, where asbestos-containing brake pads remain in use.




Key enforcement challenges include employer noncompliance, limited OSHA inspections, and lack of worker awareness. Stronger enforcement and legal action are crucial to holding negligent companies accountable.



Industries and Jobs Still at Risk for Asbestos Exposure



Despite the U.S. banning most asbestos products, millions of workers remain at risk, especially in industries tied to older infrastructure:




Construction: Renovations expose workers to asbestos in old buildings.



Shipyards: Older ships still contain asbestos insulation.



Manufacturing: Industrial workers handle asbestos in heat-resistant materials and auto parts.



First Responders: Firefighters and emergency crews risk inhaling asbestos in collapsing structures.




Aging buildings in cities like Boston, Chicago, and Philadelphia further increase workplace exposure risks, highlighting the need for stricter safety enforcement.



Legal Options for Workers Exposed to Asbestos







If you or a loved one has been exposed to asbestos due to OSHA violations or employer negligence, legal action may be your best course of action.



How Violations Strengthen Mesothelioma Lawsuits



If an employer violated asbestos laws and regulations and workers developed mesothelioma, this strengthens their legal claim. Attorneys use OSHA records, workplace safety reports, and employee testimonies to build strong cases.



Compensation Through Asbestos Trust Funds



Many asbestos companies have gone bankrupt but set up trust funds to compensate victims. An experienced asbestos law firm can help workers file claims against these multi-billion-dollar trust funds.



The Role of Mesothelioma Lawyers



A mesothelioma lawyer helps workers and families:




File lawsuits against negligent employers



Secure settlements from asbestos manufacturers



Claim benefits from asbestos trust funds



Navigate complex legal procedures




For those affected, legal action can provide financial relief for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering.



Protecting Your Rights After Asbestos Exposure



At Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, we’ve seen firsthand how OSHA’s asbestos regulations have helped reduce workplace exposure. However, enforcement challenges still leave too many workers vulnerable. Industries like construction, shipbuilding, and manufacturing continue to report asbestos-related illnesses, showing that worker protection gaps remain.



If you or a loved one has been exposed to asbestos, we are here to help. Our team connects victims with top mesothelioma lawyers who fight for justice. Whether it’s filing a claim against a negligent employer or seeking compensation from asbestos trust funds, we’ll guide you every step of the way. Don’t wait—protect your rights and your future with us today.



Legal Disclaimer



The information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### Mesothelioma Lawsuit, Delayed by COVID Restrictions, Permitted to Move Forward

Victoria Pawlowski was diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma in 2018. She attributed her illness to asbestos exposure from talc-based cosmetic products she’d used and subsequently filed a lawsuit in 2021 against Estee Lauder and other talc companies. The cosmetic company moved to have the case dismissed, arguing that her claim had missed the statutory deadlines imposed for personal injury cases. However, Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York County denied the motion, agreeing with the victim that the date of her official diagnosis and the extension of the statute of limitations imposed by New York’s governor during the COVID-19 pandemic, applied to her claim. 







Court Rejects Estee Lauder’s Attempt to Dismiss Mesothelioma Lawsuit 



In New York, plaintiffs who suffer a personal injury, including a mesothelioma diagnosis, must file any legal claim within three years of discovering their injury or when they reasonably should have discovered it. This period is known as a statute of limitations. For Mrs. Pawlowski, a November 2017 surgery following an ectopic pregnancy revealed a nodule that was identified as peritoneal mesothelioma in February 2018. Estee Lauder argued that this would have required her to file suit by February 2021 and that her filing in July 2021 was too late. 



Mrs. Pawlowski argued that New York’s tolling, or extension of the statute of limitations during the COVID pandemic, permitted her the additional time she took before filing her mesothelioma claim. She also said that her mesothelioma had not been confirmed until February 2019 or, at the earliest, November 2018, and submitted biopsy reports indicating that in November 2017, the nodule had been considered too isolated and inconclusive. She also provided the multiple potential diagnoses she’d received before mesothelioma was mentioned as a possibility in January 2018.



Judge Denies Request to Dismiss Mesothelioma Lawsuit



The cosmetic giant moved to have the mesothelioma claim against them dismissed, noting that she had filed other asbestos-related lawsuits during the same period, Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York County denied their petition.  He noted that New York courts had consistently upheld the tolling order’s validity, and clarified that the tolling period ended when the Executive Order was signed on November 3, 2020, adding an extra 228 days to the filing deadline. Under this extension, Mrs. Pawlowski’s deadline to file was pushed to August 26, 2021—well beyond the date she submitted her lawsuit.

### The Link Between Mesothelioma and Household Asbestos Exposure: Risks for Family Members

When we think of asbestos exposure, we often picture workers in construction, shipbuilding, and manufacturing. However, many families across the U.S. have unknowingly been exposed to asbestos through their loved ones. This secondary exposure can be just as dangerous as direct workplace exposure, leading to devastating illnesses like mesothelioma. If your family has been affected, an experienced asbestos law firm can help you explore your legal options.



What Is Secondary Asbestos Exposure?



Secondary asbestos exposure, also known as take-home exposure, occurs when asbestos fibers are transported from the workplace to the home. Unlike direct exposure, where workers inhale fibers on-site, secondary exposure happens through indirect contact with contaminated materials.



Common Scenarios of Secondary Exposure:




Laundering Work Clothes: Asbestos fibers cling to clothing, and washing these garments can release microscopic fibers into the air.



Physical Contact: Hugging a family member after work or sitting on furniture with contaminated clothing can transfer fibers.



Household Dust and Airborne Exposure: Asbestos fibers can settle in carpets, upholstery, and air vents, remaining a long-term risk.



Home Renovations: Older homes built before the 1980s may contain asbestos in insulation, flooring, and ceiling tiles. Renovation projects can disturb these materials and expose family members to harmful dust.




Health Risks for Family Members







Even minimal asbestos exposure can cause serious health issues. Once inhaled, asbestos fibers can remain in the lungs for decades before symptoms appear.



Mesothelioma and Other Asbestos-Related Diseases:




Mesothelioma: An aggressive cancer affecting the lungs, abdomen, or heart, often impacting spouses and children of exposed workers.



Lung Cancer: A well-documented risk, even for non-smokers exposed to asbestos.



Asbestosis: A chronic lung disease causing scarring, breathing difficulties, and reduced lung function.




Scientific Studies and Case Reports:



Research confirms a strong link between household asbestos exposure and mesothelioma. Studies show that spouses of high-risk workers have significantly higher mesothelioma rates. Legal cases have also revealed that many companies failed to warn workers about the dangers of take-home asbestos exposure.



Common Occupations That Put Families at Risk



Certain industries have historically exposed workers to high levels of asbestos, unknowingly putting their families at risk.



Jobs Linked to Secondary Asbestos Exposure:




Construction Workers: Frequently handled asbestos in insulation, drywall, and cement.



Shipyard Workers: Navy veterans and shipbuilders faced prolonged exposure from vessel components.



Factory and Manufacturing Workers: Textile mills, refineries, and industrial plants used asbestos-containing materials.



Auto Mechanics: Brake pads and clutches contained asbestos, increasing the risk of bringing fibers home.



Electricians and Plumbers: Exposure occurred through asbestos insulation and pipe coatings in homes and buildings.




Legal Rights and Compensation for Secondary Exposure Victims







If you or a loved one has developed mesothelioma due to secondary asbestos exposure, you have legal options.



Can Family Members File a Mesothelioma Lawsuit?



Yes, family members affected by secondary asbestos exposure can file claims against negligent companies. Many lawsuits have resulted in significant compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering.



Successful Cases of Secondary Exposure Compensation:




Spouses of Workers: Many mesothelioma claims have been won by spouses who inhaled asbestos fibers from their partner’s work clothes.



Children Exposed at Home: Some cases involve individuals who were exposed as children, only to develop mesothelioma decades later.



Wrongful Death Claims: If a loved one has passed away from asbestos-related disease, families may pursue wrongful death lawsuits.




Asbestos Trust Funds:



Bankrupt asbestos companies were required to set up trust funds to compensate victims. These funds help ensure that individuals affected by secondary exposure receive financial support.



Preventing Household Asbestos Exposure



While asbestos use has declined, the risk remains in older buildings and workplaces. Families can take proactive steps in preventing asbestos exposure by following safety measures at home and ensuring proper precautions in workplaces.



Safety Measures for Workers:




Change clothes and shower before returning home.



Use job-site decontamination stations when available.



Avoid bringing work clothes home—use employer-provided laundry services.




Home Protection Tips:




Be cautious during home renovations—hire professionals for asbestos testing and removal.



Regularly clean and vacuum with HEPA filters to reduce dust.



If your home was built before the 1980s, have an inspection for asbestos-containing materials.




Get the Legal Support You Deserve



If you or a loved one has suffered from mesothelioma due to secondary asbestos exposure, legal help is available. The Mesothelioma Lawyer Center connects families with top asbestos law firms across the U.S. to fight for justice and compensation. Our experienced legal partners understand the complexities of asbestos cases and are dedicated to securing the financial support victims deserve. Free case evaluation for asbestos exposure.



Legal Disclaimer



The information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### Johnson & Johnson’s Appeal of $45 Million Mesothelioma Verdict Denied

It’s been almost a year since an Illinois jury heard the details of Theresa Garcia’s mesothelioma and her family’s plea for justice. After reviewing significant testimony and evidence, the jury agreed with her survivors that her death had been caused by exposure to asbestos in Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder. They ordered the company to pay $45 million in damages. Though the company requested a new trial, judges denied their appeal, saying that the plaintiffs’ presentation had been appropriate and that issues the company raised as prejudicial did not affect the jury’s decision.







Asbestos in J&J Baby Powder Blamed for Mesothelioma Death



In their quest for justice, Theresa Garcia’s widower and six children presented the jury with evidence that her mesothelioma death followed a lifetime of using Johnson & Johnson’s talc-based product, as well as having used it on her children. The jury saw evidence that the popular powder contained asbestos fibers, as well as that the company had been aware of its presence and failed to act to protect or warn her of its dangers.



Remarkably, the $45 million award handed down by the jury came after the company had offered the family a significant amount to settle the case out of court. The family rejected the offer because it had strings attached – their assent would have required that all of their law firm’s pending asbestos claims, and any others that might be raised in the next ten years, be settled at the same time.  Johnson & Johnson also required that the family issue a statement indicating that the company had done nothing wrong. The family rejected the offer, and a short time later got word of the $45 million verdict.



New Mesothelioma Trial Would Have Further Delayed Justice



In rejecting Johnson & Johnson’s request for a new trial, the appeals court provided the mesothelioma victim’s family long-awaited justice. Their original claim was filed shortly after she died in 2020, but through a series of legal maneuvers, the company delayed having her case heard. Had the new trial been ordered, it could have been many more years before the family could get closure and move forward in their new life without their wife and mother.

### $25 Million Awarded to Philadelphia Asbestosis Victim

Like many victims of mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases, Richard Daciw worked with asbestos in various occupational settings throughout his life. After being diagnosed with asbestosis, he and his wife filed a legal claim against the companies that exposed him to the toxic mineral and recently were awarded $25 million in damages by a Philadelphia jury.







Man’s Asbestosis Blamed on Years of Asbestos Exposure



Over the course of ten days, a Pennsylvania jury heard the details of Mr. Daciw’s years-long asbestos exposure. From 1965 to 1969 he had served in the U.S. Navy as a fireman and shipfitter. He then worked as a maintenance mechanic from 1969 to 1972 and as a pipefitter and welder for Domino Sugar from 1972 to 1983. Following those jobs he went on to work as a welder at Allied Chemical in 1983 and then served in maintenance roles at Smith Kline from 1983 to 2004.



The original asbestos claim filed by Mr. Daciw and his wife named 55 separate defendants, but by the time the case got to court there was only one remaining: John Crane, Inc. In addition to learning about the various exposures he suffered and the asbestos in the various gaskets, packing, pumps, and other equipment he worked with, the jury also heard extensive testimony about how the 76-year-old’s physical condition had deteriorated, leaving him with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and diabetes. He was fully oxygen-dependent.



$25 Million Jury Verdict Represents Significant Increase



In previous years, victims who have pursued compensation following an asbestosis diagnosis have won their cases but have been awarded significantly less in damages than is the case with mesothelioma victims.  The last asbestosis case that went to a jury in Philadelphia saw the victim awarded $957,000, and the case before that ended with a verdict of $3.8 million. However, neither of those victims was in the same severe physical state that Mr. Daciw was. The attorneys who represented him believe that his significant disability played a large role in the compensation that the jury awarded.

### Can Asbestos Exposure Affect Future Generations? Understanding Genetic and Epigenetic Risks

Asbestos exposure has long been linked to devastating health conditions, particularly mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis. But could the effects of asbestos extend beyond those directly exposed? Emerging research suggests that asbestos exposure may have genetic and epigenetic consequences that could impact future generations. If you or a loved one has been exposed, consulting an asbestos attorney can help protect your family's legal rights.







Can Asbestos Exposure Be Passed Down Genetically?



While asbestos-related diseases like mesothelioma develop due to prolonged exposure, the question remains—can these risks be inherited? Scientists are exploring how asbestos affects DNA and whether it causes changes that could be passed down to children, potentially increasing mesothelioma risk for future generations.



Direct vs. Inherited Risks



Asbestos fibers cause inflammation and cellular damage, leading to DNA mutations over time. While these mutations raise an individual's disease risk, they don’t necessarily alter the genetic code passed to offspring.



Genetic vs. Epigenetic Changes



Direct DNA mutations are less likely to be inherited, but environmental epigenetics—modifications that affect gene expression due to external exposures, can be passed down. These changes don’t alter DNA itself but can turn genes "on" or "off," potentially predisposing future generations to disease.



Scientific Studies on Multi-Generational Effects



Although research is ongoing, studies on other toxins (such as radiation and lead) show that harmful exposures can lead to inherited vulnerabilities. Scientists are now investigating whether asbestos exposure has similar multi-generational effects.



Epigenetics and Asbestos: How Exposure Can Influence Future Generations







Epigenetics examines how environmental factors influence gene expression. Toxins like asbestos can imprint DNA, potentially affecting future generations.




Epigenetic Changes from Exposure: Harmful substances can alter DNA methylation, histone modification, and microRNA expression, impacting gene function.



Comparisons to Other Toxins: Studies on radiation, lead, and tobacco show epigenetic effects that persist for generations. If asbestos has similar effects, descendants may face higher risks of lung disease and immune dysfunction.



Multi-Generational Health Risks: Beyond lung damage, asbestos exposure may weaken the immune system, increase inflammation, and heighten disease susceptibility in future generations.




What This Means for Families of Asbestos Victims



If a parent or grandparent was exposed to asbestos, should their descendants be concerned? While science is still evolving, there are several factors to consider.



Increased Health Risks



Studies suggest that children of asbestos-exposed workers may face a higher risk of respiratory diseases due to secondary exposure, such as inhaling fibers brought home on work clothes. If epigenetic changes are confirmed, future generations could be at risk even without direct exposure.



Prenatal and Early-Life Exposure



Babies exposed in utero or through breast milk may undergo developmental changes that increase their susceptibility to diseases later in life.



Preventative Measures



Families with a history of asbestos exposure can take proactive steps, including regular medical screenings, genetic counseling, and lifestyle adjustments to minimize additional risk factors.



Legal and Medical Options for Families







For families affected by asbestos exposure, understanding legal rights and medical options is crucial.




Seeking Compensation for Generational Harm: Can the children of asbestos victims file claims? Some legal precedents suggest that if asbestos exposure led to a direct health impact on descendants, they may have grounds for compensation. An experienced asbestos attorney can evaluate these cases.



Legal Claims for Affected Family Members: Many asbestos-related lawsuits focus on workplace exposure, but secondary exposure cases where fibers were brought home on clothing due to inadequate workplace protection are also recognized. Legal experts can help determine eligibility for claims.



Resources for Genetic Counseling and Medical Monitoring: Those with a family history of asbestos-related diseases may benefit from genetic counseling and early screening programs to detect potential health risks before symptoms appear.




Preventing Asbestos Exposure for Future Generations



While past asbestos exposure cannot be reversed, families and communities can take steps to prevent future harm.




Removing Asbestos Safely: Many older U.S. homes, schools, and buildings still contain asbestos. Proper abatement and removal are essential.



Workplace Protections: High-risk industries like construction and shipbuilding must enforce strict safety measures, including protective gear and decontamination.



Stronger Regulations: Public advocacy can help push for stricter asbestos bans and better policies to safeguard future generations.




Protect Your Family’s Future



As scientific research continues to reveal the long-term impacts of asbestos exposure, we at the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center know how important it is for families to stay vigilant. Whether you need medical advice, genetic counseling, or legal assistance, taking proactive steps now can help safeguard your family's future. If asbestos exposure has affected your loved ones, we’re here to provide the guidance and support you need. We at Mesothelioma Lawyer Center can fight for justice and secure the resources your family deserves.



Legal DisclaimerThe information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### Asbestos in Schools: Hidden Risks and Legal Options for Teachers and Staff

Asbestos in schools is a hidden danger that many teachers, staff, and students may not realize they're facing. Across the U.S., thousands of older school buildings still contain asbestos in insulation, ceiling tiles, and flooring. When disturbed, asbestos fibers can become airborne — putting educators at risk of inhaling toxic particles that cause serious health issues decades later. If you've been exposed, consulting with an asbestos lawyer can help you understand your rights and potential legal options.



For those who dedicate their lives to education, the classroom should be a place of safety — not sickness. Yet, asbestos exposure has led to mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis among teachers and staff. Knowing your legal options is the first step toward seeking compensation. An experienced asbestos lawyer can help you fight for the justice you deserve.



The Silent Threat: Asbestos in School Buildings



Schools built before the 1980s often contain asbestos in school buildings within insulation, ceiling tiles, floor tiles, and even heating systems. While asbestos isn't dangerous when intact, it becomes a health issue when materials deteriorate or are disturbed during renovations or maintenance work. Many educators are unknowingly exposed during simple classroom repairs or when heating systems release asbestos fibers into the air.



Real-life incidents have shown how widespread the problem is. In 2019, more than 200 school buildings in Philadelphia were closed due to asbestos contamination, leaving teachers and staff worried about their long-term health effects. These cases highlight how outdated infrastructure continues to put educators at risk.



Health Risks for Teachers and Staff







Long-term asbestos exposure can lead to serious illnesses such as mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis. Teachers, janitors, maintenance workers, and administrators who spend decades working in older school buildings face a higher risk of developing these diseases.



Studies have shown that educators are among the professions most vulnerable to asbestos-related illnesses. Cases like Charles W., a former school janitor diagnosed with mesothelioma after years of repairing asbestos-laden pipes, demonstrate how devastating occupational exposure can be. These illnesses often take decades to appear, making early exposure even more dangerous.



Are Schools Meeting Safety Standards?



The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) introduced the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) in 1986, requiring schools to inspect asbestos-containing materials and create management plans. However, enforcement of these regulations remains inconsistent. Tight budgets and lack of resources in many public school districts often lead to neglected safety protocols.



Violations of asbestos safety laws are common, especially in older schools struggling with funding. While school districts are legally responsible for maintaining asbestos materials safely, many cases reveal that regular inspections and proper removal practices are not always followed—leaving staff and students exposed.



Legal Options and Compensation for Affected Educators



If you believe your health has been impacted by asbestos exposure at work, you have the legal right to seek compensation. Asbestos lawyers specialize in representing teachers and staff exposed to asbestos in the workplace. Victims may be eligible to file lawsuits against negligent school districts or asbestos product manufacturers.



Several high-profile lawsuits have resulted in significant settlements for educators suffering from asbestos-related diseases. Additionally, asbestos trust funds—established by bankrupt asbestos manufacturers—offer billions of dollars in compensation for victims. An experienced asbestos lawyer can help navigate the complex claims process and secure the compensation you deserve.



Protecting Yourself and Your Students







If you work in an older school, staying informed and proactive is crucial. Here’s how you can protect yourself and your students:




Learn to identify signs of asbestos-containing materials, such as crumbling ceiling tiles or damaged insulation.



Report any suspected asbestos hazards to your school administration immediately.



Demand written asbestos management plans from your school district under AHERA regulations.



Encourage regular inspections and advocate for asbestos removal projects in your building.



Seek regular health check-ups if you've been working in an older building for several years.




Standing Up for Safer Schools



No teacher, staff member, or student should have to face asbestos exposure in their place of learning. We all deserve safe environments where health isn't put at risk. Staying informed about asbestos dangers in schools is the first step toward creating safer classrooms. If we suspect asbestos exposure in our schools, it's up to us to take action — report hazards, demand proper safety measures, and encourage others to speak out.



If you or a loved one has been exposed to asbestos, the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center is here to support you. We can help you explore your legal rights and fight for the compensation you deserve.



Legal Disclaimer



The information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### Asbestos on Stepfather’s Work Clothes Blamed for Man’s Mesothelioma

Occupational asbestos exposure has led to countless cases of malignant mesothelioma, and it is becoming increasingly apparent that its impact goes beyond those who work directly with the carcinogenic mineral. Many people who have been diagnosed with asbestos-related diseases have no personal exposure to asbestos and trace their illness to the toxic fibers being carried into their homes by loved ones. This is known as secondary exposure, and it is the basis for David Gomez’ recently filed personal injury lawsuit.







Man’s Mesothelioma Lawsuit Links Illness to Stepfather’s Exposure



In the mesothelioma lawsuit he filed against 3M Company, Huntington Ingalls, Incorporated (Avondale Shipyard), Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and others, David Gomez says that asbestos carried into his childhood home on his stepfather’s work clothes was responsible for his diagnosis with the rare asbestos-related disease. He is seeking compensation from each of those companies for their failure to warn against the dangers of secondary exposure so that he could be protected.



In response to his claim filed in the Orleans Parish Civil District Court, two of the defendants — Avondale and Hopeman — filed a motion to have the claim removed to federal court based on their status as defense government contractors. Mr. Gomez filed a motion to stop both companies from using this defense, noting the difference between its application to those working directly with their products and those exposed to carry-home asbestos.



Asbestos Companies’ Petition Denied by Judge Hearing Mesothelioma Claim



Each of the asbestos companies challenged Mr. Gomez’s argument, with Avondale arguing that his request was premature and Hopeman asserting that their bankruptcy proceeding protected them from the argument. In Avondale’s case, the judges denied the company’s request, agreeing that there was no entitlement to immunity in a secondary exposure case. In Hopeman’s case, the judge denied the victim’s request but did so with prejudice so that the victim could pursue the claim again once the company had completed its bankruptcy process.

### Shipyard’s Personnel Records Ordered Released by Judge Overseeing Mesothelioma Lawsuit

Brenda Palermo died of malignant mesothelioma in March of 2024, but her family is continuing her quest for justice. They have assumed responsibility for her legal battle against Avondale Shipyards, and recently prevailed in an important petition: They convinced the judge hearing the case to order the company to release the personnel records of several of the woman’s family members.







Secondary Asbestos Exposure Blamed for Woman’s Mesothelioma Death



In her claim against Avondale, Ms. Palermo had argued that her mesothelioma was caused by exposure to asbestos fibers carried into her home by family members who worked for the shipyard. Included among Avondale’s former employees were her father, uncle, and cousins – the last two, Valmont and Glen Landry, are now deceased, and without their testimony as to where they had worked within the shipyard, the family needed their employment records to establish their job responsibilities and asbestos exposures.



When the family members requested this information, the shipyard refused to provide it, arguing that the information was confidential and might make them vulnerable to future lawsuits filed by the cousins’ family members. Ms. Palermo’s survivors then turned to Magistrate Judge Janis Van Meerveld of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana for help.



Judge Rules in Favor of Mesothelioma Victim’s Family 



In response to the petition from the mesothelioma victim’s family, the judge reviewed the relevant law and then ordered Avondale to provide details from the company’s personnel files, to include the men’s employment dates, job roles, work locations, asbestos exposure, and coworkers’ names. She asserted that if any confidential information was present in the records, it could be redacted. With this ruling, the family will receive the necessary records, and the case will proceed in their pursuit of justice.

### Asbestos Wrongful Death Claims Explained: A Complete Guide for Families

Mesothelioma isn’t just a diagnosis—it’s the result of years of asbestos exposure that could have been prevented. For decades, workers in shipyards, factories, and construction sites were put at risk without proper protection. Your family may be able to pursue legal recourse if a loved one contracted mesothelioma as a result of asbestos exposure.







This is where asbestos wrongful death claims come in. These legal claims allow families to hold companies accountable for their actions and seek financial compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and the emotional toll of losing someone too soon. And even if exposure happened decades ago, legal options may still be available due to the long time it takes for asbestos-related diseases to develop.



Who Can File an Asbestos Wrongful Death Claim?



Each state has specific laws regarding who can file a wrongful death claim, but typically, the following individuals are eligible:




Spouses – The most common claimants, as they suffer both financial and emotional loss, including the loss of companionship and support.



Children – Dependent children, including minors and sometimes adult children, can seek compensation for the financial and emotional impact of losing a parent.



Parents – If a deceased victim was unmarried and had no children, parents may file a claim to recover damages for funeral costs and emotional distress.



Estate Representatives – Some states allow the executor of the deceased’s estate to file on behalf of beneficiaries, ensuring compensation is distributed appropriately.




Since asbestos wrongful death laws vary by state and have strict filing deadlines, it’s crucial to work with an experienced mesothelioma lawyer who understands the specific regulations in your area and can help maximize your claim.



Compensation Available for Families







Compensation from a wrongful death claim can help alleviate the financial burden caused by a loved one’s passing. Families may recover damages for:




Medical expenses related to mesothelioma treatment, including hospital stays, medications, and specialized care.



Lost wages and future earnings the deceased would have provided, ensuring financial stability for dependents.



Pain and suffering experienced by the victim before passing, acknowledging the physical and emotional toll of the disease.



Loss of companionship and support for spouses and children, covering emotional distress and the absence of guidance.



Funeral and burial costs, including memorial services and any outstanding medical bills related to end-of-life care.




Some claims result in settlements, while others go to trial, depending on the circumstances. Additionally, families may be eligible for compensation from asbestos trust funds, which were established by bankrupt companies to pay victims and their surviving loved ones. Seeking legal guidance can help families navigate these options effectively.



How to File an Asbestos Wrongful Death Claim







The process of filing an asbestos wrongful death claim can be complex, but taking the right steps ensures your family’s rights are protected:




Consult a Mesothelioma Lawyer – An attorney with experience in asbestos cases can determine eligibility and guide you through the legal process.



Gather Evidence – Medical records, employment history, and witness testimonies help prove asbestos exposure and its link to the disease.



File the Claim – Your lawyer will file the wrongful death lawsuit against responsible parties, including former employers, asbestos manufacturers, or trust funds.



Negotiate a Settlement or Proceed to Trial – Many asbestos cases result in settlements, but if necessary, your lawyer will fight for your rights in court.



Receive Compensation – If the case is successful, your family will receive financial compensation to help cover losses.




Since each state has different statutes of limitations, it’s essential to act quickly to avoid losing your right to file a claim.



Seeking Justice for Your Loved One



Losing a loved one to mesothelioma is heartbreaking, and no amount of compensation can truly replace what was lost. However, holding responsible parties accountable can provide a sense of justice and much-needed financial security for your family’s future. Mesothelioma Lawyer Center has helped families across the country navigate the complex legal process, securing the compensation they deserve. If your loved one’s asbestos exposure led to their illness, don’t wait—time limits apply to these claims. Contact us today to explore your legal options and take the first step toward justice.







Legal DisclaimerThe information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### How are people still being diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2025?

Breathing should be effortless, but for those diagnosed with asbestosis and its long-term effects, every breath can be a challenge. This chronic lung disease, caused by long-term exposure to asbestos fibers, develops slowly but can have devastating consequences over time. While asbestos use has declined over the years, countless workers in industries like construction, shipbuilding, and manufacturing were unknowingly exposed—only to face the effects decades later.



Asbestosis and its long-term effects don’t just impact lung function; they can also increase the risk of mesothelioma and other severe illnesses. For many patients and their families, understanding the disease and knowing where to turn for medical and legal support is critical.



How Asbestosis Develops Over Time



Asbestosis develops when tiny asbestos fibers are inhaled and become lodged in the lung tissue. Over time, the body attempts to fight these foreign particles, leading to inflammation and scarring (fibrosis). This scarring stiffens the lungs, making it difficult to breathe and limiting oxygen intake.



Symptoms of asbestosis may take decades to appear, with most cases surfacing 10 to 40 years after initial exposure. Some common signs include:




Shortness of breath, especially after physical activity



Persistent dry cough



Chest pain or tightness



Clubbing of the fingers (a sign of low oxygen levels)



Unexplained weight loss




Asbestosis is progressive, meaning symptoms worsen over time. For many patients, everyday activities such as walking or climbing stairs become increasingly difficult, severely impacting their quality of life.



The Long-Term Health Implications







Living with asbestosis means facing several long-term health risks, many of which can be life-threatening, including respiratory failure, chronic lung infections, heart complications, and an increased risk of developing mesothelioma or lung cancer over time.



Increased Risk of Lung Cancer and Mesothelioma



While asbestosis itself is not cancerous, individuals with this condition have a significantly higher risk of developing lung cancer and mesothelioma. Mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer that affects the lining of the lungs, heart, or abdomen. The latency period for mesothelioma can be even longer than for asbestosis, with symptoms appearing 20 to 50 years after exposure.



Respiratory Failure and Complications



As asbestosis progresses, lung function deteriorates. This can lead to respiratory failure, a condition where the lungs can no longer provide sufficient oxygen to the body. Many patients eventually require supplemental oxygen therapy, and some may develop pulmonary hypertension, a type of high blood pressure that affects the lungs and heart.



Impact on Daily Life and Mental Health



Beyond the physical toll, asbestosis can take a significant emotional and psychological toll on patients and their families. Chronic breathlessness and fatigue can make even simple tasks exhausting, leading to frustration, depression, and anxiety. Many patients experience a loss of independence, requiring assistance with daily activities.



Seeking Medical and Legal Help



Medical Treatment Options







While there is no cure for asbestosis, treatments can help manage symptoms and slow the disease’s progression. Doctors may recommend:




Pulmonary rehabilitation to improve lung function



Medications such as bronchodilators to ease breathing



Oxygen therapy for those with severe cases



Lifestyle changes, including quitting smoking and avoiding lung irritants




Regular check-ups with a pulmonologist are essential for monitoring the disease and addressing complications as they arise.



Legal Rights for Asbestosis Patients



Many individuals diagnosed with asbestosis were unknowingly exposed to asbestos in the workplace. Companies that failed to protect workers from asbestos exposure may be held legally responsible. If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with asbestosis, you may be eligible for compensation to cover medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.



The Mesothelioma Lawyer Center helps victims of asbestos-related diseases navigate their legal options. We connect individuals with experienced attorneys who specialize in asbestos litigation and can help secure the financial support they deserve.



Moving Forward with Support



A diagnosis of asbestosis can be overwhelming, but with the right medical care, lifestyle adjustments, and legal assistance, patients can improve their quality of life. If you or a loved one is living with asbestosis, don’t hesitate to seek help. Whether it’s finding a specialist for treatment, accessing financial support, or exploring your legal rights, resources are available to guide you.



At the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, we are committed to standing by asbestosis patients and their families, ensuring they receive the justice and compensation they deserve. Reach out to us today to learn more about how we can help you navigate this difficult journey.







Legal DisclaimerThe information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.











https://youtube.com/shorts/Nfn5lQ9VNWQ?feature=share




Mesothelioma may sound like a disease from the past, but thousands of people are still being diagnosed each year. In this video, we explain why asbestos exposure remains a present-day threat—despite widespread awareness and regulation. You’ll discover how asbestos still lingers in old homes, schools, factories, and military buildings, and why symptoms of mesothelioma can take decades to develop.

### Asbestos in Safety Gloves Blamed for Mesothelioma Death

Warren Stouch died of malignant mesothelioma in July 2021, but before his death he filed a personal injury lawsuit against Magid Glove and Safety Manufacturer, accusing the company of negligence and blaming asbestos in the company’s safety gloves for having caused his terminal illness.







After Settlement Negotiations Fail, Glove Company Tries to Have Mesothelioma Lawsuit Dismissed



The lawsuit that Mr. Stouch filed against the glove company cited his years of wearing their branded kitchen gloves, first from 1957 to 1959 while working at the Albany Sheraton Ten Eyck Hotel, and later from 1981 to 1989 at St. Thomas of Villanova in Philadelphia. The former food industry worker wore the gloves to protect him from heat and flame, unaware that the asbestos they contained was deadly.



The mesothelioma lawsuit was filed in February 2020 but was delayed due to the global pandemic, and after Mr. Stouch died his estate took the case on. When a settlement attempt failed, the company filed a motion to have the case dismissed. Their petition relied on their company representative having submitted an affidavit that contradicted the victim’s deposition testimony about the gloves having borne the company’s name.



Judge Denies Motion for Summary Judgment in Mesothelioma Claim



Though Magid’s attorney argued that the affidavit indicated that their name had not been on their gloves and that the mesothelioma victim’s deposition was wrong, the judge denied their petition. Supreme Court Justice Justin Corcoran noted that the affidavit that they pointed to feel short of what was required for a motion for summary judgment to be granted.



In his ruling, Justice Corcoran said that because the affidavit from the company’s representative had relied on unspecified documents that had not been submitted as evidence, the company had failed to prove that their gloves could not have caused Mr. Stouch’s death. The case will go on for a jury to decide.

### Talc Used in Medical Procedure Blamed for Man’s Mesothelioma

In 2014 and again in 2020, Salt Lake City, Utah resident Bryce Zundel underwent a talc pleurodesis. A year after the second procedure, he was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma. He has now filed suit against the companies that supplied, packaged, marketed, and distributed the talc used in his procedure, accusing them of failing to warn about the dangers of their product.







Talc Pleurodesis Procedure Blamed for Development of Mesothelioma Tumors



Talc pleurodesis is a medical procedure that uses sterile talc powder to induce inflammation and adhesion of the pleura. It is frequently prescribed for patients suffering from recurring collapsed lung issues, as well as for the pleural effusions that are frequent symptoms of malignant mesothelioma.



In Mr. Zundel’s case, his talc pleurodesis was not administered in response to a mesothelioma diagnosis, but in his claim filed in Massachusetts state court, he argues that it ended up causing him to develop the fatal form of cancer’s tumors. His claim includes statements from his physicians noting that they had observed “talc aggregations covering most of the lower lobe surface as well as the posterior parietal pleura, diaphragmatic surface, and pericardial surfaces.



Talc Companies Named in Mesothelioma Lawsuit



The mesothelioma victim is accusing Amerilure, Inc., Boston Medical Products, Inc., and Cimbar Performance Minerals, as well as Lymol Medical Corporation and Sciarra Laboratories, of negligence in their duty to use and exercise reasonable and due care. It also cites the failure to provide detailed and adequate warnings about the dangers of the talc that they were providing.



It is unusual for mesothelioma to be caused by talc used in a medical procedure, and it is a cause for significant concern. Mr. Zundel’s lawsuit seeks compensation for the dramatic reduction in his life expectancy, as well as reimbursement for his medical expenses, mental and physical pain and suffering, and impairment in enjoyment of life. Compensation is also being requested on behalf of his family members.

### Navigating Mesothelioma Compensation Claims for Families of Victims

No one ever expects a mesothelioma diagnosis to turn their world upside down. Yet, for many families, the reality of this asbestos-related cancer brings overwhelming emotional and financial challenges. As medical bills pile up and work becomes impossible, the need for financial relief becomes urgent. The good news? Compensation isn’t just a possibility—it’s a right for those who have suffered due to asbestos exposure. Whether you’re seeking justice for yourself or a loved one, understanding mesothelioma compensation claims can make all the difference in securing the support you deserve.



Types of Compensation Available



When filing for mesothelioma compensation, it’s important to understand the different types of claims available, as each offers unique benefits depending on the circumstances of exposure and diagnosis. Navigating the legal process can be complex, but having a clear understanding of your options ensures that victims and their families can pursue the maximum compensation possible. Whether seeking damages for medical costs, lost income, or emotional suffering, knowing which type of claim best suits your situation is the first step toward securing financial justice.



1. Personal Injury Claims







Victims diagnosed with mesothelioma can file a personal injury lawsuit against asbestos manufacturers, employers, or other responsible parties. These claims seek compensation for medical bills, pain and suffering, and lost income.



2. Wrongful Death Claims



If a loved one has passed away due to mesothelioma, surviving family members can file a wrongful death claim. This type of claim covers funeral costs, loss of financial support, and emotional damages.



3. Asbestos Trust Fund Claims



Many companies responsible for asbestos exposure have declared bankruptcy, leading to the establishment of trust funds to compensate victims. Filing a claim with these trust funds can provide financial relief without the need for a lengthy court battle.



4. VA Claims for Veterans



U.S. military veterans who were exposed to asbestos during service may be eligible for benefits through the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). These benefits can cover healthcare costs and disability compensation.



How a Mesothelioma Lawyer Can Help



Navigating the legal process can be overwhelming, especially when dealing with the emotional toll of a mesothelioma diagnosis. Hiring a mesothelioma lawyer can significantly improve your chances of securing fair compensation.



Case Evaluation and Legal Guidance



A specialized attorney will assess your case, identify potential liable parties, and determine the best legal strategy. Many law firms offer free consultations, allowing families to explore their options without financial risk.



Gathering Evidence



Proving asbestos exposure can be challenging, especially when exposure occurred decades ago. Experienced mesothelioma lawyers have access to resources such as company records, medical reports, and witness testimonies to build a strong case.



Negotiating Settlements



Most mesothelioma compensation claims are settled out of court. A skilled lawyer will negotiate with asbestos companies or trust funds to secure maximum compensation without the stress of a trial.



Trial Representation



If a settlement cannot be reached, a mesothelioma lawyer will represent you in court, presenting your case before a judge or jury to fight for the compensation you deserve.



Key Steps in Filing a Mesothelioma Claim



Filing a compensation claim involves several important steps, each of which plays a crucial role in ensuring that victims and their families receive the financial support they deserve. 







1. Identifying Asbestos Exposure



Determining when and where the exposure occurred is crucial. This may require reviewing work history, medical records, and speaking with co-workers or family members.



2. Choosing the Right Type of Claim



Based on the exposure history and the victim’s circumstances, a lawyer will recommend the most appropriate legal path, whether it’s a personal injury lawsuit, trust fund claim, or VA benefits application.



3. Filing the Lawsuit or Claim



Your lawyer will handle the necessary paperwork and ensure all legal requirements are met. Timeliness is essential, as each state has different statutes of limitations for filing mesothelioma claims.



4. Negotiation and Settlement



Many cases are resolved through settlements, providing financial compensation without the need for a court trial. However, if negotiations fail, the case may proceed to court.



Secure the Compensation You Deserve



Families affected by mesothelioma should not have to bear the financial burden of medical bills and lost income alone. Seeking legal assistance from a trusted mesothelioma lawyer ensures that victims and their loved ones receive the justice and compensation they deserve. At Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, we connect families with experienced attorneys nationwide to help them navigate this challenging process. Contact us today to explore your legal options.







Legal DisclaimerThe information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### Mesothelioma Lawsuit vs. Asbestos Trust Fund: Which is Right for You?

Being diagnosed with mesothelioma is overwhelming, and navigating your legal options can feel daunting. If you or a loved one has been affected, seeking financial compensation is essential to cover medical costs and secure your family’s future. The two primary options available are filing a mesothelioma lawsuit vs. asbestos trust fund claim. The advantages and disadvantages of each choice affect the time and quantity of compensation. You can make the greatest choice for your situation and guarantee that you get the justice and financial assistance you are entitled to by being aware of these distinctions.



Understanding Mesothelioma Lawsuits



A mesothelioma lawsuit is a legal action filed against asbestos manufacturers, suppliers, or employers responsible for exposure, aiming to secure compensation for victims and their families who have suffered devastating health and financial consequences.



There are two primary types of lawsuits:




Personal Injury Lawsuits – Filed by individuals diagnosed with mesothelioma due to asbestos exposure, seeking damages for medical expenses, lost income, and emotional distress.



Wrongful Death Lawsuits – Filed by the family of a deceased mesothelioma patient, pursuing compensation for medical expenses, funeral costs, loss of financial support, and emotional suffering.




Mesothelioma lawsuits typically result in settlements, though some cases proceed to trial, where compensation can be significantly higher. The financial recovery from a lawsuit can help cover essential costs, including advanced medical treatments, home care, and ongoing medical expenses. However, lawsuits can take time—sometimes years—before reaching a resolution, requiring patience and strong legal representation.



Exploring Asbestos Trust Funds







Many asbestos companies declared bankruptcy to avoid lawsuits but were legally required to establish asbestos trust funds to compensate victims. These trust funds allow individuals to file claims without going through a lengthy court process, providing a crucial financial lifeline for those affected.



Compensation is generally processed faster than a lawsuit, helping families cover medical bills and daily expenses without long legal delays. However, trust fund payouts are predetermined and may be lower than lawsuit settlements, potentially limiting the total compensation received.



Each trust fund has specific eligibility criteria, medical documentation requirements, and strict deadlines that must be met to secure compensation. If the company responsible for your exposure has a trust fund, this could be a more straightforward option, avoiding the stress of litigation. However, if multiple companies contributed to your asbestos exposure, you may need to file multiple claims, which can become complex and time-consuming without legal guidance.



Pros and Cons of Each Option



Choosing between a mesothelioma lawsuit and an asbestos trust fund claim involves considering the benefits, drawbacks, and potential financial impact of each path. Understanding these factors, including compensation timelines and eligibility requirements, can help you determine the best course of action based on your circumstances and long-term needs.



Mesothelioma Lawsuit



Advantages:




Often results in higher compensation than trust fund claims.



Covers a broad range of damages, including medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.



Allows victims to hold asbestos companies accountable for negligence.




Disadvantages:




The legal process can be lengthy, sometimes taking years to resolve.



Requires extensive evidence, legal proceedings, and testimony.



No guaranteed outcome, as court cases can be unpredictable.




Asbestos Trust Fund Claim



Advantages:




Provides faster access to compensation, often within months.



Does not require litigation or court involvement.



Offers a more straightforward claims process with predetermined payouts.




Disadvantages:




Payouts may be lower compared to lawsuit settlements.



Claims must be filed within strict deadlines, which vary by trust.



Some trust funds have limited resources, which may reduce the amount available to claimants.




Which Option is Right for You?







Your choice depends on several factors, including your health, financial needs, and the responsible company’s status. If you require immediate financial assistance and the company has a trust fund, filing a claim may be the best route. However, if your case is strong and you seek maximum compensation, a lawsuit might be worth pursuing.



Some individuals choose both options, filing trust fund claims while pursuing a lawsuit against other responsible parties. An experienced mesothelioma lawyer can help determine the best approach based on your specific circumstances. If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, Mesothelioma Lawyer Center can guide you through the process and ensure you receive the compensation you deserve. Contact us today to discuss your case and explore your legal options. Start your asbestos lawsuit today.







Legal DisclaimerThe information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### After “Fatally Inconsistent” Verdict, Mesothelioma Victim Gets New Trial

Calling an asbestos company’s argument in favor of preserving an inconsistent mesothelioma verdict “impermissible,” the California Court of Appeals agreed with the perplexed and frustrated plaintiffs that a new trial was required. The jury had decided both that Mission Stucco’s products were a substantial factor in the victim’s illness and that they had no comparative fault.







Mesothelioma Claim Points to Stucco Company’s Asbestos-Containing Products



The new trial was ordered in a case file by mesothelioma victim Kevin Brooks and his wife. The couple had filed a personal injury lawsuit against multiple companies that they blamed for having exposed him to asbestos over the course of his life. Though the jury agreed that asbestos-containing products made by Mission Stucco were partially responsible for his illness, they assigned the company no comparative fault, choosing instead to assign 10 percent of the $5 million verdict to Kaiser Gypsum and 90 percent to other companies.



In reviewing the award that the mesothelioma jury ordered, Mr. and Mrs. Brooks immediately filed a petition for a new trial based on the wrongful exclusion of important evidence, the inadequacy of the damages award, and the inconsistency of the verdict. Though the judges considering the couple’s motion denied the first two grounds for their appeal, they agreed that the verdict had been “fatally inconsistent” and that it was irreconcilable to assign 0 percent liability to a company that it had indicated was at fault.



Asbestos Company Argues to Uphold Mesothelioma Verdict



While Mission Stucco argued that the jury’s verdict should stand because the mesothelioma victim was still going to receive the same damages no matter who paid them, the appellate court said that was an “impermissible” approach. In their review of both the trial court’s actions and the jury’s award, they noted, “After concluding Mission Stucco’s products were defective in design under both tests, there was no basis for the jury to find that the defective design both was and was not a substantial factor in bringing about Brooks’s injury.”.

### Bestwall Bankruptcy Filing Draws Legal Action from Mesothelioma Victims

When Georgia-Pacific recognized the significant liabilities it faced from pending mesothelioma and asbestos lawsuits, it established Bestwall LLC and assigned it all of those liabilities, then had the subsidiary file for bankruptcy. This strategy, called the Texas Two Step, is extremely controversial. Asbestos victims with outstanding complaints against the company have filed numerous objections based on the parent company’s lack of financial distress.







Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing Seeks to Stop Mesothelioma Claims



The use of the Texas Two Step in the face of asbestos claims has drawn the ire of mesothelioma victims and congressional leaders alike: both have argued that financially successful companies like Georgia-Pacific should not be permitted to evade responsibility for negligently exposing and harming thousands of people to asbestos by shifting liabilities to newly formed subsidiaries.



In a brief filed on behalf of the mesothelioma and other asbestos-disease victims asserted in part, “A corporation with billions of dollars in assets, Bestwall seeks bankruptcy protection on the explicit premise that it remains willing and able to pay its current and future debts in full without difficulty.” This argument was submitted to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals



Supreme Court Won’t Hear Mesothelioma Victims’ Families Arguments



After the mesothelioma victims’ appeal to the Fourth Circuit failed, the group turned to the Supreme Court, asking them to weigh in on a single element of the bankruptcy strategy. The plaintiffs asked the court to decide whether the company could use the litigation shield to stop legal actions against it, but the justices of the Supreme Court declined to hear the case. The group had also asked the justices to weigh in on whether bankruptcy courts have the authority to take action that is not specifically granted to them under the bankruptcy code.



The Supreme Court’s decision comes as a disappointment to both the mesothelioma victims and bankruptcy judges themselves, who have repeatedly requested guidance from the high court on the legal and ethical questions raised by the use of the strategy.

### The Risk of Cancer from Being on a Submarine: Asbestos and Mesothelioma Explained

If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, it’s understandable to feel uncertain about the future. For many, this diagnosis is linked to specific work environments, especially for veterans or workers who served on submarines. A primary cause of mesothelioma in these individuals is asbestos exposure, which was common in submarines. While submarines play an essential role in naval defense, they also present a hidden risk — cancer from being on a submarine.



The durability and heat resistance of asbestos made it a popular material for submarine construction. While these qualities made it ideal for many applications, they also exposed crew members to harmful asbestos fibers, which can lead to life-threatening diseases like mesothelioma.



The Silent Killer: How Asbestos Exposure Leads to Cancer



Asbestos was commonly used in shipbuilding for fireproofing and insulation. On submarines, it was found in insulation around pipes, boilers, engines, as well as in flooring, walls, and ceilings—where mostly it can be found. Sailors and military personnel unknowingly inhaled asbestos fibers during their time on board.



These fibers could eventually lodge in the lungs, abdomen, or heart, leading to mesothelioma, a rare and aggressive cancer caused solely by asbestos exposure. The challenge with mesothelioma is that symptoms may take decades to appear, often leaving people unaware of their condition until it’s too late.



The Legacy of Asbestos in Submarines



Many mid-20th-century submarines, particularly those commissioned by the U.S. Navy, were heavily constructed with asbestos, including vessels like the USS Narwhal, USS Nautilus, and USS Seawolf. These submarines were tightly sealed, allowing asbestos particles to accumulate over time. As a result, sailors were at heightened risk of developing mesothelioma.



Although asbestos use has been regulated since the 1980s, many veterans and former crew members still face the long-term health consequences of exposure. The impact of this asbestos exposure continues to affect the health of those who served.



Risk Factors for Cancer from Being on a Submarine







The risk of developing mesothelioma from serving on a submarine depends on several factors. These include the length of exposure, the frequency of contact with asbestos, and the presence of pre-existing lung conditions. However, it’s important to note that even short-term exposure to asbestos aboard submarines can lead to long-term health issues.



Veterans have a higher risk of asbestos exposure especially those who served on submarines. The conditions aboard these vessels made it difficult to avoid asbestos particles, and the confined space meant that even small amounts of asbestos exposure could have significant effects. Asbestos fibers could settle in the air, be stirred up during routine activities, and cling to clothing, creating ongoing risk for sailors.



Mesothelioma and Its Symptoms



Mesothelioma is a rare cancer that typically affects the lining of the lungs but can also impact the abdominal or heart linings. Its symptoms may take decades to develop and can appear mild at first, making early detection difficult. Common symptoms include:




Persistent cough



Chest pain



Shortness of breath



Unexplained weight loss



Fatigue




Due to the long latency period, many people diagnosed with mesothelioma don’t realize they were exposed to asbestos until much later in life. This delayed onset emphasizes the importance for veterans and former submarine crew members to monitor their health closely if they experience these symptoms.



Legal Support for Mesothelioma Victims







For those who have been diagnosed with mesothelioma as a result of exposure to asbestos on submarines, legal support can make a significant difference. A mesothelioma lawyer can help you understand your rights and potentially secure compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.



The Mesothelioma Lawyer Center offers invaluable resources for veterans and civilians who were exposed to asbestos. With nationwide legal expertise, their team understands the complexities of mesothelioma lawsuits and can guide you through the legal process with compassion and professionalism.



Taking Action: Why Legal Help is Essential



If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, seeking legal counsel is crucial. The Mesothelioma Lawyer Center can help file a claim if you served on a submarine or worked in an asbestos-exposed environment. Their experienced attorneys are committed to ensuring victims receive the compensation they deserve. Given the long-term health risks of cancer from being on a submarine, acting quickly is vital. Legal support can ease the financial burden of mesothelioma treatment and hold responsible parties accountable. Submarine veterans and workers exposed to asbestos have the right to seek justice and compensation. Get legal help for mesothelioma.



Legal DisclaimerThe information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### How to Pursue an Asbestos Claim After the Death of a Family Member

The loss of a loved one to mesothelioma or another asbestos-related illness is a deeply painful experience. Many families are left with questions about their loved one’s exposure to asbestos and how to hold the responsible parties accountable. Filing an asbestos claim after death may provide a way to seek justice and financial relief, but the process can feel overwhelming during an already difficult time.



I want to give advice on how to pursue a claim even when it seems like an uphill struggle because I have witnessed families go through this emotional and legal process.



Understanding the Basics of Asbestos Claims



When a family member passes away due to an asbestos-related illness like mesothelioma, you might be entitled to file a wrongful death claim. This type of legal action seeks compensation for medical expenses, funeral costs, lost income, and other damages caused by asbestos exposure.



Asbestos exposure often occurs in specific industries, such as construction, shipbuilding, or manufacturing. Many victims were exposed decades ago, meaning these cases require careful investigation into past workplaces and products. A skilled mesothelioma lawyer can help uncover the responsible parties and build a strong case on your behalf.



Taking the First Step: Determining Eligibility







Not everyone can file an asbestos claim after death. In most states, immediate family members like spouses, children, and sometimes even grandchildren have the legal right to pursue a claim.



Each state has its own statute of limitations for wrongful death claims, which typically ranges from one to three years after the date of death. Acting promptly is critical to ensure you don’t miss this important deadline.



If your loved one resided in a place with a rich industrial history, like Houston or Pittsburgh, their asbestos exposure could have occurred in local workplaces. Knowing where and how exposure happened is vital, and a mesothelioma lawyer with experience in these cases can guide you through the research and filing process.



How a Mesothelioma Lawyer Can Help



Mesothelioma claims are not like other personal injury cases. They involve complex laws, scientific evidence, and historical research. That’s why hiring a knowledgeable mesothelioma lawyer is essential.



Your attorney will work with medical experts, review employment history, and investigate manufacturers of asbestos-containing products. This detailed approach ensures that the claim is built on a solid foundation.



If your loved one passed away in a region with a significant legacy of asbestos use, like the industrial hubs of the Midwest or the Gulf Coast, your lawyer’s familiarity with these areas can make all the difference. They’ll understand local workplaces and job sites where asbestos exposure was common, which can help identify liable companies.



The Emotional and Financial Benefits of Filing



Pursuing an asbestos claim after death is about more than just financial compensation. For many families, it’s a way to honor their loved one’s memory and hold negligent companies accountable for the harm they caused.



Financially, the compensation from a wrongful death claim can cover significant costs, including:




Medical bills incurred during treatment



Funeral and burial expenses



Loss of income and benefits



Pain and suffering experienced by your loved one and your family




No amount of money can replace your family member, but it can ease the burden of financial stress while allowing you to focus on healing.



Choosing the Right Legal Team







Selecting the right legal team is one of the most critical decisions you’ll make. Look for a law firm that specializes in asbestos litigation and has a proven track record of success. A good mesothelioma lawyer should be compassionate, knowledgeable, and willing to fight for the justice your family deserves.



When searching for legal representation online, the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center is a trusted resource. They connect families across the U.S. with experienced attorneys who focus on asbestos-related cases.



Moving Forward with Confidence



Taking the first step in pursuing an asbestos claim after death can feel overwhelming, but you don’t have to face it alone. With the right legal support, you can navigate the complexities of asbestos litigation and seek the justice your family deserves.



If you’re ready to explore your options, reach out to the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center for personalized guidance. Their team understands the challenges families face and will provide the compassionate, professional help you need during this difficult time.







Legal DisclaimerThe information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### Asbestosis vs Mesothelioma: How Do These Diseases Affect the Lungs?

When it comes to asbestos-related diseases, two terms often come up: asbestosis vs mesothelioma. Both conditions are caused by exposure to asbestos, but they’re not the same and impact the lungs in different ways. Knowing the terrible consequences these illnesses can cause, I think it's critical to clarify their differences and what they represent for you or your loved ones.



The Origins: How Asbestos Exposure Leads to Disease



Asbestos is a mineral that was once widely used in construction, shipbuilding, and various industries due to its durability and heat resistance. Unfortunately, the microscopic fibers can become airborne when asbestos-containing materials are disturbed. When inhaled, these fibers settle in the lungs, causing long-term damage.



Asbestosis is a chronic lung disease resulting from prolonged exposure to asbestos. Over time, inhaled fibers cause scarring of lung tissue, making it difficult to breathe.



Mesothelioma, on the other hand, is a rare and aggressive cancer that primarily affects the lining of the lungs (pleura) but can also develop in the abdomen or heart lining. Unlike asbestosis, mesothelioma can develop even after minimal exposure to asbestos.



Comparing Symptoms: Subtle Differences 



In the early stages, it’s easy to confuse the symptoms of asbestosis with mesothelioma, as both impact lung function. However, there are distinct differences:



Asbestosis Symptoms:




Persistent dry cough



Shortness of breath, especially after physical activity



Chest pain or tightness



Fatigue



Clubbing of fingers (in severe cases)




Mesothelioma Symptoms:




Painful breathing or chest pain



Fluid buildup in the lungs (pleural effusion)



Persistent cough that may worsen over time



Weight loss and loss of appetite



Night sweats and fever




One critical distinction is that mesothelioma often causes symptoms related to cancer progression, such as tumor growth and metastasis.



Diagnosis: The Critical First Step







Diagnosing asbestosis vs mesothelioma typically involves imaging studies such as X-rays or CT scans, along with lung function tests. However, mesothelioma requires more specialized diagnostic procedures like biopsies to confirm the presence of cancer cells.



It's vital to seek medical attention as soon as symptoms arise. Early diagnosis can make a difference, especially with mesothelioma, where treatment options are time-sensitive.



How These Diseases Impact Daily Life



Living with asbestosis often means adjusting to reduced lung capacity. Simple tasks like walking up stairs or gardening can become exhausting. It’s a progressive disease, so symptoms worsen over time, but it’s not considered fatal unless complications like respiratory failure occur.



Mesothelioma, however, is life-threatening from the start. The aggressive nature of the cancer means it spreads quickly, often leaving patients and their families grappling with tough treatment decisions. I’ve spoken to people who had to navigate clinical trials, chemotherapy, or surgery, all while dealing with the emotional toll of the diagnosis.



Treatment: What Are the Options?



Asbestosis Treatment:



While there’s no cure for asbestosis, treatment focuses on managing symptoms:




Inhalers or oxygen therapy for easier breathing



Pulmonary rehabilitation programs



Medications to treat complications, like infections or inflammation




Mesothelioma Treatment:



Mesothelioma treatment is more aggressive and may include:




Surgery to remove tumors



Chemotherapy and radiation



Immunotherapy or targeted therapies



Palliative care to improve quality of life




Both diseases often require a multidisciplinary approach involving pulmonologists, oncologists, and other specialists.



The Importance of Legal and Financial Support







If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with either of these conditions, understanding your legal rights is critical. Exposure to asbestos often occurred in workplaces where employers failed to provide adequate protection. A knowledgeable legal team can help you pursue compensation for medical bills, lost income, and more.



At the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, we’ve helped countless families across the nation navigate this difficult journey. Whether you’re in a bustling city like New York or a close-knit community in the Midwest, you deserve justice and support.



Finding Hope in a Difficult Journey



Facing the challenges of asbestosis or mesothelioma can feel overwhelming. The physical toll, coupled with the emotional and financial strain, makes it a tough road. But you’re not alone. Knowledge is power, and understanding the differences between asbestosis vs mesothelioma can guide you toward the right medical care and legal resources.



If you need assistance or simply have questions, don’t hesitate to reach out to the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center. We’re here to provide support and fight for the justice you and your family deserve.







Legal DisclaimerThe information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### Mesothelioma Victims’ Survivors Accuse Railway of Strategic Delays

Though recently awarded millions in compensation, the families of two mesothelioma victims are arguing that the plaintiff in their claim – BNSF Railway Company – purposely delayed making payments or offering a settlement, enriching themselves instead of working to achieve justice.







Montana Railroad Found Guilty in Mesothelioma Negligence Claims



The case involves the families of Tom Wells and Joyce Walder, Libby, Montana, residents who both died of malignant mesothelioma. After years of seeking compensation for the suffering their loved ones endured, the families were each awarded millions of dollars by a federal jury in 2024. Now they’re arguing that the company and its insurer purposely delayed resolving the claims to earn interest income on the money they’d eventually be ordered to pay them.



Both Wells’ and Walders’ mesothelioma was blamed on “abnormally dangerous activity” demonstrated by BNSF in the way that it ran its operations in Libby. It was only after the Asbestos Claims Court of Montana agreed that the company was liable and the decision was upheld by the Montana Supreme Court that the families were able to have their claims heard and achieve legal justice. Each estate was awarded $4 million.



Failure to Make Offer is Basis for Claim by Mesothelioma Families



After the mesothelioma verdicts were handed down in April 2024, the families filed an additional suit against the railroad company and its insurance company, arguing that they failed to make timely or reasonable settlement offers or to pay any medical care expenses. They accuse the company of being opportunistic in its handling of their claim, “delaying resolution.”



The claim filed by the mesothelioma victims’ estates notes that “At an average annual rate of return in excess of 11%, defendants VNSF and Zurich have earned hundreds of millions of dollars on the Libby asbestos claim reserves for fully accrued clear liability claims over the past twenty years of litigation.” They are asking the court for equitable relief of disgorgement of profits and damages for violations of insurance claim handling duties.

### Can You File a Mesothelioma Lawsuit If You Were Exposed Years Ago?

The question of whether you can file a mesothelioma lawsuit after exposure decades ago is one I hear often from individuals and families coping with the aftermath of this devastating disease. The short answer is yes. Because it frequently takes 20 to 50 years after asbestos exposure for symptoms to manifest, mesothelioma is unique. You are not prohibited from pursuing justice or restitution for the injury caused by this latency period.



Understanding How Mesothelioma Exposure Happened







For many people, exposure to asbestos occurred through their occupation or the environment. Industries such as construction, shipbuilding, automotive repair, and manufacturing were notorious for asbestos use throughout much of the 20th century. Even today, older buildings and equipment may still contain this hazardous material. Whether you worked in Houston's booming petrochemical plants, in a New York high-rise, or even in the rural Midwest, asbestos exposure could have taken place without your knowledge.



, we hear stories every day from individuals who were exposed through their work or by secondary means, such as family members bringing asbestos fibers home on clothing. Each story is unique, but the pain and questions are universal.



Why Timing Doesn’t Close the Door



One of the most significant concerns for those considering a lawsuit is the statute of limitations, which varies by state. While these laws generally set strict time limits, the clock typically starts ticking from the date of diagnosis rather than the date of exposure. This distinction is critical since mesothelioma often remains undetected for decades. Working with an experienced mesothelioma law firm can help you navigate the nuances of state-specific regulations and ensure that your case is filed in time.



How a Mesothelioma Law Firm Can Help



Filing a mesothelioma lawsuit can feel overwhelming, especially if you’re already dealing with the emotional and physical toll of the disease. That’s why working with a specialized mesothelioma law firm is essential. These firms understand the complexities of asbestos litigation and have access to resources that can strengthen your case.



When I think about the process, it reminds me of the stories shared by families who’ve felt empowered after finally confronting the companies responsible for their suffering. A skilled law firm will investigate your exposure history, identify liable parties, and fight to secure compensation that can cover medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages. Importantly, many firms work on a contingency fee basis, so you won’t have to pay unless they win your case.



National Scope of Lawsuits



One of the advantages of working with a law firm that specializes in mesothelioma cases is their ability to file lawsuits in the most favorable jurisdictions. Many people don’t realize that even if you live in a different state today, your case may be eligible to be filed elsewhere, depending on where the exposure occurred or where the asbestos-related company was based.



For example, someone diagnosed in a sunny Arizona retirement community might have been exposed decades ago while working in the shipyards of San Diego. A skilled attorney will evaluate your work history, medical records, and other details to determine the best course of action.



Finding Hope Through Justice







Receiving a mesothelioma diagnosis is a life-altering moment, but pursuing a lawsuit can provide a sense of control and justice during an otherwise uncertain time. The settlements or verdicts achieved through these cases often offer significant financial relief, helping families manage treatment costs, travel expenses, and the general strain that mesothelioma brings.



While compensation can never undo the harm caused, holding corporations accountable sends a powerful message. Many clients tell me they feel a sense of peace knowing their case could protect others by shedding light on asbestos dangers.



A Message for Families and Loved Ones



Mesothelioma doesn’t just impact the person diagnosed; it ripples through families and entire communities. As someone who’s helped families nationwide, I know how important it is to have a strong support system during this time. Whether you’re caring for someone in Boston’s brisk winters or the heat of Houston summers, there’s one universal truth: you don’t have to face this alone.



If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, consider reaching out to the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center. Our experienced team is here to guide you every step of the way, helping you navigate the legal system and pursue justice with confidence. Let us help you turn your story of pain into one of strength and resilience. Contact us to file a mesothelioma lawsuit today. 







Legal DisclaimerThe information provided is for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this website is not intended as legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting a licensed attorney. Legal outcomes and laws can vary by jurisdiction, and only a qualified lawyer can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

### Mesothelioma Claim to Continue Against DAP, Despite Company’s Arguments

When Paul J. McPolin died of malignant mesothelioma, his family filed a personal injury lawsuit against several of the companies whose asbestos-containing products he was exposed to over the course of his life. Among the defendants was DAP, Inc., the manufacturer of numerous joint compounds. Though the company argued that their products did not match those described in Mr. McPolin’s deposition, the judge hearing the case denied their motion for summary judgment.







Affidavit Submitted by DAP, Inc. Fails to Meet Bar for Mesothelioma Claim to be Dismissed



In attempting to have the mesothelioma claim against it dismissed, DAP, Inc. submitted two affidavits from one of its employees, asserting that the company had not made, sold, or distributed any of the products that Mr. McPolin listed when he gave his deposition.  But a petition for summary judgment, which asks for a case to be entirely dismissed, has a specific bar that must be met for it to be granted: a defendant must show that it would be impossible for their product to have been the cause of the plaintiff’s injury.



While DAP, Inc.’s affidavit claimed that the company had not made the products that McPolin described, the judge hearing arguments in the case in the Supreme Court of New York County noted that the affidavits did not unequivocally establish that its products could not have contributed to the causation of Mr. McPolin’s mesothelioma. 



Judge in Mesothelioma Case Denies Defendant’s Request for Dismissal



Justice Adam Silvera hears many of the asbestos and mesothelioma cases filed in the state of New York, and in this case, he noted that DAP, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment relied entirely on an affidavit from an employee who did not “possess the requisite personal knowledge to establish that no DAP products containing asbestos were in circulation and used by plaintiff at the time of plaintiff’s exposure.”



In handing down his ruling, the judge agreed with the mesothelioma victim’s family that what the  defendant had submitted was “devoid of evidentiary facts,” and that rather it had relied on “speculation and unsupported allegations.” The case will continue, based in large part on the strength of the “unequivocal testimony” that the dying victim had provided in his deposition.

### DAP’s Request for Dismissal from Lung Cancer Lawsuit Denied

Many asbestos companies are sued by victims of lung cancer and mesothelioma who blame them for negligently exposing them to their toxic products without warning them of asbestos’ health risks. Many of these cases have led to multi-million dollar compensation awards. Some companies argue that the case against them isn’t strong enough to go to trial, but there are strict rules about what’s required for these motions for summary judgment to succeed. In a recent case, DAP, Inc. argued that they shouldn’t be held responsible for a lung cancer victim’s illness, but the judge hearing the case denied their petition, allowing the case to move forward.







Navy Veteran’s Lung Cancer Blamed on Asbestos in DAP Caulk



The asbestos lung cancer lawsuit was filed by John P. Reeves after years of working with several different asbestos-containing products. Reeves was a Navy veteran, and among the companies he named in his claim was DAP, Inc., whose caulking products he said he worked with as early as 1961 when he served on the USS Forrestal. He also cited other exposures throughout his lifetime, including do-it-yourself work he did in his home during the years that DAP’s caulk contained asbestos.



In response to the claim, DAP, Inc. filed a motion for summary judgment, asking that the case against them be dismissed. The company’s attorneys cited several caulk products that the company had manufactured during that time that did not contain asbestos and argued that because he had no proof of which caulk he used, his claim was speculative.



Judge Denies Request for Asbestos Lung Cancer Claim to be Dismissed



Upon review of the company’s arguments against being held responsible and the evidence submitted by the asbestos lung cancer victim, Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York County decided in favor of Mr. Reeves. In his decision, he cited New York’s high bar for dismissal of personal injury lawsuits and noted that the company had not offered any proof that its products could not have been responsible for his lung cancer, especially in light of the specifics he had provided about the years when he had used the product and the projects he’d worked on.



In addition to the victim’s testimony, the judge’s decision was also swayed by the testimony of an expert witness who had provided information to support the victim’s assertions about the company’s caulk’s role in his illness. The case will move forward for a jury to decide.

### Woman’s Mesothelioma Claim Against J&J’s Talc Manufacturer to Continue

When Lita Goldstein was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, she quickly realized that the only possible place she could have been exposed to asbestos was in the Johnson & Johnson talc products she’d used throughout her life. She filed suit against dozens of companies associated with the iconic consumer product, and one of them — talc manufacturer Kolmar Laboratories — filed a motion for summary judgment, asking for the case against them to be dismissed.







Talc Manufacturer’s Justification for Removal from Mesothelioma Claim Rejected



Kolmar Laboratories offered two different theories for why it shouldn’t have to defend itself against Ms. Goldstein’s mesothelioma claim. The first was that the victim had failed to offer proof that she’d been exposed to any talc product that they’d manufactured. The second was that despite having previously confirmed its manufacturing role in the product, as well as its active role in manufacturing the talc for Johnson & Johnson, they were simply following the company’s orders and should not be held liable for the outcome.



In response to these arguments, Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York County denied the motion. He explained that in order for a defendant to be dismissed from a mesothelioma claim, they needed to prove that there was no way that their product could have been responsible for the plaintiff’s illness. Because the company had focused on what they viewed as shortcomings in the plaintiff’s claim, they fell short of that requirement.



Judge Denies Defendant’s Contractor Defense in Mesothelioma Claim



As to the other argument offered by the mesothelioma defendant, Justice Silvera largely ignored the company’s “contractor’ defense that it was only following Johnson & Johnson’s orders and specifications. His ruling against their motion for summary judgment means that the case will move forward in New York’s court system for a jury to hear unless Kolmar and the plaintiff agree to a settlement beforehand.

### Who Should File a Mesothelioma or Asbestos VA Claim?

It is a life-altering experience to be diagnosed with mesothelioma or to deal with its effects on a loved one. Because asbestos exposure was so prevalent during military duty, especially in the middle of the 20th century, the difficulties for veterans can be considerably more complicated. Filing an asbestos VA claim is a critical step in seeking compensation for the physical, emotional, and financial toll of this devastating illness. This process can help secure benefits while holding responsible parties accountable.



As a veteran, if you’ve been exposed to asbestos during your service, you may qualify for VA benefits. Whether you served in the Navy, where asbestos use was prevalent on ships, or in another branch of the military, an asbestos lawyer can help you understand your options and navigate this often-complicated process.



Understanding Asbestos Exposure in Military Service



The U.S. military heavily relied on asbestos for its fireproofing and insulation properties, especially between the 1930s and 1980s. Veterans who served during this period may have been exposed while working on ships, in barracks, or with vehicles and aircraft parts. Navy veterans face the highest risk due to the extensive use of asbestos in shipyards and vessels.



However, it’s not just Navy personnel who are affected. Those stationed at military installations, mechanics working on brakes or clutches, and even construction workers in military housing may have been exposed. Decades later, this exposure can result in mesothelioma or other asbestos-related illnesses. If you’re experiencing symptoms or have been diagnosed, filing an asbestos VA claim is an essential step toward receiving the compensation you deserve.



Who Should Consider Filing an Asbestos VA Claim?



Veterans Diagnosed with Asbestos-Related Illnesses







If you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or lung cancer linked to asbestos exposure during military service, you should file a VA claim. These benefits can help cover medical treatments, loss of income, and other related expenses. With the complexities of VA regulations, consulting an asbestos lawyer is invaluable to ensure all necessary documentation is in order.







Family Members of Affected Veterans



Family members can also file for benefits under certain conditions. If a veteran has passed away due to an asbestos-related illness, their dependents or spouse may be eligible for Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC). This provides financial support to families who have lost a loved one due to service-related health issues.



Secondary Exposure Cases



In some instances, family members of veterans may develop asbestos-related illnesses from secondary exposure. This can happen when asbestos fibers are brought home on uniforms or personal items. If you or someone in your household has developed mesothelioma or another asbestos-related illness, you may still have a case for compensation with the assistance of an experienced asbestos lawyer.



The Importance of Legal Guidance



Navigating the VA claims process can be daunting, especially when dealing with the stress of a serious illness. An asbestos lawyer with experience in mesothelioma cases can make the difference between a successful claim and unnecessary frustration. They understand the evidence needed to prove your case, including service records, medical reports, and exposure histories.



Additionally, laws governing asbestos VA claims can vary by state, so having a legal professional familiar with local regulations is crucial. Whether you're in New York, California, or the Midwest, your lawyer can tailor their approach to reflect the specific requirements and precedents in your area.



How Filing an Asbestos VA Claim Benefits Your Family







Filing an asbestos VA claim isn’t just about compensation—it’s about securing your family’s future. VA benefits can cover cutting-edge treatments, ongoing care, and provide financial stability during a challenging time. For families who’ve lost a loved one to mesothelioma, these benefits can help with funeral costs and offer long-term support.



In addition to financial relief, pursuing a claim sends a powerful message of accountability to organizations responsible for asbestos exposure. By standing up for your rights, you contribute to raising awareness about the dangers of asbestos and the need for systemic change.



Taking the First Step Toward Justice



Filing an asbestos VA claim can feel overwhelming, but you don’t have to face it alone. At the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, we’re committed to guiding veterans and their families through this process with compassion and expertise. Our team has helped countless individuals across the U.S. secure the compensation and justice they deserve.



If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness, reach out to us today. Together, we can navigate the complexities of your claim, hold negligent parties accountable, and ensure your family’s financial security. Let us help you take the first step toward justice.

### Holding Corporations Accountable: The Power of a Mesothelioma Lawyer

Each year, mesothelioma, an uncommon but deadly illness brought on by asbestos exposure, is devastatingly diagnosed in numerous families across the United States. The severe financial, emotional, and physical toll of such a diagnosis is a burden no one should have to bear alone. This is where the expertise of a mesothelioma lawyer becomes invaluable. Beyond legal representation, these professionals are advocates who fight to hold negligent corporations accountable and secure justice for families.







The Role of a Mesothelioma Lawyer in Seeking Justice



Mesothelioma lawyers specialize in asbestos litigation, using their expertise to navigate the complexities of these cases. Their primary role is to establish the link between your diagnosis and exposure to asbestos, often occurring decades earlier. Whether the exposure happened at a worksite, in a consumer product, or through secondary exposure, these attorneys investigate thoroughly to pinpoint the responsible parties.



The intricate web of liability often involves large corporations or asbestos manufacturers who prioritized profits over safety. Your lawyer will meticulously compile evidence, including medical records, workplace histories, and witness testimonies, to build a compelling case. With their support, victims can seek compensation for medical expenses, lost income, pain, and suffering, as well as punitive damages.



Why Choose a Mesothelioma Law Firm?







A mesothelioma law firm offers the resources, specialized expertise, and unwavering dedication needed for these high-stakes cases. These firms often operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning you only pay if they win your case. This arrangement makes legal representation accessible to families already burdened by overwhelming medical bills and financial hardships, ensuring that justice is within reach for everyone.



Such firms also have access to extensive databases and networks, including past case records, workplace histories, and renowned medical experts. This allows them to identify patterns of asbestos use, corporate negligence, and industry practices that led to exposure. With their vast experience, they can predict the strategies that corporations and insurance companies will use to deflect responsibility, including blaming alternate sources of exposure, and expertly counteract these defenses with compelling evidence and testimony.



Local Relevance and Understanding



When selecting a lawyer, it’s important to consider one familiar with your specific region. Whether you’re navigating asbestos-related laws in New York, California, or the Midwest, a locally knowledgeable mesothelioma lawyer can tailor their approach to state regulations, court processes, and regional precedents that could impact your case. They may even have insight into local corporations historically known for asbestos use, giving your case a strategic advantage and bolstering its foundation with well-researched, region-specific evidence.



Moreover, an attorney rooted in your community understands the cultural nuances, emotional weight, and personal challenges of pursuing justice. In tight-knit areas, this can make a significant difference, as they often foster connections with local support groups, healthcare providers, and advocacy organizations. These relationships can offer clients not only legal assistance but also additional resources and emotional support throughout the legal process.



How Legal Action Supports Families







While no financial compensation can reverse a mesothelioma diagnosis, legal action can provide much-needed relief to families facing overwhelming medical expenses and emotional strain. Settlements or court awards often cover vital medical treatments, including cutting-edge experimental therapies not typically covered by insurance, as well as ongoing care costs. These funds can also secure the financial future of dependents, assist with education expenses, and alleviate the heavy burden of lost income, unpaid debts, and other unexpected costs associated with the illness.



Taking legal action sends a powerful and unequivocal message to negligent corporations, holding them accountable and deterring them from putting profits above safety in the future. By working with a skilled mesothelioma lawyer, you’re not just seeking compensation—you’re advocating for justice, systemic change, and greater awareness of the devastating consequences of corporate irresponsibility.



Closing Thoughts: Taking the First Step Toward Justice



Facing mesothelioma is overwhelming, but you don’t have to navigate it alone. The emotional, physical, and financial toll can feel insurmountable, but by enlisting the help of a trusted mesothelioma lawyer, you can focus on what matters most—spending precious time with your loved ones, seeking the best possible treatment, and preserving cherished memories—while they handle the complexities of your case with expertise and care. At the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, we’re dedicated to connecting families with compassionate and experienced legal professionals who fight tirelessly for justice and financial security. Together, we can hold corporations accountable, secure the compensation you deserve, and bring a sense of closure and hope during this challenging time. Speak to a mesothelioma lawyer now.

### Veteran Claims: What Every Veteran Needs to Know About Mesothelioma

Understanding the Connection Between Service and Mesothelioma







Veterans have given up things to serve our nation, frequently in hazardous conditions. One of the most devastating health issues linked to military service is mesothelioma, a rare but aggressive cancer caused by asbestos exposure. Navigating veteran claims for mesothelioma can feel overwhelming, but understanding your rights is the first step in securing the compensation you and your family deserve.



Knowing where to start and finding the right resources — like a skilled mesothelioma lawyer — can make all the difference. From VA benefits to legal claims, there are ways to get the help you need.



The Hidden Dangers of Military Asbestos Exposure



For decades, asbestos was a staple in military construction and equipment due to its heat-resistant properties. Unfortunately, its widespread use put countless service members at risk. From Navy ships lined with asbestos insulation to military bases filled with asbestos-laden materials, exposure was alarmingly common.



Many veterans who served in shipyards along the Gulf Coast, where the damp, warm weather only heightened the risks of airborne asbestos particles. Stories like these are not uncommon — veterans across the nation, from the Pacific Northwest to the Southeast, have experienced similar exposures.



Mesothelioma symptoms often appear decades later, making it hard to connect the disease to military service. By working with experts and filing veteran claims, you can seek justice and the support needed to fight this illness.



Exploring Your Rights and Benefits



The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) acknowledges mesothelioma as a service-connected disease if it can be traced back to asbestos exposure during your service. This recognition is crucial—it means you’re eligible for significant disability compensation, healthcare benefits, and other forms of assistance.







Filing a Veteran Claim



When filing a claim, it’s vital to gather comprehensive evidence of your service history and medical diagnosis. Specific roles, like machinists or shipbuilders, faced particularly high asbestos exposure risks. Documenting these details will strengthen your case.



Support from a Mesothelioma Lawyer



While VA claims provide substantial support, legal claims can offer additional compensation. A knowledgeable mesothelioma lawyer can identify manufacturers responsible for the asbestos exposure and guide you in pursuing settlements from trust funds or litigation.



This dual approach — seeking VA benefits while exploring legal options—ensures you maximize the compensation available to cover medical bills, lost income, and other damages.



How Mesothelioma Claims Impact Families







Mesothelioma doesn’t just affect the individual diagnosed— it impacts the entire family. I’ve spoken with families who felt the financial and emotional strain as they navigated treatment plans and caregiving responsibilities. Filing a veteran claim isn’t just about financial support; it’s about providing peace of mind for those you love.



Veterans from all walks of life, whether they served in New York City’s bustling ports or the rural bases of the Midwest, share a common bond: the desire to protect their families. By working with professionals who understand both the VA system and the legal landscape, you can take proactive steps to safeguard your family’s future.



The Path to Justice



Time is of the essence when dealing with mesothelioma claims. Each state has specific statutes of limitations that could affect your ability to file. I’ve seen veterans wait too long, only to discover that legal action was no longer an option. Acting now is critical.



At the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, our team has worked with veterans nationwide, helping them secure the resources they need. Whether you’re navigating the humid summers of Florida or the crisp winters of the Rockies, our national reach ensures that you’ll receive dedicated support tailored to your unique circumstances.



If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, remember that you’re not alone. The process of filing veteran claims can seem daunting, but with the right guidance, you can take control of your future. Reach out today to start your journey toward justice and peace of mind.

### Lung Cancer Victim Files Asbestos Lawsuit Against Con Edison Suppliers

When Robert Toth was diagnosed with asbestos-related lung cancer, he filed an asbestos lawsuit through the New York court system. The asbestos companies that he named as defendants objected to his claim, asking for it to be dismissed because he hadn’t specified which of their products he had been exposed to. The judge overseeing the case denied the companies’ motion for summary judgment, noting that the 86-year-old victim had provided “clear and unequivocal” testimony about his work and his exposure.







Asbestos Exposure Blamed for Con Edison Employee’s Lung Cancer



Asbestos exposure has been directly linked to malignant mesothelioma, asbestosis, asbestos-related lung cancer, and other serious illnesses. Though the general public was only made aware of this in the mid-1970s, many manufacturers whose products contained the mineral had been aware of its dangers for years but continued to use it without warning people of the risk. When Robert Toth was diagnosed with asbestos-related cancer, he filed a personal injury lawsuit against the companies that supplied his employer, Con Edison, with the asbestos-containing materials that he blames for his illness.



The asbestos lung cancer victim blames his illness on asbestos-containing products he worked with at Con Edison over his thirty years with the company. He had been a sheet metal worker assigned to work at several of the company’s powerhouses, and during deposition testimony, he described his many job assignments, what they entailed, and the kinds of products that he worked with. Despite the significant detail he used in describing his work, some of the defendants filed a motion arguing that the claims against them should be dropped because he had not been specific enough about the products that he'd worked with.



Judge Agrees that Lung Cancer Victim’s Testimony is Sufficient



In reviewing the case and the asbestos companies’ motion for summary judgment, Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York County denied the asbestos companies’ filing, noting that the 86-year-old victim had provided testimony that provided enough information for the case to move forward. The judge noted that in addition to the fact that the victim’s testimony about his exposure had been “clear and unequivocal,” the arguments submitted by the companies had not provided any evidence to suggest that they could not have caused his illness.  The case will move forward for a jury to decide.

### First Steps After a Mesothelioma Diagnosis: A Legal Survival Guide

Receiving a mesothelioma diagnosis is an overwhelming and life-changing experience. This aggressive cancer, primarily caused by asbestos exposure, often surfaces years or even decades after the initial exposure.It's critical to know what to do next if you or a loved one has received a mesothelioma diagnosis in order to protect your health, financial security, and legal rights. I'll go over the crucial steps you should take following your mesothelioma diagnosis in this guide, especially seeking legal advice from a mesothelioma lawyer.



Understanding Your Legal Rights After a Mesothelioma Diagnosis



A mesothelioma diagnosis brings both medical challenges and important questions about how the illness developed and who is responsible. Asbestos exposure, often linked to workplaces like construction sites, shipyards, and military service, is typically caused by negligent employers failing to protect workers.



The first legal step is understanding your right to seek compensation. While money can’t change your diagnosis, it can help with medical treatments, lost wages, and future care costs. A mesothelioma attorney, specializing in asbestos cases, can guide you through the legal process to secure the compensation you deserve.



Finding the Right Mesothelioma Attorney







When selecting a mesothelioma attorney, it's crucial to choose one who specializes in asbestos litigation. Not all lawyers have the necessary knowledge and experience to handle these complex cases. Seek out attorneys with a proven track record in mesothelioma claims, particularly those with experience working with veterans, construction workers, or others exposed to asbestos.



A specialized attorney knows how to investigate the sources of asbestos exposure and identify the responsible parties—whether it's manufacturers of asbestos products, construction companies, or the U.S. military. They will also guide you through legal options like filing lawsuits or seeking compensation from asbestos trust funds.



Gathering Evidence and Documentation



Once you've chosen a mesothelioma attorney, the next step is to gather relevant documentation to help build a strong case. Key documents include:




Medical Records: Diagnostic reports and pathology results confirming your mesothelioma diagnosis.



Workplace History: Records of your employment if asbestos exposure occurred at a job site.



Exposure Details: Information on how and where you came into contact with asbestos, including the type of work and products involved.




The sooner you gather these materials, the better, as it increases your attorney's ability to secure timely compensation.



Navigating Trust Funds and Lawsuits



Asbestos manufacturers have set up trust funds to compensate victims of asbestos exposure. These funds are often the quickest and most effective way to receive compensation. Your mesothelioma attorney can help you determine if you qualify for these funds and guide you through the claims process.



If trust funds are not available or if you prefer to pursue other avenues, filing a lawsuit may be necessary. This involves holding companies accountable for their negligence in exposing workers to asbestos without proper safeguards. A mesothelioma attorney can represent you in court, navigating the intricacies of asbestos law, and fighting for justice on your behalf.



Seeking Support Beyond Legal Help







In addition to legal support, seeking emotional and medical assistance is vital during this challenging time. The journey may feel overwhelming, but you're not alone. Consider connecting with local mesothelioma support groups or online communities, where you can find advice, emotional support, and resources to help manage the effects of mesothelioma.



It's also important to consult with your doctors about treatment options. Although mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer, treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation can sometimes improve quality of life and extend life expectancy. Look for hospitals and clinics that specialize in mesothelioma care, as they have the expertise needed to provide the best possible treatment.



Moving Forward with Confidence



A mesothelioma diagnosis is never easy, but with the right legal support, you can navigate the complexities of both the medical and legal worlds. Your mesothelioma attorney will be your advocate, ensuring that those responsible for your asbestos exposure are held accountable and that you receive the compensation you deserve. At Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, we understand the emotional and financial challenges you face, and we are here to help you every step of the way.



We encourage you to contact us today to discuss your case and learn more about your legal options. Together, we can fight for justice, securing a better future for you and your family, no matter where you live in the United States.

### South Carolina Jury Orders Johnson & Johnson to Pay $63.4 Million to Mesothelioma Victim

While pursuing bankruptcy protection against ovarian cancer victims’ claims, consumer giant Johnson & Johnson has continued defending itself in court against similar claims from those diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma. That strategy has proven questionable, as a South Carolina jury recently found the company liable for a 53-year-old man’s diagnosis with the rare, terminal disease, awarding him $63.4 million in compensatory and punitive damages.







Mesothelioma Victim Detailed Lifelong Use of Johnson & Johnson’s Talc Powder



A jury in Richland County, South Carolina, heard testimony from Michael Perry about his lifelong use of Johnson and Johnson’s Baby Powder and about being diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma at the age of 53. Mr. Perry explained that he had used the product because of his allergy to deodorant products. Johnson & Johnson argued that his illness was caused by his years of exposure to asbestos-containing brakes while working with his father in his garage.



In making its decision about where fault lay for Mr. Perry’s mesothelioma, the jury took note of Johnson & Johnson’s refusal to present a defense.  They awarded the man $32.6 million in compensatory damages and $30 million in punitive damages.



Mesothelioma Jury Heard Testimony Indicating J&J Was Aware of Asbestos Risk



While the mesothelioma victim’s representative indicated that the jury’s decision was a result of the evidence and their understanding that Johnson & Johnson’s actions were unacceptable, the company said that they planned on filing an appeal, asserting that the court had made erroneous rulings before and during the trial that had prevented them from presenting an appropriate defense.  Johnson & Johnson continues to claim that their talc is safe and does not contain asbestos.



Despite Johnson & Johnson’s arguments, juries hearing testimony in mesothelioma claims have found the evidence compelling and have decided in favor of several victims in recent days. Notable verdicts in the past year have included a $260 million verdict in Oregon and a $45 million verdict in Illinois.

### Electrical Supplier’s Attempt to Evade Asbestos Lung Cancer Liability Denied

After having worked for Con Edison in New York for more than forty years, Paul Scandliato was diagnosed with asbestos-related lung cancer. Among the companies he named in a personal injury lawsuit was Kennedy Electrical Supply Corporation. In response to his charge of negligence in having exposed him to dangerous products without providing a warning, the company asked the courts to dismiss the case, pointing to a discrepancy in the victim’s testimony.  That request was denied by the judge hearing the case.







New York Judge Rejects Electric Company’s Petition in Asbestos Lung Cancer Case



In response to his lung cancer diagnosis, Mr. Scandaliator named dozens of companies whose asbestos-containing products he’d been exposed to over his forty years of working for Con Edison. Among them was Kennedy Electrical Supply Corporation, and when the company asked the court to allow them to be excused from the case, Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York County carefully reviewed the company’s petition for summary judgment.



In handing down his decision rejecting the company’s request, Justice Silvera noted that the basis for the company’s request for dismissal was a discrepancy in the asbestos lung cancer victim’s deposition testimony. He pointed out that though this discrepancy could have an impact on the jury’s consideration of the company’s guilt, it was not enough to warrant dismissal by the court.



Summary Judgment Requires Different Justification in Asbestos Cancer Case



Justice Silvera explained that under New York law, petitions for summary judgment in mesothelioma and asbestos lung cancer claims can only be granted if the party seeking the action can show that its products could not have contributed to the victim’s injury. Pointing to gaps in the proof that the plaintiff provides is not enough.



Writing that “the assessment of the value of a witness’s testimony constitutes an issue for resolution by the trier of fact, and any apparent discrepancy between the testimony and the evidence of record goes only to the weight and not the admissibility of the testimony,” Justice Silvera denied the company’s request and allowed the case to move forward for a jury to decide.

### Asbestos Lung Cancer Victim Files Lawsuit Against Hospital

West Virginia resident Donna R. Spurling has filed an asbestos-related lung cancer lawsuit against a West Virginia college, accusing them of negligence in having exposed her to asbestos hidden in the walls of her buildings. In addition to Fairmont State University, her suit also names the Fairmont State Board of Governors, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Monongalia County General Hospital, United Hospital Center, and the Fairmont Medical Center.







Asbestos Case Had Pending Settlement When Defendants Canceled Negotiations



According to the lung cancer victim’s attorney, she was closing on a $650,000 settlement with Fairmont State University when the school pulled out of negotiations and hired attorneys known for doing asbestos defense work across West Virginia. He has argued that many of these attorneys recuse themselves because they were previously fact witnesses defending the same companies whose asbestos had originally contaminated the buildings where Ms. Spurling was exposed.



According to the lung cancer claim, the school knew for five decades that legacy asbestos was exposing students and others to the risk of illness but suppressed the information. Ms. Spurling asserts that her exposure occurred between 1998 and 2004 when she was a student.  According to a statement from her representative, “All the buildings at Fairmont State have asbestos-containing building materials. Floor tiles, ceiling tile, joint compound, HVAC ductwork, boiler insulation, pipe insulation, and over the years, those materials disintegrate and fall apart, and they get into the breathing zones and get into the HVAC systems, and it gets people sick.”



Asbestos Lawsuit Raises Question of Conflict of Interest



According to the asbestos lawsuit, two members of the Fairmont State University Board of Governors have connections to asbestos manufacturers. Ms. Spurling’s claim cites a 1986 asbestos lawsuit filed by then-State Attorney General Charlie Brown against dozens of asbestos manufacturers whose product contaminated buildings across the state, including Fairmont State University, Fairmont Medical Center, and buildings at Marshall University and West Virginia University.



A $20 million settlement in that earlier case was supposed to have been used for remediation, but the state only remediated buildings in the state’s Capitol Complex, where government officials work. The lung cancer lawsuit accuses the school of having “performed piecemeal asbestos abatement projects, none of which completely removed the asbestos-containing materials from its contaminated buildings” and of failing to warn former or current students of the presence of asbestos on the campus.

### What Causes Mesothelioma in Veterans? Understanding Your Diagnosis

For many veterans, a mesothelioma diagnosis comes as a devastating and unexpected reality, often tied to their years of honorable service. What causes mesothelioma in veterans is deeply rooted in the widespread use of asbestos in military operations, from shipbuilding and aircraft maintenance to construction on military bases. This exposure has had long-lasting effects on health and is frequently unavoidable because asbestos is used for its durability and heat resistance. A vital first step in pursuing treatment, justice, and support for you and your family is understanding how this illness manifests and the particular dangers that veterans confront.







Why Are Veterans at Higher Risk of Mesothelioma?



Veterans account for nearly a third of mesothelioma cases in the United States. This disproportionate impact stems from the widespread use of asbestos in military environments from the 1930s through the late 1970s. Asbestos was highly valued for its heat resistance and durability, leading to its integration into shipbuilding, vehicle components, construction materials, and even protective gear.



Navy Veterans and Asbestos Exposure



Navy veterans are among the most affected groups. Ships built or repaired in the mid-20th century often contained asbestos in insulation, piping, boilers, and engine rooms. Sailors, machinists, and shipyard workers were frequently exposed to airborne asbestos fibers during routine maintenance or repairs, increasing their risk of developing mesothelioma decades later.



Other Branches and High-Risk Occupations



While Navy veterans are at the forefront, individuals from other branches—Army, Air Force, Marines, and Coast Guard—are not immune. Mechanics working on aircraft or vehicles, engineers building or renovating military bases, and firefighters handling asbestos-laden protective gear faced similar exposure risks.



Understanding How Asbestos Causes Mesothelioma







Asbestos fibers are microscopic, making them easy to inhale or ingest. Once in the body, these fibers embed themselves in the lining of the lungs, abdomen, or heart, causing inflammation and scarring. Over time, this damage can lead to the development of mesothelioma.



For veterans, the prolonged latency period—typically 20 to 50 years—means symptoms often appear long after service. Common signs include chest pain, persistent cough, shortness of breath, and fatigue. Early diagnosis and treatment are critical for improving quality of life and survival rates.



Seeking Support Through a Mesothelioma Law Firm



Veterans diagnosed with mesothelioma face unique challenges, including navigating VA benefits, accessing specialized healthcare, and pursuing legal claims. Partnering with a trusted mesothelioma law firm can make a significant difference in securing financial compensation and justice.



Filing a VA Claim



The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs recognizes mesothelioma as a service-connected illness for those exposed to asbestos during military service. Filing a VA claim can help veterans access benefits like disability compensation, healthcare, and support for family members.



Legal Options Beyond VA Benefits



In addition to VA claims, veterans may have the option to file lawsuits against manufacturers of asbestos-containing products. A knowledgeable mesothelioma law firm can investigate your exposure history, identify liable parties, and pursue compensation through settlements or court verdicts.



Key Considerations When Choosing a Mesothelioma Law Firm



Selecting the right law firm is crucial. Look for firms with experience handling veteran-specific cases, a proven track record in mesothelioma litigation, and a compassionate approach to client care. Many firms, like the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, offer free consultations to discuss your case and explore your options.



Building Awareness and Protecting Future Generations



The legacy of asbestos exposure in the military highlights the importance of education and advocacy. Veterans and their families can contribute to awareness efforts by sharing their stories, participating in support groups, and working with organizations that support mesothelioma research.







Honoring Veterans and Supporting Families



Communities across the country, from bustling urban centers to small rural towns, often come together to honor veterans. Events like Veterans Day parades, remembrance ceremonies, and fundraisers provide opportunities to raise awareness about mesothelioma’s impact and the need for continued support.



Next Steps Toward Justice and Healing



A mesothelioma diagnosis is life-changing, but you don’t have to face it alone. Understanding what causes mesothelioma in veterans and seeking guidance from professionals, including an experienced mesothelioma law firm, can help you secure the resources you need to focus on your health and well-being.



The Mesothelioma Lawyer Center is dedicated to assisting veterans and their families nationwide. By providing tailored legal support, we aim to help you navigate this complex process with compassion and expertise. Contact our team today to learn more about your options and take the first step toward justice.

### How to Choose the Right Mesothelioma Attorney for Veterans' Cases

Veterans frequently have to make sacrifices while serving their nation, some of which are obvious and others of which are not. One of these unspoken dangers is exposure to asbestos, a substance that was once widely utilized in military installations and equipment. This exposure has left many veterans facing mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer that disrupts not only their health but also their finances and peace of mind.







Navigating this challenging time requires a knowledgeable ally. Finding the right mesothelioma attorney for veterans' cases is not just about filing claims—it’s about ensuring justice, financial security, and peace for you and your family. Whether you served in the Navy, Air Force, Army, or Marines, an experienced attorney can help uncover the link between your service and asbestos exposure, guiding you toward the compensation you deserve.



Understanding Mesothelioma in Veterans



Veterans are disproportionately affected by mesothelioma due to the military's extensive use of asbestos in ships, vehicles, and buildings before its dangers were widely known. This military asbestos exposure often occurred decades ago, leaving veterans at a higher risk today. If you or a loved one has been diagnosed, choosing a mesothelioma law firm that can help veterans require understanding their specific needs and legal avenues.



Key Legal Challenges Veterans Face




Exposure Tracking: Identifying when and where asbestos exposure occurred during military service is complex but vital.



Navigating VA Benefits: Veterans diagnosed with mesothelioma may be eligible for benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs, but accessing these benefits often requires legal expertise.



Statutes of Limitations: Filing deadlines vary by state, and delays can jeopardize claims.




Traits to Look for in a Mesothelioma Attorney



When selecting a legal representative, it’s essential to choose someone who specializes in veterans' cases and has a proven track record of success. Here are the core attributes to consider:







1. Expertise in Veterans' Asbestos Cases



Not all attorneys have experience handling military asbestos exposure. Look for those who:




Understand military service records.



Have expertise in filing claims with the VA.



Can pinpoint asbestos exposure through ship logs or duty assignments.




2. National Reach and Resources



Given that many veterans relocate after service, a national mesothelioma law firm that can help veterans ensure broader reach and better resources. Firms with nationwide practices often:




Work with asbestos databases to strengthen claims.



Collaborate with experts to provide robust evidence.



Offer consultations regardless of where you live.




3. Compassionate Client Care



The legal process can be emotionally taxing. A dedicated attorney will:




Provide transparent communication.



Handle your case with sensitivity.



Prioritize your family’s needs and wellbeing.




How a Mesothelioma Law Firm Supports Veterans



Partnering with a specialized mesothelioma law firm that can help veterans offers significant advantages. These firms understand the nuances of mesothelioma cases and work tirelessly to secure justice. Here's what they typically do:



Building a Strong Case



Attorneys will gather:




Medical Records: To confirm the diagnosis.



Service Documents: To prove asbestos exposure during military service.



Witness Testimonies: From fellow veterans or coworkers who can corroborate exposure.




Filing and Managing VA Claims



Veterans are entitled to file for:




Disability Compensation: Monthly payments for mesothelioma-related disabilities.



Pension Benefits: Financial aid based on income.



Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC): For families of veterans who pass away from service-related mesothelioma.




A skilled attorney ensures these applications are accurate and comprehensive.







Pursuing Legal Compensation



In addition to VA benefits, mesothelioma attorneys pursue:




Lawsuits against manufacturers of asbestos products.



Trust fund claims from asbestos companies that have gone bankrupt.




This dual approach maximizes financial recovery to cover medical bills, lost income, and other expenses.



Why Timely Action Matters



Mesothelioma cases are time-sensitive. Delaying legal action could result in:




Losing evidence: As documents and memories fade over time.



Missed Deadlines: Each state has its own statute of limitations for filing claims.




By acting quickly, you increase your chances of a successful outcome. National firms often provide expedited assessments to meet these urgent needs.



Take the First Step Toward Justice



Veterans and their families deserve expert guidance when navigating the complexities of mesothelioma claims. Partnering with the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center ensures you’ll have a mesothelioma attorney for veterans' cases who understands your challenges and fights for maximum compensation. Contact us today to secure your family's future and honor the sacrifices made in service to our nation.

### $24.4 Million Awarded to Chicago Mesothelioma Victim in Avon Talc Trial

Cipriano Ramirez blamed his malignant pleural mesothelioma on asbestos he was exposed to while he worked for Avon in its Morton Grove, Illinois, factory. When he filed suit against the company, they attempted to divert attention to his other employers, but the victim prevailed, and a Chicago jury ordered the cosmetic giant to pay him and his family over $24 million in compensation for the damages he and they have suffered.







Janitor With Mesothelioma Blames Job at Avon for Asbestos Exposure



When Mr. Ramirez was diagnosed with mesothelioma, he and his attorneys reviewed his occupational history and quickly identified Avon Product’s Morton Grove, Illinois factory, where he had worked as a janitor in the 1980s, as the source of his asbestos exposure.  Knowing how aggressive the disease could be and that his life expectancy was significantly diminished, he and his wife Maria filed suit against the company just three months after his diagnosis and requested an expedited trial date.



The couple’s mesothelioma lawsuit, which included claims of loss of consortium for Maria, accused the company of both negligence in his on-the-job exposure and product liability, saying he had been exposed occupationally and through his personal use of the asbestos-containing talc. Though the company filed a motion to add third-party claims against Mr. Ramirez’s other employers, the judge hearing the case severed those claims from the Avon trial so that the case could be heard, and the jury quickly decided in the couple’s favor.



Janitor with Mesothelioma Awarded $24.4 Million in Damages



Speaking of the $24.4 award that the Chicago jury ordered Avon to pay after hearing a full month of evidence and testimony in the mesothelioma trial, the victim’s representative said, “After carefully reviewing the facts of the case, the jury rejected Avon’s reprehensible attempts to impugn the dignity and integrity of Cipriano Ramirez and found that Avon was responsible for his cancer diagnosis…. Mr. Ramirez dedicated his life to working hard for his family. He should be enjoying retirement but has been forced to spend his time fighting a cancer that could have been prevented.”

### How to File a Veterans' Mesothelioma Claim: Step-by-Step Guide

Obtaining justice and compensation can be particularly difficult for US veterans who have been diagnosed with mesothelioma as a result of asbestos exposure. Filing a veterans’ mesothelioma claim is a critical step to ensure financial security and access to quality medical care. With proper guidance, this process can become more manageable, offering a pathway to support during difficult times.



In this step-by-step guide, we’ll explore how veterans can navigate the claims process efficiently while highlighting the role of an experienced mesothelioma lawyer in achieving a favorable outcome.



Understanding Mesothelioma and Its Connection to Veterans



Veterans represent a significant percentage of mesothelioma cases in the U.S. This is largely due to asbestos exposure during military service, particularly in branches such as the Navy, where asbestos was commonly used in ships, barracks, and equipment. Veterans who served before the 1980s are especially at risk.



Because of the national nature of this issue, claims are processed under federal systems, but specific locations, like regional VA offices, often assist veterans in their local communities. Understanding these systems is key to filing a successful veterans' mesothelioma claim.



Step 1: Confirm Your Diagnosis







Before filing a claim, a confirmed diagnosis of mesothelioma from a medical professional is essential. This serves as the foundation for any compensation claim. Veterans should consult with mesothelioma specialists to ensure accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment plans.



In addition to medical care, it’s vital to gather detailed records of asbestos exposure during military service. This includes listing job duties, specific locations where exposure occurred, and any documentation related to service assignments.



Step 2: Identify the Right Claim Type



Veterans can pursue several claim types based on their situation:



VA Disability Compensation



This tax-free benefit is for veterans whose mesothelioma is directly linked to asbestos exposure during active duty.



VA Healthcare Benefits



The VA provides specialized care for mesothelioma through top facilities like the West Los Angeles VA Medical Center.



Legal Claims Against Manufacturers



Veterans can file claims against companies that supplied asbestos products to the military. An experienced mesothelioma lawyer is essential for these cases.



Step 3: File the VA Claim



Filing a veterans' mesothelioma claim with the VA requires completing several forms, including VA Form 21-526EZ. This form gathers essential information about your condition and its connection to military service.



The process can be complex, so many veterans seek assistance from Veterans Service Officers (VSOs) or an experienced attorney. These professionals understand the nuances of VA claims and can help ensure that all documentation is complete and submitted correctly.



Step 4: Pursue Legal Action 







In addition to VA benefits, veterans may have the option to file a lawsuit or trust fund claim against asbestos manufacturers. Many companies that exposed veterans to asbestos have set up trust funds to compensate victims.



A skilled mesothelioma lawyer can evaluate your case, identify liable parties, and navigate the legal system on your behalf. These claims often result in significant financial compensation, which can cover medical bills, lost wages, and additional expenses.



Step 5: Track Your Claim and Prepare for Appeals



After submitting your VA appeal, it’s essential to track its progress. The VA may request additional documentation or schedule evaluations to verify your eligibility.



If your claim is denied, don’t lose hope. Many initial claims are rejected due to incomplete information or technical errors. Appeals are a routine part of the process, and with the support of a legal expert, you can present a stronger case.



Why Hire a Mesothelioma Lawyer?



Filing a veterans' mesothelioma claim involves navigating complex legal and administrative systems. A mesothelioma lawyer specializing in veterans' cases can streamline the process, ensuring no detail is overlooked. They provide valuable expertise in:




Identifying asbestos exposure sources



Gathering supporting evidence



Maximizing compensation through legal claims




Choosing a legal team with a track record of success in mesothelioma cases ensures you have the best possible support.



Begin Your Journey Toward Justice



Filing a veterans' mesothelioma claim is more than a bureaucratic process—it’s a step toward securing the care and recognition you deserve. Whether accessing VA benefits or pursuing compensation through trust funds, understanding your options and rights is essential.



At the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, we specialize in connecting veterans with skilled legal professionals who can guide you every step of the way. Reach out today for compassionate, expert assistance in your fight for justice.

### Legal Protection for Veterans: Understanding Mesothelioma Compensation Options

Numerous veterans in the United States have had to deal with significant health and financial challenges due to mesothelioma, an uncommon but aggressive cancer that is mostly brought on by asbestos exposure. Securing mesothelioma compensation is a crucial step for veterans and their families, offering financial relief and access to better care. Understanding these options can be daunting, but the right resources and legal support can make all the difference.



How Asbestos Exposure Impacts Veterans



The U.S. military, particularly during the mid-20th century, extensively used asbestos in ships, vehicles, and buildings due to its heat resistance and durability. While this protected service members in extreme conditions, it has led to a legacy of asbestos-related illnesses among veterans. Navy veterans are disproportionately affected because of their service aboard ships heavily laden with asbestos-containing materials.



Symptoms of mesothelioma, like shortness of breath and chest pain, often emerge decades after exposure. Veterans diagnosed with this disease face not only the physical toll but also the challenge of navigating their legal rights and compensation avenues. 



Types of Mesothelioma Compensation Available



Veterans diagnosed with mesothelioma can access several compensation pathways, each tailored to specific circumstances. These include:







VA Disability Benefits



The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) provides disability compensation to veterans whose mesothelioma is linked to military service. Claims require proving asbestos exposure during active duty, often supported by service records and medical documentation. This tax-free benefit is critical for covering treatment costs and daily expenses.



Legal Claims Against Manufacturers



Many companies that supplied asbestos materials to the military knew about the health risks but failed to warn service members. Veterans can file lawsuits or claims against these manufacturers to receive significant financial compensation, often in the form of settlements.



Asbestos Trust Funds



Over the years, a significant number of asbestos manufacturers have filed for bankruptcy due to the overwhelming number of lawsuits brought against them for asbestos-related illnesses. As part of their bankruptcy proceedings, these companies established asbestos trust funds to provide compensation to victims of exposure, including veterans. These trust funds were designed to ensure that eligible individuals could receive financial support without the need to engage in lengthy or costly lawsuits. For veterans, this offers a more straightforward and accessible path to secure the compensation they deserve, alleviating some of the burdens associated with their diagnosis..



Other Support Options



Some states offer additional compensation programs or tax breaks for individuals battling mesothelioma. It's worth exploring these localized resources alongside federal and legal options.



Filing a Mesothelioma Compensation Claim



Navigating the claims process can be overwhelming, particularly for veterans already managing a challenging health condition. The key steps include:




Gathering Evidence: Service records detailing exposure and medical reports confirming the diagnosis are critical.



Choosing the Right Path: Veterans must decide whether to pursue VA benefits, legal claims, or trust fund compensation, sometimes opting for multiple avenues.



Engaging a Mesothelioma Lawyer: Expert legal guidance is invaluable. Lawyers specializing in asbestos cases streamline the process, ensuring claims are properly filed and maximized.




In areas like California and Texas, where many veterans reside, legal firms are well-versed in handling cases involving shipyards, military bases, and asbestos-heavy industries. Veterans from these states often benefit from lawyers with localized knowledge of asbestos use patterns and compensation resources.



The Role of Family in Supporting Veterans







Mesothelioma affects not only veterans but their families as well. Spouses and children often take on caregiving roles, managing medical appointments, and helping navigate compensation claims. It's essential for families to educate themselves about available resources to ensure their loved ones receive the support they deserve.



Families can also play a vital role in connecting veterans with local support groups or veteran organizations. These networks provide emotional support and often share first hand advice on successfully securing compensation.



Seeking Trusted Legal Help



When facing a mesothelioma diagnosis, securing financial support quickly is critical. The Mesothelioma Lawyer Center specializes in guiding veterans and their families through this complex process. With expertise in asbestos-related claims and a focus on delivering justice for veterans, they stand ready to assist. Contact us today to learn about your options and start your journey to compensation.

### Woman Blames Late Husband’s Employer for Her Mesothelioma Diagnosis

Verna Brewer filed a personal injury lawsuit against her late husband’s former employer, BOC Group, Inc., after being diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Ms. Brewer claims her illness was caused by asbestos brought home on her husband's clothing after he worked with the material. However, the company argues that her exposure to asbestos occurred years after her late husband's death. The company has requested access to work and medical records for each of her three husbands, with mixed results in court.







Mesothelioma Lawsuit is Complicated by Multiple Husbands and Their Workplaces



Brewer's mesothelioma lawsuit revolves around her claim of secondary asbestos exposure from her first husband, Nelson Dwayne Dotson, who worked with asbestos between 1958 and 1973. She was married to Dotson for fifteen years before his accidental death. Afterward, she married Thomas Reeves in 1975, though that marriage lasted only a few months. Reeves, who is now deceased, and Brewer’s third husband, James David Brewer, who passed away in 2020 after a 37-year marriage, are also part of the legal complexities.



In her mesothelioma lawsuit, Brewer holds BOC Group, Inc. responsible for exposing her to asbestos through Dotson’s contaminated work clothes. The company, however, argues that Brewer may have been exposed to asbestos through her other husbands, who could have also worked in environments where asbestos was present. As a result, the company requested the employment and medical records for all three men. The mesothelioma victim's attorneys have objected to that request.



Court Provides Mixed Rulings on Records Request in Mesothelioma Claim



Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky is overseeing the mesothelioma lawsuit, and reviewed the company’s requests for records. He approved some but denied others. Judge Brennenstuhl directed the Social Security Administration to release the employment records of Brewer’s former husbands, but ruled against issuing a broad order to the Kentucky Department of Workers’ Claims, suggesting that the defendant must follow the standard procedure of issuing a subpoena to obtain additional records. This decision adds yet another layer of complexity to the ongoing legal case.

### On Veterans Day, Veterans with Mesothelioma Deserve Special Attention

Every November 11th, America pauses to pay tribute to those who’ve served in all branches of the military and thank them for their contributions and sacrifice. For veterans diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma after asbestos exposure during their service, every day is a reminder of the price they paid.







Malignant Mesothelioma Strikes Veterans More than Any Other Group



In the United States, the largest demographic to be impacted by malignant mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases is veterans who served in the military between 1930 and 1980. This is particularly true of Navy veterans, who were exposed in shipyards and onboard ships that were heavily contaminated with asbestos, but other service branches also faced significant exposure.



America’s veterans represent approximately one third of all mesothelioma diagnoses. Barracks, mess halls, and administrative buildings were constructed using asbestos-containing materials, and boilers and infrastructure were insulated with asbestos. Brake linings on vehicles and aircraft were made using asbestos, and so too were heat shields and other parts used in military aircraft.



Military’s Use of Asbestos Continued Through the 1980s



It was only when the Environmental Protection Agency linked asbestos exposure to malignant mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases that the military discontinued its use of asbestos in its various applications; after that they pursued a rigorous abatement project meant to protect service men and women of being exposed in the future.



For those who had already worked as machinists, boiler workers, mechanics, and in other roles with high levels of exposure, the risk of malignant mesothelioma was extremely high, and continues to be. Even those who were exposed to low levels of the toxic material may end up being diagnosed with the disease, which often takes up to sixty years to show its deadly symptoms.



Veterans exposed to asbestos during their service are entitled to special benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs if they are diagnosed with mesothelioma, and may be eligible to file personal injury lawsuits against the companies responsible for their illness.

### Michigan Supreme Court to Decide on Asbestos Whistleblower Claim

The fear of a future mesothelioma diagnosis drove information technology worker Cleveland Stegall to approach the management at Fiat Chrysler about workplace safety. When no action was taken to address asbestos contamination in the plant, he went to state and federal authorities to voice his concerns, and after that, the company fired him. Now, he is pursuing a whistleblower lawsuit alleging he was fired in retaliation for having reported the hazardous conditions, and though his claim was initially dismissed, the Michigan Supreme Court has agreed to weigh in on his claim.







 Fear of Mesothelioma Drives I.T. Worker to Report Asbestos Hazard at Fiat Chrysler



Asbestos exposure has been directly linked to being diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, asbestosis, and other deadly diseases, and that’s why Mr. Stegall went to his company’s management and asked them to act. The assembly plant area that he traversed each day had warning signs about asbestos and dust, but he was offered no personal protective equipment. Though the company did ask for a report from an in-house health and safety manager and an outside consultant, both opined that the plant floor was not hazardous, and the company refused to perform air quality tests that would reassure him that his workplace was safe.



Facing the company’s decision, Mr. Stegall reported his work conditions to several agencies tasked with workplace safety, including the state and federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration. He was fired soon after, and in response to what he viewed as wrongful termination, he filed a lawsuit in which he accused the company of violating whistleblower protection laws. In response, Fiat Chrysler asserted that his entire shift had been eliminated because the company had discontinued manufacturing a specific auto model.



Lower Courts Deny Whistleblower Claim, but Supreme Court Will Hear the Case



The trial court assigned to Mr. Stegall’s asbestos whistleblower case found in favor of Fiat Chrysler’s petition for summary judgment and dismissed the case, and that decision was upheld by the appeals court that reviewed it, but he appealed their decision to the Michigan Supreme Court. Upon review, the high court noted that employees are entitled to pursue a private cause of action if they believe they’ve been fired for reporting a violation of workplace safety laws.

### How an Asbestos Lawyer Can Help You File a Mesothelioma Claim

It can be very stressful for individuals and their family to learn that they have mesothelioma. In addition to understanding healthcare alternatives and managing medical treatments, many people often have to worry about seeking justice and obtaining financial assistance. This is where an experienced asbestos lawyer becomes essential. Filing a mesothelioma claim is often a complex legal process, but with the right legal representation, you can secure compensation that can help cover medical costs, lost income, and provide financial relief during an exceptionally challenging time.



Why You Need an Asbestos Lawyer







Mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive form of cancer, most commonly linked to asbestos exposure. While asbestos was widely used in the U.S. in industries such as construction, shipbuilding, and manufacturing, its use has been sharply restricted due to health risks. Nevertheless, mesothelioma cases are still emerging because of the disease's long latency period. Often, symptoms don’t appear until decades after exposure, meaning that many individuals who worked with asbestos between the 1940s and 1980s are only now experiencing symptoms.



An asbestos lawyer has extensive knowledge of the legal and medical complexities involved in cases involving asbestos exposure and mesothelioma. By determining the causes of asbestos exposure, obtaining important evidence, and pursuing compensation through settlements or trial verdicts, these lawyers are skilled at constructing a compelling case.



How an Asbestos Lawyer Can Support Your Mesothelioma Claim



Working with an asbestos lawyer brings many benefits, including expert guidance, resources, and a network of support that’s tailored specifically for mesothelioma claims. Here’s a look at the primary ways they can assist you:



1. Investigating Your Exposure History



An essential first step in any mesothelioma claim is determining the location and timing of asbestos exposure. Asbestos lawyers have access to historical data, employment records, and product information to help pinpoint your exposure source. Whether you were exposed to asbestos in construction jobs in New York, shipyards in Virginia, or factories in California, a specialized lawyer knows where to look for records and connections to asbestos usage.



2. Accessing Medical and Legal Resources







Mesothelioma claims involve more than just legal arguments; they also require substantial medical evidence. Experienced asbestos lawyers work closely with medical experts who can provide detailed testimony regarding your diagnosis, symptoms, and prognosis. Attorneys may also collaborate with financial analysts to determine the entire amount of money you are entitled to, taking into account lost wages and future medical costs.



3. Filing Within the Statute of Limitations



The statute of limitations for bringing a mesothelioma claim varies by state in the United States and usually lasts between one and five years after the diagnosis. A knowledgeable asbestos lawyer will ensure your claim is filed promptly, preserving your rights to compensation. This process can be particularly important for families who might be filing wrongful death claims if their loved one has passed away due to mesothelioma.



Types of Mesothelioma Claims



Mesothelioma cases can lead to various types of claims, each with its unique process and potential benefits. An asbestos lawyer can guide you in selecting the best option for your case.



Personal Injury Claims



If you are diagnosed with mesothelioma, you may file a personal injury claim against the companies responsible for your asbestos exposure. Personal injury claims seek compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages.



Wrongful Death Claims



If a loved one has passed away from mesothelioma, surviving family members may be eligible to file a wrongful death claim. This type of mesothelioma claim compensates for the loss of financial support, companionship, and funeral expenses, providing families with a measure of justice and financial stability.



Trust Fund Claims



Many asbestos manufacturers have declared bankruptcy over the years, leading to the creation of asbestos trust funds to compensate victims. Your asbestos lawyer will know if a trust fund claim is available based on the companies associated with your exposure and can help file the necessary documentation. Trust fund claims often allow faster resolution, though the compensation can vary depending on fund availability.



Preparing for the Legal Process with an Asbestos Lawyer







When working with an asbestos lawyer, you’ll gain an advocate who will guide you through the entire legal process, from the initial consultation to court hearings, if necessary. Many attorneys offer free consultations, allowing you to discuss your case, ask questions, and understand your options without obligation.



The Importance of Experience



An attorney with specialized experience in asbestos and mesothelioma cases can make all the difference. Since these cases involve unique legal and medical complexities, it’s beneficial to work with a lawyer who has a proven record of successful mesothelioma claims. They will understand state and federal regulations, have insights into common defense tactics used by asbestos companies, and be able to strategize accordingly to maximize your compensation.



Take the First Step Toward Justice



Although managing mesothelioma is difficult, you don't have to do it alone. Working with an experienced asbestos lawyer is a critical first step in obtaining financial assistance that might lessen some of the hardships you and your family experience. Whether you are pursuing a personal injury claim, a wrongful death claim, or a trust fund claim, a dedicated lawyer can help build a strong case and ensure you get the compensation you deserve.



For more guidance on filing a mesothelioma claim and navigating this process, reach out to the experienced team at the Mesothelioma Lawyer Center.

### Essential Questions to Ask Your Mesothelioma Lawyer Before Hiring

Getting legal advice after receiving a mesothelioma diagnosis might be a crucial next step. The right mesothelioma lawyer not only represents your case but also understands the complexities of asbestos-related illnesses, provides clear mesothelioma legal advice, and assists in navigating the legal and emotional journey. Mesothelioma cases are highly specific, with unique requirements, so ensuring that your lawyer has both expertise and compassion is essential. Asking the right questions upfront can give you peace of mind that you’re making a well-informed decision.



Understanding the Lawyer’s Experience with Mesothelioma Cases



Why is Specialized Experience Important?







One of the first questions to ask a potential mesothelioma lawyer is about their specific experience handling mesothelioma and asbestos-related cases. Not every personal injury lawyer possesses the depth of knowledge necessary to properly negotiate the complexities of mesothelioma law. The laws, rules, and statutes of limitations that apply to mesothelioma cases in every state in the union, from Maine to California, will be familiar to a lawyer with a great deal of experience in these situations.



Some questions to consider here include:




“How many mesothelioma cases have you handled?”



“Do you have experience winning significant settlements or verdicts in mesothelioma cases?”




Choosing a lawyer with specialized experience increases your chances of securing the compensation needed to cover medical expenses, lost income, and other costs associated with a mesothelioma diagnosis.



Discussing Fee Structures and Payment Options



How Do Legal Fees Work in Mesothelioma Cases?



Legal fees can vary significantly in mesothelioma cases, so understanding how a lawyer’s fees are structured is crucial. Many mesothelioma lawyers work on a contingency basis, which means you only pay if they win your case. This fee structure can be advantageous, especially if medical costs have already impacted your financial situation. Confirm that the lawyer will take on your case under this arrangement, and inquire about the specific percentage they’ll charge if you win.



Consider asking:




“Do you work on a contingency basis?”



“Are there any upfront costs or additional fees I should know about?”




These questions clarify potential costs so you’re not faced with surprises later in the process. Transparent mesothelioma legal advice includes clear explanations of all potential expenses, enabling you to budget for the legal journey ahead.



Examining Communication and Case Management Practices



Will the Lawyer Be Accessible and Keep You Updated?







Mesothelioma cases can be lengthy, often requiring detailed documentation, ongoing communication, and patience. A good mesothelioma lawyer should be accessible, responsive, and transparent about updates in your case. Ask about how frequently they communicate with clients and if you’ll have direct access to them or if you’ll work mostly with their legal team.



Some key questions to ask include:




“How often can I expect updates on my case?”



“Will you be my primary contact, or will other team members handle my case?”




Frequent and clear communication builds trust and keeps you informed about the progression of your case, allowing you to focus on your health and personal matters.



Understanding Their Success Record and Approach to Mesothelioma Cases



Can They Demonstrate a Strong Track Record of Success?



Knowing your lawyer’s success rate with mesothelioma cases can be a deciding factor. A high success rate reflects experience and understanding of the challenges these cases often present, like proving asbestos exposure, identifying liable parties, and securing evidence. Lawyers experienced in mesothelioma law often have established connections with medical experts, industrial hygienists, and other professionals who can strengthen your case.



Ask your lawyer about:




“What is your track record with mesothelioma cases?”



“Do you have references from past clients?”




These questions help gauge a lawyer’s dedication and ability to deliver results. A successful record in mesothelioma cases indicates they are well-equipped to pursue justice for your family.



Clarifying the Lawyer’s Knowledge of Asbestos Exposure Sites



Are They Familiar with Common Asbestos Exposure Locations?







Diagnoses of mesothelioma are frequently linked to places of employment, building sites, or even educational institutions where asbestos was widely utilized. A mesothelioma lawyer with knowledge of common exposure sites, both locally and nationally, can be invaluable. For instance, areas with historical ties to industries like shipbuilding, mining, or chemical production frequently have cases tied to asbestos exposure.



Ask your lawyer if they are familiar with sites in your area or within your loved one’s work history:




“Are you familiar with asbestos exposure sites that may be relevant to my case?”



“How will you help identify potential sources of asbestos exposure?”




Lawyers experienced with asbestos exposure sites often have access to databases that track asbestos history, which can save significant time and aid in building a compelling case.



Ensuring the Lawyer’s Compassionate Approach



Will They Provide Personalized Support Throughout the Case?



Navigating a mesothelioma diagnosis is emotionally challenging, and your lawyer should be empathetic to your unique needs. A compassionate lawyer will understand that your case is more than just a file on their desk. They should take the time to address your concerns, answer questions thoroughly, and provide clear guidance through each stage.



To gauge their approach, ask:




“How do you support your clients beyond the legal aspects of the case?”



“Do you provide resources for coping with mesothelioma or managing related medical expenses?”




This helps ensure that you have a lawyer who genuinely cares about your well-being and will go the extra mile to make the legal process as comfortable as possible.



Partner with Mesothelioma Lawyer Center



Choosing the right mesothelioma lawyer is an important step in securing justice and peace of mind. Asking these essential questions ensures that you’re working with a lawyer who brings the right expertise, communication skills, and compassion to your case. At Mesothelioma Lawyer Center, we’re dedicated to providing experienced, empathetic mesothelioma legal advice tailored to each client’s unique circumstances. Let us help you through this process with the expertise and concern you deserve if you're looking for representation for yourself or a loved one.

### “Reckless Disregard” Results in 100% Mesothelioma Liability for Burnham LLC

A New York jury hearing the details of an 86-year-old contractor’s exposure to asbestos has ordered boiler manufacturer Burnham LLC to pay $22 million in damages to the victim. Though the jury only assessed 25% of the blame for Frank Gondar’s illness to the company, they felt that the reckless disregard the company exhibited warranted them being assessed 100% of the financial responsibility.







New York Mesothelioma Victim Ran His Own Construction Business



The jury hearing 86-year-old Frank Gondar’s case heard that though he had held positions as both a New York City police officer and a teacher, he was exposed to asbestos during the 20 years that he ran his own construction business. His testimony included a long list of asbestos-containing products that he had been exposed to while on the job, but it was the information about his exposure to asbestos from Burnham boilers that made the biggest impression on the group.



Mr. Gondar blamed his malignant mesothelioma diagnosis on the years that he spent doing home renovation projects for his customers and said that though he had not worked directly with Burnham boilers, he had been present on job sites where other contractors were maintaining, repairing, installing, or removing them between 1953 and 1973. His attorneys presented evidence that the company had been aware of the dangers posed by their product but had chosen not to provide warnings of any kind to anybody using them.



Jury Awards Mesothelioma Victim $22 Million in Damages



After hearing the evidence, the mesothelioma jury awarded Mr. Gondar $22 million in compensation, broken down into $12 million for his past pain and suffering and another $10 million for the pain and suffering that they anticipate he will experience between the trial and his eventual death. Though the jury found that Burnham was liable for just 25 percent of Mr. Gondar’s exposure among the several companies named in the suit, they felt that the “reckless disregard” the company had shown for public safety deserved them being forced to pay 100% of the asbestos liability assessed.

### Brake Grinder Used on Asbestos Brakes Blamed for Mesothelioma

Walter Miller was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma after years of using an AMMCO grinder on asbestos-containing brake linings manufactured by BMW. When he filed suit against AMMCO’s owner, Hennessy Industries, in New York’s court system, a jury agreed that the grinder company was at fault and ordered the company to pay him $25 million in damages. Though the award was reduced to $9 million, the company appealed the verdict, but an appellate court denied their request, leaving the award in place.







$9 Million in Damages Awarded to Mesothelioma Victim



At issue in the original mesothelioma claim was whether a company that knows that its product will be used on asbestos-containing products in a way that poses a risk to the owner has a responsibility to warn of the dangers. Though Hennessy Industries argued that the answer was no, the New York jury sided with the victim. Their original award of $25 million in damages was reduced to $5 million for Mr. Miller’s past pain and suffering and $4 million for his future pain and suffering.



Despite expert witness testimony at trial about the asbestos dust that their equipment generated by being used on asbestos-containing brakes and that they knew the brakes it would be used on would have contained asbestos, the company insisted that it should not be held liable for Mr. Miller’s mesothelioma and argued as much in its appeal of the jury’s verdict. Its attorneys also argued that the amount assigned and apportioned by the jury was inappropriate and should be further modified.



Appellate Judge Upholds Jury’s Mesothelioma Verdict and Victim’s Award



Justice Cynthia S. Kern of the Supreme Court of New York County heard the grinder company’s appeal but, upon review of the facts of the case, upheld the jury’s verdict and the reduced award. She noted that the reduction had been agreed to by the victim and was appropriate based on the evidence submitted at trial by the victim's asbestos lawyer as well as previous mesothelioma damages awards.

### How to Choose the Right Mesothelioma Law Firm for Your Case

Facing a mesothelioma diagnosis is overwhelming, and finding the right mesothelioma law firm to represent your case can be just as daunting. With so many legal options available, it’s crucial to select a firm that specializes in asbestos exposure cases and understands the complexities of mesothelioma litigation. The right law firm can help secure the compensation you deserve to cover medical costs and provide peace of mind during a difficult time. In this guide, we’ll explore how to choose the best legal representation for your case and ensure you receive reliable mesothelioma legal advice.



Experience Matters in Mesothelioma Cases







Not all law firms are equipped to handle mesothelioma cases, which can be complex due to the long latency period between asbestos exposure and the onset of the disease. A qualified mesothelioma law firm should have extensive experience in asbestos litigation. Ask potential law firms about their track record with similar cases, including how many mesothelioma victims they have represented and the outcomes of those cases.



An experienced law firm will also have connections with the top medical experts, who can provide crucial testimony in your case. They’ll know how to investigate past asbestos exposure, whether it occurred in the workplace, military, or through other means, to build a strong claim on your behalf.



National Reach with Local Understanding



While it's important to find a firm that understands local laws and procedures, the best mesothelioma law firms often operate on a national scale. National firms have access to more resources and experience working with clients across the U.S., making them a good option for mesothelioma victims anywhere in the country.



For example, if you live in a specific region of the country that has historically had industries known for asbestos exposure, such as shipyards, construction sites, or automotive factories, you'll want a firm that understands the local context of your case. Firms that have handled asbestos exposure cases in these areas will be more familiar with the nuances of your situation. In colder northern regions, for instance, industries often used asbestos for insulation, while in the South, it was more common in shipbuilding.



Compassion and Personalized Mesothelioma Legal Advice



When choosing a mesothelioma law firm, it’s important to work with attorneys who not only understand the law but also have compassion for what you and your family are going through. Dealing with mesothelioma is an emotional and stressful time, and having a supportive legal team can make a huge difference. Look for firms that offer personalized attention to their clients and who will take the time to explain every step of the legal process clearly.



A top-quality mesothelioma law firm should provide you with mesothelioma legal advice tailored to your specific case. They should be able to answer questions like:




How strong is my case?



What compensation can I expect to receive?



How long will the process take?




The right firm will also offer free consultations, so you can get a sense of their approach before committing.



Understanding Costs and Payment Structure







Most mesothelioma law firms work on a contingency fee basis, meaning they only get paid if they win your case. This arrangement is crucial for victims and their families, as mesothelioma treatment can be incredibly expensive. Before signing any agreement, make sure you understand the firm's fee structure and how much they will take from any settlement or verdict.



Additionally, ask if the firm will cover upfront expenses such as filing fees, expert witness costs, and travel. Some firms may require you to cover certain costs upfront, while others will deduct them from your final compensation.



The Importance of Client Testimonials and Reviews



One of the best ways to evaluate a mesothelioma law firm is to hear what past clients have to say. Check online reviews and testimonials to see how other mesothelioma victims and their families rate the firm's services. Were they satisfied with the communication, the handling of the case, and the final outcome? Client stories can give you a better understanding of what to expect.



If possible, speak directly with former clients about their experience with the law firm. This can give you an insider’s perspective on how the firm operates and whether they truly specialize in mesothelioma cases.



National or Local Firms: Which is Better?



While there are excellent local law firms that handle asbestos cases, many of the most successful mesothelioma law firms work nationwide. A national law firm will have the advantage of greater resources, larger legal teams, and more experience with high-stakes cases. If you live in a smaller town or state without many options, a national firm with a history of successfully representing mesothelioma victims across the country may be the best choice.



For example, residents of industrial areas like Pittsburgh or Detroit, where asbestos was used heavily in manufacturing, or regions like the Pacific Northwest, known for its shipyards, might benefit from a national law firm with deep experience in these sectors.



Final Thoughts



Choosing the right mesothelioma law firm can greatly impact the success of your case and the compensation you receive. You need a law firm with proven experience, compassionate attorneys, and a deep understanding of mesothelioma legal advice. National firms with local expertise, like Mesothelioma Law Center, can offer victims and their families the best combination of resources, experience, and personal attention.



If you or someone you love has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, don’t wait to seek legal help. Contact Mesothelioma Law Center today for a free consultation to discuss your case and explore your legal options.




https://youtu.be/RKQ9OriTLqg

### The Role of a Mesothelioma Attorney in Securing Financial Compensation

When facing a diagnosis of mesothelioma, families often find themselves overwhelmed by the emotional and financial strain that follows. A mesothelioma attorney plays a crucial role in helping victims and their loved ones navigate this challenging time by securing mesothelioma compensation. With the right legal support, victims can gain access to funds that cover medical bills, lost wages, and other expenses, helping them focus on what truly matters—healing and spending time with loved ones.



Why You Need a Mesothelioma Attorney







Mesothelioma cases are unique and complex. This rare form of cancer is caused by exposure to asbestos, often through negligence on the part of employers or product manufacturers. A seasoned mesothelioma attorney understands the intricate details of asbestos litigation and the challenges victims face. They have experience in tracing asbestos exposure that might have occurred decades ago, often in industries like construction, shipbuilding, or manufacturing.



Moreover, the process of filing a mesothelioma lawsuit can be daunting without professional guidance. Deadlines, known as statutes of limitations, vary by state and can greatly impact your ability to file a claim. A knowledgeable attorney ensures that your case is filed on time and that you have the best possible chance of receiving the compensation you deserve.



How a Mesothelioma Law Firm Can Help



Partnering with a mesothelioma law firm that specializes in asbestos-related cases is essential to building a strong case. These firms have the resources, networks, and knowledge needed to investigate your exposure history, identify responsible parties, and fight for maximum compensation. Unlike general personal injury lawyers, mesothelioma attorneys are experts in navigating the complexities of asbestos-related claims, making them your best advocate in the courtroom.



A reputable mesothelioma law firm will take care of everything from collecting medical records to handling negotiations with insurance companies. Many of these firms operate on a contingency basis, meaning you won’t have to pay any legal fees upfront. Instead, they only get paid if you win your case, making it easier for you to access justice without the added financial burden.



The Importance of Financial Compensation in Mesothelioma Cases







The financial toll of mesothelioma can be staggering. Medical treatments, such as surgeries, chemotherapy, and radiation, can easily cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. On top of that, many patients are forced to stop working, leading to a loss of income. A mesothelioma attorney will fight to secure compensation that covers these expenses, as well as pain and suffering.



Compensation can also provide much-needed financial security for your family. Mesothelioma doesn’t just affect the patient—it impacts everyone around them. Financial compensation can ensure that your loved ones are taken care of, even after you’re gone. Whether it’s securing funds for future medical expenses, lost wages, or funeral costs, a mesothelioma law firm can help you recover the compensation you are entitled to.



Navigating the Legal Process with a Trusted Mesothelioma Attorney



The legal process for mesothelioma claims can be long and complex. From filing paperwork to attending court hearings, it’s important to have an experienced attorney by your side every step of the way. A mesothelioma attorney will handle the heavy lifting, allowing you to focus on your health and well-being.



Additionally, asbestos exposure cases often involve multiple defendants, including large corporations, manufacturers, or employers, depending on where and when the exposure occurred. Mesothelioma law firms are skilled in identifying all liable parties, ensuring that you have a solid case that stands up in court.



Victims of mesothelioma across the country have turned to attorneys to help them seek justice. Whether you were exposed to asbestos while working in industries like shipbuilding in states like California or in industrial manufacturing in Texas, a national mesothelioma law firm will be able to tailor their approach to your specific circumstances.



How to Choose the Right Mesothelioma Attorney for Your Case



When selecting a mesothelioma attorney, it’s important to look for a law firm with a proven track record of success in asbestos litigation. Ask potential attorneys about their experience, case outcomes, and whether they’ve handled cases similar to yours. Mesothelioma law firms with extensive networks can also help you find the best medical experts and support services.



Location is another factor to consider. While mesothelioma attorneys serve clients nationwide, it’s helpful to choose a law firm that understands the local legal landscape. For example, if you live in New York, your attorney should be familiar with state-specific statutes of limitations, asbestos regulations, and court procedures. Similarly, if you were exposed to asbestos while working in Houston or Philadelphia, your attorney should have experience with cases in those areas.



Taking the First Step Toward Financial Justice



If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, taking action quickly is essential. The legal system provides an avenue for holding responsible parties accountable, but the window for filing a claim is limited. By working with an experienced mesothelioma attorney from a reputable mesothelioma law firm, you can take the first step toward securing the financial compensation you need to cover medical bills and ensure your family’s future well-being.



At the Mesothelioma Law Center, we understand the challenges faced by mesothelioma victims and their families. Our experienced attorneys are dedicated to fighting for justice and ensuring that you receive the compensation you deserve. Reach out to us today to learn how we can help you navigate this difficult time and secure the financial resources you need.




https://youtu.be/sJZ1QCj9uIc

### Despite Asbestos Company’s Appeal, Mesothelioma Widow Will Keep $5 Million Award

George Coulbourn served in the U.S. Navy as a machinist, and that work exposed him to numerous asbestos-containing products that he blamed for his malignant mesothelioma diagnosis. After he died, a jury awarded his widow $9 million in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages. Though one of the defendants argued for the decision to be reversed and the award reduced, the appeals court hearing their argument, ruled that the jury’s verdict would stand.







$5 Million Punitive Damages Award at Issue in Mesothelioma Verdict  



After mesothelioma claimed the Navy veteran’s life, his widow continued his quest for justice as a wrongful death claim. The jury hearing her case awarded her $9 million in compensatory damages and assigned the gasket company John Crane, Inc. 20% responsibility for those damages. The jury also agreed that punitive damages were appropriate and ordered the company to pay her an additional $5 million.



The company appealed the verdict and the damages, arguing that insufficient evidence had been presented at trial for the jury to determine that their gaskets were the cause of the mesothelioma victim’s illness. On reviewing their assertion, the circuit court judges responded that the state of Arizona did not require that a defendant be the sole cause of the injury; rather, the test is whether the company’s product was ‘a substantial factor.’ The judges concluded that the jury had seen enough evidence to support that finding.



Would Mesothelioma Victim Have Listened to Warnings About Asbestos?



The attorneys representing John Crane in the mesothelioma lawsuit also argued that they should not be held responsible for a failure to warn because there was no proof that he would have changed his actions had he received those warnings. The judges rejected this notion, in large part because of the testimony about the significant suffering that the victim had experienced as a result of his illness.



Concerning the punitive damages awarded to the mesothelioma widow, though John Crane argued that their failures did not warrant punitive damages and that the amount was too high, the judges pointed to the plaintiff’s evidence that demonstrated the company had known that its products posed a substantial risk of significant harm to others and did nothing to amend its actions and that the damages were in keeping with ratios seen in other, similar claims.

### Why You Need a Mesothelioma Lawyer for Your Mesothelioma Trial

Mesothelioma is a rare, aggressive cancer caused by asbestos exposure. For those diagnosed, navigating treatment options, medical bills, and the legal complexities of a lawsuit can be overwhelming. If you or a loved one is facing a mesothelioma diagnosis, hiring a skilled mesothelioma lawyer is crucial. From building a strong case to securing the compensation you deserve, an experienced mesothelioma law firm can make all the difference in the outcome of your trial.







Understanding Mesothelioma and Its Legal Implications



Mesothelioma develops after prolonged exposure to asbestos, often in workplaces like construction sites, shipyards, or factories. Given the long latency period of the disease, symptoms may not appear until decades after exposure. By then, the cancer is usually in an advanced stage, leading to significant medical expenses and life-altering consequences for the patient and their family.



Filing a mesothelioma lawsuit requires detailed knowledge of asbestos-related laws, liability, and compensation claims. Since mesothelioma cases involve multiple parties, including former employers, product manufacturers, and asbestos suppliers, it’s important to have legal representation that specializes in asbestos litigation. This is where hiring a mesothelioma lawyer becomes essential.



Why You Need a Specialized Mesothelioma Lawyer



1. Expertise in Mesothelioma Law 



A general lawyer may not be familiar with the nuances of mesothelioma cases, which often involve tracking down decades-old records and witnesses. Mesothelioma lawyers, on the other hand, have dedicated their practice to asbestos litigation. They have the knowledge, resources, and experience necessary to uncover the specifics of your exposure and link it directly to your illness.



Lawyers who specialize in mesothelioma also understand the complex statutes of limitations that vary by state. For example, in states like California or Texas, there are specific deadlines for filing claims, and missing these deadlines could prevent you from recovering any compensation. An experienced mesothelioma lawyer ensures your case is filed on time, no matter where you live or were exposed to asbestos.



2. Access to Extensive Resources 







A mesothelioma law firm often works with a network of professionals, including medical experts, asbestos investigators, and historians, who provide crucial evidence to strengthen your case. They can track down the companies responsible for your exposure, even if they’ve long since closed or merged with another business.



In addition, mesothelioma lawyers can help you gather medical records, work history, and any other documents that prove asbestos exposure. With their resources, they can establish liability and make sure you have a solid foundation for your lawsuit.



3. Maximizing Your Compensation



The costs of battling mesothelioma can be astronomical, with medical treatments, lost wages, and emotional distress taking a significant toll. Compensation from a lawsuit can help cover these costs and provide financial security for your family.



An experienced mesothelioma lawyer knows how to negotiate settlements and, if necessary, take your case to trial to ensure you receive the maximum compensation possible. Many mesothelioma lawsuits result in significant payouts because of the devastating nature of the disease and the clear link to asbestos exposure. A seasoned attorney knows the value of your claim and can fight to get you the best outcome.



4. Understanding National and Local Legal Contexts







While mesothelioma cases are filed in courts across the country, certain states have become hotspots for asbestos litigation. For example, places like Pennsylvania, Texas, and California have seen a high number of mesothelioma cases due to their industrial histories. A skilled mesothelioma lawyer is familiar with the courts and procedures in these states, giving you an edge if your trial takes place there.



Additionally, they’ll be aware of local asbestos laws, exposure sites, and relevant cases that could benefit your trial. Whether you live in a bustling city like New York or a smaller town in the Midwest, a national mesothelioma law firm can provide representation regardless of location. They often have offices across the country and can work with you remotely or in person, depending on your needs.



5. Working on a Contingency Basis



One of the most daunting aspects of hiring a lawyer is the potential cost. However, most mesothelioma law firms work on a contingency fee basis, meaning you don’t pay unless they win your case. This arrangement allows you to pursue justice without the financial burden of legal fees, giving you peace of mind as you focus on your health and well-being.



What to Look for in a Mesothelioma Law Firm



When choosing a mesothelioma lawyer, it’s important to find a firm with a proven track record in asbestos litigation. Look for firms that have handled similar cases and secured large settlements or verdicts. Client testimonials and case results can provide insight into a firm’s success rate.



You’ll also want a law firm that offers personalized attention. Mesothelioma cases are unique, and every client’s story is different. A compassionate mesothelioma lawyer will take the time to listen to your situation and tailor their approach to your specific needs. This personal connection can make all the difference in a stressful legal battle.



Conclusion



Navigating a mesothelioma diagnosis is challenging, but you don’t have to face it alone. By hiring a dedicated mesothelioma lawyer, you’ll have an advocate on your side who will fight for the justice and compensation you deserve. From investigating the source of your asbestos exposure to ensuring your case is filed in the right jurisdiction, an experienced attorney will handle every aspect of your lawsuit, allowing you to focus on your health.



At the Mesothelioma Law Center, our team of experienced mesothelioma lawyers is here to guide you through every step of your trial. Contact us today to learn how we can help you secure the compensation you deserve and hold those responsible for your asbestos exposure accountable.




https://youtu.be/bxRjcKGf8_8

### Top 5 Qualities to Look for in an Asbestos Lawyer

If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma due to asbestos exposure, finding the right asbestos lawyer is essential to secure compensation for medical expenses, lost income, and emotional distress. Mesothelioma cases are complex and require specialized legal knowledge, making it crucial to choose a lawyer who understands the intricacies of asbestos litigation. In this blog, we’ll discuss the top five qualities to look for in an asbestos lawyer to ensure you have the best representation possible.



1. Experience in Asbestos Litigation



The first and perhaps most crucial factor is the lawyer’s experience in handling asbestos-related cases. Asbestos litigation is complex, involving many moving parts, including detailed medical records, scientific data, and historical knowledge of industries that have used asbestos. An experienced asbestos lawyer will be familiar with the nuances of mesothelioma cases, from uncovering responsible companies to understanding the long latency period of asbestos exposure.



Look for a lawyer who has a proven track record in securing favorable outcomes for mesothelioma victims. A skilled asbestos lawyer will not only guide you through the legal process but also ensure that your case receives the attention it deserves. Their knowledge of prior settlements and verdicts, particularly in regions like California, New York, or Texas—where many industries have historically exposed workers to asbestos—will help build a stronger case.



2. Compassion and Understanding



Mesothelioma doesn’t just affect the patient; it also deeply impacts their family. A compassionate asbestos lawyer will not only fight for justice but will also understand the emotional toll this disease takes. They should treat you as more than just a client, showing empathy and patience as you navigate through this challenging time.



When looking for the right legal representation, pay attention to how they communicate with you. Are they taking the time to explain the details of asbestos exposure and how it might relate to your diagnosis? Do they seem genuinely invested in your well-being? A lawyer who demonstrates compassion will work tirelessly to ensure that you and your family receive the best possible outcome.



3. Resources and Connections







Handling a mesothelioma case requires significant resources, both financial and technical. From hiring expert witnesses to conducting thorough investigations into your asbestos exposure, a successful asbestos lawyer must have access to a vast network of professionals who can help strengthen your case.



A lawyer who is well-connected in the field of asbestos litigation can often pinpoint exactly when and where your exposure occurred, even if it was decades ago. For example, a mesothelioma lawyer might work with industrial hygienists, medical experts, and occupational safety specialists to gather crucial evidence. Whether the exposure happened at a construction site or a shipyard, these resources are essential for winning a settlement or verdict.



4. A Strong Track Record of Winning Compensation



While compassion and connections are important, the end goal of hiring an asbestos lawyer is to secure financial compensation for your suffering. A strong track record in mesothelioma settlements or verdicts is a critical indicator of a lawyer's ability to win your case.



Many asbestos lawyers work on a contingency fee basis, meaning they don’t get paid unless they win your case. This setup motivates them to work diligently to maximize their compensation. Be sure to ask potential attorneys about their success in winning cases similar to yours. Look for lawyers who have secured substantial payouts for clients, whether through settlements or court verdicts, in places where asbestos exposure has been widespread.



5. Nationwide Reach



Asbestos exposure often occurred in industries that spanned multiple states, such as construction, manufacturing, and shipbuilding. Because mesothelioma cases may involve multiple locations and even different companies, it’s essential to choose an asbestos lawyer who can practice nationwide.



A lawyer with a national reach has the experience and licensing to handle cases in various jurisdictions. Whether your asbestos exposure happened in a small town in Kentucky or a major city like Chicago, a nationwide attorney will be well-equipped to navigate different state laws and statutes of limitations. They will also have experience working with the local courts and legal systems, ensuring your case is handled as efficiently as possible.



Finding the Right Lawyer for Your Family







Choosing the right asbestos lawyer is a personal decision, but by focusing on these five qualities—experience, compassion, resources, a strong track record, and nationwide reach—you can increase your chances of finding a lawyer who will fight for the justice you deserve. Keep in mind that mesothelioma lawsuits often have strict deadlines, so it’s important to act quickly to protect your rights.



When meeting with potential lawyers, don’t hesitate to ask questions about their previous asbestos cases and how they can help you navigate the complexities of your situation. A good lawyer will always be transparent about their approach and how they plan to win your case.



Contact Us Today for Help with Your Mesothelioma Case



Contact us at the Mesothelioma Center to connect with a skilled asbestos lawyer who can provide the legal representation you need. Our team understands the impact of asbestos exposure and is committed to helping mesothelioma victims and their families receive the compensation they deserve. Let us help you take the next step in your journey toward justice and peace of mind. Speak to a mesothelioma lawyer now.

### $9 Million Mesothelioma Verdict Upheld on Appeal

A jury ordered the manufacturer of a grinder used on asbestos-contaminated brake linings to pay mesothelioma victim Walter Miller $9 million in damages. Facing this decision, Hennessy Industries filed an appeal, arguing that they should not have been held responsible for the effects of asbestos that was not part of their company’s product. But Justice Cynthia S. Kern of the Supreme Court of New York County denied the company’s appeal, agreeing with the victim that because the grinder company knew its equipment would be used on asbestos-containing products, they had a duty to warn of the latent danger arising from its foreseeable use.







Mesothelioma Victim Inhaled Asbestos in Brake Linings



In his original mesothelioma lawsuit, Walter Miller successfully argued that even though the grinding equipment designed by its subsidiary AMMCO did not itself contain asbestos, Hennessy Industries had a responsibility to warn users of the risks posed by asbestos in the brake linings it was used on.  Mr. Miller had used the AMMCO grinder on brake linings manufactured by BMW, which Hennessy knew contained asbestos.



After hearing testimony from an expert witness about the asbestos in those brake linings and how the AMMCO grinder worked,  a New York jury awarded Mr. Miller $25 million in damages. That award was later reduced to $9 million, with $5 million allocated to Mr. Miller’s previous pain and suffering and $4 million for his future pain and suffering.



Grinder Company’s Appeal of Mesothelioma Verdict Fails



Despite the significant reduction in the mesothelioma verdict, the grinder company filed an appeal of the jury’s decision. They asserted that they should not be held responsible for an asbestos-related illness when their product contained no asbestos, but Justice Kern pointed to the clear testimony that established the role that the grinder had played in Mr. Miller’s illness.  She also noted that the apportionment of the damages and the revised damages amount was wholly appropriate and should not be adjusted any further. The victim will receive the amount that the jury awarded.

### Navy Mechanic’s Widow's Lung Cancer Claim to Proceed Against Corporate Giants

After her husband died of asbestos-related lung cancer, Leona Rhoades filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the companies she blamed for his death. Out of the 43 original defendants, most settled out of court or had the claims against them dismissed. This left General Electric Company, Northrop Grumman Corporation, and Raytheon Technologies Corporation, and though all three filed motions for summary judgment, the judge hearing the case ruled that they proceed to trial.







Widow Seeks Justice from Asbestos Company Following Husband’s Lung Cancer Death



Dewey Rhoades died of asbestos-related lung cancer after decades of having worked on U.S. Navy ships and other job sites, including Erie Forge and Steel, Odeco, and Pensacola Aviation Center. Though he was exposed to asbestos-containing materials at all of those job sites, the majority of his exposure came from his time working for the Navy as an Air Force power plant mechanic, primarily working on engine repair. Because he died before he could provide testimony about his exposure, Mrs. Rhoades enlisted former Naval officers to provide depositions about the asbestos exposure from the work he performed.



The deposition testimony provided by the veterans confirmed that in his role, the lung cancer victim would have worked on several different models of the defendants’ aircraft. They explained that each model was powered by Pratt & Whitney engines built with asbestos-containing parts made by the defendants.



Widow’s Case Blames Asbestos-Containing Parts for Lung Cancer Death



Pointing to their asbestos-containing parts as responsible for her husband’s death, Mrs. Rhoades accused all three manufacturers of negligence. Though the companies argued that the law cited in her claim did not apply to them, that she lacked supporting evidence, and that they were protected by the law of derivative sovereign immunity, the judge denied each argument, concurring that the veterans’ testimony had met the required test for locality and causation. He allowed the case to move forward.

### Did Company Execs Try to Hide Funds from Mesothelioma Plaintiffs?

The executives of an asbestos company facing thousands of mesothelioma lawsuits have been accused of trying to avoid paying claims to victims by improperly transferring company assets to family members. The Nash Engineering company is facing two cases filed against it by the company’s bankruptcy trustee.







Bankruptcy Trustee’s Claim Involves Mesothelioma Plaintiffs



After manufacturing asbestos-containing pumps, pulps, and papers, The Nash Engineering Company has been named in thousands of personal injury lawsuits accusing it of causing victims’ malignant mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases. The company filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection in October 2021 and was assigned a bankruptcy trustee.



After reviewing the company’s assets and financial activities, the trustee filed two lawsuits accusing its executives of a plot to avoid paying claims to mesothelioma and asbestos plaintiffs. George I. Roumeliotis says that the executives concealed transfers of assets to their family members and their trusts. He filed suit to undo those transfers and return the funds to the company so that creditors could be properly reimbursed.



Asbestos Pump Company Named in Thousands of Mesothelioma Lawsuits



With over 1,600 mesothelioma claims pending, The Nash Engineering Company filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, but according to its bankruptcy trustee, they did so after improperly transferring $59.7 million to stockholders. The trustee is seeking a court ruling to allow him to return the assets to the company for sale or distribution benefitting creditors.



In response to the trustee’s claims, the asbestos company executives filed a motion asking the court to dismiss the two cases, arguing that they had been filed too late and that they had no fiduciary duty to inform mesothelioma victims or other asbestos claimants that they had transferred funds to their family members and others. This request was denied by the judge. Similarly, the trustee’s lawsuit asking for the transfers to be undone will also be allowed to move forward.

### Navy Veteran with Mesothelioma Blames Shipboard Parts for Illness

Michael and Victoria Marcus filed a mesothelioma lawsuit against multiple asbestos companies, accusing them of negligence in having supplied equipment to the Navy that exposed him to the asbestos that caused his fatal illness. Like many veterans, Mr. Marcus was exposed to so many asbestos-containing products that when asked to quantify them, he said that there were “too many to count.”







Navy Use of Asbestos Caused Mesothelioma in Many Veterans



Unaware that asbestos exposure caused malignant mesothelioma and other serious diseases, the U.S. military relied on equipment that contained the material. This was especially true in Navy ships like those that Mr. Marcus served on. According to his claim heard in the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of California, he was a boiler technician and boiler repairman between 1966 and 1986 on Navy vessels and in Navy shipyards, and in those twenty years, he was exposed to countless asbestos-containing products and equipment.



The mesothelioma victim and his wife submitted evidence and testimony about multiple parts and manufacturers whose equipment he worked on and submitted a long list of expert witnesses in support of his claim. They are seeking both compensatory damages and punitive damages against the asbestos companies that failed to warn of the dangers of asbestos.



Hearing in Mesothelioma Case Addresses Numerous Outstanding Legal Issues



In a recent hearing on the case, U.S. District Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. weighed in on several outstanding legal issues surrounding the mesothelioma claim, including whether testimony from the defendants’ witnesses would be allowed, objections filed by the asbestos companies against the claim, and the specific details involving maritime law. ing



Among the most notable issues addressed in the recent court hearing was a statement concluding that it could not be assumed that a piece of shipboard equipment did not contain asbestos if the mineral was not listed in its specifications. The use of the toxic material was so ubiquitous that it was often included without being mentioned. This makes it painfully obvious that it would have been nearly impossible for a sailor to avoid asbestos exposure.



The other notable aspect of the mesothelioma case was the number of asbestos-containing pumps, gaskets, and valves that the victim was exposed to throughout his 17-year career, a quantity that he described as “too many to count.”  While the defendants argued that this would contribute to the use of an ‘every exposure’ claim in the lawsuit, the judge noted Mr. Marcus’ presentation of the type of work he performed on the various products, evidence that the products contained asbestos, and estimates about the amount of asbestos exposure caused by the work he performed substantially contributed to his development of mesothelioma.

### Johnson & Johnson’s Safety Claims Cited in Mesothelioma Victim’s Lawsuit

Ashley Johnson filed a personal injury lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson after being diagnosed with malignant epithelioid mesothelioma. With no history of occupational or environmental exposure to asbestos, she pointed to her regular and prolonged use of the company’s talcum powder products as the source of her illness. The company asked the court to dismiss her charge of nonconformity to an express warranty, arguing that they’d never warranted the product, but the judge hearing the case agreed with the victim that the terms the company referred to as “marketing” did imply a warranty.







Mesothelioma Victim Says She Relied on J&J’s Promises of Purity and Safety



The mesothelioma victim’s claim against Johnson & Johnson and its subsidiary LTL management accused the company of a construction/composition defect in its product, nonconformity to express warranty, failure to warn, and design defects. In its defense, Johnson & Johnson filed a motion to dismiss the charges, but the district judge hearing the case only agreed with the company on one of its arguments.



In response to Johnson & Johnson’s argument that she hadn’t met the standard required to accuse them of a construction/composition defect, Ms. Johnson agreed, and the claim was dismissed. But when the company argued that they’d made no express warranty about their product, she pushed back. She produced evidence of the company’s advertisements of being “safe” and “pure” and said that she had relied on those statements when deciding on what product to use on herself and her children.



Judge Agrees with Mesothelioma Victim that J&J Advertising Went Beyond Opinion or Praise



Ms. Johnson produced additional advertisements from the company, including descriptions of a “strict 5-level safety process, ensuring every ingredient is safe for use” and others including “backed by science,” “clinically proven,” and “purity of its ingredients.” She asserts that those were express warranties that induced her to use the Johnson & Johnson’s talc powders she says caused her mesothelioma.



In his decision, the judge agreed with the mesothelioma victim, explaining the company’s advertisements and references to safety, purity, and science went beyond being a general opinion or praise and represented an expressed warranty. The charges against the consumer giant will remain and the case will move forward.

### Judge Dismisses Johnson & Johnson’s Lawsuit Against Mesothelioma Researcher

Dr. Jacqueline Moline is a highly respected researcher and noted expert on the subject of malignant mesothelioma. She is frequently called upon for expert witness testimony in asbestos exposure lawsuits. Recently, she was named in a suit filed by Johnson & Johnson’s subsidiary LTL Management: the suit called her writings fraudulent and libelous, but New York federal judge Georgette Castner dismissed their claim, saying there was no proof that her conclusions were “verifiably false” and noting that they were protected under her free speech rights.







Talc Companies Object to Mesothelioma Researcher’s Conclusions



At issue in Johnson & Johnson’s case against the occupational medicine researcher was a paper she authored that linked asbestos-contaminated talcum powder products to mesothelioma. The company, which is facing over 61,000 lawsuits from people diagnosed with ovarian cancer and malignant mesothelioma, sued four researchers, attacking their studies and calling Dr. Moline’s work false advertising.



The paper that the company’s subsidiary LTL Management objected to discussed the connection between exposure to asbestos-contaminated talcum powder and asbestos-related diseases, including malignant mesothelioma. The suit focused on five of the people who had been included in her study who may have been exposed to asbestos from sources other than the talc. But the judge rejected this argument



Judge Calls Mesothelioma Researcher’s Conclusions “Tentative”



In dismissing the claim against Dr. Moline, Judge Caster pointed out that the mesothelioma researcher had specifically identified her research as “tentative scientific conclusions” rather than unequivocal statements of fact.  The judge also criticized the consumer giant’s assertion that it was problematic for the researcher to both publish scientific studies and participate as an expert witness in asbestos cases, noting that the research had specifically referenced that aspect of her professional work.



Finally, the judge referenced the First Amendment’s protection of free speech and said that Dr. Moline’s publication of her asbestos research fell into that category. Johnson & Johnson has pledged to appeal the judge’s decision in the case.

### Judge Denies Asbestos Companies’ Discovery Request in Mesothelioma Case

Malignant mesothelioma is a fast-moving disease, but victims seeking compensation often find that the justice system moves painfully slowly. While victims hope the process will move forward in an orderly fashion, asbestos companies and their attorneys frequently delay progress, either with the hope of exhausting the plaintiffs or because they don’t feel the same urgency for resolution that the victims and their families do. In an ongoing case, the defendants named in a mesothelioma claim asked to reopen discovery because they’d overlooked questioning an expert witness. Upon review, the judge hearing the case denied their request.







Mesothelioma Victim’s Expert Witness Dismissed by Asbestos Company Attorney



The case involves Michael and Victoria Marcus, who are seeking compensation for Michael’s exposure to asbestos and subsequent diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma. Michael’s exposure occurred during his Navy service, and among the expert witnesses he is relying on to support his case is Captain Francis Burger, a former Naval Engineering officer and Project Manager in Marine Engineering. The Captain will testify about asbestos-containing products Mr. Marcus would have been exposed to while he served.



The mesothelioma victim named several asbestos companies as defendants in his claim and provided them with a list of his expert witnesses so that they could interview them during the discovery process. One of those companies, Foster Wheeler, notified the court that they would not need to depose Captain Burger on March 20th, but did so without first checking with the other companies. One of those companies later asked the court to reopen the process so that they could depose the captain.



Lack of Diligence in Mesothelioma Litigation Not an Excuse for Modification of Procedure



In response to mesothelioma defendant J.R. Clarkson Company’s appeal to District Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. of the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of California, asking for the expert discovery period to be extended, Mr. Marcus’ attorney pointed to a lack of “diligence during the expert discovery period in securing Captain Burger’s deposition.”  While the judge agreed that Foster Wheeler’s counsel had improperly terminated the availability of the witness and had deprived the other defendants of the opportunity to depose him, he also noted that the companies had not been “overly invested” in Captain Burger’s deposition.



The judge decided that the mesothelioma victim was correct in asserting that discovery should remain closed. He said that the defendants had not demonstrated that good cause existed to modify the scheduling order and reopen discovery and that therefore the court would not do so.

### Violations of Asbestos Regulations Raise Fears of Mesothelioma Risk

When people hear the word asbestos, they first think of mesothelioma and the many diseases that have been linked to the mineral, and they then think of it as a problem of the past. That’s because use of the toxic material was largely discontinued after the public learned of its dangers in the late 1970s and early 1980s. But asbestos that has been in place for decades remains an issue, especially when it’s been damaged. Concerns over the mishandling of this legacy asbestos recently drove Illinois’ attorney general to take dramatic legal action.







Asbestos-Contaminated Hospital Site Put People at Risk for Mesothelioma



According to a lawsuit filed by Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul, the owners and operators of Lake Behavioral Hospital in Waukegan, Illinois, and the demolition subcontractors tasked with taking down the old building violated strict regulations for handling asbestos. In doing so, they are accused of having put workers and neighbors at risk for mesothelioma and other asbestos-related disease.



Mesothelioma is a deadly form of cancer caused by inhaling or ingesting asbestos fibers. Though asbestos was more prevalent decades ago, these fibers are still present in old buildings, brake linings, and other applications, and they pose the greatest risk when they are disturbed or damaged, as happens when a building is renovated or demolished.  To guard against this risk, highly specific regulations exist for managing the removal of asbestos before construction or demolition work is done. The lawsuit filed by the attorney general asserts that these regulations were ignored by the owners and subcontractors of the hospital.



Hospital Owners and Contractors Accused of Jeopardizing Public Health



Attorney General Raoul’s lawsuit was filed out of real concerns about future mesothelioma diagnoses and followed investigations by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). That agency’s investigation identified dozens of violations in the management of asbestos on the property, including one subcontractor that was aware of the dangers it was exposing its employees and others to.



The lawsuit accuses the defendants of having “jeopardized public health” by exposing people to asbestos fibers and dust that can lead to mesothelioma and other illnesses. The attorney general has indicated that the companies will be expected to remediate the asbestos and be held accountable for any damages they caused.

### Daughters Accuse Navy of Negligence in Mother’s Mesothelioma Death

Mesothelioma victim Geraldine Perkins was a Navy wife and mother to five daughters.  After she died in 2020, her family set out to seek justice against those they blamed for exposing her to the asbestos that caused her illness. What makes their case unusual is that they filed suit against the U.S. Navy.







Navy’s Argument Against Being Named in Mesothelioma Lawsuit Rejected



Though veterans represent the majority of mesothelioma and asbestos deaths in the United States, the military is rarely named in personal injury lawsuits because of laws protecting government entities from liability. Mrs. Perkins’ daughters felt that the Navy’s failure to adhere to mandatory asbestos safety precautions was egregious enough to defeat that argument against suing the Navy, and their argument was compelling enough that they won the right to proceed.



The mesothelioma victim’s daughters point to decisions made by the navy fifty years ago, when their father, Harang Joseph Perkins, served as a Navy machinist at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard. They cite both the dust he carried home on his clothing into their home and the lack of safety precautions taken to protect the neighborhood where Navy families lived from asbestos being blown downwind.



Navy Denies Negligence in Mesothelioma Death



In seeking justice for their mother’s death, the daughters point to asbestos safeguards that were put in place specifically to protect against the risk of mesothelioma. These safeguards included requiring monitoring of the air in the Navy Yard City where they had lived and providing disposable coveralls to workers like their father to prevent asbestos from being carried into the family’s home.



In its defense, the Navy argued that the safeguards were advisory and that they were exempt from liability under the Federal Tort Claims Act, and that the mother of five had not been diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma. The victim’s family pushed to argue that had the Navy followed rules that they assert were mandatory, their mother would not have gotten sick.  The court allowed the case to be heard so that the women could present their case to a jury.

### UK Women Point to Asbestos in Makeup as Cause of Mesothelioma

Lawsuits filed by mesothelioma and ovarian cancer victims have put a spotlight on asbestos hidden in talc-based body powders, but legal action taken by victims in the United Kingdom is raising awareness of other places where asbestos-contaminated talc has been used. A group of British women have filed suit in the U.S. courts, accusing some of the country’s most recognizable cosmetic companies of negligently exposing them to the carcinogen that led to their fatal illness.







British Mesothelioma Victims File Suit in the U.S.



Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder is one of the world’s most trusted and iconic products, and that’s why the lawsuits blaming it for mesothelioma and ovarian cancer diagnoses have been so shocking. However, according to an article published in The Guardian, there are many more cases of the rare forms of cancer that are being attributed to the use of bronzers, blushers, eye shadows, and other makeups found in similarly well-known and trusted brands.



The news organization reported that multiple British women have filed mesothelioma lawsuits against Estee Lauder Companies, Clinique, and Avon asserting that they were diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma after using cosmetic talc-based products manufactured and sold by the companies. Among those cited in the article was Hannah Fletcher, who agreed to an undisclosed but substantial financial settlement after pointing to foundation and eye shadow she used as an adult and her mother’s loose face powder, makeup, and body talc that she’d played with as a child.



UK Women ReferenceTalc Study to Support Mesothelioma Claims



Another peritoneal mesothelioma victim, Jade Jenkins, pointed to the makeup she’d been purchasing since the age of 12 and described the feeling of receiving a fatal diagnosis because of something as innocuous as makeup. “When I was told I had one-to-two years to live, I was shocked and panicked. I wear makeup every day, and to find out that the thing I put on my face which I’ve been buying since I was 12 years old caused this was awful.” 



According to a recent study, the cosmetic companies named as defendants in the women’s lawsuits exerted tremendous efforts into differentiating cosmetic talc from industrial talc, even though both contained asbestos. With that information in hand, women like 69-year-old Sylvia Jackson filed a claim seeking compensation, explaining, “A successful claim would allow me access to treatments which can cost tens of thousands (of pounds) and aren’t available on the NHS – that’s my main hope.”

### Texas Mesothelioma Claim Against Johnson & Johnson Resolves in Settlement

Last June, a Texas jury was the first in the state to hear a mesothelioma victim blame consumer giant Johnson & Johnson’s baby powder for causing his deadly illness. Despite much anticipation of how testimony from both sides would proceed, the victim and his wife reached a confidential settlement agreement with the company after just one witness had testified.







Mesothelioma Victim Blamed Lifelong Use of Powder for His Illness



The mesothelioma lawsuit was filed by Jerry Newton and his wife against Johnson & Johnson in 2019 after he'd been diagnosed with the rare asbestos-related disease. He claimed that he’d used the product daily since 1961 when he was 14 years old, and that he’d only stopped using it in the early 2000s.



The first days of the mesothelioma trial saw opening arguments from both sides, as well as testimony from pulmonologist Dr. Steven Haver of the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. Days before the trial began, Johnson & Johnson had lost two significant verdicts, with a jury in Illinois awarding a victim $45 million and a jury in Oregon awarding a victim $260 million.



Johnson & Johnson Argues Against Mesothelioma Liability



The confidential agreement between the mesothelioma victim and Johnson & Johnson is one of several that the company has agreed to in recent months. Though the company’s representatives repeatedly deny the presence of asbestos in its iconic talcum powder product, juries have been swayed by victims’ testimony and the presentation of internal company documents that suggest the company was aware of the risk of asbestos contamination. Juries have also seen evidence of Johnson & Johnson’s efforts to quash reports suggesting that talcum powder held hidden dangers.



There are currently over 60,000 pending mesothelioma and ovarian cancer claims against Johnson & Johnson, and though they were put on hold by the company’s bankruptcy filing, plaintiffs’ cases have begun being heard again.

### Appeals Court Defers to Jury’s 2.75 Million Dollar Mesothelioma Verdict

When a Louisiana jury ordered Union Carbide to pay $2.75 million each to the daughters of a mesothelioma victim, the company appealed the decision. They argued that the amount, in addition to the $4.85 million survival damage award, was arbitrary and represented an abuse of discretion from the court. After the company lost its appeal it took the case to the state’s Supreme Court, which ordered reconsideration. Upon review, the appeals court again upheld the trial court’s decision.







Company Objects to Large Damages Award to Mesothelioma Victim’s Daughters



David Stauder’s battle against malignant mesothelioma was painful for both him and his daughters Jill and Shelley. The family was exceptionally close, and the suffering that Mr. Stauder experienced was devastating. When he died and the women filed suit against Union Carbide, the jury heard extensive testimony about the pain he had suffered and how traumatized the women were at witnessing his pain, and from his loss. After consideration, the mesothelioma jury awarded the women $4.85 million in survival damages, plus another $2.75 million each for his wrongful death.



Union Carbide’s petition to overturn the mesothelioma verdict was denied by the Louisiana Court of Appeals, but the Louisiana Supreme Court vacated that decision and ordered the appeals court to reconsider. They did that, and upon careful review and attention to the aspects of the case specified by the state’s highest court, they reaffirmed their original decision confirming the award to the women.



Appeals Court Stresses Deference to Jury in Mesothelioma Verdict



After revisiting the facts of the mesothelioma trial, the appeals court stressed that the jury that heard the evidence was “entitled to great deference.”  The judges wrote “elements of damages for wrongful death include loss of love and affection, loss of services, loss of support, medical expenses, and funeral expenses” and that the jury had considered all of that in calculating the damages they’d awarded. They also compared previous awards given to mesothelioma victims and found the amount given was not unreasonable based on the testimony the jury had heard.

### High Court Favors Newly Wed Mesothelioma Widow

Imagine living with the same person for years, then learning they’re going to die of mesothelioma in a matter of months. When that happened to Jennifer Ripple, she and Richard Counter quickly married so that she could continue to seek justice on his behalf.  But after he died, in addition to the shock, pain, and grief she experienced she was told she had no right to assume his lawsuit because they hadn’t been married at the time that he was exposed to asbestos. Ms. Ripple fought back, and the Florida Supreme Court agreed with her position.







Mesothelioma’s Long Latency Period Creates Additional Legal Challenges



Malignant mesothelioma has a notoriously long latency period: Victims aren’t diagnosed until forty to fifty years after they’ve been diagnosed. This can create complications for those seeking justice for deceased spouses, as many insurance companies require that victims be married to their spouse before an injury occurs for them to be entitled to file claims on their behalf.  



This rule can preclude claims by those who’ve been married for decades and those married for shorter periods. In the case of Ms. Ripple and Mr. Counter, he was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2015 and the two got married two months later, but they had been together for many years before that. Common-law practice said that she was not entitled to assume his personal injury claim as a wrongful death claim, but the Florida Supreme Court disagreed.



CBS Corporation Argues Marriage Before Injury in Mesothelioma Claim



The original lawsuit filed by Mr. Counter blamed CBS corporation for his mesothelioma, pointing to asbestos exposure from the 1950s and 1960s. Four months after he filed suit he died and his widow amended his claim. Still, the company and an association of insurance companies fought back, arguing that “a person may not marry into a cause of action.”



The court took a dim view of what the defendants in the case referred to as a “long-established rule,” saying that Florida state’s 1972 Wrongful Death Act placed no restrictions on who qualifies as a surviving spouse. They wrote that a “surviving spouse under section 768.21(2) is a spouse at the time of the decedent’s death because the ordinary meaning of ‘surviving spouse’ is a spouse who outlives the other spouse.”  The quest for justice on behalf of the mesothelioma victims will continue.

### As Mesothelioma and Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Mount, Study Associates Link to Talc

There are more than 60,000 mesothelioma and ovarian cancer lawsuits pending against Johnson & Johnson, accusing the company of selling talc-based powder and failing to warn of its dangers. Though the company’s defense has relied on denying that talc exposure leads to cancer, a new study of ovarian cancer victims has confirmed an association between the incidence of the disease and the application of talc powder to the genitals.







Ovarian Cancer and Mesothelioma Victims File Lawsuits Against Talcum Powder Companies



Malignant mesothelioma and ovarian cancer are both diseases caused by exposure to asbestos, and people who’ve been diagnosed with these diseases and who have no occupational or environmental history of exposure have cited years of talcum powder use in their personal injury lawsuits.  In response, Johnson & Johnson and other talc companies have aggressively rejected reports of a link between talc and cancer. However, a new analysis conducted by researchers from the National Institutes of Health and published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology weakens the companies’ arguments.



The retrospective study focused on ovarian cancer. It collected data from more than 50,000 women between the ages of 35 and 74 who had a sister diagnosed with breast cancer and asked them about their talcum powder use, assessing whether the substance was associated with an increased risk of the disease. The researchers concluded that there is a link.



Talc Lawsuits Will Be Strengthened by Researchers’ Finding



As Johnson & Johnson attorneys continue to defend its product and deny its role in mesothelioma and ovarian cancer, the company also discontinued talc use, replacing the long-time main ingredient with cornstarch. Though the company blames the shift on misinformation, their position will be significantly weakened (and mesothelioma plaintiffs’ position strengthened) by the study’s lead author’s comment on talc: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences epidemiologist Kate O’Brien asserted that there is no medical reason to use talc and indicated that women should carefully before using it.

### Mesothelioma Victim Awarded $15 Million by Connecticut Jury

When Nicholas Barone first filed his mesothelioma lawsuit against Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC., he submitted to a deposition and was asked about the presence of asbestos in the GE plant where he’d worked. His answer, along with other evidence, had a powerful impact on the jury hearing his case. Though Mr. Barone died by the time the case was heard, the jury awarded his estate $10 million in compensatory damages and another $5 million for loss of consortium.







Compelling Asbestos Testimony Leads to $15 Million Mesothelioma Verdict



Mr. Barone was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma nearly sixty years after having worked at General Electric in Pittsfield in its phenolic resin compounding facility. When asked about asbestos, he replied, “It came in boxcars. It was manually unloaded. Guys used to screw around having snowball fights with it. They’d unload it into like, I guess, hoppers, and it was used in most formulations that were going to be in a hot application.”



Mr. Barone’s mesothelioma lawsuit charged Vanderbilt Minerals as a successor to International Talc, for having exposed him to the carcinogenic material. His attorneys successfully argued that the talc provided by International Talc was contaminated with asbestos and that Vanderbilt had been aware of this in 1974 when they purchased the company.



Testimony in Mesothelioma Trial Proved Victim’s Argument to Jury



Among the many things that the Connecticut jury heard in the mesothelioma trial was that those handling talc had never worn a dust mask or respirator, and that Mr. Barone hadn’t either because nobody had been warned of its dangers. The only defense that Vanderbilt Minerals offered against the charge was that because Mr. Barone had been a GE employee, workers’ compensation was the only remedy available to him. The jury took just two hours to reach its verdict.

### Jury Awards $7.4 Million to Mesothelioma Victim

It took a Chicago jury just five hours to conclude that two asbestos companies were responsible for former brick mason Alonzo J. Cain’s malignant pleural mesothelioma. Over the course of a two-week trial, the group heard evidence that compelled them to order two defendants to pay the 76-year-old $7.4 million to compensate for his pain, suffering, and medical expenses.







Mesothelioma Victim Had Been Brick Mason



Mr. Cain was diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma in early 2023. He immediately began treatment at the University of Chicago and simultaneously began a search for answers to where he’d been exposed to asbestos. He landed upon two specific companies that had exposed him six decades earlier, during his years working at Inland Steel after a brief period of Army service in Korea



The two companies that Mr. Cain named in his mesothelioma lawsuit were Foseco, the manufacturer of asbestos-containing hot top boards used in his employer’s steel-making process, and Paul J Krez, Inc., a contractor that had been installing and removing asbestos-containing pipes in the vicinity of where he had been working. He recalled the significant dust that had been created during this work, and that he and his co-workers had breathed in that dust and been covered with it.



Chicago Jury Awards Mesothelioma Victim $7.4 Million in Compensation



In addition to describing the asbestos particles that floated in the air while the maintenance work was being done in his workplace, the mesothelioma victim explained his work process with the hot top boards to the judge and jury. Expert witnesses provided further testimony about the link between asbestos exposure and the rare form of cancer, as well as about the disease itself.



Though both companies argued against being held responsible for the victim’s fatal illness, the jury was convinced of their role in his mesothelioma. They allocated 30% liability to Foseco and 70% to the contractor that had raised such a significant amount of asbestos dust in his presence.

### Asbestos Companies’ Attempt to Bar Mesothelioma Expert Witnesses' Testimony Denied

Malignant mesothelioma lawsuits represent high stakes to victims and defendants alike: Many companies that have exposed people to the asbestos that caused their devastating illnesses have been ordered to pay millions of dollars. This has led to aggressive legal strategies, including trying to bar valuable expert witness testimony. In a recent case, a U.S. Magistrate Judge denied a motion that came from multiple companies.







Mesothelioma Lawsuit Accuses Talc Companies of Negligence



The case was filed by Brian Joseph Gref, who was diagnosed with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma after years of using talcum powder. He filed claims against multiple cosmetic talc powder companies, accusing them of negligence in allowing their product to be contaminated with asbestos and failure to warn of the products’ dangers. He notified the court that expert witness testimony would include opinions from renowned occupational disease expert Dr. Jacqueline Moline.



When Dr. Moline provided her initial deposition she alerted attorneys from both sides that she had not yet been able to conduct asbestos dose calculations that were specific to the defendants’ talcum powder, and that she was basing her preliminary answers on data from a document prepared by someone else, before her deposition. She then conducted the investigation and relied on her own data for her second deposition.



Judge Denies Request to Dismiss Mesothelioma Experts’ Testimony



When the mesothelioma defendants’ attorneys learned at a later conference that Dr. Moline would be using data from an article that she’d written after the deposition as part of her testimony, they objected, arguing that the evidence was entered after the court’s deadline. They asked that she be entirely barred from testifying, and made the same request regarding three other expert witnesses, without offering any justification for their request.



The judge overseeing the case, U.S. Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo, denied the defendants’ request. Though she acknowledged the late entry of the evidence, she ruled that it was harmless and did not “merit the extreme sanction of preclusion.” She allowed Dr. Moline’s testimony in its entirety, as well as that of the other scheduled witnesses.

### Appeals Court Agrees with Judge in Mesothelioma Dispute

The road to a verdict in a mesothelioma lawsuit can be long, with lots of twists, turns, decisions, and appeals of decisions. When a judge decides in favor of a mesothelioma victim, there’s a good chance that the asbestos company that they’re suing is going to try to have the decision overturned by a higher court. In a recent case, a judge forgave confusion from a very sick victim, only to have the asbestos company assert that his decision was wrong. An appeals court rejected their argument.







Mesothelioma Victim’s Testimony Deteriorated as his Health Declined



The mesothelioma lawsuit was filed against cement pipe manufacturer Ameron International by Rudolf Horvath. When Mr. Horvath was deposed shortly after his diagnosis, he was still feeling strong. He provided highly specific, detailed answers to deposition questions about his experience with the company’s products that made clear how and when he was exposed.



At a much later date, Mr. Horvath was deposed again. His mesothelioma had taken its toll and his health had declined significantly. His answers were less certain, and there were disparities between what he said the first time and his testimony the second time. Based on this, the asbestos company asked Justice Adam Silvera to dismiss the case.



Trial Judge Denies Request to Dismiss Mesothelioma Claim, and Appeals Court Agrees



Noting the clarity of the victim’s original deposition testimony and his declining health during his second round, Justice Silvera denied Ameron International’s request to dismiss the mesothelioma claim. Despite the firmness of the judge’s decision, the company filed an appeal to New York’s First Department, arguing again that the case should be dismissed. They said that because the victim could not remember the exact locations of his work sites during the second deposition, there was insufficient proof for the case to proceed.



In its response to Ameron, the appeals court noted that they had not provided the evidence that would have justified dismissing the mesothelioma claim. The court reminded the defendant that they were required to show that Mr. Horvath’s mesothelioma could not have been caused by asbestos in their pipes and that instead, they had pointed to issues in his testimony. They confirmed Justice Silvera’s decision and the case will move forward.

### Asbestos Victim’s Family Gets Second Chance at Justice

Frank Burford and his children blame his years of working for Howmet Aerospace’s predecessor Alcoa for his wife’s death from asbestosis, a disease that, like malignant mesothelioma, is caused by exposure to asbestos. When their wrongful death lawsuit claim was dismissed for lack of evidence, the bereaved family appealed and argued that the trial court had demanded the wrong standard of proof. An appellate court agreed and gave the family a second chance at justice.







Texas Judge Grants Asbestos Victim’s Family’s Appeal



According to the lawsuit filed by the Burford family, Carolyn Burford got sick in the same way that many mesothelioma victims do: From years of laundering her husband’s asbestos-covered work clothes. Frank had worked for Alcoa at its aluminum smelter from 1963 to 1993, working with or around asbestos-containing materials regularly.



In the same way that secondary asbestos exposure has led to so many cases of malignant pleural mesothelioma, people exposed to asbestos carried home on their loved ones’ clothing, hair, or skin can lead to asbestosis, asbestos-related lung cancer, and other illnesses. Carolyn Burford washed her husband’s work clothes separately from the rest of their family’s clothing every day for the first twenty-five years that Frank worked for Alcoa. She developed shortness of breath in 2006, was diagnosed with asbestosis, and succumbed to the disease in 2015.



Trial Court’s Dismissal of Asbestosis Claim Reversed by Appellate Court



The trial court dismissed the case, agreeing that there was a lack of evidence that the asbestos at Alcoa’s site was sufficient to have caused Mrs. Burford’s illness, but the family appealed that decision. They argued that the court had applied the standard of proof of causation for mesothelioma and that this was not appropriate for an asbestosis case.



The appellate court decided in the victim’s favor, noting that the family had established that Alcoa was the only source of Carolyn’s exposure to asbestos and that since asbestos was the cause of asbestosis and Alcoa had been her only source of exposure, it was not necessary to apply a statistical standard to establish causation. Concluding that reasonable jurors could find that Carolyn had been exposed to and inhaled asbestos fibers that came from Alcoa’s plant and that they could have caused her asbestosis, they reversed the lower court’s decision and allowed the case to move forward

### Victim Points to Apprenticeship Work as Cause of Mesothelioma

Michael Wagner was diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma after years of working with asbestos-contaminated products. He filed suit against the companies whose contaminated products he’d worked with, accusing them of negligence and failure to warn of the danger he faced. When American Biltrite petitioned for the case against it to be dropped, the victim provided expert witness testimony that defeated its arguments.







Mesothelioma Victim Cites Work with Vinyl Tiles



Among the many companies Mr. Wagner named in his mesothelioma lawsuit is American Biltrite. He specifically recounted having worked with the company’s asbestos-contaminated tiles in the 1960s, when he was an apprentice tile installer and breathed in the toxic dust generated by that work.



In response to the mesothelioma victim’s claim, American Biltrite argued that the case against them should be dismissed because there was insufficient evidence to support his argument. They cited an industrial hygienist’s study that concluded that the amount of asbestos dust created by scoring or cutting its tiles would be insufficient to cause the rare form of cancer. But Mr. Wagner responded by pointing out that as an apprentice he had been tasked with sanding the tiles, a job that created far more dust.



Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss Mesothelioma Claim.



After listening to arguments from both sides, Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York County noted that the company’s motion to dismiss the case did not meet the requirements that the state requires for summary judgment. He reminded the asbestos company that to have the mesothelioma claim dismissed, they needed to establish that there was no possibility that their product could have been responsible for his illness and that they had failed to reach that bar. The case will go forward for a jury to weigh the evidence from both parties.



. 

### As Mesothelioma Trial Approaches, Both Sides Argue Against Other’s Witnesses

One of the most important elements of any personal injury lawsuit, including those about malignant mesothelioma, is the testimony of expert witnesses. Though these individuals are not directly associated with the victim’s exposure, they are asked to provide background information and opinions that the jury relies upon to help them understand complex issues. In a case about to be heard in the Louisiana court system, both the plaintiffs and the defendants tried to have expert witnesses being called by the other side prevented from testifying.







Expert Witness Testimony Essential in Mesothelioma Lawsuits



The case involved the mesothelioma death of Terry Legendre, which is being heard in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. In addition to having worked for Avondale Shipyard for a short time, he suffered secondary exposure to asbestos from the clothing of his family members and friends who worked for the notorious asbestos-contaminated site. His survivors planned to have two different physicians, as well as a certified industrial hygienist, called to explain how his interactions with all of these people would have contributed to his risk of mesothelioma.



Several of the companies named in the family’s mesothelioma lawsuit as defendants planned to submit expert witness testimony from an anatomic pathologist asserting that the only secondary exposure that would have played a role in his illness would have been from his father’s clothing.



Judge Denies Requests to Block Expert Witnesses in Mesothelioma Lawsuit



The mesothelioma victim’s family and the asbestos companies each objected to the others’ witnesses and asked the judge hearing the case to block their testimony, but the judge denied requests from both sides. In his decision, he wrote, “It is the role of the adversarial system, not the court, to highlight weak evidence’ and that the fact that opposing parties do not agree with the facts relied upon by the experts or their interpretation of those facts does not render their opinions irrelevant or unreliable.”



The decision means that the jury will have the opportunity to fully weigh all available information when making its decision about the asbestos companies’ role in Mr. Legendre’s mesothelioma death.

### Mesothelioma Victim’s Daughter Prevails in Quest for Justice

Sandra Reichart’s malignant mesothelioma diagnosis came after years of working with talcum powder products in her beauty salon, and her daughter, Holly Fisher, blamed asbestos in the talc for her mother’s death. Though she won her mesothelioma lawsuit against multiple companies, one appealed the verdict and asked for relief. The Superior Court of Pennsylvania recently heard the case and affirmed the award.







Superior Court of Pennsylvania Upholds Mesothelioma Verdict and Award



The mesothelioma lawsuit that Ms. Fisher filed named the manufacturers of Clubman, Jeris, Jean Nate, and Cashmere Bouquet talcum powders, as well as AII, the product-line successor to Clubman after it purchased the brand. The jury was shown studies of asbestos contamination of talc, as well as evidence that talc companies were aware of the risk posed by their products and details of Mrs. Reichart’s decades of use of the products in her beauty salon.



The jury agreed that all but one of the products had been used with “sufficient frequency, regularity, and proximity” to have caused the victim’s mesothelioma, and ordered them to pay $400,000 in compensation, along with damages due to delays. The award was allocated between the four defendants, with the successor to Clubman told to pay half of the damages. The company filed an appeal of this decision.



Court Rejects Appeal of Mesothelioma Verdict



All, the new owner of Clubman, argued that the evidence presented in the case had not warranted the jury’s decision. They also argued that there was no proof that asbestos-contaminated Italian talc had been used in the product. Despite their assertions, the Appellate court said that the expert witness testimony presented at trial had been sufficient to support the jury’s decision.



In its analysis of the allocation of the award, the court agreed that the defendants’ responsibilities should be realigned, but the court upheld the jury’s assessment of guilt and ordered that the mesothelioma victim’s daughter receive the award.

### Jury Blames Johnson & Johnson for Woman’s Mesothelioma Death

Johnson & Johnson’s bankruptcy feeling succeeded in temporarily pausing the legal claims of mesothelioma and ovarian cancer victims, but now that the cases are being heard, courts are holding the company responsible for consumer injuries. In a recent case, an Illinois jury ordered the company to pay $45 million to the family of a 53-year-old mother who died after years of using their talc powder products.







$45 Million Jury Award Following Testimony in Mesothelioma Claim



In the last several years, Johnson & Johnson has argued against its liability for consumers’ mesothelioma and ovarian cancer diagnoses. While the victims have argued that the company knew its talc-based products were contaminated with asbestos and carried significant risk, the company has asserted that there is no proof and that their product ingredient was pure. On hearing evidence presented by the family of 53-year-old Theresa Garcia, the jury chose the victim and awarded her survivors $45 million.



According to the mesothelioma victim’s family, Mrs. Garcia used Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder from the time she was a child and continued its use as an adult. She also used it on her own children.  They presented evidence that the product contained asbestos fibers and blamed those fibers for her painful death six months after diagnosis.



Family Awarded $45 Million After Turning Down Mesothelioma Settlement Offer



After the jury awarded the mesothelioma victim’s family $45 million in compensation, it was revealed that the company had offered their attorneys a settlement and that they had rejected the offer. According to the family’s representatives, agreeing to the settlement would have meant stating that the company had done nothing wrong, and further required settlement of all of the other mesothelioma and ovarian cancer claims that the firm was representing for the next ten years.



Responding to the outcome, the family’s lawyers said, “The defendants knew that talc contains asbestos impurities that were mined and put in the bottles of baby powder J&J sold. Not only did the defendants’ negligence and deceit cheat loyal customers like Theresa, but their deception has ultimately robbed a family of their mother.”

### Former Railroad Worker Names Multiple Companies in Mesothelioma Lawsuit

Anthony Ditcharo sued several of his former employers after being diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma in August of 2022. Though he died in January 2023, his family is continuing his pursuit of justice, converting his personal injury claim to survival and wrongful death claims.







Mesothelioma Lawsuit Includes Union Pacific and Avondale as Defendants



The claim originally filed by Mr. Ditcharo on November 30, 2022, named multiple defendants, and he blamed his mesothelioma on exposure to asbestos that occurred at several worksites throughout Louisiana. He claimed that his employers knew, or should have known, that their use of asbestos would injure him based on studies and other information available at the time. He also filed a claim under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act against Union Pacific because his work for them fell under the auspices of interstate commerce.



In response to the family’s mesothelioma claims, four of the defending companies denied the allegations against them, while Union Pacific and Avondale fought against the family’s request to move the case from federal court back to the Orleans Parish Civil District Court where he had originally filed his claim. The family argued that the case having been removed to federal court was improper.



Judge Determines that Mesothelioma Claim Should Remain in Federal Court



In reviewing the arguments from both the mesothelioma victim’s family and the asbestos companies named in the claim, Judge Eldon E. Fallon applied Fifth Circuit precedent. He determined that because Avondale had met its burden of proof in demonstrating that it had a federal contract with the government to repair Navy ships, their argument that the case should remain in federal court should prevail and that the other cases should remain there too because the family’s state law claims don’t “substantially predominate” the charges against Avondale.



Still, the judge stressed that his ruling in the case did not mean that the family’s rights to file a FELA claim against Union Pacific in state court under different circumstances had been eliminated, thus potentially allowing the family to pursue their claims against the railroad.

### California Landlord Lawsuit Points to Asbestos’ Mesothelioma Risk

It is well known that asbestos exposure can lead to a mesothelioma diagnosis. Though many think of the risk as a thing of the past, legacy asbestos that remains in place continues to be a real danger. This is the basis of a recent lawsuit accusing a landlord of failure to disclose the presence of asbestos to their tenant, putting them at risk of the deadly disease.







Asbestos and Lead in Commercial Greenhouse Leads to Fears of Mesothelioma



The premises liability case raised the risk of mesothelioma as information the landlord had a duty to disclose. Orchid grower Epochal Enterprises filed the claim against its former landlord LF Encinitas Properties. The plaintiff had rented a commercial greenhouse from the defendant, but upon learning of the dangerous conditions in the property, defaulted on their lease and were evicted.



In response to the eviction, the orchid grower sued Encinitas for the economic damages it suffered as a result of having to hurriedly leave the property to minimize the tenants’ risk of mesothelioma. The jury hearing the case sided with the tenant, but the court agreed with the landlord that language in the lease limited their liability for lost profits and other economic losses, thus reversing the jury’s decision.



Orchid Grower Who Feared Mesothelioma Appeals Trial Court’s Decision and Wins



In the face of the trial court overturning the original jury verdict, the orchid grower appealed the decision to the California Court of Appeal. They argued that their fear of mesothelioma was legitimate and should outweigh the language of the lease document. The court agreed.



In reversing the trial court’s decision, the appellate court noted that the landlord’s failure to disclose the environmental hazards conflicted with public policy. The appeals court wrote that the landlord was liable for violating the Health and Safety Code and that their failure to disclose the environmental hazards in their property had invalidated the lease’s liability limiting language.

### Jury Awards Libby, Montana Mesothelioma Victims $4 Million Each

Following heart-wrenching testimony and the presentation of mountains of evidence, a federal jury ruled against BNSF Railway and ordered the company to pay $4 million each to the estates of two Libby, Montana residents who died of malignant mesothelioma. The families had accused the company of negligence in allowing asbestos-contaminated vermiculite to spill into its railyard and blow through the downtown area.







Libby, Montana Vermiculite Blamed for Mesothelioma Deaths



Libby, Montana’s tragic legacy of asbestos-related disease follows years of W. R. Grace & Co. extracting vermiculite from their mine above the town and transporting it across the country for use in insulation and other applications. Thousands died of mesothelioma and other illnesses as a result of this product, and many of them lived in the path of the railcars that transported the carcinogenic material from the mine to the railyard and then across the country.



Though the jury did not find that BNSF had acted intentionally or with indifference, they did blame the railway company’s negligence for the mesothelioma victims’ illnesses and deaths. Both victims lived near the railyard and suffered significant exposure. Though BNSF’s attorney told jurors that the company’s employees hadn’t known that the vermiculite was dangerous and suggested that the victims might have been exposed to asbestos elsewhere, the jury rejected their argument.



Mesothelioma Trial Evokes Memories for Libby Residents



The testimony presented during the mesothelioma trial evoked strong memories for many residents of Libby, who recalled the piles of vermiculite found in the town. One resident spoke of playing in piles of the toxic material and helping his father add it to their home garden. He, his two siblings, and both of his parents were all later diagnosed with asbestos-related diseases.



More mesothelioma litigation surrounding the contamination of Libby, Montana is expected to begin this summer and into the future.

### Court Grants Mesothelioma Victims Right to Join Lawsuits

Even though malignant mesothelioma is an extremely rare disease, there are a significant number of victims and their survivors who pursue justice from the companies responsible for their illness. In addition to having remarkably similar diagnoses and histories of exposure, many of them seek legal representation from the same attorneys. When this happens and there are enough shared elements to their claims, the plaintiffs can ask the court to let them combine their lawsuits to save time and money, In a recent case, a New York judge granted two victims’ requests, despite objections from the defending asbestos company.







Joining Mesothelioma Claims Has Multiple Benefits



Filing a mesothelioma lawsuit is a big step for somebody who is already facing a terminal diagnosis, or for family members who are grieving the loss of a loved one. The process is emotionally exhausting and time-consuming, so sharing the burden with another family and getting two (or more) cases onto the court’s calendar makes good sense. It also meets the needs of the overburdened courts, but asbestos companies generally object to the move because they fear that the quantity of testimony from multiple cases will work against them with a jury.



In the face of defendants’ objections, New York law has established a set of benchmarks that must be met for two mesothelioma claims to be joined. Not every factor needs to be met, but there does need to be a preponderance of them for a judge to grant the plaintiffs’ request.



Families of New York Carpenters Who Died of Mesothelioma Are Granted Joinder



In a recent example of joinder making sense to the New York courts, the families of two carpenters who both died of malignant pleural mesothelioma found their requests granted. Both Kenneth Last and Patrick Joyce had spent years in the same occupation and had been exposed to asbestos while assisting auto mechanics. Discovery had been completed in both men’s cases and both were represented by the same lawyer.



With seven of eight of the elements in common, Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York County rejected the defending asbestos companies’ objections and allowed the families to combine their cases into one, noting that the central issue and other elements in the claims were virtually identical.

### Navy Veteran’s Suffering Justifies Family’s Quest for Punitive Damages

There is no question that malignant mesothelioma is a cruel and tragic disease that causes tremendous suffering to those who have it, as well as to the people who love them. What is less clear is the remedies available under the justice system. Every case is different and has different laws that apply. A recent lawsuit filed by the widow of a Navy veteran presents a clear example of how those who are exposed to asbestos at sea, and subsequently sickened, must follow different rules than those who are exposed on land.







Maritime Law Directs Quest for Justice in Navy Veteran’s Mesothelioma Death



After William Henry Banks died of malignant mesothelioma, his family filed a wrongful death lawsuit. His exposure to asbestos came during the years he’d served as a machinist mate in the Navy, and their claim cited 26 defendants whose asbestos-contaminated products he’d been exposed to. One of them, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, filed a motion asking the court to apply maritime law to the case, which generally does not allow punitive damages or compensation for pain and suffering, loss of society, or loss of future earnings.



The family’s lawsuit requested those forms of compensation, as well as general damages, burial expenses, and reimbursement for medical expenses related to his mesothelioma. They had no objection to the application of maritime law but asserted that the prohibitions against the damages they were seeking did not apply to their claim. Though the judge did not agree with them on most of their points, he did agree on one: She said that though their request for emotional and punitive damages and loss of future earnings damages on their own behalf were not available under maritime law, they had the right to sue on behalf of the victim’s suffering.



Victim’s Pain and Suffering Cited in Mesothelioma Claim



Maritime law specifically applies to damages suffered by those at sea, and its distinct rules frequently impact how mesothelioma damages are determined in cases involving seamen, sailors, and Navy veterans. In the case of Mr. Banks, Judge Josephine L. Staton of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California noted that precedent had established that when the family member of a seaman brought legal action, the laws that apply to railway employees also apply to them.



Because a previous Supreme Court ruling regarding the death of a railway employee had allowed the victim’s family to seek compensation for his “loss and suffering while he lived,” Judge Staton wrote that the same standard applied to Mr. Banks, allowing his family to continue their quest for compensation for his pain and suffering.

### Family Seeks Punitive Damages After Loved One’s Death

There are few things more devastating than having a loved one diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, but it’s even worse to learn that it could have been prevented. When Peter R. Carrier’s family found out that Burnham, LLC, whose boilers he’d worked with, had failed to offer warnings or protections despite knowing of their dangers, they took legal action. They filed suit against the company and asked that their claim include punitive damages.







Punitive Damages Requests in Mesothelioma Claims



When the plaintiffs in a mesothelioma claim request consideration of punitive damages, it’s because they believe that the defending company’s actions went beyond mere negligence. In the Carrier family’s case, they accused the company of knowing that the asbestos in their boiler parts could cause sickness and death, and of recklessly disregarding that knowledge in the interest of earning more profits.



In the face of this request, the company filed a motion to dismiss that aspect of the claim against it, arguing that tests had indicated that the asbestos particles released from the use of their parts had fallen below regulatory limits. They also noted that there had never been any workers’ compensation claims filed against them by their employees, as though that would have any bearing on a personal injury claim.



Boiler Company Fails to Meet Burden of Proof for Dismissal of Punitive Damages in Mesothelioma Case



Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York County assessed the arguments from both sides of the mesothelioma case and then denied Burnham’s request for dismissal of the punitive damages claim. He explained that the company’s arguments had failed to meet the burden of proof required for summary judgment, and called their assertion about Burnham’s lack of workers’ compensation claims “wholly irrelevant” to whether they had shown reckless disregard for people exposed to their parts.



The judge also noted that the company’s own representative had provided testimony in another mesothelioma case that supported the Carrier’s argument about their failure to provide warnings. In that case, the witness had admitted that “Burnham, never … put a warning regarding hazards of asbestos on any of its boilers.”

### Mixed Memory of Asbestos Company Name Ruled Insufficient to Dismiss Mesothelioma Lawsuit

When Collin Bassier was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, he took immediate legal action. He filed suit against all of the companies whose asbestos-contaminated equipment he’d worked with throughout his career as an electrician, including Burnham Boilers. But because his depositions included two different versions of the company’s name, the boiler company attempted to have the case dismissed, but New York judge Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York County denied their petition for request.







Mesothelioma Victim’s Testimony Included Mistaken Version of Asbestos Company’s Name



Mr. Bassier’s mesothelioma was blamed on multiple lifetime exposures to asbestos-contaminated products, including the boilers he worked with between 1981 and 1984 when he worked at his stepfather’s HVAC business. The victim was an immigrant to the United States who was born in Jamaica.



Between his diagnosis with mesothelioma and his death from the disease in October 2021, he gave two different depositions. Though he named Burnham Boilers as the type of residential boilers he had worked on, he also answered an attorney’s question by saying that the boiler company name was Burningham. The asbestos company attempted to use this mistake as reason to have the entire case thrown out.



Judge Gives Multiple Reasons for Denying Boiler Company’s Request for Mesothelioma Claim Dismissal



Justice Adam Silvera frequently rules on mesothelioma cases, and is well aware that defendants seeking summary judgment in these complex cases cannot simply point to problems in the victim’s claim: They are required to prove that their product could not have caused the illness.



Because Burnham Boiler made no effort to meet this burden of proof, he ruled against their petition for summary judgment in the mesothelioma claim and allowed the claim to move forward, saying that it would be up to the jury to resolve whether the discrepancy was reason enough to deny the victim’s claim.

### South Carolina Supreme Court Ends Asbestos Company’s Mesothelioma Appeals

Despite the strength of the evidence against it in a mesothelioma lawsuit, a South Carolina asbestos company appealed a jury’s million-dollar award to a victim, and when the Court of Appeals agreed with the trial court’s decision, the company appealed the award again to the state’s Supreme Court. Upon review, the justices affirmed both lower courts’ decisions, providing the victim’s family with a final answer in their quest for justice.







Mesothelioma Victim’s Illness Blamed on Asbestos in Dryer Felt



The mesothelioma lawsuit named Scapa Waycross as a defendant, accusing the company and others of negligence in the death of Stephen Stewart. Stewart had spent years working at Bowater Southern Paper Corporation, where he was exposed to several asbestos-contaminated products. All of the other companies whose products he worked with reached settlements with the victim’s family, but Scapa Waycross refused to do so and defended itself aggressively.



Despite the asbestos company’s argument that there was insufficient evidence that their product had been the cause of Mr. Stewart’s mesothelioma, the jury heard testimony about the specifics of the victim’s exposure to Scapa Waycross’ asbestos-contaminated product. Following installation of their dryer felt he’d been so covered with asbestos dust that he’d used an air hose to blow it off of his hair, skin, and clothing. In response to the testimony, the jury had awarded his survivors $700,000. The judge then increased the award to $1 million based on what he’d heard about Stewart’s agony during his illness.



Multiple Appeals Filed Following Mesothelioma Verdict



After the appeals court rejected its argument against the mesothelioma verdict, the company took its case to the state Supreme Court, but they also affirmed the lower court’s management of the case and the jury’s verdict. They said that expert witness testimony had been properly permitted and that the testimony had satisfied the state’s requirements for evidence of causation. They ordered the company to pay the victim’s family the $1 million the jury had directed, putting an end to the family’s difficult journey.

### Massachusetts AG’s Asbestos Enforcement Protects Public and Employees from Mesothelioma and Other Asbestos Diseases

The presence of in-place asbestos presents a significant risk of mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases for workers and the public alike. The Attorney General of Massachusetts has made a point of pursuing companies that fail to comply with regulations regarding asbestos management and recently pursued two companies that illegally disposed of asbestos-contaminated materials during the demolition of a power station. The companies and the state recently entered a $200,000 consent judgment.







Failure to Comply with Asbestos Regulations Puts People at Risk of Mesothelioma



Failure to comply with asbestos regulations is a significant concern, as legacy asbestos used to build power plants, schools, and even homes presents a real risk of malignant mesothelioma. It is this risk that has driven the Massachusetts Attorney General and Department of Environmental Protection to ensure that these cases are pursued. Their enforcement has resulted in nearly $8 million in civil penalties over eight years.



With the risk of mesothelioma in mind, Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell pursued Holtec Decommissioning International LLC and its affiliate Holtec Pilgrim LLC, accusing them of improperly handling asbestos-containing demolition debris while tasked with the demolition of a decommissioned power station. In addition to improper disposal of the debris, the companies were accused of failure to survey and identify the carcinogenic material and of failure to notify the state of its presence before beginning the work.



$200,000 Consent Judgment Sends Powerful Message About Actions to Prevent Mesothelioma



Putting the public at risk of mesothelioma is a serious concern for the Attorney General, a fact made clear by her having sought civil penalties of $25,000 for each day of the companies’ violations, in addition to a court order demanding future compliance with state and federal laws. In granting the $200,000 consent judgment, all allegations against the company are resolved. Notably, the companies are prohibited from paying the penalty with monies from a fund that was created by charges to ratepayers that financed its decommissioning

### Asbestos Companies Blame Each Other After Mesothelioma Lawsuit

Most mesothelioma lawsuits name multiple defendants that have been involved in the asbestos supply chain, and the case filed by Ted Matherne and his family is no exception. When their wrongful death claim named Westinghouse Electric Corporation and its customer Hopeman Brothers, the two turned on each other, with one asking to be dropped from litigation and the other opposing the action.







Second-Hand Asbestos Exposure Blamed for Wife’s Mesothelioma



Though it’s not common for asbestos companies facing mesothelioma liability to lay blame on one another, it’s not unheard of either. In the case filed by the Matherne family, the issue surrounding Mrs. Matherne’s second-hand exposure to asbestos carried home on her husband’s work clothes. The asbestos came from a product called Micarta, which was manufactured by Westinghouse Electric Corporation and then sold to Hopeman Brothers.



Hopeman Brothers supplied the deadly product to the Avondale Shipyard where Mr. Matherne worked. Though the lawsuit named pointed to both companies as being liable, Westinghouse petitioned to be dropped from the claim, arguing that Hopeman was a “sophisticated user” and required no warning that asbestos-contaminated products were dangerous. The victim’s family and the contractor both objected to the request.



Judge Denies Asbestos Company’s Request in Mesothelioma Claim



In support of their argument, Westinghouse presented a memo from a former Hopeman executive that questioned the use of the product, asserting that the man had known that it contained asbestos and posed a risk of mesothelioma. But Hopeman’s attorneys countered this argument by saying that the man was not a sophisticated user; that he had only been in his early 20s, had not been fully aware of the implications or dangers, and that his fears had been discounted by a representative from Johns-Manville.



In ruling on the case, the judge agreed with Hopeman and the mesothelioma victim’s family that the sophisticated user argument was a fact to be decided at trial. The case will move forward for a jury to consider.

### Controversial Mesothelioma Study at Issue in Ovarian Cancer Case

There are tens of thousands of people who’ve filed suit against consumer giant Johnson & Johnson, blaming talc in the company’s products for their ovarian cancer or malignant pleural mesothelioma diagnoses. Though their claims were delayed by the company’s bankruptcy filing, courts have recently begun hearing testimony again, and an issue that’s been raised by J&J is sure to be heard frequently: The company is seeking information on an expert witness’ employees who participated in the preparation of her recently published scientific study.







Mesothelioma Expert Witness Questioned Over Employee Records



For those diagnosed with serious and fatal illnesses like ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, the question of who worked for a researcher seems like a distraction. But as court dates near for victims’ multidistrict litigation, Johnson & Johnson has requested that a subpoena be issued to Northwell Health. The health system employs Dr. Jacqueline Moline, a noted mesothelioma researcher and frequent expert witness in cases involving cosmetic talcum powder.



Johnson & Johnson and its asbestos bankruptcy subsidiary LTL Management have previously filed suit against Dr. Moline over her mesothelioma writing and testimony, and she and her employer have filed objections to the company’s request for subpoena in the upcoming ovarian cancer claims, calling it and other subpoenas “fishing expeditions.”



Talc Company Argues that Subpoena of Mesothelioma Expert’s Records is Justified



While the ovarian cancer victims argue that the difference between mesothelioma and their illness is enough to warrant the subpoena request being rejected, the company claims that victims are relying on the expert witness’ research as a basis for their lawsuits. A company representative said, “Allegations that asbestos is present in cosmetic talc is a central and hotly disputed issue in this litigation.” A decision from the court is expected shortly.

### Aerospace Companies Resolve Mesothelioma Lawsuit Out of Court

Multi-million-dollar mesothelioma verdicts get a lot of media attention, but they also take a lot of time and can cause significant stress.  Many victims’ families choose instead to negotiate with the asbestos companies they blame for their loved ones’ deaths. By working to reach an out-of-court settlement, their cases usually get resolved more quickly and with a lot less aggravation. That’s what happened in the case of a former U.S. Air Force aircraft technician whose family filed suit against some of the country’s biggest defense contractors.







Defense Contractors and Mesothelioma Victim’s Family Agree on Settlement



John R. McCabe Sr.’s mesothelioma was blamed on exposure to asbestos during the 1950s, when he worked on engines and aircraft made by Raytheon, Northrop Grumman Corporation, Koch Industries, and dozens of other companies. He died just three months after filing suit against them, and when the case was assumed by his adult children, they pursued the option of settling out of court.



The original mesothelioma filing listed multiple sites where Mr. McCabe had been exposed to the toxic mineral between 1953 and 1957. His skill in repairing and maintaining the equipment and his knowledge of rockets meant that he worked near launchpads and alongside astronaut support systems at air bases and sites including Cape Canaveral. Though the companies whose products he worked with were aware that asbestos in their products was dangerous, they provided no warning, and Mr. McCabe said that he and his colleagues had been misled about their safety.



Undisclosed Settlement Resolves Legal Issues with Seven Defendants in Mesothelioma Case



The McCabe family’s original lawsuit named companies involved in every step of the asbestos or asbestos-contaminated product supply chain. These cases were resolved over the course of a year, and though the compensation that was agreed upon remains unknown, the dismissal of the claims against Koch Industries Inc., Rohr Inc., Raytheon Technologies Corporation, General Cable Corporation, HLI Solutions Inc., Flint Hills Resources LLC., and Specialty Cable Corporation represent a significant development.

### Shipboard Asbestos Blamed for Veteran’s Mesothelioma

Navy veteran Chloyde Pelton has filed a lawsuit against manufacturer John Crane, Inc., accusing the company of negligence, willful and wanton conduct, and strict product liability for its failure to warn against the dangers of asbestos in products he worked with during his time in the military. Though the company filed a motion to have the claims against it dismissed, an Ohio court denied their petition and is allowing the case to move forward.







“Dirty Work” Described by Veteran with Mesothelioma



According to the mesothelioma lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Mr. Pelton served aboard the U.S.S. Lyman K. Swenson, the U.S.S. Pritchett, and the U.S.S. Frontier in the years between 1959 and 1963. His shipboard duties included removing old gaskets and packing using a wire brush, work that he described as dirty and which he said created “lots of dust in the air.” His claim of causation was supported by testimony from several expert witnesses, including a retired U.S. Navy Captain who spoke to the amount of dust that would have been raised in his work, a medical expert, and an industrial hygienist.



Despite the strength of the testimonial evidence provided by the plaintiff, John Crane, Inc. argued that the case against it should be dismissed. The company said that the witness testimony was insufficient to establish that the harms posed by their asbestos-contaminate products were outweighed by their benefits. The company argued that there was no proof of causation and that the victim had offered no alternative that would have represented a safer design than what was used. They also asserted that there is no recognition of willful and wanton conduct under maritime law and that therefore the punitive damages claim should be stricken.



Judges Deny Motion to Dismiss Navy Veteran’s Mesothelioma Lawsuit



John Crane, Inc.’s products are frequently named in mesothelioma lawsuits, and the company consistently attempts to evade liability, but its efforts were rejected by the judges hearing Mr. Pelton’s case. Though they agreed that maritime law does not recognize willful and wanton conduct, they left the punitive damages claim in place and denied the company’s assertions regarding the evidence. They also noted that the plaintiff had no obligation to offer an alternative design or weigh the pros and cons of function versus potential harm. The petition for dismissal was denied and the case will continue for a jury to hear.

### New York Judge Denies Asbestos Company’s Attempt to Avoid Lung Cancer Liability

When asbestos exposure victims and their families or survivors decide to pursue litigation, their attorneys often warn them that the road will be long and filled with ups, downs, and unexpected twists and turns. But few could anticipate the tortuous path that awaited Susan Carboni, who sued Alfa Romeo USA after her husband Francesco died of asbestos-related lung cancer. Despite the company’s best efforts, Justice Adam Silvera refused to allow them to avoid facing her in court.







Asbestos Lung Cancer Victim’s Widow Pursues Justice



Susan Carboni filed a personal injury lawsuit against multiple companies that she blamed for her husband’s 2019 asbestos-related lung cancer death, including Alfa Romeo USA. Her claim pointed to asbestos exposure suffered during his long career as an auto mechanic.



Though Alfa Romeo USA’s attorney deposed the lung cancer victim’s widow and other witnesses about the case, they failed to respond to the standard New York City Asbestos Litigation interrogatories that the widow’s attorneys sent to them. These interrogatories asked specific questions about the company’s corporate history and the existence of any transitions that might have impacted successor liability.



Company Suddenly Asserts Improper Filing in Lung Cancer Case



Despite the fact of having been involved in litigation with the lung cancer widow for years, in 2023 Alfa Romeo USA suddenly declined to participate any longer and filed a motion asking to be dismissed from the case. They asserted that they were actual FCA US LLC, not the company named in the claim and that there was no company called Alfa Romeo USA, and further argued that their company had not existed at the time that Mr. Carboni had worked on Alfa Romeo vehicles.



This argument came as a surprise to the widow after years of legal correspondence and cooperation and was eventually rejected by Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York County. Relying on publicly available documents provided by the widow’s attorney, the judge wrote that the defendant had properly been on notice of the claim for years and that they had accepted service, appeared, and answered in the past.



Since the company had never provided an indication of any questions about its corporate identity or history, he said that no was not the time. He also pointed out that for a motion for summary judgment to be granted, the company would have needed to prove that it had played no part in his exposure to asbestos, something that it never mentioned in its petition for summary judgment.

### Asbestos in Safety Gloves Blamed for Man’s Mesothelioma

One of the great ironies of mesothelioma is that it is often the products meant to protect the victim that led to their illness. That’s exactly what happened to Mario Caligiuri. The former welder wore asbestos-fortified gloves to protect him from the extreme heat of the materials he was working with, and as the glove material deteriorated, he breathed in the fibers that eventually sickened him.  







Former Welder with Mesothelioma Sues Safety Glove Company



When Mr. Caligiuri was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, he took legal action against the companies whose asbestos-contaminated products he worked with. Olympic Glove & Safety Company is a defendant named in the claim, but the company filed a petition for summary judgment asking the court to dismiss the case against them.



The mesothelioma victim included Olympic in his claim because he wore the company’s asbestos-contaminated gloves extensively in the 1970s. His claim of negligence was supported by testimony from expert witnesses who provided carefully collected scientific data regarding the quantity of asbestos he was likely to have inhaled based on the number of times Mr. Caligiuri says that he wore those gloves over the years.



Judge Denies Asbestos Glove Company’s Request for Dismissal from Mesothelioma Claim



Though they were confronted with highly specific, quantitative analysis from the plaintiff’s expert witnesses, the glove company justified its request for dismissal from the case on an industrial hygienist’s opinion that asbestos from their gloves would not have caused his mesothelioma. The company did not argue that their gloves did not contain asbestos and did not attempt to quantify the amount of asbestos he would have been exposed to over his years of use.



Basing his decision on the strict requirements for granting a motion for summary judgment, Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York County denied the company’s petition. He explained that for such a request to succeed, Olympic would have needed to establish that Mr. Caligiuri’s mesothelioma couldn’t have been caused by their gloves, and they came nowhere near that high bar. The case will proceed with Olympic included among the defendants.



.

### Outrage Over Asbestos Companies’ Bankruptcy Response to Mesothelioma Claims Leads Senators to Act

Over the last few years, asbestos companies facing legal action from victims of malignant mesothelioma, ovarian cancer, and other asbestos-related diseases have adopted a new legal tactic. Rather than agreeing to settle with those whose lives they’ve affected or allow a jury to decide on the question of liability, they’ve turned to a strategy in which they file for bankruptcy, despite earning millions in profits. The controversial move has led many senators to act.







Texas Two-Step in Response to Mesothelioma Claims Spurs Outcry



Many of the biggest and most profitable companies in the world have found themselves in the unhappy position of having to pay billions of dollars in compensation to mesothelioma victims and others after juries have found them liable for negligence. In an attempt to stop the financial bleeding, some have adopted a novel legal strategy called the Texas two-step in which they spin off a subsidiary that specifically holds all of their asbestos liabilities, and then file for bankruptcy on behalf of that subsidiary.



The companies that have adopted this move include Johnson & Johnson and Georgia-Pacific, and with both companies being worth billions of dollars, the practice has quickly been called into question. The courts have been asked to weigh in on whether this approach evades justice, and now three U.S. senators and 24 states’ attorneys general have added their voices to those of the victims. They’ve filed ‘friend of the court’ briefs asking the Supreme Court to stop companies from using the country’s bankruptcy rules inappropriately.



Many Mesothelioma Victims’ Claims Have Been Delayed by the Texas Two-Step



One of the damaging effects that have been seen from companies using the Texas two-step strategy has been the significant delays in cases being heard. Mesothelioma victims have little time left due to the aggressive nature of the fatal asbestos-related disease.  Johnson & Johnson’s bankruptcy filing for its subsidiary LTL Management stopped tens of thousands of mesothelioma lawsuits being heard while the court weighed the bankruptcy filing’s merits. Many victims have died in the interim, never having had the chance to see justice.



After the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Texas two-step could be used by asbestos companies to protect them from their liabilities to victims of mesothelioma, U.S. senators Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, Josh Hawley of Missouri, and Dick Durbin of Illinois were among those asking the Supreme Court to step in, noting that the companies are worth tens of billions of dollars and that their actions were not in keeping with the intention of bankruptcy law.

### Judge in Mesothelioma Claim Denies Insurance Company’s Request

Mesothelioma lawsuits are complex legal actions that involve numerous defendants and multiple layers of liability. The wrongful death claim filed by Roseanna Matherne’s family accused multiple companies of negligence for having exposed her to asbestos carried home on her husband’s work clothes, and that liability extended beyond her husband’s employer to the company that ensured her employer. Though the insurance company was involved in a bankruptcy that seemed to preclude the family from compensation, the judge hearing the case refused to grant them the right to formally close the proceeding, maintaining that the family might still be able to access funds through an appeal.







Insurance Company’s Bankruptcy Filing Complicates Mesothelioma Claims



The recent ruling preserved rights for Ted Matherne and his family, whose mesothelioma claim was originally filed against Avondale Shipyards following the death of his wife Roseanna. Ted had worked for Avondale Shipyards, and the asbestos that he’d unwittingly carried home on his clothing was the cause of his wife’s fatal illness. When they filed suit against his employer, the claim also named the Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association (LIGA), which was obligated to pay for policies issued by Lamorak Insurance Company, the shipyard’s insurer.



Avondale has been found liable for hundreds of asbestos claims over the years, resulting in its insurer being included in a 2021 bankruptcy filing. At the time of the bankruptcy claim, a notice was issued letting all claimants know the deadline for filing claims, but that occurred prior to Mrs. Matherne’s death. When the family later filed a claim, a judge ruled that it had fallen beyond the last day to file, and was therefore barred.



Insurance Company Request for Final Rule Barring Mesothelioma Claim Denied



In light of this victory, the insurance company asked the courts to make this ruling final and bar the Mathernes and any other mesothelioma victims from appealing the decision. The Mathernes filed a motion to bar this action and asked the court not to finalize the ruling until their lawsuit had been resolved. Though Lamorak argued that action would open them up to multiple potential claims, the judge hearing the case disagreed and said that since they remained the statutory obligor on claims against Avondale, he would forestall the finalization of the ruling to allow the victim’s family to file an appeal in the future.

### Mesothelioma Victim Files Suit Against Talc Manufacturers and Sellers

Elsie Louise Graham’s family blames her lifetime use of asbestos-contaminated talcum powder products for her malignant mesothelioma death. They filed a personal injury lawsuit listing numerous talcum powder products as defendants, as well as the owner of a local Oregon grocery store where she’d purchased the products. The defendants filed suit to have the case moved to federal court, claiming that the local market’s inclusion was a fraudulent legal strategy, but the justices of the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon denied their motion and allowed the case to remain in the state’s court.







Mesothelioma Claim Filed in Oregon Courts to Remain in State



Many defendants named in mesothelioma claims prefer to have their claims heard in federal court, which they believe will be more friendly to big business. But because Elsie Louise Graham’s family members wanted to hold the company that sold her the contaminated powder responsible for her death, they filed in state courts. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, and other defendants in the case objected to this and argued that it was inappropriate for the family to the Woodvillage Market and Deli to the case.



To support their argument that the local store should be removed from the mesothelioma claim (thus allowing the case to be moved to federal court), the companies named as defendants asserted that the market had been served inappropriately. Their basis for this argument was that the summons and complaint had been delivered to owner Young Suk Chang’s wife instead of directly to him.



Judges Deny Bid to Remove Mesothelioma Claim to Federal Court



While the corporate giants in the mesothelioma claim argued that the case belonged in federal court, the family argued that their inclusion of the local market was appropriate and that there had been nothing wrong with serving the owner’s wife in her husband’s absence. The Judges of the District Court for the District of Oregon agreed, noting that since she was the only employee in the store the service had met the standard required. They also determined that the companies’ arguments against the market’s inclusion were premature and better decided later. The case will remain in Oregon.

### Printing Press Operator’s Mesothelioma Death Spurs Lawsuit

Raymond Desiena died of malignant pleural mesothelioma after decades of working as a printing press operator. Upon learning that some of the equipment he’d worked with between the 1960s and 1980s had been built with asbestos-contaminated parts, he filed claims against the companies that manufactured them, accusing them of negligence in having failed to warn of their health risks.







Printing Press Companies Seek Dismissal from Mesothelioma Claim



Malignant pleural mesothelioma is caused by exposure to asbestos, but Mr. Desiena had no idea that the Airflex friction brakes installed in the L3Harris Technology printing presses he worked with were contaminated with the carcinogen. He also didn’t know that the toxic material contaminated the Heidelberg USA equipment he worked with.



Confronted with the mesothelioma lawsuits, both companies filed motions for summary judgment asking that the claims be dismissed. They supported their requests with affidavits from corporate representatives asserting that their company’s equipment did not contain the toxic material, but Justice Adam Silvera identified significant weaknesses in the statements the representatives submitted.



Weaknesses in Corporate Affidavits Allow Mesothelioma Claim to Move Forward



Though one of the printing press company representatives, George Karosas, asserted that his company’s equipment contained no asbestos and could not have caused Mr. Horvath’s mesothelioma, he also admitted that his knowledge was limited to printing presses in operation decades after Mr. Horvath’s exposure took place. The same was true of Shawn McDougall, who submitted an affidavit on behalf of Heidelberg. Neither man had any knowledge of the equipment or its contents during the twenty years when the victim had worked with it, fifty years earlier.



Based on these shortcomings, as well as the clarity of information that Mr. Desiena had provided about the nature of his work and exposure and details about the way he’d interacted with the equipment, the judge denied the motions to dismiss and allowed the case to proceed.

### Mesothelioma Suit Against World Trade Center Asbestos Company Allowed to Proceed

The Supreme Court of New York was asked to weigh in on a mesothelioma lawsuit filed by the widow of a mesothelioma victim who traced his asbestos exposure to his days working in New York City’s World Trade Center. Marie Bassi Ryder filed suit against several companies that she’s accused of negligence in her late husband’s death, and though one of those companies filed a motion for summary judgment, the court rejected their argument and allowed the case against them to proceed.







Fireproofing Spray Containing Asbestos Blamed for Mesothelioma



Mrs. Ryder’s late husband was diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma decades after he worked at the site of the World Trade Center. Among the named defendants in her lawsuit was Arconic, Inc., whose fire-proofing spray was used in the iconic buildings’ construction and which contained asbestos. She said that he had been exposed by having been in close proximity to workers using the product without taking proper precautions.



In its motion to have the mesothelioma claim against them dismissed, Arconic argued that their spray did not contain asbestos after 1970, before he began working at the site. But the widow’s attorneys pointed out that the proof of this that the company had presented was limited to a memo that suggested that the product might be discontinued rather than evidence that it actually had been. They also pointed out that, even if the workmen had stopped using it, that didn’t prove that they didn’t start using it again.



Symptoms Associated with Potential Mesothelioma from 9/11 Dust



Exposure to the hazardous 9/11 dust has been linked to symptoms that may indicate mesothelioma, even though definitive cases haven't been reported by some surveys. The primary symptoms associated with potential mesothelioma include:




Shortness of Breath: Many individuals have noted difficulty in breathing.



Wheezing: A noticeable whistling sound can occur when breathing due to airway obstruction.



Persistent Cough: A long-lasting cough that does not subside easily is another potential sign.




Of over 9,000 individuals with significant exposure to the dust, nearly half reported experiencing at least one of these symptoms. Alarmingly, 11% encountered all three symptoms simultaneously, highlighting the potential health risks linked to the toxic exposure from that tragic event.



Exposure to 9/11 dust has been linked to a variety of cancers and other health conditions. Here's a comprehensive look at the most impacted health issues:



Common Cancers Linked to 9/11 Dust



Individuals exposed to the dust have been diagnosed with several cancer types, including:




Prostate Cancer



Breast Cancer



Thyroid Cancer



Lung Cancer



Kidney Cancer



Colon Cancer



Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer



Melanoma



Lymphoma



Leukemia




By 2021, nearly 24,000 people were reported to have developed cancer related to 9/11 exposure.



Other Health Conditions



Besides cancer, other significant health conditions have been identified among those exposed to the toxic dust:




Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)



Sleep Apnea



Musculoskeletal Syndromes



Sarcoidosis (an inflammatory condition)



Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)



Anxiety and Depression




Overall, over 63,000 individuals have been diagnosed with health issues attributed to exposure from the events of 9/11. This list underscores the long-term health impacts faced by survivors and responders.



What Are the Health Effects from Exposure to 9/11 Dust?



Exposure to the dust from the 9/11 attacks has left long-lasting health impacts, as documented over the years. Here's a comprehensive look at the related health issues:



Respiratory Diseases



A significant number of those exposed have developed respiratory conditions. These include chronic ailments such as asthma, rhinosinusitis, and bronchitis, all of which are often grouped under what is commonly referred to as “World Trade Center cough syndrome.” This syndrome brings persistent respiratory symptoms, frequently worsened by gastrointestinal reflux disease (GERD).



Lung Issues




Asbestosis: Over 350 individuals have been diagnosed with this severe lung disease.



Pulmonary Fibrosis: More than 440 cases have been documented. This condition may be linked to inhaling asbestos and other dangerous fibers present in the dust.




Cancer



The incidence of cancer among those exposed has nearly doubled since 2007, affecting roughly 16% of the population studied. This significant increase underscores the carcinogenic potential of substances present in the dust.



Additional Health Concerns




Shortness of Breath: Approximately 35% of individuals report needing medical attention for breathing difficulties.



Gastrointestinal Conditions: These are often exacerbated by respiratory disorders, creating a complex interplay of symptoms.



Psychological Conditions: Mental health issues have also surfaced, stemming from the traumatic exposure and its ongoing physical repercussions.




Impact on Recovery Personnel







Nearly 70% of recovery workers have experienced lung issues, bearing testimony to the harmful effects of the dust.



These health challenges reflect the severity of 9/11 dust exposure, necessitating ongoing medical attention and research to aid those affected.



Sure! Here's a rewritten version:



The aftermath of 9/11 dust exposure is predicted to pose significant future health risks, primarily due to inhaled asbestos fibers. Experts foresee a surge in asbestos-related diseases, such as mesothelioma and lung cancer, with cases beginning to increase two decades after the tragic event. These conditions are expected to reach their highest levels around 2041, 40 years post-exposure.



According to specialists, accurately determining the risk level for each individual remains challenging. However, there is consensus that these health issues are not being adequately recognized by the public today and require serious attention in upcoming years.



The dust released by the collapse of the World Trade Center towers on 9/11 consisted of a complex mixture of materials.




Nonfibrous Construction Materials: Dominating the composition, about half of the dust was made up of building materials commonly used in construction.



Glass and Other Fibers: These accounted for approximately 40% of the dust, originating from shattered windows and fiberglass insulation.



Cellulose from Disintegrated Paper: Roughly 9.2% of the dust came from the disintegration of paper products that were present in the office spaces.



Asbestos: Though less prevalent, asbestos constituted about 0.8% of the dust. Despite its small percentage, the presence of asbestos raised significant health concerns due to its notorious reputation for causing respiratory diseases.




Overall, the dust was a complex blend of common materials found in a bustling office building, mixed with hazardous substances, some of which presented long-term health risks to first responders and nearby residents.



Health Safety Tips for Individuals Exposed to 9/11 Dust



Exposure to the dust and debris from the 9/11 attacks can have significant health implications. Here are several important safety tips recommended for those affected:



Prioritize Comprehensive Health Evaluations




Respiratory and Digestive Assessments: It's crucial to conduct a thorough examination of your respiratory and digestive systems to identify any abnormalities or potential issues.



Mental Health Check: Ensure you receive a comprehensive evaluation of your mental health. Psychological impacts can be as significant as physical effects.




Engage in Holistic Treatment




Integrated Care Approach: Seek treatment plans that address both physical and mental health. Multidisciplinary teams can offer a more cohesive healing strategy.



Adhere to Medical Advice: Follow all prescribed treatments and medications carefully to manage and alleviate symptoms effectively.




Manage Chronic Conditions




Proactive Disease Management: If you have existing chronic conditions, diligent management is key to controlling their impact over time. Ensure regular monitoring and adjust treatments as advised by your healthcare provider.




By taking these steps, individuals exposed to 9/11 dust can work towards safeguarding their health and mitigating the long-term effects of exposure.



Understanding the Risk of Asbestos Exposure Post-9/11



In the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, the air within a 1.5-mile radius of Ground Zero was perilous, filled with toxic substances. Among these, asbestos was a major concern, posing a significant health risk to many.



High-Risk Groups




First Responders and Firefighters: These brave individuals were among the first on the scene, exposed to harmful particles during their rescue operations.



Search and Rescue Teams: Those involved in the search for survivors often worked in the most contaminated areas, increasing their exposure risk.



Cleanup Crews: Engaging in the difficult task of debris removal placed them in direct contact with asbestos-laden dust.



Local Residents and Survivors: People living nearby or present during the attacks faced prolonged exposure as the toxic dust settled in their homes and neighborhoods.




These groups experienced the highest risk due to their proximity to the site and the intense nature of their involvement in the immediate response and recovery efforts. Understanding these risks highlights the importance of ongoing health monitoring and support for all affected individuals.



Why was Asbestos Used in the Construction of the World Trade Center?



In the late 1960s and early 1970s, the World Trade Center was being constructed at a time when asbestos was a popular material in the building industry. This popularity was due to its exceptional strength and heat-resistant properties, which made it a go-to option for enhancing the safety and durability of structures.



Multiple products in the construction of the twin towers incorporated asbestos. Among them was a spray-on fireproofing material, which was applied to the steel framework of the north tower, specifically up to the 40th floor. This application was crucial for protecting the structural integrity of the building from potential fire damage.



However, during the construction phase, builders anticipated forthcoming regulations that would impose restrictions on the use of asbestos due to health concerns. This foresight led to the eventual cessation of asbestos use in the ongoing construction of the towers.



Arguments and Court Decision



Fireproofing Spray Containing Asbestos Blamed for Mesothelioma




Description of the fireproofing spray and its asbestos content.



Arconic’s argument that their product did not contain asbestos post-1970.



Widow’s attorneys counterargument regarding insufficient evidence from Arconic.




Request for Dismissal from Mesothelioma Claim Denied



Because Arconic had not “unequivocally” established that its product could not have played a part in Mr. Ryder’s mesothelioma, the judge hearing the widow’s case denied Arconic’s request for dismissal, especially because of the abundance of documentary evidence that she had provided about the use of Arconic’s asbestos-containing materials at the worksite.



He wrote that in presenting her mesothelioma claim, the widow had provided “sufficient documentary evidence to raise a question of fact as to the extent of asbestos-containing material in use at the World Trade Center post-1970, its proximity to plaintiffs work, and whether the company had notice of, or created, the dangerous condition.”





Legal Actions and Settlements Related to 9/11 Dust Exposure







In the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, tens of thousands of individuals exposed to the hazardous dust developed serious health issues, including respiratory conditions and various cancers. This has led to numerous legal actions seeking compensation for asbestos exposure and other related health problems.



Major Settlements




2010 Agreement: Over 10,000 rescue and recovery workers who suffered dust-related injuries joined a significant court settlement of $713 million. This was facilitated by a captive insurance company specifically set up to handle claims arising from the World Trade Center disaster.



Other Settlements: Additional agreements reached with entities such as the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey have collectively increased the total compensation to approximately $810 million.




These settlements reflect the extensive impact the dust had on first responders and others who were on site during and after the tragedy.



Research Findings and Implications



A study published earlier this year revealed a distinct immune response in 9/11 victims with prostate cancer, suggesting that the dust might increase cancer risk through an inflammatory response. This research has influenced how conditions are linked back to dust exposure in legal contexts.



Legislative Changes



The Zadroga Act, which initially provided limited compensation, has evolved. Before 2012, it did not cover cancer claims due to insufficient evidence linking them to the dust. However, it now allows those affected to file claims, acknowledging the connection as more research emerged. It's important to note that receiving compensation from this fund might reduce payouts from separate legal suits.



Future Considerations



Asbestos-related diseases, such as mesothelioma, have long development periods. Experts like Dr. Craig Stevens from Michigan anticipate that legal claims associated with these conditions will likely increase, with disease cases peaking around 2041, thus highlighting ongoing and future legal ramifications.



Compensation and Support for 9/11 Responders and Survivors







In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, significant efforts have been made to support those affected by related health conditions. A key piece of legislation providing this support is the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act. This law expands upon previous relief measures and set aside $8.1 billion to offer essential resources.



Key Benefits and Services:




Compensation Fund: More than 19,000 responders and survivors have received financial compensation. This fund aims to alleviate the economic burden caused by health issues arising from exposure to the tragedy.



Health Monitoring and Treatment: Eligible individuals can access annual health monitoring exams. These exams are essential for early detection and treatment of both physical and mental health conditions linked to 9/11 exposure.



Counseling Services: Those affected by 9/11 can benefit from professional counseling services designed to assist in navigating the complexities of their benefits and overall healthcare journey.



World Trade Center Health Program: This program offers comprehensive medical and mental health care specifically for conditions related to the attacks, ensuring that responders and survivors receive tailored support.



VA Health Care Benefits: Veterans who were deployed as responders to the disaster sites also have potential access to Veterans Affairs health care benefits, providing an additional layer of support for those who served during the recovery efforts.




These resources are continually extended and refined to ensure ongoing support for those who put their lives at risk in the aftermath of 9/11, as well as for the civilians impacted by the dust and debris.

### Mesothelioma Widow Prevails Against Honeywell International

When Richard Bell died of malignant mesothelioma, his widow Sharon decided to take legal action against those whom she blamed for his untimely death. She filed a negligence claim against several companies whose asbestos-contaminated products he had worked with, seeking compensation for her own loss and for the pain and suffering that her husband had endured. After her initial filing in the Southern District of Illinois, she added Honeywell International to her original list. Though the company asked to be dismissed from the case, the judge denied their motion.







Honeywell Files Motion for Dismissal from Mesothelioma Claim



Honeywell offered multiple reasons for asking the court to dismiss them from the mesothelioma lawsuit. They argued that because Mrs. Bell’s testimony about her husband’s use of their company’s Bendix automotive brakes had been given before they had been named in the claim, it was considered hearsay. They also argued that she had provided no proof that his illness had specifically been caused by his exposure to their products.



The testimony that the mesothelioma widow provided, and which Honeywell objected to, asserted that Mr. Bell had been exposed to asbestos in the brakes between 1964 and the late 1970s when he replaced old brakes with new ones for their family members. There is significant historical evidence that Bendix brake linings were contaminated with the toxic material.



Summary Judgment Request Denied in Mesothelioma Lawsuit



Mrs. Bell’s mesothelioma claim was heard by District Judge Staci Yandle, who denied the company’s request for dismissal from the claim. In her ruling, she distinguished between the legal definition of hearsay and the interpretation that Honeywell International used in support of its argument. She also explained what was allowed in terms of timing for deposition testimony and adding new defendants to a claim.



She then turned to the company’s assertion that proof was needed that their products had played a role in the mesothelioma victim’s death. She noted that there was a well-established legal precedent regarding “every exposure” to asbestos playing a contributing role in asbestos-related diseases. The company’s request to be dismissed from the case was denied.

### Court Rules that When Testimony Conflicts, Mesothelioma Victim’s Words Prevail

When a mesothelioma victim files a lawsuit seeking compensation, there is no question about their diagnosis or the eventual outcome. But beyond the fact of their illness, there are plenty of conflicting opinions and assertions on how they were exposed and who is at fault. In a recent case, a New York judge made clear that when this tension exists and a defendant has asked for the case to be dismissed, the courts are required to give credence to the victim and allow the case to move forward.







Mesothelioma Victim Recalls Working on Specific Boilers



In an asbestos lawsuit filed in the Supreme Court of New York County, Anthony W. Morale accused Fulton Biler Works of having negligently exposed him to asbestos during his long career as a heating technician. Though Mr. Morale died of his illness, he provided extensive testimony before his death, filled with significant detail about the products he worked with and the type of work he did over 40 years of work.



Despite the specificity of Mr. Morale’s deposition testimony, Fulton Boiler Works argued that the mesothelioma case against them should be dismissed. Their justification rested on testimony from their own corporate representative, who claimed that they could not have been responsible for his death because their boilers didn’t require the type of service and assembly he had described and had not been sold for use in the applications and environments he’d described.



Judge Denies Company’s Request to Dismiss Mesothelioma Claim



Though the boiler company had hoped that their representative's testimony would prevail, Justice Adam Silvera noted that Mr. Morale’s testimony had been unequivocal despite the exceptional circumstance of him suffering the effects of his mesothelioma and having been weeks away from death. In weighing testimony from both sides, the judge said that the case came down to a “battle of the experts” and that a jury would have to decide which side to believe. The asbestos company’s request for the case to be dismissed was denied and the case will proceed.

### Bridgestone Firestone Ordered to Pay $30 Million Following 65-Year-Old’s Mesothelioma Death

Malignant mesothelioma claims the lives of thousands of people every year, and though every victim is different, they all share a history of having been exposed to asbestos. In the case of 65-year-old Thomas Jackson, that exposure came from the clothing his father wore to work every day. On hearing details of Mr. Jackson’s life, sickness, and death, a Chicago jury awarded his widow $30 million in damages.







Jury Hears Details of Mesothelioma Victim’s Childhood Asbestos Exposure



Over the course of a nine-day trial, a jury learned of the many years that the mesothelioma victim’s father had worked for a Bridgestone Firestone tire manufacturing facility in Decatur, Illinois, and how the company had used talc to prevent the components of their tire and rubber products from sticking to each other. Mr. Jackson’s attorneys submitted almost 100 separate documents that proved that the talc the company used had been sourced from Vermont and New York mines whose talc was contaminated with asbestos.



Mr. Jackson died of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma just five weeks after being diagnosed, and his family’s attorneys drew a straight line from his exposure to his father’s work clothes to his illness.  “For years, this Firestone facility allowed hardworking men to go home to their families covered in raw asbestos materials, endangering the next generation and, in Mr. Jackson’s case, causing a sudden and painful death,” one said.



Jury Takes Less than Two Hours to Reach $30 Million Mesothelioma Decision



In addition to presenting the jury with proof of the mesothelioma victim’s exposure to asbestos from the Bridgestone Firestone plant, Mr. Jackson’s attorneys made clear the depth of loss caused by his death. Mr. Jackson had been married to his high school sweetheart and had been the successful owner of a wealth management company he’d started after having put himself through school. The jury ordered the tire company to pay the widow $13.6 million in survivor damages, $11.14 million in wrongful death damages, and $5.25 million in economic losses.

### Asbestos Company Looks to 88-Year-Old’s Inability to Remember to Evade Justice

Summary judgment is a common request from those accused of liability for asbestos-related diseases like malignant mesothelioma and lung cancer. Asbestos companies point to perceived faults in the claims to argue that they should not be held liable. In a recent case, an 88-year-old lung cancer victim gave specific testimony about his work history, but the companies he accused of negligence argued that his failure to specify their names in his testimony warranted dismissal of his claims. The judge hearing the case denied their requests.







New York Lung Cancer Victim Points to Asbestos-Contaminated Workplace



In a recent case, 88-year-old lung cancer victim Josip L. Radovic filed a personal injury lawsuit against multiple companies whose asbestos-contaminated products he was exposed to when he worked at Rockefeller Center between 1970 and 1979. His claim included deposition testimony he had provided three years earlier when he was first diagnosed.



Though his testimony specified the jobs he had performed and the sites where he had worked around Rockefeller Center and referenced boxes of tiles marked as containing asbestos, his deposition did not specify the names of Union Carbide Corporation, Domco Product Texas, or Goodyear Tire & Rubber. In response, the companies argued that the cases against them should be dismissed.



Lung Cancer Victim’s Case to Continue Against Asbestos Company



Though Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York County agreed that Mr. Radovic had not specified their company names, he denied the asbestos companies’ request to have the asbestos lung cancer claim against them dismissed. He noted that the law did not require that he remember every particular, though it did require that for them to have been successful in their requests, they would have had to prove that their products were not present – which they did not. The case will move on for a jury to decide.



.

### Asbestos Company’s Objections to Lung Cancer Case Consolidation Denied

Whether dealing with mesothelioma, lung cancer, or any other asbestos-related diagnosis, the idea of pursuing legal justice can be daunting. The idea of facing off against an asbestos company is intimidating, which is why the idea of consolidating similar cases is so appealing. Though the defendants object to cases being joined, in the state of New York the action is viewed as an overall positive by the courts as long as the cases are similar enough. In a recent example, two lung cancer victims successfully convinced a judge that they shared enough elements in common for consolidation to represent a smart move.







Asbestos Lung Cancer Victims Ask for Consolidation of Cases Against Asbestos Companies



As is true of many mesothelioma victims, both Paul Scandaliato and Guiseppe Rullo were exposed to asbestos on the job. Their workplace exposure occurred from the 1960s through 1980 when each man worked for Consolidated Edison Company of New York. The two worked with similar equipment and machinery, so it is unsurprising that they both developed asbestos-related lung cancer.



For consolidation to occur, the New York courts require that a preponderance of certain criteria be shared between cases. Those criteria are:



Common worksites



Similar occupation



Similar time of exposure



Type of disease



Whether plaintiffs are living or deceased



Status of discovery in each case



Whether all plaintiffs are represented by the same counsel



Type of cancer



With both men represented by the same attorney and sharing so many commonalities in their claims, they appealed to the court to allow them to consolidate their litigation in the name of judicial economy. To support their case, they pointed out how many of the criteria required for a successful consolidation they shared.



Lung Cancer Asbestos Victims Win Argument



On review of the two cases and the many elements that they shared, the judge denied the asbestos companies’ arguments against combining the cases. The judge agreed that judicial economy would be served by consolidating the cases.

### Mesothelioma Victim’s Family Blames Asbestos in Valves for Illness and Death

When Willie Hollingsworth was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, he and his family members immediately began searching for answers. How could he have fallen pretty to this deadly disease? They quickly found the answer: the products he had worked with throughout his career had been contaminated with asbestos. In response, they filed personal injury lawsuits against several of them, including the manufacturer of the Clow Valves installed in his employer’s boiler room.







Family Files Mesothelioma Lawsuit Against Valve Manufacturer



Though mesothelioma claimed Mr. Hollingsworth’s life before his case got to court, his family continued pursuing justice. Among those named in their lawsuit was McWane, Inc., whose unincorporated division Clow Valve Company was responsible for manufacturing the valves Mr. Hollingsworth worked with.



In response, the company filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing they should be held responsible for his mesothelioma. In support of their motion, they offered affidavit testimony from an employee representative who asserted that the valve in question could not have been in use at the time that Mr. Hollingsworth was working in the named boiler room.



Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss Mesothelioma Claim



Though the judge reviewed the affidavit from the valve company representative, he found it fell far short of what was required to dismiss the mesothelioma claim, especially in light of the strength of the statements Mr. Hollingsworth had made about his exposure. The judge noted that in order for the witness’ testimony to have sufficed, it would have had to prove that it would have been impossible for the product to have caused Mr. Hollingsworth’s exposure. Instead, the witness had simply submitted a statement asserting that it could not have been in use at the time, and that fell far short of what was needed to eliminate questions of fact. The case will continue for a jury to decide.

### DAP Caulk and Plaster Blamed for Mesothelioma Death

DAP caulk is a familiar sight to nearly anybody who has done home repair or worked in construction, but few modern users are aware that the product has been named in multiple mesothelioma lawsuits. The product once contained asbestos, and people who worked with it regularly breathed in the dust created when the product had dried and was sanded. Jose Munoz was one such victim. His family’s personal injury claim is making its way through the New York asbestos litigation system.







Asbestos Company Seeks Dismissal of Mesothelioma Claims



According to the claim filed in a New York court, Mr. Munoz filed his mesothelioma lawsuit against DAP Inc. and other companies that he accused of having caused his mesothelioma by negligently exposing him to asbestos and not warning him of their products’ dangers. He cited asbestos in both the company’s caulk products and its plaster products. DAP responded to this claim y filing a motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the legal action.



DAP’s request to have the mesothelioma case dismissed was based on their assertion that Mr. Munoz’s claim was “speculative.” They argued that not all DAP caulks historically contained asbestos and that no DAP plaster product had ever contained the carcinogen. They also said that his claim for causation of his illness was insufficient.



Judge Denies Asbestos Company’s Motion to Dismiss Mesothelioma Lawsuit



In reviewing the claims from both Mr. Munoz’s survivors and the company, Justice of the Supreme Court of New York County Adam Silvera noted the evidence that both had provided in support of their arguments, as well as the strict standards that needed to be met for summary judgment to be granted. He then pointed out that DAP’s arguments had relied heavily on an affidavit from a former employee who lacked the requisite personal knowledge to establish that no DAP products containing asbestos had been in circulation and used by Mr. Munoz.



Combining this lapse, and the fact that the company had confirmed that some of its products had contained asbestos, with the testimony provided by the mesothelioma victim was all that was needed to eliminate the viability of the company’s motion for summary judgment. The case will continue for a jury to hear.

### Judge Denies Carnival Cruise Request for Mesothelioma Death Arbitration

Basilio Gallo’s widow and daughter filed their mesothelioma claim directly against his long-time employer, Carnival Corporation, as well as other companies they accused of negligently exposing him to asbestos.  Though Carnival tried to enforce an arbitration agreement that he’d signed in the last years of his employment, a Florida federal judge denied the company’s request, agreeing with the family that his exposure had not occurred during the time that the agreement was in place.







Employer’s Attempt to Enforce Arbitration Agreement Fails Against Mesothelioma Claim



Though most mesothelioma claims filed by workers name manufacturers and other companies responsible for the equipment that employees are exposed to, in some cases the victims are also able to seek justice from their employers. Mr. Gallo worked onboard Carnival’s popular cruise vessels for more than 30 years, between 1972 and 2008.



Towards the end of his employment, the dangers of asbestos and the risk of mesothelioma was well known and the material had been removed from the ship, but in the earlier years of his employment he suffered significant exposure.  Despite the difference in the environment between the beginning and end of his tenure, the company attempted to evade a jury trial by pointing to an agreement that had been signed when the risk no longer existed.



Florida Judge Rejects Carnival Corporation’s Argument in Mesothelioma Case



The Florida judge who was hearing the mesothelioma case listened carefully as Carnival asserted that the wrongful death lawsuit Mr. Gallo’s family had filed in Texas state court was inappropriate because of the arbitration agreement that he signed toward the end of his employment. They wanted the case to remain in Florida, under its arbitration agreement.



But the judge agreed with the family and allowed the case to remain where it had been filed, as a wrongful death lawsuit. Commenting on their victory, a representative noted,  “Mr. Gallo served for decades aboard Carnival vessels, and the vast majority of his employment agreements contained no arbitration provisions. There is no evidence that he sustained any asbestos exposure on any of the very few voyages covered by an arbitration agreement. We are pleased that his family can now seek justice before a jury and we look forward to presenting their case in court.”

### 85-Year-Old’s Lawsuit Highlights Challenges of Mesothelioma Claims

Because there’s no question that exposure to asbestos causes malignant mesothelioma, lung cancer, and other serious illnesses, many victims believe that seeking compensation should yield quick results. But asbestos cases are challenging, in large part because the illness appears so long after exposure. This point was made clear in a recent case that pitted an 85-year-old lung cancer victim against a pump manufacturer whose products he had worked with decades earlier.







Pump Manufacturer Points to Memory Lapse as Reason to Dismiss Asbestos Case



Like many mesothelioma and asbestos-related disease victims, John Gonder was diagnosed with lung cancer more than four decades after his exposure, when he was in his eighties. Despite his advanced age, he was able to recall specifics of the asbestos-containing products he was exposed to between 1970 and 1990 when he was an inspector for Con Edison. Mr. Gonder submitted to a deposition a year before his death, citing specific details of the sites where he’d worked forty years earlier, the products he worked with, and more. Included in his list of products were pumps made by manufacturer Milton Roy.



Both lung cancer and mesothelioma are diseases that leave victims weak, and the treatments that patients undergo to extend survival can be debilitating. The company went beyond asserting that the pumps they provided to Mr. Gonder’s job sites did not contain any asbestos-contaminated parts: they also asked for the case to be dismissed because he had failed to specify their company’s name in his deposition, even though the evidence he had submitted in support of his claim explicitly named them. They showed no sympathy for his age or his condition.



Judge Denies Asbestos Pump Manufacturer’s Request in Lung Cancer Case



Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York County serves on the New York Asbestos Litigation Court, and he hears many asbestos-related claims filed by lung cancer and mesothelioma victims. After listening to Milton Roy’s argument against allowing Mr. Gonder’s case to be heard, the judge ruled that the case should be allowed to move forward.



His reasoning referenced a frequent challenge in mesothelioma cases: That Mr. Gonder had been deposed when he was ill, elderly, and just a year from death. He pointed out that even under those circumstances, the victim had provided “clear and unequivocal details regarding his work history from approximately forty-five years ago.” Because Mr. Gonder had been able to provide specifics about the locations of worksites, his role, and the category of products he'd been exposed to, the judge decided that the case should advance to a jury to decide.

### Conflicting Testimony in Asbestos Lung Cancer Case

Like many people diagnosed with mesothelioma or asbestos-related lung cancer, Kenneth Nankervis had a long history of having worked with many products that were contaminated the carcinogenic material. He filed suit against several of the companies that manufactured those products, including air compressor company Campbell Hausfeld, LLC. Though the company insisted that his illness was caused by his cigarette smoking, the judge hearing the claim denied their request to dismiss the man’s lawsuit.







Man Blames Lung Cancer on Asbestos in Air Compressor Gaskets



According to Mr. Nankervis’ claim, during the years that he worked as a roofer, he was frequently close to Campbell Hausfeld’s air compressor gaskets. Like many others who have been diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma or other asbestos-related diseases, his claim filed in New York City’s Asbestos Litigation docket accuses the company of negligence in failing to warn of the dangers of its products.



In response, Campbell Hausfeld pointed to Mr. Nankervis having smoked cigarettes as the cause of his lung cancer, despite studies that have shown that exposure to asbestos increases the risk for both lung cancer and malignant pleural mesothelioma in smokers.



Judge Notes Remaining Issues of Fact in Lung Cancer Claim



When a judge in the New York City Asbestos Litigation Court is asked to dismiss a mesothelioma or lung cancer claim, they must weigh the evidence that has been provided by both sides to see where there are issues of fact that need to be determined by a jury. They also must assess whether the defendant who is asking for the claim to be dismissed has proven that their product could not have caused the plaintiff’s illness. In this case, Justice Adam Silvera determined that neither condition applied.



In ruling that the company’s attorneys did not prove that the gaskets in their air compressors did not contain asbestos, Justice Silvera indicated that a jury would have to decide whether exposure to the company’s products could have caused Mr. Nankervis’ lung cancer. “As conflicting evidence has been presented herein with regards to defendant Campbell’s manufacturing of air compressors utilizing asbestos-containing parts during the period of Mr. Nakervis’ exposure, issues of fact exist to preclude summary judgment. Moreover, defendant Campbell wholly failed to meet its burden to establish that its products could not have been the cause for Mr. Nankervis’ illness.”

### Lung Cancer Victim’s Family Prevails Against Airplane Parts Manufacturer

Malignant mesothelioma and asbestos-related lung cancer have claimed countless lives in the United States, with most victims’ deaths blamed on occupational exposure to asbestos. Following the 2021 death of their family member, Gustave Sahm’s survivors filed suit against the companies they blamed for his illness and death, including the manufacturer of parts for the airplanes he flew. Though the company attempted to have the case dismissed, a judge denied their request and the family’s quest for justice can proceed.







Asbestos Lung Cancer Victim Was a Navy Veteran



Like many others diagnosed with mesothelioma or lung cancer, Gustave Sahm was a Navy veteran, but the case against Morton International was not based on his service-based exposure. Instead, the family pointed to parts that the company had provided to the St. Louis County Police Department. Years before being diagnosed with asbestos-related lung cancer, Mr. Sahm had been a helicopter pilot and detective for the St. Louis County Police Department, and it is exposure to asbestos-related parts manufactured by the company that formed the basis for the family’s negligence claim against the company.



Though there were several other companies named in the suit that successfully requested dismissal from the family’s claim, Judge Audrey G. Fleissig of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri reviewed precedent from previously filed mesothelioma and asbestos lung cancer claims and determined that the claims against Morton International successfully raised issues of both strict product liability and negligent manufacture.



Family Points to Asbestos Company’s Sale of Parts to Police Department in St. Louis



Many of the companies that were named in the family’s original suit successfully followed the same pattern that has been used in mesothelioma and asbestos-related diseases in the past: they argued that the court where the claim was filed had no jurisdiction over them. But in the case involving Morton International, that argument failed due to evidence that the company had directly sold the asbestos-containing products to which Mr. Sahm was exposed to the man’s employer.



By providing proof that the asbestos lung cancer victim had been directly exposed to Morton International’s asbestos-contaminated parts and that the company had provided no warning that their products could lead to mesothelioma or other asbestos-related diseases, the family defeated arguments against jurisdiction or statement of a case, and their journey for justice can proceed.

### Montana Talc Supplier Accused of Bad Faith Attempt to Evade Mesothelioma Claims

Facing over 500 pending claims filed by mesothelioma victims and others diagnosed with asbestos-related diseases, a Montana-based talc supplier has filed for bankruptcy in the state of Texas. Representatives for the company’s unsecured creditors are objecting, calling the move “bad-faith forum shopping at its worst.”







Company Named in Mesothelioma Lawsuits Attempts Texas Two-Step



Barretts Minerals has always been based in the state of Montana, but that hasn’t stopped the company from attempting the legal strategy known as the “Texas Two-Step” to try to evade mesothelioma liability. In the same way that Johnson & Johnson and other companies have done, the company is being accused of “blatant forum shopping” after it filed for bankruptcy in Texas. Victims say the move is designed to avoid the potential of significant jury awards and have petitioned the Texas bankruptcy court to disallow the move.



Originally part of Pfizer, the company at the center of the mesothelioma controversy was spun off in 1992 and changed its name to Minerals Technology. But last July, that independent company established a new subsidiary called Barretts Ventures Texas, which borrowed close to $6 million at 10% interest just days before filing for bankruptcy. The money was used to buy two plots of land in Texas. Those are its only assets.



Lack of Debt Questioned by Judge Overseeing Mesothelioma Bankruptcy Claim



Among the many questions posed by U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Marvin Isgur in reviewing the talc company’s bankruptcy allegation was why they were filing for bankruptcy when they had no apparent debt. Representatives for mesothelioma victims and others diagnosed with asbestos-related diseases argue that the company has long centered its operations in Montana and that the move was specifically designed to shield it from taking responsibility for those harmed by its product.

### Libby, Montana Woman’s Mesothelioma Claim Will Be Heard in State Court

Asbestos companies named in mesothelioma lawsuits are frequently accused of negligence, either in failing to warn of their products' dangers or of negligently handling the dangerous material.  BNSF Railway is among those who’ve been blamed for many illnesses in Libby, Montana. In a recent case, a woman who blames her illness on asbestos that BNSF transported carelessly through town won the right to have her case heard by the Montana Asbestos Claims Court.







Woman Blames Her Mesothelioma On BNSF’s Negligent Handling of Asbestos



When Libby, Montana resident Karen Morey was diagnosed with mesothelioma, she blamed her exposure to asbestos on BNSF Railway, which transported the toxic material in open-air railcars through her town.  Her original claim was filed with another plaintiff and remanded to federal court due to federal officer removal requirements and the defendants being from a variety of states, but when the co-plaintiff’s case was dismissed, it left only BNSF.



The railway attempted to keep the mesothelioma claim in the more defendant-friendly federal courts, but a judge denied their request and returned the case to the Montana Asbestos Claims Court where Ms. Morey originally filed it.



Asbestos Carried from W.R. Grace & Co. Mines Led to Mesothelioma Deaths



Libby, Montana is located in a beautiful part of the country, but its reputation has been severely damaged by the epidemic of mesothelioma and asbestos-related disease diagnoses that have affected its population. These are the result of its nearness to the W.R. Grace & Co. vermiculite mine, which has been blamed for contaminating the town with asbestos for decades.



Ms. Morey’s mesothelioma claim accuses BNSF Railway of both negligence and common law liability and seeks compensation for the damages she suffered. Though the company insisted that the case should remain in federal court, the judge rejected their argument because the reason for it having been removed to federal court no longer applied. Chief District Judge Brian Morris  added that the case was best suited to the Montana Asbestos Claims Court, which was specifically created to address the issues facing Libby residents.

### Packaging at Issue in Mesothelioma Lawsuit

When malignant mesothelioma claimed Wilburn Freeman’s life, his family filed a personal injury claim against Georgia Pacific, blaming asbestos in the company’s pre-mixed joint compound for his illness and death. When the company asked the court to dismiss the case, the issues that needed to be addressed included the packaging that the product was sold in. Following arguments from both sides, the judge hearing the case sided with the victim’s family and allowed the case to proceed.







Asbestos in Pre-Mixed Joint Compound Blamed for Mesothelioma Death



Georgia Pacific asked for the mesothelioma case to be dismissed by the Delaware judge hearing the case. They argued that the product named in the family’s claim was not on the market during the years specified in the lawsuit, and since Mr. Freeman died before giving deposition testimony, it was impossible to establish the facts in the case.



But the mesothelioma victim’s son recalled specifics of having worked with the product while helping his father on renovation and construction products in the 1960s and 1970s and testified about the white tubs that he recalled the product being packaged in. In response, Georgia Pacific argued that they had not begun use of those pails until years later.



Judge Rejects Company’s Request to Dismiss Mesothelioma Claim



Though Georgia Pacific sufficiently established that the buckets had not been in use during the years cited by the mesothelioma victim’s son, the judge allowed the case to move forward. He noted that the victim’s son had “clearly and repeatedly identified the joint compound his father used.” He also said that the issue of the packaging was not relevant, recognizing that the image of the containers that the son carried from childhood could have been impacted by years of marketing by the company or association to more recent packaging. The case will move forward.

### Despite Efforts to Protect Itself, Merck Joins List of Companies with Talc Mesothelioma Liability

People whose mesothelioma, ovarian cancer, and other illnesses have been linked to asbestos-contaminated talc are increasingly seeking justice from the consumer companies that included the product in their products. In the face of companies like Johnson & Johnson, Colgate-Palmolive, and Avon being told to pay enormous sums to victims, others are doing whatever they can to build a wall around their companies. In a recent example, Merck & Company made an unsuccessful bid to void the terms of its own sales contract with Bayer AG to evade liability.







Merck Sale of Talc-Based Powder Division at Issue in Delaware Courts



Long before mesothelioma victims began looking at asbestos-contaminated talc as the cause of their illness, Merck & Company sold its talcum powder products division to Bayer AG. That division sold popular products including Lotrimin foot powder and Dr. Scholl’s talcum powder, both of which have been cited in pending asbestos suits, and both Merck & Co. and Bayer AG have been named as defendants.



In response to this development, the two companies began negotiating shared liability for mesothelioma and ovarian cancer claims, but those talks broke down when Merck demanded a sunset date for its responsibilities. The stalemate led to Merck suing Bayer, claiming that the sales agreement between the two specified a limit of seven years for its legal responsibilities for the product.



Review of Sales Agreement Leads to Merck Liability for Mesothelioma Claims



Despite Merck’s assertion of terms limiting its liability for harms linked to its talc-based products, Delaware’s Chancery Court determined that the agreement between the two companies included Merck’s retained product liability for products sold before the sale, and this tied them to the mesothelioma and ovarian cancer claims.



Though Merck appealed the Chancery Court’s decision to the Delaware Supreme Court, the higher court upheld lower court Vice Chancellor Nathan A. Cook’s decision about its liability. The vice chancellor’s decision pointed to language in the original agreement that “clearly and unambiguously provides that Merck indefinitely retained substantive liability for product liability claims related to products sold prior to the closing of the transaction.”  This means that mesothelioma victims can continue naming Merck as a defendant in any personal injury claims that they file.

### Mesothelioma Victims Agree to Johnson & Johnson Settlement Offers

For years, Johnson & Johnson has fought hard against legal claims filed by mesothelioma victims and others that have blamed asbestos-contaminated talc in its baby powder product for their illnesses. While arguing against liability, the company has also pursued a controversial bankruptcy filing that America’s courts have rejected twice. Facing challenges on multiple fronts, the company has quietly begun to settle with some of its victims.







Johnson & Johnson Settles Two Mesothelioma Claims



Though the details and amounts received by the victims remain unknown, Johnson & Johnson demonstrated a reversal of its previous stance by agreeing to settle two outstanding mesothelioma claims. The move is part of ongoing negotiations with a law firm that is representing multiple talcum-powder-based claims against the company.



Both the family of mesothelioma victim Rosalino Reyes, who died at the age of 54, and victim Marlin Eagles blame Johnson & Johnson’s product for their diagnosis with the rare, asbestos-related disease. Mr. Reyes died in 2020 a few days after the jury trial regarding his illness began, leading to the case ending in a mistrial. Mr. Eagles is 81 years old and still battling the disease.



Mesothelioma Claims Filed in California Court



Mr. Reyes’ family and Mr. Eagles and his wife filed their claims in Alameda Superior Court in California, which had previously seen significant jury decisions in mesothelioma claims against the company. The court’s most recent decision in an asbestos claim against Johnson & Johnson resulted in an $18.8 million damages award.



Though Johnson & Johnson continues to argue against its responsibility, it is also facing more than 50,000 outstanding mesothelioma and ovarian cancer claims, and the rejection of its bankruptcy filing has given rise to concerns about the costs of future litigation. It is unknown whether they will continue to offer settlements to victims and their families.

### Will J&J File a Third Bankruptcy to Stop Mesothelioma Claims?

There have now been over 51,000 mesothelioma and ovarian cancer lawsuits filed against consumer giant Johnson & Johnson. While those claims were put on hold by the company’s bankruptcy filings, the courts have now rejected those claims twice and the cases have begun being heard again. Facing the very real possibility of more multi-million-dollar claims, the company is quietly settling with some victims out of court while at the same time mulling a third attempt at bankruptcy protection.







Talc in Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder Blamed for Mesothelioma and Ovarian Cancers



Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder had been one of the most trusted products in the world until long-time users began being diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma and ovarian cancer. Scientists linked the diagnoses and deaths to asbestos-contaminated talc in the product, and internal company documents revealed that the company attempted to suppress a researcher’s report concerning cancer risks posed by the product.



As word spread among mesothelioma and ovarian cancer victims and their survivors, tens of thousands filed personal injury claims seeking compensation for the harm that they’ve suffered, and many of them resulted in multi-million-dollar jury awards. Facing the very real possibility of billions of dollars in liability, the company created a subsidiary called LTL Management to hold all of its asbestos liabilities, then attempted to place the subsidiary into bankruptcy. That controversial legal move put a temporary hold on litigation against the company, but with the bankruptcy filing being denied twice, the cases have started moving through the courts again, and the most recently heard case resulted in an $18.8 million award.



Johnson & Johnson Board Considering Third Bankruptcy Filing



As more mesothelioma claims begin to be heard, including one that is currently being held in Florida and others scheduled for March and August in New Jersey, the Johnson & Johnson board of directors is considering their options. Some board members favor settling with select victims while others are leaning toward filing another bankruptcy claim.

### Lawsuit to Pit Libby, Montana Mesothelioma Victims Against BNSF Railway

A lawsuit scheduled to begin on April 8th of this year will see two families who lost loved ones to mesothelioma demanding justice from the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway. The case accuses the company of negligently exposing their family members to asbestos-contaminated vermiculite it was transporting from the infamous W.R. Grace & Company vermiculite mine.







Libby, Montana Was the Site of Asbestos Exposure That Caused Mesothelioma



There have been thousands of people sickened by malignant mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases because of the W.R. Grace & Co. vermiculite mine in Libby, Montana, but the mining company was not the only one that was negligent in its handling of the carcinogenic material. Numerous other companies involved in the mining, transport, and sale of the toxic material have been held responsible for the injury the product has caused.



In two months, several of those companies will have to face a jury as they defend themselves against charges of negligence in the mesothelioma deaths of two Libby, Montana residents. The families of Thomas Wells and Joyce Walder have accused the company and others of strict liability and negligence in their deaths. The families are seeking both economic damages and punitive damages meant to send a strong message about the need for companies to take responsibility for their recklessness and disregard.



Suit Blames Open Rail Cars Loaded with Vermiculite for Mesothelioma Deaths



The evidence that the Wells and Walder families plan to present reveals that despite BNSF’s knowledge of the dangers of asbestos-contaminated vermiculite, the company used open rail cars to transport crushed vermiculite ore from the mine down the “Libby Logger” line to their railyard, leading to their inhaling the carcinogenic fibers and their subsequent mesothelioma diagnosis.



The mesothelioma victims’ families’ claim cites evidence that between 1925 and 1981, BNSF railway transported up to 105,000 pounds of asbestos every day. This led to Mr. Wells, who lived in a trailer one-quarter mile from the railyard, and Ms. Walder, who walked along the railroad tracks daily, to breathe in significant amounts of the toxic fibers, leading to their illnesses and deaths.

### Controversial Decision in Mesothelioma Case Raises Concerns Among Advocates

In October of 2022, mesothelioma victim Randolph McCabe filed a negligence lawsuit against 3M, alleging that the company’s 8710 model respirator that he used as a warehouse employee was defective and allowed him to inhale the asbestos that caused his illness. In response, the company requested genetic testing of Mr. McCabe’s blood, and the judge granted their request. The decision has raised significant concern among mesothelioma advocates.







Victim Points to Respirator’s Failure as Cause of His Mesothelioma



According to Mr. McCabe’s mesothelioma claim, he was provided with 3M 8710 respirators when he worked as a warehouse employee for both Associated Insulation Company and Acuron. His later diagnosis with the asbestos-related disease was an indication that the respirators had failed, but in response to his claim, 3M filed a motion to order genetic tests of his blood.



Controversial Study Cited to Support 3M’s Argument in Mesothelioma Case



Malignant mesothelioma is caused by exposure to asbestos, and this fact has been the basis for causation in countless negligence claims against asbestos companies. In response, many of these companies have attempted to put forward evidence of a genetic basis for mesothelioma. These arguments are based on dubious science and have largely been dismissed out of hand.



In requesting a sample of the mesothelioma victim’s blood, 3M pointed to a mesothelioma study conducted at the University of Hawaii that asserted that mesothelioma was caused by a genetic mutation. Though this study has been widely discredited, the company’s attorneys requested a blood sample from Mr. McCabe to determine whether he had this specific mutation. They noted an indication from his lung biopsy that suggested that he did, and noted that in his deposition he had indicated he would be willing to provide such a sample.



Request for Blood Sample from Mesothelioma Victim Granted by Judge



Mr. McCabe’s attorney objected to the mesothelioma victim’s blood being submitted, noting that the studies the company was citing indicated that fewer than 50% of all the cases in the report had the genetic mutation they were looking for. They also pointed out that Mr. McCabe’s willingness to submit to the blood test specified that he would do so if it might improve his health. Despite these facts, Judge James H. Ashford allowed 3M’s request, causing alarm among both legal advocates and the research community.

### Consolidation of Claims Works to Benefit of Courts and Mesothelioma and Lung Cancer Victims

It is well known that America’s courts are overburdened with cases waiting to be heard, and this presents a significant problem for people diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, lung cancer, and other asbestos-related diseases. These victims are running out of time, so they work to do whatever they can to move their cases forward. One popular option is to consolidate their claims whenever they can.







Asbestos Companies Object to Consolidating Mechanics' Mesothelioma and Asbestos Claims



Consolidating mesothelioma and lung cancer claims is permitted in New York’s courts when certain criteria are met, but the asbestos companies named in these claims tend to object to this move: they are concerned that when juries hear from multiple victims alleging harm by the same company, it will work against them.



In a recent example, two auto workers diagnosed with asbestos-related lung cancer, represented by the same attorney, and who both worked with auto parts made by Mercedes Benz, Volkswagen, and other companies requested that their cases be consolidated in the interest of judicial economy. Though the companies objected to their petition, the New York judge hearing their case granted their request.



Workplace Exposure to Asbestos Common in Mechanics’ Mesothelioma and Lung Cancer Claims



Asbestos present in auto parts, and particularly in brake linings and gaskets, is frequently cited in mesothelioma and asbestos-related lung cancer claims and was the basis for claims filed by both Joseph Munna and Daniel Lamonica. Though the two men worked for different companies, both were diagnosed with asbestos-related lung cancer and both blamed asbestos in parts provided by the same companies. Their shared attorney suggested consolidating their cases so that they could each save money and time, and the men agreed. But the companies they were seeking justice from objected.



Though Mercedes-Benz USA, Volkswagen Group of American, and other defendants all argued that there were not enough commonalities between the two men’s asbestos claims for them to be consolidated, Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York County disagreed. Noting the significant number of factors in common, including similar occupations, similar time of exposure, type of disease, and status of discovery, as well as the fact that New York did not require that every factor match, he ruled that enough of the state’s requirements had been met, that jury instructions would eliminate any juror confusion and that the cases could be joined.

### Judge Rules Flight Attendant’s Mesothelioma Case Subject to New York Laws

Before former Delta Airlines flight attendant Linda English died of malignant mesothelioma, she filed suit in the state of New York against Colgate-Palmolive, blaming asbestos-contaminated talc in the company’s Cashmere Bouquet for her fatal illness. The company filed a motion to have the case dismissed based on her residency in Texas, but a New York judge rejected their argument and permitted the claim to remain in the state’s courts.







Flight Attendant’s Death Blamed on Asbestos in Talcum Powder Product



Ms. English died in 2021. Her claim is being carried on by her widow, Patricia Raso, who argued against Colgate-Palmolive’s petition for the case to be dismissed. She asserted that Ms. English had used Cashmere Bouquet talcum powder while on layovers in New York over the course of her 33-year career and that the company is based in New York.



Texas has different standards for filing a mesothelioma claim, and the evidence supporting Ms. English’s case would not reach those standards, while it is sufficient in New York. This is why Colgate-Palmolive argued that the case should have been filed in Texas. They pointed to the mesothelioma victim having been a resident of Texas, having purchased the product in Texas, and never having lived or received treatment in New York, but Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York County disagreed.



Judge Cites New York’s Conflicts of Law in Mesothelioma Venue Decision



Before her mesothelioma death, Ms. English testified that she had used the Colgate-Palmolive powder regularly and extensively during layovers in New York, and the judge pointed to that testimony, as well as New York conflicts of law requirements, in denying the talcum company’s motion. He said that New York has a judicial interest in what happens within its boundaries, and denied the company’s request for summary judgment.

### Johnson & Johnson Sued by Los Angeles County Over Mesothelioma Deaths

Though most personal injury claims surrounding malignant mesothelioma are filed by surviving family members or individual victims of the rare asbestos-related disease, other parties can be harmed by asbestos company negligence. This includes municipalities that incur significant costs as a result of subsidizing care for those afflicted with serious illness. This is the basis for a claim that was recently filed by Los Angeles County against consumer giant Johnson & Johnson. The city is blaming the company for the illnesses of many of its residents and is seeking compensation for the costs involved.







Los Angeles Joins Tens of Thousands of Johnson & Johnson Mesothelioma and Ovarian Cancer Claimants



The lawsuit filed by Los Angeles County goes into significant detail regarding the harms that it says the company’s talc products have caused: included in its claims are compensation for having made “false and misleading representations about the product’s safety” related to mesothelioma and ovarian cancer care, as well as for the way that the company’s marketing campaigns specifically targeted women of color.



The county’s approach is significantly different from what is commonly seen in cases filed by individual mesothelioma and ovarian cancer plaintiffs. Designed to counter the company’s arguments that talc is not dangerous and that their popular product was not contaminated by asbestos, Los Angeles’ attorneys have presented numerous health studies that directly link talc products to asbestos-related diseases. They also point to documents showing that the company had been warned of the health risks that their product presented as long ago as 1975, but did nothing to adjust their marketing or pull the product from consumer shelves.



Data in Johnson & Johnson’s Possession Integral to Los Angeles County’s Mesothelioma Case



Included in the county’s filing against Johnson & Johnson are records showing that the company had decided against following recommendations to switch from its talc base to corn starch, despite having been aware of data “suggesting an association between talc and ovarian cancer and were thereby on notice of the association as early as the mid-1970s.” It is unclear what amount of compensation the county will be seeking as its case move forwards.

### Where Safety Gloves Were Purchased Integral to Where Mesothelioma Claim Is Heard

After Giacinto Pira died of malignant mesothelioma, his survivors filed a personal injury lawsuit in New York’s court system against Steel Grip, Inc., the manufacturer of safety gloves that he wore while working as a welder. The company, based in Illinois, argued that the case should be dismissed due to jurisdictional questions, but the judge hearing the case allowed the family more time to investigate where the gloves had been sold.







Jurisdiction is Often Key Question When Filing a Mesothelioma Lawsuit



Questions of jurisdiction when filing a mesothelioma lawsuit may seem like technicalities to those who’ve lost a loved one to the rare, asbestos-related disease, but they can make a very big difference to the case’s outcome. Though the key question involving liability for Mr. Pira’s death is whether his work gloves were contaminated with asbestos and whether the company was negligent in allowing him to be exposed, these other points need to be established for the case to move forward.



In Mr. Pira’s case, if Steel Grip were able to show that they’d never done business in New York, then the mesothelioma claim filed in the state’s court could end up being dismissed. Steel Grip argued to the Supreme Court of New York that they were not subject to the court’s jurisdiction because their principal place of business is in Illinois, and they neither manufactured products nor owned property in the state.



Mesothelioma Victim’s Survivors Request Time for Additional Discovery



In response to the company’s motion to have the case dismissed, Mr. Pira’s survivors pointed to the deposition testimony he’d provided before his mesothelioma death, which included swearing that the company he’d worked for had purchased the gloves for his use. Acknowledging Steel Grip’s argument, they requested that the Supreme Court of New York’s Appellate Division give them more time for discovery to determine whether the contaminated gloves had been sold. The court granted the family the time that they requested.

### Asbestos Company Maligns Mesothelioma Victim’s Testimony

Malignant mesothelioma is a cruel disease. Caused by exposure to asbestos, it doesn’t reveal itself until decades later: many victims are elderly when they’re first diagnosed, and the aggressive form of cancer debilitates them rapidly. Despite this, they use their last days to pursue justice against those responsible for their exposure. When one victim did so, the asbestos company used some contradictions in the man’s testimony to seek dismissal of his case, but the New York judge rejected that attempt.







Dismissal of Mesothelioma Claim Sought by Asbestos Pipe Company



The mesothelioma claim was filed by Rudolf Horvath, a former New York City plumber who’d spent years working with pipes made by Ameron International Corporation.  He blamed asbestos in those pipes, but Ameron argued that there was no proof of his exposure or that their pipes had caused his illness, and pointed to inconsistencies in the victim’s testimony to support their request for the case against them to be dismissed.



The company based its request for summary judgment on the mesothelioma victim having testified about exposure to their pipes in the West Side of New York. His specific words were, “I think I did once for the City, contracted from the City, in, I think, the West Side area, a chemical plant where they took raw sewage and created — you know, make that drinkable and stuff like that.” The company argued that at the time that he had been referring to, between the 1960s and the 1990s, their pipes no longer contained asbestos.



Judge Points to Mesothelioma Victim’s “Declining Condition”



In denying the company’s request, Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York noted and agreed with the mesothelioma victim’s survivors’ assertion that his previous testimony about exposure had been unequivocal and that at the time of the deposition in question, he had been in a “declining condition.” He said that the previous testimony carried enough weight to counter the company’s arguments and that the case should go to trial for a jury to decide the facts.

### Court Reopens Mesothelioma Victim’s Claim Against Former Employer

When Roslyn T. Barnes was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, she filed both a workers’ compensation claim and a personal injury lawsuit against her former employer, accusing them of negligently exposing her to asbestos. The company successfully had her civil claim dismissed based on a clause in the Missouri state law, but on appeal, the woman provided evidence that the company’s documents supporting their defense had been fraudulent and that questions of fact remained open. The appeals court agreed and reversed the trial court’s dismissal.







Mesothelioma Victim Claims Asbestos Fell on Computer and Desk During Ceiling Work



The mesothelioma victim blamed her illness on asbestos exposure that occurred when she worked for the Business Man’s Association between 1976 and 1980.  She pointed to ceiling work that was frequently being performed over her work area, and the asbestos-contaminated dust that would constantly fall on her, her desk, and her computer.



When she filed her personal injury mesothelioma claim and a workers’ compensation claim, the company pointed to a Missouri law that barred civil claims when employers’ workers’ compensation insurance included enhanced mesothelioma benefits. Based on documents the company submitted, the trial court granted a dismissal of the civil claim.



Mesothelioma Victim Suggests Fraudulent Evidence Submitted by Former Employer



Ms. Barnes appealed the lower court’s decision, and accused her former employer of fraud against the court in her original mesothelioma claim. She presented evidence suggesting that the company had not actually purchased the additional mesothelioma coverage during the time covered by her claim, but had instead submitted evidence that showed they’d been investigating the coverage.



The appeals court noted that the documents submitted to the court in the original mesothelioma claim were not properly authenticated or self-proving and did not establish that the company had supplemental mesothelioma benefits in place. They reversed the lower court’s decision and reopened the woman’s civil claim for damages against her former employer.

### Family Prevails in Appeal of Mesothelioma Dismissal

Years after losing their loved one to malignant pleural mesothelioma, a Connecticut family is one step closer to getting justice from the company they blame for his death after an appellate court reversed a lower court’s decision to dismiss their claim. At issue was the question of whether an employer that ignored employee health could evade responsibility by pointing to workers’ compensation as an exclusive remedy.







Mesothelioma Claim Details Filthy Conditions in Factory



When Harold Dusto’s family filed their original personal injury lawsuit, they detailed the mesothelioma victim’s thirty-plus years of work for Rogers Corporation in its Manchester, Connecticut plastics factory. The company produced an industrial plastic that contained both chrysotile and crocidolite asbestos and did such a poor job of maintaining their environment that in 1972, an industrial hygienist wrote, “In general, Rogers Corporation Manchester was a real mess. Their housekeeping and attitude of the foremen as well as the hourly people left a lot to be desired in the area of environmental control.”



Despite this, the company had dismissed concerns about the risk of mesothelioma and called the asbestos that contaminated their work environment as a “nuisance dust.” Mr. Dusto died in 2019, five months after being diagnosed with the rare, asbestos-related disease, and when his family filed suit against the company, their case was dismissed based on a statute that limited workplace injury remedies to the worker compensation system.



Mesothelioma Victim’s Family Wins Reversal of Dismissal Decision



In their appeal of the dismissal of their earlier mesothelioma claim, the Dusto family asserted that Rogers Corporation’s management knew that his illness was “substantially certain to occur. They argued that the company’s consistent failure to meet OSHA standards and its persistent and active acts of deception towards its employees created an exception to the workers’ compensation exclusive remedy rule.



In support of their argument, the family provided industry-wide correspondence and other proof that the company knew of the risk of mesothelioma. The appellate court agreed, returning the mesothelioma case to the state’s civil trial system.

### Mesothelioma Victim’s Family Gets Chance to Continue Case

Despite the fact that they are repeatedly named in mesothelioma lawsuits, most asbestos companies continue to fight every claim that’s filed against them. That’s what happened recently with Vanderbilt Minerals. When the company — a supplier of industrial talc — was named in a wrongful death lawsuit filed by widow Maria Gonzalez, they filed a motion to have the claim against them dismissed, but a Los Angeles Superior Court judge denied their request.







Mesothelioma Widow Points to Asbestos in Talc and Putty as Cause of Husband’s Death



According to Mrs. Gonzalez’s claim, her husband Roberto’s mesothelioma death was caused by his exposure to asbestos in Vanderbilt Mineral LLC’s talc. The company had provided talc to talcum powder companies, as well as to Durham Rock Hard putty. The family pointed to Gonzalez’ use of the putty product and presented expert witness testimony confirming that both the putty and the company’s talc had contained asbestos.



In addition to presenting significant evidence about asbestos in the putty product, the mesothelioma victim’s family noted that Vanderbilt was the only supplier for the product. In addition to seeking compensatory damages, they requested punitive damages be assessed against the company, which Vanderbilt also asked to have dismissed.



Judge Rejects Both of Asbestos Company’s Motions



The company’s basis for having the punitive damages claim against them was that the mesothelioma victim’s family had not provided documentary proof that they’d “intentionally [marketed] a defective product knowing that it might cause injury and death.” Despite this assertion, the judge hearing the case rebuffed their claim, noting that there was no requirement for that level of evidence to be submitted at this point in the case. He denied both the company’s motion for summary judgment and the removal of the punitive damages claim and allowed the case to move forward for further discovery and consideration.

### ‘Euphoria’ Star’s Family Files Mesothelioma Claim Against Johnson & Johnson

Last May, the father of ‘Euphoria’ star Angus Cloud died of malignant mesothelioma after years of using Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder. Last October, the victim’s family, still reeling from the loss of their patriarch and the accidental overdose days later of the 25-year-old actor, filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the company that manufactured the product.







Johnson & Johnson Faces Mesothelioma Claim from Late Star’s Family



Angus Cloud died of a fatal accidental overdose shortly after his father, Conor Joseph Hickey died of malignant mesothelioma at the age of 65. Months later, Cloud’s mother Lisa, and his sisters Molly and Fiona filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson, joining tens of thousands of other victims seeking compensation for the damage they say the company caused.



According to the mesothelioma lawsuit, Mr. Hickey used Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder regularly from 1957 to 2023. They blame asbestos fibers contained within the company’s talc-based product for his illness and death.



Johnson & Johnson’s Continues to Battle Mesothelioma Claims



Speaking of the company’s continuing efforts to deny its role in victim’s mesothelioma and ovarian cancer, the family’s representative said, “Johnson & Johnson has gotten away with and continues to get away with misrepresenting their product even in 2023 — after numerous juries and courts have found their product causes cancer — they keep lying to the public and telling everybody it’s safe.”



In the face of over 40,000 mesothelioma and ovarian cancer claims, the company has discontinued the use of talc in its baby powder product and has been attempting to settle claims against it out of court. It also has attempted to place all of the asbestos claims against it into a new subsidiary, but that strategy has not yet proven successful.

### Big-Name Cosmetic Companies Must Face Mesothelioma Charges

When you think of mesothelioma and its causes, you usually picture a factory or construction worker whose asbestos exposure occurred in the workplace. But Victoria Kaye’s illness is being blamed on asbestos contamination of the cosmetic talc products she used throughout her life, and her family is pursuing justice against well-known beauty companies including Chanel and Revlon.







Revlon and Chanel Ask to Be Dismissed from Mesothelioma Claim



The Supreme Court of the State of New York recently saw legal filings from Revlon, Inc. and Chanel, Inc., asking to be dismissed from the wrongful death mesothelioma lawsuit filed by Victoria Kaye’s surviving family members. Though each company’s petition cited different justifications for seeking dismissal, neither was successful.



Revlon’s motion for summary judgment asserted that the Charlie-brand talcum powder that Ms. Kaye’s family said she’d used from 1968 to 1976 had not begun being manufactured until 1974, that it had not contained asbestos, and that there’s no proof that talc causes mesothelioma. For its part, Chanel, Inc. requested that the punitive damages claim the company had filed against them be dismissed because there was no evidence of the level of disregard required to justify the claim. They asserted that they had been unaware of asbestos’ dangers.



Judge Denies Both Cosmetic Company’s Requests for Dismissal from Mesothelioma Lawsuit



Justice Adam Silvera heard both of the petitions in the mesothelioma claim and in denying each company’s request, he pointed to weaknesses in their argument. He said that the representative testifying on behalf of Revlon had no personal knowledge of their product manufacturing or development during the period in question and that no evidence had been provided about the presence or absence of asbestos in the product.



As for Chanel, he said that the company had failed to provide proof that they had not been reckless in their actions regarding asbestos in the talc, while Ms. Kaye’s family had submitted significant evidence that they had been aware of contamination but had continued selling the product.

### Misunderstanding of Law Leads to Denial of Company's Attempt to Evade Mesothelioma Claim

When asbestos companies are named as defendants in claims filed by mesothelioma victims, they have a few options. They can concede that the victim’s case is strong and settle out of court. They can choose to go to court and begin gathering evidence in support of their position. Or they can ask to have the claim against them dismissed by filing a petition for summary judgment. For the last approach to be successful, the defense must prove that the case is baseless, with no issues of fact to be decided. These attempts frequently fail, and in a recent case, it did so in part because the attorneys for the defense entirely misstated the law.







HVAC Company Files Motion to Stop Mesothelioma Claim Against Them



The lawsuit was filed by the adult children of a man who died of malignant mesothelioma years ago. Michelle Togher and Peter Vincent filed suit against multiple companies whose products they blamed for his illness, and one of them, SPX Cooling Technologies, filed a petition for summary judgment to have the case against them dismissed.



In its motion, the company suggested that the victim’s family had failed to provide evidence of causation and that as a result they should be dismissed from the mesothelioma claim. To support their argument, they pointed to a recent court decision. But that decision pertained specifically to jury verdicts rather than pre-trial cases. The rules regarding dismissing a case rather than having it heard are entirely different.



Judge Denies Asbestos Company’s Petition and Allows Mesothelioma Claim to Proceed



In denying the company’s petition for summary judgment, Justice Adam Silvera provided a basic tutorial on what is required for an asbestos company to successfully have a mesothelioma claim dismissed. He noted that defendants have to prove there is no conflict in evidence and that they must present evidence that shows that there is no way that they could have been responsible for the illness. The judge also pointed out that when there is a question as to which way to lean before a case goes to a jury, the benefit goes to the victim by law.



When SPX Cooling filed its motion for summary judgment, it entirely failed to provide evidence showing that it would have been impossible for the victim to have been exposed to asbestos from their products. Instead, they pointed to what they viewed as weaknesses in the case presented by the mesothelioma victim’s family, and that falls well below the bar that they would have needed to have the case dismissed. For their part, the victim’s family had provided a significant amount of testimony supporting their assertion of blame against the company. As a result, the petition was denied and the case will move forward to trial.

### Mesothelioma Victim’s Daughter Has Spent Years Fighting For Justice

Amy DeMaio’s father Peter Bergrud died of malignant mesothelioma in 2018, and she has been fighting for justice on his behalf ever since. She is among thousands of people suing CertainTeed over asbestos in their cement pipes, but the company’s owner is pursuing a controversial bankruptcy strategy that has kept their legal claims in limbo for years.







Bankruptcy Strategy Holds Up Thousands of Mesothelioma Claims



Mr. Bergrud’s mesothelioma came after decades of working cutting and laying cement water and sewage pipes, breathing in the dust created by his labor. That dust was heavily contaminated with asbestos, and in 2018 he was diagnosed with two forms of the rare, asbestos-related disease. His doctors advised him that his cancer was too far advanced for treatment to help, and he died shortly after getting the news.



Before his death, the mesothelioma victim joined 32,000 others who were similarly harmed in filing a lawsuit against CertainTeed’s owner, Saint-Gobain. Facing billions in asbestos claims, the company responded by forming a subsidiary called DBMP LLC to hold those liabilities, then filed for bankruptcy three months later.  This legal maneuver automatically placed all of the asbestos litigants into the category of creditors awaiting the outcome of the bankruptcy filing.



CertainTeed Joins Other Asbestos Companies in Legal Move to Stay Mesothelioma Claims



The legal move is the same one being pursued by Johnson & Johnson and other asbestos companies to evade liability for mesothelioma deaths and related illnesses. It has caused outrage among victims, who point to Saint-Gobain having paid over $1 billion in dividends to its shareholders after having reported over $55 billion in revenue and $5.7 billion in profits in 2022.



Attorneys for mesothelioma victims have argued against solvent companies being able to evade justice by pursuing this course of action, with Ms. DeMaio’s family representative saying that “billionaires are using bankruptcy as a menu choice.” As the courts try to address the question, Congress is considering action.

### Conflicting Evidence Means that Goodyear Can’t Have Lung Cancer Lawsuit Dismissed

For years, American manufacturers ignored warnings that asbestos in their products could lead to users and employees being sickened by mesothelioma, lung cancer, and other serious illnesses. The practice didn’t stop until the public became aware of the danger, and companies began facing lawsuits seeking compensation for the damage that they’d caused. Now those same companies try to use the legal system to evade responsibility. Fortunately, the American legal system has rules designed to level the playing field.







Asbestos in Goodyear Gaskets Frequently Blamed for Mesothelioma and Lung Cancer



Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company is just one of many companies frequently named as a defendant in mesothelioma and lung cancer lawsuits, as the company’s asbestos-containing gaskets were frequently used by people who worked in automotive repair. In a recently heard case, Robert O. Waldon’s survivors filed a personal injury lawsuit against the company.



In response to the lung cancer lawsuit, Goodyear filed a legal petition asking for the case to be dismissed rather than going to trial. This type of legal filing is called a motion for summary judgment: it argues that the plaintiff’s claim does not contain enough evidence to warrant the case being heard by a jury.



Judge Decides Against Asbestos Company’s Argument in Lung Cancer Lawsuit



In reviewing the arguments from both the lung cancer victim’s family and the company, Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York County reminded both sides of the high level of proof that a defendant must present to have a plaintiff’s case dismissed. He said that in mesothelioma and lung cancer cases in general, and this case in particular, Goodyear could only have the case dismissed if it could establish that its products could not possibly have caused Mr. Waldon’s lung cancer.



The judge then turned to the evidence that each side had presented. He noted that the company had provided expert reports from an industrial hygienist and a physician and that Mr. Waldon’s family had provided testimony in conflict with the company’s, including evidence from the company’s manufacturing history that indicated that they had used asbestos-containing sheet gasket material in its fabrication process.



As a result of the direct conflict and Goodyear’s failure to provide an estimate of how much asbestos Mr. Waldon would have been exposed to during his career, he said the company had failed to meet the burden required for summary judgment, and the case must be decided by a jury.

### New York Judge Rejects Boiler Company’s Argument Against Mesothelioma Liability

Most claims filed by mesothelioma victims come down to a basic accusation: That the named asbestos company put profits over concerns about the people who would be using their products. In two separate suits filed against the same company, a New York judge pointed to that disregard for potential victims as a reason not to dismiss punitive damages claims.







Punitive Damages Claims in Mesothelioma Lawsuits Are Meant to Punish



Mesothelioma claims generally seek compensation for monetary damages including medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering. But victims can also seek punitive damages meant to punish a company for egregious behavior. Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York County recently weighed in on two cases against boiler company Burnham LLC in which both victims were seeking punitive damages. The company had asked the court to dismiss that portion of both claims.



The lawsuits had been filed by the survivors of Joseph M. DeRoy and Anthony Giuliano, both mesothelioma victims who had worked with Burnham LLC boilers. With both families including punitive damages in their claims, the company filed a petition for partial summary judgment, arguing that their actions had not been careless or shown reckless disregard.



Company Justification of Petition in Mesothelioma Lawsuit Fails



Burnham’s attorneys argued that punitive damages in the mesothelioma claims were inappropriate. They justified their argument on two key points: that the asbestos exposure the men would have experienced from their boilers would have been below limits set by OSHA and that none of their employees had filed workers’ compensation claims against them.



In rejecting the company’s petition, Justice Silvera called their arguments “wholly irrelevant” to the question at hand. He concluded that “a reasonable juror could find that defendant Burnham’s knowledge and use of asbestos in their boilers constituted a prioritization of their corporate benefits over plaintiff’s safety, issues of fact exist to preclude summary judgment on punitive damages.”

### DAP Caulk Named in Multiple Victims Mesothelioma Lawsuits

Roughly 3,000 Americans are diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma each year, and over 40,000 die each year from asbestos-related diseases. Remarkably, the same companies are named over and over in lawsuits accusing them of negligently and knowingly allowing victims to be exposed to asbestos. In a recent court hearing, families of three separate victims accused the same caulk manufacturer of responsibility, and though the company tried to evade liability, a New York judge ordered them to face the claims.







Three Mesothelioma Victims Name Same Caulk Manufacturer



Malignant mesothelioma is caused by exposure to asbestos, and in most cases that exposure occurs on the job. In three claims filed separately in New York’s asbestos litigation court, the families of Anthony Torio, Mario Bellicose, and Thomas Learmond all pointed to their loved ones’ long work histories in the building trade, during which they either used or were in proximity to others using DAP caulk. They blamed asbestos in the product for their painful deaths.



DAP’s attorneys argued against being held responsible for each man’s mesothelioma. They called the claims “speculative” and defended the company by noting that not all of the company’s caulk products contained asbestos at the time that the men used it. In support of this argument, they submitted testimony from a former employee.



Judge Denies DAP’s Motion to be Dismissed from Mesothelioma Claims



Though the company’s representative said there was no way to attribute the men’s mesothelioma to their product, he failed to submit evidence that it could not have caused their illness. The absence of this level of proof effectively eliminated their ability to have the case dismissed as a matter of law. Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York County pointed out that the bar is high for dismissing a case, and the company had failed to reach it, while the victims’ attorneys had submitted unequivocal testimony supporting their claim.

### Multiple Asbestos Companies Attempt to Evade Family’s Mesothelioma Claim

One of the most important parts of preparing a mesothelioma claim is identifying the companies that should be named as defendants. The process involves going through the victim’s entire work and personal history and matching it with known exposures from previous claims. The companies often object to being named and ask to be dismissed, but unless they can prove it would have been impossible for their product to have exposed the victim to asbestos, those requests are denied.







Shipyard Worker’s Mesothelioma Claim Names Multiple Defendants from the Site



The mesothelioma lawsuit filed by Felton Robichaux’s family named multiple companies whose asbestos-contaminated products were found throughout the shipyard where he worked. Included were Uniroyal, whose asbestos cloth was regularly used by insulators in the yard, and Foster Wheeler, whose boilers were installed on the ships that he’d worked on.



Both companies filed petitions for summary judgment, asking the judge hearing the claim to dismiss the cases against them. Uniroyal argued that the mesothelioma victim’s family couldn’t show that he had been exposed to asbestos through its products, or that if he had been, it wouldn’t have been enough to have sickened him. Foster Wheeler also said there was no proof their boilers were present on the ships Mr. Robichaux had worked on, and that the boilers installed on ships had been supplied without asbestos-contaminated exterior insulation.



Asbestos Companies’ Arguments Fail in Mesothelioma Hearing



In response to the arguments presented by the asbestos companies, the mesothelioma victim’s survivors presented evidence that discounted their assertions. They presented testimony from former shipyard employees who said that they had seen and worked with the Uniroyal branding, as well as testimony from a Uniroyal representative who testified that cutting the cloth would release asbestos. In response to Foster Wheeler’s argument, a former Avondale boilermaker testified that though the boilers did not have their exterior installation installed, the company had sent them with kits that included the asbestos-contaminated exterior insulation.



After hearing the arguments from both sides, the judge hearing the case noted that there were facts to be determined by a jury and agreed that both should move on to trial. He denied both companies’ petitions.

### Judge Again Denies Shipyard’s Attempt to Evade Justice in Mesothelioma Case

Felton Robichaux died of malignant mesothelioma after years of having been exposed to asbestos. In pursuing justice from those he blamed for his illness, he named Avondale Shipyard, where both he and his brother had worked. Avondale has attempted to have the case against them dismissed on multiple grounds, and each time their petitions have been denied by the judge hearing the case.







Petitions for Summary Judgment Filed in Mesothelioma Lawsuit



Avondale Shipyard is a frequent defendant in mesothelioma lawsuits because their work site was so contaminated with asbestos. When Mr. Robichaux first filed his claim against them, the company argued that the case was improperly filed and should have been submitted under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act. When the approach failed, they followed it with two more attempts, on different grounds.



Most recently, Avondale argued that the mesothelioma victim had failed to adequately support his claim with evidence of his first- and second-hand asbestos exposure. They also attempted to have the judge preclude expert testimony from a witness for Mr. Robichaux, arguing that documentation had been submitted past the deadline.



Judge Denies Shipyard’s Requests in Case Filed by Mesothelioma Victim



Mr. Robichaux’s mesothelioma claim is being heard in the Eastern District of Louisiana with U.S. District Judge Darrel Pappillion presiding. The judge denied both of the company’s requests. Concerning their argument against a witness being able to testify, the judge noted that the reason that the documentation in question had been filed past the deadline was due to delays on the part of the shipyard itself.



Regarding the company’s assertion that the mesothelioma victim had not submitted adequate proof of his exposure to asbestos during his employment, the judge said that through deposition testimony, employment records, information on the work he had done, and more, the victim had made it clear that he’d been exposed “injurious levels of asbestos” both on the job and through exposure carried into his home on his brother’s clothing. He denied the shipyard’s petition and allowed the case to continue moving forward.

### Pointing to “Reasonable Inference,” Judge Denies Companies’ Request to Dismiss Mesothelioma Claims

When Samson Bareh filed a personal injury lawsuit against Mercedes Benz USA and American Honda Motor Co., Inc., both companies filed motions to dismiss the cases against them. But a California judge denied their request, noting that the company’s argument against the former auto mechanic’s claim was unreasonable.







Former Auto Mechanic Diagnosed with Mesothelioma



The mesothelioma lawsuit was filed by Samson Bareh, a former auto mechanic who blamed his illness on asbestos contained in the auto parts he worked with.  He filed suit against American Honda Motor Co., Inc. and Mercedes-Benz, USA, accusing them of strict product liability, negligence, and fraud. His suit cited his recollections of having worked on both companies’ vehicles from 1988 forward but did not include the specific models and years of all the cars he’d worked on.



Because of this lack of detail, both companies asked for the mesothelioma liability claims against them to be dismissed. They also argued that there was no evidence of malice or fraud to justify Mr. Bareh’s inclusion of a claim for punitive damages in his suit.



Judge Dismisses Punitive Damages Claim, Allows Balance of Mesothelioma Lawsuit to Proceed



While the Honorable Judge Laura A. Seigle of the Superior Court of California agreed with the companies that there was no evidence to support a claim for punitive damages in the mesothelioma lawsuit, she denied the rest of the companies’ assertions. Though she noted that both had stopped including asbestos in their brakes in 1988, she also pointed out that it was not reasonable to expect the victim to cite each and every type and year of car he’d worked on.



Further, she said that it made sense that a mechanic tasked with brake repair would not have worked on brand new vehicles, so it was reasonable to expect that at least some of the cars he had worked on were manufactured before the switch from asbestos brakes to non-asbestos brakes. “It is not a reasonable inference that all of [the] vehicles for which he replaced brakes in 1988 and a few years thereafter had been manufactured in 1988 and therefore did not have asbestos-containing brakes. It is not a reasonable inference that brand new cars would need their brakes replaced.” Though the mesothelioma lawsuit was stripped of the claim for punitive damages, Mr. Bareh’s case will move forward.

### Widow Files Mesothelioma Lawsuit Against Car Parts Companies

Years before he was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, Ronald Carpenter worked as a truck driver. That job entailed spending a lot of time in auto shops, watching his vehicles being repaired. When he was diagnosed with the deadly form of cancer, he realized that he’d been exposed to asbestos from auto parts placed in his trucks, and after he died his widow filed suit against the auto parts companies. Though the companies attempted to have the case against them dismissed, a California court rejected their argument and allowed the case to move forward.







Auto Parts Companies Facing Mesothelioma Lawsuit Knew of Asbestos Dangers



Though both BWDAC, Inc. and Paccar Inc. filed motions for summary judgment, asking for the mesothelioma lawsuit against them to be dismissed, Judge Laura Seigle denied both requests. The judge reminded the parties of the overarching requirement that they prove there was no way that their parts could have caused Mr. Carpenter’s illness. She also looked at the arguments that each company had made on its own behalf, pointing out why neither one would justify the case being dismissed.



Specific Arguments Addressed in Mesothelioma Decision



In speaking to BWDAC’s argument, the judge noted that before dying of mesothelioma Mr. Carpenter had testified to using Borg Warner clutches in his trucks and that BWDAC had purchased all of that company’s assets in 1981, as well as their liabilities. The judge also shut down BWDAC’s argument that they’d only sold their products to warehouses and distributors, pointing out that the shop that Mr. Carpenter had frequented may have purchased BWDAC’s parts at those warehouses.



Similarly, though the judge took note of Paccar’s argument that their products would have been installed at an auto assembly plant rather than in a shop, the judge pointed out that the parts the mesothelioma victim had been exposed to might not have been original.  She also upheld the widow’s right to seek punitive damages against them because she had presented proof that they had been aware of the dangers of asbestos.

### Mesothelioma Victim’s Case Against Johnson & Johnson Can Remain in New York Courts

When Ann Greenberg was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, her search for a cause for her disease led her to asbestos-contaminated Johnson & Johnson talcum powder products.  Further investigation led to the products’ manufacturer, Kolmar Laboratories, Inc., so she filed suit against both: Kolmar first, and then Johnson & Johnson the next day. The iconic manufacturer responded to her suit by accusing her of using a fraudulent legal strategy to keep the case against them out of federal court.







Johnson & Johnson’s Legal Motion Aims at Keeping Mesothelioma Claim in Federal Court



Because both Kolmar Laboratories and Ms. Greenberg are based in New York, her mesothelioma lawsuit was filed in the U. S. District Court for Southern New York. Johnson & Johnson asserted three different reasons that they claimed made it inappropriate for her to have included Kolmar in her suit, and accused her of naming them to avoid having the case heard in federal court. This accusation of false joinder was rejected by the judge hearing the case.



Johnson & Johnson had asked U.S. District Judge John P. Cronan to review Ms. Greenberg’s claim, asserting that the mesothelioma victim’s inclusion of Kolmar included date discrepancies between her use of the product and the date when Kolmar began manufacturing their product. They also argued that there was no proof that the talcum powder that she had used had been manufactured by Kolmar and that as a “mere manufacturer,” the company was immune from liability.



Judge Rejects Accusations of Joinder Against Mesothelioma Victim



Though Johnson & Johnson argued that the mesothelioma victim had included Kolmar in her claim for the sole reason of having the case heard in New York courts, Judge Cronan denied their assertion. He pointed to revisions she had made in the time frame during which she said she had used the product which eliminated some of Johnson & Johnson’s argument, and also noted that the company had done nothing to disprove the possibility of her having used versions of their powder manufactured by the company.



As to Johnson & Johnson’s argument that Kolmar could not be held liable for a mesothelioma claim because it was a “mere manufacturer,” the judge said that because the company had been a member of the Cosmetic, Toiletry, and Fragrance Association at the time, the organization’s knowledge of the dangers of asbestos would waive their immunity from liability.

### Court Says Mesothelioma Victim Can Pursue Punitive Damages

Being diagnosed with cancer is reason for fear, grief, and anger, but this is especially true for people diagnosed with the rare asbestos-related cancer known as malignant mesothelioma. Most victims were exposed to asbestos in products whose manufacturers were aware of its hazards. As a result, many have filed personal injury lawsuits seeking compensation for the damages they suffered. Some also pursue punitive damages if they believe that the asbestos company acted egregiously. Such is the case of a New York victim named Kevin Burns.







Mesothelioma Victim Accuses Boiler Company of Intentional Disregard



When Kevin Burns was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, he filed a personal injury lawsuit against Burnham, LLC, the company that he blamed for having exposed him to asbestos. In addition to seeking compensation for damages, he also asked that a jury hearing his case determine whether punitive damages should be assessed based on the company ignoring the dangers that their product posed.



Burnham filed a motion for partial summary judgment to have the punitive damages claim removed from Burns’ lawsuit. They argued that there was no evidence to support a judgment that their conduct was morally culpable or egregious. To prove themselves innocent of this type of behavior, they submitted documents showing that the exposure that Mr. Burns had suffered was below the standard allowed by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.



Judge Denies Boiler Company’s Request for Punitive Damages to be Dismissed



On hearing both sides of the case Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York County denied the company’s request that punitive damages be dropped from the claim against them. The judge explained that the law was clear regarding when punitive damages could be sought: it required that “the actor has intentionally done an act of an unreasonable character in disregard of a known or obvious risk that was so great as to make it highly probable that harm would follow and has done so with conscious indifference to the outcome.”



Based on this standard, the judge said, the evidence presented by the company did not disprove the mesothelioma victims’ claim, and since that is required for a defendant to successfully obtain summary judgment, the case will continue for a jury to assess whether the company’s actions warrant punishment.

### Asbestos Used in World Trade Center Construction Blamed for Man’s Mesothelioma

A New York man diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma has filed a claim against a general contracting company that built the World Trade Center, accusing them of exposing him to the asbestos that caused his illness. Though ALCOA argued against Kenneth Last’s case being heard, Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York ruled that the case should move forward for a jury to hear.







Mesothelioma Victim Exposed to Asbestos at World Trade Center Workplace



The claim filed by Jo-Ann Silviano blamed Kenneth Last’s malignant pleural mesothelioma death on exposure to asbestos-containing materials that ALCOA had used to construct the World Trade Center.  Mr. Last had worked at the site as a sub-contracted employee beginning in 1972, and the claim presented evidence both that the carcinogenic material had been used and that ALCOA, the general contractor in his work area, had known of its dangers.



ALCOA filed a motion for summary judgment to have the case against them dismissed, asserting both that they had not used asbestos-containing fire-proofing material during the time that Mr. Last had been employed on the site and that they were not responsible for his work because he was a sub-contracted employee.



Mesothelioma Victim’s Family’s Argument Prevails



In response to ALCOA’s motion, Mr. Last’s family argued that a general contractor can be held liable for a victim’s mesothelioma if it can be shown that they had actual or constructive notice that they were creating unsafe working conditions. In response, ALCOA submitted a memo from the World Trade Center’s construction manager discussing the need to switch from an asbestos-based fire-proofing spray to one that did not contain asbestos, but Mr. Last’s family pointed out that the memo did not indicate a date by which the switch would be made, or even a confirmation that it actually would be made.



Since  ALCOA could not provide proof that the mesothelioma victim could not have been exposed to asbestos on their worksite and Mr. Last’s family submitted evidence that the company had been well aware of the risks surrounding asbestos’ use, Justice Silvera denied the company’s motion for summary judgment and the case will move forward to a jury.

### Mesothelioma Fears Inspire Philadelphia Teachers’ Protest and Class Action Lawsuit

Asbestos, the carcinogenic material known to cause malignant mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, and asbestosis, is present in many older public buildings, particularly in America’s school buildings. There has been significant media attention on this problem in Philadelphia’s public schools and the threat it poses to teachers in those buildings, and this has recently led to those teachers protesting and subsequently filing a class action First Amendment lawsuit.







First Amendment Class Action Lawsuit Filed by Teachers Who Fear Mesothelioma



While it is public knowledge that asbestos poses health threats to those who are exposed to it, this knowledge is heightened among Philadelphia teachers, who have seen one of their peers diagnosed with mesothelioma after years of working in the city’s asbestos-contaminated structures.



As a result of this painful knowledge of their colleague’s illness and their fears of mesothelioma spurred by their continued exposure to asbestos, several Philadelphia teachers from the city’s Masterman Laboratory and Demonstration School protested their unsafe conditions by moving their workstations to an outdoor area. The teachers subsequently had their pay docked. Now the teachers are accusing the school district of violating their First Amendment rights and have filed a class action lawsuit seeking relief from the courts. Their complaint accuses the district of trying to quash the teachers’ objections and silence their voices, despite the concerning presence of over 100 confirmed or assumed sources of asbestos in the building,



School District Faces Billions in Costs to Eliminate Mesothelioma Risk



Philadelphia teachers and students have been greatly impacted by the constant closures of buildings found to be contaminated with asbestos and by the fears that exposure to that asbestos could lead to mesothelioma.  Knowing that it will cost upwards of $5 billion to remove the asbestos from the district’s buildings has exacerbated the teachers’ fears that nothing will be done, and led to their protest. They also say that the district’s failure to communicate what steps were being taken to protect them and their students had exacerbated the situation.

### Legal Technicality Allows Mesothelioma Victim Choice of Legal Claim

When a person is diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, one of the first decisions they make is whether to pursue legal action against those responsible. If their disease results from workplace exposure, they are generally unable to sue their employer because of workers’ compensation laws, so they turn instead to pursuing claims against the manufacturers and distributors of the asbestos-contaminated products they worked with. Special circumstances apply to longshoremen and harbor workers that may limit their legal options, but a recent case saw a legal technicality work in the victim’s favor.  







Shipyard Worker with Mesothelioma Allowed to File Suit Against Shipyard



The case involved Felton Robichaux, a land-based insulator and carpenter who spent years working at Avondale Shipyard. When he filed a claim against the company and shipyard, they countered by arguing that the case against them should be dismissed. Their reason was that the rules of the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act restricted him to filing for no-fault limited compensation rather than the personal injury claim he filed against them in state court.



In response to Avondale’s request for the claim to be dismissed, the mesothelioma victim noted that he had worked in the shipyard between 1961 and 1979, a time that the courts had established as a legal “twilight zone” during which injured maritime workers could choose whether to file their claim under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (LHWCA) or Louisiana state’s Worker’s Compensation Act.



Judge Notes Legal Twilight Zone in Mesothelioma Claim



U.S. District Judge Darrel James Papillion heard arguments from the defendants and the mesothelioma victim, then analyzed the laws that were in effect at the time that the victim was exposed to asbestos. He found that because the victim was able to choose between the LHWCA and the Louisiana State Workers’ Compensation Law that was in effect at the time, and that the latter did not specifically list mesothelioma as a covered disease, the victim was free to opt out of both choices and to turn instead to filing a personal injury claim under state law, as he’d done.



The ability to file his mesothelioma claim as a personal injury lawsuit rather than relying on no-fault workers’ compensation coverage gives Mr. Robichaux the ability to tell his story to a jury, which is likely to lead to significantly higher compensation for the damages that he suffered.

### Judge Denies Request for New Mesothelioma Trial or Reduced Monetary Award for Victim

Malignant mesothelioma claims often lead to multi-million dollar verdicts, but when one victim was awarded $35 million, the losing asbestos company objected and argued that there should either be a new trial or that the verdict, which they called “excessive,” should be revised. Despite the company’s arguments, the judge hearing the case said that it is not her role to “second guess a jury’s consideration.”







Man Diagnosed with Malignant Mesothelioma After Years of Asbestos Exposure



The case was filed by James McWilliams, whose 36 years of work as a steamfitter had him constantly working with asbestos-contaminated valves manufactured by Jenkins Bros. The jury awarded him $35 million after hearing extensive testimony about the exposure he suffered and about Jenkins’ knowledge of the dangers that their valves posed.



The jury agreed that the company had demonstrated reckless disregard leading to his development of mesothelioma and found them guilty of negligence. They awarded Mr. McWilliams $13 million for past pain and suffering and $10 million for future pain and suffering, as well as millions in actual expenses.



Company’s Argument Against Mesothelioma Verdict Fails



Justice of the Supreme Court of New York Suzanne J. Adams listened closely to Jenkins Bros. arguments for a new mesothelioma trial or a reduced award. After closely examining the court documents and transcripts, she assessed all of the trial’s proceedings as appropriate and said that the evidence had been sufficient for the jury to reach its verdict.



She then moved on to a review of the mesothelioma award the jury gave Mr. McWilliams and disagreed with the company’s characterization of the $35 million as excessive. In her decision, Justice Adams concluded, “It is not the purview of the court to second-guess a jury’s consideration of these factors in light of the evidence presented at trial, or to speculate, for example, that perhaps the jury has considered that the longer plaintiff continues to live, the longer he will suffer (including mentally) before his eventual death and wishes to compensate him accordingly.”  Mr. McWilliams will receive the amount that the jury found appropriate.

### Late Filing and Mesothelioma Plaintiff’s Foreign Status Defeats Asbestos Companies’ Objections

Luciano Susino died of malignant mesothelioma after years of working as a seaman onboard vessels owned and managed by Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc. (OSG). His daughter Carmela filed a personal injury lawsuit in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands accusing the company and several other defendants of both negligence and violations of the Jones Act and maritime law. Both OSG and 3M argued that the case should be removed to federal court, but their arguments were denied, each for its own reason.







Asbestos On Vessels Blamed for Seaman’s Death



Ms. Susino’s claim identified 17 manufacturing, equipment, boiler, and premises defendants whose negligence in having exposed her father to asbestos-contaminated products or locations contributed to his mesothelioma death. She also cited the rules of both the Jones Act and maritime law. In response, 3M company asked for the case to be removed to federal court, arguing that maritime law and Jones Act claims are subject to diversity jurisdiction.



In response to that argument, Chief District Judge Robert A. Molloy noted that both Ms. Susino and another defendant in the mesothelioma claim, Scotland-based Foster Wheeler, are foreign nationals, thus nullifying the question of diversity jurisdiction and allowing the case to remain in the Virgin Islands court where it had originally been filed.



Defendants Late in Objecting to Mesothelioma Claim



In addition to the objection filed by 3M Company, OSG revised its original response to the mesothelioma victim’s daughter’s claim, advocating for the case to be removed based on the fact that doing so was appropriate due to its current petition for bankruptcy. The plaintiffs asked the judge to deny this argument, noting that for the motion to have been considered, it needed to be filed earlier. The judge agreed that the petition had been submitted well past the deadline and denied OSG’s request.

### Judge in Mesothelioma Case Calls Asbestos Company’s Argument “Unconvincing”

When a mesothelioma victim files a personal injury lawsuit against an asbestos company, they are blaming their negligence for having caused their deadly illness. If a jury agrees with the victim it can cost the company millions, so many defendants attempt to prevent the case from ever being heard. Though some do that by offering settlements, others file motions asking for the case to be dismissed based on lack of evidence. A recent case saw the judge hearing the case calling an asbestos company’s argument “unconvincing.”







Death of 82-Year-Old HVAC Technician at Center of Mesothelioma Case



The case was filed by the family of 82-year-old Benedict Silvestri, whose family blamed his 2021 mesothelioma death on years of work as an HVAC technician. Rockwell Automation, the successor to Timken-Detroit Axle Company, was among the many companies named in their lawsuit, but they filed a petition asking the courts to dismiss the case against them, arguing that there was insufficient evidence to support the family’s claim.



Timken-Detroit Axle Company had manufactured burners used in boilers, and the mesothelioma victim had provided significant testimony before his death describing his work with asbestos-contaminated boiler-related parts required as part of the installation of the Timken burners. Despite this, the company argued that they should not be held responsible for his death because the victim’s testimony had only referred to asbestos exposure caused by boiler-related parts, and not specifically to Timken burners.



Judge Denies Asbestos Company’s Argument Against Mesothelioma Liability



In his review of the burner company’s arguments, Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York noted that summary judgment is a “drastic remedy” only granted if a defendant proves there are no questions of fact to be decided. New York law also requires that, when a question of dismissal is raised, a judge should always err on the side of the party that is not asking for the dismissal.



Based on both of these rules and the evidence Rockwell submitted, the judge denied their request. He said that their reliance on a single piece of testimony was “unconvincing,” especially because the rest of the victim’s testimony, which detailed work with the Timken burners, had been “clear and convincing.” He noted that had the company proven that their burners contained no asbestos or had not required asbestos-containing parts then the dismissal would have been warranted, but that argument was not asserted. The case will move forward to a jury.

### Collaboration Between Mesothelioma Victims Leads to Asbestos Settlement

It’s been a long and painful road for the families of mesothelioma victims August Adams and Clarence Hales, but a big part of their legal journey ended earlier this year when Armstrong International agreed to the terms of a confidential settlement. Both men had been exposed to asbestos when they worked in the company’s Kinston, North Carolina Dupont plant decades earlier.







Dupont Employees’ Families Blame Asbestos in Plant for Mesothelioma Death



Years before their mesothelioma deaths, both Mr. Hales and Mr. Adams had worked in the DuPont manufacturing facility, and both men’s survivors filed suit against Armstrong and other companies whose asbestos-contaminated products they blamed for their illnesses. Because both men had worked at the same site and were represented by the same attorney, they filed a motion to consolidate their two cases into one. That petition was denied.



Despite their motion for consolidation being rejected, the two men’s families continued collaborating in their efforts to achieve closure to their mesothelioma claims, and that strategy was awarded by the recent settlement with Armstrong. Though they still have outstanding claims against other defendants, the families see hope in the resolution they’ve achieved.



Other Defendants Remain in Men’s Mesothelioma Claims



The Adams and Hales families have been pursuing justice on behalf of the mesothelioma victims since 2021, naming several other companies whose products were used in the DuPont plant between 1950 and 1980, when they’d both worked there. Their claims against Dow Chemical Company, Fluor Enterprises, Inc., and Viking Pump, Inc. are still being negotiated and may end up being heard in court, with Viking having filed a motion for summary judgment to have the case against it dismissed.



While both families still have litigation ahead of them, they plan to continue to collaborate in the name of efficiency and justice and hope for a positive outcome. Speaking of the confidential agreement that they reached with Armstrong, a representative said that both families are “appreciative of everyone’s efforts to find a way to resolution.”

### Family Seeks Justice Following Loved One’s Mesothelioma Death

After Dennis Freeman died of malignant mesothelioma, the former insulation contractor’s family members filed a personal injury lawsuit against many of the companies they blame for having exposed him to asbestos. Though several of those companies asked the courts to dismiss them from the case on various grounds, the majority of their motions for summary judgment were denied.







Family Files Mesothelioma Suit in California Court System



Mr. Freeman’s malignant pleural mesothelioma is blamed on the asbestos he was exposed to when he worked in shipyards in Washington state, Hawaii, and California. They filed their lawsuit in the California court system against Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, National Steel and Shipbuilding Company (NASSCO), and BAE Systems San Diego Ship Repair Inc., among others.



In their petition to have the case removed, those companies asserted that the widow and her daughters had failed to state a claim, and the repair company also questioned the court’s personal jurisdiction over the case and asked for the widow’s claim for loss of consortium to be dismissed. BAE and NASSCO both asked for the family’s fraud and punitive damages claims to be dismissed from the family’s overall claim.



U.S. District Court Judge Denies Most of Mesothelioma Defendants’ Requests



The arguments against the mesothelioma claim were heard by Hon. M. James Lorenz of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. The judge quickly dismissed BAE’s argument against its jurisdiction, as well as questions that had been asked about the applicability of maritime law to the facts of the case and the remedies being sought by the victim’s surviving family members. He also struck down the argument that no specific cause of action had been submitted for each defendant, noting that none was required because they had all been accused of the same thing.



Though the judge granted the request to dismiss the widow’s claims for loss of consortium, he also denied the companies’ request to dismiss the charges of strict liability claims based on the proof of exposure to asbestos that had been submitted. The case will move forward largely intact.

### Question of Law Decided in Mesothelioma Widow’s Favor

Before Arnold Pritt’s death, he and his wife initiated legal action against the companies they blamed for his illness, and after he died Ruth Pritt filed to amend the original claim to one for wrongful death and to add a claim of punitive damages. Defendant John Crane filed an objection, arguing that the compensation she sought was not available under maritime law, but the judge hearing the case denied their objection, pointing to both precedent and the underlying values of the written law.







Mesothelioma Victim Was a Navy Veteran



Mr. Pritt and his wife blamed his malignant mesothelioma on exposure to asbestos that he suffered during his years of U.S. Navy service.  They filed their claim in Massachusetts under general maritime law rather than the Jones Act or the Death on the High Seas Act (DOHSA). But when Mrs. Pritt applied to add wrongful death and punitive damages claims to the original complaint after Mr. Pritt’s death, John Crane argued that the amendments would be struck down because neither of those claims were recoverable.



In her response, the mesothelioma widow addressed the company’s arguments, pointing out that the Jones Act that the company referenced did not apply to her claim because Arnold had not been employed by the company, and that the Death on the High Seas Act was not applicable either because of the law’s specifics. She asserted that in cases where neither law applies, state laws prevail, and that was the law that she was relying upon.



Judge Agrees with Mesothelioma’s Widow



Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler is overseeing the case, and upon review of maritime law, she agreed with the mesothelioma widow. She pointed to several precedential cases in which maritime law has allowed both punitive damages and consortium and wrongful death claims. She also made a point of noting the Supreme Court’s previous writings on the intention of maritime law, which is “humane and liberal.” She wrote that precedent points to the law finding it better “to give than to withhold the remedy when not required to withhold it.” The widow’s amendments were allowed.

### Judge Calls Request for Mesothelioma Tissue Sample “Egregious”

It is not uncommon for a defendant in a malignant mesothelioma to request biological samples from a victim, but those requests are generally made in a timely way, and in a way that is respectful of the victim’s health and wellbeing. By contrast, a recent request by Mercedes Benz was so far beyond either timely or reflective of concern that a New York judge called it “particularly egregious.”







Mesothelioma Victim’s Tissue Sample Deemed Too Limited



Mercedes Benz was named a defendant in Almando D. Rodney’s mesothelioma lawsuit more than two years ago. Though the company could have asked for a tissue sample at the time, they waited until recently for access to the sample that was made at the time of his diagnosis, saying that their expert witness needed it to ascertain whether they had been responsible for his illness.



The company’s attorneys used a legal maneuver known as a post-note-of-issue, which is only to be used in “unusual or unanticipated circumstances.” Their attorney argued that providing the mesothelioma patient’s pleurectomy specimen would not cause him harm and that failure to do so would harm their case. But the patient’s physician pushed back against that assertion, saying that a second pleurectomy would risk his health and that the remaining tissue might be needed for him to qualify for future clinical trials or new drugs or treatments.



Judge Denies Mesothelioma Defendant’s Request for Tissue



In a sternly worded decision, Supreme Court of New York judge Justice Adam Silvera called the request for the mesothelioma victim’s tissue sample “particularly egregious” and the company’s argument “unconvincing and wholly inapplicable.”  He noted that the company had known that the pleurectomy sample existed for two years, and told the company that putting their legal argument’s interests over a “living mesothelioma plaintiff’s” interests in his health was inappropriate.

### ExxonMobil Loses Final Appeal of Mesothelioma Claim

The road to justice can be long and tortuous for mesothelioma victims and their families, but for many, victory eventually comes. Warren Wright’s family lost him to the rare, asbestos-related disease in 2015, and it took until this past summer for their legal case against ExxonMobil to finally come to an end.







ExxonMobil Filed Multiple Appeals of Jury’s Mesothelioma Verdict



According to the original personal injury claim that Mr. Wright’s family filed, he was exposed to asbestos by several different companies while working at their oil refineries. But Shell Oil, Co., Texaco, and 3M all settled the case out of court, leaving only ExxonMobil as a defendant. When the jury heard the details of Mr. Wright’s exposure and subsequent death, they awarded the family $4 million in damages.



Unhappy with that result, ExxonMobil filed an appeal of the verdict, arguing that the judge should have provided the jury with a specific instruction about Mr. Wright’s knowledge of asbestos’ dangers. The company claimed that the verdict would have been different had that instruction been given. Though the appeals court agreed to lower the verdict amount to $2.2 million based on settlements the family had arranged with the other defendants, they denied the company’s request to overturn the decision, saying that the trial court judge had properly exercised his discretion in deciding against the instruction.



ExxonMobil Takes Mesothelioma Decision to Washington State Supreme Court



In a final effort to evade liability for Mr. Wright’s mesothelioma death, ExxonMobil asked the Washington State Supreme Court to overturn the lower court and appeals court’s decisions. Though the company asserted that the jury should have been instructed that Mr. Wright’s knowledge of the dangers of asbestos mitigated their liability, the Supreme Court disagreed, saying that the argument was difficult to reconcile with the appeals court’s ruling about the strength of the company’s argument. The family will be able to keep their hard-won compensation.

### New Law Helps Illinois Mesothelioma Victims’ Survivors

Punitive damages are frequently assessed against companies judged liable for an individual’s mesothelioma. Different from economic or compensatory damages, punitive damages are specifically meant to punish those responsible for actions – or inactions – that are deemed to be malicious. Examples include situations where companies knew of asbestos’ dangers and have extended protections from it for their own employees, but not for those who use it elsewhere. Up until recently, these damages were not available to those in the state of Illinois who were seeking wrongful death claims, but a new law has made a significant change.







Illinois Mesothelioma Victims’ Survivors Can Now Ask for Punitive Damages



Punitive damages are not available in every state, and mesothelioma victims in the state of Illinois have previously been barred from pursuing them, even in the most egregious situations. But a recently passed state law has changed that, allowing those who are pursuing wrongful death claims to add punitive damages to the compensation that they ask juries to award.



Illinois had been one of only 16 states that prevented mesothelioma victims’ family members and others from pursuing punitive damages in connection with wrongful death claims.The state’s courts indicated that the right to pursue compensation for malicious actions was limited to the individual who had been harmed.



New Law Provides Remedy for Mesothelioma Family Members



When the Illinois Supreme Court, ruling on a mesothelioma claim, indicated that punitive damages could only be sought after a victim’s death if the state changed its laws, survivors took action and sought help from state legislators. A bill to change the law was passed earlier this year, and in August the state’s governor, J.B. Pritzker, made the law official by signing the bill.



Though nothing can be done to help those mesothelioma survivors who had sought justice in earlier cases, the new law allows anybody who had an active wrongful death claim on August 11th, and anybody who files thereafter to seek punitive damages from the court hearing their case.

### Mesothelioma Victims Encouraged as Judge Rejects J&J Bankruptcy Again

Tens of thousands of mesothelioma and ovarian victims have been watching and waiting as a New Jersey bankruptcy judge considered a second bankruptcy filing from consumer giant Johnson & Johnson. The victims, who blame the company for negligently exposing them to asbestos-contaminated talc in their iconic baby powder product, learned late last summer that the court had again rejected the company’s claim, noting that they continued to demonstrate that their economic situation justified having their financial liabilities discharged.







New Jersey Bankruptcy Judge’s Decision Inspires Hope that Mesothelioma Victims Will See Justice



Like several other companies facing significant mesothelioma claims, Johnson & Johnson elected to pursue a controversial legal maneuver known as a Texas two-step in which they established a new subsidiary, LTL Management that held all of their asbestos liabilities, then filed for bankruptcy protection. The maneuver effectively put all outstanding claims on hold, leaving sick and dying victims waiting for the courts to address the issue.



U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan had initially approved the petition, only to have his decision overturned by the U.S. appeals court, which noted that bankruptcy protection was inappropriate for companies that were not facing significant financial distress. The company then attempted the maneuver again, submitting new arguments in support of its claim and offering an $8.9 billion settlement for victims. Judge Kaplan’s recent denial of this second application is offering mesothelioma victims new hope.



Disagreement Among Mesothelioma Victims



The group that is trying to block the bankruptcy petition is made up of people diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma or ovarian cancer, or their survivors. Some others who have suffered the same fate and who have outstanding claims against Johnson & Johnson are in favor of accepting the settlement, but the plaintiffs argue that the company’s offer does not provide enough for victims who have not submitted claims because they have not yet been diagnosed with an asbestos-related disease.



Johnson & Johnson continues to argue that their product is safe and never contained asbestos, but one of the plaintiffs’ attorneys responded by saying, “J&J has spent two years trying to convince us that somehow a company worth a half-trillion dollars is bankrupt. It’s time for the nonsense to stop and for J&J to accept responsibility.”

### New York Mesothelioma Claim to Include Punitive Damages

When a mesothelioma lawsuit seeks both compensatory damages and punitive damages, the plaintiff is asserting that the defendant's actions went beyond negligence to the point of being malicious or egregious and that they demand separate, additional punishment. That is exactly what the family of the late Michael F. Brady is seeking and was granted by a New York judge.







Oil Burner Serviceman’s Mesothelioma Death Blamed on Boiler Company Negligence



The claim filed by Mr. Brady’s family accused boiler maker Burnham LLC, among others, of having exposed him to asbestos and leading to his death from malignant mesothelioma. They point to parts contained within the company’s equipment that shed deadly fibers that he inhaled, and the company’s failure to take action to protect him, or even to warn of the dangers.



In response to the mesothelioma lawsuit including a claim for punitive damages, Burnham filed a motion for partial summary judgment, arguing that the punitive damages were not warranted and should not be offered to a jury for consideration. Their defense revolved around levels of acceptable asbestos exposure established by the Occupational Safety and Health Act: They relied upon testimony offered by Dr. William Longo to back up their argument.



Judge Denies Request to Dismiss Punitive Damages Claim in Mesothelioma Lawsuit



Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York denied Burnham LLC’s petition to have the punitive damages portion of the mesothelioma lawsuit dismissed. He agreed with the family’s argument that Dr. Longo’s testimony about the levels of asbestos released by Burnham boilers was not based on studies of a Burnham boiler, and therefore offered no certainty about the amount of exposure that Mr. Brady would have suffered.



Beyond that conclusion, the judge also considered the fact that Burnham did not take steps to place a warning on its boilers about asbestos or the risks that it posed until 1982, well after it became aware of the dangers of its products. The case will move on for a jury to determine whether their lack of care for those exposed to their products warrants additional punishment.

### Mesothelioma Victim’s Family’s Appeal Leads to Earlier Ruling Being Overturned

Those pursuing justice for mesothelioma victims should be prepared for an emotional rollercoaster, as the legal process will present both wins and losses along the way. Though the family of Joan Smith was disappointed by a lower court decision in her second-hand asbestos exposure claim, the Court of Appeal of Florida recently reversed that decision, renewing their hope for a positive outcome.







Woman’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Exposure to Asbestos on Husband’s Work Clothes



Mrs. Smith died of malignant mesothelioma after years of laundering her husband’s asbestos-covered work clothes. He had worked as a mechanic from 1969 through 1993, specifically removing, repairing, and installing brakes on Mack heavy trucks. Those parts were contaminated with asbestos, and at the end of each day’s work, his clothing was covered with asbestos fibers that she inhaled when she shook out the dust and put the clothes in the washing machine.



The mesothelioma victim's family pursued a personal injury lawsuit against several companies whose brakes Mack had purchased for use in their trucks, including Carlisle Industrial Brake & Friction. But the company filed a motion for summary judgment that pointed to other third-party manufacturers whose parts Mack had purchased and asserted that there was no proof that Mrs. Smith had specifically been exposed to their products. The lower court agreed with this argument and granted the company’s petition to have themselves dismissed from the lawsuit.



Appeals Court Reverses Lower Court’s Decision in Mesothelioma Claim



Mrs. Smith’s family was certain that Carlisle should be included in their mesothelioma claim and filed an appeal of the lower court decision. They pointed to the overlap in years that Mrs. Smith had been exposed to asbestos from Mack truck replacement brakes and the years that Carlisle had been one of Mack’s authorized suppliers. The appeals court agreed that there was no need to prove that Carlisle had been an exclusive supplier: Rather, for the family to prove that the case warranted a jury trial, they simply needed to show that it was more likely than not that she’d been exposed to them. Because they’d met that bar, they reversed the earlier decision and the case will continue to a jury.

### Mesothelioma Claim Points to New York Power Company’s Negligence

When Alvin Smith died of malignant mesothelioma, the former electrician’s family filed claims against numerous defendants that they blamed for exposing him to asbestos. Though many years have gone by, those claims are continuing to be heard. Most recently, the Long Island Power Authority argued against having to defend themselves because they said they were immune from liability based on their status as a public authority. A New York judge agreed.







Power Company Attempts to Evade Responsibility for Mesothelioma



Mr. Smith’s mesothelioma was blamed on asbestos exposure through decades of working as an electrician. Though many of the individual claims have been resolved, others remain. In one outstanding claim, the Long Island Power Authority (LIPA) and Long Island Lighting Company asked for the case against them to be dismissed based on privileges and immunities that they have today, but the family argued that at the time that Mr. Smith had worked for them, they were private entities.



The specific argument that LIPA, a public authority, and its subsidiary LILCO made to the court was that the mesothelioma victim’s family had failed to submit their claim within the time special limitations required by New York state. The family responded that though the companies are currently public, that was not the case when their loved one had suffered asbestos exposure years earlier.



Judge Rejects Power Companies’ Arguments in Mesothelioma Case



Justice Adam Silvera has previously overseen the claims made by LILCO in their fight against the mesothelioma victim. The company had earlier tried – and failed — to be excused from the case by asserting that they had not been responsible for supervising Mr. Smith’s work. In his review of their more recent argument, the judge pointed out that the whole reason that LIPA had been formed was to amend the negligence demonstrated by LILCO at the time.



He also examined precedent regarding whether a statute of limitations should be applied retroactively to companies that became public authorities and found that the company’s argument was not supported. The family’s case can continue to a jury.

### Strength of Mesothelioma Victim’s Testimony Defeats Asbestos Company’s Arguments

It has been well established that exposure to asbestos causes malignant mesothelioma, a rare and deadly form of cancer that often claims its victims' lives within months of diagnosis. But despite this and strong evidence to the contrary, asbestos companies exert tremendous effort to argue against their role in mesothelioma victims’ illnesses. In a recent case, a New York man’s clear testimony defeated an asbestos company’s motion to have his case against them dismissed.







Asbestos-Contaminated Fire Doors in Theater Blamed for Man’s Mesothelioma



The mesothelioma lawsuit was filed in 2021 by James Witte and his wife Holly, naming several companies that they blamed for having exposed him to asbestos. Though Mr. Witte died of his disease, he had the opportunity to submit testimony about his exposure, recalling asbestos-contaminated doors in an old Broadway theater that he had been renovating. His memory of the work involving fire doors manufactured by T.M. Cobb Company was of “a lot of dust. A lot of old insulation.”



Though the mesothelioma victim’s testimony was clear and detailed, T.M. Cobb Company filed a motion to have the case against them dismissed based on their argument that they were a California Company and had never sold products or conducted business in the state of New York.



New York Judge Denies Petition to Dismiss Mesothelioma Lawsuit



Though the fire door company argued that they should not have to stand trial in New York because they did not do business in New York, Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York first looked at deposition testimony from their president, Jeffrey Cobb: He noted that though Cobb claimed that his company had never sold doors in New York, he had not provided any documentation to support his statement and that because he hadn’t worked for the company during the years in question, he had no personal knowledge to back up his statements.



Though the judge also singled out the company’s lack of document retention policy as hurting their argument, he also noted that according to New York precedent, the strong and clear testimony of the mesothelioma victim was enough to raise questions of fact that required that the case move forward for a jury to decide.

### Advance Auto Parts Named in Mechanic’s Mesothelioma Claim

When Joseph Munna was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, the former auto mechanic filed suit against those companies he blamed for exposing him to asbestos. Included in that list was Advance Auto, which he blames for selling him parts that were contaminated with asbestos. Though the company asked for the case against them dismissed, a New York judge denied their request, noting that much of the company’s argument was unrelated to the victim’s claim.







Mechanic’s Claim Identifies Asbestos-Contaminated Parts Caused His Mesothelioma



Mr. Munna’s career lasted for decades, but the asbestos exposure he blames for his mesothelioma occurred between the 1970s and 1990s. He points to parts purchased from Advance Auto between the 1970s and 1990s, recalling seeing the company’s delivery vehicles and branding on items that he worked with.



Though the mesothelioma victim was clear that he had been an employee, and had not been responsible for purchasing the parts, nor did he know which store they’d been purchased from, Advance Auto’s petition for summary judgment contained language arguing that they hadn’t operated New York stores in Staten Island or Valley Stream: curiously, Mr. Munna never referenced those locations in his claim, and never specified a particular store.



Mischaracterization of Mesothelioma Victim’s Testimony Defeats Motion for Dismissal



Further perplexing the judge in the case was Advance Auto’s argument that the mesothelioma claim against them should be dismissed because Mr. Munna had not been personally involved in buying or ordering any of their asbestos-contaminated parts. As this was in keeping with his testimony and had no relation to whether they could be held liable or found negligent, Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York said that they had failed to meet the standard for summary judgment to be granted, and further noted that the motion had “relied solely upon a mischaracterization of plaintiff’s consistent and unequivocal testimony regarding their products.”



The judge denied the motion for summary judgment, and the mesothelioma claim will move forward to be heard by a jury.

### Woman’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos in Bowling Accessory

A California court has denied a bowling accessory company’s attempt to evade responsibility for a woman’s mesothelioma. Though Master Industries Worldwide argued that they weren’t a legal entity in the years that Debra Manns had been exposed to asbestos in their product, the victim’s family pointed to the company’s advertising to convince the court otherwise.







Asbestos in Easy Slide Bowling Product Blamed for Woman’s Mesothelioma



Debra Manns enjoyed bowling and never dreamed her use of a product called Easy Slide would eventually lead to her death from mesothelioma. But the product, a shoe conditioner designed to keep bowlers’ shoes from sticking, was made with asbestos, and years later she was diagnosed with the rare and deadly cancer.



When her family filed a wrongful death lawsuit against several companies they blamed for her mesothelioma, they included Master Industries among the defendants. The company responded by filing a motion to quash service of summons for lack of personal jurisdiction, saying that because Mrs. Manns’ exposure had occurred years before they’d become a legal entity in 2011, they could not be held responsible. They said that their business was not a continuation of the previous company, whose name they had assumed.



Company’s Own Advertising Defeats its Defense Against Mesothelioma Liability



Though Master Industries argued that they hadn’t sold or manufactured the product until after the mesothelioma victim’s exposure and therefore shouldn’t be responsible, the woman’s family noted that they were selling the same product made by the company they’d purchased and that they were successor-in-interest to that company. They presented the company’s own advertising boasting that they’d been in business for fifty years and including photos dating back years before the time they were arguing was the start of their business operations.



The judge hearing the case agreed with the mesothelioma victim’s family, noting that the company had continued the brand name, sold the same product to the same customers, used the same facility, and retained the same employees.   He said that Master Industries, Inc. and the company that it had purchased had benefited from doing business in California and therefore there was not question of jurisdiction, and that in purchasing the original company Master Industries had assumed its predecessor’s liabilities. The petition to have the case dismissed was denied.

### “Passion or Prejudice” Question Raised by Asbestos Company After $20 Million Mesothelioma Award

Patricia Casey was awarded $20 million in punitive damages following the mesothelioma death of her husband John. The significant award came after the initial jury hearing the case could not decide on appropriate compensation.  The defendant, Kaiser Gypsum, filed an appeal of the decision, arguing that the large award was a result of either passion or prejudice, but the appellate court hearing the case determined that there were no abuses of discretion in either of the trials that were held.







Kaiser Gypsum Accused of Negligence in Mesothelioma Case



The original mesothelioma claim was filed against more than 60 asbestos companies that Patricia and her late husband filed before mesothelioma claimed his life. He had worked for decades as a plumber and pipefitter on multiple construction sites and cited exposure to asbestos-contaminated products that he had worked with or around.



Among the companies named in the mesothelioma claim was Kaiser Gypsum, and by the time the trial began it was one of only a few that had not already resolved the issue. Though the company defended itself against charges of negligence, the jury found them guilty, paying special attention to the fact that the company had taken steps to protect its own employees from the asbestos in their drywall product, but had done nothing to warn anybody else of its dangers.



Second Jury Awards Mesothelioma Punitive Damages



Though the first jury hearing the mesothelioma claim came back with a guilty verdict and compensation for damages, they were unable to agree to an amount to assess in punitive damages, and the judge hearing the case ordered a second trial. The second jury heard all the same evidence and concluded that $20 million was an appropriate punishment.



Though the asbestos company argued that testimony from one of their witnesses should not have been excluded, that the trial court had abused its discretion, and that the second jury should not have exclusively been charged with deciding punitive damages, the appellate court hearing their argument denied their appeal. The judges of the Court of Appeal of the State of California noted that the state holds that juries know best whether the evidence presented at trial is credible, and that their review of the trial court’s decisions did not expose any type of legal error. The jury’s award will stand.

### Citing Lung Cancer Victim’s Extensive Testimony, Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss Lawsuit

Christopher Yohe was diagnosed with asbestos-related lung cancer at the age of 64. He and his wife filed personal injury lawsuits against many of the companies whose asbestos-contaminated products he was exposed to during his years working as a plumber.  Though water heater manufacturer Bradford White asked the court to dismiss them from the suit, Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York denied their motion for summary judgment.







Facing Lung Cancer Liability, Company Files Motion to Dismiss



Though Mr. Yohe died of his asbestos-related lung cancer, his widow, Barbara, continued her claim against the companies she held responsible for her loss. In response to being named in the suit, Bradford White filed a motion for summary judgment that argued there was no basis for them having been named as a defendant. To support their assertion, they submitted an affidavit from an individual who later admitted that he had no firsthand knowledge of or familiarity with the company’s historical water heater products.



In responding to the company’s request, Justice Adam Silvera noted that in cases regarding malignant mesothelioma and asbestos-related lung cancer, a great deal of weight is given to the testimony of the plaintiff and that, in Mr. Yohe’s case, he had clearly identified Bradford White water heaters as those he had worked with. The judge also said that Mr. Yohe had given “unequivocal testimony” on the differences between asbestos-containing parts in older water heaters and non-asbestos-containing parts in newer models based on his training.



Judge Rejects Water Heater Company’s Argument Against Asbestos Liability



Pointing out the insufficiency of the water heater company’s witness testimony, as well as their lack of documentary evidence to support their assertion that their water heaters did not contain asbestos, Justice Silvera wrote that “a reasonable juror could decide that the plaintiff was exposed to asbestos from a Bradford White-manufactured water heater or part,” and that therefore issues of fact exist to preclude summary judgment. Mrs. Yohe’s case against Bradford White will move forward to trial.



.

### Asbestos Hidden in Printing Press Blamed for Man’s Malignant Mesothelioma

A jury will decide whether Jean Castagna’s death from malignant mesothelioma was caused by asbestos in the printing press that he worked with for years. Though the equipment manufacturer asked for the case against them to be dismissed, a New York judge ruled that there were too many questions of fact to be decided for their motion for summary judgment to be granted.







Mesothelioma Blamed on Years of Work with Asbestos-contaminated Equipment



Before he succumbed to his illness, Jean Castagna filed a mesothelioma lawsuit against several companies that he accused of having negligently exposed him to the carcinogen asbestos. In response to being named as one of the defendants, Komori America Corporation filed a motion for summary judgment, asking the Supreme Court of New York County to dismiss the case against them dismissed.



Company Argues Against Liability for Mesothelioma



Mr. Castagna provided testimony while undergoing chemotherapy for his malignant mesothelioma, and during his deposition, he indicated that between 1980 and 1988, he had worked for Martin Lithographers with Komori’s printing presses. The company responded by arguing that since they had not been incorporated until 1982, they could not have caused his illness, and also submitted an affidavit from an employee to agree to the timeline of their entity having been formed.



The employee also signed a document saying that there had been no asbestos in their printing presses and that there were no records of Komori having ever sold a printing press to the mesothelioma victim’s employer, but Justice Adam Silvera rejected both the company’s assertions and their attempt to have an employee excuse them from standing trial. He noted that since the victim claimed exposure through 1988, the argument regarding the two years before incorporation was inadequate to justify the case being dismissed.



The judge also said that the employee’s testimony had not proven that their equipment did not contain the asbestos that had caused Mr. Castagna’s mesothelioma, and that the fact that there were no receipts of a sale to his employer ignored the role that resellers might have played in the sale of contaminated equipment. Calling all of the printing press company’s arguments weak, the judge decided that the case must be heard by a jury.

### Mesothelioma Death Leads to $107 Million Jury Award

After a two-phase trial, a twelve-person California jury awarded the family of a 46-year-old janitor who died of malignant pleural mesothelioma a remarkable $107 million in compensatory and punitive damages. The defendants in the case were Union Carbide Corporation, E.F. Brady Co., Inc., and Elementis Chemicals.







On-the-Job Asbestos Exposure Blamed for Janitor’s Malignant Mesothelioma



The victim in the case, Joel Hernandezcueva, died of malignant mesothelioma in April 2014. Mr. Hernandezcueva was only 46 at the time of his death, but decades had passed since the time he’d worked at a Fluor facility in Irvine, California between 1992 and 1995. In his role as a maintenance employee at the location known as Park Place, he’d suffered constant exposure to asbestos when the property underwent demolition. Asbestos-contaminated walls were removed as part of the structure’s tenement improvement project, and he was further exposed while doing daily cleanup and routine maintenance work.



Though there were several different sources of asbestos exposure over the years, Mr. Hernandezcueva’s family focused their mesothelioma lawsuit on the dual-purpose joint compound that was used on every wall at Park Place. That compound was manufactured by E.F. Brady Company, Inc., and supplied by Union Carbide Corporation.



Significant Damages in Mesothelioma Suit Tied to Defendant’s Knowledge of Risk Posed by Asbestos



The $107 million jury verdict was a direct response to evidence that Union Carbide was aware of asbestos’ danger that was presented on behalf of the mesothelioma victim. Various expert witnesses testified to the fact that Mr. Hernandezcueva had never been warned of asbestos’ danger, and that, as his attorneys asserted, “For decades, Union Carbide told its customers its asbestos was ‘different,’ ‘innocuous,’ and ‘not harmful,’ while its internal corporate documents revealed the truth: thousands – people such as Joel – would die.”



The jury assigned the three companies to pay the mesothelioma victim’s family $32 million in compensatory damages and $75 million in punitive damages, with both figures subject to interest fees. Union Carbide was assigned 46.4% of the blame as a result of what the jury viewed as malice.

### Despite Caterpillar’s Objections, Court Allows $4.5 Million Mesothelioma Verdict to Stand

The family of Navy veteran Edwin Estenson was devastated by his mesothelioma diagnosis and death and was intent on getting justice from the companies that had exposed him to asbestos and caused him so much suffering. While every other company they filed suit against agreed to settle out of court, Caterpillar Inc. insisted on having the case heard by a jury, and when that jury decided against them, they appealed the $4.5 million verdict they were assigned. An appeals court rejected their argument, indicating that the jury had made the right call.







Multiple Asbestos Companies Named in Navy Veteran’s Mesothelioma Lawsuit



Edwin Estenson’s mesothelioma claim detailed numerous asbestos exposures that occurred throughout his life. After a stint in the Navy, he’d worked as a heavy-duty mechanic, and all of his jobs involved exposure to asbestos-containing pipe insulation and other components and parts. His lawsuit named all of the asbestos companies whose negligence and failure to warn had resulted in his illness.



The mesothelioma victim’s claim noted his exposure onboard the USS Curtiss as well as the many exposures he suffered between 1955 and 1967. Caterpillar was one among many named in the original lawsuit, and though they filed a motion to have the case against them dismissed, their request was denied. When the other companies all agreed to out-of-court settlements, Caterpillar was the only defendant left, and the Washington state jury hearing the case ordered them to pay $4.5 million in damages.



Mesothelioma Damages to be Split Between Widow, Estate, and Adult Children



After hearing the details of Mr. Estenson’s suffering, the jury awarded the mesothelioma victim’s estate $331,928 for his actual costs and another $3 million to compensate for the pain and heartache he endured. They also awarded each of his four children $175,000 in noneconomic damages and his widow $2 million for loss of consortium.



Though that verdict was adjusted in recognition of the previously agreed settlements, Caterpillar Inc. still objected to being held responsible for his mesothelioma, and filed an appeal of the jury's decision. Despite their arguments, the Court of Appeals of Washington denied their request, determining that all of the decisions made by the lower court had been appropriate and that there had been no abuse of discretion: rather than the “passion and prejudice” that the company argued was behind the jury’s decision, the court said that the verdict had been based on the evidence that had been presented to them.

### After Losing Both Parents to Asbestos, Daughters Win Mesothelioma Lawsuit

Melissa Ann Bobo and Shannon Jean Cox lost their mother to malignant mesothelioma sixteen years to the day after their father died of a heart attack following years of battling asbestos-induced lung cancer. The women stepped in as plaintiffs in the personal injury claim their mother filed before her death and were awarded over $3 million in damages from their late father’s former employer. Though Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) appealed that decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit upheld the trial court’s decision and denied the appeal.







Trial Details Second-Hand Asbestos Exposure and Woman’s Mesothelioma Treatment



In his review of the original mesothelioma lawsuit, Chief Judge Ed Carnes summarized how Barbara Bobo had been exposed to asbestos, and how extensively she had suffered. He noted that her late husband, James “Neal” Bobo, had worked for the TVA for more than 22 years, that he had been diagnosed with asbestos-induced lung cancer, and that she was later diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma. He wrote of the many painful treatments and symptoms she endured before her death.



The jury in the original trial had awarded the mesothelioma victim’s daughters over $3 million in damages based on evidence that Mr. Bobo had been exposed to asbestos constantly, as well as that TVA’s own documents confirmed the presence of asbestos products throughout the plant and that the company had failed to adhere to its own internal policies regarding protecting employees and their families from asbestos. As a result, Mr. Bobo’s clothing was caked with asbestos fibers when he returned home from work each day, and Mrs. Bobo inhaled those fibers when she laundered his clothes. Testimony in the case indicated that the family’s laundry room was so filled with asbestos dust that it became “foggy.”



Judge Upholds Lower Court’s Decision in Mesothelioma Claim



Though TVA argued against the jury’s decision on the mesothelioma damages based on two legal technicalities, the Court of Appeals aggressively rejected their argument, pointing out that the company had failed to adhere to its own internal policies and that the outcome for Mrs. Bobo was entirely foreseeable. In a scathing rebuke to the company, the judge wrote in part:



Here is the gist of it.  TVA used asbestos-containing products … during the twenty-two years Mr. Bobo worked for it.  His duties included cleaning up residue left by insulators and asbestos workers, which in turn allowed asbestos fibers to settle on his clothes. And Mrs. Bobo was exposed to those fibers regularly for 22 years.  Her … was that she was exposed to so much dust from shaking out her husband’s work clothes that the air was foggy.  Dr. Mark testified that with mesothelioma there is “no known safe level” of exposure to asbestos.  Even if there were, the massive amounts of asbestos fibers to which Mrs. Bobo was exposed over more than two decades would far exceed any imaginable safe level. To answer the question with which we began, TVA did cause Mrs. Bobo to die sooner and suffer more in the course of dying than she otherwise would have.

### Jury Awards Mesothelioma Victim $32 Million

When William Tyler worked in an asbestos-contaminated foundry, he relied on his respirator to protect him from mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases. Unfortunately, the respirator did not do what it claimed that it would, and he and his wife filed a lawsuit against its manufacturer, who they accused of knowing of its inadequacy. After a one-month trial, a California jury agreed and assessed the company $32 million in punitive and compensatory damages.







Mesothelioma Victim Accuses Respirator Company of Negligence and Concealment



In presenting their case to the jury, the mesothelioma victim and his wife said that the failure of American Optical Corporation’s respirator to protect him went beyond negligence: They presented evidence that the company had been well aware that the respirator would not keep deadly asbestos fibers from entering his airway, and added accusations of concealment and intentional misrepresentation to their personal injury claim.



Throughout the one-month trial, American Optical Corporation’s attorneys attempted to direct responsibility back at Mr. Tyler’s employer, arguing that the environment at Southern California Foundry was what had put him at risk for malignant mesothelioma They said that the company had been haphazard in its approach to asbestos protection and that it had been inappropriate for the victim to rely upon the respirator to keep himself safe.



“Last Level of Defense” Argument Fails to Sway Jury in Mesothelioma Case



Though the respirator company argued their product should have been the “last level of defense” for the mesothelioma victim, the jury was shown proof that American Optical had known that the product would not do as they had promised that it would. The victim’s attorney argued that they had knowingly, falsely claimed it was protective in the interest of boosting their own profits.



After deliberating for less than a day, the jury ordered the company to pay the mesothelioma victim and his wife $32 million, with $22 million specified to provide compensatory damages and another $10 million specifically assigned as punishment for what was referred to as an intentional tort.

### Expert Witness Testimony Proves Invaluable to Mesothelioma Victim’s Case

It can be a challenge to prove a mesothelioma lawsuit. The asbestos exposure blamed for causing the deadly illness generally occurred decades earlier: memories fade, and physical proof is rarely available. Because of this, plaintiffs rely on testimony from expert witnesses, which often makes the difference.







Navy Veteran Blames Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma on Shipboard Products



David Welch was diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma, and he and his wife Linda blamed his fatal illness on asbestos-contaminated valves that he worked with during his years in the U.S. Navy. Before his death he provided testimony that he had served aboard both the USS Carronade and the USS Princeton as a fireman in the ships’ pipefitters' welding shop, working alongside and in support of civilian personnel doing repair work for the Navy. He explained that this entailed working on various valves, pumps, and monitoring gauges.



Mr. Welch indicated that this created a "big mess" of asbestos packing that he and others were required to clean up, and it was his exposure during this work that he blamed for his mesothelioma. He filed a personal injury claim against the valves’ manufacturer, Crane Company, arguing that they’d failed to warn of dangers that they’d been aware of, and were therefore negligent and liable for the damages that he’d suffered.



Asbestos Company Argues Against Being Held Responsible for Veteran’s Mesothelioma



Crane Company asked for the mesothelioma case against them to be dismissed, but expert witness testimony from a Navy veteran and maritime expert defeated their motion for summary judgment. After providing his credentials as an engineering plant ship superintendent and project manager at the Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Commander Andrew Ott testified about the valves that had been provided by Crane Company over the years that Mr. Welch had served aboard U.S. Navy ships, and about the significant and substantial exposure that he would have experienced in his role.



He also confirmed what the mesothelioma plaintiffs had said about the intended use and useful life of the gaskets, and that it was understood that during their normal service life, they would be disturbed and that asbestos fibers were likely to be released. Between his testimony and documentary evidence that demonstrated Crane Company’s knowledge of the hazards of asbestos, the court denied the company’s motion for summary judgment and allowed the lawsuit to proceed.

### Navy Veteran’s Widow Granted Right to Have her Mesothelioma Lawsuit Heard

Following the mesothelioma death of her Navy veteran husband, Linda Cook filed a negligence lawsuit that accused several companies of having negligently exposed him to asbestos. Despite three of those companies seeking summary judgment of the cases against them, a Massachusetts court determined that their arguments for dismissal fell short and that the claims against them should move forward to be heard by a jury.







Three Asbestos Companies Argue Against Mesothelioma Widow’s Claim



The three companies named in Linda Cook’s mesothelioma lawsuit are each accused of having exposed her late husband Ronald to asbestos during the years that he served in the Navy or in the years thereafter. According to her claim, he served from 1966 through 1968 onboard ships whose boilers were contaminated with asbestos, and later worked to repair small engines that contained asbestos-contaminated parts.



 In response, the companies each offered rebuttals to her mesothelioma claims, with Foster Wheeler Energy arguing that they should be excused from liability because they'd been acting on orders from the Navy, they had no obligation to warn of the dangers of their products. Briggs & Stratton argued that tests they'd commissioned had shown no release of asbestos from the gaskets Mr. Cook had worked with, and DCo LLC said that the widow had no proof of their role in the sale of asbestos-contaminated parts he had worked with.



Judge Denies Petition for Summary Judgment in Navy Veteran’s Mesothelioma Case



In reviewing the arguments submitted by each of the mesothelioma defendants, Senior District Judge Rya W. Nobel of the United States District Court of the District of Massachusetts said that the widow’s claim had raised questions of fact that required consideration by a jury. Among the disparities in each side’s argument was a question of the scientific validity of the test that Briggs & Stratton had conducted, with the widow arguing that because the parts tested had been inappropriately coated in oil during the test, asbestos fibers were prevented from becoming airborne and being detected.

### Judge Rejects Boiler Company’s Motion to Dismiss, Denies Request for Sanctions Against Victim’s Attorneys

It has been decades since asbestos’ role in malignant mesothelioma became public knowledge, but companies whose products contained the carcinogenic material had been aware of its dangers long before that. Their decision not to warn of its hazards or halt its use was based on profit, and so are the maneuvers they attempt to avoid legal liability for the harm their products caused.







Boiler Company Accused of Pursuing Multiple Sales to Defeat Claims of Mesothelioma Liability



In a case recently decided in New York’s courts, a boiler company argued they couldn't be held responsible for a man's mesothelioma because liability had not transferred to them following an extensive series of sales of the original company. They asked for the case to be dismissed, and also asked for sanctions against the victim’s attorneys, accusing them of frivolous legal conduct.



Victim Argues that Mesothelioma Liability Followed Acquisitions



The mesothelioma victim’s claim asserted that PB Heat was responsible for having exposed him to asbestos. They argued that the company’s argument against liability because of subsequent sales and mergers was wrong. The victim presented the full history of acquisitions that took place over several years, arguing that asbestos-related liability had transferred with the sales.



 In defending itself, PB Heat argued that they were protected by New York law against claims for wrongdoing by their predecessor companies and that the victim had not provided adequate proof to support his claim. Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York reviewed both sides’ arguments, as well as the company's request for sanctions against the victim's attorney. He denied all of the boiler company’s arguments.



Judge’s Decision in Mesothelioma Claim Explains Rules of Successor Liability



In denying the boiler company’s request to have the case against it dismissed, the judge said that while New York law absolves successor companies of liability for their predecessors’ negligence, there are four notable exceptions that apply to this case. Those exceptions are:




When a corporation expressly or impliedly assumes the predecessor’s tort liability



When there is a consolidation or merger of seller and buyer



When the purchasing corporation was a mere continuation of the selling corporation



When the transaction is entered into fraudulently to escape tort liabilities




The judge then pointed out that the company’s internal documents did not allow them to escape these exceptions, leaving issues of fact for a jury to decide.



The judge also denied the company’s request for sanctions against the mesothelioma victim’s attorneys, noting that the lawyers’ conduct could not be considered frivolous because rather than having been filed to harass, the case had merit in law.

### Appeal in Mesothelioma Case Establishes New Standard of Liability

When Deborah Johnson’s husband Bruce died of malignant mesothelioma, the couple filed a personal injury lawsuit against The Edward Orton Jr. Ceramic Foundation. Their claim, which pointed to the packing material that the company’s products were packed in, was dismissed by a lower court, but a recent decision by the Seventh Circuit both reversed that decision and established a new standard of liability that extended a company’s duty to include the material used in packaging and shipping their products.







Ceramic Artist’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Packing Material that Kiln Cones Were Shipped In



Mrs. Johnson’s personal injury lawsuit against the ceramics foundation did not blame their pyrometric cone products for her husband’s mesothelioma death. Rather, she pointed to the pure vermiculite that the cones were packed in.



Company records showed that they’d purchased the material over two separate time periods from W.R. Grace & Company. The vermiculite the company sold was contaminated with asbestos, and the mining operation that has been blamed for hundreds of mesothelioma and asbestos-related deaths.



Seventh Circuit Overturns Lower Court’s Mesothelioma Decision



The company successfully argued that they had not known about the dangers of vermiculite, and that they should not have to defend against the mesothelioma claim because they had not been the packing material’s manufacturer. But the widow appealed that decision, and won a significant victory. In reversing the lower court’s decision, the Seventh Circuit wrote that despite Orton’s claim that they’d had no “actual knowledge” of the dangers of asbestos, the court found that by September of 1981, it was highly probable that they were aware of its risks.



The court’s decision is expected to have far-reaching impact, as it establishes a precedent that companies can be held responsible for mesothelioma for reasons beyond the actual products that it sells or manufacturers. Adding the means of transportation significantly extends the potential scope of future claims.

### Dismissal of Electrician’s Mesothelioma Claim Reversed After His Death

Though it was too late for the mesothelioma victim to see it happen, an appeals court reversed the dismissal of his negligence claim, allowing the man’s son to continue seeking justice on his father's behalf. The case involved electrician Charles Curtis, whose death was blamed on asbestos exposure endured over the course of his career.







Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos in Electrical Products



The Curtis family first pursued legal action when Charles was initially diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma. In recalling the various products he’d worked with over the years, he recalled ABB, Inc., Eaton Corporation, and Schneider Electric USA as their manufacturers, noting specifics of each products branding, including colors and logos. He provided deposition testimony in which he said that he’d worked with those products “many, many times,” and when asked to quantify the number of exposures he’d had, he’d responded that it was “too many to count.”



Despite the mesothelioma victim’s clear testimony about having worked with their products, the three companies filed a motion for summary judgment saying he’d provided no proof that it had been their products he’d worked with, and arguing that he hadn’t raised a triable issue of fact regarding his asbestos exposure. Despite the rules of summary judgment indicating that their decision should be made using the facts most favorable to the plaintiff, the trial court granted the defense’s petition and dismissed the case.



Mesothelioma Victim’s Son Continues Seeking Justice



Following Mr. Curtis’ mesothelioma death, his son Christopher asked the appellate court to review the lower court’s decision, asserting that the victim's testimony should have been enough to defeat the motion for summary judgment. His attorneys pointed to the detailed testimony Mr. Curtis had provided, and argued that the lower court had been wrong when it wrote he hadn’t come into contact with any asbestos-contaminated parts of the companies’ products: Mr. Curtis had specifically noted that he’d repaired and sanded those parts of the companies’ products, a process which created dust that he’d inhaled.



After close analysis of the district court’s decision, the appellate court reversed its decision and sent the mesothelioma case back to them for further consideration. It said that the lower court had erred in its finding, and noted that it had further failed to address the issue of causation. The court also awarded court fees to the mesothelioma victim’s son.

### Following Long Legal Battle, Louisiana Mesothelioma Victim Wins Right to Pursue Claim Against Asbestos Company

When Ronald Barosse was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, he chose not to file a claim under the Louisiana State’s Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act: rather he filed a personal injury lawsuit against the successor to his previous employer. That company argued against his ability to do so, and this led to a long legal fight which was eventually resolved by the U.S. Fifth Circuit. That court noted that his case represented a rare exception to the requirement that such claims be filed as workers’ compensation.







Mesothelioma Victim’s Claim Traveled Long Legal Journey



Mr. Barosse blamed his malignant mesothelioma on asbestos he was exposed to between February 1969 and June 1977, when he worked at the Avondale Shipyard. He filed suit against the company’s successor, Huntington Ingalls, Inc., which immediately filed to have the case dismissed because it was in conflict with the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (LHWCA.) The company successfully argued that the LHWCA was instituted to provide compensation for all longshore and harbor workers in the state, and that it specifically prohibited those workers from filing personal injury claims for workplace injuries.



Mr. Barosse believed that he had a right to file his mesothelioma personal injury claim, so he appealed the trial court’s decision to the District Court, and when he lost his appeal he further appealed to the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court. That is where the merit of his argument was fully recognized and his efforts at justice rewarded.



Fifth Circuit Agrees with Mesothelioma Victim About His Right to File a Personal Injury Claim



Though the U.S. Fifth Circuit noted that the LHWCA’s original intent was to offer injured workers compensation while preventing personal injury claims from being filed against their employers, they also noted that the mesothelioma victim’s claim fell into a unique time period and category. They found that the U.S. Supreme Court had ruled in 1942 that the LHWCSA did not expressly preempt state tort claims, and that the explicit prohibition against them did not exist until the law was modified in 1975. As a result, they ruled that Mr. Barosse fell into a unique category of victims: because his exposure occurred prior to 1975, he was able to file his personal injury suit. His case can finally be presented to a jury.

### $6.6 Million Jury Verdict Returned to Mesothelioma Victim

After a grueling trial, a Florida jury ordered Union Carbide to pay mesothelioma victim William Aubin an astonishing $14,191,000 in damages. Though that amount was later reduced to $6.6 million to reflect other companies’ previously established liabilities, the asbestos company appealed the overall verdict and an appeals court overturned the verdict. Upon review, the Florida Supreme Court reinstated the original jury's reduced award.







Man’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos-Contaminated Construction Dust 



Union Carbide is frequently named a defendant in mesothelioma claims. Not only did the company make its joint compound  with asbestos, but there is significant proof that it did so knowing that the material was carcinogenic. In Mr. Aubin’s case, he was exposed to the material in the early 1970s, when he worked as a construction supervisor for his father’s company.



The mesothelioma victim recalled working on sites in Sarasota, Florida, where he frequently inhaled the dust created by drywall joint compounds that had been sanded down and then swept up. He accused the company of negligently failing to warn of the dangers of the carcinogenic material despite having known of its dangers as early as 1964. He also pursued them of grounds of strict liability in the design of their product.



Decision in Mesothelioma Case Overturned on Appeal, then Reinstated



When Union Carbide appealed the original decision in the mesothelioma case, the appeals court hearing their argument agreed with the company's attorneys and overturned the jury’s decision. But the victim refused to accept that result and asked the Supreme Court of Florida to review the case. Upon analyzing the various arguments put forward by both sides, the higher court rejected the appeals court decision and reinstated the verdict. The mesothelioma victim will be able to keep the compensation that the original jury awarded him.

### Asbestos Company Points to Lapses in 90-Year-Old’s Memory to Have Mesothelioma Case Dismissed

The passage of time presents one of the biggest challenges for those pursuing a mesothelioma lawsuit. The disease has such a long latency period that several decades may pass between exposure to asbestos and the symptoms appearing, and in that time, memories of specific details can fade. In a recent case, an asbestos company attempted to use a 90-year-old’s lapses in memory to evade having to defend itself against charges of negligence, but the judge hearing the case denied their attempt.







Man Blames Mesothelioma on Second-Hand Exposure to Asbestos from Father’s Job



The mesothelioma lawsuit was filed by Mark Ricci, who had never worked with asbestos throughout his life. He blamed his malignant mesothelioma on asbestos carried into his childhood home on his father’s work clothes. The elder Mr. Ricci, Aldo, had worked with boilers decades earlier, and though he remembered having worked with numerous makes and models, some of the details that the 90-year-old offered during his deposition were contradictory. Boiler manufacturer Cleaver-Brooks based its motion for summary judgment on his inability to recall specifics.



The mesothelioma victim’s father had offered clear testimony regarding his long career as a draftsman engineer and engineer, and had provided a list of the many different manufacturers whose asbestos-contaminated boilers he had worked with. The testimony was in support of his son’s second-hand asbestos exposure claim, which said that the asbestos that his father had carried home on his clothes, skin, and hair had caused his illness.



Judge Cites Rules Regarding Summary Judgment in Mesothelioma Claim



In response to being named a defendant in the mesothelioma lawsuit, Cleaver-Brooks, Inc. noted that Mr. Ricci’s testimony had been unclear on direct examination, and that there were details that he could not remember regarding his personal contact with different equipment. Based on this, they asked for the case against them to be dismissed, but the judge hearing the case denied their request.



The judge noted that in order for a defendant to be dismissed from a mesothelioma lawsuit, they needed to show that there was an absence of facts to support their role in the illness. He said that the 90-year-old’s inability to remember a specific did not qualify as such, and that there were significant details for a jury to weigh. The judg allowed the case to move forward.

### Repairman’s Death Blamed on Asbestos from Radios

When Kenneth Anderson died of malignant mesothelioma, his widow Thelma filed a personal injury lawsuit against Motorola Solutions Inc. and Zenith Electronics, LLC. She argued that the companies’ radios were contaminated with asbestos, and that over the course of his career as a radio and television repairman he had inhaled that carcinogenic dust. Both companies filed for and were granted summary judgment based on the widow’s inability to establish proof that their products were at fault for her late husband's illness and death. An appeals court reversed this decision and permitted the case to move forward.







Widow Argues that Lower Court Should Not Have Dismissed her Mesothelioma Claim



In her petition to the Court of Appeals of Kentucky, the mesothelioma widow argued that her husband had testified to having worked on both companies’ equipment. She noted that both Motorola and Zenith acknowledged that their radios had contained asbestos heat shields, and that those shields generally were not replaced throughout the life of the product.



Additionally, she pointed to testimony by an industrial hygienist indicating that cleaning the radios during repair would have generated significant asbestos to which her husband would have been exposed. She also highlighted the testimony of her husband’s physician, who had asserted that the amount of asbestos the industrial hygienist estimated Mr. Anderson had breathed in over the years would have been more than enough to have caused his illness.



Court Agrees with Mesothelioma Widow, Reverses Summary Judgment Decision



In reviewing the mesothelioma widow’s argument, the judges of the appeals court agreed that there was sufficient proof of the companies' roles, and overturned the granting of summary judgment. They noted that though the evidence was circumstantial, in total it was probative enough to create genuine issues of material fact that warranted being reviewed and decided by a jury.

### Potential “Miscarriage of Justice” Causes Judge to Grant New Trial in Mesothelioma Claim

What happens when the attorney you hire to represent your mesothelioma claim falls so short of what he should do that a judge sees the outcome as a miscarriage of justice? In the case of Emily Everett’s survivors, it leads to a new trial.  







Judge Orders New Mesothelioma Trial Based on Additional Evidence and Attorney’s Failure



Emily Everett died of malignant mesothelioma after years of exposure to asbestos carried home on her ex-husband’s work clothing. She filed a personal injury claim against several of the defendants whose products the journeyman welder and boilermaker had worked with, and after her death in 2019 her case was carried on as a wrongful death claim by her children.



Foster Wheeler was one of the companies named in the mesothelioma lawsuit, and though the company is frequently named in asbestos cases, their attorneys argued successfully that the victim and her survivors had failed to provide evidence of specific causation.  The claim against them was dismissed, but with new evidence in hand, the victim’s children filed a motion for a new trial based on the additional information. The judge hearing the case denied their motion despite the new evidence, in large part because of errors made by their attorney in arguing the family's petition.



Mesothelioma Victim’s Children Continue Seeking Justice



In the face of these repeated losses, the mesothelioma victim’s children filed another appeal, this time asking for reconsideration of the judge’s decision. The appeals court judge hearing the case noted that the lower court judge’s denial had been the fault of the family’s attorney, who she said failed to grasp what was needed to address and correct the evidentiary issue in court.



In granting the mesothelioma case retrial, Judge Paula A. Brown of the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit agreed that the new information that the victim’s children had collected “would create a genuine issue of material fact as to causation.” She also pointed out that “when a trial judge is convinced by his examination of the facts that the judgment would result in a miscarriage of justice, a new trial should be ordered.” The family will have another chance at justice.

### California Man Awarded $18.8 Million in Mesothelioma Claim Against Johnson & Johnson

Though almost all of the asbestos-based claims against Johnson & Johnson have been put on hold by the company’s ongoing bankruptcy litigation, a single mesothelioma lawsuit was allowed to move forward because of the plaintiff’s dire condition. This week, a California jury resolved that claim, ordering the manufacturer of the iconic baby powder product to pay Emory Hernandez Valadez $18.8 million in compensation for his medical expenses, pain, and suffering.







Victim Blames Baby Powder Used On Him as an Infant for his Fatal Mesothelioma Diagnosis



Mr. Valadez is just 24 years old and has been diagnosed with malignant pericardial mesothelioma that he blames on his childhood and lifelong exposure to Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder. The six-week trial included his testimony as well as testimony from his mother, who had used the product on him as an infant. Anna Camacho cried as she explained that she had used the product on him when he was an infant and beyond, and as she described the impact of his fatal illness on him and on their family.  



Johnson & Johnson’s attorneys argued vehemently against being held responsible for Valadez’ mesothelioma, asserting that there was no evidence that pericardial mesothelioma is caused by exposure to asbestos, or even that he had been exposed to asbestos-contaminated powder. The jury clearly rejected their defense, though they chose not to award the victim punitive damages.



Johnson & Johnson Bankruptcy Litigation Will Stall Mesothelioma Victim Receiving Payment



The mesothelioma victim’s ability to access the $18.8 million award will be significantly hampered by the ongoing argument over Johnson & Johnson having assigned their asbestos liability to a newly formed subsidiary, then having that subsidiary declare bankruptcy. There are currently over 60,000 outstanding asbestos-related claims against the company that are awaiting the resolution of that issue.

### Difference Between Salvage and Skilled Labor Allows Mesothelioma Claim to Move Forward

Before it became known that asbestos causes malignant mesothelioma, the material was widely used in a variety of applications including as insulation in commercial boilers. Boiler manufacturer Cleaver-Brooks, Inc. was recently named in a personal injury suit seeking compensation for plumber Ernest G. Smith’s diagnosis with the rare form of cancer. Though the company attempted to evade liability by pointing to a decision in a similar case filed by a salvager, the judge in the case noted the difference between the work done by a skilled laborer and that done by an individual whose work involves indiscriminate actions.







Plumber’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos in Cast-Iron Sectional Boilers



In the mesothelioma lawsuit filed against boiler manufacturer Cleaver-Brooks, Inc. by Ernest G. Smith and his wife, the couple point to his work disassembling the company’s boilers between 1984 and 1989. The company initially responded by arguing that since they’d only begun manufacturing the boilers in 1985, the equipment that Smith worked with would not have been old enough to require the type of work that he described in his claim. Expert witnesses debunked this assertion, and the company’s petition for summary judgment was dismissed.



The company then filed a second motion for summary judgment, arguing that the mesothelioma claim against them should be dismissed because a judge in a separate case had dismissed an asbestos claim filed by a salvager. That dismissal had been based upon the asbestos company having successfully argued that the salvager’s exposure to the substance within the boiler could not have been foreseen.



Judge Notes Difference Between Foreseeability of Asbestos Exposure in Two Different Mesothelioma Victims



In her decision regarding Cleaver-Brooks’ second motion for summary judgment, Judge Sherry Klein Heitler of the Supreme Court of the State of New York acknowledged her colleague’s decision in the salvager’s mesothelioma claim, but noted the significant difference between the foreseeability of a plumber’s exposure to asbestos and to that of a person whose job “consisted of ripping, cutting, breaking, and smashing, anything he could to salvage the desired metal for his employer.”



While sympathetic to the salvager’s mesothelioma diagnosis, she said that Mr. Smith’s “skillful preparation of boiler equipment for removal was an integral, direct, necessary, and therefore foreseeable aspect of product replacement projects,” and that therefore the company can be held liable for its failure to warn of the dangers that his job presented.

### Judge Allows Widow’s $5 Million Mesothelioma Award to Stand

When Thomas Glenn died of malignant mesothelioma, his widow Rita filed claims against several companies that she accused of negligently exposing him to mesothelioma. Among them was Fisher Controls International, and that company was the only one that refused to settle out of court. When the jury decided against Fisher and assessed them millions of dollars in damages, the company appealed the decision, asking the court to review and reverse it.







Mesothelioma Victim Worked at Nuclear Station



From the mid-1970s through the 1990s, Thomas had worked as an instrument technician at the Oconee Nuclear Station in South Carolina, and his widow argued that it was exposure to the valves that Fisher Controls supplied to the power station that led to his mesothelioma. She presented evidence at court that the company’s gaskets were contaminated with asbestos, and that his close proximity to other workers who were removing and replacing those parts put him at risk.



Though the company asserted that their gaskets could not have caused Thomas’ mesothelioma because the asbestos that they contained was encapsulated, the jury decided against them. They found Fisher guilty of the charges against them and ordered the company to pay the widow $3 million in wrongful death damages, survival damages, and loss of consortium. They also held that Fisher’s actions made them deserving of having to pay and additional $2.1 million in punitive damages.



Judge Upholds Jury’s Decision in Mesothelioma Claim



In response to the jury’s finding that there was “clear and convincing evidence” that they had behaved in a way that was “willful, wanton, or reckless,” Fisher appealed the decision and the award, but the Court of Appeals of South Carolina denied their request for reversal. Upon review of all of the evidence presented at trial, they decided that the lower court’s actions had been appropriate, that all expert testimony provided had been admissible, and that the verdict was consistent with the information that the jury heard. They also found that the company’s attorneys had acted in bad faith with regard to certain discovery issues and had taken no action to correct their improper behaviors.

### Defendant in Ohio Mesothelioma Lawsuit Accuses Widow of Form of Fraud

Despite its co-defendants having acknowledged selling asbestos-contaminated products to which a mesothelioma victim would have been exposed, a talc mine accused the widow suing them of a form of fraud meant to keep her case based in the state courts. Despite Vanderbilt Minerals’ attempt to remove the personal injury claim to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, the judge hearing the case denied the company’s request.







Plumber’s Mesothelioma Death Leads to Lawsuit



The mesothelioma lawsuit was filed by Carolyn Keiser, whose husband David died of the rare asbestos-related disease in 2021. Her claim, which was filed in her local Ohio court, named three companies as defendants: Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC, Donald McKay Smith, Inc. (DMS), and Red Seal Electric Company. While the latter two were based in Ohio, Vanderbilt was based in another state. 



In response to being accused of causing Mr. Keiser’s mesothelioma death, Vanderbilt Minerals attempted to have the case removed to federal court, accusing the widow of a form of fraud that consists of falsely including a local defendant or defendants in order to keep the case heard in local court. This is known as fraudulent joinder.



Court Denies Asbestos Company’s Attempt to Remove Mesothelioma Case to Federal Court



In considering the widow’s argument against Vanderbilt’s removal of her mesothelioma claim, Judge James S. Gwin gauged whether the two Ohio-based defendants had actually been included without “reasonable basis for predicting recovery.” He determined that because both companies had a previously acknowledged history of having having sold asbestos-containing products to which Mr. Keiser might have been exposed, her recovery from them was possible, and therefore fraudulent joinder was not applicable. The widow’s case will remain in the local court where she originally filed her claim.

### Safe Work Space at Issue in Mesothelioma Lawsuit

Mario Ferrari was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma following years of exposure to asbestos. When his son filed a personal lawsuit on behalf of his parents’ estate, he named a general contractor called Structure Tone as a defendant, accusing the company of negligence in the way that they had managed the carcinogenic material on their work sites. In petitioning the court to have the case against them dismissed, the company argued that they’d never used asbestos-contaminated products, but their executive’s testimony on the subject was later proven to be insufficient to support summary judgment.







Worksite Asbestos Blamed for Malignant Mesothelioma



The lawsuit filed by the mesothelioma victim’s son accused Structure Tone of negligence in maintaining a safe work environment. Mr. Ferrari had provided deposition testimony that he had worked on twenty to thirty different job sites under the company's control, and had breathed in asbestos dust that its employees and subcontractors had created while sweeping up the remnants of asbestos-contaminated insulation and joint compound.  He charged the company with negligently failing to provide a safe work environment.



In response to the mesothelioma lawsuit, the company first wrongly asserted that Mr. Ferrari had indicated he had only worked on two sites with Structure Tone employees and that no asbestos was used there. In fact, it was later shown that he’d said that those two sites were the only ones for which he could remember addresses, but that he had worked on dozens of sites that Structure Tone had controlled, and where he remembered asbestos being swept up.



Company’s Executive Provides Insufficient Testimony to Have Case Dismissed



In addition to getting the facts of Mr. Ferrari’s testimony wrong, Structure Tone submitted erroneous testimony from their own company executive in the mesothelioma lawsuit. While John T. White asserted that Structure Tone could not have been responsible for Mr. Ferrari’s illness because no asbestos had ever been used on their site by any of their employees or subcontractors, careful cross examination revealed that he had never asked any of their subcontractors whether they'd used asbestos-containing materials, thus raising a significant issue of fact. The case will move forward for a jury to decide.

### Mesothelioma Victim Awarded $5 Million After Summer Job Exposed him to Asbestos

As a teenager, Joseph Muir never dreamed that his summer job at the plastics plant where his father worked would lead to a diagnosis with malignant mesothelioma. But between his two years working at Durez Plastics in North Tonawanda, plus exposure to asbestos carried home on his father’s work clothes, he was stricken with the fatal disease. A New York jury awarded him over $5 million from the mining company that had supplied the plant with the carcinogenic material.







Asbestos Mining Company is No-Show at Mesothelioma Trial



Malignant mesothelioma is caused by exposure to asbestos, and many of those who are diagnosed with the rare and fatal form of cancer take legal action against the asbestos companies that they accuse of negligently exposing them to the toxic substance. In Mr. Muir’s case, the asbestos used by the plant where he and his father worked came from Hedman Resources Limited.



The Canadian company has been named in hundreds of mesothelioma and asbestos-related lawsuits, and has paid out millions to victims. By the time Mr. Muir was diagnosed they had exhausted their primary insurance coverage and released their secondary insurers from liability for outstanding and future asbestos claims.  This action did nothing to prevent Hedman from being named a defendant by victims, or from their own responsibility for failing to protect or warn Mr. Muir or others from the dangers of their product. But in response to the victim’s claims, the company did not appear at its own trial



Jury Assigns $5 Million in Mesothelioma Damages to Absent Asbestos Company



Though Hedman had previously litigated many asbestos lawsuits, the company opted out of defending itself against the mesothelioma victim’s claim. The plaintiff was there with his attorneys and the jury heard plenty of evidence about the exposure and damage that Muir suffered and of Hedman’s knowledge of the dangers of asbestos. After hearing testimony and noting that Hedman had not bothered to defend itself or even to show up, the jury ordered the absent company to pay the victim $2,795,103 for his future lost wages and anticipated medical expenses, $500,000 for his anticipated medical expenses, and $1.75 million for his past pain and suffering.

### Mesothelioma and Asbestos Victims on St. Croix Benefit from $106 Million Hess Settlement

The U.S. Virgin Islands are not generally associated with sickness and death, but residents of St. Croix have suffered for years from asbestosis, mesothelioma, and other asbestos-related diseases. Their illnesses came from having worked at the asbestos-contaminated Limetree Bay refinery on the island’s south shore. For years there have been lawsuits and litigation surrounding the plant, and last month the company’s owner, Hess, finally agreed to a settlement that will put $106 million into a trust for the former refinery workers and their families.







Former Refinery Workers Diagnosed with Mesothelioma



The settlement will benefit those diagnosed with mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases as well as those not yet diagnosed and those who have lost family members. It comes after decades of litigation surrounding the Limetree Bay refinery, which operated from 1965 to 1998 and is said to have exposed countless residents and workers in St. Croix to asbestos and other carcinogenic materials. The refinery was operated by Hess and its subsidiaries, and then later sold to Hovensa. It was finally closed in 2012, though there have been attempts to reopen it.



Since 1987, over 1,500 mesothelioma victims and others have sought compensation from the oil company, and in response Hess’ subsidiary HONX filed for bankruptcy to protect the company’s billions in assets from asbestos claimants. The settlement will set aside $90 million for those who have already filed lawsuits against the company, $15 million for those who may yet file claims if they are diagnosed with asbestos-related diseases in the future, and $1 million to cover administrative costs. The company has also agreed to provide an additional $10 million if future claims exceed the $15 million that has already been agreed to within the trust’s first seven years of operation.



Settlement Blocks Future Mesothelioma or Asbestos-Related Action



In agreeing to the settlement, mesothelioma victims and the company agreed that this action will preclude any future lawsuits filed against the company for asbestos exposure from the refinery. For those who file claims, the trust will determine compensation based on disease level, duration of asbestos exposure, and the severity of the individual claimant’s condition.

### Repeated Second-Hand Asbestos Exposure Cited in Woman’s Mesothelioma Lawsuit

Though malignant mesothelioma has long been considered an occupational disease, in recent years many people — and particularly women — have been diagnosed with asbestos-related diseases that come from other sources of exposure. While some cases are caused by asbestos contamination of talc powder products that victims have used throughout their lives, others are blaming asbestos that was carried into their homes on the clothes, skin, and hair of family members who worked with or near the toxic material.







Mesothelioma Victim’s Relatives and Husband Inadvertently Exposed Her to Asbestos



In 2020, Linda Crossland got the news that her troubling symptoms were caused by malignant mesothelioma, a rare and aggressive form of cancer that is caused by exposure to asbestos. Though she'd never worked with the material, she recalled that her childhood driveway was made with asbestos concrete, and that her father, uncle, and husband all worked at the asbestos-contaminated Avondale Shipyards from the 1950s through the 1970s. She also learned that her husband had been exposed to asbestos while working for Woodward Design & Build LLC.



Mrs. Crossland filed a mesothelioma lawsuit against many of the companies she blames for her second-hand exposure to asbestos, including her husband’s former employer. She accused them of negligence for having failed to protect him, and her, from exposure to the toxic material.



Company’s Motion to Dismiss Mesothelioma Claim Denied



Upon hearing Woodward Design & Build’s objection to having been named in Mrs. Crossland’s lawsuit, Judge Sarah S. Vance of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana allowed them to evade strict liability charges, but sided with the victim regarding her allegations that the company had failed in its duty of care. She pointed to evidence that Mr. Crossland had been exposed to asbestos dust from the materials he worked with, and that employers “owe a duty not just to their employees, but also  to their employees’ household family members.”



Additionally, the judge denied the companies’ attempt to block testimony from Mrs. Crossland’s expert witnesses, who were prepared to testify regarding how her husband’s exposure to asbestos-contaminated pipe insulation would have ended up causing her malignant mesothelioma. The case will move forward to be heard by a jury.

### “Egregious” Behavior by Ford’s Attorney Leads to Reopening Mesothelioma Trial

Malignant mesothelioma is a devastating illness, and those left behind suffer tremendous emotional pain and sorrow. Even in the midst of adversarial court hearings, those mourners are owed respect and fair treatment, but an attorney representing Ford Motor Company in a mesothelioma lawsuit treated a victim’s son so unfairly that the judge hearing the case agreed that a new trial should be held. An appeals court agreed, calling the lawyer’s actions “deeply troubling and egregious.”







Questionable Legal Move in Mesothelioma Lawsuit Created “Tactical Disadvantage”



After an Illinois jury ruled in favor of Ford Motor Company in a mesothelioma lawsuit filed by Trudy LaFever, the judge hearing the case agreed that the auto giant’s attorney had behaved so egregiously that the widow should be granted a new trial.  Though Ford appealed this decision, the Appellate Court of Illinois noted that the lower court judge was in the best position to have made that decision, and that his decision would stand.



Mrs. LaFever had filed a personal injury claim against Ford following the mesothelioma death of her husband, Steve. The victim had worked with the company’s replacement brakes for years, and she accused them of negligence: she noted that though the company had warned its own employees and its dealers’ employees about the dangers posed by their brakes, they had failed to provide the same warning to others, including her husband. Mr. LaFever died of peritoneal mesothelioma, leaving behind Trudy and their son.



Mesothelioma Trial Impacted by “Skullduggery” Regarding Evidence



After the jury ruled in Ford’s favor, the mesothelioma widow appealed to the judge who had heard the case, asking for a new trial. Her request was based upon the auto company’s attorney having broken a previously agreed-to rule about the presentation of evidence. Both sides in the case had agreed about the presentation of evidence and documents, yet when Ford’s attorney interviewed Mr. LaFever’s son, he presented him with photographs that the son had not known about, catching him off guard and confusing him. The same lawyer also hinted that the victim had known about asbestos’ dangers from warnings provided by other brake manufacturers when that was not the case.  



Though the mesothelioma widow had requested a mistrial when these actions took place, the judge ruled against that option, but later agreed that what he called “skullduggery” warranted a retrial. After the appeals court agreed, the widow will have a chance to have her claim heard again in a fairer way.

### Mesothelioma Widow Asks Court to End Ford Motor Company’s Redundant Petitions

After years of legal battles and multiple hearings, mesothelioma widow Laura Walls was finally able to present her husband’s story to a jury and get justice from Ford Motor Company. But despite repeated losses, the automotive giant is continuing to fight its responsibility for having exposed Robie Walls to asbestos in its truck brake parts. This recalcitrance has forced Mrs. Walls to continue her legal fight.







$275,000 Mesothelioma Award Is Too Much for Ford to Accept



Laura Walls filed suit against Ford and several other companies after her husband Robie died of malignant mesothelioma. Her claim detailed more than five decades of exposure to asbestos, beginning with the years during the 1950s when he had served in the U.S. Navy and then moving on to the decades of working for an array of employers as a tractor-trailer fleet mechanic.



Ford Motor Company was among the defendants named in her original mesothelioma lawsuit. In response to Mrs. Robie having pointed to asbestos-contaminated dust from the company’s replacement brakes and clutches for her late husband’s illness, the company denied responsibility, and indicated that her case was not even appropriate for court. Their attorneys filed multiple petitions to have the case dismissed and to block testimony from her expert witnesses.



Despite Multiple Losses in Court, Ford Files Yet Another Petition to Dismiss Mesothelioma Claim



Following all of these appeals and motions, a jury finally heard the mesothelioma lawsuit and assigned Ford responsibility for $275,000 in damages, and another $67,000 in interest. Instead of acknowledging their repeated losses, the company has filed yet another petition. They are asking the judge to overturn the verdict, making the same arguments that it has made — and lost — in the past. Mrs. Walls has responded to the company’s latest legal action by asking the court to deny the company’s petition.

### Lifetime of Talc Exposure Blamed for 42-Year-Old’s Malignant Mesothelioma Death

According to a lawsuit filed by Christopher Campise, his brother Jeffrey died of malignant mesothelioma after a lifetime of exposure to asbestos. Rather than coming from his workplace as is often the case, the 42-year-old’s exposure came from the talc products his mother used on herself and on him when he was a baby, and that he used himself as a young man. Though talc supplier Whitaker, Clark, & Daniels asked to be dismissed from the case, their petition for summary judgment was denied and the case will move forward.







Lawsuit Describes Talc Products Blamed for Mesothelioma Victim’s Death



Whitaker, Clark & Daniels was not the only company named in the mesothelioma lawsuit. Mr. Campise’s family cited various companies whose talc products he had been exposed to since the time he was born, including a variety of powder products that his mother had used on herself and on him.



The victim’s malignant mesothelioma was blamed on the Caldesene powder that had been used during his diaper changes as well as the talcum and body powder that his mother had used on herself and to which he was frequently exposed. Avon Imari, Avon Skin So Soft, Jean Nate talcum powder, and Chanel No. 5 Body Powder were all popular products, as was the Gold Bond Medicated Powder he used himself once he began engaging in athletics as a teen. Whitaker, Clark, and Daniels admittedly sold talc to each of those companies.



Mesothelioma Victim’s Family Seeks Economic and Punitive Damages from Talc Supplier



In their motion to have the mesothelioma case against them dismissed, the talc company pushed back on the notion that talc causes malignant mesothelioma. They also pointed to the fact that other companies had also provided some of the talc that the powder companies had used, and argued that Mr. Campise had not been exposed to enough talc to have caused his illness. Though the judge rejected these arguments and allowed the case to move forward, they agreed with the company that they should not be subject to a punitive damages award: this was because the company had consistently tested their product for safety.

### Following Settlement Between Federal Defendant and Mesothelioma Plaintiff, Judge Returns Wrongful Death Claim to State Court

Monique Mohammed’s father, Alvin Fiffie, died of malignant mesothelioma following years of having worked around and with asbestos. She filed a wrongful death claim against those she held responsible for his death, and her case was successfully removed to federal court by Avondale Shipyards. When Ms. Mohammed settled with Avondale, only state-level defendants remained and she asked for the case to be returned to Louisiana’s state courts. Though one defendant objected, a judge agreed with the victim’s daughter.







Avondale Shipyard Named in Mesothelioma Claim



Like many Louisiana residents diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, Alvin Fiffie had worked at the Avondale Shipyards, where he was exposed to asbestos. Because much of the work that Avondale performed was done on behalf of the U.S. government, it frequently removes cases that it has been named in to federal court.



When the shipyard and Ms. Mohammed agreed to a settlement of her mesothelioma claim, she requested that the case be returned to state court. Though none of the other Louisiana-based defendants asserted any objections to this request, IMTT-Geismar did, forcing Ms. Mohammed to seek relief from the courts.



Mesothelioma Victim’s Daughter Requests Intervention from Court in Remanding Case to State Jurisdiction



On hearing the facts of the mesothelioma claim, District Judge Sarah S. Vance pointed out that the state court retained jurisdiction of all non-federal claims, and that since the laws and facts in the remaining cases were state based, it made more sense for the lawsuit to be remanded to the state court, which was more familiar with the applicable laws. She also that the company had not provided any legitimate reason against the state court’s ability to resolve the case fairly. Ms. Mohammed’s lawsuit will be heard in the state court as she requested.

### Mesothelioma Victim’s Widow Asks Court for Help with Asbestos Company

When Roland Cook was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, he blamed his deadly illness on asbestos exposure from the gaskets he had worked with throughout his career. He and his wife Linda filed a personal injury lawsuit against the gasket manufacturer before he died. Later, the asbestos company’s owner filed for bankruptcy and notified the widow that no funds had been set aside for claims like hers. In response, she filed suit and sought assistance from the courts.







Asbestos Company’s Bankruptcy Filing Would Cheat Mesothelioma Victims of Justice



The company that Roland Cook blamed for his malignant mesothelioma was a predecessor to Reinz Wisconsin Gasket, LLC. He was not the only one who was harmed by the manufacturer’s asbestos-contaminated products. Faced with multiple asbestos claims, the company filed for bankruptcy and notified Mrs. Cook that no assets had been set aside for creditors or claimants.



The certificate of cancellation that Mrs. Cook received came after her mesothelioma lawsuit had already been filed, while the case was pending in the judicial system. Upon receipt of the bankruptcy notification, she filed a petition with the court that accused the company of non-compliance with bankruptcy laws and asked that a receiver be appointed and the certificate of cancellation of her claim be canceled.



Asbestos Company’s Argument Against Paying Mesothelioma Victims Subject of Petition



The mesothelioma widow filed a petition arguing that the company had still had assets when they filed for bankruptcy, and that they’d been obligated to set aside money for asbestos plaintiffs that had claims pending against them. Though the company pushed back and said that she did not have standing to seek the appointment of a receiver, the Court of Chancery of Delaware disagreed with that assertion.



The judge hearing the case agreed that Mrs. Cook had standing to request a receiver on behalf of her mesothelioma claim, and that the petition had provided sufficient evidence that the company had assets that it had failed to set aside when it filed for bankruptcy. Each side is now submitting the names of proposed receivers to assess the situation and determine how best to distribute assets to mesothelioma victims.

### Pointing to Combination of Products Increasing Risk of Injury, Court Denies Mesothelioma Defendant’s Appeal

Donald Jordonek died of malignant mesothelioma after years of exposure to asbestos from a number of sources. His estate sued the companies whose products he had worked with as an auto mechanic, including the company that manufactured brake lathes and grinders that he worked with while employed at a Goodyear Tire Service Center. The manufacturer argued against liability because their product did not contain asbestos, but the Superior Court of Delaware denied their request for dismissal from the case, noting that the combination of the company’s product with asbestos-containing parts created an increased risk of injury and a duty to warn.







Brake Grinding Company Files Motion to Be Dismissed from Mesothelioma Claim



In arguing against its liability for Mr. Jordonek’s malignant mesothelioma, Hennessy Industries (predecessor-in-interest to AMMCO Tools, Inc., which manufactured the brake grinder) argued that they had no duty to warn because their product did not contain asbestos. They asserted that the fault for an asbestos-related disease lays entirely with the company that provides the asbestos-containing part or supplies.



In its review of the case, the court noted that while the brake grinder’s argument was correct, it was also true that Ohio law established exceptions to that rule. Those exceptions require the mesothelioma victim to produce evidence that the original manufacturer recommended or required the use of an asbestos-contaminated part with its product, and therefore would have foreseen that asbestos products could later have been used with its product.



Judge Denies Brake Grinding Company’s Bid to Evade Mesothelioma Liability



In its ruling, the court noted a previous decision that applied to this particular mesothelioma case, writing, “the defendant’s product was intended to be used with another product for the very activity that created a hazardous situation. Where the intended use of a product inevitably creates a hazardous situation, it is reasonable to expect the manufacturer to give warnings.”



The judge concluded, “If an Ohio court is prepared to impose liability on a manufacturer where its products require the incorporation of another manufacturer’s product, it surely would impose liability when a combination of the two products increases the risk of injury.” The case will proceed for a jury to hear.

### Court’s Decision Points to Benefits of Experienced Representation in Mesothelioma Claims

When Roberto Elorreaga died of malignant pleural mesothelioma, his wife and sons continued pursuing his personal injury lawsuit. He’d filed claims against companies that either manufactured of supplied the asbestos-containing equipment to which he’d been exposed during his years working aboard U.S. Navy vessels and in Naval shipyards. Though the companies attempted to have the claims dismissed, the thoughtful legal approach that the family’s attorneys took to their filing defeated the companies' arguments against having the case heard.







Mesothelioma Claims Filing in Federal Court Made the Difference in Judge’s Decision



Malignant mesothelioma strikes those who have been exposed to asbestos, and a large percentage of mesothelioma lawsuits are filed by those who worked in shipyards or who served onboard Navy vessels. Because the asbestos that was used met government specifications, suppliers frequently argue that they are not liable because they were following U.S. instructions and had warned the government about the dangers of the materials. This is known as the government contractor defense.



The asbestos companies named in the Elorreaga family’s case attempted to use this defense against being held liable for his exposure, but their argument failed for one simple reason: the mesothelioma attorney that the family hired had encouraged them to file their claim under federal maritime law, and made a powerful argument in support of the case not being preempted there. While the government contractor defense can be used in state court, it does not apply in the venue that the attorney suggested, and the asbestos companies’ motion for summary judgment was denied.



Asbestos Companies’ Argument Regarding Causation in Mesothelioma Claim Also Denied



In addition to arguing that they should not be held liable for Mr. Elorreaga’s mesothelioma based on the government contractor defense, the asbestos companies also asserted a lack of sufficient evidence regarding their products’ role in his sickness and death. The judge denied this aspect of their motion as well, noting that “there are of course ‘inherent practical difficulties, given the long latency period of asbestos-related disease,’ in establishing causation from work performed several decades ago. Plaintiffs often lack direct evidence of causation, and often must rely on circumstantial evidence.”



The family’s case is continuing through the justice system.

### Mesothelioma Trial Sees Shipyard Face-Off Against Physician Testimony

Frank P. Ragusa spent over forty years working as a crane operator at the Avondale Shipyards, and as a result of asbestos exposure at his work site he was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma in 2021. The site’s owners are frequently named in victims’ personal injury lawsuits, and Mr. Ragusa included them in his own quest for justice. In response, the company argued that the expert witnesses enlisted to support his case should not be permitted to testify.







Experts Testify About Asbestos Exposure’s Role in Mesothelioma



It is common for mesothelioma victims to enlist the help of expert witnesses who can help a jury understand exactly how asbestos affects the body. It is also common for asbestos companies to argue against this testimony being admitted. Many argue that witnesses rely on an “every exposure” theory that has been debunked and which is frequently forbidden to be used. In Mr. Ragusa’s lawsuit, Avondale Shipyard argued that the two witnesses for Mr. Ragusa had employed that theory and that their testimony should be excluded.



The two witnesses that the mesothelioma victim had enlisted were radiation oncologist Dr. Stephen Terry Kraus and thoracic surgeon Dr. Rodney Landreneau. The shipyard asserted that both men had assumed that “each and every time” that Mr. Ragusa had been exposed, it could have caused his fatal illness. They argued that because the men had not provided a quantitative assessment of his exposure, their testimony should be struck.



Mesothelioma Lawsuit Judge Disagree with Shipyard’s Argument



The judges of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana reviewed the testimony that the two doctors provided on behalf of the mesothelioma victim. Their careful reading revealed that neither man had relied upon the “every exposure” theory and that they had simply testified that cumulative doses determine whether exposure is significant or not, and that the victim’s exposure was clearly far above what would be considered brief or low level. The testimony will be permitted, and the case will continue moving forward.

### Judge Permits Expert Testimony in Mesothelioma Wrongful Death Claim

Malignant mesothelioma is a rare form of cancer caused by exposure to asbestos. Victims and their survivors frequently file personal injury lawsuits against the companies they hold responsible for the exposure, and their claims are supported in court by a wide range of evidence.  Testimony from expert witnesses, who offer opinions based on scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge, also helps the jury understand the information being presented. In a recent case, General Electric attempted to have testimony by two expert witnesses excluded, but their request was denied by the judges hearing the case.







Asbestos Fibers from General Electric Turbines Cited as Cause of Mesothelioma



A personal injury lawsuit was originally filed by James Grant Gooding, who was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma after years of working as an engineer for the American Bureau of Shipping. His job involved performing inspections at Louisiana shipyards, where he was exposed to asbestos. Mr. Gooding died in 2020 and his claim was continued by his survivors.



Among the companies named in the mesothelioma lawsuit was General Electric, whose turbines onboard the SL5 ships he inspected were contaminated with asbestos fibers. The family submitted two expert witnesses to testify about the amount of asbestos that the turbines would have exposed him to. GE asked for their testimony to be excluded, arguing that it was irrelevant because they had no personal knowledge of Mr. Gooding’s actual exposure in the field.



 District Court Calls Expert Witness Testimony in Mesothelioma Case “Relevant”



The question of whether the expert witness’ testimony should be allowed was put to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, which considered General Electric’s argument that their opinions were “based on hypotheticals.” The court noted that the company’s own representative had raised a factual question about exposure that the mesothelioma victim might have suffered, and determined that because they both possessed specialized knowledge that would help a jury in its decision, their testimony should be allowed.

### Mesothelioma Victim Prevails Against Metalclad

In 2021, a California jury awarded mesothelioma victim Ronald Wilgenbusch and his wife Judith $2.5 million in economic and non-economic damages to be paid by Metalclad and several other companies. When the liability assignments were reapportioned after the trial, Metalclad was made responsible for almost half of the payment. Though the company appealed this decision, the Court of Appeals of California rejected their argument and upheld the trial court’s decision.







Exposure to Asbestos Insulation During Navy Service Blamed for Mesothelioma



During the original trial, the jury heard that Mr. Wilgenbusch’s mesothelioma had been caused by exposure to asbestos during the years he served in the U.S. Navy. Evidence was submitted that from 1956 through 1978 he worked around asbestos-containing products onboard the ships, including asbestos insulation sold by Metalclad.



The jury found Metalclad and the other companies named in the mesothelioma victim’s suit liable. They awarded the couple $795,000 in economic damages and $1.75 million in non-economic damages, and originally apportioned just 7 percent of the liability to Metalclad. The Wilgenbusch’s asked the court to adjust the assignment, making Metalclad liable for a greater portion of the damages because of their larger role in the chain of distribution of the asbestos. This raised the company’s responsibility to $1,012,044. The company appealed.



Appeals Court Upholds Apportionment of Mesothelioma Liability



When the Court of Appeals of California reviewed the details of the mesothelioma case, they noted that the jury had been given special instructions regarding liability and apportionment. They wrote, “The record shows that the trial court’s ruling is supported by the language of the verdict, the pertinent instructions, and the evidence.” Despite the company’s argument that the trial court had erred by refusing to limit the noneconomic damages award to the “small percentage of fault” that the jury attributed to Metalclad, the appeals court determined that the trial court’s construction of the special verdict was supported by the law and the evidence. The apportionment of damages was allowed to stand.

### Connecticut Jury Awards $20 Million to Mesothelioma Victim, Punitive Damages Still Being Considered

John Peckham was exposed to asbestos for just four months, but that was enough time for the mineral to do its damage and lead to the malignant mesothelioma that claimed his life. When he died eleven months after his diagnosis, his widow filed a lawsuit against the two companies she blamed for his exposure. After seven weeks of testimony, it took a Connecticut jury just two hours to award her and her family $20 million in damages. Punitive damages are still being considered.







Mesothelioma Death Traced to Temporary Work in 1960s



Mr. Peckham was just 76 years old when he died of malignant mesothelioma, a rare disease caused by exposure to asbestos. After his diagnosis, he was able to trace his exposure to work that he did in the 1960s for Stillwater Worsted Mill, replacing windows in a factory building.



Evidence submitted in the case showed that the mesothelioma victim had been assigned to chisel out dozens of individual window planes.  The work involved scraping out sealant and glaze that had been made by Vanderbilt Minerals and made and sold by DAP, Inc.  The DAP “33” window glazing that he removed, was contaminated with asbestos, and his exposure to and inhalation of the dust it created led to his fatal illness. The jury was also shown that both companies had been well aware of the dangers posed by the asbestos in their products but had done nothing to alert the public of the risk of exposure or of how to protect themselves.



$20 Million Mesothelioma Award Among Highest in State History



The $20 million personal injury amount is among the largest ever awarded in the state of Connecticut, and it may not be all that the mesothelioma victim’s family receives. While the two companies will each be required to pay half of the initial verdict, that portion of the decision only provided compensatory damages. The jury will still be asked to decide whether the two companies are liable for punitive damages.

### Despite Asbestos Company’s Objection, $10.4 Million Mesothelioma Award is Upheld

Is $10.4 million in damages unreasonable when it’s paid to two daughters who’ve lost their father to malignant mesothelioma? That’s the question that a Louisiana appeals court had to decide recently. A jury hearing a claim against Union Carbide Corporation awarded David Strauder Jr.’s daughters $4.85 million in survival damages, judicial interest dating back to the petition date, and another $2.75 million each in wrongful death damages. When the company appealed the verdict, the Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s decision.







Pipefitter’s Malignant Mesothelioma Death Left Daughters Bereft



The claim filed by Mr. Strauder’s adult daughters accused Union Carbide of negligence in having exposed him to asbestos. He had been a pipefitter from the 1960s to the 1980s, and had worked at various shipyards and industrial facilities where he worked with and was exposed to numerous products that were contaminated by asbestos. As part of the testimony in the trial, the jury heard of the extraordinarily close relationship between the father and his daughters, and of their significant mental distress at his suffering and his death.



Included in the testimony that the jury heard were details about how the daughters had both spent almost every day with the mesothelioma victim for several years, eating dinner with him and living within a few miles of his home. The two women had cared for him during his illness, taking him to doctor’s appointments and arranging for hospice care, and both were left in extreme distress by his death. The jury responded to this testimony by awarding the women a total of $5.5 million in wrongful death damages beyond compensation for economic damages.



Union Carbide Calls Mesothelioma Damages “Grossly Excessive”



In arguing against the mesothelioma verdict, Union Carbide argued that the evidence presented at court did not support the high dollar figure: they called it “wholly inconsistent” with previous damage awards and “grossly excessive.” In response, the court noted that juries are given a wide berth and vast discretion when it comes to what they provide to plaintiffs seeking compensation for wrongful death. The grieving women will be permitted to keep what the jury felt was appropriate for their loss.

### 3M, Dow, GE, and MetLife Face Claims from Two North Carolina Mesothelioma Victims

Some of the world’s biggest and best-known companies are facing litigation from two separate North Carolina families affected by malignant mesothelioma. August Adams and his wife Diane have asked the court to let them consolidate their claim with a claim filed by the widow of Clarence Greene in order to save time, money, and stress on all parties involved.







North Carolina Families Seek Consolidation of their Mesothelioma Lawsuits



Though Clarence Greene died in 2019 and August Adams is still fighting his disease, the way that the two mesothelioma victims were exposed to asbestos is extremely similar, and that is why they are asking the court to consolidate the cases they’ve filed against 3M Company, Dow Chemical, General Electric, and MetLife. Both August and Clarence spent the decades from the mid-1950s through the 1980s working at a DuPont plant in Kingston, North Carolina, and that is where they say they were exposed to asbestos.



While the corporate giants are arguing that the two mesothelioma claims are too different to be joined into a single trial, a representative for both families calls the cases “about as similar as any two cases could possibly be,” and asserts that “the burden on the court, jurors and parties can be significantly reduced through consolidation.”



Companies’ Negligence Blamed for Mesothelioma, While MetLife is Accused of Hiding Asbestos’ Dangers



Though the two mesothelioma victims worked in the plant in different capacities, each of their claims point to having been exposed to the same asbestos-contaminated equipment and materials in the same environment, during the same period of time. Both plaintiffs have also named MetLife Insurance as a defendant, alleging that the company conspired to cover up the risk posed by exposure to the carcinogenic material.



The federal judge overseeing both cases is currently considering the families’ petition, which reads in part, “The interests of judicial economy, and the parties’ convenience and expense all heavily favor consolidation by allowing them to combine the two claims into one.”

### Juries Must Decide Whether Boiler Manufacturer Deserves Punitive Damages in Mesothelioma Claims

A diagnosis with malignant mesothelioma represents the first in a  series of unhappy discoveries. Victims are quickly told that their illness is both painful and fatal. They also learn that their condition could have been prevented had manufacturers of equipment they worked with or around provided warnings about or protections from the asbestos hidden within. Many file lawsuits against those companies for their failure to act, and in some cases, they seek compensation beyond their actual costs, specifically meant to punish. Though punitive damages are not always appropriate, juries who are allowed to assign them often do so in very high dollar amounts.







Boiler Manufacturer Argues Against Punitive Damages for Two Mesothelioma Victims



Two recent rulings in a New York court regarding the same mesothelioma defendant make clear how avidly companies try to avoid being assessed punitive damages. Boiler manufacturer Burnham LLC is frequently named in asbestos lawsuits because of the asbestos insulation within their product. Those who worked with the boilers might have avoided breathing in asbestos fibers had they known of the dangers that the material posed, but despite being aware of the risks, Burnham never issued any warnings.



The company was named as a defendant in separate lawsuits filed by mesothelioma victims: one was a painter who worked on his own Burnham boiler for decades and also cleaned asbestos off of the company's boilers as part of his job, while the other was a mechanic’s helper and carpenter. The latter recalled dozens of times that he'd worked around boilers being demolished or installed. Both men’s claims sought punitive damages from Burnham.



Boiler Company’s Argument Against Mesothelioma Damages Deemed Insufficient to Dismiss



In its effort to avoid having the juries in these two mesothelioma lawsuits even consider punitive damages against them, Burnham enlisted testimony from an expert witness who spoke of the two men’s exposure levels. In two separate hearings, the company made the same argument — that based upon the witness’ testimony, their lack of warning did not rise to the standard required for punitive damages to be appropriate.



The court’s answers to the company’s argument was consistent, and points to the strength of the laws regarding punitive damages in mesothelioma claims. The judges noted that the testimony the company was relying upon did not accomplish what they'd hoped it would, as it had not met the standard for proving that they had not been grossly negligent. In both cases, the victims will be able to provide evidence to the jury in support of the company being held liable for punitive damages as well as other compensation.

### 3M Required to Pay Mesothelioma Victim’s Court Fees

Mesothelioma lawsuits can take years to pursue, and often present a rollercoaster of wins, losses, and draws. While victims are simply seeking justice, asbestos companies do everything in their power to stall and stand in the way in order to keep from having to pay. In a recent example, the legal action that 3M Company’s took was considered so unreasonable by the judge hearing the case that he ordered the company to pay the plaintiffs’ legal fees.







3M Attempts to Have Mesothelioma Claim Removed to Federal Court



Different courts have different reputations when it comes to their decisions in mesothelioma cases. Juries sitting on state courts tend to be more sympathetic to the plight of victims, and so asbestos companies work hard to have cases removed to federal court, but removal is only available under a few circumstances. The most common reason for removal is diversity, which refers to when none of the named defendants are located in the same state as the victim.   



When Gary Haeck was diagnosed with mesothelioma, he and his wife Elizabeth filed their lawsuit in California state court, naming 3M Company and several others as defendants. They settled with four of the defendants and a fifth filed a successful petition for summary judgment that resulted in the case against them being dismissed. This left no California defendants and 3M filed to have the case removed to federal court. The Haecks objected. They asked for the case to be remanded back to state court and for compensation for the costs of litigating an issue that an earlier Ninth Circuit decision had made clear, namely that because the fifth California defendant was removed from their claim involuntarily, the case should remain where it was filed.



3M’s Legal Position in Mesothelioma Case Went Against Precedent



In hearing the case, District Judge Edward Chen agreed with the mesothelioma victim, noting that the company’s removal to federal court had been without “an objectively reasonable basis” and ordering them to pay the couple’s attorney fees up to $5,000. The judge’s ruling particularly noted 3M’s acknowledgment of the conflict between their plea and the Ninth Circuit’s earlier decision, which he termed an “invitation to eschew a well-settled legal rule.”

### Talc Company to Pay $29 Million to 35-Year-Old Mesothelioma Victim

It took a South Carolina jury just four hours to agree that talc supplier Whittaker Clark & Daniels should pay a 35-year-old mesothelioma victim and her husband $29 million in damages. After four weeks of evidence of the company supplying asbestos-contaminated talc to Mary Kay cosmetics, the group was convinced of the company's negligence, and awarded the victim $4.1 million in past and future medical expenses and $20 million in past and future noneconomic damages. They also awarded $5 million for loss of consortium to her husband.







Jury Hears Weeks of Testimony Regarding Woman’s Mesothelioma



The case was held in South Carolina, where a jury heard 35-year-old Sarah Plant speak to her confusion after being diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma. The rare and fatal form of cancer is caused by exposure to asbestos, and the young woman struggled to identify a time when she had been near the mineral. It was only after hearing news reports of others sickened by asbestos-contaminated talc that she connected her illness to her lifelong use of cosmetic talc products.



Her original mesothelioma lawsuit named several defendants, but by the trial’s end makeup pigment company Color Techniques and Mary Kay Cosmetics had both settled out of court and the jury found talc manufacturer IMI Fabi innocent of the charges. That left only Whittaker Clark and Daniels. The jury determined that they were strictly liable and that they had breached an implied warranty in selling their products.



Talc Supplier Faces Multiple Mesothelioma Claims



This case is far from the first or last mesothelioma claim that Whittaker Clark and Daniels will face. The company has repeatedly been accused of knowing that its talc was contaminated with asbestos. Though its representatives have denied the existence of the carcinogenic material in its talc, and in this case argued that there was no proof that it was they were the sold supplier of talc in the products to which Mrs. Plant was exposed, they have frequently failed to convince juries at trial.

### Court Revives Mesothelioma Claim Against Avon

When Alicia Ramirez and her husband Fermin first filed a mesothelioma lawsuit against Avon Products, the company successfully had the case against them dismissed. Rather than giving up, the couple doubled down and appealed the court’s decision. After close examination, the California Court of Appeal for the Second District reversed the lower court’s decision and revived the couple’s quest for justice.







Mesothelioma Victim Blames Asbestos in Avon Powder for Terminal Illness



The mesothelioma victim and her husband have been pursuing Avon since she was first diagnosed with the rare and fatal disease. They blame asbestos in the company’s talc powder products for her illness, pointing to her three-decade-long daily use of Avon talcum products as well as exposure from the Avon talc products that her daughter used in their shared bathroom.



Avon responded to the mesothelioma claim with a declaration from Lisa Gallo, vice president of global innovation, research, and development, stating that she had investigated whether the company had knowledge of asbestos in their product and had found none. Her statement, as well as documents prepared by employees of the company, supported the company’s motion for summary judgment, which was granted by Los Angeles Superior Court Judge David S. Cunningham III.



Evidence Submitted in Mesothelioma Claim Called Hearsay



In the face of their mesothelioma claim against Avon being dismissed, the Ramirez’ chose to appeal Judge Cunningham’s decision. They argued that Ms. Gallo had not begun working for Avon until 1994 and could have no personal knowledge of what the company had done or known prior to her arrival, and that an independent review conducted in her role did not comport with California’s rules of evidence. They also argued that the documents prepared by the company employees were hearsay and not admissible.



In its reversal of the lower court’s decision, the appeals court went beyond simply agreeing with the mesothelioma victim: they referred to Avon’s complaint about the rules of evidence being applied as “nonsense.” In writing for the court, presiding Justice Maria E. Stratton wrote, “What Avon is in effect suggesting is that if a party deposes a corporate entity, the corporate entity is no longer bound by the rules of evidence at any subsequent trial or hearing. This is simply nonsense.”

### University of Pittsburgh’s Effort to Stop Engineer’s Mesothelioma Claim Fails

The quest for justice following a diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma is always a challenge, but this can be especially true when the entity blamed for asbestos exposure is an employer. Though these cases can be difficult due to Workers Compensation laws, a case heard recently by the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court saw the family of an engineer who died from the rare form of cancer prevail in its claim against the University of Pittsburgh.







Mesothelioma Claims Engineer’s Life After Decades of Work at University of Pittsburgh



Mesothelioma victim William Herold spent the years between 1976 and 2015 working as an engineer for the University of Pittsburgh. Following his death, his family included the state school among the defendants in its lawsuit seeking compensation.



In response to the mesothelioma lawsuit, the school filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that the exclusivity provision of the Occupational Disease Law limited the family’s remedy against them to filing a Workers’ Compensation claim. This motion was denied by an Allegheny County, Pennsylvania court. The school then appealed that decision.



Appeals Court Denies University of Pittsburgh’s Attempt to Evade Mesothelioma Claim



Though Workers’ Compensation laws do usually protect employers from having to defend themselves against personal injury claims, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth court noted that the rules are different in cases of mesothelioma, where long latency periods are common.  The court said that Workers’ Compensation rules that protect employers from personal injury  litigation only apply to occupational illnesses that manifest within four years of workplace exposure.



The court explained that because Mr. Herold was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2019 and that his claim was for exposure to asbestos-contaminated products that occurred prior to 2004, the case could proceed. In their ruling the judges wrote, “We conclude that the legislature did not intend for employees suffering from an occupational disease that manifests outside the ODA’s four-year limitations period to surrender their rights.”

### Mesothelioma Victim Takes Action to Reverse Georgia Pacific Bankruptcy Move

In recent years, asbestos companies have added insult to injury by trying to evade mesothelioma victims’ personal injury claims through a complex bankruptcy maneuver known as a “Texas Two-Step.”  After a recent attempt by Johnson & Johnson was rejected by the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals, a man who blames Georgia-Pacific for his asbestos-related illness is taking action to overturn that company’s 2017 bankruptcy filing.







Georgia-Pacific’s 2017 Bankruptcy Filing Meant to Evade Mesothelioma Claims



Wilson Buckingham was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma in 2020, and filed suit against Georgia-Pacific for having exposed him to asbestos. But he quickly learned that in 2017 the company had moved its asbestos liabilities into a subsidiary called Bestwall, and that immediately afterward the newly formed company filed for bankruptcy protection. This legal maneuver is controversial, as it puts those seeking compensation from the company at a significant disadvantage.



Johnson & Johnson recently pursued the same “Texas Two-Step” strategy, forming LTL Management and then having it file for bankruptcy protection from the tens of thousands of asbestos claims filed by people diagnosed with mesothelioma and ovarian cancer after using its baby powder product. That move was initially approved by a bankruptcy judge, but then overturned by the higher court.  In light of the asbestos plaintiffs’ victory in that case, Mr. Buckingham is attempting to have Georgia-Pacific’s maneuver overturned as well.



Court Sides with Mesothelioma Victims, Says “No Signs of Financial Distress”



In its decision, the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals noted that though Johnson & Johnson’s maneuver indicated that subsidiary LTL needed bankruptcy protection, the newly-formed company showed “no signs of financial distress at the time of the filing.” While asbestos plaintiffs have previously attempted to have the Georgia-Pacific/Bestwall bankruptcy dismissed, Mr. Buckingham hopes to leverage the court’s LTL Management decision as he asks for reconsideration.



To support his argument, Mr. Buckingham intends to note that while Bestwall has assured the mesothelioma victims that they will see justice, nothing has been provided over the past five years, and that in just the last year, the allegedly “financially distressed” company paid nearly $2.5 billion in dividends to its parent company.

### Judge in New York Mesothelioma Case Clarifies Role of Punitive Damages

When a loved one dies of malignant mesothelioma, it is natural for those left behind to seek justice from those who exposed them to the asbestos that led to their disease. This is especially true if the entity at fault was aware of asbestos’ dangers, as happened in a case recently heard in New York: a family asked the court to consider extra punishment for the consequences of the defendant’s inactions. Though the asbestos company objected, the judge noted that this was exactly what punitive damages were meant to deliver.







Plumber’s Mesothelioma Death Blamed on Company’s Neglect



The mesothelioma lawsuit was filed by the widow of James Scheriff. Mr. Scheriff spent years working as  a plumber, and his duties involved installing, removing, and maintaining asbestos-contaminated boilers manufactured by Burnham LLC.



The suit filed against the company sought both compensation for the economic and noneconomic damages imposed by Mr. Scheriff’s mesothelioma and punitive damages intended to punish the company for its failure to warn of asbestos' dangers. The widow based her quest for punitive damages on proof that the company had known of the dangers that their product caused, yet had failed to do anything to protect against those dangers.



Company’s Objection to Punitive Damages in Mesothelioma Claim Shut Down



Burnham LLC filed a motion, asking the New York courts to remove the claim for punitive damages from the widow’s mesothelioma lawsuit, but Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York County denied their motion.  Though the company argued that the evidence against them was insufficient to justify punitive damages, the judge noted that that New York law established that those damages are appropriate when “the actor has intentionally done an act of an unreasonable character in disregard of a known or obvious risk that was so great as to make it highly probable that harm would follow and has done so with conscious indifference to the outcome.” 



He went on to quote a precedent-setting New York case that explained that “the purpose of punitive damages is not to compensate the plaintiff but to punish the defendant for wanton and reckless, malicious acts and thereby to discourage the defendant and other people, companies from acting in a similar way in the future.”  Based on the evidence that the widow presented of the company’s knowledge of the dangers posed by their product, the judge will allow her to continue her quest for justice.

### Following $36.5 Million Verdict, Asbestos Victim Pursues Further Legal Action

Delaying legal proceedings is a strategy that’s frequently used by asbestos companies facing mesothelioma litigation. The tactic takes advantage of the physical, emotional, and financial toll that asbestos-related diseases take on victims, pushing them to accept settlements that are lower than what they would likely be awarded in court. Knowing this, an asbestos victim who recently won $36.5 million in damages from a Libby, Montana mine’s insurance company following a protracted legal battle is now pursuing further action accusing the company of “opportunistic breach.”







Asbestos Victim's Second Lawsuit Accuses Company of Actions Motivated by Greed



Ralph V. Hutt’s $36.5 million jury award is viewed as a victory for him as well as many others who blame their mesothelioma and other illnesses on W.R. Grace & Co. The Libby, Montana mine exposed countless people to asbestos. His original suit against their insurer, Zurich American Insurance Company, accused them of conspiring with the company to hide the dangers of the carcinogenic material.



Though the jury agreed with Mr. Hutt and awarded him $6.5 million in damages and an additional $30 million for Zurich having conspired with its client, the process of reaching that verdict took an extended period of time because of the company’s legal maneuverings. Mr. Hutt is now seeking redress for these delays, which he says were purposeful and meant to force him to settle and to lead the company’s other victims with mesothelioma to accept settlements as well. He notes that in the time it took to reach the verdict, the company earned far more in profits than they would ever be required to pay out to victims.



Opportunistic Breach Accusation Follows Bellweather Asbestos Decision



Though the significant jury award is considered a positive sign for other W. R. Grace & Co. mesothelioma victims seeking to follow in Mr. Hutt’s legal footsteps, his subsequent claim notes the price that he paid as a result of the legal process’ extended timeline. He accuses the company of having delayed the outcome on purpose. This is known as opportunistic breach.



According to Mr. Hutt’s attorneys, “Zurich used leveraging designed to exploit Hutt’s vulnerable position through withheld medical expense and low-ball offers,” denying his claims for basic healthcare services including supplemental oxygen. They accuse the company of having done so to weaken his resolve. In their summation, Mr. Hutt’s attorneys wrote, “Because Hutt and similarly situated Libby Asbestos Claimants require the settlement money to pay for medical expenses, to otherwise address the harm arising from their asbestos injuries, and to secure a just resolution within their lifetimes, Zurich’s commodity profit scheme literally makes profit a function of human suffering.”

### Mesothelioma Victim Points to Asbestos Exposure While Working as School Engineer

The Supreme Court of New York recently denied the arguments of an asbestos manufacturer that was attempting to evade responsibility for a man’s death from malignant mesothelioma. The court wrote that pump manufacturer Milton Roy was attempting “to circumvent the standards of summary judgment” by offering testimony from a person with no knowledge of the actual facts, as well as by offering arguments before they were legally appropriate.







Man’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos in Pump Gaskets



The case centered on the mesothelioma death of Thomas N. Wixted. Mr. Wisted had served in several positions at the Suffolk State School in New York, including several years as senior stationary engineer. In that role, he supervised the removal and replacement of gaskets on Milton Roy pumps which his widow argues were contaminated with asbestos



In their motion for summary judgment, the pump manufacturer argued both that there was insufficient evidence that Mr. Wixted had been exposed to sufficient asbestos from their parts to have caused his malignant mesothelioma, and that the parts that they sent to the school did not contain asbestos.



Court Denies Asbestos Company’s Arguments in Mesothelioma Lawsuit



In responding to the asbestos company’s motions, the court noted the testimony provided by Daniel Stoffel, a fireman for the school who had said that Mr. Wixted was always present and supervising the work he did, which included removing asbestos insulation on pumps during gasket removal. The widow’s attorney noted that the company’s attorneys were inappropriately offering their argument at the wrong time in the court proceeding.



The attorney also noted that the testimony provided by the company about the absence of asbestos in their products was being offered by a company representative whose tenure with the company did not overlap Mr. Wixted’s time there, and that he could have no real knowledge of whether the mesothelioma victim had been exposed to asbestos-contaminated parts more than a decade earlier. The court agreed and the case will be able to be heard by a jury.

### Judge Cites Insufficiency of Porsche’s Argument in Allowing Asbestos Case to Proceed

Diseases like malignant mesothelioma and asbestosis are frequently the result of workplace exposure to asbestos. Following her husband’s death from asbestos-related lung cancer, Susan Carboni pursued legal action against the companies she blames for exposing him to asbestos-contaminated materials, including Porsche Cars, North America. Though the company argued that it should be dismissed from the case, a New York judge denied their petition.







Porsche Files Motion for Summary Judgment in Asbestos-Lung Cancer Case



The case revolves around the death of 79-year-old Francesco Carboni, who died of asbestos-related lung cancer in 2020. In her personal injury lawsuit against the various companies whose asbestos-contaminated parts her husband had worked with over the course of his decades-long career as an auto mechanic, the widow noted the many years that he had worked on European vehicles while growing up in Italy, and his continued work on those vehicles when he emigrated to the United States fifty years before his death.



Mr. Carboni worked for Zumbach Sports Car for 37 years, and before his death he provided deposition testimony that he had “personally performed brake, clutch, exhaust/muffler, generator, and starter-motor work on Porsche vehicles.” The company responded to these claims by offering testimony from an employee who noted that Porsche could not be held liable because they had not incorporated in the United States until August of 1984.



Judge Denies Porsche’s Arguments in Asbestos Lung Cancer Death



In his response to Porsche’s motion for summary judgment, Justice Adam Silvera pointed out that the company had failed to provide any supporting documentation regarding the years of their incorporation. He also noted that the years of Mr. Carboni’s work on Porsche vehicles went beyond the date cited by their employee, making their argument both insufficient and moot. Mrs. Carboni will be able to continue her quest for justice.

### <a>81-Year-Old Mesothelioma Victim Awarded $23 Million</a>

James McWilliams has little doubt about how he came to have malignant pleural mesothelioma. After a lifetime of work as a steamfitter, he blames asbestos in Jenkins Bros. valves for his illness and sued the company for the damages that he suffered. Earlier this year a New York City jury awarded him $23 million in compensation.







Company Denies Role in Man’s Mesothelioma



Mr. McWilliams provided significant detail to the jury hearing his mesothelioma claim. He described his 36-year career that lasted from 1960 to 1996, and recalled having installed and removed valve flange gaskets, valves, and other parts manufactured by Jenkins Bros. Those parts contained asbestos, which the company purchased from notorious asbestos supplier John Manville.



Though the company denied its role in Mr. McWilliams illness, they were confronted with evidence that they had specifically known of the dangers of asbestos in the 1960s, and with the possibility that they had known it was carcinogenic as early as the 1930s. They were also reminded of the many years that they had marketed themselves as the top manufacturer and supplier of the same valves to the Manhattan building industry.



$23 Million Mesothelioma Award for Past and Future Pain and Suffering



After consideration of the testimony, the New York jury agreed with Mr. McWilliams that the company had been negligent in its failure to warn of the dangers posed by the asbestos in their parts. They found the company liable for the damages the mesothelioma victim suffered and awarded him a total of $23 million, with $13 million compensating him for his past pain and suffering and another $10 million to compensate him for the pain and suffering that it is anticipated he will suffer in the future.

### Philadelphia Jury Awards Asbestos Victim $25 Million in Damages

Richard Daciw's personal injury lawsuit originally listed over 50 different manufacturers, suppliers, and others that he accused of negligence in having exposed him to the deadly carcinogen asbestos. The mineral, which is the cause of malignant mesothelioma, can also lead to serious illnesses including lung cancer and asbestosis, with the latter being the illness that has debilitated the victim and led to his quest for justice. In response to his story, a Philadelphia jury awarded Mr. Daciw and his wife compensation totaling $25 million dollars.







Asbestos Victim Cites Workplace Exposure, as Well as Exposure at Home



The dozens of defendants that Mr. Daciw listed in his personal injury lawsuit were an echo of countless mesothelioma and asbestos cases that have been pursued over the last several years, but by the time the trial was held, only John Crane, Inc. remained. The jury heard extensive testimony about Mr. Daciw’s work as a pipefitter and maintenance mechanic between the 1960s and 1980s, and about the company’s negligence. They learned how severely Mr. Daciw’s asbestosis has impacted his quality of life, and of its impact on the couple’s marriage.



Mr. Daciw’s exposure to asbestos and subsequent illness is similar to that of many mesothelioma and asbestosis victims. He spent years in the U.S. Navy, working as a fireman and shipfitter, then leveraged those experiences in his future work at Jeffries Processors, where he worked as a maintenance mechanic, and Domino Sugar where he worked as a pipefitter. Throughout all of those years, he was never warned of the dangers that the carcinogenic material posed to his health. 



John Crane, Inc.’s Arguments Against Liability Fail in Asbestosis Case



John Crane, Inc.’s attorneys asserted that Mr. Daciw was exaggerating the extent of his illness and denied that their asbestos packing was the cause of his condition, but the victim and his wife enlisted testimony from an occupational medicine expert who explained in detail how the various materials that Mr. Daciw had worked with were connected to asbestos-related diseases. Additional testimony from the victim’s doctors further convinced the jury of how deeply impacted he and his wife have been. 



The testimony in the case was not limited to John Crane’s role in Mr. Daciw’s illness. After hearing about twenty different defendants, the jury blamed his illness on eight of them, but because the others had already been dismissed from the case, only Crane was assigned a percentage of blame. The total damages award was $25 million, with $15 million owed to the victim, and another $10 million to his wife. 

### Deficiencies in Mesothelioma Victim’s Testimony Not Enough to Have Case Dismissed

Facing a personal injury lawsuit filed by a Navy veteran diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, pump manufacturer Armstrong Pumps attempted to have the case against them dismissed. Though the company argued that there were gaps in his testimony that warranted them evading judgment, the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division denied their motion and the case will move forward.







Navy Veteran with Mesothelioma Spent Years on Submarines



According to the filing in his mesothelioma lawsuit, Albert O. Howard spent the years between 1961 and 1978 serving onboard multiple submarines. Diagnosed with mesothelioma in December of 2020, he and his wife blame his illness on exposure to asbestos-contaminated products onboard those vessels, including those manufactured by Armstrong Pumps.



Armstrong argued that his mesothelioma could not be blamed on them because their company had not come into existence until 1965. They also argued that he’d failed to identify the exact vessels on which he’d been exposed.



Mesothelioma Victim’s Testimony Defeats Asbestos Company’s Argument



In denying the company’s motion for summary judgment, the New York Supreme Court noted that New York law required the company to prove it impossible for their products to have caused his mesothelioma rather than pointing to gaps in the victim’s testimony. With reference to their argument about their company not existing prior to 1965, the court noted that Mr. Howard had specifically indicated that the pumps and other equipment were frequently replaced, thus making it possible for them to have been installed on ships after 1965.



With reference to testimony from a company representative not hired until 2007, the court called themselves “unpersuaded” and noted that he “fails to identify his basis of knowledge for his conclusions, or whether there were any specific standards that were applicable during the relevant timeframe. Finally, the court wrote that “Defendant’s remaining arguments are clearly intended at pointing to deficiencies in Howard’s testimony concerning his recollection of the exact time and place that he observed defendant’s pumps, which is insufficient to meet its burden on its motion.” The case will continue to a jury.

### Court Overturns Dismissal of Mesothelioma Widow’s Claim Against Dairy Farm

Four years after her husband’s death from malignant mesothelioma, Pamela Shellenberger won a significant jury against the dairy farm that she holds responsible for his illness and death. Though her original personal injury claim against Kreider Dairy Farms was dismissed by the Philadelphia Common Pleas court, she appealed that decision and the Superior Court of Pennsylvania overturned its dismissal.







Mesothelioma Victim Suffered Daily Exposure to Asbestos at Dairy Farm



Richard Shellenberger died of malignant mesothelioma in early 2019. He and his wife Pamela had earlier filed suit against his former employe,r Kreider Dairy Farms, as well as against the manufacturer of asbestos-contaminated products and equipment with which he worked. The couple’s claim was based on his employers’ duty to protect and warn him against the dangers of asbestos at the worksite where he served from 1972 through 1980.



In the deposition testimony that he provided a month before his death, the mesothelioma victim detailed his role in building the dairy processing plant for his employer, and how once the dairy opened and was operating, he was required to blow down the boilers to clean out any “junk” that had accumulated. He also testified that he had to replace the boiler’s asbestos-contaminated gaskets “usually weekly” for eight years.



Pennsylvania Supreme Court Overturns Mesothelioma Decision



The dairy farm filed a successful motion for summary judgment to have the mesothelioma claim against them dismissed, but the widow appealed that decision. She argued that the law said that as her husband's employer, the dairy farm had owed Mr. Shellenberger a heightened duty of care to provide him with a safe working environment. She asserted that they had breached that duty by exposing him to asbestos on a regular basis, that they knew he was working with asbestos-containing equipment, and that they should have known, with the exercise of reasonable care, that asbestos contained a significant risk to exposed workers.



Though the company argued that they had relied upon others, including the victim, for expertise in their farm's products and equipment and that they had not been aware of asbestos’ dangers, the Supreme Court cited precedent that read in part, “The knowledge which is required of an employer includes a knowledge of generally known scientific discoveries and inventions applicable to conditions of safety in his business. He is required to inform himself of current advances and of the progress in industries of the same nature as his own…. He is also under a duty to realize the limits of knowledge of those whom he employs, so that he can guard them against dangers which he is required to know, but of which he should know they may be unaware.” They also noted that questions of fact are better decided by a jury. The dismissal of the case was overturned.

### Lung Cancer, Mesothelioma, and Other Asbestos Diseases Linked to Goodyear Floor Tiles

Though the name Goodyear is most frequently associated with tires, the company was also a major supplier of floor tiles in the 1970s and years previous to that, and as a result they’re frequently named in mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis lawsuits. That's because many of those tiles were contaminated with asbestos. In a recent case, a man who’d spent years working with the company’s tiles blamed them for his illness, but the company attempted to have his case against them dismissed.







Asbestos-Contaminated Floor Tiles Blamed for Man’s Asbestos-Related Lung Cancer



When Paul M. Moutal was diagnosed with asbestos-related lung cancer, he filed a personal injury lawsuit against Goodyear. The former handyman had spent much of his time working with the company’s tiles, cutting and installing them. He remembered the dust that was created when he cut them, heated them, and cracked them. He did that work from 1969 to 1975, and then later worked as a laborer and carpenter, but did not learn of the danger of asbestos in the tiles until the early 1990s. At that point, he wore a mask to protect himself, but it was too late. He’d already endured significant exposure to the deadly fiber.



As often happens in mesothelioma and other asbestos lawsuits, Goodyear filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that the case against them should be dismissed by the court. They based their argument on Mr. Moutal’s lack of specific proof that he’d worked with their branded tiles, or that if he had, that the tiles he'd worked with had contained asbestos.



New York Judge Explains Rules of Evidence Pertaining to Asbestos Claims



In response to Goodyear’s petition, Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York explained that the company’s argument against being required to stand trial ignored the state’s standard for such a motion to be granted. The only way that they would be successful in a mesothelioma or asbestos case would be to prove that their product absolutely did not contain asbestos and therefore could not have been responsible for his illness. It is not enough to simply say that the victim provided inadequate proof.



Because Goodyear failed to offer any such evidence, their motion for summary judgment was denied and Mr. Moutal will be able to continue presenting his case for a jury to decide.

### Washington Court of Appeals Upholds $17 Million Mesothelioma Judgment

In 2021, The widow of Kevan Holdsworth was awarded nearly $17 million by the Washington state jury hearing her mesothelioma claim. Sherrie Holdsworth and her late husband had sued Scapa Waycross, manufacturers of asbestos-contaminated dryer felts used by the paper mill where he’d worked for almost forty years. Throughout the trial, the asbestos company argued against being held responsible for Kevan’s death, and after the award was handed down they filed an appeal. In January that appeal was denied.







Mesothelioma Victim Exposed to Asbestos for Decades



According to testimony provided during the original mesothelioma trial, Kevan Holdworth’s work at a paper mill in Camas, Washington exposed him to asbestos constantly. From 1969 to 1976 his duties included cleaning the paper machine by using air hoses to blow asbestos dust off of them. This occurred every three weeks. From 1976 to 1988 his duties included hammering off chunks of asbestos-contaminated insulation from pumps. He also was exposed to asbestos while working in the paint shop.



Following Mr. Holdworth’s mesothelioma death and prior to the trial being heard, Scapa Waycross filed a motion for summary judgment, which was denied. The company filed objections during the course of the trial regarding jury instructions, and the company filed a motion for judgment as a matter of law and moved for a new trial. These petitions were denied. The company then appealed this decision.



Court of Appeals Denies Asbestos Company’s Argument Against Mesothelioma Liability



Though Scapa insisted that the mesothelioma trial court had erred in denying its motion, the Court of Appeals of Washington disagreed, noting that, “Courts are appropriately hesitant to take cases away from juries.” They opted for respecting the opinion of the jury that had heard all of the conflicting evidence, and noted that circumstantial evidence of exposure to asbestos-contaminated products is acceptable in mesothelioma claims.



In its conclusion, the court asserted that the victims had submitted more than enough evidence to support their mesothelioma claims. They also noted that Scapa’s attorneys had not objected to the court’s ruling regarding the closing argument at the time, thus mooting their current objection. The widow will be able to keep her award.

### Avon Ordered to Pay Mesothelioma Victim $52.1 Million

A California jury has ordered the iconic cosmetic company Avon and another defendant to pay $52.1 million in damages to a 76-year-old woman and her husband as compensation for causing her malignant mesothelioma. The woman had claimed that Avon’s talc-based products were contaminated with asbestos, and after weighing the testimony in the case, the jury agreed.







76-Year-Old Mesothelioma Victim Awarded Significant Jury Award



Rita-Ann Chapman and her husband Gary filed their mesothelioma lawsuit against both Avon and Mr. Chapman’s former employer, Hyster-Yale Group after she was diagnosed with the terminal disease. Her claim against Avon detailed her lifelong use of the company’s products, while Hyster-Yale Group was blamed for having negligently allowed Mr. Chapman to carry asbestos home on his work clothes, which further exposed Mrs. Chapman to asbestos when she did the laundry.



The jury in the mesothelioma case heard convincing evidence presented against both companies. Mr. Chapman’s employer was a forklift manufacturer, and the jury was shown that they were informed of asbestos’ dangers but continued selling asbestos-contaminated parts. The company’s actions were described as being egregious, with documentation of asbestos’ dangers being purposely destroyed once they began being named in personal injury claims. Parts that were labeled with warnings about asbestos had those warnings removed before being provided to consumers. Similarly, Avon continued selling asbestos-contaminated products months after learning that they could harm people.



$52.1 in Mesothelioma Damages Sends a Powerful Message



After the jury awarded the mesothelioma victim monetary damages of $40 million, her attorneys asked that the amount of punitive damages be set high enough that it would send a powerful message to the multi-million dollar companies. In response, the jury added $10.3 million to the amount that the company has to pay. Avon is responsible for 90% of the total $52.1 million, and the remaining 10% will be paid by Hyland.

### Facing Mesothelioma Claims, Johnson & Johnson Files Suit Against Talc Expert

In the face of tens of thousands of personal injury claims filed by malignant mesothelioma and ovarian cancer victims, Johnson & Johnson’s subsidiary LTL Management has filed a disparagement claim against the author of a frequently cited article. Dr. Jacqueline Moline published the work titled Mesothelioma Associated with the Use of Cosmetic Talc in 2019. The company claims Dr. Moline knew that the claim she made in the article was false, yet repeated it anyway, to their detriment.







Johnson & Johnson Subsidiary Accuses Author who Linked Talc to Mesothelioma of Deception



Johnson & Johnson has already been ordered to pay billions of dollars to mesothelioma and ovarian cancer victims who blame the company’s talc products for their illnesses. The company has pursued several legal moves to avoid more liability, including creating LTL Management, a new company, to hold its talc liabilities and then having the subsidiary file for bankruptcy. The courts are currently attempting to determine whether that maneuver stands in light of Johnson & Johnson's robust economic position. In the meantime, the company is now taking steps against the expert whose article has been used in testimony against them.



The company’s lawsuit references the article, which claims 33 individuals who used talc powder and had no other asbestos exposure developed mesothelioma. Saying that Dr. Moline had repeated her claim “to the media, in scientific literature, at public conferences, and to Congress, judges and juries,” LTL Management says she knew the claim was false but made it for “her own personal aggrandizement and gain.” They say that she knew that some of the individuals whose stories were included in her article had exposure to other sources of asbestos and had sought compensation from other companies.



 Expert’s Article is Frequently Cited in Mesothelioma Claims



Dr. Moline is an Occupational Medicine specialist and Professor of Occupational Medicine, Epidemiology and Prevention and Internal Medicine. She teaches at the Donald & Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell and is the Director of the Northwell Health Queens World Trade Center Health Program. Her testimony is often sought in mesothelioma and other toxic tort lawsuits.



Dr. Moline’s testimony regarding asbestos and talc has proven extremely helpful to mesothelioma victims over the years. She has helped juries understand the role that these materials play in the development of asbestos-related illnesses. LTL Management is asking the courts to hold Dr. Moline financially accountable for what they call her “malfeasance.” 

### Mesothelioma Claims Often Pit Asbestos Companies Against One Another

Frequently, defendants in mesothelioma and asbestos-related claims turn on one another in order to evade having to carry too much liability. Such was the case in a recent lawsuit filed by a man diagnosed with asbestos-related lung cancer. Though one of the companies tried to have the case against them thrown out for vagueness, other defendants filed cross-claims against them to keep them from escaping responsibility.







Mesothelioma Victims and Others Exposed to Asbestos Seek Justice



Malignant mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases wreak havoc on their victims, and many choose to file lawsuits seeking compensation from the companies that are at fault. In most cases, claims are filed against multiple defendants: this is because a person may have been exposed to several different manufacturer’s products in their workplace, or they may name the environment in which they were exposed, the products to which they were exposed, and others in the supply chain.



When Sheldon A. Boutte, Jr. was diagnosed with asbestos-related lung cancer, he and his wife Arlene filed claims against the Avondale Shipyard, the McDermott Shipyard, and the M.A. Patout Sugar Mill. He asserted that he had been exposed to asbestos when he worked in those locales, and from when his father and brothers had worked there too. He blamed the companies for having failed to ventilate the area where their employees worked and for failing to warn them or provide protection for them and family members who were at risk of malignant mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases through take-home exposure.



Shipyard Files Motion to Be Excused From Asbestos Case Based on Claim’s Vagueness



Despite the fact that specific information about how Mr. Boutte had been exposed to asbestos had been included in the original claim and that more would eventually revealed during the discovery process, the McDermott Shipyard filed a motion to be excused based on an “exception of vagueness.” Before the victim could respond, another defendant, the Avondale Shipyard, filed a cross-claim against them and the other named defendants to make sure that nobody evaded the liability that they shared.



In reviewing the claim and cross-claim, the judge hearing the asbestos case agreed with Avondale Shipyard and denied McDermott’s petition to be excused. He noted that information about where the various family members had worked, how they had been exposed, and additional detail, was either already presented in the claim or would eventually be brought to light.

### Mesothelioma Victim’s Claim Includes Asbestos Company’s Insurer as Defendant

After Kirk Reulet’s 2019 death from malignant mesothelioma, his family filed a wrongful death and survival action against multiple companies that they blamed for having negligently exposed him to asbestos, as well as insurance companies that issued policies for those companies. Though one insurance company asked to be dismissed from the case, the judge denied their motion for summary judgment.







Berkshire Hathaway Files Motion to Dismiss Mesothelioma Claim Against Them



The family’s mesothelioma claim cited a variety of companies whose products and environments contributed to Mr. Reulet’s mesothelioma death. Reulet had spent more than 40 years working in marine-economy jobs, and defendants included manufacturers, former employers, and the insurance companies that issued policies covering those companies. Among them was Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance company, which had issued two separate umbrella liability insurance policies to defendant Eagle Asbestos & Packing Company, Inc.



The mesothelioma victim's family claimed he had been exposed to Eagle Asbestos’ products in two ways. They claim that he suffered second-hand exposure from his father’s work with the products, and his own first-hand exposure when he later worked with Eagle’s products.  Berkshire Hathaway admitted to issuing policies to Eagle during both of those time periods, but argued that they could not be held liable because there was no proof of his proximity to their clients' products during the time covered by either of those policy terms.



Judge Dismisses One Mesothelioma Claim but Keeps Second



Though Judge Brian A. Jackson of the U.S. District Court agreed that the family had failed to present evidence establishing Mr. Reulet’s exposure to Eagle's asbestos from his father’s work, he called the family’s direct exposure claim “another matter.” He noted deposition testimony from the mesothelioma victim’s co-worker from 1974, who'd described their work process and confirmed that the two of them had regularly inhaled asbestos dust. Because that testimony established a link between the asbestos dust inhaled by the victim and Eagle Asbestos’ insulation, that claim will not be dismissed and Berkshire Hathaway will remain a defendant in the case.

### Washington State Mesothelioma Victim Prevails Against Successor to Former Employer

Washington state resident Jeffrey Cockrum filed a mesothelioma lawsuit against Howmet Aerospace, the successor to his former employer, and several other companies. He later dismissed his original claim and resubmitted it to add another company to the list of defendants. In response, Howmet accused him of fraudulent joinder, a legal term that describes inappropriate adding a defendant for fraudulent purposes. The Washington state courts dismissed the company’s claim, adding that they were misinterpreting the law.







Mesothelioma Victim Adjusts Claim After Initial Filing



Jeffrey Cockrum’s mesothelioma lawsuit was filed in Washington State’s King County Superior Court, but when he amended his claim to add Washington-based North Coast Electrical without first getting permission from the court, he withdrew his case and resubmitted it. In response, Howmet Aerospace, successor to his former employer Alcoa Wenatchee Works, accused him of having added the company to the list of defendants in order to avoid having the case removed to federal court, where juries are often more friendly to asbestos companies.



In making their fraudulent joinder argument, Howmet pointed out that it was only after they'd argued for the mesothelioma claim to be removed to federal court that Mr. Cockrum amended his claim to add the Washington-based company as a defendant. They said that he had submitted a “sham defendant” in order to defeat their motion for removal, and said that his evidence in support of naming the electrical company was circumstantial.



Sham Defendant Argument Denied in Washington Mesothelioma Claim



In responding to Howmet’s argument, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington noted that the company's argument regarding circumstantial evidence inappropriate placed the burden of proof on the victim, and that at this point in the case, it was a defendant’s job to prove that they could not have been responsible for his illness. The court also pointed out that Mr. Cockrum’s deposition testimony established that he had been exposed to asbestos from North Coast’s products, and that therefore the company had been appropriately – rather than fraudulently – named as a defendant. The case will be heard in the state’s courts.

### Mesothelioma Victim Awarded $5.75 Million in Case Against Volkswagen

A King County, Washington jury has awarded $5.75 million in damages to the estate of a mesothelioma victim who filed a lawsuit against Volkswagen Group of America and Volkswagen AG. The victim, Thomas Sorrentino, died shortly after his diagnosis with the aggressive form of cancer, but in the time he had left, he provided essential deposition testimony that supported his claim of negligence.







Work as VW Auto Mechanic Led to Mesothelioma Diagnosis



According to his deposition testimony, Mr. Sorrentino spent the years between 1972 and 1975 working as an auto mechanic at a Spokane Washington Volkswagen dealership. His duties included replacing brakes and clutches on the German company’s vehicles, and in the course of his workday, he frequently used a grinding machine to make the brakes fit the drums on the cars he was assigned to work on. Those brakes were contaminated with asbestos, and the grinding action created carcinogenic dust that he inhaled on a regular basis.



Recalling his work at United Volkswagen, the mesothelioma victim said that there was so much dust created that he'd needed to use an air compressor to blow it off of the surfaces that he was working with.  This further spread the deadly asbestos fibers through his work environment’s air. Expert witnesses testifying at trial confirmed that the fibers he inhaled in the workplace would have contributed to his risk and led to him developing the rare and deadly asbestos-related disease.



Replacement Brakes Had No Warning of Asbestos’ Risks



Though Volkswagen’s attorneys attempted to defend the company against charges of negligence, the jury in the mesothelioma trial quickly learned that they’d been aware of the dangers posed by asbestos but had chosen not to place any warnings on their brakes’ packaging. The jury also learned that the company had equipped their German employees with protective gear to prevent them from inhaling asbestos or carrying the fibers home, yet had offered no such protection for those working in America or other countries where the parts were shipped.



Responding to the facts, the jury quickly agreed that the company had been negligent and awarded the estate $5 million. Mr. Sorrentino’s surviving son was also a plaintiff in the case, and the jury ordered the auto manufacturer to compensate him with $750,000.

### Hess’ St. Croix Refinery Blamed for Mesothelioma and Other Asbestos Injuries

An oil refinery operated for decades by Hess in the U.S. Virgin Islands has been blamed for countless cases of malignant mesothelioma and other asbestos injuries. Though victims have sought justice against HONX, Inc. for years, the company has evaded liability through a series of legal maneuvers. Recently, the company announced a deadline of March 17, 2023, by which time all victims seeking compensation must submit claims.







U.S. Virgin Islands’ Laws Support Mesothelioma Victims



According to many of the St. Croix mesothelioma victims, HONX filed for bankruptcy protection after settling hundreds of asbestos claims out of court. The company created a subsidiary organization, which it then placed in bankruptcy protection. In response, victims have asked a federal judge to lift the filing. They accused the company of trying to evade having their claims heard in the U. S. Virgin Islands, where the laws are friendlier to victims.



Attorneys for mesothelioma victims and others affected by asbestos during the 33 years that the oil refinery operated say that Virgin Islands law requires that claims filed by older, sicker patients be expedited. They accuse the company of trying to protect its $37 billion in assets by pursuing the bankruptcy protection instead of facing victims in court.



Refinery Workers with Mesothelioma Seek Justice



While the company continues its pursuit of bankruptcy protection from those exposed to asbestos at its St. Croix refinery, attorneys representing mesothelioma victims are pushing back. Within their claim they said, “Hess, like every other asbestos defendant in the USVI, has been terrified of having its liability determined by members of the community that it devastated through its reckless and rapacious conduct — and no defendant has permitted an asbestos case to go to trial there."



Their claim continued, "Every day that goes by in this case, and every day the USVI actions remain enjoined, Hess continues to generate millions in free cash flow, while asbestos claimants suffer, witness memories fade, and evidence grows stale. Like most defendants, Hess would prefer litigation and judgments years into the future to litigation and judgments right now.”

### Despite Texas Company’s Objections, Oklahoma Mesothelioma Victim Can Keep Jury Award

Michael Galier has happy childhood memories of visiting Oklahoma construction sites with his dad and playing at those sites with his brothers, but those fun times were also the cause of his malignant mesothelioma. When he filed suit against the Texas company whose asbestos he’d been exposed to as a child, they claimed they could not be held liable in Oklahoma. The courts disagreed.







Mesothelioma Victim’s Childhood Playthings were Deadly



According to evidence presented in his mesothelioma lawsuit, Michael Galier and his brothers spent many childhood days visiting their father’s construction sites. Those sites were in Moore, Oklahoma, and the boys would play and help to sweep up the debris and drywall dust left behind by subcontractors. They’d frequently put the dust into paper bags and then throw them at each other, calling them grenades. They also threw dried clumps of drywall joint compound at each other. All of those materials were made with asbestos, the mineral that causes malignant mesothelioma.



After his mesothelioma diagnosis he remembered his childhood play, and realized that the products he'd played with were contaminated with asbestos.  He remembered that they'd been branded with Murco Wall Products’ name, and filed a product liability and negligence lawsuit against the Texas-based company. Though Murco objected to being tried in an Oklahoma court, their argument was denied and a jury heard the case. The company was determined to be forty percent responsible and ordered to provide compensation to Mr. Galier.



Texas Company Files Repeated Appeals of Mesothelioma Decision



Not satisfied with the original court’s decision or with being held responsible for Galier’s mesothelioma, Murco filed an appeal with the Court of Civil Appeals, where it was confirmed. They then appealed the decision to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma, which again affirmed the lower courts’ decisions.



In its decision, the court noted the company’s assertion that there was no direct link between their product and Mr. Galier’s exposure and mesothelioma, but said that this level of proof was not required. They also said that the Texas company’s nonresident status did not keep them from being accountable to residents of Oklahoma because they had actively pursued the Oklahoma market for joint compound. The judges ruled that the company needs to take responsibility for the damage caused by their product.



Legal Resources for Mesothelioma Claims




See the top mesothelioma lawyers in Texas



Calculate your mesothelioma claim value

### Judge Denies Company’s Attempt to Shut Down Asbestos Testimony in Mesothelioma Trial

Though Captain Francis J. Burger may not be an expert in malignant mesothelioma, he does know a lot about the use of asbestos onboard Navy vessels. His decades of experience in shipbuilding and his knowledge of Navy specifications made him a natural expert witness in a case involving asbestos exposure onboard the USS Purdy.  Despite or because of this, asbestos company John Crane objected to his testimony and asked for it to be struck. Multiple judges denied the company's request.







Mesothelioma Victim’s Case Supported by Navy Captain’s Testimony



Captain Burger’s testimony was part of a case filed by Arnold Pritt, who was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma after having served on the USS Purdy from December 1961 to August of 1964. Mr. Pritt and his wife are pursuing liability claims against John Crane, Inc. and other defendants, accusing them of negligence and product liability violations in having exposed him to the carcinogenic material.



In response, John Crane filed a motion to strike Captain Burger’s testimony, but the magistrate judge hearing the case denied their petition. The company then filed an objection to her decision and asked a district judge to overturn it. That judge supported the lower court magistrate’s ruling.



Navy Captain Deemed Qualified to Provide Testimony in Mesothelioma Claim



In his review of the asbestos company’s motion in the mesothelioma claim, District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton of the United States District Court of Massachusetts considered the company’s claim that Captain Burger lacked relevant expertise. The company argued that his opinions on product composition and warnings were unreliable and contradictory. He also weighed the captain’s hands-on experience and knowledge of the Navy’s requirements regarding its vessels, and of what the Navy expected of the manufacturers that supplied their equipment.



Judge Gorton’s decision came down on the mesothelioma victim’s side. He agreed with the Pritts that Burger was both an expert on military specifications and qualified to offer opinions. He also noted that the asbestos company would have the opportunity to question the captain in front of a jury and that the jury could then decide whether his testimony was relevant or not. The information that Burger provided in support of Mr.  Pritt will stand.

### Second-Hand Asbestos Exposure Blamed for Louisiana Woman’s Malignant Mesothelioma

Herbert Tabor never dreamed that his work at Avondale Shipyards would eventually lead to his wife's death from malignant mesothelioma. But seven years of laundering asbestos-covered clothing meant that Ethel Tabor inhaled countless deadly asbestos fibers that infiltrated her pleural lining and grew into the deadly form of cancer. Now her family is seeking justice from the shipyard, and recently won an important victory in court.







Avondale Shipyard Attempts to Remove Mesothelioma Case from Local Courts



After Ethel’s mesothelioma diagnosis, her family filed a personal injury claim against the shipyard. Their first filing came in August of 2019, and two years later they responded to a discovery request that led Avondale to remove the case to federal court rather than the state court where it had originally been filed. The family filed a motion to return the case to the district court. 



Removing a mesothelioma claim to federal court is a common strategy for asbestos companies. If they see an opportunity to seek protection under the federal officer removal statute they do so, and then argue that their actions fell under the auspices of the government. This generally gives them a better chance of defending themselves. But there are rules for when and how removal can be executed, and the family argued that Avondale's actions came far too late.



Family Appeals Removal of Mesothelioma Claim from Local Courts



In response to the shipyard removing their mesothelioma claim to federal court, the Tabor family filed an appeal with the U.S. District Court in Louisiana. They argued that Avondale’s removal came years after their filing, which far exceeded the 30-day time limit established by law. Though Avondale responded to this by indicating that their removal was a response to the answers provided in the supplemental responses delivered in 2021, the court agreed with the family and returned the case to the local district court.



In their decision, the justices noted both the significant lateness of the removal and the overall position that the shipyard had taken regarding federal officer protection. Upon review of all of the evidence provided, they said that Avondale had not provided anything to suggest that Mr. Tabor’s time at the shipyard had any relation to work ordered by the government or that his exposure to asbestos would have been protected by the federal officer statute. The case will return to the district court.

### Punitive Damages Deposition Ordered by New York Special Master

Ernest Masetro filed a lawsuit against multiple asbestos companies he blames for his malignant mesothelioma. When one of those companies attempted to avoid answering questions aimed at holding them responsible for punitive damages, he asked a Special Master to weigh in and force them to comply, and he did. Though the company appealed this order, their petition was denied.







Mesothelioma Lawsuit Filed by Mechanic Serviceman



Mr. Masetro blames his malignant mesothelioma on exposure to asbestos he suffered during his years of working as a mechanic serviceman. He spent three decades servicing and maintaining boilers manufactured by a variety of companies, including Burnham Corporation.  



In filing claims against Burnham and several others, the mesothelioma victims sought both economic damages for the monetary losses he suffered and punitive damages, which are specifically created to assess financial pain on companies as punishment for their recklessness and disregard.



Company Argues Against Answering Questions from Mesothelioma Victim



When Burnham’s representatives repeatedly evaded being questioned by the mesothelioma victim’s attorney, the man’s legal team sought assistance from the courts. They explained to a Special Master that the company’s responses had been inadequate, and upon hearing the details of the company’s actions, the Special Master ordered the company’s representatives to appear. Instead of complying, they filed an appeal asserting that the questioning was inappropriate based on New York’s procedural rules.



Though Burnham argued that the Special Master’s decision ran counter to New York law regarding discovery on punitive damages, the Supreme Court of New York denied their petition and noted that their argument ignored the special allowances that had been created to address the “exceptional needs of asbestos cases and litigants.” The court determined that their argument was a misinterpretation of the law and that the company needed to comply with the Special Master’s order to appear for questioning.

### Mesothelioma Litigants See Decades of Confusion and Delayed Litigation Ended by Judge’s Decision

There are so many mesothelioma and asbestos lawsuits filed in the city of New York that, years ago, the city established a dedicated court, the New York City Asbestos Litigation Court, or NYCAL. Recently, Justice Adam Silvera of that court ended years of confusion and frustration for victims by lifting a decades-long deferral of punitive damages hearings.







1996 Deferral of Punitive Damages in Mesothelioma Claims



Malignant mesothelioma is a rare form of cancer that is caused by exposure to asbestos. Many of the companies that exposed victims to this toxic material were aware of its dangers, and have been successfully sued for negligence. They have been required to pay victims significant sums in compensation for their economic damages.



But many mesothelioma victims want to go further with their quest for justice. They want to let juries decide whether the companies should also have to pay them as punishment additional sums for their willful disregard for their health and their lives. This type of claim seeks what are known as punitive damages, and requires its own, dedicated hearing of facts. In 1996, victims in New York who had won monetary damages learned that the courts were going to indefinitely defer their right to pursue this type of claim.



Punitive Damages in Mesothelioma Claims Deferred for Multiple Reasons



At the time, the NYCAL court indicated that there were several reasons for putting off mesothelioma victims’ ability to file punitive damages claims. They noted that so much time had elapsed between the wrongdoing by the companies and the damages the victims had suffered that the punishment could be meaningless, and that payment of punitive damages could so deplete the resources of the companies that they might be unable to compensate future victims.



Since that time, multiple mesothelioma victims have attempted to have the deferral lifted, and a variety of rulings have attempted to address or mediate the issue. Each time, the asbestos companies have objected and the deferral has been put back in place. This time, Justice Silvera denied those objections, noting that the victims have been denied their rights and that the asbestos companies had failed to prove why they should not be subject to the same type of punitive damages risk as companies in any other type of case. The victims will now be able to pursue their long-awaited justice.  

### Mesothelioma Widow Pursues Lawsuit Against Auto Parts Seller

A California court ruled in favor of Evelyn Chandler, a mesothelioma widow who is suing a retailer that sold asbestos-contaminated auto parts to her husband. Mrs. Chandler has accused the company and others of negligence.







Mesothelioma Claims Victim’s Life in Just Four Months



Mrs. Chandler’s husband Gail succumbed to malignant mesothelioma just four months after his diagnosis. In tracing his exposure to the asbestos she believes led to his disease, she found that Parts Warehouse and its alternate entity Lamus-Lundlee sold parts that were contaminated with the toxic mineral, and filed suit against the company and others that she holds responsible.



In response to being named in the mesothelioma lawsuit, Parts Warehouse filed a motion for summary judgment, pointing to what they viewed as a dearth of evidence that the parts that Mr. Chandler had purchased contained asbestos.



Judges Deny Asbestos Company’s Argument in Mesothelioma Case



Mrs. Chandler had submitted proof that her husband had purchased a non-asbestos-containing clutch from Parts Warehouse to support her claim that the mesothelioma victim had purchased parts from the business. The company then turned to that single item as proof that the mesothelioma widow lacked evidence of exposure to asbestos from anything that had been bought at their stores.



But the Superior Court of California of Sacramento County rebuffed this argument, noting that the mesothelioma victim had purchased parts from the company for years, and that Parts Warehouse’s expert witness ignored many other parts that the victim would have purchased or the years prior to the time period about which he testified.



The court’s decision to deny Parts Warehouse’s petition read in part, “This is not a case where a single asbestos-containing part was purchased from an unidentified supplier. Rather… Decedent used multiple brands, at least some of which were obtained through Lamus-Lundlee. Combined with evidence that all of the brands contained asbestos, this testimony may be sufficient to support a finding that Decedent was more likely than not exposed to asbestos-containing parts sold by Lamus-Lundlee.” The case will continue for a jury to hear.

### Mesothelioma Verdict Stands Despite Asbestos Company’s Appeal

Before Ben Viglietta’s malignant mesothelioma death, he and his wife Terri filed a lawsuit against Johns Manville and Hedman Resources Limited, accusing them of negligence, failure to warn, and reckless disregard for the safety of others in exposing him to the asbestos that led to his disease. After a jury awarded the victim $2 million in damages, Hedman filed a motion seeking a judgment nothwithstanding the verdict and an order granting a new trial. The New York Supreme Court in Niagara County denied this request.







Asbestos Company Argues Against Mesothelioma Verdict



Mr. and Mrs. Viglietta’s claim against Hedman asserted that his malignant mesothelioma was caused by his exposure to the company’s cationic fiber, which he was exposed to between 1974 and 1976 when he worked at a chemical plant. They claimed that the company had failed to provide adequate warning about the risks posed by the toxic material and a jury agreed, awarding a total of $2 million for past and future pain and suffering with 65% of the damages assigned to Johns Manville and the balance to Hedman.



Hedman filed a motion asking for the mesothelioma verdict to be discarded and the trial reopened. They claimed that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish that the victim had been exposed to a sufficient level of asbestos to cause his illness. They also argued that the court had made multiple errors regarding subpoenas, requests for jury charges, and more.



Court Rejects Asbestos Company’s Motion for a New Mesothelioma Trial



In its response to Hedman, the Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Niagara concluded that the mesothelioma victim’s expert’s testimony satisfied the standard required to support causation of his illness. They also rejected the company’s arguments regarding jury charges, including that the trial court had made a mistake in failing to instruct the jury that fault could lay with Mr. Viglietta’s employer because their bagged product had originally contained a warning. The justices said that the failure of the trial court to tell the jury that this could be considered an intervening superseding act did not eliminate the causal chain that made Hedman responsible for his illness. The victim’s family will retain their damages award.

### Ford Must Pay $6 Million After Limousine Manufacturing Job Leads to Mesothelioma Death

Linda Behling was just 70 years old when she was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma. A mother, grandmother, and great-grandmother, she had been exposed to Ford Motor Company brakes for decades, and her family blamed exposure to asbestos in those parts for her illness and subsequent death. After hearing two weeks of testimony, a Missouri state jury agreed and ordered the auto giant to pay $6 million in damages.







Mesothelioma Victim Was Exposed to Asbestos for Decades



According to testimony in the trial, before being diagnosed with mesothelioma Mrs. Behling had worked in a number of manufacturing environments, including years of employment with Executive Coach Builders. A statement by a family representative explained, “The limousine manufacturing company cut new Ford Towncars in half and converted the vehicles into limousines.” This exposed those working on the vehicles to significant amounts of asbestos in Ford’s brakes.



Pointing to the various materials, products, equipment, conditions, and activities of her job and of Ford's failure to warn of the dangers of asbestos in its products, the mesothelioma victim’s family accused the company of negligence, willful/wanton misconduct, and strict liability. It took just three and a half hours for the jury hearing the trial in the Missouri Circuit Court to agree and award the family the compensation that they sought.



Ford Points to Other Companies Named in Mesothelioma Lawsuit



In its attempt to defend itself against being held liable for Mrs. Behling’s mesothelioma, Ford argued that her exposure to asbestos from their brakes was limited, and that there was insufficient proof linking their product to her illness. They noted the numerous other sources of asbestos she had suffered in her life from her other manufacturing work, and Certain Teed Corporation, Crown Cork and Seal, Crane Co., and General Electric were named during the trial. The jury made its decision that Ford was responsible and required to pay for her pain, suffering, and death.

### Mesothelioma Widow’s Fight with Honeywell International Continues

A loved one’s death from malignant mesothelioma often leads to David and Goliath legal actions that pit lone individuals against giant corporations. When Joan Barbarino lost her husband Roy to the rare asbestos-related disease, she filed a claim against one of the biggest companies in the world — Honeywell International. A New York judge recently awarded her a victory in her pursuit of justice.







Mesothelioma Victim Exposed to Asbestos While Working for New York City Transit Authority



Mrs. Barbarino’s mesothelioma claim asserts that her husband was exposed to asbestos from Honeywell International’s Bendix brakes during the 25 years that he worked for the New York City Transit Authority. Between 1962 and 1987, he worked at a variety of locations in a Bus Maintainer “B” position and ultimately being promoted to Bus Maintainer “A”. Each of these positions put him in close proximity to workers performing engine and brake repairs on the transit authority’s vehicles.



To support her case, Mrs. Barbarino presented the mesothelioma victim’s own testimony about having breathed in dust in his workplace from the repair area that he worked near. She also presented testimony from two of her late husband’s former co-workers: each testified regarding the use of Bendix brakes by the transit authority, with one specifically indicating that he had seen mechanics working alongside the victim. Despite this evidence, Honeywell petitioned for the case against them to be dismissed. They argued that the widow had not presented sufficient proof to show that the dust in their brakes had led to her husband’s illness.



Judge Notes Burden of Proof in Mesothelioma Cases



Upon hearing the case, Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of the State of New York denied Honeywell International’s motion for summary judgment and permitted the widow’s mesothelioma claim to move forward. He noted that the company’s arguments against the claim rested on the widow’s failure to prove that their brakes had caused his death, and that this was not what the law required for summary judgment to be granted. In order to win and have the case dismissed, the company would have had to prove that their dust could not have caused his illness, and they failed to do that. The widow’s claim will move forward to a jury.

### New York Plastics Plant Blamed for Workers’ and Residents’ Mesothelioma

The OxyChem chemical plant in Niagara Falls New York and its neighboring industrial plastics plant in North Tonawanda, New York are both the subject of renewed scrutiny after revelations of malignant mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases among the plants’ employees and neighbors. According to a ProPublica report published in October, the company’s extensive asbestos contamination was widely acknowledged and a constant cause for concern.







New Employees Warned by Coworkers About Risk of Mesothelioma



Though it has long been known that exposure to asbestos causes malignant mesothelioma, the ProPublica article noted that workers at the OxyChem plant were constantly exposed to the toxic material up until the time that the facility closed in 2021.  Employees recounted being warned by coworkers to avoid breathing in the asbestos fibers that “hung in the air, collected on the beams and light fixtures and built up until it was inches thick.” Plant managers were unresponsive to pleas for remediation.



Today, many of those workers, as well as people who lived in the neighborhoods surrounding the plant, have been diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases.  Victims have filed personal injury lawsuits seeking compensation, and the majority of them have received payment in settlements that have been arranged out of court and out of the public eye. The company has never admitted guilt or mishandling of the toxic material.



Mesothelioma Victims Recall Blue Asbestos Inside Their Homes



Among the anecdotes recounted by mesothelioma victims are accounts of layers of blue asbestos fibers on freshly fallen snow, of asbestos coating the windowsills of their homes and the seats of their cars, and even of blue asbestos coating the ballfield where Little League games were played.



How that deadly material spread outside of the plant is an open secret to those who’ve investigated the source of their mesothelioma: they learned that the plant's workers were occasionally told to use powerful air hoses to blow accumulated asbestos dust out of the facility. Years later, residents have been diagnosed with the rare form of cancer, as well as asbestosis and other breathing difficulties.

### Asbestos Companies Argue that Mesothelioma Wasn’t Single Cause of Death

Kirk Reulet was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma after spending 45 years working as a welder. He died in 2019. When his widow Joanne filed a wrongful death and survival claim against the companies that exposed him to asbestos, they argued that mesothelioma had not been the single cause of his death. This forced the widow to go to court be able to continue pursuing her claim against them.







Medical Experts from Both Sides Agree that Victim had Mesothelioma



Mr. Reulet was diagnosed with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma just two weeks before his death. Testimony confirming his diagnosis was provided by both his treating oncologist and pulmonologist, as well as by physicians representing the asbestos companies. His official Texas Death Certificate noted “diseases, injuries, or complications … that directly caused the death” as septic shock, aspiration pneumonia, multi-organ failure, and peritoneal mesothelioma.



Despite this assessment, the asbestos companies asked that the widow’s case be dismissed because she could not prove that mesothelioma was the single or sole cause of his death. They did not deny that he had the rare asbestos-related disease, or even that their contaminated products, parts, or work environment had contributed to his disease. Rather they said that he had died from the conditions caused by his diagnostic testing for the disease, and that they could therefore not be held responsible.



Judge Denies Asbestos Companies’ Attempt to Evade Responsibility for Mesothelioma



In her review of the case, U.S. District Court judge Briana Jackson permitted Mrs. Reulet’s wrongful death and survival action to proceed against the companies who she claimed played a role in causing his exposure to asbestos and subsequent death.  The judge explained that the companies’ petition to have the case dismissed was not supported by Louisiana law. The law does not require a plaintiff in an asbestos case to prove that mesothelioma was the sole cause of death; rather, the plaintiff only needs to show that it was a substantial factor resulting in the death.



Based on this, the judge noted that experts for both the widow and the asbestos companies agreed that Mr. Reulet had died from complications of mesothelioma and that he would not have died but for the disease or for diagnostic tests necessitated by the disease. The widow will be able to continue her quest for justice.

### Judge Rules Japanese Brake Company Cannot Escape Mesothelioma Litigation

There was once a time when almost all automotive brakes were fabricated using asbestos, and exposure to dust from these contaminated parts has been blamed for countless cases of malignant mesothelioma. In a recent lawsuit, a Japanese manufacturer of brakes attempted to evade liability for the harm that their product caused by insisting that the state of California had no authority to hear the case.







Japanese Brake Manufacturer Named in Man’s Mesothelioma Lawsuit



When Akebono Brake Industry Co., Ltd. and its subsidiary, Akebono Brake Corporation, found itself named in George Sweikhart’s mesothelioma lawsuit, they almost instantly filed a petition requesting dismissal. The basis for their motion was a purported lack of personal jurisdiction because the case was filed in the state of California and they are a Japanese company.



Though their motion to dismiss the mesothelioma claim was denied by the Superior Court of California, the company tried again, insisting that they could not legally be served with legal documents and that they had no meaningful place of business in the state.



Company’s Connections with State of California Made Clear in Mesothelioma Victim’s Case



Though Akebono insisted that they had never ‘purposefully caused’ or ‘deliberately directed’ its Japanese or United States subsidiaries to engage in contacts with California,” the mesothelioma victim provided evidence that the parts had been used throughout his tenure at a California car dealership from 1969 to 1985 and then again from 1986 to 1997 and from 1998 to 2000. In support of the assertion that the parts were readily available and constantly used within the state, the court heard that the company had sold hundreds of thousands of parts to a distributor in the state, and had also registered its subsidiary with the state and worked to remain in compliance with state regulations.



The court ruled that the mesothelioma victim had used Akebono’s asbestos-contaminated parts and that they’d played a role in his illness. They also denied Akebono’s argument, saying that there was “sufficient evidence that Akebono purposefully availed itself of forum benefits in California at the time George Sweikhart testified he was using Akebono parts in California.”

### Objection to $5 Million Mesothelioma Verdict Centers on Question of Recklessness

Donald and Linda Miller’s mesothelioma lawsuit against Kaiser Gypsum Company accused the company of acting recklessly. An Oregon jury agreed and ordered the company to pay the couple more than $6.2 million in damages. Though that amount was later reduced to $5.2 million, the company still objected to being held responsible, and appealed the verdict. Despite their arguments, the Oregon Court of Appeals allowed the jury’s decision to stand.







Mesothelioma Blamed on 1960s Exposure to Kaiser Gypsum Product



The mesothelioma victim and his wife blamed his illness on a variety of products to which he was exposed over the years, and filed suit against several companies.  With the exception of Kaiser Gypsum, the case against each company was either dismissed or a private settlement was negotiated with the couple.  



That left only Kaiser Gypsum to face the mesothelioma victim in court. The Millers pointed to the years 1966 through 1969, the years when he’d worked as a mechanical insulator in close proximity to the company’s joint compound. After hearing the evidence, the jury agreed that the company had been negligent in failing to warn about the dangers of asbestos in their product.



Kaiser Gypsum’s Appeal of Mesothelioma Verdict Denied



After the jury decided in favor of the mesothelioma victim, Kaiser Gypsum appealed, arguing that the jury’s decision was wrong based on the evidence that had been presented to them. They also argued that the judge erred in failing to order a directed verdict in their favor, and that mistakes had been made in the directions given to the jury about the term “recklessness.”



On hearing Kaiser Gypsum’s case, the Oregon Court of Appeals determined that the jury’s verdict should stand, and that the compensation was rightly awarded to the mesothelioma victim. Their analysis concluded that the jury instructions had appropriately defined recklessness and distinguished it from intentional misconduct. They ruled that there was sufficient evidence that the asbestos in the joint compound contributed to Mr. Miller’s illness and allowed the family to keep the award.

### Secondary Exposure to Asbestos Blamed for Woman’s Malignant Mesothelioma Death

Avondale Shipyard in Louisiana is frequently named a defendant in malignant mesothelioma lawsuits. The company employed thousands of workers who were exposed to and sickened by asbestos, but is frequently able to avoid responsibility by pointing to its role as a government contractor. A recent case showed that defense does not protect them from blame for secondary exposure.







Laundering Asbestos-Contaminated Work Clothing at the Heart of Mesothelioma Lawsuit



According to a claim filed by John Falgout, his wife Ruby Lee died of malignant mesothelioma after years of having laundered his work clothing. John had worked for the Avondale shipyard for years, and was exposed to asbestos on a constant basis. Asbestos fibers clung to his hair and skin, as well as to the clothing that Ruby Lee washed as part of her household chores. In shaking the clothing out, washing it, and then sweeping up debris on the floor, she inhaled the fibers that later grew into deadly mesothelioma tumors.



The shipyard attempted to evade responsibility for Mrs. Falgout’s mesothelioma death by saying that as a government contractor, they could not be held responsible. They argued that they had no duty to warn because they were simply meeting the specifications imposed by the government. Mr. Falgout asked that the company be prevented from using this defense because it was not applicable to the exposure of somebody who was outside of the workplace, and because their failure to warn of the potential harm of asbestos was not ordained by the government. He said that the company could have issued a warning, but had chosen not to.



Judges Agree with Mesothelioma Widower



In reviewing Avondale Shipyard’s argument that they are immune to the Falgout’s mesothelioma claim, the judges of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana sided with the widower. They said that Avondale had failed to provide any reason why the government contractor defense applied to them in instances of exposure outside of what had been authorized by the government. They concluded that “Avondale’s warnings, storage, and safety policies regarding asbestos are acts separate from the act that the government authorized: the use of asbestos in building government ships for the United States military.”



The widower’s case against the shipyard will be allowed to proceed to a jury.

### Lawsuit Blames Cashmere Bouquet Powder for Woman’s Mesothelioma

Maryann Purser died of malignant mesothelioma. After her diagnosis, she and her family reviewed her life history to determine where she could have been exposed to asbestos, the mineral that causes the rare and fatal form of cancer. They realized that the Colgate Palmolive’s Cashmere Bouquet Talcum Powder she'd used throughout her life contained asbestos, and filed suit against the company for negligence. Though the company attempted to have the case against them dismissed, a judge denied their motion for summary judgment.







Mesothelioma Victim Used Talc from the Age of Six



In deposition testimony given before her death, the mesothelioma victim recalled having used Cashmere Bouquet, a popular body powder, from the time she was just six years old through the year 2000.  Her suit claims that asbestos in the powder led to her pleural mesothelioma, and seeks both compensatory damages and punitive damages  based on Colgate’s “reckless and wanton disregard for the health and safety of its product’s users.”



Rather than arguing that there was no asbestos in their product, Colgate-Palmolive responded by saying there had not been enough asbestos from her use of their powder to have caused her mesothelioma. They also argued that Mrs. Purser was not entitled to punitive damages because they had taken affirmative action to make sure that their products were safe for consumers.



Judge Rules for Mesothelioma Victim and Allows Case to Continue



In his decision, Justice of the New York Supreme Court Adam Silvera noted that the mesothelioma victim's expert witness submitted scientific studies showing that asbestos causes mesothelioma, as well as studies showing that Cashmere Bouquet contained asbestos. By contrast, Colgate-Palmolive argued that Mrs. Purser had not been exposed to “sufficient levels of asbestos” from their product to have caused her illness, basing their argument on modeling that assumed a worst-case scenario for exposure rather than trying to approximate her actual exposure.



Based on previous mesothelioma and asbestos case law, the judge said that the motion for summary judgment did not meet the standard for having their case dismissed. Though he did dismiss the request for punitive damages, he said that the evidence the company used to support their argument did not fit the exposure that Mrs. Purser had experienced, and that they had also confused her burden of proof with their own. Their petition was denied and the case will move forward. Get legal help for mesothelioma.

### Court Rejects Ford’s Motion to Dismiss Mesothelioma Lawsuit

Joseph Skrzynski blames his malignant mesothelioma on the years he spent working for Towne Lincoln Ford Mercury. The 65-year-old and his wife filed a personal injury lawsuit against Ford Motor Company in which he describes sweeping up asbestos dust after mechanics had replaced or repaired asbestos-contaminated brakes, and opening boxes filled with asbestos-contaminated Ford brakes and clutches. Though Ford offered various reasons for the case against them to be dismissed, the judges of the Supreme Court of New York in Erie County denied their motion for summary judgment. They also allowed the couple’s punitive damages claim against the auto giant to stand.







Ford Mounts Multiple Arguments Against Liability for Man’s Mesothelioma



In its petition to have the mesothelioma lawsuit dismissed, Ford argued that there was no evidence that the asbestos in their parts led to Mr. Skrzynski’s illness. They also wanted his expert witness’ opinions excluded and that they had not considered Ford’s assertion that therapeutic radiation he'd received earlier in his life might have played a role.



The judges dismissed each of these arguments, noting that Ford’s own exhibits had shown that their brakes and clutches contained amphibole asbestos. They said that the company's assertions about disagreements between expert witnesses actually supported the case being heard by a jury.



Punitive Damages Decision Can't Be Decided Until Mesothelioma Liability is Established



Regarding the mesothelioma victim’s claim for punitive damages and Ford’s request to have it dismissed, the judges noted that “the threshold for establishing punitive damages in New York is demanding, requiring the plaintiff to demonstrate that the defendant’s conduct was so reckless or wantonly negligent as to be the equivalent of a conscious disregard of the rights of others and that the conduct demonstrates a high degree of moral culpability.”



The court determined that it was not possible at the summary judgment stage to waive the mesothelioma victim’s claim for punitive damages, and that whether a particular award should be allowed could not be decided until after a jury had heard all of the details and resolved the question of guilt.

### Vessel Owner Can’t Escape Mesothelioma Widow’s Lawsuit

For decades, shipyards, parts manufacturers, ship owners, and others have been aware that exposure to asbestos causes malignant mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, asbestosis, and other diseases. Yet despite this knowledge, these companies continued to use the material, and failed to warn or provide protection to the unknowing workers who were at risk. Countless people have been sickened and have died of these deadly diseases. Many have fought back and sought compensation for the damage they’ve suffered, including Patricia Hotard, the widow of a shipyard worker who died of mesothelioma.







Shipyard Worker’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos Contamination of Vessel



When Paul Hotard went to work for Avondale Shipyards, he never dreamed that he'd die as a result of his job handing pipe to pipefitters and tacking pipe together for a welder to weld. After all, he never worked directly with asbestos. Yet this simple act took place within the asbestos-contaminated walls of ships owned by SeaRiver Maritime, and Mr. Hotard spent years breathing in the carcinogenic dust.



When Hotard and his wife realized that his workplace environment had been contaminated with asbestos, and had led to his malignant mesothelioma, they filed suit against the shipowner,  and though Paul died, his wife proceeded with the case, accusing the company of negligence and strict liability. SeaRiver Maritime promptly responded with a petition to have the case against them dismissed.



Judge Rejects Company’s Argument Against Liability for Mesothelioma



In their argument against being held liable for Mr. Hotard’s mesothelioma, the vessel owner argued that they had no duty to warn him of the dangers of his work environment because they did not have legal control. They asserted that all responsibility rested with Avondale, his employer. But the widow countered by noting that the ships had been designed to SeaRiver’s specifications, including asbestos materials, and that because they were aware of this and the dangers, they had a duty to warn. She also pointed out that the ships had officially been delivered to the company’s custody and control during the time that her late husband had been working on them.



In keeping with the rules regarding summary judgment and the evidence presented by the mesothelioma widow, the judge hearing the case denied the company’s petition and allowed the case to move forward for a jury to decide the facts.

### Veteran’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos in Navy Ship’s Boiler

When malignant mesothelioma claimed Navy veteran Keith W. Hipwell’s life, his family decided to pursue justice against those responsible for having exposed him to the asbestos. At the top of their list was boiler manufacturer Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation. Despite the company’s objections, a U.S. district court judge is permitting the case to move forward for a jury to decide.







Family Blames Asbestos from Boilers for Navy Veteran’s Mesothelioma Death



According to Hipwell’s family, his mesothelioma death was a direct result of the three years he spent as a boiler tender on the U.S.S. Foss. Their claim cites both the 250 pounds of asbestos contained within the two Foster Wheeler boilers he worked with between 1951 and 1953, as well as the parts that the company specified be used with the boiler: rope, millboard, tape, and gaskets, all composed with asbestos.



In their mesothelioma lawsuit, the family argues that the company was aware of the dangers posed by the asbestos in their products, yet failed to warn of the risks. This put Mr. Hipwell in a position where he was completely vulnerable, and which eventually led to his painful death.



Judge Rejects Company’s Argument Against Mesothelioma Liability



Foster Wheeler filed a petition to have the mesothelioma claim against them dismissed. They offered numerous objections, ranging from a lack of evidence that the victim had been exposed to enough asbestos from their products to have been sickened by it to arguing that they were protected by having been a government contractor. They even asserted that there was no reason to believe that Mr. Hipwell would have taken action to protect himself had he known of the dangers that he faced.



After reviewing the arguments mounted by both the mesothelioma victim’s family and Foster Wheeler, Judge Jill N. Parrish denied the company’s motion for summary judgment. The said that there was sufficient evidence that the company had a duty to warn about the asbestos in their products. As to whether the victim would have acted to protect himself had he known of asbestos’ dangers, she called the answer to that question “unknowable.”

### Second-Hand Exposure to Asbestos Can Cause Lung Cancer, Mesothelioma, and More

It has long been known that exposure to asbestos can lead to significant and deadly illnesses, including malignant mesothelioma and asbestosis. But a case that is moving through the Louisiana court system makes clear that you don’t have to work directly with the deadly carcinogenic material for it to claim your life. 







Laundering Husband’s Asbestos-Contaminated Work Clothes Blamed for Deadly Illness



Mesothelioma is not the only deadly disease that has been linked to exposure to asbestos. Many victims die of asbestos-related lung cancer, and others find themselves debilitated by chronic diseases, including COPD and asbestosis. The Louisiana courts recently heard the case of Joyce Allen, who died of asbestos-related lung cancer after years of laundering her husband’s asbestos-contaminated work clothes.



A lawsuit filed by her husband Odell claims that he worked in an environment that was so heavily contaminated with asbestos that he would protect the seat of his truck with a sheet when he returned home from work. His wife Joyce would then launder both his clothing and the sheet, and unfortunately that – and the overall contamination created within their household over the years – led to her eventual death.



Asbestos Companies Deny Role in Woman’s Second-Hand Exposure Death



Mr. Allen worked as a freight handler and longshoreman between 1968 and 1983, and he too suffered from an asbestos-related disease after his years of exposure. He filed a wrongful death and survival action against several of the companies that he worked for and whose products he worked with. He also named the insurance companies that insured his employers, and several of the named companies filed a motion to have the case against them dismissed. 



Upon hearing expert witness testimony regarding the risk posed by second-hand asbestos exposure, a lower court denied the companies’ motion to dismiss the case, and a court of appeals upheld that decision. Both agreed that there was sufficient evidence to support the case moving forward for a jury to hear.

### Shipyard Sides with Mesothelioma Victim’s Family in Naming Vessel Repair Company as Defendant

When James Grant Gooding died of malignant mesothelioma, he was in the midst of seeking justice from a number of companies he accused of negligently exposing him to asbestos. Chief among them was Avondale Shipyard, a frequent defendant in asbestos cases. Mr. Gooding had participated in constructing, maintaining, and repairing various vessels as well as ships' boilers in Avondale's shipyard. While defending itself, Avondale asked that a third party, vessel repair shop Buck Kreihs, be added to the suit, and Gooding’s family agreed. Despite Buck Kreihs’ objections, the court agreed and allowed the addition to go forward.







Mesothelioma Blamed on Exposure Throughout Coast Guard Veteran’s Life



While Mr. Gooding’s mesothelioma was partly blamed on asbestos exposure he suffered while serving in the U.S. Coast Guard from 1967 through 1970, his family also pointed to his work as a Marine Inspector in the years after his service. That was the justification for naming Avondale Shipyard as a defendant. Their site, notoriously contaminated with asbestos, was where much of his work took place.



In the course of defending themselves against the potential for a significant mesothelioma damages award, Avondale noted that much of Mr. Gooding’s exposure during those years occurred when he was working at other shipyards as a field surveyor for American Bureau of Shipping. Buck Kreihs’ yard was one of those locations. The vessel repair company petitioned the court to have the case against them dropped, arguing that there was no evidence of their role in Mr, Gooding’s death.



Court Weighs Arguments from Mesothelioma Victim’s Family and Defendant



Though Buck Kreihs’ attorneys objected to Avondale Shipyard’s crossclaim, Mr. Gooding’s family agreed with their primary named defendant that the smaller vessel repair company could be added to their claim. That created an unusual dynamic in which the victim’s family and the company they were suing joined forces.



Despite Buck Kreihs’ argument against being named as a third-party defendant in the mesothelioma case, the judge hearing the case allowed Avondale’s crossclaim to stand. He noted that there was sufficient testimony and evidence to support the theory that Mr. Gooding would have been exposed to asbestos-containing products in Buck Kreihs’ yard as well.

### Man’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Work in World Trade Center in 1960s

People who spent decades working in construction, in shipyards, and in factory settings make up the vast majority of today’s mesothelioma victims. Men like William Theophil, who worked as a union member in multiple job settings, were exposed to asbestos in countless ways, so the list of companies that they pursue in the name of justice can be long. One of the defendants Mr. Theophil has named in his recently filed personal injury lawsuit is the company formerly known as ALCOA. He points to their negligent application of asbestos-contaminated fireproofing spray in Tower A of the World Trade Center as being partially to blame for his fatal diagnosis.







Mesothelioma Victim Points to Asbestos in Fireproofing Spray



According to testimony Mr. Theophil provided in support of his mesothelioma claim, he worked as a steamfitter and a member of the union on the 7th floor of Tower A of New York’s ill-fated World Trade Center when it was being built in the 1960s. He recalls ALCOA’s employees spraying fireproofing material on the building’s curtain wall, and how the dust from the spray filled the air and was impossible to avoid inhaling.



In response to being named in Mr. Theophil’s mesothelioma lawsuit, ALCOA filed a motion for summary judgment. They asked to be dismissed from the case based on their assertion that the insulation had been applied by a subcontractor hired by the Port Authority, and argued that they should not be held responsible for that company’s negligent actions. They also claimed that the victim’s testimony belied his own assertions, and indicated that he was too far from the area where the carcinogenic material was being sprayed to have inhaled the toxic asbestos fibers.



Court Denies Company’s Motion to Dismiss them from Mesothelioma Liability



Though ALCOA’s attorneys argued strenuously against being held legally responsible for Mr. Theophil’s asbestos exposure and subsequent malignant mesothelioma diagnosis, the court denied their petition. The judge pointed to New York precedent that required deference to the victim in personal injury cases. As a result, the court ruled that his testimony about being in the presence of the sprayers was sufficient for a jury to be presented with the evidence and make the decision as to whether the company was negligent or not.

### Shipyard Facing Mesothelioma Liability Sues Asbestos Manufacturer

Avondale Shipyards, whose work environment was heavily contaminated by asbestos through much of the 20th century, is frequently named a defendant in mesothelioma lawsuits. When the wife of a man who'd worked as a pipefitter and welder’s was sickened by second-hand asbestos exposure, she sued the company. Avondale then filed its own claim against a company whose asbestos-contaminated products were used in their yard. The suit is an attempt to lessen their own liability should a large award be awarded by a jury.  







Malignant Mesothelioma and Other Diseases Caused by Exposure to Asbestos



Though malignant mesothelioma is the fatal disease that is most frequently associated with exposure to asbestos, many other serious illnesses have been linked to the toxic material. In this suit, Ora Adams filed a claim after being diagnosed with asbestos-related lung cancer. She named Avondale Shipyards as the defendant in her claim, and the worksite then filed its own claim against Westinghouse. The third-party claim specifically cited wallboard that the company manufactured, which was used in the shipyard at the time that Mr. Adams worked there.



According to Mrs. Adams’ lawsuit, her husband carried asbestos into their home from his workplace at Avondale Shipyards, and she then laundered his clothing. While the Adams’ suit focused on Avondale’s failure to warn of the dangers of their workplace, Avondale identified Westinghouse as having contributed to those dangers by incorporating asbestos into the products that were cut and installed in close proximity to Mr. Adams, and tried to bring the manufacturer into the case.



Judge Allows Third-Party Asbestos Claim Against Westinghouse



Though Westinghouse pushed back against the third-party claim and said that the testimony presented was not credible, the judges hearing the case found Avondale’s case compelling. They agreed that there were substantial questions about whether there was asbestos in the Westinghouse Micarta coating that covered the boards, and that those questions should be presented to a jury for a decision.  

### Judge Rejects Asbestos Companies’ Argument that Smoking History Should Negate Liability for Lung Cancer

Malignant mesothelioma is just one illness that is attributed to exposure to asbestos. People who have been exposed to the toxic material have also been diagnosed with chronic illnesses such as asbestos and COPD, as well as other deadly diseases including asbestos-related lung cancer. In a recent case, a man exposed to significant levels of asbestos over his work life was diagnosed with and died of asbestos-related lung cancer. When his family filed suit against the asbestos companies responsible, the companies attempted to have the case dismissed because of his history of smoking cigarettes.







Avondale Shipyard and Others are Frequent Defendants in Mesothelioma and Cancer Claims



When James Becnel was diagnosed with asbestos-related cancer in 2019, he immediately knew that his exposure to asbestos while working in Avondale Shipyards must have contributed to his illness. Before his death the same year, he filed suit against them and other companies whose asbestos-contaminated products he’d worked with. But the companies pushed back against his claim, arguing that because he had been a lifelong cigarette smoker, it was his own actions that led to his illness. They asked for the case against them to be dismissed.



Avondale Shipyards is one of many companies with a long history of defending against claims of causing malignant mesothelioma and other asbestos-related illnesses. These companies attempt to use whatever legal loophole they can to avoid liability for their asbestos-contaminated products and work environments. Mr. Becnel’s history of smoking cigarettes provided them with the opportunity to claim contributory negligence and argue that he, and after his death his heirs, had no way to prove that their product was responsible for his illness.



Conflicting Testimony from Expert Witnesses in Asbestos Cancer Case



The case was heard by Senior District Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, who rejected the asbestos companies’ arguments for dismissal and ruled that the lawsuit should proceed. Judge Lemelle noted that expert witness testimony regarding Mr. Becnel’s illness had raised a legitimate question as to whether his cancer was a result of his years of smoking cigarettes or his years of exposure to asbestos in his workplace. With that important question open to debate, the judge said that the answer could only be decided by a jury and that the case should proceed.

### Brake Manufacturer Must Face Mesothelioma Victim After Claim is Reinstated by Appeals Court

One of the first things that mesothelioma victims are told when they decide to pursue a claim is that they should expect a lot of ups and downs. Asbestos companies attempt to have the cases against them dismissed, and verdicts are handed down and appealed. The journey to justice is worthwhile, but long. A recent case heard in Iowa saw a case dismissed by a district court, only to have it reinstated by the state’s court of appeals. At issue was a recent Iowa Supreme Court ruling regarding how far liability for asbestos exposure extends.







Iowa Supreme Court Holds Those Who Make or Sell Asbestos Products Responsible for Mesothelioma



The mesothelioma lawsuit was filed by Paul and Mary Fankhauser. He was diagnosed with the rare asbestos-related disease after a forty year career with the Iowa Department of Transportation. He named several defendants whose products he worked with, including Abex Corporation and Honeywell International.



After Mr. Fankhauser blamed asbestos in the companies’ brakes for his mesothelioma, both defendants filed to have the case against them dismissed, arguing that state law “limits liability to those who make or sell component parts that are the source of the asbestos exposure.” This interpretation was upheld by a lower court but reversed by the state’s court of appeals, which reinstated the case.



Appeals Court Ruling Shows Importance of Supreme Court decision for Mesothelioma Victims



In reinstating the case, the Iowa Court of Appeals demonstrated the importance of a recent Iowa Supreme Court decision that extended liability to those that made or sold asbestos-contaminated products. They explained that if the companies’ argument was true, then only those companies that process raw asbestos for use in products could be held responsible for exposing mesothelioma victims to asbestos.



The appeals court judges noted that the lower court had misinterpreted the law and “missed the broader context of the statute. The decision makes clear that liability cannot be limited to those that mine, process or refine asbestos and can extend to those who put the toxic material into the flow of commerce without regard for health or wellbeing. The question of the companies’ guilt will move on to a jury.

### Expert Witness Testimony Is Pivotal in Mesothelioma Lawsuits

Whether you are the victim of asbestos exposure or you’re pursuing justice for someone you loved, mesothelioma lawsuits entail a significant amount of time and an enormous amount of evidence. Testimony from expert witnesses is among the most critical parts of presenting a case, as juries rely on the information presented to assess whether a defendant has been negligent. In a recent case, an asbestos company filed a motion to prevent an expert witness from speaking to a jury, but a Louisiana judge denied their petition and allowed the evidence to be presented.







Mesothelioma Victim Had Been Exposed to Asbestos on the Job



The case in question involved Callen Cortez, a mesothelioma victim whose family continued his case after his death. Their lawsuit named several defendants, including Hopeman Brothers, a company that they accused of contributing to his risk of developing mesothelioma because of the negligent way that their asbestos-containing wallboard was cut in Mr. Cortez’ presence. The family enlisted an industrial hygienist, Gerald Baril, to provide expert witness testimony about how dust and fibers from cutting wallboard spreads in a workplace environment.



In response to Mr. Baril’s planned testimony in the mesothelioma cas, Hopeman Brothers filed an objection to block his testimony. They argued that Mr. Baril had no specific knowledge of the way that asbestos-containing materials were handled in Mr. Cortez’ workplace, despite the fact that he referenced several scientific studies that specifically examined different situations and compared the dust created to current and historical health standards.



Asbestos Company Tries to Block Testimony About “Significant Risk of Mesothelioma”



When Hopeman Brothers learned that Mr. Baril was going to testify that Mr. Cortez had been at “significant risk of mesothelioma” from their wallboards and workplace practices, they argued that his methodology was inappropriately applied and this his lack of familiarity with the specifics of their operations made him an unreliable and inappropriate witness.



The Louisiana court hearing the mesothelioma case considered Hopeman Brothers’ assertions, but denied their petition. They noted that there was no requirement for the victim’s family to show the precise amount of asbestos exposure suffered by their loved one: rather they simply needed to present evidence that the asbestos he was exposed to was harmful. The witness will be permitted to testify for the jury.

### Mesothelioma Widow’s Lawsuit Against Nissan Motors Permitted to Move Forward

Lawrence Carroll died of malignant mesothelioma in 2016, just months after having been diagnosed with the rare and fatal disease.  Knowing that he had been exposed to asbestos at various points in his life, his widow and her son ordered an autopsy for litigation purposes. That autopsy and the disposition of the samples taken were at the center of significant legal action by one of the named defendants and resulted in the widow’s claim being dismissed until an appeals court overturned a lower court’s ruling.







Nissan Motors Accuses Mesothelioma Widow of “Willful and Deliberate” Violations



The mesothelioma widow's contract with the autopsy company stated that after six months the materials collected would be made available to medical researchers or destroyed. She later filed a mesothelioma lawsuit against five bankruptcy trusts representing companies whose asbestos-contaminated products her husband had been exposed to as a child, and then later Nissan Motors as a defendant for workplace exposure to asbestos during his years working as a service and parts manager. 



Nissan requested samples from the mesothelioma victim's autopsy to determine the type of asbestos fibers in his lungs, and when told that they were not available subsequently filed a motion asking for the case to be thrown out. They accused the 80-year-old widow of “willful and deliberate” violations of the discovery process.



Lower Court’s Dismissal of Mesothelioma Lawsuit Overturned



Though the lower court hearing the case agreed with Nissan Motors and dismissed the mesothelioma lawsuit, the widow appealed that decision to a Washington state appeals court, which agreed that the lower court had acted inappropriately. They noted that when imposing discovery sanctions, trial courts must be mindful that the law favors the resolution of cases and that courts should impose the least severe sanction adequate to serve its purpose. They also indicated that Nissan had not established that the violations of the rules of discovery were willful or deliberate. The case will be reinstated and permitted to proceed.

### Can You Pursue a Mesothelioma Claim Against a Company That Has Been Sold and Changed Its Name?

Imagine knowing that a company is responsible for your diagnosis with malignant mesothelioma, but having them attempt to evade a lawsuit by pointing to a sale and name change years earlier. That is what happened to Eric Cislo. Fortunately, a New York court hearing testimony in the case has rejected the company’s arguments and ordered them to stand trial in front of a jury.







Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos Carried into Childhood Home



Mr. Cislo filed a personal injury lawsuit against ADSCO Manufacturing Corporation as successor to Farrar and Trefts. Farrar and Trefts was the manufacturer, seller, and installer of Bison boilers, which Mr. Cislo’s father had worked with as a plumber when Mr. Cislo was a child. Those boilers were contaminated with asbestos that was carried into the family home each night on his father’s work clothes.



ADSCO Manufacturing petitioned the court to dismiss the mesothelioma claim against them based on the theory that though they were successors to Farrar and Trefts, the company’s many acquisitions, successions, and name changes had eliminated their legal liability for the wrongs of the original company.



Supreme Court of New York Denies Dismissal of Mesothelioma Claim



Justice Pace of the Supreme Court of the State of New York In Erie County reviewed the applicable law surrounding the mesothelioma claim and denied the company’s motion for summary judgment. They read through the various laws surrounding successor liability to see how they applied to Mr. Cisco’s case, and ultimately determined that the company’s argument was insufficient to dismiss the case and that there were genuine issues of fact that needed to be determined.



One of the most notable points that the judges relied upon in their decision was that ADSCO’s company website promoted the company having been founded in 1877 and that it was “the same company operating today.” They said that this provided significant reason to question the company’s assertion that they were an entirely different entity and not responsible for wrongs from decades earlier. A jury will hear and decide the mesothelioma case.

### Judge Denies Asbestos Company’s Bid to Quash Mesothelioma Claim

Before being diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, William Theophil spent decades working in New York. He worked a variety of jobs, including during the late 1960s when he worked at the 59th Street Powerhouse. His main responsibilities there included scraping gaskets, cleaning pumps, and re-piping pumps. When he got his fatal diagnosis, he filed suit against multiple companies, including O’Connor Constructors. Though the company attempted to have his case dismissed, the judge hearing the case denied their motion for insufficiently meeting the legal standards.







Mesothelioma Victim Worked Near Boiler Insulators



In his mesothelioma case against O’Connor Constructors, Mr. Theophil claims that when he was employed by Almirall & Alford & Swift, he worked in the vicinity of boilers that were being refurbished and insulated by O'Connor's workers. He asserts that he was sickened from breathing in asbestos that they were negligently spreading throughout the air.



In response, O’Connor filed a motion to have the mesothelioma case against them dismissed, noting that the victim could not “point to any evidence that he had ever encountered O’Connor’s employees at any point in his life and thus cannot demonstrate that he was exposed to asbestos from a product for which O’Connor would owe a duty to warn.” They also argued that the claim did not belong in a New York courtroom because they were based in Massachusetts.



Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss Mesothelioma Claim



In his analysis of the asbestos company’s petition, Judge Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York County noted that the company had made the mistake of trying to dismiss the mesothelioma claim by pointing to perceived gaps in the victim’s case rather than proving that they hadn’t exposed him to asbestos. He also noted that though they tried to have the case dismissed for jurisdictional reasons, the fact that they had a New York state office belied their argument against doing business in the state. The motion for summary judgment was denied in its entirety and Mr. Theophil’s case can continue through the court system.

### Mesothelioma Suit Against Colgate Palmolive to Move Forward

Though the majority of mesothelioma claims are filed against industrial manufacturers and suppliers that produced or sold items like brake linings, insulation, floor and ceiling tiles, and shipyard materials components, an increasing number of victims are coming forward and naming a different type of product and defendant. Consumer giants, including Johnson & Johnson and others, are being accused of selling asbestos-contaminated talc-based products to American consumers.  Many claims have been filed against Colgate Palmolive.







Colgate Palmolive’s Cashmere Bouquet Powder Blamed for Malignant Mesothelioma



The mesothelioma lawsuit was filed by Caroline Zicklin, who alleges she was exposed to asbestos from her use of Colgate Palmolive’s Cashmere Bouquet powder and that it led to her diagnosis with malignant mesothelioma. Ms. Zicklin describes more than two decades of using the product, from the early 1950s to the end of the 1970s, detailing her use of a powder puff and seeing the dust “fly around.”



To support her mesothelioma claim, Ms. Zicklin presented Colgate’s own testing, independent testing, geological surveys, and the establishment of the presence of asbestos in talc within the scientific and medical community. Despite this, the company argued that the case should be dismissed. They argued that their product has never contained asbestos and that she would not have been exposed to sufficient levels of asbestos from their product to have caused her illness. They also claim that her mesothelioma was a result of having smoked Kent cigarettes with Micronite filters that contained crocidolite amphibole asbestos.



Judge Sides with Mesothelioma Victim, Allows Case to Move Forward



In his review of both sides’ arguments, Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York County noted that despite Colgate Palmolive’s assertion of no causal connection between mesothelioma and talc exposure, Ms. Zicklin had presented an article from the Center for Disease Control that expressly stated that malignant mesothelioma could develop after short-term asbestos exposure, and a case study indicating that use of cosmetic talc products of the course of twenty years would create significant and repeated exposure to asbestos.



The judge also noted that precedent had established that even if Ms. Zicklin’s having smoked Kent cigarettes contributed to her illness, it would only amount to contributory negligence and would not negate Colgate Palmolive’s product’s effect on her health. Because there are triable issues of fact to be determined, the judge denied the company’s motion to dismiss the case.

### Judge Denies U.S. Steel’s Request to Move Mesothelioma Case from New York Courts

When 84-year-old Navy veteran Gerald Wagner was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, it wasn’t hard for him to figure out how he'd gotten the disease. Not only had he been exposed to asbestos when he’d served in the U.S. Navy, but he’d also followed his service with years onboard an asbestos-contaminated freighter. When he named U.S. Steel Corporation as a defendant in his New York-based lawsuit, the company objected. They argued that another court would be more convenient and asked that the New York case be dismissed. The judge hearing the case denied their motion.







Navy Veteran’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos Exposure in New York



In his claim, the mesothelioma victim detailed multiple exposures to asbestos traceable to U.S. Steel, including during his career in the Navy from 1954 to 1957, his work abord a U.S. Steel freighter in 1959, and his work at Michigan Limestone, a subsidiary of U.S. Steel.



U.S. Steel Corporation filed a motion to dismiss the mesothelioma claim against them based on a legal principle called forum non conveniens. As it sounds, this is essentially an argument that the forum where the case was filed was not as appropriate as another court would be. U.S. Steel claimed that Michigan would be better suited for the case, arguing that there was no nexus between Mr. Wagner and New York and that New York would be an inconvenient forum.



Mesothelioma Lawsuit to Remain in New York



In denying U.S. Steel’s motion to dismiss the mesothelioma case from New York’s courts, Justice Adam Silvera said that “it is clear that there is a nexus between the Plaintiff’s claim and New York,” and that U.S. Steel had conceded that he had been exposed to asbestos in New York during several periods, including while working in New York for U.S. Steel. He concluded that the company had failed to establish an undue hardship for the case to be heard in New York and allowed the case to move forward in the current venue.

### Failure of 3M Mask Blamed for Mesothelioma

Protective gear can be an invaluable tool in the fight against mesothelioma, but only if it works. The failure of a 3M mask to block asbestos, and the company’s knowledge of their product’s defects, was the focus of a recent lawsuit, and though the victim lost his original case, an appeals court has ordered that it be reheard due to mistakes that were made by the court.







3M Mask Worn by Asbestos-Exposed Man Failed



Mesothelioma victim Larry Roemmich spent decades working at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard. His job as an insulator exposed him to asbestos, but for several years he wore a 3M mask that was supposed to keep him from inhaling the toxic substance. He and his wife learned that 3M had been warned about defects in their mask, but chose not to pass those warnings on to the public or to their customers.



The Roemmiches filed a mesothelioma lawsuit against 3M, providing evidence that the company had been warned of their masks’ leaks by the National Institute for Occupational Health (NIOSH) but had not passed that information on: in fact, they continued advertising the masks as effective protection against asbestos.



3M Shifts Blame to Mesothelioma Victim’s Employer



In defending itself against the mesothelioma suit, 3M argued that Puget Sound Naval Shipyard had been negligent for having relied upon their assurances and the assurances of the Bureau of Mines.  They argued that the shipyard having provided the faulty masks had created a superseding cause that negated their own liability.



Though the decision in the mesothelioma case favored 3M, the Roemmiches appealed based on explanations that had been provided to the jury. They petitioned the appeals court for the case to be reheard because the jury had been given incorrect information on the difference between proximate and superseding causation. The justices of the Court of Appeals of Washington agreed, writing, “We agree that the trial court gave an erroneous proximate cause instruction when it combined the “but-for” causation standard with the substantial factor standard. And we agree that the court erred in giving the superseding cause instruction. Both errors prejudiced the Roemmiches with respect to their negligence claim.” The couple will have another chance to get justice.

### Judge Cites Rules of Evidence in Ruling for Mesothelioma Victim

After 81-year-old Anastasios E. Katechis died of malignant mesothelioma, his widow Agathi filed a personal injury claim against Allied Building Products Corporations, as well as several other companies that she blamed for having exposed him to asbestos. Though Allied tried to have the case against them dismissed based on decades-old testimony, the judge hearing the case denied their request, noting that it was inadmissible under the law.







Testimony from Company’s Representative Cited Against Mesothelioma Claim



Though mesothelioma quickly claimed Mr. Katechis’ life, before his death he provided extensive testimony about his exposure to asbestos. He testified that when he’d worked as a painter for Mamais Construction between 1967 and 1970, he'd used asbestos-contaminated joint compound. He recalled seeing the product delivered and provided by Allied and three other companies.



In response to the mesothelioma victim’s testimony, the company's vice president/corporate vice president George Jones testified that Allied had never used joint compound, and asserted that Allied had never sold, distributed, manufactured or otherwise offered it at the time that Mr. Katechis worked for Mamais. Much of his testimony was based on testimony provided by a company representative given in another case that had been heard 21 years earlier. Allied asked for the case to be dismissed based on this old testimony.



Judge Rules Testimony Inadmissible in Mesothelioma Claim



In reviewing the testimony of both the mesothelioma victim and that submitted by Allied from their former executive, Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York County noted that Mr. Jones’ assertions were based on testimony provided 21 years earlier by a person who “at the time the testimony was given was an officer, director, member, employee or managing or authorized agent” of the company, and that under New York law was inadmissible as evidence. 



The company’s motion to dismiss the mesothelioma claim against them was denied and Mrs. Katechis’ case will move forward.

### Woman’s Mesothelioma Death Blamed on Asbestos-Contaminated Home Renovation Products

Imagine being diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma with absolutely no known exposure to asbestos. You didn’t work with the material and neither did anybody in your family, and you didn’t live anywhere near an asbestos mine or plant. Only after extensive research is the mystery solved: the asbestos came from the joint compound used fifty years earlier when your home was renovated. This is exactly what the Mellor family says happened to their mother Esther.  They have filed suit against Union Carbide Corporation, the company whose product she was exposed to.







Union Carbide Tries to Evade Mesothelioma Lawsuit



In response to the mesothelioma lawsuit filed against them, Union Carbide filed a motion for summary judgment, asking for it to be dismissed. They claimed that there was no specific evidence that it had been their joint compound used fifty years earlier for the renovation, but Mrs. Mellor’s daughter remembered the five-gallon buckets that she had seen around the house during the project, and the family provided evidence that all the joint compound the company had sold in five-gallon buckets at the time were contaminated with asbestos.



Family Claims Mesothelioma Victim Inhaled Asbestos Fibers from Renovation Project



Mrs. Mellor’s family points to the enormous amount of dust that was released in their home from Union Carbide’s Georgia-Pacific Ready Mix joint compound, which had to be sanded after application. They say that she inhaled the dust when she cleaned the house during and after the project, as well as when she laundered the family’s clothing, which was constantly covered with the dust.



In handing down its ruling, the Superior Court of Rhode Island pointed to the significant amount of evidence that the mesothelioma victim’s family had provided, and said that it provided a jury with a “basis on which to find it is more probably true than false” that the product had contained asbestos. They denied the company’s motion for summary judgment and allowed the case to move forward.

### In Case Against Westinghouse, Woman’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos from Stepfather’s Clothing

Every mesothelioma death is a tragedy, but among the most heart wrenching stories are those where the victims have never worked with or near asbestos, and instead were exposed inadvertently by a family member. That’s what happened to Ann Stadtler. Her family points to asbestos carried into her childhood home on her stepfather’s work clothes for her illness, and blames asbestos-contaminated equipment manufactured by Westinghouse company for her death.







Secondhand Exposure to Asbestos is Increasingly Common in Mesothelioma Claims



Ann Stadtler died of malignant mesothelioma when she was just 76 years old. Her family filed suit against Westinghouse Electric Corporation in the Rhode Island Courts, blaming exposure to asbestos fibers her stepfather, a union insulator brought into their home between 1948 and 1965. Claims like these seek compensation for second hand asbestos exposure and are increasingly common in mesothelioma claims. The family served the company with a motion to compel the production of documents. The company objected and moved for the case against them to be dismissed.



In their mesothelioma lawsuit, the family pointed to the turbines that Westinghouse had manufactured in sold to power stations throughout New England. In their initial response to the filing, Westinghouse provided a list of power stations where their turbines were used and agreed to produce documents related to them.  Months later they changed course and indicated that they would only produce documents “relative to the turbines at the Narragansett Electric Stations, where Charles Ferguson (Mrs. Stadtler’s stepfather) testified he worked on turbines.” The company also filed a motion to have the case against them dismissed.



Court Orders Westinghouse to Provide Information to Mesothelioma Victim’s Family



In response to Westinghouse, Mrs. Stadtler’s family filed a motion to compel Westinghouse to deliver the documents they needed in support of their mesothelioma claim, as well as to fight the motion to have the case dismissed. They supported their need for the information by pointing to what Westinghouse had already admitted about their products, as well as pending litigation against other asbestos companies. The court agreed, noting that any information pertaining to products in place where Mr. Ferguson had worked were relevant to the family’s claim.

### Dental Supply Salesman’s Mesothelioma Death Blamed on Asbestos Soldering Blocks

Karl Beierschmitt died of malignant mesothelioma after years of exposure to asbestos products. He had been a dental specialist and dental supply salesman, and part of his work involved the use of asbestos soldering blocks sold by Grobet File Company of America’s predecessor William Dixon Company. When Mr. Beierschmitt and his family sued the company for negligence, Grobet tried to evade responsibility by arguing they were not subject to California law. While a lower court granted their motion to dismiss, the California Court of Appeals disagreed.







Lower Court Initially Decides Against Mesothelioma Victim



When the mesothelioma victim was originally diagnosed with his fatal illness and filed suit against the asbestos company, the Superior Court of Los Angeles County agreed the case should be dismissed on personal jurisdiction grounds. The court found the company was not incorporated in the state and had no principal place of business there, and that the victim could not establish a relationship between his illness and the company’s activity in California.



Mr. Beierschmitt died of mesothelioma, but his family members stepped in as plaintiffs and appealed the lower court’s decision. They pointed to testimony from the company’s president regarding national catalogs for the jewelry, dental, and optical industries. Those catalogues were produced from 1968 and 1973 and featured the asbestos soldering block products. There was no specific dental products catalog until 1973. Rather, dental products were sold from a price list with a description of the product.



Court Overturns Lower Court Decision in Mesothelioma Claim



In its review of the testimony presented in the mesothelioma case, the appeals court noted that the asbestos block company had a dedicated jewelry salesperson in California and that the president could not answer as to whether the salesperson would have been prohibited from selling dental products in the state. Based on a recent Supreme Court decision that no “strict causal relationship” was required to establish specific jurisdiction, the court decided that Grobet had purposely availed itself of the California market for soldering blocks and that the California courts did have jurisdiction over the case.

### Family Awarded $3.8 Million After Employer is Blamed for Grandfather's Mesothelioma Death

Before his diagnosis with malignant mesothelioma, Daniel Rugg was an avid outdoorsman who played a huge role in the life of his family, and particularly in the lives of his grandchildren. But years of exposure to asbestos put an early end to Mr. Rugg’s life, and a Pennsylvania jury ordered his former employer to pay his survivors $3.8 million in damages.







Mesothelioma Lawsuit Names Former Employer as Defendant



Most mesothelioma lawsuits blame product manufacturers for the injuries the victim has suffered. They accuse the companies of negligence for having failed to warn of the dangers posed by asbestos hidden in their equipment, parts, or supplies. Mr. Rugg’s case was unusual because his death was blamed on his former employer, Washington Penn Plastics.



Workers’ compensation laws generally protect employers from being named in personal injury lawsuits by their employees, but in this case, Washington Penn’s action was considered egregious. Despite knowing that asbestos was dangerous, they’d assigned Mr. Rugg to dump 50-pound bags of asbestos-contaminated industrial talc into giant storage hoppers. They provided him with no warning of the dangers that they knew he faced, and no protective gear.



Jury Awards Family $3.8 Million Following Mesothelioma Loss



Mr. Rugg suffered with his mesothelioma for three years before the disease took his life at the age of 64. It took the jury just one day of deliberation to find Washington Penn Plastics guilty of failing in its duty to protect him as their employee. The jury awarded the family $3.8 million in compensation. In response to the decision, the victim’s widow said, “This lawsuit was never about the money. This is about the fact that a jury has held Wash Penn responsible for putting profits over its people. I hope no other family has to go through the loss and pain my family and I have experienced.”

### Judge Chafes at Asbestos Company’s Objections to Mesothelioma Claims Language

When Honeywell International’s attorney complained about mesothelioma claims being paid too easily by its own asbestos bankruptcy trust, a Pennsylvania bankruptcy judge pushed back hard. At issue was the language that the trust’s administrators were deeming acceptable on victims’ claims.







Asbestos Bankruptcy Trusts Are Set Up to Make the Mesothelioma Claims Process Easier



Asbestos bankruptcy trusts offer an alternative path to compensation for mesothelioma victims and others sickened by asbestos exposure. The companies that exposed workers and others to asbestos were required to create these funds as a condition of the bankruptcy protection that they received for these workers. Those funds hold over $30 billion for current and future claimants, who can file claims detailing their exposure and illness and be provided with compensation.



Asbestos trusts pay mesothelioma victims less than a jury would award if they were to find an asbestos company guilty, but the route to compensation is faster and far less stressful. It is that ease that Honeywell International’s attorney found objectionable and complained to the bankruptcy court about.



Judge Unsatisfied by Asbestos Company’s Objections to Mesothelioma Claims



Honeywell’s attorney Greg Primis complained that the asbestos trust set up for its subsidiary North American Refractories Company was using “formulaic allegations of exposure” to pay mesothelioma claims and that the funds were being disbursed too easily. He said that the “check the box” affidavits were not detailed enough to warrant compensation. But Pennsylvania bankruptcy judge Thomas Agresti pushed back, asking how many different ways such a claim could be worded.



When Mr. Primis referred to the language in 81 separate mesothelioma claims “rubber stamped”, Judge Agresti objected, saying, “How many other ways can you say it? They’re saying the same thing. Maybe 81 people over the country have the same exposure experience. How many different ways can you say it?” Though the attorney persisted and said that using the same language made it hard to believe that the claims were true, the judge rejected his argument, saying, “You say just because there’s some commonality, you can’t believe the affiant? It seems like we’re dancing around the same thimble. I just wanted to hear what you thought, but frankly you didn’t clear me up on that.”



The argument makes clear how far an asbestos company will go to fight mesothelioma victims getting the compensation that they deserve, and how important it is for those victims to have the legal system and strong advocates working on their behalf.

### Judge’s Dissent Highlights Asbestos Company’s Knowledge of Mesothelioma Risk

79-year-old mesothelioma victim Willie McNeal Jr. prevailed in his lawsuit against talc manufacturer Whittaker Clark & Daniels, but the company was successful in having a $3 million punitive damages award vacated. One member of the California appeals court sharply rejected the reasoning offered by his colleagues, noting the talc company’s clear attempt to conceal the presence of asbestos in their product.







Veteran Maintains $4.8 Million Mesothelioma Award but Loses $3 Million in Punitive Damages



The jury awarded the mesothelioma victim $4.8 million to compensate him for the damages that he suffered as a result of asbestos in Whittaker’s talc and from other sources. They also assigned the company $3 million in punitive damages based on a letter the company’s executive vice president, Frederick F. Roesch, wrote to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 1976. That letter failed to note the presence of asbestos in the company’s talc despite the company’s knowledge of the risk posed by the carcinogenic material.



The jury found the company’s failure to reveal the presence of asbestos to be evidence of deliberate malice, but when the company filed an appeal of this additional charge, the California appeals court hearing the case vacated the order. They agreed with the company’s attorneys that deliberate malice was traditionally appropriate in cases of direct exposure but not when it came from within a product.



Judge Rebukes Company and Colleagues in Mesothelioma Case



In his response to the appeals court vacating the punitive damages awarded to the mesothelioma victim, Justice John Shepard Wiley Jr. called the talc company’s arguments feeble. He argued that the failure of the company to reveal the presence of asbestos despite knowing its dangers merited the punishment.



“The reasonable inference is Roesch left out the bad fact to yield to an instinct as old as human nature: deny, deny, deny. Here is a bad fact. Cover it up. … No one contends there is some safe level of asbestos. A ‘trace’ of a toxin is a major problem. Whittaker’s letter could have said it found only a little asbestos, which would have been like a manufacturer saying its cornflakes contain only a little cyanide or the cake flour has just a bit of anthrax.”

### Mesothelioma from Take-Home Exposure Creates Liability for Shipyard

Upon diagnosis, the first thing that most mesothelioma victims learn is that their disease was entirely preventable, and that the companies that exposed them to asbestos were aware of its dangers. Despite this, many of these companies are protected from legal responsibility by federal laws. In a case currently making its way through the judicial system, a man unable to sue over his employer’s behavior towards him was deemed able to sue that same company over asbestos carried into the family home on his brother’s work clothing.







Court Permits Mesothelioma Victim to Sue Brother’s and Father’s Workplace



Callen Cortez filed his mesothelioma lawsuit against Avondale Shipyards. The Louisiana company is a frequent defendant due to the extensive asbestos contamination of their worksite but is often able to evade responsibility by pointing to the Longshore and Harbor Workers Compensation Act (LHWCA). This federal law provides protection against employee lawsuits, and because Mr. Cortez worked for them, the company filed a motion for summary judgment asking for the claim to be dismissed.



In response, the mesothelioma victim noted that in addition to having been an employee of the shipyard, he was also exposed to asbestos that was carried into his family’s home on the clothing of his brother and his father: his brother had been employed by Avondale when he was a teenager and his father had been employed by another asbestos company, which he named in a separate claim. In addition to his claim as Avondale’s employee, Mr. Cortez cited his childhood exposure to asbestos from his father’s clothing and his teenage exposure from his brother’s clothing.



Judge Agrees that Mesothelioma is Not a “Single Compensable Disease”



While the justices hearing the mesothelioma lawsuit sided with Avondale on the protections provided to them against Mr. Cortez’ suit as an employee and on the question of whether the exposure he suffered was a result of intentional actions, they allowed his claims as a family member to stand, noting that mesothelioma is not a “single compensable disease” but that each exposure to asbestos can lead to the condition.



In their decision, the judges wrote, “Plaintiff’s claim against Avondale in its capacity as his brother Daniel’s employer is materially indistinguishable from plaintiff’s claims against his father’s employers for whom plaintiff himself never worked. The Court finds that plaintiff is not deprived of a tort claim for non-employment injuries suffered via his brother in the home, merely because he later became an Avondale employee.”

### Louisiana Jury Delivers Record-Breaking $37.6 Million Mesothelioma Award

Countless mesothelioma victims have filed personal injury lawsuits against the companies that exposed them to asbestos, and juries have awarded them significant awards to compensate them for the damages that they've suffered. In a recent case, a Louisiana jury awarded a former union welder and his family a record-breaking $37.6 million in damages.







Welder's Story Reveals the Tragedy of Mesothelioma



A diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma is devastating. The condition is always considered fatal and the course of the disease is extremely painful. Making matters worse is the fact that mesothelioma is an entirely preventable disease. It is caused by exposure to asbestos, and for years the companies that used the mineral in their products failed to warn of its dangers or to seek a replacement component.



In the Louisiana case, the mesothelioma victim worked as a union welder and pipefitter in an industrial area that has since been dubbed Cancer Alley because so many sicknesses have been blamed on the work environment. The man’s lawsuit named twenty-one companies, including his former employer, Level 3 Holdings (formerly known as Peter Kiewit Sons' Co.). All the defendants were accused of negligently exposing the victim to asbestos and not warning of its dangers, despite knowing that it could lead to serious illness or death.



Jury Agrees that Companies Were Responsible for Mesothelioma



The jury decided that the companies were negligent, and provided the multi-million-dollar mesothelioma verdict based on their decision. The evidence presented by the man's attorneys had shown that the executives of all of the defendants were well aware of the dangers that asbestos posed, yet took no steps to protect workers.



A representative of the mesothelioma victim’s family said, “We know that no amount of money can make things right for mesothelioma victims, but it is necessary they receive financial support for the costly medical bills and expenses they have incurred as a result of the negligence of companies that chose profits over safety.”

### Asbestos Company Tries to Sue Judge That Ruled Against them in Mesothelioma Case

When the family of a longshoreman who died of mesothelioma filed a lawsuit against Ports America Gulfport, the company did what many asbestos defendants do: they filed a motion for summary judgment, asking the court to have the case against them dismissed. But when the state court judge in the case denied their request, as also frequently happens, the asbestos company did something remarkable: its attorneys filed a lawsuit against the judge in federal court.







Defendants Claims Federal Law Protects Them Against Mesothelioma Claims



In filing their initial petition against liability for the man’s mesothelioma death, Ports America Gulfport petitioned Louisiana state's Judge Rachael Johnson to dismiss the case against them. They pointed to the Longshore Harbor Workers Compensation Act, which they argued protected them against state tort claims. Judge Johnson ruled against them and five days later they filed suit against her and sought declaratory and injunctive relief to stop the state proceedings, as well as any potential enforcement of a final judgment against them.



In hearing their pleading, U.S. District Judge Sarah S. Vance denied the company’s request. She pointed out that injunctive relief could only be granted under one of two circumstances: either that the asbestos company could show that they had a good chance of winning their case on its merits or that they could show that they would suffer irreparable damage if the case were not enjoined. She decided that neither was the case.



Judge Predicts Damage to the Legal System if Mesothelioma Defendant’s Argument Were to be Accepted



Moving beyond the specific issues surrounding the mesothelioma lawsuit, Judge Vance noted that allowing the asbestos company to pursue their argument and having the federal court intervene in a state case could cause chaos in the litigation system. She wrote that “having cases and controversies disposed of in an orderly fashion, using the designated motions and appeals processes of the appropriate judicial system” was essential and that the company’s request would set precedent for “an increase in unpredictable and disorderly litigation practice, introducing thorny legal issues – jurisdictional and otherwise – into even the most garden-variety cases.”

### Mesothelioma Widow’s Claim Against Brake Manufacturer Restored

Though a lower court had initially agreed with an asbestos company and dismissed the mesothelioma claim against them, a California appeals court overturned that decision, allowing a mesothelioma widow’s claim against them. 







Rail Vehicle Brake Company Accused of Negligence in Mesothelioma Lawsuit



The mesothelioma lawsuit was filed by Susan Hahn, the widow of mesothelioma victim Richard Hahn. Hahn had worked for the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency for years, and though the family knew that it was exposure to asbestos that had killed him, their list of companies whose products he'd been exposed to was incomplete. As many plaintiffs do and as the law allows, they chose to refer to those yet undiscovered companies as Doe defendants.



The family eventually added the name of New York Air Brake to their list of mesothelioma defendants after discovery showed that the company, which had been mentioned in an earlier decision, did use asbestos in their products. The company objected to their addition and filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that the family “knew or should have known” that they were an asbestos supplier and that their filing was late.



Lower Court Decision in Mesothelioma Claim Overturned



Though the trial court agreed with the company and dismissed the mesothelioma claim, California’s First Appellate District ruled that the lower court had applied the incorrect standard in their decision. They noted that it would have been impossible for the widow to include the company’s name until they had established that they manufactured brakes that contained asbestos. This decision upholds a 100+ year old doctrine that holds plaintiffs to a looser standard to plaintiffs than to defendants when it comes to “negligent ignorance.”



The appellate court noted that the mesothelioma widow had applied “reasonable diligence to obtain the facts” that the asbestos company argued she “should have known.” In this case, while an executive had named the company as having made the brakes that were used in the rail cars that Mr. Hahn had worked with, it wasn’t until later that Boeing provided documents that confirmed that the brakes contained asbestos. The case will move forward for a jury to hear.

### Despite General Electric’s Arguments, Mesothelioma Lawsuit Will Proceed

One of the most daunting aspects of pursuing a mesothelioma lawsuit is the fact that the companies named as defendants are often some of the world’s biggest corporations. But victims of asbestos deserve justice, and the courts give ordinary people the opportunity to stand up and be heard. In a recent case, a Navy veteran and electrician argued that his case against General Electric should go to a jury, and a New York judge agreed.







Navy Veteran’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos Exposure During Service and Civilian Job as Electrician



The mesothelioma lawsuit was filed by Arnold Pritt and his wife Ruth Ann. Mr. Pritt claims that he was exposed to asbestos both during the years he served in the Navy and in the years after, when he worked as a civilian electrician. In both instances he points to equipment manufactured by General Electric as the source of his exposure.



General Electric filed a motion to have the mesothelioma lawsuit against them dismissed. The company argued that they had not manufactured the equipment that he was exposed to onboard the ship, and that it had in fact been manufactured by Westinghouse. Though evidence presented supported this argument and the judge dismissed the claim against the company on that count, the question of his exposure as a civilian was more complicated.



Expert Witness Points to “Above Background” Asbestos Exposure in Mesothelioma Claim



Though General Electric acknowledged that Mr. Pritt might have been exposed to asbestos from their products as a civilian electrician, they argued that the exposure would not have been enough to have caused his mesothelioma. In response, Mr. Pritt presented an expert witness who testified that his “hands-on activity” would have led to asbestos being released into his work environment, and that those levels would have been “above background” levels.  As a result, the judge determined that a jury would need to examine the material facts that were in dispute. The case will move forward.

### Asbestos Companies Use Invasive Legal Strategy Against Mesothelioma Claim

Ever since malignant mesothelioma was found to be caused by exposure to asbestos, people diagnosed with the disease have successfully sued asbestos companies for their failure to warn them about or protect them from exposure. Billions of dollars have been awarded, and the defendants have gotten increasingly creative in their legal strategies. Most recently, some asbestos defendants have attempted to gather genetic material from victims to try to show that they are not at fault for development of their disease. In a case in California, the defendants have gone even further.







Court Asked to Decide on Use of Mesothelioma Victim’s Genetic Material



Many defense lawyers have attempted to blame mesothelioma on the victim's genetics, and have succeeded in requesting genetic testing of some plaintiffs under specific circumstances. A case pending in the California court system has seen the asbestos company go one step further. They are asking for the victim’s genetic material in order to use in future research.



John C. Lohmann was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma after working for five decades in refrigeration maintenance. When he and his family filed suit against several companies, the expert witnesses called by the defense requested that they be able to make use of his genetic material that they’d analyzed in advance of their testimony in court. They argued that since the material was presented in court proceedings, that it was now in the public domain and available for their future research.



Mesothelioma Advocates Express Concern Over Medical Data’s Use



As Mr. Lohmann’s family works to protect the privacy of his own medical data, mesothelioma advocates have expressed concern that the use of his genetic material goes far beyond what has previously been seen in asbestos negligence proceedings. Compelled genetic testing has been permitted in certain cases, but the use of a mesothelioma victim’s tissue for research purposes to be used with no specific condition in mind suggests the possibility for abuse, privacy violations, and the questionable linking of genetic predispositions to be used against future plaintiffs.

### Navy Veteran’s Mesothelioma Claim Will be Heard, Despite Asbestos Company’s Objections

While a federal judge acknowledged that it’s not clear whether Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation was at fault in a Navy veteran’s fatal malignant mesothelioma, he also said that it’s impossible to eliminate the possibility based on the facts in the case. As a result, he denied the company’s motion to have the case dismissed and let Jerome J. Gehant’s family’s claim against the company proceed for a jury to hear.







Three Years of Navy Service Exposed Sailor to Asbestos that Led to Mesothelioma



According to the lawsuit filed against Foster Wheeler by Gehant’s family, the Navy veteran served for just three-and-a-half years, from March 1967 through December 1970. But during his service he worked in shipyards and aboard the USS America. The claim asserts, “The asbestos and asbestos-containing products in and about the vessels upon which Jerome J. Gehant worked and in the shipyards are known to be highly toxic to mankind.”



Much of the equipment that the mesothelioma victim worked with was manufactured by Foster Wheeler, and though the company argued that they had not known about the dangers of the asbestos contaminating the gaskets in their equipment, the judge hearing the case noted  that “there is ample evidence that defendants knew or should have known … that exposure to asbestos dust could cause lung cancer … and there is evidence defendants knew or should have known that removing and replacing asbestos-containing gaskets could expose a user to asbestos dust.”



Asbestos Company Looks to Government Contractor Status to Shield it from Mesothelioma Claim



Faced with accusations that they knew or should have known that their equipment’s parts were contaminated with asbestos and could lead to sailors’ developing malignant mesothelioma, Foster Wheeler turned to their status as a government contractor, arguing that the government did not offer the option of whether to use asbestos in their products. In response the judge noted that “several courts have denied motions for summary judgement on the basis that there was a triable issue of fact related to whether the Navy prohibited manufacturers from placing warning on their product.” The judge denied the motion for summary judgment and allowed the case to move forward,

### Merchant Marine Dies After Years of Fearing Asbestos-Related Cancer

In November of 2020, Carlo G. Badamo died of asbestos-related lung cancer. He had been diagnosed with the disease on August 9th of 2017, and on July 28, 2020 he filed a lawsuit under the Jones Act against Chevron, Chiquita Brands, and other defendants, accusing them of having exposed him to the asbestos that caused his illness. The companies all petitioned the court to have the case against them dismissed, arguing that the statute of limitations had passed because the first medical testing leading to his diagnosis took place before July 29, 2017. Though this was true, the family argued that his definitive diagnosis did not come until he had a biopsy several days later. The court agreed and the case will proceed.







Victim’s Claim Recounts Extensive Asbestos Exposure and Cancerphobia



According to the lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of New York, Mr. Badamo had served in the merchant marines for eleven years, from 1944 to 1955. During that time he suffered extensive exposure to asbestos-containing products in the crews quarters, the engine room, the passage ways and the galley. The working conditions in the engine room were described as resembling a “mild snowstorm” of asbestos insulation, and he described working with “rolls and rolls” of asbestos gaskets.



He testified that he had been exposed to asbestos in each position he held over the years and that he had no training in identifying the product, nor was he warned of the risk of mesothelioma or any other asbestos-related disease. He indicated that he would have worn a mask if one had been available, and that nobody had ever indicated that he needed to. In 2008 he had filed a lawsuit against multiple shipowner employers, shipbuilders, and others alleging that he had suffered injuries due to his asbestos exposure, including cancerphobia that made him constantly seek monitoring for asbestos-related diseases.



Asbestos Companies Argue No Definitive Diagnose Needed to Start Statute of Limitations Clock



Though the companies moving to have the asbestos case against them dismissed argued that no definitive diagnosis was required for a claim to accrue and start the statute of limitations clock, the court agreed with one of Mr. Badamo’s expert witnesses that there was no way that he could have learned that he had asbestos-related lung cancer until a biopsy had been completed, and that courts have previously held that certain illnesses are more reliant on medical diagnosis than others. As a result the judge denied the motions for summary judgment and allowed the case against them to move forward.

### Maintenance Worker Defeats Asbestos Company’s Bid to Dismiss Mesothelioma Lawsuit

From the 1950s through the 1980s, Augustus A. Adams worked for E.I. duPont de Nemours as a maintenance worker and insulator, and it was that work that exposed him to the asbestos that caused his malignant mesothelioma. He and his wife Diane filed suit against the many companies that supplied asbestos-contaminated equipment to his employer, but one of the companies they named filed a motion to dismiss, claiming that the couple had not included any factual allegations against them. Upon review, the judge in the case denied the petition, noting that there were “viable legal claims” against them.







Company Argues that Mesothelioma Claim is Inappropriate



Mr. Adams' mesothelioma lawsuit named several defendants whose products were present at the DuPont work site in Kinston, North Carolina, identifying each piece of asbestos-contaminated equipment and its manufacturers to which he had been exposed. Included in the list was Vistra Corporation, whose “alternate entity” is “Vistra Energy Corporation., CRS Sirrine, CRSS, and J.E. Sirrine.”



Vistra Corporation responded by arguing that it should not be included in the mesothelioma lawsuit because the complaint against them had not included “the nature or identity of any product that [they had] defectively designed or warranted” and subsequently not warned Mr. Adams about. The company’s argument was that their role at the North Carolina site was as a provider of professional services, “namely architectural and engineering services.”



Judge Denies Bid to Evade Mesothelioma Claim



In reviewing the company’s bid to be removed from the list of mesothelioma defendants, the judge noted that the Adams had specifically sued the company as a product defendant rather than as a service defendant, and that though they had referred to Vistra using the term “design of facilities,” they did not limit them to that role. The judge noted that the motion to dismiss would not resolve the company’s questions regarding the complaint, and that those would be better raised at a later point in the case.

### $13.5 Million Mesothelioma Verdict Stands Despite Asbestos Company’s Appeal

Washington state resident Raymond Budd blames his malignant mesothelioma on the joint compound that he used while working for his father and uncle’s drywall business from 1962 to 1972. When he and his wife sued the joint compound’s manufacturer, they were awarded $13.5 million by a King County jury. Though the company appealed the verdict, the judges of the Court of Appeals of the State of Washington upheld the decision, saying that the evidence presented at trial “sufficed to sustain the jury’s verdict.”







Kaiser Gypsum Argues Against Mesothelioma Trial Decision



In its appeal of the jury’s decision, Kaiser Gypsum posed several arguments, claiming that the jury selection process in the mesothelioma trial had been insufficiently random; that expert witness testimony had been erroneously transcribed; that there was a lack of proof that their product had caused Mr. Budd’s mesothelioma; and several other technical grounds for dismissal.



In response, the mesothelioma victim’s attorneys addressed each assertion. They noted that the jury selection process had been impacted by COVID-19 protocols and that though Kaiser had challenged it at the time, the trial court had denied their argument. Mr. Budd’s attorneys noted that the company had challenged transcription records during the trial and had been twice denied, had argued that Mr. Budd would not have paid attention to warnings against the use of the product despite his providing proof that he had quit smoking once warnings appeared on cigarette packs, and that the lower court had agreed during the trial that Budd had provided sufficient evidence of the role that chrysotile asbestos plays in the development of malignant mesothelioma.



Court of Appeals Affirms Jury’s Decision



The Court of Appeals issued a thorough and detailed response to the many arguments that Kaiser Gypsum made against the jury’s decision in the mesothelioma lawsuit. In assessing each assertion, they ultimately determined that the lower court had complied with all of the requirements and applicable law, that the transcription error was harmless and would not have changed the jury’s verdict, that the evidence presented had been enough to support a finding of cause in fact, and that each of the technical issues raised had correctly been decided. The mesothelioma victim and his wife will be able to retain the $13.5 million that the jury had awarded them.

### Statute of Limitations Decision Rests on Who is Filing the Mesothelioma Claim

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently reversed a lower court decision regarding a mesothelioma claim, and in doing so they clarified the importance of understanding on whose behalf a personal injury claim is being filed.  The question revolved around the death of Thomas Deem, an outside marine machinist at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard who died in 2015.







Mesothelioma Widow’s Claim Wrongly Dismissed



Mr. Deem was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma in February 2015, and the disease claimed his life a few months later, in July. Just shy of three years after his passing, in June of 2018, his wife Sheri filed a wrongful death claim against several companies that had manufactured, sold, and distributed the asbestos that was used in his workplace and to which he had been exposed. Those companies filed a motion to have the case dismissed, pointing to her suit having been filed more than three years after his diagnosis.  The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington granted their petition and dismissed the case.



Mrs. Deem appealed the district court’s decision, arguing that though more than three years had passed since her husband’s mesothelioma diagnosis, her case was filed less than three years before his death. She'd filed a wrongful death claim on her own behalf, and in her appeal she argued that her filing fell within the required time limit.



Court of Appeals Agrees With Mesothelioma Widow



The Court of Appeals agreed with Mrs. Deem and allowed her mesothelioma claim to move forward. In their decision they noted that the date on which the statute of limitations clock begins ticking is entirely dependent upon the type of claim that is being filed. “A wrongful death claim cannot arise or accrue before death even if the cause of death is anticipated. Stated another way, the plaintiff in a personal injury action or a survival action for the seaman’s estate after his death assumes the legal posture of the seaman, but by contrast, the plaintiff in a wrongful death action is necessarily a family member or relative of the deceased.”

### Auto Parts Company’s Bid to Avoid Mesothelioma Claim Denied

Frank Labarre died of malignant mesothelioma after decades of working in the automobile repair industry. Over the years he worked as a tire repairman, a salesman, and even owned his own shop, Fleet Tire Service. When he was diagnosed with the deadly illness he filed suit against multiple defendants, including the companies that manufactured and sold him asbestos-contaminated brakes without warning him of their dangers. One company, Bienville Auto Parts, Inc., tried to evade responsibility by arguing that they were only a vendor, and not responsible for the brakes’ dangers.







Daughter Continues Claim after Father’s Mesothelioma Death



Though the original mesothelioma claim against Bienville was filed by Frank, his wife Barbara, and his daughter, both Frank and Barbara died, leaving Karen Labarre Birdsall to pursue justice on her father’s behalf. She argued that even though Bienville had not manufactured the brakes, they were “professional vendors of asbestos-containing products” and “knew or should have known of the defects of the asbestos products they sold, and negligently failed to warn the users of potential health hazards from the use of said products.”



Bienville asked for the case against them to be dismissed. They argued that they'd never put their name on the products or modified them, and that they were not in control of the brakes’ quality. They said that they had no duty to warn, and further that Mr. Labarre was a “sophisticated user” of the brake products and should have known of their dangers.



Judge Rules Against Brake Company in Mesothelioma Case



In ruling on the motion for summary judgment, the judge denied the company’s argument that Mr. Labarre’s exposure to asbestos in their products was too trivial to have contributed to his mesothelioma. He also pointed out that under Louisiana law “a seller of a product can be held strictly liable as a manufacturer if the plaintiff proves that the seller qualifies as a “professional vendor.” He also noted that Bienville had their own employees wear masks when working with the asbestos-contaminated products. He said that this provided some evidence that the company knew or should have known that the products contained asbestos and that asbestos was dangerous, and allowed the case to move forward.

### Tiles Linked to Mesothelioma and Other Asbestos-Related Diseases Subject of Lawsuit

Asbestos was once a common component of vinyl tiles, and as a result tile manufacturers are frequently named in lawsuits filed by those diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, asbestosis, and other asbestos-related diseases. In a recent case, The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company was named as a defendant in a personal injury lawsuit. The company asked a New York judge to dismiss the case, claiming that the tiles the victim worked with did not contain asbestos, but witness testimony contradicted this assertion, and the judge allowed the case to move forward.







Fibers Released When Cutting Contaminated Tiles Cause Cancers Like Mesothelioma



Many cases involving vinyl asbestos tiles are filed by victims of malignant mesothelioma, but in the recent case, victim Ferdinand Catapano was diagnosed with a different illness, asbestos-related lung cancer. Catapano worked as a union carpenter with his brother-in-law from 1969 until 2007. The men worked in both residential and commercial buildings, and spent much of their time installing Goodyear floor tile.



In deposition testimony, Catapano remembered working with specific Goodyear-branded tiles whose boxes were marked “vinyl asbestos tile.” The company argued that the tiles that they produced during the time that Catapano referenced did not match his exact description and did not contain asbestos, and they asked for the case against them to be dismissed.



Judge Notes Questions of Fact in Asbestos Cases Need to be Decided by Jury



In handing down his decision, Justice Adam Silvera noted disparities between Goodyear’s assertions and statements given by Mr. Catapano and by a former Goodyear floor tile development engineer. While the victim’s memories are important, the judge gave additional weight to the former employee’s indication that special orders for asbestos tiles continued to be filled past 1975, and that those orders were filled both with tiles that were still available and with some tiles that were specially produced. The judge denied Goodyear’s motion for summary judgment.

### While Mesothelioma Plaintiffs Wait, Fraud Case Against Johnson & Johnson Allowed to Proceed

Johnson & Johnson has been named as the defendant in tens of thousands of person injury lawsuits filed by people diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma and ovarian cancer, and by their survivors. Those cases, which blame talc in the company’s popular baby powder product for their illnesses, are all on hold, awaiting the outcome of bankruptcy proceedings involving the company’s recently formed subsidiary, LTL Management LLC. However, a separate case accusing the company of fraudulently misrepresentation involving talc, will be permitted to move forward.







Case Accusing J&J of Fraud Deemed Separate from Mesothelioma Claims



Although Johnson & Johnson’s attorneys attempted to shift the fraud claim into the same pending category as is currently impacting mesothelioma and ovarian cancer victims, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan agreed with the plaintiffs in the fraud case that their claims were distinct from the asbestos injury claims and should not be precluded by the litigation stay in the Chapter 11 case.



While the company’s transfer of all of its liabilities involving mesothelioma and ovarian cancer claims is the root of the Chapter 11 litigation, Judge Kaplan said that the establishment of LTL did not create indemnification obligations with regard to the fraud class action, and that the fraud case should proceed.



Fraud Case is a Class Action Suit Filed by Workers Exposed to Industrial Talc



Rather than being filed by consumers diagnosed with mesothelioma or ovarian cancer, the fraud case that the judge has allowed to proceed was filed by Daniel and Roger Edley, whose father Louis died in 1994. Tey are representing a class of workers exposed to industrial talc who had filed suit against Johnson and Johnson and a unit of Imerys Talc. The case was dismissed based on what they say were false and fraudulent representations by J & J, and they are now suing the company for fraud and spoliation of evidence rather than for compensation for the asbestos injuries suffered.

### Nebraska Woman’s Family Settles Mesothelioma Claim for $260,000

For years, Donna Grant worked concessions and catering at Lincoln, Nebraska’s Pershing Center, never dreaming that the job would lead to her eventual diagnosis with malignant mesothelioma. Two years after her death, her family has agreed to a $260,000 settlement with the city. The money will pay for her funeral and burial costs and her hospital and medical expenses, as well as offering compensation for the pain and suffering that she endured prior to her death.







Vibrations from Concerts, Maintenance Crews Disturbed Asbestos That Led to Mesothelioma



Following her mesothelioma diagnosis, Mrs. Grant recalled dust that fell onto the concession areas where she'd worked — it would appear whenever the Pershing Center vibrated from the sound generated during concerts. She also recalled maintenance being done in those areas, and the tremendous amount of dust that was generated. She hadn't realized that the dust was deadly.



Her sister, Dixie Johnson, filed a mesothelioma lawsuit against the city, accusing them of negligence in its management of the popular entertainment venue where Mrs. Grant had worked from 1974 through 2014, when it stopped hosting events. The suit cited a lack of care in the hiring and supervision of maintenance subcontractors, as well as the failure to test for asbestos in areas where employees worked and were vulnerable to breathing in carcinogenic asbestos fibers.



City Agrees to Pay $260,000 in Mesothelioma Death



While the $260,000 settlement of the mesothelioma case has resolved the issue for Mrs. Grant’s family, the Pershing Center building remains a subject of concern for people who live and work nearby. With the asbestos-contaminated building slated for demolition, the city of Lincoln has sought help from an asbestos remediation firm to guide them through the process and ensure that no neighbors or workers risk any further exposure.

### Dismissed Mesothelioma Claim Reinstated by Delaware Supreme Court

A mesothelioma widow seeking justice on behalf of her late husband won an important victory in Delaware’s Supreme Court when the justices overturned a lower court decision that had dismissed her claim. Shelley Droz will now be able to pursue her case against the company she blames for her husband’s illness and death.







Suit Claims Equipment Created Asbestos Dust that Led to Mesothelioma



Eric Droz died of malignant mesothelioma decades after having been exposed to asbestos. According the lawsuit filed by his wife Shelley, as a high school student he’d worked at an auto repair shop, using an arc grinding machine to resurface brake drum shoes that were made with asbestos. The widow’s suit claimed that the machine’s manufacturer, Hennessy Industries, Inc., knew that the equipment would raise asbestos dust but issued no warnings.



Hennessy filed a motion to dismiss Mrs. Droz’ original mesothelioma lawsuit, arguing that she had presented insufficient evidence and that their equipment could have been used on products that didn’t contain asbestos. The Superior Court agreed based on rules of evidence, but following Mrs. Droz’ appeal of that decision, the Delaware Supreme Court reversed and ordered the case continued.



Supreme Court Reverses Decision in Mesothelioma Lawsuit



In reviewing the mesothelioma lawsuit, the Supreme Court noted that Mrs. Droz had shown that there were only three brands of brake shoes used in the shop where her late husband had worked, and that all contained asbestos. That being the case, the court agreed that there was no possibility that he had worked with non-asbestos products.



Chief Justice Collins J. Seitz, Jr. took the time to comment on the difficulties involved in mesothelioma claims, noting that “Asbestos exposure cases are beset with evidentiary challenges. The latency period before disease is lengthy. Memories fade about the circumstances of exposure.”

### UK Mesothelioma Widow Awarded $18 Million in Damages by Florida Jury

Following years of legal wrangling, mesothelioma widow Roseann Donovan finally got the legal justice she'd fought for. Mrs. Donovan’s late husband Michael had died of the rare asbestos-related disease in 2015, and ever since she has been on a quest to make the American companies she blamed for his death pay.







Mesothelioma Victim Had Been an RFA Engineer



Michael Donovan’s mesothelioma was traced back to the years he had worked as an engineer for the Royal Fleet Auxiliary. Though a UK citizen, some of the work that he performed was conducted in American ports along the Florida coast, and many of the parts and equipment that he worked with while rebuilding, repairing, and maintaining the RFA ships were contaminated with asbestos.



Though the asbestos companies attempted to evade responsibility for Mr. Donovan’s mesothelioma by objecting on grounds of jurisdiction, the widow eventually defeated those legal arguments and was able to have her case heard in a Florida court.



Multiple Witnesses Support Widow’s Mesothelioma Claim



Though there had been concerns that a Florida jury might hesitate to order American companies to pay damages to a UK citizen, Mrs. Donovan’s mesothelioma claim was supported by testimony from eleven witnesses. They spoke to Mr. Donovan’s work environment while in the Florida ports, the amount of asbestos exposure he would have suffered, and the impact that the asbestos would have had on his health.



Florida law places limits on the damages that can be awarded in a wrongful death claim, but the mesothelioma widow’s legal team offered the jury a way to give her the significant $18 million award. Rather than labeling the damages as compensation for pain and suffering, the jury awarded Mrs. Donovan $1 million for each year of her own life they estimated she would lose due to the mental pain she'd suffered as a result of her husband’s death.

### Upholding Sanctions in Mesothelioma Case, Judge Calls Ford’s Actions “Exceptionally Troubling”

Calling Ford Motor Company’s failure to produce requested documentation pertaining to a mesothelioma lawsuit “an exceptionally troubling and deliberate disregard of the court’s authority,” the New Jersey Appellate Division soundly rejected the company’s appeal of sanctions imposed on it for withholding evidence in violation of discovery rules. The company was required to pay the victim’s family’s costs, and the judge in the case had directed verdict to plaintiff on the issues of duty and breach of duty, and ordered the jury be told that Ford had violated a court order and withheld evidence.







Mesothelioma Lawsuit Against Ford Led to $800,000 Verdict and More



The mesothelioma against Ford Motor Company had been filed by the family of Anita Creutzberger. The 85-year-old woman died after having laundered her husband’s work clothing for years. He had been a service manager for Ford and Lincoln automobile dealerships, and his work area was adjacent to the service bays where asbestos-contaminated Ford brakes send toxic dust onto his clothing.



In addition to the evidence the jury heard about the link between asbestos and mesothelioma, about second-hand asbestos exposure and the presence of dust in the dealership and carried home into the Creutzberger’s laundry, the jury was instructed on Ford’s wrongdoing regarding providing evidence requested by Mrs. Creutzberger’s family in support of their claim.



Appeals Court Finds Sanctions in Mesothelioma Case Appropriate



In affirming the sanctions that had been imposed by the judge in the original mesothelioma lawsuit, the appeals court noted that though Ford had first agreed to provide all pertinent requested manuals as part of the discovery process, they later denied any knowledge of the documents. Even when the plaintiff’s attorneys pointed out that the information had been produced in response to another lawsuit, the company denied having any knowledge of the materials or that they existed.



In her remarks on the mesothelioma victim’s case and the sanctions from which they benefitted, appellate panel judge Mary Gibbons Whipple wrote, “The detailed record offers little support to Ford’s claims that it acted in good faith in responding to plaintiff’s key discovery requests in this case. Thus, we discern no abuse of the court’s discretion in rejecting Ford’s claim.”

### Jury Awards $20 Million to Mesothelioma-Stricken Mechanic and his Wife

A St. Louis jury listened intently as Bill Trokey and his wife Cathy detailed his mesothelioma journey. They heard how the man had been exposed to asbestos, of his diagnosis, and of the impact on the family’s life. After two weeks they’d heard enough: They agreed that asbestos in Ford Motor Company’s brakes had caused his illness and ordered the company to pay the couple $20 million.







Man’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos in Ford Motor Co. Brakes



Years before Mr. Trokey was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, he’d spent years working as a mechanic, repairing and replacing brakes in Ford vehicles. The 76-year-old had worked at his father’ auto shop during the 1960s, and recalled for the jury the amount of dust that had been generated as he removed, replaced, and repaired brakes using Ford brakes. That dust was contaminated with asbestos.



Ford denied its role in the man’s mesothelioma, arguing that because he only worked part-time at his father’s shop he would not have had enough asbestos exposure to have caused is illness. But an occupational medicine specialist who testified on the victim’s behalf explained that Mr. Trokey would have inhaled “an amount 100,000 to a million times greater” than what is found in urban ambient air.  He said that there was enough asbestos in the air when Mr. Trokey swept the floor that it would have resulted in a “huge level of exposure.”



Jury Finds Ford’s Negligence Caused Man’s Mesothelioma



The jury returned a guilty verdict in the mesothelioma case in just three hours, and ordered the automotive manufacturer to pay Mr. Trokey $10 million in compensation and his wife another $10 million for loss of consortium.  The remarkable award sends a strong message to asbestos companies but does little to alleviate the pain that the family is suffering.  Said Cathy Trokey, “I lose a little bit of him every day, and every day he loses a little bit of himself.”

### Pennsylvania Widow Fights for Justice Following Husband’s Mesothelioma Death

When Darlene Data’s husband Michael died of malignant mesothelioma she took legal action, filing personal injury lawsuits against several companies whose asbestos-contaminated equipment she blamed for her husband’s illness. Though mesothelioma plaintiffs face significant challenges in gathering proof of exposure that took place decades earlier, the Pennsylvania courts have created special allowances that give victims the benefit of the doubt.







Navy Veteran’s Mesothelioma Arose After Multiple Asbestos Exposures



Michael Data’s malignant mesothelioma arose after exposure to multiple asbestos products. After serving in the U.S. Navy from 1969 through 1973, he went on to work at the Crane company  from 1973 through 1974, then on to Mesta Machine from 1974 to 1982, and then finished his career working at the West Pittsburgh Power Station from 1983 to 2009. At each of these locations he worked with equipment contaminated with asbestos, and her lawsuit names many of those companies.



One of the asbestos companies named as a defendants in Mrs. Data’s mesothelioma lawsuit filed a motion for summary judgment, asking for her case against them to be dismissed for lack of evidence. Though her claim was supported by evidence that had been used in previous asbestos-related personal injury lawsuits, as well as Mr. Data’s deposition prior to his death and receipts indicating that his employers had purchased Joy Global Underground Mining’s air compressors, the company argued that the presence of their equipment in his workplace was not the same as proving that he had actually worked with it or been exposed to asbestos from it.



Judge Notes Pennsylvania’s Evidence Rules for Mesothelioma Cases



In handing down her decision on the case, Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy noted that “Pennsylvania courts have recognized the difficulties facing plaintiffs bringing asbestos-related litigation ‘where they have unquestionably suffered harm on account of a disease having a long latency period and must prove specific causation under prevailing Pennsylvania law which may be insurmountable.’…. The plaintiff must do more than show the mere presence of asbestos in the workplace, he must prove he worked in the vicinity of a specific manufacturer's product."



She went on to say that in the case of Mr. Data’s mesothelioma, Pennsylvania’s courts have ruled that “the court should apply a ‘less stringent’ test where the plaintiff produces direct evidence of exposure to a particular defendant's product and applicable here, in cases involving mesothelioma, the frequency and regularity requirements should be ‘less cumbersome.’" Based on that she determined that the widow had provided enough evidence to survive summary judgment and the case can continue for a jury to decide.

### $36.5 Million Verdict Provides Positive Signal for Libby Mesothelioma Victims

A $36.5 million damages verdict against an insurance company has sent a positive, hopeful signal to 800 remaining plaintiffs waiting to file claims for mesothelioma, asbestosis, and other diseases related to asbestos exposure in Libby, Montana.







Lawsuit Chosen as Bellweather for Other Mesothelioma and Asbestosis Cases



The town of Libby, Montana has become synonymous with mesothelioma and asbestosis: It was where the W. R. Grace company operated the vermiculite mine that spread asbestos throughout the town and beyond, sickening and killing thousands of people. When W.R. Grace declared bankruptcy in the face of relentless lawsuits, individuals with claims had nowhere to turn but to the company’s insurance company, Maryland Casualty Company, which had known of the risks that the mine posed.



Over 800 individual victims of mesothelioma or other asbestos-related diseases have claims pending against Maryland Casualty Company. In or to manage the caseload and assess how juries would decide, Judge Amy Eddy of Montana’s special asbestos court chose a single case to be heard. That was the case of Ralph Hutt, a former miner diagnosed with asbestosis after only having worked in the mines for a year-and-a-half. His disability is complete, as he is now dependent upon an oxygen tank and debilitated.



Jury Awards $6.5 Million in Compensatory Damages, $30 Million in Punitive Damages



There is significant evidence that the insurance company knew of the risks of mesothelioma and asbestosis faced by W.R. Grace workers. After reviewing a warning of toxicity from the state of Montana that was only shared with the mine’s management, the company issued a safety guide that never mentioned the word asbestos or made reference to the specific risks it posed, while at the same time urging the company to settle any claims that arose in order to avoid publicity.



Upon hearing the details of Mr. Hutt’s case, the jury awarded him $6.5 million in compensatory damages and $30 million in punitive damages. Though different cases may yield different results, the bellweather case makes clear that the insurance company is likely to face similar verdicts, and may be compelled to offer other victims generous settlements.

### Court Allows Mesothelioma Victims to Join Forces

Many of those diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma are victims of negligence on the part of asbestos companies who put profits ahead of the people who would be exposed to their carcinogen-contaminated products. Though victims sickened as a result of these decisions have the right to sue for negligence, they often hesitate due to the time and stress the legal process entails. When two victims tried to combine their claims against the same asbestos companies to increase efficiency, the companies objected. They filed a motion to prevent consolidation of the cases, but a New York judge denied the companies’ request and will allow the two to move forward as one.







Joinder of Mesothelioma Claims Can Work to Victims’ Advantage



Though every malignant mesothelioma victim is unique, their claims are often similar. Most are filed by people who were exposed to asbestos-contaminated products in the workplace, and many of those products are sourced from the same companies. Leonard Backer and Edward Unger each sought legal representation from the same mesothelioma lawyer separately, but it quickly became apparent that by combining their claims, a great deal of time could be saved.



Each mesothelioma victim was exposed to asbestos on the job: one was an electrician and the other an electrician’s mate, and both had worked with the same type of machinery and equipment. Once discovery was completed in both men’s cases the similarities were so plain that the idea of "joinder" was introduced to both of them, and they agreed. They y requested that the court allow the to combine their two cases into one for the sake of efficiency.



New York Judge Allows Mesothelioma Claims to be Joined



In handing down his decision, Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York County pointed to the similarities between the mesothelioma victims’ cases and the fact that their cases met the criteria for joinder that had previously been established. He also noted that the asbestos companies were represented by the same attorneys, making it even more obvious that joinder would result in savings of time and money.  Though the asbestos companies argued that joinder would prejudice the jury against them, the case will move for the two men will move forward as one. 

### Asbestos Company’s Appeal of $2.9 Million Mesothelioma Verdict Fails

After an Oregon jury awarded mesothelioma victim David Hoff $8.75 million in damages, the defendant, Kaiser Gypsum, was assigned 35% responsibility and ordered to pay $2.9 million. The company filed an appeal of the decision and the award. Nearly six years later, a court of appeals rejected their appeal and Mr. Hoff’s widow will be provided the compensation that she deserves.







Man’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos in Joint Compound



Kaiser Gypsum manufactured joint compound that contained asbestos, the carcinogenic mineral that cases malignant mesothelioma. As a result the company is frequently named in mesothelioma lawsuits. Mr. Hoff had worked with the product as a carpenter decades before his diagnosis. He had applied it to wallboard and then sanded it when it was dry. He blamed his illness on breathing in the asbestos fibers that became airborne during that process.



The jury in Mr. Hoff’s mesothelioma lawsuit was told about asbestos, and about the fact that the company had been aware of its dangers as early as 1965. After a three-and-a-half-week trial they found the company negligent and awarded Hoff $750,000 in compensation for his medical expenses and $4 million for his pain and suffering. They also awarded his wife Patricia $4 million for her emotional pain and for the loss she would eventually suffer upon his death.



Appeal of Mesothelioma Verdict Rejected by Court



Years after the mesothelioma damages were granted and Mr. Hoff had died, the Court of Appeals of Oregon reviewed Kaiser Gypsum’s motion to overturn the verdict or reduce the damages and rejected them. The company had asserted that the evidence submitted had been insufficient to have warranted the verdict. They also argued that the court had made a mistake by having permitted the compensation calculation and process to have been presented to the jury in the way that it was, but the judges noted that there had been ample opportunity for the issue to be raised at the time, and that the company had failed to do so. They rejected the request to lower the damages that had been awarded and allowed the verdict to stand.

### Lower Court’s Assertion of Speculation in Mesothelioma Claim Rejected by Appeals Court

After remembering men in “moon suits” having conducted asbestos remediation work in the same buildings where he worked as a mechanical engineer, mesothelioma victim Frank Williams Jr. filed suit against Lockheed Martin and others, including The Boeing Company. Boeing’s motion for summary judgment was granted by a federal judge, but that decision was later overturned by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which said that the lower court calling the claim “impermissibly speculative” was incorrect and that the case should move forward.







Engineer’s Mesothelioma Death Blamed on Asbestos Remediation Work



The mesothelioma lawsuit that Mr. Williams filed was supported by expert witness testimony regarding “above-average ambient background levels of asbestos” in the buildings where he worked. Boeing had maintained custody of the buildings, while other named defendants had supplied the asbestos insulation that was being removed. While the remediation workers were protected against inhaling asbestos, Mr. Williams was not.



In response to the mesothelioma claim, an Eastern District of Pennsylvania federal judge granted Boeing’s petition for the case against them to be dropped, agreeing that it was “impermissibly speculative” to assume the presence of enough asbestos to have sickened Mr. Williams. In its review of the case, the three-judge appeals panel rejected that assertion.



Judges Decide “Reasonable Inference” is Enough for Mesothelioma Claim to Move Forward



Relying on the use of different legal terms and their appropriate use, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the lower court’s decision. Judge Leslie H. Southwick explained that “speculation” was not correctly evoked in the case, and that what was appropriate was to ask where a potentially reasonable inference regarding exposure to the carcinogen could be drawn. Based upon that standard, they agreed with the mesothelioma victim that there was enough evidence for the case to move forward. They also issued instructions permitting discovery to move forward as per the family’s request.

### Mesothelioma Lawsuit Points to Second-Hand Asbestos Exposure in Grandmother’s Restaurant

Malignant mesothelioma is a rare form of cancer that is caused by exposure to asbestos. It is generally thought of as an occupational disease, as most people can trace their exposure to the carcinogen back to their workplace, but in some cases people are sickened through second-hand exposure to asbestos fibers on other people’s clothing. Such is the case of Reginald A. Hamilton.







Man Traced Mesothelioma to Childhood Asbestos Exposure



Mr. Hamilton died of malignant mesothelioma in June of 2021, just days after being granted the right to perpetuate his testimony. In providing information about his personal history, h indicated that when he was a child in the 1960s and 1970s, he had spent nearly every day in the restaurant owned by his grandmother. The Rail Restaurant, as it was called, was within walking distance of the Avondale shipyard, a location which is frequently named in mesothelioma lawsuits.



Mr. Hamilton blamed his mesothelioma on asbestos that was carried into the restaurant by those who were working in the shipyard. After his death his family filed a claim for compensation for his loss and for the damages that they suffered, naming several companies that manufactured and sold the asbestos-contaminated equipment and supplies used there.



Judge Permits Case to be Removed to Federal Court



Though Mr. Hamilton’s family filed their claim in state court, the judge hearing the case allowed the defendants to remove the case to federal court because the companies’ asbestos-contaminated products were provided for the American military. Though most people injured by exposure to asbestos prefer to have their cases heard in state courts, where juries tend to be more friendly to plaintiffs, companies that fulfill orders on behalf of the government have the right to request that their case be heard in federal court.

### 79-Year-Old Mesothelioma Victim Awarded $10 Million in Damages Seven Decades After Asbestos Exposure

After two weeks of testimony about childhood exposure to the same asbestos that killed his father and sickened his brother, a Washington state jury awarded 79-year-old George Kraemer $10 million in compensation for his diagnosis with malignant pleural mesothelioma.







Asbestos that Caused Man’s Mesothelioma Also Killed his Father and Sickened his Brother



According to testimony presented to the jury, George Kraemer’s malignant mesothelioma was a result of exposure to asbestos that his father carried home on his clothing when George was just a toddler. The 79-year-old victim told of his father’s work at the Todd Shipyard, which started just before the attack on Pearl Harbor and continued for years thereafter. He spoke of the asbestos fibers that were on his father’s clothing.



Mr. Kraemer blamed his own mesothelioma on his father’s exposure to asbestos-contaminated insulation supplied by defendant Lone Star Industries’ predecessor company, Pioneer Sand & Gravel. He also indicated that his father, Charles, had succumbed to lung disease in 1970 and that his brother George had been diagnose with asbestosis in the 1980s.



Jury Agrees that Company is Liable for Mesothelioma



In handing down their verdict of guilt, the jury awarded Mr. Kraemer $10 million in damages. Speaking of the award afterward, he said, “We are grateful the court found in favor of our case. It set a precedent so others afflicted with this disease may find justice in the future. Our family has been through a lot in the past few years so the judgment will ease the financial medical burden, but moreover we’re just relieved to know those responsible have been held accountable. I was an innocent toddler when I was exposed to asbestos in my own home.”

### Family Legacy of Asbestos-Exposed Work Claims Another Mesothelioma Victim

Though malignant mesothelioma is an extremely rare form of cancer, its link to exposure to asbestos means that it strikes certain communities – and sometimes even certain families – repeatedly. When people live near asbestos-contaminated sites or are employed at nearby worksites that expose them to the carcinogen, asbestos-related diseases become an all-too familiar part of the environment. Such is the case for the Legendre family.







Multiple Family Members Suffered Asbestos-Related Diseases



The Legendre family has suffered multiple tragedies related to exposure to asbestos, including two siblings diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, a father who succumbed to lung cancer, and another sibling diagnosed with asbestosis. The most recent diagnosis affected Stephen, who is currently seeking compensation from Avondale Shipyard following his diagnosis with malignant mesothelioma. Just months before his own diagnosis, he and his brothers were seeking justice on behalf of his sister Mary Jane Wilde, who died of the disease.



In both of the siblings’ cases of malignant mesothelioma, their exposure to asbestos was not a result of direct exposure to the carcinogenic material. Rather, they blame asbestos that was carried home on the clothing of their father, Perry Legendre, Sr., and of another brother. Both worked at the Avondale Shipyard between 1943 and 1945.



Lawsuit Blames Shipyard’s Negligence for Mesothelioma



In the mesothelioma lawsuit filed on behalf of Mary Jane, as well as in the case filed on Stephen’s behalf, the family accuses the shipyard of having been aware of the dangers of asbestos but failing to take action to protect either its workers or the family members that were exposed to the asbestos that they inadvertently carried into their homes.



Avondale Shipyard has been named as a defendant in thousands of mesothelioma lawsuits. In the case of Stephen Legendre, the company's response has been to argue that it is protected from liability for personal injuries by federal laws. The case is currently in litigation.

### Air Force Vet Pursues Mesothelioma Claim Against Brake Manufacturer

Asbestos companies work hard to have mesothelioma cases heard in friendlier federal courts, while victims want their claims heard by juries in state courts. In a lawsuit filed by a retired Air Force veteran, a judge agreed with the plaintiff that the presence of a research and development facility in New Jersey was enough to warrant the case proceeding in the state.







Exposure to Asbestos in B-52 Jet Parts Blamed for Vet’s Mesothelioma



According to the mesothelioma lawsuit filed against Pneumo Abex by Paul and Julie Klick, Paul’s illness was a result of having been “occupationally exposed to asbestos and asbestos-containing products while serving in the United States Air Force between 1967 and 1971. Mr. Klick breathed the airborne dust created from mechanics under his direct supervision maintaining, removing and installing asbestos-containing friction and insulation products on the B-52G and KC-135A.”



In tracing the provenance of the Abex manufactured asbestos-containing brakes that were on the aircrafts, the mesothelioma victim identified a research and development facility that the company operated in Mahwah, New Jersey, and subsequently filed his personal injury action in the Superior Court of New Jersey. The company filed a motion to have the case removed to federal jurisdiction, arguing that Mr. Klick had not come into contact with any of their products in New Jersey and that New Jersey did not account for the majority of their business.



Judge Rejects Asbestos Company’s Arguments Against Mesothelioma Suit Being Heard in New Jersey Court



In reviewing Pneumo Abex’ arguments, the judge noted that personal jurisdiction could be either general or specific, and that specific jurisdiction allowed the mesothelioma victim to file his claim in the state court even though he was a non-resident because Abex had conducted activities within the state and the litigation arose out of or relating to at least one of those activities.



The judge ordered the asbestos company and the mesothelioma victim to conduct further discovery regarding the Mahwah plant to determine whether any of the products that Klick had been exposed to were developed, researched, or otherwise the subject of the work conducted there.

### Exxon’s Appeal of $2.2 Million Mesothelioma Verdict Fails

Warren Wright died of malignant mesothelioma after years of working with asbestos-contaminated insulation. His son Wayne filed claims against the companies responsible for his father’s exposure, and after settling with most, faced Exxon Mobil in court, where the jury ordered the corporate giant to pay him $4 million in damages. Though the amount was lowered to $2.2 million, Exxon appealed the decision. An appeal court rejected Exxon’s arguments.







Mesothelioma Victim Had Championed Available Protections



In his original lawsuit, Mr. Wright provided significant evidence of Exxon’s culpability and negligence in his father’s mesothelioma. Warren had worked as a foreman for Northwestern Industrial Maintenance, which contracted with Exxon on demolition of insulation from pipes, pumps, and other equipment in an out-of-service unit at one of the company’s refinery. The lawsuit argued that Exxon had failed in its responsibility to protect those who were there on their property.



Exxon defended itself against liability for Mr. Wright’s mesothelioma and asked for the verdict to be overturned. They based part of their appeal on what they called his 'contributory negligence,' arguing that he had a duty to protect himself. But the jury was told of Mr. Wright’s efforts to do so for himself and for his co-workers, and the judges took note of this, writing, “The evidence presented showed that Wright took all precautions known at the time to limit his exposure to asbestos. As the corporate representative for Mobil noted, ‘Mr. Wright was the champion of wearing respirators,’ and he ‘not only wore one religiously himself’ but also told other workers that they needed to wear one.”   



Judges Reject Exxon’s Appeal of Mesothelioma Verdict



In handing down their decision on the mesothelioma verdict, the Court of Appeals of the State of Washington rejected Exxon’s appeal. Thought they agreed that the verdict had inappropriately skipped a careful review of the details of the settlements with other asbestos companies and therefore required a reasonableness review, they upheld the jury’s overall decision that Exxon Mobil was culpable for Mr. Wright’s illness.

### Asbestos Company Attempts to Bar Testimony from Mesothelioma Victim’s Late Father

When Kristina T. Strong filed her mesothelioma suit against Honeywell International, she needed to prove that her late husband Matthew had been exposed to asbestos through the company’s Bendix-brand automotive brakes. She turned to her father-in-law, Terry, who testified to using the parts while doing automotive repairs with his son and in his son’s presence. But a year after Terry’s death, Honeywell moved to have his testimony struck, calling him an incompetent witness. Fortunately, the U.S. District Judges hearing the case rejected the asbestos company’ motion.







Witness in Mesothelioma Case Volunteers Information About His Early Onset Dementia



The testimony that Terry Strong offered in support of his daughter-in-law’s mesothelioma lawsuit confirmed that Matthew Strong had been repeatedly exposed to Bendix brakes.  He said that he had performed multiple brake replacements using the parts in his son’s presence and that as years went by, his son participated in the repairs. Terry also noted during his testimony that he had been diagnosed with early-onset vascular dementia within a month of his deposition.



When asked about his condition by attorneys from both sides, the mesothelioma victim’s father explained that his short-term memory had become an issue but that he had no lapses in his long-term recall. Honeywell made no motion to object to his testimony, but when he died a year later, they filed a request for his death certificate and medical records and requested exclusion of his testimony, arguing that he had been an incompetent witness. The widow objected to their request for the medical information and to the testimony being excluded.



Judges Reject Honeywell’s Motions in Mesothelioma Case



In reviewing the request to dismiss Mr. Strong’s testimony, the justices of the U.S. District Court sided with the mesothelioma widow, indicating that there was nothing to indicate that Mr. Strong had been incompetent and that had the company been concerned, they should have voiced their opposition at the time that the testimony was given and they became aware of his diagnosis.

### Mesothelioma Case to Be Heard in State Court, Despite Asbestos Company’s Arguments

Every cancer death is tragic, but when people die from malignant mesothelioma the death is particularly upsetting. The rare and deadly form of cancer is known to be caused by exposure to asbestos, and though companies had the opportunity to warn of its dangers or take it out of the stream of commerce, they failed to do so. This has resulted in countless mesothelioma deaths, and then to lawsuits being filed by victims and their families seeking compensation. A recent case exemplifies how hard these companies will fight against being held responsible, going so far as to accuse a victim of committing fraud.







Mesothelioma Victim Accused of Fraudulent Joinder



The mesothelioma claim was filed by John Edward Rathbun and his wife, Gwendolyn. They filed their suit in California state court against multiple defendants, including Chattem, the manufacturer of Gold Bond talcum powder, and two consumer retail stores – Safeway, Inc. and Lucky Stores, Inc. — in California, where they lived and where they purchased the asbestos-contaminated product. In response to the claim, the defendants removed the case to federal court. They did this because they are located outside of California, but the Rathbuns filed to have the case returned (or remanded) to state court because the two retail defendants were located in their state.



The defendants opposed having the mesothelioma lawsuit remanded to state court, and accused the Rathbuns of including Safeway and Lucky fraudulently, for the sole purpose of voiding a diversity claim. A diversity claim points out that plaintiffs and defendants are located in different states with different laws,  and would allow the suit to be heard in federal court, where juries tend to be less generous with victim compensation.



Judges Reject Asbestos Companies’ Argument Against Mesothelioma Victim



While the judges agreed that there were some areas of the mesothelioma victim’s claims that were ambiguous and needed to be amended, they rejected the asbestos companies’ motion to stop the case from being remanded to state court. They rejected the accusation of fraud, and pointed out that law requires that if there is any chance that the case against the two California-based defendants could be won then there was a basis for the claim to remain in the state court.

### Jury’s Anger Leads to $26.5 Million Mesothelioma Judgment Against Pabst Blue Ribbon

A Wisconsin jury hearing a mesothelioma lawsuit was so angered by the position taken by Pabst Blue Ribbon that they awarded the victim’s family $26.5 million in punitive damages — and two jurors wanted to set the award even higher.







Mesothelioma Victim’s Family Says Pabst Failed to Provide Safe Work Environment



When Gerald “Jerry” Lorbiecki was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, he filed claims against two of his former employers: Wisconsin Electric and Pabst Blue Ribbon. The former steamfitter accused both companies of exposing him to asbestos, and in doing so failing to provide him with a safe work environment. Though the utility company settled the case against them out of court, Pabst refused to do so, and that case went to trial.



Rather than acknowledge their responsibility for Mr. Lorbiecki’s mesothelioma, Pabst defended the fact that they had not protected their workers. Confronted with evidence that asbestos was so common in their building that it was even present in the worker’s lunchroom, the company pleaded ignorance of asbestos’ dangers.  When pressed further on why Pabst safety officers hadn’t taken protective action on behalf of employees, the jury heard company officers say that rather than reading safety literature they had spent their time reading about brewing beer. 



Dissenting Jurors Wanted to Give More Money to Mesothelioma Victim’s Family



The dismissive attitude taken by Pabst and the company’s failure to settle with the mesothelioma victim’s family made a significant impression on the Wisconsin jury. They voted 10-2 to award the family $6.45 million in actual damages and another $20 million in punitive damages meant to send a message about the company’s actions. The two who voted against the award wanted to give the family even more money to encourage companies in similar situations to spare families the pain of a protracted court proceeding.

### Judge Rejects Railroad’s Attempt to Evade Mesothelioma Lawsuit

A District Court judge in the state of Louisiana has denied a railroad’s motion to dismiss a mesothelioma lawsuit filed against them. Judge Elizabeth Erny Footft rejected Kansas City Southern Railway’s interpretation of the law, saying that allowing it would mean that long-term employees “should be left without any available remedy for prolonged asbestos exposure arising from work on locomotives and locomotive parts.”







Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos in Locomotive Parts



The lawsuit was filed against Kansas City Southern Railway (KCSR) by Dennis Bouck. Bouck had performed maintenance and repairs for the company from 1964 to 2007. He was diagnosed with the rare, asbestos-related cancer in 2020, and blamed his illness on exposure to the asbestos in the various parts within the locomotives that he worked on over four decades. Mr. Bouck sued the parts manufacturers, and separately filed a negligence claim under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) for having failed to provide him with a reasonably safe workplace.



The mesothelioma lawsuit against the manufacturers was dismissed based on the claims having been preempted by the Locomotive Inspection Act (LIA), which can establish the standard of care for FELA negligence claims. In other words, LIA protects the private manufacturers who supply railroads from liability claims by placing the responsibility for protecting railroad workers on the railroads themselves. Remarkably, KCSR attempted to have the LIA protections extend to themselves, which would have left Mr. Bouck and all other victims of asbestos exposure with nowhere to turn for justice.



Judge Refuses to Remove Railroad Workers’ Ability to Recover Mesothelioma Damages



In handing down her decision, Judge Footft wrote, “The Court declines to … completely remove a railroad worker’s ability to recover for asbestos exposure arising from work on locomotives and locomotive parts, especially considering that the LIA and FELA both have “the purpose and effect of facilitating employee recovery, not of restricting such recovery or making it impossible.” The case will move forward for a jury’s consideration.

### Judge Grants Mesothelioma Widow Two Weeks to Correct Legal Error

Despite multiple legal wrong turns and errors that could have upended her quest for justice, a mesothelioma widow has been granted two weeks to amend her claim and transfer her legal case to the appropriate court of jurisdiction.







Mesothelioma Claim Complicated by Asbestos Company’s Name Change and Relocation



The initial legal claim was filed by Eugene and Elodie Paroni following his diagnosis with malignant mesothelioma. The couple’s research linked his asbestos exposure to several companies that provided parts for turbine equipment he’d worked on, including Ruston Gas Turbines. Though Ruston was based in England, the company had contracted with customers in California to install, repair and service the asbestos blankets that covered turbines in the state, and the couple filed suit there.



When the couple found that the company had been purchased, they amended their mesothelioma lawsuit to name the successor in interest, but made several mistakes along the way involving the company’s name and the appropriate court in which to file their claim.



Mesothelioma Lawsuit Continued After Man’s Death



After Mr. Paroni died from his mesothelioma, Mrs. Paroni continued to pursue a wrongful death claim against the company but was constantly stymied by issues of jurisdiction.  When General Electric United Kingdom moved to have her case against them dismissed on those grounds, District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer took a sympathetic view of the widow’s plight and provided her with an extension during which she could correct the errors in her case.



According to the judge, precedent existed for him to permit the mesothelioma claim to be amended in the interest of justice. He told her that she had two weeks to transfer her case to the appropriate federal district court in California that has jurisdiction over the case.

### After BASF Falsehoods Were Exposed, Judge Approves $100 Million Asbestos Settlement

Asbestos exposure has been proven to cause serious and deadly illnesses, including malignant mesothelioma, asbestosis, and asbestos-related cancers. While victims have pursued justice through the legal system, many of those responsible have gone to great lengths to avoid having to pay for their negligence. Following discovery that attorneys for Englehard Corporation, a subsidiary of BASF Corporation, had hidden and falsified evidence, the company participated in negotiations with victims. A federal judge recently approved a $100 million settlement that was reached.







Mesothelioma Victims Pursued Litigation for Years



The settlement was the end result of litigation that first started in 1984, when BASF settled an asbestos injury case out of court. A class action lawsuit filed by mesothelioma and asbestos-related disease victims accused the company and its former counsel at law firm Cahill Gordon and Reindel LLP of anticipating that there would be more claims filed against them in the future. The plaintiffs claimed that the company and its former attorneys had conspired to store or destroy all evidence that the Emtal Talc that Englehard had produced between 1967 and 1983 was contaminated with asbestos.



Over two-and-a-half decades, thousands of mesothelioma claims, as well as claims filed by people diagnosed with other asbestos-related diseases, were dismissed based on the company’s false assertion that there was neither evidence nor testimony supporting victims’ assertions of asbestos contamination of their product. Then in 2009, the daughter of an Englehard chemist was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma following exposure to the company’s products. He provided deposition testimony regarding the presence of asbestos and of the hidden evidence.



$100 Million Settlement Resolves Years of Injustice for Mesothelioma Victims



When the company’s falsehoods about asbestos contamination of its products were revealed, six named plaintiffs filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of the thousands of mesothelioma and asbestos victims whose initial claims had been denied or dismissed.  The $100 million settlement that the New Jersey federal judge approved will provide between $3,500 and $300,000 to each of the 20,000 class members, and each of the six named plaintiffs will receive an additional $50,000 award.

### Asbestos-Contaminated Wallboard Blamed for Woman’s Mesothelioma Death

Patricia Ann Dumas Jackson was constantly exposed to asbestos as a child, and it is that exposure that her family blames for her death from malignant mesothelioma. After diligent research they identified the companies whose products she was exposed to, and filed suits seeking compensation for the damages that she suffered. Though most agreed to settle before moving to litigation, Hopeman Brothers Inc. refused, arguing that the case against them should be dismissed. A Louisiana court disagreed, allowing the case to move forward.







Mesothelioma Traced to Father’s Shipyard Exposure to Asbestos



According to testimony presented in the mesothelioma lawsuit, Mrs. Jackson’s father O’Neal Dumas had worked at the Avondale Shipyard when she was a child. His work included cleaning up dust left behind after Hopeman’s asbestos-contaminated wallboard was cut up for installation on vessels. That left his clothing, which Patricia was responsible for laundering each night, covered with asbestos dust and fibers.



The family blamed second-hand exposure to asbestos from Hopeman’s product for her malignant mesothelioma, describing her daily process of shaking out her father’s dust-covered clothes, washing them, and then sweeping up the dust left behind on the floor. But the company’s attorneys pushed back against this assertion, claiming that though their wallboard products did contain asbestos, they were not cut or installed until the ship had launched – and Mr. Dumas had never worked onboard the ships.



Evidence Contradicts Asbestos Company’s Arguments



While the asbestos company’s attorneys argued that the family’s claim included details that were “wrong place, wrong time” and that they could not be responsible for Mrs. Jackson’s mesothelioma, witnesses contradicted their arguments. Many people who had worked at Wet Dock No. 2 at the same time that Mr. Dumas had been employed testified that wallboard cut pre-launch, and that the dust that was generated covered everybody who came near.



The judges in the case indicated that because the mesothelioma victim’s family had raised genuine issues of material fact, the case needed to be heard by a jury. The family will continue on their quest for justice.

### Distinguished Veteran’s Family Blames Mesothelioma Death on “Grossly Negligent” Behavior

A mesothelioma lawsuit filed by the family of the late Fred Russell Stafford takes aim at several companies that equipped the Naval vessels on which he served. Michael Stafford is seeking justice in the form of compensation from John Crane Co., General Electric, ViacomCBS, Foster Wheeler, and others following his father’s illness and death.









Mesothelioma Lawsuit Cites Scientific Data in the Asbestos Companies’ Possession



Mr. Stafford filed his lawsuit following the death of his 90-year-old father. The suit, filed in the Superior Court of Fairfield, Connecticut, details Fred’s enlistment in the U.S. Navy in 1948 as part of the Submarine Service, and recounts his service over twenty years on several boats before retiring with the title of Senior Chief Engineman. He then moved on to the private sector, where he used his experience and knowledge in further support of the submarine force at General Dynamics.



The elder Mr. Stafford served proudly, which makes his death from malignant mesothelioma all the more poignant. Though he'd had no knowledge that he was surrounded by asbestos-contaminated materials, the lawsuit states that the companies were well aware of the hazards that he faced, and that they had “medical and scientific data, studies and such reports that it possessed throughout the 1930s, 1940s, 1950s and 1960s.” 



Family Says Navy Veteran Was the Victim of “Reckless, Malicious, Willful and Wanton” Decisions



Michael Stafford’s mesothelioma lawsuit against the asbestos companies also contained evidence that prior to and during his father's service, the companies had paid workers’ compensation claims related to asbestos exposure, making clear their knowledge of the material’s dangers.  His claim asserts that the companies’ failure to warn of the dangers of asbestos exposure reflected actions that were “grossly negligent, reckless, malicious, willful, and wanton.” He is seeking compensation for his father’s pain, suffering, and anguish.

### Mesothelioma Lawsuit Against J&J Proceeds After Appeals Court Reverses Ruling

The family of a California man who died of malignant mesothelioma got another chance at justice after the Court of Appeal of the State of California reversed a lower court decision that had favored Johnson & Johnson. Just 68 years old, Douglas Strobel died of the rare form of cancer in April of 2020. He blamed his illness on asbestos contamination of talcum powder he had used throughout his life.







Continuous Exposure to Asbestos Blamed for Mesothelioma



Mr. Strobel was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma in 2019, and at that time he sued Johnson & Johnson for product liability, negligence, and fraud. Among other claims, his lawsuit accused the company of failing to warn him of the potential dangers posed by asbestos in their product, which he had used for 60 years. He claimed that his mother had used the product on him when diapering him as an infant, and that he had continued using it on his feet and in his shoes as a Little Leaguer, and that he'd continued that practice throughout his life.



In response to his mesothelioma claim, Johnson & Johnson argued that their product was free of asbestos during all the times that he used it, and objected to the expert witness testimony provided on Mr. Strobel’s behalf. The court granted the company’s motion for summary judgment, agreeing that the victim could not uphold its burden of proof on legal causation of his illness.



Motion for Summary Judgment Reversed by Court of Appeal



Though Mr. Strobel’s mesothelioma claimed his life in 2020, his widow appealed the decision, which was reversed by the Court of Appeal. They noted that though the Strobels were not able to produce containers of the product that he had used during his life, they had shown that he had not been exposed to asbestos from any other source. They also presented testimony from physicians that asbestos in talc powder was the likely cause of his mesothelioma and from geologists and asbestos detection experts that asbestos was present in other samples of the finished product.



In its final analysis, the Court of Appeal concluded that the Strobels had presented “sufficient admissible evidence on legal causation to create a triable issue” and that the case should proceed for a jury’s consideration. Mrs. Strobel will be able to continue her quest for justice on her own behalf as well as on behalf of her late husband.

### Judges Call Union Carbide’s Argument in Mesothelioma Claim “Misplaced”

In 2015, malignant mesothelioma turned Charles and Louise Brannan’s world upside down. Charles was diagnosed with the disease and died less than a month after the couple filed their claim. One of the defendants, Union Carbide Corporation, filed several motions to have Louise’s revised complaint dismissed based on legal technicalities. The judges of the Court of Appeals of Georgia rejected their motions. Following this, the company appealed that court’s decision to the Georgia Supreme Court. The high court denied the company’s request to hear their objection.







Asbestos Company Attempts to Evade Responsibility for Man’s Mesothelioma



It is all-too common for asbestos companies to use legal technicalities as a basis for having malignant mesothelioma claims against them dismissed. In the Brannan’s case, the short period of time between the couple’s complaint and Charles’ death resulted in a series of legal maneuvers being required. Union Carbide filed a “Notice of Suggestion of Death of Plaintiff” ten days after the death, but because no estate representative had been assigned yet, proper service did not take place.



A year later, the mesothelioma widow filed an amended complaint removing her late husband from the claim and naming herself as a representative of the estate, but the asbestos company filed a legal objection, to which she appropriately responded. She filed a voluntary dismissal of the original complaint and then filed a new claim as both a representative of the estate and for herself for loss of consortium. The company objected again because of the prior pending action, and when that claim was denied they filed another arguing that she had no right to dismiss her late husband’s claims. After losing both of these arguments, the company appealed.



Appeals Court Clarifies Mesothelioma Widow’s Legal Rights



In responding to the asbestos company’s arguments, the appeals court called Union Carbide’s arguments against the mesothelioma widow’s rights “misplaced.” They pointed to the fact that she had refiled all of her motions within the required time frame and appropriately and ordered that the case be allowed to continue. Though the company then appealed that decision to the state’s highest court, the Georgia Supreme Court refused to even consider their argument.

### Black Women’s Group Files Suit Against J&J Over Failure to Warn of Mesothelioma and Other Cancers

In addition to facing thousands of individual lawsuits, Johnson & Johnson has been accused by the National Council of Negro Women of failing to warn black women of the dangers of ovarian cancer or malignant mesothelioma posed by their talc products, despite making them a “central part” of their business strategy. The suit accuses the company of “knowingly deceptive marketing to Black women.”







Suit Cites Ovarian Cancer and Risk of Mesothelioma



Asbestos has been directly linked to malignant mesothelioma as well as other forms of cancer, and asbestos-contaminated talc is the central issue in the group’s lawsuit. The council’s executive director, Janice Mathis, indicated that many of its members used Johnson & Johnson’s power products after the company, “through its words and images, told Black women that we were offensive in our natural state and needed to use their products to stay fresh. Generations of Black women believed them and made it our daily practice to use their products in ways that put us at risk of cancer — and we taught our daughters to do the same. Shame on Johnson and Johnson."



Though the company has denied asbestos contamination of its products and defended itself vigorously against mesothelioma and ovarian cancer claims, several plaintiffs have won significant jury verdicts. The council’s lawsuit indicates that a “large proportion” of its members used the products after the company targeted its marketing to black women, including a promotion that involved handing out 100,000 gift bags at churches and a radio campaign in the southern U.S. The company had even considered hiring either Aretha Franklin or Patti LaBelle as a spokesperson.



Black Women at Risk for Mesothelioma Face Additional Challenges



Malignant mesothelioma is an aggressive form of cancer that is always considered fatal. It requires state-of-the-art treatment, and the council points out that as a demographic black women are historically underinsured and less likely to be diagnosed early in the disease’s progression. Despite this, internal company memos cited in the council’s claim make specific reference to black women as representing “opportunities to grow the franchise” despite “negative publicity from the health community on talc.”



For its part, Johnson & Johnson has denied the claims that it singled out black women or put them at risk for malignant mesothelioma or ovarian cancer. A statement provided by the company said, "The accusations being made against our company are false, and the idea that our Company would purposefully and systematically target a community with bad intentions is unreasonable and absurd."

### Family of Korean War Veteran Awarded $12.1 Million After Mesothelioma Death

John Crane, Inc. is a company that has been named as a defendant in countless mesothelioma lawsuits. The company sold asbestos-contaminated products for a wide range of applications without warning users of the dangers that they posed.  In one such case, the family of a Korean War veteran who died of the disease was awarded $6.1 million in damages by the jury hearing the case, and the presiding judge assessed the company another $6 million in punitive damages for what he called their callous disregard.







Mesothelioma Victim Served in Korea, then Spent Forty Years Working



Before 83-year-old Robert Mitchell died of malignant mesothelioma, he had a long and full life. He served in the Korean War, then spent over forty years working at the Pfaudler Co. plant in Elyria, Ohio, where he was responsible for preparing shipments of specialized glass-coated steel bowls used by the pharmaceutical and chemical manufacturing industry. To ensure that the bowls made it to their destination in one piece, he used rope packing that he cut with a band saw. That packing was manufactured by John Crane, Inc., and it was contaminated with asbestos.



Mr. Mitchell spent years unknowingly inhaling asbestos particles that filled the air when he cut the rope packing, and those toxic particles led to his developing mesothelioma. He was never warned of the dangers or told to wear any type of protective gear to prevent him from breathing in the carcinogen.  To the contrary, the company advertised that their rope packing product was ‘completely non-toxic.’  Shortly after it dangers became known, his employer discontinued its use in their plant, but that change came too late for Mr. Mitchell. For its part, John Crane, Inc. continued to sell and market the product as safe.



Judge and Jury Hold John Crane, Inc. Responsible for Mesothelioma Death



After listening to all of the evidence provided by the mesothelioma victim’s family, as well as by John Crane, Inc., the jury awarded the family $6.1 million in compensatory damages. The judge determined that the company should pay an additional $6 million in punitive damages, which are meant to punish wrongdoing and send a message to the manufacturers of dangerous products.

### Mesothelioma Lawsuit Seeks Compensation for Pep Boys’ “Despicable Conduct”

Though the average consumer associates Pep Boys with the smiling faces of Manny, Moe, and Jack, for the family of mesothelioma victim Renato C. Pizarro the company evokes significant pain and grief for which they are seeking compensation. The California judge hearing the case recently denied the company’s attempt to have the case against them dismissed, noting that the evidence provided by the victim was sufficient to warrant consideration of whether the company's actions had risen to the standard of "despicable conduct." If a jury decides that it did, then they can be found to have acted with malice and subject to punitive damages.







Man’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos in Bendix Brakes Sold by Pep Boys



The lawsuit that the Pizarro family filed against Pep Boys blames his malignant mesothelioma on the Bendix brakes that he purchased from the retailer. For almost twenty years, Mr. Pizarro performed his own maintenance on his and his family’s vehicles, including annual brake maintenance that included blowing out brake drums and linings and installing new brakes. The Bendix products were contaminated with asbestos, and his suit claims that the dust he inhaled caused his illness. It also claims that Pep Boys sold the products without warning of its dangers, despite having knowledge of its potential for harm.



The family is seeking punitive damages against Pep Boys based on testimony that had been submitted in previously-conducted mesothelioma trials. Transcripts from these proceedings indicate that the company had been well aware of the dangers of the products that they sold. 



California Judges Hearing Mesothelioma Case Reference Prior Knowledge of Asbestos Dangers



In permitting the malignant mesothelioma claim against Pep Boys to continue, the judges noted evidence submitted by the Pizarro’s that the company had sold Bendix brakes from 1930 all the way through 2001, despite having been aware that they were contaminated with asbestos and that asbestos was extremely dangerous.  



The judges noted that the definition of malice used in mesothelioma cases seeking punitive damages referred to “despicable conduct which is carried on by the defendant with a willful and conscious disregard of the rights or safety of others,” and that as a result of the available information the case should not be dismissed and should go to a jury for determination.

### Court Denies Effort to Block Witness, Calling Expert Testimony “Helpful”

Dr. Carl Brodkin is no stranger to malignant mesothelioma or to its causes. A specialist in occupational and environmental medicine, he is frequently deployed as an expert witness to speak on behalf of those who have been harmed by their exposure to asbestos. As a result of his effectiveness, asbestos companies are aggressive in their attempts to have his testimony barred, but this ploy rarely works, as was seen in a recent case heard in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.







Victim Blames Asbestos in Bendix Brakes for Mesothelioma



The case was filed by Agnes and Thomas Toy, Jr. after Mr. Toy was diagnosed with, and later died of, malignant mesothelioma. The couple filed suit against Honeywell International as successor-in-interest to The Bendix Corporation, which manufactured the Bendix brakes that the couple blames for his asbestos exposure. As part of their claim, they enlisted Dr. Brodkin to testify regarding causation.



Honeywell moved to have Dr. Brodkin’s testimony barred, arguing that he did not quantify the mesothelioma victim’s exposure to asbestos from Bendix brakes, and that without that information his opinion was based on an “each and every exposure” theory of causation. They also argued that he ignores studies concluding that brake mechanics do not have an increased risk for developing mesothelioma from asbestos exposure.



Court Rules Against Honeywell in Mesothelioma Case



In reviewing Honeywell’s argument, the court sided with the mesothelioma victim’s family, saying that evidentiary rules are intended to be flexible and that “when evaluating specialized or technical expert opinion testimony, ‘the relevant reliability concerns may focus upon personal knowledge or experience.’” They also pointed out that quantifiable evidence is not required, and that rather all that is needed is proof that exposure to a defendant’s product was a “substantial factor” causing the illness, and that Dr. Brodkin could meet this burden by demonstrating a “reasonable medical probability.”



With reference to the asbestos company’s argument regarding the “each and every exposure” theory of mesothelioma causation, the court noted that “Dr. Brodkin does not conclude that every exposure to an asbestos-containing product caused Mr. Toy's mesothelioma. Rather, he considered the type of work Mr. Toy performed; the amount of time he engaged in such work; and the amount of asbestos produced from such activities. There is therefore more than just "speculat[ion] as to the actual extent of his exposure to asbestos from [Defendants'] materials." Dr. Brodkin’s testimony will be permitted.

### Talc Supplier Settles with Teacher Afflicted with Mesothelioma

A highly publicized mesothelioma lawsuit was resolved just days after jurors began hearing testimony. Though few details are available, talc supplier Whittaker Clark & Daniels agreed to pay an undisclosed amount to California teacher Linda Zimmerman.







Teacher Blamed Mesothelioma on Years of Talcum Powder Use



In the first days of trial, a Los Angeles jury heard about Linda Zimmerman’s four decades of using the talcum powder products that she accused of causing her malignant mesothelioma. Her attorneys argued that the talc that Whittaker Clark and Daniels supplied to the manufacturers of Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder, Avon Unforgettable talcum powder, Jean Nate bath powder, and Chanel Number Five bath powder was contaminated with asbestos.



Attorneys for the talc manufacturer argued that Mrs. Zimmerman’s mesothelioma was not caused by their clients’ talc, but instead was attributable to second-hand asbestos carried home from her stepfather’s workplace during her childhood. This argument was countered by evidence that two containers of powder in her possession had tested positive for containing asbestos.



Expert Witness Testimony Plays Significant Role in Mesothelioma Settlement



Despite the talc supplier’s assertions, the mesothelioma victim’s expert witnesses had a profound impact on the settlement decision. One witness, Mayo Clinic pathologist Dr. Theresa S. Emory, testified that over the course of her lifetime Linda Zimmerman had inhaled levels of asbestos 38,000 times beyond what is considered background level, and that it had been enough to cause her illness.



Another expert witness, materials scientist William Longo, testified that it was impossible for miners excavating talc to avoid contaminating the material with veins of asbestos, as the two minerals are almost always found in close proximity to one another.  He explained that this led to asbestos being identified in consumer products containing talc.



Mesothelioma Victim’s Medical Details Add to Jury Consternation



The agreement to settle the mesothelioma lawsuit came after the jury was told that Mrs. Zimmerman was unable to attend the court proceeding in person as a result of her immunosuppressed condition. They heard that since her diagnosis the mother and grandmother had endured a 10-hour surgery and periods of daily radiation that led to a scarring condition called pneumonitis.

### Can A Retailer Be Held Responsible for a Customer’s Malignant Mesothelioma?

It doesn’t take long after being diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma for victims to find out that their fatal illness was entirely preventable. The aggressive form of cancer is caused by exposure to asbestos, a mineral that has long been known to be carcinogenic. Those who choose to pursue legal action are told that they can file claims almost any entity that was part of the supply chain that led to their exposure. A case heard in New York shows that even a retailer that sold the product may be compelled to defend themselves against charges of negligence.







Woman Blames Mesothelioma Diagnosis on Asbestos in Talc Products



The mesothelioma lawsuit was filed by Vanessa Milan-Leal on behalf of her late mother, Elizabeth Milan, who died of the disease in 2018. In addition to naming asbestos distributor Whittaker, Clark and Daniels, talc product manufacturer Johnson & Johnson, and others, the suit named Lot Less, a retailer from whom Mrs. Milan had purchased Johnson & Johnson talcum powder.



In response to the mesothelioma claim against them, Lot Less filed a motion for summary judgment. They argued that the victim’s family had failed to demonstrate that the product had contained asbestos or that it was ever contaminated. They also argued that the plaintiffs had not proven negligence, had not established that Lot Less had breached express and implied warranties, and had not identified their role in her illness or in a fraudulent conspiracy. They asked for the case against them to be dismissed because they believed that retailers could not be held responsible for the actions of the manufacturers whose products they sold.



Judge Rules Against Retailer in Mesothelioma Case



In handing down his decision against Lot Less, Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of the State of New York noted that the retailer had been wrong in its assertion that a retailer could not be found negligent or strictly liable for goods it did not produce, writing that, “It is well settled law that strict liability may be imposed on retailers of defective products because retailers are in a position to influence manufacturers to improve the safety of products.” 



He also noted that in New York, mesothelioma victims are “not required to show the precise cause of their damages, but only to show facts and conditions from which defendant’s liability may be reasonably inferred.” The case against the retailer will go on for a jury to decide.

### Victim’s $15 Million Mesothelioma Award Stands

A California jury’s $15 million award to a retired construction supervisor will stand, despite an appeal filed by the asbestos company he blamed for his illness. Norris Morgan and his wife had successfully sued J-M Manufacturing for having exposed him to asbestos dust on the job.







California Jury Held Asbestos Company Responsible for Mesothelioma Diagnosis



According to testimony provided during the Morgan’s 2018 mesothelioma lawsuit, Norris had worked as a construction supervisor. He had frequently worked at job sites where cement pipes were being cut to size and installed. Those pipes were fabricated using asbestos, and when the plumbers that he supervised used gas or electric saws to cut the pipes, a significant amount of dust was created, and Mr. Morgan inhaled it.



When asbestos fibers are inhaled, they can become embedded in the cells that line the lung cavity, eventually leading to the development of malignant mesothelioma tumors. After hearing testimony about Mr. Morgan’s work environment and about the company’s knowledge of the dangers of asbestos, the jury awarded him and his wife compensatory damages of $15,270,502. They also ordered that J-M Manufacturing pay an additional $15 million in punitive damages meant to punish the company for their negligence and malfeasance.



Court of Appeals Decides Evidence Sufficient to Support Mesothelioma Judgment 



When J-M Manufacturing appealed the award, they asserted that the instructions given to the jury had been improper and that the evidence presented had not proven their involvement with either manufacturing or supplying the pipes that the mesothelioma victim had been exposed to. While the court of appeals rejected this argument, they did agree that the punitive damages should be set aside because there was “no evidence of malice on the company’s part.” The couple will retain the $15 million in compensatory damages that the jury had assigned.

### Despite Appeal, $25 Million Mesothelioma Verdict Stands

In 2020, a California jury ordered Fluor Enterprises and Middle East Fluor to pay a mesothelioma victim $25 million. The companies appealed the decision, arguing that the award was excessive and contrary to Iranian law, which they said applied because the victim was injured while he was an Iranian citizen working for the National Iranian Oil Company. They requested that the court set aside the verdict, but the Court of Appeals of California denied their appeal and provided the victims with the costs they incurred to defend against the appeal.







Man’s Testicular Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos Exposure in Iran



The original lawsuit was filed in 2018 by Houshang and Soraya Sabetian after Mr. Sabetian was diagnosed with testicular mesothelioma. He blamed his condition — the rarest form of the asbestos-related disease — on exposure to asbestos when he had worked for Fluor Enterprises and Middle East Fluor in Iran between 1959 and 1979.



After the mesothelioma victim and his wife were awarded $25 million in damages by a jury, the companies appealed the verdict. They claimed both that there had been insufficient evidence to support the verdict and that they should not be subject to American law because the man had been an Iranian citizen at the time of his exposure. They also argued that the award was inappropriately high.



Court Upholds Jury’s Mesothelioma Verdict



In handing down their decision, the Court of Appeals of California noted that the subject of Iranian law had never been raised during the trial, and indicated that reversing the jury’s verdict in the mesothelioma case would be contrary to California’s “interest in compensation of its residents according to proof at trial.” 



They also ruled that a motion for judgment notwithstanding the trial was not appropriate because there was sufficient evidence that the companies’ asbestos had caused Sabetian’s mesothelioma to support the verdict. The couple will maintain the award and was also awarded court costs.

### Judge’s Decision Gives Mesothelioma Victim’s Family a Second Chance

The path to justice often represents an emotional rollercoaster ride for those affected by malignant mesothelioma.  Jury awards get appealed by asbestos companies, and important decisions can be reversed by appellate courts. The family of a woman who blamed Johnson & Johnson for her death was first handed a loss by a Kentucky jury, but a court has ordered a new trial after concluding that certain prejudicial testimony should not have been allowed.







Woman’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos in Talc Products



When Ms. Hayes died of malignant mesothelioma, her family sued Johnson & Johnson and Colgate-Palmolive, accusing the companies of failing to warn about the dangers that their products posed. When the jury decided against the family, it was due in part to witness testimony provided on behalf of the companies by a Johnson & Johnson corporate representative. 



The mesothelioma victim’s family had objected to having John Hopkins, Ph.D. testify, saying that when he spoke of his decision to allow his family's use of Johnson & Johnson’s products, the jury had interpreted that as a reflection of his expertise as a noted toxicologist. They argued that he was speaking of personal use rather than as an expert witness, but the jury had assumed otherwise and that his assertions had swayed their decision.



Court of Appeals Agrees with Mesothelioma Victim’s Family



Upon review of the decisions made over the course of the trial, the Court of Appeals of Kentucky agreed that the jury’s decision was unduly prejudicial and therefore unfair to the mesothelioma victim’s family. They wrote that Dr. Hopkins’ testimony should not have been allowed, and that “despite his non-expert disclaimer and regardless of any words that Cynthia’s experts offered to the effect that J&J’s products were unsafe, the jury was made aware that Dr. Hopkins is a preeminent toxicologist who evaluated safety issues concerning J&J’s talc products. The jury heard about Dr. Hopkins’ actions, i.e., that he was so certain of the safety of J&J’s talc products that he essentially staked the health of his family on it for decades.”

### Mesothelioma Victim’s Wife Provides Gripping, Grief-Stricken Testimony

Juries seated in mesothelioma lawsuit spend hours listening to highly technical information about asbestos, the amount of exposure to the carcinogen that can lead to illness, and the presence of asbestos in each victim’s environment. But sometimes a more human side of the story emerges, as in the recently heard case of Cliff Little.







Retired Boiler Worker Diagnosed with Malignant Mesothelioma



The case revolved around a retired boiler worker named Cliff Little who was diagnosed with sarcomatoid mesothelioma. Mr. Little and his family blamed asbestos contamination in boiler insulation he was exposed to for his fatal illness, and in seeking compensation for the damages that they suffered, they detailed the extreme grief and sorrow that they were all suffering.



Though the testimony was heard via Zoom due to COVID-19 precautions, the mesothelioma victim’s wife made clear the pain that his fatal diagnosis had on the family. She spoke of a long planned 50th anniversary celebration that she feared he would be unable to attend, and to the fact that his particular type of mesothelioma had an extremely short survival time. “The time frame that you’re given when you’re [told] about sarcomatoid is not very long. So right now, we don’t know what the time frame is. So that’s always in the back of your mind.”



Asbestos Manufacturer Denies Role in Mesothelioma



Though the Little family offered compelling testimony about the impact that malignant mesothelioma has had on them, the defendant, an Alabama-based refractory company called Pryor-Giggey Co., argues that there is no proof that its products were used at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and that therefore they cannot be held responsible for the victim’s illness. 



The trial was held on an expedited basis as a result of the mesothelioma victim’s advanced illness and anticipated death. 

### Asbestos Widow Diagnosed with Mesothelioma Prevails in Court

When Lorraine Sprague was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, it likely came as little surprise. Her husband David had died of asbestos-related lung cancer years earlier after decades of working with Fel-Pro gaskets that were contaminated with the carcinogenic material. The asbestos widow filed suit against the company, and despite the efforts of their attorneys, succeeded in having her case allowed to be heard.







Asbestos Company Files Motion to Stop Mesothelioma Victim’s Lawsuit



Years after her husband died of asbestos-related lung cancer, Mrs. Sprague filed a lawsuit against Fel-Pro accusing the company of causing her malignant mesothelioma diagnosis. She claimed that asbestos fibers from the company’s products was carried home on her husband’s work clothes, and that she inhaled those fibers while washing his clothing.



Prior to his own illness, Mr. Sprague had worked as an oiler/wiper and tugboat/marine engineer between the early 1960s to the late 1980s. Though the mesothelioma victim’s story was compelling and she had provided fact witnesses that testified to having seen Fel-Pro brands among the supplies at her husband’s worksite, Fel-Pro filed a motion to have the case dismissed, arguing that the testimony was “speculative and conclusory,” and that she had not produced enough evidence that it had been their specific products to which her husband had been exposed.



Judge Sides With Mesothelioma Victim



In considering the arguments from both sides, Justice Adam Silvera of the New York City Asbestos Litigation Court determined that Mrs. Sprague’s claim was sufficient to move forward, and that rather than meeting its burden to show that their product could not have caused her mesothelioma, Fel-Pro had instead simply pointed to gaps in her case.  The judge noted that the company had also not argued that their gaskets didn’t contain asbestos. In his ruling he wrote in part, “Defendant has provided no evidence that their product did not create visible asbestos dust, which could have gotten onto Mr. Sprague’s clothing and been inhaled by plaintiff at home for a span of over two decades.” The motion to dismiss was denied and the case was able to move forward

### Can A Mesothelioma Victim Sue a Foreign Asbestos Company?

Being diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma is a challenging and painful experience. At the same time that they're dealing with the pain of the disease and the shortcomings of available treatments, victims are also faced with questions about pursuing legal action against those responsible for their exposure to asbestos. With many asbestos-contaminated products being manufactured outside of the United States, pursuing legal action can be complicated.







Japanese Brake Manufacture Argues Against Legal Liability for Man’s Mesothelioma



When George Sweikhart was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, the former autoworker and his wife Christina filed suit against Akebono Brake Industry Co., Ltd. (ABIC), accusing the Japanese company of negligence in having sold asbestos-contaminated brake parts that had caused his illness. The company went to court to quash the claim, arguing that under the Hague Convention the filing’s service of process was improperly done because the couple had presented their legal documents at the company’s Los Angeles office.



Though a lower court agreed with the company and dismissed the case, the Court of Appeals of California reversed that decision, noting that because the company had incorporated its American subsidiary Akebono Brake Corporation in the United States in 1980 and had a general manager in the United States, California law permitted service of process through that office.



Court’s Ruling Offers Opportunity for Justice for Mesothelioma Victim



The court ruled that when the legal documents pertaining to the Sweikhart’s mesothelioma claim were handed to and accepted by the Japanese company’s American representative, they had accomplished the requirement of “delivery by hand of a copy of any process to the ‘general manager in this state’ of a foreign corporation.” They noted that previous precedent had interpreted ‘general manager’ as “construed to mean any agent of sufficient rank to make it reasonably certain the agent will apprise the defendant of service.”



As a result of this decision, the mesothelioma victim and his wife will be able to pursue their claim against the Japanese auto parts company. The decision also sets a precedent that future victims can pursue in cases where asbestos-contaminated parts are manufactured outside of the United States.

### After Navy Veteran’s Mesothelioma Death, Widow Pursues Justice

Years before being diagnosed with the malignant mesothelioma that eventually claimed his life, Peter Allen had served as an electrician’s mate in the U.S. Navy onboard the LST 528 (later renamed the U.S.S. Catahoula Parish) and the U.S.S. Marquette. Blaming asbestos-contaminated boilers onboard those ships for his illness, his widow Lorraine filed suit against their manufacturer, who denied responsibility. Despite their plea to have the case dismissed, a judge ordered that the case be heard by a jury.







Motion for Summary Judgement in Mesothelioma Claim Denied



In testimony given before his mesothelioma death, Mr. Allen indicated that his work repairing motors and pumps throughout the ship had put him in close daily proximity to machinist mates who worked on asbestos pumps, and that at the time he had noticed the crumbling asbestos insulation within the equipment, as well as the dust that had been raised. 



In addition to this damning testimony, the mesothelioma victim also acknowledged several points that the boiler company used as their basis for having the case dismissed. He had admitted that the identifying labels on the boilers he had been closest to had been painted over within the battleship, and that he had also been near to asbestos from other sources, including bilge pumps, ventilation pumps, heating and air conditioning pumps, and water pumps throughout the ship. 



Boiler Company’s Motion to Dismiss Mesothelioma Claim Denied by Judge



In his ruling, Justice Manuel J. Mendez pointed out that in order for the mesothelioma claim to be dismissed, the asbestos company needed to show that all material issues of fact had been eliminated. Rather than pursuing evidence in support of that, the company had relied on their attorney’s affirmation alone, which was insufficient. He also noted that the victim only needed to show “facts and conditions from which defendant’s liability may be reasonably inferred.”



The testimony provided by the mesothelioma victim was ruled strong enough for a jury to weigh the evidence, and so the motion to dismiss was denied.

### Appeals Court Upholds Widow’s Compensation in Mesothelioma Case

After a tortuous journey through the California court system that included a decision from the California Supreme Court, the last question about a mesothelioma claim was resolved by the state’s Court of Appeal. The judges sided with Cynthia Hart, allowing the widow to receive the compensation she had previously been awarded by a jury. They also ordered that her court costs be paid by the appellant, an asbestos company that she had sued.







Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos-Contaminated Cement Pipes



The original mesothelioma lawsuit concerned the illness and death of Frank C. Hart. Mr. Hart had worked cutting asbestos-cement pipe for sewer lines from 1976 to 1977. He and his wife filed a personal injury claim against several companies, including Keenan Properties, which had provided the pipes.



When the jury found Keenan guilty of negligence leading to Mr. Hart’s mesothelioma, the company appealed the decision, claiming that the court should not have admitted evidence that they had provided the pipe, but the California Supreme Court denied their appeal. After that decision they continued to try to avoid justice, asserting to the Court of Appeal that Mr. Hart’s medical costs had not been calculated properly, and arguing against the validity of evidence that had been submitted by an expert witness. 



Court of Appeal Rejects Asbestos Company Appeal in Mesothelioma Claim



In reviewing the case, the court of appeal rejected the asbestos company’s argument and upheld the compensation that the jury had awarded to the mesothelioma widow. The court disagreed with the company’s assertion that the expert had not provided a reasonable basis for his opinions and pointed out that the company had not objected to the testimony regarding medical costs at trial, thus forfeiting their ability to challenge. 



The court also addressed Keenan’s assertion that the trial court’s allocation of damages had represented an abuse of discretion. The judges found no abuse of discretion existed, and awarded Mrs. Hart court costs.

### “Illogical” Decision by Jury Leads to Mesothelioma Claim Being Reopened

Imagine filing a mesothelioma lawsuit against the asbestos companies responsible for your exposure to asbestos, and then having the jury become so confused by the evidence presented that they deliver a factually impossible verdict. That is exactly what happened to the family of Jerry R. Bagwell in their pursuit of justice. Fortunately, the Court of Appeal of the Fourth Circuit for the State of Louisiana agreed, and ordered the case to be reheard.







Mesothelioma Victim Exposed to Asbestos from Drilling Mud Companies



Jerry Bagwell filed his claim against Union Carbide Company, Monello, Inc., Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, and Johns-Manville, blaming asbestos in their products for his mesothelioma diagnosis. During the course of the trial the parties agreed that there was no evidence that he had been exposed to any other products that would have exposed him to asbestos, and so the manufacturers of other products he used were specifically excluded from possible guilt.



Despite this fact, when it came time for the jury hearing his mesothelioma lawsuit to reach a verdict, they only blamed the companies that had specifically been excluded and did not assign any blame to the companies that the suit had been filed against. In response, the Bagwells appealed the decision and asked for the court to have their case heard again.



Appeals Court Reverses Earlier Decision in Mesothelioma Case



Although the court initially rejected the mesothelioma victim’s argument, upon appeal they realized that they jury had reached an illogical decision that was “factually impossible.” They reviewed the court’s documents and determined that the jury had been confused and that the verdict was “irreconcilable with a reasonable interpretation of the record.”  Therefore they granted the Bagwell’s application for rehearing and ordered a new trial be held in the case.

### Does an Old Asbestosis Settlement Eliminate Your Rights to a Mesothelioma Claim?

Many people are diagnosed with asbestosis and receive compensation for that diagnosis, only to later be diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, a far more serious asbestos-related disease. A case recently heard in the state of Louisiana makes clear that victims who receive funds for the earlier illness are not blocked from filing claims for a subsequent diagnosis.







Shipyard Worker Dies of Mesothelioma Years After Receiving Compensation for Asbestosis



Callen L. Dempster died of malignant mesothelioma after 32 years of asbestos exposure while working for Avondale Shipyards. When his family pursued a personal injury lawsuit seeking compensation for the damages that he suffered from the painful terminal disease, they were met with resistance from the shipyard, whose attorneys pointed to a settlement he had received in 1991 following a diagnosis of asbestosis.



Like mesothelioma, asbestosis is caused by exposure to asbestos. But mesothelioma is a fatal disease, while asbestosis is survivable, and there is no comparison between the diseases’ costs. When Avondale filed a motion for summary judgment to have the case dismissed, the family fought back, arguing that when Dempster had signed the settlement agreement decades earlier he’d had no idea that there was any risk of contracting a future cancer, and that the settlement he received was of “nuisance value.”



Judge Agrees with Mesothelioma Victim’s Family



Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown of the U.S. District Court agreed with the mesothelioma victim’s family and denied the motion to have the case dismissed. She pointed out that Louisiana law states that if a release instrument “leaves any doubt as to whether a particular future action is covered by the compromise, it should be construed not to cover such future action.”  She further pointed to previous cases involving similar settlement questions where courts had ruled that a release “did not bar a plaintiff’s mesothelioma claim because the $500 settlement was a mere nuisance settlement,” and that where a release instrument “leaves any doubt as to whether a particular future action is covered by the compromise, it should be construed not to cover such future action.



Based upon these previous decisions, the judge permitted Mr. Dempster’s family to proceed with their mesothelioma claim against those who had exposed him to asbestos, indicating that the asbestosis settlement was not meant to prevent him from pursuing justice for a worse diagnosis in the future.

### $10 Million Award After Peritoneal Mesothelioma is Blamed on Asbestos in Brake Gaskets

Five years after being diagnosed with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma, Marlena Robaey died of the disease at the age of 68. Before her death, she and her husband filed suit against the companies they blamed for her illness. Though their original jury award of over $75 million was struck down as unreasonable, the appeals court upheld the guilty verdict. They reduced the couple’s award to over $10 million.







Jury Determined that Mesothelioma Was Caused by Exposure to Automotive Maintenance Dust



Though attorneys representing the defendants argued against it, the Robaeys asserted that asbestos in automotive brake gaskets manufactured by Dana Companies, Fel-Pro, and others was responsible for Marlena’s diagnosis with peritoneal mesothelioma. The jury heard details of how Marlena and Ed had spent time together as he, a mechanic, automotive enthusiast, and drag racer, worked on his cars. 



The Robaey’s explained that the mesothelioma victim had helped her husband to overhaul his vehicles’ engines for two decades, and described asbestos dust rising from worn gaskets. Neither had been aware that the asbestos was dangerous, as there were no warning labels on the gaskets or their packaging.



Jury’s Award Follows Description of Mesothelioma’s Impact



Mrs. Robaey was placed in hospice shortly after providing deposition testimony, and was unable to attend her own mesothelioma proceedings. The jury was told of the multiple operations and procedures that she’d endured and of her chronic and continuing pain. In response they awarded her $50 million for past and future pain and suffering and awarded her husband $25 million for loss of consortium.



The asbestos companies appealed the mesothelioma award and verdict, arguing that it had been wrongly decided and that they award was excessive. Though the jury’s decision was upheld, the appeals court reduced the award for Mrs. Robaey’s pain and suffering to $9.5 million and Mr. Robaey’s loss of consortium award to $900,000. 

### Asbestos-Contaminated Cooling Towers Blamed for Air Conditioning Contractor’s Mesothelioma

Charles Vincent died of malignant pleural mesothelioma after spending most of his working life around air conditioning cooling towers. He believed that asbestos that contaminated the towers’ parts was responsible for his illness and filed a claim against Baltimore Aircoil Company (BAC) seeking compensation for the harms that he suffered due to their negligence. The company responded with a motion to have the case dismissed, but upon review, Judge Manuel J. Mendez of the New York City Asbestos Litigation court rejected the company’s argument and allowed the case to proceed for a jury to decide.







Mesothelioma Victim Recounts Years of Asbestos Exposure



In deposition testimony provided prior to his death, the mesothelioma victim traced his asbestos exposure to his years of working for William A. Schwartz, an air conditioning contractor who had hired him as an office worker when he was just sixteen years old. He went on to work as a mechanic and later as a supervisor on Baltimore Aircoil Company’s cooling towers that were located at the Squibb Building in Manhattan, the World Trade Center, and a residence at Rockefeller University.



He described the specific work that he believed caused his mesothelioma. It included cleaning and scraping asbestos-containing louvers and the asbestos-contaminated gaskets that were used with them. In response BAC argued that the louvers never contained asbestos and claimed that their cooling towers did not use any gaskets for the louvers.



Judge Calls Asbestos Company’s Witness Testimony “Without Factual Basis”



In denying BAC’s motion to dismiss the mesothelioma claim against it, Judge Mendez pointed to an affidavit provided by their witness and said that it was “without factual basis” and did not meet the burden required for a case to be dismissed. By contrast, he said that the testimony provided by Mr. Vincent was sufficient to meet the requirement that it “only show facts and conditions from which defendant’s liability may be reasonably inferred.” The case will proceed to court for a jury to decide.

### Company’s Attempt to Blame Mesothelioma on Childhood Asbestos Exposure Fails

Whittaker Clark and Daniels is a talc supply company that has faced multiple mesothelioma lawsuits. The company provided talc that was used in many consumer products, including Clubman talc. Despite significant evidence that they knew their product was contaminated with asbestos, the company continues to fight claims of negligence, even blaming childhood exposure to asbestos mines 29 kilometers away rather than confessing to their legal liability.







Barber Diagnosed with Mesothelioma After Decades of Exposure to Talc



Vincent Luca died of malignant mesothelioma in 2018, nearly two years after being diagnosed with the rare, asbestos-related disease. In suing Whittaker Clark and Daniels, he and his family provided evidence that he had used the asbestos-contaminated talc for over forty years in his role as a barber. 



Mr. Luca recounted his immigration from Sicily to New York in 1960, and his years of working in barbershops in both Manhattan and New Jersey. He specifically recalled having used the Clubman talcum powder, the product’s good smell, and the clouds of dust that were raised when he applied it and when he swept the floor after clients left his shop. He blamed asbestos fibers in the product for his subsequent illness.



Company Shifts Blame for Mesothelioma to Asbestos Mines in Italy



Despite significant evidence that Whittaker Clark and Daniels was aware that their product contained asbestos and that asbestos could cause malignant mesothelioma, the company argued that the Mr. Luca’s case should be dismissed. They asserted that there was no proof that the specific bottles of product he had used had contained asbestos, and pointed to asbestos mines located in Sicily during his childhood as a potential source of his exposure.



In response to the asbestos company’s motion, the mesothelioma victim’s attorneys pointed to both evidence that the company had worked hard to evade accurate asbestos testing of their product and to the fact that the asbestos mines that they were blaming for his illness were more than 29 kilometers away from where he had lived. The judge hearing the case agreed that there was insufficient reason to have the case dismissed, allowing Mr. Luca’s family to continue in their quest for justice.

### Citing J&J’s “Reprehensible” Actions, Judge Upholds Mesothelioma Punitive Damages

One of the most significant mesothelioma lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson saw four victims awarded $750 million in punitive damages on top of $37.3 million in compensatory damages. Despite the punitive award being reduced to $186 million in keeping with New Jersey law, Johnson & Johnson petitioned New Jersey Superior Court Judge Ana C. Viscomi to further reduce or set aside the award. She denied their request, citing the company’s “reprehensible” actions and “direct lies” to the public.







Judge Points to “Clear and Convincing” Evidence of Company’s Role in Mesothelioma 



There have been many mesothelioma and ovarian cancer lawsuits filed against Johnson & Johnson. Each victim has argued that the company was negligent in having allowed the company’s talc products to be sold without warnings about asbestos contamination and potential risks to consumer health. 



Though the company’s attorneys have defended their actions and argued that the corporate giant had removed all impurities that could lead to mesothelioma or other asbestos-related diseases, Judge Viscomi pointed to compelling evidence showing that the company’s executives were aware that not all asbestos fibers had been filtered out of its products.



J & J Knew that Asbestos Could Cause Malignant Mesothelioma and Other Asbestos-Related Diseases



In denying Johnson & Johnson’s motion to have the punitive damages against them set aside, Judge Viscomi referred to much of the evidence that had been presented during the course of the mesothelioma lawsuit. She said that “J&J’s conduct here was reprehensible.” She recalled that the company had failed to report the presence of asbestos in their product to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, had edited “unfavorable test results from reports,” and that they had even gone so far as to push the agency to accept a testing standard that they were aware was not sensitive enough to detect the carcinogen.



Despite the company’s assertions that the damages they’d been ordered to pay were too high, Judge Viscomi said that it was “not so clearly disproportionate to the injury and does not shock the conscience of the court.” The victims and their families will receive the compensation they deserve.

### Asbestos Companies’ “Speculative” Arguments Dismissed in Lung Cancer Case

Companies accused of causing malignant mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases work hard to avoid financial responsibility for the damages they cause. In a recent case, two companies accused of negligence in a man’s fatal asbestos-related lung cancer argued that the fact that he smoked cigarettes was proof that he wouldn’t have paid attention to warnings about asbestos' dangers had they been provided. The court rejected this argument, calling it “speculative.”







Viacom and General Electric Are Frequent Mesothelioma Defendants



The defendants that submitted this argument are frequently defendants in mesothelioma lawsuits. Both Viacom and General Electric manufactured and provided electrical panels and transformers that are known to have been contaminated with asbestos, the carcinogenic material that has been linked to numerous fatal and serious illnesses.



Though the companies acknowledged that their products had not been marked with labels warning that they could cause mesothelioma and other illnesses, they presented a novel argument in Mr. Fahey’s case. They pointed to his years of smoking cigarettes as proof that he would have ignored warnings about dangers to his health even had they provided them, and that therefore the personal injury case against them should be dismissed.



Asbestos Victim Defends Himself Against Companies Claims



Like many victims of malignant mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases, Mr. Fahey had smoked cigarettes through much of his life, but he said that when he first took up the habit the warnings were not on the packages. It was not until later that the dangers of smoking became known, and after that he had repeatedly tried to quit.  



Though asbestos companies often point to asbestos victims’ have smoked cigarettes as a defense, most have used it to blame the cancers on nicotine rather than on their products. The assertion that Mr. Fahey’s smoking was proof that he disregarded his own safety was called “unpersuasive” by the judges hearing the case, who dismissed the companies' motion for summary judgment, as well as their attempt to have a claim for punitive damages dismissed.

### Inspector’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos-Contaminated Boilers

Calling their argument “unpersuasive,” a judge hearing a personal injury lawsuit filed by the widow of a mesothelioma victim denied an asbestos company’s motion to have the case dismissed and allowed the case to move forward for a jury to decide. 







Family Blames Asbestos Dust from Boiler Maintenance for Man’s Mesothelioma



After hearing pleadings from both sides, Judge Manuel J. Mendez of the New York City Asbestos Litigation court agreed that there was more than sufficient evidence to suggest that Thomas L. Eckrich’s malignant mesothelioma may have been caused by his exposure to ECR International’s Utica-brand boilers. 



The mesothelioma victim had been a pollution control engineer for the city of New York’s Department of Air Resource between 1970 and 1995. Over his 25-year tenure, much of his job responsibility involved being present during the maintenance and replacement of asbestos-containing boilers. He died in 2019, and his family filed suit against the manufacturer of those boilers, claiming that he had been sickened by asbestos dust that he inhaled when that work was being done. 



Company’s Own Representative’s Testimony Aligned with Mesothelioma Victim



Though ECR argued that their Utica-brand boilers could not have caused Eckrich’s mesothelioma because they had not contained asbestos, testimony from their own representative contradicted their assertion. Relying upon the New York state rules surrounding evidence and criteria for dismissing cases, Judge Mendez noted that when Mr. Eckrich’s product identification was combined with testimony from ECR’s corporate representative that asbestos-containing insulation was used in Utica Boilers still in service at the time Mr. Eckrich was exposed to them, it was more than enough to deny the motion for summary judgment and allow the case to go to a jury.



Further, the judge noted that ECR’s assertion that the mesothelioma victim had never been exposed to boilers and insulation that they had manufactured, sold, or distributed, “unpersuasive.”  

### Mesothelioma Case Sees Conflicting Testimony from Both Victim and Asbestos Company

Mesothelioma victims struggling with the effects of both their disease and their treatment are often asked to summon memories from decades earlier to prove the source of their asbestos exposure, while asbestos companies work to contradict their testimony. One case saw a mesothelioma victim use multiple terms to describe the same asbestos-contaminated products, and as a result the asbestos company tried to have his case against them dismissed. But the judge denied the company’s motion for summary judgment, pointing out that the company’s representative had done the exact same thing.







New York Asbestos Litigation Court Allows Mesothelioma Claim to Progress



Louis Stiglitz died from mesothelioma in 2018, one year after his diagnosis and almost 60 years after he had worked with asbestos-contaminated products as a union apprentice. He provided four days of testimony about the products that he used, during which time he used different terms to describe the same product. 



Though the mesothelioma victim’s descriptions of the products he worked and how he used them were highly detailed, he alternated between different names for it in his deposition. In response, the Homasote Company named as defendant in his personal injury claim, and whose products he described using, filed a motion to have the case dismissed.



Representative of Asbestos Company Also Offers Conflicting Testimony



Though the Homasote Company’s attorneys indicated that Mr. Stiglitz’s testimony gave conflicting information, the mesothelioma victim’s attorneys pointed out that the same was true of testimony about the product’s characteristics and names provided by the company’s representative.  Because of the conflict and the requirement that defendants must unequivocally establish that their products were not the cause of the victim’s illness, the judge denied the motion for summary judgment. The case will proceed and the victim’s family will be able to continue in their pursuit of justice.

### Asbestos Victim’s Family Succeeds in Re-Opening Case

Ronald Callanan died of asbestosis after years of working as a field inspector for FM Engineering. Blaming his death on exposure to asbestos in Cleaver-Brooks boilers, his family filed a personal injury lawsuit against the company, seeking compensation. Though the company initially succeeded in having the case against them dismissed, the family members appealed that decision to the Missouri Court of Appeals, which overturned the circuit court’s dismissal and allowed the case to move forward.







Mesothelioma and Asbestos Victims Are Entitled to “Most Favorable” Consideration



When a mesothelioma victim or victim of asbestos exposure files a claim against an asbestos company, they are often hampered by the severity of their illness or the long period of time that has passed since their exposure to the toxic material. The court has established a standard that requires that summary judgment should not be granted without reviewing the case in the light “most favorable” to the victim. In Mr. Callanan’s case, the appellate court determined that the lower court had failed to do so.



The asbestos company’s motion for summary judgment had been based on a lack of direct evidence that Mr. Callanan had worked with their equipment. But circumstantial evidence was provided to the court by a colleague with identical job responsibilities, who indicated that they had each inspected hundreds of locations per year, with twenty to thirty percent of their time spent inspecting boilers. Because each man had been required to work independently neither of them had seen each other work, but he asserted that Cleaver-Brooks had been one of the “top manufacturers in the area” and that there had been a Cleaver-Brooks boiler at “just about every facility” they inspected.  



Court Reopens Mesothelioma and Asbestosis Cases When Decided Wrongly



As often happens in reviewing cases of mesothelioma and asbestosis, in light of the testimony from the victim’s colleague, the appellate court determined that the lower court had erred in granting summary judgment in the case. The judges allowed the family members to continue seeking justice.

### Johnson & Johnson Ordered to Pay $9 Million to Elderly Woman with Mesothelioma

In what her attorney labeled a “bittersweet” victory, 82-year-old Blanca Moure-Cabrera has been awarded $9 million in damages following her diagnosis with the terminal disease mesothelioma. The elderly woman filed suit against Johnson & Johnson, accusing the company of having failed to warn of the dangers of asbestos contamination in its popular talc products.







Mesothelioma Followed Fifty Years of Baby Powder Use



Over the course of the trial, the jury heard that Mrs. Moure-Cabrera had developed malignant mesothelioma after more than fifty years of having used Johnson & Johnson’s iconic baby powder product. She recalled having used it as a child after she moved to South Florida from her native Cuba, and that she had used it personally for decades, as well as on each of her children. 



The jury also heard extensive scientific testimony regarding the exact mechanism by which asbestos infiltrates the body’s cells and leads to mesothelioma, as well as how asbestos contamination in talc occurs. Though Johnson & Johnson’s attorneys rejected the victim’s assertions of negligence and product liability, the jury was clearly more impressed by the information provided by Mrs. Moure-Cabrera: They returned with a verdict and the $9 million damages award in under an hour.



Jury Awards Mesothelioma Victim Past Expenses and Compensation for Pain and Suffering



Prior to awarding the mesothelioma victim $9 million in damages, the jury had the opportunity to review internal company documents that showed that Johnson & Johnson had been warned about the presence of asbestos in their product. They also heard direct testimony from the victim about how much she has suffered since the time of her diagnosis. In addition to providing her with $3 million to compensate for the medical expenses she has already incurred, they also provided her an additional $6 million for her past, present, and future pain and suffering.

### Hawaiian Woman with Mesothelioma Blames Asbestos Hidden in Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder

A Hawaiian Islands woman has filed a personal injury lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson as well as the local Foodland Super Market chain, blaming asbestos in talc-based baby powder for her malignant mesothelioma. An equestrian, Jacqueline Becker used Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder for her entire life, both for her own comfort and while caring for her horses.



Woman Diagnosed with Mesothelioma at Age 55







Though most mesothelioma victims are elderly men whose disease appears decades after their occupational exposure to asbestos, a disturbing number of middle-aged women are being diagnosed after childhood use of talc-based products. These products have been accused of being contaminated with the toxic mineral, which is often found in close proximity to talc in nature.



In Ms. Becker’s case, her mesothelioma claim cites her use of Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder from 1963 to 2018, from the time she was born and raised in Australia and continuing into 1991 to 2018 when she was an adult and became a resident of Hawaii.  She was diagnosed with the rare and deadly form of cancer in 2019.



Mesothelioma Claim Accuses Johnson & Johnson of Negligence



Ms. Becker accuses Johnson & Johnson of negligence, claiming that the product was defective and unsafe and that the company had failed to discover its defects, to adequately test it, and to give adequate warnings of its known or knowable dangers. She is seeking compensation for her physical and emotional damages.



Incorporated in the charges that she filed against the consumer giant was a reference to the company’s own internal testing from decades earlier, alerting company management that the product was contaminated with asbestos. According to her representative, “The company had a responsibility to warn the public, but they failed to do so and now thousands of people are sick.” Though thousands of pending mesothelioma claims have been put on hold by Johnson & Johnson’s recent bankruptcy filing, Ms. Becker’s case was filed prior to that filing.

### Failure to Test Talc Key Point in Mesothelioma Lawsuit

When a mesothelioma victim files a personal injury lawsuit against a product manufacturer, the case is all about negligence. Companies are accused of failing to warn of asbestos in their product or of how consumers or workers could protect themselves from the asbestos, or of having failed to take other actions. In the case of talc product manufacturer American International Industries, the maker of Clubman talcum powder is accused of never having tested their product’s for the presence of asbestos at all.







Mesothelioma Victims Point to Lack of Internal Testing



The case was filed against American International by mesothelioma victims Margaret Lashley and Dwayne Johnson. Lashley is a longtime hairdresser who used the company’s Clubman talcum powder on her clients, and Johnson attributes his illness to almost four decades of trips to the barbershop for haircuts. 



When the mesothelioma victims’ attorneys asked the company’s executive vice president, Charles Loveless, whether any precautions or testing had been taken on behalf of the public, he indicated that there had been no need because the product’s suppliers had provided certificates of analysis. “There would be nothing to investigate,” he said.



Expert Testifies to Significant Amounts of Asbestos in Talc Blamed for Mesothelioma



In contrast to Mr. Loveless’ assertions, the mesothelioma victims provided testimony from an electron microscope expert, Steven Compton of MVA Scientific Consultants, who testified that the mines where the company’s talc came from contained asbestos fibers, and so did bottles of the product. He said that 8 out of ten samples of talc from the Italian mines the company sourced talc from contained asbestos, as did six out of 53 samples from Montana mines the company used. 



In addition, he explained that all four samples of Clubman talc found on Ms. Lashley’s bottles and brushes contained asbestos fibers. He indicated that the samples he took were such a small proportion of the amount of talc contained in a full bottle, that it was fair to assume that there were millions of asbestos fibers per gram in the original product. 

### Louisiana Man Exposed to Asbestos on the Job Will Have His Mesothelioma Claim Heard

Though most mesothelioma victims are exposed to asbestos on the job, almost all of their negligence and product liability lawsuits name equipment manufacturers rather than their employers as defendants. This is because workers’ compensation laws prohibit employees from filing personal injury lawsuits against their place of work. But these state laws have all been enacted at different times, and their start date makes a difference, as seen in the case of a Louisiana man seeking justice after his diagnosis with the rare, asbestos-related disease.







Mesothelioma Victim’s Start Date Impacts Ability to Sue Employer



Robert Stephen Sentilles blames his malignant mesothelioma on asbestos exposure that occurred throughout his life, between the 1950s and the 1980s. He recalls asbestos being brought into his childhood home on his father’s work clothes and his brothers’ work clothes, and to his own later work around the toxic material.



Among the companies named in his mesothelioma claims is Pelnor, L.L.C., where he worked from July 31, 1974 through 1983. Pelnor filed to have the case against it dismissed based upon the Louisiana Workers’ Compensation Act that went into effect on September 1, 1975. The company argued that because the law limits its tort liability to anything that happened before that date, any evidence of exposure afterwards should be excluded.



Court Sides with Mesothelioma Victim About Admissability of Evidence



Attorneys working on behalf of the mesothelioma victim argued that the workers’ compensation laws do not preclude claims for asbestos exposure prior to their effective date, and that his long-latency claim is not divisible when exposure straddles that date. 



In his review of the case, District Judge Barry W. Ashe of the United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana agreed with the mesothelioma victim. He wrote, “Once it has been determined that a plaintiff’s cause of action for workplace exposure to asbestos accrued before September 1, 1975, the plaintiff has a viable claim to pursue, whether or not exposure to asbestos continued after that date.” He also said that he would not bar evidence of post-September 1, 1975 exposure because “a jury could infer from defendant’s alleged negligence involving asbestos-related injuries after 1975 that it did not act differently while plaintiff was employed by defendant.” 



If you or someone you love has been exposed to asbestos on the job, it is important that you know your rights. For information, contact the Patient Advocates at Mesothelioma.net today at  1-800-692-8608.

### Port Authority of New York Named in Man’s Mesothelioma Lawsuit

Bernd Hildebrand died less than two months after being diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma, leaving him without time to testify in his own behalf in a personal injury lawsuit against the Port Authority of New York. But coworkers and other witnesses came forward to support his claims, and the judge hearing the case agreed that the case should move forward to a jury.







Mesothelioma Victim Worked for Pan Am at JFK Airport



Despite his severe illness, Mr. Hildebrand was quickly able to remember the asbestos exposure that led to his malignant mesothelioma. He had worked as an employee of Pan American Airlines at the Pan Am Unit Terminal Building at JFK Airport in New York, and when the terminal had undergone renovations the asbestos was stored and used throughout the structure.



The Port Authority of New York was named in Mr. Hildebrand’s family’s mesothelioma lawsuit because they were the owner of the Pan Am terminal and controlled the work that was being done within. The Port Authority filed a motion to have the case dismissed, defending itself by saying that the use of asbestos-containing materials was not their decision and that they had no authority to “control the activity bringing about the injury.”



Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss Mesothelioma Lawsuit



Though the Port Authority of New York claimed that they had no role in Mr. Hildebrand’s mesothelioma, evidence submitted in court showed that the lease agreement between them and Pan Am specified that Pan Am needed to obtain Port Authority’s advance approval for all specifications for any work done on site. The terms of the lease even gave the Port Authority the right to conduct testing on samples of materials. 



Based on this evidence and testimony by coworkers as to the extent of asbestos that was present throughout the terminal during the years that the mesothelioma victim had worked there, the judge determined that there was sufficient issues of fact for the negligence case to move forward to be heard by a jury.

### Detailed Memory of Asbestos Insulation Drives Mesothelioma Lawsuit

George C. Proctor died of malignant mesothelioma just 13 months after being diagnosed with the rare, asbestos-related disease, but that was enough time for him to file suit against those he blamed for his illness. Though Burnham LLC, a boiler manufacturer, moved to have his case against them dismissed, Mr. Proctor’s clear description of his use of their product outweighed their arguments and the judge permitted his quest for justice to continue.







Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos-Containing Insulation



The mesothelioma victim provided detailed deposition testimony about his work for Vanderlin Electrical Contractors, and that as part of his job he worked on boilers branded with the Burnham name. He described the boilers as having been “unjacketed” and that his work required assembling them and applying an asbestos cement mix to the exterior of the boilers to create a “jacket.”



He further testified that he was certain that the cement mix he used contained the asbestos that led to his mesothelioma because its packaging was marked with the word “asbestos.” He recalled the dust that was generated when he removed insulation from the boilers and breathing that dust in when the asbestos was either applied or removed.



Asbestos Company Denies Negligence in Mesothelioma Lawsuit



Though Burnham did not deny that its insulation had once contained asbestos, or even that it had recommended the use of asbestos-containing insulation, they argued that they had stopped manufacturing those products prior to Mr. Proctor’s exposure to them. They said that he had failed to show that they had a duty to warn of the risk of mesothelioma because after 1963 their products were distributed with non-asbestos insulation already underneath the jacket, and that therefore his case should be dismissed.



In considering this argument, Justice Manuel J. Mendez of the Supreme Court of the State of New York noted that even if it was true that Burnham’s had stopped manufacturing boilers requiring asbestos in 1962, they could not prove that their products weren’t residually in inventory and available for use. He also noted the strength of Mr. Proctor’s recollection and said that it supported the weight of the evidence against the company. He permitted the case to move forward and denied the company’s motion to dismiss. 

### Cleaning Up After Contractors Leads to Mesothelioma Death

Louis Decanio blamed his 2016 mesothelioma diagnosis on parts he had picked up over years of cleaning up after his colleagues. The long-time contractor’s laborer was regularly tasked with collecting boiler parts that had been disassembled, and when he got sick he and his wife filed suit against Kohler Company, whose name he remembers seeing on the boilers that the crews had worked on. Though Kohler tried to have the case against them dismissed, the judge in the case denied their motion, allowing the case to move forward.







Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos in Kohler Boilers 



Though mesothelioma claimed Mr. Decanio’s life, he was able to provide deposition testimony a few months after his diagnosis. He testified to having observed the Kohler brand name on the outside of the boilers at his worksites, and to having carted away frayed gaskets that were left on the floor after the boilers were disassembled. 



In response, Kohler moved for summary judgment, arguing that Mr. Decanio’s removal of the Kohler boiler parts after dismantling was not a foreseeable use of the product, and that therefore they owed no duty to prevent his mesothelioma. They also pointed out that Mr. Decanio had not testified to actually having seen asbestos on the parts that he removed.



Mesothelioma Attorneys Defeat Boiler Company Argument



The mesothelioma attorneys representing Mr. Decanio rejected Kohler’s arguments, pointing out that boilers are expected to be replaced or updated at some point and that would require disassembly and removal of used parts.  The asbestos company had also attempted to rely on a previous ruling in which salvage workers were unable to claim negligence for illnesses suffered when they were sickened by contaminated parts, but Judge Manuel J. Mendez denied them this argument, pointing out that there is a significant difference between salvage workers who “rip, cut, and smash pieces out of products that might contain asbestos” and when the products are “disassembled in a professional manner by someone skilled in such assembly.”

### Mesothelioma Victim Blames Talc in Avon Powders for her Illness

When 61-year-old Kim Young was diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma, it came as a shock. Though she had never worked with asbestos, she quickly learned of studies showing asbestos-contamination of talc in cosmetic products she’d used throughout her life. She filed suit against Avon Products Inc. and their talc suppliers, and though the supplier quickly moved to have her case dismissed, a New York judge denied their motion for summary judgment and allowed the case to proceed.







Woman with Mesothelioma Describes Years of Avon Powder Use



In her testimony, the mesothelioma victim recalled over 30 years of using Avon’s products, specifically “Unforgettable,” “Bird of Paradise,” and “Skin So Soft” talc powders. She remembered her mother using the products and using them on her after her baths when she was four or five years old in 1961. She described applying the powders herself once she was ten or eleven years old and applying more when going out with friends. She recalled using her finger to write in the powder on countertops where it had collected, and the “dusty environment” that was created when she shook the bottle into her hands or used a powder puff.



Talc Supplier Named in Woman’s Mesothelioma Lawsuit



The motion for summary judgment was filed by Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc, a talc supplier to Avon named in Mrs. Young’s mesothelioma lawsuit. The company argued that they should not be held liable for her illness and damages because she could not establish that their talc was specifically in the powders she had used, or that the talc that they had sold was contaminated with asbestos.



Judge Allows Mesothelioma Claim to Continue



Though Whittaker, Clark & Daniels claimed that Mrs. Young’s mesothelioma claim was based on insufficient establishment of causation, Justice Manuel J. Mendez of the New York City Asbestos Litigation Court disagreed, writing, “There remains issues of fact as to whether WCD’s talc used in Avon’s talc products, “Unforgettable,” “Bird of Paradise” and “Skin So Soft” during the relevant period of 1961 through 1999 exposed Mrs. Young to asbestos and caused her mesothelioma, warranting denial of summary judgment.”

### Disabled Woman’s Mesothelioma Claim Settled Two Days into Hearing

A mesothelioma lawsuit accusing consumer giant Johnson & Johnson of negligence was settled out of court just two days after the trial’s start.  The victim in the case was a 36-year-old woman with mental disabilities. Gail Koretoff’s mother had just provided testimony that the young woman’s suffering was amplified by her lack of understanding of either her diagnosis or the aggressive medical procedures that she needed to endure.







California Jury Heard Details of Mesothelioma Ordeal



Johnson & Johnson and other manufacturers of talc-based products have been defending against mesothelioma lawsuits for several years. In this particular case Johnson and Johnson’s attorney denied that the company’s baby powder was dangerous, but the jury heard accusations that the product was dangerous, as well as testimony about the young woman’s battle against the disease.



The mesothelioma victim’s mother, Anneilla Koretoff, described the stomachache that her daughter had complained of, followed by the diagnosis of her cancer, the major surgery to remove her tumors, and the rounds of chemotherapy she’d had to endure. Mrs. Koretoff explained that her daughter is intellectually disabled and had never gained understanding beyond that of a child.  



Settlement Terms with Mesothelioma Victim Remain Undisclosed



Johnson & Johnson’s rarely settles mesothelioma claims out of court, choosing instead to defend itself and to file multiple appeals in those cases that they have lost and been ordered to pay victims compensation. No details or explanation were provided by either the company’s representatives or Ms. Koretoff’s family. 



In recent days Johnson & Johnson has pursued a complicated and controversial bankruptcy aimed at evading future mesothelioma litigation. There are currently approximately 38,000 claims pending against the company. They have been filed by mesothelioma victims as well as by women diagnosed with ovarian cancer who blame asbestos contamination in the company’s talc-based products for their illnesses.

### Asbestos from Flooring Blamed for Interior Designer’s Mesothelioma

Allison Linsky was just 58 years old when she was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma. An interior designer and project manager who had spent years working on commercial design projects, she blamed her illness on exposure to asbestos contained within Mannington Mills’ vinyl tiles. Though the company attempted to have her personal injury lawsuit against them dismissed, a New York judge denied their motion and permitted the case to move forward.







Woman’s Mesothelioma Lawsuit Describes Years of Inhaling Dust from Asbestos Vinyl Flooring



In deposition testimony, the mesothelioma victim described having worked as an interior designer, draftperson and project manager for multiple employers between 1978 and 1985. She then moved on to her own design firm, where she worked through 2013. She said that throughout those years she worked with Mannington Mills’ vinyl asbestos sheet flooring, which had been produced until 1983 when the company stopped using asbestos as its flooring backing.



Ms. Linsky’s experts testified that her mesothelioma likely came from inhaling asbestos fibers that were released when Mannington's vinyl asbestos flooring was removed, as well as when it was cut. She described being present when the floor was being scarred by installers in order to get an even surface, and when flooring pieces needed to be cut to fit a particular space. 



Asbestos Company Denies Role in Woman’s Mesothelioma 



Despite the evidence presented in Ms. Linsky’s deposition testimony and the testimony of her expert witnesses, Mannington Mills, Inc. filed a motion attempting to have the case against them dismissed. They argued that there was insufficient evidence to establish that her illness had been caused by their tiles.



In handing down his decision, Justice Manuel J. Mendez denied the company’s motion to dismiss the mesothelioma lawsuit. He pointed out that in order for summary judgment to be granted there needed to be an absence of material issues of fact. Because so many facts were in conflict he determined that the case needed to be moved forward for a jury to weigh the evidence.

### Cigarette Company and Talc Powder Company Named in Mesothelioma Lawsuit

Lois Prokocimer was diagnosed with both pleural mesothelioma and pulmonary adenocarcinoma (lung cancer) at the age of 80, in 2016. Upon her diagnosis she filed personal injury lawsuits against multiple companies, including Avon Products, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, and Johnson & Johnson, accusing each of negligently exposing her to asbestos in their consumer products. Though each company filed motions to have her cases dismissed, the courts have permitted at least portions of each of her claims to move forward.







Woman Blames Asbestos in Kent Cigarettes Blamed for Malignant Mesothelioma



In her claim against R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Mrs. Prokocimer and her husband claimed that from March 1952 through May 1956 or 1957, the Kent cigarettes that she smoked were manufactured with a filter containing crocidolite asbestos. 



The company moved for summary judgment from the failure-to-warn claim against them, arguing that the dangers were unknown and unknowable in the 1950s.  However, Mrs. Prokocimer’s expert witnesses provided substantial testimony showing that the company had been aware of multiple studies linking asbestos to cancer, and that they had been urged to discontinue use of its Micronite filter.



Mesothelioma Victim Also Names Talc Companies in Lawsuit



In addition to filing suit against the cigarette company, Mrs. Prokocimer also names Avon Products and Johnson & Johnson’s in her mesothelioma lawsuits, arguing that asbestos contamination of the talc in baby powder and other powders she used throughout her life and her children’s lives led or contributed to her development of the terminal disease. 



Though the court granted summary judgment on some of her claims, they permitted the mesothelioma victim’s negligence case against Johnson & Johnson to move forward, as well as her claim for punitive damages. All of the litigation will move forward for a jury to consider.

### “Weak” Warning Plays Role in $2.38 Million Mesothelioma Verdict

After years of battling to have her case heard, a mesothelioma widow heard a New Jersey jury order corporate giant Union Carbide to pay her $2.38 million in damages. Among the evidence that swayed the jury was the company’s own internal document indicating that hazard labeling on the company’s bags of asbestos was “weak.”







Union Carbide Asbestos Blamed for Worker’s Mesothelioma Death



Thomasina Fowler filed the mesothelioma lawsuit against Union Carbide after her husband, 75-year-old Willis Edenfield, died of the rare, asbestos-related disease in 2011. Mr. Edenfield had worked as a chemical compounder from 1954 to 1994. Union Carbide successfully filed motions to have the case dismissed based on lack of evidence that it was their company’s asbestos that caused his illness, but that decision was later overturned and the case sent to trial.



The jury in the mesothelioma lawsuit heard details of Mr. Edenfield’s duties at the manufacturing plant where he worked. Though Mr. Edenfield died before being able to testify to whether the bags he worked with were marked as having come from Union Carbide, co-workers testified that he had worked the only shift that mixed the dry raw ingredients used in the plant’s products. Evidence was also presented showing that Union Carbide had shipped over 50,000 pounds of its asbestos to the facility during the years that Edenfield worked there.



Company Found Guilty of Failing to Warn That Asbestos Causes Mesothelioma



The company had argued against being held responsible for Mr. Edenfield’s mesothelioma, continuing to point to lack of direct evidence that it was their product that sickened him and asserting that the asbestos they provided was not the type that causes the disease. They also pointed to a warning that had been placed on their asbestos bags, but that argument was diminished by an internal document that described the warning as “weak” and watered down in order to prevent problems with unions.



The jury found the warnings placed on the company’s bags of asbestos to have been insufficient to have adequately warned Mr. Edenfield of the dangers of mesothelioma. They found that the company’s asbestos was to blame for the man’s fatal illness and death and awarded the widow $2.37 million in damages.  

### Mesothelioma Verdict Stands Despite Railroad Defendant’s Appeal

After Nancy Little’s father, Robert Rabe, died of malignant mesothelioma in December of 2012, she filed suit against The Budd Company. She claimed that her father had been exposed to asbestos-containing pipe insulation the company had manufactured and sold to her father’s employer. Though the company fought her at every turn, she prevailed in the case, including winning affirmation of the jury’s award from the Kansas Court of Appeals.







Railroad Company Files Multiple Motions During Mesothelioma Lawsuit 



Over the course of the mesothelioma lawsuit, The Budd Company’s attorneys filed multiple objections and motions that delayed justice being served. These included attempting to block testimony from expert witnesses and attempting to add additional expert witnesses of their own after deadlines had passed.



Despite these efforts, a jury heard the case and found the company negligent in Mr. Rabe’s mesothelioma death, but only assigned them 7% liability because they blamed his employer to a greater extent. The company was told to pay Ms. Little $139,500 in damages. Despite the relatively small amount, the company continued to object. They filed multiple motions to have the judgment set aside, claiming in multiple courts that the case against them was preempted by the Locomotive Inspection Act and the Safety Appliance Act. 



Court of Appeals Allows Mesothelioma Award to Stand



In reviewing the railroad company’s motions, the Kansas Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s decision in favor of the mesothelioma victim’s daughter. They noted that the company had failed to assert this argument at the time that the case was being heard and that they had also not sought a plain-error review. As a result, the assertion of error was waived. They also found that the company’s argument was contrary to a decision made by the Supreme Court in 1914. Ms. Little will receive the award as decided by the jury.

### Adult Children of Mesothelioma Victim Prevail Against Chemical Company

Marty Marteney was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma after a lifetime history of exposure to asbestos. He and his wife Marie filed suit against the asbestos companies whose products he was exposed to, settling with some and winning verdicts against other cases in court. After his death his adult children filed their own wrongful death claims and one company — Elementis — objected. They argued that Marty’s sons and daughter should be limited to accessing the settlement funds that their mother had received. The Court of Appeals of California disagreed and allowed his heirs to make their claim.







Asbestos Company Argues Against Adult Children’s Mesothelioma Claims



When the mesothelioma victim and his wife filed suit against the asbestos companies they believed responsible for his illness, they included manufacturers of truck brakes he’d worked with at the age of 9 and the suppliers of joint compound he worked with thirty years later. When a jury found the company Elementis to have been negligent, a percentage of liability was apportioned to them. 



The company filed an appeal, both to the way that their apportionment was calculated and to Mr. Marteney’s adult children filing a wrongful death claim separate from their mother’s settlement. They argued that the children were limited to the terms that their mother had agreed to, and pointed to financial gifts the couple had given to them as prior to Marty’s death as proof that the parents had been acting as their children’s financial agents.



Judges Dismiss Asbestos Company’s Attempts to Evade Mesothelioma Liability



In denying the asbestos company’s appeal, the judges of the Court of Appeals of California not only noted that the apportionment was calculated correctly, but also that the adult children’s claims were separate from the widow’s wrongful death claim. They wrote that the “reject the central premise underlying Elementis’s contentions” and that the company had “failed to show that respondents were subject to Marty’s and Marie’s settlements.”  

### Court Denies Bid to Overturn $7 Million Mesothelioma Verdict

In September of 2018, a jury rendered a significant verdict on behalf of mesothelioma victim James Stock. They ordered Jenkin Brothers, a valve manufacturer, to pay him $4.5 million for his past pain and suffering, $1.5 million for future pain and suffering, and additional amounts totaling $7 million. The company filed a motion to have the verdict dismissed entirely or the amount they owed lowered, or for a new trial to be ordered. The New York Supreme Court denied their motion entirely, allowing the order to stand.







Georgia Police Officer Blamed Mesothelioma on Earlier Work with Asbestos-Contaminated Materials



Though James Stock was a Georgia police officer when he was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, he traced his disease to asbestos exposure suffered when he worked at New York Wire Mills from 1979 through 1986. He provided evidence that Jenkins Bros.’ valves were contaminated with asbestos and that the company had failed to warn about its dangers. The jury agreed that the company was fifty percent responsible for his mesothelioma, allocating responsibility between Jenkins and four other companies. 



Jenkins Bros. objected to this allocation, and also argued that Stock had failed to provide evidence that his mesothelioma was the result of exposure to asbestos from their valves. They also asserted legal technicalities regarding evidence they had not been able to use, and argued that the award was excessive and should be reduced.



Court Determines That Mesothelioma Verdict was Fair, Denies Asbestos Company’s Motion



After reviewing the asbestos company’s argument, the court denied its motion entirely and specifically pointed to the damages suffered by the mesothelioma victim. They wrote in part, “Plaintiff, at the time of trial, was 60 years old and — far from being retired — was an inner-city police officer in Atlanta Georgia. He underwent a number of serious surgeries and several procedures … The future course of his disease … is ‘downhill.’ … The pain and suffering award encompasses loss of enjoyment of life and here the evidence supports the view that his loss has been profound. This Court will not disturb the award.”

### Defective 3M Respirators Blamed for Weyerhaeuser Employees’ Mesothelioma

When Elvira Kilty and Herbert Spatz worked for the Weyerhaeuser Company’s door manufacturing plant in Marshfield, Wisconsin, they were issued 3M respirators to protect them against mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases. Years later both were diagnosed with the rare form of cancer and filed suit against 3M. Though the company attempted to have the case against them dismissed, a judge has allowed the case to move forward.







Defects in Respirators Meant to Protect Against Mesothelioma Were Hidden by 3M



Though attorneys for 3M argued against the mesothelioma victims’ accusations of negligence, Ms. Kilty and Mr. Spatz presented persuasive arguments showing why the company should be required to defend itself in front of a jury. The judge was particularly convinced by internal 3M documents written and received between 1972 and 1978 that revealed that they were aware that their respirators had failed to meet NIOSH (National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health) requirements for safety criteria.



Known Deficiencies May Have Led to Asbestos Inhalation by Mesothelioma Victims



Much of the information about the respirators’ ability to protect against mesothelioma was highly technical, but what the judge thought most concerning was the company’s failure to reveal the known defects to either NIOSH or the U.S. Bureau of Mines. Based upon the deficiencies cited within those internal documents, District Judge William M. Conley denied 3M Company’s motion for summary judgment and ruled that the question of negligence needed to be decided by a jury.



Though the question of liability still needs to be decided, Ms. Kilty and Mr. Spatz will have the opportunity to explain the conditions in their work environment, their need for adequate protection while working in a heavily asbestos-contaminated area of the door plant, and their misplaced reliance upon the defective equipment that they believe led to their fatal diagnosis. 

### Judge Applies “Thirteenth Juror Doctrine” to Order New Mesothelioma Trial

When Jerry Crawford filed a mesothelioma lawsuit against Covil Corporation, the case seemed like a slam dunk. Not only was there strong evidence in support of his claim of negligence, but Covil’s blatant lies during the trial led the judge to explicitly inform the jury about them. Despite this, the jury found in favor of the asbestos company. In response, Judge Jean H. Toal invoked a little-used legal doctrine known as the “thirteenth juror doctrine” to order a new trial.



Asbestos Exposure from Pipe Insulation Led to Mesothelioma Diagnosis



The evidence and testimony that Mr. Crawford presented to the jury in support of his mesothelioma lawsuit pointed overwhelmingly to Covil’s responsibility. Not only did he talk about the dust raised by cutting the insulation for the steam pipes, but an insulator for the construction company at the site where Crawford work testified that the insulation had been supplied by Covil, and a Covil employee admitted that they’d sold asbestos-containing insulation.



The Covil representative also claimed that all of Covil’s sales information had been destroyed by a fire, but another employee contradicted this and said that the documents had likely been destroyed by another means. This led the judge to admonish the defendant and to order that the jury be told of the lies.



Jury’s Decision in Mesothelioma Case Leads Judge to Action



When the jury decided in favor of Covil Co. in the mesothelioma lawsuit, Mr. Crawford petitioned for a new trial and the judge agreed. Writing that “Under the ‘thirteenth juror doctrine,’ a trial judge may grant a new trial absolute when he finds the evidence does not justify the verdict,” she decided to apply the doctrine.



In her concluding remarks about allowing the mesothelioma victim a new trial, Judge Toal wrote, “Given the overwhelming evidence against Covil on the issues of Mr. Crawford’s exposure to Covil-supplied insulation, Covil’s knowledge of the danger and failure to warn, and Mr. Crawford’s injury and damages, the Court finds that the jury’s verdict for Covil was contrary to the fair preponderance of the evidence.”



She went to write, “The Court exercises its discretion to act as the thirteen juror and, finding that the evidence does not justify the jury’s verdict, the Court is persuaded that Plaintiff is entitled to a new trial.”

### Judge Denies Crane Co.’s Arguments Against Mesothelioma Case Being Heard

When Robert Grimes was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, the family law attorney immediately realized that his years working as an apprentice coppersmith in the early 1960s had exposed him to asbestos. Though he died in December of 2017, the lawsuit he filed against Crane and Co. was continued by his domestic partner, Linda F. Phelps, who recently won an important court victory.



Asbestos Company Asks for Mesothelioma Claim to be Dismissed



To support her accusation that Crane and Co.’s negligence had caused Mr. Grimes’ mesothelioma, Ms. Phelps submitted testimony from three expert witnesses. The first testified about Mr. Grimes’ lost earnings; the second about his potential asbestos exposure at the Brooklyn Navy Yard; and the third about how asbestos exposure leads to mesothelioma. 



Crane and Co. filed a motion for each of these three experts’ testimony to be barred, and for the case itself to be dismissed based on a lack of genuine dispute as to any material fact. They attributed the lack of dispute on what they called the absence of evidence in support of Ms. Phelps’ case. 



Judge Allows Most of the Expert Witnesses to Testify in Mesothelioma Case



In reviewing Crane and Co.’s plea, District Judge Alison J. Nathan modified some of the testimony that the experts would be allowed to provide in the mesothelioma claim but allowed most of it to be presented. She restricted some of the projections about his lost income, but ruled that all of the other testimony was admissible.



With reference to the company’s motion to dismiss the mesothelioma lawsuit entirely, the judge pointed out that the motion was based on its arguments regarding the expert witness testimony. She concluded that because she had denied those arguments, genuine issues of material facts remain to be determined. The case will move on to be heard by a jury. 

### Mesothelioma Widow Faces Multiple Companies in Quest for Justice

Tatjana Pogacnik’s husband Leon died of malignant mesothelioma after he endured occupational exposure to asbestos during his career as an architect. She filed a personal injury lawsuit against multiple companies whose products or unsafe work environment contributed to his eventual diagnosis with the deadly form of cancer, and each of those companies worked hard to avoid having to face a jury at trial.



Asbestos in Mannington Mills’ Tiles Blamed for Malignant Mesothelioma 



One of the companies Mrs. Pogacnik accused of causing her husband’s mesothelioma was Mannington Mills. She claimed that the company’s sheet flooring – which he’d been exposed to while working on projects between 1969 and 1983 – was contaminated with asbestos, and that when it was cut and installed in his presence on job sites, he had inhaled the toxic fibers. She argued that the company should have warned of the dangers posed by its products.



In response, the company’s attorneys filed a motion to have her mesothelioma claim against them dismissed. They argued that she had failed to provide sufficient evidence that their product contained asbestos or that her late husband had suffered enough exposure to their product to have caused his illness. The judge hearing the case dismissed their motion, pointing out that they had failed to meet the minimum requirements for a motion for summary judgment to be considered. She noted that rather than it being the plaintiff’s responsibility to prove her case, Mannington Mills was obligated to disprove it.



Port Authority of NY/NJ Argues Against Responsibility for Mesothelioma



Another company named in Mrs. Pogacnik’s mesothelioma lawsuit is the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. She pointed to asbestos exposure that he’d suffereed while working at JFK Airport between “approximately” 1972 and 1973. The Port Authority filed a motion for the entire case against them to be dismissed because in a deposition provided before his death, Mr. Pogacnik had mentioned that he had worked at the airport on two separate projects, one of which was in the early-to-mid 1970s and the other occurred in the late 1970s. They argued that the entire case against them should be dismissed because the late 1970s exposure had not been included in the original claim.



In reviewing the Port Authority’s motion, the judge agreed that the widow could not use information from the late 1970s exposure in support of her case, but that her error in not having included those years in her original filing did not negate the legitimacy of her claim regarding the mesothelioma victim’s earlier exposure. 



Both cases will move forward for a jury to decide.

### Late Discovery of Evidence Changes Outcome for Mesothelioma Victim

A mesothelioma lawsuit filed against the makers of Scotts Turf Builder was dismissed based on the victim’s experts not having examined original samples of the asbestos-contaminated product. But when it came to light that the company had samples that they’d testified did not exist, an appeals court reversed the dismissal and reactivated the case.



Mesothelioma Victim Blames Asbestos in Turf Builder for Illness



Lorenz Brandecker died just seven months after having been diagnosed with mesothelioma, but before his death he and his family took action against those responsible for exposing him to the asbestos. Their lawsuit named the maker of Scotts Turf Builder as a defendant, saying that the product he’d applied to his lawn twice a year between 1967 and 1980 had been contaminated with asbestos. The case against Scotts was dismissed in large part because the family’s expert witnesses had not tested samples from the time that Brandecker had used it. 



Scotts’ attorneys criticized the mesothelioma victim’s experts witnesses for not having examined actual samples of their product, and had indicated that no samples from those years existed. But shortly after the dismissal the family’s attorney learned that Scotts did in fact possess vintage samples and had provided them in another case prior to their case having been dismissed. The family requested that their case be reopened, but even though the trial court agreed that Scotts had a “duty” to provide the samples under discovery rules, they denied the motion on procedural grounds.



Appeals Court Overturns Lower Court’s Decision



The Brandecker’s mesothelioma lawsuit against Scotts had rested entirely on the premise that between the years 1966 and 1980, most of the vermiculite in the product had come from the asbestos-contaminated vermiculite mine in Libby, Montana. Without access to samples from those years their case had been dismissed, but when they learned that the company had deceived them, they were emphatic about reopening the case, and the Superior Court of New Jersey’s Appellate Division agreed.



The court wrote in part that the lower court’s denial on procedural grounds was a “misapplication of discretion.” They wrote, “We do not know what affect knowledge about the vintage samples would have had on the outcome of the in limine or summary judgment motions. We do know that the in limine motions criticized plaintiffs' experts, particularly Fitzgerald, for not having tested samples of vermiculate from the Libby Mine, by relying on a draft EPA report and by not testing Turf Builder from the applicable time frames…. If plaintiffs had the ability to test the samples, they could have refuted the criticism that it was inappropriately relying on draft reports and testing of materials other than Turf Builder.”  The appellate court’s decision allows the family to continue in their search for justice.

### Brothers Pursue Justice on Behalf of Their Sister After Her Death from Mesothelioma

When Mary Jane Wilde died of malignant mesothelioma, her four heartbroken brothers filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Huntington Ingalls, Inc. They accused the organization of having failed to take the actions that would have protected her and the rest of their family from exposure to asbestos. Though the company attempted to remove the case to a federal court by arguing that their shipyard’s work was done on behalf of the government, both the district court and the United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit denied their motion, allowing the case to remain in the local court system.



Woman’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Childhood Second-Hand Asbestos Exposure 



The mesothelioma lawsuit was filed by Stephen, Paul, Ragus, and Percy Legendre following the 2016 death of their sister Mary Jane. They claimed that her fatal illness had been caused by exposure to asbestos that their father had unknowingly carried home on his clothes each day when he returned home from working at the Avondale shipyard. 



Second-hand asbestos exposure is frequently cited as the cause of malignant mesothelioma. In the case of Mary Jane Wilde’s illness, her siblings say that the shipyard could have taken measures to warn their father Percy of the risk that asbestos posed to him and to his family. The elder Legendre’s work in engine rooms at the Avondale shipyard in the 1940s had exposed him to asbestos that adhered to his hair, skin, and clothing, and when he returned home and played with her, she breathed in the deadly fibers that would later cause her cancer.



Asbestos Company Argues that Their Work was for the Government 



Huntington’s attorneys attempted to have the mesothelioma case removed to federal court, where verdicts tend to be more favorable for defendants. But the justices on the appeals court said work being done for the government only excused a company of liability if the government had required them to act as they had. Because there was no conflict with the government’s requirements and the safety measures that Avondale could have taken, the judges ruled that they had been “free to adopt the safety measures the plaintiffs now allege would have prevented their injury.” The case will remain in the state courts where the Legendre brothers wanted it to be heard.

### Ford Fights Mesothelioma Lawsuits by Funding Questionable Research

It is impossible to say exactly how many victims of malignant mesothelioma were sickened by exposure to products manufactured by the Ford Motor Company, but it is a significant number. A recent report shows that the company, facing constant lawsuits, has invested over $40 million in research specifically designed to cast doubt on asbestos’ role in causing the disease.



Iconic Auto Manufacturer Was Well Aware of Asbestos’ Role in Causing Mesothelioma



Though Ford Motor Company represents an iconic brand associated with American values of hard work and responsibility, its company executives were aware that exposure to its vehicle parts could cause asbestos-related illnesses like malignant mesothelioma. An internal memo written fifty years ago, following an analysis of research on asbestos’ role in causing cancer, bemoaned the $1.25 cost burden that using asbestos-free brakes would impose. 



Report Details Ford’s Funding of Research Questioning Asbestos’ Role in Mesothelioma



In what many view as a response to constant losses in mesothelioma lawsuits, Ford has spent decades quietly funding research supporting the idea that asbestos does not cause illness. The Center for Public Integrity and Vice News collaborated on a report showing that over $40 million has been invested in writing and gathering papers meant to weaken evidence that asbestos in brake linings could sicken those who worked with the parts. The research funded by Ford has been based on early studies based on what many scientists and physicians have called bad science. They say that it is “just supporting litigation” and that it “has had a real negative impact on pushing the science forward.”



Juries Understand That Asbestos Causes Mesothelioma 



Though this questionable practice of denying asbestos' role is meant to confuse juries seated in mesothelioma trials, it has largely failed in the face of notable health institutions including the World Health Organization stating that there is “no safe exposure level for asbestos.”

### Jury Awards $23 Million After Laundry Equipment Causes Malignant Mesothelioma

When Cynthia B. Cowger was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, she decided to pursue a lawsuit against Qualitex Company. She never dreamed that they’d argue that her own genes had led to her getting the rare, asbestos-related disease, nor did she imagine that a jury would disregard their arguments and award her $23 million in compensation.



Mesothelioma Is Caused by Exposure to Asbestos



Malignant mesothelioma is a rare and fatal form of cancer whose cause has been known for decades: it is caused by exposure to asbestos, a mineral that was used in construction, in insulation, and in other high heat environments and products requiring strength and fire resistance. Cynthia B. Cowger worked for F.W. Means/Aramark handling laundry press pads and other commercial laundry equipment that was contaminated with asbestos and manufactured by Qualitex Company.



When she filed a mesothelioma lawsuit against Qualitex accusing them of negligence and liability for her illness, the company responded by arguing that her illness had been caused by her genes. They demanded blood tests so that they could prove their case, and a significant amount of court time was spent arguing over whether they were entitled to samples for study.



Years of Legal Argument Led to $23 Million Mesothelioma Award



Despite the company’s persistent arguments, the courts would not allow them to sample Ms. Cowger’s blood and rejected their assertion that her mesothelioma was caused by a genetic mutation. A judge wrote that “the theory underlying Qualitex’s request has not gained general acceptance whereby it would be permitted to conduct full genomic sequencing of the Plaintiff’s genome.” The company appealed this decision but their argument was rejected and the case went to trial before a jury.



Though the company continued to argue against its responsibility for her mesothelioma and claimed that she “was not exposed to any asbestos-containing product manufactured, supplied, or distributed by Qualitex,” the jury disagreed and awarded her a total of $23 million, including $6 million for her loss of a normal life, $5 million for her shortened life expectancy, $2 million for physical disfigurement, and another $10 million total for her pain and suffering and emotional distress. Remarkably, Ms. Cowger had been negotiating a settlement immediately before the jury heard closing arguments and had been willing to accept just $5 million in damages, but the asbestos company rejected that offer.

### Louisiana’s Interest in Protecting its Workers Benefits Mesothelioma Victim’s Family

Mesothelioma victims seeking compensation for the damages they’ve suffered are often hampered by legal complications. Asbestos companies file for bankruptcy protection or are purchased and change their names. Some relocate to other states or countries. The difficulty of pursuing legal action would be stressful enough, but is far worse when also dealing with a painful terminal disease. A case that exemplifies these difficulties recently made its way through the Louisiana court system. Though the named asbestos company fought hard against being held responsible, the Court of Appeal of Louisiana cited its own interest in the protection of state workers as one reason for allowing the case to move forward.



Mesothelioma Widow Seeks Justice for Husband’s Asbestos Exposure



The case was filed by the family of Charles Hayes, a Louisiana worker who died of malignant mesothelioma after having been exposed to asbestos at two different plants in the state. One was built by a company called Ford, Bacon & Davis. When the company was named in the Hayes family’s original suit, it was determined that the construction company had changed its name and business registration two decades earlier, did so again a few years later, and then after another few years was sold to SYSTRA USA.



When SYSTRA defended itself against the mesothelioma lawsuit, they insisted that they held no responsibility for Ford, Bacon & Davis’ negligence because they were not the same company. At trial the lower court denied the company’s motion for summary judgment but that decision was reversed by an appellate court. The family appealed the dismissal, pointing in part to something the company’s own attorney had said. When asked whether SYSTRA’s acquisition had included assuming Ford, Bacon & Davis’ liabilities or changed the company’s business, he answered, “I will stipulate that the Systra Engineering, Inc., but for a name change is the same corporation, but I don’t – I haven’t seen the documents and I can only be honest in that regard.”



Court Rules in Favor of Mesothelioma Widow



Upon review of the case, the appellate court agreed that the words of the company’s counsel had weight, but also spoke to the interests of the state of Louisiana in protecting its citizens against mesothelioma and other occupational diseases. The court wrote, “Louisiana has an interest in not only protecting those employed in the state but also in ensuring that those workers have a fair and efficient venue for seeking compensation for their injuries.“ The case will go forward to a jury.

### Decision in South Carolina Mesothelioma Case Will Help Future Victims

The outcome of negligence lawsuits against asbestos companies may seem obvious to mesothelioma victims, but the cases are complex, and proving causation can be difficult. A recent decision by a South Carolina court of appeals has smoothed the way for future plaintiffs by allowing testimony about a cumulative dose of asbestos to be presented for a jury’s consideration.







Mesothelioma Victim Exposed to Asbestos Fibers for Years



The South Carolina appeal followed a decision in a mesothelioma lawsuit filed by Mr. Beverly Dale Jolly, known as Dale, and his wife Brenda. Dale had been diagnosed with the rare and fatal form of cancer after having worked for four years as a mechanical inspector for Duke Power Company’s nuclear power plants in South Carolina and North Carolina. Though he did not work directly with asbestos gaskets and valves, his job put him in close proximity to them as they were being removed.  Testimony was provided indicating that he had been so close during the removal of the gaskets that he’d had to wear safety goggles to keep the dust out of his eyes.



The asbestos-contaminated valves and their parts blamed for Mr. Jolly’s mesothelioma were manufactured and provided by Fisher Controls International LLC and Crosby Valve, LLC. The jury hearing the case awarded the couple approximately three hundred thousand dollars, and that award was later increased to almost $2 million dollars. The companies’ appeal was denied but they resubmitted it for further consideration, arguing among other things that the testimony in the case had relied upon an each-and-every-exposure argument, which has previously been ruled insufficient to establish causation.



Judges Distinguish Between Cumulative Exposure and Each-And-Every-Exposure Testimony in Mesothelioma Lawsuit



In handing down their decision, the appeals court judges agreed with the Jolly’s attorney in distinguishing between an each-and-every-exposure argument and a cumulative dose exposure, which explains that “all exposures contribute to the cumulative dose that causes disease” but “does not mean that every exposure rises to the level of a substantial factor.” Though the asbestos companies argued that the distinction made by the victim’s attorney was “artificial,” the judges ruled that the testimony concerning cumulative dose was “background information essential for the jury’s understanding of medical causation, which must be based on science,” and that they did not interpret the presentation as an attempt to argue that each exposure could be responsible for his illness. The increased compensation amount awarded to the couple will be allowed to stand, and future litigants will be able to rely upon this decision as they make their case for justice. 

### Appeal of Bowling Ball Mesothelioma Verdict Rejected – Victim’s Family to Keep $1.9 Million

Malignant mesothelioma is a type of cancer diagnosed in less than 3,500 people each year, but public awareness is higher than for other rare cancers because it is caused by asbestos, a mineral that is still a risk factor in many buildings and in our infrastructure. Asbestos was used in applications beyond construction of public buildings and industrial settings, as exemplified by a lawsuit filed by a widow who lost her husband following years of drilling finger holes in asbestos-filled bowling balls. After she and her sons were awarded $1.9 million in damages by a jury hearing the details of her case, Honeywell International appealed the decision, arguing that there was insufficient evidence to support the decision. The Court of Appeals of California heard those assertions but rejected them. The victim’s family will be able to keep the compensation they were awarded.



Bowling Balls Filled with Asbestos at Heart of Mesothelioma Lawsuit



Because mesothelioma is caused by exposure to asbestos, when Donald Vanni was diagnosed with the rare disease he and his family quickly identified the source of his exposure: it was the bowling balls that he’d sold and into which he’d drilled finger holes. He and his brother co-owned and operated a bowling alley for years, and one of Donald’s’ responsibilities involved sitting in a small back room in the building and drilling custom-sized finger holes for customers. The custom bowling balls that they’ sold were the popular Ebonite brand. 



The jury that heard the original mesothelioma lawsuit learned that Ebonite’s plastic bowling balls contained asbestos filler that was sold to the manufacturer by Bendix Corporation, Honeywell International’s predecessor. Mr. Vanni had drilled holes in balls for hours and days at a time in an unventilated room, inhaling the asbestos fibers that eventually caused his death. The jury awarded his widow and children $1.9 million in damages, but Honeywell appealed the decision.



Appeal Claims Insufficient Exposure to Cause Mesothelioma



In its appeal, the huge corporation argued against having to pay the mesothelioma victim’s family the $1.9 million award that the jury had awarded. They claimed that the asbestos Mr. Vanni had been exposed to was insufficient to cause his illness and that he might have been exposed to asbestos from another source. The Court of Appeals dismissed each of these arguments, noting that evidence of Bendix’s asbestos dust being inside the balls was irrefutable, and so too was the fact that he had inhaled that deadly dust. 

### Navy Veteran’s Mesothelioma Lawsuit to Proceed

Pursuing a mesothelioma lawsuit often means an emotional rollercoaster of disappointments and victories for victims and their families. Faced with a certain death sentence, asbestos victims are already suffering heartache, and then confront additional stress as asbestos companies pursue various legal maneuvers to evade responsibility. In a recent example, Navy veteran Michael Harris and his wife Beth saw their negligence case dismissed after Thomas Dee Engineering Company successfully argued against the admission of vital evidence. The family appealed the decision to the Court of Appeals of California, which reversed the lower court and permitted the lawsuit to move forward to a jury. 



Evidence of Asbestos Exposure Deemed a Genuine Issue of Material Fact



Mr. and Mrs. Harris filed their lawsuit against Thomas Dee Engineering shortly after Michael’s diagnosis, and the widow and her children continued it as a wrongful death case after he succumbed to the disease. Though there was a good deal of testimony regarding the presence of asbestos aboard the ship’s boilers and environment, Michael had testified that he had not personally seen the work being done — rather, he spent significant time in the area where it had been performed and believed that he had inhaled the asbestos fibers left behind during his four hour watch duties. 



A witness supporting his mesothelioma claim had originally testified, “If he wasn’t present when the work was done, then I don’t think there’s any issue regarding any exposure,” but stated at a later time that he “did not need to be present at the exact time that the insulation block was being removed, swept up, and/or installed by Thomas Dee workers to be exposed.”  The asbestos company’s attorneys used this conflicting testimony to argue against it being admitted, and the judge in the case agreed. He then granted the defendant company summary judgment, closing the door to the case proceeding.



Mesothelioma Victim’s Family Successful in Appeal



Mr. Harris’ family was devastated by the decision of the lower court and filed an appeal arguing that the disallowed testimony was critical to their theory of how Michael had gotten mesothelioma. They explained that asbestos re-entrainment – a physical phenomenon in which asbestos fibers remain suspended and can continue to circulate in the air for up to 80 hours before they settle onto the ground or onto surfaces — explained his illness and subsequent death. 



The Court of Appeals heard arguments for and against the case being reopened and agreed with the mesothelioma victim’s family. The court ruled that the information about the re-suspension of asbestos had significant evidentiary value that represented a matter for a jury to weigh. The case will move forward.

### Mesothelioma Victims Reject Johnson & Johnson’s “Bad Faith” Bankruptcy Maneuver

In the face of multi-million-dollar mesothelioma and ovarian cancer verdicts against them, consumer giant Johnson & Johnson recently executed what some are calling a “bad faith” bankruptcy maneuver that – if allowed to stand – will minimize victims’ ability to get the compensation that they deserve. The company pursued a strategy known as a “Texas Two Step,” establishing a spinoff, assigning it liability for asbestos claims related to Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder, and then having it file for bankruptcy in order to fend off the 38,000 pending lawsuits against it. Advocates for victims plan to fight the action and will file a motion to dismiss the bankruptcy claim.



Conference of Mesothelioma Victims’ Advocates Discusses Strategy



In response to Johnson & Johnson’s maneuver, attorneys representing mesothelioma and ovarian cancer victims held a conference to discuss the options available to them.  Said one, the spinoff and subsequent bankruptcy petition had a clear goal of “shutting down the pending litigation” and protecting the parent company’s significant holdings from those that it had harmed through its negligent actions. Johnson & Johnson is accused of knowing that the talc in its baby powder and other products was contaminated with asbestos, and failing to act to protect or warn its users.



Bankruptcy Judge Favors Mediation



While the bankruptcy judge has voiced enthusiasm for mediation, legal advocates for mesothelioma victims have said that they will fight allowing the bankruptcy to stand. With regard to mediation they say that it would validate the company’s “machinations and abuses of the bankruptcy system and its code,” and a committee of claimants afflicted with asbestos-related diseases says that a statement issued by the new subsidiary fails to acknowledge the devasting impact that Johnson & Johnson’s products have had on them and their families. Though the judge wants to move forward expeditiously, he acknowledged that “if parties aren’t aligned in their thoughts as to what they want to achieve in mediation, it’s a waste of their time.”  

### Judge Says Asbestos Company’s Mesothelioma Defense “Misses the Point”

Many mesothelioma victims were exposed to asbestos as a result of products that were used for specific military applications. When these victims pursue compensation for their injuries, they find that they must fight their cases in federal court rather than in their local courts because the companies are able to defend themselves as government contractors, arguing that they were simply adhering to the military’s specifications rather than acting negligently.  Asbestos companies often turn to the strategy of removing cases to friendlier federal courts where it is not appropriate, as was seen in the case of a Washington state science teacher who was exposed to asbestos supplied by Lone Star Industries to the Todd Shipyard.



Asbestos Sold to Shipyard Blamed for Malignant Mesothelioma



According to the lawsuit filed by 79-year-old George Kraemer and his wife Patricia, his mesothelioma diagnosis was a result of exposure to asbestos and asbestos-containing products manufactured and sold by Lone Star and used at Todd Shipyard and Puget Sound Bridge and Dredging in Seattle, where his father had worked as an insulator between 1942 and 1945. He filed suit against the company in King County, Washington’s Superior Court, but the company removed the case to the federal district court under the federal officer removal statute. The Kraemer’s then asked for the case to be returned to their local court because they felt that Lone Star had not proven that it was entitled to be treated as a government contractor.



In reviewing the case, the judge noted that Lone Star argued it could remove the mesothelioma lawsuit to federal court because the asbestos-containing products it had supplied to Todd and Puget Sound were used almost “exclusively on U.S. Navy ships.” The Kraemer’s argued that in removing the case to federal court, the company had not alleged that the asbestos-containing insulation was “military equipment” as required. The judge agreed, noting that the Ninth Circuit had earlier ruled that “where the goods ordered by the military are those readily available, in substantially similar form, to commercial users, the military contractor defense does not apply.”



Judge Calls Mesothelioma Defense “Remarkably Sparse” 



In ruling for the mesothelioma victim and his wife, the judge said that Lone Star could not “invoke the government contractor defense without evidence that its product constituted ‘military equipment,” and that though they definitely sold asbestos-containing products to shipyards during World War II, their “remarkably sparse opposition” had failed to address this, and that their argument had missed the point. Because the insulation was not manufactured with the “special needs of the military in mind” and was the same product that was commercially available, the company had failed to meet its legal burden. She remanded the case back to the local jurisdiction and awarded attorneys’ fees to the Kraemers.

### Kraft Heinz and Others Ordered to Pay $32 Million to Mesothelioma Victim’s Family

Kraft Heinz is one of the world’s most recognized and iconic brands, but their stature and power did nothing to prevent a jury from ordering them to pay millions to the bereaved family of a mesothelioma victim. The company had been accused of negligence for allowing asbestos exposure in a Louis Rich Company facility that they owned. 



Asbestos Carried Home on Clothing Blamed for Mesothelioma



When a person with mesothelioma’s exposure to asbestos occurred in their workplace, it is considered occupational or primary exposure. But many victims are sickened by what is known as second-hand exposure. This occurs when they are exposed to the toxic fibers being carried into their environment on the clothing, skin, or hair of others. This is what happened to Kathy Weist. Both her husband and his father worked during the 1980s for Metal Masters within a Louis Rich Company plant owned by Kraft Heinz. The asbestos that they were exposed to there adhered to their clothing, which she laundered each day.



Though evidence existed that Mrs. Weist had also suffered second-hand exposure to asbestos as a child from her father and uncle’s work in asbestos-contaminated factories, that was during the 1960s, when less was known about the mineral’s role in causing mesothelioma. Her husband and son pursued justice from Kraft Heinz and Metal Masters because by the time they worked there in the 1980s, the companies were well aware of the dangers that the toxic material posed and had a duty of care to warn about the risk.



Mesothelioma Victim Leaves Behind Husband and Son



When Kathy Weist succumbed to malignant mesothelioma she was just 62 years old. The South Carolina jury that heard her case agreed that the defendants had been negligent in failing to warn against the danger asbestos posed to her. Their verdict provided her widower and son with compensatory and punitive damages totaling $32 million, which included $10 million in punitive damages against Kraft.

### New Law to Benefit California Mesothelioma Victims

As things stand now (and have for years), family members of California malignant mesothelioma plaintiffs are not able to receive compensation for their loved ones’ pain and suffering if the victim dies prior to a jury hearing the case and making a decision at trial. But a new law inspired by an 82-year-old who succumbed to the disease will take effect in 2022 and restore fairness to the process.



California Senate Bill Allows Posthumous Damages for Mesothelioma  



The new law, Senate Bill 447, was inspired by the story of 82-year-old Alfonso Rocciola, who was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma after years of supervising construction projects in San Francisco, years before the public or workers knew the dangers of asbestos. Because Mr. Rocciola died before his trial began, his claim for compensation for pain and suffering died with him.  Outraged by the lack of fairness to victims, the California Senate passed Bill 447, which will right the wrong suffered by Rocciola’s family and many others like them.



In almost every other state, those who are the survivors of mesothelioma victims due to negligence are able to seek posthumous damages from those responsible. But California, Florida, Idaho, Colorado, and Arizona all prohibit the awarding of posthumous damages for pain and suffering. This has largely been at the behest of insurance companies whose clients are organizations that negligently allowed asbestos exposure. A spokesperson for the Consumer Attorneys of California viewed the changes to California’s laws as a significant victory, saying, “A wrongdoer should not get a financial benefit if their victim dies before they have to compensate them.”



New Law Is Specifically Aimed at Mesothelioma Victims



The new bill will become effective in just a few months when the calendar flips to 2022 and will only help family members of mesothelioma victims who die after January 1st. It is also notable that the law is only effective for a four-year period, though it is possible that it will be extended. 

### Mounting Legal Bills Lead Companies to Settle with Mesothelioma Victims

With an estimated 80,000 personal injury claims pending against them from mesothelioma victims and others, and countless more to be filed in the future, asbestos companies Aldrich Pump LLC and Murray Boiler LLC have reached a settlement agreement with plaintiffs’ attorneys. If approved by the bankruptcy courts, the settlement will set aside $545 million for victims and allow the companies to stop defending themselves in court.



Asbestos Bankruptcy Trusts End Legal Battles and Provide Options for Mesothelioma Victims



Many companies accused of negligence by mesothelioma victims and others diagnosed with asbestos-related diseases were forced to file for bankruptcy. The courts required them to establish trust funds that would ensure that their victims would be compensated for their illnesses, and in total these asbestos bankruptcy trusts funds are valued at more than $30 billion. 



According to court records, Aldrich Pump and Murray Boiler have paid approximately $100 million per year to defend themselves against mesothelioma claims and claims from other victims of asbestos. The two are each part of Trane Technologies, an Irish-based organization that manufactured asbestos-contaminated parts for equipment. Facing tens of thousands of suits that have already been filed or that may be filed in the future, the companies filed for bankruptcy protection and began negotiating with victims’ representatives to reach a suitable agreement.



Court Approval of Mesothelioma Bankruptcy Settlement Pending



Though the bankruptcy court has not yet approved the agreement, if they do it will create a fund containing an initial lump sum cash payment of $540 million, with $45 million set aside to pay for the trust’s administration and the remainder being set aside to pay claimants. The settlement value of lawsuits that have already been filed has been set at $125 million. 

### Asbestos Company’s Attempt to Overturn Mesothelioma Ruling Fails

In early 2019, Harold Cox was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma. Determining that his fatal illness was caused by exposure to asbestos during the years that he served in the Navy onboard the USS Chukawan, he and his wife Doris filed a lawsuit against several companies including Foster Wheeler, the manufacture of the boilers that he worked on and in close proximity to. The company attempted to have the case dismissed, but a report and recommendation prepared by a magistrate denied their motion for summary judgment. Rather than face a jury, the company appealed the judge’s decision to The United States District Court for the District of Delaware, where a U.S. District judge upheld the lower court’s decision.



Mesothelioma Caused by Primary and Secondary Exposure to Asbestos on Ship



Prior to his death in October of 2019, Mr. Cox blamed his mesothelioma on both primary and secondary exposure to asbestos that he endured while serving in the U.S. Navy. In a deposition he testified to having been on active duty onboard the USS Chukawan, where on several occasions he removed the doors from Foster Wheeler boilers in the boiler room in order to perform maintenance work. He described the aftermath of that work, saying that after completing it sailors would cough up “black stuff” for days. He also described having stood on a catwalk directly above the boilers for four-hours at a time, and the particles from the work below rising to the level where he stood and inhaled them.







Despite Testimony, Foster Wheeler Denies Responsibility for Mesothelioma



In the face of testimony from Mr. Cox and others, Foster Wheeler argued that the mesothelioma lawsuit against them should be dismissed. They claimed that there was insufficient evidence that his exposure to asbestos was enough to cause the disease from their product, as well as that expert witness testimony should not have been allowed and that the maritime law in question had been misinterpreted. In her review of the case, the Honorable Maryellen Noreika addressed and overruled each of their objections. She adopted the magistrate’s report and recommendation, indicating that she disagreed with each point the company had made and determining that the genuine issues of fact in dispute required that the case be tried by a jury.

### Asbestos Attorneys Accuse Mesothelioma Victim’s Family of Evading Autopsy Request

When James LaFrentz died in October of 2019, he was in the midst of a lawsuit accusing General Dynamics and 3M Company of negligence and blaming them for his malignant mesothelioma diagnosis. But because LaFrentz was a lifelong smoker, the companies questioned whether he truly had the asbestos-related disease. They wanted a sample of his lung tissue preserved after his death and informed the victim’s attorney of this orally when they learned his death was imminent, following up with a letter and email the next day. But the attorney did not relay this to the family and LaFrentz died a few days later. He was buried before any of the attorneys learned of his death, without an autopsy being conducted. Afterwards, the asbestos companies’ attorneys filed a motion for the court to inform the jury of wrongdoing on the part of the victim’s attorney.



Judge Notes Defense Hesitation to Ask for Autopsy Before Mesothelioma Death



In reviewing the actions of both the defense counsel and the plaintiff’s attorney, District Judge Andrew S. Hansen of the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of Texas acknowledged both sides’ predicament in the face of an impending mesothelioma death. He noted that the asbestos companies’ attorneys never filed a motion for an autopsy, and therefore there was no duty for the victim’s attorney to preserve lung tissue. He also noted that the victim’s attorney was, in fact, on notice that the companies wanted an autopsy performed. 



Writing about the hesitation on both attorneys’ parts with reference to an impending mesothelioma death, the judge wrote, “It is not surprising that the Defendants were hesitant to make what some might consider a morbid motion prior to LaFrentz’s passing.” He also said that the oral requests “at the very least” created “a duty to respond to defense counsel’s requests.”



Unanswered Question on Mesothelioma Diagnosis Leads to Request for Sanctions



Faced with an unanswered question on whether Mr. LaFrentz had malignant mesothelioma or lung cancer following a lifetime of smoking, the asbestos companies’ attorneys asked the judge to sanction the plaintiffs. They asked him to tell the jury that the failure represented “spoliated evidence in bad faith,” but he refused to do so because he felt that the adverse inference was inappropriate and that no bad faith existed. Instead, he decided to let the jury know that the companies’ attorneys had requested the information in a timely manner and that it had not been refused, as well as that LaFrentz died and was buried before the family was informed of the request, preventing the evidence from being collected.  He said he would not tell the jury what conclusions they should reach regarding that information. 

### BBC Blamed for Another Mesothelioma Death

The British Broadcasting Corporation’s storied reputation is being challenged by accusations that its negligence led to multiple former employees being diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma.  Renowned for being the world’s first national broadcaster, for its historic role during World War II, and for the quality of its programming, in the last few years it has faced charges of knowing both that asbestos was dangerous and that it was present in its studios. The latest in a string of claims against the organization was recently filed by the family of a celebrated set builder.



Set Builder for “Doctor Who” Dies of Malignant Mesothelioma



Richard Evans died of malignant mesothelioma in 2019, and his family blames the British Broadcasting Corporation for his untimely death. According to papers filed with British courts, Evans spent 23 years of his life building sets for shows including Hard Times, The Lotus Eaters, and the iconic Doctor Who television programs. In doing so he was exposed to asbestos in a material known as Artex.



In deposition testimony provided before his mesothelioma death, Evans described the dust raised and inhaled when he mixed the material with water to create the sets, as well as when breaking down the material after it was no longer needed. “While working for the BBC I was not warned of the dangers of asbestos, nor was I provided with protective respiratory equipment,” he said. “When I was mixing the Artex and water and creating the paste, dust could clearly be seen all around me and could actually be seen on my bare skin, hands and my forearms and on my overalls.”



Family Grieves Preventable Mesothelioma Death



Speaking of her grief and anger at the preventable nature of mesothelioma, Evans’ daughter said, “No one ever thinks that their parent won’t be around one day. But it is so much harder to accept when his cancer could have been avoided if he had not worked with asbestos.”  The family is joining others who have lost loved ones to malignant mesothelioma in seeking compensation from the broadcasting company through the courts.

### Despite Confusion Over Facts, Mesothelioma Victim Will Have His Day in Court

When a mesothelioma victim decides to file a lawsuit against an asbestos company, their quest for justice can encounter many hurdles. One of the biggest challenges is tied to the amount of time that has passed and the difficulty of remembering specific details integral to proving liability. A recent case involving a subcontractor exposed to asbestos in his work environment exemplifies this difficulty. Though the testimony Michael Benavidez provided contained so many disparities that the trial court dismissed the case, an appeals court overturned that decision and allowed the case to move forward.



Fifty Years Later, Mesothelioma Victim Struggles with Details



The case of mesothelioma victim Michael Benavidez demonstrates how challenges of memory can be overcome in a legal setting. The sheet metal worker had been a subcontractor at an Anheuser-Busch facility in California in the 1970s. He filed a claim against Fluor Corporation, accusing them and their workers of negligent handling of asbestos-containing building materials in his work environment. Fluor’s attorneys sent him questionnaires and later deposed him twice, only to find that the answers he provided were inconsistent in details about the exact years that he was exposed and what the role of the workers was. In answer to some questions he recalled Fluor’s emblem on helmets while for others he said that he had seen Fluor trucks. The company filed a motion for the case to be dismissed because his responses were “devoid of any specific facts” and calling his testimony “varied and inconsistent.” The court agreed and dismissed the case.



Appeals Judge Overturns Summary Judgment in Mesothelioma Lawsuit



Anybody can have difficulty remembering details fifty years after the fact, and when the years combine with the emotional challenges presented by a mesothelioma diagnosis, exact recall can feel impossible. A victim of asbestos exposure can easily lose hope without the support of an experienced legal team. In Mr. Benavidez’ case, the legal team filed an appeal that resulted in the victim being provided with another chance to tell his case in court. The judges on the appeals court overturned the lower court’s decision saying there were enough triable issues of material fact for a jury to consider. 

### Court Upholds Rules for Mesothelioma Victims Too Sick for Extensive Testimony

Malignant mesothelioma is a cruel disease that causes great pain and claims its victims’ lives too quickly. It is caused by exposure to asbestos, and as a result people diagnosed with the disease frequently pursue lawsuits against companies that negligently exposed them to the toxic substance. These lawsuits are often complicated by the medical fragility of the plaintiffs. In recent litigation an asbestos company attempted to bypass special court rules established to prevent further suffering for victims, but the Court of Appeals of California put a stop to their attempt, asserting that the rules were based in “principles of fairness and decency.”



California State Law Limits Testimony Time for Mesothelioma Victims



The case involved 72-year-old mesothelioma victim Edward Richards, who filed a claim against 105 defendants he believes exposed him to asbestos. Because Richards' physician indicated that he had just six months to live, his case was expedited and he both provided written discovery and made himself available for deposition testimony. Though he provided 14 hours of testimony, one of the defendants, Cahill Construction, indicated that they needed even more time to question him. When the court denied them that access based on existing California law, the company sued the court.



Court of Appeals Cites “Unambiguous” Law and Tendency to Harass Mesothelioma Victims



The law that limits victim testimony to no more 14 hours was written with specific circumstances in mind: that the case must be “for injury or illness that results in mesothelioma” and that a licensed physician must have raised “substantial medical doubt of their survival beyond six months.” In denying Cahill Construction’s petition for an exception to the rule, the California Court of Appeals called the law’s language “unambiguous” and explained that it was intended to act as a block to defendants who wish to “stall litigation or needlessly harass plaintiffs.” The 14 hours of deposition testimony and the written discovery provided will need to be enough for the company to work with.

### Utah Supreme Court Decision in Mesothelioma Lawsuit Expands Premise Owner Liability

A recent decision by the Utah Supreme Court overturned a lower court’s grant of summary judgment in a mesothelioma lawsuit. In doing so, the court dramatically expanded premise owner liability for asbestos-related claims. The case involved the tragic death of a woman whose husband had worked in asbestos-contaminated worksites and unwittingly carried the deadly fiber into their home on his clothing.



Woman’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Second-hand Asbestos Exposure



According to the original mesothelioma claim filed by Larry Boynton, his wife Barbara died of malignant mesothelioma just one month after her diagnosis with the rare and aggressive cancer. Though she had never worked with or around the material, she had regularly laundered his work clothing, and he determined that he had been exposed to asbestos when working as a laborer and electrician at facilities controlled by ConocoPhillips, Kennecott Utah Copper LLC, and PacifiCorp. He filed premises liability claims against all three, arguing that they owed his wife a duty of care.



All three companies named in the mesothelioma lawsuit filed motions for summary judgment, arguing that they owed no duty to Mrs. Boynton or that they did not control the work of Mr. Boynton’s employer at their facility. Two of the three companies’ motions were granted, with the third denied due to factual disputes. Mr. Boynton appealed the lower court’s decision to the state’s supreme court.



Supreme Court Ruling in Mesothelioma Case Dramatically Expands Liability



In handing down its decision in the Boynton case, the Utah Supreme Court dramatically expanded liability potential involving take-home exposure to asbestos and mesothelioma claims. They explicitly stated that because risks associated with asbestos were foreseeable at the time of Mr. Boynton’s exposure and because the companies had chosen to use asbestos-containing materials, they had “launched the instrument of harm” and “engaged in misfeasance” against its workers. 



The court further ruled that it was “common sense” that asbestos would be carried home on clothing and that take-home asbestos injuries, including mesothelioma, were foreseeable, and that the premise owners should have taken affirmative actions to prevent this from happening. The court wrote that because of their failure to do so, they may be held liable for Mrs. Boynton’s injuries. The case will move forward to a jury.

### Long-Delayed Justice Finally Comes for South Carolina Mesothelioma Victim’s Family

As if malignant mesothelioma were not devastating enough for its victims and their loved ones, their situation is frequently made even more challenging by relentless pushback by the asbestos companies from whom they seek compensation. A South Carolina family that has been fighting for justice for six long years was handed a major victory by the South Carolina Supreme Court when it agreed that their late husband and father, who’d been employed by a contractor company working for on a plant owned by Celanese, had not been their statutory employee and therefore the family was not limited to seeking workers compensation. 



Six-Year Mesothelioma Battle Comes to an End



The six-year-long battle over compensation for Dennis Seay’s family began shortly after he was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma. Seay was a skilled mechanic who worked for Daniel Construction. The company was hired to maintain machinery in a Celanese plant that produced polyester fiber. He was exposed to asbestos insulation in the plant’s machinery, and ultimately developed the rare and fatal form of cancer. When Seay filed a negligence claim  against Celanese, they filed a motion to dismiss that argued he had been their employee despite being hired by Daniel. They based their argument on how integral his work was to the operation of their plant, and said that made him a part of their “trade, business, or occupation.”



This argument was dismissed after the mesothelioma victim’s attorney convinced a judge that Seay’s maintenance work was not part of Celanese’s business, which was fiber production. The judge agreed and denied the motion to dismiss, and a jury awarded him $14 million in compensatory damages plus another $2 million in punitive damages. Celanese appealed the decision to the South Carolina Court of Appeals, and after the appeals court upheld the jury’s decision the company appealed again to the South Carolina Supreme Court.



Mesothelioma Victim’s Family Hopes State Supreme Court Decision is the Final Word



When the South Carolina Supreme Court heard the company’s appeal, they decided in favor of the mesothelioma victim’s family, pointing out that the workers compensation act “would not be served” by granting companies impunity for wrongdoing. They agreed that Seay had not been their employee, statutory or otherwise, and that the company could not be shielded by liability. Though there is concern that Celanese will appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, the victim’s family hopes that their six-year-long ordeal has finally come to an end. 

### Nevada Jury Awards $15.6 Million to Electrician with Mesothelioma

After John Wagner was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, he and his wife Denise filed a product liability lawsuit against Eaton Corporation, an electrical supply company whose products they blamed for his illness. They accused the company of having knowingly exposed him to asbestos over the fifty years that he worked as an electrician, and after listening to testimony in the case, a Nevada jury agreed and awarded the couple $15.6 million in damages.



Asbestos-Contaminated Components Central to Mesothelioma Lawsuit



Though Eaton Corporation denied responsibility for Mr. Wagner’s mesothelioma, the jury heard compelling testimony about his many years of working as an electrician. He described having worked in commercial and industrial settings as well as doing residential work throughout his career, and of having done so with the faith that the products he was working with were safe. It was only after his diagnosis with the rare and deadly form of cancer that he discovered the motor starters and controllers manufactured by Eaton had been contaminated with asbestos. 



After being told he had mesothelioma and that the disease is caused by exposure to asbestos, Wagner and his team discovered that the sanding, filing, and manipulating of Eaton’s plastic-molded housings and arc shields required in his job had led to asbestos fibers being released into the air, where he inhaled them. Though the company’s attorneys presented expert witnesses to deny their responsibility for his illness, the jury believed the victim’s experts when they explained that there were enough of those fibers present to lead to Wagner’s terminal illness.



Jury Told of Asbestos Company’s Negligence in Electrician’s Mesothelioma



In their convincing presentation to the Washoe County jury, the mesothelioma victim’s attorneys explained the care that he had taken throughout his career and spoke of the company’s negligence in failing to provide him with the information he needed to make an informed decision about his own work environment and products. “To be an electrician, you must be able to identify and anticipate potential dangers, and John was an exceptional electrician who was skilled at navigating known life-threatening risks,” he said. “The asbestos content in these products was only known to Eaton, and the company made a business decision not to share that information. Because of that, a dedicated craftsman like John could not take the necessary precautions to protect himself.”

### Jury Orders Johnson & Johnson to Pay $26.5 Million to Baby Powder Mesothelioma Victim

A 35-year old woman diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma has been awarded $26.5 million by a California jury. Christina Prudencio blames her diagnosis with the rare and fatal form of cancer on asbestos-contaminated talc used in Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder, a product that she had used every day from the time that she was sixteen years old.



Mesothelioma Victim Claims Johnson & Johnson Ignored Asbestos Warnings



Prudencio’s verdict is the latest in a long string of jury decisions that have favored those diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, ovarian cancer, and other diseases that have been linked to asbestos in Johnson & Johnson’s talc-based products. Each claim has pointed to evidence that the company had been warned of the presence of asbestos in the talc it was using in their iconic consumer product and that they chose to ignore it. In some cases, company executives took specific actions to keep the public from learning of their product's potential dangers.



Among the evidence presented to the jury in support of the mesothelioma victim were notes of a meeting that took place in 1971, during which a company researcher reported the presence of chrysotile in their talc. Rather than removing the product and investigating further, the company chose to continue selling and marketing the product until 2020, when it discontinued sales of all talc products and reported to the SEC that it has set aside $3.9 billion specifically to resolve talc-related litigation.



Mesothelioma Victim’s Award Includes Medical Damages, Lost Income, and More



The $26.5 million award represents compensatory damages to be paid to the mesothelioma victim for her past and future medical expenses, for lost past and future income, for lost household services, and more. The jury will also be asked to determine whether Ms. Prudencio should be awarded punitive damages meant to punish the company for their negligence, and if so, how much that award should be.

### $11.2 Million Awarded to Mesothelioma Victim Who Dismantled World War II Ships

A Tacoma jury awarded a mesothelioma victim over $11 million in damages after hearing testimony about his employers’ extreme negligence in its handling of asbestos. Dennis Woodruff was diagnosed with the rare and fatal form of cancer after having worked for Zidell Dismantling, tearing down World War II ships that were heavily contaminated with the carcinogenic material.



Company’s Negligence Caused Mesothelioma and Environmental Damage



In testimony presented during the mesothelioma lawsuit, Mr. Woodruff’s team described the harm that he suffered as a result of their failure to protect him from the effects of asbestos known to be contained within the walls of the ships that he was dismantling. Navy ships built for use during World War II made heavy use of the mineral, which was both inexpensive and extremely effective at providing insulation from heat and fire. It was only after the material was used that its dangers became widely known. Decades later, countless Navy veterans have been diagnosed with asbestos-related diseases.



Mr. Woodruff’s exposure to asbestos came when he worked for Zidell between 1970 and 1973, when the company contracted with the Port of Tacoma to do the work. Not only did they fail to provide respiratory protection or warning to their workers, the company also reneged on their promise to the port that the work site would be safe and that they would comply with all pertinent safety regulations. Fifty years later, the site continues to be contaminated with asbestos as a result of the company’s careless practices.



Dusty Conditions Described During Mesothelioma Lawsuit



The jury heard details of the dusty conditions present in Mr. Woodruff’s work environment, as well as the pain and suffering he was forced to endure as a result of his mesothelioma. Though the company’s attorneys argued that Mr. Woodruff’s illness was his own responsibility and that he should have chosen to wear a respirator, the jury awarded him $11.2 million in damages to be paid by Woodruff’s employer’s sister company, Zidell Explorations. 

### $29 Million Jury Verdict Stands in Mesothelioma Case

Malignant mesothelioma is a rare and fatal form of cancer that is caused by exposure to asbestos. Though we tend to think of it as an occupational disease, a disturbing number of cases have been linked to use of one of the world’s most trusted consumer products – Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder. According to scientists, the talc that the powder is made of is frequently contaminated with asbestos. A 55-year-old woman was recently awarded $29 million by a California jury after convincing them that the iconic product was to blame for her illness. Though the company appealed the verdict, an appellate court rejected their motion and ordered them to pay the victim the full amount.



Mesothelioma Victim Points to Thirty Years of Baby Powder Use



The appeal came after the jury awarded mesothelioma victim Teresa Elizabeth Leavitt a significant $29 million award as compensation for her pain and suffering, as well as for her medical expenses and other damages. Diagnosed with the rare and fatal disease at the age of 51, she told a compelling story of her mother using the product during her diaper changes from the time of her birth in the Philippines, and of her continued use of the product well into her teens. Not only did she used it after baths, she also used it as a dry shampoo and face powder, and continued to do so until 1998. In 2017 she learned that she had mesothelioma and took legal action.







Expert Witness Testimony Grounds for Appeal in Mesothelioma Lawsuit



Though Johnson & Johnson argued that their baby powder product did not contain asbestos, the mesothelioma victim enlisted the help of an expert witness, Dr. William Longo, who tested both current and vintage bottles of the company’s baby powder. He found the carcinogen in both. Hearing this and other evidence, the jury found Johnson & Johnson guilty of negligence and assigned them 98% responsibility for her illness. The company argued that Longo’s testimony should not have been allowed because he did not testify to the contents of the actual bottles of product that Ms. Leavitt had used, but the appellate court disagreed, saying that the rules of evidence did not require that level of exactitude and that a change in his testimony would not have changed the trial’s outcome. Justice Gordon B. Burns ordered Johnson & Johnson to comply with the jury’s order and provide the victim with the compensation she deserved.

### Holiday Decorations Linked to Man’s Malignant Mesothelioma

Decorating for the Christmas holidays is the foundation on which many fond family memories are built, but for one man, it may have led to his death from malignant mesothelioma. It has definitely led his family to a legal battle against the company that manufactured and sold Snow Drift, an artificial snow product, and which failed to warn that their product was contaminated with asbestos.



Mesothelioma Lawsuit Centers on Asbestos in Artificial Snow



Though Larry Petries’ family acknowledges that his mesothelioma came after exposure to asbestos from multiple occupational sources, they have also named the Novelis Corporation as a defendant in their personal injury lawsuit. They point to the company’s artificial snow product called Snow Drift as the cause of his cancer. Petrie’s family used Snow Drift to decorate their house during the holidays, and his survivors say that the asbestos it was made from contributed to his malignant mesothelioma diagnosis.



Though the Novelis Corporation moved to have the family’s mesothelioma lawsuit dismissed, the judge hearing the case denied their motion for summary judgment and is allowing the case to proceed for a jury’s consideration. The company argued that Petrie’s illness was a result of asbestos exposure while having worked as a pipefitter on Naval ships, while working on automobile brakes as a teen, and during his years of work at the Mare Island Naval shipyard.



Family Acknowledges Mesothelioma Victim’s Multiple Exposures to Asbestos



Though Mr. Petrie’s family acknowledged multiple sources of the asbestos exposure that led to his death from malignant mesothelioma, they particularly blame the makers of Snow Drift, which his family used to decorate at Christmas each year in the 1950s. They recounted family tales of playing and having snowball fights with the product, and point to scientific data indicating that early exposure can cause significant harm. 



In denying the company’s motion for summary judgment, the judge made it possible for the family to present their evidence to a jury. When the case goes to trial, it will be up to the jury to make a decision as to whether the company was negligent in allowing the product to be sold to consumers without appropriate warnings of its dangers. 

### Successful Mesothelioma Lawsuits Often Detail Multiple Sources of Asbestos Exposure

It is very common for people diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma to have been exposed to asbestos from multiple sources. If your occupation put you in close proximity to equipment or parts that were contaminated with the carcinogen, there’s a good chance that several different manufacturers’ whose products you worked with used the same, dangerous materials. Though victims often fear that being unable to pinpoint the exact time and duration of exposure from one company’s products will work against them, in most cases mesothelioma attorneys are able to name multiple companies as defendants and hold all of them responsible for the damages they have caused.



Plumber with Mesothelioma Exposed to Asbestos Throughout his Working Career



The plight of mesothelioma victim Robert Swanson is a good case in point. Though the plumber died of the rare and fatal form of cancer in 2016, his product liability lawsuit against several different defendants was continued by his son Shawn as a wrongful death case, and a jury recently ordered boiler manufacturer Marley-Wylain to pay the family over $5 million in damages.



Mr. Swanson’s mesothelioma was diagnosed in 2014 and he filed suit against multiple defendants during the following year. In testimony provided before his death he detailed years of exposure to asbestos, starting with his two-year naval assignment onboard the U.S.S. Theodore E. Chandler and his years installing and servicing heating and plumbing systems in the years thereafter. The Weil-McLain boilers that he worked on were just one of many that were contaminated with asbestos.



The jury reviewed the testimony of expert witnesses about how asbestos exposure can lead to malignant mesothelioma, as well as the information provided about the dust Swanson had inhaled while working on the company’s boilers as well as those made by other companies and from having worked in close proximity to drywallers over the years. Despite the multiplicity of sources, the jury determined that the manufacturer’s negligence had been the proximate cause of Mr. Swanson’s death, and ordered them to pay $5,489,688 to the victim’s family.

### Dispute Over Asbestos Evidence Drives Appeals Court’s Mesothelioma Trial Decision

Despite the best efforts of two asbestos companies, a New York woman’s mesothelioma lawsuit will move forward for a jury to decide. The companies both employed Victoria Pistone’s father and exposed him to asbestos, and she is accusing them of negligence in allowing her to be exposed to the carcinogen when she visited him at his workplace as a child.



Secondhand Exposure is Known Risk for Malignant Mesothelioma



Though most cases of malignant mesothelioma are diagnosed in people who worked directly with asbestos-contaminated products, there are many instances of employees’ family members being sickened by asbestos fibers carried into their homes on their loved ones’ clothing, hair, or skin. But in Ms. Pistone’s case, her exposure came when she would accompany her father on weekends, when he would go in to work at both Mannington Mills and American Biltrite. During those visits her father would cut vinyl sheet flooring and open boxes of vinyl tiles. Both products were contaminated with asbestos, and Ms. Pistone and her husband Peter blame the dust generated for her diagnosis with peritoneal mesothelioma at the age of 41.



Though both companies acknowledged that their products contained asbestos, they filed motions to have the case dismissed based on affidavits from experts saying that she would not have been exposed to enough asbestos to have caused her illness. Ms. Pistone and her husband submitted contradictory expert testimony, but the Supreme Court of Nassau County agreed with the asbestos companies and dismissed the case.



Appellate Court Overturns Mesothelioma Decision



In its review of the mesothelioma lawsuit decision, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York determined that it was “not always necessary for a plaintiff to quantify exposure levels precisely” and that there was sufficient evidence in support of the victim’s position for a jury to hear. They overturned the lower court’s decision and allowed the case to move forward.

### Company Ordered to Pay $25 Million to Mesothelioma Victim Only Protected Its Own Employees from Asbestos

Copeland Corporation, a compressor manufacturer, filed an appeal to overturn a jury’s award after being ordered to pay a mesothelioma victim’s family $25 million in damages. But the Court of Appeals of California denied their appeal, noting that the company’s lack of warning about the dangers of asbestos had been responsible for significant harm to the victim and his family.



Compressor Manufacturer Only Company That Refused to Settle with Mesothelioma Victim



When William Phipps was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, he and his wife filed a lawsuit that named 23 different companies. All of the companies settled with the family except for Copeland Corporation. When the case went to trial, the jury heard substantial testimony about the asbestos that was present in Copeland compressors’ gaskets, and that Mr. Phipps’ inhalation of the asbestos dust generated when he scraped the old gaskets represented significant exposure. 



The jury was also told that while Mr. Phipps had never been warned about the risk of mesothelioma associated with the asbestos in the equipment, the Copeland Corporation had warned its own employees about the carcinogenic material’s dangers, and had even equipped those employees with respirators to protect them. When questioned as to why the company took that action on behalf of their own workers, an expert witness for the defense acknowledged that mesothelioma was “one of the worst cancers to have” and “a very dreadful disease.”



Asbestos Company Argued that $25 Million Award was “Excessive”



In its appeal of the jury’s $25 million damages award, Copeland Corporation’s attorneys argued that they should not have been found responsible for 60 percent of the blame for Mr. Phipps’ mesothelioma, and that the award amount was “excessive.” In response, the appeals court judges pointed out that the company had not offered an alternative apportionment and that $25 million was appropriate given the significant harm that Mr. Phipps and his family had suffered. The judges also ordered the company to reimburse the family all of the court costs corresponding to fighting the company’s appeal.

### Asbestos Mishandling Leads to Mesothelioma Risk and Legal Action

Recognizing that exposure to asbestos risks mesothelioma and other serious diseases, the state of Massachusetts has taken legal action against a local construction company. The state’s Attorney General Maura Healey has accused GTA Co. and its president of ignoring state laws by demolishing asbestos-contaminated municipal water pipes without taking the necessary precautions to prevent asbestos from spreading throughout the community. She has also named other entities that transported and illegally stored the asbestos.



Community at Risk of Mesothelioma from Airborne Asbestos



Healey claims that the actions of Gregory T. Antonelli, president of GTA Co., exposed vulnerable communities to the risk of malignant mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases. Her lawsuit indicates that the work the company did on asbestos water mains in the towns of Everett and Braintree were illegally conducted, and that in addition to the risk to local residents, the company’s own employees were exposed to the deadly carcinogen.



“We allege that these defendants put the health of the public and their workers at risk by conducting illegal and unsafe asbestos work in the middle of city streets, including in environmental justice communities that already bear disproportionate environmental risks. We will hold accountable people and companies who violate the laws intended to protect the public from this dangerous material.”



State’s Clean Air Act Violated



The lawsuit was filed after the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection alerted Healey that the companies had raised the risk of mesothelioma by failing to take appropriate precautions to prevent asbestos from becoming airborne. Additionally, once disturbed the asbestos-contaminated debris was left behind in neighborhoods, either dumped into open trash containers or crushed and buried in roadways. These actions violated the state’s Clean Air Act, and the company’s misrepresentation of its compliance with environmental requirements and asbestos handling rules violated the Massachusetts False Claims Act. 



Speaking of the risk of mesothelioma and other illnesses, MassDEP Deputy Commissioner Gary Moran said, “When asbestos is improperly handled, fibers can be released into the air, potentially resulting in health impacts to workers and the general public. MassDEP strictly regulates the handling, removal, and disposal of asbestos, and provides technical assistance to parties engaged in asbestos abatement, in order to protect the public health. Those who cut corners to save money will be penalized and learn that it is more cost-effective to do it right from the beginning.”

### Asbestos in BBC Studio Blamed for Orchestra Members’ Mesothelioma

Though malignant mesothelioma is largely an occupational disease associated with factories, mills, boiler rooms and other industrial or construction settings, the mineral that causes the disease was used in environments of all types. People from all walks of life and who worked in all types of jobs suffered exposure to asbestos. This was made painfully clear when a British widow filed a suit against the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), accusing them of knowing her husband was exposed to the deadly carcinogen for years and doing nothing to protect him or his colleagues.



BBC Admits Liability in Mesothelioma Death



The mesothelioma claim was filed against the BBC by Patricia Larkin, whose 73-year-old husband Christopher recently died of the rare asbestos-related disease. Her suit cites 36 years of performances in the broadcasting company’s iconic Maida Vale studio and accuses the company of knowing of the dangers posed by asbestos for decades. Rather than fighting her assertions, the BBC has admitted its liability over Larkin’s death, and has provided her attorneys with documents acknowledging that they had been aware of asbestos in the walls and ceilings of their studios since 1984. 



Many of the mesothelioma deaths in the United Kingdom have been attributed to the use of asbestos in reconstructing the nation after the extensive damage it suffered in World War II. The mineral was used constantly because of its strength and resistance to fire and heat. Unfortunately, by the mid 1970s it became clear that its fibers are toxic when inhaled or ingested, and that people who worked in structures where it was used were highly vulnerable to asbestos-related diseases. 



Additional Mesothelioma Victims May Come Forward



As the BBC works with Mrs. Larkin following her husband’s mesothelioma death, there is word that others may come forward seeking justice, including the family of an 89-year-old orchestra member who died last year. Mr. Larkin’s son spoke to the family’s concerns for those who frequented the building, whether members of the orchestra, janitorial staff, or caterers. Barney Larkin also spoke to his own loss, saying, “I’m also angry and sad for my family and for Dad that the BBC was negligent … He should have had another 10 years. As a family we want to know: when did the BBC know about the problem and what did they do about it?”

### State Supreme Court Reinstates Jury’s $81.5 Million Mesothelioma Verdict

Calling trial by jury the “bedrock of our justice system,” the Washington state Supreme Court recently reversed an appeal’s court’s revocation of an $81.5 million mesothelioma verdict. The court called the Court of Appeals decision “inappropriate,” putting an end to a long and emotional journey for a family already suffering from the grief of losing a loved one.



Case Involved Painful Death from Peritoneal Mesothelioma



The case decided by the Washington state justices revolved around Jerry Coogan, a 67-year-old man who died of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma six months after being diagnosed with the rare and deadly disease. His family filed suit against Genuine Parts Company and National Automotive Parts Association, accusing them of having been negligent in exposing him to their asbestos-contaminated brakes and automobile parts. After twelve weeks of testimony, a Washington state jury awarded his family and estate $81.5 million in damages. Both companies appealed.



Upon hearing the defendants’ arguments against the trial jury’s mesothelioma verdict, the Court of Appeals held that the decision was correct but that the damages needed to be recalculated, and that a new trial was needed. The family appealed this decision to the state’s Supreme Court, which overturned the appellate court’s decision. In confirming the $81.5 million in damages for the family, they criticized what they viewed as judicial overreach.



State Supreme Court Decision Ends Six-Year Journey for Mesothelioma Victim’s Family



In reversing the appellate court’s order of a new trial for damages, the state Supreme Court put an end to six years of legal torment for the former auto mechanic’s family, who had testified about the pain and suffering his mesothelioma caused in his last few months. Though the defendants argued that a decision to exclude testimony from their medical expert about Coogan’s liver cirrhosis had negatively impacted their case and had been an abuse of discretion, the Supreme Court called the appeals court’s decision in support of this argument an overstep, ruling that the judges had “inappropriately substituted its own judgment for that of the trial court, and most importantly, the jury.”

### Judge Rebukes Liberty Mutual’s Attempt to Prorate Mesothelioma Settlement

The impact of a mesothelioma diagnosis goes far beyond the medical implications, and often goes beyond the victim’s eventual death from the rare and fatal form of cancer. The loss of income due to disability, cumulative medical expenses, burial costs, and other damages suffered frequently leads to litigation against those responsible, or to negotiated settlements. In some cases, even agreements become the subject of litigation. In a recent case, the court system quickly upheld the agreed-to terms and protected the rights of victims and their survivors.



New Jersey Manufacturer Agreed to Mesothelioma Settlement



The case was filed by a group of people who had been exposed to asbestos through the negligence of a New Jersey manufacturer called Jenkin Brothers. The company had negotiated a settlement with them following their diagnoses with mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases, and later filed for bankruptcy. When payment was due the victims found that the bankrupt company’s insurer, Liberty Mutual, was unwilling to pay the negotiated amount due to a lapse that had occurred in the insurer’s coverage of the company. 



The nine asbestos victims were informed by Liberty Mutual’s claims manager, Resolute Management, that because the manufacturer had paused their policy, they only were obligated to pay a pro-rated amount of the settlement. In response the victims sued for what they were owed, arguing that Liberty Mutual had become a “party-in-interest” when their client ceased to exist and maintaining that the agreement to insure Jenkins against asbestos claims had been provided with full knowledge of the risks faced by the company, and had been offset by the payment of large premiums.



Verdict Favors Mesothelioma Victims



Upon review of the case, Justice Arthur Engoron of the New York state court system agreed that the insurer was responsible for Jenkins Brothers financial obligations “in all relevant and meaningful ways” and ordered the company to pay the mesothelioma victims the full negotiated amount. In his verdict he pointed out that it was “entirely wrong” to have even attempted to evade the full amount owed.

### Power Company’s Attempt to Blame Mesothelioma on Subcontractor Fails

Despite the best efforts of Georgia Power Company’s attorneys, the company will be required to defend itself against charges of causing Colen Campbell’s malignant mesothelioma.  The company had attempted to shift the blame to North Brothers, a subcontractor that Campbell worked for, and that the power company had hired to install asbestos-contaminated insulation. But Campbell was able to show that it was Georgia Power that had been completely in control of all work done at the Edwin I Hatch Nuclear Power Plant during the time that he worked there – not his employer.



Court of Appeals Says Factual Questions Need to be Resolved in Mesothelioma Claim



When Campbell was diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma, he sued 49 different defendants, including Georgia Power Company. He claimed he had been exposed to asbestos while working at the Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Power Plant for North Brothers in 1973 and 1974, when they had been hired by the power company as a contractor.  Though Georgia Power claimed that Mr. Campbell’s safety was the responsibility of his employer, the lower court reviewed the facts and decided otherwise. They said that since the power company had designated materials, maintained the right to inspect the work and establish safety and performance rules, and had even demanded the right to fire those working for the contractor for substandard work, they had substantively been in control of the site, and therefore liable. The Georgia Court of Appeals agreed.



Records Show that Georgia Power Specified Use of Asbestos



Making matters worse for the power company was the fact that they had kept copies of all of the purchase orders for materials used, and had even given the contractor specifics on how it was to be used and that it was to contain asbestos. This was particularly damning information because by the time the orders were placed, Georgia Power was well aware of the dangers of the carcinogenic material.

### Ford Ordered to Pay $8.2 Million to Mechanic Diagnosed with Mesothelioma

Before Steven “Joe” Aaron Sr. was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, he was an active and involved grandfather and great-grandfather who loved to take his family camping and fishing. But his days of helping his family with challenges and entertaining them with outings came to a halt when he was diagnosed with the rare and deadly form of cancer. He blames his illness on asbestos in Ford Motor Company automobile parts, and filed a personal injury lawsuit against them shortly after getting sick. A Louisiana jury that heard three weeks of testimony in his case took just one hour to find the auto giant guilty of negligence and award him over $8.2 million in compensation.



Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos in Ford Vehicle Brakes and Clutches



Mr. Aaron’s mesothelioma lawsuit was based on his assertion that he had been exposed to asbestos in the 1960s and 1970s, when his jobs entailed servicing brakes and clutches installed on Ford buses and vehicles. He had worked for the Evans Shell service station as a gas station mechanic, and later for the Ouachita Paris School Board as a school bus mechanic. Though Ford was aware of the dangers of asbestos at the time that he performed his work those parts continued to be made using the carcinogenic material and no warnings were provided to anybody who might work with them. 



Family Advocate Says Mesothelioma Victim Did Everything Right



In explaining the cost that mesothelioma has exacted on Mr. Aaron and his family, his attorney explained that “In his life, Joe made all the right choices; he did everything right to provide for his family. He should be enjoying the reward of those choices, but now he can’t because he’s got a fatal disease called mesothelioma. And the reason why he has mesothelioma is because of the choices made by Ford Motor Company.” Speaking for himself on the impact of the disease, Aaron spoke in large part about his grandchildren, saying, “I want to help them more. They’re just starting out in life and they need help, but I just got to where I couldn’t do the things I wanted anymore.”

### Paper Mill’s “No Settlement” for Mesothelioma Policy Leads to $16.67 Million Jury Award

When Kevan Holdsworth was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, his family knew that they needed to pursue justice on his behalf. He had worked for the local paper mill in Camas, Washington ever since his graduation from high school, and while working there he was exposed to asbestos-contaminated dryer felts in Scapa Waycross paper making machines. When he got sick he filed a personal injury lawsuit against the company, but he died in 2019 before his case could be heard by a jury. This year his case went to trial, and his widow was awarded $16.67 million in compensation for her loss and the suffering that he endured.



Dryer Felt Company Fought Mesothelioma Liability



In many cases where a person exposed to asbestos is diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, their attorneys approach the company responsible for their illness and suggest that the case be settled out of court instead of putting the victim through a lengthy and stressful legal process. But Scapa Waycross has a “no settlement” policy that meant that the only way the Holdsworth family could obtain justice was to go to court. Despite their grief they proceeded, and the Washington state jury heard over a month of testimony about how the lifelong Washington state resident had worked at the papermill since 1964. The jury was told that between 1970 and 1976 he’d been assigned to the paper machine clean-up crew which involved cleaning out the dryer felts with compressed air. Asbestos fibers were blown into the air that he inhaled, eventually leading to his diagnosis with the rare, asbestos-related disease.



Jury Decision Favoring Mesothelioma Victim Comes in Just One Day 



Though they listened to weeks of testimony from both sides, the jury in the mesothelioma lawsuit was apparently clear on the role that Scapa had played. Their verdict made clear that they believed the company had been negligent in failing to test their products for asbestos or to issue any kind of warning about the hazards that it posed. Within a single day they returned their significant verdict, agreeing with the Holdsworth’s attorney that “if Scapa had exerted the same sort of effort to investigate the dangers of its products that it now spends fighting lawsuits, Kevan Holdsworth might still be alive.”

### Johnson & Johnson’s Appeal of $2.1 Billion Asbestos Verdict Refused by Supreme Court

Mesothelioma victims and those with other asbestos-related diseases sat up and took notice when a St. Louis jury awarded $4 billion in compensation to 20 ovarian cancer victims and their families. The plaintiffs had blamed talc in Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder for their illness, and the award was seen as an enormous victory, but the company immediately appealed the decision. They appealed it again to the U.S. Supreme Court even after the decision was upheld but the $4 billion award was cut to $2.1 billion by an appeals court. Recently the high court put an end to the victims’ legal journey by refusing to hear any arguments in the case. The $2.1 billion award will stand and the victims will receive the financial justice they deserve.



Mesothelioma and Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Blame Asbestos in Talc for Illness



There are tens of thousands of mesothelioma and ovarian cancer lawsuits that are either ongoing or pending against Johnson & Johnson’s as well as other companies that manufactured and sold talc-based consumer products and that provided talc to those companies. These lawsuits are based on the presence of asbestos – a carcinogen – within the talc that they sold. Product liability lawsuits against these companies accuse them of knowing of the dangers posed by these products and failing to warn of those dangers.



Original Jury Called Johnson & Johnson's Marketing Approach "Reprehensible"



There have been multiple verdicts that have favored mesothelioma and ovarian cancer victims, and some that have favored the defendants, but the Supreme Court’s decision not to weigh in on the St. Louis verdict is considered a powerful signal, if not a comment on the evidence or merits of the original jury’s decision. That decision provided each victim with $25 million in compensatory damages as well as an additional $4 billion in punitive damages. The halving of that award explicitly maintained the verdict, which was based in part on what the jury called “particularly reprehensible conduct” on the part of Johnson & Johnson’s marketing approach. 

### New York Judge Sends Case to Jury to Determine Fault for Mesothelioma

Many people diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma make the decision to sue the companies responsible. In most cases these are product liability lawsuits that accuse asbestos companies of negligence and having failed to warn of its dangers. When juries hear these cases and see evidence that supports the victim’s assertions, they frequently order the companies to pay millions of dollars in damages. To avoid this outcome, asbestos companies work hard to quash evidence and have cases dismissed. Though this occasionally works, in most cases judges decide that issues of fact need to be determined by a jury and allow the cases to move forward.



Electrician’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos-Contaminated Wire and Cable



A good example of how this type of mesothelioma lawsuit proceeds can be seen in the case of Alvin Smith, an electrician who had been exposed to asbestos-contaminated wire and cable manufactured by Anaconda Wire & Cable and Continental Wire & Cable. He filed suit against the companies’ current owner, Ericsson, Inc., but the company moved to have the case dismissed. Its attorneys argued that the fact that their products contained asbestos did not necessarily warrant the conclusion that they had been the cause of Mr. Smith’s illness.



Though the company did not deny that their products contained asbestos, and also did not deny that asbestos causes mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases, they still maintained that they were not responsible for Mr. Smith’s illness, asserting that “it is not enough for a plaintiff in a toxic tort action for damages to show that a certain agent sometimes causes the kind of harm that he or she is complaining of: at a minimum, there must be evidence from which the factfinder can conclude that the plaintiff was exposed to levels of that agent that are known to cause the kind of harm that the plaintiff claims to have suffered.”



New York Judge Denies Motion, Allows Mesothelioma Lawsuit to Proceed



The judge overhearing the motion for summary judgment was Supreme Court of New York County Justice Adam Silvera, who oversees many mesothelioma lawsuits. After hearing arguments from both sides, he reminded attorneys from both sides that asbestos claims are often issues of credibility, and as such they need the involvement of a jury to determine who should be believed. He also reminded the defense that Mr. Smith’s family was not required to show the precise cause of his illness – and that ‘facts and conditions from which defendant’s liability may be reasonably inferred’ were sufficient for the case to move forward.

### Talc Manufacturer Suffers Another Monetary Blow As Mesothelioma Verdicts Pile Up

According to evidence presented in multiple mesothelioma lawsuits, company management at talc supplier Whittaker Clark & Daniels was aware that its talc was contaminated with asbestos but continued supplying their product to consumer companies without warnings. With exposure to the mineral causing incalculable harm to an unknown number of individuals, the company has been named as a defendant repeatedly over the last few years. Last April they faced yet another in a series of monetary consequences when a California jury found them guilty of negligence and ordered them to pay 78-year-old Willie McNeal, Jr. $4.8 million in damages.



Vietnam Veteran’s Mesothelioma Linked to Old Spice Body Powder



The mesothelioma victim in this case is a 78-year-old veteran of the Vietnam War. When he was diagnosed with the rare and deadly form of cancer he filed lawsuits against several companies that exposed him to asbestos, the mineral that causes mesothelioma as well as several other serious illnesses. While Johnson & Johnson, AutoZone, Inc., Bendix, R. J. Reynolds, and Shulton, Inc. all settled Mr. McNeal's claims out of court, Whittaker Clark & Daniels chose to fight. They defended themselves against his accusations of negligently failing to warn of their product's dangers when they supplied it to the maker of Old Spice body powder.



Talc Supplier Blamed for Mesothelioma from Use of Old Spice and Other Products



Mr. McNeal pointed to evidence that Whittaker Clark & Daniels' company management had been aware that asbestos contaminated the talc that they were selling to the makers of Old Spice, as well as to the makers of products sold by Revlon and other consumer product companies. The jury hearing his mesothelioma claim agreed that the company should be punished for their role in his illness. In addition to attributing 42% of the responsibility for his illness to the company, they also assessed punitive damages of $3 million as a warning message about their recklessness in failing to protect consumers.  This verdict followed an earlier $18 million damages award that a jury had ordered paid to a man whose wife had used Revlon products and was stricken with the deadly disease.

### Despite Ford’s Appeal, $34 Million Mesothelioma Award Can Only be Reapportioned, Not Reduced

Despite an appeal by Ford Motor Company, a mesothelioma victim will receive the $34 million awarded to him by a California jury. Though the Court of Appeal of the State of California agreed that reapportioning the damages assigned to Arthur Putt might be appropriate, it denied the auto company’s request for an entirely new trial, determining that the jury had decided the case correctly and that there was no basis for overturning their decision.



Former Gas Station Employee Diagnosed with Malignant Mesothelioma



The mesothelioma victim in this notable case was Arthur Putt, a former gas station employee who performed brake jobs in the 1960s and 1970s. At that time brake pads contained asbestos, and because of that exposure to the carcinogenic material, decades later he was diagnosed with the rare, asbestos-related disease. He filed suit against Ford Motor Company and several others whose asbestos-contaminated products that he had worked with, and all but Ford agreed to out-of-court settlements. At trial the jury awarded Mr. Putt and his wife $8.5 million in compensatory damages and $25.5 million in punitive damages.



In reviewing the information presented during the mesothelioma trial, the court found that the jury’s findings against Ford applied to all of the other automakers and brake pad manufacturers and suppliers. This decision was based on the pads he was exposed to being indistinguishable from each other, regardless of which company manufactured or supplied them. As a result, the court agreed that the apportionment of fault should be reviewed at a new trial, potentially assigning more fault to other manufacturers and a lower percentage to Ford. But they refused the balance of Ford's appeals, indicating that the rest of the jury’s decision was appropriate and should be left intact.

### Judge Grants Mesothelioma Victim the Right to Seek Evidence

Numerous challenges await mesothelioma victims who choose to pursue justice, but aggressive advocates can help smooth the way. A case recently heard by Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of the State of New York exemplifies how roadblocks thrown up by asbestos companies can be defeated with thorough knowledge of the law.



Door Company Tries to Evade Cooperation in Mesothelioma Lawsuit



The case was filed by James Witte, who was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma after having spent years supervising the renovation of an old theater and studio on 81 Street and Broadway in Manhattan, New York. He cites exposure to asbestos in fire doors manufactured by T.M. Cobb as the source of his illness and seeks compensation for the damages he suffered.



Cobb argued that the mesothelioma lawsuit against them should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction: The company’s owner claimed that they are not and never were incorporated in New York, never had a place of business in New York and never had any contracts with the State of New York, and therefore Mr. Witte could not establish that he suffered an injury in New York as a result of their products.



Court Agrees with Mesothelioma Victim that More Discovery is Required



In response to the door manufacturer’s arguments, the mesothelioma victim’s attorneys argued that more discovery is required to determine whether or not Cobb had distributed, marketed, sold, or delivered its products in New York. Though the company’s owner submitted an affidavit indicating that they had not, the court called the statement self-serving and pointed to previous cases in which further investigation was allowed. The judge said that Mr. Witte is “entitled to depose Cobb’s corporate representatives in order to better determine whether Cobb distributed its product either directly or indirectly through an agent to New York,” and ordered the company to produce such a person for deposition.

### Stained Glass Maker’s Mesothelioma Leads to Negligence Claim

Michael A. Love was a stained glass maker who never dreamed that the creative work he did could lead to his death from malignant mesothelioma. But much of his time was spent his working with gloves and boards that were contaminated with asbestos, and that lead to his eventual diagnosis with the deadly form of cancer. When his survivors filed a lawsuit against CSC/Cenco Scientific Company, accusing them of negligence in failing to warn of the dangers of their products, the company attempted to have the case dismissed. They argued that theirs had not been the only asbestos-contaminated supplies that Mr. Love had worked with, and therefore they could not be held responsible. But the rules of evidence say that negligence can occur even when there is more than one proximate cause of illness, and as a result the company will have to defend their lack of protective action in front of a jury.



Negligence Claims in Mesothelioma Case Are About Failure to Protect



When a mesothelioma victim or their family member files a negligence claim against an asbestos company, they are pointing to the company’s failure to warn of a danger that they were aware of, or to take steps to prevent the illness from happening. In the case of the Love family’s claim against CSC/Cenco Scientific, the company never denied that their product had exposed the man to asbestos. Instead, they argued that all of the companies that had manufactured gloves and boards for use in making stained glass had contained asbestos, and that therefore they could not be singled out as responsible for his death. 



Though CSC’s attorneys acknowledged that Mr. Love had “recalled seeing a box of boards from CSC” they also pointed out that he “offered no testimony whatsoever that he ever actually performed the scoring, snapping or scraping work on a board supplied from Cenco” and that since all of the products were identical and he had not personally unpacked the gloves, there was no way for him to know which had caused his illness.



Law Does Not Require Mesothelioma Victims to Prove Sole Liability



Despite the asbestos company’s arguments against being held responsible, the judges in the mesothelioma lawsuit agreed with Mr. Love’s family that there was no requirement that they prove a single source of asbestos exposure. They agreed that the family had demonstrated the existence of triable questions of fact, and that was sufficient for the question to be put to a jury. The case will move forward.

### Legal Expertise Makes All the Difference in Mesothelioma Litigation

When you or someone you love has been diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, seeking justice and security for your family is often a top priority, especially because the “right and wrong” of the situation seems so abundantly clear. Unfortunately, what is obvious to the layman doesn’t always adhere to the rule of law, and some victims are denied compensation because of their attorneys’ lack of familiarity with the nuances of these highly specialized cases. A case that was recently resolved by the Florida Supreme Court makes this all too clear, as a victim who had spent years battling asbestos companies was finally told he could keep the $8 million a jury had awarded him years earlier – and his victory was the result of his attorneys’ deep knowledge of the rules of evidence.



$8 Million Mesothelioma Award Reinstated for Victim



The original mesothelioma lawsuit was filed by Richard De Lisle, a man who was diagnosed with mesothelioma after having worked with asbestos and having smoked Kent cigarettes. His suit named both Crane & Co., which he blamed for his occupational exposure to asbestos, and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, as defendants.  A jury awarded him $8 million in damages, but the 4th District Court of Appeals overturned that ruling after the companies filed an appeal based on expert witness testimony that they argued should not have been allowed.



Supreme Court Overturns Appellate Court Ruling in Mesothelioma Case



Though it seemed as if the mesothelioma victim was going to lose the $8 million that the jury awarded him in compensatory damages, his attorneys asked the state’s Supreme Court to review the case, arguing that a 2013 law passed by the Florida legislature had infringed on Mr. De Lisle’s rights and the court’s authority. In their analysis the judges agreed, saying that the lower court’s reliance on a specific standard for expert witnesses had been incorrect. The reversal ended the long battle for justice for Mr. De Lisle, providing him and his family with the multi-million dollar award that the original jury had felt that he deserved.

### Court Victory for Mine Workers with Mesothelioma

It is nearly impossible to determine exactly how much harm the W.R. Grace & Company did by failing to control the asbestos in their mines, or how many cases of malignant mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases resulted from their negligence. But the blame for those illnesses went far beyond the single company — there were others who worked with the company, who turned their heads and ignored the problem or stayed silent. A recent court decision against W.R. Grace's insurance company, the Maryland Casualty Company, makes clear how many others contributed to the problem, and how many lives might have been saved had companies just done the right thing.



Insurance Company Failed to Warn of Mesothelioma Health Risks



The case, which involved more than 800 W.R. Grace & Co. mine workers afflicted with asbestosis, malignant mesothelioma, or other asbestos-related diseases, was heard by the Montana Supreme Court. At issue was the question of whether the insurance company charged with advising the company on the health of their miners had a duty to warn the men of the dangers posed by asbestos. 



According to evidence presented at trial, part of Maryland Casualty Company’s contract with W.R. Grace & Co. included medical monitoring of the workers for signs of mesothelioma and other diseases. According to the Montana Supreme Court judges, as the exclusive provider of medical evaluations of the employees, the company had a greater responsibility than simply to advise the company of the risks posed by asbestos. They also owed a duty of care to the men.



Judges Make Clear That Insurance Company Had a Duty to Warn Workers of Asbestos Risk



The decision by the high court followed a similar ruling by Montana’s Asbestos Claims Court, which had also sided with the mesothelioma victims. Though the insurance company argued that it was exclusively W. R. Grace’s responsibility to act on the information that they'd been given, the judges rejected that assertion, saying that the company’s knowledge of asbestos’ dangers had created a duty to warn and that the company’s failure had increased the men’s risk of harm.



Speaking of the company’s conduct, Justice Dirk M. Sandefur wrote, “Regardless of whether or how Grace ultimately acted on the worker-specific medical monitoring evaluations and recommendations provided by MCC, Grace in fact relied on MCC to perform that distinct aspect of the workplace safety and risk management precautions that Grace deemed necessary to take.” Following this decision, damages owed by the insurer will be determined by the Asbestos Claims Court and paid to the victims and their families.

### Judge Denies Asbestos Company Attempt to Bar Mesothelioma Witnesses

Anybody who has ever participated in a trial, or even watched one on television or in a movie, knows how important witnesses are to understanding a case, and that is just as true in a mesothelioma lawsuit as in any other kind. When Navy veteran John Dale Wineland died of malignant mesothelioma his family filed suit against those they believed responsible and began searching for his shipmates to act as witnesses in support of their claim. When those witnesses were finally found, the asbestos company tried to block them from testifying. But the judge in the case denied their attempt, and allowed them to support their old colleague.



Shipboard Asbestos-Contaminated Equipment Blamed for Mesothelioma



As was true of so many who served in America’s Armed Forces, Mr. Wineland’s mesothelioma was caused by asbestos he was exposed to while serving in the Navy. During his years on the U.S.S. Tuscaloosa he'd worked with equipment manufactured by Auburn Technology, but because he died before he could testify to that effect, the family sought his old shipmates to testify about his work. Though they did not know the specific individuals’ names, they submitted muster rolls for the ships on which he’d served in hopes that they would be located, and they eventually were, just days before the court’s deadline. 



Witness Names Submitted to Defendants in Mesothelioma Case



Though Mr. Wineland’s attorneys submitted the names of the witnesses to Auburn Technology’s representatives so that they could interview them themselves, the defense instead attempted to have their testimony struck, accusing the Winelands of attempting to impede their access to the witnesses. This would have had a profound impact on the strength of the family’s case.



Judge Rejects Defense’s Assertions About Mesothelioma Victim’s Attorneys



When the asbestos company’s attorneys attempted to blame the Wineland family’s attorneys for their failure to interview the veterans who had served with him, the judge denied their argument.  In his decision he wrote that the “defendants made no effort to take discovery from the victim’s shipmates” and that this could not be “blamed on the plaintiffs’ failure to remind defendants of their existence.”  The witnesses were permitted to testify on behalf of their old shipmate’s family. 

### Mesothelioma Widow Wins Benefits for Herself and Her Eight Orphaned Children

Malignant mesothelioma is a cruel disease that robs victims of their lives. But the pain that the disease causes extends far beyond the individual diagnosed with the disease. It also affects family members and friends who must lose their loved one after watching them suffer and deteriorate. This painful situation is exacerbated by the fact that the disease is entirely preventable, and that's why so many victims prevail against asbestos companies and others that have a duty to protect workers against exposure to the carcinogenic material. In a recent case, a widow who lost her husband to mesothelioma was able to win workers’ compensation benefits for herself and for her eight children, despite objections from the late man’s employer.



Exposure to Asbestos-Contaminated Tiles Blamed for Mesothelioma



Decades before Robert Casey was diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma, he had worked for the E.J. Cody Company. His job responsibilities included the installation and removal of acoustical ceiling and floor tiles, and though the new tiles he installed were free of asbestos, the tiles he had to remove as part of his job had been manufactured long before the dangers of asbestos were known, and were made with the dangerous mineral. Though the management at Cody was well aware of the tiles' dangers, they provided no protective clothing or masks to keep Mr. Casey from inhaling the carcinogenic materials.



When he was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2014, he filed a workers’ compensation claim against the company seeking benefits, and after he died his widow amended the claim so that she would receive the benefits. She also added their eight children to the claim and the Worker’s Compensation Board granted their application, agreeing that the exposure he suffered over the seven years that he worked for the company qualified the family for the benefits.



Asbestos Company Appeals Mesothelioma Benefits



As is the case with many asbestos companies, E.J. Cody pushed back against having to pay benefits to Mr. Casey’s family, arguing that he had been exposed to asbestos in jobs previous to having worked for them and that they were not responsible for his malignant mesothelioma. They also said that because the children had not been listed on the original claim, they should not be eligible for benefits now. Despite this argument, the Workers’ Compensation Board agreed with the original ruling and denied the company’s appeal, stating that the benefits for the children were appropriate and that the company was liable based upon workers’ compensation rules. 

### Lifetime of Asbestos Exposure Muddies Mesothelioma Responsibility

When a victim of malignant mesothelioma seeks justice for the harm they’ve suffered, the first step is to figure out when and where their asbestos exposure occurred. Sometimes the answer is clear and straight forward, but in many cases — and particularly for those who served in America’s military — exposure to asbestos was such a constant throughout their lives that individual asbestos companies try to take advantage, denying their own role and blaming other sources of exposure. This is what happened to Edward Atchley, who served in the U.S. Navy before relocating to Libby, Montana. When Mr. Atchley died of malignant mesothelioma and his widow attempted to collect the Workers’ Compensation she was owed, his employer blamed his earlier military exposure to avoid paying. But the Montana court system has clear rules that quashed the company’s attempt to evade responsibility and ensured that justice was served. 



Veteran’s Mesothelioma Attributed to Multiple Sources



Like many other veterans of America’s Armed Forces, after Mr. Atchley was discharged from the Navy he went on to work in occupational environments that repeatedly exposed him to asbestos. In his widow’s lawsuit against Louisiana Pacific Corporation, there were several different sources of asbestos exposure acknowledged, including:



From 1951 to 1955 when he served in the U.S. Navy onboard the USS Herbert J. ThomasHis relocation to the town of Libby, Montana, where he lived and worked and was exposed to background asbestosIn 1955, from 1958 to 1959, and again from 1963 to 1971 when he worked for the J. Neils Lumber Company at its large plywood mill in LibbyTwo to four weeks when he worked at the W.R. Grace vermiculite mineFrom 1985 to 1997 when he worked as a security guard at the Louisiana Pacific lumber mill



Veteran’s Benefits Previously Assigned Due to Asbestos-Related Disease



Years before Mr. Atchley was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma he was diagnosed with another asbestos-related disease, for which he received military benefits. But when he died after years of working as a security guard in the asbestos-contaminated lumbermill, his widow filed a claim for workers compensation, blaming occupational exposure for his later illness. Though the company pointed to all of his previous asbestos exposure, Montana law requires that workers’ compensation assign responsibility to the site of the last known occupational exposure. Hazel Atchley will receive the compensation that she sought.

### Court Permits Navy Vet’s Case to Move Forward

In May of 2018, John W. Pruitt, Senior was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma. Shortly after his diagnosis he filed suit against the various companies whose asbestos-contaminated equipment he was exposed to during his years working as a machinist mate onboard several different Navy ships between 1958 and 1963. Four of the named companies attempted to have the cases against them dismissed based on a variety of objections, but the judges in the United States District Court in Delaware denied the motion for summary judgment that two of them filed, allowing the case against the other two and the remaining defendants to move forward.



Veteran Blames Mesothelioma on Exposure to Shipboard Equipment



Mr. Pruitt’s lawsuit named Amdura LLC, BorgWarner Morse TEC LLC, Gardner Denver, Inc. and Warren Pumps LLC as the manufacturers of the asbestos-containing materials that he worked with as a machinist mate, and which he blamed for his malignant mesothelioma. He provided testimony that he had joined the U.S. Navy in 1958, at which time he was stationed on attack transport vessel USS Bayfield and in 1959 he was stationed on the oil tanker USS Tolovana. During that time, he worked on pumps, valves, winches, purifiers, and compressors. He also replaced winch brakes, attached brake linings, and remembered the various manufacturer names on the equipment that he worked on. He testified that this process produced dust which he later learned was from asbestos. He was honorably discharged in 1963. Because all of these exposures occurred onboard ships, he filed his lawsuit based on maritime law as well as Georgia law. 



Asbestos Companies Cite Lack of Proof in Mesothelioma Lawsuit



In filing their motion to dismiss the mesothelioma lawsuit, the asbestos companies argued that maritime law mandates proof of exposure to each defendant’s product, and that this type of evidence was lacking. The judges examined the victim’s evidence and determined that both Amdura and Borg Warner’s case should be dismissed because only circumstantial evidence of exposure to their products had been submitted, but that for the other two defendants there were significant questions to be determined by a jury. Mr. Pruitt’s case will continue to move forward for a jury to determine fault.

### Louisiana Woman’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Lifetime of Second-Hand Asbestos Exposure

A mesothelioma lawsuit that was recently remanded to federal court illustrates the significant dangers posed by second-hand asbestos exposure. The suit accuses Avondale Industries of negligently causing Lana Waguespack’s death by exposing her to the carcinogen despite the fact that she had never worked for the company. Her suit claims that instead of her having been exposed directly, she was sickened by asbestos carried home on the clothing worn by her father, brother, and ex-husband when they worked for the shipyard. 



Mesothelioma Lawsuit Points to Asbestos Exposure Starting in 1944



The case, originally filed by Lana Waguespack in September of 2019 after she was diagnosed with the rare, fatal form of cancer, was joined by her heirs after her death just one month later. In it she attributed her mesothelioma diagnosis to having been exposed from the time of her birth in 1944 until at least 1971, first from the clothing worn by her father when he worked at Avondale, and later also by the clothing worn by her brother and her ex-husband when they each also worked in the company’s shipyards. This type of exposure is referred to as carry-home or second-hand exposure, and it has been blamed for numerous asbestos-related deaths, particularly among women.  



Mesothelioma Lawsuit Removed to Federal Court



Though Mrs. Waguespack died of mesothelioma in October of 2019, her case is continuing to make its way through the court system, in part because Avondale filed a motion to have the litigation moved out of the Louisiana court system and to the federal courts. The basis for this removal was that many of the vessels that the men worked on during the years cited in the case were being built at the request of the federal government. Though the family argued to have the case remain within their local judicial system, judges hearing the shipyard’s motion agreed that the company had met its legal obligations in the process of removing the case to federal court. The family will continue to seek justice in this new venue.

### Mail Carrier Blames Malignant Mesothelioma on Shipyard Asbestos

When we think of workplaces where mesothelioma is a risk, shipyards immediately come to mind.  We picture welders and steelworkers and others who handle asbestos-contaminated materials and think of them as likely victims. But asbestos is a material that breaks down easily into microscopic fibers, and once those fibers become airborne they can be inhaled by anybody in the vicinity, whether they are physically working with it or not.  That is exactly how former mailman Robert Bourgeois II believes he contracted the fatal disease. He has filed a lawsuit against his former employer, the Avondale shipyard, accusing them of negligence in having allowed him to be exposed to the toxic material.



Asbestos in Navy Shipyards Blamed for Many Mesothelioma Cases



Mr. Bourgeois is far from the first person to be diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma after working in a Navy shipyard. Because the military believed that asbestos would protect service men and women from fire and heat, they specified that the material be used in the fabrication of Navy ships for decades. Those serving on those ships were exposed to that asbestos, and so were those who helped to build them in Navy shipyards. Mr. Bourgeois’ case is unusual because he was exposed in the course of delivering mail to the various areas within the shipyard.



Mr. Bourgeois was diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma in February of 2019, and he dates his exposure back to when he worked for Avondale as a mail carrier and was stationed at the company’s main yard between May of 1973 and January of 1974. At that time he would travel around the yard to deliver mail to the shops and warehouses that were preparing parts that would be used on the Navy ships. Though he never boarded any of the Navy vessels being built in the yard where he worked, he remembered that the shops were extremely dusty, and that he frequently breathed that dust in.  He is seeking compensation from the company for the damages that he has suffered.

### Retired Rear Admiral Stricken with Malignant Mesothelioma Awarded $2.5 Million

Thousands of individuals are diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma in the United States each year, and a significant portion is made up of veterans of America’s Armed Forces. Of those most served in the Navy, working in shipyards, boiler rooms or engine rooms. The exposure to asbestos took place throughout the vessels, which made heavy use of asbestos in their construction. A lawsuit recently conducted over Zoom made clear that no one who served aboard a ship during the years between World War II and the Afghanistan and Iraq wars was safe from risk of exposure: the victim was a retired Rear Admiral who’d served on several different ships throughout his career. A California jury awarded him and his wife $2.5 million in damages. 



Rear Admiral with Mesothelioma Accuses Metalclad Insulation of Negligence



The mesothelioma lawsuit was filed by retired Rear Admiral Ronald Wilgenbusch and his wife Judith against Metalclad Insulation. The former officer blamed the company for having exposed him to asbestos via the insulation used on the Navy ships on which he served.



As a result of the pandemic, the mesothelioma case was conducted over Zoom rather than in person in the Alameda County, California courtroom as originally planned. This presented several complications which the defense attorneys attempted to use as basis for a mistrial. They complained that the admiral had voiced his opinions about the process in a way that was inappropriate. In response the admiral’s attorneys indicated that expert witnesses for the defense had used the COVID-19 crisis as an excuse for not producing documents that they’d requested. While Superior Court Judge Brad Seligman acknowledged the challenges, he also denied Metalclad’s attorneys’ motions for dismissal.



Troubling Expert Witness Testimony in Mesothelioma Lawsuit



As part of their defense against liability for Wilgenbusch’s mesothelioma, Metalclad presented Donald Rees Trueblood as an expert witness to testify that the company’s products were not “pure asbestos,” saying that instead they simply "contained" asbestos. He also indicated that those contaminated products had stopped being sold after 1973. Upon being questioned about whether the company had taken any steps to protect those who might have been exposed to the carcinogenic material he acknowledged that no instructions or warnings had been provided either about the danger of exposure to the products or of how to safely remove it. Apparently his arguments did not convince the jury, which awarded the couple $2.5 million in damages.

### Couple Pursues Justice After Navy Service Leads to Mesothelioma Diagnosis

A Navy veteran is blaming his malignant pleural mesothelioma on exposure to asbestos-contaminated equipment during his six years of service, and he and his wife have filed suit against the companies that manufactured that equipment. Though the couple is seeking compensation for the injuries that both he and she have suffered, a court recently decided that because his injuries fall under maritime law, only the actual victim will be able to pursue justice.



Motion to Dismiss Mesothelioma Lawsuit Fails



Dale and Mary Spurlin filed their mesothelioma lawsuit against several companies that supplied the equipment for the two Navy ships he had served on between 1963 and 1969. Their suit sought compensation for negligence, strict liability, breach of express and implied warranties, and loss of consortium. The companies filed a motion to dismiss the cases against them for a variety of reasons, arguing that they had no duty to warn Mr. Spurlin of the hazards of their products, that there was no proof that their products had caused his illness, that because they were government contractors they were protected from liability. They also argued that maritime law does not provide for punitive damages and loss of consortium.



In its review of the various assertions by the defendants, the U.S. District Court S.D. California granted only the motion to dismiss the mesothelioma victim's wife's claims for loss of consortium and punitive damages, agreeing that they are not available under maritime law. However, they denied all of the other motions to dismiss, methodically moving through each aspect of the case and finding that the defendants knew or had reason to know that their products or their integrated parts were likely to be dangerous and that the manufacturers had a duty to warn. They ruled that a jury needed to determine whether there was factual evidence to support causation. 



Judges Deny Government Contractor Defense Against Mesothelioma Claims



With reference to the companies' argument that as government contractors they should be shielded from liability against mesothelioma claims, the judges wrote that it was reasonable to infer that they "knew more about the dangers of their products than did the United States" and that they therefore were not entitled to summary judgment based on that defense. The case, with the exception of the claim for punitive damages and loss of consortium, will move forward to be heard by a jury.

### Illinois Judge’s Decision Will Have Far Reaching Impact for Cross-State Mesothelioma Litigation

John C. Clark is an Illinois resident who was diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma after having been exposed to asbestos while commuting to and from a job as a contractor for North Dakota Great River Energy (GRE). Though he filed a lawsuit against the company in the Illinois courts, he immediately found himself enmeshed in a legal argument with the company as to where he could legally file his claim. Though GRE claimed that personal jurisdiction could not be established in Illinois and requested that the trial be relocated to North Dakota or Minnesota, the Honorable Judge Clare E. McWilliams ruled against their motion and granted personal jurisdiction in Illinois.



Case Sets New Precedent for Illinois Mesothelioma Victims



When a person is diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma they are significantly weakened by their disease and require constant medical attention. It is far preferable for them to remain as close to home as possible, and that includes avoiding travel for their legal proceedings. Despite this, GRE attempted to force Mr. Clark to travel back and forth to North Dakota in order to have his asbestos exposure claims heard. His lawsuit asserted that he had been an employee of an Illinois-based company that had assigned him to the North Dakota location where he was subjected to asbestos exposure. His suit cites injuries that occurred both at the North Dakota facility and in Illinois as a result of asbestos dust remaining on his clothes and shoes when he returned home.



In denying the company’s motion, Judge McWilliams established a precedent that will apply to future cases filed by state residents who want their asbestos litigation against out-of-state defendants heard in their home state. She pointed out that because GRE had chosen to contract with an Illinois company and had permitted employees to commute without providing appropriate safety precautions to prevent asbestos exposure in Cook County, the case should be heard in Illinois, where the injury occurred.



Decision Provides Significant Relief for Mesothelioma Victim



In addition to establishing that Illinois juries should make decisions on justice for injuries occurring within the state, the judge’s decision also offered the mesothelioma victim the ability to get “efficient and effective relief” without the additional burden and expense of crossing state lines and pursuing multiple lawsuits. The decision is expected to impact many future mesothelioma lawsuits.

### Mesothelioma Death Puts Family on Long Journey for Justice

The family of retired janitor and Navy veteran Bobby Hilt has seen some victories in their pursuit of justice for his mesothelioma diagnosis, but their battle is not over yet. After winning a $7.5 million settlement from several asbestos defendants in 2008, they turned their attention to others that refused to negotiate and that insisted that the case be dismissed. The U.S. District Court in California recently heard both sides and agreed that the case should be heard by a jury to determine whether these recalcitrant companies should also be held responsible.



California Mesothelioma Victim Suffered Extensive Exposure to Asbestos



When Mr. Hilt was first diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma in early 2008, he looked back at his work history and found significant exposure to asbestos. He had worked as a janitor cleaning around asbestos-contaminated boilers at the Schlage Lock Company, had installed valves and pumps that used asbestos-contaminated gaskets when working for the Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, and had served on new construction ships and submarines equipped with asbestos-contaminated boilers and pipe insulation.



He filed mesothelioma lawsuits against 11 defendants and won a $7.5 million settlement from several of them, but the manufacturer responsible for the boilers in place on two of the ships that he'd worked on filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that there was no proof that the asbestos-contaminated parts he’d been exposed to had been in their equipment. A lower court agreed with them, but Mr. Hilt’s family appealed that decision. The U.S. District Court in California overruled the lower courts, granting the original motion.



Foster Wheeler Loses Argument Against Answering for Mesothelioma



The manufacturer that filed the motion to dismiss the mesothelioma lawsuit was Foster Wheeler, manufacturer of boilers in place on the U.S.S. Constellation and U.S.S. Bradley. Mr. Hilt had testified to having inhaled “lots of dust” around their equipment, and the judges ruled that because the ships had been new when Mr. Hilt worked on them it was reasonable to believe that the parts had been part of the original construction. The case will now move to a jury.

### Woman’s Second-Hand Asbestos Exposure Leads to Mesothelioma Death

Though malignant mesothelioma continues to stymie researchers and physicians who are seeking an effective cure, there is no mystery as to the cause of the disease. Mesothelioma is caused by exposure to asbestos, a fibrous mineral that was used extensively in shipbuilding, factories, construction, and many other industrial settings. Though the vast majority of cases are diagnosed in people who worked directly with the carcinogenic material, there are also many instances where family members were sickened when asbestos fibers were carried home on those workers’ clothing, hair, and skin. One such case is currently making its way through the courts, as the adult children of a woman who died of mesothelioma seek justice from the asbestos companies whose products their father worked with.



Adult Children Seek Justice Following Mother’s Mesothelioma Death



When Betty Ann Broussard was diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma in 2018, her condition was already extremely grave. The woman died of the aggressive form of cancer just six months after it was identified, leaving her two adult children, Elizabeth and Edward Guilbeau to continue seek justice in her lawsuit against several asbestos defendants on her behalf. Ms. Broussard blamed her illness on asbestos dust that had been carried into her home on the clothing of her ex-husband, Kenneth Guilbeau, who had worked in the Avondale Shipyards.



According to evidence submitted in the mesothelioma lawsuit, Mr. Guilbeau had worked on two government ships for the Navy during the time that the couple was married. Deposition testimony submitted in the case acknowledged that she had never worked directly with asbestos herself, and instead blamed her illness on exposure to airborne asbestos fibers that she l inhaled while laundering his work clothes each day.



Second-Hand Asbestos Exposure Leads to Mesothelioma



In her lawsuit against the companies, the mesothelioma victim and her family accused them of knowing that asbestos was a danger and failing to provide either warning or precautionary measures to prevent workers from exposure or from carrying the dangerous materials home with them to their families. The family is seeking compensation for the damages that she suffered, as well as for her pain and suffering.

### Technicalities of Maritime Law Impact Mesothelioma Lawsuits

For a large percentage of those diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, service onboard ships is to blame for their fatal illness. This is because so many ships — and in particular Navy ships — were built using asbestos and equipped with asbestos-contaminated equipment. When it comes to pursuing legal action against those responsible, shipboard exposure introduces the need to apply maritime law to all proceedings, and this sometimes precludes some of the claims that are available in non-seafaring settings. An example of this was seen in a case filed by the survivors of a Navy veteran who had been seeking punitive damages against a pump manufacturer.



Family’s Mesothelioma Case to Continue But Punitive Damages Unavailable



The case was filed by the family of former Navy machinist’s mate James T. McAllister, Jr. after his death from malignant mesothelioma. The veteran’s wife and adult sons filed a claim against pump manufacturer Nash Engineering Company, which provided some of the asbestos-contaminated equipment that McAllister had worked with while serving in the engine rooms of submarines. The company filed a motion to dismiss the family’s lawsuits, arguing that they were not recoverable under maritime law.



Jones Act Cited in Mesothelioma Lawsuit



Following McAllister’s February 2019 death, his wife and surviving adult children each sought damages for his pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment life, loss of income and loss of household services. They also sought punitive damages. The company argued that because the claims were filed under maritime law, the family was not entitled to any of the damages that they were seeking, but the judges in the case only partially agreed, writing, “There can be no question that injured seamen can seek recovery for their own pain and suffering under the Jones Act and the general maritime law. Additionally, under the Jones Act, a decedent’s estate can bring a survival action to recover all losses suffered during the decedent’s lifetime. While only pecuniary losses are available under the Jones Act, the term pecuniary has been extended beyond its typical meaning to encompass the decedent’s pain and suffering.



The judges determined that under the rules of maritime law, the sons’ claims against the company would need to be dismissed along with the punitive damages claims, but that Mr. McAllister’s widow would be able to continue her case against the company for her losses.

### Roofing Mechanic’s Case to Proceed Despite Asbestos Company’s Objections

Despite years of losses at the hands of judges and juries, asbestos companies continue to argue against their responsibility for mesothelioma diagnoses, even while admitting that their products contained the deadly carcinogen. One such case was heard in early 2020, when Veronica Jackson sued the Henry Company, seeking compensation for the injuries suffered by her late husband Stephen.



Widow Sues Asbestos Company for Husband’s Mesothelioma Injuries



The lawsuit was filed by the widow after her husband succumbed to malignant mesothelioma less than one year after his diagnosis. She provided evidence that he had worked as a roofing mechanic in New York City from approximately 1970 to 1997, regularly applying asbestos-containing roofing cements, sealants, and coatings manufactured by Henry Company. The suit claimed that the victim applied asbestos-containing products onto the roofs, and that the materials also contaminated his tools, clothes and shoes, and that when he scraped it of it created asbestos dust that he inhaled.



In response to the lawsuit, Henry Company filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that there was no proof that Mr. Jackson’s malignant mesothelioma was caused by their product or that he had been exposed to any asbestos-containing product that they manufactured. The company’s attorneys argued that the deposition testimony that the man had given before his death failed to adequately and properly identify their products as a specific source of his asbestos exposure.



Mesothelioma Widow Will Have Her Day in Court



In response to the asbestos company’s assertions, the widow’s legal team pointed out that there had been significant testimony from the mesothelioma victim pointing to brand identifications of Henry Company’s products, and that the company’s corporate representative had also testified that during the years in question the company had manufactured and sold asbestos-containing products. Though the representative also said that some of the company’s products sold during that time did not contain asbestos, the judge in the case determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to reasonably infer that Henry’s products exposed Mr. Jackson to asbestos and that summary judgment should be denied. The case warrants a trial and will move forward to be hear by a jury.

### Asbestos Filler in Bowling Balls Causes Lane Owner’s Mesothelioma

When Donald Vanni and his brother decided to make bowling a family business, the two never dreamed that their venture would lead to one dying of mesothelioma. But that is exactly what happened. A Los Angeles County jury hearing their story agreed that Honeywell International Inc. had been negligent and was responsible for the man’s death, and ordered the company to pay $4.4 million in damages to the man’s family.



Years Spent Drilling Holes in Bowling Balls Filled With Asbestos



Mr. Vanni’s malignant mesothelioma was diagnosed in 2012 after he’d spent the 30 years from 1957 to 1986 as co-owner of the Arcata Bowl bowling lane. He and his brother worked every day, alternating opening and closing shifts with each other to manage and operate the business. One of their responsibilities was to drill finger holes in Ebonite bowling balls to custom-fit them for bowlers. Unbeknownst to the brothers, the popular bowling balls were made using discarded brake lining dust as a filler. The lawsuit noted that there had been no warnings provided about the presence of asbestos inside the plastic balls, and that Mr. Vanni had drilled the balls in a small room with no ventilation, leading to him unknowingly inhaling large quantities of asbestos fibers



Honeywell Sold Asbestos to Ebonite Despite the Known Risks



At the time that the Vannis were operating their bowling lane, Honeywell was generating and selling discarded brake lining dust from its Bendix brake manufacturing plant as a filler for commercial products. The asbestos-contaminated dust was a known danger, but extremely profitable for Honeywell. The family filed suit, arguing that the death was “completely preventable. The Vanni family should not have lost Don nine years early due to Honeywell’s greed. Asbestos brake dust should have never gone into a single bowling ball.” The family noted that prior to his diagnosis, Mr. Vanni had been healthy and extremely active.

### $17 Million Awarded to Family of Veteran Felled By Mesothelioma

Mesothelioma affects victims from all walks of life, but the vast majority of Americans diagnosed with the rare and fatal form of cancer continues to be veterans, and particularly those who served in the U.S.  Navy. An Arizona jury recently heard the case of one such victim, a man whose 35-year history of service in the Navy exposed him to deadly levels of the asbestos that led to his illness.



Family Continues Lawsuit After Loved One’s Mesothelioma Death



George Colbourn was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma in 2012. After realizing that his illness was caused by the asbestos he was exposed to from 1959 through 1966, when he served as a machinist at the Norfolk Naval Shipyard in Portsmouth, Virginia, he filed a product liability lawsuit against several companies whose products he’d worked with. He died less than a year after his diagnosis and his claim was amended to a wrongful death action on behalf of his family.



Evidence provided in the mesothelioma lawsuit showed that Mr. Colbourn had numerous job responsibilities that exposed him to asbestos in products manufactured by Crane Company, William Powell Company, and several others, and that the companies were aware or should have been aware of the dangers that the deadly material posed. His job had included removing asbestos-containing gaskets and packing from valves that were clearly contaminated with the deadly material.



Navy Found Partially to Blame for Mesothelioma Death



Though the jury agreed with the family that the defendants were largely responsible for Mr. Colbourn’s mesothelioma death, they also held the Navy 47% responsible. They awarded Mrs. Colbourn $6 million for her losses and each of his surviving children $1 million, plus provided and additional $8 million in punitive damages to the victim’s estate. In all the family will receive $17 million in damages following the loss of their loved one.

### New Mesothelioma Trial Ordered After Judge’s “Manifestly Unreasonable” Decision

We all count on the court system to treat us fairly, and that is especially true of mesothelioma victims taking on big asbestos companies and their attorneys. Whether you’re a mesothelioma widow, a child who lost their parent to the disease, or an asbestos victim yourself, you expect judges to act in a reasonable way. That did not happen when Colleen Schrader sought justice on behalf of her late husband, and as a result an appeals court threw out a jury decision and has ordered a new trial.



Judge Preferred That the Jury Not See Evidence in Mesothelioma Trial



The order for a new trial came after mesothelioma widow Colleen Schrader filed an appeal of a decision that had been made by the judge overseeing her lawsuit. After Mrs. Schrader’s husband Ernest died in 2017, she filed lawsuits against several companies that had supplied Mr. Schrader’s employer, Dupont, with asbestos-contaminated products. The defendants included Ameron.



Mrs. Schrader provided evidence that her husband’s 20 years of exposure to asbestos had led to his mesothelioma. She accused the companies of negligence, and all but Ameron agreed to settle the case. During the subsequent trial the jury asked to review critical evidence showing that Ameron had been aware of asbestos in their product and of its dangers, but the company’s attorneys objected, arguing that it would cause too much of a delay in the trial. The judge agreed, saying that not providing the evidence was his “preference.” Without that critical piece of information, the jury ended up finding the company not guilty.



Appeals Court Calls Judge’s Decision in Mesothelioma Trial an Abuse of Discretion



After losing at trial, the widow appealed the verdict on the grounds that the judge’s decision had negatively impacted the jury’s ability to make a decision about the company’s role in her husband's mesothelioma death. The appeals court agreed, calling the original judge’s decision an “abuse of discretion” and writing, “In the face of a very specific request from the jury charged with resolving these very serious and complicated issues after 10 days of trial, the trial court’s decision to deny them access to one piece of duly admitted evidence that it deemed important to its verdict, based solely upon speculation that it could inspire them to ask for more exhibits and prolong resolution of the case, amounts to a manifestly unreasonable exercise of discretion.”

### Former Firefighter Cites Manipulation of Data in Mesothelioma Lawsuit

Firefighters face many hazards as part of their job, including the risk of malignant mesothelioma from exposure to asbestos on the job. A lawsuit filed by a Colorado man has accused several companies of conspiring to hide the dangers of the hazardous material from him when he served as a firefighter in Lincoln and Omaha, Nebraska, as well as when he served as a boiler operator in Nebraska City.



Mesothelioma Lawsuit Names Several Defendants



The mesothelioma lawsuit filed by Starr Snyder names the manufacturers of numerous asbestos-contaminated products as defendants, as well as Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. He alleges that American Optical Corporation, Cleaver Brooks, Inc., DAP, Inc., Honeywell International Inc., Kaiser Gypsum Company and Mine Safety Appliances Co. LLC conspired with the insurer to change data included in a study of asbestos safety that would have served as a warning to him and to others.



According to Snyder’s lawsuit, the 1935 study examined asbestos-related health hazards at asbestos mines in Canada and the United States. He claims that the company changed scientists' conclusions, indicating that the mineral was safe and leading him and others exposed to the material to remain unaware of its dangers. He subsequently was exposed to it and breathed in its fibers while working as a Lincoln firefighter from 1960 to 1964, as a boiler operator at a Nebraska City hospital from 1964 to 1965, as a repairman from 1965 to 1966 and as a firefighter again from 1966 to 1992.



Mesothelioma Lawsuit Points to Warnings Provided to Companies’ Own Employees



In support of his mesothelioma lawsuit, Snyder includes proof that some of the companies named in his suit warned their own employees of the dangers of asbestos, advising them against inhaling the carcinogenic material yet failing to provide those same warnings to first responders and workers like himself at risk of breathing in asbestos-contaminated fumes, smoke, dust and fibers. He is seeking compensation for the pain and suffering he has endured as well as for his anticipated early death.

### Motion to Dismiss Denied After Mesothelioma Victim Points to Grueling Deposition

Mesothelioma is a form of cancer whose symptoms don’t appear until many decades after the asbestos exposure that causes it, and once it makes itself known its effects can be devastating. Victims seeking justice from those responsible for their illness are asked to remember details from years earlier, all while suffering the effects of the disease and the side effects of the treatments they are undergoing. It is this dynamic that was described when clothing manufacturer American Optical Corporation tried to have Donald MacLachlan’s lawsuit against them dismissed. The company argued that Mr. MacLachlan had changed his testimony between two legal proceedings, while the man blamed the shift on the grueling effects of his disease. The court sympathized with the victim and denied the asbestos company’s motion to dismiss.



Mesothelioma Victim Blames Asbestos in Protective Clothing for His Illness



Mr. MacLachlan’s lawsuit blamed asbestos in American Optical’s protective clothing for his mesothelioma. He had worked as a cast house helper in a steel plant and wore the company's coats, gloves, leggings, and hoods that protected him from the molten steel and intense heat. He claimed that the material frequently broke down and that he had inhaled its fibers, but there were inconsistencies about the dates that he'd worn them in statements he gave during two different depositions.



Despite acknowledging that they had manufactured asbestos-containing products, American Optical pointed to inconsistencies in testimony the mesothelioma victim provided in September of 2014 and again in May of 2015 to have the claim against them dismissed. They pointed to discrepancies as small as whether the collars of the coats he'd worn were made of leather or wool, where a tag with a logo was located on the coat, and what year he'd worn the coats.



Judge Denies Asbestos Company’s Motion to Dismiss Mesothelioma Lawsuit



In response to the asbestos company’s argument that the victim’s testimony was “revisionist,” Mr. MacLachlan explained that he'd been deposed “over two grueling days while suffering with the symptoms of mesothelioma.”  The judge considered both arguments and concluded, “Dealing with ill health and intense questioning about his complete work history, including dates of employment, locations, job responsibilities and asbestos-containing products he saw, Plaintiff concedes that at his depositions he misstated the extent of the time frame he wore Defendant’s protective coat.”



The judge went on to say, “Plaintiff Donald MacLachlan was asked about a job he held over thirty years earlier. He is now suffering with mesothelioma symptoms and somewhat advanced age. … the Court concludes that the contradictions in the supplemental affidavit can be reasonably explained by confusion, memory lapses and new pertinent evidence.” He determined that the decision as to facts should be made by a jury and that the case should be allowed to continue.

### Civil and Criminal Lawsuits Filed Against Scranton School District Over Asbestos Exposure and Mesothelioma Risk

The Scranton School District in Pennsylvania is facing both a civil lawsuit and a criminal lawsuit, both of which accuse it of knowingly putting district teachers and students at risk for malignant mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases. The civil case charges the district with ignoring and hiding the dangers of asbestos within their building’s walls, and the criminal case echoes those claims, charging the district’s former superintendent and two other officials with felony child endangerment over allegations they covered up lead and asbestos contamination in the schools.



Failure to Address Asbestos Risked Mesothelioma in Students and Teachers Alike



The civil case was filed by a district principal, a teacher, and a retired maintenance worker, all of whom were concerned about mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases after the district closed four different sites found to be contaminated with both asbestos and lead. Those plaintiffs claim that the district became aware of the contamination through an environmental report published in 2016 that identified a significant, potentially deadly health problem. The district is working to have that case dismissed, referring to it as frivolous and arguing that school district employees have no constitutional right to a safe working environment.



The criminal case was filed by the state of Pennsylvania, which similarly expressed concerns about mesothelioma and other asbestos-related disease in their charge that former Superintendent Alexis Kirijan, former Director of Operations Jeffrey Brazil, and current maintenance supervisor, Joseph Slack were aware that dangerous levels of asbestos and lead had been identified but did little to fix the problem, and in many cases hid it from those who were most at risk. At a news conference announcing the charges, state Attorney General Josh Shapiro said, “Hiding the truth exposed Scranton schoolchildren to unsafe levels of lead in their water, and asbestos in their air, and these administrators’ failure to fix the problem broke the law.”



Ceiling Collapses Cited in Criminal Case As Source of Asbestos Exposure



Among the most concerning claims in the criminal case are those voiced by a school principal who told the officials about ceilings collapsing in their schools, spreading asbestos through classrooms and hallways and risking mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases in teachers and students. The grand jury that heard the evidence and indicted the group said that the superintendent “went out of her way to hide the extent of the district’s asbestos problem” by telling the principal to stop putting his concerns in writing and only speak about the asbestos issue on the phone or in person.

### Asbestos Company Argues Against Liability for Veteran’s Mesothelioma

Imagine being diagnosed with mesothelioma after years of sweeping up asbestos dust onboard Navy ships. With that clear a source of exposure, your path would seem clear and the road to justice apparently unobstructed. You would file a lawsuit against the companies whose equipment created the dust. That is exactly what former U.S. Navy Aviation Storekeeper Gordon Smeal did after being diagnosed with the rare and fatal form of cancer, but asbestos company Air & Liquid Systems attempted to shut his claim down before it started. After hearing both sides in the case, Judge Manuel J. Mendez of the Supreme Court of New York County denied the asbestos company’s motion to dismiss and allowed the case to move forward.



Sixty Years Passed Between Navy Service and Mesothelioma Diagnosis



Despite sixty years having passed, Gordon Smeal had clear memories of his service on board the U.S.S. Intrepid and the U.S.S. Wasp, including the constant flow of contractors coming onboard the ships to install, repair and replace Air & Liquid Systems' pumps and motors. Those workers would leave behind debris and dust that Mr. Smeal was responsible for sweeping up, and in doing so he suffered significant exposure to asbestos fibers.



Mr. Smeal traced his mesothelioma to exposure that occurred between 1957 and 1960 when the ships he worked on were rehauled and refurbished at the Brooklyn Navy Yard. He described his duties, including responsibility for disposal of all materials left behind by contractors, and recalled the significant amount of dust left behind from insulation from that equipment. He also had to remove used asbestos-contaminated covers and gaskets that contractors discarded. Despite the clear connection between his exposure and his mesothelioma, Air & Liquid Systems filed a motion to have Smeal’s claim dismissed, arguing that he had not worked directly on the equipment and there was no proof that the asbestos from their equipment caused his fatal disease.



Judge Denies Asbestos Company’s Motion to Dismiss Mesothelioma Lawsuit



In explaining his decision, Judge Mendez said that Mr. Smeal’s case demonstrated “facts and conditions from which defendant’s liability may be reasonably inferred.” His decision will allow the case against Air & Liquid Systems to continue and be heard by a jury.

### Judges Agree with Mesothelioma Victim’s Family That Testimony was Improper

When a mesothelioma victim’s family pursues compensation for the loss of their love one, they rely on expert witnesses' testimony. Defendants also use expert witnesses, and juries are left to decide whose testimony they believe. In a recent case, a family accusing Johnson & Johnson and Colgate-Palmolive of allowing asbestos to contaminate their talc products appealed a jury’s decision, arguing that one of Johnson & Johnson's expert witnesses provided improper, prejudicial testimony. Judges hearing the family's appeal agreed and sent the case back for a retrial.



Asbestos Company Witness Testified About Personal Use Instead of Science



When an expert witness provides testimony in a mesothelioma case or any other type of personal injury lawsuit, the information they provide is supposed to meet certain standards. In her case against the talc companies, Cynthia Hayes objected to Dr. John Hopkins’ testimony as improper. They argued that he not employed by the company directly, and that he improperly testified about his personal use of the product as an indication that it did not contain asbestos. The victim’s family argued that this was prejudicial and irrelevant: They said that the witness had never personally tested the talc for asbestos or had any role in analyzing its safety, and that his testimony was confusing to jurors because they believed him to be an expert on the product’s safety. Additionally, the victim’s family had been barred from questioning him further by the trial judge.



Judges Distinguish Between Personal Choice and Personal Knowledge of Mesothelioma Risk



Johnson & Johnson argued that Dr. Hopkins’ testimony in the case was relevant and permissible because it was used to weigh the question of punitive damages in the family’s mesothelioma loss, but the judges disagreed. They ruled that the testimony “unduly prejudiced” the case, allowing “irrelevant personal and family use testimony” that “gave rise to an unnecessary distraction.” As a result, the original jury’s decision against the mesothelioma victim’s family was reversed and a new trial ordered.

### 74-Year-Old Retired Shop Fitter Blames Branson and Virgin Records for Mesothelioma

Former shop fitter Bernard Jones once boasted of his work on the iconic first location of Virgin Records in London. Decades later he now blames asbestos he was exposed to on that job for his malignant mesothelioma diagnosis. He is seeking compensation from the company and from Sir Richard Branson himself.



Asbestos Dust in Post-War Buildings Blamed for Mesothelioma



Though mesothelioma victims in the United States think of their disease in local terms, asbestos-related diseases are a global problem, and are particularly tragic in the United Kingdom.  After much of London was destroyed in World War II the city’s entire infrastructure needed to be rebuilt, and much of that work was done using asbestos. For Bernard Jones and others who later renovated those post-war buildings, that led to exposure to the deadly material. Roughly 2,700 new cases are diagnosed each year, and though that is less than the 3,500 diagnosed annually in the United States, there is a significant difference between the two countries' populations.



Mesothelioma Victim Attempted Out-of-Court Remedy



Shortly after being diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2020, Mr. Jones wrote to Branson in hopes that he could avoid filing a claim with the High Court. At roughly the same time he began undergoing immunotherapy treatments he also wrote to Virgin Records, which Branson no longer owns, to report his illness and seek compensation. He received no response to his correspondence, and though his attorneys continued to attempt contact their overtures were ignored. They eventually filed an official legal claim of negligence, pointing to the years 1971 through 1973 when he was one of six workers hired to convert an old shoe shop on Oxford Street into the company’s first location.  He also performed the same work at the Sloane Street location, and recalls having swept up asbestos-contaminated debris and dust after removing old insulation boards and sheets. Jones says he even slept at the work sites. He is now seeking over £200,000, which is roughly equivalent to $280,000.

### Mesothelioma-Stricken Navy Vet Asks for More Time to Prove His Case

Ronald Behrmann is a 30-year veteran of the U.S. Navy who was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma. He believes that his fatal illness was caused by exposure to asbestos-contaminated electrical components he worked with during the course of his career, and filed a personal injury lawsuit against the companies that supplied those parts. While his attorneys were still collecting evidence to prove his case, one of those manufacturers attempted to have the claim against them dismissed, but a Washington state judge agreed that he needed more time and denied the company’s motion.



Company Attempts to Have Mesothelioma Claim Dismissed



Meriden Molded Plastic is one of the companies that the veteran has blamed for his mesothelioma diagnosis. The company manufactured a part called an arc chute that was a component of the equipment Behrmann used during his 30-year career working onboard ships as an electrician’s mate, and later as a Journeyman electrician and supervisor at the Lockheed Shipyard. He named the company as one of the defendants in his suit.



In response to being named in the mesothelioma lawsuit, Meriden’s attorneys filed a motion to dismiss, pointing to lack of evidence to support the claim against them. Mr. Behrmann’s legal team acknowledged to the United States District Court in Tacoma, Washington that they had not yet proven their case, but asked for more time, indicating that they had not yet completed their discovery process.



Judge’s Deferred Decision Allows Mesothelioma Claim to Move Forward



According to Mr. Behrmann’s attorneys, their discovery process in the mesothelioma lawsuit they filed against various equipment manufacturers was not yet complete because “critical information had not yet been disclosed.” They explained that they knew that Meriden had sold its arc chute parts to several companies, including General Electric, Square D, Cutler Hammer and ABB and that those companies had sold equipment for the ships on which he served and to the shipyard, but that they were waiting for a “complete list of Meriden’s customers,” as well as other information in support of their case. In making his decision in Mr. Behrmann’s favor the judge also acknowledged that the case had not yet been proven, but agreed to allow the stricken man’s team more time. He denied the motion to dismiss the case entirely, choosing instead to defer his decision until a later date.

### Federal Law is Frequently Cited in Mesothelioma Lawsuits

Malignant mesothelioma is a risk for anybody who has been exposed to asbestos. The deadly mineral was frequently used in the fabrication of buildings, equipment, and infrastructure, and though manufacturers — and some employers — were aware of the dangers that it posed to workers, few took action to protect or even warn of the health hazards it posed. Though most employees are unable to seek justice beyond workers compensation from their employers, that is not the case for railroad workers, who are protected by the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, or FELA.



Mesothelioma Victim Points to FELA Mandate for Workplace Safety



A mesothelioma lawsuit being heard in the United States District Court in Maine makes clear how federal employees can use FELA to seek compensation from their employer. FELA requires federal agencies to provide a reasonably safe workplace. Victor Coffin was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma after years of operating the Carlton Bridge for the Maine Central Railroad. He filed a lawsuit against them under FELA, pointing to the asbestos dust that contaminated his workplace and accusing them of multiple failures in fulfilling their obligation.



In Mr. Coffin’s mesothelioma lawsuit, he argued that despite the foreseeability of the bridge having been constructed using asbestos, the railroad had never tested his worksite on the bridge. They also never warned him that asbestos was dangerous or provided him with appropriate safety equipment or clothing.



Judges Side with Mesothelioma Victim Regarding Foreseeability of Asbestos in Bridge



Maine Central Railroad filed a motion to dismiss the mesothelioma lawsuit, arguing that they had no reason to suspect that the bridge operations office would be contaminated by asbestos, but the court rejected their argument. Pointing out that the Carlton Bridge had been built in 1929, they reasoned that it was foreseeable that asbestos would have been used in its construction and that asbestos dust would be created by vibrations caused by trains crossing the bridge.  The case will move to a jury for consideration.

### Veteran’s Mesothelioma Claim Nearly Derailed by Speed of His Death

Decades before he was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, Donald Johnson worked at the Boston Naval Shipyard, where his work exposed him to asbestos. This was in the 1960s, and though he and his fellow Navy servicemen were unaware that the dust they were inhaling was carcinogenic, many asbestos companies were well aware of the dangers. After Mr. Johnson died too quickly for him to give deposition testimony about his exposure, three witnesses came forward to speak of the work environment they had all experienced. That testimony allowed his case against the asbestos companies to move forward.



Witness Testimony Supports Mesothelioma Claim



Mr. Johnson died of mesothelioma just one month after he was diagnosed with the deadly form of cancer. There was no time for the ill veteran to provide a deposition in support of a lawsuit his survivors filed, but three other service men who served alongside him stepped up in support of their fallen comrade. They spoke about their specific responsibilities when they served at the shipyard from 1966 through 1967, the asbestos-contaminated equipment they replaced and the dust that the work created.



In response the asbestos product companies argued that they could not be held responsible – and should not even have to stand trial – because there was not enough evidence of asbestos exposure levels to support a mesothelioma claim. In reviewing the companies’ motion to dismiss the charges against them, Justice of the Supreme Court of New York County Adam Silvera pointed out that the families were “not required to show the precise cause of his damages, but only facts and conditions from which defendant’s liability can be reasonably inferred.” He also noted that the companies did not even attempt to deny the presence of asbestos, to argue against causation, or any of the other typical legal moves that defendants would use to support their motion to dismiss. As a result, the family will be able to move forward with their quest for justice.

### Asbestos in Family-Owned Repair Shop Leads to Mesothelioma in Two Brothers

A mesothelioma diagnosis always brings pain and grief, but a lawsuit making its way through the Connecticut court system has revealed a remarkable family tragedy. Two brothers — one of whom owned an auto repair shop and the other who helped run it — were both diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma.



Mesothelioma Lawsuit Against BMW Reveals Harm Caused by Asbestos in Brakes



The Erhardt family’s tragedy came to light in the course of a mesothelioma lawsuit filed by Helmut Erhardt against BMW of North America. He is seeking damages for his peritoneal epithelioid mesothelioma, which he blames on asbestos in the company’s brake pads. He claims that he was exposed to the carcinogenic mineral while working for Ridgefield European Motors in Ridgefield, Connecticut. The repair shop was owned by his brother Eric, who had previously died of the rare, asbestos-related disease.



Mr. Erhardt was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma in 2014. He explained that over the course of his career at his brother’s shop he had been parts manager between 1970 and 1972, sales manager from 1971 to 1980, and general manager from 1980 to 1990. Though he “never worked as a mechanic” he “worked near technicians performing automotive work that included brake work and clutch work during which they scuffed brakes, pads and removed the glaze.” He also swept dust and debris from the work areas each evening. Mr. Erhardt says that all of these exposures led to him breathing in deadly asbestos fibers, and though his brother's death is not the subject of the lawsuit, his testimony makes clear that he believes asbestos in BMW's brakes also led to his brother's illness and death. 



Lawsuit Moving Through Court



Mr. Erhardt’s mesothelioma lawsuit is still in its early stages, but he prevailed in a recent decision. BMW of North America sought to bar testimony from his expert witnesses and to have the entire lawsuit dropped. In his decision, U.S. District Judge Victor A. Bolden said, “Ultimately, the issues raised by BMW NA may carry the day at trial, and a jury may find the evidence presented through the testimony of Dr. rank, Dr. Zhang and Mr. Ewing insufficient to prove that exposure to BMW NA’s products caused Mr. Erhardt’s mesothelioma. But that is a factual matter for the jury to decide, not a judgment for this Court to make.”

### Painted-Over Labels at Issue in Mesothelioma Lawsuit

Peter Allen was a Navy veteran who died just 15 months after getting his malignant mesothelioma diagnosis. He had no doubt as to where he had been exposed to asbestos, as he had a clear memory of crumbling insulation and dust-filled air from his years on board the U.S.S. Marquette and a ship called LST 528 (later renamed U.S. S. Catahoula Parish.) When his widow filed a liability lawsuit against the company that provided the asbestos-contaminated equipment, the company argued against being held liable based on the victim’s admitted inability to read the company’s name as a result of its labels having been painted over. A New York Supreme Court judge ruled against their motion to dismiss, allowing the case to move forward for a jury’s consideration.



Mesothelioma Victim Recalls Dust Created by Machinist Mates’ Work



In a deposition provided before his death, the mesothelioma victim testified that he had served as an electrician’s mate, working feet away from machinist mates tasked with repairing and maintaining shipboard pumps.  He noted that he worked in many locations throughout the ships he was stationed on. Though he clear recalled crumbling asbestos insulation in his work environment and airborne dust as his shipmates did their work, he was not able to name the pumps’ manufacturer because the identifying information was painted over with “battleship grey” paint.



Pump Manufacturer Argues Lack of Identification Precludes Liability



The pump manufacturer named in Mrs. Allen’s mesothelioma lawsuit filed a motion for summary judgment, insisting that the painted-over labels on the equipment meant that there was no proof on which to base the lawsuit in the first place. They pointed to an affirmation that their attorney had sent via email as well as to the fact that their pumps had been located in different areas of the ship from the specific location where he had been in proximity to the machinist mates.



In his ruling on the case, Judge Manuel J. Mendez of the Supreme Court, New York County ruled against the pump manufacturer and allowed Mrs. Allen’s mesothelioma lawsuit to move forward to the jury. His decision was based on the fact that the attorney’s affirmation was hearsay, as well as that the victim had pointed out that he'd been exposed to pumps and asbestos in other locations as well as those specifically cited.

### Fading Memories Won’t Prevent Veteran’s Mesothelioma Lawsuit from Moving Forward

Malignant mesothelioma is an insidious disease that doesn’t make itself known until decades after the asbestos exposure that causes it. As a result, many victims are reluctant to move forward with lawsuits, afraid that their fading memories of exact product names or locations will work against them. A recent ruling by the Rhode Island Superior Court should address that hesitation, as the court ruled that even fading memories could be combined with hard evidence to provide enough proof for a case to move forward to a jury.



Asbestos Company Objections Overruled by Judge in Mesothelioma Lawsuit



The recent ruling by the Rhode Island Superior Court revolved around a lawsuit filed by U.S. Navy veteran Paul F. McCarthy. McCarthy was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma more than fifty years after having been exposed to asbestos while serving aboard the U.S.S. Glennon. Though he remembered having worked with the asbestos-contaminated equipment during his service in the 1950s, his specific memories of product manufacturers had faded over the years. He relied upon research to determine which companies had provide the equipment, and the asbestos companies named in his suit objected, claiming that the evidence he had submitted was insufficient. They sought a dismissal of his case.



Judges Deem Related Information Sufficient for Mesothelioma Case to Proceed



In reviewing the information submitted by the mesothelioma victim, the Rhode Island court determined that by having conducted diligent research as to the companies that provided the asbestos-contaminated products, and having proven that he’d worked in the setting in which they were placed, he had met the burden of proof for the case to proceed. Though the judges agreed that this type of decision needed to be made on a “case by case” basis, they also indicated that Mr. McCarthy’s use of “historical documents to show a range of years during which the Defendants supplied equipment to the Glennon, and Mr. McCarthy’s sworn statement described his contact and proximity to those products and areas of the ship that allegedly contained asbestos” was sufficient.

### Court Denies Chemical Plant Owner’s Argument Against Mesothelioma Liability

Malignant mesothelioma victims have a history of exposure to asbestos, the mineral that causes the disease, and that exposure can occur in many different ways. Some victims have worked directly with materials contaminated with the carcinogen, cutting tiles or pipes and inhaling the dust that it raised. Others have worked in environments where asbestos was incorporated into structural elements, and breathed the fibers in as it slowly deteriorated or was blown throughout the atmosphere. The latter is what happened to Dr. James L. Gaddy, a chemical engineer who worked in Ethyl Corporation’s chemical plant.



Ethyl Corporation Appeals Jury’s Decision in Mesothelioma Lawsuit



After hearing the details of Mr. Gaddy’s workplace exposure and subsequent diagnosis of mesothelioma, a jury awarded his family $7.5 million in damages, agreeing that the hundreds of feet of asbestos insulation installed in the plant and insulating the plant’s sodium cells near his work area drifted into the air that he breathed and led to his illness.  A district court reviewed this decision and lowered the damages to $3 million, but the company still argued against having to pay that reduced amount. They filed a motion to strike the jury’s decision and have the award reduced to just $900,000.



Court of Appeals Denies Appeal in Mesothelioma Lawsuit



In hearing the company’s appeal of the mesothelioma verdict, the U.S. Court of Appeals reviewed the company’s argument that the evidence presented had been insufficient to link Dr. Gaddy’s mesothelioma to exposure within their environment. The company also maintained that they had not been negligent and argued that the testimony of the expert witnesses who appeared in the trial should not have been allowed. In lieu of a new trial, Ethyl Corporation asked that the damages awarded to the family be reduced to less than $1 million.  Upon review, the appellate court denied the appeal, writing, “Given its first-hand view of the trial testimony and evidence, the district court was in a far better position that we to review the effect of those factors on the damages award.” They concluded, “Plaintiffs presented ample evidence from which the jury could conclude that Dr. Gaddy was exposed to asbestos in the pilot plant,” and allowed the jury’s decision to stand.

### Asbestos in Linotype Machine Blamed for Man’s Mesothelioma

In the years prior to the 20th century, people were not aware that asbestos caused malignant mesothelioma and other illnesses. Its dangers were simply not known so manufacturers used it freely, relying on the substance to increase durability and to insulate against fire, heat and sound. This was true of many types of equipment, including the Linotype, which was first patented in 1884. But by the time Thomas Pearson was responsible for maintaining one of the modern versions of the machine, its manufacturer was well aware of the dangers. Mr. Pearson died of mesothelioma caused by his exposure to asbestos, and the company’s lack of warnings or precautions is at the heart of a mesothelioma lawsuit filed by his widow.



Cleaning and Repair of Linotype Machine Blamed for Mesothelioma



Mr. Pearson died of malignant mesothelioma after 24 years of working for the Vermont Standard newspaper, cleaning and repairing a Mergenthaler Model 8 Linotype machine. He was just 72 at the time of his death, and his widow Donna accused the linotype company of negligence. In her filing she described her late husband’s role and job responsibilities and claimed that had he been warned of the dangers he would have done his work differently and taken appropriate precautions.



Thomas Pearson began working for the weekly newspaper at just 17 years old, and the young apprentice could never have dreamed that the work he loved would eventually lead to a malignant mesothelioma diagnosis. He learned to operate, clean and maintain the equipment, and continued to do so for decades. His work constantly exposed him to asbestos dust. He used a cleaning tool that was made of asbestos, and frequently scraped old asbestos insulation out of the machine and replaced it with new. He even mixed asbestos with water as part of the process, breathing in the toxic fibers.



Company Argues Against Responsibility for Mesothelioma



Faced with accusations of negligence in Mr. Pearson’s death, Heidelberg USA filed a motion to have the case dismissed. They claimed that too much time had passed since his exposure, that he had not done his work properly, and that there was no proof that it was their machine that had led to his fatal illness. The court denied each of these arguments and allowed the case to move forward. The widow will be able to continue seeking justice for her loss.

### Concessions Worker Struck Down by Malignant Mesothelioma

Asbestos was once highly valued for the strength and fire resistance it added to structures, but in the mid-1970s the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) confirmed it as a powerful carcinogen, responsible for malignant mesothelioma and many other serious and deadly diseases. While the use of the deadly material was severely curtailed, the EPA’s announcement did nothing to protect people exposed to asbestos that was already in place, and countless victims have died as a result. A Nebraska woman recently filed a lawsuit as a result of this exposure, blaming a popular local venue for negligently exposing her sister to asbestos during her years of selling concessions there.



Falling Asbestos Blamed for Woman’s Mesothelioma



Donna Grant was just fifty-nine years old when she was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, and she died at the age of 60. Her sister filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the city of Lincoln, Nebraska, blaming the city for negligent management of asbestos at the Pershing Center venue where Donna had worked for over forty years.



According to Dixie Johnson, Donna’s work, which encompassed both selling concessions and catering assistance, exposed her to asbestos that was disrupted by maintenance crews who were working on pipes covered with asbestos-insulation, as well as to fibers that fell when concert music caused the building to vibrate, and even when patrons touched the building’s popcorn ceiling. She says that the city had a duty to conduct testing to see if the building was contaminated with asbestos and to protect those exposed to the toxic material.



Mesothelioma Victim’s Sister Seeks Compensation for Expenses and Pain and Suffering



Dixie Johnson’s mesothelioma lawsuit against the city claims that the city failed to protect its workers, or even to take appropriate and reasonable precautions when hiring subcontractors to perform work with asbestos-contaminated materials. She is seeking compensation for her sister’s hospital and medical bills, for the cost of her funeral and burial, and for the pain and anguish suffered by Ms. Grant and by her surviving family.

### Second-Hand Asbestos Exposure During Teen Years Blamed for Man’s Mesothelioma

Alfred Mata was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma when he was 64 years old, but unlike most victims of the rare, asbestos-related disease, the California man had not personally worked with or near asbestos. Instead, the toxic material was carried into his family’s home on his father’s work clothing during Alfred’s teen years. Alfred and his wife Leticia filed a lawsuit against his father’s employer, Liberty Utilities Corporation (previously Park Water). The jury agreed that the company was negligent and had acted unreasonably, and awarded the couple $11.3 million in economic, noneconomic and punitive damages.



Asbestos Carried into the Home Can Cause Malignant Mesothelioma



Exposure to asbestos most commonly occurs in the workplace, but the carcinogen’s fibers can stick to skin, hair and clothing, and workers have unwittingly carried the deadly material into their homes and exposed their family members to the risk of malignant mesothelioma. This is exactly what the Matas say led to his illness. During a 12-day trial he described his father Francisco’s work for Park Water, a water service provider. Francisco worked for the company from 1970 to 1989, starting when Alfred was 17. He installed and repaired water pipes made from asbestos-contaminated cement. His work included cutting those pipes, creating dust that he carried into the home where Alfred lived.  



Company Accused of Negligence in Man’s Mesothelioma



The jury in the case heard testimony confirming that Park Water's management was aware of the dangers of asbestos but had done nothing to protect their employees, to warn them of its dangers, or to provide separate lockers for street and work clothing as required by long-standing federal and state health and safety laws. This resulted in Francisco's clothing being contaminated with asbestos and eventually being carried into his home, where Alfred inhaled the fibers.



Jury Assigns Park Water Majority of Blame for Man’s Mesothelioma



The jury hearing the mesothelioma lawsuit determined that Park Water was 54 percent responsible for Mr. Mata’s mesothelioma, with other named defendants assigned the rest of the blame. Though they initially decided that the company should pay $5 million in punitive damages in addition to $6.3 million in compensatory damages, an appeals court overturned the punitive damages, deciding that there was no deliberate disregard of the dangers of asbestos exposure. The $6.3 million award stood.

### Asbestos Company Fails in Effort to Overturn $14.6 Million Mesothelioma Award

Barbara Barr co-owned an auto parts and repair store for years, and her involvement in that business put her in constant contact with the asbestos that led to her eventual diagnosis with malignant mesothelioma. A California jury hearing the details of her exposure agreed that her illness was caused by the negligence of Parker-Hannifin Corporation and its successor Standard Motor Products, and further found that the company had acted with malice, warranting the assessment of punitive damages. Though the company appealed the $14.6 million damages award against them, the appeals court denied their motion and allowed the jury’s decision to stand.



Repair Shop Owner Diagnosed With Mesothelioma 



Mrs. Barr’s diagnosis of mesothelioma came when she was 71 years old. The evidence submitted during the trial showed that she handled new brakes manufactured by Parker-Hannifin when they arrived at the shop and that she packed used brakes up to return them to the company. She was a constant presence in the service bays, where asbestos fibers from the brakes was constantly in the air and on the ground, but she was unaware of its dangers because while the company took actions to protect and warn its own employees, they never warned their customers of its hazards.



Court Rejects Asbestos Company's Argument



Parker Hannifin’s attorneys argued that the jury had erred in finding them responsible for Mrs. Barr’s mesothelioma because her father had worked as a shipyard welder and might have carried asbestos into her childhood home. They also argued that they should not have been assessed punitive damages, claiming that they were being punished for their attorneys’ manner in court rather than for their corporate actions or inactions.



The Court of Appeals of California, First District Division reviewed the company’s appeal but denied their motion. They determined that the witness testimony suggesting that Mrs. Barr’s mesothelioma was caused by childhood exposure was insufficient to prove that theory and that punitive damages were assigned in response to the company’s failure to warn its customers of the dangers of their products. They upheld the jury’s decision.

### Psychiatrist Cites "Fear and Panic" About Risk of Mesothelioma

Being seated on a jury requires paying attention to evidence, and sitting on a jury in a mesothelioma case means learning a great deal about the disease from expert witnesses. Many witnesses will speak to the role of asbestos in the disease's development, the amount of asbestos contamination present in a product or environment, or how mesothelioma tumors develop and progress. In a recent case in Indiana, a victim seeking compensation for her fear of getting mesothelioma submitted her psychiatrist as expert witness to testify about the damage her fear of mesothelioma had done. Though the asbestos company moved to prevent the psychiatrist from testifying, the judge in the case determined that his testimony is permissible.



Victim’s Fear of Mesothelioma Called “Extreme”



The case involved a woman who was exposed to asbestos and chlorinated chemicals produced by Johnson Controls, and whose subsequent fear of mesothelioma for herself and her family led to her developing severe psychological damage. Her attorneys enlisted psychiatrist Dr. Zachary Torry to testify about her condition, but the asbestos company moved to block him from providing his opinion.



In their argument against Dr. Torry testifying in the mesothelioma lawsuit, attorneys for Johnson Controls asserted that the psychiatrist was wrong to assume that the plaintiff had actually been exposed to asbestos, and that he was speaking about conditions that he had no firsthand knowledge of. They also argued that the methodology he used in reaching his conclusions did not support causation.



Judge Rules Psychiatrist Meets Expert Witness Criteria



In speaking to the damage the victim suffered upon learning she'd been exposed to asbestos, Dr. Torry said she had suffered “extreme emotional distress.” He wrote, “[S]he has developed a pervasive ‘fear and panic’ that is centered on the potential for her and her family developing a fatal disease. [S]he carries an excessive amount of guilt and blames herself, as she believes that she ‘put their lives at risk. Moreover, the uncertainty of when, and how the risks will manifest in her or her children elevates her level of fear and worry to such an extent that she is overwhelmed by her helplessness and powerlessness to affect or control the situation.”



In considering all of the evidence and reviewing the psychiatrist’s qualifications and conclusions, the court determined that he had met all eligibility requirements of an expert witness and that he will be able to testify in support of his patient.

### $10.3 Million Awarded to New Orleans Longshoreman Following Mesothelioma Diagnosis

A New Orleans man spoke eloquently of his heartbreak at learning he’d been diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma and the jury hearing his testimony responded, awarding him $10.3 million in compensation from the stevedoring and shipping companies that had put him at risk.



Longshoreman with Mesothelioma Speaks of Years of Asbestos Exposure



Though the jury seated in Henry Pete's mesothelioma lawsuit had to be socially distanced as a result of the COVID-19 crisis, they were still able to hear full testimony and review all of the evidence. Mr. Pete blamed his fatal illness on his exposure to raw asbestos during the 1960s, when he worked to load and unload cargo on the New Orleans wharfs.



In his testimony to the jury, Mr. Pete explained that he and other African Americans were traditionally made responsible for dangerous jobs like handling raw asbestos, and further indicated that the companies he held responsible for his mesothelioma never provided any warning or protective clothing to him or his co-workers. He also testified that the same work had been done by his father decades before, and surmised that he had likely been exposed to asbestos on his father’s work clothes as a child.



Multiple Defendants Found Responsible for Longshoreman’s Mesothelioma



In filing his mesothelioma lawsuit, Mr. Pete named Ports America Gulfport Inc., Cooper T. Smith Stevedoring Co., Inc. and South African Marine Corp. as defendants. The jury agreed that the companies had “ignored or concealed such information, or condoned such concealment, in order to sell or use asbestos or asbestos-containing products and to avoid litigation by those who were injured from asbestos inhalation” and awarded him $10.3 million in damages, broken down into a $2 million award for his past and future physical pain and suffering, $3 million for past and future physical disability, $2.3 million for past and future mental pain and suffering, $2.5 million for past and future loss of enjoyment of life, and over $551,000 for past medical expenses.

### Mesothelioma Lawsuit Spotlights Asbestos Risk from Hair Dryers

Though many believe occupational risks from asbestos exposure are limited to environments like construction, factory work and mining, the mineral has caused mesothelioma and other deadly diseases in people working in a wide range of job settings. Because it insulates so effectively, asbestos was used in all types of heat-generating equipment, including toasters, coffee pots, and hair dryers, and decades of exposure can eventually lead to deadly illness. That was the basis of one widow’s workers’ compensation claim for her hairdresser husband’s death, and though she had to take her case all the way to the Court of Appeals of Missouri, she eventually prevailed and received the survivor benefits she deserved.



Lifelong Hairdresser’s Mesothelioma Death Leads to Workers’ Comp Claim



Marc Hayden’s diagnosis with malignant pleural mesothelioma came in 2015, and he immediately sought workers’ compensation benefits on the basis of exposure to asbestos in the hair dryers that he'd used while working at two salons, The Cut-Zaven and Papillion, LTD. Though he died in 2016, his case was continued by his widow, who offered expert witness testimony that many hairdryers contained asbestos insulation or asbestos-contaminated decorations into the late 1970s. She also submitted deposition testimony from Mr. Hayden himself that he had frequently cleaned the appliances, as well as having used them on a daily basis.



In response to the claim the hair salons offered their own expert witness, who insisted there was no known connection between hairdryer use and mesothelioma as well as pointing to a lack of mention of asbestos in Mr. Hayden’s death certificate. Mrs. Hayden’s claim was denied by the Administrative Law Judge as well as the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission to which she appealed. This led her to the Court of Appeals of Missouri, which reversed the denial of benefits.



Court of Appeals Reverses Decision in Mesothelioma Workers Compensation Claim



Though the Court of Appeals rarely overrules the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s decisions, in this mesothelioma case the court ruled that the commission had erred in relying so heavily on the defense expert’s testimony, and that this had led to an inappropriately heavier burden of proof on the claimant. The court also noted that the testimony provided by Mrs. Hayden’s expert witnesses — including a 1978 review of National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health testing which confirmed “the excess release of asbestos fibers from hair dryers,” had effectively countered the salons’ expert witness testimony. On this basis the court ordered the widow be provided the benefits she deserved.

### Veteran’s Widow Seeks Justice for Mesothelioma Death

Linda Hammell’s late husband Arthur was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma more than fifty years after he was exposed to asbestos, but the former Navy reservist still remembered having been exposed to asbestos during his years in the military. Though he died before his lawsuit could be heard, he provided deposition testimony about his exposure to boilers installed on the vessels on which he served, and that evidence is now the basis of his widow’s claims.



Veteran with Mesothelioma Enlisted in Naval Reserves in 1960



Mr. Hammell’s service in the Navy placed him onboard the U.S.S. Charles H. Roan while it was undergoing rehabilitation and overhaul at the Brooklyn Navy Yard as well as while it was at sea, and he blamed asbestos exposure during that time for his malignant mesothelioma. Veterans who served in the Navy have long represented the lion’s share of mesothelioma victims because asbestos was used so extensively in the insulation of the ships and their equipment. Though the military cannot be held responsible for this exposure, they have acknowledged the consequences of it and provide significant benefits for those diagnosed with asbestos-related diseases.



Veterans like Mr.  Hammell who have been afflicted with mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases are able to pursue justice against the manufacturers who knowingly provided products contaminated with the toxic material. The companies are frequently found legally liable for the injuries suffered because they without providing warnings or any type of instructions about how people who were exposed to it could protect themselves. The fire room where Mr. Hammell maintained boilers, forced drat blowers and other equipment had no ventilation, leaving him vulnerable to asbestos fibers released while he manipulated the equipment.



Multiple Asbestos Companies Named in Mesothelioma Lawsuit



Mrs. Hammell named numerous companies in her mesothelioma lawsuit, and they each denied liability and filed a motion to have her case dismissed. Many argued that because Mr. Hammell had smoked throughout his life, they should not be held responsible for his death, and others defended themselves by saying that the asbestos-contaminated parts that had sickened him had been manufactured by third parties and that the Navy could have purchased other, non-asbestos contaminated replacement parts as their original parts wore out. Despite the companies’ motion to dismiss, the United States District Court of New Jersey denied their request and will allow the case to be heard by a jury.

### “Systematic Fraud” Leads to $72.5 Million Mesothelioma/Asbestos Settlement

A thirty-year saga that saw manufacturing giant BASF and its law firm battle thousands afflicted by mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases came to an end after the company agreed to pay victims a $72.5 million settlement. The defendants admitted to having hidden evidence of asbestos contamination in their talc products. As part of the settlement, those who had previously dropped their suits against the company will have the opportunity to enter new claims.



BASF Lawyers Helped Hide and Destroy Asbestos Evidence in Mesothelioma Case



The story behind the remarkable settlement dates back to 1979, when a tire worker’s family sued the company over his death from malignant mesothelioma. BASF was represented by the law firm of Cahill, Gordon & Reindel LLP, which eventually negotiated a settlement with the family. The agreement included a confidentiality order that sealed testing results confirming that BASF’s talc was contaminated with asbestos. Ever since that case's settlement, the company has fraudulently insisted that there was no asbestos in its products.



Remarking on the case, legal ethics professor Stephen Gillers of New York University Law School said that this “no asbestos” claim has been offered in a way that has put other mesothelioma victims at a disadvantage. “The allegation is that Cahill lawyers helped BASF hide and destroy evidence of asbestos in its talc,” he said.



BASF Roadblock Overturned by Testimony from Mesothelioma Victim’s Father



The eventual resolution of the $72.5 million settlement followed evidence offered in the case of a BASF employee's daughter who was herself diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma. The father had been a research scientist for the company and the case accused the company of causing her second-hand asbestos exposure. Her father provided a deposition confirming that the company had been aware of asbestos contamination of its talc for years.



The battle to obtain payment for victims was hard fought and included a class-action lawsuit that alleged “fraud on the court” which was dismissed in 2012 and a 2014 ruling by a federal appeals court which determined that BASF and its attorneys had perpetrated “systematic fraud” designed to “thwart the judicial process.” That decision was appealed and then then recently reopened, leading to the recent agreement.

### Mesothelioma Case to Be Retried After Judge’s Decision Deemed “Unreasonable”

Imagine having a jury decide that an asbestos company is not liable for your mesothelioma based on a judge’s unwillingness to let them review essential evidence. That is exactly what happened to a Philadelphia widow who was seeking compensation in the death of her husband from the rare, asbestos-related disease. Upon review of the case, the judges of Pennsylvania’s Superior Court said the lower court had abused its discretion and that as a result the case would need to be reheard.



Jury Had Found All Other Mesothelioma Defendants Guilty



The mesothelioma lawsuit was filed by Colleen Schrader, whose husband Ernest had died after having worked for the E.I. Nemours DuPont Edgemoor Facility in Delaware for over 35 years. During that time he was exposed to asbestos from several different products, and she filed suit against all of them. Only one refused to settle out of court – Ameron International Corporation – and her case against that company was heard over the course of a 10-day trial.



A large amount of evidence was heard over a week-and-a-half by the jury, all pointing to the company’s asbestos-contaminated product and its role in Mr. Schrader’s mesothelioma. A key piece of evidence revolved around an Ameron employee who had specifically discussed the dangers posed by asbestos. When the jury was sent to consider the company’s liability they asked to see that evidence again, but the judge refused the request and told them to rely upon their memory.



Judge’s Denial of Jury Request Leads to Appeal and Retrial



When the jury deciding the mesothelioma case asked to see the single piece of evidence again, the judge remarked that he did not want to set a precedent that would lead to multiple evidence requests. Without that piece of information, the jury found Ameron not liable, even though they found all of the other named defendants guilty.



In consideration of Mrs. Schrader’s appeal, the Superior Court judges criticized the trial court’s denial of the jury’s evidence request. They wrote that it was a “manifestly unreasonable exercise of discretion” that they could not “conclude that the error was harmless.” The widow’s case will be heard again and she will have the opportunity to get the justice that she and her late husband deserved.

### Virginia Vet’s Claim Illustrates Complexity of Mesothelioma Lawsuits

Every lawsuit is unique, but pursuing a personal injury claim accusing a company of causing malignant mesothelioma is particularly complex, and especially when the victim is a Navy veteran. This is because most Navy veterans were exposed to asbestos while working onboard ships, thus raising the question of whether each case should be pursued under federal law or maritime law. A recent case illustrates the importance of working with attorneys who understand which laws apply.



Navy Vet with Mesothelioma Seeks Justice from John Crane, Inc.



The mesothelioma lawsuit filed by Navy veteran Herbert H. Mullinex cited both federal and maritime law, with the latter encompassing an entirely unique set of rules governing injuries that occur on navigable waters. Mullinex attributes his asbestos exposure to years doing shipbuilding and repairs on several ships, and names John Crane, Inc. as a defendant. Instead of arguing causation or the presence of asbestos in their products, the company chose to file a motion to dismiss the use of maritime law, arguing that because the ships that Mullinex served on were in dry dock when he worked on them, only Virginia law should apply.



Federal Court Denies Asbestos Company’s Motion



In reviewing the asbestos company’s argument in the mesothelioma lawsuit, the U.S. District Court in the Eastern District of Virginia decided that whether the ships that Mr. Mullinex worked on were at sea or docked was immaterial to his case. What was most important was that he was exposed to asbestos and that the vast majority of his exposure occurred on vessels on navigable waters. As a result, they determined that maritime law applies and the asbestos company’s motion was denied.



Court Addresses Role of Asbestos-Containing Products in Navy Ships



One of the more notable aspects of the Virginia court’s decision was its rejection of John Crane’s argument that their mesothelioma-causing products were not necessary for naval operations. The court rejected that assertion, writing, “While it is true that “asbestos work” in general is not inherently related to the traditional application of admiralty law, the sale of an asbestos-containing product geared toward the proper functioning of Navy ships places the Plaintiffs’ allegations squarely in a context that interests admiralty law.” This decision is likely to be used to support the use of maritime law in future mesothelioma claims.

### Conflicting Testimony from Asbestos Defendant Works to Mesothelioma Victim’s Benefit

When a person diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma files a personal injury lawsuit against an asbestos company, they're warned that the defendants will do everything they can to win. Asbestos companies argue that there's no evidence that their product caused the victim’s illness, that there's no proof their product was used at all, and sometimes even that the plaintiff doesn’t really suffer from the rare and fatal form of cancer. In a case hear recently in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, a lab equipment company accused of causing a man’s mesothelioma denied being the supplier of the asbestos products he'd used, but their witness constantly contradicted herself, causing a judge to rule against the company's motion to dismiss.



Mesothelioma Lawsuit Pits Lab Technician Against Equipment Supply Company



The mesothelioma lawsuit was filed by Harald and Brigitte Mehnert against Fisher Scientific Co. LLC. The couple are accusing the company’s products, which Mr. Mehnert used while working at the U.S. Geological Survey in the Denver Federal Center, of causing his malignant mesothelioma.



According to Mr. Mehnert, he was exposed to Fisher’s products during the decades that he worked in the laboratory. He recalled purchasing the products through the company’s catalogue as long ago as 1965, and described how he'd used each item. In response, Fisher’s representative argued both that the company’s products had not been in its catalog in the years he indicated and that the company had no record of when the products were last sold. The witness said that the company had never sold the products to Mr. Mehnert’s office, and then indicated that customer records from those years had not been retained.



Asbestos Company Argues Against Small Details from Mesothelioma Victim



While Mr. Mehnert provided exacting detail about his job responsibility and the asbestos products that he'd ordered, used, and which he believes caused his mesothelioma, the company’s representative attempted to diminish the strength of his testimony by contradicting details such as the width of the tapes that they sold or the positioning of the company’s branding on their products.  



After hearing both sides, U.S. District Judge Nora Barry Fischer ruled that “Mr. Mehnert testified repeatedly that he was exposed to the asbestos products supplied by Fisher during his decades-long career working in his laboratory” and that he had explained in great detail the specifics of the products that he’d used. By contrast, the defendant’s representative gave contradicting testimony. As a result, a genuine issue of material fact exists and therefore a jury will need to decide where the fault lies.

### Mesothelioma Lawsuit Blames Talc Used in Ceramics Studio for Illness

Though most cases of malignant mesothelioma, asbestosis and other asbestos-related diseases track back to occupational exposure to the carcinogenic material, an unfortunate number of victims’ exposure comes from helping friends or family members, laundering clothes, and other non-occupation-related activities. That’s what happened to Stanley Peterson, who was diagnosed with the rare and fatal form of cancer after years of helping his wife by doing the heavy lifting in her ceramics studio. Mr. Peterson is suing the company that provided her company with asbestos-contaminated talc, blaming them for his illness.



Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Blamed on High Levels of Asbestos in Company’s Talc



Mr. Peterson is suing Vanderbilt Mineral, LLC, accusing the company of selling asbestos-contaminated talc that he was exposed to when he helped his wife with her ceramics business from 1980 to 2000. Though the company initially succeeded in having the case halted, the New York City Asbestos Litigation court reversed a lower court’s decision and agreed to let the case proceed.



In the company’s argument against being held responsible for Mr. Peterson’s mesothelioma, they claimed there was no asbestos in their talc and no proof that it had caused his illness. But a professional geologist who gave testimony in the case reported that the specific product sold by Vanderbilt contained chrysotile, anthophyllite and tremolite asbestos fibers. Another witness, a pathologist, spoke to the levels of asbestos exposure that would have caused the man’s illness, calling it “many orders of magnitude above background level.”



Significant Exposure to Asbestos Led to Mesothelioma



In his own testimony, Mr. Peterson described the work that he did for his wife and how it had exposed him to asbestos and led to his mesothelioma. He said that when bags of talc were delivered to her studio he would carry them from the delivery truck to the studio’s storage. Later, when she was ready to use the talc, he would open the bags, dump the talc into a mixing tank, and mix it with clay, silicate, soda ash and water. He also rolled up the empty bags of talc and swept the workspace. All of these activities caused him to breathe in asbestos-contaminated dust.



Though the asbestos company originally prevailed in having the case dismissed over a legal technicality, an appeal resulted in that decision being overturned and Mr. Peterson will be able to pursue legal action for his deadly diagnosis.

### Mesothelioma Widow’s Appeal Results in New Trial

When mesothelioma victims first decide to pursue justice from those responsible for their fatal illness, they're warned that the journey will be long and challenging, but worthwhile in the end. A good example of the emotional rollercoaster that these lawsuits represent can be seen in the case of James Clevenger, a Navy veteran and maintenance mechanic who had spent over forty years being exposed to asbestos. Though his family’s lawsuit against John Crane, Inc. ended in a ruling in favor of the asbestos company, the family appealed that decision based on unfair jury instructions and the appeals court agreed. The case will be heard again by a new jury.



Jury Instructions That Required Mesothelioma Diagnosis Contrasted with Trial Submissions



One of the most daunting issues in the lawsuit about Mr. Clevenger’s illness was lack of clarity as to whether he died of mesothelioma or of another asbestos-related lung cancer. Another was that he had a 30-year smoking habit, which the asbestos company tried to convince the jury had been the cause of his death.



Despite the fact that the Clevenger family’s attorney had consistently pointed to asbestos exposure as the proximate cause of his death, clearly and repeatedly stating that it was unknown whether his illness had been mesothelioma or some other asbestos-related disease, the asbestos company inserted words into the jury instructions that specifically referenced mesothelioma. Based upon that instruction the jury came back with a ruling in favor of the company.



Appellate Court Agrees that Jury Instruction Should Not Have Referenced Mesothelioma



In reviewing the appeal by Mr. Clevenger’s family, the Court of Appeals of Washington agreed that there had been frequent references throughout the case to the fact that his death was caused by asbestos exposure, with no certainty to the actual disease. There had also been significant testimony indicating that asbestos can cause lung cancer.



In their ruling, the judges wrote that Mr. Clevenger’s widow “was entitled to argue her theory that James’s exposure to John Crane, Inc. asbestos was a substantial factor in his death, whether the asbestos-related disease he suffered was mesothelioma or a lung cancer. Jury instruction[s] did not allow her to adequately argue her theory of the case.”

### Virginia Legislature Rights Wrong, Passes Law to Protect Mesothelioma Victims

The Virginia state legislature has taken steps to right what they viewed as an intolerable legal wrong: They passed a new state law that would have permitted a mesothelioma victim’s family to pursue justice against the asbestos companies responsible for his illness. Though it is too late for the law to benefit the family of Orvin Kiser, it will help other families facing similar circumstances in the future.



Mesothelioma Victim Barred from Filing Lawsuit by Statute of Limitations



The action on the part of the Virginia lawmakers followed a ruling by the state’s supreme court on a case filed by a mesothelioma victim’s family. Orvin Kiser experienced occupational exposure to asbestos throughout the course of his life, and in 1988 he was diagnosed with pleural thickening and asbestosis. He filed a lawsuit against asbestos companies, which he eventually settled. When he was diagnosed with and died of malignant mesothelioma decades later, his survivors filed a wrongful death lawsuit against a different set of asbestos companies, but those companies pointed to the original lawsuit and argued that the statute of limitations for asbestos exposure litigation had expired based on his earlier diagnosis. The case was appealed repeatedly, and in 2013 the Virginia Supreme Court finally agreed with those companies and the case was dismissed.



Outrage at Supreme Court Decision Spurs New Asbestos Law



Understanding that the Supreme Court’s unpopular decision was based on existing statute of limitations laws regarding asbestos exposure, the lawmakers passed House Bill 781, a new law that defines the beginning of the statute of limitations for a second asbestos-related illness as the time of diagnosis of that subsequent illness. This will permit those diagnosed with mesothelioma years after having been diagnosed with a separate asbestos-related disease to pursue a new legal action. The law was passed by a unanimous vote and quickly signed into law by the state’s governor, Ralph Northram.

### University Accused of Negligence in Professor’s Mesothelioma Death

Traditionally, an employee who has been diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma following workplace exposure is not permitted to file a personal injury lawsuit against their employer. This is a result of laws around worker’s compensation, which provides no-fault insurance coverage to employees in exchange for them not being able to sue their employers. But a 2013 Pennsylvania court ruling allowed employees to pursue litigation if they can prove that their employer is negligence. Now the family of a retired Penn State University professor is testing that decision.



First Mesothelioma Case Filed Against A University by a Former Employee



The case filed by the family of Peter Labosky Jr. is the first to be filed against a university, but if it succeeds it will not be the last. Mr. Labosky was diagnosed with mesothelioma twelve years after he’d retired from his position as a professor of wood sciences at Penn State. He had taught there for 22 years.



According to the family’s lawsuit, Penn State was well aware of both the link between mesothelioma and asbestos and the fact that many of their campus’ buildings had been constructed using the deadly material within insulation, ceiling spray, floor and ceiling tiles, and other applications. The family says that despite this, they chose to put profits over the protection of their professors.



Decision to Halt Asbestos Remediation Called Negligent in Mesothelioma Death



The family’s mesothelioma lawsuit against the university specifically references internal documents that confirm that the school halted asbestos remediation as a result of budget concerns in 1989 and thereafter. Though the school had conducted a study in the 1970s with the goal of pursuing removal of the carcinogen, in 1989 they stopped this practice, despite knowing of at least 500 buildings that remained contaminated. The buildings where Mr. Labosky taught were included among those remaining.



The decision was memorialized in a Penn State memo that read in part, “In all future projects, our goal should be to minimize the removal of asbestos to only what is absolutely required. Obviously, this will help us a lot in the area of project budgets.”  

### Judge Orders Asbestos Company to Produce Evidence for Mesothelioma Trial

Eric and Christine Slonim are seeking compensation from two film editing machine companies that they blame for her malignant mesothelioma, but to win their case they need proof that the companies’ products were contaminated with asbestos. In response to the couple's suit the companies refused to cooperate and denied the couple’s request that they provide old equipment for inspection. While the Slonims took matters into their own hands and secured the machines by purchasing them on E-Bay, the judge hearing the case later ordered the company to comply.



Asbestos in Old Movie Equipment Blamed for Malignant Mesothelioma



Christine’s diagnosis with malignant mesothelioma was a shock to the couple, and they worked hard to determine where she had been exposed to asbestos. When they reviewed possible sources, they determined that the Moviola film editing equipment that Eric had spent two decades servicing were insulated with the material and that he had likely carried the dust into their home, where she then inhaled it.



Second-Hand Exposure to Asbestos Causes Malignant Mesothelioma



When mesothelioma is the result of asbestos that is carried into the home by the person who was directly exposed to it, it’s called second-hand exposure. Second-hand exposure to asbestos is responsible for a significant percentage of mesothelioma in women whose husbands or other family members worked near the carcinogen, as Eric Slonim had from 1969 through the mid-1980s when he serviced equipment manufactured by Magnasync/Moviola Corporation and J & R Film Co.



The Slonims asked the companies to provide samples of the machines so that they could be tested for the presence of asbestos, but both denied their requests, saying that they did not have those models in their possession. The coupled asked the court to compel the companies to produce the equipment, but at the same time they took matters into their own hands and located identical equipment for sale on E-bay. Those machines tested positive for asbestos.



Judge Compels Companies to Provide Equipment for Testing



Once the case was presented in court, the companies admitted to having located the same models of equipment that the Slonims blamed for Mrs. Slonim’s illness, though they maintained that there was no proof that they were the same machines that Mr. Slonim had worked with. The judge moved the case forward by ordering the equipment be provided to the couple and tested.

### Mesothelioma Victims Win Punitive Damages from Johnson & Johnson

A group of mesothelioma victims who filed a lawsuit against consumer giant Johnson & Johnson, blaming asbestos in the company’s iconic baby powder for their illness, got their first victory in 2019, when a jury awarded them $37.3 million collectively in compensatory damages.  But their search for justice was not over. They also sought punitive damages, hoping that the jury would send a punishing message as to the company’s wrongdoing. A separate jury did just that five months later, awarding the group a total of $750 million for what the jury deemed reckless indifference. A judge later reduced the combined punitive damages to $186 million in keeping with New Jersey state law.



One of Original Mesothelioma Victims Has Died Since Original Lawsuit



One of the original group of plaintiffs has died of the rare and fatal form of cancer since the original jury verdict was handed down. While the first phase of the trial focused on establishing that Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder was the cause of their mesothelioma, a separate jury examined evidence that the company had purposely worked to hide the dangers of their product. After hearing and reviewing testimony, it took the jury just two hours to come back with the $750 million judgment.



They found that the company had acted “maliciously or in wanton and willful disregard” of the victims’ rights by setting the testing limits and procedures aimed at detecting asbestos at strategically high levels so that the carcinogen would not be identified and they could evade making changes or being found culpable for its dangers.



Judge Reduced Mesothelioma Punitive Award in Keeping with State Law



Though the jury assigned each of the mesothelioma victims an award of $186 million in punitive damages, New Jersey state law required Superior Court Judge Ana C. Viscomi to reduce that number to a multiple of five times the compensatory verdict that each victim had been given in the earlier trial. That provided each of the victims with an amount ranging from $29.5 million in punitive damages to $73.5 million.

### Barber’s Wife Dies of Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos in Talcum Powder

The familiar sight of a barber sprinkling talc on a client’s neck seems harmless and normal, but according to Eddie and Mildred Germain it was exposure to that white powder that caused their wife and mother’s mesothelioma and death. Now they are seeking justice from the companies that failed to warn them that the product used every day in Mr. Germain’s barber shop contained asbestos, a deadly carcinogen.



Michelle Germain Was Just Sixty Years Old When She Died of Mesothelioma



Though Mrs. Germain was young when she was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, the illness claimed her life quickly. She died in 2017, just six months after learning of her illness, but that was enough time for the family to learn there was asbestos in the Clubman talc powder her barber husband used throughout his career. They have filed suit against the product’s manufacturers and their talc suppliers, seeking compensation for her wrongful death and the damages that the entire family has suffered as a result.



In deposition testimony provided before her mesothelioma death, Mrs. Germain explained that her husband Eddie had worked as a barber in New York from 1978 through 1993, initially working in a shop part-time and then taking on more hours. He eventually purchased the shop, and she described visiting him at work and watching as he would sprinkle talcum powder on a brush and apply it to the back of a customer’s neck over a dozen times a day. She recalled washing his powder-covered aprons, and how in the years that followed they moved to Florida and he continued working as a barber and using the same product. Even after he retired he would cut hair in their garage and she would sweep it from the floor, giving rise to clouds of the same powder she had inhaled constantly over the years.



Talc Companies Attempt to Have Mesothelioma Case Dismissed



Though Johnson & Johnson, Colgate-Palmolive and various talc suppliers filed motions to have the mesothelioma lawsuit against them dismissed, the judge hearing their arguments denied those requests, stating that there were issues of fact that needed to be heard and decided by a jury. The family that lost their wife and mother will continue seeking justice.

### Asbestos-Contaminated Fire Doors at Heart of Mesothelioma Lawsuit

Leon Franklin Lamson died of malignant mesothelioma in 2015, more than 50 years after his carpentry work first exposed him to asbestos. After his death his family filed a personal injury lawsuit against International Paper Company and Weyerhaeuser Company, saying that the asbestos in the fire doors they manufactured, and that he frequently repaired, were responsible for his illness and death. Though a lower court granted the companies summary judgment, the Pennsylvania Superior Court later reversed that decision. The companies took their arguments to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, where the justices upheld the Superior Court’s decision and allowed the case to move forward.



Companies Argue Against Mesothelioma Victim’s Exposure to Asbestos



Mr. Lamson blamed his mesothelioma on the fire doors that he regularly installed and repaired, first during his work as a carpenter at Dupont from 1962 to 1967 and later at the Philadelphia Navy Yard from 1967 to 1971. Prior to his death he provided deposition testimony explaining the process of repairing the doors and the dust that was created when he sawed or drilled through the doors, which contained asbestos cores.



Despite his testimony and the testimony of a former colleague who had worked by his side, the trial judge agreed with the companies that there was insufficient evidence that his mesothelioma was caused by exposure to asbestos from the doors.  She said that he had not produced evidence that his work had disturbed the doors’ asbestos cores.



Superior Court Reverses Lower Court Judge in Mesothelioma Case, Supreme Court Agrees



When Mr. Lamson’s surviving family appealed the lower court’s decision to the state’s superior court, the judges agreed that the lower court had erred. They pointed to testimony that the mesothelioma victim had penetrated the asbestos core of the fire doors in his work and said that the case should be remanded for trial. When that decision was appealed by the defendant companies to the state Supreme Court, the justices handed down a single sentence decision allowing the Superior Court’s decision to stand. The case will move forward and the family will have the opportunity to present Mr. Lamson’s case to a jury.

### Mesothelioma Death Blamed on General Electric’s Products

For years, General Electric’s products contained asbestos, and as a result the company has faced thousands of mesothelioma lawsuits. Though the company has frequently argued against their products’ role in the rare and deadly illness, a recent case saw them apparently assuming responsibility but arguing against the mesothelioma victim’s legal approach. Because Fidel Rivera had spent twenty years working for the company before he got sick, General Electric maintained that he was only eligible for Workers’ Compensation and that his personal injury lawsuit should be dismissed.



Mesothelioma Victim Worked with GE's Products Before Becoming Company Employee



Fidel Rivera died of malignant pleural mesothelioma before his case was heard in court, but his family continued his pursuit of justice in the form of a wrongful death lawsuit. The man had worked as an electrician’s apprentice from the time he was 18, and then worked for independent contractors as a union electrician. From 1956 to 1975 he was exposed to asbestos-contaminated products made by General Electric. It was only after that point in time that he went to work for the company.



General Electric’s Motion to Dismiss Based on Victim’s Status as a Former Employee



Though Mr. Rivera did work for General Electric, he never filed a Worker’s Compensation claim against them over his malignant mesothelioma. Instead, the lawsuit claimed that his exposure to the company’s products prior to his years of working for them had caused his illness. General Electric filed a motion to dismiss based on him having worked for them for twenty years.



Judge Denies GE’s Argument in Mesothelioma Lawsuit



Though it is true that employees are generally not permitted to file personal injury lawsuits against their employer over mesothelioma caused on the job, Judge Manuel J. Mendez of the New York Supreme Court denied the company’s motion to dismiss. He agreed with the victim’s family that Mr. Rivera having worked for GE did not mean that the company was shielded from liability for his exposure to their products prior to his employment. In his decision he wrote that Mr. Rivera had worked with GE’s asbestos-contaminated products “separately from the course of decedent’s employment.”  As a result, GE was not able to escape the potential for being liable for negligence. The case will move forward to a jury.

### Tile Manufacturer Must Face Jury in Mesothelioma Death

Faced with accusations of causing Santo Lanza’s mesothelioma and subsequent death, tile manufacturer Amtico Biltrite pushed back. The company filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that there was insufficient expert testimony to support the man’s family’s accusations. They asked the Supreme Court of New York County to dismiss the case, but Judge Manuel J. Mendez decided that the case could move forward, allowing the family’s quest for justice to continue.



Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos in Tiles Used for Home Improvement



Though American Biltrite argued against being blamed for Santo Lanza’s mesothelioma, the origins of the man’s illness are clear to his family, and particularly to his son John, who had been his father’s frequent assistant on renovation projects. John recalled having worked with his father in their Brooklyn home constantly between 1963 and the early 1980s. He also helped his father make extra money doing repair work between 1966 and 1973.



According to John Lanza, the asbestos contained in Amtico vinyl tiles were the cause of his father’s mesothelioma. His father consistently used American Biltrite tiles for projects in their home and elsewhere. The tiles were installed in the basement, hallways, stairways, bedrooms and kitchen of their home. John described the boxes that the tiles came in, which he remembered from helping his father from the time that he was eleven until he was fourteen or fifteen years old. He also described the dust that was created as they worked to remove damaged tiles and replace them.



Man Died of Mesothelioma Two Months After Filing Lawsuit



Mesothelioma claimed Santo’s life just two months after he filed his lawsuit against the tile manufacturer, and before he could provide deposition testimony. His son John’s testimony was provided after the death, and form much of the evidence to be presented at trial. Though American Biltrite questioned the sufficiency of the testimony John provided, arguing that expert witness testimony was lacking, Judge Mendez dismissed their motion and indicated that those gaps could be filled in. The case will move forward.

### Family Seeks Justice from Talc Companies After Mesothelioma Death

In the last few years, the American public has become aware that the talc sold in popular body powder products over the last several decades may have been contaminated with asbestos, the mineral that causes malignant mesothelioma, asbestosis, and other asbestos-related illnesses. Victims of these diseases have come forward to seek justice from Johnson & Johnson’s, Avon, and other recognizable names in consumer products, and a New York family is now seeking justice against Colgate-Palmolive.



Colgate-Palmolive’s Talc Products Blamed for Man’s Mesothelioma



The case was filed by the family members of Edward Rothlein, who died of malignant mesothelioma in October of 2018 after years of exposure to Colgate Palmolive’s Cashmere Bouquet product. According to the family’s claims, though Mr. Rothlein occasionally used the product himself, the majority of his exposure came from his proximity to his wife’s excessive use of the body powder.



Mesothelioma Widow Describes Smoke Screen of Powder



Though Colgate-Palmolive filed a motion for summary judgment in the mesothelioma case, New York’s Supreme Court judge Manuel J. Mendez denied the motion after the family provided details about how Mr. Rothlein had been exposed to the company’s talcum powder product. In Mr. Rothlein’s own words provided in a deposition before his death, his wife was a “powderholic” who used the powder so such a great extent that their bathroom and bed were constantly covered with the powder. His widow admitted to having “made the whole room look like a smoke screen” and said that they had fought about the issue frequently. The family’s plan is to submit expert testimony at trial supporting their assertion that his mesothelioma had been caused by inhaling particles of asbestos from this powder.



Though Colgate Palmolive’s attorneys argued that there was no proof that Mr. Rothlein’s mesothelioma had been caused by their product, Judge Mendez determined that there was enough conflicting evidence to require that the case be heard by a jury. He denied the company’s motion for summary judgment.

### Asbestos-Contaminated Dust Blamed for Mill Worker’s Mesothelioma

A recent decision by the Georgia Court of Appeals has given new life to a mesothelioma widow’s quest for justice. Leisa Davis stepped in to pursue the lawsuit after her husband John died in the same year that he'd been diagnosed with the rare and fatal form of cancer. She appealed a lower court decision that had dismissed the case following a motion for summary judgment filed by John Crane, Inc. Upon review of the lower court decision, Judge Todd Markle of the Court of Appeals reversed its decision, finding that the company’s argument was unsupported and that they had misstated the victim’s testimony.



Widow to Continue Seeking Justice for Mesothelioma Victim



According to the original filing in the case, John F. Davis was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma in 2015 after years of working with and around asbestos-contaminated materials manufactured by John Crane, Inc. He had worked at a fiberboard mill from 1984 through 1998, doing tasks as varied as sweeping up dust and debris around the mill when he worked as a laborer to installing and removing asbestos-contaminated gaskets as a boiler operator. He was eventually promoted to the position of maintenance supervisor, which still left him exposed to asbestos within his workplace from John Crane, Inc. equipment.



Summary Judgment Decision in Mesothelioma Lawsuit Deemed Flawed



In reviewing the mesothelioma widow’s appeal, Judge Markle determined that the lower court had erred in granting summary judgment. He indicated that John Crane, Inc.’s attorneys had misstated Mr. Davis’s testimony regarding asbestos warnings. He also disagreed that the evidence that had been provided was speculative, saying that because the mesothelioma victim had identified John Crane products during his deposition, enough testimony had been provided to indicate that the company had manufactured the asbestos-containing materials that had been present in his workplace. The case will continue to a jury.

### Flooring Installer’s Mesothelioma Death Blamed on Goodyear Asbestos Tiles

Many mesothelioma victims have blamed their illness on asbestos hidden in vinyl tiles manufactured by The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, and when Peter Komiak was diagnosed with the rare and fatal disease, he filed a lawsuit against the manufacturer seeking compensation for his damages. The company filed to have the case dismissed based on a former employee’s testimony that the product Mr. Komiak had worked with had not contained the carcinogenic material, but the victim’s attorneys presented conflicting testimony that other Goodyear employees had provided in an earlier case.



Years of Breathing in Asbestos Dust Caused Man’s Mesothelioma



Peter Komiak’s mesothelioma diagnosis was not surprising after his long history of exposure to Goodyear’s vinyl asbestos floor tiles. He had worked part-time for a carpeting retailer while a high school student in 1960, and slowly worked his way up in the industry over more than three decades. During those years he did everything from sweeping floors and emptying trash to cutting and installing tile. All of these tasks involved breathing in dust from cut and damaged tiles that were contaminated with asbestos. He died just one year after his diagnosis, but not before providing extensive testimony about his exposure.



Asbestos Company’s Affidavit Contradicted in Mesothelioma Case



Goodyear filed a motion for summary judgment in response to the mesothelioma lawsuit, and to support their argument submitted an affidavit from Mr. Joseph A. Kemmerling, who had worked for the company from 1968 through 1979. Mr. Kemmerling claimed that prior to and during the period of his employment the company’s vinyl tiles had not contained asbestos, and that therefore the products Mr. Komiak had worked with could not have cause his illness. But Mr. Komiak’s attorneys countered this argument with contradictory testimony from several other Goodyear employees, including evidence from an earlier lawsuit against Goodyear. In that case a floor tile development engineer who had worked for the company testified that Goodyear’s tiles had contained asbestos between 1954 and 1975.



The conflicting testimony presented was enough to convince Judge Manuel J. Mendez of the New York Asbestos Litigation court that a jury needed to hear the case. He denied Goodyear’s motion and the case will move forward.







Do Armstrong Floor Tiles Contain Asbestos? 





https://youtube.com/shorts/D49cVfb_xDc




If you have old Armstrong floor tiles in your home or building, you might be wondering whether they contain asbestos—and you’re right to be cautious. Many Armstrong flooring products installed before the 1980s may contain asbestos, not only in the tiles but also in the adhesive used to secure them. In this video, we explain the potential health risks of disturbing asbestos-containing materials during renovation or demolition. Homeowners, contractors, and property managers will learn how asbestos exposure can happen, why professional testing is essential, and when abatement is necessary. Before starting any work, make sure you understand the risks—your health could depend on it.

### Louisiana Appeals Court Decides Against Insurance Company in Mesothelioma Case

Once diagnosed, mesothelioma victims quickly learn about their fatal illness, and for many that includes that it could have been prevented. Mesothelioma is caused by exposure to asbestos, and despite knowing that the material was carcinogenic, companies included it in their products and didn’t warn of its dangers. Victims seeking justice can pursue lawsuits against those companies, but in many instances those responsible have filed for bankruptcy protection or gone out of business. When an insurance company tried to avoid having to pay claims for their bankrupt client through legal maneuvering, they nearly got away with it: A court agreed that they owed no money. But an appeals court reversed that decision and allowed the victim to collect the compensation he was owed.



 Insurance Company Attempts to Evade Responsibility for Mesothelioma Claim



The original lawsuit was filed by Nelcome Courville, who died of mesothelioma after filing suit against several asbestos companies. Among them was Reilly-Benton Company, Inc., which had previously filed for bankruptcy. As a result, the family pursued justice against Reilly-Benton’s insurer, Liberty Mutual, only to find that they had a settlement agreement that protected them from liability for asbestos exposure from their client’s products. Based on this agreement, the trial court determined that the family could not pursue payment, but Mr. Courville’s survivors appealed that decision to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.



Appeals Court Points to State Supreme Court Decision Regarding Insurance Contracts



Though the insurance company had specifically tried to avoid having to pay mesothelioma victims for their client’s negligence, the appeals court referred to a decision by the Louisiana Supreme Court meant to protect injured third parties. The justices indicated that the language of Liberty Mutual’s settlement agreement would have harmed Mr. Courville and his beneficiaries, writing, “The plain language of the statute is clear; insurers and insured cannot retroactively rescind or annul policy contracts by agreement post-occurrence. The 2013 Settlement Agreement at issue in this case essentially rescinded or annulled policy contracts for injuries that were sustained decades ago. That Settlement Agreement undoubtedly violates the statute. Accordingly, the Settlement Agreement should be considered null and void as to third-party tort victims.”

### Stagehand’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos in Lighting Equipment

Beyond the risks of working with electricity, setting up festival lighting hardly seems like dangerous work, but according to a personal injury lawsuit filed by Peter Tytell it is what caused his malignant mesothelioma.  Mr. Tytell was diagnosed with the rare and fatal form of cancer in February of 2017, and within months he took legal action against an electrical products company that included asbestos in their power cable products. Though the company tried to have his lawsuit dismissed, a New York judge dismissed their motion for summary judgment and allowed the case to proceed.



Electrical Supply Company Argues Against Liability for Mesothelioma



After his mesothelioma diagnosis, Mr. Tytell filed suit against Mole-Richardson Company, whose electrical power cables he had wrapped around scaffolding when setting up lighting for festivals and block parties in New York City during the summer of 1969. He claimed that he was exposed to asbestos from the cords, as well as from the lights themselves when coating came off of them. He described seeing particles floating in the air and remembered the taste of them when he breathed them in.



Court Rules Asbestos Product Company’s Legal Argument Insufficient



When a mesothelioma victim files a personal injury claim, it is common for the defending asbestos company to file a motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the case. These motions frequently argue against allowing testimony from an expert witness, or may assert that causation was not proven. In this case, Mole-Richardson Company's evidence in support of their motion was deemed inadmissible hearsay that did not meet the legal standard for the court’s consideration. Because of the shortcomings of the company's argument the court indicated that there was no need to even consider whether Mr. Tytell had proven his case worth moving forward to a jury, and the motion for summary judgment was denied.

### Mesothelioma Victim Denied Justice Provides Cautionary Tale

Jody Ratcliff was diagnosed with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma in 2005, but at that time she focused on her medical needs rather than taking legal action. Her physicians were able to treat her and provided her with several years of remission. When her disease returned, she filed personal injury claims against the asbestos companies she blamed for her illness, but a North Carolina judge dismissed her claims because too much time had elapsed since her diagnosis. Her story provides an important lesson for those affected by asbestos-related diseases: Once diagnosed, it is important that you take timely action to protect your legal rights.



Statute of Limitations Plays Key Role in Mesothelioma



At issue in Ms. Ratcliff’s case was the three-year statute of limitations in place for filing a mesothelioma lawsuit in North Carolina. A statute of limitations is a time limit between when a person receives a diagnosis or sustains an injury and the time by which they have to file their claim. Though every state has its own laws, in North Carolina the time period is three years.  After that period has elapsed, an asbestos victim loses their right to sue.



Ms. Ratcliff’s mesothelioma was diagnosed in May of 2005 but she waited until March of 2017 to file her claim for compensation. She defended her delay by saying that she’d been focused on getting second opinions and medical care, and that the statute of limitations was not applicable to her because her cancer had spread to other parts of her body and should therefore be considered a different disease. Unfortunately, her argument was dismissed by the judge in the case and her opportunity to seek justice was denied.



Seek Legal Guidance After a Mesothelioma Diagnosis



Had Ms. Ratcliff spoken with an experienced mesothelioma attorney after her diagnosis she would have known the importance of filing a mesothelioma claim before the expiration of the statute of limitations. If you are diagnosed with an asbestos-related disease, it is essential that you make time to speak with an experienced attorney who can help you understand your options and preserve your rights.

### Physician’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Protective Asbestos Gloves

Michael Rosen is a physician and scientist who was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma in May of 2018. Though his career as a pathologist has not placed him in proximity to asbestos, during his undergraduate and graduate school years he consistently wore protective gloves that were made of the carcinogenic material. He filed a personal injury lawsuit against the glove manufacturer, Fisher Scientific Company. Though Fisher tried to have the case dismissed, a New York Asbestos Litigation judge allowed the case to proceed.



Mesothelioma Victim Describes Years of Asbestos Glove Use



In his deposition and in testimony provided by expert witnesses, Dr. Rosen attributes his mesothelioma to his ten years of using Fisher’s asbestos gloves and burner pads. From 1968 through 1978, he wore them as an undergraduate at Fairleigh Dickinson University during 5-hour long chemistry lab classes that were held three to four days a week, as well as during lab classes held over the three summers that he studied chemistry at Columbia University. He continued wearing the gloves as a Ph.D. candidate and when he worked at Metpath as a bench tech for a summer.



Dr. Rosen described the asbestos in the gloves that he wore, the labels on the gloves, the markings on the boxes that the gloves came in and the dust that rose from them and from his hands after wearing them. Expert witnesses also described the levels of dust that he was exposed to as sufficient to lead to malignant mesothelioma. Fisher Scientific argued that there was no proof that the gloves that he’d worn were theirs and that the amount of dust that the gloves would have emitted was not enough to lead to his illness. They filed a motion for summary judgment, asking for the case to be dismissed.



Judge Decides Mesothelioma Lawsuit Should be Decided by a Jury



After listening to both sides in the mesothelioma lawsuit, Judge Manuel Mendez decided that there was sufficient contradictory evidence and testimony to warrant a jury hearing both sides and making the decision about whether Fisher’s gloves were responsible for Dr. Rosen’s illness. He denied the motion for summary judgment and the case will move on to trial.

### Woman Receives $40.3 Million Award After Jury Agrees on Johnson & Johnson Negligence

Exposure to asbestos has long been known as the cause of malignant mesothelioma, with most victims exposed while working in high-heat, industrial settings. But the last few years has seen a notable and heartbreaking development: Asbestos contamination in cosmetic talc powder products has led to a new wave of victims who have innocently used those products throughout their lives. One such case has resulted in a California jury awarding $40.3 million to a woman who is struggling with the fatal disease.



Idaho Woman Diagnosed with Mesothelioma After Years of Talc Use



Nancy Cabibi and her husband Phil filed a mesothelioma lawsuit against consumer giant Johnson & Johnson shortly after she was diagnosed with the rare and deadly form of cancer. They accused the company of negligently allowing asbestos contamination of their talc-based product and of a failure to warn the public of the product’s dangers. The Los Angeles, California jury heard that she had used two of the company’s talc-based powders – Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower-to-Shower Body Powder – throughout her life.



Expert witnesses testified about Mrs. Cabibi’s physical condition, about the surgeries she had undergone to remove malignant tumors and about the chemotherapy, radiation therapy and immunotherapy treatments she's undergone. They explained how asbestos leads to the development of mesothelioma and revealed that they’d found both anthophyllite asbestos and tremolite asbestos in tissue removed from Mrs. Cabibi’s body.



Johnson & Johnson Argues Against Responsibility for Woman’s Mesothelioma



Though Johnson & Johnson’s attorneys tried to blame Mrs. Cabibi’s mesothelioma on her having lived in an industrial section of Los Angeles, she testified that she'd never worked for any of the asbestos manufacturers based in the area, nor had she ever entered any of their facilities. After six days of reviewing the evidence and considering the extensive treatment she’d undergone in an attempt to extend her life, they awarded her $40.3 million dollars to compensate for her expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering and more.

### Court Denies Asbestos Company’s Attempt to Blame Part-Time Job for Mesothelioma

When an asbestos company is found guilty of causing malignant mesothelioma, it can cost them millions of dollars in damages. As a result, those that are accused will grasp at any other possibility and go to great lengths to prove themselves right. This is exactly what happened in the case of Vickie Williams, who died of the rare asbestos-related disease in February of 2017. Though Ms. Williams had no doubt that her illness came from second-hand exposure to the asbestos her father had carried into their home for years, his employer instead blamed her illness on the part-time job she’d held with them for three months. Had they been successful she would have been limited in the amount of compensation to which she was entitled. In the end, two courts cast the company’s defense aside, allowing the victim’s personal injury case to proceed.



Personal Injury vs Workers’ Compensation Makes a Big Difference in Mesothelioma Claims



At first glance, it may not seem to matter whether Ms. Williams’ mesothelioma came from asbestos carried home on her father’s work clothes or from the brief period when she worked for her employer herself. But it can make a very big difference when it comes to compensation for illness. If an employee is injured in the workplace then they are not entitled to hold the company legally responsible – they are only entitled to workers’ compensation benefits, which simply cover medical expenses and lost wages.



By contrast, if a person’s malignant mesothelioma is caused by negligence – such as when an employee’s family member is exposed to asbestos because the company did not take care or provide warning about the dangers of asbestos – then the company can be found liable for the individual’s pain and suffering, and punitive damages can be assessed against them. This is why, in Ms. Williams’ case, the company worked so hard to prove that her illness was caused by the three-month-long job she took with them as a teen.



Court Disagrees with Asbestos Company’s Argument



Though Schneider Electric argued their case at trial and then again at the Court of Appeals of Kentucky, both courts disagreed with their position. They made the distinction that workers’ compensation benefits are for “work-related traumatic event or serious of traumatic events, including cumulative trauma arising out of and in the course of employment,” and inappropriate in the case because there was no evidence to support it, and ordered that the case should proceed as a personal injury claim.

### Asbestos Found in Mesothelioma Victim’s Lungs Match Cosmetic Powders She’d Used

While malignant mesothelioma has long been associated with male-dominated work like shipbuilding and insulation, a disturbing increase in women being diagnosed with the rare and fatal form of cancer is being blamed on exposure to asbestos in talc-based powders. Though companies like Johnson & Johnson and Colgate Palmolive have denied asbestos contamination in their products, a recent lawsuit revealed that a Kentucky woman’s lungs contained undeniable proof of asbestos contamination from cosmetic talc.



Kentucky Woman’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Talc-Based Powder



The case involved Donna Hayes, a former travel agent who died of malignant mesothelioma just eight months after having been diagnosed with the disease at the age of 72. Her family pursued legal action against both Johnson & Johnson and Colgate Palmolive, saying that she had used their talc-based powders throughout her life and that asbestos hidden in the talc had led to her illness.



When the companies denied responsibility for her death by claiming that their products had not contained asbestos, the family asked Brown University’s Alpert Medical School professor David Egilman to examine her lung tissue to either confirm or deny the link between her death and the powder.



Expert Witness Confirms Presence of Specific Asbestos in Mesothelioma Victim’s Lungs



Dr. Egilman is a noted expert in epidemiology and occupational medicine, and he testified to the jury in the mesothelioma lawsuit that his analysis of Mrs. Hayes’ lung tissue had identified a unique combination of talc and asbestos that is specific to cosmetic talcum powder. Egilman said that different types of asbestos have their own “fingerprint”, and that the anthophyllite found in her lungs “is not mixed with talc in any commercial product — aside from talc.” He also found tremolite present, for which the same limited use is true.



As more and more claims of liability for malignant mesothelioma and other cancers have been lodged against Johnson & Johnson, the company has made the decision to stop selling their talc-based products in North America.

### New York Judge Calls Asbestos Company’s Evidence in Mesothelioma Suit Hearsay

The manufacturer of a popular brand of boilers was recently accused of negligence and legal responsibility for a New York man’s mesothelioma death. Superior Boiler Works, Inc. defended itself bybut evidence submitted at court showed that the documents they produced had been created for the sole purpose of defending against asbestos litigation and that they had presented contradictory testimony in previously heard lawsuits.



Years of Boiler Work Led to Mesothelioma



The case revolved around Solomon Serrano, who died of mesothelioma in 2017. Before his death he spent several days providing testimony about his asbestos exposure. He recalled having worked in apartment buildings throughout the South Bronx while in high school and then working after graduation for Royal Boiler as a boiler technician. He specifically recalled working with SBW boilers and the asbestos dust that came from the top of the boilers and the flue passages. He filed suit against the company, and after his death his widow continued the case. SBW filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that they had never supplied boilers to the area where Serrano had worked and that their products did not contain asbestos.



Boiler Company's Evidence Created for Asbestos Litigation



In support of their motion to have the case dismissed, the boiler company submitted an affidavit of its corporate representative, who had been the company’s data processing manager from 1973 through 1994 and then the general manager until 1999. Though the company claimed that the databases were proof of their innocence, Mr. Serrano’s attorney showed four deposition transcripts Mr. Helfrich had provided in previous asbestos litigation that specifically contradicted the documents that he had prepared.



In consideration of the evidence presented, the judge in the case agreed that the information contained in the affidavit had been created by the company’s attorneys, thus rendering them hearsay. As a result of the conflicting testimony the judge decided that the case should move forward for a jury’s consideration.

### Long Ago Construction Project Leads to Mesothelioma Diagnosis, $7.3 Million Damages Award

A former employee of Honeywell International was recently awarded $7.3 million in personal injury damages after a Baltimore, Maryland agreed that his malignant mesothelioma was caused by the negligence of an asbestos installation company. Though the company later appealed the jury’s verdict, the appeals court upheld the verdict and damages, and he will be provided the much-needed compensation.



Man’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos Exposure During High School Construction Project



William Busch, Jr. blames his malignant mesothelioma on work that he did in the early 1970s when he was an employee of Honeywell International. As part of his job responsibilities he was sent to assist in the construction of a Baltimore-area school, Loch Raven High School, where he worked alongside insulators who were covering the building’s boilers with asbestos-contaminated insulation.



In describing the conditions that he believes led to his illness, Mr. Busch described the air in the boiler room being filled with “snowstorms” of asbestos, the carcinogenic mineral that causes malignant mesothelioma. Though he personally wore a respirator, he asserted that the company’s handling of the asbestos was negligent.



Company Appeals Malignant Mesothelioma Verdict



The company that was blamed for Mr. Busch’s mesothelioma was Wallace & Gale. Though time sheets and other evidence were presented to support the assertion that they had been responsible for the work done in the school, the company’s attorneys argued that another contractor had done the work that led to his illness and that the evidence presented was circumstantial.



When they jury first heard the malignant mesothelioma lawsuit, they reviewed the evidence presented and agreed that Wallace & Gale had been responsible for the man’s illness. They awarded Mr. Busch with $14.1 million, which was later reduced to $7.3 million. Despite the reduction and supporting testimony, the company elected to continue with its appeal, but the appeals court decided against them, writing in their conclusion, that “circumstantial evidence was presented such that a reasonable factfinder could have found by a preponderance of the evidence that W&G performed the asbestos insulation work in the LRHS boiler room.”

### Company that Acquired Asbestos Company Ordered to Pay Mesothelioma Damages

In many cases, a person who has been diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma learns that the company that originally exposed them to asbestos is no longer operating under its original ownership. In most cases, an acquiring company is not able to escape legal responsibility for the negligence of the company that they’ve purchased. A Washington appeals court recently heard a case that revolved around this issue, as an acquiring company tried to escape paying damages to a mesothelioma victim both because the original negligence was not theirs and because they questioned the legal standing of the victim’s beneficiaries. The company lost on both counts.



Asbestos Company’s Successor Questions Mesothelioma Victim’s Stepdaughter’s Rights



The original mesothelioma lawsuit had been filed by Marvin Leren, a man who had worked for a brick manufacturing company and had endured 20 years of exposure to asbestos dust. He was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma in the spring of 2015, and before he died he pursued legal action against the company that had provided his employer with the asbestos in their bricks. He learned that it had been sold, and that the acquiring company had also been sold, leaving all ownership with a company called Elementis.



Though Mr. Leren died from mesothelioma a few months later, before his death he filed a lawsuit against Elementis. He also wrote a will in which he left a portion of his estate to his stepdaughter from a marriage that had ended amicably 30 years earlier. After Mr. Leren’s case was decided in favor of his estate, Elementis appealed the verdict. They wanted to evade responsibility based on their own lack of involvement in having originally supplied the asbestos, but also tried to deny the victim’s stepdaughter her portion of the damages based upon the fact that his relationship with the girl’s mother had ended decades earlier.



Appeals Court Rules Against Successor to Asbestos Company



The judges of the Washington state appeals court quickly dispatched with Elementis’ appeal of the mesothelioma verdict. In their decision they pointed out that according to the doctrine of successor liability, in purchasing the company’s assets they had also acquired the goodwill associated with their sales, including those of hazardous materials, and therefore were legally responsible for any harm done. They also quickly dismissed the company’s argument against the stepdaughter’s right to be a beneficiary, pointing out that relationships between parents and their stepchildren do not end when a marriage does.

### $70 Million Award to Lab Tech With Mesothelioma Among the Region’s Largest

In what has been called one of the largest asbestos-related verdicts in South Florida history, a 71-year-old mesothelioma victim and his wife have been awarded over $70 million in damages. Charles E. Thornton is a former laboratory technician who accused a biopharmaceutical equipment company of negligence in its failure to warn of asbestos contained in the equipment they supplied to his employer. Though the company argued that there was not enough of the deadly material in their equipment to have caused his fatal illness, a Miami jury disagreed.



Asbestos in Biopharmaceutical Equipment Blamed for Mesothelioma



Malignant mesothelioma is caused by exposure to asbestos, a material that was long used to strengthen and insulate a range of materials. For over a hundred years, workers exposed to asbestos have been diagnosed with illnesses ranging from lung cancer and mesothelioma to asbestosis and COPD. Since asbestos was identified as a carcinogen, its use has been significantly diminished and victims of asbestos exposure have become aware that companies had known about the material’s dangers much earlier, but had failed to stop using asbestos in their products or to warn of the hazard as a result of self-interest. This has been the basis of countless personal injury lawsuits.



Maintaining Lab Equipment Led to Mesothelioma



Most mesothelioma lawsuits are filed by those who have been exposed to asbestos in the workplace, and that was the case for Mr. Thornton as well. He had worked for Nabi Pharmaceuticals from 1976 to 2010, and among his responsibilities was the maintenance of the laboratory equipment. He had no idea that GEA Mechanical’s equipment contained asbestos fibers or that he was breathing those fibers in as he worked. The company had provided no warnings on its equipment or within the instructions on its use.



The jury hearing the lawsuit disregarded GEA Mechanical’s argument that there was insufficient asbestos in their equipment to have Mr. Thornton’s mesothelioma. They provided the victim with over $70 million in damages. The award included $102,000 in compensation for his past medical expenses, $30 million for past damages and $20 million for future damages, and another $20 million to his wife of forty years for her past damages and future loss of consortium.

### Ex-Smoker Prevails in $2.3 Million Asbestos Lawsuit Against Conrail

The link between exposure to asbestos and malignant mesothelioma has been established for decades, and so has the relationship between the carcinogenic material and lung cancer. But when smokers who have been exposed to asbestos are diagnosed with lung cancer, they’ve had a hard time proving that asbestos companies share in the legal responsibility for their illness. A recent lawsuit filed against Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) exemplifies this challenge. Fortunately, the victim was able to leverage scientific data to prove his case and prevail, winning $2.3 million.



Asbestos Accelerates Risk of Lung Cancer and Mesothelioma in Smokers



Researchers have definitively established that exposure to asbestos can cause lung cancer — which is distinct from mesothelioma. They have also proven that when a person who smokes cigarettes is exposed to asbestos, the carcinogen accelerates and exacerbates their risk for being diagnosed with either lung cancer or mesothelioma.  But asbestos companies have attempted to deny this risk and blame cigarette smoking alone for plaintiffs’ illnesses in order to evade legal responsibility.



Asbestos and Cigarettes Are A Deadly Mix



When former Conrail employee Kevin Howell was diagnosed with lung cancer, he filed a personal injury lawsuit against his former employer under the Federal Employers Liability Act, saying that over his 38 years as a signal maintainer he had been required to drill holes in signals boxes made with asbestos, and in doing so had breathed in asbestos fibers. Though Howell acknowledged that he had smoked a pack of cigarettes a day since the age of 17, he accused the company of increasing his risk of lung cancer and mesothelioma by failing to provide protection or warnings about the dangers he faced. A jury awarded him a total of $4.5 million in damages and asserted that he was 40% responsible for his own illness, leaving Contrail to pay the other 60%, or $2,334,139.81. The company appealed the decision.



Though Conrail argued that Howell’s lung cancer was not their responsibility and that Howell’s smoking had been the cause of its illness, the appeals court upheld the lower court’s decision, agreeing that he had presented sufficient evidence of the role that asbestos plays in the development of lung cancer.

### Judge Reduces Mesothelioma Damages from $325 Million to $120 Million

Indicating that the $325 million a Manhattan jury awarded a mesothelioma victim was too high, a New York state judge reduced the punitive damages payout for 67-year-old Donna Olson and her husband to $120 million. The case revolved around Mrs. Olson’s lifelong use of Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder, which the couple claim was contaminated with the asbestos that caused her illness.



Mesothelioma Lawsuit Saw Several Notable Awards



The mesothelioma lawsuit that Mr. and Mrs. Olson filed was resolved in several phases. The jury initially awarded the couple $25 million in compensatory damages, then reconvened to decide on whether the corporate giant should face punitive damages meant to punish them for their negligence in allowing asbestos to contaminate their product and failure to warn of its dangers.



In that phase of the trial, the jury awarded the couple $300 million, finding that the company had been “knowingly deceitful about” or “willfully blind to” the dangers of both their Shower-to-Shower talc product and their iconic baby powder product. The Olsons had accused the company of choosing profit and popularity of their products over the serious risk of malignant mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases.



Judge Ordered Mesothelioma Damages Reduced



Though Justice Gerald Lebovits determined that the jury’s finding of Johnson & Johnson’s liability for Mrs. Olson’s mesothelioma was legally correct, he also indicated that the amount that they couple was awarded was too high to allow to stand. He reduced the compensatory damages from $25 million to $15 million and the punitive damages from $300 million to $105 million, bringing the total payout to $120 million. The couple was given a limited period of time to accept the modification.



Though Johnson & Johnson has indicated that it will file an appeal of the verdict, the mesothelioma attorney that represented the Olsons indicated that the couple was satisfied with the judge’s decision and believed that the company’s appeal would fail.

### Jury to Hear Details of Building Supervisor’s Mesothelioma

The life that Branko Srica dreamed of when he arrived in the United States in 1971 was cut short by malignant mesothelioma, and now his widow is fighting for justice from those she believes are responsible. Mr. Srica, a native of Yugoslavia, died of the rare, asbestos-related disease in 2016 after a two-year battle, but not before he provided testimony about his decade-long daily responsibilities as a building supervisor in Queens, New York, and the American Biltrite asbestos floor tiles that he removed and replaced.



Asbestos in Floor Tiles Blamed for Malignant Mesothelioma



According to testimony Mr. Srica provided before his death from mesothelioma, after emigrating to the United States in 1971 he was hired as a building superintendent of a Queens, New York apartment building. From 1975 through 1986 he was in charge of maintenance for dozens of apartments, and this included removing old floor tile and replacing it with new. He and his widow blame the asbestos-contaminated dust created during this task for his illness and death. Though he has passed away, she is continuing his case against the company as a wrongful death lawsuit.



According to the couple, the asbestos-contaminated tiles that Mr. Srica worked with were manufactured by American Biltrite, Inc., but the company filed a motion to dismiss the case, arguing that there was no proof that the tiles were theirs or that they were responsible for his death. To counter this, Mr. Srica had detailed the tile’s appearance and packaging, as well as the work that he did. His widow, who accompanied him frequently as he did his work around the apartment building, also described the tiles’ packaging and other details.



Judge Denies Motion for Summary Judgment



Though American Biltrite's attorneys requested a dismissal of the mesothelioma lawsuit against them, their motion was denied by Judge Manuel J. Mendez of the New York City Asbestos Litigation Court, who determined that there was sufficient factual testimony to support the case moving forward to be heard and decided by a jury.

### Expert Witness in Mesothelioma Trial Admits to Little Knowledge About the Disease

Who wins a mesothelioma lawsuit often depends upon the strength of the testimony expert witnesses provide to the jury. While victims and other witnesses provide information about what happened and how exposure took place, it is expert witnesses who give the jury members the scientific information on which they base their assessment of what is true and what is false. In a recent case, Johnson & Johnson and Colgate-Palmolive presented an expert witness whose testimony contradicted all known science about asbestos-related diseases. The attorney representing the victim quickly exposed the witness’ shortcoming.



California Mesothelioma Case Accuses Companies of Hiding Risk



The mesothelioma lawsuit involved 61-year-old Patricia Schmitz, who was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma after years of using Johnson & Johnson and Colgate-Palmolive products that she says were contaminated with asbestos. Jurors seated in the Alameda County Superior Court heard Dr. Suresh Moolgavkar of the scientific consulting firm Exponent Inc. testify that Mrs. Schitz' illness was caused by the aging process, contradicting years of scientific research about the rare, terminal disease.



Though testimony like that provided by Dr. Moolgavkar would be upsetting to any mesothelioma victim, Mrs. Schmitz’ attorney quickly exposed the doctor’s history of acting as an expert witness for large corporations, and the large fees that he has earned by testifying that a variety of diseases are spontaneous events rather than being caused by the toxic substances previously proven to cause them.



Witness Paid $500,000 to Manufacture Doubt About Mesothelioma’s Causes



After Dr. Moolgavkar testified that Mrs. Schmitz’ mesothelioma was a result of aging rather than her 40-year history of using asbestos-contaminated products, the victim’s attorney confronted the witness about the fees that he is paid to “manufacture doubt” about the cause of the rare disease. The doctor acknowledged that he makes half a million dollars for each case, plus a $400,000 bonus if his clients win.



Additionally, the mesothelioma attorney provided the jury with a clear sense of the nature of the doctor’s purported expertise when he evoked confirmation that he had provided testimony that diesel exhaust and formaldehyde, both known toxins, had not been responsible for physical harm in other victims, as well as that he had never treated a patient diagnosed with the terminal asbestos-related disease.

### After Appeal, California Court Orders CertainTeed to Pay Over $10 Million to Mesothelioma Victim

There are many mesothelioma lawsuits filed against asbestos companies on the grounds that they either knew or should have known about the hazards that asbestos posed to those working with their products. But in some cases, the accusation goes beyond basic negligence and accuses defendants of actively concealing danger. Juries convinced of this level of malicious deception tend to assign extremely high damages awards, and that was the case in the suit filed by Michael and Cindy Burch of California against CertainTeed Corporation.



Long-Time A/C Installer Awarded $10 Million By California Jury



Michael Burch spent years working as an air conditioning pipe installer, and when he was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma he blamed CertainTeed Corporation for having exposed him to asbestos. Though there were several other companies named in his suit, CertainTeed attracted the majority of the attention, as Burch and his wife accused the company of fraudulent concealment.



For fraudulent concealment to be established in a mesothelioma lawsuit, there are several elements that need to be proven. These include:



That the defendant concealed or suppressed a material factThat the defendant had a duty to disclose the material fact to the plaintiffThat the defendant intentionally concealed or suppressed the fact with the intent to defraudThat the plaintiff was not aware of the material fact and would have behaved differently if they had knownThat the plaintiff was damaged as a result of not knowing the material fact



The jury agreed that these elements were present and awarded Mr. Burch $9.25 million in non-economic damages, as well as almost $800,000 in economic damages. CertainTeed appealed this verdict.



CertainTeed’s Appeal of Mesothelioma Verdict Denied



Though CertainTeed argued that a fraudulent concealment judgment was not appropriate in the mesothelioma verdict, the Court of Appeals of California upheld the jury’s decision, and assigned full responsibility to the company.  The court took special note of evidence of the company’s intent to deceive, including internal memos and attempts to have OSHA change their allowed asbestos exposure levels, as well as efforts to block use of the word “cancer” on warning labels.

### Jury Awards $25 Million Verdict to Mesothelioma Victim and His Wife

A California man afflicted with malignant testicular mesothelioma has won his lawsuit, taking home $25 million for himself and his wife. Houshang and Soraya Sabetian filed suit against several companies, charging them with negligently exposing him to asbestos when he worked at Iranian oil refineries between 1959 and 1979 and leading to his eventual diagnosis with testicular mesothelioma. 



Asbestos at Iranian Oil Refineries Blamed for Mesothelioma Diagnosis



Though most mesothelioma lawsuits heard in the United States name American companies as defendants, Mr. Sabetian named both Fluor Enterprises Inc. and Middle East Fluor for his illness, accusing them of having used asbestos-containing products in the construction of their Iranian refinery units despite their knowledge that the material could cause cancer.



According to testimony in the mesothelioma lawsuit, the company had asbestos insulation left over from a previous project. Thought they knew that their leftover material was illegal to use in the United States, they chose to maximize their profit by sending the carcinogenic material to Iran for use in the project that Mr. Sabetian would eventually work on, acting with “conscious disregard for the health and safety of others” and putting him at risk and eventually leading to his diagnosis.



Jury Awards Millions to Mesothelioma Victim and His Wife



Though the Los Angeles jury also attributed 20 percent of the responsibility for Mr. Sabetian’s mesothelioma to the National Iranian Oil Co., they decided that he himself was not negligent and did not contribute to his own illness. Their decision awarded Mr. Sabetian $14 million for past and future pain and suffering and provided his wife $11 million in recognition of her loss of love and companionship.



Speaking of the wrongs done to Mr. Sabetian, a family representative said that Fluor had put profits ahead of people, saying, "This case represents the latest in a long line of Iranian Refinery workers fallen victim to Fluor's irresponsible conduct overseas.”

### Asbestos-Contaminated Protective Clothing Blamed for Ohio Man’s Mesothelioma

One of the tragic ironies surrounding mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases is that they’re caused by a material whose intent was protective. Asbestos is a mineral that has long been used to mitigate the effects of heat, sound and flame — it was incorporated in insulation, brake linings, floor and ceiling tiles and more, specifically to keep the environment around those items safe. Even clothing meant to shield workers from high heat proved to be dangerous. A lawsuit first filed in 2014 makes this clear, as a man diagnosed with mesothelioma seeks justice from the clothing manufacturer whose garments he blames for his fatal illness.



Mesothelioma Victim Remembers Protective Coats and Gloves



Working in a steel plant exposes employees to extreme heat and the risk of life-threatening burns, so they are equipped with protective clothing that shields them. Until the 1970s that clothing often included asbestos, the mineral known to cause malignant mesothelioma. Ohio native Donald MacLachlan filed suit against American Optical Corporation, blaming the company for failing to warn that the thermal protective coats and gloves that they made could cause him harm. The company filed a motion to dismiss his lawsuit, arguing that he contradicted himself in multiple depositions and that some of his testimony was factually incorrect.



Mr. MacLachlan first provided testimony regarding his asbestos history in September of 2014 and May of 2015 after being diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2014. Some of his testimony was contradictory, and he later offered an affidavit in 2018 explaining that though he had tried his best to remember all of the details of his work clothing, several decades had passed and he was suffering from the effects of his mesothelioma. Despite this explanation, the clothing company move to dismiss his case.



Judge Allows Mesothelioma Lawsuit to Move Forward



Though Judge Christopher A. Boyko of the U.S. District Court Northern District of Ohio Eastern Division acknowledged the contradictions in what American Optical’s attorneys called a “revisionist affidavit”, he ruled that those contradictions did not mean that it should automatically be stricken. He writes, “The Court recognizes that these product liability cases, where an asbestos-related illness may not appear for decades, often involve extensive employment histories and recollection of multiple workplaces, job responsibilities and products used or simply observed by plaintiffs. Plaintiff Donald MacLachlan was asked about a job he held over thirty years earlier. He is now suffering with mesothelioma symptoms and somewhat advanced age. He was shown pictures of protective coats in an American Optical catalog which he did not see at the time of his depositions. Thus, the Court determines that the contradictions in the supplemental affidavit can be reasonably explained by confusion, memory lapses and new pertinent evidence.”

### Mesothelioma Lawsuit Cites Second-Hand Asbestos Exposure from World Trade Center Construction

In 2015, 73-year-old Albina Licul was diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma, and she died of the rare, asbestos-related disease just sixty days later. But before her death, she was able to file a mesothelioma lawsuit against the plaster company that she blamed for her illness. She cited the asbestos they sprayed at the World Trade Center as it was being constructed, saying her husband carried the dangerous substance home on his clothes, leading to her second-hand exposure.



Mesothelioma Victim Laundered Husband’s Asbestos-Contaminated Clothing



Although Mrs. Licul succumbed to mesothelioma just two months after her diagnosis, she provided testimony in a deposition before her death, and so did her husband. The two indicated that Mario DiBono Plastering Co. had been spraying asbestos fireproofing at the World Trade Center site at the same time that Mr. Lucil had been working as a union carpenter for a sheetrock company called Design Office Partition.



According to their testimony, Mrs. Licul’s mesothelioma was a result of exposure to asbestos that Mr. Licul carried into their home each day on his work clothing. They described hugging each evening when he returned home despite the dust on his clothing, and the daily routine of shaking out the asbestos-contaminated clothing and laundering it.



Company Moves to Dismiss Mesothelioma Lawsuit



In response to the mesothelioma lawsuit, Mario DiBono Plastering Co. filed a motion to have the case dismissed, arguing that there was no way to prove that their company was responsible for the death. That motion was dismissed in 2019, with Judge Manuel J. Mendez ruling that the case needed to be presented to a jury for a decision about the facts in the case. That decision was subsequently appealed based on some contradictory evidence submitted, but Judge Mendez’ ruling was ruled appropriate and the case is still on track to be heard by a jury.

### New York Court Sides with Mesothelioma Victim Sickened by College Asbestos Exposure

Recalling college is usually a happy, nostalgic experience, but mesothelioma victim Paul Margolis' memories center on piles of asbestos dust on the floors of his dormitory, and the devastation that dust has created for him and his family. The 70-year-old blames contaminated materials used during repair work for his eventual diagnosis with the fatal disease, and he is pursuing legal action against the tile company that was responsible for manufacturing the dangerous materials.



Man Sues American Biltrite Over Asbestos-Contaminated Amtico Vinyl Tiles



Though Mr. Margolis has named multiple companies for his mesothelioma diagnosis, his claim against American Biltrite specifically recalls repair work being done in his dormitory while he was a freshman at Syracuse University from September of 1964 through May of 1965. In deposition testimony he recalled similar work being done all around the campus that year and in the years after, including while he was living in a fraternity house where walls were being taken down and rebuilt to accommodate a new addition. He also remembered the brands of tiles in evidence on boxes of the vinyl asbestos floor tiles that were in and around his dorm at the time.



Mr. Margolis testified regarding the asbestos fibers that would have been released as workmen around campus completed their work, asserting that they led to his mesothelioma diagnosis.  He provided additional testimony about further exposure to American Biltrite’s asbestos-contaminated tiles when he worked in an office on Madison Avenue in New York City.



Company Files Motion to Have Mesothelioma Lawsuit Dismissed



In response to Mr. Margolis’ mesothelioma claim, American Biltrite filed a motion to have the case against them dismissed, arguing that there was no expert opinion establishing causation from their product, but Judge Manuel J. Mendez of the Supreme Court of New York County denied the motion. In his ruling, the judge said that the victim had no requirement to show the precise cause of his damages and that the company’s liability could be “reasonably inferred.” The case will move forward and Mr. Margolis will be able to pursue justice and compensation for the damages that he has suffered.

### Ford Assessed $9 Million Liability After Auto Repair Career Leads to Mesothelioma Death

Larry Knecht lost his life to malignant mesothelioma with the knowledge that his illness was the result of his life’s work. He identified the asbestos-contaminated auto parts he’d worked with for decades as the source of his illness, and after his death his widow filed a personal injury lawsuit. A jury awarded his widow over $40 million in compensatory damages and assessed Ford Motor Company 20% of that verdict. Ford appealed the decision, but the Superior Court of Delaware denied their appeal and the company will pay the widow $9 million.



Mesothelioma Victim’s Death Blamed on Asbestos-Contaminated Auto Parts



Before his mesothelioma death, Larry Knecht was an auto mechanic who was successful enough to eventually own his own auto repair business, Knecht Automotive in Los Alamos, New Mexico. His death came just 8 months after being diagnosed with the asbestos-related disease, leaving his widow to pursue justice on his behalf. She named several defendants in her case, one of whom was Ford Motor Company.



After the jury attributed 20% of the blame for Knecht’s mesothelioma death on Ford, the company filed two motions. The first asked for the case to be overturned entirely based on several different legal technicalities, and the second motion argued that the $40.6245 million total award was excessive and created by inflammatory statements made by the widow’s attorneys during the course of the trial.



Superior Court Denies Ford’s Motion, Orders Payment Made to Mesothelioma Widow



After reviewing Ford Motor Company’s motions, the Superior Court of Delaware left both the mesothelioma verdict and its corresponding award in place. To the argument against the expert witness testimony used in the case, the jury instructions and other legal questions, the Superior Court noted that all of the issues had already been reviewed and decided correctly, and with reference to their complains that there had been “bias, passion or prejudice caused by Plaintiff’s counsel during closing argument” the court similarly found no basis in fact. They ordered the automotive giant to pay the widow the money she was owed following the loss of her husband.

### Asbestos Company Claims Contractor as Employee to Avoid Mesothelioma Liability

After losing a $14 million mesothelioma lawsuit, Celanese Corporation had two options: either pay the money they owed to the family of Dennis Seay, who died of the disease at just 70 years old, or find some reason to appeal the verdict. The company chose the latter, arguing that though it was true the man had been sickened while working in their building from 1971 to 1980, he had effectively been an employee, and therefore only eligible for workers’ compensation.



Lower Court Had Already Denied Claim of Employment in Mesothelioma Trial



The argument that Celanese mounted in their appeal of the mesothelioma verdict was not a new one. They had already argued it in front of the original jury, claiming that though Mr. Seay had maintained and repaired their asbestos-contaminated machinery on behalf of his employer, contractor Daniel Construction, he was there with such regularity that he should be treated as a “statutory employee”, and therefore not able to file a personal injury claim against them. Employees are limited to seeking workers’ compensation, which involves far less money.



In addition to arguing against Mr. Seay’s right to sue them at all, Celanese Corporation’s attorneys also appealed the verdict on the grounds that $14 million in damages was too high an amount for a mesothelioma diagnosis and that the jury had been effected by the presence of a jury member who had to be dismissed for not having admitted to also having worked in the Celanese plant.



Appeals Court Denies Asbestos Companies’ Motions



Both the lower court and the appeals court shut down the Celanese argument regarding Mr. Seay’s work, saying that there was a substantial difference between his work as a repairman and the company’s main focus, which was chemicals. The appeals court wrote, ”Although maintenance of the equipment in the plant may have been important to Celanese’s operations, it does not follow that such maintenance was a ‘part or process’ of its synthetic fiber manufacturing business.”



The court also rejected the companys’ argument that the verdict was excessive, writing, “The circuit court thoughtfully compared all of the awards with awards in other mesothelioma cases and with the legislative cap on punitive damages and concluded the awards were not excessive.”

### Can A Forgotten Address Derail a Mesothelioma Lawsuit?

Mesothelioma victims who pursue justice against asbestos companies face countless challenges. In addition to battling their disease, they're expected to recall minute details from forty to fifty years earlier in support of their claims. This would be hard under the best of circumstances, but while confronting a terminal, painful disease it is particularly difficult. Such was the case for Albert Schwartz, a painter diagnosed with mesothelioma after years of working with asbestos-contaminated joint compound, caulk and window glazing purchased from Sherwin-Williams. The retailer attempted to have his claim against them removed because of a mistaken address, but the Supreme Court of the State of New York dismissed their motion for summary judgment, indicating that there was no requirement for him to remember the exact detail of their store’s location.



Confusion About Address Ruled Insufficient to Dismiss Mesothelioma Lawsuit



In deposition testimony provided for his mesothelioma lawsuit, Albert Schwartz said that he'd been exposed to asbestos in products he worked with while employed by Coleman Painting in Metuchen, New Jersey. Though he remembered frequently accompanying his boss to a Sherwin-Williams store to buy the asbestos-contaminated supplies, he was admittedly unclear as to the store’s exact location, and on that basis the company requested that his case be dismissed.



In its filing, Sherwin Williams argued that they were entitled to summary judgment because the mesothelioma victim lacked “competent, admissible evidence that Albert Schwartz worked with or around asbestos-containing products purchased from a Sherwin-Williams store.” They pointed to his reference to a store in Edison, New Jersey that had not opened until years later as proof that he could not have been exposed to products from their store.



Judge Denies Sherwin-Williams’ Motion to Dismiss Mesothelioma Lawsuit



In his ruling, Justice Manuel J. Mendez points to the mesothelioma victim's clear indication that it was a Sherwin-Williams store where the products had been purchased, but also to his admission that he did not remember the store’s exact location. Justice Mendez wrote, “Mr. Schwartz need not definitively identify the “precise location” of the Sherwin-Williams store from which the products at issue were allegedly purchase. He need only “show facts and conditions from which defendant’s liability may be reasonably inferred.” The case was allowed to continue so that Mr. Schwartz could seek justice.

### Mesothelioma Victim’s Family Wins Victory After Long Wait for Justice

In February of 2015, Mason South filed a malignant mesothelioma lawsuit against Chevron, seeking damages for the disease caused by decades of asbestos exposure onboard ships owned by Texaco, which the company had since purchased. To his surprise, the oil giant moved to have his case dismissed, pointing to a $1,750 asbestos settlement he had received in 1997.



Oil Company Aggressively Pursued Multiple Appeals Against Mesothelioma Victim



Mr. South’s case is a stark example of just how aggressively asbestos companies fight to avoid taking responsibility for malignant mesothelioma caused by their unsafe work environments and products. Though the trial court in the case ruled against their motion to dismiss, Chevron’s attorneys appealed that decision to the New York Appellate Division, and after that rebuff the company appealed again to the New York Court of Appeals.



At issue was the fact that nearly 20 years prior to his diagnosis with malignant mesothelioma, Mr. South and other seamen had filed a lawsuit against Texaco for having exposed them to asbestos. At that time the former merchant marine had been diagnosed with a non-fatal, non-malignant asbestos-related disease. When he was awarded $1,750 in that case he was required to sign a release against future legal actions, and Chevron insisted that the previously-signed release protected them from further litigation.



Court Rules No Proof Mesothelioma Victim Understood Impact of Release



In its ruling, the New York Court of Appeals pointed to both the wording of the release, which included mesothelioma in an extended list of potential illnesses caused by asbestos exposure, and the amount of the settlement as proof that Mr. South had not fully understood the waiver he'd signed. They also indicated that t the release's waiver ran counter to the Jones Act’s FELA law, which invalidates any contract that a common carrier crafts to avoid future liability. They also said that it was simply common sense that nobody would accept just $1,750 if they understood that they were relinquishing their rights in the face of mesothelioma.

### Family of Mechanic with Mesothelioma Wins Decision Against Ford Motor Company

Victor Michel’s family’s mesothelioma lawsuit against Ford Motor Company seemed fairly straightforward. The former mechanic had worked on Ford cars and trucks for years, fixing engines and brakes that the automotive giant had manufactured using asbestos-contaminated parts. After years of breathing in the toxic particles, Michel developed the peritoneal mesothelioma that ended up claiming his life. Unfortunately, rather than acknowledging their role in his death, Ford Motor Company filed multiple motions for summary judgment against the family’s claim, seeking dismissal of the case.



Ford Argues Against Expert Witnesses



Early in the legal process, Ford Motor Company’s attorneys argued that there was no proof that their products had been responsible for his malignant mesothelioma. They filed a motion for summary judgment in the United States District Court of the Eastern District, arguing against admission of the Michel family’s expert witness’ testimony, who had testified that his work would have exposed him to enough asbestos to have caused his illness. They also argued against his ability to file a claim against them at all, since many of years were spent working for a Ford dealership. They pointed to the Louisiana’s Workers Compensation Act, which had classified mesothelioma as an occupational illness excluded from filing liability claims against their employers.



Judges Deny Ford’s Motion to Dismiss Mesothelioma Case



In their response, the judges provided meticulous reasoning denying both of Ford’s arguments against being held responsible for Michel’s mesothelioma. With reference to the company's workers’ compensation argument, they pointed out that the Louisiana Workers Compensation Act went into effect in 1975, which was after his exposure to asbestos in the company’s products and therefore excluded from the law. With reference to the company’s argument against the expert witnesses, the court explained that summary judgment could only be granted when there was no genuine dispute about the material facts presented. Since the two sides were far apart on the issue, a jury needed to hear the case.

### Court Frees Woman to Pursue Mesothelioma Lawsuit Against Colgate Palmolive

Women have been using cosmetic body powders after their baths and showers and for personal hygiene for decades, never dreaming that doing so put them at risk for malignant mesothelioma. Unfortunately, in recent years it has become clear that the talc in these products was frequently contaminated with asbestos, putting users at risk for the rare, asbestos-related disease. As victims have begun to come forward to file lawsuits against the powder companies responsible for their exposure, those companies have pushed back and tried to have the cases dismissed. The justice system has largely disallowed motions for summary judgment and permitted the cases to proceed to jury trials.



Colgate Palmolive’s Attempt to Deny Justice in Mesothelioma Case Fails



One instance of a mesothelioma lawsuit being filed against a talc company involved a woman named Desiree Hooper-Lynch. Ms. Hooper-Lynch was diagnosed with mesothelioma in April of 2015 and believes that the disease was a result of her use of Colgate-Palmolive Company’s Cashmere Bouquet product. She had used it while she was teaching in England and Guyana and continued using it after having moved to New York in 1979.



In total, Ms. Hooper-Lynch’s exposure to Cashmere Bouquet extended from 1968 through 1985, and expert witnesses supporting her claim have indicated that the nearly 20 years of exposure to asbestos in the product could easily have caused her malignant mesothelioma.



Judge Criticizes Colgate Palmolive’s Motion for Summary Judgment in Mesothelioma Claim



While Ms. Hooper-Lynch’s expert witnesses went into significant detail about her level of exposure to the product and how it could have caused her malignant mesothelioma, while Colgate Palmolive’s entire argument rested on an inability to meet a burden of proof. The judge hearing the case noted that the company’s attorneys had not even established a prima facie case for summary judgment, and that some of their legal motions had not been included in the documentation provided. Rather it was presented for the first time at oral argument.



In ruling against the corporate giant, the judge wrote, “Conflicting affidavits and testimony and construing the evidence in a light most favorable to the plaintiff as the non-moving party warrants denial of this motion for summary judgment sought by the defendant. There remain issues of fact as to whether plaintiff’s use of defendants’ product, Cashmere Bouquet, during the relevant period caused her mesothelioma.”

### California Lawsuit Claims Neighborhood Asbestos Exposure Led to Malignant Mesothelioma

Imagine being diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, the rare form of cancer caused by exposure to asbestos, and then learning your exposure came from breathing the air outside of your home. That is exactly what Dean Trapp’s family claims happened to their loved one. Mr. Trapp died of the rare, asbestos-related form of cancer in 2014, and after his death his family filed a lawsuit against both CertainTeed Corporation and Calaveras Asbestos, accusing both of negligence. Though a lower court granted both companies a dismissal of the case, the Court of Appeal of the State of California Sixth Appellate District overturned that decision, allowing the family to move forward and their case to be decided by a jury.



Companies Accused of Negligence in Mesothelioma Death



The lawsuit filed by Beverly Trapp and her children pointed to the fact that Dean had lived within four-to-seven miles of the CertainTeed cement pipe plant for a period of over thirty years, and that during that time the company had negligently allowed asbestos to spew into the air. Calaveras had provided the deadly material to the plant.



The companies defended themselves against the claim, relying upon the testimony of expert witnesses who had argued that the asbestos emitted would not have been enough to cause Mr. Trapp’s mesothelioma and that — even if it had been — it would be impossible to prove that it had been their asbestos that led to his illness. The companies also claimed that there was no duty of care to non-employees or non-employee families.



Appeals Court Overturns Decision in Mesothelioma Case



In reversing the lower court’s decision, the Court of Appeals made several notable statements. They agreed with the family that the testimony of the expert witnesses could not be backed up by science, and more importantly they took a firm stand against the notion that companies have no duty of care to those who live in surrounding neighborhoods.



On this point the court wrote, “We disagree with the notion that the take-home exposure …. is somehow more dangerous or risky than the airborne exposure to asbestos alleged by appellants here. … Take-home exposure and airborne exposure are two different methods to being exposed to a harmful substance. It is certainly not clear, as the trial court assumed, that one method of exposure is more serious and life-threatening than the other. …. Moreover, we note that there is language suggesting that landowners that use asbestos and manufacturers of asbestos-containing products have a duty of care that extends beyond the premises of their facility.” They pointed out that in the state of California there have been previous rulings regarding landowners’ responsibility to prevent conditions that could cause harm to those in their area. The case will move forward.

### New York Supreme Court Denies Tile Company’s Motion to Dismiss Mesothelioma Case

Between the time that Steven Hall was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma and his death six months later, he filed suit against Biltrite, Inc., the company that made the Amtico floor tiles he identified as the source of his asbestos exposure. As his family pursued justice after his death, the company filed a motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the case in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, but Justice Manuel J. Mendez denied the motion, ruling that the question of cause needed to be resolved by a jury.



Mesothelioma Victim Points to Asbestos Dust from Tiles As Cause of Fatal Illness



Prior to his death from malignant mesothelioma, Mr. Hall provided extensive detail about his use of Amtico floor tiles between 1969 and 1979. He testified to having cut around the edges of tiles, scoring them and breaking pieces loose, and sanding them so that they would fit where they were being installed. He also recounted the layers of dust that were present in each box of tiles that he opened.



In response, Amtico argued that the victim had provided insufficient evidence that their product had caused his mesothelioma, and that the case should therefore be dismissed. But Justice Mendez denied their claim, pointing out that though the company claimed that there was no causal relationship between the type of asbestos in their product and mesothelioma, the expert witness for Mr. Hall testified otherwise.



Tile Company’s Own Warnings Used Against It in Mesothelioma Trial



One of the most impactful pieces of testimony in the mesothelioma hearing came from the tile company’s own products, which began carrying warnings against sanding them down in the late 1970s, after Mr. Hall had used the product. That warning stated:



WARNING: DO NOT SAND EXISTING RESILIENT FLOORING, LINING FELT, OR BACKING.THESE PRODUCTS MAY CONTAIN ASBESTOS FIBERS WHICH ARE NOT READILY IDENTIFIABLE. INHALATION OF ASBESTOS DUST MAY CAUSE ASBESTOSIS OR OTHER SERIOUS BODILY HARM.



The judge’s ruling allowed the family to continue moving forward in their quest for justice for their loved one, and for compensation for the loss that they suffered.

### Deceased Mesothelioma Victim's Family Wins Ruling Against Pep Boys

When J.D. Williams's surviving family filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Pep Boys, blaming the automotive retailer for negligence in his death from malignant mesothelioma, the San Francisco County Superior Court decided against awarding them compensation for the home health services he had needed. Maddeningly, the court also ordered the family to compensate Pep Boys for the costs of hiring expert witnesses. Believing this decision unjust, the family filed an appeal with the First District Court of Appeal, Division Four, in San Francisco. In his ruling, Judge Ethan Schulman of the San Francisco City and County Superior Court agreed with the family, reversing the lower court’s decision.







Mesothelioma Lawsuit Focused on Asbestos in Brakes Sold by Pep Boys



The original mesothelioma wrongful death lawsuit filed by Williams’ family focused on his decades of exposure to asbestos after using asbestos-contaminated brake systems purchased from the retailer. They claimed negligence and strict liability following his death, describing him as "a do-it-yourselfer type of guy who rarely sent one of his automobiles into the shop for work.” Instead, he did his own brake repair and replacement, and "regularly inspected and when necessary did brake work on his cars by himself and with the help of his three boys.” They pointed to the retailer's failure to warn of the dangers of the products that they sold.



Williams had purchased the asbestos-contaminated brakes from four different retailers, with Pep Boys having been his “favorite.” Included in his purchases were “Bendix, EIS and Raybestos brand” brakes that contained asbestos and were sold at the store “during the 1960s through the mid-1980s." Though the lower court awarded the family $213,052 in damages, tit also gave the retailer several legal wins, granting a motion for judgment on the family’s wrongful death claim based on the statute of limitations and ordering the family to pay for the company's legal expert costs. They appealed this decision. 



Judge Overrules Lower Court, Stating that Mesothelioma Decision was in Error



In overruling the lower court’s decision, Judge Schulman indicated that the court had erred in its ruling. "'In tort actions, medical expenses fall generally into the category of economic damages, representing actual pecuniary loss caused by the defendant’s wrong,'” he said.

### Asbestos Company’s Attempt to Shift Mesothelioma Blame to Navy Fails

Asbestos companies accused of responsibility for victims’ malignant mesothelioma work hard to lay the blame on others. Despite their knowledge that their products contained asbestos, a highly carcinogenic material, they refuse to accept responsibility for the damage that their products have done. A good example can be found in a case involving veteran Harry L. Goodrich, who was exposed to asbestos from John Crane Inc.’s products during the time that he served in the Navy.



Veteran’s Navy Service Led to Deadly Mesothelioma Diagnosis



The mesothelioma lawsuit was filed in 2017 by Harry L. Goodrich and his wife, Agnes. The two filed suit against multiple defendants, accusing them of responsibility for the asbestos fibers, particles and dusts that Mr. Goodrich was exposed to while serving in the United States Navy from June of 1959 tot June of 1963. The couple sought compensation for the companies’ negligence and strict liability, as well as for spousal, pre-death loss of society and consortium.



In response, John Crane Inc. filed for a motion to dismiss the charges against them, arguing that the Navy had been Mr. Goodrich’s employer and that they had been aware at that time of the risk of malignant mesothelioma and other dangers posed by exposure to asbestos.



U.S. District Court Denies Asbestos Company’s Attempt to Avoid Mesothelioma Liability



In response to the motion for summary judgment, the U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Virginia, Newport News Division ruled against John Crane, Inc., preventing them from submitting evidence to a jury in the mesothelioma lawsuit about the Navy’s role in his illness. In its decision, the court indicated that admitting testimony to that affect would risk “unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative evidence.”   



In damning language, the court indicated that the asbestos company’s wish to present evidence against the Navy represented a “backdoor” way of trying to escape its own responsibility for knowingly selling a carcinogenic material.

### Ford Vehicle Parts Blamed for Man’s Malignant Mesothelioma

Imagine having spent a good part of your life tinkering with and repairing your own cars, only to find that in doing so, you’d exposed yourself to the risk of malignant mesothelioma. It’s happened to many people, and John DeCastro was one of them. Mr. DeCastro and his wife filed a mesothelioma lawsuit against Ford Motor Company, blaming asbestos hidden in parts of some eight Ford vehicles he’d maintained throughout his life for his terminal illness. Though the company defended itself by arguing that the asbestos-contaminated parts may have been made and distributed by third party manufacturers, the Superior Court of Delaware ruled that the company had to stand trial in the case.







Facing Off Against A Corporate Giant



Though Ford Motor Company is one of the world’s biggest and most powerful corporations, that did not dissuade the DeCastros from pursing justice for his malignant mesothelioma. The case relied upon Mr. DeCastro’s deposition testimony that he had been exposed to asbestos from multiple sources, including during his service in the U.S. Air Force, his civilian employment with Pacific Bell Telephone and United Airlines, and his personal automotive maintenance work.



Ford attempted to deny their role in the man’s mesothelioma death. They asserted that though the repairs he’d done on at least eight different Ford vehicles for himself and his friends — including a 1935 Ford coupe, a 1938 Ford coupe, and a 1936 Ford two-door — may indeed have exposed him to asbestos, that they were not responsible because the original parts and materials they’d installed in the cars may not have been contaminated with asbestos.



Court Rules in Favor of Mesothelioma Victim



Despite the arguments made by Ford Motor Company, the court sided with the DeCastros, determining that they had provided enough evidence to raise questions about whether or not they had a duty to warn of the dangers of the parts used in their vehicles. They sent the case to be decided by a jury

### Honeywell Blames Attorney’s Harsh Words for High Mesothelioma Verdict

Every mesothelioma victim who decides to seek justice against the asbestos companies that sickened them dreams of having their day in court. What most want more than anything is to finally shine a light on the negligence that caused their illness. But mesothelioma attorneys need to walk a fine line when talking to a jury: They need to convince them of the defendant’s wrongdoing while not going so far that a defendant can argue that their words were too inflammatory and drove a disproportionately high verdict. When Ronald Conda’s attorney won millions from Honeywell International, the company appealed the verdict, citing counsel “misconduct.” Fortunately, the appeals court disagreed and ordered the company to pay the judgment.



Mesothelioma Victim Sickened by Asbestos in Power Plant



Ronald Conda’s malignant mesothelioma was blamed on several factors, including asbestos in products manufactured by Honeywell International, asbestos-contaminated products from Honeywell’s co-defendant Foster Wheeler, and the asbestos present at his work environment during the years he worked for Northern States Power in Minnesota. The jury agreed and assessed 80% of the blame to his employer and 10% each to the two companies.



The decision awarded the mesothelioma victim’s family nearly $4 million in compensation, but Honeywell pushed back, appealing the judgment for a variety of reasons. Most notable among these was what they called attorney misconduct. They claimed that Mr. Conda’s attorney’s language about them had violated Minnesota law and unduly influenced the jury to assign an inappropriate damage amount.



Were Mesothelioma Attorney’s Words Too Harsh?



In speaking to the jury about Honeywell’s role in Mr. Conda’s death, his attorney made several pointed statements, including calling malignant mesothelioma “a horrific way to die,” calling Honeywell’s failure to protect him from asbestos a “blatant, explicit, known, eyes wide open violation of the law,” and imploring the jury to make a decision that would be “as calculated and deliberate as the decision of the company’s decision makers over decades.”



Though Honeywell argued that the jury’s damages should be reversed as too excessive, the Court of Appeals of Minnesota disagreed, pointing out that the original judge had instructed the jury to ignore the harshest of the comments and that the damage amount awarded had not been inappropriate under the circumstances. Mr. Conda’s family was able to retain the damages that the jury had found fair and reasonable.

### Asbestos Company Fails in Attempt to Skirt Compensating Mesothelioma Victim

When Linda Guillot was diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma she filed suit against Avondale Industries, accusing them of failing to warn of the dangers posed to family members of those who worked in their asbestos-contaminated environment. Though Avondale asserted that her case should be dismissed based on federal protections, the judge in her case denied their petition for summary judgment, ruling that government contracts do not absolve asbestos companies of the duty to warn.



Second-Hand Asbestos Exposure Blamed for Mesothelioma



Though malignant mesothelioma is most frequently considered an occupational disease, there are many examples of victims whose illness is caused by second-hand exposure to asbestos carried home on their loved ones’ clothing. Such was the case for Ms. Guillot, whose husband and father both worked for Avondale Industries, a company that produced asbestos-contaminated products for use onboard Navy vessels.



Avondale argued that they are immune from liability for her malignant mesothelioma because the materials that they produced were created to the specifications of the U.S. government, and that they are therefore protected. They filed a motion for summary judgment to have her case dismissed, essentially saying that they had no responsibility to warn of asbestos’ dangers to their employees’ families because they were producing what the government ordered from them.



Judge Points to Duty to Warn in Mesothelioma Case



In his ruling in the mesothelioma lawsuit, District Judge Carl J. Barbier of the United States District Court of Louisiana pointed to Avondale Industries’ duty to warn of dangers, regardless of whether they were fulfilling a government request or not. He wrote in part, “There is simply nothing in the record indicating that Avondale was prevented from adopting the safety measures that Plaintiff claims would have prevented her from contracting mesothelioma. At best, Avondale demonstrates that the federal government required Avondale to use asbestos when building ships.”

### Former Tile Worker with Mesothelioma Agrees to Undisclosed Settlement

Though the headlines are filled with reports of multi-million-dollar awards for malignant mesothelioma victims, in many instances these cases never end up in the hands of a jury. Instead, the victims agree to settle with the companies they’ve accused of causing their terminal illness. That’s exactly what happened when Robert Lord, a former tile worker, sued Vanderbilt Minerals LLC and accused them of hiding the presence of asbestos in their industrial talc.



Agreement Reached While Jury Was Deliberating Over Mesothelioma Verdict



Though some mesothelioma settlements are agreed upon shortly after the victim’s attorney presents the details of their case to the asbestos company’s lawyers, there are many times that a trial will begin and all evidence is presented before a settlement is reached. In Mr. Lord’s case, both sides had already presented testimony and the Polk County, Florida jury was deliberating when the two sides came together and agreed to an undisclosed amount of compensation for the victim.



The mesothelioma victim had worked for Florida Tile Company throughout the 1970s and had accused Vanderbilt Minerals of knowing that its industrial talc was contaminated with asbestos and of hiding that fact. According to Mr. Lord’s representative, “For many years, companies have denied their products contained asbestos, when in fact they did, exposing the hard- working people like Mr. Lord to asbestos with no warning.”



Asbestos Company Points Mesothelioma Blame Elsewhere



Instead of denying that its talc product contained asbestos, Vanderbilt Minerals pointed the blame for Mr. Lord’s mesothelioma on other potential exposures, including having serviced his own vehicles and breathing in asbestos dust while replacing Bendix automotive brakes. They also pointed to his years of smoking cigarettes. But Mr. Lord’s attorneys were able to present scientific evidence showing that though smoking makes it more likely that a person exposed to asbestos will be diagnosed with mesothelioma, there is no causal link.



Though the amount of the settlement remains confidential, it is known that the mesothelioma victim had initially sought over $11 million in compensation for the damages that he and his family were suffering as a result of the company's negligence.







Asbestos in Armstrong Linoleum Tiles: What Homeowners Should Know





https://youtube.com/shorts/PdZ73lXUPY8




Many older homes still contain flooring materials that can pose hidden health risks—especially Armstrong linoleum tiles that may contain asbestos. In this video, David Foster explores why these tiles were so widely used, how time and wear can make them dangerous, and what every homeowner should know before tackling a renovation.Even if undisturbed, aging asbestos-containing tiles can release harmful fibers as they degrade. Learn how to identify potential risks, understand the dangers of asbestos exposure, and take the right steps to protect your health and your home.

### $8 Million Awarded to Mesothelioma Victim’s Family

A Louisiana jury recently responded to emotional testimony from the family of a mesothelioma victim who died at the age of 70 years old. Elray Lege and his wife Brenda originally filed a personal injury lawsuit against Union Carbide Corporation and ten other defendants in 2016, shortly after he was diagnosed with the rare and fatal form of cancer. Less than one year later Mr. Lege died of his illness. In October of 2019 his case against the single remaining defendant in the case was heard, and the jury awarded his widow and four children a total of $8 million in compensation for their loss.



Work as Insulator Linked to Diagnosis of Mesothelioma



According to testimony submitted at trial, Mr. Lege had spent the years between 1970 and 1978 working for Texaco and other companies. His responsibilities as an insulator exposed him to a variety of products that contained asbestos, a carcinogenic material that has been identified as the cause of malignant mesothelioma.



Though several of the named defendants settled or had the mesothelioma claims against them dismissed, his lawsuit against Birla Carbon, the successor to Columbian Chemicals, remained and was heard in October of 2019, two years after his death.



Company Accused of Failure to Warn of Mesothelioma Risk



The mesothelioma lawsuit against Birla focused on the time that Mr. Lege had worked as an insulator for Cajun Insulation at the Cities Services/Columbian Chemical facility in Lake Charles, Louisiana. Though he’d spent only two months working at the facility, his deposition testimony revealed that former co-workers had told him that the old insulation that he’d been tasked with removing contained asbestos.



Upon learning of the company’s negligence in protecting Mr. Lege, the jury took just four hours to hold them 51% responsible for his mesothelioma and to award a total of $4 million in survival damages and $4 million in wrongful death damages to his widow and four surviving children.

### Ohio Court of Appeals Reverses Judgment Against Mesothelioma Widow

When Barbara Maddy pursued her mesothelioma lawsuit against Honeywell International Inc., she knew that she was in for a battle. The corporate giant is frequently blamed for asbestos-related deaths, and its team of attorneys works hard to convince judges and juries of their innocence. Despite a disappointing initial result, Mrs. Maddy recently won an appeal and another chance for justice to be served.



Mesothelioma Case Initially Dismissed by Judge



In Mrs. Maddy’s case, she initially filed a wrongful death claim against the company in 2017, accusing them of negligence, product defect, “willful and wanton conduct” and more in the mesothelioma death of her husband James.  Her claim detailed his years of working as a supervisor at a bus company and relied extensively on deposition testimony from one of her husband’s co-workers. That co-worker confirmed that Mr. Maddy had been exposed to asbestos from brakes manufactured by a company owned by Honeywell.



Honeywell argued that the co-worker’s testimony was not competent to provide evidence of Mr. Maddy’s mesothelioma having been caused by exposure to their product. The judge dismissed the case and then denied a motion for relief from that judgment. Mrs. Maddy pursued justice by filing a consolidated appeal, arguing that the trial court had abused its discretion. There were several legal submissions back and forth leading to the current decision in which the Court of Appeals of Ohio agreed with the widow, allowing the case to move forward.



Appeals Court Rules that Specific Evidence Supporting Mesothelioma Claim Exists



In its conclusion, the appeals court pointed out that the motion for summary judgment in the original mesothelioma claim was not well founded. They cited a lack of exposure to asbestos anywhere other than from Mr. Maddy’s time working at the bus company and the sufficiency and specificity of the co-worker’s testimony in their decision, and wrote that “Based on the record before us, we find that genuine issues of material fact exist as to these elements of appellant’s claims.”  They decided that the trial court had been wrong in granting Honeywell’s motion to dismiss, and that the case be returned to court, with Mrs. Maddy being reimbursed for her appeal costs.

### Court Upholds Mesothelioma Widow’s $32.7 Million Jury Verdict

When a North Carolina jury heard the details of Franklin Finch’s painful death from malignant mesothelioma, they provided his widow with compensation in the amount of $32.7 million. The defendant in the case appealed the amount, claiming that it was unreasonably high due to inflammatory arguments made at trial. Last month a three-judge panel rejected that argument, ordering the company to pay the widow what she was owed.



Jury Hears of Painful Mesothelioma Death



Ann Finch’s husband died of mesothelioma after having worked in a Firestone tire curing room for over twenty years. During that time he was regularly exposed to asbestos-contaminated insulation fibers, and after his 2016 diagnosis with the rare and fatal form of cancer he endured significant physical pain and agonizing treatments, including having organs and cancerous tissue removed.



Franklin Finch died of malignant mesothelioma one year after his diagnosis. Following his death his widow Ann filed personal injury lawsuits against several companies that had exposed him to asbestos. With one exception, the companies settled her claims out of court: Covil Corporation, which had supplied Firestone’s steam pipe insulation, insisted on going to trial. They lost and were ordered to pay the widow $32.7 million.



Judges Disagree with Mesothelioma Defendant’s Arguments



Though Covil Corporation argued that the damages awarded by the jury had been speculative and that a comparative analysis of the verdict size should have been one, a three-judge panel from the 4th Circuit disagreed. They noted that there had been no fault in the instructions given to the jury or in the rationale that the judge at trial had used in not reducing the verdict against the company.



The judges made particular note of the extremely painful death that Mr. Finch had suffered, writing in part, "We are struck by the lack of any inflammatory argument by Mrs. Finch's counsel, the absence of any contrary evidence on many now contested issues, and the district court's care throughout the trial and post-trial proceedings, including its thoughtful consideration of, and ultimate rationale for rejecting, Covil's attack on the size of the damages award.”

### Asbestos Companies’ Attempt to Strike Dying Man’s Deposition Denied

A diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma is always considered fatal, but some victims face death much faster than others. When Paul F. McCarthy was diagnosed with the rare form of cancer, his disease was diagnosed as extremely advanced. He acted quickly, providing a sworn deposition and filing a mesothelioma claim against those he knew to be responsible. Following his death his case continued, but the asbestos companies filed a motion for summary judgment. They argued against his testimony being admissible, in part because they hadn’t been able to cross examine him. Upon review of the case, the Superior Court in the State of Rhode Island denied the companies’ motion, ruling that the case could move forward.



Mesothelioma Victim’s Death Came Six Months After Diagnosis



Mr. McCarthy was diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma on May 23rd and died six months later. On July 1st he provided a sworn statement under oath, explaining his exposure during his time in the Navy, working onboard the U.S.S. Glennon. Navy. Days after his deposition he filed his mesothelioma lawsuit.



Mr. McCarthy’s statement gave tremendous detail about the facts regarding his asbestos exposure and subsequent mesothelioma. He described having served in the Navy from June of 1951 through June of 1955, and having worked on the U.S.S. Glennon as a member of the deck force, painting, scraping paint and washing equipment, and then later becoming quartermaster and metalsmith, helping in the boiler room. He described cleaning dust out of vents, and recalled that when the ships’ guns were fired, asbestos dust would come loose and rain down upon all on board.



Asbestos Companies Deny Material Fact in Mesothelioma Lawsuit



In response, the asbestos companies named in Mr. McCarthy’s claim argued that the product identification that he'd provided was insufficient for the case to move forward, and also that his testimony was provided in an improper way. Mr. McCarthy’s attorneys indicated that his testimony should be allowed under an exception specifically provided for those “under belief of impending death.”



The judges in the case agreed with the mesothelioma victim on all counts. They held that his declaration was made based in good faith on his personal knowledge and with significant documentation and historical documents to support them. They also agreed that though he'd made the statements out of keeping with standard practice and order, he had done so in anticipation of his imminent death. The case was permitted to move forward so that justice could be served.

### Appeals Court Permits Pittsburgh High School Teacher’s Mesothelioma Lawsuit

When a person is suspected of having malignant mesothelioma, one of the first questions they're asked is whether they've ever been exposed to asbestos. The answer to that question will be important later on, if they choose to pursue legal action against those responsible for their exposure. For one Pennsylvania high school teacher, the answer to that question was clear, but because she was exposed in a governmental building there were concerns that she would not be able to pursue justice. Fortunately, a Pennsylvania appeals court decided that there were exceptions to governmental immunity in her case, and it was allowed to proceed.



Exception to Governmental Immunity in Mesothelioma Case Against School Board



Marianne M. Geier died of malignant mesothelioma, but not before she and her family filed a negligence lawsuit against the Pittsburgh Board of Public Education. Geier had been a high school math teacher for the School District of Pittsburgh and had taught at South High School during the 1958-to-1959 school year. When she was diagnosed with mesothelioma, her thoughts immediately turned to the asbestos dust that had come from pipe coverings on the steam and water pipes in the school.



In her mesothelioma lawsuit, Mrs. Geier described asbestos dust in the classrooms, stairways and halls of the school, but the Board of Education moved for summary judgment against her claim, insisting that it had governmental immunity under Pennsylvania’s Tort Claims Act and that there were no exceptions that applied to her case.



Court Rules that Exceptions to Governmental Immunity Exist in Mesothelioma Lawsuit



The Court of Appeals denied the Pittsburgh Board of Education’s assertions, indicating that even public employers had to provide reasonably safe conditions of employment and that the asbestos exposure that Mrs. Geier described fell outside of the duty to maintain safe structures.



The court wrote in part, “Given the evidence here of PBE’s use of asbestos-containing products in its maintenance of its steam and water pipe coverings, and repair of its floors, ceilings and walls, and the decedent’s contraction of mesothelioma, we conclude plaintiffs sufficiently alleged a dangerous condition of PBE’s utility service facilities and real property substantially contributed to decedent’s mesothelioma and ultimate death.”

### Maryland Mesothelioma Victims Benefit from Court of Appeals Ruling

A 2018 decision by the Maryland Court of Appeals gave one man’s family the right to continue its legal journey for justice, while also clearing the path for other mesothelioma victims whose exposure to asbestos occurred decades ago.



Mesothelioma Victim’s Case Involved Asbestos Exposure in Early 1970



The Maryland mesothelioma case reviewed by the Court of Appeals involved James F. Piper. Mr. Piper died from malignant pleural mesothelioma in 2016, years after he worked as a steamfitter for Potomac Electric Power Company (PEPCO). During a two-month period in 1970, Mr. Piper was assigned to work on steam piping that was insulated with asbestos-contaminated materials.



Mr. Piper was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma in 2013, and he tracked his illness to that exposure. When he filed a personal injury lawsuit against Westinghouse, the company that made the steam generator, he learned that a law had been passed by the Maryland General Assembly in 1970 that specifically prohibited victims from filing such cases for injuries that had occurred more than 20 years earlier. 



Court Determines that Mesothelioma Cases Are Not Covered by 1970 Law



While a lower court granted Westinghouse summary judgment in the case based on the 1970 law, Mr. Piper’s family pursued the case in an appeal arguing that it was the date of exposure that was applicable rather than the date of diagnosis. The family maintained that since Mr. Piper’s exposure occurred prior to the law’s passage it did not apply to his injury.



Upon review of the case, the Court of Appeals agreed with the family and disagreed with two lower courts' previous rulings. They based their decision on the use of two specific words in the law — “arise” and “accrue” — which they believed were used for the purpose of allowing long latency diseases like mesothelioma to move forward. They wrote in part, “Asbestos fibers lie dormant in the human body over a period of time. The fibers may eventually manifest into cancer, asbestosis, or mesothelioma. The party exposed to asbestos becomes aware of the injury only after he or she starts to experience symptoms of a latent disease, which usually occur may years after exposure. We have determined, therefore, with respect to the development of asbestos-related diseases, ‘bodily injury occurs when asbestos is inhaled and retained in the lungs.'”



Their decision allowed the family to move forward, and will do the same for other, similarly situated mesothelioma victims.

### New Jersey Man Awarded $37 Million in Mesothelioma Lawsuit Against Johnson & Johnson

Over the course of the last fifty years, mesothelioma victims have been awarded significant amounts by juries hearing of asbestos companies’ negligence and wrongdoing, but few have garnered the amount of attention that the verdicts against consumer giant Johnson & Johnson have. One notable example involves the case of a 46-year-old man, Stephen Lanzo, who was diagnosed with the rare form of cancer after three decades of using the company’s iconic baby powder product and their “Shower to Shower” powder. A New Jersey jury awarded Mr. Lanzo $30 million in compensatory damages related to his asbestos-related disease, and also ordered the company to provide Mr. Lanzo’s wife with $7 million.



Mesothelioma Risk Posed by Popular Talc-Based Powders



Though most American consumers are only familiar with malignant mesothelioma from television advertising, Mr. Lanzo’s case appeared in national headlines, in large part due to the popularity of the products accused of causing his illness. Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder has long been one of America’s most trusted and recognizable brands, and the notion that using it could lead to a fatal form of cancer shocked people’s sensibilities.



Making the issue even more alarming, the sick man’s attorneys presented evidence to the jury that Johnson & Johnson had been aware of the mesothelioma risk posed by asbestos in their product, and that instead of taking action to protect consumers, the company worked to suppress the information.



Mesothelioma and Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Lead to J&J Pulling Talc-Based Products



Mr. Lanzo’s mesothelioma lawsuit was decided in 2018, and since then there have been tens of thousands of claims filed against Johnson & Johnson accusing the company of negligently causing both mesothelioma and ovarian cancer. The company has settled some of these cases, won some, and lost some.



Though they continue to defend themselves against mesothelioma claims, the company has also made the notable decision to stop selling talc-based powder products in North America.

### $1 Million Mesothelioma Verdict Awarded to Widow of Paper Mill Worker

It took many years, but 12 years after Henry Barabin was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma and six years after his death from the rare and fatal form of cancer, his widow was awarded over $1 million dollars by a Washington state-based federal jury.



The mesothelioma lawsuit surrounded Mr. Barabin’s years of working at the Crown Zellerbach Paper Mill where he worked in a variety of roles between 1968 and 2001. During that time he was frequently exposed to asbestos-containing dryer fabrics used in paper drying machines. These materials were manufactured by Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc, and Mrs. Barabin filed a product liability claim against the company for its design defects, failure to warn, and negligence. A jury had previously decided the case in favor of the Barabins, but the company appealed the verdict and it was remanded for a new trial.











Long Legal Journey Ends in Victory for Mesothelioma Widow



The lawsuit wound its way through the courts for years, and many of the depositions and trial evidence were conducted and gathered while Mr. Barabin was still undergoing surgery, chemotherapy and numerous other interventions against his mesothelioma. Scapa Dryer Fabrics continued to battle long after many other asbestos companies had agreed to settle, arguing against allowing expert witness testimony in the case. The case finally ended up in the U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington, Seattle, Washington under U.S. District Court Judge James L. Robart.



Under the supervision of Judge Robart, a jury was empaneled and over several days they heard testimony alleging that Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. had been negligent in its product design and failure to warn, and that their negligence had led to Mr. Barabin’s death. The jury agreed and assessed the company $750,000 in economic damages for medical expenses, loss of income and loss of household services, as well as an additional $306,000 in non-economic damages.

### Louisiana Court Upholds Mesothelioma Victim’s Right to be Heard

To mesothelioma victim Robert Schindler, his personal injury claim against Dravo Basic Materials Company should have been an open and shut case. His only exposure to asbestos had been decades before his diagnosis, when he’d worked in the engine room of one of their vessels in Louisiana.  But shortly after he filed his lawsuit the company moved to have his claim dismissed. They argued that because they hadn’t done business in the state in years, the case should not have been filed in a Louisiana courtroom. Fortunately, the judge hearing the case disagreed and Mr. Schindler’s case was able to move forward.







Company Relied on Technicalities When Defending Against Mesothelioma Claims



Faced with the accusation that asbestos in the engine room of their vessel had caused Mr. Schindler’s mesothelioma, Dravo Basic Materials Company chose a legal technicality as the basis of their defense. Rather than attempting to argue against their culpability, they filed a motion to dismiss the case for lack of personal jurisdiction.



The asbestos exposure that Mr. Schindler suffered occurred in 1973, when the vessel DRAVO was dredging for clamshells on Lake Pontchartrain in Louisiana.  It is typical for forty to fifty years to pass between the time that a person is exposed to asbestos and when their mesothelioma symptoms begin to appear. Dravo Basic Materials motion attempted to use that span of time against the victim, pointing out that they had not done business in Louisiana for years and that the case should be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction.



Five Decades for Mesothelioma Symptoms to Appear



While Mr. Schindler filed his mesothelioma lawsuit against Dravo shortly after his diagnosis, it had been nearly fifty years since the time of his exposure to asbestos on their ship. The company’s attorney argued that because they had not done business in the state of Louisiana for more than two decades and was neither organized under Louisiana law nor did it have its principal place of business there, they should not be subject to the state’s laws.



After reviewing the details of the case, the Louisiana court disagreed, writing that like Mr. Schindler, the state “has an interest in a claim that allegedly resulted from exposure to asbestos while a person was working with a company that was performing shell dredging within the state.” Mr. Schindler’s case was able to move forward so that he could pursue justice against the company.

### Over $25 Million Awarded in J&J Baby Powder Mesothelioma Lawsuit

Johnson & Johnson recently announced that they would discontinue their sales of their iconic baby powder product in North America following multiple accusations that the product contained asbestos-contaminated talc had led to malignant mesothelioma and ovarian cancer diagnoses in tens of thousands of consumers. One of those claims came from 68-year-old Joanne Anderson, whose personal injury lawsuit against the company led to a jury awarding her $21.7 million in compensatory damages and an additional $4 million in punitive damages.







Thirty-Year Use of Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder Blamed for Malignant Mesothelioma



Mrs. Anderson’s mesothelioma lawsuit was heard by a jury in the Los Angeles-area city of West Covin. They listened to testimony about her lifelong use of the product on herself and on her children, as well as evidence that the two bottles of the product that she purchased and used each month contained talc that was contaminated with asbestos. 



In assessing who was to blame for the woman’s mesothelioma diagnosis, the jury held the consumer giant responsible for 67% of her damaged, assigning the other defendants in the case with the remaining 33%. Though all of the defendants asserted at the time that there was no evidence that the company’s talc had contained the product, Mrs. Anderson’s attorneys presented internal company documents that led the jury to believe otherwise. 



Series of Mesothelioma Lawsuit Losses Preceded Company Decision to Stop Baby Powder Sales



Similar decisions in subsequent cases clearly impacted the company’s decision to stop its North American sales. In the Anderson case the verdict form indicated that the jury had determined that the company had acted with "malice, oppression or fraud." In their decision-making process the jury had inquired as to whether they could punish the company by requiring that they place a warning label on their products. When told that they could not correct the company’s conduct in that way, they chose to impose the punitive damages.

### New York Judge Denies Avon’s Motion to Move Mesothelioma Case to Wisconsin

A mesothelioma lawsuit surrounding a Wisconsin man who died of malignant mesothelioma will be heard in the New York court systems despite the objections of Avon Products, the defendant. Though the company attempted to have the case moved, the family of Scott M. Dohse made a compelling argument for why it made more sense for the claim to be heard in New York’s Asbestos Litigation courts, and Judge Manuel J. Mendez agreed.







Avon Talc Powder Products Blamed for Man’s Mesothelioma Death



According to evidence submitted in the case, Scott Dohse was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma in 2015 after lifelong exposure to Avon’s talc-based products. His mother had been an Avon representative throughout his childhood, and both she and his sister used several of the company’s products. His sister even remembered having chased him around the house with powder, and as Mr. Dohse got older, he too used Avon’s products. 



Mr. Dohse died a few short months after his mesothelioma diagnosis, and his family filed a negligence claim against the cosmetic manufacturer, blaming them for having exposed him to the asbestos that caused his illness and subsequent death. In response, Avon filed a motion to have the Court dismiss the complaint on the grounds of forum non conveniens, which is a legal term that translates to asking the court to acknowledge that another court is more appropriate and to send the case to Wisconsin, where Mr. Dohse was treated for his disease and where the witnesses reside.



Court Sides with Mesothelioma Victim’s Family



In response to Avon’s motion, Mr. Dohse’s family justified their decision to file their mesothelioma lawsuit in New York. They cited the fact that the company’s corporate headquarters are in New York and that their witnesses had already been deposed or could be deposed in New York. They also pointed out that the specific talc powders cited in the case could have been manufactured in New York and that Avon has a research and development lab located in Suffern, New York. Finally, they pointed to actions taken by Avon to counter negative publicity about asbestos in their products, including publishing ads in the New York Times in New York City.



After careful consideration, Judge Manuel Mendez agreed with Mr. Dohse’s family, writing that “the balance of factors weighing in defendant’s favor is not strong enough to overcome its heavy burden on a motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens and to overturn the plaintiffs’ choice of forum.” The case will continue in New York.

### West Virginia Mesothelioma Victims Reach Rapid Settlement Agreement in Face of COVID-19

COVID-19 is impacting mesothelioma victims in countless ways, and one of the most surprising happened last week in a 4,000-square-foot events venue in Wheeling, West Virginia, the Highlands Event Center. The location hosted attorneys representing hundreds of asbestos plaintiffs, attorneys for asbestos companies, and a West Virginia Supreme Court judge. Working together, the group successfully reached an undisclosed private settlement and avoided exposing a large number of jurors and litigants to the risk of exposure to the novel coronavirus.







Mass Litigation Asbestos Case Resolved



The trial in the mass litigation asbestos case involved people diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, asbestosis and other asbestos-related diseases, and it was scheduled to take place in Ohio County Circuit Court next week. The grouping of lawsuits consisted of 38 separate cases with more than 100 defendants named, and some of which included more than 140 defendants. 



In anticipation of companies sending attorneys and witnesses to testify, as well as having mesothelioma and asbestos-related lung cancer victims, their attorneys and families, and jurors present, Judge Ronald Wilson had urged the parties to come together to reach a settlement. He warned that otherwise the weeks-long case would have brought all those people and court personnel together needlessly, all having to practice social distancing, wearing masks and practicing other COVID-19 precautions.



Mesothelioma Settlements Achieved in Less Than Two Days



Despite the high number of defendants and litigants in the mesothelioma and lung cancer lawsuits, the negotiations between defense and plaintiffs’ attorneys and Judge Wilson were successfully resolved in less than two days. Ohio County Clerk of Courts Brenda Miller said that Judge Wilson had urged the parties to come together, warning that otherwise a trial would have begun today despite concerns over COVID-19.



“Those are usually very long trials, and they can go for weeks.,” she said. “Judge Wilson usually has about three of those cases a year. It’s great it was settled before we had to bring in a jury,” she said. “With these types of settlements, we try to settle as much as possible with the defendants to limit the number of people who are going to trial.” 

### Missouri Appeals Court Denies J&J’s Appeal in $2.11 Billion Talcum Powder Asbestos Case

In June of 2018, a Missouri jury awarded $4.7 billion to 22 women who’d claimed that asbestos in Johnson & Johnson’s talc products had caused their ovarian cancer. Though an appellate court later cut the damages award to $2.11 billion, the consumer giant filed an appeal asking that the jury’s findings be reviewed and overturned. This week the Eastern District Court of Appeals denied the company’s request, as well as their request that the case be transferred to the Missouri Supreme Court.







Appellate Court’s Denial of Asbestos Appeal Sets Up State Supreme Court Battle



Johnson & Johnson’s talc-based products have been cited in multiple mesothelioma and ovarian cancer lawsuits, and the Missouri verdict represents the largest damages amount awarded to victims. In recent months the company has made the remarkable decision to discontinue selling the iconic product in North America.



According to legal experts, the court’s denial of Johnson & Johnson’s appeal will lead to the company directly petitioning the Missouri Supreme Court to hear its appeal on the asbestos-related cancer case.  Since the original jury verdict, the lead plaintiff, Gail Ingham, died of her ovarian cancer. The remaining plaintiffs are cancer survivors, their spouses, and the heirs of women who have died of the disease.



Court Indicates that Decisions In Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder Lawsuit Were Proper



The original appeal of the 2018 asbestos-related cancer case had questioned decisions made by the trial judge about allowing multiple plaintiffs, including some from outside the state of Missouri, to proceed in one trial. It also argued that scientific experts’ in the case should not have been permitted to testify and that the punitive damages ratio was inappropriate. 



In its response, the three-judge panel pointed to evidence that Johnson & Johnson had knowingly sold asbestos-contaminated products to consumers as support for the jury’s decision.

### $7.55 Million Awarded to New England Power Plant Worker with Mesothelioma

New England Insulation was in the business of selling, distributing, installing and removing asbestos insulation material until the early 1970s, stopping only when it became public knowledge that their product caused malignant mesothelioma. But a victim of their carcinogenic material presented evidence in court that the company had known of asbestos’ dangers years before and had taken no action to protect employees or others exposed to it. In response, a Boston jury ordered the company to pay $7.55 million dollars to a power plant worker and his wife who were victims of their negligence.







New England Insulation Workers Exposed Others to Asbestos Fibers



The mesothelioma lawsuit revolved around Gerald Sylvestre, a former power plant worker responsible for the management of various equipment within the plant. His suit claimed that while doing his job he was in close proximity to employees of New England Insulation who were at the plant doing asbestos insulation work. The removal of old asbestos insulation and installation of new replacement installation generated an enormous amount of asbestos dust and airborne fibers that Mr. Sylvestre blamed for his diagnosis with the rare and fatal form of cancer.



At the time of the trial, Mr. Sylvestre had been aware of his mesothelioma for two years. He and his wife pursued compensation for the expenses for numerous surgeries he had already undergone as well as for ongoing chemotherapy treatments. They also sought damages for the loss of enjoyment of life as he had known it. Prior to his diagnosis he and his wife had enjoyed traveling and numerous athletic pursuits, including snowshoeing, but his illness left him unable to continue even going on daily walks.



Mesothelioma Victim Speaks of Suffering Caused By Asbestos



Speaking of the jury’s verdict, Mr. Sylvestre attributed their decision to the proof his team presented of NEI’s long-standing knowledge of the dangers of asbestos and of the harm that he and his wife had suffered. He added, “No one should have to go through this illness, and I particularly hate the suffering it has caused my family, especially because it could have been prevented. My wife and I were very happy with the verdict, but what meant the most was that we got to tell our story and the jury heard it and responded as they did.”

### Citing “Malice, Oppression and Fraud,” Jury Awards Mesothelioma Victim $22 Million

After hearing that two talc companies had taken specific action to mislead about asbestos in their product, a California jury awarded a 72-year-old mesothelioma victim $22 million in compensatory and punitive damages. The defendants in the case were Vanderbilt Minerals and Imerys Talc America.







Mesothelioma Victim’s Asbestos Exposure Came from Mixing Paints



According to testimony provided in the case, it was not initially clear where Richard Booker’s malignant mesothelioma had come from. His family could not immediately identify a source of his asbestos exposure: He had worked for years as a paint mixer, and that occupation has not traditionally been associated with asbestos-related diseases.



However, a further investigation into the ingredients that he worked with revealed that the talc provided by both Vanderbilt Minerals and Imerys Talc America were contaminated with asbestos. 



Companies Tried to Evade Liability for Mesothelioma by Hiding Evidence



The considerable compensation awarded to Mr. Booker’s family is a reflection of the jury’s response to what they learned during the six-week trial. They were shown shocking evidence that both companies had taken overt actions to hide the carcinogen’s presence in their products.



The jury heard and saw a great deal of evidence in the mesothelioma trial, including internal documents from Imerys indicating that they had tried to minimize evidence of asbestos in their product by reblending it. They also learned that tissue samples taken from Mr. Booker’s lungs were infused with the same ingredients as both companies’ talc products.



Measuring Responsibility for Mesothelioma



After finding both companies guilty, the jury assigned 60% of the liability for Mr. Booker’s mesothelioma to Vanderbilt and 40% to Imerys. They ordered both companies to pay the family a total of $17.5 million in compensatory damages for economic and emotional damages.



Facing the possibility of a significant punitive damages award, Vanderbilt agreed to an undisclosed settlement before the jury had the opportunity to arrive at an amount. Imerys was assessed an additional $4.6 million in punitive damages. 

### 2016 Decision Changed Everything for California Mesothelioma Victims with Second-Hand Asbestos Exposure

In late 2016, the California State Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision whose impact continues to be felt by mesothelioma victims today. Responding to evidence that family members could contract the rare and fatal form of cancer after exposure to asbestos carried home on their loved ones’ clothing, the court ruled that these victims have a right to sue their family members’ employers for their failure to provide appropriate protection or warnings.



Asbestos Carried Home on Hair, Skin and Clothes Can Cause Mesothelioma



Malignant mesothelioma is an incurable form of cancer that is caused by exposure to asbestos. Though its victims are most commonly people who have worked directly with the carcinogenic material, there have also been many afflicted with the disease after family members unwittingly carried the fibers into their homes.



Though asbestos companies argued that they had no responsibility to the family members of their employees, the California State Supreme Court was unanimous in its decision. They ruled in favor of those who had been sickened by the asbestos brought into their homes, with Justice Goodwin Liu writing, “Employers have a duty to take reasonable care.” 



Children of Asbestos Workers Face Mesothelioma After Sitting on Their Fathers’ Laps



Prior to the decision being handed down, the court heard numerous accounts of those who had been diagnosed with mesothelioma after spending their childhoods greeting their fathers after each workday, with loving hugs being blamed for their eventual terminal diagnoses. Many told of climbing onto their father’s laps and coming away covered with asbestos dust, which they inhaled. Similar stories were told of wives and mothers sickened after shaking out asbestos laden work clothes in laundry rooms.



The California State Supreme Court was careful in its wording, limiting the right to sue to those who lived in a worker’s household. It ruled against the same capability for neighbors, store clerks and others who may have randomly or intermittently encountered asbestos workers, noting, “To be sure there are other persons who may have reason to believe they were exposed to significant quantities of asbestos by repeatedly spending time in an enclosed space with an asbestos worker – for example a regular carpool companion,” but noting that their ruling was limited to “an identifiable category of people … most likely to have suffered a legitimate, compensable harm.”

### Minnesota Man with Mesothelioma Sues Asbestos Company That Employed Both Him and His Father

When Gene R. Backe was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, there was no question in his mind as to the source of his illness. Not only had he worked for an asbestos manufacturer and supplier, but prior to his own workplace exposure his father had worked there too. He filed a lawsuit against the company, asserting claims for negligence, strict liability, and breach of warranty, but the company filed a motion to dismiss the case because it no longer did business in Minnesota, where the lawsuit was filed. The Court of Appeals of Minnesota recently denied the company’s motion.







Mesothelioma Victim Suffered Second-Hand Exposure and More



In his mesothelioma claim against Conwed Corporation, Mr. Backe described having grown up in Cloquet, Minnesota, where the company operated a mill that manufactured asbestos-containing ceiling tile from 1959 to 1974. His father had worked at the mill from 1939 to 1975, and he himself began working there in 1963. 



In recollecting his childhood years and the years thereafter, Mr. Back described his father coming home from work “covered in asbestos fiber” which he said contaminated his childhood home. He also remembered having visited his father at work, where he witnessed employees dumping burlap bags of asbestos into large vats, and later performing the same work himself.



Asbestos Company Attempts to Deny Liability Through Jurisdictional Technicality



When Mr. Backe filed suit against Conwed, he submitted evidence that in 1959 an internal company memorandum referenced “hazards associated with the production of our [products] and also mentioned “lung disease caused by inhaling asbestos dust.” He accused them of failing to warn of its dangers or to provide appropriate protective equipment. The company responded by arguing that it had not conducted business in Minnesota since 1985 and that the case should be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction. The trial court denied their motion and the court of appeals agreed. The case will proceed to trial in the state of Minnesota. 

### Pennsylvania Court Rules Against Board of Public Education in Teacher’s Mesothelioma Lawsuit

Mesothelioma victims whose asbestos exposure came after having worked for a government agency often face legal challenges based on the theory of governmental immunity. But the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania denied that defense in a notable case involving a teacher who died of mesothelioma. The three-judge panel unanimously decided that the Pittsburgh School District’s Board of Education could be held liable for her illness and death.



Math Teacher Died of Malignant Mesothelioma



Fifty-five years after math teacher Marianne M. Geier was exposed to asbestos at South High School in Pittsburgh, she was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, and died shortly thereafter. Before her death she provided deposition testimony about the 1958-1959 school year and the steam pipe that was located in her classroom.



After her mesothelioma diagnosis, Mrs. Geier remembered that the pipe in her classroom was covered with asbestos insulation. She also recalled that there were frequently bags of asbestos in the hallway outside of her room in order for repairs to be made to the pipe. She recalled the dust being heavy while repairs were being made, and also remembered seeing asbestos dust coating other common areas within the school building.



Mesothelioma Lawsuit Named Asbestos Companies and Government Agency



In addition to filing claims against dozens of asbestos companies responsible for the carcinogen that caused her mesothelioma, Mrs. Geier named the school district in her claim. In response, the Board of Education filed a motion for summary judgment on the basis of government immunity.



In their review of the case, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania referred to a 2013 ruling by the state’s supreme court which had established that a government agency could be held legally responsible in certain exceptional situations. In the math teacher’s case, one of those exceptions was clearly present: There was a dangerous condition on her employer’s property that substantially contributed to her illness and death. The court’s ruling read in part, “We hold that a public employer has a common-law duty to create reasonably safe conditions of employment, including the maintaining of safe structures.”

### $40 Million Mesothelioma Verdict Ruled Appropriate and Reasonable

When Paula Knecht’s husband Larry died of malignant mesothelioma at the age of 71, she was understandably heartbroken. The two had been together for 52 years and his death had been particularly painful and traumatic. When the widow’s wrongful death lawsuit against Ford Motor Company resulted in her being awarded over $40 million in compensatory damages and an additional $1 million in punitive damages, the verdict felt appropriate. But Ford did not agree, and filed an appeal asking whether the verdict was “inconsistent” and “shocked the conscience.”  Upon reviewing the case, the Superior Court of Delaware decided that neither was true, and left the verdict intact.



16 Days of Testimony Made Liability and Depth of Loss Clear



The mesothelioma lawsuit against Ford and other defendants made painfully clear both the role that Ford played in exposing Mr. Knecht to asbestos and the depth of his family’s loss. Mr. Knecht had been an automobile mechanic who owned and operated his own automotive shop. His family blamed asbestos-contaminated brakes and clutches for his illness. 



The jury also heard details of how painful Mr. Knecht’s mesothelioma had been, and how Mrs. Knecht suffered during both his illness and after he died. After 16 days of testimony the jury awarded Mrs. Knecht $40.625 million in compensatory damages and assigned 20% of the responsibility to Ford. Ford’s appeal argued against the generosity of the verdict and asked the Superior Court to examine whether legal argument had inflamed jury passions to the point that the award was unreasonable.



Court Finds Jury Was Careful in Its Considerations



Citing Delaware law as well as the emotional testimony provided by Mrs. Knecht about her loss, the court determined that the award was “not so grossly excessive so as to shock the Court’s sense of justice” and that there was no reason to believe that the jury had been anything but careful  in reviewing the facts, applying the law and awarding damages.  



In their closing remarks, the judges wrote, “The jury did not disregard the evidence in assessing compensatory damages, but rather considered the evidence of the unendurable pain and suffering Mr. Knecht sustained, the considerable value of his life to his loved ones, especially Mrs. Knecht, and the terrible emotional distress suffered by Mrs. Knecht. 

### Oil Refinery Employee Awarded $25 Million Following Mesothelioma Diagnosis

Testicular malignant mesothelioma is an exceedingly rare form of an already-rare disease. Malignant mesothelioma strikes roughly 3,000 victims in the United States each year, and the form that impacts the lining of the testicular cavity occurs in less than 5 percent of cases. But when 85-year-old Housang Sabetian was diagnosed with the disease, it was quickly determined that his illness was caused by his exposure to asbestos when he was employed by the National Iranian Oil Company between 1960 and 1979. He and his wife filed a mesothelioma lawsuit against the companies that built the oil refineries in Iran during those years, and a Los Angeles Superior Court jury found in the couple's favor, awarding them $25 million in damages.



Multiple Defendants Found Guilty in Mesothelioma Lawsuit



In filing their mesothelioma lawsuit, the Sabetians named Fluor Enterprises Inc., Middle East Fluor, and other companies as defendants. They accused them of contributory and comparative negligence, and presented evidence showing that though the company had taken strict safety precautions when building refineries in the United States, they failed to do the same in their construction work in Iran.



The Sabetian family asserted that the defendant companies’ failure to act responsibly while building oil refineries in Iran had resulted in him having been exposed to the carcinogen and developing malignant mesothelioma. The jury agreed and handed down the significant verdict, providing compensation to both the victim and his wife.



$25 Million Mesothelioma Verdict Split Between Victim and his Wife



The Los Angeles jury was asked to determine how much compensation should be given to the mesothelioma victim and his wife, and also to allocate blame among the defendants. They determined that Fluor Enterprises, Inc. was responsible for 60% of the blame and that their Middle East Fluor subsidiary was responsible for 20%. Mr. Sabetian’s employer, National Iranian Oil Company, was not a defendant in the case but was identified as being 20% responsible for his illness.



The damages that the asbestos companies are required to pay to Mr. and Mrs. Sabetian in compensation for his testicular mesothelioma totaled $6 million in past damages to him and $3 million in past damages to her, and another $8 million in future damages for him and $8 million in future damages for her.

### NJ Supreme Court Reaches Landmark Decision in Mesothelioma Lawsuit

For years, Arthur Whelan (and after his death, his family) waged a legal battle to hold those responsible for his mesothelioma accountable. At issue was whether the original manufacturers of equipment could be found liable for harm caused by asbestos in replacement parts that their equipment needed in order to operate. After his claim was dismissed and that decision was overturned in his favor by the Appellate Division, Whelan’s case was appealed to the state’s Supreme Court by the defendants. The superior court’s decision not only cleared the way for Whelan’s case to proceed: It also set precedent for similar claims in the future.



Mesothelioma Lawsuit Hinged on Failure to Warn of Replacement Part Asbestos Risk 



Arthur Whelan’s mesothelioma lawsuit was filed against dozens of companies that manufactured or distributed products integrated with asbestos-containing components. His claim was based on their failure to warn of the risks posed by the asbestos he was exposed to from either asbestos-containing components or asbestos-containing replacement components in their equipment, all of which were manufactured or supplied by third parties.



The equipment manufacturers argued that even though their products were designed to be used with the asbestos-contaminated replacement parts and could not operate without them, they had no duty to warn and should not be held liable for Whelan’s mesothelioma. The trial court agreed with the manufacturers and granted them summary judgment, dismissing the case. The Appellate Division overturned this order, saying that the defendants not only had a duty to warn, but also that they could be held strictly liable for damages resulting from their failure to do so.



Supreme Court of New Jersey Affirms Appellate Division’s Mesothelioma Decision



In handing down their decision in Whelan’s mesothelioma claim, the high court affirmed that no distinction should be made between the aggregation of all component parts and the replacement components necessary for their continued operation. 



The court’s decision read in part, “The purpose of warnings is to allow a worker, like Whelan, the opportunity to take the necessary precautions, such as donning protective gear, to protect against the inhalation of deadly asbestos fibers or dust. The manufacturer or distributor of the integrated product is best situated to provide those warnings. Here, defendants provided no warnings at all.”

### Wrongful Death Mesothelioma Case Filed Against Con Edison

In February of this year, the family of Joseph Mauro, Jr. got one of the first pieces of good news since having lost their loved one to malignant pleural mesothelioma in April of 2018. Mr. Mauro had been diagnosed with the rare and fatal form of cancer after years of operating a backhoe on worksites controlled by Con Edison, and they were suing the company for negligence over his exposure to asbestos. Despite the company filing a motion for summary judgment to have the case dismissed, New York Asbestos Litigation Judge Manuel J. Mendez ruled against the electric company and allowed the case to proceed to a jury.







Backhoe Operator’s Mesothelioma Blamed on Asbestos at Worksite



According to deposition testimony provided by the mesothelioma victim prior to his death, he was exposed to asbestos at various Consolidated Edison of New York job sites between 1970 and 1976, when he worked for a subcontractor called Michael J. Torpey, Inc. It was his job to perform excavation and backhoe work.



Mr. Mauro’s case asserted that his mesothelioma came from asbestos-containing conduits and ducts at the sites, and that Con Ed chose the pipes that were used.  He also indicated that he was exposed to asbestos from asbestos cement pipes that were delivered by Con Ed to the job sites.



Con Ed Claims Mesothelioma Liability Falls on Victim’s Employer



In their argument against being held responsible for Mr. Mauro’s mesothelioma, attorneys from Con Edison argued that there was no way to prove that the products used at their sites were contaminated with asbestos and that Mr. Mauro’s testimony was hearsay. They also argued that protecting Mr. Mauro was the responsibility of his employer and that his complaint was more appropriately filed as a workers’ compensation claim.



Countering those arguments, Mr. Mauro’s mesothelioma attorney proved that Con Ed was in control of the sites at all times and had been responsible for selecting and delivering the asbestos-contaminated products to the sites. They also submitted documentary evidence showing that Con Ed had purchased and stored asbestos-contaminated pipes like those described by Mr. Mauro in his deposition. The judge agreed that the mesothelioma victim had shown “facts and conditions from which defendant’s liability may be reasonably inferred,” which is the legal standard by which a motion for summary judgment must be denied. The case will proceed. 

### Court of Appeals Rules Part-Time Job Doesn’t Eliminate Electrical Supply Company’s Mesothelioma Liability

In February of 2017, Vickie Williams died of malignant mesothelioma while in the midst of a lawsuit charging Schneider Electric USA with responsibility for her death. Schneider had previously been known as Square D Company, and had been her father’s employer for several years, as well as her part-time employer for a few months when she was a teen. Though her claim blamed her illness on asbestos brought into her childhood home on her father’s work clothes, the company insisted that her part-time job forced her case into a workers’ compensation claim. The trial court denied the company’s motion for summary judgment and the court of appeals agreed.







Second-Hand Exposure from Father Blamed for Woman’s Mesothelioma



The malignant mesothelioma that claimed Ms. Williams’ life at the age of 55 is a rare, fatal form of cancer that is caused by exposure to asbestos. Ms. Williams’ lawsuit, which was filed as an unverified complaint in May of 2016, rested entirely on her second-hand exposure to the asbestos dust that was carried into her childhood home on her father’s work clothes, hair and skin. 



When the company moved to have the case dismissed, they hoped that they would be able to leverage her part-time job to force the case into workers’ compensation court, where the compensation levels would likely be significantly lower than if the case was heard as a negligence case by a jury. 



Court Finds No Evidence That Mesothelioma Was Caused by Part-Time Employment



While most mesothelioma defendants argue that there is no asbestos in their environment, Square D found itself in the unusual legal position of arguing that their workplace was contaminated enough with the carcinogen that it sickened Ms. Williams during the three months that she worked there as a teen.



In reviewing their position, the court found that their argument did not hold up, and that though she had acknowledged having worked for the company in her deposition testimony, there had been no evidence submitted that referenced asbestos. This lack of judicial admission failed to reach the level of anything but anticipated testimony, and therefore could not be used against her. The asbestos company’s motion for summary judgment was denied and the case has moved on to either be heard by a jury or for settlement negotiations.

### Blood Plasma Equipment Company Ordered to Pay $70 Million in Mesothelioma Damages

There are many occupations that have rightly been associated with malignant mesothelioma, the rare and fatal form of cancer caused by exposure to asbestos. Though it is widely understood that people who worked in high heat settings and in construction or insulation were at risk because of the high levels of asbestos used in their workplace, hearing of a mesothelioma victim in a seemingly safe environment like a lab is shocking. After hearing of such a case, a Miami, Florida jury awarded a former lab technician and his wife $70 million in damages.



Asbestos-Contaminated Laboratory Equipment Blamed for Mesothelioma



The case involved 71-year-old Charles E. Thornton, a former lab technician diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma after years of working for Nabi Pharmaceuticals. When the man was first diagnosed, he immediately began investigating the equipment that he had worked with over the years, and upon filing product liability claims against those whose equipment was contaminated with asbestos, all but GEA Mechanical agreed to settlements.



Rather than provide the elderly man compensation for the pain and suffering caused by their equipment, GEA Mechanical elected to defend themselves against the charge of responsibility for his malignant mesothelioma. After hearing testimony over a two-week period, the jury concluded that asbestos in the company’s blood plasma separating equipment was at fault for Thornton’s illness and awarded the man and his wife $70 million in compensation.



Company’s Failure to Warn Led to Tragic Mesothelioma Diagnosis



Though victims of malignant mesothelioma who win at trial are often awarded significant compensatory awards, the amount that the jury provided to Mr. Thornton and his wife was particularly eye-opening. 



Court observers believe that the jury responded to the overwhelming level of grief expressed by Mr. Thornton and his loved ones. He and his wife reportedly had been happily married for over forty years and the two detailed the suffering that both were enduring.

### Convenience Store Clerk Who Suffered Second Hand Asbestos Exposure Permitted to Proceed with Mesothelioma Lawsuit

In 2019, Jesse Hernandez was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma. After realizing that he’d been exposed to asbestos as a young man, when he’d worked at a family grocery store and had come into daily contact with plant workers from the nearby Allied Chemical plant, he filed a negligence lawsuit against Honeywell International as successor to the company. Though the corporate giant filed a motion for summary judgment against his lawsuit, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana denied that motion, allowing the case to proceed. It will be heard by a jury at some point in the future.







Workers’ Asbestos-Contaminated Clothing Blamed For Deli Clerk’s Mesothelioma



Malignant mesothelioma is a rare and fatal form of cancer that is caused by exposure to asbestos. According to Mr. Hernandez’ lawsuit, he was exposed to the carcinogenic material at an early age, when his work at a family grocery store and deli put him in close and constant proximity with plant employees came into the deli for lunch and convenience items each day. 



Mr. Hernandez’s lawsuit cites asbestos contaminating those workers’ clothing, as well as the need to clean asbestos dust off of the surfaces that they’d touched during their lunch break, as the source of his contact with asbestos. He argues that the company owed a duty of care to him because his exposure was both foreseeable and preventable.



Honeywell Argues Against Responsibility for Third Party Mesothelioma



When Honeywell International, Inc. filed their motion to dismiss the complaint, their argument was simple: they claimed that they did not have a duty to protect third parties such as store clerks from asbestos that might be carried into a store on their employees’ clothing, skin or hair. They maintained that the case goes far beyond the duty owed to household members, and argued that contact with store clerks was “too incidental, sporadic, or transitory to impose a duty of care.”



In denying the motion, the court found it entirely “plausible that Honeywell owed a duty to Mr. Hernandez,” saying that the company’s assertion that their duty of care was limited to an employee’s household members was “erroneous.”

### Mesothelioma Fears Drive Philadelphia Teachers to File Lawsuit

Ever since it became clear that exposure to asbestos can lead to malignant mesothelioma, victims of that and other asbestos-related diseases have filed personal injury lawsuits against product companies that have negligently exposed them to the toxic material. In most cases they are unable to sue their employers, but that has not stopped the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers from proactively pursuing legal action against the Philadelphia School District, accusing them of failing to protect over 13,000 employees as well as 125,000 students from the effects of the carcinogen within its school buildings.



Lawsuit Preceded by Asbestos Discovery and Mesothelioma Diagnosis



Over the last year or so, the School District of Philadelphia has seen building after building shut down by discovery of asbestos, the material responsible for malignant mesothelioma. The mineral was widely used in the construction of public buildings in the first half of the twentieth century and is commonly found in school buildings. As a result, school districts have a legal responsibility to inspect in place asbestos to ensure that it is not friable, and if it presents a danger to have it removed immediately. This is a task that the city’s school district has not been able to fulfill.



The district’s unwillingness or inability to remove the dangerous carcinogen has led to numerous problems, and most recently to a long-time Philadelphia teacher being diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma. Speaking of the problem, union president Jerry Jordan said, “From start to finish, the district’s egregious missteps have shown a disregard for the health of my members and our students. Not only is the process by which the district deals with known hazards extraordinarily flawed, but also, from the start, they are missing even identifying extremely hazardous conditions.”



Parents Are Just As Concerned About Mesothelioma As Teachers Are



In addition to the members of the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers being concerned about the risk of malignant mesothelioma, parents have expressed concern about the future health of their children. They view the closure of six schools over the last several months as an indication that their children were in significant danger.



Speaking on the issue of mesothelioma and other health concerns, one parent said, “Education is important, but I’m sorry that my children’s health is more important. You know, the School District threatened us with truancy and they want to report us to [the Department of Human Services], but who do we report them to for neglecting our children? That’s neglect.”



The union’s lawsuit is seeking both periodic and systematic inspections of school buildings, as well as the ability to access all asbestos reports and lab reports. They also are demanding that the school district create a court-approved plan to protect students and staff from asbestos.

### Bank Manager Diagnosed With Mesothelioma Prevails Against Contractor

Imagine working your way up the corporate ladder as a management trainee, only to find that 40 years later you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma as a result of a contractor’s carelessness. That is exactly what happened to Patrick Rossello, an employee at Union Trust bank who was assigned to work in a branch that was undergoing construction. A jury decided Mr. Rossello was deserving of over $2 million in compensation, and the Court of Special Appeals in Maryland agreed.



Bank Building Construction Project Leads to Mesothelioma for Employee



Malignant mesothelioma is most frequently thought of as an occupational disease, but afflicted employees are more likely to be those working hands-on with asbestos-contaminated products rather than behind a desk. Yet sitting at a desk is exactly how Mr. Rossello was exposed to the carcinogenic material. The bank branch that he was assigned to during his days as a trainee was undergoing construction to add fourth and fifth floors, and the desk where he sat in 1974 was on the incomplete fourth floor. 



The contractor assigned to do the work, Lloyd E. Mitchell, Inc. (LEM) was aware of the need to protect people from the asbestos dust that could cause mesothelioma, but only provided Mr. Rossello with plastic sheeting around his work area. The dust was heavy enough that Mr. Rossello remembered that his suits were always covered with dust and his desk needed to be wiped down constantly.



Jury Awards Former Bank Trainee $8 Million



After hearing testimony in the mesothelioma lawsuit, a jury agreed with Mr. Rossello that the contractor had been negligent in their duty of care and awarded him over $8 million in damages. This was reduced to slightly over $2 million in light of other judgments and settlements that Mr. Rossello received, but LEM appealed the award on technical grounds, arguing that they had wanted to submit more testimony into evidence that had been improperly barred by the judge.



In reviewing the case, the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland disagreed with the asbestos company’s objections and allowed the mesothelioma victim to receive the $2 million judgment. 

### California Supreme Court Decision Considered Landmark Victory for Mesothelioma Victims

After more than three years of litigation, the California state Supreme Court has decided in favor of a now-deceased mesothelioma victim. Though Frank C. Hart did not live to see his victory, legal experts say it will have long-lasting positive impacts for other victims of exposure to asbestos.







Asbestos Company’s Defeat in Mesothelioma Lawsuit Rests on Witness Memory of Invoice



The original 2017 lawsuit filed by Mr. Hart accused pipe supply company Keenan Properties of providing the asbestos-contaminated pipes that he blamed for his mesothelioma diagnosis. Though the construction worker and his wife settled with other defendants in the suit, Keenan defended themselves in court and the jury ordered them to pay $1.6 million to the victim.



Though one of the witnesses in the mesothelioma lawsuit had testified to having seen Keenan Properties’ logo on the invoices for the contaminated pipes, the company’s attorneys had argued that because the invoices had been destroyed, the testimony was hearsay and should not have been allowed. They appealed the $1.6 million damages and the verdict itself, and the appellate court agreed, but the state Supreme Court reversed that judgment saying that the name and logo was circumstantial evidence rather than hearsay.



State Supreme Court Rules That Observation of Company Name Is Sufficient for Mesothelioma Decision



The distinction that the California Supreme Court made in Mr. Hart’s between hearsay evidence and circumstantial evidence is likely to prove helpful to future mesothelioma plaintiffs. Justice Carol A. Corrigan wrote that the foreman’s “observations were circumstantial evidence of Keenan’s identity as the source of the pipes.” She further wrote, “Taken together, the evidence was relevant to prove the disputed link between Keenan and the pipes, regardless of the content the words on the invoice might otherwise have asserted.”



The state Supreme Court’s decision in the mesothelioma case was unanimous and reinstated the $1.6 million jury award. It will now return to the appeals court regarding the apportionment of the damages based upon settlements with other defendants.

### Court Upholds Jury’s $6 Million Mesothelioma Verdict

In April of 2017, Patrick O’Reilly passed away from malignant mesothelioma after over forty years of working as a union pipefitter in Chicago. After his death, his daughter, Sharon Daniels, filed a lawsuit on behalf of his estate, seeking compensation for the damages that he had suffered.  By the time of trial, only gasket and packing manufacturer John Crane, Inc. remained as a defendant. The Cook County, Illinois jury decided against the company and awarded the estate over $6 million with a $1.1375 million setoff based on prior settlement amounts. Though Crane appealed the decision, claiming multiple trial court errors, the Illinois appellate court affirmed the decision.



Judges Address Multiple Objections to Jury’s Mesothelioma Decision



In filing for a motion for a new trial in the mesothelioma case, the asbestos manufacturer cited four specific errors that they maintained were made in the initial trial. They argued that the medical expert that testified in the case had used a cumulative dose explanation that should not have been allowed; that jury instructions regarding cause were inaccurate; that information had not been provided to the jury regarding settlements with other defendants; and that the court had not properly analyzed some of the settlement agreements before deciding that they had been resolved in good faith.



In their consideration of the appeal, the Illinois Appellate Court, First District reviewed each of these arguments carefully. They found that the expert witness had not testified that Mr. O’Reilly had experienced a cumulative dose, but rather that the greater an individual’s historical exposure, the more likely that they would develop mesothelioma. They found that the jury instructions had been appropriate, that John Crane had forfeited the provision of settlement information to the jury at court by only requesting that one of the settled defendants be on the form at trial, and that there was “nothing in the record to suggest that the trial court did not review the settlement agreements as required.”

### Asbestos Defendants’ Appeal of Mesothelioma Verdict Shut Down by Appeals Court, Leads to Larger Award

When mesothelioma victims pursue litigation against the companies whose asbestos-contaminated products made them sick, they face a long, challenging journey. Even when they win in court, they are often warned that the defendants are likely to push back against jury verdicts and file appeals, arguing that they should not be held liable despite being found guilty of negligence. That is exactly what happened to a widower in a New York court recently, with the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York determining that he was actually owed more than the original amount awarded.







Talcum Powder Accused of Causing Woman’s Mesothelioma



The original case revolved around the late Florence Nemeth, who died of peritoneal mesothelioma. She and her family accused the manufacturers of Desert Flower Talcum Powder and the distributor of raw talc that was used in the product. The woman’s testimony detailed her daily use of the product between 1960 and 1971, using a powder puff to apply it all over her body in an unventilated bathroom that measured 5’x6’. 



Scientists who testified in her case tested the product, including an antique bottle, and concluded that the amount of asbestos that she would have inhaled each day was “several orders of magnitude higher than that found in ambient air.” Upon hearing this and other supporting evidence the jury awarded the surviving family $15 million which was later reduced and apportioned to a principal amount of $2,933,750 in damages from the talc company.



Talc Company Argues Against Causation, Calls verdict “Irrational”



The talc company filed a motion for the appellate court to review the jury’s decision in the mesothelioma case, arguing that the evidence did not support the verdict and that the verdict was irrational. They also argued that the victim’s attorney had unfairly influenced the jury in their closing argument.



The appellate court’s review upheld the original decision based on causation and dismissed the talc companies’ arguments against the plaintiff’s attorney’s comments. They also supported the plaintiff’s request for recalculation of the judgment, leading to it being increased to $3.3 million from the talc company and supplier.

### New York Jury Awards Mesothelioma Victim $8 Million From Negligent Contractor

A Rochester, New York jury spent several days listening to testimony in a lawsuit filed by a 73-year-old mesothelioma victim, and after they’d heard it all they awarded him $8 million dollars. Wayne Meissner had been a civil engineer working for Eastman Kodak in the 1970s when he was exposed to asbestos by a construction company doing work at Kodak Park. Evidence showed that the contractor, Ridge Construction, was aware of the dangers posed by asbestos but provided him with no protection or warning.







County’s Largest Mesothelioma Award in Twenty Years



The $8 million jury award was among the largest mesothelioma awards in Monroe County, New York in the last twenty years, but that will do little to make up for the tragedy being faced by Mr. Meissner, his wife, and their extended family. A representative for Meissner said, “He wishes we weren’t in his life. This was totally, 100 percent preventable.”



According to evidence presented at trial, Mr. Meissner’s mesothelioma is a result of asbestos exposure that began in the late 1960s, when he was working as a civil engineer. He was assigned to monitor and inspect an asbestos spray job being performed by Ridge Construction, the company assigned to spray the fireproofing material near his workplace.



Mesothelioma Lawsuit Victory Turned on Company’s Internal Documents



As has been true in many mesothelioma lawsuits, Mr. Meissner’s victory over Ridge Construction was cemented by the presentation of internal documents that proved that the company’s president had been aware of the dangers posed by asbestos. The family’s spokesperson said, “We found ancient documents that go back to the 60s that show unequivocally that they knew asbestos was dangerous, specifically the way it was used in and around Mr. Meissner.”



In handing down the $8 million dollar verdict, the jury determined that Ridge Construction was 80% at fault for Mr. Meissner’s mesothelioma, with other defendants assigned the balance of liability. 

### Philadelphia School District Agrees to $850,000 Mesothelioma Settlement With Longtime Teacher

A long-time public school teacher has agree to a settlement with the Philadelphia School District over her recent diagnosis with malignant mesothelioma. Though the state of Pennsylvania has a legal gap of $250,000-to-$500,000 on personal injury claims brought against a government entity, the district responded quickly, overcoming obstacles to make the settlement happen.







Students, Parents, Colleagues Shocked by Mesothelioma Diagnosis



The city of Philadelphia is a big town with a small-town mentality, so when long-time special education teacher Lea DiRusso was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, the news was received like a punch to the gut. Things got even worse when the public realized that her illness was caused by the very same asbestos contamination that has shut down so many school buildings in the last several months. 



In response to the diagnosis and before a mesothelioma lawsuit could even be filed, the Philadelphia School District agreed to an $850,000 settlement with the 51-year-old, whose illness has forced her to retire seven years earlier than she had planned on, and has already put her through aggressive surgery and three rounds of chemotherapy.



Teacher’s Mesothelioma Demonstrates District’s Asbestos Failures



In 1986, concerns over asbestos in school buildings and the risk of malignant mesothelioma led to a law requiring school districts to inspect their buildings for the carcinogenic material and fix or remove any of it that has been damaged and poses a health hazard. When Ms. DiRusso was diagnosed it became obvious that the school district had failed in its duty.



The settlement that the school district reached with Ms. DiRusso provides a significant amount more than Pennsylvania’s $500,000 cap for personal injury cases against government agencies, but in exchange she was asked to resign from her job, to skip a one-year medical sabbatical, and to waive her right to future district health benefits.  



Commenting on her agreement, she said, “While I appreciate them going above the cap, it’s barely going to sustain me for medical coverage and things that I need for the remainder of my life, which is being cut short. There’s no windfall here.”

### Johnson & Johnson Halts Talcum Powder Sales, Continues to Deny Asbestos Risks

Johnson & Johnson announced on May 19, 2020 that it would discontinue the sale of talcum powder product Baby Powder in the U.S. and Canada. This move comes as lawsuits over asbestos-related illnesses in regular, long-term users of talc products continue to grow. In spite of those claims, and studies linking asbestos in talc to cancer, the company continues to deny there are any health risks associated with their products.



Asbestos in Talc, What J & J Knew



Talc is a natural mineral that is mined to make a range of products, including for use in cosmetics. It is ground into a fine powder and used in products like Baby Powder to absorb moisture and reduce friction on skin. As a natural mineral, it often has other minerals in it, including asbestos.



Asbestos is a well-known human carcinogen, linked to a number of cancers but most strongly to mesothelioma. Investigations conducted by journalists uncovered information that Johnson & Johnson knew about asbestos in its products but failed to warn consumers of the risks.



These investigations found that the company knew as early as 1971 that both raw talc and finished products contained trace amounts of asbestos. Some independent studies have also found asbestos in these products.



A recent study, published in February 2020, found an important link between talc and mesothelioma. The researchers looked at 75 people diagnosed with mesothelioma whose only known exposure to asbestos was likely through the use of cosmetic talc products. They concluded that talcum powder played a role in all of these cases of mesothelioma.



Johnson & Johnson Discontinues Baby Powder



Baby powder has long been a popular product, both for use on infants and with adults. More than 16,000 lawsuits over ovarian cancer and mesothelioma have been filed against Johnson & Johnson and other companies that make talcum powder. The plaintiffs claim that asbestos found in the products caused their cancers, and there is evidence from studies to back up those claims.



The company announced it would stop selling the product, but it still denies that any of these claims are valid or that Baby Powder is unsafe. It instead cites the declining interest in the product for discontinuing its sale in the U.S. and Canada.



The lawsuits over cases of ovarian cancer and mesothelioma related to talcum powder use have seen mixed results. Some juries have found in favor of the victims, finding for instance that a group of 22 women in a St. Louis trial were owed $4.7 billion from Johnson & Johnson. Other cases have been appealed and overturned of found in favor of the company.



Johnson & Johnson’s main source of revenue has shifted over the years. It is no longer household hygiene products like Baby Powder that bring in the most money. Pharmaceuticals now make up the company’s biggest revenue stream, and it is this, and declining interest in Baby Powder that it cites for stopping the product’s sale.



For advocates of consumers and victims of asbestos exposure, this may seem like a flimsy reason. They celebrate, however, the fact that this potentially harmful product will no longer be on store shelves. If you used a talcum powder product for many years and later developed mesothelioma or another type of cancer, you may have a case. Contact an asbestos or mesothelioma lawyer in your area to find out what to do next to seek justice and compensation.

### Coronavirus Delays EPA Advisory Panel on Asbestos Risks

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) postponed a meeting of a science advisory panel that was supposed to happen on April 27. The panel is set to critique the EPA’s draft of an analysis of the risks posed by ongoing asbestos use. Asbestos, which can cause serious illnesses, including mesothelioma, is not completely banned I the U.S. The delay comes as too many experts are unavailable due to the pandemic.



EPA Finds Unreasonable Risk in Asbestos Use



The Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC) was set to gather virtually beginning April 27 to critique the agency’s assessment of asbestos risk. The analysis also included other chemicals, like trichloroethylene.



The EPA released a report that the SACC is supposed to evaluate. That report on the risks of asbestos use concluded that its use in commercial and personal uses poses unacceptable risk levels to human health. Exposure to asbestos fibers can lead to inhalation or ingestion. The fibers can then cause damage in tissue and lead to scarring in the lungs, lung cancer, mesothelioma, or other asbestos-related diseases.  



The draft of the risk evaluation was mandated by the Toxic Substances Control Act, a law that was modified in 2019. The changes to the law, according to the EPA were designed to close loopholes and limit asbestos use even further. But critics say that nothing short of an outright ban will eliminate asbestos risks.



COVID-19 Outbreak Delays Panel Indefinitely



Because of the ongoing pandemic due to the coronavirus, the SACC critique of the EPA’s risk evaluation has been put off indefinitely. The panel was set to meet virtually, but too many members are unable to attend. The medical experts on the SACC felt that attending to the pandemic took precedence.



Public comments on the risk evaluation are currently set to be due June 2, but the EPA may put off that deadline as well. The amended law on toxic substances requires that the final analysis on asbestos risk be ready by June, but the EPA announced that it may end up behind that deadline.



Legacy Asbestos Products Continue to Pose Public Health Risk



The EPA’s current risk assessment highlights legacy asbestos products as the biggest danger to human health. These are products that were made and installed 30 years ago, before the Toxic Substances Control Act was signed into law.



These products, according to the EPA, pose an unreasonable risk to workers involved in using them but also to residents and bystanders. Some of the products specifically mentioned in the report include:



Brake blocks with asbestosAftermarket brake liningsFriction products used in the automotive industryAsbestos diaphragms used in chloralkali productionAsbestos gaskets used in many commercial industries



While the EPA did not find a risk to the general public, there are plenty of people who have no choice but to work with or around these asbestos materials. The risk posed to their health is high.



As the pandemic continues, it is currently unknown when the evaluation of asbestos risk will continue. Proponents of a full ban hope to get back to it soon in order to push for laws and amendments to the current law that will truly end the risk of asbestos exposure.

### COVID-19 and Mesothelioma Patients

The coronavirus pandemic is affecting everyone, but in different ways. Among those most at risk for a serious, life-threatening infection are cancer patients. This outbreak impacts sensitive patients, like those with mesothelioma, and also their loved ones and caregivers. Know the facts about this illness, how it may put you at risk if you have mesothelioma, and what you need to do about it.



Why Cancer Patients Are in an At-Risk Group



Most people who develop COVID-19 will have mild symptoms and recover quickly. Certain groups, however, are at-risk for developing the illness more easily and having more severe, possibly life-threatening symptoms.



One group at-risk is cancer patients. COVID-19 has the potential to cause shortness of breath, difficulty breathing, and pneumonia. Anyone with a lung condition or lung damage is at risk of having more serious respiratory symptoms. If you have pleural mesothelioma, you already struggle with breathing and the coronavirus can make it worse.



If you have been treated for mesothelioma, you may also have a compromised immune system. Certain treatments, including chemotherapy, weaken the immune system and make you more vulnerable to getting infected.



Protective Steps for Mesothelioma Patients



Because the risks are so serious, it is important for mesothelioma and other cancer patients to take extra care to avoid getting infected with coronavirus. Here are some steps you and your caregivers and family members should be taking:



Stay home unless it is absolutely necessary. All residents living with you should stay home as much as possible also.If anyone needs to leave the home, for groceries for instance, stay at least six feet from other people. Wash your hands and disinfect anything you bring back into the home upon returning.Wash your hands often throughout the day, even if staying at home. Use soap and wash for a full 20 seconds.Avoid touching your face, even with good hand washing.Disinfect surfaces in the home you touch often, like door handles.If you need to talk to your doctor, call or use a telehealth service first. Only go into your doctor’s office or a hospital if recommended or if it is an emergency.If you think you have symptoms of COVID-19, call your doctor right away to find out what to do next. The symptoms, including coughing and shortness of breath, are similar to the symptoms of mesothelioma.



If You Are Due for Cancer Treatment



Another issue for cancer patients during the pandemic is that there may be barriers to getting scheduled treatments and other care. The healthcare system is being stressed by the outbreak, and many appointments and procedures considered non-essential are being postponed. If you are scheduled for chemotherapy or another treatment, call your doctor to discuss your options.



Coping with Social Distancing



During this time of required social distancing, it is easy to become isolated and lonely. Keep in touch with friends and family in safe ways, such as through video conferencing and phone calls to avoid loneliness and depression. Any kind of human contact is beneficial now.



If you have a loved one with mesothelioma stuck in a treatment facility, assisted living, or a nursing home, you may find you cannot visit them. This can be difficult, but again, any way you can stay in touch will help. Write letters, text and call, and even wave and smile through a window if it’s possible.



The coronavirus pandemic will pass, but not before negatively affecting so many people. If you or someone you care about is living with mesothelioma, take extra precautions and talk to your doctor about treatments.

### Largest Study of Women and Mesothelioma Complete

The incidence of mesothelioma in men is significantly higher than in women. This is likely because workplace exposure to asbestos decades ago is the leading cause of this type of cancer. However, women do get mesothelioma, and studying the cancer in this population is important. They may have different underlying causes, varying symptoms, and even respond differently to treatment.



Now, the largest study ever conducted with women and mesothelioma has been completed and is shining light on the cancer in this group. The details will help improve prevention, diagnosis, and treatment for women.



The Study



Researchers at Duke University Medical Center investigated the pathology, diagnosis, survival rates, asbestos exposure, biological markers, and demographics of over 300 women with mesothelioma. The study was published in December 2019 in the American Journal of Surgical Pathology. The paper publishes the final results of an ongoing study, the first and most extensive of its kind exploring this rare type of cancer in women.



Household Contact with Asbestos



Asbestos, the mineral now highly regulated but once used in a number of industries, is the leading cause of mesothelioma. The fibers of the mineral, when inhaled or ingested, cause tissue damage that can trigger cancer growth in the body’s mesothelium, a thin, double tissue layer. Most commonly, the cancer develops around the lungs because of accidental inhalation of asbestos fibers.



The recent study found that more than half of the women in the study did have asbestos exposure in their pasts. While most men with mesothelioma were exposed on the job, women were most often exposed in the home. Often, the exposure resulted from contact with a family member or their clothing. If a man in the household worked around asbestos, he may have carried the fibers home and caused exposure in family members.



Workplace Exposure and Markers



The study found that some women experienced exposure on the job, just like most men. Those who did had similar markers of the disease as men with mesothelioma. Among the 354 cases studied, 40 included women with industrial jobs that caused exposure.



Markers for mesothelioma and asbestos exposure include pleural plaques, signs of damage on the pleural tissue around the lungs, as well as certain proteins in the blood. Most of the women who showed markers for the disease had pleural mesothelioma.



Peritoneal Mesothelioma by Age



One unexpected finding in the study was a significant age difference between women diagnosed with peritoneal versus pleural mesothelioma. Peritoneal mesothelioma is the second most common type of this cancer and forms in the tissue around abdominal organs.



The average age of diagnosis for pleural mesothelioma among these women was 62.1 years. For peritoneal it was nearly a decade earlier at 52.8 years. The women with peritoneal mesothelioma also had better life expectancies and survival times.



This study is important because women have long been left out of research for mesothelioma. Because it is more common in men, studies have focused on them and on workplace exposure. This and further study of women with mesothelioma should help doctors and other researchers come up with better treatments to help female patients live longer.

### Philadelphia Teachers Fight Back Against Asbestos in Buildings

The Philadelphia Federation of Teachers (PFT) recently brought a lawsuit against the city’s school district. The teachers allege that the district has failed to protect staff and teachers, numbering approximately 13,000 and 125,000, from asbestos in old buildings. Several schools have been closed in recent months due to damaged asbestos that has the potential to cause exposure and resulting illnesses, like mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis.



Aging School Buildings and Asbestos



Many of Philadelphia’s school buildings are older and contain asbestos, which is not unusual. At one time nearly all building across the country were constructed with some type of asbestos. It was used in insulation, cement and wall board, flooring tiles, roofing and siding materials, and fireproofing materials.



Asbestos in older buildings is not harmful if it is well maintained. It is only when asbestos materials break down or are disturbed by work or accidents that they become dangerous. Then the fibers of the asbestos mineral can become airborne, contaminating the area and leading to exposure through inhalation or ingestion.



In older buildings containing asbestos these materials must be maintained regularly. Over time they can decay and fall apart, causing the risk of exposure.



Philadelphia Closes Schools for Safety Reasons



Between October of 2019 and January of 2020 the district shut down six buildings because of damaged asbestos materials. Inspectors in the district found these spots that had either been missed on previous inspections or were never repaired.



Federal laws require that school buildings be tested for asbestos in the air after big jobs involving asbestos materials. Districts must also inspect buildings every three years, regardless of any work being done. The Philadelphia district has claimed to have complied with these regulations.



Teachers Sue as Final Straw



The current legal filing by the PFT comes after the district closed yet another building, McClure Elementary School. This was after the second of two air tests came back positive for asbestos. The district had previously told teachers and parents that the building was safe, and these results only came after teachers demanded the additional air test.



The PFT filed its asbestos lawsuit with the state’s Common Pleas Court. It seeks to get immediate relief from the issues and requests that a judge take action right away to force the district to meet the union’s demands. These include regular and thorough testing of all buildings, a court-approved plan for protecting teachers and students, and that all testing and inspection be done with the PFT involved directly in the process.



The teachers and parents of the Philadelphia schools have been complaining about asbestos safety for months. Some parents have even chosen to keep their children home and have been threatened with Truancy Court by the district. The lawsuit represents a strong step taken by teachers, with the support of parents, to demand safety from asbestos for staff and children.

### Investigative Report Finds FDA Bowed to Industry Pressures over Asbestos in Talc

A recent, in-depth investigation into the controversy surrounding talcum powder, asbestos, mesothelioma, and Johnson & Johnson conducted by Reuters turned up troubling information. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was found to have been deferring to the cosmetics industry for decades, letting companies like J & J regulate their own products and potential contamination with harmful asbestos.



Asbestos in Talcum Powder



Talc is a natural mineral and as such it is often found in deposits with other minerals when mined. Asbestos has been heavily regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency since the 1970s when it became clear that it causes mesothelioma, an aggressive, rare, and deadly cancer.



The small fibers of asbestos can enter airways or get into the digestive tract causing irritation and cancer. Several people, mostly women, have come forward in recent years and sued Johnson & Johnson over cases of mesothelioma developing after decades of use of talc-based products, like baby powder. Some women have also developed ovarian cancer.



FDA Defers to Industry over Asbestos in Talc



Johnson & Johnson continues to deny that asbestos is in its products. The FDA held a symposium in Washington D.C. Called the “Asbestos in Talc Symposium,” it brought together participants and experts largely from industry organizations. These were individuals and labs that had done testing for companies like Johnson & Johnson and represented them in lawsuits.



According to Reuters, the FDA turned down several people to participate, including several who had testified against Johnson & Johnson. The investigation dove deeper into the history of asbestos, talc, and the FDA and found that the government agency has been deferring to industry in this matter for nearly 50 years. The FDA continued to allow Johnson & Johnson and other companies regulate their own talc products even after many people and experts came forward to warn that talcum powder is often contaminated with asbestos.



Reuters found documentary evidence that the FDA has repeatedly refused to issue warnings to the public about the risks of using talcum powder. It has not set any safety standards for these products and has consistently downplayed the dangers and risks.



FDA Finally Conducting Independent Talcum Powder Tests



The number of lawsuits being brought against Johnson & Johnson has forced the FDA to take action. Tests released in October that demonstrated some of the baby powder samples contained asbestos prompted a voluntary recall by Johnson & Johnson. Even so the company indicated that it was with an abundance of caution and continued to deny the presence of asbestos.



Johnson & Johnson also quickly followed the FDA’s tests with their own tests of the same products. These tests showed no asbestos, but the company did admit that the results were rushed. Some testing was quickly done in a lab that had not been properly prepared for the work. This has called the results into question.



The FDA is now finally also admitting that there is no safe level of asbestos exposure. Even a trace amount in talcum powder can be harmful. This is a position other groups took years ago, including the World Health Organization.



The ongoing lawsuits over ovarian cancer, mesothelioma, and asbestos in talcum powder along with the Reuters report and other information are expected to keep pushing the FDA to do right by consumers. If you have been affected by talcum powder, contact an asbestos lawyer in your area.

### Johnson & Johnson Disputes FDA Finding of Asbestos in Talcum Powder

Johnson & Johnson recently recalled thousands of bottles of its popular baby powder after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reported finding asbestos in samples. Already facing thousands of lawsuits over mesothelioma and other types of cancer potentially triggered by talcum powder, the company is denying the FDA’s findings. A new problem has arisen, however, with evidence that Johnson & Johnson rushed its tests that found no asbestos in baby powder.



Voluntary Recall of over 33,000 Baby Powder Bottles



The lawsuits have been going on for several years, and while some victims have won their cases, Johnson & Johnson has consistently denied their products contain any asbestos or cause cancer. Just a few weeks ago, the FDA tested a batch of baby powder and found it contained contaminating asbestos. The FDA recommended that consumers immediately stop using the product.



Out of what it calls “an abundance of caution,” Johnson & Johnson responded to the FDA report by issuing a voluntary recall of a batch of baby powder made and shipped to retail outlets in 2018. The company also announced it would be working closely with the FDA to test products and determine the validity of the results that found asbestos.



Third-Party Testing Finds No Asbestos – But Results Rushed



Although Johnson & Johnson responded to the FDA by issuing a voluntary recall, it also took steps to initiate third-party testing of the same batch of product. It announced that two separate labs tested the baby powder and found no more than 0.00002 percent of asbestos.



While the news seemed good and bumped the company’s stock significantly back up, now reports indicate that the third-party results could be compromised. Johnson & Johnson was so eager to get new results that it rushed the testing.



One round of the tests was done in a lab that hadn’t been properly prepared. As a result the tests were likely contaminated by an air conditioning unit. The lab that did the testing blames the contamination on Johnson & Johnson for pushing them to get it done so quickly.



No Safe Amount of Asbestos



It may be true that the FDA samples contained asbestos and that the third-party samples did not. To truly understand if a batch of talcum powder is contaminated requires multiple tests. Any contaminating asbestos may not be uniformly distributed throughout the product.



Another issue is that no amount of asbestos is considered safe. The tiny fibers of asbestos, which may be in talcum powder products because talc is a natural mineral found with other mineral deposits, can be inhaled into the airways. There they cause damage, and the more exposure a person has, such as after years of baby powder use, the more likely that damage will cause mesothelioma or lung cancer.



There is no safe level of asbestos exposure, which means that even trace amounts found in Johnson & Johnson products can be problematic. Consumers need to be aware of the risks so they can make their own, informed decisions about using these products. If you used Johnson & Johnson talcum powder and later developed mesothelioma or other lung conditions, contact an experienced mesothelioma and asbestos lawyer for guidance.

### Benefits of Immunotherapy Match Those of Chemotherapy, New Mesothelioma Study Finds

A trial of immunotherapy drug pembrolizumab in patients with mesothelioma has had promising results. The trial shows that the benefits of the therapy equal those of standard chemotherapy, which can cause a lot of uncomfortable side effects. Researchers hope that the study will also shed light on why some patients respond better to immunotherapy than others, advancing this important type of treatment.



Pembrolizumab and Immunotherapy



Pembrolizumab is an immunotherapy drug used under the brand name Keytruda. It is currently approved to treat several types of cancer, including lung cancer, gastric cancer, cervical cancer, and esophageal cancer, often along with chemotherapy. It is used for mesothelioma in trials, where researchers hope it will prove useful for these patients.



This drug is known as a checkpoint inhibitor. It is a humanized antibody that binds to a receptor known as PD-1 on T-cells. The T-cells are cells in the immune system that attack and eliminate invading, harmful cells in the body. Cancer cells have developed to evade T-cells by expressing a protein on their surfaces called PD-L1.



PD-L1 on cancer cells binds to PD-1 on immune system T-cells. This causes the T-cells to recognize the cancer cells as harmless. Pembrolizumab binds to PD-1 so that cancer cells cannot bind there and fool the T-cells into thinking they are harmless. In some patients this has the effect of increasing immune system action against cancer cells. In other words the immunotherapy drug boosts the immune system to attack tumors.



The PROMISE-Meso Trial



The current trial, known as PROMISE-Meso, is testing the use of pembrolizumab in patients with mesothelioma. Results so far show that about four times as many patients responded to the immunotherapy than standard chemotherapy.



The bad news about these results is that the positive response to immunotherapy did not extend patients’ lives. However, the results are promising in that they demonstrate that many more patients can benefit from pembrolizumab than previously believed.



A difficulty with immunotherapy is that some patients respond to it and others do not. Why this is the case is not well understood, but studies like the PROMISE-Meso trial are helping to answer the question. And, with similar benefits to chemotherapy but with fewer side effects, pembrolizumab may be a better option for some patients.



Moving Forward with Immunotherapy



The PROMISE-Meso trial is providing important information about immunotherapy and mesothelioma. Moving forward researchers hope to get even better results by combining pembrolizumab with other types of chemotherapy drugs and trying it in patients with earlier-stage mesothelioma, which is considered much more treatable.



Researchers also hope that ongoing studies with this drug and with mesothelioma patients will give them a better understanding of who benefits. This will help oncologists provide more targeted, effective treatments for individuals.



Treatment options for patients with mesothelioma, especially in the later stages, are currently limited. Studies like this one are important for developing better, more individualized treatment that will provide patients with more hopeful results and fewer damaging side effects.

### Phase II Clinical Trial Recruiting Mesothelioma Patients for Immunotherapy

A clinical trial testing two immunotherapy drugs in the treatment of mesothelioma is still recruiting patients who want to participate. The trial, led by Dr. Arkadiusz Dudek of HealthPartners Regions Cancer Care Center in Minneapolis, Minnesota, needs 35 adults with mesothelioma. The trial is ready for phase II and will be held at several locations around the U.S. It is being sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Eli Lilly and Company.



Nivolumab and Ramucirumab



The clinical trial is testing two immunotherapy drugs used together for malignant mesothelioma: nivolumab and ramucirumab. The outcomes being measured in the study include the patient response rate to the treatment, adverse events, progression-free survival times, and overall survival. The researchers also hope to determine why some patients respond to this kind of treatment and others do not.



Nivolumab is an immunotherapy cancer drug that has already been used in treating many types of cancers. It is a PD-1 inhibitor, which means it blocks the interaction between a protein, PD-L1 on mesothelioma cancer cells, and another protein, PD-1 on immune system T-cells.



The interaction between these two proteins is used by the cancer cells to block the action of the T-cells. The immune system cells would otherwise recognize the cancer cells as problematic and move to destroy them. Nivolumab blocks the interaction so that T-cells are able to recognize cancer cells.



The idea of the current trial is to add ramucirumab to the mix to weaken and slow the growth of cancer cells so that nivolumab can be more effective. Ramucirumab blocks the development of new blood vessels, which are necessary for tumor growth. With fewer blood vessels the cancer cells cannot access the necessary oxygen and nutrients. Ramucirumab only acts on cancer cells, not healthy cells.



Who is Eligible for the Trial?



The current trial, in phase II, is recruiting patients who have been diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma who are not eligible for surgery to cure the cancer and who have already had one round of chemotherapy.



Participants must be at least 18 years old, must be prepared to undergo a biopsy guided by a CT-scan, and must meet several health requirements. Certain health conditions make participants ineligible. These include strokes or heart attacks in the past six months, major surgery in the last month, brain metastases, poorly controlled hypertension, hepatitis, cirrhosis, and others.



Clinical Trial Locations



Patients who wish to participate in this trial have the benefit of being able to choose from among several study locations:




Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.



University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland



Karmanos Cancer Center, Wayne state University, Detroit, Michigan



HealthPartners Institute Regions Cancer Care Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota




If you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma and have already had at least one round of chemotherapy, you may be eligible for this exciting clinical trial. Phase II is already under way, but the researchers still need qualified participants. Talk to your medical team about the benefits and risks of participating in clinical trials and let them know you’re interested in being a part of this one.

### White House Staff Relocated as Asbestos Discovered and Abated

Several White House staffers, including senior aides like Ivanka Trump and Larry Kudlow, have been forced to relocate from their offices due to the hazards posed by asbestos in the historic building. The $250,000-abatement project to remove the harmful materials is expected to take a few weeks. This highlights the ongoing need to recognize the presence and the risks of asbestos in older buildings and the president’s stance of current use of asbestos.



Asbestos in Older Buildings – Risks and Removal



The use of asbestos in the construction of buildings was once widespread. Construction workers were long put at risk of exposure to asbestos dust from insulation, wallboard, cements, adhesives, and may other materials. Now, people who live or work in older buildings are at risk.



Asbestos that is contained well is not much of a risk to human health. But any disruption of asbestos, through normal wear and tear, natural disasters, or maintenance work, can release harmful fibers into the air. Workers or residents in buildings with loose asbestos may inhale the fibers, which then can cause damage to internal tissues and organs, potentially leading to respiratory illnesses and cancers, particularly pleural mesothelioma.



Abatement is the process of removing asbestos and it must be done with care. If asbestos is secure and contained, abatement isn’t typically necessary. If it is going to be removed, the process requires specially trained workers with the right equipment.



The White House Project



In the White House, abatement teams are removing asbestos from the second floor of the West Wing. Several top aides as well as much of the legal team have been relocated for the duration of the project. Asbestos being removed is in the ceiling and attic spaces.



The abatement is expected to take through the end of August and to cost $250,000. A spokesperson for the U.S. General Services Administration has stated that the work is precautionary and that none of the people in the building right now are at risk of exposure.



Trump’s Controversial Position on Asbestos



Not only does the current abatement project in the White House serve as a reminder that asbestos is still all around us, it also calls to attention some of the positions Trump has taken on asbestos in the past. Long before running for president, in the 1990s, Trump stated in his book The Art of the Comeback that he believed anti-asbestos movements to be conspiracies led by the mafia. He took a stand for the safety of properly installed asbestos materials.



More recently, and as the president, Trump has continued to downplay the risks of asbestos. In 2017 the president cut back a review of asbestos and other harmful chemicals. The review had been mandated by Congress as part of the Toxic Substances Control Act. He has also appointed cabinet members, such as Scott Pruitt, briefly the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, who favor industry over protecting the public from asbestos.



Consumers and voters need to be aware that asbestos is still around, even if there are restrictions in place to make it less common. The U.S. is one of very few industrialized countries that have still not placed an outright ban on this harmful substance. The current abatement project in one of America’s most famous buildings shows just how insidious and common asbestos is.

### Disappointing Results in Ofev Mesothelioma Clinical Trial

Immunotherapies, treatments that harness the immune system to fight cancer cells, hold a lot of promise for all types of cancer and even treatment for mesothelioma, a difficult type of cancer. Some treatments have been successful in some patients, while others have fallen short. One immunotherapy drug that held great promise for mesothelioma patients has unfortunately recently failed in clinical trials.



Ofev and Immunotherapy



Ofev is the brand name for an immunotherapy drug known as nintedanib. Developed by Boehringer Ingelheim, nintedanib is currently used to manage idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis associated with non-small-cell lung cancer and for some cases of lung cancer.



This drug works by targeting growth factor receptors, which are part of the process of the development of pulmonary fibrosis, scarring in the lungs. For treating cancer, Ofev may help by slowing the formation of new blood vessels that carry nutrients and oxygen to cancer cells. Without these blood vessels tumor growth slows and may even stop or result in cell death. Unlike chemotherapy, this kind of immunotherapy drug is specific and targets cancer cells, not healthy cells.



The Mesothelioma Clinical Trial – Hopes and Failures



Ofev has shown some promise in managing lung cancers, which gave researchers and patients hope that it could also treat mesothelioma. Early trials were promising. The results with lung cancer were successful enough that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted orphan drug status for Ovef, allowing it to be used for some mesothelioma patients even without final approval.



In the second phase of the clinical trial to use Ofev for mesothelioma patients, results were positive. Patients who received Ofev along with chemotherapy had a survival time of 18.3 months compared to 114.2 months for patients who only received chemotherapy. The progression-free survival times were 9.4 months and 4.7 months, respectively.



While these results indicated Ofev with chemotherapy could extend a mesothelioma patient’s life, the next round of the trial proved disappointing. The most recent results showed know benefits. A group of 458 patients received cisplatin chemotherapy and pemetrexed, an immunotherapy drug. Some got a placebo as well, while others received Ofev.



The overall survival time was 16.1 months for patients who received the placebo. It was just 14.4 months for those who received Ofev. In terms of symptoms and side effects the Ofev group faired only slightly better. Unfortunately, due to these results the study was halted.



More Results with Ofev Expected



While the phase III results for Ofev disappointed patients and researchers, other trials are ongoing and provide hope. A clinical trial being conducted at Wayne State University is about to complete phase II and results are expected soon. The trial is using Ofev alone in patients with pleural mesothelioma. There are other factors to be considered than those tested in the failed trial. Researchers in this current trial hope that they will see better, more hopeful results.



Whether the results from the Wayne State trial will be positive remains to be seen. In the meantime, researchers continue to test new drugs, develop more promising immunotherapies, and give patients with this terrible cancer a little more hope.

### Researchers Developing Breath Test for Earlier Mesothelioma Diagnoses

Mesothelioma is a difficult disease to treat, in part because it is aggressive and grows in the form of multiple small tumors. It spreads quickly and because of the way the tumors grow, it is difficult to eliminate all cancerous cells. Researchers are working toward developing better treatments, but some are also tackling the problem from the diagnostic end. If oncologists can diagnose mesothelioma earlier, treatments will be more effective and patients will have a chance to live longer.



Collaboration Brings Study to Mesothelioma Patients



The latest research that may help diagnose mesothelioma earlier involves identifying markers in exhaled breath. The studies are a result of a partnership between the International Association of Heat and Frost Insulators and Allied Workers (IAHFAIW) and a British company Owlstone Medical.



The IAHFAIW is interested in this kind of research because its members are vulnerable to asbestos exposure, the leading cause of mesothelioma. Owlstone is a company that researches and develops diagnostic tests, including several breathalyzers used as a type of biopsy for cancer.



The Breathalyzer Studies



The purpose of the study is to determine if breathalyzer diagnostics can find markers of mesothelioma and accurately diagnose patients earlier than current, more invasive strategies like surgical biopsy. The first phase of the study will use the breathalyzer to analyze compounds in the breath of patients already known to have been exposed to asbestos and to have mesothelioma.



The researchers are looking for volatile organic compounds, or VOCs, that clearly indicate the presence of this specific type of cancer. The hope is that there will be VOCs that are distinct in patients known to have mesothelioma which could then be used to diagnose or rule out the cancer in other patients.



In the second part of the study researchers will verify how sensitive and specific the test is at identifying the VOCs. They will also look at how accurately the test can give a negative or positive result for mesothelioma.



The Importance of Early Diagnosis



Mesothelioma is not just an aggressive cancer that is difficult to treat, it is also a cancer type that is challenging to diagnose. The latency period between exposure to asbestos and diagnosis is often decades, up to 50 years. By the time most people get an accurate diagnosis of this cancer, it is in a later stage and treatment options are limited. Life expectancy is limited.



A non-invasive, accurate diagnostic took like a breathalyzer could give people many more years to live. It may have the potential to screen any workers who are at risk for asbestos exposure. Mesothelioma is rare, and not everyone exposed will develop it. But if an easy test could quickly sort between those who have the cancer and those do not, it could save lives.



Currently the prognosis for patients with mesothelioma is a survival time of one year or less. An early diagnosis could give these patients many more years to live. This is the hope of the new collaboration and set of studies.

### First New Approved Treatment for Mesothelioma in More Than a Decade

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently approved a new therapy indicated for the treatment of mesothelioma. Using electric currents rather than toxic chemotherapy drugs, the therapy can inhibit tumor growth. The last new treatment approved by the FDA specifically for treatment of this type of cancer was the chemotherapy agent pemetrexed in 2004. The new approval gives patients living with this difficult cancer new hope.



Clinical Success with Tumor Treating Fields



The medical device approved for mesothelioma treatment is known as the NovoTTF-100L System, or the Tumor Treating Fields System. Made and tested by Novocure, the device received approval under the FDA’s Humanitarian Device Exemption. This exemption allows for quicker and easier approval of a device that may benefit patients with rare diseases, like mesothelioma.



The approval came on the heels of Novocure’s phase II clinical trial known as STELLAR. Usually, new treatments are not approved until several more phases have proven it to be safe and effective. In the phase II trial, nearly 100 percent of participants saw benefits from the Tumor Treating Fields System.



Clinical results were positive, with survival times of 12 months for patients who received only chemotherapy and 18 months for those who received chemotherapy along with the new treatment. The System also did not seem to cause any major adverse events in participants. Mild skin irritation was most common.



How the New Treatment Works



The NovoTTF-100L makes use of alternating electrical fields of low intensity to disrupt tumor growth. Researchers believe that the electrical fields and currents at specifically tuned frequencies interfere with how cancer cells divide. Disrupting this process prevents tumors from getting bigger. The device is designed to be used by patients in their own homes.



Similar therapies have already been used and approved in other types of cancer that are similarly aggressive and difficult to treat. The patients in Novocure’s phase II trial included 80 people with unresectable mesothelioma. This means that it could not be managed or treated with surgery, in most cases because the cancer had metastasized and spread throughout the body.



The Importance of New Treatments for Mesothelioma



Mesothelioma is a devastating type of cancer that is often diagnosed when it is too late to achieve remission. It is generally considered incurable and has a poor prognosis. Caused by exposure to asbestos in the vast majority of cases, mesothelioma is especially tragic because it is preventable.



Because the cancer is aggressive, grows as small, multiple tumors, and is mostly diagnosed in later stages, mesothelioma is difficult to treat. Chemotherapy, often combined with surgery or radiation therapy, is most often used as treatment. There are very few treatments, and just a couple of chemotherapy drugs that the FDA has approved for managing mesothelioma.



Patients living with this cancer and trying to fight it often turn to clinical trials with the hope that experimental therapies will give them a chance at extending their lives. This new treatment, the NovoTTF-100L System, is one of the few new therapies that have proven to do just that. Now, thanks to the FDA’s accelerated approval, more patients with mesothelioma have access to a low-risk, safe treatment that really could help.

### EPA Falls Short of Total Asbestos Ban with New Rule

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a new asbestos rule that limits asbestos imports and use but does not completely ban the material. Advocate groups are disappointed with the new rule after the head of the Agency said he would support a full ban. Asbestos is connected to serious illnesses and cancers, including mesothelioma and lung cancer.



The New Asbestos Rule



In 2016 an amendment to the Toxic Substances Control act was instituted that required the list of harmful toxic substances be regularly re-evaluated. The result of the re-evaluation of asbestos was a new rule to limit it use even further.



The EPA does not currently ban asbestos, and many were hoping that this new rule would be an outright ban. Instead, the rule states that companies have to get approval from the EPA before being able to import certain types of asbestos and products. Approval will also be required before these products can be manufactured in the U.S. The products and uses that now require approval include:



Adhesives, sealants, and roof coatingsArc chutesBeater-add gasketsCement productsExtruded sealant tapeAcetylene cylinder fillerFriction materialsElectrical paperMillboardMissile linerPackagingPipeline wrapReinforced plasticsRoofing feltFuel cell and battery separatorsVinyl floor tilesTextiles



The regulation also requires approval on any other building materials or use of asbestos not identified, with a few exceptions. This provides a catchall for nearly any new type of use of asbestos materials or products.



Critics Say the Rule Doesn’t Go Far Enough



While many people have applauded the rule change for placing more restrictions on asbestos use, others are disappointed. Many had hoped the rule change would include a total ban on asbestos products. Andrew Wheeler, the administrator of the EPA had testified before the House Energy and Commerce Committee stating that he would be committed to banning asbestos. But the new rule falls short of that commitment.



Why Asbestos is So Damaging



Asbestos is a mineral that has long been used in a number of construction and industrial applications. It comes in six different forms that can be mined from the ground. The properties of asbestos that are so useful include fire and heat resistance, flexibility, lightweight, strength, and resistance to electricity.



But exposure to asbestos fibers also causes a lot of harm. The small fibers that are inhaled or ingested by people in the vicinity of its use can trigger serious illnesses. The illness most often associated with asbestos is pleural mesothelioma, a deadly and aggressive cancer that is otherwise rare. Thousands of people have been exposed to asbestos and developed this fatal cancer as a result, which is why many are calling for a full asbestos ban.



While the new regulation from the EPA falls short of that total ban, only time will tell if the next review will be different. The next time asbestos comes up for re-evaluation, the EPA may finally decide to completely ban any import or use of this highly dangerous, carcinogenic material.

### Asbestos Found in Children’s Cosmetics – Voluntary Recall Issued

Asbestos, the carcinogenic mineral known to be the leading cause of mesothelioma, has recently been identified as a contaminant in some children’s cosmetic products. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a warning of the risks of these products and recommended that people not use them. The company, Claire’s, has since issued a voluntary recall of those products.



Child Makeup Products Contain Asbestos



The FDA announced in March that several makeup products made for kids tested positive for asbestos. The tests included three products from the accessories store Claire’s and one from the store known as Justice.



The FDA reported that it acted on information from a 2017 report of asbestos in certain products made for children. The agency began an independent analysis that recently concluded and confirmed the contamination of asbestos in these cosmetics.



Asbestos and Cancer



Asbestos is a natural mineral that was used for decades in industries like shipbuilding and construction. With a lot of unique properties, it was useful for applications that required fire and heat resistance and lightweight strength. It wasn’t until the 1960s that the researchers confirmed the link between asbestos and serious illness.



Exposure to the tiny fibers of asbestos can lead to internal damage that triggers lung cancer or mesothelioma. Any level of exposure, including small amounts in products like cosmetics, is considered unsafe and can contribute to the risk of developing cancer.



The reason that asbestos may show up in cosmetic products is that it is sometimes found contaminating sources of talc. Talc is the mineral that makes up talcum powder, a material used in nearly every type of cosmetic.



Recalls of Claire’s Products



The company Justice responded to the test results on its one product found to contain asbestos by saying that it had already been recalled. Claire’s denied the accuracy of the results, claiming there were errors in the tests and that they believe their products are safe. But, the company still decided to voluntarily recall the products:



Batch and lot numbers 08/17 of Claire’s Eye ShadowsBatch and lot numbers 07/15 of Claire’s Compact PowderBatch and lot numbers 04/17 of Claire’s Contour Palette



The FDA has recommended these products not be used. Claire’s has pulled them from the shelves and asks consumers to return any they have to stores for a refund.



FDA Hopes to Improve Regulation of Cosmetics Safety



Currently there is no law in place that requires companies like Claire’s to test their products for safety. The FDA has no authority to regulate the safety of these products, but it does conduct tests and issue recommendations. The agency is pushing to update the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which has not changed since 1938. The FDA hopes changes to the law will allow the FDA to approve cosmetics before they can be sold.



Some lawmakers are also pushing for greater oversight of cosmetics. Democratic representative Debbie Dingell, a democrat from Michigan, introduced a bill after the first tests found asbestos in Claire’s products back in 2017. The bill, called the Children’s Product Warning Act of 2018 would require warnings that products have not been tested for safety or asbestos contamination, unless specific testing requirements have been met.



Until that bill becomes law, parents need to be aware that children’s products may contain harmful asbestos. Without the oversight of the FDA, it can be difficult to know what products are safe and which should be avoided, but new legislation may change that.

### Cancer Vaccine Presents Promising New Treatment for Mesothelioma

Immunotherapy is a growing area of research in the treatment of all types of cancer. But for mesothelioma, which is among the most difficult cancers to manage, treat, or cure, these new therapies that harness the immune system are especially promising. They are offering new hope to patients diagnosed with this deadly, asbestos-related cancer. The most recent research is showing that a potent combination of a vaccine and chemotherapy could have good results for mesothelioma patients.



The TroVax Vaccine



A vaccine is biological material that is injected into a person to stimulate the immune system to fight back against a particular pathogen. Vaccines have traditionally been used to prevent transmission of viral diseases like the flu, but they are now being developed to treat cancer.



A cancer vaccine works by training the immune system to recognize and kill cancer cells. These cells have substances on their surfaces called antigens. Immune cells recognize antigens, but they need to be coached to do so. Vaccines that treat cancer maybe general, but they can also be made to target the specific antigens and cells in an individual patient.



A new vaccine called TroVax has been developed specifically for mesothelioma patients. It is a virus that has been genetically engineered to target a protein called 5T4 that is found in the cells of most mesothelioma tumors. Even the types of mesothelioma that are the most difficult to treat usually contain this protein.



Phase II Clinical Trial



TroVax has recently been tested in clinical trials. These are studies of new drugs or therapies in human patients. With TroVax, the results were promising. The researchers found that it could control cancer in 87 percent of participants with mesothelioma. In 17 percent of the patients, tumors were actually reduced in size.



The trial researchers did not just use the new vaccine in participants, though. The vaccine was given two weeks prior to regular chemotherapy using cisplatin and pemetrexed. As compared to patients who only received chemotherapy, those who got the vaccine as well had a greater chance of living longer. Eight patients in the study were still living after 24 months, a result significantly better than what is seen with chemotherapy treatment alone.



Improving Chemotherapy



Mesothelioma is very challenging to treat, and chemotherapy is the only approved treatment for it. Clinical trials like the one with TroVax are attempting to find and test therapies that can improve upon the success rates of traditional chemotherapy.



With mesothelioma, surgery is often not a treatment option, making chemotherapy the best and most effective choice for extending life. Even so, most patients don’t live longer than 18 months after diagnosis. By adding other kinds of therapies to chemotherapy, researchers hope to improve those odds.



The phase II clinical trial for TroVax was considered successful, but it is not the end of the research. TroVax will likely be moved into phase III trials, now that researchers know it is relatively safe and may provide a good solution for mesothelioma patients. Current patients will have to wait a while for this treatment to become approved, but in the meantime they can look for this and other clinical trials to join.

### Johnson & Johnson knew for decades that its baby powder contained asbestos: Lawsuit

Giant corporation Johnson & Johnson is currently facings thousands of asbestos lawsuits, and for good reason: the company apparently knew its baby powder contained the lethal mineral asbestos for decades and did nothing about it, according to Reuters.



An investigative report released on Friday claimed Johnson & Johnson never informed the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that three different tests conducted by three different laboratories from 1972-1975 found asbestos in the company's talc.



Johnson & Johnson publicly denied the findings in 1999, when a woman who filed a lawsuit against the company. She alleged the powder caused her to develop mesothelioma.



The Reuters investigation also uncovered that the company's talc tested positive for asbestos all the way until the 2000s. Court orders prohibited many of the documents from being released to the public, but the recently-revealed reports under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) indicated that J&J talc had “acicular" contaminants in it, dated back to a lab report from the 1950s.



In 1971, a J&J executive told the company's senior staff that its talc products contained asbestos and recommended the company "upgrade quality control," according to The New York Times.  A few years later, another J&J executive warned that company should never assume talc mines are asbestos-free and the company's talc product ingredients “might be classified as asbestos fiber.”



Yet, instead of taking measures to prevent risks of consumers developing the toxic illness, the company hid the findings, at least according to reports.



When J&J heard about the Reuters report, they snapped back, accusing the outlet of being one-sided and defamatory.



"The Reuters article is one-sided, false and inflammatory," Johnson & Johnson said in a statement. "Johnson & Johnson’s baby powder is safe and asbestos-free. Studies of more than 100,000 men and women show that talc does not cause cancer or asbestos-related disease."



According to the American Cancer Society (ACS), some forms of talc in its natural form do indeed contain traces of asbestos. Whether talcum powder causes life-threatening diseases such as mesothelioma depends on the form of talc used in products.



Not every form of talc contains asbestos. The asbestos-contaminated talc tends to be from tremolite or anthophyllite. However, studies show that even the asbestos-free forms of talc can cause other types of cancers, such as ovarian cancer and lung cancer.



The talc that contains asbestos greatly depends on where it's located. Numerous companies have gotten talc from mines contaminated with asbestos in areas such as Alabama, Vermont, and North Carolina.



Several people who developed mesothelioma and other forms of cancer have successfully sued J&J, resulting in millions of dollars lost by the company and gained by the victim.



For instance, in May 2018, a jury in Los Angeles sided with victim Joanne Anderson, who used Johnson’s Baby Powder for years, resulting in a mesothelioma diagnosis. Anderson won the suit and won $21.7 million in the process. Just one month prior, the company lost another lawsuit after another victim sued in an asbestos-related talcum powder suit, winning a whopping $117 million.



Shortly after Reuters released its investigative report, J&J's stock fell by 10%, which took out "close to $40 billion of its market value," according to CNN.



Further, the report indicated that J&J demanded government regulators to block information to the public regarding the dangers of asbestos.



“The documents also depict successful efforts to influence U.S. regulators’ plans to limit asbestos in cosmetic talc products and scientific research on the health effects of talc,” the report read.



The company convinced one official at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to never release the findings, to which the official agreed, and said the findings would only be released "over my dead body."



According to the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), regardless of how small the amount is, there is no safe level of asbestos.



Although people are more likely to develop life-threatening illnesses after exposure to large amounts of asbestos, the risk still remains that people are in danger if when in contact with small traces of the mineral.



Around 11,700 plaintiffs have sued the company so far. Not only is the company at risk of losing millions upon millions, but its reputation has reportedly plummeted, and one of the most popular household names in and longest-standing products, J&J Baby Powder, is deemed dangerous.



Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related cancer, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more.  For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540.

### Department of Justice scrutinizes asbestos trust funds, calls for more transparency so victims get rightful compensation

The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) is calling for asbestos trust funds handlers to provide more accountability and transparency after reportedly learning of alleged fraud and mismanagement inside asbestos trusts.



What is an Asbestos Trust Fund?



Asbestos trust funds are a way for victims to asbestos-related diseases to receive compensation without the hassle of going to trial. Almost all victims who receive compensation through a trust fund were exposed to asbestos at a worksite that used asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) in occupational settings.



Companies unable to handle the mounting lawsuits have the option to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, which, if approved, will offer protection from lawsuits. In turn, a judge may require the company to fund an asbestos trust with enough money to cover pending and future lawsuits. A trustee is assigned to manage asbestos trust funds and decides how much compensation each victim gets.



It seems like an ideal situation to ensure that qualified victims get rightful compensation. Yet, according to Peter Knudsen, spokesman for the American Association for Justice, there are companies claiming that there may be people who aren't qualified for trust fund compensation engaging in fraud. It's something Knudsen said he found "ironic."



"There is incredible irony in the fact that an industry that covered up the dangers of a known carcinogen for decades, leading to the ongoing deaths of 15,000 Americans a year, is now claiming that its victims are committing systemic fraud against the trusts — even though no court has ever found evidence of such fraud," Knudsen said, according to The New York Times.



Regardless, the claims caught the attention of the DOJ. The agency stepped in to ensure the process of creating new trusts and the screening process was going as smoothly as possible. DOJ got involved shortly after another company associated with asbestos, Kaiser Gypsum Company, filed for bankruptcy at the  U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of North Carolina.



Possible Fraudulent Claims



In a September statement, the DOJ indicated that asbestos-related victims should be able to "feel certain" they'll receive the money they're rightfully entitled to. Yet, isolated incidents could be hindering true victims.



“In recent years, alarming evidence has emerged of fraud and mismanagement inside asbestos trusts,” Principal deputy associate attorney general at the DOJ, Jesse Panuccio, said. “Asbestos victims should feel certain that they will receive compensation when they are promised, but fraudulent claims and mismanagement call that promise into question.”



The DOJ claimed that new trust creations "lacked critical details" on how it can be guarded against fraudulent activities. The department said it would object to any trust that failed to provide details on how much effort is put into preventing fraud, as well as "how asbestos claims will be evaluated, paid and reported."



“The Department sends a clear message that we will not tolerate fraudulent conduct that cheats asbestos victims and the United States,” Panuccio added. “This is just one action the Department will take to increase transparency and accountability of asbestos trusts.”



DOJ challenged corporation Duro Dyne, stating that the company's lawyer was "too conflicted" to represent victims who may file for compensation. Another trust, DII Industries, received an administrative subpoena that required them to produce settlement record and prove that Medicare was being properly reimbursed in regards to trust payments.



This isn't the first time accusations of asbestos trust funds mismanagement has arisen. In 2014, a judge indicated that a "startling pattern of misrepresentation" occurred with a trust fund for a company that made gaskets filled with asbestos. The judge said that some reported victims and their lawyers first struck enormous settlement agreements with the company then after it filed for bankruptcy, also filed claims to get compensation from the trust.



Meanwhile, during a Statement of Interest, Panuccio made it clear that no form of fraud will be tolerated going forward.



“The Department sends a clear message that we will not tolerate fraudulent conduct that cheats asbestos victims and the United States. This is just one action the Department will take to increase transparency and accountability of asbestos trusts.”



Help for Victims



If you or a loved have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more. If you need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540.

### New study shows one-third of schools in the U.S. still contain asbestos

A  comprehensive study regarding asbestos and schools has found that around one-third of the schools in the United States contain asbestos.



The Los Angeles Times reports that the study came from the staff of Senator Edward J Markey of Massachusetts. Marquis, of the Subcommittee on Superfund, Waste Management and Regulatory Oversight, an investigation into the schools across the nation to ascertain which buildings contain the harmful materials and what actions need to be taken to ensure children are safe.



Although federal law requires all schools to comply with the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA), there have been instances in which children have been allegedly put into danger, and reportedly at the hands of those in charge of maintaining a safe and hazardous-free school environment.



For example, according to Manhattan Beach superintendent Michael Matthews, the carpet was supposed to be installed on the tile in a school that has asbestos.



The carpet was to be used as a preventative measure so that potential asbestos exposure to be avoided.



Yet, the contractors at the school ended up disrupting asbestos in the process, according to the Daily Breeze, resulting in 27 violations.



Several of the school's rooms were shut down after asbestos fibers were released. Asbestos fibers are odorless, microscopic, and impossible to detect with the human eye. Airborne asbestos fibers can be easily ingested/inhaled, then lodged within the body.



Over time, the fibers attach to the linings of major organs, which can lead to toxic illnesses.



“Since then, the district has worked closely with regulatory agencies and will continue to do so cooperatively until all concerns have been resolved,” Matthews later wrote in a statement. “To that end, we have brought on qualified environmental experts to assist with assessing the area and remediation efforts.”



Further, three schools in the Ocean View School District in California have been closed down because of asbestos concerns and issues. Over 1,000 students were transferred out of their schools, which ended up costing the district around $18 million.



Were the children harmed before they were uprooted from their school? In many instances, it's impossible to tell if people have been affected by asbestos immediately. Typically, diseases that are a result of asbestos exposure can take anywhere from 30 to 50 years to surface.



Some of the key findings in the study include:



States may not be monitoring and addressing asbestos issues and concerns in schools as outlined in the AHERA.There have been very few instances in which school districts are being held accountable for violating AHERA.States are not reporting the record-keeping activity required, which shows each school district's adherence to AHERA.States are not sharing information with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).



The study indicated that new rules need to be implemented and acts need to be amended to ensure that children are safe.



"The public deserves access to information about where asbestos can be found in products, school buildings, and elsewhere to empower the public to avoid preventable asbestos exposures," the study reads.



"The Asbestos Information Act of 1988, which required a one-time publication of asbestos-containing products, needs to be amended to provide consumers with access to current information about asbestos-containing products."



AHERA must also be strengthened to require the EPA to evaluate states’ AHERA programs every ten years; require the states to communicate information to the EPA on their progress with implementation; and increase funds available for AHERA enforcement. Continued research and outreach is needed to improve public awareness of the danger of asbestos exposure."



Numerous industries have already banned the use of asbestos in completely after learning of its health hazards. Yet, many of the nation's schools still contain harmful minerals, which can result in life-threatening diseases such as asbestosis, mesothelioma, and asbestos-related lung cancer.



If states and schools aren't following the required procedures and rules of AHERA, more and more children could be at risk.



The study suggests that around 34% of students in the United States have been subjected to possible asbestos exposure.



Despite numerous other studies that have proven asbestos is toxic and lethal, it still remains legal in the U.S. The EPA attempted to ban the hazardous mineral years ago. In 1991, however, technicalities resulted in the court overturning the ban.



In 2016, the Toxic substances Control Act was overhauled by Congress. It was an attempt to make asbestos (among other hazardous and toxic substances) illegal in the U.S. To date, however, this has not happened.



If your child attends a school that contains asbestos, it's important to understand the right you have his parents under the AHERA act. You have a legal right to request the school district's maintenance records, plans, and what active actions the school is taking to ensure the children are safe from asbestos exposure. You also have the right to receive annual notifications in regards to the school's yearly plans to contain asbestos and keep children safe.



Additional Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. 



Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. For additional help, feel free to contact us at 800-793-4540.

### Another mesothelioma lawsuit victory: Johnson & Johnson to pay $4.7B to asbestos victims

More families were victorious earlier this month when 22 women and their loved ones won a mesothelioma lawsuit against giant company Johnson & Johnson after it failed to warn its customers that its talc products could cause life-threatening illnesses, such as malignant mesothelioma.



According to the Associated Press (AP), a jury at the St. Louis Circuit Court in Missouri not only awarded the plaintiffs $500 million in compensatory damages, but also punitive damages of $4.14 billion. The verdict was handed down on July 12.



Carol Goodrich, the company's spokesperson for Johnson & Johnson, continues to defend the company, stating that Johnson & Johnson's products do not contain dangerous asbestos.



"Johnson & Johnson remains confident that its products do not contain asbestos and do not cause ovarian cancer and intends to pursue all available appellate remedies. Every verdict against Johnson & Johnson in this court that has gone through the appeals process has been reversed and the multiple errors present in this trial were worse than those in the prior trials which have been reversed."



The jury disagreed. Several medical experts testified that asbestos is indeed "intermingled" with talc. Johnson & Johnson's Baby Powder and Shower to Shower products' primary ingredient is talc.



Further, the plaintiffs' asbestos lawyers testified that medical records showed that asbestos fibers were found in many of the plaintiff's ovarian tissues.



"We hope this verdict will get the attention of the J&J board and that it will lead them to better inform the medical community and the public about the connection between asbestos, talc, and ovarian cancer," one of the plaintiff's lawyer's said. "The company should pull talc from the market before causing further anguish, harm, and death from a terrible disease."



According to The St. Louis Post-Dispatch, one of the plaintiffs said that although there have been previous cases against Johnson & Johnson, this was the first case where jurors were provided documentation that proved the company knew the products contained asbestos, yet decided against warning its consumers.



Related Reading: Mesothelioma victims win $25M lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson



Asbestos is a naturally-occurring mineral,  but it's been proven to cause fatal illnesses, including mesothelioma, asbestosis, and asbestos-related lung cancer. Yet, the company continues to deny that any of its products can cause cancer, despite over 9,000 women filing lawsuits after developing ovarian cancer.



Of the 22 plaintiffs, six of them have since passed away from ovarian cancer. Their families will receive compensation on their behalf.



One of the plaintiffs and victims of cancer,  73-year-old Gail Ingham of O'Fallon, Missouri, Ingham, used baby powder for decades. She became a part of the lawsuit because she feels any person who uses Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder should be aware of the dangers.



[They] need to know what's in there. They need to know what's going on. Women need to know because they're putting it on their babies."



Another plaintiff, Toni Roberts, of Virginia, said she felt like "justice has been served," while plaintiff Cecilia Martinez, of Dallas, hopes that the company “make changes to protect mothers and babies.”



One of the jurors said that the jury decided on the high compensation amount against the company in order to send a clear message.



We were just trying to find something they would feel.”



Johnson & Johnson earned around $70 million from its Baby Powder product within the last year alone. The jury multiplied the $70 by the 43 years the company has been claiming to not know their product contained cancer-causing ingredients.



There has been no indication as to whether the company plans to continue selling its talc products, although one of the plaintiffs' lawyers said that Johnson & Johnson “should pull talc from the market before causing further anguish, harm, and death from a terrible disease."



The cases against Johnson & Johnson continue to develop. Please check back with Mesothelioma Lawyer Center for additional



Additional Information and Resources for Mesothelioma and Asbestos Victims



If you or a loved one were diagnosed have been mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos-related cancer, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 



For additional questions or comments, feel free to contact us at 800-793-4540.

### Mesothelioma victims win $25M lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson

A Los Angeles jury found Johnson & Johnson and several other companies liable of causing an Oregon woman's development of mesothelioma. The company was hit with a $25.75 million verdict after the jury found the business negligent about warning consumers against possible health risks from its powder.



WJLA reports that Gary Anderson and Joanne Anderson filed an asbestos lawsuit against the companies after Joanne developed pleural mesothelioma after using Johnson & Johnson"Baby Powder." After reviewing the overwhelming evidence against the company, the jury returned a $21.75 million in compensatory damage amount, then tacked an additional $4 million for punitive damages.



Joanne, of Oregon, said that as a bowler, she used the company's powder in her bowling shoes and on her hands for numerous years without any thought it would one day cause cancer, as the company never warned its consumers of the possibility.



She also used the powder for her children's diaper rash when they were babies. Experts who testified in court estimated that Joanne likely used the powder more than 10,000 times.



After diagnosing Joanne with pleural mesothelioma, her physicians explained that it was likely caused by asbestos fibers sticking to the lining of her lungs. Johnson & Johnson unsuccessfully argued that there is no asbestos in its talc products.



Johnson & Johan was found responsible for liable 2/3 of the compensatory damages and 100% in punitive damages. The other businesses listed in the lawsuit included Fel-Pro, Borg Warner, and Honeywell.



"We are extremely pleased that our clients have found a measure of justice, although nothing can truly compensate them for what they have lost. Our clients are hopeful that this verdict can further bring light to this unbelievable example of corporate misconduct," Joanne's mesothelioma lawyer said.



Johnson & Johnson, however, disagrees. They released a public statement shortly after the verdict, announcing they will continue to fight anyone who files a lawsuit against them for asbestos-related cases.



"We are disappointed with the verdict and we will begin the appeals process. We will continue to defend the safety of our product because it does not contain asbestos or cause mesothelioma. Over the past 50 years, multiple independent, non-litigation-driven scientific evaluations have been conducted by respected academic institutions and government bodies, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and none have found that the talc in Johnson's Baby Powder contains asbestos."



Additional Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. 



Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. If you need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540.

### Colgate-Palmolive Co. settles asbestos lawsuit over talc powder products

Colgate-Palmolive Co., makers of talcum powder products (among many others products), agreed to settle a lawsuit brought on by a Pennsylvania woman who claimed her usage of their talcum powder products caused her to develop malignant mesothelioma.



The company resolved Carol Schoeniger’s lawsuit in a New Jersey courtroom, likely to avoid undergoing another lengthy trial. The amount awarded to the plaintiff remains private since it was an agreed-upon settlement.



The deal came about as numerous talcum powder users begin to hold businesses such as Colgate-Palmolive and other talcum products makers and distributors accountable for not forewarning them that their body powders contained the toxic mineral, asbestos, which is a known carcinogen linked to deadly diseases, including mesothelioma, asbestos, and asbestos-related lung cancer.



The lawsuits declare that some of the companies' products made with talcum are polluted with asbestos, which can frequently be found in talcum deposits.



Currently, Colgate-Palmolive is facing over 170 cases against them for allegedly selling talc products laced with asbestos. They’ve said that 43 cases have been rectified this year alone.



In 2015, as reported by the Sacramento Bee, the company once again lost an asbestos-related lawsuit after a California woman with mesothelioma sued the business for not giving warning that their Cashmere Bouquet product contained asbestos--which ultimately led to the plaintiff developing an asbestos-related illness.



In this instance, the company fought the lawsuit and after a two-week trial in a Los Angeles court, they ultimately lost. They were initially required to pay $12.4 million to the plaintiff, but just as the jury convened to discuss adding punitive damages, an agreed-upon undisclosed amount was settled upon.



“Colgate was disappointed with the jury’s verdict,” company spokesman Tom DiPiazza later said.



“Defendants manage their litigation in different ways," Schoeniger’s attorney said earlier this month. “Colgate settles some and tries other.’’



In 2013, in another talc-related lawsuit, a New Jersey jury determined that Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc., a company that distributed talc-related products such as Desert Flower and Old Spice body powder, didn't warn plaintiff Steven Kaenzig of the risks of asbestos. Similar to Schoeniger, Kaenzig developed mesothelioma.



However, Kaenzig's exposure came second-hand after his father brought asbestos-contaminated talc products from his work and into the family home.



Kaenzig was diagnosed with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma in 2011. Two years later, a jury awarded Kaenzig and his wife, Linda, $1.6 million in damages.



Another giant corporation, Johnson & Johnson, is also facing mounting claims. Currently, the company has over 5,000 pending claims against its popular baby powder product, with many plaintiffs alleging it caused ovarian cancer in women.



According to the American Cancer Society (ACS), although talc isn't considered a carcinogen, there is a possible link to ovarian cancer. The link, according to ACS, is a small one.



Small risks do not mean people won't develop life-threatening illnesses. For instance, ACS also suggests that there is no safe amount of asbestos exposure.



Although it's more likely for someone to develop a toxic illness such as mesothelioma when large amounts of asbestos are inhaled and/or ingested, the risk is still there and can't be ruled out simply because it's minute.



Additional Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. 



Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. If you need additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540.

### Asbestos Settlement For Kansas City Victims Reached At $80M

Former Kansas City government employees settled an asbestos lawsuit for $80 million against Jackson County, Missouri, and Kansas City-based U.S. Engineering, just one month before the trial was scheduled to start.



The Kansas City Star reports that the lawsuit was filed by over 7,000 peopled who'd been in the Kansas City courthouse, including jail inmates, lawyers, jurors, and more. The $80 million will ensure that the plaintiffs have access and means to ongoing medical screenings and evaluations that specifically look for asbestos-related illnesses.



The class-action lawsuit was filed in 2015 by former Kansas City workers, Jeanne Morgan and David Elsea, who wanted nothing more than to receive medical care and screenings for life. They're both frightened by the possibility that they're in danger of developing mesothelioma, an aggressive form of cancer that strikes after people have been exposed to asbestos.



Thousands of others who were in the courthouse for at least 80 hours (a qualification to join the lawsuit) followed suit. Anyone who was (and can prove) that they were in the Kansas City courthouse for at least 80 hours, between the years of 1986 and 2007, is eligible for free medical screenings, X-rays, evaluations, and blood screenings for life.



Asbestos in the Courthouse



For two years during the 1980s, U.S. Engineering made a number of renovations to the Jackson County courthouse. They used asbestos-containing materials to complete the project. Asbestos dust and residue literally scattered everywhere during the renovations, even seeping through the vents as workers cut through asbestos-containing pipes.



Further, workers would carry old, asbestos-containing parts and materials down an old elevator to take it to the dumpster, and leave behind toxic asbestos fibers all over the building. Not only did the workers fail to use masks or gloves while working, but there were absolutely no signs placed anywhere that warned others about the dangers.



U.S. Engineering defended itself, stating that regulations were always followed, even when they were shown proof.



“Integrity and safety have always been at the heart of our 123-year-old, family-owned business, and we will not waiver from our commitment to these fundamental values,” CEO of U.S. Engineering Co. Holdings Tyler Nottberg said.



Morgan testified that she'd see particles of asbestos dust all over the places, including paperwork on desks.



“The particles would be … all over the papers. The dust from their boots and their work shoes was on the stairway and in the hallways," Morgan said.



Morgan's co-worker,  Nancy Lopez, died at age 56 in 2010. Her cause of death: malignant mesothelioma. Her family won $10.4 million during a 2011 settlement with Jackson County and U.S. Engineering. Lopez's death greatly frightened a number of people who either worked in the courthouse or spent time there.



Air testing performed on the courthouse in 2010 indicated that it's now safe and asbestos-free.



Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. 



Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more.  For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540.

### Asbestos Settlement Of $80 Million Reached For Kansas Courthouse Workers

Jackson County, Kansas, employees were awarded $80 million in a class-action settlement brought forth by two former workers who are concerned about the negative impact asbestos exposure will have on their health in the future. Both plaintiffs, as well as all the workers involved, were potentially exposed to asbestos the Jackson County courthouse.



The Kansas City Star reports that workers were exposed to asbestos when the courthouse when through renovations 30 years ago. Both Jackson County and U.S. Engineering, the Kansas City company hired to overlook the renovations, agreed to the settlement after overwhelming evidence showed that they were responsible for the plaintiffs' failing health.



Both plaintiffs are concerned about the future of their health after breathing in asbestos fibers daily.



The first plaintiff, Jeanne Morgan, a former courthouse employee, testified that dust and power nearly coated the entire area of the 5th-floor office where she worked. Not only did the dust blow through the air vents, but renovation workers tracked it through the entire building as they hauled out materials. They apparently didn't bother to take any precautions while renovating the building.



“The particles would be … all over the papers,” said Morgan. “The dust from their boots and their work shoes was on the stairway and in the hallways.”



Another former courthouse worker, David Elsea, the 2nd plaintiff, agreed with Morgan's testimony. They were both represented by the same asbestos lawyer, who proved that the companies were extremely negligent in the renovation process, literally putting thousands of workers at risk of developing toxic illnesses.



The defendants initially argued that there was no proof that anyone was harmed by asbestos. Yet in 2010, another former courthouse worker, Nancy Lopez, passed away from mesothelioma complications in 2010. Her family won a $10.4 million settlement from U.S. Engineering in 2011.



The plaintiffs' attorney argued that it's better to start health monitoring immediately, and on the defendants' expense, before more people passed away from asbestos-related diseases.



According to the lawsuit, U.S. Engineering constructed the courthouse during the 1950s and used asbestos in a variety of places, including in air ducts and vents, pipes, walling, heating, the air conditioning system, and more. Although it was the norm to use asbestos freely during that time, it wasn't standard 30 years later when the same company came back to the building to perform renovations.



One of  U.S. Engineering's top former executives testified against the company. He claimed the company did absolutely nothing to sexperienced asbestos fibers from flowing through the building's vents. They also made no effort to sexperienced asbestos fibers from spreading when workers cut into asbestos-containing materials.



Tyler Nottberg, U.S. Engineering's current CEO, prepared a written statement read in court last week, stating that the company complied with everything required of them, including relevant industry and regulatory safety standards."



“Integrity and safety have always been at the heart of our 123-year-old, family-owned business,” the statement read. "And we will not waiver from our commitment to these fundamental values and the Kansas City community, where we are proudly based.”



Part of the $80 million settlement includes around $25 million in lawyer’s fees. The rest of the settlement will go into a "medical monitoring fund," which will provide workers with the necessary funds to undergo regular medical checkups.



It will cover the costs of medical diagnostic tests for the workers, for the next 30 years. Asbestos-related illnesses can lie dormant for up to 50 years. In rare cases, workers develop asbestos diseases within a few years or less of exposure, but in most cases, illnesses such as asbestosis and malignant mesothelioma don't surface until 20-50 years after exposure.



Fortunately, asbestos is no longer a danger at the courthouse.



Additional Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. 



Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. For additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540.

### Engineering Company Reaches $480M Asbestos Settlement Agreement

EnPro Industries, Inc., an engineering company that's been the center of numerous asbestos lawsuits, agreed to settle all pending and future cases for $480 million. The settlement applies to EnPro and all of the company's subsidiaries.



The Charlotte Business Journal reports that EnPro reached the settlement agreement with the court-appointed committee, which will handle all of the company's asbestos-related cases, and will include eliminating a pending $25 million case against EnPro.



The settlement will also handle any cases against the EnPro subsidiary Garlock Sealing Technology, LLC (GST). According to EnPro president Steve Macadam, the new agreement will bring a full stop to any asbestos cases against the company.



“This comprehensive, consensual settlement will bring us full, complete and permanent relief from asbestos litigation and will achieve complete and total peace with the asbestos plaintiff’s bar."



The $48 million will be put into an asbestos trust fund, to be disbursed to those who developed asbestos-related illnesses due to EnPro's products.



A total of $400 is to be deposited into the trust fund immediately by EnPro, and another $80 million by the trust fund's first anniversary.



Along with the money for the asbestos trust fund, EnPro will also provide $17 million for all pending and future Canadian asbestos claims. The funds for Canada are for Canadian asbestos injury recovery statutes for claims made by people who were exposed asbestos via GST or EnPro's other subsidiary, Coltec.



According to court documents, numerous asbestos-related claims have already been filed against Coltec, and thousands of these cases are still pending. The company's insurance company has spent millions while trying to defend Coltec, but with the new settlement agreement, all pending and future cases against Coltec will be taken care of.



More About Asbestos Trust Funds



Asbestos trust funds are bankruptcy trusts set up after a company files for bankruptcy. The U.S. Bankruptcy Code allows these companies to set up trust funds after being approved for bankruptcy reorganization.



Once approved, companies such as EnPro, that have mounting asbestos-related lawsuits against them and anticipate future cases to follow, will put money into the trust funds. The funds are then distributed to plaintiffs who file lawsuits after being harmed by asbestos due to the company's negligence.



Not everyone can file against companies that have asbestos trust funds set up. Just like any other lawsuit, you must show evidence that you have an asbestos-related disease, in addition to evidence that shows that the illness came from the company's negligence.



Yet, trust funds are also different than traditional mesothelioma lawsuits in several ways.



For instance, a mesothelioma lawsuit involves the plaintiff filing a personal injury case or a wrongful death case. Furthermore, while lawsuits are either settled or sent to trial, trust fund claims are decided by trustees who handle the funds on behalf of the companies who set them up.



In some states, plaintiffs are allowed to file both a mesothelioma lawsuit and a trust fund claim, but keep in mind that doing so may reduce the amount of compensation you'll receive. An experienced asbestos attorney can help you understand which course of action works best for your particular case.



For more information on trust funds, visit our article, Mesothelioma Trust Funds.



Additional Assistance and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you or a loved have mesothelioma or asbestos-related lung cancer, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in trusts set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. 



We invite you to use our Asbestos Attorney Locator Tool to find a top mesothelioma lawyer in your area. For additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540.

### Plant Worker's Family Wins $14M in Asbestos Lawsuit

A South Carolina man's family won $14 million after a jury found that the Texas-based materials manufacturing company, Celanese Corp., was responsible for his asbestos-related death.



Dennis Seay, 70, passed away in 2014 from malignant mesothelioma. He was diagnosed in 2013 and went through extensive and invasive treatments, including having his lungs drained 11 times after they collapsed 10 times. The process was painful, adding to his mounting difficulties in handling the disease.



Seay worked at a Celanese factory as a maintenance worker for almost a decade, from 1971 until 1979, while he was an employee for the Daniel Construction Co. Like many factories during that time, it contained exorbitant amounts of asbestos and asbestos-containing materials. Although it was well-known by then that asbestos was extremely dangerous to human health, the Celanese Corp. continued to use it and place workers at risk of developing fatal illnesses.



Seay's family filed an asbestos lawsuit at the 7th Judicial Circuit of South Carolina, in the Spartanburg County Courthouse. Along with suing the Celanese Corp., the family's attorney also stated the John Crane Co. was also responsible for providing asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) to the factory. Along with providing asbestos-containing gaskets to the factory, the companies also provided numerous other products, including asbestos insulation.



The jury agreed with the plaintiffs and awarded Seay's family $14 million in damages after a 13-day trial, which includes $12 million in compensatory damages and the remaining $2 million in punitive damages. The family attorney indicated that the amount was appropriate for these types of cases and that Celanese made no attempts at all to try and settle lawsuit, even though they knew full-well they were guilty of supplying asbestos.



"You’ve got a company that had no way of running away from the fact that they knew the hazards of asbestos, period. "



The attorney also stated that the Seay family lawsuit is noteworthy because it's not often that a contractor working as an employee for another company is victorious when suing a different company.



“You don’t see a lot of premises cases tried."



The Celanese Corp. tried to pin responsibility on the company Seay was employed by, Daniel Construction Co.. Celanese argued that Daniel Construction was responsible for the safety of their workers, including overseeing they had proper safety gear when working around hazardous materials. However, since South Carolina law forbids workers from suing their employers in these types of lawsuits, Daniel Construction was not named as a defendant in the lawsuit.



John Crane prevailed in the lawsuit due to arguing successfully that asbestos-containing gaskets that are sealed pose no threat. The family's attorney stated that the jury was confused over this matter, although it doesn't necessarily mean that John Crane wasn't responsible, indicating that the product needn't be defective or broken for a company to be liable for damages.



Additional Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma or any other illness related to asbestos, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, set up for those who are victims to asbestos-related diseases. Use our free Asbestos Attorney Locator Tool today to find a experienced mesothelioma attorney in your area. For additional assistance, feel free to contact us at 800-694-4856.

### Federal Regulators Knew of Asbestos-Contaminated Talc Over 40 Years Ago

Although federal regulators knew asbestos was contaminating talc powders commonly used in household across the nation, nothing was done to stop it, according to the Environmental Working Group (EWG). Instead, regulators reportedly allowed the cosmetic companies to monitor asbestos levels themselves.



EWG reports that a "Fair Warning" memo was sent out by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in March of 1976 that “charged that cosmetics makers had been lax in monitoring the safety of talc supplies.”



Subsequently, the FDA was set to regulate asbestos in talc, until the cosmetics industry indicated that testing groups were created to help test the safety of the products.



Although the FDA backed off, the organization was still not satisfied with the testing groups. Consequently, they tried several times, once in 1994 and once in 2001, to test talc and other cosmetics themselves, but they ultimately didn't follow through.



However, in 2009, the FDA finally got around to testing numerous products, none of which showed asbestos.



The FDA felt that the tests were not sensitive enough, and in 2010, ordered a more detailed test from the U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention. Yet, federal regulators agreed not to regulate the cosmetics regardless of what the result would indicate, and instead leave that task up to the cosmetics manufacturers.



Instead of taking action against the cosmetic companies, the FDA released a statement that the new testing method would “have insufficient sensitivity to detect asbestos and cannot provide the highest possible level of confidence when used by suppliers of talk to certify ‘absence of asbestos.’”



U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission Follows Similar Standards



A recent discovery of a number of brands of children's crayons and toys show that the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission followed similar steps when they didn't regulate the products, even though asbestos-containing talc was found in at least four different brands of crayons and two toy kit.



A recent study performed by the EWG Action Fund shows that the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission has known for 15 years that these crayons contain asbestos. Yet, all they can do is warn the public of the hazards and hope that stores take the products off of the shelves.



The EWG Action Fund reached out to the Safety Commission, but so far, there is no indication that any action has been taken to completely ban the products.



Crayon Brands Found to Contain Asbestos:



Amscan Crayons: Contains Tremolite, AnthophylliteNickelodeon Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle Crayons: Contains TremoliteDisney Mickey Mouse Clubhouse Crayons: Contains TremoliteSaban’s Power Rangers Super Megaforce Crayons: Contains Tremolite



Toy Kits Found to Contain Asbestos:



Inside Intelligence Secret Spy Kit: White Fingerprint Powder Contains TremoliteEduScience Deluxe Forensics Lab Kit: Black Fingerprint Powder Contains Tremolite/ Actinolite, Anthophyllite



Help and Resources for Asbestos Victims



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma or any other illness due to asbestos exposure, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. Use our free Asbestos Attorney Locator Tool to find a experienced mesothelioma attorney in your area. 



With over $30 billion currently in asbestos trust funds, now is the right time to take the first step in determining what you may qualify for. For questions or assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-694-4856.

### Asbestos Diseases to Increase Due to NYC 9/11 Attacks

The September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in New York City left thousands of people dead and injured. Many of people who helped out in the aftermath of the attack are still alive today, and according to Dr. Raja Flores, a renowned thoracic surgeon, those helpers, including firefighters, police officers, and more, may start to develop asbestos-related diseases.



Dr. Flores has been treating people diagnosed with asbestos-related diseases for more than 20 years, and part of his experiences shows that people exposed to asbestos start having the first symptoms of mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases within 15 to 20 years after initial exposure to asbestos. It sometimes takes up to 50 years before the symptoms surface.



Although Dr. Flores wishes his assumptions were wrong, he thinks that there will a large spike in asbestos diseases surfacing soon from those who helped or were around the aftermath of 9/11.



“I hope I’m wrong, but I don’t think so. We’ve seen a little of it so far, but I think we’ve just scratched the surface. You’re going to start seeing a lot of these cases in the future.”



Dr. Flores indicated that it may be a little while before the rates of mesothelioma and other asbestos diseases start to rise. Although some people may develop symptoms within a few years, these are rare cases. Flores states that by next year, we may see the rates slowly start to grow, but within 25 years, an influx of new people with asbestos illnesses will surface.



“We still need a little more time. Between 15 and 20 years out, we'll start seeing it in individuals one-by-one, but by 25 years out, it will be real obvious what has happened. Again, I hope I'm wrong, but I think I know how this is going to turn out."



In the meantime, U.S. Congress is gearing up to help people that were affected by 9/11. The  James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act will more than likely be extended this year, and the 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund and the  World Trade Center Health Program, which are due to expire soon, will probably be extended as well.



According to John Feal, president of the non-profit organization, Fealgood Foundation, Congress has not extended to programs yet, but he fully expects it to happen within the next few months.



"I fully expect an extension to pass at some point in October or November. It's going through. I know people are getting nervous about it, but the broad support is there this time. This is not me predicting the weather next week. It's me predicting what I know and have seen the last 14 years. A bill will get passed."



Compensation Across the Nation



NYC residents are not the only ones suffering from the aftermath of September 11, 2001. There are people all over the nation currently receiving 9/11 benefits.



Volunteers across the nation showed up to lend a hand after the 9/11 tragedy, and subsequently, many of those volunteers now receive compensation benefits. New York has the highest number of people receiving benefits, followed by volunteers from Florida, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina.



Cancer victims associated with 9/11 accounts for 18% of all claimants. If Flores is correct, this number will more than likely triple.



Additional Help and Resources



If you or a loved one have been injured by asbestos, you may be entitled to significant compensation. We invite to use our Attorney Locator Tool to find an experienced mesothelioma lawyer. 



If you have questions or need assistance feel free to contact us at 800-694-4856.

### Study Reveals Surgery Still Best Mesothelioma Treatment

A recent study conducted by numerous renowned hospitals and medical organizations confirms that surgery is still the leader in treating mesothelioma.



The study, performed by researchers from North Shore/Long Island Jewish Health System, Hofstra School of Medicine and Mount Sinai Medical Center, included patients already confirmed with malignant mesothelioma. The purpose of the study was to determine which course of treatment works best for mesothelioma patients.



A total of 14,228 mesothelioma patients were studied. They were divided into different groups according to gender, age, stage of cancer, time of diagnosis, and other additional factors. For patients that received no other treatment aside from surgery, survival rates were longer than average.



For patients who underwent radiation therapy along with surgery, survival rates did not extend any longer. The study didn't provide information on chemotherapy combined with surgery.



As a result of the study, Mount Sinai Medical Center's Andrea Wolf, MD, MPH, states that surgery still remains the strongest treatment option for mesothelioma patients.



“These data support the role of surgery-based therapy as the cornerstone of treatment for this challenging disease."



However, even though surgery remains the best possible treatment for mesothelioma, the average prognosis still remains at around 18 months. This may seem discouraging, but with healthy lifestyle changes and a positive outlook, numerous mesothelioma patients have lived years longer than the average survival rate.



The entire study, entitled, “Surgery Improves Survival in 14,228 Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma," can be found in the April 2015 edition of the Oncology journal.



Mesothelioma Surgery Qualifications



Not every mesothelioma patient will qualify for surgery. Although unfortunate, patients must meet certain criteria for surgery due to its aggressive and invasiveness. For example, some forms of mesothelioma surgery require the removal of the affected organs in order to eliminate as much cancer as possible. The patient must be in good enough health to withstand such an aggressive form of treatment.



Other criteria for mesothelioma surgery includes the patient's age (younger patients tend to withstand surgery better), the type of mesothelioma the patient has, and the stage of the disease.



Different Types of Surgeries for Mesothelioma



It's important to note that there are different types of surgery for mesothelioma, but most require the same qualifications of good overall health to be able to withstand the treatment.



Curative surgery is the most invasive type of treatment. It can entail removing the affected organs and the surrounding linings.



Palliative surgery, on the other hand, is reserved for people who are in the late stages of mesothelioma. Instead of trying to eliminate the cancerous tumors completely (which have spread too much throughout the body), palliative surgery aims to reduce painful side effects of mesothelioma so that the patient can live more comfortably.



Additional Help and Resources for Mesothelioma Victims



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma or any other illness due to asbestos exposure, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. We invite you to fill out our contact form today to get free brochures from the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area. 



For more than 20 years, we've been helping families successfully connect with the best mesothelioma attorneys. With over $30 billion currently in asbestos trust funds, now is the right time to take the first step in determining what you may qualify for.

### Keytruda, New Skin Cancer Drug Stops Mesothelioma Tumor Growth

Researchers have recently discovered that an immunotherapy drug intended to treat melanoma has shown to be extremely powerful in stopping cancerous tumor growth in pleural mesothelioma patients.



Scientists and researchers at Pennsylvania's University School of Medicine and physicians from Europe recently provided results of their ongoing study on Keytruda, a prescription medicine originally used for melanoma.



During the study, 25 pleural mesothelioma patients who already received standard chemotherapy participated in the research. The patients had already experienced tumor growth, even after their first-line chemotherapy treatment. Keytruda was then administered to the mesothelioma patients as a second form of treatment.



According to the results, at least 7 patients showed tumor shrinkage while another 12 patients showed no tumor growth at all. Dr. Evan Alley, one of the lead researchers in the study, indicates that only 4 people out of the 25 in the study experienced growth in tumors.



"The 76 percent disease control rate is very promising and represents a signal of efficacy in the treatment of this disease. The study has provided an early glimpse of the potential benefits. Our team was also gratified that none of our patients had unexpected side effects, there were no patient deaths related to the treatment, and we managed all adverse events without discontinuing treatment.”



How is Keytruda Administered?



During the study trial, pleural mesothelioma patients received Keytruda every 21 days for two years. The study also included patients who experienced tumor growth after receiving chemotherapy treatment.



How Does Keytruda Work?



Keytruda works by stopping the gene mutations that are responsible for helping cancerous cells grow into tumors. The medication spots current tumors and increases the patient's immune system, which helps to fight off cancer.



Mesothelioma Still Has No Second-Line Medication Approval



Keyrtuda is being used in a clinical trial and has not yet been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). There are currently no second-line treatment options for mesothelioma patients who experience tumor growth after receiving traditional treatments.



If the clinical trial continues to prove successful, the researchers are hoping that the FDA will approve it for second-line treatment of mesothelioma patients. Alley also indicates that immunotherapy is a big key in the future treatment of mesothelioma patients.



Unlike chemotherapy, immunotherapy comes with minimal side effects, with rashes and feelings of tiredness being the main side effects. Alley, however, states that the side effects are easy to control.



"We managed all adverse events without discontinuing treatment. It was very encouraging."



The findings of the new research study were presented at the April 2015 American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Annual Meeting, in Pennsylvania. Studies will continue on Keytruda, but in the meantime, there is another drug, pembrolizumab, that's proven helpful to mesothelioma patients during clinical trials.



Alley also indicated that he hopes that more clinical trials will continue for pembrolizumab.



“This study has provided an early glimpse of the potential benefits of using pembrolizumab in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. More research and trials will be occurring, which we hope will provide further grounds for optimism.”



Additional Help and Resources for Mesothelioma Patients



If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma or any other illness due to asbestos exposure, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. We invite you to fill out our contact form today to get free brochures from the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area. For more than 20 years, we've been helping families successfully connect with the best mesothelioma attorneys. With over $30 billion currently in asbestos trust funds, now is the right time to take the first step in determining what you may qualify for.

### W.R. Grace Trust Fund Opens

Last year, W.R. Grace emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy.  Starting this week, after more than 13 years, the company started accepting claims under their reorganization plan, which aims to compensate property owners and claimants who've been injured by asbestos due to the company's negligence.



In April 2001, W.R. Grace filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy after being hit with over 100,000 claims from people diagnosed with asbestos-related illnesses, such as malignant mesothelioma and asbestosis. Many of these cases have moved extremely slowly, due to negotiations, appeals, and more.



Most of the claims stem from either the public or former employees and contractors who were employed at the Zolonite mine in Libby, Montana. In 1963, W.R. Grace purchased the mine and managed it until its closing in 1990.



For numerous years, asbestos fibers were released into the air as workers extracted vermiculite, a form of asbestos known for its heat and fire-resistant properties.



Not only were workers at constant risk of danger, but local residents of Libby also faced the constant threat of ingesting airborne asbestos fibers. Hundreds of residents who never worked at the mine were diagnosed with mesothelioma and eventually died due to the disease's harsh symptoms.



Joint Plan of Reorganization



In 2008, W.R. Grace reached a settlement agreement with numerous plaintiffs under an independent trust fund that allows the company to pay off all pending and future asbestos-related claims. After six years of finalizing the details, the trust opened under the Joint Plan of Reorganization.



The WRG Asbestos PI Trust Distribution Procedures (TDP), created from the Joint Plan of Reorganization, outlines all of the payment procedures for the last 13 years, as well as any future asbestos-related claims. Under TDP,  8 Scheduled Disease levels are recognized, ranging from minor asbestos injuries, asbestosis, pleural diseases, and up to life-threatening diseases such as asbestos-related lung cancer and malignant mesothelioma.



The level of the illness caused by W.C. Grace will determine how much compensation the claimant will receive. The most severe cases will get the highest compensation amount, but all proven claims that meet the requirements will be paid out, regardless of how minor or severe.



“We’re pleased that all remaining objections to the Joint Plan of Reorganization and its centerpiece third-party trusts have been resolved and that the trustees now can move forward to address actual claims," said Rich Badmington, Vice President of Global Communications with W.R. Grace.



"We have been focused on this outcome since the day, many years ago, when the parties to the bankruptcy became co-proponents of the Plan."



EPA Files Against W.R. Grace for Toxic Substances Violation



Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, W.R. Grace was found liable “for response costs and natural resource damages incurred and to be incurred by the Settling Federal Agencies in the course of responding to releases and threats of releases of hazardous substances into the environment.”



Consequently, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also filed claims against W.R. Grace in 2003.



As a result, part of W.R. Grace's settlement agreement entailed a fine of $34 million to the EPA and the  Department of Justice (DOJ) for clean-up costs. In addition, the Libby mine was also named a Superfund site, meaning that the company is liable for cleaning up an area that has been highly toxic by the EPA.



Keep in mind that if you or a loved one been have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness, you may be eligible for considerable compensation. With more than $30 billion currently available in asbestos trust funds, now is the time to determine what you qualify for. Fill out our contact form today to get free brochures from the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### Mesothelioma is a 'Global Epidemic' According to New Studies

A report performed by Italian researchers indicates that mesothelioma is not declining. In fact, it's reaching epidemic proportions and is expected to keep growing.



According to the report published in the Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, two researchers,  Claudio and Tommaso Bianchi of Mofalcone, Italy's Center for the Study of Environmental Cancer, studied the data of cancer registries worldwide, as well as data received from mesothelioma researchers.



Results showed an increasing trend in mesothelioma across numerous countries in England, in New Zealand, and in Australia. Some of the highest reported cases of mesothelioma are in Malta, Belgium, and The Netherlands.



The countries with the lowest incidence of mesothelioma are Central Europe and Japan. In some countries, there was no data, and therefore, the researchers were unable to determine the exact number of mesothelioma patients.



Of course, the countries with the highest rates of mesothelioma are also the countries that once used asbestos and asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) the most. After World War II, the United Kingdom built houses with cement-filled with asbestos.



In addition, not only was Australia once the largest asbestos exporter in the world, but it also contains a myriad of asbestos mines. Consequently, both the United Kingdom and Australia are leading in the most mesothelioma cases per capita.



Mesothelioma Growth Continues



The researchers stated that not only is mesothelioma failing to decline, but that several countries continue to ignore the warning signs and risks of asbestos exposure.



“[The] mesothelioma epidemic does not show signs of attenuation,” the report states. “The lack of data for a large majority of the world does not allow that the consciousness of the risks related to asbestos exposure is reached.”



Although the hazards have been published worldwide, officials are still not educating the public enough on the dangers of asbestos and are still not taking the proper steps to protect workers and others who may be around asbestos.



Once someone ingests the tiny, odorless fibers that come from asbestos, they run the risk of developing extremely dangerous diseases, which include not only mesothelioma, but also asbestosis, and asbestos-related lung cancer.



Since people inhale asbestos fibers without even realizing it, they generally do not seek medical help in time. In fact, it's not until mesothelioma has lied dormant for decades that the first symptoms of the disease show up. When the symptoms show, they mimic common respiratory ailments, which results in many people still not seeking medical treatment.



The U.S. Still Has the Most Mesothelioma Cases



Fortunately, the United States has declined a little in mesothelioma cases. However, over 2,000 people in the U.S. are diagnosed with life-threatening illnesses each year. Similar to the United Kingdom, many older American homes contain asbestos, especially in attics, which were once heavily insulated with asbestos manufactured at the W.R. Grace & Co. manufacturing facilities in Libby, Montana.



If you've been diagnosed with an asbestos-related disease, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. With over $30 billion currently in asbestos trust funds, now is the time to take the first step in determining what you may qualify for.



We invite you to contact our experienced and knowledgeable mesothelioma lawyers today and let us help you fight for the compensation you may qualify for.

### $7.7M in New York Asbestos Verdict

The family of a Fayetteville-Manlius school bus driver won $7.7 million in an asbestos trial against a bus manufacturer, making it one the largest asbestos verdicts ever, Syracuse Media reports.



According to court documents, Lewis Nash, of Manlius, New York, was a school bus driver for close to four decades. During that time, he was exposed to brakes, gaskets, and other parts that were created with asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) in a bus station garage in New York City.



In September 2011, he was diagnosed with mesothelioma died from complications just a year later.



Nash's family filed an asbestos lawsuit against Navistar, a manufacturing company that supplied the asbestos-filled parts to the F-M buses that Nash used to drive. Since the beginning of his career in 1954, Nash was exposed regularly to asbestos.



During the three-week trial, the family attorney argued that Navistar, formerly known as International Harvester, was well-aware of the fact that asbestos exposure could lead to life-threatening diseases such as malignant mesothelioma and asbestosis, yet failed to protect and warn bus drivers.



Nash's family members testified during the trial as well, reliving how difficult it was to watch a loved one go through such a devastating disease.



The jury agreed with the plaintiffs and felt that enough sufficient evidence was provided to prove fault against Navistar. Consequently, the plaintiffs won $7.7 million, with $3 million for the victim's physical pain, another $3 million for the victim's emotional pain, $1.5 million to Nash's wife for wrongful death, and an additional $200,000 for loss of consortium.



The large verdict comes with good reason. Along with significant emotional hardship, Nash endured extreme physical pain. Prior to his death, he tried to undergo a surgical procedure to remove the cancerous tumors from his lungs but was denied, thus prolonging his pain (which was factored into the verdict amount).



The plaintiffs' attorneys are “are thrilled that the jury returned a just verdict in their favor.”



Although Navistar can still appeal the verdict, the defense hasn't made any comments so far after the verdict.



Several December Asbestos Verdicts in New York



The Nash case marks the second asbestos-related verdict in Syracuse, in just December alone. Earlier this month, commercial flooring manufacturing company American Biltrite Inc., along with several other companies lost a lawsuit against John Colasanti, a plaintiff who developed asbestos-related cancer after working around the dangerous mineral for years.



Unlike the Nash lawsuit, the companies named in the Colasanti lawsuit were found to only be 3.57% liable for the plaintiff's illness. This in turn, drastically reduced the amount of money that Colasanti received; he was awarded a total of $400,000.



Additional Lawsuits Against Navistar



Navistar is in additional litigation in a multi-district lawsuit filed against Maxxforce, a diesel trucking company that allegedly manufactured faulty engines. Recently, a total of 13 pending lawsuits against Mxxforce were consolidated in Illinois, per Navistar's request.



Keep in mind that if you or a loved one have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related disease, you may be entitled to significant compensation. There is currently more $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, awaiting those who have been affected by asbestos exposure. We invite you to get in touch with our leading, dedicated mesothelioma lawyers for a free, confidential case evaluation.

### How Baby Powder Causes Mesothelioma

Although most people associate mesothelioma with asbestos exposure while at work during a time in which the deadly mineral was used excessively, research indicates that people who used talcum-containing products, including baby powder, may be at risk of developing an asbestos-related illness as well.



The main ingredient of baby powder, talc, is used for numerous purposes, including not only making powder, but also soaps, ceramics, electronics, and much more. Talc alone is generally considered harmless, but some talc is contaminated with a form of asbestos known as tremolite, which has been linked to the most dangerous types of the mineral.



Not only are talc and tremolite are transformed by heat, but they are both also forms of magnesium silicate. Consequently, they are often both found close together in natural mines and sources. In the past, when mining for talc, most people didn't notice tremolite may have been combined in the talc. Asbestos-contaminated talc occurred and still occurs quite often, as the two are located close together in talc mines.



Today, fortunately, the majority of mined talc goes through a strict inspection for asbestos. Yet, those who used talc-containing products, including those who used baby powder, may have inadvertently ingested asbestos fibers.



In recent years too, however, asbestos was found in factories that process talc. In fact, in 2000, a newspaper based out of Seattle reported asbestos presence at a Virginia talc-mining facility.



Children's Art Supplies May Contain Asbestos



Asbestos in the talc of children's art supplies, such as crayons, were also discovered in 2000.



Although research by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) suggested that the amount was so low that there is little risk of harm, many doctors who specialize in mesothelioma state that no amount of asbestos, no matter how small, is safe.



Using Asbestos-containing Talc Products May Cause Mesothelioma



A woman who was recently diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma informed her physician that she had never worked at a job site that contained asbestos, nor had any of her friends or close relatives. However, she did admit to using talc powder for many years, during the times in which talc wasn't scrutinized for asbestos. Consequently, the brand of powder she used was inspected for asbestos.



Results indicate that there was asbestos in a total of 50 researched samples. Detailed information regarding the results can be found in the International Journal of Occupational Health's 2014 issue, Vol. 4.



According to the American Cancer Society (ACS), however, there are different types of talc products and brands, some of which used asbestos and some of which are asbestos-free. It's important to let your physician know the exact brands you used, if applicable. Although more studies are needed, ACS suggests that talcum powder may also be linked to ovarian cancer, lung cancer, and uterine cancer.



Talc Mines



People who worked in talc mine and operations are also in danger of developing an asbestos-related illness. Although today's modern safety protection and equipment reduce the risk of asbestos exposure significantly, workers who mined talc for many years prior to the known dangers of asbestos were constantly placed at risk.



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma or any other asbestos-related illness, there is a good chance that you qualify for significant compensation. We invite you to contact our experienced mesothelioma lawyers today for a free, confidential case consultation.

### Texas Jury Awards $18.6 Million in Asbestos Lawsuit

The family of a Texas man with malignant mesothelioma, who once worked for Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. plant in Tyler, won $18.6 million in an asbestos lawsuit after proving the company negligently exposed him to asbestos.



According to court documents, the family of Carl Rogers and their attorney filed an amended petition on Aug. 4, stating that Rogers developed mesothelioma as a result of the working at Goodyear's tire manufacturing center, where asbestos was once heavily used.



Although the original complaint was filed in 2010, the new petition included allegations that Goodyear acted in a gross and negligent manner, which would help the plaintiffs in seeking punitive damages. Goodyear has been denying the allegations from the beginning and refused to answer or return phone calls regarding the case.



The trial lasted nine days and after hours of deliberations, the jury concluded that there was enough evidence shown to prove that Goodyear acted in a negligent manner. Along with $900,000 in economic damages, the verdict also included $2.7 million in non-economic damages and punitive damages of $15 million.



Rogers worked for Goodyear for 30 years, at the Kelly-Springfield Tire Co. in Tyler, an extended branch of the Goodyear company. Not only did he work as a tire builder, but he did maintenance work on pipes that were created with asbestos-containing materials (ACMs), and worked around machines and equipment that were littered with asbestos.



In August 2008, Rogers was diagnosed with mesothelioma. He died only a year later. His family filed a lawsuit against Goodyear shortly after.



Goodyear, however, plans to appeal the decision.



“We are extremely disappointed in the verdict and will appeal this decision. Regardless, under Texas law, the damages will be capped and the amount of this verdict will be drastically reduced," a representative for the company wrote in an email statement.



Regardless, the Rogers' family attorney is prepared for the appeal and will continue to fight to ensure that Goodyear is held liable for negligently exposing workers to a life-threatening mineral.



Per court documents, the Rogers' family lawyer states that Goodyear knew and understood the risks of allowing their employees to work around asbestos, yet did nothing to protect them, and completely ignored the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) standards when it comes to asbestos use and protection.



This isn't the first time Goodyear has lost an asbestos lawsuit. In 2011, a New York state jury found the company negligent of protecting workers against asbestos found in gaskets. Two former workers, who worked at various Goodyear job sites in the Buffalo, New York area, passed away shortly being diagnosed with mesothelioma.



The lawsuit for both workers was filed in 1988. Although it took many years before the case was settled, the victims' families were victorious and won a combined $22 million.



Keep in mind that if you are a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma or any other asbestos-related disease, you may be eligible for compensation for pain, suffering, medical expenses, and much more. Looking for a mesothelioma law firm in Texas? For more information and for a free, no-obligation legal consultation, contact our dedicated and experienced mesothelioma law firm today.



Legal Resources for Texas Mesothelioma Claims




See the top mesothelioma lawyers in Texas



Calculate your mesothelioma claim value

### Albumin Levels May Help Predict Mesothelioma Prognosis

New research suggests that mesothelioma patients with low levels of albumin, a blood protein, are more likely to survive only a year or less after being diagnosed malignant pleural mesothelioma.



Chinese experts and researchers conducted a study of 97 patients who were admitted into the Shandong University Hospital from 1995 through 2013. Each patient was newly diagnosed with mesothelioma and was already set up to undergo platinum-based chemotherapy. 



After evaluating the patients and their records, researchers determined that 34 of the patients had extremely low albumin levels prior to treatment. Once treatment began, the patients with low albumin levels had a  44.1% survival rate for one year, whereas those that had high levels of albumin had a 72% chance of surviving past one year. 



Albumin's main function in the body is to carry fatty acids, thyroid hormones, and steroids into the bloodstream. According to the research, the survival odds of mesothelioma decreased by at least 9% for each 1 g/l albumin level reduction. 



Dr. Zhou-Hong Yao, the lead researcher in the study, says that a pretreatment serum is the easiest way to detect albumin levels, and in turn can help measure patient survival rates much easier. 



“The pretreatment serum albumin level is a simple, inexpensive and easily measurable marker with prognostic significance in malignant pleural mesothelioma patients treated with platinum-based systemic chemotherapy," said Dr. Yao. 



The full details of the study are located in Tumour Biology, July 2014, Volume 35, issue 7, pp. 6839-6845. 



Mesothelioma is a life-threatening illness that's generally brought about after exposure to asbestos. Unfortunately, most victims will live with the disease for decades before its initial symptoms start to surface.



Since the early symptoms tend to mimic symptoms of common respiratory ailments, many people don't seek out medical treatment until the disease is in its latest stages. It's important to undergo routine medical check-ups if you've been exposed to asbestos.



Some of the most common initial symptoms of pleural mesothelioma include:



Coughing, with or without phlegmBreath shortnessChest pain, typically under the rib cageA general feeling of lethargy and fatigue



As the disease progresses, abnormal lumps may start to appear under the skin on the chest, fluid buildup may occur in the lungs, and unusual weight loss may follow.



In addition, if your exposure to asbestos is due to the negligent actions of another party, such as a manufacturer supplying asbestos-containing products to your job site, you may be eligible for compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain, suffering and more. For more information on your legal rights and for a free, no-obligation case consultation, contact our experienced asbestos law firm today.



To learn more about mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases, fill out our form today for a free, comprehensive Mesothelioma and Asbestos Guide. Each guide is filled with pertinent information, including causes, diagnosis, treatment options, and more.

### Paint Company Agrees to Resolve Asbestos Lawsuit for $797.5 Million

RPM International Inc., the makers of Rust-Oleum paint, settled an asbestos lawsuit this week for $797.5 million. The lawsuit was brought against Bondex International Inc., a unit of RPM. 



According to reports, Bondex filed for bankruptcy in 2010 after a series of personal injury lawsuits. If the court approves the asbestos settlement, it would put a stop to Bondex's bankruptcy, which currently mandates that they pay around $1.2 billion to resolve outstanding asbestos lawsuits. 



With the new agreement, RPM would now be required to give $450 million to an asbestos trust fund, which would come after a reorganization plan is determined for Bondex. The remaining $347.5 is to be paid out in cash, stocks, or a combination of both. The new agreement mandates that RPM pay the remaining amount within two to fours years after the trust fund has been set up. In turn, any and all future asbestos lawsuits against Bondex will be directed to the trust fund. 



Along with Bondex, another RPM unit, Specialty Products Holding Co., filed bankruptcy in 2010 after an influx of asbestos lawsuits. Plaintiffs claim the company's joint compound, among other products, contained asbestos, which led to life-threatening illnesses such as malignant mesothelioma. 



Meanwhile, Bondex had several disagreements with the attorneys representing the plaintiffs and stated that the sum of $1.25 billion was an unfair amount, given that Bondex had already paid out in other settlements in the understanding that it would eliminate additional asbestos lawsuits. Yet, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Judith Fitzgerald rejected Bondex's argument in 2013. Yet, now that she is retired, the case has been sent to Judge Peter Walsh. 



According to RPM, they expect their contributions to the trust fund to be tax-deductible.



Asbestos-containing products, such as the ones both Bondex and Specialty Products have been associated with, have been linked to a series of health complications. There has been an abundance of asbestos-related lawsuits in the past decade alone, with many companies being mandated to set aside billions in trust funds for future victims of mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases.



Keep in mind that if you or a loved one have been exposed to asbestos to asbestos due to the negligence of a company, manufacturer, or any other responsible party, you may be entitled compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain, and suffering.



There is currently more than $30 billion in asbestos trust funds awaiting those who've been injured due to negligence. For more information and for a free, no-obligation case consultation, contact our leading, experienced mesothelioma and asbestos law firm today.



We also invite you to fill out our form for a free Mesothelioma and Asbestos Guide. Our comprehensive guide is filled with invaluable information for anyone who has been affected by asbestos exposure.

### $25 Million Awarded in New York Asbestos Lawsuit

The estate of a man who died of mesothelioma and another man struck by the deadly asbestos-related disease both won a $25 million verdict against Crane Company after a consolidated asbestos trial in New York County Supreme Court.



According to court documents, a six-member jury reached the guilty verdict against Crane after a 28-day-long trial and deliberating for two days. During the trial, jurors determined that electricians Selwyn Hackshaw and Ivan Sweberg were exposed to asbestos present in valves and other products manufactured or sold by Crane, which is based in Stamford, Connecticut.



In addition, the six-member panel determined that Crane failed to warn consumers and workers about asbestos-related dangers connected to the use of the company’s products and equipment. The jurors believed this failure to provide health advisories about exposure to asbestos was a major contributing factor which caused the plaintiff’s mesothelioma.



The jury awarded $10 million to Dorcas Hackshaw, Selwyn Hackshaw estate’s executor, for past pain and suffering dating from the commencement of his mesothelioma to his death.



It also awarded $15 million to Sweberg and his wife Laraine. The award was split - $5 million for past pain and suffering from the beginning of the mesothelioma to the date of the verdict, and $10 million for future pain and suffering.



The jury found Crane, one of 20 defendants in Hackshaw’s case and 30 in Sweberg’s case, to have acted recklessly and without regard for the safety of the plaintiffs and other people.



Hackshaw and Sweberg had filed separate asbestos lawsuits against Crane and various other companies, including General Electric, Goulds Pumps, and Westinghouse Electric Corp. In 2013, the New York County Supreme Court ordered the two cases to be consolidated because many of the legal issues, witnesses, and the companies’ defense arguments were essentially the same.



Hackshaw, who was 74 when he died of mesothelioma last August, worked as an electrician and pipefitter. Part of his job entailed making gaskets out of Crane’s Cranite Asbestos Sheet Gasketing Material. The product contained high amounts of asbestos, ranging between 75% to 85%.



Before his death, Hackshaw said he would use a ball-peen hammer to beat the material into shape, then cut it with a saw to make the gaskets. These activities caused clouds of asbestos dust to form around him.



He also applied and removed asbestos-containing insulation as part of his job as an electrician, especially when he needed to get to the Crane-made gaskets.



Sweberg, 72, worked as an electrician on many construction and building renovation projects between 1962 and 1972.  He was indirectly exposed to asbestos when other workers applied insulation made with the material to pumps, boilers, and other pieces of equipment around his work area.



Sweberg was diagnosed with asbestosis 27 years ago. He was monitoring the disease with yearly CT scans to check on its progress. After a CT scan in 2012, his doctors discovered that Sweberg had developed pleural mesothelioma.



Remember, if you or a loved one have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related disease due to the negligence of another party, you may be entitled to compensatory damages. Contact our experienced asbestos law firm today for more information and to learn more about your legal rights and options.

### New Study Shows Higher Survival Rate Among Women With Mesothelioma

A recent study performed by several physicians who've been endlessly researching mesothelioma and its effects, confirms what has been suspected by scientists and mesothelioma doctors for several years: women with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma have higher chances in achieving longer lifespans when compared to men who have the same disease.



Presented at the Fiftieth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeon's Poster Session in January 2014, the study represents one of the largest studies ever conducted regarding gender and asbestos-related diseases. The study included over 14,000 mesothelioma cases of people who were diagnosed with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma from 1973 through 2009. 



Around 22% of the patients in the study were women. When compared to men with similar health traits, race, and age, women had a five-year survival rate of a little over 13% as opposed to men who had a five-year survival rate of 4.5%.



The study also discovered that the gap in survival rate declined as the patients grew older. Even if the patients have surgery, the difference in survival rate is small the older the patients get. For example, 35% of women with mesothelioma who had surgery survived at least one year, whereas 32% of men with mesothelioma who had surgery survived at least a year.



Experts first believed that women's hormones were the main contributing factor, yet after the studies confirmed that older women still have slightly higher survival rates, they now feel there is more to the higher lifespans than just hormones.



"The fact that women have better survival rates than men suggests that there may be more than just hormones involved. Young women seem to do great, and it gives us good reason to be more aggressive in treating them," said Andrea Wolf M.D., one of the assistant professors who contributed to the study.



Another contributing factor may include vast differences in asbestos exposure. Men were typically exposed much more to asbestos, and on a daily basis, compared to women. When women were exposed, in many cases, it was second-hand exposure from spouses' clothing. 



"There could be many factors in why women seem to do better with this disease. It could be different types of exposure, for example. Historically, women were not working in the shipyards with all the asbestos, but they were cleaning the clothes of workers who did work there," Dr. Wolf said.



Although experts have not pinpointed exactly why women have a longer survival rate, the new study has helped them understand more about how the peritoneal malignant mesothelioma affects people, which in turn can assist them in developing better treatment plans.



For up-to-date information on mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases, we invite you to fill out our form to receive a complimentary Mesothelioma and Asbestos Guide. Each guide is filled with invaluable details on treatment options, diagnosis, prognoses, and your legal rights and options if you were negligently exposed to asbestos.

### The Danger Lingers On: Asbestos Retains Toxicity Despite the Passage of Time

According to a recent study, asbestos’ toxic nature does not wane or vanish with the passage of time. If someone was exposed to asbestos three or four decades ago, the dangerous effects of are still present and can cause the formation of malignant mesothelioma tumors at any time. Although this was discovered long ago, the study marks the first study to report on the findings.



The study, carried out by Dr. Alison Reid of the School of Public Health, Curtin University in Western Australia, and six researchers from Australia and Italy, shows that even after nearly a half-century passes following the initial exposure to asbestos fibers, the risk of developing pleural or peritoneal mesothelioma does not diminish.



The study followed 862 mesothelioma cases from a pool of over 22,000 people who were exposed to asbestos. Six groups of participants were made up of workers exposed on the job, and two groups were comprised of stay-at-home spouses who were exposed to asbestos by other means.



It not only takes into account exposure that took place in job sites contaminated by asbestos, but it also examines the effect of second-hand exposure.



Per the report, occupational exposure primarily affected workers at various facilities in Australia and Italy, including asbestos material processing plants, an asbestos mine, an amosite factory, and an asbestos mill. In addition, occupational exposure took place during the transportation of refined asbestos products by train and via asbestos presence in the environment.



Second-hand exposure was measured in a study of asbestos workers’ spouses who were not employed outside the home. Per the various studies used by Reid and the report’s co-authors, 54% of peritoneal mesothelioma cases (which affect the lower abdomen) and 44% of pleural mesothelioma cases were diagnosed over 40 years after the patients’ initial exposure to asbestos.



There were several cases of mesothelioma diagnoses that took place 50 years after the initial exposure. For pleural mesothelioma cases, the percentage of cases diagnosed during the time frame was 13.3%. For peritoneal mesothelioma patients who received diagnoses half a century after the asbestos exposure, the percentages were higher at 23.2%.



Though the long latency period of asbestos-related diseases is well-documented, “Mesothelioma Risk After 40 Years Since First Exposure to Asbestos,” is the first report stating that even the passage of 45 or more years does not reduce the incidence of malignant mesothelioma.



In the United States, where asbestos was considered an essential “wonder product” in several industries for over 100 years, close to 3,000 cases of mesothelioma are diagnosed every year. Statistics show that the number of average cases remains steady even though the use of asbestos in the U.S. has been seriously reduced over the past 30 years.



Considering that asbestos products have been replaced by substitutes, conventional wisdom suggests that the incidence of mesothelioma in the U.S. would diminish over time. Yet, since asbestos was used in construction and industry in large quantities as late as the 1970s, the average number of new mesothelioma cases in the U.S. has not decreased. Instead, it holds steady at a rate of 3,000 a year.



Additionally, the presence of asbestos in buildings and homes built in the 20th Century that have not undergone abatement procedures makes it certain that people will continue to be exposed in the years to come.



According to the study, even though the increased rate of mesothelioma cases seems to stabilize 40 to 50 years after the initial exposure to asbestos, every patient with the disease dies before the excess risk disappears.



Keep in mind that if you've been exposed to asbestos, it's important to get regular check-ups.



Furthermore, if your exposure is due to the negligence of another party, you may be entitled to compensatory damages. For more information, contact our award-winning mesothelioma law firm today for a free case consultation.

### Study Helps Determine How Well Alimta Works for Mesothelioma Victims

Researchers in Japan recently stated that a new way to determine the effectiveness of the medication Alimta may have been discovered, and in turn, they can pinpoint which mesothelioma patients will respond more favorably to the drug.



According to researchers at the Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Oncology at the Nippon Medical School in Tokyo, a total of six malignant pleural mesothelioma cell lines were tested during a recent study to determine how well patients react to Alimta, currently one of the most popular medications for the treatment of malignant mesothelioma.



Out of the six cell lines tested, three were extremely sensitive to the medication.



Per Susumu Takeuchi, the lead author of the study, osteopontin was the main target of the sensitivity. Two of the patients that responded well to Alimta were found to have a large osteopontin expression.



As a result, the researchers conclude that glycoprotein is the sole biomarker that can help predict how effective Alimta will work on mesothelioma patients.



“Pathway analysis revealed that osteopontin was an important target in pemetrexed (Alimta) sensitivity. Overexpression of osteopontin was observed in the sensitive cells by quantitative PCR and western blot analysis,” Takeuchi wrote in the study’s report.



What is Alimta?



Approved in 2004 by the Federal Drug Administration (FDA), Alimta, also known by its generic name, pemetrexed, is a medication specifically used for the treatment of pleural mesothelioma. In September of 2008, Alimta was also approved as a medication for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) when used in conjunction with Cisplatin, another drug used in the treatment of asbestos-related diseases.



Mesothelioma has a history of being known as a rare but life-threatening disease that’s often difficult to treat. With this new study, however, scientists and researchers can now pinpoint which patients will respond favorably to Alimta, which in turn can help reduce the pain associated with mesothelioma and assist in metastasizing cancer cells.



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, it’s important to speak with your physician in regards to the treatment that will work best for you.



In addition, if your illness is a result of the negligence of another party, such as an asbestos manufacturer or supplier, you may be entitled to compensation for medical expenses, pain, suffering, anguish, disfigurement, and much more.



You’ll need an experienced lawyer by your side to ensure that you have the best chance of success with your case. For more information, contact our leading mesothelioma law firm today for a free, no-obligation case consultation.

### NYC Reinstates Punitive Damages in Asbestos Lawsuits

This Tuesday, Justice Sherry Klein Heitler of the New York Supreme Court brought back the option for plaintiffs to sue for punitive damages in New York City asbestos lawsuits after a motion was made to remove previous deferral requirements under the NYCAL Case Management Order (CMO).



Part of Heitler’s decision stems from the fact almost every other state court in New York allows plaintiffs to seek punitive damages.



“What I cannot ignore is the fact that victims of asbestos exposure are permitted to apply for punitive damages in every New York state court except this one. I for one cannot justify a situation in which an asbestos plaintiff is permitted to apply for punitive damages in Buffalo but not this court. This raises serious constitutional equal protection concerns which should not be overlooked,” Heitler wrote.



Those who oppose Heitler’s punitive damages reinstatement claim that resources for future cases will be depleted.



However, even though she said both sides were presented well during a recent discussion regarding the matter, Heitler proceeded to allow punitive damages to be reinstated on a case-by-case basis. Heitler made sure to point out though, that she expects plaintiffs to act ethically when pursuing punitive damages.



“While plaintiffs have evinced their intention not to abuse this opportunity, it is appropriate for the court to caution the plaintiffs’ bar not to overstep this permission by attempting to seek punitive damages indiscriminately. Punitive damages should only be sought in the most serious cases to correct for the most egregious conduct, and must present a valid reference to corrective action."



In asbestos lawsuits, punitive damages are a way to “punish” liable parties for wrongful behavior and for actions considered extremely reckless in nature.



For example, if an asbestos manufacturer has had several complaints regarding people becoming ill after exposure to their products, yet they still continue to supply the same asbestos-containing materials (ACMs), this type of behavior may be considered excessively reckless.



Although punitive damages are awarded by compensation, it’s important to note that these types of damages are not the same as compensatory damages. Whereas punitive damages allow victims to be compensated for the reckless actions of others, compensatory damages cover compensation for lost wages, medical bills, property damage, pain, suffering, funeral expenses (if applicable), disability, and disfigurement.



If you or a loved one have been injured by asbestos,  you have legal options and rights, and you may be entitled to both punitive and compensatory damages.



Since punitive damages are state-specific, retain the services of an experienced mesothelioma lawyer in order to fully understand what you may be entitled to. To get started, contact our leading mesothelioma law firm today for a free, no-obligation legal consultation.

### Devastating Results Found: Firefighters and Mesothelioma

A new bill in New Hampshire was proposed this week after devastating results from a study performed last fall by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) were released. Although several asbestos lawsuits have been filed by firefighters over the past few decades, the studies confirm just how dangerous asbestos exposure is.



NIOSH, along with the National Fire Administration, published the study in the October 2013 edition of the Occupational and Environmental Medicine, which revealed that the impact of asbestos exposure on firefighters is severe. The initial goal of the study was to determine exactly what type of relationship, if any, existed between work exposure and cancer with firefighters.



Not only did the study determine that exposure to agents such as formaldehyde caused cancer in firefighters, but also that the rate of mesothelioma among firefighters who have been exposed to asbestos is double the amount of the mesothelioma victims in the entire United States general population.



The new study may help firefighters in obtaining additional medical coverage costs. Under proposed House Bill 1489, Representative Laura Pantelakos, of New Hampshire, aims to start the Firefighters with Heart, Lung, and Cancer Disease Fund, which would be used solely to reimburse firefighters for costs associated with medical issues. If the new bill is passed, the fund would begin in July of 2014.



Some of the findings in the report that prompted the new bill include:



The study was the first one ever to find such a high incidence of mesothelioma among United States firefightersThe study researched cancer deaths among firefighters from 1950 through 2,009, resulting in findings that show thousands upon thousands of workers were exposed to harmful, life-threatening materialsFirefighters are more likely than the general population to develop urinary, digestive, and respiratory cancer



Firefighters can be exposed to asbestos in several different ways. For example, when entering buildings that were ruined or damaged by fires, workers face asbestos exposure from pipes, furnaces, gaskets, shingles, and more.



In addition to facing asbestos risks while working, firefighters may also face exposure via their protective gear and clothing. Since asbestos is known for its heat and fire-resistant properties, helmets, jackets, gloves, and old fire equipment was made with asbestos. Although asbestos is hardly used in protective gear and equipment anymore, a multitude of firefighters has already developed mesothelioma, stemming from the time period in which asbestos was used abundantly.



It’s estimated that more firefighters will develop mesothelioma even though it’s been over 20 years since they’ve worn clothing and gear that contained asbestos. Yet, mesothelioma is a silent disease that can take anywhere from 30 to 50 years for the first symptom to appear.



The medical community recommends that all firefighters seek regular medical checkups since the disease has such a long dormancy period. Early detection is imperative for the best chances of successful treatment.



If you've been exposed to asbestos while on the job, you may be entitled to compensation for your losses. You’ll need an experienced asbestos attorney to assist you and help you understand what you may be entitled to. For additional information and a free, no-obligation legal consultation, contact our experienced asbestos lawyers today.


## Lawyers

### Baltimore Mesothelioma Lawyer

People who developed asbestos cancer in and around Baltimore can rely on an experienced Baltimore mesothelioma lawyer to seek justice. Workplaces in the area, including manufacturing plants, shipyards, construction, paper mills, and steel corporations, relied on asbestos for years and exposed workers. 



If you or someone you love suffers from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in Baltimore, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 





Baltimore Asbestos Facts




No city in Maryland has seen more asbestos-related deaths than Baltimore. 



Between 1999 and 2017, Maryland had nearly 5,300 asbestos deaths, and over 1,200 of those were in Baltimore County.



Both industrial manufacturing jobs and shipyards in the city used asbestos for decades and exposed workers. 




Why Should I Sue for Mesothelioma in Baltimore?







Most people sue for mesothelioma to seek compensation. Most people with mesothelioma were negligently exposed by asbestos companies that can now be held liable for resulting expenses.



Filing an asbestos claim is crucial because it offers more than just financial relief. It helps cover the exorbitant costs of medical treatments, including travel for advanced care and living expenses when you can no longer work.



Moreover, these claims serve a vital role in holding companies accountable. For years, many companies concealed the dangers of asbestos, prioritizing profit over safety. By pursuing a claim, you not only seek justice for yourself but also contribute to a broader effort to ensure these entities face consequences for their negligence.



Mesothelioma is a devastating and also costly illness. Many people travel for advanced treatment with specialists and can no longer work or earn an income.



How Can a Baltimore Mesothelioma Lawyer Help? 



To sue asbestos companies or pursue other sources of compensation, you need a mesothelioma or asbestos lawyer. These cases are far too complicated to attempt without expert legal guidance. 



Choose a top Baltimore mesothelioma lawyer in Baltimore who can help you by:




Providing a free initial consultation to review your case.



Explaining your options for filing a lawsuit or making a claim.



Using investigative and medical experts to find the evidence needed to prove your case.



Maximizing the compensation you are owed.



Starting a lawsuit and negotiating a fair settlement.



Litigating your case in court if necessary.



Making a claim with any asbestos trust funds you qualify for.



Navigating the veterans benefits system to make a claim.




When selecting a lawyer, prioritize those with:




Decades of Experience: Look for attorneys who have a long-standing history of handling asbestos cases. Experience is crucial in understanding the complexities of mesothelioma litigation.



A Proven Track Record: Choose a firm with a history of significant compensation recoveries for mesothelioma clients. A strong track record indicates their ability to successfully advocate for victims.



No Financial Risk: Opt for lawyers who work on a contingency fee basis. This ensures that you only pay if they win your case, minimizing your financial burden during an already challenging time.




By focusing on these attributes, you can ensure that you are choosing a lawyer who not only offers comprehensive services but also has the experience and success needed to handle your case effectively.



As you choose a mesothelioma lawyer in Baltimore, remember that they should be backed by a nationwide firm. Asbestos lawsuits are complex and often involve multiple defendants in different states. 



Understanding the Statute of Limitations for Mesothelioma Claims in Maryland



In Maryland, the statute of limitations is a crucial set of laws that dictate the time frame within which mesothelioma patients and their families can file a legal claim. This time-sensitive process means that once a diagnosis is received, the clock starts ticking. Therefore, reaching out to a legal expert promptly is imperative.



Key Points to Consider:




Timeline for Filing: Typically, the statute of limitations in Maryland requires that a mesothelioma claim be filed within three years from the date of diagnosis. If filing on behalf of a deceased loved one, the period generally remains the same but starts from the date of death.



Why It Matters: Filing within this timeframe is crucial because, after the limitation period expires, the courts will likely refuse to hear the case. This could result in losing the opportunity to seek compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.




Steps to Take:




Immediate Action: After a diagnosis, consult with an asbestos attorney as soon as possible to assess your case. Quick action can help ensure all necessary information and documentation are gathered within the legal window.



Legal Guidance: An experienced lawyer can help navigate the complexities of asbestos litigation and ensure that your claim is filed correctly and promptly.




In conclusion, the statute of limitations is an essential component of filing a mesothelioma claim in Maryland, making immediate legal consultation a vital first step following a diagnosis.



When you work with certain mesothelioma attorneys, they often utilize a contingency fee structure, which means you won't face any hourly fees or out-of-pocket costs. Instead of an upfront payment, these lawyers agree to receive a portion of the settlement or compensation you receive from your case. This approach ensures they only get paid if they're successful in securing compensation for you.



This arrangement aligns the attorney's interests with yours, motivating them to achieve the best possible outcome. You'll have the reassurance that your financial risk is minimized, allowing you to focus on your health and recovery without concern over accumulating legal costs.



When considering the costs associated with hiring a mesothelioma lawyer, it's important to note that many firms operate on a contingency fee basis. This means you won't face hourly fees or upfront expenses. The lawyers only collect payment if they successfully secure compensation for you.



Here's a breakdown of the financial structure:




No Hourly Charges: You're not billed for the hours the lawyers work on your case.



No Out-of-Pocket Costs: There are no initial fees required to start the process.



Contingency Fee: The firm only gets paid a percentage of what you win. If there's no compensation, you don't owe anything.




This approach can ease the financial burden, allowing you to focus on your health and recovery while your legal team works to secure the compensation you deserve.



How Can Veterans with Mesothelioma Access VA Benefits?



Veterans diagnosed with mesothelioma have unique options available to them through the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to secure medical and financial support. Navigating these benefits, however, requires a clear understanding of the process. Here's a breakdown of how veterans can access these essential resources:




Understand Eligibility Requirements: Veterans must first confirm their eligibility for VA benefits by ensuring their mesothelioma diagnosis is connected to asbestos exposure during military service.



Prepare Necessary Documentation: Gather all necessary medical records and service documents that link mesothelioma to military service. These papers will form the foundation of your claim.



File a Claim: Submitting a VA claim is a crucial step. It involves completing the proper forms and providing evidence that corroborates your military exposure and diagnoses.



Access Support from Accredited Professionals: Work with VA-accredited attorneys or representatives who specialize in mesothelioma cases. These experts can guide veterans through the claims process, ensuring all paperwork is accurately filled and submitted on time.



Explore Additional Benefits: Beyond medical treatment, veterans may be eligible for monthly compensation, travel reimbursements for VA medical appointments, and potentially, funeral benefits.




By following these steps and utilizing expert resources, veterans can effectively access the VA benefits they are entitled to, providing critical support during their battle with mesothelioma.



How Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Baltimore?



Baltimore has a long history of industrial and shipping industries that used asbestos. You could have been exposed on several job sites if you worked in the area. 



The Curtis Bay Coast Guard Yard



Once situated in downtown Baltimore, Curtis Bay Coast Guard Yard was used to repair several vessels until the 1990s. The busiest time for the yard was during World War I and War II. At that time, nearly 3,000 people worked there.



As with most shipyards in that area, the Curtis Bay Coast Guard Yard used massive amounts of asbestos in construction and repairs. Workers risked being exposed and developing serious, life-threatening illnesses, including mesothelioma.



Key Highway Shipyard 



Another maritime company in Baltimore, Key Highway Shipyard, also used asbestos. The facility mainly worked on repairs and making components for ships. It used asbestos in those parts and materials, putting workers at risk for years. 



During World War I and World War II, the shipyard repaired over 1,000 naval ships. Around 11,000 people worked at the Key Highway Shipyard, and almost every worker faced asbestos exposure.



The shipyard closed in 1982, but shortly after, in 1988, several former employees filed an asbestos-related lawsuit against Raymark Industries, the manufacturer that supplied parts to Key Highway Shipyard. Many former workers had already developed illnesses such as mesothelioma and asbestosis.



Titan Steel Corporation







Titan Steel Corporation was one of the many steel corporations that relied heavily on asbestos before the early 1980s. Titan Steel Corporation became one of the biggest distributors of steel and tin worldwide during its peak. 



Many of the workers at Titan were exposed to asbestos. Steel manufacturing relied on the mineral because of its ability to resist heat and prevent fires. Today, former steelworkers are still diagnosed with mesothelioma from the exposure that occurred decades ago. 



Other Job Sites Associated with Asbestos Use in Baltimore



Along with steel corporations and shipyards, oil companies, hospitals, and other public buildings used asbestos. Some still contain asbestos today and pose a risk. 



Schools




Seton Keough High School



Arundel Elementary School



Belmont Elementary School



Calverton Middle School



Cardinal Gibbons School



Deep Creek Middle School



Dunbar High School



Johns Hopkins University



Johns Hopkins School of Medicine



Edmondson High School



Forest Park High School



Greenspring High School



Hilton Elementary School



Howard High School



Raven High School



Lombard Middle School



Middle River High School



Northwestern Senior High School



Parkville High School



Baltimore Polytechnic Institute



Saint Michael's School



Sussex Elementary School



Walbrook High School



Western High School



Allegheny Community College




Oil Companies




American Oil Company



Baltimore United Oil Company



Caso Standard Oil Company



Continental Oil Company



Esso Standard Oil Company



Gulf Oil Company



Humble Oil Company



Hess Oil Company



Standard Oil Refinery




Steel Companies




Armco Steel Corporation



Bethlehem Steel Mill



Eastern Stainless Steel Corporation



Scullin Steel Company



Sparrow Points Steel Mill




Hospitals




Baltimore City Hospital



Bon Secours Hospital



Franklin Square Hospital



Good Samaritan Hospital



Harbor Hospital



Johns Hopkins Hospital



Montebello State Hospital



Mount Sinai Hospital



Saint Agnes Hospital



Spring Grove Hospital



Union Memorial Hospital




The Power of Personal Stories in Raising Mesothelioma Awareness



Sharing personal stories of mesothelioma can profoundly impact awareness and understanding. Each narrative brings a unique perspective that can resonate deeply with audiences, creating a ripple effect that extends far beyond the individual.



Humanizing the Statistics



Statistics and facts are crucial, but personal stories breathe life into numbers. When people share their experiences, they offer a glimpse into the emotional and physical challenges faced by those affected. This human connection makes the issue more relatable and memorable to a wider audience.



Inspiring Action and Advocacy



Real-life accounts have the power to inspire action. When someone hears a personal story, they are more likely to feel compelled to contribute to the cause, whether through donations, advocacy, or volunteering. Michelle Pfeiffer and Steve McQueen have shared their personal connections to mesothelioma, bringing significant attention to the disease and encouraging others to get involved.



Building Community Support



Sharing experiences fosters a sense of community among those affected. It provides comfort and validation, letting others know they are not alone. Bob Stephenson's story, for instance, not only raised awareness but also created a support network that connected him with others going through similar journeys.



Educating the Public



Stories personalize the dangers of asbestos exposure, educating people on how mesothelioma develops and why prevention is critical. By contextualizing the experiences of those who endured the disease, personal narratives can highlight precautionary measures and influence policy changes aimed at reducing exposure risks.



In conclusion, personal stories don't just spread awareness; they forge connections, inspire action, provide education, and create community support, ultimately transforming the landscape of mesothelioma awareness and advocacy.



Bethlehem Steel Company Lawsuit



In 2007, the families of former Bethlehem Steel Company employees received $3.97 million in damages. The workers passed away from asbestos-related lung cancer after working with equipment that used asbestos brakes. 



Eagle-Picher Industries Inc., Pittsburgh Corning Corp., and Owens-Illinois Inc. were all found at fault by the Baltimore City Court. All three companies were responsible for the manufacturing of asbestos-containing parts that were used at the steel company.



Baltimore Asbestos Lawsuit Backlog







The Baltimore City Circuit Court faced a major backlog of asbestos lawsuits in recent years. In 2019, approximately 27,000 asbestos cases were waiting to be resolved in Baltimore. 



These involved thousands of victims who worked in the city's steel mills, shipyards, and other workplaces with asbestos. Many waited years for a resolution only to have their cases dropped. Others had their cases quickly resolved in a flurry of activity. The backlog was blamed mainly on one firm that let cases languish for years or decades. 



In 2020, the Baltimore City judiciary began a plan to bring forth at least 500 asbestos cases per month to try to chip away at the mountain of lawsuits. 



Mesothelioma Treatment in Baltimore



Mesothelioma patients in Baltimore have access to two world-class cancer centers. Both offer treatment for mesothelioma patients. 



Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center



Baltimore is home to the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University. It offers advanced treatments and conducts cancer research. 



The Lung Cancer Program is a multidisciplinary team focusing on lung cancer that also treats patients with pleural mesothelioma. The Cancer Center also treats peritoneal mesothelioma and offers HIPEC treatment. 



Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center



The Marlene and Steward Greenebaume Comprehensive Cancer Center is part of the University of Maryland Medical Center in Baltimore. The Mesothelioma and Thoracic Oncology Treatment and Research Center treats patients with pleural mesothelioma and gives them access to clinical trials. 



Patients with peritoneal mesothelioma also have access to HIPEC here, the leading treatment for the abdominal form of mesothelioma. 



How Long After Asbestos Exposure Can Mesothelioma Develop?



Mesothelioma, a severe cancer primarily linked to asbestos exposure, has a notably long latency period. After an individual inhales or ingests asbestos fibers, these tiny particles can embed themselves in the lining of vital organs, such as the lungs. Over time, they cause persistent irritation.



Unlike many diseases that manifest shortly after contact with a harmful substance, mesothelioma takes its time. The disease may not emerge until many years later, often remaining dormant and undetected. For many individuals, the timeline ranges widely from 10 to 50 years post-exposure before symptoms become evident.



This extended latency period is why mesothelioma often affects older adults, who may have been exposed to asbestos in their careers or through environmental contact decades earlier. Therefore, it's crucial for those with past exposure to remain vigilant and undergo regular health screenings.



People in this company are friendly, knowledgeable, and professional. They quickly answered all my questions and patiently walked me through the case and any open issues. I so appreciate their diligence and patience during this challenging time.- Jingjing Z.



Legal Assistance in Baltimore



If you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. For questions and assistance, feel free to contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Annapolis Mesothelioma Lawyer

An Annapolis mesothelioma lawyer can help if you suffered asbestos exposure and resulting illness in the area. The construction of many of the buildings, facilities, and naval ships in Annapolis involved asbestos, leading to exposure, illness, and lawsuits. 



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Annapolis, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 





Annapolis Asbestos Facts




Only Baltimore has more asbestos-related deaths than Annapolis in Maryland. 



Between 1999 and 2017, 656 people in Anne Arundel County and Annapolis died from illnesses related to asbestos exposure. 



The maritime and naval industry in Annapolis were major contributors to exposure. 




When Do I Need an Annapolis Mesothelioma Lawyer? 







If you have a diagnosis of mesothelioma, contact a lawyer as soon as possible. Top-rated asbestos lawyers in Annapolis can explain your legal options for seeking compensation. 



Mesothelioma is a devastating and expensive illness. It is almost always caused by negligent asbestos exposure. The companies responsible for exposing you to asbestos can be held liable for damages, but you must act quickly. 



How Can a Lawyer Help Me Get Mesothelioma Compensation? 



As a victim of negligent asbestos exosure in Annapolis, you have several options for seeking compensation. The right lawyer will explain these options and guide your choices. You could be eligible for one or more types of asbestos or mesothelioma claims:




Mesothelioma personal injury lawsuit



Mesothelioma wrongful death lawsuit



Asbestos trust fund claim



VA benefits claim




Exploring Compensation Options in Annapolis 



In Annapolis, victims of asbestos exposure have multiple avenues to pursue compensation, each offering unique benefits and challenges. Understanding these options can help you make informed decisions about your case.



Mesothelioma Lawsuits



Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Lawsuits: These lawsuits aim to recover economic, non-economic, and punitive damages. Economic damages cover tangible losses like medical expenses and lost wages, while non-economic damages compensate for pain and suffering. Maryland has specific statutes that limit non-economic damages but allows for punitive damages in cases of malicious conduct.



Asbestos Trust Fund Claims



Due to the widespread impact of asbestos-related diseases, many companies have established trust funds through bankruptcy proceedings. There are approximately 60 asbestos trust funds available, holding an estimated $30 billion. These funds provide a vital resource for victims seeking economic and non-economic damages.



Workers’ Compensation Benefits



For those exposed to asbestos at work, workers' compensation offers benefits like free medical care and partial wage replacement. These benefits are crucial for employees, although they typically preclude the ability to sue employers directly. Dependents of deceased workers may also qualify for death benefits and funeral expense coverage.



VA Claims for Veterans



Maryland's strong military presence means many veterans have been exposed to asbestos during their service. Veterans diagnosed with asbestos-related illnesses can file VA claims for disability benefits and medical care. Surviving family members may also be eligible for VA survivor benefits.



Lawsuits for mesothelioma typically end in a settlement. Only rarely do they go to trial. A trial can lead to a large jury award, but there is also the risk of receiving nothing. Trials also take longer to resolve. 



If an asbestos company went bankrupt, they likely set up an asbestos trust fund to compensate victims. Your lawyer can find the trusts you qualify for and help you make a claim. This process involves more than just filing paperwork; it's about thorough investigation and precise identification. Your legal team will dig deep to uncover all potential sources of asbestos exposure.




Identifying Employers and Sources: They'll start by pinpointing past employers and other direct sources where asbestos exposure might have occurred.



Tracing Asbestos Providers: Beyond just identifying where exposure happened, your lawyer will also trace back to the companies that supplied asbestos to those locations.




This meticulous approach ensures that every potential avenue for a claim is explored, maximizing your chances of a successful outcome. With this comprehensive strategy, you can feel confident that no stone will be left unturned in your pursuit of justice.



Annapolis has a long military history; unfortunately, the military has a long history of using asbestos. Veterans have high rates of mesothelioma compared to the general population. 



Navy veterans are most affected by asbestos illnesses. If you are a veteran and have mesothelioma, you could be entitled to monthly disability compensation. 



Challenges in Proving Punitive Damages in Mesothelioma Cases



Proving punitive damages in mesothelioma cases poses several distinct challenges:




Evidentiary Requirements: To justify punitive damages, it must be established that companies knowingly endangered health by using asbestos. This involves gathering substantial evidence that demonstrates the firms were aware of the risks associated with asbestos exposure and took measures to hide these facts.



Corporate Conspiracy: Demonstrating that there was a deliberate conspiracy by companies to conceal the health hazards of asbestos from the public is crucial. This requires unveiling internal documents, emails, and other communications that reflect the company's intent to mislead regulators or consumers.



Regulatory Standards: Different states have varying standards for what constitutes punitive damages. In some jurisdictions, there must be clear evidence of an egregious disregard for safety. Therefore, aligning the evidence with these specific legal criteria is a formidable task.



Complex Litigation Process: Mesothelioma cases often involve going up against large corporations with significant legal resources. These companies invest heavily in defense strategies, making the litigation process lengthy and complex.



Historical Context: Many mesothelioma cases stem from exposure that happened decades ago. Collecting evidence from that era and ensuring it meets today's legal standards presents unique hurdles. Records may be lost, and witnesses may be unavailable or difficult to locate.




Despite these challenges, a well-prepared legal team can effectively present the case by utilizing historical documents, expert testimonies, and strategic legal arguments to meet the stringent requirements for awarding punitive damages.



Understanding Compensation in a Maryland Mesothelioma Claim



When pursuing a mesothelioma claim in Maryland, the potential compensation can be significant. Some verdicts have reached up to $11.5 million, showcasing the serious financial repercussions associated with asbestos exposure. Those affected have several avenues to seek compensation, which include lawsuits, asbestos trust fund claims, worker’s compensation, and VA claims.



Types of Claims




Lawsuits: Victims often file mesothelioma lawsuits to seek damages related to asbestos exposure. This can cover a range of compensatory categories, such as economic and non-economic damages.



Asbestos Trust Fund Claims: Those exposed may claim compensation from established asbestos trust funds set aside by companies who used these dangerous materials.



Worker’s Compensation: Occupational exposure may qualify individuals for worker’s compensation benefits, covering medical expenses and lost wages.



VA Claims: Veterans with asbestos exposure resulting from military service can seek compensation through VA claims.




Compensation Categories



Economic Damages: This covers direct financial losses, including:




Medical bills from diagnosis to treatment



Lost wages due to inability to work



Future medical costs and anticipated wage losses



Personal and domestic care expenses




Non-Economic Damages: These focus on the intangible impacts, primarily pain and suffering. Maryland imposes a limit on these damages, which is adjusted annually. As of recent figures, it stands at $920,000.



Punitive Damages: In situations where companies acted with malice or deceit regarding asbestos dangers, punitive damages might be awarded. These are designed to punish and deter such conduct, although they require substantial evidence to justify.



Compensation for Wrongful Death



If a family member succumbs to an asbestos-related disease, Maryland law allows families to pursue wrongful death claims. This may include:




Coverage of medical and personal expenses incurred by the deceased



Compensation for the family’s emotional grief and suffering



Loss of companionship and comfort



Loss of parental or spousal care and advice




Overall, the compensation structure in Maryland mesothelioma claims is comprehensive, addressing both tangible and intangible losses suffered due to asbestos exposure.



Understanding Non-Economic Damages in Mesothelioma Lawsuits



When pursuing a mesothelioma lawsuit, it’s crucial to comprehend the concept of non-economic damages. These damages serve as compensation for intangible losses experienced by the victim. Unlike economic damages, which cover measurable costs such as medical bills, non-economic damages address the pain and suffering endured due to the illness.



Key Aspects of Non-Economic Damages:




Pain and Suffering: This accounts for the physical discomfort and emotional distress caused by mesothelioma. It is a crucial component since the disease significantly affects quality of life.



Loss of Enjoyment: Compensation also covers the inability to enjoy life’s activities as before, such as hobbies, family gatherings, and other personal interests.



Emotional Distress: Understandably, dealing with a severe illness like mesothelioma induces significant emotional turmoil. Non-economic damages account for these psychological impacts.




Maryland’s Approach



In Maryland, the law has imposed a cap on non-economic damages since October 1, 1994, starting at $500,000, with an annual increment of $15,000. This cap adjusts over time, and as of October 1, 2022, it stands at $920,000.



Understanding these damages and their limits can guide victims and their families through legal proceedings, ensuring they seek appropriate compensation for their suffering beyond just financial losses.



Understanding Economic Damages in a Mesothelioma Lawsuit



When you're dealing with a mesothelioma lawsuit, one critical aspect is securing economic damages. But what exactly does that entail? Essentially, economic damages refer to the financial compensation for tangible losses resulting from an illness like mesothelioma. These losses, which can be quantified with evidence, cover a wide range of areas:




Medical Costs: This includes everything from initial diagnoses to ongoing treatments related to your condition. Every doctor's visit, hospital stay, and prescribed medication contributes to these expenses.



Lost Income: If your illness prevented you from working, either temporarily or permanently, you could claim the wages you would have otherwise earned. This takes into account past income as well as potential future earnings that you may never realize due to your health condition.



Future Financial Needs: Beyond current expenses, you'll want to consider anticipated medical bills and any expected loss of income that might arise as your condition progresses.



Business Revenue Losses: If you're a business owner, your disease may obstruct operations and generate losses. These are accounted for as well, capturing the economic impact on your company.



Cost of Personal and Domestic Care: Many mesothelioma patients require personal assistance, whether it's skilled nursing or domestic help, such as cleaning or cooking. The financial burden of these services can be substantial and are therefore included as economic damages.




In summary, economic damages provide a comprehensive monetary compensation framework, addressing the direct financial impacts mesothelioma has on your life's journey. Whether through lost income, rising medical costs, or necessary personal care, economic damages aim to alleviate the monetary strain imposed by this challenging illness.



Understanding the Time Limits for Asbestos Exposure Claims in Annapolis



When pursuing an asbestos exposure claim in Annapolis, it's essential to be aware of the specific time limits, known as statutes of limitations. These deadlines are crucial for ensuring that your lawsuit is filed in a timely manner.



Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Claims




Personal Injury Claims: In Maryland, individuals have three years from the date of diagnosis to file a personal injury claim related to asbestos exposure. This period begins when a doctor formally identifies the condition as linked to asbestos.



Wrongful Death Claims: For cases of wrongful death due to asbestos exposure, the statute of limitations is either ten years from the date of death or three years from when the cause of death is uncovered—whichever happens first.




Trust Fund Claims




Varying Deadlines: Asbestos trust fund claims have their own deadlines, which can vary depending on the specific trust fund. Many of these deadlines are aligned with the state’s statute of limitations for mesothelioma and related claims.




Importance of Timely Legal Action



It's paramount not to delay contacting a qualified attorney in Annapolis. Legal professionals need ample time to thoroughly investigate your case and prepare a strong claim. Engaging a lawyer early can significantly impact the strength of your case against asbestos companies that may deploy extensive defenses to avoid paying compensations.



By acting swiftly, you enhance the likelihood of securing a favorable settlement or verdict, ultimately aiming for maximum possible compensation. The sooner you start, the better your chances of a successful outcome become.



Exposure to Asbestos in Annapolis



With its strategic location on the water, Annapolis has long been an important port, shipping, and naval center. Ships were once constructed with asbestos in nearly every component. Any industry involving ships put workers at risk of exposure. 



Annapolis and the Maritime Industry



Ships and shipbuilding, both civilian and military, used asbestos components and materials for decades until 1980. 



Any workplace that involved building, repairing, maintaining, or crewing ships put workers at risk of asbestos exposure. As an important naval and shipbuilding center, asbestos has long been a risk in Annapolis.



Asbestos at the U.S. Naval Academy







The Annapolis Naval Academy, also known as the U.S. Naval Academy, was in the spotlight when officials found asbestos in the school’s public works department in March 1995. 



Sheeting materials with asbestos were found, putting students, staff members, workers, and school mechanics at risk of exposure. 



The sheeting was initially created for gaskets and pipes in the school’s heating plants and mechanical rooms.



The materials, found to contain 80 percent asbestos, were used for decades with no appropriate protections for workers. 



Although the occupational health manager of the school ordered all of the sheeting to be removed, it only occurred well after several people had already been exposed.



Other Job Sites Associated with Asbestos in Annapolis




Kevin Hughes LTD



Old Mill Senior High School



Court of Special Appeals Building



Tawes Fine Arts Building (University of Maryland)




Understanding Secondary Asbestos Exposure



What is Secondary Asbestos Exposure?



Secondary asbestos exposure occurs when individuals come into contact with asbestos fibers indirectly, rather than through direct interaction with asbestos-containing materials. This type of exposure is particularly concerning because it affects people who don't work directly with asbestos but are nonetheless at risk due to its presence in their environment.



How Does It Happen?




Transfer Through Work Clothing:

Workers in environments with asbestos use may inadvertently bring fibers home. These microscopic particles cling to their clothing, shoes, and even skin.





Home Contamination:

Once inside, these tiny and lightweight fibers can spread throughout the house. They often travel through the air and can infiltrate the ventilation systems, reaching various rooms.





Family Exposure:

Family members face risks primarily through regular household activities. Hugging the worker or handling their laundry can lead to exposure, as fibers can transfer from clothing to the skin and respiratory system.






Key Points to Consider:




Invisible Threat: Asbestos fibers are exceedingly small and difficult to detect without specialized equipment.



Widespread Presence: Once dispersed in a home, fibers can remain suspended in the air, posing an ongoing health risk.



Health Risks: Even low levels of exposure can contribute to serious health issues over time, making awareness and prevention crucial.




Understanding secondary asbestos exposure is vital for preventing unintentional health risks to those who might otherwise be unaware of the dangers lurking in their everyday environment.



Annapolis Residents Still at Risk of Asbestos Exposure



A lot of the risk of asbestos exposure is in the past. But, because asbestos was used so heavily in building and ship construction, it remains an ongoing risk to residents and workers. A few incidents in Anne Arundel County and near Annapolis highlight the issue: 




Anne Arundel County residents protested the development of the River Glen subdivision in Pasadena near Annapolis because of asbestos concerns. Residents claim that the county government knew about the risks but proceeded anyway. The site was once an asbestos dumping area. Many residents fear it is too late and that they have been exposed to asbestos due to the activities at the site. 



Another community near Annapolis, Odenton, is facing the introduction of a new landfill that would accept asbestos waste. Odenton residents protest the landfill as a local blight and a potential source of exposure to asbestos and other toxic materials. 




Maryland Governor Sponsors Asbestos-Related Lawsuits







In 1991, Governor William Donald Schaefer agreed to sponsor a bill for asbestos victims seeking to file a lawsuit against both local and state governments. This was an effort to recover millions of dollars from distributors and manufacturers of asbestos.



The bill changed the state of Maryland’s “statute of repose.” The law previously stated that building manufacturers and their insurers were protected from lawsuits for at least 20 years after the construction of the buildings. 



Due to the long-term latency period associated with asbestos-related diseases, the repose law was unfair. It prevented most victims of asbestos illnesses from seeking damages for life-threatening diseases.



Mesothelioma Treatment in Annapolis, Maryland



If you’ve been exposed to asbestos, treatment from a comprehensive cancer care center with experts in mesothelioma. These cancer specialists can offer the best treatment for life-threatening and rare asbestos illnesses.



Maryland is home to several excellent cancer centers that can treat mesothelioma and offer spots in clinical trials: 




Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Care Center at John Hopkins: Weinberg Building, 401 N. Broadway, Baltimore, Maryland, 21231, 410-502-1133



The University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center: 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, 800-888-8823



National Cancer Institute: 6116 Executive Boulevard, Suite 300, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, 800-422-6237




Physicians who offer comprehensive cancer care treatment




Dr. Stephen Yang (Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Care Center at Johns Hopkins)



Dr. Petr F. Hausner (the University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center)




These lawyers made us feel so much better about going through this terrible process. We had no idea where to begin and they helped get us all the compensation we possibly could. They were friendly understanding and very hard-working. They answered any questions we had about compensation and even medical advice- Natalie F.



Getting Legal Help in Annapolis



As aforementioned, if you’ve been exposed to asbestos and suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. For questions and assistance, feel free to contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### New Orleans Mesothelioma Lawyer

New Orleans mesothelioma lawyers help area victims of asbestos exposure. The city has a long history of asbestos-heavy industries, including shipping and oil refining. Many workers have developed mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses. 



If you suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in New Orleans, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more.



Understanding Asbestos Trust Funds



Asbestos trust funds are financial assets set aside by companies that manufactured asbestos products, specifically created during bankruptcy proceedings to ensure compensation for victims of asbestos exposure. It's a safety net, ensuring that even if a company has gone out of business, victims still have a pathway to receive the compensation they deserve. As of now, approximately $30 billion remains available in these funds.



Accessing Compensation



If you've been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness and a company is responsible for your exposure, you can file a claim with the relevant asbestos trust fund. Here's how:




Identify the Companies: Determine which companies' products you were exposed to.



File Multiple Claims: If multiple companies are responsible, you can file separate claims with each company’s fund.



Family Claims: Family members of deceased asbestos-exposure victims also have the right to file claims.




Taking these steps can significantly impact how quickly and effectively you receive compensation, helping to ease the financial burden during such a challenging time. Whether you're seeking legal advice or ready to file a claim, our packet can guide you through the process with clarity and confidence.





Mesothelioma Compensation Calculator







New Orleans Asbestos Facts








Orleans Parish and nearby Jefferson Parish have seen high numbers of asbestos-related deaths. 



Between 1999 and 2017, this area accounted for nearly one-third of deaths from asbestos exposure in the state. 



The shipping industry, oil refineries, construction, and vermiculite plants all contributed to New Orleans-area asbestos exposure incidents. 




About Asbestos and Mesothelioma



Asbestos is a natural mineral that causes cancer in some people. Many industries used asbestos in the past, especially before the 1970s. Some people in those industries were exposed to asbestos and developed mesothelioma, lung cancer, or asbestosis. 



Asbestos is made up of tiny fibers. They shed easily from asbestos materials and enter the air or settle on surfaces. Anyone in the area can inhale those fibers. Inside the body, asbestos fibers cause damage. In some people, this results in illness decades later. 



If you worked with or around asbestos in New Orleans, talk to your doctor about cancer and health screenings. Not everyone gets sick from asbestos, but if you do, it's best to get a diagnosis as soon as possible. 



Why Contact a New Orleans Mesothelioma Lawyer



Mesothelioma is a terrible illness that is almost always caused by negligent asbestos exposure. Negligence means that your exposure and illness could have been avoided. The companies negligent in your exposure can be held accountable and liable for your expenses.



To hold those companies to account, you need an experienced mesothelioma lawyer. They can help you sue for a settlement or seek compensation in other ways. If you have mesothelioma, you are eligible to seek compensation.



Act Quickly to Protect Your Rights



It's crucial to act swiftly after a mesothelioma diagnosis to preserve your right to compensation. Legal rights are time-sensitive, and delaying action could mean missing out on the financial support you deserve. Reaching out to a legal expert immediately can help ensure that all necessary steps are taken to secure your compensation.



For a comprehensive understanding of your options, consider contacting a mesothelioma lawyer for a free case review. This initial assessment can provide clarity on your situation and the potential for holding negligent parties accountable.



By taking prompt action, you not only safeguard your legal rights but also take the first step towards securing financial relief for medical expenses and other costs associated with your illness.



Understanding the Contingency Fee Basis for Mesothelioma Attorneys



When hiring a mesothelioma attorney, many clients opt for a contingency fee arrangement. This payment structure offers financial accessibility and peace of mind during a challenging time. Let’s break down how it works:




No Upfront Costs: You don't need to pay anything at the start. The attorney begins working on your case without requiring an initial fee, reducing financial strain while you focus on your health.



Payment Tied to Success: Attorneys who work on a contingency basis only get paid if they win your case. Their fee is a predetermined percentage of the total recovery amount. This aligns the attorney’s interests with yours, as their compensation depends on securing a favorable outcome.



Percentage of Recovery: Once compensation is awarded, the lawyer receives a portion of it as their fee. This percentage is agreed upon before you sign any agreement, ensuring transparency about how much they will earn from a successful case.



Access to Expertise: Hiring a skilled mesothelioma attorney through a contingency fee arrangement can enhance your chances of obtaining full and fair compensation. They bring expertise and resources to build a strong case, which might be challenging to afford otherwise.




Overall, this payment method opens doors to expert legal representation without adding to your financial burden, making it a viable option for many seeking justice and compensation.



How New Orleans Lawyers Help Mesothelioma Patients



If you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, the right lawyer can help you in several ways:




Free initial consultation to review your case



Information about mesothelioma, medical care, and legal options



Expert guidance on what legal steps to take



Guidance on filing a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit



The ability to maximize the compensation you receive in a settlement



Help to make an asbestos trust fund claim




Understanding Your Legal Options



When it comes to pursuing compensation for mesothelioma, several pathways are available:




Mesothelioma Personal Injury Lawsuits: These lawsuits allow you to seek financial compensation from the manufacturers and distributors responsible for your asbestos exposure. By holding these companies accountable, you can recover costs related to medical treatment, lost wages, and emotional distress. Most of these cases settle before reaching trial, providing quicker resolutions.



Wrongful Death Lawsuits: If you've lost a loved one to mesothelioma, you can file a wrongful death lawsuit. This legal action targets the parties responsible for the asbestos exposure, allowing family members to claim compensation for funeral expenses, loss of companionship, and more.



Asbestos Trust Funds: Many asbestos product manufacturers have established trust funds during bankruptcy proceedings to compensate victims. With approximately $30 billion available, these funds are a critical resource for those seeking financial recovery. Multiple claims can be filed if various companies contributed to your exposure.




Support for Veterans



Veterans who served between the 1930s and 1980s may have been exposed to asbestos during their service. Filing a VA mesothelioma claim can secure monthly compensation and health care benefits. Surviving family members of veterans who succumbed to asbestos-related illnesses can also receive benefits.



By exploring these options with a knowledgeable attorney, you can navigate the complexities of mesothelioma claims and secure the compensation you deserve.



Understanding the Statute of Limitations for Mesothelioma Cases in Louisiana



In Louisiana, if you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, you typically have just one year from the date of diagnosis to initiate a legal claim. This relatively short timeframe underscores the importance of acting swiftly to secure your legal rights.



Key Points to Consider:




Time is Limited: One year is the standard period within which you need to file your lawsuit. Exceeding this deadline usually means your case might be dismissed, eliminating the possibility of receiving compensation through the legal system.



Complex Investigation: Mesothelioma cases are complex, requiring thorough investigation to identify exposure sources and responsible parties. This necessitates quick action to allow your legal team adequate time to build a robust case.



Legal Assistance: It’s crucial to consult an attorney specializing in asbestos-related cases as soon as possible. They can help navigate the complexities of your case and ensure that all legal documents are filed correctly and on time.




Procrastination can be costly in mesothelioma cases. By taking prompt action, you protect your opportunity to seek justice and potentially receive compensation for damages related to your illness.



Estimated Value Range for Mesothelioma Cases in New Orleans



Estimating the worth of a mesothelioma case in New Orleans can be complex, as numerous factors influence the final compensation. Each case presents unique circumstances, making precise predictions challenging.



However, data indicates that mesothelioma settlements typically range from $1 million to $1.4 million on average.



It's essential to understand that these figures are broad estimates and actual compensation may vary. Variables such as the extent of exposure, medical expenses, and emotional distress all play significant roles.



Individuals seeking a more personalized evaluation should consult with a specialized attorney familiar with local laws and precedents. Expert guidance helps provide a clearer picture tailored to individual situations.



How Long Does It Typically Take to Settle a Mesothelioma Lawsuit in Louisiana?



The duration of a mesothelioma lawsuit in Louisiana can vary widely, generally ranging from several months to a few years. The timeline is influenced by various factors such as:




Case Complexity: Simpler cases may reach settlements faster, while complex ones can extend the timeline significantly.



Defendant Numbers: The more defendants involved, the longer it may take to negotiate a fair settlement.



Venue and Legal Procedures: The legal system in Louisiana and case-specific procedures can impact the overall timeline.




Some claimants may see a resolution in as little as 90 days. However, more intricate cases might require 12 to 18 months, or even longer, to finalize a settlement.



How Veterans Can File VA Claims for Asbestos-Related Illnesses



If you served in the U.S. Military between the 1930s and 1980s and believe you were exposed to asbestos, you may be eligible to file a claim for benefits. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) offers disability compensation for asbestos-related conditions such as mesothelioma. Here's how to navigate the claims process:



Steps to File a VA Claim for Asbestos Exposure




Gather Required Documentation:

Service Records: Collect any records showing your military service dates and duties, particularly those highlighting your exposure to asbestos.



Medical Diagnosis: Obtain your medical records documenting your asbestos-related illness, such as mesothelioma diagnosis by a physician.



Work History: If applicable, compile information on your post-military work that may have involved asbestos exposure.





Submit Initial Claim:

Visit the official VA website and use their online portal to initiate your claim. Alternatively, you can submit a paper application via VA Form 21-526EZ, available on their site or at local VA offices.





Consult a Veterans Service Officer (VSO):

A VSO can guide you through the intricacies of the claims process. They offer free assistance in gathering necessary documents and providing legal advice.





VA Evaluation:

After submission, the VA will review your claim. This includes assessing your military service history and medical condition to establish a connection between your illness and service.





Decision and Appeals:

Once the VA reaches a decision, they will notify you. If approved, you’ll receive details on your compensation and benefits. If denied, you have the option to appeal the decision using VA Form 20-0995 for a supplemental claim or seek a higher-level review.






Benefits for Family Members



In cases where a veteran passes away due to an asbestos-related condition linked to their military duties, surviving family members might qualify for Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC). Make sure to file a separate claim to access these benefits.



Filing a VA claim can be complex, but with careful preparation and assistance from trusted professionals, veterans can secure the benefits they deserve.



Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in New Orleans? 







Asbestos exposure almost always occurs in the workplace. If you have mesothelioma, you likely worked with or around asbestos in the past. New Orleans is home to many industries that used asbestos heavily in the past: 




Shipping, shipbuilding, and ports



Chemical manufacturing



Oil refining



Construction



Mineral processing




Avondale Shipyards



Among the industries that used asbestos and are part of the New Orleans economy, shipping is an important one. 



Avondale Shipyards was once the largest employer in Louisiana, with over 20,000 workers. The company constructed, designed, and repaired commercial and military vessels. 



As with most other shipyards before the regulations of asbestos use by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Avondale Shipyards relied on asbestos for its parts, equipment, and machinery for decades.



In 2011, Leopold Granier Jr. won his lawsuit against Avondale Shipyards, Union Carbide Corporation, and Cajun Insulation. According to court documents, Granier developed malignant mesothelioma after suffering from prolonged exposure to asbestos while working at the shipyard.



The jury awarded Granier $1.5 million in damages. Granier also received $104,160.77 in special damages. The jury stated that Cajun Insulation and Union Carbide were as culpable as the Shipyard because they provided asbestos materials.



The Plaza Tower



The construction industry also relied heavily on asbestos in the past. Many older buildings in New Orleans still contain asbestos and put workers and residents at risk of exposure. 



The Plaza Tower, a 45-story historical site located in downtown New Orleans, was vacant for several years until 2010. Plans were announced that year to restore the site. This came after residents left the tower, alleging health issues. 



Workers sifted through tons of asbestos and mold in an attempt to remove all traces of hazardous materials before reopening it. 



As of 2013, the tower remains empty, but it is on the market for sale after the former owners filed bankruptcy.



In 2001, several employees who worked for Plaza Tower filed lawsuits against the state for asbestos exposure. They claimed they were exposed to dangerous materials while working and that the dangers were well-known and they were not protected.



In March 2008, after a seven-day bench trial, most plaintiffs were awarded $25,000 in general damages and $10,000 for mental and emotional anguish.



Zonolite Vermiculite Plant



A former Zonolite vermiculite processing plant in New Orleans is now known to have used asbestos-contaminated minerals. The site processed vermiculite, a harmful mineral, but contaminants caused serious exposure risks.



Between 1966 and 1988, the plant received nearly 150,000 tons of asbestos-contaminated vermiculite from the W.R. Grace mine in Libby, Montana. 



The mine shipped out minerals contaminated with asbestos. Workers and residents living near the New Orleans plant were put at risk of exposure. 



Additional Job Sites Associated with Asbestos in New Orleans



Many other worksites and buildings in the city have used asbestos and even still contain the material. 



Schools




Louisiana State University (LSU) Library Building



Tulane University



Brothers of The Sacred Heart High School (Brother Martin High School)



McDonogh #32 Elementary School



Pinecrest State School




Steamship Companies




Alcoa Steamship Company



Delta Queen Steamboat Company



Industrial Canal Steam Electric Station



Waterman Steamship Corporation




Oil Companies




Hunt Wesson Oil



Lone Star and Crescent Oil Company



Maginnis Oil Works



Shell Oil



Standard Cotton Seed Oil Company



Tenneco Oil Company



Wesson Oil and Snowdrift Company




Insulation Companies




Branton Insulations, Inc.



Gabler Insulation Company



Marquette Insulation Inc.




Additional Businesses




A. Baldwin and Company Limited



A.M. Lockett and Company Ltd.



Lane Cotton Mills Company



Armstrong Contracting & Supply Corporation



Boland Marine



Lockheed Martin Marietta Michoud



Maginnis Cotton Mills



Merchants Ice Company Ltd



Caffrey Central Sugar Refining and Railroad Company



Wesson Oil and Snowdrift Company Inc



Tenneco Oil Company



L & N Crossing and Industrial Canal



J.S. Otis Mahogany Company



American Sugar Refinery



American Brewing Co.



ANJI



Buck Kreihs Shipbuilding



Celotex Corporation



Cape Flattery



Castle Industries



Charity Hospital of Louisiana



Redstone Seam



Port of New Orleans



Reef Industries Inc.




Secondhand Asbestos Exposure in New Orleans







Primary, workplace asbestos exposure is the most common way people get sick with mesothelioma, but not the only one. Secondhand exposure occurs when a worker inadvertently brings asbestos fiber home on their clothing, exposing family members. 



This has happened to many families in New Orleans. In one example, Henry Pete sued for damages and won a jury award of $10.35 million. His father worked as a longshoreman and handled asbestos cargo. Pete and his lawyers argued that his father brought home asbestos fibers, exposing him to the harmful mineral. 



Mesothelioma Treatment in New Orleans



New Orleans area mesothelioma patients can get excellent care at the Gayle and Tom Benson Cancer Center, part of the Ochsner Medical Center. It is home to the largest lung cancer multidisciplinary team in the region, which treats patients with pleural mesothelioma. 



The Cancer Center treats patients with the latest technologies. It is also a cancer research center, which means that patients can access clinical trials. 



For more information, contact the center directly at 877-356-1647.



People in this company are friendly, knowledgeable, and professional. They quickly answered all my questions and patiently walked me through the case and any open issues. I so appreciate their diligence and patience during this challenging time.- Jingjing Z.



Getting Legal Help in New Orleans



Keep in mind that if you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, there is a good chance that you may qualify for significant compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Baton Rouge Mesothelioma Lawyer

Workers in the area who were harmed by asbestos are now fighting back with the help of Baton Rouge mesothelioma lawyers.  Baton Rouge's economy includes shipping, shipbuilding, and a Dow Chemical plant, all of which used asbestos at some point in their history. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Baton Rouge, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.





Facts About Asbestos in Baton Rouge




Baton Rouge and the East Baton Rouge Parish had the second-highest number of deaths in Louisiana related to asbestos from 1999 to 2017. 



During that period, nearly 400 people in the area died from asbestos illnesses like mesothelioma.



A shipping port and a nearby chemical plant are among the biggest sources of asbestos exposure in Baton Rouge. 




Why Are Mesothelioma Cases Particularly High in Baton Rouge, Louisiana?



Baton Rouge, Louisiana sees a strikingly high number of mesothelioma cases, a trend closely linked to its industrial landscape. At the heart of this issue lies the state's significant concentration of chemical plants and manufacturing facilities. These industries have historically been notorious for their heavy use of asbestos, a material once prized for its heat-resistant properties.



Asbestos in Industry




Chemical Plants: Asbestos was widely used for insulation in chemical plants due to its ability to withstand extreme temperatures. Workers in these settings often handled equipment wrapped in asbestos, putting them at risk of exposure.



Manufacturing Sector: From shipbuilding to construction materials, many products manufactured in Louisiana's facilities traditionally incorporated asbestos. This widespread use increased the likelihood of workers breathing in dangerous fibers.




Historical Context



For decades, asbestos was considered a 'miracle' material, and its dangers were not widely recognized until it was too late for many workers. Louisiana, with its abundance of relevant industries, became a hotspot for asbestos exposure.



Current Implications



Understanding this historical misuse and exposure helps explain why mesothelioma cases remain disproportionately high in Louisiana. Continued awareness and legal actions are essential in addressing the long-term impacts on workers and communities in the region.



In summary, the industrial history of Louisiana, heavily entrenched in asbestos use, significantly contributes to the state’s elevated mesothelioma rates.



Why Do I Need a Baton Rouge Mesothelioma Lawyer? 







Mesothelioma is caused by asbestos exposure. The asbestos exposure that leads to mesothelioma is almost always negligent. If you have mesothelioma, the companies responsible for exposing you to asbestos can be held accountable. 



People primarily sue for mesothelioma because this terrible disease is expensive. The companies responsible can and should be held liable for your expenses. 



To get compensation from them, you need an asbestos or mesothelioma lawyer. They can help you file one or more of the following: 




Mesothelioma personal injury lawsuit



Asbestos trust fund claim



Mesothelioma wrongful death lawsuit




Lawsuits and trust fund claims are reliable ways to get the compensation needed to pay medical and other expenses related to mesothelioma. 



How to Choose a Baton Rouge Mesothelioma Lawyer



Top-rated Louisiana attorneys serving asbestos victims in Baton Rouge are available now. It's important that you choose the right lawyer to take your case. Your ability to get the compensation you need for medical and other expenses depends on this choice. 



Consider these factors when selecting a Baton Rouge mesothelioma lawyer:




They should have years of experience settling and litigating asbestos and mesothelioma cases. 



Ask for evidence of wins for previous asbestos clients. 



Your lawyer should be part of a larger, nationwide firm with the resources needed to take on and win a complicated lawsuit. 



They should offer a free initial consultation and contingency payment, so you pay no fees until they win. 



Look for a compassionate legal team that considers your illness and helps you get through the legal process comfortably. 




Choosing the right lawyer is so important. Asbestos cases are complicated and require proof of where, when, and by what companies you were exposed to. You also need evidence that the exposure led to your illness. Only an experienced lawyer in a large asbestos firm can gather the proof needed to build a strong case. 



Asbestos and Mesothelioma in Baton Rouge



Baton Rouge is a hotspot for past asbestos exposure and ongoing mesothelioma diagnoses. The city and surrounding area have been host to numerous industries that used asbestos heavily. 



Workers in those industries risked asbestos exposure, as did their families and nearby residents. Port workers, construction workers, and chemical company workers had some of the highest risks of asbestos exposure. 



Port of Baton Rouge







Located a few miles west of Baton Rouge in Port Allen, the Port of Baton Rouge handled asbestos and other cargo types over many years. Before the 1980s, many workers unloaded and handled bags of the harmful mineral, even opening some for inspections.  



Dr. Mike Hackler, a leading cardiovascular surgeon, worked at the Port of Baton Rouge during his summers while in school during the 1960s. Along with several friends, Dr. Hackler was responsible for unloading, opening, and inspecting numerous bags of asbestos.



Several years later, Dr. Hackler diagnosed some of these former co-workers with asbestos-related illnesses. He also developed mesothelioma in 2006 after those early years of working with and inhaling asbestos fibers. 



To promote awareness, Dr. Hackler’s son, Mike Hackler Jr., joined several asbestos awareness groups and lobbies to Congress annually at the Meso Foundation Symposium. He also advocates for National Mesothelioma Awareness Day, which takes place on September 26.



Dow Chemical



In August of 2013, a Baton Rouge jury awarded $5.3 million to Sidney Mabile, a native of Louisiana who worked for Dow Chemical for several years.  Along with thousands of other employees, the plaintiff was exposed to asbestos on the job.



According to the official court documents, in the 1970s, Dow Chemical predicted that some of the employees might develop cancer. Yet, the company did nothing to stop its employees and contractors from being exposed. In addition, documents revealed that Dow Chemical lobbied in an attempt to oppose the EPA’s regulations on asbestos use.



Asbestos at LSU



In addition to the industries in the area that exposed workers to asbestos, many buildings were constructed using asbestos materials. These include homes, schools, and public buildings. 



Now, many are facing potential exposure to aging asbestos. Staff and students at Louisiana State University may be at risk because of materials in several campus buildings. 



Renovations on campus have stalled because of asbestos, including a restoration of the clock tower. Nearly $1 million is needed to remediate and renovate several buildings for safety. 



Additional Job Sites Associated with Asbestos



Schools




Broadmoor Middle School



Central Middle School



Mckinley High School



Louisiana State University



Mckinley Middle Magnet School



Scotlandville Magnet High School



Southern University and A&M College



Ascension High School




Chemical Companies




Allied Chemical Company



Borden Chemical Inc.



Consolidated Chemical Corporation



Copolymer Rubber & Chemical Corporation



The Dow Chemical Company



Enjay Chemical Company



W.R. Grace Chemical Research and Development



Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation



Stauffer Chemical Company



Uniroyal Chemical



Ethyl Chemical



Monochem Incorporated




Asbestos Companies




Eagle Asbestos & Packing Company, Inc.



Standard Asbestos Manufacturing & Insulating Company




Additional Companies and Buildings




Avondale Shipyards Inc (Baton Rouge)



B & B Engineering & Supply Company



Mobile Oil Louisiana



Earl K. Long Medical Center



Baton Rouge Municipal Dock



Big Cajun Power Plant



Esso Research



Humble Oil & Refining Company



Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation



Cajun Electric LLC



Reilly-Benton Company, Inc.



A.G. McKee Standard Oil



Alcorn Combustion



Anco Insulations



Baton Rouge Hospital



Baton Rouge City Docks



Crawford Corporation



Delta Southern



Exxon Baton Rouge



Gulf State Utilities



JTT Warehouse




Mesothelioma Treatment in Baton Rouge







Mesothelioma, asbestosis, and other diseases caused by asbestos are rare and require treatment by specialists. In Baton Rouge, the Ochsner Cancer Center is a recognized cancer treatment center specializing in asbestos-related issues.



Ochsner Cancer Center - Baton Rouge17050 Medical Center DriveBaton Rouge, LA 70816225-761-5200



Another location in the area for cancer treatment is the Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center. The lung cancer department treats patients with pleural mesothelioma.



Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center



4950 Essen Lane



Baton Rouge, LA 70809



1-888-501-4763



These lawyers made us feel so much better about going through this terrible process. We had no idea where to begin and they helped get us all the compensation we possibly could. They were friendly understanding and very hard-working. They answered any questions we had about compensation and even medical advice- Natalie F.



Getting Legal Help in Baton Rouge



If you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Boston Mesothelioma Lawyer

Boston has always been home to manufacturing, industrial, shipbuilding, and construction industries. Unfortunately, many of these work sites were filled with asbestos. People who have been injured by asbestos are now fighting for justice with the help of an experienced Boston mesothelioma lawyer.



If you or someone you love suffers from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Boston, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more.



Many of our clients start receiving mesothelioma compensation in as few as 90 days, with additional checks coming in for months after that. This means you can begin to alleviate financial burdens quickly, allowing you to focus on what truly matters: your health and well-being.



By taking the first step with our Financial Compensation Packet, you gain access to a wealth of resources. Not only will you find detailed information about filing claims, but you'll also learn about the timelines and processes involved, ensuring you're informed every step of the way.




Experienced Mesothelioma Lawyers: Connect with legal experts who specialize in asbestos cases.



Step-by-Step Guidance: Understand how to file claims efficiently and effectively.



Ongoing Support: Learn about the long-term compensation options available to you.




Take action today and discover how you can secure the compensation you deserve, starting in as little as 90 days. Your journey towards financial relief and support begins now.





Boston Asbestos Facts








Between 1999 and 2017, more than 8,000 people died from asbestos-related illnesses in Massachusetts. 



This included mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis.



As an important port city, Boston's shipping industry has been responsible for a major portion of the area's asbestos exposure. 




How Did I Get Mesothelioma? 



If you have a mesothelioma diagnosis, you probably worked with or around asbestos in the past. Many Boston workplaces used asbestos, including shipyards, construction sites, and industrial plants.



Asbestos is made up of little fibers that shed easily into the air where workers can breathe them in. Once in the body, the fibers cause damage. This leads to illnesses like mesothelioma, lung cancer, or asbestosis in some people.



Occupations most at risk of asbestos exposure include:




Construction Workers: Often work directly with materials containing asbestos, such as insulation and drywall.



Shipyard Workers: Asbestos was commonly used in shipbuilding for its fire-resistant properties.



Factory Workers: Many manufacturing environments used asbestos due to its durability.



Electricians and Plumbers: These trades often require working in environments where asbestos is present.



Auto or Aircraft Mechanics: Asbestos was used in brake pads and other vehicle components.



Firefighters and Insulators: Regularly exposed to asbestos during building fires and insulation installation.



Miners and Boilermakers: Directly handle raw asbestos or materials containing it.




Unfortunately, family members of those in high-risk jobs may also be affected through secondhand exposure. Workers can unknowingly bring asbestos fibers home on their clothing or hair, putting their entire household at risk.



When these fibers are inhaled or ingested, they can become lodged in the linings of organs, irritating healthy tissue over time. This irritation is a known cause of mesothelioma, a rare and aggressive cancer. Unfortunately, it can take 20-50 years for symptoms to appear after initial exposure to asbestos, making early detection challenging.



Because the symptoms of mesothelioma often resemble those of more common illnesses, it is frequently not diagnosed until reaching an advanced stage. This delay in diagnosis complicates treatment options and outcomes, emphasizing the importance of awareness and regular health screenings for those who may have been exposed to asbestos. 



Understanding the Early Signs of Mesothelioma from Asbestos Exposure



Mesothelioma, a serious condition often linked to asbestos exposure, can initially manifest through subtle symptoms. Recognizing these early signs is crucial for timely medical intervention. Here’s what to watch out for:




Persistent Discomfort: You might experience lingering pain in the chest or abdomen, heightened by routine activities.



Respiratory Changes: Take note of any ongoing cough or difficulties with breathing, as these could be early indicators.



General Fatigue: Feeling unusually tired even after adequate rest? This could be an early warning sign.



Unexplained Weight Loss: Rapid weight loss without changes in diet or activity levels is noteworthy.



Appetite Reduction: A decreased interest in food can accompany other symptoms.



Low-Grade Fever: Monitor for any intermittent fevers that lack an apparent cause.




These symptoms don't automatically confirm mesothelioma, but recognizing them can lead to crucial early detection and treatment. If you have a history of asbestos exposure and notice any of these signs, consulting a healthcare professional is the next prudent step.



Understanding the Timeline for Mesothelioma Symptoms



After exposure to asbestos, the timeline for mesothelioma symptoms to manifest can be quite lengthy. Typically, individuals may not notice any signs until 20 to 50 years after the initial exposure. This extended latency period means that symptoms often emerge decades after coming into contact with asbestos fibers.



Why the Delay?



The long incubation period is due to the slow progression of the disease. The asbestos fibers can remain in the body for years without causing symptoms. Over time, they can lead to inflammation and scarring, eventually resulting in cancerous growths.



Challenges in Diagnosis



When symptoms do appear, they often resemble those of common illnesses. This similarity can lead to misdiagnosis, delaying treatment until the disease has advanced. Common symptoms include:




Persistent cough



Chest pain



Shortness of breath




By the time these symptoms become pronounced enough to prompt investigation, the disease is frequently at an advanced stage. Understanding this timeline is crucial for early detection and better outcomes.



When Should I Contact a Boston Mesothelioma Lawyer?



Contact a local mesothelioma lawyer as soon as you receive a mesothelioma diagnosis. You can also talk to a lawyer if you know you worked around asbestos and are concerned you might get sick. 



It costs nothing to consult with a mesothelioma lawyer, so don’t hesitate to reach out. Time is limited, and you could miss your opportunity to file a lawsuit or make a claim.



Our mesothelioma attorneys work on a contingency-fee basis, providing you peace of mind with no upfront costs or hourly fees. We only receive payment if we successfully secure compensation for you, whether through a lawsuit or an asbestos trust fund claim.



This means you can focus on your health and well-being without worrying about immediate financial burdens. Don't delay in seeking the justice and compensation you deserve. 



What Steps Are Involved in Filing a Mesothelioma Claim?



1. Initial ConsultationBegin by reaching out to a specialized mesothelioma attorney. Most offer a free consultation to review your case details. You can typically initiate this process by calling or filling out a contact form on their website.



2. Case EvaluationOnce you provide your information, the legal team will assess your situation. This involves analyzing your asbestos exposure history and reviewing your medical documentation to ensure there's a solid foundation for the case.



3. Evidence GatheringShould you have a viable claim, the next step is to collate all necessary evidence. This might include documenting your work history, gathering witness testimonials, and collecting medical records that substantiate your condition.



4. Filing the ClaimYour attorney will prepare and file the claim in the relevant court. This includes determining which parties are legally responsible for the asbestos exposure and formally notifying them of your intent to seek compensation.



5. Settlement NegotiationsThe majority of mesothelioma claims are resolved before the trial stage. Legal representatives will negotiate with the responsible parties to reach a fair settlement, leveraging your documented evidence for a favorable outcome.



6. Court ProceedingsIn cases where a settlement isn't possible, the claim may proceed to court. Your legal team will argue your case, present evidence, and work tirelessly to secure the compensation you deserve.



By following these steps, you can navigate the complexities of filing a mesothelioma claim with confidence and clarity.



Can You Pursue Compensation for a Loved One Who Passed Away from Mesothelioma?



Absolutely, pursuing compensation after a loved one's passing due to mesothelioma is possible.



Even if your loved one is no longer with you, there are still legal avenues available. Family members or estate representatives may be eligible to file claims on behalf of the deceased.



These claims can include:




Wrongful Death Claims: These are intended to cover medical bills, funeral costs, and loss of income or companionship.



Trust Fund Claims: With several asbestos manufacturers having set up trust funds, you might access compensation from these resources even after the individual's death.




It's Important to Act Promptly




Deadlines Apply: Different states have specific statutes of limitations, which limit the time you have to file a claim. Acting quickly is crucial to ensure eligibility.



Seek Expert Guidance: Consulting with a legal professional experienced in mesothelioma cases can help navigate the complexities of establishing a claim.




Remember, while the journey of seeking compensation can be challenging, it's designed to provide financial support and justice for the suffering endured.



What Services Does a Mesothelioma Law Firm Provide for Asbestos Victims?



Mesothelioma law firms offer comprehensive legal support for victims, ensuring that the intricate legal process is handled meticulously so clients can concentrate on their recovery and family.



1. Comprehensive Case Management



Mesothelioma attorneys manage every aspect of your legal journey. From gathering crucial evidence to represent your case effectively, to formally initiating legal proceedings on your behalf, their expertise allows you to focus on healing.



2. Exploring Compensation Opportunities



Mesothelioma claims can be pursued through a variety of channels. These may include:




Lawsuits for Settlements or Verdicts: Skilled lawyers can guide you through the litigation process to secure the best financial outcomes.



Asbestos Trust Funds: Many companies have established trusts with allocated funds to compensate victims. Legal experts navigate these complex systems for you.



VA Claims: Veterans exposed to asbestos during service can access benefits through a VA claim, with lawyers ensuring all requirements and documentation are met.




3. Timely and Accurate Filing



Legal deadlines, known as statutes of limitations, define the timeframe for filing a claim. Missing these deadlines can forfeit your right to compensation. A mesothelioma law firm will ensure all necessary paperwork is completed accurately and submitted within the required timeframes to maintain your claim’s validity.



By entrusting your case to experienced professionals, you gain a powerful ally dedicated to securing the justice and compensation you deserve.



Understanding the Advantages of Selecting the Right Mesothelioma Law Firm



Choosing the best mesothelioma law firm can make a significant difference in how your case is handled and the compensation you receive. Here are some key benefits to consider when evaluating your options:



Expertise and Resources



A top-tier mesothelioma law firm often has a wealth of resources at its disposal. Experienced lawyers are equipped to thoroughly investigate your case, identifying the companies responsible for asbestos exposure. Their extensive knowledge in asbestos litigation helps in effectively holding these companies accountable for their negligence.



Proven Track Record



Selecting a firm with a history of success can significantly impact the compensation outcomes. Look for firms with a strong track record of securing substantial settlements and verdicts. Some firms have successfully obtained millions in settlements, reflecting their ability to navigate complex legal scenarios.



Cost-Effective Services



Reputable mesothelioma law firms generally operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay nothing upfront. This ensures that anyone can pursue justice without worrying about hourly legal fees or other out-of-pocket expenses.



Expedited Compensation



Time is essential, especially for those battling mesothelioma. Some law firms can expedite the process, allowing you to start receiving compensation within a few months, helping to ease the financial burden quickly.



Comprehensive Support



Many of these firms employ on-staff medical professionals, such as registered nurses, who can offer valuable insights into your diagnosis and treatment options. This holistic approach ensures you receive both legal and medical guidance tailored to your situation.



When seeking justice for asbestos exposure, it's important to choose a law firm that is not only experienced but also compassionate and supportive. The right firm will prioritize your needs, giving you peace of mind during a challenging time.



Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Boston? 



There are many potential sites of asbestos exposure in and around Boston. Many industries and workplaces used asbestos through the 1970s. Boston's long history of shipping is one major source of asbestos. Others include mineral processing, construction, and industrial manufacturing. 



Bethlehem Hingham Shipping Yard



Established in 1913, Bethlehem Hingham Shipping Yard once employed over 24,000 workers who built destroyer ships and war vessels. When the shipping yard closed in 1986, more than 220 ships had been built there.



From its inception until the late 1970s, the shipping yard used asbestos in many materials and parts, including gaskets, boiler components, electrical insulation, coatings, and more. Workers were exposed to the dangerous asbestos fibers day after day, year after year.



Consequently, former employees of the shipping yard later developed dangerous asbestos-related diseases, including peritoneal mesothelioma, pleural mesothelioma, and asbestosis.



Charlestown Navy Yard







The Charlestown Navy Yard, a ship repair business, opened in Boston during the early 1800s. After the Civil War, the yard’s work began in decline, so it shifted focus to shipbuilding. 



Thousands of workers built ships, including steel-hulled warships. As with the Bethlehem Hingham Shipping Yard, the Charlestown Navy Yard also used asbestos in parts, machinery, and equipment.



Asbestos in Boston Buildings



Many of Boston’s public buildings were also constructed using asbestos. Most of these buildings are still in use today, including:



Schools




Boston Latin School



Boston University



Harvard School of Public Health



Harvard Medical School



John W. McCormack Graduate School



Katharine Gibbs School



McMenamins-Kennedy School



South Boston High School



Law School at Suffolk University



Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)




Hospitals




Beth Israel



Boston City (closed in 1996)



Boston State Hospital (closed in 1979)



Brigham and Women’s Hospital



Children’s Hospital Boston



Massachusetts General Hospital




Additional Public Buildings




Boston City Hall Annex



Boston Federal Building



Boston Symphony Hall



Boston Municipal Auditorium



Cutler Majestic Theater



Museum of Science



New England Aquarium



Park Square Building




Asbestos in older buildings continues to be a problem for residents and workers in Boston. In 2023, Boston University faced asbestos controversy after renovating a student residence. 



Students claimed construction work went on in neighboring rooms for a week or more before the university warned that asbestos was involved. They filed a complaint with the university and were relocated until the building was safe. 



W.R. Grace Asbestos Cover Up



For decades W.R. Grace and Co. mined materials contaminated with asbestos and manufactured chemicals and products using asbestos. Through numerous workplaces across the U.S., the company exposed thousands of workers to asbestos. 



The Boston Globe broke the story that the company knew about asbestos and its harmful fibers used in one of its best-selling products: Zonolite Attic Insulation. 



Globe reporters found internal documents proving the company knew of the health hazards associated with the insulation by 1977. They kept selling the product for seven years after that. 



Mesothelioma Treatment in Boston







When seeking treatment for asbestos-related diseases such as malignant mesothelioma and asbestosis, look for experienced physicians who specialize and have in-depth knowledge of these types of illnesses. 



Boston has a few excellent cancer centers that can treat mesothelioma patients:



Dana-Farber Cancer Institute



Dana-Farber is affiliated with the Harvard Cancer Center. Together, they offer comprehensive cancer care, cancer research, and clinical trials. 



In addition to pleural mesothelioma, specialists at Dana-Farber treat the rarer peritoneal mesothelioma, which occurs in the abdomen. Patients benefit from multidisciplinary teams that use a variety of treatment approaches. 



Brigham and Women's Hospital



Brigham and Women's is particularly important for mesothelioma patients in Boston. It hosts the International Mesothelioma Program as well as a Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Program with HIPEC treatment. 



VA Boston Healthcare System



For Boston-area veterans, the VA provides world-class mesothelioma care. VA Boston includes a minimally-invasive thoracic surgery department directed by Dr. Abraham Lebenthal, a pleural mesothelioma specialist. 



Achieved Mesothelioma Settlements in Massachusetts



If you're curious about past mesothelioma settlements in Massachusetts, here’s a glimpse into some notable cases:




$9.3 Million was awarded to the family of a veteran from the U.S. Navy. This significant settlement highlights the compensation possibilities for military personnel exposed to harmful substances.



In a case of secondhand asbestos exposure, a claimant secured $5.3 Million. This underscores the serious implications and compensation available even when exposure is indirect.



A boilermaker, who was also a union member, received a settlement of $1.3 Million. This case reflects the risks industry workers face and the potential financial recourse available to them.



Another notable settlement, amounting to $2.4 Million, was for someone involved in home remodeling and automotive work, particularly with clutches. This demonstrates the diverse scenarios in which asbestos exposure can occur.



A $3.67 Million settlement was awarded to a veteran of the U.S. Marine Corps, illustrating the lifelong impact service-related exposures can have and the restitution paths that exist.




It's important to remember that settlement amounts can vary significantly based on individual case details, and outcomes aren't guaranteed. Each mesothelioma case is unique, and numerous factors influence compensation.



When my husband was diagnosed we had no idea what to do. Our doctor said we should reach out to an attorney to talk about compensation. After talking to several firms we found the mesothelioma lawyer center and were grateful we did. They helped with every step of the way. If you need a meso attorney then I would recommend contacting them- Isabelle D.



Getting Legal Help in Boston



While it’s important to seek medical assistance if you’ve been exposed to asbestos, it’s also important to understand your legal rights and options. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. 

### Fort Lauderdale Mesothelioma Lawyer

Fort Lauderdale's growth coincided with the widespread use of asbestos in construction and other industries. Many residents rely on experienced Fort Lauderdale mesothelioma lawyers after developing asbestos-related illnesses such as asbestosis and malignant mesothelioma.



If you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 






Fort Lauderdale Asbestos Facts








Between 1999 and 2017, there were over 18,000 asbestos-related deaths in Florida.



Broward County, home to Fort Lauderdale, has the third-highest number of asbestos deaths in the state.



Fort Lauderdale grew rapidly in the 1900s, and the construction of hotels, homes, and other buildings coincided with the heavy use of asbestos in building materials.



Other sites in Fort Lauderdale that put people at risk of asbestos exposure include military stations, airports, utility and power companies, and shipyards and ports.




When discussing the dangers associated with asbestos, certain types are recognized as posing greater risks than others. Specifically, crocidolite and amosite asbestos are known for their significant health hazards due to their properties and fiber structures.



Crocidolite, often referred to as blue asbestos, is exceptionally toxic and can cause serious lung diseases. Its thin fibers are easily inhalable, making it highly dangerous.



Amosite, commonly known as brown asbestos, also represents a high risk. It’s primarily found in construction materials and is associated with an increased likelihood of mesothelioma and other lung-related illnesses.



In comparison, chrysotile asbestos, or white asbestos, is generally considered less harmful. It’s the most prevalent form and its curly fibers are believed to be less likely to embed in the lungs.



Understanding the varying dangers of these types can aid in the awareness and prevention of asbestos-related health issues.



What is Asbestos and How is it Used in Construction?



Asbestos is a naturally occurring silicate mineral known for its durability and resistance to heat. Composed of microscopic fibers, this robust material has long been a staple in construction.



Key Characteristics of Asbestos




Heat Resistance: Asbestos can withstand extreme temperatures, making it invaluable for fireproofing applications.



Durability: The fibrous nature of asbestos gives it remarkable strength and longevity.




Applications in Construction




Insulation: Asbestos is frequently utilized as a thermal insulator, providing an effective barrier against temperature fluctuations.



Electrical Insulation: Given its non-conductive properties, asbestos has been incorporated into materials that insulate electrical components.



Fireproofing: Its ability to resist fire made asbestos a popular choice for enhancing the safety of buildings.




Due to these properties, asbestos has historically been integrated into a variety of construction materials, although its use has diminished significantly due to health concerns related to asbestos exposure.




How Did I Get Mesothelioma? 



Mesothelioma is a rare cancer that is almost always caused by asbestos exposure. Most people were exposed to asbestos on the job. If you have mesothelioma, you likely worked with or around asbestos products. Asbestos readily sheds small fibers, which can be inhaled. Once in the lungs, the asbestos fibers cause damage that can lead to cancer and other illnesses.



Who is at Risk?



Asbestos exposure is not limited to a single environment or profession. Various groups and settings are at risk:




Occupational Exposure: Many individuals who develop mesothelioma have been exposed to asbestos in their workplaces. This includes:

Shipyard workers



United States Navy personnel



Plumbers and electricians



Pipe fitters and steel workers



Construction workers



Auto and airplane mechanics



Contractors



Maintenance and janitorial workers





Environmental Exposure: Living in a "sick building" constructed with asbestos materials can increase risk.



Secondary Exposure: Family members of workers exposed to asbestos may also be at risk, particularly when laundering contaminated clothing.




Additional Risk Factors



While asbestos is the primary cause, smoking can significantly increase the risk of developing mesothelioma after asbestos exposure. It's crucial for those in high-risk categories to be aware of these factors and take preventive measures whenever possible.



Understanding these risks and exposures can help individuals take proactive steps to protect themselves and their loved ones from the dangers of asbestos-related diseases.



Pleural mesothelioma occurs when asbestos damages tissue around the lungs. It causes symptoms like shortness of breath, chest pains, and coughing. Mesothelioma can also occur in the abdomen. This is called peritoneal mesothelioma. 



If you are diagnosed with an asbestos illness like mesothelioma, you were most likely the victim of negligent asbestos exposure. You have a right to take legal action and to seek compensation. Top-rated Florida mesothelioma lawyers in Fort Lauderdale can help you take the next step. 



How Smoking Influences Mesothelioma Risk Post-Asbestos Exposure



Smoking and asbestos exposure together pose a heightened health threat, particularly when it comes to mesothelioma, a type of cancer linked to asbestos. Here's how smoking can exacerbate this risk:




Impaired Lung Function: Smoking damages your lung tissues. This damage can weaken the lungs, making them less capable of handling additional harm from asbestos fibers.



Synergistic Effect: When smoking is combined with asbestos exposure, there's a multiplicative effect rather than just an additive one. In other words, the risks associated with each can compound, significantly elevating the likelihood of developing mesothelioma.



Reduced Clearance of Particles: Smokers may have a reduced ability to clear asbestos fibers from their lungs. Smoking can impair the cilia, tiny hair-like structures in the lungs, which play a crucial role in expelling foreign particles.



Inflammation and Scarring: Both smoking and asbestos can lead to inflammation and scarring in the lung tissue. This environment promotes cellular changes that can lead to cancer over time.




Ultimately, if you have a history of asbestos exposure, avoiding smoking is a crucial step in reducing your overall cancer risk.



How Does Asbestos Exposure Lead to Various Cancers?



Asbestos exposure is primarily linked to lung-related diseases, but its impact extends to several types of cancer beyond the lungs. Understanding this risk can highlight the profound influence asbestos has on the body's internal systems.



Types of Cancer Linked to Asbestos




Esophageal Cancer: Inhaled asbestos fibers can travel through the body's systems, sometimes lodging in the esophagus, leading to irritation and inflammation. Over time, this persistent irritation can contribute to the development of cancerous cells in the esophagus.



Laryngeal Cancer: If asbestos fibers are inhaled, they may directly contact the larynx. This contact can result in chronic inflammation, a major risk factor for cancer in this area.



Stomach Cancer: Once ingested, asbestos fibers can settle in the stomach lining. There, they can induce inflammation and mutagenic changes, eventually leading to the growth of malignancies.



Colon Cancer: Similar to stomach cancer, asbestos fibers that make their way to the colon can cause inflammation and cellular changes. The fibers might irritate the colon's lining, increasing the likelihood of cancerous developments.



Rectal Cancer: Asbestos can also lodge in the rectal area, where long-term exposure can initiate changes at the cellular level, culminating in cancer.




The Pathway of Exposure



The dangers of asbestos largely stem from its ability to become airborne, entering the body through inhalation or ingestion. Once inside, these tiny yet harmful fibers can travel to various sites, embed themselves in tissues, and cause chronic inflammation—a precursor to cancer.



Prevention and Awareness



Being aware of the risks can lead to better preventive measures. Ensuring homes and workplaces are free of asbestos materials and educating individuals about potential exposure sources remains crucial in the fight against asbestos-induced cancers.



How Can Family Members Be Affected by Asbestos Exposure?



Family members of workers exposed to asbestos are at risk, even if they’ve never set foot in a contaminated workplace. Here’s how:




Contaminated Clothing: When workers return home with clothes covered in asbestos fibers, their families can inhale these harmful particles during activities like laundry.



Secondary Exposure: Fibers can settle in common areas, such as on furniture or in cars, leading to indirect contact. Routine household cleaning can disturb these fibers, putting family members at risk.



Ambient Particles: Asbestos fibers are incredibly durable and can linger in the air for extended periods. This means that anyone in close proximity to an exposed worker might inhale these particles over time.




The health risks linked to asbestos include serious conditions like mesothelioma and lung cancer, which makes understanding and mitigating secondary exposure crucial for protecting loved ones.



What Will a Fort Lauderdale Mesothelioma Lawyer Do to Help Me? 



Mesothelioma and asbestos attorneys represent victims of asbestos exposure in legal actions. Asbestos litigation is very complicated. If you have mesothelioma, you need an experienced guide to help you take action and recover damages.



One of the primary challenges in these cases is the long latency period of mesothelioma symptoms. It often takes years, sometimes decades, for symptoms to manifest after asbestos exposure. This prolonged period can make it difficult to establish a direct connection between the cancer and asbestos exposure.



To overcome this hurdle, the testimony of medical professionals becomes crucial. These experts can help draw the line between exposure and illness, providing the vital evidence needed to substantiate your claim.



Navigating these complexities requires a legal expert who understands the medical intricacies and can effectively argue your case.







Choose a lawyer with experience winning for asbestos clients. They should be part of a larger firm with the resources necessary to win complex cases like those involving asbestos exposure. The right lawyer will help you in several ways: 




Provide a free initial consultation to review your case



Provide guidance on your next steps while explaining your options



Use expert investigators to find the evidence to prove companies exposed you to asbestos



Provide medical and other expert witnesses to prove your case



Negotiate a settlement that gets you as much compensation as possible



Litigate your case in court if it goes to trial



Find and file claims for any asbestos trust funds you qualify for




Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Fort Lauderdale? 



Asbestos was used in many industries and workplaces, from ports to military sites and more. These are just a few locations where you might have encountered asbestos in Fort Lauderdale. 



Naval Air Station Fort Lauderdale



South Florida’s location on the Atlantic coast and year-round warm weather are ideal for the military. World War II resulted in many new military installations, including in Fort Lauderdale. Naval Air Station (NAS) Fort Lauderdale provided aviation training for Navy pilots and crew members.



Other military stations in the area include:




Naval Air Station Boat Facility



Fort Lauderdale Navy Section Base



Fort Lauderdale Coast Guard Station








Like most military sites of the era, NAS Fort Lauderdale and its supporting facilities were either built with construction materials that contained asbestos or housed aircraft, vehicles, and vessels made with asbestos-containing materials. 



Consequently, thousands of men and women assigned to Fort Lauderdale were exposed to asbestos during the war. Many of these veterans developed asbestos-related mesothelioma and other illnesses.



Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport



After the war, the U.S. Navy decommissioned NAS Fort Lauderdale, which had been built on the city’s Merle Fogg Airport site. It resumed commercial aviation operations and in 1959 was named Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport.



Asbestos was used in large quantities during the construction and modernization of the terminal, and it was also present in airplanes, ground vehicles, maintenance areas, and other parts of Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood. Many workers were exposed to the harmful fibers from these materials.



Port Everglades



Port Everglades is one of the busiest ports in the U.S. It is the world’s third-largest cruise ship port; in the 2013-2014 winter cruise season, over 40 passenger ships sailed to Port Everglades. Additionally, Port Everglades receives over 4,000 container ship calls a year.







Port Everglades was constructed in 1928. Its original structures, including warehouses, passenger terminals, fuel bunkers, pipelines, and oil storage tanks, contained large amounts of asbestos. Asbestos exposure in Port Everglades became a long-lasting workplace safety issue for port workers and seamen alike.



The port also handled vessels containing considerable amounts of asbestos, placing more lives at risk and contributing to the current increase in mesothelioma and asbestosis cases.



Other Fort Lauderdale Job Sites Linked to Asbestos Exposure



Fort Lauderdale’s growth and development coincided with the peak period of asbestos use by construction companies and other industries, including such utility companies as Florida Power & Light.



Many of the city’s public buildings, hospitals, apartment buildings, hotels, and single-family houses were built with materials laden with asbestos fibers.



Some of the job sites and public facilities with past or current asbestos include:



Hospitals




Broward General Hospital



Good Samaritan Hospital



Holy Cross Hospital



North Shore Hospital




Schools




Fort Lauderdale High School



Dillard High School



Stranahan High School



South Broward High School



Plantation Middle School



Deerfield Beach Elementary School




Department Stores




Burdines (now Macy’s)




Insulation and Construction Materials




North Brothers, Incorporated



Florida insulation & Fireproof



Lakeview Siding




Public Utilities




Southern Bell (BellSouth/AT&T)



Florida Power & Light (FPL)




Professions Frequently Exposed to Asbestos



Asbestos exposure remains a concern in various occupations, particularly those involving manual labor and technical skills. Some of the most affected professions include:




Shipyard Workers: Often dealing with materials that contain asbestos due to its heat-resistant properties.



Military Personnel: Especially those in the U.S. Navy, where asbestos was widely used for insulation and fireproofing.



Plumbers and Pipefitters: Frequently encounter asbestos in old pipe systems and boilers.



Electricians: May face exposure through insulated wiring and electrical panels.



Steel and Construction Workers: Engage with construction materials that historically contained asbestos for durability and fire resistance.



Automotive and Aircraft Technicians: Handle brakes, clutches, and other parts containing asbestos fibers.



Construction and Building Contractors: Often involved in renovations or demolitions where asbestos is disturbed.



Maintenance and Janitorial Staff: Frequently responsible for cleaning mechanical spaces and facilities where asbestos-containing materials might be present.




These professionals often encounter asbestos during routine tasks, highlighting the importance of awareness and safety precautions in these fields.



These lawyers made us feel so much better about going through this terrible process. We had no idea where to begin and they helped get us all the compensation we possibly could. They were friendly understanding and very hard-working. They answered any questions we had about compensation and even medical advice-Natalie F.



Mesothelioma Treatment in Florida



The Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa is a cancer treatment facility designated by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) as a Comprehensive Care Cancer Center. 



As one of the 41 NCI-designated centers in the U.S., Moffitt’s primary mission is to develop new research techniques and treatments for cancers of the lungs, including mesothelioma.



Contact Information for Moffitt Cancer Center:



12902 USF Magnolia DriveUniversity of South Florida, USF HealthTampa, Florida, 33612888-663-3488



Getting Legal Help in Fort Lauderdale



As previously mentioned, if you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to compensatory damages. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Houston Mesothelioma and Asbestos Exposure Lawyers

If you worked around asbestos, an experienced Houston mesothelioma lawyer can help you take legal action and recover damages. Houston is the largest city in Texas and a key economic center. It has a long, extensive history of asbestos use in many industries, putting workers at risk of serious illnesses.



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for significant compensation. Right now, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds for people who have been affected by asbestos. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in Houston, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more.



While financial compensation cannot erase the challenges posed by an incurable condition or permanent loss, it can provide critical support for patients and families. These recoveries offer the means to seek necessary medical treatments and improve quality of life. The funds can help cover healthcare costs, ensuring that you or your loved ones have access to the best possible care and support services.



In addition to medical benefits, financial compensation can also aid in restoring stability and peace of mind during a difficult time. By alleviating some of the financial burdens, families can focus on what truly matters—supporting each other and navigating the path ahead.



Top 10 Mesothelioma & Asbestos Lawyers in Houston, TX










Paul Danziger




Founding member of Texas-based law firm that handles asbestos and mesothelioma cases throughout the United States



Over two decades of experience in mesothelioma litigation with more than 1,000 mesothelioma patients helped



His law firm, Danziger & De LLano, has won more than $1,000,000,000 in mesothelioma-related claims



Graduated with honors from the University of Texas, 1989



Law degree from Northwestern University, 1993



Bar admission in Texas



Member of the American Association of Justice and Texas Trial Lawyers Association



Recognized among Top 100 Trial Lawyers by National Trial Lawyers, 2017-2019








Working from his law offices in Houston and San Antonio, Paul Danziger handles mesothelioma cases throughout the United States. He has focused on mesothelioma litigation for over 25 years, and has recovered significant compensation for victims of mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, and asbestosis. 



Paul Danziger grew up in Houston and earned a law degree from Northwestern University School of Law in Chicago in 1993.



Contact Paul →









Jeffrey B. Simon




Graduated from the University of Texas School of Law in 1993



Licensed to practice in Texas, New York, and California



Founding partner of Simon Greenstone Panatier, PC



Named among Top Lawyers Under 40 by D Magazine in 2003 and 2004



Named a Texas Super Lawyer by Super Lawyers (a Thomson Reuters service), 2006 to 2009 and 2014 to 2016



Awarded a Dallas County Special Civil Service Commission from 2011 to 2013



Awarded National Trial Lawyers’ Top 100 Trial Lawyers Award in 2016



Awarded Lifetime Achievement Award by America’s Top 100 Attorneys in 2016








Jeffrey B. Simon is a founding partner of Simon Greenstone Panatier, PC. He is licensed to practice in California, Texas, and New York. He has worked on mesothelioma cases for over 20 years. Simon received a lifetime achievement award from America’s Top 100 Attorneys in 2016.



Contact Jeffrey →









David C. Greenstone




Founding shareholder of Simon Greenstone Panatier, PC



Graduated cum laude from the University of Texas Law School in 1998



Instrumental in the first verdict against Colgate for mesothelioma related to asbestos in talcum powder



Helped win a verdict for significant damages in Arizona in 2016 for a U.S. Navy civilian employee who died from mesothelioma



Awarded Top Verdict in 2015, 2016, and 2018 by TopVerdict.com for wins in California and Arizona



Awarded Premier Attorney Award in 2015 by the American Academy of Trial Attorneys



Named among top 100 trial lawyers from 2014 to the present by National Trial Lawyers








Based in Dallas, Texas, David C. Greenstone is a founding shareholder in the law firm Simon Greenstone Panatier, PC. He has gained significant experience working as a trial lawyer, focusing on cases involving asbestos exposure, toxic torts, and pharmaceuticals. These included the first verdict won against Colgate-Palmolive for mesothelioma caused by a talcum powder product. He earned his undergraduate and law degrees from the University of Texas in 1995 and 1998.



Contact David → 









Michelle Whitman




Secured millions of dollars in settlements for victims of asbestos exposure, including workers in construction, shipbuilding, and power plants



Working through Danziger & De LLano, a mesothelioma law firm with over a billion dollars won in asbestos and mesothelioma cases



Over two deceased of experience



Licensed through the Texas State Bar



Active member of American Bar Association, American Association for Justice, and Texas Trial Lawyers Association








Michelle Whitman is a skilled attorney at Danziger & De Llano, LLP, specializing in Mesothelioma and Asbestos litigation. With over a decade of experience in the field, Michelle has built a strong reputation for securing justice and substantial compensation for victims of asbestos exposure. Her expertise in asbestos-related cases has led to millions of dollars in settlements for clients suffering from mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases.



Contact Michelle → 









Rod de LLano




Founding partner of Danziger & De LLano, LLP, one of America’s most successful firms specializing in mesothelioma and asbestos litigation



Secured over $1,000,000,000 in asbestos and mesothelioma compensation for victims through his Texas-based law firm



Featured in New York Times, Boston Globe, Houston Chronicle, and many more



Awarded Super Lawyers Selection in 2025



Awarded Best Attorney, RUE Ratings Best Attorneys of America in 2024



Awarded Best of Business Houston, General Small Business Community Awards in 2014



Awarded Top 10 Law Firms, American Institute of Personal Injury Attorneys in 2020 and 2024








Rod de Llano is a founding partner of Danziger & De Llano, LLP, one of the nation’s most successful firms specializing in mesothelioma and asbestos litigation. A graduate of Princeton University with a degree in Economics, his career took a remarkable turn when one of his cases inspired the independent film Puncture, starring Chris Evans.



Contact Rod’s Texas Mesothelioma Law Firm →









Chris J. Panatier




Graduated from the University of Texas Law School in 2001



Founding partner in Simon Greenstone Panatier, PC



Won verdicts with significant damages



With practice partner, brought the first verdict against Colgate-Palmolive for mesothelioma caused by talcum powder



Named a Thomson Reuters Texas Rising Star, 2005 to 2012



Named Thomson Reuters Texas Super Lawyer from 2013 to 2019



Top Lawyer Under 40, as named by D Magazine for 2006








Chris J. Panatier is a partner in the trial law firm Simon Greenstone Panatier, PC. He focuses on asbestos and mesothelioma, toxic tort cases, products liability, and pharmaceuticals. With a partner he helped to win the first talcum powder and mesothelioma verdict against Colgate-Palmolive. Panatier earned his law degree from the University of Texas in 2001.



Contact Chris →









Lou Black




Partner at Black Law Group



Focuses solely on asbestos exposure and mesothelioma cases



Graduate of Texas Christian University and South Texas College of Law, 1990 and 1993



A career dedicated to asbestos cases and victims of mesothelioma and lung cancer



Admissions in Texas and Pennsylvania



Member, board of directors and executive committee of Texas Trial Lawyers Association








Lou Black is a partner and founding member of Black Law Group, with offices in New Mexico and Texas. A graduate of the South Texas College of Law, Black has been practicing law since 1993. She has dedicated her career to helping victims of mesothelioma and lung cancer from asbestos exposure seek justice and recover damages. She is an expert in asbestos litigation.



Contact Lou →









Peter A. Kraus




Founding partner at Waters, Kraus & Paul



Admitted to the State Bar of Hawaii, California, Missouri, Texas, and Virginia, as well as several U.S. Courts and the U.S. Supreme Court



Involved in numerous mesothelioma cases with significant compensation for victims



Graduated University of Texas School of Law, 1985



Awarded Above and Beyond Award by the American Association for Justice in 2017



Appointee to the Federal Judicial Center Foundation Board, 2014 to the present



Named a Texas Top Rated Lawyer by Lexis Nexis, 2013 through 2016



Listed Best Lawyer in Dallas by D Magazine, 2001, and 2011 to 2019








Peter Kraus is a founding partner with the Waters, Kraus & Paul law firm serving Houston from their Dallas, Texas office. He focuses on litigating cases related to harmful exposure, particularly asbestos. His nearly 30 years of work on behalf of asbestos and mesothelioma victims has led to major wins and jury awards. He is active in his community and spends time on pro bono work and in serving on boards of directors and trustees for a number of charitable organizations.



Contact Peter →









Lawrence G. Gettys




Over 27 years of experience advocating for asbestos victims



Practicing counsel at Talbot, Carmouche & Marcello in Baton Rouge, Louisiana



Graduated with honors, Southern University Law Center, 1995



Bar admissions in Louisiana and Texas



Member, American Association for Justice, Louisiana Association for Justice, and Texas Trial Lawyers Association








Lawrence G. Gettys has over 20 years of litigation experience and focuses on cases involving asbestos exposure and mesothelioma. He has been instrumental in winning major verdicts for asbestos victims as a member of the Waters, Krauss & Paul law firm. Working from the Baton Rouge, Louisiana office, Gettys is admitted to practice in Louisiana and Texas, as well as several federal courts.



Contact Lawrence →









Ross Stomel




Accreditation from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs for excellence in representing veterans



Recovered over $250 million in verdicts and settlements related to asbestos exposure



Named among the “Top 100 Trial Lawyers” by National Trial Lawyers Association








Ross Stomel is a leading expert in mesothelioma and asbestos litigation who practices in Houston, Texas. He has made a career of working with victims of personal injury and wrongful death, with special expertise in asbestos exposure. He has litigated throughout the U.S. and helped his clients recover more than $250 million in settlements and jury awards.



Contact Ross →






Houston Asbestos Facts




Texas has one of the highest rates of asbestos-related deaths, with over 15,000 between 1999 and 2017. 



Of those, 2,124 occurred in Houston and Harris County, the highest number in the state. 



Oil and shipping, two major Houston industries, were heavy users of asbestos and responsible for much of the exposure. 




Understanding Mesothelioma: Causes and Development



Mesothelioma Defined:Mesothelioma is a rare, but aggressive cancer primarily affecting the protective linings of the lungs, abdomen, and, less commonly, the heart. These linings, called mesothelium, play a critical role in protecting internal organs and facilitating smooth movements.



How Does It Develop?The primary culprit behind the development of mesothelioma is asbestos exposure. Asbestos fibers, once widely used in construction and manufacturing due to their durability and heat resistance, are incredibly hazardous. When these fibers are inhaled or ingested, they can lodge permanently in the body.



Routes of Exposure:




Occupational Hazards:Workers in industries such as construction, shipbuilding, and manufacturing may have been exposed to asbestos, often unknowingly inhaling or coming into contact with these fibers.



Environmental and Secondary Exposure:Living with an asbestos-exposed worker can also lead to exposure, as fibers can cling to clothing and hair. Additionally, older buildings may still harbor asbestos materials, posing a risk to residents.




Statistics Snapshot:In the United States alone, approximately 3,000 new cases of mesothelioma are diagnosed each year, underscoring the ongoing impact of past asbestos use.



Understanding how mesothelioma develops underscores the critical importance of asbestos safety measures and the need for ongoing medical research and awareness initiatives.



When Should I Hire a Houston Asbestos or Mesothelioma Lawyer?



Talk to a top Houston mesothelioma lawyer as soon as possible after receiving a mesothelioma diagnosis. Mesothelioma is a devastating illness with a poor prognosis. Time is of the essence when it comes to getting legal advice and seeking compensation.



Because mesothelioma is caused by asbestos and most asbestos exposure is negligent, you have a right to seek compensation with the help of a lawyer. Mesothelioma is primarily linked to asbestos exposure, a hazardous material once commonly used in construction and various industries. The risk of developing this aggressive cancer increases significantly for individuals who work, attend school, or reside in environments laden with asbestos fibers.



Those at greatest risk include workers in industries such as construction, shipbuilding, and manufacturing, where asbestos was frequently used. Additionally, people who live near asbestos mines or processing plants, or in older buildings where asbestos was used, may also face heightened exposure.



If you've been exposed to such environments and developed mesothelioma, it's crucial to understand your legal rights. As most asbestos exposure is due to negligence or lack of adequate safety measures, consulting with a lawyer can help you seek the compensation you deserve.



How Much Compensation is My Mesothelioma or Asbestos Exposure Lawsuit Worth?



You might qualify for one or more types of mesothelioma claims: 




Personal injury lawsuit



Wrongful death lawsuit



Asbestos trust fund claim



Veteran benefits claim




Mesothelioma lawsuits usually end in settlements, which average between $1 million and $1.4 million. Trust funds pay out a little less but are often the only option if the asbestos companies that exposed you went bankrupt. 



You can file for VA benefits if you were exposed to asbestos during military service. These include monthly disability compensation. 



Complete for the form below for a better idea of what your legal compensation should be. 





                
                        
                            Calculate Case Value
                            
                        
                        Diagnosis-- Select --MesotheliomaAsbestosisAsbestos-Related Lung CancerIs Diagnosed Person Alive?-- Select --YesPassed away under 2 years agoPassed away over 2 years agoAge of Diagnosed Person-- Select --Under 6565-8485 or olderExposure-- Select --MilitaryOccupationalSecond-HandOther / UnknownMain Job Site-- Select --ShipyardsBoiler RoomsPowerhousesPaper MillsConstruction SitesAutomotiveFirefightingRailroadsRefineriesOther / UnknownMain Asbestos Product Used-- Select --Fire Protection ProductsBrake Pads / LiningsCeiling Textures / Tile / PlasterElectrical ProductsTransite ProductsHeating & Cooling ProductsVermiculiteRoofing ProductsPaints / Plasters / Wall CoveringsOther / UnknownState-- Select --AlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaNorthern Mariana IslandsOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahU.S. Virgin IslandsVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces EuropeArmed Forces PacificPhone(Required)Email(Required)First Name(Required)Last Name(Required)NameThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
         Any information you send is secure and will never be sold or released.This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
        
                        Δ
                        





How to Choose a Houston Mesothelioma Lawyer







Mesothelioma and asbestos claims are complicated, so choose your legal representation carefully. Look for an experienced asbestos attorney backed by a large firm in Houston. The importance of hiring a mesothelioma attorney cannot be overstated, as they focus on crucial aspects such as:




Protecting your rights and interests



Pursuing all of your legal options for mesothelioma compensation



Resolving your claim as favorably and efficiently as possible




The right lawyer should be able to offer you:




A free initial consultation to review your case



A clear explanation of your legal options



Investigators to find the evidence of asbestos exposure that will prove your case



Medical experts to connect asbestos exposure to your illness



Experience negotiating mesothelioma settlements and litigating in court



A fast resolution of your case with quick compensation



Maximum compensation



Contingency payment and no up-front fees




With exceptional advocacy at every phase of your claim, you can expect:




Personalized, responsive service that addresses your unique situation



Optimal chances of bringing your claim to the best possible outcome




By ensuring you have a dedicated legal team, you can focus on your health while they manage the intricacies of your case, providing peace of mind and confidence in your pursuit of justice.



How Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Houston? 







You were most likely exposed to asbestos on the job. Several important industries and many workplaces in the area used asbestos. 



Houston has long been home to energy production companies that used asbestos-containing materials. Oil drilling and refining facilities sprang up around the city after oil discovery in Houston in the early 1900s. Asbestos was added to oil rigs and other machinery to protect them from the effects of high heat and to prevent fires. Asbestos was also incorporated into pipelines and most of the various components in oil refineries. Shipyards also used large amounts of asbestos during the process of constructing ships. Engine parts, boilers, gaskets, insulation, and even wiring for electronic devices contained some amount of asbestos. It protected vessels, cargo, passengers, and crew from overheating and fires.



However, the risk of developing mesothelioma is not limited to those working in these industries. Individuals who are at the greatest risk include:




Construction, demolition, and abatement workers who directly handle asbestos-containing materials.



Residents and students who live or study in older buildings where asbestos might be present in flooring, insulation, ceilings, and roofing materials.




In these environments, even those not directly handling asbestos might still face exposure due to the fibers present in the air. This highlights the importance of awareness and protective measures for anyone potentially exposed to this hazardous material, whether in industrial settings or daily living environments.



Asbestos use in Houston oil facilities and shipyards decreased gradually after 1973 when the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued reports which officially connected asbestos exposure to mesothelioma and other deadly illnesses. 



Lingering asbestos in industrial sites, ships, and even homes and public buildings remains a health issue in the city.



Houston Refining (Lyondell-Citgo Refinery)



One example of a local company that used asbestos is the Gulf Coast's Houston Refining facility. It once belonged to Citgo Petroleum, a subsidiary of Venezuela’s state-owned PDVSA oil company. 



In the early 2000s, PDVSA sold the refinery to Lyondell Chemical, which renamed the refinery the Lyondell-Citgo Refinery (LCR).



In 2006, Lyondell purchased Citgo’s share of the facility and renamed it Houston Refining. Name changes could not hide the fact that this refinery was built when asbestos was in standard use. It has been cited as a significant source of pollution and incidences of cancer in workers.









Houston-Area Shipyards







Houston’s proximity to the Gulf of Mexico has made it a major shipbuilding community. Shipyards contributed to Houston’s industrial growth during both World Wars and the postwar era.



The shipyard built thousands of ships for civilian operators and the U.S. Navy, including hundreds of warships and mass-produced Liberty cargo ships used during World War II. 



The majority of these vessels were constructed with asbestos-containing materials. As a result, shipyard workers and others who worked and lived aboard these ships were exposed to harmful asbestos.



Houston shipyards include:




Bloodworth Bond Shipyard



Brown Shipbuilding Corporation



Platzer Boat Works



Schmidt Barge Yard



Todd-Houston Shipbuilding Corporation/Houston Shipbuilding Corporation




Not all of these are still in operation, and some have changed hands. But all used asbestos at one point in time. 



Platzer (later Trinity Marine), for instance, built tug boats and tank barges at its Greens Bayou facility from 1925 to 1997.



First Wave Marine acquired the shipyard and operated it as a repair yard until 2002. Many tugs and barges were built with asbestos-based materials and parts. Many are still in service today.



Currently, Southwest Shipyard is a primary provider of repair and refit services for several types of vessels. Southwest began operating in 1954, during the peak period of asbestos use in U.S. shipyards. 



Although their Houston-area facilities have participated in asbestos-abatement programs, former employees were still exposed to asbestos.  



People in this company are friendly, knowledgeable, and professional. They quickly answered all my questions and patiently walked me through the case and any open issues. I so appreciate their diligence and patience during this challenging time.- Jingjing Z.



What Are the Standard Treatment Options for Mesothelioma?



When it comes to addressing mesothelioma, several treatment paths are typically considered, each based on individual health status and the specific characteristics of the disease. Here's a closer look at the standard treatment options:




Surgery: This approach may be used to remove the tumor or affected tissue. It's often an option if the cancer is detected early and localized.



Radiation Therapy: By using high-energy rays, radiation therapy targets and shrinks cancer cells. It can be a standalone treatment or coupled with surgery and chemotherapy to enhance results.



Chemotherapy: Utilizing powerful drugs, chemotherapy aims to kill or slow the growth of cancer cells. It's a common approach that can be used before surgery to reduce tumor size or after to eliminate any remaining cancerous cells.




These treatments can be used individually or in combination, depending on the patient's unique circumstances. Doctors tailor treatment plans specifically to a patient's health and how advanced the disease is to achieve the best possible outcomes.



Exploring Additional Treatment Options for Mesothelioma Patients



When it comes to managing mesothelioma, traditional treatments like surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy are often the cornerstone. However, patients might be curious about what additional options are available to complement these standard therapies. Here's a closer look:




Palliative Care: This option focuses on enhancing the patient's quality of life by easing symptoms such as pain or difficulty breathing. It's a supportive approach aimed at making everyday life more comfortable.



Clinical Trials: These are research studies that offer patients access to cutting-edge treatments that aren't yet widely available. They provide an opportunity to try experimental therapies that could potentially improve outcomes.



Alternative Treatments: While not a replacement for conventional care, therapies such as acupuncture, massage, or meditation can offer emotional and physical relief, helping patients cope better with the condition's impacts.




Patients should always consult with their healthcare providers to discuss these additional options and determine what might work best for their specific situation. The goal is to create a comprehensive care plan that aligns with both medical needs and personal preferences.



Mesothelioma Treatment in Houston



Mesothelioma is a complicated illness that is difficult to treat. Houston is one of the best places to receive mesothelioma care, with several specialists in the area: 



Dr. David C. Rice, M.B.University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center1515 Holcombe Blvd.Houston, TX 770301-877-632-6789



Dr. Anne Tsao, MD, Anderson Mesothelioma Program1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 432Houston, TX 77030713-792-6363



Dr. Stephen Swisher, MD, Thoracic Surgeon, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 1489Houston, TX 77030713-792-2121



Getting Legal Help in Houston



Remember, if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you need additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Portland, Maine Mesothelioma Lawyer

A Portland mesothelioma lawyer can help you recover damages if you have an asbestos-related illness. The economy in Portland, Maine, includes a long history of port activities and shipbuilding. Both of these are connected to asbestos exposure in workers. 



If you or someone you love suffers from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in Portland, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more.





Portland Asbestos Facts




Maine has the highest rates of new mesothelioma diagnoses and deaths from asbestos illnesses among all states. 



Portland's long history of shipping and shipyards, asbestos exposure has been a risk for many residents. 



Between 1999 and 2017, over 2,400 people in Maine died from asbestos-related illnesses. 



Nearly 400 of those deaths were in Cumberland County and Portland. 




When Do I Need a Portland, Maine, Mesothelioma Lawyer? 







Contact a lawyer as soon as possible after receiving a diagnosis of an asbestos illness like mesothelioma. You could be eligible to make a claim or file a lawsuit for compensation to cover medical and other expenses.



Top Portland, ME, mesothelioma lawyers are available now to help you take the next steps. Don't wait to contact them. Time is limited to make a claim or file a lawsuit. Reputable lawyers will not charge you for an initial consultation to discuss your case. 



Understanding the Statute of Limitations for Mesothelioma Lawsuits in Maine



In Maine, the statute of limitations determines the timeframe within which you can file a mesothelioma lawsuit. This period ranges from 2 to 6 years and is influenced by specific circumstances. If you are the individual diagnosed with mesothelioma, the clock typically starts ticking from the date of diagnosis.



For family members of a deceased victim, the allowable time to file can also be determined by the date of the individual's passing. It's important to act within these limits because once the deadline expires, the opportunity to seek financial compensation is permanently lost.



Considering the nuances involved, consulting with experienced legal professionals is advisable to navigate this complex process effectively.



Mesothelioma Settlements in Maine: Past Examples



If you're curious about mesothelioma settlement figures in Maine, here are some noteworthy examples from past cases:




A laborer in Machias received $3.51 million.



$2.77 million was awarded to a U.S. Navy veteran who also worked as a heavy equipment operator in York.



A union sheet metal worker in Wiscasset secured $2.42 million.



A small engine mechanic in Blaine was granted $2.13 million.



Another U.S. Navy veteran in Portland obtained $2.12 million.




These settlements were influenced by various factors unique to each case. Remember, compensation is never a sure thing, as outcomes hinge on the individual details and complexities involved.



How to Choose a Portland Mesothelioma Lawyer



Mesothelioma and asbestos cases are complicated. They require a lot of evidence and often involve multiple defendants. Don't settle for a lawyer without expertise and experience handling these types of cases. 



When choosing a lawyer in Portland, Maine, to help you make a mesothelioma or asbestos claim, consider the following:




They should offer a free initial consultation.



A local lawyer is important, but they should be part of a larger law firm that operates nationwide.



A firm should have enough resources, investigators, and medical experts to build a case and see it to a successful conclusion.



The right lawyer should have proven experience winning cases for similar clients.



You should not have to pay any fees until they win and you receive a settlement or other form of compensation.




Proven Track Record and Experience



Look for firms with a strong history of success. Ideally, they should have recovered substantial compensation for their clients. A high percentage of resolved cases resulting in compensation is a significant indicator of their capability.



Specialized and Comprehensive Legal Team



Choose a firm that offers a dedicated team of professionals. This should include experienced attorneys, medical experts, and investigators who work collaboratively to ensure the best possible outcome for your case.



Client Convenience and Accessibility



Consider whether the firm can accommodate your needs by meeting you at a convenient location, whether in person or through virtual consultations. This flexibility can make a significant difference in how comfortably you can engage with your legal team.



No Financial Burden



Ensure that the law firm operates on a contingency fee basis, meaning you won’t face upfront costs or hourly fees. This arrangement allows you to pursue justice without financial stress, as the firm only gets paid if you win your case.



By focusing on these key factors, you can select a mesothelioma law firm in Maine that aligns with your needs and increases the likelihood of a successful claim.



Can Family Members File a Lawsuit After a Loved One's Death from Mesothelioma?



Absolutely, family members have the legal right to file a wrongful death lawsuit if a loved one passes away due to mesothelioma. This path allows families to seek justice and financial reparation from those responsible.



Eligible family members often include:




Spouses who shared their lives and financial responsibilities with the deceased.



Children who depended on their parent for support and guidance.



Parents who have lost a child to this tragic illness.



Estate representatives who manage the legal affairs tied to the deceased's estate.




Filing such a lawsuit can lead to compensation, which may alleviate the financial burden by covering:




Unpaid medical expenses incurred during treatment.



Costs associated with the funeral and burial.



Lost income that the family relies on.



Additional expenses arising from the loss.




By seeking legal recourse, families not only aim to ease their financial strain but also hold those accountable for the suffering caused.



Navigating Mesothelioma Settlements: What You Need to Know



When facing a mesothelioma diagnosis, understanding the settlement process is crucial. An experienced asbestos attorney can play a pivotal role in negotiating a settlement with the manufacturers responsible for asbestos exposure. Here's how these negotiations typically unfold and what to expect if they don't lead to a settlement.



Settlement Negotiations




Gathering Evidence: The process begins with compiling comprehensive medical and occupational histories, supporting the link between asbestos exposure and your diagnosis.



Negotiation Process: Attorneys leverage this evidence to engage with the responsible companies, often aiming for a settlement to avoid a lengthy court process.



Resolution Timeline: Many cases are resolved within a few months, but timelines can vary based on the complexity of the case and the willingness of the manufacturers to settle.




What If a Settlement Isn't Reached?




Proceeding to Trial: If negotiations stall, the case may proceed to trial. Here, a judge and jury will deliberate based on the presented evidence.



Courtroom Decision: The decision on compensation is then made by the jury, potentially leading to a larger award than a pre-trial settlement might have offered.



Long-Term Compensation: Whether resolved by settlement or verdict, injured parties often receive compensation in stages over time.




Understanding these steps can empower individuals and families with the knowledge needed to seek justice and compensation effectively. With the right legal support, navigating these challenges can lead to the best possible outcome for affected individuals.



How a Law Firm Gathers Evidence for a Mesothelioma Case



Building a strong mesothelioma case involves meticulous evidence collection over a span of years, especially considering that exposure to asbestos could have occurred decades before symptoms manifest. Here's how a law firm typically approaches this complex task:




Historical Research and Database CompilationLaw firms often maintain extensive databases detailing known locations of asbestos exposure, lists of asbestos-containing products, and historical data on companies involved in the manufacture and distribution of such materials. By continuously updating these records, they can quickly identify potential sources of asbestos exposure relevant to each new client.



Investigations and Site VisitsTo build a compelling case, investigators may visit old job sites or residences where exposure might have occurred. They gather additional information and corroborate existing evidence by interviewing former coworkers, supervisors, or other knowledgeable individuals.



Document RetrievalFirms often sift through decades-old documents such as invoices, purchase orders, and internal company memos. This archival research can uncover evidence that links particular companies to the use or distribution of asbestos-containing products.



Expert TestimonyEngaging experts who specialize in occupational and environmental health can be pivotal. These professionals provide insights into how and why asbestos was present in specific environments, strengthening the legal argument with scientific backing.



Leverage Past CasesWith extensive experience in mesothelioma litigation, firms leverage precedents from past cases. This includes utilizing previously gathered depositions, testimonies, and outcomes to streamline evidence collection and build more persuasive arguments for current clients.




By utilizing these comprehensive strategies, law firms excel in collecting and assembling the evidence necessary to hold responsible parties accountable for asbestos exposure, ultimately striving to secure justice and compensation for affected individuals.



Understanding VA Claims for Mesothelioma



What Are VA Claims for Mesothelioma?



Veterans who have developed mesothelioma due to asbestos exposure during their military service can file for VA benefits through the Department of Veterans Affairs. These claims are pivotal in securing vital support and resources.



Mesothelioma is recognized by the VA with a 100% disability rating. This high rating signifies the condition's severe impact on health and quality of life. As a result, eligible veterans may receive substantial compensation, often exceeding $3,800 per month, along with access to comprehensive health care at no cost.



Who Is Eligible for These Benefits?



To qualify, you must demonstrate a connection between your military service and asbestos exposure that led to mesothelioma. This includes:




Veterans: Those who served in environments with potential asbestos exposure, such as shipyards or construction sites, are particularly at risk.



Dependents and Survivors: Surviving spouses or dependents of veterans who succumbed to mesothelioma might also be eligible for certain benefits.




Assistance from VA-accredited representatives can smooth the claims process. They provide valuable guidance, ensuring that all necessary documentation is properly submitted, even in cases where previous claims were denied.



For veterans considering additional legal action, it's important to note that pursuing a mesothelioma lawsuit does not interfere with VA claims. Both avenues can be explored concurrently to maximize support and compensation.



How Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Portland?  







Asbestos exposure mainly occurs in the workplace. Maine has a high rate of mesothelioma and asbestos deaths for several reasons. One is that Maine's economy has long relied on several industries that used asbestos heavily in the past: 




Ports and shipping



Shipbuilding



Ship repair



Lumber



Paper manufacturing




Additionally, the construction industry everywhere used asbestos in many materials. Maine has a lot of older buildings that still contain asbestos and that continue to put people at risk of exposure. 



Shipyards and Asbestos in Portland



Maine has been a center for shipbuilding for hundreds of years. Pines and other trees that grew in its forests were used by the British Navy to build its warships during colonial times. Portland's position on the coast made it ideal for ports and shipyards. 



Asbestos became prized for shipbuilding because of its ability to protect from fire and heat without adding a lot of extra weight. 



Asbestos was an integral part of shipbuilding, especially throughout most of the 20th Century. Every modern vessel, civilian or military, built from the early 1900s to the 1970s, contained asbestos in almost every component.



Steam pipes, gaskets, wall insulation, and even firefighting suits contained the fibrous minerals because a fire at sea was a major concern for ships’ owners, captains, and crews.



Asbestos use soared during World War II when the U.S. built thousands of warships and cargo vessels to conduct a two-ocean war. In South Portland, 30,000 men and women built 266 cargo ships for the U.S. and Britain between 1941 and 1945.



Todd-Bath Iron and South Portland Shipbuilding owned and operated the two main shipyards. These two companies, which later merged into the New England Shipbuilding Company, closed after the war ended.



The asbestos industry suppressed information about the material's risks and dangers for years. Many unsuspecting shipyard workers inhaled or swallowed asbestos fibers while they worked. They were all put at risk of developing diseases like mesothelioma and lung cancer. 



Other Portland Job Sites Affected by Asbestos



Shipbuilding wasn't the only industry that used asbestos. Every major industry that relied on fire produced a lot of heat and needed sturdy insulation. 



For decades paper mills, power stations, chemical plants, oil storage tanks, pipelines, public buildings, rail yards, airports, and dockyards used asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) in their construction and operation.



Although asbestos use is now significantly reduced and abatement programs help keep new exposures down, there are many job sites in the Portland area where workers may have been exposed in the past: 




New England Shipbuilding Company (Todd Iron) East Yard



New England Shipbuilding Company (South Portland) West Yard



Wyman Power Station in Yarmouth



Cape Station Power Generator in South Portland



Boston & Maine (B&M) Railroad Yard in Portland



Portland Transportation Center



Randall and McAllister Coal Company



Maine Central Railroad Yard in South Portland




Understanding the Symptoms of Mesothelioma and Its Diagnostic Challenges



Diagnosing mesothelioma presents unique challenges due to the nature of its symptoms. This rare form of cancer primarily affects the lining of the lungs, abdomen, or heart, and its symptoms can closely mirror those of more common conditions.



Common Symptoms:




Respiratory Issues: Shortness of breath and persistent cough.



Chest or Abdominal Pain: Often in the affected area.



Unexplained Weight Loss: Significant drop in weight without a clear reason.



Fatigue: Constant tiredness that doesn't improve with rest.



Fever and Sweating: Particularly night sweats.




Diagnostic Challenges:




Delayed Symptom Onset: Symptoms might take decades—anywhere from 20 to 50 years—to appear after initial asbestos exposure, making it hard to link symptoms to the true cause.



Symptom Overlap with Other Ailments: Many symptoms mimic those of more common illnesses like pneumonia or lung cancer, often leading to misdiagnosis in the early stages.



Non-specific Symptoms: General symptoms such as fatigue or weight loss do not immediately suggest mesothelioma to healthcare professionals, delaying further investigation.




Given these factors, individuals experiencing persistent or unusual symptoms, especially with a history of asbestos exposure, should prompt their healthcare provider to consider mesothelioma as a potential diagnosis for timely intervention.



Mesothelioma Treatment in Portland







The MaineHealth Medical Center in Portland is home to the Maine Medical Cancer Institute, the largest cancer treatment facility in the state. Its doctors, surgeons, and oncologists provide cancer treatments of all types that meet national guidelines. 



The Cancer Institute is also an accredited teaching cancer hospital vetted by the Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons.



It is crucial to receive care for mesothelioma from specialists. This is a deadly and rare type of cancer that not all physicians or oncologists can treat. 



When my husband was diagnosed we had no idea what to do. Our doctor said we should reach out to an attorney to talk about compensation. After talking to several firms we found the mesothelioma lawyer center and were grateful we did. They helped with every step of the way. If you need a meso attorney then I would recommend contacting them- Isabelle D.



Legal Assistance in Portland



As previously mentioned, if you’ve been exposed to asbestos and suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to compensatory damages. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. For questions and assistance, feel free to contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Little Rock Mesothelioma Lawyer

Numerous people who have gotten sick from asbestos exposure in the area are now seeking justice with the assistance of experienced Little Rock mesothelioma lawyers. Many industries that contributed to Little Rock’s growth relied on asbestos-containing materials (ACMs). 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be able to receive substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on leading Little Rock mesothelioma attorneys, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 






Little Rock Asbestos Facts








Between 1999 and 2017, the state of Arkansas had 1,848 deaths related to asbestos exposure, including those caused by mesothelioma, asbestosis, and lung cancer.



Pulaski County and Little Rock had the most asbestos deaths during that time period.



Railroad, construction, power, and manufacturing industries in and around Little Rock contributed the most to worker asbestos exposure.



Asbestos illnesses are still a concern in Little Rock, especially in the Dixie neighborhood of North Little Rock.





A History of Asbestos in Little Rock



The Little Rock area has been part of the United States since the Louisiana Purchase of 1803. 



Its location in the middle of the state and on the Arkansas River made it an important transportation and trading hub as the country expanded westward. 







By 1860, railroads and gaslighting transformed Little Rock from a rustic frontier town to a modern city. By 1900, Little Rock's population had grown to around 40,000. It also had the amenities of a 20th Century city.



Six rail lines connected Little Rock to the rest of the nation, and over 170 businesses operated within city limits.



In the 1950s, an industrial district was set up in the southwestern fringes of Little Rock, and suburbs spread outward with increasing housing demand.



Little Rock’s growth coincided with the widespread use of asbestos and ACMs by several industries. 



Asbestos minerals have long been used to create heat-resistant and fireproof products. These products, including building materials, machine parts, and workers’ specialized gear, were used throughout much of the 19th and 20th Centuries.



Many of Little Rock’s government buildings, industrial facilities, businesses, hospitals, schools, and homes still contain asbestos if they were built between 1900 and 1979.



People in Little Rock have been and continue to be exposed to asbestos in their homes and workplaces that were built with asbestos materials. 



Some people were even exposed when asbestos dust was unwittingly brought in on work clothes belonging to loved ones who worked in power plants, factories, or railroad stations.



Understanding the Latency Period in Asbestos-Related Diseases



The latency period plays a crucial role in understanding asbestos-related diseases, especially mesothelioma. This period refers to the time between initial exposure to asbestos fibers and the appearance of symptoms.



Why is the Latency Period Significant?




Delayed Onset of Symptoms:

Symptoms of diseases like mesothelioma may not manifest until 20 to 50 years after exposure. This delay makes it challenging to pinpoint when and where the exposure occurred.





Challenges in Diagnosis:

Due to the long latency period, individuals may be unaware of their risk until the disease is already advanced. This can complicate early diagnosis and timely treatment.





Ongoing Cases:

Because of this extended latency period, new cases continue to emerge long after initial exposure. Thus, people who were exposed decades ago are still being diagnosed today.





Epidemiological Impact:

The prolonged latency period contributes to a persistent public health concern as asbestos exposure historically occurred in many industries.






In conclusion, the latency period underscores the insidious nature of asbestos-related diseases, highlighting the importance of preventive measures and ongoing medical surveillance.



Understanding Friable vs. Non-Friable Asbestos



When discussing asbestos, it's crucial to differentiate between two key categories: friable and non-friable asbestos. These terms are essential in assessing the potential risk associated with asbestos-containing materials.



Friable Asbestos



Friable asbestos refers to materials that are easily crumbled or reduced to powder with bare hands. This characteristic makes friable asbestos highly hazardous. Because it can easily become airborne, it poses a significant risk of inhalation—one of the primary ways asbestos affects health. Common examples of friable asbestos include pipe insulation and spray-applied fireproofing.



Non-Friable Asbestos



In contrast, non-friable asbestos materials have asbestos fibers firmly bound within another material, such as cement or vinyl. This binding makes it less likely for the fibers to be released into the air under normal circumstances. However, non-friable asbestos is not free from risk. It can still become dangerous if damaged, cut, or sanded, as these actions may cause the fibers to become airborne. Roofing shingles and vinyl floor tiles often contain non-friable asbestos.



Key Differences




State of Matter:

Friable: Easily crumbled or turned into powder.



Non-Friable: Tightly bound fibers, difficult to disperse without disturbance.





Risk Level:

Friable: High risk due to ease of fiber release.



Non-Friable: Lower risk unless disrupted or damaged.





Examples:

Friable: Pipe insulation, spray-on coatings.



Non-Friable: Roofing materials, floor tiles.






Understanding these distinctions is vital for safety and compliance, especially during renovation or demolition projects. Always consult professionals for asbestos handling to minimize health risks.



Do I Need a Little Rock Mesothelioma Lawyer? 



Yes, if you have mesothelioma, a lawyer can help you get justice and the compensation you need for this expensive illness. The first thing a lawyer will do is answer the question of your exposure. They can determine which companies are responsible for the negligent asbestos exposure that caused your illness.



Contacting a qualified mesothelioma attorney is crucial not just for navigating the legal landscape, but also for receiving the compassionate support you need during this challenging time. A skilled attorney provides aggressive representation, ensuring that your case is pursued with the tenacity required to hold negligent parties accountable.



A Little Rock lawyer with nationwide asbestos lawsuit experience can then help you take legal action. This might include filing a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit. You might also be able to make a claim with an asbestos trust fund if any of the companies that exposed you went bankrupt.



Moreover, a seasoned attorney understands the emotional and financial toll of mesothelioma. They offer guidance and support, helping to alleviate the burden of dealing with legal proceedings while you focus on your health and wellbeing.



How to Find a Top Little Rock Mesothelioma Lawyer



Finding a local attorney specializing in mesothelioma and asbestos cases is ideal. Even more important is working with a firm with a national reach and extensive experience helping victims of asbestos exposure. 



Asbestos cases are complicated and often involve multiple states. Look for a firm that handles asbestos lawsuits and has won for clients in several states. 



Only these bigger firms have the resources and experience necessary to determine the companies responsible for your exposure and bring your case to a successful conclusion.



How Much Compensation Can a Little Rock Asbestos Lawyer Get for Me? 



The amount of compensation you will get from your asbestos case depends on many factors:




The number of companies involved and their degrees of negligence



The severity of your illness



Your current and future medical expenses



The income you have lost from being sick



Emotional pain and suffering




There is no way for a lawyer to predict precisely how much you can recover in damages. However, an experienced asbestos attorney can make a reasonable estimate and will maximize your compensation. 



An example of what is possible is a case that resulted in $18.5 million for a Little Rock auto mechanic. He worked at Bendix in Little Rock for many years. He developed mesothelioma after working with asbestos brakes and clutches. His family filed a wrongful death lawsuit that went to trial.



In a related case, two companies settled before the trial began. Pneumo Apex LLC and Genuine Parts Co., known as Napa Auto Parts, were each found to be about nine percent at fault. These settlements were part of a lawsuit concerning asbestos exposure, which has been linked to serious health conditions like mesothelioma. Because of Thomas’ loss of life, pain and suffering, and medical expenses, he was awarded just under $6,000,000.



These cases highlight the significant impact of asbestos exposure and the legal recourse available for affected individuals and their families. The settlements and awards reflect the severe consequences of exposure and the accountability of companies involved in manufacturing or distributing asbestos-containing products.



Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Little Rock? 



If you worked or lived in Little Rock, Arkansas, and now have an asbestos illness, you need to know when and where you were exposed. Most exposure occurs in the workplace. 







Many industries used asbestos in the past and exposed workers. These included construction, manufacturing, chemical plants, the energy industry, and automotive repair. 



Some people were also exposed by working in schools and government buildings containing asbestos. 



Asbestos in North Little Rock



The Dixie neighborhood of North Little Rock continues to pose a risk to residents. 



Officials discovered asbestos in the area in 2011 around a site that operated as a vermiculite processing plant from 1953 to 1959.



For decades, the minerals came from the infamous Libby, Montana, mine that shipped out asbestos-contaminated vermiculite.







The discovery of asbestos in this area included contamination of parks, schoolyards, and other places residents could have been exposed. 



While cleanups occurred, residents are still concerned about the exposure risks.



Little Rock Job Sites Linked to Asbestos Exposure



Some of the specific workplaces in Little Rock that used asbestos and are known to have caused some exposure issues include:



Schools and Universities




The University of Arkansas at Little Rock



The University of Arkansas for Medical Services (UAMS)



Arkansas Baptist College



Philander Smith College



Arkansas School for the Blind (ASB)



Arkansas School for the Deaf (ASD)



Hall High School



Little Rock Central High School



McClellan Magnet High School



Parkview Arts and Science Magnet High School



Cloverdale Magnet Middle School



Dunbar Magnet Middle School



Henderson Health Sciences Magnet Middle School



Mabelvale Magnet Middle School



Mann Arts and Science Magnet Middle School



Pulaski Heights Middle School



Williams Traditional Magnet Elementary School




Hospitals




UAMS Medical Center



Baptist Health Cardiac Rehab Center



Arkansas Children’s Hospital



John L. McClellan Memorial Veterans Hospital



Eugene J. Towbin Healthcare Center



St. Vincent Infirmary Medical Center




Military Bases and Facilities




Little Rock Air Force Base



Pine Bluff Arsenal




Transportation, Utilities, and Public Works




Little Rock Street Railway and Electric Company



Little Rock and Pine Bluff Traction Company



Missouri Pacific Railroad (MoPac)



Union Pacific North Little Rock Yard



Arkansas Power and Light (AP&L)




Historic and Government Buildings




Arkansas State Capitol



Joseph Taylor Robinson Memorial Auditorium



Community Theater of Little Rock




Industrial and Construction-Related Sites




American Machine and Foundry (AMF) Bicycle Plant



Breeding Insulation Company



Knox Hill Siding



Little Rock Crate & Basket Co.



Planters Cotton Oil Mill



CenterPoint Energy, Inc.



Arkansas Brick and Tile Company



Pfeifer Plumbing, Heating & Cooling Company








This firm was extremely professional and responsive. If you have any meso questions, I’d highly recommend themThis firm was extremely professional and responsive. If you have any meso questions, I’d highly recommend them-Michael L.



Mesothelioma Cancer Treatment Centers in Little Rock



The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences offers cancer treatment for asbestos-related illnesses, including malignant mesothelioma, at its Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute.



Since 1989, oncologists, thoracic surgeons, and medical researchers have treated cancer patients from all over the United States and nearly 40 other nations.



The Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute also conducts clinical studies, which help develop new treatments to improve patients’ quality of life. Scientists hope to eventually discover a cure for mesothelioma and other forms of cancer.



UAMS Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute



4018 W. Capitol AvenueLittle Rock, AR 72205Phone: 501-686-8211 



Getting Legal Help in Little Rock



Remember, if you were exposed to asbestos and have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to receive compensation for the costs of your medical treatment, pain, suffering, diminished enjoyment of life, lost earning capacity, and more. Get our free Financial Compensation Packet for info on the top mesothelioma and asbestos lawyers in your area. If you need additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Denver Mesothelioma Lawyer

Denver mesothelioma lawyers help victims of asbestos exposure fight for justice and compensation. Denver job sites once had so much asbestos from power plants, energy stations, mills, chemical plants, and more that former workers developed life-threatening asbestos illnesses. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation.



An estimated $30 billion has been set aside by asbestos companies in asbestos trust funds. These funds were established to provide financial relief to individuals who have developed asbestos-related diseases, ensuring victims receive compensation without lengthy litigation.



Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the top Denver mesothelioma lawyers, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.



These trust funds are designed to help victims get the support they need quickly and efficiently, allowing for a smoother claim process. Discover how these resources can benefit you and your family during this challenging time.





Denver and Asbestos Facts








There were 3,214 asbestos-related deaths in Colorado between 1999 and 2017.



The Western Minerals Company Plant in Denver received hundreds of shipments of vermiculite contaminated with asbestos from the Libby, Montana site.



A recent incident in which several employees at Metropolitan State University were diagnosed with cancer highlights the ongoing risk of asbestos in buildings in Denver.




How Did I Get Mesothelioma? 



Asbestos exposure is the leading cause of mesothelioma. If you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, you likely came into contact with asbestos decades ago. This disease often takes a long time to develop, with symptoms appearing 10-50 years after initial exposure.



When asbestos fibers are inhaled or swallowed, they may become lodged in the lining of major organs like the lungs. These fibers irritate healthy tissue over time, leading to the development of mesothelioma.



Understanding the prolonged latency period is crucial for those at risk, as it underscores the importance of early detection and monitoring for anyone who has had potential asbestos exposure in their past.



By recognizing how these fibers affect the body, individuals can better appreciate why vigilance and regular health check-ups are key in managing potential risks related to asbestos.



Many industries used asbestos until the 1970s or 1980s. If you worked with or around it, you probably inhaled the fibers. These fibers caused damage to the tissue around your lungs, leading to cancer. 



Do I Need a Mesothelioma Lawyer in Denver? 



If you have a diagnosis of mesothelioma, you need an experienced lawyer. Mesothelioma is mostly caused by negligent asbestos exposure. Companies that did not warn you of the risks of asbestos can be held accountable for your exposure. 







The most important reason to work with a lawyer now is to seek compensation. You may be entitled to recover damages for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain or suffering. A lawyer can help you get compensation through:




Mesothelioma personal injury lawsuits



Mesothelioma wrongful death lawsuits



Asbestos trust funds



Veterans Benefits




A mesothelioma lawyer not only assists in pursuing financial compensation but also seeks justice for the injuries sustained by you or your family. These specialized attorneys help navigate complex legal pathways, ensuring you get the best possible outcome while minimizing stress.



Many families successfully obtain the compensation they deserve without ever going to trial—sometimes even without leaving their home. This is crucial, especially when dealing with the challenges of mesothelioma, as it allows you to focus on what truly matters: your health and family.



Top Colorado mesothelioma lawyers in Colorado have national reach and are part of large firms that give you the best chance of getting the compensation you deserve. Their expertise and resources allow them to efficiently manage your case, aiming for a resolution that respects both your time and well-being. 



Understanding the Process of Filing a Mesothelioma Lawsuit in Denver



Taking legal action for mesothelioma can be a critical step to managing your medical expenses and ensuring financial security for your family. Let's walk through the process to help you understand what to expect.




Consultation and Case EvaluationThe first step involves a detailed consultation with experienced mesothelioma attorneys who will assess your case's viability. During this initial meeting, you’ll provide essential details about your medical condition and exposure history. The legal team will evaluate potential options for your claim, ensuring the claim is strong enough to pursue.



Exploring Compensation OptionsVarious compensation routes are available beyond just the courtroom. Here’s a breakdown:

Asbestos Trust Funds: Companies responsible for asbestos exposure have established funds to compensate victims. With around $30 billion allocated, these funds are a significant source of compensation.



Settlements through Litigation: Many cases settle before reaching court, resulting in compensation without a trial. However, if needed, your legal team is prepared to argue your case in court.



Veterans Benefits: If you’re a veteran, specialized benefits are available through the Veterans Affairs system. Legal experts familiar with these claims can assist in securing entitled benefits.





Building Your Legal TeamWhen pursuing a lawsuit, you'll have a dedicated team working on your behalf. This typically includes a senior partner, skilled attorneys, paralegals, medical experts, and investigators, all focused on providing personalized attention and building a robust case.



Filing the LawsuitYour legal team will then formally file the lawsuit. Throughout this stage, they’ll handle all the required documentation and keep you informed about any developments.



Negotiation and Trial (if necessary)While the majority of lawsuits settle outside of court, your team will negotiate vigorously for a fair settlement. Should negotiations fail, they are prepared to take the case to trial to fight for the compensation you deserve.




By understanding these steps, you can feel better prepared to move forward with confidence. The goal is to secure a future that's financially stable, allowing you to focus on your health and loved ones.



Choosing the Right Mesothelioma Lawyer for Your Case



Selecting the right lawyer for your mesothelioma case is crucial in securing the compensation you deserve. Here are several key factors to consider:




Experience in Asbestos Litigation: Look for lawyers who have extensive experience with mesothelioma cases. Ideally, they should have spent at least a decade specializing in asbestos-related lawsuits, demonstrating a deep understanding of the intricacies involved.



Strong Track Record: It's important to find an attorney or firm known for their success in recovering significant settlements or verdicts for clients. Research past case outcomes to ensure they have a proven history of achieving favorable results in mesothelioma claims.



Client Recommendations: Investigate client testimonials and reviews. Positive feedback from previous clients can give you confidence in the lawyer's ability to handle your case with empathy and efficiency.



Contingency Fee Basis: Ensure the lawyer offers services on a contingency fee basis. This arrangement means you won't pay any legal fees unless you receive compensation, minimizing financial risk.



Comprehensive Legal Support: Choose a lawyer who will take charge of all legal proceedings, allowing you to focus on your health and recovery. They should be capable of managing paperwork, negotiations, and court appearances if necessary.




Ultimately, the right mesothelioma lawyer will combine experience, a proven track record, and compassionate client service to guide you through the legal process. Take advantage of initial consultations to ask questions and ascertain their approach, ensuring you feel confident and supported in your choice.



Understanding Colorado's Statute of Limitations for Mesothelioma Claims



A statute of limitations is a legal time limit that dictates how long individuals have to initiate legal proceedings. In Colorado, the statute of limitations for filing a mesothelioma claim is particularly important due to the nature of the disease and its causes.



Timeframe for Filing




Personal Injury Claims: For mesothelioma claims stemming from personal injury, you generally have two years from the date of diagnosis to file a lawsuit.



Wrongful Death Claims: If a loved one has passed away due to mesothelioma, the statute allows two years from the date of death to file a wrongful death claim.




The critical factor in these cases is timing. Mesothelioma often manifests many years after asbestos exposure, making it essential to act swiftly once a diagnosis is confirmed.



Importance of Legal Guidance



Given the complexities and severe time constraints associated with these cases, consulting with a qualified mesothelioma attorney in Colorado at the earliest opportunity is highly advisable. These professionals can navigate the legal landscape effectively, ensuring that your claim is filed within the appropriate timeframe.



Final Thoughts



Being proactive in seeking legal assistance can make a significant difference in the outcome of your claim. Understanding these deadlines and acting accordingly ensures that you preserve your right to seek justice and compensation for the impact of this devastating disease.



Mesothelioma Settlement Amounts in Denver: What to Expect



If you or a loved one are exploring legal action for mesothelioma, understanding past settlement amounts can provide useful insights. Here’s a breakdown of some previous settlements in the Denver area:



Triumphs in the Courtroom




A mold maker and carpenter’s helper received $3.25 million in Denver.



In Larkspur, a carpenter and laborer settled for $5.27 million.



A railroad worker in Arvada was awarded $3 million.




More Success Stories




$3 million for a machinist in Littleton.



$2.27 million awarded to a Northglenn sheet metal worker with pleural mesothelioma.



A Lakewood carpenter and U.S. Army veteran secured $2.88 million.



A Denver construction worker settled for $2 million.



An Arvada woman exposed secondhand to asbestos through her husband’s job as a union insulator received $2.26 million.



$1.91 million awarded to a mechanic in Denver.



In Lakewood, a U.S. Air Force veteran and union plumber received $2.98 million.



A Palmer Lake teacher and mail clerk battling pleural mesothelioma settled for $2.6 million.



$2.47 million for a Lakewood furnace repairman with pleural mesothelioma.




These figures highlight the potential for substantial financial relief, though each case is unique. It’s important to note that outcomes can vary based on factors such as the level of asbestos exposure, age at diagnosis, and specific circumstances surrounding each case. Remember, no outcome can be guaranteed.



Understanding the Costs of Hiring a Mesothelioma Lawyer



When considering the services of a mesothelioma lawyer, a common concern is the potential cost involved. Fortunately, most law firms specializing in mesothelioma cases offer a convenient and client-friendly payment structure.




No Hourly Fees: You won't have to worry about accumulating hourly charges each time you consult with your lawyer.



Zero Upfront Costs: There are typically no out-of-pocket expenses required to initiate your case, allowing you to focus on your health and well-being.



Contingency-Based Fees: Payment is only required if your case results in a successful compensation outcome. The lawyer’s fee is a pre-agreed percentage of the settlement or award.




This contingency fee arrangement ensures that legal representation is accessible without adding financial stress to what is already a challenging time.



Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Denver? 



Most asbestos exposure in Denver and elsewhere occurs in the workplace. Until the 1970s, many companies used asbestos and didn't warn workers of the risks. Some of the industries that used asbestos the most include:




Construction



Power plants



Oil refineries



Chemical plants



Manufacturing plants



Automotive Repair



The U.S. military




If you worked in one of these industries, you may have been exposed to asbestos and could be at risk for mesothelioma. 



Asbestos in Denver Power Stations



Denver is home to several power stations and energy companies that have used asbestos for decades and put workers at risk of exposure:



Cherokee Power Station



Created in 1957, the Cherokee Power Station, now known as Xcel Energy, is an electrical generation facility in Denver. For many years, the power station used asbestos in its facilities.







Asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) were used in many products and machinery at the job site, including boilers, turbines, tanks, pipes, pipe coverings, and much more, placing workers at risk of inhaling asbestos fibers daily.



Gary-Williams Energy



Gary-Williams Energy Corporation is an independently-owned energy company in Denver. It was created in the 1950s, but decades later, in 1995, it purchased Oklahoma's Wynnewood Refinery and became one of the leading crude oil producers in the area.



As with many other refineries, Gary-Williams Energy once relied on asbestos and caused exposure in workers.



The fact that asbestos did not react during chemical spills made it one of the most popular choices. Consequently, asbestos was used in many products at the energy company, including:




Furnaces



Pumps



Boilers



Tanks



Reactors



Pipes



Equipment



Machinery




In addition to the risk of routine exposure on the job, workers were seriously harmed by asbestos during two facility fires in 2007 and 2008.



The first fire permeated the air with asbestos and smoke, traveling up to 25 miles. A year later, the refinery experienced a second fire, caused when lightning struck a storage tank in the facility.



In 2012, Wynnewood Refinery faced yet another disaster after a boiler exploded. 



Employees died in the explosion, prompting an investigation by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).



Libby Vermiculite in Denver



The W.R. Grace mine in Libby, Montana, shipped contaminated vermiculite to processing plants nationwide. 



In Denver, the Western Minerals Plant received many shipments of this mineral that contained harmful asbestos.



The Denver plant was one of the country's largest processors of vermiculite. Thousands of workers and nearby residents risked exposure to contaminating asbestos.



Asbestos in Auraria



The Auraria campus of Denver's Metropolitan State University recently came under scrutiny because of several cancer diagnoses in employees. 







All work in the same campus area and investigators found asbestos in the West Classroom as early as 2010.



Other areas of the campus have been shut down in the last few years due to asbestos. 



Whether or not the current cancer cases were caused by campus asbestos is uncertain.



Additional Denver Job Sites Associated with Asbestos Use



Other companies associated with asbestos use in Denver include, but are not limited to:




Colorado General Hospital



Colorado State Industrial School (currently known as the Lookout Mountain Youth Services Center )



Denver Municipal Airport (currently known as the Stapleton International Airport)



Denver City Hall



ANB Bank



Lowry Air Force Base



Midwest Plumbing and Heating



Colorado and Southern Railway Company



Colorado Packing and Provision Company



Phillips Elementary School



VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System



University of Colorado (Denver campus)



Fitzsimons Army Medical Center



Johns Manville



Arapahoe Station




Treatment for Mesothelioma Near Denver



Denver does not have a designated National Cancer Institute (NCI). In nearby Aurora, the University of Colorado's Cancer Center (UCCC) provides innovative, in-depth treatment options for people with mesothelioma, asbestosis, and other forms of cancer caused by asbestos.



UCCC utilizes multidisciplinary clinics to treat patients. For pleural mesothelioma, the Lung Multidisciplinary Clinic provides a group of experts in different fields who consult each other for the treatment of each individual patient. 



The Peritoneal Cancer Multidisciplinary Clinic provides treatment for peritoneal mesothelioma, including HIPEC. 



People in this company are friendly, knowledgeable, and professional. They quickly answered all my questions and patiently walked me through the case and any open issues. I so appreciate their diligence and patience during this challenging time.-Jingjing Z.



Legal Help in Denver



If you or a loved one have been a victim of mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that you may qualify for significant compensation. Get our free Financial Compensation Packet for info on the top mesothelioma and asbestos lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### San Diego Mesothelioma Lawyer

Many asbestos victims are seeking justice with the help of an experienced San Diego mesothelioma lawyer after workplace exposure. Many workplaces used asbestos in San Diego, including every naval installation and most industrial sites. 



Asbestos trust funds with more than $30 billion are currently available to people who suffer from asbestos-related diseases. If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on leading San Diego mesothelioma attorneys, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 






San Diego Asbestos Facts




According to records, California saw over 27,000 asbestos-related deaths between 1999 and 2017.



Most of these were from lung cancer and mesothelioma tied to exposure to the toxic mineral in the workplace.



San Diego County had the second-highest number of asbestos deaths in the state after Los Angeles.



The presence of the U.S. Navy in the area has led to exposure to service members and civilian workers.









About Asbestos Exposure and Mesothelioma 







Thousands of companies used asbestos in the past and put their workers at risk of exposure and illness. Asbestos companies knew about the dangers of asbestos but failed to warn people of the risks. This negligence has led to significant health consequences.



When asbestos fibers are inhaled or ingested, they can become lodged in the body, leading to inflammation and scarring over time. Unfortunately, the body cannot expel these fibers. Of all the people exposed to asbestos, between 2% and 10% develop mesothelioma, a rare and fatal cancer.



As a result, thousands of people in San Diego and around California have developed mesothelioma and other asbestos-related illnesses, such as asbestosis and lung cancer. Mesothelioma specifically affects the tissue around the lungs, causing symptoms like shortness of breath, coughing, and chest pains. Due to its rarity and difficulty in diagnosing, many people discover this devastating illness too late for effective treatment.



If you worked around asbestos or in an industry that used asbestos, see your doctor for a cancer screening. If you get a diagnosis of mesothelioma, contact a top-rated California and San Diego mesothelioma lawyer and asbestos firm.



Understanding these risks highlights the importance of early detection and seeking legal assistance if affected.



How a San Diego Mesothelioma Lawyer Can Help



A local mesothelioma lawyer who is part of a large, nationwide asbestos firm can help you in several ways after a mesothelioma diagnosis: 




Provide a free initial case evaluation



Investigate your case to find out where and when you were exposed to asbestos



Determine which companies were liable for your exposure



File a personal injury lawsuit to seek compensation through a settlement or jury verdict



Make a claim with an asbestos trust fund if any of the companies that exposed you went bankrupt and cannot be sued



File a wrongful death lawsuit if your loved one died from negligent asbestos exposure



Maximize the compensation you receive through any legal action, so you can get the treatment you need




How Much Compensation Can I Get for Mesothelioma? 



The compensation you might receive from legal actions or claims cannot be guaranteed. The most experienced asbestos attorneys can give you a reasonable estimate and will give you the best chance of receiving maximum compensation. 



Average settlements for mesothelioma lawsuits are around $1 million. Verdicts can be much higher, often in the tens of millions of dollars, but there are no guarantees.



Compensation amounts consider the extent of your illness and the degree of negligence of the defendants. The consideration also includes your actual and future medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. 



Statute of Limitations for Mesothelioma Lawsuits in San Diego



When filing a mesothelioma lawsuit in San Diego, being mindful of the statute of limitations is crucial. Generally speaking, individuals have one year from the date they were exposed to asbestos to initiate legal action. This timeframe applies to personal injury claims, aiming to hold accountable those responsible for the exposure.



If the unfortunate event of a loved one passing due to asbestos exposure occurs, the timeline remains the same. You have just one year to file a wrongful death claim. Failing to act within these deadlines means forfeiting any chance to seek compensation for damages incurred.



It's important to take timely legal action to ensure your rights and potential recovery are not jeopardized. Consider consulting with a legal professional who can offer guidance tailored to your specific situation.



Understanding Asbestos Regulations in San Diego



San Diego, like the rest of California, is governed by specific regulations aimed at minimizing asbestos exposure. These regulations, known as the Airborne Toxic Control Measures (ATCMs), are designed to protect the public by managing the risks associated with naturally occurring asbestos. Here's a closer look at the laws in place:




Regulation of Construction and Mining Activities:The ATCMs impose strict guidelines on activities such as construction, grading, quarrying, and surface mining, all of which may disturb asbestos-containing materials. These measures ensure that appropriate safety and containment procedures are followed to minimize the release of asbestos fibers into the air.



Control of Surfacing Materials:The laws also address the production and sale of aggregate materials, including gravel and sand, originating from areas known to contain asbestos. Companies must adhere to specified protocols when dealing with these materials to prevent contamination.




By enforcing these comprehensive regulations, San Diego seeks to safeguard its residents and workforce from the serious health risks posed by asbestos exposure.



How Was I Exposed to Asbestos in San Diego? 







Many industries used asbestos. Some of the worst offenders were construction, manufacturing, power generation, and shipyards. The U.S. Navy also used a lot of asbestos. Navy veterans have some of the highest rates of mesothelioma in the country. 



These are just some examples of workplaces and industries that exposed San Diego residents and workers to asbestos: 



San Diego Naval Shipyard



The San Diego Navy Shipyard, or the Naval Base San Diego, has a long history of asbestos use dating back to 1918. 



During the shipyard’s peak, the 1940s, over 5,000 ships were repaired, overhauled, and manufactured.



Almost all components of ships constructed during that period contained asbestos. 



Anyone involved in work there was at risk of exposure. Even later, investigators found tons of the material in several units after asbestos use stopped.



National Steel and Shipbuilding Company (NASSCO)



From the early 1900s until the 1970s, the NASSCO facility in San Diego made many ships. Typical products that contained asbestos included tiles, pipes, compounds, plaster, epoxies, and insulation.



Many workers and contractors at the shipyard were exposed to dangerous asbestos fibers.



After employees and contractors came forward with diagnoses of mesothelioma and asbestosis, the number of lawsuits against the company multiplied. 







In one case, an employee sued the manufacturer of asbestos materials after his wife developed mesothelioma via second-hand exposure.



The Shipyard’s Worker Union also filed a lawsuit against the shipyard for unfair labor practices after refusing to allow a new health inspector to join the union and assess the health risks.



Schools and Hospitals Associated with Asbestos Use in San Diego



Many older schools and hospitals in San Diego were built when asbestos was heavily used in the construction industry. A lot of these buildings are still in use today.



Recently employees in the San Diego City Administration Building had to be evacuated over asbestos found in ceiling tiles. 



Contractors working on the building's sprinkler system caused part of the ceiling to come down, and asbestos fibers were detected. The fibers contaminated the air and surfaces, putting workers at risk.



While the incident was quickly cleaned and handled, it illustrates how many buildings in San Diego and other cities still pose a risk. Here are some other buildings in the city known to have asbestos:



Schools




Fleet Anti-Submarine Warfare Training Center



Patrick Henry High School



San Diego County Public Schools Building



University of California



San Diego State University



John Muir College



Mesa College



Palomar College




 Hospitals




Sharp Healthcare



Sharp Grossmont Hospital



Scripps Mercy Hospital



Sharp Mesa Vista Hospital



Naval Medical Center



Paradise Valley Hospital



UC San Diego Hospital



VA San Diego Healthcare




Additional Job Sites Associated with Asbestos Use in San Diego




American Electric Powerhouse



BluePrint Exhaust



Camp Pendleton



Consolidated Steel Shipbuilding



George Crawford Company



San Diego Marine Construction Company



San Diego Power Plant



San Diego Sewer Treatment Plant



Savage Tire Company



Sears Roebuck & Company



Southern California Edison Power Plant



Sun Harbor Industries



Union Oil



Valley Circle Theater



Wesley Palms Retirement Home



San Diego Fire Academy




Mesothelioma Treatment in San Diego



If you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, you need a treatment center that caters to this rare type of cancer.



The University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center has a rare tumor division. It has also been designated a Comprehensive Cancer Center by the National Cancer Institute. 



The center has specialists, cutting-edge research, clinical trials, and the latest treatments for rare and difficult cancers.



San Diego Legal Help



People in this company are friendly, knowledgeable, and professional. They quickly answered all my questions and patiently walked me through the case and any open issues. I so appreciate their diligence and patience during this challenging time.-Jingjing Z.



Remember, if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area.

### Pittsburgh Mesothelioma Lawyer

Contact an experienced Pittsburgh mesothelioma lawyer if you worked with asbestos or have a related illness. Pittsburgh's steel industry used asbestos for many years to protect against heat and fire. Asbestos exposure resulted in deadly diseases, like mesothelioma, in some workers. 



If you or a loved one have been injured in Pittsburgh and has mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Pittsburgh, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.





Pittsburgh Asbestos Facts








Pennsylvania saw over 17,000 asbestos-related deaths between 1999 and 2017. 



The highest number of asbestos deaths during that time was in Allegheny County, which includes Pittsburgh, with 1,969. 



Pittsburgh's long history with steel was a major factor in exposing workers and residents to asbestos. 




Asbestos and Mesothelioma in Pittsburgh, PA



Many industries and workplaces in Pittsburgh used asbestos. Asbestos is a natural mineral that was once prized for its ability to insulate and resist heat and fire. No longer used very much today, it was heavily used in construction, manufacturing, and many industrial workplaces throughout the 1900s. 



Workers who handled or worked near asbestos were at risk of inhaling its tiny fibers. Inside the body, these fibers cause tissue inflammation and cell damage.



In some people, the damage caused by asbestos fibers leads to illnesses, including:




Pleural mesothelioma



Peritoneal mesothelioma



Asbestosis



Lung cancer




Who Is at Risk for Mesothelioma in Pittsburgh?



Pittsburgh's industrial legacy has left thousands of workers at risk. If you worked in environments such as factories, manufacturing plants, steel mills, power plants, or refineries, you might have been exposed to asbestos. Construction sites and older buildings also pose significant risks, particularly for those involved in renovations without prior asbestos checks.



Beyond workplaces, older homes in Pittsburgh may contain asbestos. While most exposure occurs on the job, the risk extends to residential areas. Renovating or finding decaying asbestos materials in these homes could potentially lead to exposure.



Understanding these risks is crucial, as asbestos exposure can have serious health consequences. Identifying potential exposure sources in both occupational and residential settings can help in taking necessary precautions.



Mesothelioma is a rare cancer, but it is almost always caused by asbestos exposure. It most often develops around the lungs (pleural) and causes symptoms like coughing, shortness of breath, and chest pains. Mesothelioma is a devastating illness. It is an aggressive cancer with a poor prognosis. 



Do I Need a Pittsburgh Mesothelioma Lawyer? 



If you have a diagnosis of mesothelioma, you need to talk to a lawyer. Mesothelioma is almost always caused by negligent asbestos exposure. Companies that exposed you to asbestos without warnings or adequate protections can be held liable for expenses related to your illness. 



Recovering compensation for these costs is the main reason people sue for mesothelioma. To do so successfully, you need an experienced asbestos attorney guiding you.



With the right guidance, there are multiple avenues to explore:




Contact Asbestos Trusts: These trusts exist to offer compensation to victims of asbestos exposure. An attorney can help you access these funds, which can cover medical bills and other related expenses.



Negotiate a Settlement: Often, cases are resolved through settlements. An experienced attorney will negotiate on your behalf to ensure you receive a fair amount without the need for a prolonged trial.



File a Lawsuit for Wrongful Death: If a family member has tragically passed away due to asbestos exposure, you might consider filing a wrongful death lawsuit. This can secure compensation for loss and provide some financial relief during a difficult time.




Each of these outcomes requires strategic legal action, underscoring the importance of having skilled legal representation by your side.



What Will a Mesothelioma Lawyer Do for Me? 



When you hire a mesothelioma or asbestos lawyer in Pittsburgh, they will start by reviewing your case for free. If they believe you have a case, your mesothelioma lawyer can do several things to help you and your family:




Answer all your questions and help you decide what to do next.



Investigate your work history and find the companies responsible for your asbestos exposure.



Build a strong case with evidence to prove you were exposed to asbestos and that this resulted in your illness.




To strengthen your case, your lawyer will:




Investigate the Source: They will conduct a thorough investigation to find proof of where, when, and how you were exposed to asbestos. This involves gathering detailed documentation and records from your employment history and other potential exposure sites.



Collaborate with Medical Experts: Your lawyer will connect you with medical specialists who can provide expert testimony and reports confirming that your illness was caused by asbestos exposure. This medical evidence is crucial for substantiating your claims.



File Claims and Lawsuits: They will file a claim on your behalf with an asbestos trust fund, if applicable, and may also file a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit against responsible parties.



Negotiations and Litigation: Your lawyer will negotiate a fair settlement on your behalf, but if necessary, they are prepared to litigate your case in court to secure a jury award.



Seek Additional Benefits: If you were exposed to asbestos during military service, they can assist you in seeking and obtaining VA benefits.




By combining investigative diligence with expert medical collaboration, your lawyer ensures that all necessary evidence is compiled to build a compelling case. Whether through settlements or court verdicts, they aim to secure the compensation you deserve.



Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Pittsburgh? 



Pittsburgh is well known for the steel industry, which used a lot of asbestos. Many other industries and workplaces in the area also used asbestos and put workers at risk of exposure. These are just a few examples of where you might have been exposed. 



Pittsburgh Steel Mills and Asbestos







Until the 1970s, the steel industry formed the backbone of Pittsburgh’s economy. The rapid growth of the railroad industry in the mid-19th century created a demand for steel. The proliferation of steel mills in the area earned Pittsburgh the nickname “Steel City.”



Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel (now USX) became the largest steel company in the U.S. in 1901 after Carnegie Steel merged with the Federal Steel Company and the National Steel Company. 



During World War II, Pittsburgh’s steel mills produced 95% of all the steel in the U.S. 



Almost every steel company in Pittsburgh has been associated with heavy asbestos use at one point in time.  



The damage caused by asbestos is irreversible, but exposure dropped dramatically with the industry's decline in the 1970s. Thousands of Pittsburgh steelworkers lost their jobs during the recession of the early 1980s. 



Other Asbestos-Related Industries



Pittsburgh’s economy is strongly associated with steel, but other important industries operated here.



Coal and iron mining were the precursors to the growth of steel plants. Pittsburgh's factories and steel mills consumed huge quantities of coal from area mines. 



In the 20th Century, the city diversified its economy. Oil, food processing, shipbuilding, and power-generating companies began to operate various facilities in Pittsburgh.



These industries were heavy users of asbestos-containing materials, especially in plants and factories built before the mid-1970s and early 1980s. 



Many of the employees and contractors who worked for these companies have gotten sick. Some have only recently experienced the symptoms of mesothelioma, as the disease can lie dormant for decades. 



Transportation and Asbestos in Pittsburgh



Pittsburgh is a major transportation hub that links western Pennsylvania to the rest of the world. Three major airports  are located in the Pittsburgh area and provide passenger, cargo, and general services:




Pittsburgh International Airport 



Arnold Palmer Regional Airport



Allegheny County Airport




Freight and passenger trains run on various railway lines connecting Pittsburgh to other East Coast and Midwest cities, including the Pittsburgh Line to Harrisburg and the Norfolk Southern Railway. 



All of these transportation industries used asbestos in machinery, equipment, brakes, and other components. 



Businesses Associated with Asbestos in Pittsburgh



Many other industries in Pittsburgh used asbestos, including construction, leaving many older buildings laden with the harmful mineral:



Plants




B & W Main Tube Plant



Bellefield Border Plant



Central Power Plant



City of Pittsburgh Mayview Plant



Corning Glass Plant



Eliza Furnace Plant



Elrama Power Plant



H W Oliver's Central Power Plant



Henry Phipps Central Power Plant



Papercraft Plant



Pilot Plant



Singer Nimick Plant



South Side Plant



Stanwix Heating Plant



U. S. Steel Chemical Plant




Schools




Saint Anselm High School



Bailey High School



Bethel Senior High School



Carnegie Technical School



Chartier Valley High School



The Ellis School



Northview Heights Elementary School



Old Fourth Ward School



Penn Township Junior High School



South Hills High School




Steel Companies




Aliquippa Steel Company



Amer Sheet Steel Company



American Sheet Steel Company



Apollo Iron Steel Company



Bethlehem Steel Mill



Canonsburg Iron and Steel Company



Carbon Steel Company



Carnegie Steel Company



Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corporation



Clarion Steel Works



Clinton Iron and Steel Company



Colonial Steel Company



Crucible Steel Company of America



Pittsburgh Des Moines Steel



Edgewater Steel Company



Empire Reeves Steel Company



Great Lakes Steel



Hainsworth Steel Company



Homestead Steel Works



Illinois Steel Company



J&L Steel Corp



Oliver and Snyder Steel Company



Otis Steel Company



Park Steel Works



Parkersburg Iron and Steel Company



Pittsburgh Steel Foundry



Pittsburgh Iron and Steel Engineering Company



Pittsburgh Steel Casting Company



Pittsburgh Steel Foundry



Republic Iron and Steel Company



Schoen Steel Wheel Company



Shenango Steel



Sharon Steel Hoop Company



Shelby Steel Tube Company



Shoenberger Steel Company



Shulenberger Steel Company



Spang Steel and Iron Company



Standard Steel Car Company



U.S. Steel Corporation



Union Steel Casting



Usx Steel Mill



Zug Iron and Steel Company




Hospitals




Allegheny General Hospital



Braddock Hospital



C. Howard Marcy State Hospital



Elizabeth Steel Magee Hospital



John J Kane Hospital



Montefiore Hospital



Passavant Hospital



St Francis Hospital



St Margaret's Hospital



St. John's General Hospital



West Pennsylvania Hospital




Am I Still at Risk of Being Exposed to Asbestos in Pittsburgh? 







Most asbestos exposures occurred in the past, but the risk has not disappeared. This is mostly because asbestos was used so heavily in construction. Many buildings in Pittsburgh and the surrounding area contain old asbestos materials. 



A recent incident in Churchill illustrates the risk. The Alleghany County Health Department fined a contractor over $1 million for illegal practices during an asbestos abatement project at the former Westinghouse headquarters. The contractor’s actions put workers and nearby residents at risk of asbestos exposure. The money paid in fines will go to Alleghany’s clean air fund.



This is not the first time asbestos has posed a threat in Pittsburgh. A poignant case involved a teacher who worked at South High School in the 1950s. Decades later, she developed mesothelioma, a severe illness linked to asbestos exposure, and subsequently passed away. Her family pursued legal action against the Pittsburgh School District and other defendants, bringing to light the lurking dangers of asbestos in older buildings.



In a significant ruling, a judge determined that the school district could not evade the lawsuit, emphasizing that employers have an obligation to maintain a reasonably safe work environment. This legal precedent underscores the critical importance of addressing asbestos risks, both in current abatement projects and in the legacy of older structures.



Together, these incidents highlight the ongoing battle against asbestos exposure in the region, reflecting both regulatory actions and personal stories that continue to bring attention to this public health issue.



Mesothelioma Treatment in Pittsburgh



Pittsburgh is home to the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center. It has been designated a Comprehensive Cancer Center by the National Cancer Institute. 



The designation highlights the facility's expert staff, innovative treatments, and cutting-edge research and clinical trials. 



The Hillman Cancer Center is staffed by physicians and surgeons specializing in treating various cancers, including mesothelioma. The Mesothelioma Specialty Care Center works with patients with pleural or peritoneal patients. 



Getting Legal Help in Pittsburgh



Remember, if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to substantial damages for lost wages, medical expenses, pain, suffering, and more. Don't forget to fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you need additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 



People in this company are friendly, knowledgeable, and professional. They quickly answered all my questions and patiently walked me through the case and any open issues. I so appreciate their diligence and patience during this challenging time.- Jingjing Z.

### Los Angeles Mesothelioma Lawyer

Los Angeles mesothelioma lawyers help victims of asbestos exposure take legal actions and seek compensation. The city has an extensive history of asbestos use in construction and industrial businesses. Many California workers have been diagnosed with mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases as a result.



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on leading Los Angeles mesothelioma attorneys, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 






Los Angeles Asbestos Facts








Los Angeles County has the highest number of asbestos-related deaths in the state of California.



Between 1999 and 2017, there were over 27,000 deaths in the state related to asbestos exposure, and nearly 5,000 asbestos deaths occurred in the Los Angeles area.



Construction, shipping, and industrial workplaces in this large city have largely contributed to asbestos exposure and illnesses.



Several sites in and around Los Angeles received shipments of vermiculite from Libby, Montana, a mineral heavily contaminated with asbestos.





How Can a Los Angeles Mesothelioma Lawyer Help Me? 







If you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, you need a lawyer to handle pressing legal matters. A top California lawyer serving Los Angeles residents in asbestos cases helps their clients with:




Asbestos Personal Injury Lawsuits



Asbestos Wrongful Death Lawsuits



Asbestos Trust Fund Claims



Veteran Benefits



Other Benefits




Mesothelioma is nearly always caused by negligent asbestos exposure. One or more companies are responsible for your exposure and can be held liable for damages.



If a loved one has passed away due to an asbestos-related illness, you may wonder if you can pursue a claim on their behalf. In California, wrongful death claims can generally be initiated by the deceased’s personal representative, surviving spouse, domestic partner, or children.



Consulting with an experienced mesothelioma attorney is essential to determine whether you have grounds for a wrongful death lawsuit. They can guide you through the legal process, ensuring that the responsible parties are held accountable for their negligence.



By taking action, you not only honor your loved one's memory but also seek the justice and compensation your family deserves.



How to Schedule a Free Consultation with a Mesothelioma Law Firm in Los Angeles



If you're looking to schedule a free consultation with a mesothelioma law firm in Los Angeles, the process is straightforward and convenient. Follow these steps to get started:




Visit the Firm's Website: Head over to the law firm's website and locate their contact page. This is usually found in the navigation menu at the top of the homepage.



Fill Out the Contact Form: Look for an online form you can complete, typically labeled as a contact or consultation form. Provide your details, including your name, email, and phone number, along with a brief message about your inquiry.



Make a Phone Call: Prefer direct conversation? Call their office directly. Many firms offer around-the-clock phone support, ensuring you can reach out at any time.



Email Communication: If you prefer written communication, send an email to the address provided on their site. Include your relevant information and any specific questions you have.



Follow Up: After your initial outreach, a representative from the firm should contact you to schedule your consultation.




These law firms typically promise no obligational commitment for setting up a meeting, giving you the freedom to explore your legal options without any pressure.



How Much Does It Cost to Hire a Mesothelioma Attorney in Los Angeles?



Hiring a mesothelioma attorney in Los Angeles can seem daunting, but understanding the costs can help ease your concerns. Here's a breakdown:




Free Consultations: Most mesothelioma attorneys offer free initial consultations. This allows you to discuss your case and explore your legal options without any financial commitment.



Contingency Fee Basis: Typically, mesothelioma attorneys work on a contingency fee basis. This means you won't be charged any upfront fees. Instead, the attorney will only be paid if you receive a settlement or win a verdict. Generally, the fee is a percentage of the compensation awarded.



No Hidden Costs: With a contingency fee arrangement, you won't have to worry about hidden charges or extra fees during the legal process. Attorneys usually cover all case-related expenses upfront.




Make sure to discuss the specific percentage your attorney will take and any other potential costs during your initial consultation. This ensures that you are fully informed before proceeding with legal action in your mesothelioma case.



What is the Process for Filing a Mesothelioma Lawsuit?



Filing a mesothelioma lawsuit involves a systematic approach to seek justice and financial compensation for asbestos exposure. Here's a step-by-step breakdown of the process:




Initial Consultation:

Connect with an experienced attorney who specializes in asbestos litigation. This often starts with a free consultation to discuss your specific case and the potential for legal action.





Case Evaluation:

The attorney will gather detailed information about your asbestos exposure history. This includes identifying potential sources such as product manufacturers, contractors, or property owners.





Gathering Evidence:

Crucial evidence is collected to support your claim. This may involve medical records confirming your diagnosis, work history, and any documents or testimonials linking your illness to asbestos exposure.





Filing the Claim:

Your attorney will draft and file a legal complaint in the appropriate court, clearly outlining the defendants and the basis for your claims. The complaint usually seeks compensation for pain and suffering, medical expenses, lost wages, and potentially punitive damages.





Discovery Phase:

Both parties exchange information through depositions, document requests, and interrogatories. This phase is crucial for building a strong case.





Pre-Trial and Negotiations:

Attorneys may negotiate settlements with the defendants to avoid going to trial. Many cases are settled out of court, but if a fair settlement isn't reached, the case will proceed to trial.





Trial:

If no settlement is agreed upon, the case goes to trial. Both sides present their arguments, and a judge or jury determines the outcome, including any financial compensation awarded.





Resolution:

After a verdict, if the decision is favorable, the compensation is distributed as per the court’s judgment or settlement agreement. If needed, parties might appeal the decision, which could extend the process.






By following these steps, the legal process aims to hold responsible parties accountable and secure the compensation deserved for the hardships endured due to asbestos exposure.



How Much Compensation Can I Get for Mesothelioma? 



The answer to this question depends on many factors. A lawyer cannot guarantee a certain amount from a settlement or jury award. They can make a reasonable estimate and maximize your compensation based on several factors:




Your diagnosis and the severity of the illness



Medical expenses



Future expected medical and care expenses



Lost wages and lost earning potential



Degree of pain and suffering




However, the compensation you may be eligible for also hinges on the specific circumstances of your case. Each mesothelioma lawsuit is unique, and the parties who may be liable for your illness can significantly influence the outcome. Identifying these parties is crucial, as they are responsible for covering your damages.



Working with experienced lawyers can help ensure a comprehensive review of your situation. They can assess all possible avenues for recovery, considering the intricate details of your case. By doing so, they aim to provide a more accurate estimate of potential damages tailored to your specific needs and circumstances.



Mesothelioma Settlements and Jury Awards in Los Angeles



Most asbestos lawsuits end in settlements that fairly compensate the victim. A few go to trial and end in jury awards that can be substantially larger. These are a few examples from Los Angeles: 




$11 Million. In 2018, a Los Angeles jury awarded Alfred Mata and his wife $11 million. He developed mesothelioma because his father worked around asbestos and brought the fibers home on his clothing. This is known as secondhand exposure. The jury agreed that Liberty Utilities Corp. had a duty to warn workers of the risks of bringing asbestos home. 



$43 Million. Deanne Warren was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2019, also from secondhand exposure. Algoma Hardwoods, Inc. was found responsible for her exposure to asbestos fibers in the home. 



$48 Million. In 2012, a Los Angeles court awarded Bobbie Izell's family $48 million after he died from mesothelioma. He worked as a contractor and was exposed to asbestos in construction products. Some of the companies found liable included Union Carbide, Riverside Cement, and CalPortland. 




Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Los Angeles? 



Most asbestos exposure occurs in the workplace. If you have mesothelioma, a lawyer can help you track down your exposure history so you can take legal action. 







Los Angeles is a large city with an industrial economy and many locations that used asbestos and put workers and even residents at risk. Some of the people at greatest risk worked in power plants, shipyards, construction sites, steel plants, mines, and factories. 



These are just some major sources of asbestos exposure in Los Angeles and the surrounding area. 



Shipping and Asbestos in Los Angeles



Todd Shipyards was one of the largest companies that used asbestos in Los Angeles. Created in 1916, the company provided ships during wartime, especially during World War II. During this time and later, all shipyards used asbestos. 



In 1945, the Los Angeles Shipbuilding and Dry Dock became a part of the business, which included military and private ships. At this time, nearly all components on ships contained asbestos. 



Todd Shipyards continued its success until the mid-1980s when competition from other shipbuilding enterprises forced the shipyard to close the Los Angeles site in 1989. 



In 2010, the company was bought by Vigor International. Vigor International has strict laws in place concerning the use of asbestos on the worksites. Yet, this law came about decades after thousands of workers at the former Todd Shipyards had been exposed daily.







By 2010, Todd Shipyard faced 490 asbestos claims, ten malignant mesothelioma claims, and 184 less-serious claims from its former employees. 



Many of these cases have already been settled, and the company placed $3 million in a trust fund bank for future lawsuits.



Libby Vermiculite in Los Angeles



The W.R. Grace mine in Libby, Montana, produced asbestos-tainted vermiculite for decades, shipping it to industrial locations throughout the country. 



Several workplaces in and around Los Angeles received this vermiculite:




Al-Lube Division of Far Best Corporation, Glendale



California Zonolite Company/W.R. Grace, Glendale



Domtar/Kaiser Gypsum America Inc., Long Beach



Germain's Seed Company, Los Angeles



Southwest Grease Company, Compton




Other Places Associated with Asbestos Use in Los Angeles



Schools, plants, mills, hospitals, restaurants, and hospitals are among the many types of businesses that contained asbestos before its ban in the late 1970s:



Schools




Aviation High School



Banneker High School



Bell High School



Belmont High School



Belvedere Middle School



Carson High School



El Camino Real Estate School



Fairfax Senior High School



Fern Avenue School (demolished)



Gardena High School



Garfield High School



Hammel Street Elementary School



Hoover Street Elementary School



Jefferson High School



John Muir Middle School



Los Angeles High School



Los Angeles Manual Arts High School



Los Angeles Technical Trade School



Los Angeles Unified School District



Los Feliz Elementary School



Marvin Avenue Elementary School



Pacoima Middle School



Ramona Elementary School



Roosevelt High School



Sherman Oaks High School



State School for Boys



Topeka Drive School



Washington High School




Plants




Aynes Steam Plant



Balboa Water Treatment Plant



Central Plants Incorporated



Dickson Gun Plant



El Segundo Steam Plant



Haynes Steam Generating Plant



Los Angeles County Central Plant



Los Angeles Water Plant



Mccullough Plant



Oxnard Mandalay Plant



San Onofre Generating Plant



Texallano Plant



Trigen Central Plants



Union Pacific Plant




Hotels




Alexander Hotel Company



Alexandria Hotel



Beverly Hills Hotel



Biltmore Hotel



Blackstone Apartment Hotel



Century Plaza Hotel



Hunts Hotel



Mayflower Hotel



Statler Hilton Hotel




Hospitals




Angelus Hospital (demolished)



Cedars of Lebanon Hospital



Children's Hospital (Vermont Ave)



Good Samaritan Hospital



Hollywood Presbyterian Hospital



Los Angeles County General Hospital



Los Angeles Infirmary Sisters' Hospital



Martin Luther King Jr General Hospital



Midway Hospital



Queen of Angels Hospital



Saint Francis Hospital



Shriners Children's Hospital



St. John's Hospital



St. Vincent's Hospital



Temple Hospital



UCLA Medical Center



The University of Southern California Hospital



Veterans Administration Hospital



White Memorial Hospital




Chemical Companies




Amer Chemical



American Potash & Chemical Corporation



Ashland Chemical Company



Borden Chemical Company



Bray Chemical Company



Collier Carbon & Chemical Corporation



Dixon Chemical



Dow Chemical Company



Filtrol Chemical



Food Machinery & Chemical Corporation



Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical



Kerr Mcgee Chemical Corporation



Old Colony Paint & Chemical Company



Pacific R & H Chemical Company



Rohm & Haas Chemical



Shell Chemical Company



Southern California Chemical Company



Stauffer Chemical



Witfield Chemical Corp




Electric Companies




Cannon Electric



Edison Electric Company



General Electric Company



Hoagland Lakin Electric and Engineering Company



Los Angeles Electric Company



Pacific Electric Railway Company



Pasadena Los Angeles Electric Railway Company



San Gabriel Electric Company



Santa Maria Electric and Gas Company



Sawyer Electric



U.S. Electrical Motors Inc




Additional Businesses




A. P. Mc Guinness



Aaron Ferer & Son



Affiliated Metals



Air Reduction Pacific Company



AiResearch Corporation



Alameda Tank Company



Aluminum Company of America (Alcoa



Aluminum Extrusion Company



Amalgamated Oil Company



American Airlines -Los Angeles International Airport



American Appliance Company



American Brazing Company



American Bridge Division



American Container



American Hair & Felt Company



American Manganese Steel Division



American Pacific Steamship Company



Anchor Hocking Glass Corporation



Angelus Floor Covering



Angelus Steel Treating



Apex Steel Corporation



ARCO Twin Towers



BF Goodrich Company



Balboa Water Treatment Plant



Beeson Engineering Company



Bradbury Building



California Fireproof Door Company



California Sanitary Canning Company



Chevrolet Division of General Motors Company



Devoe & Reynolds Company, Inc.



Dominguez Water Corporation



E. P. Clark Building.



E.B. Wiggins Oil Tool



Firestone Tire & Rubber Company



Food Machinery & Chemical Corporation



Golden State Creamery



Kaiser Medical Center



United Technology Corporation



Valley Place Methodist Church



Wesco Steel Rolling Mills Corp




Talcum Powder Asbestos Lawsuits



An emerging source of asbestos exposure is contaminated talc. Many people who used talcum powder for decades have developed mesothelioma or ovarian cancer. 



Los Angeles has been the site of important lawsuits against makers of talcum powder products contaminated with asbestos. In December 2021, the family of Doreen Myers won their lawsuit against talc suppliers and Avon Products. 



Myers used the products for years and died from mesothelioma. Her legal team helped her family secure a $780,000 jury verdict for the companies' failures to warn consumers of the risks of asbestos in talc. 



Understanding the Time Limit for Mesothelioma Lawsuits in Los Angeles



When considering legal action in Los Angeles, California, the statute of limitations for filing a mesothelioma lawsuit is crucial. In California, you generally have one year from the date of your mesothelioma diagnosis to file a personal injury lawsuit. Alternatively, if you were unaware that your condition was linked to asbestos exposure, you have one year from the date you should have reasonably discovered this connection.



Why Timeliness Matters



Initiating your lawsuit promptly is essential. This allows your attorney adequate time to:




Investigate your case: Gathering all necessary information and evidence.



Build a strong legal argument: Collaborating with medical and exposure experts.



File appropriate documentation: Ensuring all paperwork is correctly submitted.




Speak with a Mesothelioma Attorney



It's advisable to consult a specialized mesothelioma lawyer in Los Angeles without delay. Early consultation helps clarify your options and initiate necessary legal procedures within the stipulated timeframe.



Don't risk missing out on the opportunity for justice and potential compensation due to time constraints. Reach out to a legal professional experienced in handling mesothelioma cases to safeguard your rights.



What is the Statute of Limitations for Filing Asbestos Lawsuits in California?



In California, timing is crucial when it comes to filing lawsuits related to asbestos exposure. The law typically grants you a two-year window to take legal action for mesothelioma claims. This period begins from the moment you receive your diagnosis.



If you're pursuing a wrongful death claim due to a loved one’s passing from asbestos-related illness, you similarly have two years from the date of death to file. Be aware that claims against asbestos trust funds might have different deadlines, but they often align with these same timeframes.



For veterans, it's important to note that filing a claim with the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) doesn't have a statute of limitations, giving more flexibility in seeking benefits.



Mesothelioma Treatment in Los Angeles



Victims of asbestos exposure in Los Angeles have access to one of the world's premier treatment centers for mesothelioma.



The Pacific Mesothelioma Center, part of the Pacific Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, launched in 2012. It focuses on the research and treatment of pleural mesothelioma.



Also in Los Angeles is the UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center. It is recognized as a center of excellence and a Comprehensive Cancer Center by the National Cancer Institute. 



The Cancer Center specializes in lung and other thoracic cancers, including mesothelioma, and partners with the Pacific Mesothelioma Center.



Great people. Helped my family through our meso diagnosis.-Donald H.



Los Angeles Legal Assistance



As previously mentioned, you may be entitled to financial compensation if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis. Get our free Financial Compensation Packet for info on the top mesothelioma and asbestos lawyers in your area. If you need additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Tulsa Mesothelioma Lawyer

Contact an experienced Tulsa mesothelioma lawyer to learn about your legal options if you have an asbestos-related illness. The timing of construction and oil booms in Tulsa coincided with heavy asbestos use. Workplace exposure put people at risk of developing mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Tulsa, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.





Tulsa Asbestos Facts




Between 1999 and 2017, there were over 2,600 asbestos-related deaths in Oklahoma. 



Tulsa and Tulsa County had the second-highest number of deaths in that period, with 396. 



The long history of the energy industry in Tulsa has contributed to significant asbestos exposure in the area.




About Mesothelioma



Mesothelioma is an aggressive and deadly cancer caused by asbestos exposure. Most people with mesothelioma were negligently exposed to asbestos at work. Many industries and workplaces in Tulsa used asbestos and put workers at risk. 



Asbestos can cause a couple of different types of mesothelioma. Pleural mesothelioma develops in the chest and causes symptoms like shortness of breath, coughing, and chest pains. Peritoneal mesothelioma occurs in the abdomen and causes pain, bloating, and digestive symptoms. 



Asbestos in the workplace causes mesothelioma by shedding fibers into the air. Workers then inadvertently inhale or ingest the fibers. The fibers cause inflammation and damage inside the body, which causes mesothelioma, lung cancer, or asbestosis in some people. 



Do I Need a Tulsa Mesothelioma Lawyer? 







If you have mesothelioma, you need an experienced mesothelioma and asbestos lawyer. Asbestos exposure is negligent, so you can hold companies accountable for your illness. They should have protected you from asbestos and didn’t.



Filing a mesothelioma lawsuit in Tulsa is crucial for several reasons:




Receive Compensation: Legal action offers the opportunity to receive compensation that can alleviate the burden of costly medical expenses and treatments.



Secure Your Family's Future: Beyond immediate financial relief, compensation from a lawsuit can help secure your family’s financial stability, providing peace of mind for the future.



Hold Companies Accountable: Many asbestos companies knowingly hid the dangers of their products. By filing a lawsuit, you take a stand against this negligence and ensure justice is served.




A top Tulsa, Oklahoma, mesothelioma lawyer can help you take legal action to seek compensation from asbestos companies. They can investigate your past asbestos exposure and determine which companies are responsible.



The right asbestos lawyer will find evidence to prove your case, explain your options, and give you the best chance of recovering damages. Taking these steps not only supports your personal cause but also contributes to holding negligent companies accountable for their actions. 



What Are the Benefits of Starting a Mesothelioma Lawsuit?



Embarking on a mesothelioma lawsuit can be pivotal for both financial security and peace of mind. Here's how pursuing legal action can be advantageous for you and your family:



Financial Relief



Navigating the burdensome costs associated with mesothelioma treatment can be daunting. A lawsuit can provide you with the finances needed to manage medical bills, ensuring that both short-term needs and long-term care plans are covered.



Multiple Avenues for Compensation



Not all compensation involves lengthy court battles. Here are some accessible options:




Asbestos Trust Funds: To address claims from affected individuals, asbestos companies have established trust funds estimated to total around $30 billion. These funds can be a direct source of compensation without court intervention.



Settlements: Many mesothelioma cases are resolved through settlements before reaching the courtroom. By negotiating a settlement, families can often secure timely and substantial compensation.



Veterans Affairs Benefits: For veterans affected by mesothelioma, the Department of Veterans Affairs offers pathways to obtain medical and financial support. Legal support can aid in navigating VA claims to access these benefits.




Expert Guidance



Engaging experienced attorneys ensures a smoother journey through the legal maze. They provide crucial support at every turn, from gathering evidence to advocating on your behalf, making an overwhelming process manageable.



Ensuring Family Well-being



Beyond direct financial relief, successful lawsuits offer reassurance that your family's future is protected. With secured funds, they can focus on healing and personal matters without financial strain.



In essence, a mesothelioma lawsuit serves as a vital tool, offering both immediate financial support and long-term security for those facing the challenges of this disease.



How to Choose a Tulsa Mesothelioma Lawyer



Asbestos cases are very complicated. Winning them requires experience, expertise, and extensive resources. When hiring a mesothelioma lawyer in Tulsa, look for these characteristics:




A lawyer with experience handling and winning mesothelioma lawsuits and claims



A lawyer who is part of a larger firm with investigators, medical experts, and adequate resources to take your case



Free initial consultations and contingency payment, so you pay nothing until they win



The ability to come to you if you are too sick to travel



Nationwide reach and jurisdiction in other states, as asbestos cases often cross state lines




When considering costs, rest assured that hiring a mesothelioma lawyer doesn't have to be a financial burden. Most reputable firms operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning there are no hourly fees or out-of-pocket costs. They only receive payment if your case results in compensation. This allows you to pursue justice without the worry of upfront legal expenses.



By choosing a lawyer with these qualities, you can focus on your health and recovery while your legal team handles the complexities of your case.



Examples of Mesothelioma Settlements in the Tulsa Area



When it comes to mesothelioma cases, several individuals in the Tulsa area have secured significant settlements. These settlements vary widely depending on factors like exposure history, age, and diagnosis. Here are some examples:




High-Profile Settlements:

A secretary in Tulsa received a substantial settlement of $3.92 million.



An asbestos worker from Claremore was awarded $3.6 million.



In Okmulgee, a pipefitter and machinist secured $3.73 million.





Additional Notable Cases:

$3.11 million was awarded to a Tulsa resident suffering from pleural mesothelioma.



An electrical worker in Tulsa received $2.1 million.



A notable settlement of $3 million went to a Tulsa oil company worker diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma.



A U.S. Navy veteran affected by pleural mesothelioma was granted $1.5 million.



Another U.S. Navy veteran, this time in Chouteau, received $2.7 million.



A laborer in Tulsa, dealing with peritoneal mesothelioma, obtained $1.18 million.






These figures highlight the potential compensation available in mesothelioma cases, though outcomes can differ significantly based on individual circumstances. It's essential to understand that each case is unique, and there's no promise of a specific result.



Understanding the Statute of Limitations for Mesothelioma Claims in Oklahoma



When considering filing a mesothelioma claim in Oklahoma, it's essential to understand the state's statute of limitations. This legal time frame determines how long you have to file a claim after receiving a mesothelioma diagnosis.



Key Points to Consider:




Time Limit After Diagnosis: Typically, the statute of limitations in Oklahoma for personal injury claims, including mesothelioma cases, is two years from the date of diagnosis. This means you need to take legal action within this period to ensure your case is heard.



For Families of Deceased Victims: In unfortunate situations where a mesothelioma patient has passed away, the family has two years from the date of death to file a wrongful death claim.



Why Timeliness Matters: Filing within these time limits is crucial. Missing the deadline may result in losing the right to seek compensation.




Given these constraints, it is imperative to consult with experienced asbestos attorneys in Oklahoma promptly. They can provide guidance and ensure all legal paperwork is filed correctly and on time, maximizing your chances for a successful claim.



Navigating these legal waters can be complex, but understanding these timelines is your first step toward securing justice and compensation.



How Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Tulsa, Oklahoma?



Many industries and workplaces in Tusla used asbestos and exposed workers. These are just a few examples of where you might have encountered asbestos in the city. 



Sinclair Oil Corporation







Sinclair Oil is a petroleum corporation with fueling stations throughout the Midwest and Western parts of the U.S. Sinclair Oil also operated refineries in Tulsa. 



Before the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) strict regulations on asbestos use in the 1970s, Sinclair Oil used asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) in equipment, machinery, products, and construction materials.



Since amphibole asbestos is heat-proof, a fire retardant, and helps block reactive chemicals, it was one of the leading choices of asbestos for oil companies.



Common uses of asbestos in oil refineries, like Sinclair's, included:




Thermal insulation and insulation materials, such as pipes, gaskets, and conduits



Refinery equipment, such as sealants, sheets, and metal gaskets



Construction products, such as floor, ceiling, and roofing tiles, as well as work surfaces and walls



Protective clothing and equipment, such as gloves, masks, work uniforms, textile cloths, and aprons




Skelly Building



The Skelly Building, the headquarters of Skelly Oil, was a major contributor to asbestos-related diseases among the people who built it. The former 9-story building was constructed in 1921, with several renovations over subsequent decades.



Although the building was demolished to make room for a new parking lot, this only happened after workers had been exposed to asbestos for years.



In 1960, a Tulsa carpenter, whose name wasn't made public, was assigned to re-size drywall sheets at the Skelly building. As he cut and re-sized the drywall sheets, he exposed asbestos fibers but had no idea he was inhaling them. 



Decades later, the building worker was diagnosed with mesothelioma. He was never made aware of the risks. 



Remediating Tulsa Buildings



Tulsa's rapid growth in population and construction came when the industry used asbestos in insulation and many other building materials. 



Now, many of those aging buildings pose exposure risks for workers and residents. 



In 2019 the EPA awarded Tulsa a Brownfield grant of $500,000 to clean up asbestos and toxic sites within older buildings and industrial sites. 



The city plans to use the funds to remediate asbestos and other toxic substances in Air Force Plant #3 at the Tulsa International Airport and to renovate an old oil company building downtown. 



In 2020, the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality and the city of Tulsa agreed to partner on major asbestos remediation in the Abundant Life Building. 



Constructed in the 1950s, the building contains a lot of asbestos. Remediating the building, which is currently vacant, will take over $2 million to complete. 



Other Job Sites Associated with Asbestos in Tulsa



The case of the worker at the Skelly Building is just one of many tragic examples of Tulsa workers and residents exposed to asbestos. Many other buildings and workplaces in the city used asbestos and put workers at risk. 



Schools, Churches, and Hospitals




Mcclain High School



University of Tulsa



Oral Roberts University



St. Francis Hospital



St. John's Hospital



First Baptist Church



Edison Middle School



Hillcrest Medical Center




Banks




First National Bank



National Bank of Tulsa




Oil Companies




Bareco Oil Company



City Services Oil Company



Sunray Oil Refinery



Humble Oil



Skelly Oil



Stanolind Oil and Gas Company




Petroleum Companies




Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation



Warren Petroleum Corporation




Additional Companies and Buildings




American Public Service Company of Oklahoma (PSO)



Douglas Aircraft Company



American Airlines



McDonnnell Douglas Aircraft Company



Armstrong World Industries



Bryant Refractory Company



Tulsa City Hall



Douglas Aircraft Company



Carpenter's Union (Local 943)



Tulsa City-County Library (downtown)



Gulf Pipe Line Company



Jones & Laughlin Steel Company



Lone Star Pressure Precision Company



Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company



Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation



Tulsa Assembly Center



Thermal Systems Incorporated



Tulsa Ice and Packing Company



Tulsa International Airport



Union Carbide Corporation



Waite Phillips Building



The Thorpe Company



Tulsa Rig and Steel



Trigen Oklahoma



Wheeler Drywall



Maloney Crawford Tank Company




Cancer Treatment in Tulsa







The nearest cancer treatment centers to Tulsa are in Oklahoma City: 




Stephenson Cancer Center. Part of the University of Oklahoma, the Stephenson Cancer Center is recognized by the National Cancer Institute as a Cancer Center. It provides comprehensive, cutting-edge care and access to clinical trials. 



INTEGRIS Health Cancer Center. INTEGRIS also offers treatment for a variety of cancer types. There are five locations, including two in Oklahoma City and one each in Yukon, Enid, and Grove.




How Veterans Affairs (VA) Benefits Can Assist Veterans with Mesothelioma



Veterans who have developed mesothelioma due to asbestos exposure during military service may find crucial support through Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits. These benefits are designed to provide both medical care and financial assistance, helping veterans manage their condition effectively.



Medical Assistance




Specialized Treatment: The VA offers access to specialized healthcare facilities where veterans can receive treatment from experts familiar with mesothelioma. This may include surgery, chemotherapy, or other necessary medical interventions.




Financial Support




Compensation Options: Eligible veterans can apply for disability compensation, which provides a monthly financial benefit to help cover the costs associated with the disease.



Pension Programs: Veterans with limited income and resources might qualify for pension programs that provide additional financial relief.




Claims Assistance



Veterans are encouraged to work with experienced VA-accredited claims agents or attorneys. These professionals can guide them through the paperwork and legal process, ensuring that veterans receive all the benefits to which they are entitled.



This firm was extremely professional and responsive. If you have any meso questions, I’d highly recommend them.- Michael L.



Legal Help in Tulsa



Get our free Financial Compensation Packet for information on the top mesothelioma and asbestos lawyers in your area. Fill out our form today. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Cleveland Mesothelioma Lawyer

Contact a Cleveland mesothelioma lawyer for legal options if you've been harmed by asbestos in the area. Cleveland has long been a center for economic and manufacturing industries, but most job sites once used asbestos. 



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.





Cleveland Asbestos Facts








Nearly 1,600 of Ohio's 12,697 asbestos-related deaths between 1999 and 2017 were in Cleveland and Cuyahoga County. 



Industrial job sites in and around Cleveland, including coal mines, steel mills, foundries, and automotive manufacturers, used asbestos for decades. 



Some of these sites are still causing exposure issues in the city. 




Asbestos Exposure and Mesothelioma



Asbestos exposure causes mesothelioma, a rare cancer. Most asbestos exposure occurs at work and is considered negligent. Asbestos companies had a duty to warn workers of the risks of exposure, but most did not for many years. 



Asbestos is made of small fibers. When workers handle asbestos materials, fibers come loose and contaminate the workplace. Workers inhale or ingest the tiny fibers, which then cause damage inside the body. 



In some people, asbestos damage leads to pleural mesothelioma, peritoneal mesothelioma, lung cancer, or asbestosis. Most do not get a diagnosis until decades after asbestos exposure. 



Why Do I Need a Cleveland Mesothelioma Lawyer? 



Filing an asbestos claim is a crucial step in securing justice and financial stability for those affected by mesothelioma. Because asbestos exposure is negligent, you can hold asbestos companies liable for expenses related to your illness. Many of these companies knew the risks associated with their products but chose to hide this information from the public for years.



By pursuing a claim, you not only seek compensation to help cover medical expenses and secure your family's future, but you also take a stand against corporate negligence. This accountability can bring a sense of closure and justice to victims and their families.



Contact a top-rated Ohio mesothelioma lawyer working with clients in Cleveland to learn what to do next. A skilled attorney can guide you through the process, ensuring that you understand your rights and the potential outcomes of your claim.



Remember, holding these companies accountable is not just about personal gain—it's about preventing future harm and promoting corporate responsibility.



Mesothelioma is expensive to treat. It also causes emotional and physical pain and suffering. “You need an experienced asbestos attorney to help you get the compensation you deserve.” Our dedicated legal team stands ready to support you every step of the way. With a senior partner leading the charge, our team includes seasoned attorneys, skilled paralegals, and knowledgeable medical staff.




Personalized Attention: We tailor our approach to meet your unique needs, ensuring you receive the individualized care every client deserves.



Comprehensive Resources: Our investigators work diligently to uncover the details of your case, providing a thorough foundation for your lawsuit.



Simplified Process: We handle the complexities of the legal system, making it as straightforward and stress-free as possible for you and your family.




By choosing our firm, you’re not just hiring a lawyer; you’re gaining an entire team committed to fighting for your rights and securing the justice you deserve.



Understanding Ohio's Statute of Limitations for Mesothelioma Claims



When dealing with mesothelioma claims in Ohio, one critical factor to consider is the statute of limitations. This refers to the time frame within which a patient or their family must take legal action after a diagnosis.



Key Points to Know:




Time Frame: In Ohio, the statute of limitations often allows mesothelioma patients two years from the date of diagnosis to file a personal injury lawsuit. If a loved one has passed away from mesothelioma, the family typically has two years from the date of death to file a wrongful death lawsuit.



Reason for Timing: These time constraints ensure that claims are filed while evidence is relatively fresh and witnesses are more likely to be readily available. Acting quickly can significantly impact the strength of the case.



Importance of Swift Action:

Delaying action might forfeit the opportunity to claim financial compensation.



Early consultation with experienced asbestos attorneys can aid in gathering necessary documentation and evidence in a timely manner.





Flexibility and Exceptions:

While these are standard limitations, exceptional cases may alter the allowable time frame. For instance, if the asbestos exposure was discovered later than initially realized, it could potentially adjust the timeline.






By understanding and adhering to these legal time constraints, mesothelioma patients and their families can better protect their rights and potential compensation. Getting in touch with a lawyer specializing in asbestos-related cases as soon as the disease is diagnosed is crucial in navigating these legal nuances effectively.



How to Choose a Cleveland Mesothelioma Lawyer



Choosing the right lawyer for your mesothelioma lawsuit or claim is important. Look for these characteristics as you find a Cleveland asbestos lawyer: 




Experience. Rely on a lawyer with proven experience handling and winning asbestos cases. These cases require specific knowledge and skills that not all attorneys have. 



Proven Results. The lawyer you choose should be able to show you they have won for other clients. 



Asbestos Law Firm. Investigating and proving a mesothelioma case takes a lot of resources. Your lawyer might be local to Cleveland, but they should be part of a larger law firm with adequate resources and nationwide reach. 



Free Consultation. You shouldn't have to pay anything for a case review. Reputable mesothelioma lawyers offer free initial consultations. They also offer contingency payment. You pay nothing until they win. 




Your Cleveland Mesothelioma Case Could Be Worth Millions



The amount of compensation you can get from a mesothelioma or asbestos lawsuit depends on individual factors. These include your medical and care expenses, lost wages, degree of pain and suffering, and the defendants involved. 



Most asbestos cases end in settlements. Mesothelioma settlements average between $1 million and $1.4 million. When they go to trial, mesothelioma lawsuits often result in jury awards of several million dollars. 



An example from Cleveland is a case that went to trial in 2014. John Panza was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2012. His father worked in a plant that made asbestos brakes. Panza was exposed to asbestos fibers on his father's work clothing. A Cleveland jury awarded Panza $27.5 million. 



How Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Cleveland? 



If you have a diagnosis of mesothelioma, you might not know where you were exposed. This is essential information to prove a mesothelioma case and one of the main reasons you need an experienced attorney. 



Cleveland has been home to several industries and employers that used asbestos and exposed workers in the past. Some continue to put workers at risk today. 



The Republic/LTV ArcelorMittal Cleveland Steel Plant







Steel manufacturing has been one of Cleveland’s major industries since the 1850s. 



The ArcelorMittal Cleveland plant is one of the city’s largest and oldest operating steel manufacturing facilities. The plant consists mainly of pre-existing sections of the old Republic Steel Corporation/LTV plants. Cleveland-Cliffs bought ArcelorMittal USA in 2020. 



The section on the West Side used to belong to Otis Steel and has been in its present location since 1914. ArcelorMittal’s facilities on the East Side were part of Corrigan McKinney Steel and have operated there since 1913.



These old sections of the plant were built during a period in which many of the machines used to process raw iron ore into finished steel products contained asbestos.



Steam pipes, insulation, floor panels, and even workers’ utility clothing were made with ACMs for safety purposes. Asbestos was also mixed into some of the steel products to make them stronger and more heat resistant. 



Workers and their families came into contact with asbestos for decades. Many are now developing mesothelioma and other related illnesses.



National Acme Building



Many of the older industrial job sites in Cleveland are still standing. Some are no longer in use but still pose risks of asbestos exposure to nearby residents.



Once a manufacturer of machine tools, the National Acme Building is no longer in use. But the site is now littered with asbestos. 



In 2012, a demolition company hired to demolish the building failed to follow proper steps to remediate the asbestos, prompting the IRS to get involved. 



Several workers associated with the demolition were sentenced to prison plus hefty fines. The same workers were also associated with similar scams at job sites in Louisiana. 



The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is now working on cleaning up the site. By 2019, the "EPA removed about 4,000 tons of trash and rubble, deeming the asbestos mix hazardous waste," according to Cleveland.com. 



However, around 30,000 to 40,000 tons of debris and trash remain. 




"And so what this now breeds ... (is) dumpers, scrappers, vandals, and now it has affected all these buildings along here."
Councilman Mike Polensek (2019)



Other Cleveland Job Sites and Buildings Associated with Asbestos 



Cleveland’s association with heavy industry and energy production has lasted for over 150 years. Much of that period coincided with the heyday of the asbestos industry. 



Consequently, many job sites in Cleveland and the surrounding communities have been known to have used asbestos and consumer products made with ACMs. 



Schools and Hospitals




Case School of Engineering



Case Western Reserve University



Garfield High School



Lake City Vocational School



Rocky River High School



South High School



Cleveland State University



University Hospitals Case Medical Center



Cleveland Clinic



Metro Health System



St. Alexius Hospital



St. Vincent Charity Medical Center



St. Michael's Hospital




Manufacturing




Alloys & Chemical Manufacturing Company



Avtron Manufacturing Inc.



Cleveland Welding and Manufacturing Company



Grabler Manufacturing



Avtron Manufacturing Inc.



Dangler Stove and Manufacturing Company



Eberhard Manufacturing



Kroehler Manufacturing



Mcmyler-Interstate




Plants




Calcio Chemical Plant



General Motors (Chevrolet plant)



City of Cleveland Southerly Wastewater Treatment Plant



Cleveland Wire Plant



Edgewater Power Plant



Cleveland Municipal Lighting Plant



Standard Oil Pilot Plant



Avon Lake Power Plant




Additional Businesses and Job Sites




Apex Smelting Company



Armstrong Contracting & Supply



Boston & Ohio Railroad



Bronson Portland Cement Company



Champion Machine & Forging



Chandler & Price



City of Cleveland Board of Public Service



Cleveland: Fairmont Pump Station Rehabilitation



Kirkland Street Pumping Station



Cleveland & Sandusky Brewing Corporation



Cleveland and Elyria Electric Railway



Cleveland Arcade



Cleveland Board of Education



Cleveland City Cable Railway



Cleveland City Forge and Iron



Cleveland Frog and Crossing Co.



Cleveland Metropolitan Housing Authority



Cleveland Transit Drill Company



Fisher Body and Casting



Cleveland Botanical Garden



Hinde and Dauch Paper Company



Hollenden Hotel



LTV Steel Mill



Perfection Stove Corporation



Plain Dealer Publishing Co.



Rauch and Lang



Red Seal Electric Company



Reliance Electric & Engineering Co.



Schlather Brewing Company



Swasey Company Boiler House



Thompson Ramo Wooldridge



W.H. Hanna



White Sewing Machine Company



The W.M. Pattison Supply Company



WHK Broadcasting Studio



West Ninth St. Terminal Warehouse



Waldron Firebrick & Insulation



United States Aluminum Company



Troy Laundry Machinery



Union Carbide & Carbon Chemical Corporation



Union Rolling Mill Company



Todd Welding Company



Zurowski Greenhouse




Mesothelioma and Cancer Treatment in Cleveland







There are two major medical facilities in Cleveland that provide cancer treatment for victims of asbestos-related diseases: the Cleveland Clinic and the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center.



Founded in 1921, the Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit medical center that combines multi-specialty medical care with academic research. Its Taussig Cancer Institute provides surgical procedures, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and drug-based treatment options. 



Cleveland Clinic



2010 East 90th StreetCleveland, OH, 44195Phone: 866-223-8100



The Case Comprehensive Cancer Center (Case CCC) is one of only 41 medical facilities in the country designated by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) as a Comprehensive Cancer Center.



Case Comprehensive Cancer Center



Wolstein Research Building, Suite 1422



2103 Cornell RoadCleveland, OH 44106Phone: 216-844-8797



What Benefits Can Veterans with Mesothelioma Access Through the VA?



Veterans diagnosed with mesothelioma have access to a variety of medical and financial benefits provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). These benefits are designed to alleviate the burden of medical expenses and provide support.



Medical Benefits




Health Care Services: Veterans can receive specialized treatment for mesothelioma at VA medical centers, which often include access to experienced oncologists.



Prescriptions and Medications: Coverage for necessary medications related to mesothelioma treatment.



Supportive Care: Access to palliative care services to improve quality of life.




Financial Benefits




Disability Compensation: Monthly payments are available to veterans who developed mesothelioma due to asbestos exposure during service.



Pension Programs: Additional financial aid is offered for those who meet specific income and age criteria.



Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC): Benefits may extend to the surviving spouses and children of veterans who have passed away from service-connected mesothelioma.




Assistance in Filing Claims



Navigating the VA benefits system can be complex, but help is available:




Veteran Service Organizations (VSOs): Many nonprofits offer free assistance to guide veterans through the process of filing for benefits.



VA-Accredited Attorneys: Specialized attorneys can assist in preparing and filing claims to ensure veterans receive the benefits they deserve.




Veterans with mesothelioma should explore these options to secure the support needed for managing their health and financial well-being.



People in this company are friendly, knowledgeable, and professional. They quickly answered all my questions and patiently walked me through the case and any open issues. I so appreciate their diligence and patience during this challenging time.-Jingjing Z.



Legal Help in Cleveland and Additional Information



If you've been injured by asbestos, there is a good chance that you'll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to get our free Financial Compensation Packet for information on the top mesothelioma and asbestos lawyers in your area.

### San Francisco Mesothelioma Lawyer

With the help of a qualified San Francisco mesothelioma lawyer, many people in the area with mesothelioma are now fighting for their rights. San Francisco’s industrial past included shipbuilding, construction, and energy production, all of which used asbestos. 



Keep in mind that if you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.






San Francisco Asbestos Facts








California experienced over 27,000 asbestos-related deaths in the years between 1999 and 2017.



During that period, San Francisco's asbestos death rate numbered 620.



The Bay Area was home to several industrial sites that used asbestos and major sites that received asbestos-contaminated vermiculite from the W.R. Grace mine in Libby, Montana.





Why Do I Need a San Francisco Mesothelioma Lawyer? 







Top-rated California attorneys serving San Francisco are available to help you if you receive a mesothelioma diagnosis. Mesothelioma is usually caused by negligent workplace asbestos exposure. You can hold companies accountable, but you need an experienced mesothelioma lawyer.



Companies often prioritized profits over safety, knowingly exposing workers to asbestos despite its well-documented dangers. This negligence has put countless lives at risk, leading to severe health consequences for many families.



By holding these corporations accountable, you're not only seeking justice but also pursuing compensation that can help cover medical expenses and secure your family's future. An experienced mesothelioma lawyer can guide you through this process, ensuring that those responsible are held liable for their actions.



Taking action is not just about your case—it's about setting a precedent that emphasizes the importance of corporate responsibility and worker safety.



A San Francisco mesothelioma lawyer can help you in several ways: 




With a free initial consultation to review your case



Investigating your asbestos exposure history to find the companies responsible



Filing a personal injury lawsuit against those companies



Negotiating a fair settlement from the defendants to get you the compensation needed for medical and other expenses



Litigating your case in court if necessary



Maximizing the compensation you receive



Filing a successful claim with an asbestos trust fund




Why Swift Action is Crucial for Mesothelioma Claims



When dealing with a mesothelioma diagnosis, time is of the essence in several ways. One of the critical reasons to act quickly when filing a mesothelioma claim is the statute of limitations. Each state has its own specific rules that limit the time frame in which you can initiate legal proceedings. In California, for instance, this period is restricted, meaning that delaying action could result in losing the right to seek compensation.



Key Reasons to File Promptly:




Statutes of Limitations: These legal boundaries establish a limited window to file claims. Missing this window may prevent you from pursuing legal action at all.



Preservation of Evidence: As time passes, important evidence can be lost or become less reliable. Prompt action helps ensure that relevant documents and witness testimonies are preserved.



Access to Resources: Acting quickly allows you to connect with experienced legal professionals who can navigate through the complex landscape of asbestos litigation, maximizing your chances of a favorable outcome.



Financial Relief: Seeking compensation sooner rather than later can provide much-needed financial support for medical expenses and family needs during a challenging time.




In essence, promptly reaching out to legal expertise can make a significant difference in both the outcome and the relief process, emphasizing the critical need for immediate action upon diagnosis.



What to Look for in a San Francisco Mesothelioma Lawyer



You need a lawyer if you have mesothelioma and hope to recover damages. But you can't settle for any lawyer or firm. Look for an attorney with proven mesothelioma and asbestos experience. They should have a successful track record for getting settlements and litigating cases for mesothelioma clients. 



A local lawyer with a San Francisco office is a great choice, but they should be part of a nationwide firm. They need national resources to investigate and build your case. They should offer a free consultation and take no fees until they win for you.



To kickstart your journey with the right mesothelioma law firm, simply fill out the contact form provided. This initial step ensures that a dedicated legal representative will reach out to discuss your case and explore your options.



Key Steps to Begin Your Consultation:




Fill Out the Form: Enter your details in the consultation form to express your interest.



Expect a Callback: A knowledgeable attorney will contact you to discuss your case specifics.



Free Consultation: Benefit from a no-cost, no-obligation discussion about your legal rights and potential compensation.




By following these steps, you’re positioning yourself with a team that has the resources and expertise to secure the best possible outcome for your situation.



Understanding the Statute of Limitations for Mesothelioma Claims in California



When dealing with mesothelioma claims in California, the statute of limitations plays a crucial role in determining the timeline for filing a lawsuit. The statute of limitations sets a legal deadline to initiate a claim, significantly impacting the ability of patients and their families to seek compensation.



Key Points about the Statute of Limitations




Time Sensitivity: For mesothelioma patients, the clock starts ticking either from the date of diagnosis or when the disease should have reasonably been discovered. This makes it essential to consider legal action promptly.



Family Claims: In unfortunate cases where the patient has passed away, family members can file a wrongful death claim. The time limit for these claims usually begins from the date of the patient’s death.



Legal Assistance: It's crucial for patients and their families to engage with experienced asbestos attorneys who understand California's specific restrictions and can navigate the complexities effectively.




Why Timing Matters



Acting quickly is vital due to these restrictive timelines. Missing the deadline could mean losing the right to compensation. Thus, reaching out to a qualified lawyer who specializes in asbestos-related cases is an important step after receiving a diagnosis. Attorneys can help ensure that all legal options are explored within the time limits, offering a better chance for a successful claim.



By understanding and respecting the statute of limitations, mesothelioma patients and their families can take the necessary steps toward securing justice and financial relief for the challenges posed by this disease.



How Was I Exposed to Asbestos in San Francisco? 







One of the most important things an experienced mesothelioma lawyer can do for you is to determine where and when you were exposed to asbestos. You need this information to prove your case and get compensation. 



A History of Asbestos in San Francisco



Spanish settlers founded San Francisco as a Catholic mission in 1776. Its location on the Pacific coast made it an ideal place for ports, naval bases, and shipbuilding. Its growth as a major city in Northern California started during the Gold Rush of the late 1840s and 1850s.



By the late 1890s, San Francisco was the eighth-largest city in the U.S., with new industries that used large amounts of asbestos. 



The use of asbestos in the city grew during its recovery from the 1906 earthquake. It was used in construction materials and as a fire retardant and insulator in vehicles and machinery, ending only in the late 1970s and early 1980s.



The city’s post-quake recovery period and the two World Wars of the 20th Century contributed heavily to San Francisco’s asbestos problems. 



The need to rebuild three-quarters of the city resulted in many buildings and homes with building materials infused with asbestos.



Power plant workers, shipbuilders, sailors, pipelayers, and dockyard engineers experienced constant exposure to asbestos fibers, especially during World War II. In addition, San Francisco was a central point of embarkation for the Pacific Theater of Operations. 



Many Army, Navy, Coast Guard, and Marine Corps personnel were exposed to asbestos in transit to and from the battlefront.



All the military bases in the San Francisco area with major asbestos issues were decommissioned during the 1990s due to the Cold War’s end in 1989.



Areas of Asbestos Exposure in San Francisco



Many San Francisco area job sites exposed their workers to asbestos. Shipyards, power stations, and petroleum storage or refining facilities were among them, including:




Bethlehem Steel Shipyard - San Francisco



Hunters Point Naval Shipyard



Moore Drydock



Pacific Gas & Electric Power Plant



San Francisco Dry Dock Company



San Francisco Naval Shipyard



Shell-Martinez Oil Refinery



Todd Shipyard



Treasure Island Naval Station




Hunters Point Naval Shipyard



Hunters Point Naval Shipyard operated until 1974. Activities on the site contaminated soil and water with numerous pollutants. Eventually, it was named a Superfund by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 







Among the many contaminants on the site is naturally-occurring asbestos. The U.S. Navy has managed and cleaned the site, with the EPA overseeing efforts. The EPA continues to monitor it. 



You could have been exposed to asbestos if you served in the Navy at Hunters Point or worked there as a civilian. Even residents in the area were at risk of exposure to airborne asbestos or contaminants in the groundwater. 



Contaminated Vermiculite in San Francisco



The W.R. Grace mine in Libby, Montana, shipped asbestos-contaminated vermiculite all over the country for decades.



Three sites in San Francisco and the Bay Area are known to have received significant amounts of Libby vermiculite:




Arabian American Oil, San Francisco



H.B. Fuller Company, San Francisco



California Zonolite/Diversified Insulation, Newark



Pabco/CA Gypsum Company/Fireboard Paper, Newark




The Zonolite location in Newark was particularly problematic. It received over 330,000 tons of Libby vermiculite. As an exfoliation facility, it contributed significantly to workers' and nearby residents' asbestos exposure.



Other San Francisco Job Sites with Asbestos Exposure




Allis Chalmers Manufacturing Company



American Asbestos Company



American Biscuit Company



American Cream of Tartar Company



American Linen Supply Company



American Trust Office Building



Bank of America



Bank of California



Bay & River Navigation Company



Bedford Hotel



C.W. Stouffer Company



Cahill Construction



Dawson Meat Company



Four Seasons Hotel (Geary Street)



Fremont Center Building



General Chemical - Anhydrous Plant



Hall of Justice



Hospital For Children and Training School For Nurses



Hotel Westminster



San Francisco and San Mateo Railway Company



Quality Motel



Rialto Building



Salomo Manufacturing



San Francisco Examiner Building



San Francisco Galvanizing



San Francisco Gas and Electric Light Company



San Francisco General Hospital



San Francisco Housing Authority



San Francisco International Airport



San Francisco Museum of Art



San Francisco Railway and Power Company



Leland Stanford Jr. University Hospital




School Buildings with Known Asbestos




Giannini Middle School



Belmont School



Cathedral High School



Del Mar School



Diamond Heights High School



Everett Junior High School



Hospital For Children and Training School For Nurses



Kate Kennedy School



Lowell High School



Mercy High School



Mission High School



Pelton Jr High School



Pennhurst State School



Potrero Hill Middle School



Raphael Weill School



San Domenico School



Silver Avenue School



St. Ignatius High School



St. Mary's Cathedral School & Convent



Star of Sea High School



Town School For Boys



Ulloa School



United States Navy Postgraduate School



Woodrow Wilson School



City College of San Francisco



Cooper Medical College



De Anza College



Golden Gate College



San Francisco Community College



San Francisco State College



Skyline College



Stanford University



University of California San Francisco




How Asbestos Exposure Can Lead to Mesothelioma



Asbestos exposure mainly occurs when its tiny fibers are inhaled or ingested. Once inside the body, these durable fibers can embed themselves in the lining of vital organs, including the lungs, abdomen, or heart.



The Process and Impact




Cell Damage: The presence of asbestos fibers irritates healthy tissues. This irritation can gradually lead to damage and inflammation.



Cell Mutation: Over time, the persistent irritation and damage can cause cells to mutate, disrupting normal cell functions.



Disease Development: These mutations may eventually trigger the onset of mesothelioma, a form of cancer affecting the mesothelium, the protective lining covering most of the internal organs.




Time Frame for Development



The progression from exposure to diagnosis isn't swift. After initial contact with asbestos, it can take anywhere from 10 to 50 years for mesothelioma symptoms to surface. This long latency period is why early detection is challenging and emphasizes the importance of monitoring health if you have a history of exposure.



By understanding this process, individuals can better appreciate the importance of safety measures when dealing with asbestos and the need for regular medical check-ups if exposure has occurred in the past.



What Benefits Can Veterans with Mesothelioma Access Through the VA?



Veterans diagnosed with mesothelioma are entitled to a range of benefits through the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). These benefits are designed to provide both medical support and financial assistance, ensuring veterans receive the care they need without additional stress.



Medical Benefits




Comprehensive Healthcare: Veterans can access specialized healthcare treatments for mesothelioma at VA medical centers or through VA-approved providers.



Treatment and Care: Coverage includes surgeries, chemotherapy, and both traditional and emerging therapies.




Financial Assistance




Disability Compensation: Veterans may qualify for monthly compensation due to mesothelioma being recognized as a service-connected illness.



Pension Benefits: Additional financial aid may be available for those eligible based on income and need.




Additional Support




VA Claims Assistance: Specialized representatives and accredited attorneys can assist in preparing and filing VA claims to ensure veterans receive the benefits they're entitled to.



Survivor Benefits: Families of veterans may be eligible for dependency and indemnity compensation in the event of the veteran’s passing.




By leveraging these resources, veterans can focus on their health and recovery with the support they deserve.



Paul at Mesothelioma Lawyer Center provided outstanding support when my family faced a mesothelioma diagnosis. From the start, his professionalism and genuine care were evident. Paul explained every step of the legal process with patience and empathy.His meticulous attention to detail and expertise ensured our case was handled swiftly and efficiently. What truly impressed us was Paul's responsiveness—he was always quick to reply and kept us well-informed throughout.I highly recommend Mesothelioma Lawyer Center.-Patrick M



Notable Mesothelioma Settlements and Verdicts in the San Francisco Area



If you're curious about significant mesothelioma settlements and verdicts in the San Francisco area, here are some noteworthy cases that underline the potential compensation achieved by victims or their families:




Remarkable $15.79 Million Settlement: Achieved for a mesothelioma patient in Livermore, this substantial sum highlights the possibility of securing significant financial redress.



$4.14 Million for a U.S. Army Veteran: A veteran residing in Benicia received this impressive settlement, underscoring the recognition of service-related asbestos exposure.



$1.7 Million Awarded to Laborer & Longshoreman: This verdict in San Francisco demonstrates support for workers exposed to harmful asbestos in their line of duty.




Additional Settlements




$3.54 million: Awarded to a union carpenter from Fairfield, showcasing support for tradesmen suffering from asbestos exposure.



$1.48 million: Received by a Daly City union teamster battling pleural mesothelioma, reflecting the specific challenges faced by union workers.



$1.64 million: Granted to a San Francisco electrician affected by pleural mesothelioma, highlighting the city's industrial links to asbestos-related conditions.



$2.76 million: Settlement for a plasterer from Soquel, showing the risks tied to construction trades.



$1.26 million: Compensating a U.S. Navy veteran based in San Francisco, this amount exemplifies support for veterans in similar situations.



$2.74 million: Provided to an insulator from Rio Vista with pleural mesothelioma, underscoring the occupational hazards faced by those in insulation jobs.




It is important to remember that settlement amounts can vary extensively. Factors such as an individual's exposure history, age, and overall health play a critical role. Although no outcome is guaranteed, these cases do illustrate the successful pursuit of justice and compensation for those affected by asbestos exposure.



Getting Expert Mesothelioma Care in San Francisco 



Dr. David M. Jablon, MDUniversity of California - San Francisco (Mt. Zion Campus)Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center1600 Divisadero StreetSan Francisco, CA 94115



Dr. Thierry Marie Jahan, MDUniversity of California - San Francisco (Mt. Zion Campus)Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center1600 Divisadero StreetSan Francisco, CA 94115



Getting Legal Help in San Francisco



As mentioned earlier, if you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for compensation for your losses. Get our free Financial Compensation Packet for info on the top mesothelioma and asbestos lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Norfolk Mesothelioma Lawyer

Top Norfolk mesothelioma lawyers are helping asbestos-exposure victims in the area seek justice and compensation. Military and civilian facilities dedicated to shipbuilding, maritime operations, and land transportation helped Norfolk grow into one of Virginia’s largest cities. These industries also exposed people to asbestos. 



Right now, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, set aside for victims who developed an asbestos-related disease. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Norfolk, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 





Norfolk Asbestos Facts




The number of asbestos-related deaths in Norfolk between 1999 and 2017 is nearly 250. 



Both military and civilian shipbuilding and repair in Norfolk contributed significantly to asbestos exposure. 



Former employees sued the Norfolk Southern Railway Company over asbestos exposure and cancer. 




When Do I Need a Norfolk Mesothelioma Lawyer? 



If you have a diagnosis of mesothelioma, you need to talk to a lawyer as soon as possible. Mesothelioma's only known cause is asbestos exposure, which is nearly always negligent. 



You have a right to sue or make a claim for compensation and hold asbestos companies accountable. They failed to protect you from exposure and later illness. A mesothelioma lawyer is the best person to help you make a successful case and get maximum compensation. 



What Can a Norfolk Asbestos Attorney Do to Help Me? 







Top Norfolk mesothelioma lawyers are experts in complex asbestos cases. They are best placed to help you seek justice and get a good outcome. There are several ways an asbestos attorney or law firm can help you during this difficult time:  




Asbestos law firms offer free initial consultations to review your case and answer questions. 



They will use their extensive resources and investigators to find the companies responsible for your asbestos exposure. 



They provide medical experts to prove your illness is a result of asbestos exposure. 



Asbestos attorneys provide these resources and years of experience to build a strong case on your behalf. 



They will file a claim or lawsuit for you, negotiate a settlement, or, if necessary, take your case to trial. 



Experienced attorneys can maximize your compensation and ensure you get it sooner. 



They offer contingency payment, so you pay no fees until you win. 




How Much Does It Cost to Hire a Norfolk Mesothelioma Lawyer?



Hiring a mesothelioma lawyer in Norfolk doesn't have to be a financial burden. When you choose lawyers from established firms, you won't face any hourly fees or upfront costs. What's more, they operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning they'll only receive payment if your case is successful and you receive compensation.



This client-friendly approach ensures that legal expenses won't be a barrier in pursuing justice and securing the compensation you deserve. You can focus on your case without worrying about immediate legal costs.



Why Should You File an Asbestos Claim in Norfolk?



Filing an asbestos claim in Norfolk can be a vital step for those affected by asbestos-related illnesses. Here’s why it matters:




Financial Relief for Medical CostsTreatment for illnesses caused by asbestos exposure, such as mesothelioma, can be incredibly costly. Compensation from a claim can cover medical bills, from surgeries to ongoing treatments, easing the financial burden on you and your family.



Ensuring Long-Term SecurityBeyond immediate medical expenses, securing compensation can provide financial stability for your family’s future. This is especially crucial if your illness has affected your ability to work.



Holding Companies AccountableMany companies that manufactured asbestos products were well aware of the health risks involved but chose to prioritize profit over people. By filing a claim, you're taking a stand against their negligence, ensuring they answer for their actions.



Accessing Experienced Legal SupportNavigating the legal system can be daunting, but filing a claim means you have expert legal support on your side. Experienced asbestos lawyers can guide you through the process, increasing the likelihood of a successful outcome.



Protecting OthersYour claim can raise public awareness and contribute to regulations that prevent future asbestos exposure, helping to safeguard others from the same fate.




Taking legal action isn't just about compensation; it's about justice and responsibility. To embark on this journey, consider reaching out to a legal expert who specializes in asbestos claims. They can offer the advice and support needed to secure your due compensation.



Filing a Mesothelioma Claim in Norfolk



One of the first things your asbestos lawyer will do is explain your legal options. You could be eligible for one or more of the following claims: 




Mesothelioma Personal Injury Lawsuit. A personal injury lawsuit is a way to seek compensation for negligent asbestos exposure. Most cases end in settlements and never go to trial. 



Mesothelioma Wrongful Death Lawsuit. A wrongful death suit can help you seek compensation for a loved one who died from mesothelioma. 



Asbestos Trust Fund Claim. You cannot sue asbestos companies that went bankrupt, but if they set up an asbestos trust, you can make a claim for compensation. 



VA Benefits Claim. If you served in the military, you might have been exposed to asbestos during service. Your lawyer can help you track down evidence of exposure and make a claim for VA benefits. 




Ready to take the next step?



If you're prepared to start your lawsuit and pursue financial compensation, the first step is to schedule a free consultation with a specialized asbestos lawyer. This initial meeting is crucial for understanding your legal standing and exploring the most viable options for your case.



Experienced attorneys with a focus on asbestos-related cases will guide you through the process, from identifying the type of claim you may qualify for to gathering the necessary evidence. Their expertise is vital in navigating the complexities of asbestos litigation and ensuring you receive the compensation you deserve.



A free consultation not only provides clarity but also establishes a foundation of trust with your legal representative. With over 25 years of experience in this field, many lawyers bring a wealth of knowledge and a strong track record of helping families affected by mesothelioma.



Start your journey towards justice and financial relief by reaching out to a qualified asbestos attorney today. They will support you every step of the way, from the initial consultation to the final resolution of your case.



Understanding the Statute of Limitations for Mesothelioma Claims in Virginia



In Virginia, the statute of limitations is a legal timeframe within which individuals must initiate a mesothelioma claim. This timeframe is critical as it determines how long patients or their families have to seek compensation after a diagnosis or death related to mesothelioma.



Key Points About Filing Deadlines:




Personal Injury Claims: If you are diagnosed with mesothelioma, Virginia law typically allows two years from the date of diagnosis to file a personal injury claim.



Wrongful Death Claims: If a loved one has passed away due to mesothelioma, the family generally has two years from the date of death to file a wrongful death claim.




Why Timing Matters



These legal deadlines underscore the importance of acting promptly. Missing these timeframes can result in losing the chance to hold responsible parties accountable for asbestos exposure. Therefore, it's crucial for affected individuals or families to seek legal guidance as quickly as possible after a diagnosis or the loss of a loved one.



Consulting with experienced asbestos attorneys can help ensure that your case is filed within the appropriate timeframe, maximizing the potential for a successful outcome.



Comprehensive Legal Support for Mesothelioma Victims in Norfolk, VA



Our dedicated legal team offers specialized services to assist families affected by mesothelioma in Norfolk, Virginia. With extensive experience in asbestos-related cases, we provide:




Expert Legal Representation: Navigate the complexities of asbestos litigation with a team committed to seeking justice and compensation on your behalf.



Proven Track Record: With over 25 years in the field, our proficiency is demonstrated by securing billions for families nationwide.



No Upfront Costs: We operate on a contingency basis, ensuring no hourly fees or out-of-pocket expenses during the legal process.




Holding Corporations Accountable



The use of asbestos by corporations, despite knowing its dangers, has risked many lives. Our goal is to hold these entities liable and secure rightful compensation for your family. Here's how we can help:




Case Evaluation: Conduct a thorough investigation to determine asbestos exposure and gather necessary evidence.



Legal Advocacy: Act as your powerful voice throughout the legal proceedings, ensuring your rights and interests are prioritized.



Personalized Assistance: Our Norfolk-based asbestos lawyers manage each aspect of your case, making the process smoother for you.




Start Your Journey Towards Justice



Reach out to us for a complimentary legal consultation. Together, we will explore your options and embark on a path to justice and financial restitution for your family.



Factors to Consider When Choosing a Mesothelioma Lawyer in Norfolk



Finding the right mesothelioma lawyer is crucial for ensuring you receive the best representation and potential compensation. Here’s a guide on what factors to consider during your search:



Extensive Experience



Look for attorneys with a long history in asbestos litigation. Lawyers with decades of experience are often better equipped to handle the intricacies of such cases. Their years in practice can provide insights and strategies that newer firms might lack.



Proven Success



A track record of winning significant settlements or verdicts is essential. Evaluate their history by checking how much compensation they’ve secured for their clients in the past. This will give you confidence in their ability to handle your case effectively.



Client-Centric Fee Structure



Financial stress can be a burden, especially when dealing with medical issues. Opt for firms that operate on a contingency fee basis. This means they only get paid if they win your case, which can alleviate upfront financial worries and align their success with yours.



Personalized Attention



A good lawyer should offer personalized attention, understanding that each case is unique. Ensure that the legal team is willing to listen to your concerns and provides a tailored approach that best suits your situation.



Local Understanding



While not strictly necessary, choosing a lawyer familiar with Norfolk and its local courts can be advantageous. They may have established relationships with local judges and an understanding of the nuances specific to the area.



Testimonials and Reviews



Don’t forget to read reviews and testimonials from previous clients. Positive feedback can give you insights into the attorney’s mannerisms and reliability. It’s essential to choose someone whom past clients describe as supportive and communicative.



By considering these factors, you can make an informed decision and select a mesothelioma lawyer who’s well-equipped to fight for your rights and secure the compensation you deserve.



Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Norfolk, VA? 



Many industries and workplaces in and around Norfolk used asbestos. These are just a few important examples. 



Asbestos in Navy and Civilian Shipyards







Norfolk has a long tradition as a thriving port and an important region for the U.S. Navy. Since the 1800s, the Navbeenesence in the area, especially in Hampton Roads and Naval Station Norfolk. 



The city of Norfolk also has a civilian port with one of the largest ship terminals in the world. The Norfolk International Terminal is the nation’s largest intermodal center. The cruise ship dock in downtown Norfolk can handle oceangoing ships carrying up to 3,000 passengers.



Asbestos was important in both military and civilian shipbuilding for many years. With its ability to protect against heat and fire and add strength without a lot of extra weight, asbestos found a place in nearly all ship components. 



The peak period of U.S. asbestos use coincided with World War II and its aftermath, making Norfolk one of the communities hardest hit by the nation’s asbestos problem. 



The U.S. Navy depended heavily on asbestos and ACMs to protect ships, especially warships, from damage caused by fire and heat.



Shore installations, such as Naval Station Norfolk’s various headquarters buildings, power generation stations, dry docks, repair yards, and maintenance shops, used asbestos products. 



Some of the military and civilian ship industry sites that contributed to asbestos exposure in and around Norfolk include: 




Norfolk Naval Shipyard



Naval Air Station Norfolk (merged with Naval Base Norfolk in 1999)



Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Fort Story



Naval Air Station Oceana



Newport News Shipyard & Drydock




Norfolk Southern Railway



Norfolk is also an important hub for land transportation, including connections to the rest of the country through a network of railroads. Norfolk Southern Railway has its headquarters in the city. It operates 20,000 route miles in 22 states and the District of Columbia. 



The railroad industry used asbestos for the same reason ships did: heat and fire protection. Workers for Norfolk Southern were put at risk of exposure, and some have since sued the company for damages. 



Recently, former worker Ronnie Sparks brought a case against Norfolk Southern, claiming exposure to asbestos and toxic chemicals on the job caused his cancer. The former conductor also said the company violated safety regulations.



Other Norfolk Job Sites With Asbestos







Any industry that operated machinery, ran on steam, or generated high temperatures likely used asbestos, including factories, steel mills, electrical plants, auto repair shops, and railroad terminals.



In addition,  ships, planes, trains, and automobiles used asbestos-derived components, such as gaskets, valves, or brake pads, to minimize the wear and tear from heat and friction.



Some additional examples of Norfolk job sites that once contained asbestos include: 




Colonna’s Shipyard



Chesapeake Transit Company/Norfolk Southern Railroad



C.E. Thurston & Sons



Norfolk Portland Cement Corporation



Lone Star Cement Corporation



Lyon Shipyard



Norfolk and Portsmouth Traction Company




National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers in Virginia




Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, 401 College Street, Richmond, VA 23298, (804) 828-0450



UVA Cancer Center, University of Virginia, 6171 West Complex, Charlottesville, VA 22908, (434) 924-5022




Great people. Helped my family through our meso diagnosis.- Donald H.



Getting Legal Help



Remember, if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you need additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Green Bay Mesothelioma Lawyer

Contact an experienced Green Bay mesothelioma lawyer to learn about your legal options if you've been harmed by asbestos. Green Bay's heavy industry job sites and its shipping port have contributed to fatal asbestos illnesses that continue to harm workers decades after the exposure. 



If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you might be eligible for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in Green Bay, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 





Green Bay Asbestos Facts




Between 1999 and 2017, nearly 7,000 people in Wisconsin died from asbestos-related diseases. 



Of those deaths, more than 250 were in Brown County and Green Bay.



Major contributors to asbestos exposure and illness in the area include paper mills, lumber companies, and the meatpacking industry. 




How Can a Green Bay Mesothelioma Lawyer Help Me? 







If you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, you probably worked with or around asbestos in the past. The leading cause of mesothelioma is negligent workplace asbestos exposure. Because it was negligent, you can take legal action to seek compensation. Mesothelioma is a costly illness. Compensation through a claim can help you cover medical and other expenses.



Inhaled or ingested asbestos fibers are the primary culprits behind mesothelioma. These fibers cause inflammation and scarring within the mesothelium—a protective lining covering many internal organs—over time. This process can unfold over decades, silently wreaking havoc before physical symptoms emerge.



Individuals exposed to asbestos fibers seldom show immediate signs of disease. Instead, symptoms are typically delayed, often not manifesting until decades after the initial exposure to the carcinogen. This extended latency period can complicate diagnosis, making early detection challenging.



Understanding the prolonged timeline and biological impact of asbestos exposure reinforces the importance of legal recourse. Seeking compensation not only addresses the financial burden but also acknowledges the negligence that led to the exposure.



These are just a few of the things a top Green Bay mesothelioma lawyer can do to help you during this difficult time: 




Review your work history and medical records to determine if you have a case



Explain your legal options and suggest the best course of action



File a claim or lawsuit on your behalf and do all the work along the way



Maximize any compensation you receive from a settlement or claim



Negotiate with the defendants' lawyers to get you a settlement sooner



Come to you when you are too ill to travel



Provide extensive experience and resources to make a strong case and give you the best chance of being compensated. 




Understanding Mesothelioma and Its Impact on the Body



Mesothelioma is a daunting form of cancer, notorious for its aggressive progression and lack of a current cure. Predominantly associated with asbestos exposure, this cancer primarily targets the protective lining covering many of our internal organs, known as the mesothelium.



Types of Mesothelioma



While most people recognize its impact on the lungs—referred to as pleural mesothelioma—this condition can manifest in various areas:




Pericardial Mesothelioma: Affects the lining around the heart.



Peritoneal Mesothelioma: Targets the abdominal cavity's lining.



Testicular Mesothelioma: Impacts the protective layer of the testicles.




How It's Provoked and Spreads



The danger begins when asbestos fibers, which are either inhaled or ingested, provoke inflammatory reactions in the mesothelium. Over years, sometimes even decades, these fibers embed in the tissue, leading to persistent inflammation and scarring. Eventually, this silent damage awakens, manifesting through a variety of physical symptoms that depend on the affected region.



This slow-moving yet relentless onset makes mesothelioma a particularly challenging disease, emphasizing the critical need for awareness and early detection.



The Challenges of Filing a Mesothelioma Claim on Your Own



While it’s certainly possible for individuals to file a mesothelioma claim or lawsuit independently, there are several significant challenges and potential drawbacks to consider.



The Power of Legal Teams



Most companies facing a mesothelioma lawsuit are equipped with robust legal teams. These teams are adept at defending against claims and have extensive resources at their disposal. Going up against such well-prepared adversaries without professional legal support can make it difficult to secure a favorable outcome.



The Importance of Legal Expertise



Mesothelioma cases involve complex medical and legal issues that can be difficult for a layperson to navigate. A seasoned attorney who specializes in asbestos-related claims will understand the nuances of these cases and can effectively advocate on your behalf. They can also negotiate with insurance companies to help secure a substantial settlement or fair trial verdict.



Advocacy and Representation



Having a dedicated legal advocate means you're more likely to be taken seriously by the opposition. An experienced lawyer will not only fight for your rights but will ensure that you receive the compensation you deserve for medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.



Conclusion



While going it alone is an option, the benefits of enlisting an experienced mesothelioma lawyer are considerable. Their expertise and advocacy provide a strategic advantage that often leads to more successful outcomes.



Talk to a Local Green Bay Attorney for Free



Don’t hesitate to reach out to a local Green Bay mesothelioma attorney if you have a mesothelioma diagnosis. Asbestos law firms do not charge a fee for an initial consultation, and there is no obligation to move forward.



It's crucial to act promptly when considering legal action for mesothelioma. Here's why:




Trust Funds Depletion: There’s always a possibility that trust funds set aside for asbestos victims may run out, potentially affecting your compensation.



Documentation Risks: Important records documenting the onset and progression of your illness could get lost or become difficult to access over time.



Legal Changes: Laws can change, and these changes might impact your ability to file a claim or influence the benefits you’re eligible to receive.




Taking immediate action ensures you preserve your rights and have the best chance of securing the compensation you deserve.



Filing a Mesothelioma Claim in Green Bay, WI



Talking to a Green Bay asbestos lawyer will help clarify your situation. They can determine if you have a case and what you should do next. You could be eligible for one or more of the following: 




Mesothelioma Personal Injury Lawsuit. Mesothelioma is almost always considered a personal injury. You can sue for damages. Most of these cases end in a settlement, which gets you compensation faster than a trial would. 



Mesothelioma Wrongful Death Lawsuit. If you lost a loved one to mesothelioma, you can sue for damages with a wrongful death suit. 



Asbestos Trust Fund Claim. Many asbestos companies went bankrupt over asbestos lawsuits and can no longer be sued. Most of them set up asbestos trust funds to compensate victims. Your lawyer can find any trusts you're eligible for and help you file a claim. 



VA Benefits Claim. If you are a veteran, there is a good chance you were exposed to asbestos during military service. A lawyer can help you make a successful claim for VA benefits like monthly disability compensation. 




Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Green Bay, Wisconsin? 







Green Bay has a long manufacturing and production industry history, which began in the 1800s with logging and lumber. Industrial workplaces are the most common sources of asbestos that cause mesothelioma. 



As the city grew, iron smelting joined lumber as a significant industry and type of employer in the area. Eventually, meatpacking and paper mills joined the regional industry. All of these industries have used asbestos over the years. 



Green Bay Paper Mills



In the lower Fox River area of Wisconsin, including Green Bay, 24 paper mills still operate.  



Atlanta-based paper manufacturer Georgia-Pacific became the city’s fifth-largest employer after the company acquired the Fort James Corporation in 2000.



Green Bay’s asbestos problem started with sawmills and lumberyards when they were the city’s principal employers. 



Most of the machinery used in sawmills was susceptible to friction and heat and ran on steam power. Heat-resistant asbestos additives were applied to circular saw blades, gang saws, and boilers to prevent breakdowns and fires.



The paper mills operating in and around Green Bay used asbestos for similar reasons. While asbestos use is now minimal or non-existent in all of these industries, it lingers in older buildings, and its effects linger in former workers.



Other Workplaces Associated With Asbestos Use in Green Bay



Many companies relied on asbestos at one point in Green Bay. Older buildings, including schools and other public facilities, also contain asbestos: 



Schools and Hospitals




Ashwaubenon High School



Norwood Elementary School



Southwest Elementary School



Bellin Healthcare Systems (also known as Bellin Memorial Hospital)



Sisters of Our Lady Charity




Mills and Paper Companies




Charmin Paper Mill



Hoberg Paper Mills Inc.



Northern Paper Mills



Northwest Cooperative Mills



Green Bay Paper and Pulp Company



Fort James Paper Company




Additional Buildings and Businesses




Beaumont Motor Inn



Cork Insulating Company of Wisconsin



Fox River Electric Railway and Power Company



Green Bay and Western Railroad



Green Bay Packaging (also known as Green Bay Box Company)



Wisconsin Public Service Corporation



Havers Crossing



Pulliam Power Plant



East Side Exhaust Inc.



Georgia-Pacific Corporation (Green Bay Operations)




Current Asbestos Exposure Risks in Green Bay



Federal and state regulations are supposed to keep current workers and residents safe from asbestos, but risks remain. Most of the risk comes from asbestos materials that linger in older Green Bay area buildings. 



For example, before demolishing the old Brown County arena in Ashwaubenon just outside Green Bay, the city had to have asbestos abated. The old arena was full of asbestos materials that could have harmed workers. 



In 2016, a New London middle school in nearby Waupaca County underwent an asbestos abatement project. Many school buildings throughout the Green Bay area have asbestos that can deteriorate over time and expose staff and students. 



In some older buildings, asbestos is not properly abated and causes harm to workers. In 2018, a foundry in Berlin, Wisconsin, pleaded guilty to violating the Clean Air Act when it required workers to clean old industrial ovens filled with asbestos. 



Supervisors for the company ordered employees to do the work without providing protective gear. They also failed to provide instructions on how to do the work according to appropriate procedures. The company must pay a fine and medical screening costs for the workers. 



Can Asbestos Fibers Be Transferred Between People, Leading to Mesothelioma Diagnoses?



Yes, asbestos fibers can indeed be transferred between people, which may result in mesothelioma diagnoses even if direct exposure has not occurred. While mesothelioma, a cancer linked to asbestos exposure, is not itself contagious, the microscopic asbestos fibers can travel unknowingly.



How Does This Transfer Happen?



Consider a person who works in an environment laden with asbestos. These tiny, harmful fibers can cling to their clothing, hair, or skin. Once they return home, the fibers can become airborne, potentially exposing family members or housemates who breathe them in.



The Risk of Environmental Exposure



Even without direct interaction with asbestos materials, secondary exposure can happen in this manner. This indirect contact with asbestos fibers increases the risk of developing mesothelioma, especially as this exposure can go unnoticed for years.




Clothing and Belongings: Asbestos fibers embed in textiles and get transported to new locations, posing risks to those unaware of their presence.



Cleaning and Handling: When shaking out or laundering contaminated clothing, fibers can disperse into the air, further spreading the risk of inhalation.




Understanding the Consequences



Though mesothelioma originates from exposure to asbestos, how the exposure occurs is crucial. Through secondary exposure or environmental contamination, individuals may unwittingly face the same dangers as those working directly with asbestos. This highlights the importance of taking preventive measures, such as separate laundering and workplace clothing protocols, to protect loved ones from this hidden hazard.



Awareness and proactive measures can significantly reduce the risk of secondary asbestos exposure and the accompanying health threats.



Mesothelioma Treatment in Green Bay







The University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center (UWCCC) in Madison is the state’s only comprehensive care center certified by the National Cancer Institute (NCI). 



Located at the University of Wisconsin Madison Campus, UWCCC provides medical treatment and support to cancer patients, including people with mesothelioma and other asbestos-related illnesses.



UWCCC is 135.6 miles away from Green Bay, or approximately two and a half hours by car.



University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center (UWCCC)



600 Highland AvenueMadison, WI  53792Phone: (608) 275-1700



Recognizing Early Symptoms of Mesothelioma and Why Misdiagnosis Occurs



Mesothelioma, a cancer linked to asbestos exposure, typically presents symptoms long after initial contact with the harmful fibers. This delayed reaction often complicates early detection. Initially, individuals might experience a variety of symptoms, which include:




Fever: Elevated body temperature without known cause.



Persistent Cough: A cough that doesn't subside over time.



Fatigue: Constant tiredness that rest doesn’t alleviate.



Shortness of Breath: Difficulty in breathing even during light activities.



Night Sweats: Excessive sweating during sleep.



Unexplained Weight Loss: Significant weight reduction without dieting.



Chest Pain: Discomfort or sharp pain in the chest area.




In addition to these signs, diagnostic tests frequently reveal pleural effusion, an abnormal accumulation of fluid around the lungs.



Misdiagnosis: A Common Challenge



The overlap of these symptoms with other respiratory conditions complicates accurate diagnosis. Diseases like lung cancer or pneumonia share similar signs, leading to potential misdiagnosis. This overlap makes a second medical opinion crucial, especially if there's a possibility of previous asbestos exposure. Seeking further evaluation can ensure a correct diagnosis, enabling timely and appropriate treatment.



Understanding the subtlety of mesothelioma’s early symptoms and their resemblance to more common ailments is key in differentiating and managing this rare but serious condition.



How Do Doctors Determine the Most Appropriate Mesothelioma Treatment for a Patient?



When it comes to selecting the most suitable treatment for mesothelioma, doctors consider several critical factors unique to each patient. By evaluating these elements, healthcare professionals can tailor a treatment plan that maximizes effectiveness and aligns with the patient's circumstances. Here's how they decide:




Cancer Location: Doctors first consider where the mesothelioma has developed in the body. This aspect influences both the type of treatment and the method of administration. For example, tumors in the lining of the lungs may require treatments different from those growing in the abdominal lining.



Cancer Stage: The progression of the disease at the time of diagnosis significantly impacts treatment choices. Early-stage mesothelioma may be eligible for more aggressive treatments like surgery, whereas advanced stages might require palliative care to manage symptoms and improve quality of life.



Patient’s Overall Health: A comprehensive assessment of the patient’s general health and medical history is essential. Factors such as age, fitness level, and pre-existing conditions can influence whether a patient is a good candidate for certain treatments like chemotherapy, radiation, or surgery.



Patient Preferences: Finally, the patient's own preferences play a crucial role. Understanding the pros and cons of each treatment option helps patients make informed decisions in collaboration with their healthcare team. They may weigh life expectancy, potential side effects, and personal priorities when selecting a course of action.




Doctors collaborate closely with patients to craft a personalized treatment plan, aiming to provide the most effective care possible while respecting the patient's wishes and comfort levels.



Great people. Helped my family through our meso diagnosis.- Donald H.



Getting Legal Help in Green Bay



If you suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for financial compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### Mesothelioma Lawyers in Canada

Asbestos-related deaths continue to rise in Canada despite the total ban on the substance in 2018. Mesothelioma lawyers in Canada help victims fight for justice. If you or a loved one living in Canada received a mesothelioma diagnosis, contact an experienced asbestos law firm. 



There is currently more than $30 billion available in asbestos trust funds. We are here to help our Canadian visitors receive the compensation they are entitled to. If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about qualified lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.





Facts About Asbestos in Canada



Mesothelioma is a rare form of cancer primarily caused by asbestos exposure. For centuries, asbestos was mined and used at numerous Canadian job sites. 



Industries prized mesothelioma for its ease of use, affordability, and resistance to heat and fire. In Canada, asbestos mining has been around since the 1800s. The toxic substance was known as "Canada's gold" and the "magic mineral."  




Asbestos was discovered in Canada in the 1870s. 



The country continued extensive asbestos use until protestors and public health officials helped to shut down the last few open asbestos mines in the country. 



The last asbestos mine in Canada, Thetford in Quebec, closed in 2011. 



The majority of asbestos-related deaths and illnesses in Canada resulted from working at job sites that used the toxic set of minerals. 



The most recent statistics from the Canadian Cancer Society indicate that 445 people received a mesothelioma diagnosis in 2016. 



Nearly 500 Canadians died from mesothelioma in 2017. 



Sometimes, children and spouses developed diseases through second-hand asbestos exposure. Fathers and spouses came home from work with tiny asbestos fibers stuck to their hair, clothing, and skin. 



Canada fully banned asbestos in 2018, but diagnoses of asbestos illnesses continue to rise. 




Who Is at Risk of a Mesothelioma Diagnosis in Canada? 



As in the U.S., many industries in Canada used asbestos heavily for decades. Anyone who worked in these industries in Canada could have been exposed to asbestos: 




Mining



Shipbuilding and other maritime industries



Construction



Manufacturing



Power generation



Oil refining



Automotive



Pipefitting and boiler work



Building demolition, maintenance, and renovations. 




The workers at greatest risk handled or worked with or near asbestos regularly. This includes insulators, certain workers on ships, such as those that manned the boilers, and workers who repaired and maintained equipment with asbestos. 



Diagnosing Mesothelioma: What You Need to Know



The definitive diagnosis of mesothelioma involves acquiring a sample of fluid or tissue from the patient. This process, known as cytology for fluid and biopsy for tissue, is key to identifying the presence of mesothelioma cells.



Initial Steps Toward Diagnosis




Medical History and Symptoms:

The journey often begins with a physician evaluating symptoms and considering any history of asbestos exposure. Given mesothelioma’s strong link to asbestos, this history is vital.





Imaging Techniques:

X-rays are typically the initial imaging tests that might suggest the presence of an abnormal mass. However, they cannot confirm mesothelioma on their own.






Confirmation Through Pathology




Pathological Examination: The most crucial step in diagnosis is through a pathological examination. A pathologist examines the collected samples under a microscope to look for signs of mesothelioma.



Importance for Legal Claims: For those pursuing compensation due to asbestos exposure, a pathology report is often essential. This report provides the medical evidence needed to substantiate claims.




Additional Considerations




Autopsy for Unconfirmed Cases: If mesothelioma is suspected but not confirmed during a patient’s life, a diagnostic autopsy may be requested to establish the diagnosis posthumously.




Identifying mesothelioma involves a careful and thorough approach, relying on both medical expertise and a detailed understanding of the patient’s exposure history and symptoms.



What Types of Mesothelioma Are There, and How Do They Differ?



Mesothelioma, a rare but aggressive cancer, manifests in a few distinct forms based on the area of the body affected. Here's a breakdown of the different types and how they vary:



1. Pleural Mesothelioma



This variant targets the pleura, the thin membrane enveloping the lungs. It is the most prevalent form of the disease, making up over 80% of cases. The primary culprit is the inhalation of asbestos fibers, which causes significant damage over time.



2. Peritoneal Mesothelioma



This type attacks the peritoneum, the lining of the abdominal cavity. Unlike pleural mesothelioma, it is linked to the ingestion of asbestos fibers.



3. Pericardial Mesothelioma



Here, the cancer affects the pericardium, the protective lining around the heart. This form is even rarer and can disrupt cardiac function.



4. Testicular Mesothelioma



Affecting the lining around the testes, this is the rarest type, accounting for less than 1% of all cases. Its limited occurence makes it less understood compared to other types.



Cellular Structures



Further categorization exists based on cell type:




Epithelial: The most common cell type, often easier to treat.



Sarcomatoid: Less common and more aggressive, posing treatment challenges.



Biphasic: A combination of epithelial and sarcomatoid cells.




Understanding these variances is crucial for appropriate diagnosis and treatment planning, significantly impacting patient prognosis and care strategies.



Compensation Options for Bystanders of Asbestos Exposure



Bystanders of asbestos exposure, such as family members or individuals living with those who worked directly with asbestos, often faced unexpected health risks. These individuals might have been exposed through clothing or hair contaminated with asbestos fibers, brought home by workers.



If you've experienced secondhand exposure to asbestos, here are the potential compensation options available:




Asbestos Compensation Trusts:

Primary Avenue: Bystanders can pursue claims through asbestos compensation trusts. These funds were established to help victims who developed illnesses due to asbestos exposure.





Ineligibility for Worker's Compensation and VA Benefits:

Bystanders aren’t typically covered by traditional workers’ compensation or veterans’ benefits, as these are reserved for direct occupational exposure.





Legal Assistance:

It's advisable to seek legal assistance to navigate the claims process effectively. Legal professionals can help establish your exposure history and guide you through trust fund claims to secure any entitled benefits.






Rising Concerns



The number of mesothelioma cases related to secondary exposure is on the rise, especially as impacted individuals age. This highlights the importance of understanding and exploring compensation options to address any potential health implications.



Can You Sue for Asbestos Exposure in Canada? 



If you were exposed to asbestos in Canada and reside there, you can sue for damages. Mesothelioma is almost always caused by asbestos; most workplace asbestos exposure is considered negligent. One or more more companies can be held liable. 



The laws in Canada are different from the U.S. If you lived or worked in Canada and encountered asbestos that made you sick, a Canadian asbestos firm or attorney can help. They will explain the laws and outline your options for suing and recovering damages. 



If a company that exposed you to asbestos is now bankrupt, you cannot sue. That company likely set up an asbestos trust fund to compensate victims. You can claim the trust fund to get your share.



Navigating these trust funds can be challenging, as there are over 60 active Asbestos Compensation Trusts out there. To determine which ones you should apply to, consider the following steps:




Share Your Story: Provide details about your job and the asbestos products you worked with. This information is crucial in identifying the right trusts for your claim.



Understand the Complexity: Many companies have undergone mergers, acquisitions, or closures, making it difficult to pinpoint which trusts cover your exposure.



Seek Expertise: Trust the specialists who have the knowledge and experience to streamline the claims process for you. They can quickly file your claims with the appropriate trusts, ensuring you receive the compensation you deserve.




This personalized approach not only saves you time but also increases your chances of a successful claim. 



Understanding Age and Exposure in Asbestos Compensation Claims



Navigating compensation claims for asbestos exposure involves several crucial considerations, with age and exposure history being key factors. Here's how these elements play a significant role in shaping your claim:



Age of the Individual




Younger Individuals: Typically, younger individuals might face fewer immediate health issues but have a longer period to potentially develop asbestos-related diseases. This can influence the longevity and terms of compensation packages.



Older Individuals: For older adults, the urgency for compensation might be higher due to more immediate health concerns. The age factor can also impact the time limits for filing claims, as older individuals may need expedited processing.




Exposure History




Duration and Intensity: The length and intensity of asbestos exposure significantly affect claims. Long-term, high-intensity exposure often leads to more severe health implications, necessitating higher compensation.



Source of Exposure: Whether exposure occurred in the workplace, through the military, or other sources, each scenario has different avenues for seeking compensation. For example, claims through Workers’ Compensation or Veterans Affairs often have specific protocols and may not always necessitate legal representation.




Timing in Filing Claims



Time limits exist for most compensation applications, so taking action shortly after diagnosis is crucial. This ensures that your claim is processed before memories fade or health deteriorates further, potentially complicating your case.



Legal Consultation



While some claims do not require legal assistance, consulting with a legal expert can clarify your options. An initial consultation usually doesn't obligate you to hire a lawyer but can provide insight into the best path forward based on your circumstances.



Understanding how age and exposure history influence your asbestos compensation claim is pivotal. By evaluating these factors carefully, you can make informed decisions to secure the support you need.



How Can a Canada Mesothelioma Lawyer Help Me? 



Experienced Canada mesothelioma attorneys assist clients in getting compensation, whether through a lawsuit, asbestos trust funds, government benefits, or veteran benefits. If you were a member of the military and exposed to asbestos during your service, applying for Veterans Affairs benefits may be a good option. This path can provide support specifically tailored to veterans, acknowledging their unique circumstances and service history.



For those affected, exploring multiple avenues for compensation is crucial. Here are some potential options:




Lawsuits: Pursuing legal action against responsible parties can offer significant compensation for medical expenses and suffering.



Asbestos Trust Funds: Established by companies responsible for asbestos exposure, these funds are designed to compensate victims.



Government Benefits: Various programs exist to support those affected by asbestos-related illnesses, including healthcare and financial aid.



Veteran Benefits: As highlighted, Veterans Affairs offers dedicated benefits for military personnel exposed to asbestos during their service.




Consulting with seasoned attorneys who specialize in mesothelioma cases can help navigate these options, ensuring that you receive the compensation and support you deserve.



Exploring Mesothelioma Treatment Options



If you or a loved one is facing a mesothelioma diagnosis, understanding your treatment options is crucial for navigating the journey ahead. Mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer linked to asbestos exposure, requires prompt medical intervention to improve outcomes. Here’s a comprehensive look at the treatment avenues available:



1. Chemotherapy



Chemotherapy uses potent drugs to target and destroy cancer cells. It is often the first line of defense and can shrink tumors, slowing the disease's progression. Chemotherapy may also be administered in combination with other treatments for more effectiveness.



2. Surgery



For some patients, surgical intervention may be possible. This option aims to remove as much of the tumor as feasible. Surgery can be a standalone treatment or part of a combined approach with chemotherapy and radiation.



3. Radiation Therapy



High-energy beams, such as X-rays, are used in radiation therapy to kill cancer cells. This treatment is particularly beneficial for targeting specific areas, reducing pain, and enhancing the quality of life.



4. Experimental Treatments and Clinical Trials



Investigational treatments, such as targeted therapy and immunotherapy, are constantly evolving. These therapies aim to enhance the body's own immune response or directly attack cancer cells. Participation in clinical trials provides access to cutting-edge treatments that may not yet be widely available.



5. Supportive and Palliative Care



Focusing on quality of life, supportive care addresses symptoms and side effects of cancer treatments. Palliative care can be integrated alongside curative treatments to manage pain and improve well-being.



Early diagnosis and consultations with specialists are key. Consider discussing these options with your healthcare provider to craft a personalized strategy tailored to your needs. Virtual consultations with oncologists may also be possible, offering flexibility in accessing expert advice.



This comprehensive look at mesothelioma treatments highlights the importance of a multifaceted approach, empowering patients and their families to make informed decisions. 



Mesothelioma Lawyers Offer Unique Expertise



You don't want to rely on any personal injury lawyer to make a case for your asbestos exposure. Asbestos attorneys and law firms are experts in their area of the law. 



They know which companies used asbestos and when and where. They can track down your past asbestos exposure and work with medical experts to prove it caused your illness. 



How Do I Know if I'm Eligible for a Mesothelioma Claim? 



The best way to know if you qualify for a claim is to consult a mesothelioma lawyer. If you were exposed to asbestos and later got sick, you can file a lawsuit in Canada. 



The right lawyer will offer you a free consultation to review your case's details. They can tell you your options and help you decide what to do next. 



You may want to file a lawsuit, seek government benefits, or make a claim with an asbestos trust fund. 



How Much Can I Get in a Settlement with a Canada Mesothelioma Lawyer? 



Experienced lawyers know how to find every penny asbestos companies owe their victims. They will consider your past work experience, the actions of the negligent companies, your illness and medical expenses, and even losses to your family. 



Every case is different, but many people receive upwards of $1 million in their mesothelioma settlements. A jury verdict is usually higher, but a trial delays compensation. A settlement is usually best for mesothelioma patients. 



How Long Will a Claim Take? 



An important reason to work with a lawyer is to speed up the process. Most claims take no longer than a few months to resolve, but the more complicated your case, the longer it will take. 



Your lawyer will get through it as quickly as possible to ensure you get the compensation you need for treatment. 



Canada Mesothelioma Lawyers and Government Compensation



You might be eligible for compensation for asbestos-related illnesses if you received a mesothelioma diagnosis in Canada.  



This means that if you have documentation to prove your condition came from occupational exposure, you can receive provincial government payments. 



How Do I Find a Good Lawyer Near Me? 



In Canada, finding an experienced mesothelioma lawyer is crucial, as few attorneys can offer in-depth knowledge of asbestos laws and the process of winning compensation.  



Canadian laws differ from other countries, and an experienced attorney who understands the country's specific laws on asbestos is your best bet.  



What to Look For in a Canada Mesothelioma Lawyer



One important aspect to remember before hiring a lawyer is that they should have a successful track record of handling previous similar cases. 



In addition, you will need an attorney who: 




Offers to work on a contingency-based fee plan so that you won't have to worry about costs while dealing with a costly disease



Will provide references from past cases upon request



Is compassionate and understanding about your illness and what you're experiencing



Specializes explicitly in mesothelioma and asbestos-related cases



Has enough time and resources to devote to your case



Is willing to answer all of your questions and keep you in the loop




Keep in mind that you'll want to feel comfortable with your lawyer, and you'll want to know what to expect.



Avoid attorneys who guarantee they can get you a specific amount of compensation. While a good attorney may be able to give a ballpark figure, it's impossible to know how much your case will bring before it's even started. 



Many Canadian and other manufacturers used asbestos, putting workers at risk of illness for decades. If this includes you, talk to a lawyer about your options. 



Help and Legal Assistance



If you’ve been injured by asbestos, keep in mind that there is a good chance that you’ll qualify for considerable compensation. We invite our Canadian visitors to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Charleston, South Carolina Mesothelioma Lawyer

An experienced Charleston, South Carolina, mesothelioma lawyer can help if you encountered asbestos at any workplace in the area. Shipyard jobs and numerous other industries in Charleston have been marred by asbestos use for decades. 



Keep in mind that if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to considerable compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Charleston, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim and much more. 





Charleston Asbestos Facts




South Carolina saw 3,801 deaths from asbestos-related diseases between 1999 and 2017. 



The county with the highest number of asbestos deaths in that period was Charleston, with 550. 



Charleston's long history with shipyards is a major contributing factor to the asbestos exposure workers experienced for decades. 




About Asbestos and Mesothelioma



 Asbestos is a natural mineral once used heavily in most industries. It was most commonly used as an insulator. Asbestos materials shed small fibers that can be inhaled or ingested by anyone in the area.



Workers exposed to these tiny asbestos fibers were at risk for later illnesses, including pleural or peritoneal mesothelioma. The fibers cause damage to tissues and cells in the body, which can cause cancer to develop years later.



Understanding Asbestos Exposure



During the 20th century, asbestos was incorporated into thousands of products due to its strength and heat-resistant properties. However, it has been linked to severe health conditions, such as:




Mesothelioma



Lung cancer



Other asbestos-related diseases




When inhaled or ingested, asbestos fibers can become embedded in the lining of certain organs. This irritation can lead to the mutation of healthy tissues and cells, eventually becoming cancerous.



The Challenge of Diagnosis



One of the complexities of mesothelioma is its similarity to other illnesses, making it difficult to diagnose. Symptoms might not manifest until 20-50 years after the initial exposure, often leading to late-stage discovery. Understanding these risks and the long latency period is essential for those who may have been exposed to asbestos in the past.



Understanding Secondhand Exposure to Asbestos and Its Impact on Families



Secondhand exposure to asbestos occurs when individuals indirectly come into contact with this hazardous material, often through someone else. This typically happens when a person employed in environments with asbestos unwittingly carries the fibers away on their clothing, shoes, or even in their hair.



How Does It Affect Families?




Household Transmission: Once the fibers enter the home, family members without direct contact with asbestos can inhale or ingest the particles. This makes the household at risk for asbestos-related illnesses, such as mesothelioma, without ever having stepped foot in a contaminated area.



Health Risks:

Mesothelioma: A rare and aggressive cancer often linked to asbestos exposure.



Lung Cancer: Not exclusive to smokers, as asbestos is a known cause.



Asbestosis: A chronic lung disease resulting from inhaled asbestos fibers.






Preventive Measures




Workplace Precautions: Employers should enforce strict decontamination protocols for workers in at-risk environments.



At-Home Safety: Families can minimize risk by ensuring work clothes are removed and cleaned before individuals enter common living areas.




By understanding and addressing secondhand exposure, families can significantly reduce the associated health risks and create a safer home environment.



Understanding Mesothelioma Symptoms and Diagnostic Challenges



Mesothelioma, a rare form of cancer typically caused by asbestos exposure, presents unique diagnostic challenges. One reason it's difficult to diagnose is the latency period; symptoms often don't manifest until decades after exposure—sometimes as long as 20 to 50 years.



Symptoms of Mesothelioma



The symptoms can be elusive because they often resemble those of more common ailments. Here are some key symptoms to look out for:




Shortness of Breath: This may occur due to fluid buildup around the lungs or tumors pressing on lung tissue.



Persistent Cough or Chest Pain: Often mistaken for a common respiratory illness, these symptoms can indicate pleural thickening.



Abdominal Pain and Swelling: Indicative of peritoneal mesothelioma, these symptoms occur as tumors develop in the abdominal lining.



Unexpected Weight Loss: This can happen alongside fatigue, making it hard to attribute to mesothelioma alone.




Diagnostic Challenges



The difficulty in diagnosing mesothelioma primarily stems from its symptom similarity to other diseases, such as pneumonia or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Moreover, the long latency period makes it hard for individuals to connect current symptoms to past asbestos exposure. This can lead to multiple misdiagnoses before identifying mesothelioma as the culprit.



In summary, the subtlety and delay of symptom onset are key factors in complicating the timely diagnosis of mesothelioma. Being aware of its unique symptoms and maintaining an awareness of any past asbestos exposure are crucial for early detection and treatment.



Why Do I Need a Charleston, SC, Mesothelioma Lawyer? 







You need an experienced asbestos attorney if you have a diagnosis of mesothelioma. An expert in asbestos cases gives you the best possible chance of recovering damages and being able to pay for costly treatments. 



Mesothelioma is caused by negligent workplace asbestos exposure. The companies that failed to protect you from asbestos can and should be held accountable. For a successful claim or lawsuit, you need expert legal guidance. 



Benefits of Partnering with Our Mesothelioma Law Firm



Choosing the right legal partner for your mesothelioma case can make all the difference. Our firm is committed to providing top-tier legal representation with unique advantages tailored to your needs.



Access to Justice Without Financial Burden



We understand the challenges of facing a mesothelioma diagnosis. That’s why our firm offers complimentary legal consultations and promises no preliminary costs or hourly charges. We work on a contingency basis, meaning we only earn our fee if we successfully secure compensation on your behalf. This allows you to focus on your health while we handle the legal complexities.



Proven Success in Mesothelioma Claims



With over $5.2 billion recovered for our clients, our firm boasts a track record of securing significant compensation in asbestos cases. A remarkable 98% of our cases result in a favorable outcome, showcasing our ability to navigate the legal system effectively and efficiently.



Unmatched Expertise and Experience



For over 45 years, we have been dedicated to handling asbestos and mesothelioma cases. Our legal team comprises seasoned experts including skilled attorneys, registered nurses, and investigators who are all committed to building the strongest case for you.



Personalized and Convenient Service



We prioritize your convenience and comfort. Our team is willing to travel to meet with you, whether that’s in the comfort of your own home or through a virtual consultation. This ensures that you have access to high-quality legal assistance without added stress or costs associated with travel.



By choosing our firm, you're not just hiring attorneys; you're gaining a dedicated team ready to fight for justice and the compensation you deserve.



How to Make a Mesothelioma Claim in Charleston 



The first step is to choose an experienced mesothelioma lawyer working in and around Charleston. They should be backed by a large asbestos law firm with the resources to handle your case.



The right asbestos lawyer will offer you a free initial consultation to review your information. If they think you have a case, your lawyer will get you started on one or more types of mesothelioma claims:




Mesothelioma personal injury lawsuit



Mesothelioma wrongful death lawsuit



Asbestos trust fund claim



VA benefits claim




Once you've decided on the path forward, here's what typically follows:




Evidence Gathering: Your lawyer will gather crucial evidence regarding your work history, asbestos exposure, and medical diagnosis. This step is vital to building a strong case.



Filing the Claim: Your attorney will file a legal claim on your behalf against the parties responsible for your asbestos exposure. This ensures that the legal process is underway and your rights are being represented.



Negotiating a Settlement: Most mesothelioma cases are resolved through settlements out of court. Your lawyer will negotiate diligently to secure a fair settlement, maximizing your compensation without the stress of a trial.



Court Proceedings: If a satisfactory settlement cannot be reached, your lawyer is prepared to advocate for you in court. They will present your case before a judge and jury to seek a favorable verdict.




Your lawyer will handle all aspects of the lawsuit or claim, giving you the best chance of a successful outcome and fair compensation.



Past Mesothelioma Settlement Amounts



If you're curious about the types of settlements achieved in mesothelioma cases, here's a glimpse into some notable outcomes from past cases our firm has handled:




A $4.9 million settlement was awarded to an individual from Johns Island.



A waitress from Fort Mill received $3.44 million.



An experienced union teamster and assembly line worker secured $1.82 million.



A veteran of the U.S. Coast Guard and electrician in Simpsonville achieved a $1.72 million award.



A laborer and pipefitter in Ruby received $1.57 million.



A skilled carpenter and U.S. Army veteran from Aiken was awarded $2.37 million.



A former U.S. Navy shipfitter from Ladson secured $1.45 million.



A home remodeler in Honea Path received $1.26 million.



An Easley resident battling pleural mesothelioma achieved a settlement of $2.36 million.




Remember, compensation can vary significantly based on the unique aspects of each case. Settlement results are contingent upon various factors, including the specifics of exposure and individual circumstances.



What Factors Determine the Value of a Mesothelioma Settlement?



Mesothelioma settlements can vary significantly, often ranging from $1 million to $1.4 million. However, some verdicts may even reach amounts between $5 million and $11.4 million. Several crucial factors play into determining these values:




Severity of the Illness: The extent and progression of mesothelioma in the patient are primary considerations. More severe cases often lead to higher settlements due to increased medical costs and suffering.



Duration and Intensity of Asbestos Exposure: How long and how intensely a person was exposed to asbestos can impact the settlement. Longer or more intense exposure often correlates with higher compensation.



Medical Costs and Treatment Needs: The cost of medical treatment, therapies, and necessary care weigh heavily on settlement amounts. More extensive or experimental treatments may drive up compensation.



Loss of Income and Earning Capacity: If the illness has led to significant time away from work or reduced the ability to earn a living, settlements will typically reflect the financial loss endured.



Pain and Suffering: Emotional and physical suffering experienced by the victim are important factors. High levels of distress and life disruption can justify higher settlements.



Number of Defendants: When multiple companies are liable, settlements might be larger since each defendant might contribute to the total payout.



Legal Precedents: Previous case outcomes in similar circumstances can influence settlement expectations, pushing for amounts aligned with regional or historical verdicts.




By understanding these elements, plaintiffs and their legal teams can better assess the potential value of a settlement, ensuring fair compensation tailored to individual circumstances.



What is the Average Settlement Amount for Mesothelioma Lawsuits?



When pursuing a mesothelioma lawsuit, financial compensation can vary significantly. On average, settlements for these cases typically fall between $1 million and $1.4 million.



This range represents the usual compensation achieved without going to trial. However, if a case proceeds to court, the awards can escalate substantially, with averages ranging from $1 million to as high as $11.4 million.



Key Points to Consider:




Settlement vs. Court Verdicts: Settlements tend to be lower than court verdicts. Many cases settle outside of court to reduce time and legal expenses, but if a case does go to trial, the payout can be considerably higher.



Factors Influencing Compensation: Various elements can affect the final amount, including the severity of the illness, the extent of negligence, and the financial impact on the victim's family.




Understanding these aspects can help create realistic expectations regarding potential compensation in mesothelioma lawsuits.



Understanding the Nature of Mesothelioma Lawsuits



Mesothelioma lawsuits are usually handled individually rather than as class actions. Here's why:




Individual Circumstances: Each case of mesothelioma is unique, influenced by specific exposure circumstances and personal experiences. This individuality makes personalized legal strategies more effective than a one-size-fits-all approach.



Compensation Maximization: By filing individually, attorneys have the opportunity to delve deeper into each case. This allows them to pursue compensation amounts that truly reflect the client's personal losses and suffering, rather than being limited to the collective interests of a class action.



Personal Attention: Individual lawsuits enable attorneys to dedicate their time and resources to thoroughly exploring the details of the case. This dedication ensures that each client's story is fully represented and advocated for.



Complexity and Variability: The complexities involved in mesothelioma cases, such as varying exposure levels and differing statute limitations across jurisdictions, create challenges for class actions. Individual lawsuits can better navigate these intricacies.




In summary, filing mesothelioma lawsuits individually ensures that each case receives the detailed attention it deserves, improving the likelihood of achieving a fair and just compensation.



Understanding the Cost and Payment Structure for Hiring an Asbestos Attorney



When you're considering hiring an asbestos attorney, it's crucial to understand both the costs involved and the payment structure. Here's what you need to know:




No Upfront Fees: Generally, reputable law firms specializing in asbestos cases do not require any upfront payments from clients. This means you won’t need to pay anything out of pocket to start working with them.



Contingency-Fee Basis: Most asbestos attorneys operate on a contingency-fee arrangement. Under this model, the attorney's payment is contingent upon the success of your case. In simple terms, this means that the lawyer only receives payment if you receive compensation through a settlement or court decision.



Percentage of Compensation: If your case is successful, the attorney's fees are typically a pre-agreed percentage of the compensation you receive. This percentage will be established when you first engage their services, ensuring transparency from the start.



Risk-Free Consultation: Many firms also provide free initial consultations, allowing you to explore your legal options without financial commitment.




This fee structure is designed to provide you with access to legal representation with minimal financial risk, ensuring that you can pursue justice for asbestos exposure without the burden of upfront legal costs.



Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Charleston? 



Several industries in and around Charleston used asbestos and put workers at risk of exposure and illness. These are just a few examples. 



Charleston Naval Shipyard







Business at the Charleston Naval Shipyard grew to over 25,000 workers by 1943. The majority of these contractors and employees faced daily asbestos exposure. Workers here built more than 220 ships at the Charleston Naval Shipyard during World War II alone. 



Asbestos long played a role in both U.S. Navy and civilian ship repair, building, and construction throughout much of the 20th century. Asbestos insulated and protected against heat and fire. Asbestos was also desirable on ships for its ability to add lightweight strength to materials. 



In 1978, the Navy released the “Controlled Procedure for the Removal of Asbestos Containing Materials” documentation to the Charleston Naval Shipyard. 



Although the report provided a detailed outline of how to abate asbestos as safely as possible, the document came after many workers had already been exposed to dangerous asbestos fibers.



After the shipyard closed in 1996, citizens began expressing concerns about exposure to dangerous toxins left behind. 



In 2005, new construction began at the old site, now renamed The Navy Yard at Noisette.



In February 2019, The Post and Courier reported that the shipyard "remains very much a work in progress."



Braswell Services Group



In addition to Charleston Naval Shipyard, the Braswell Service Group was a shipyard that once relied on asbestos. Asbestos was used in almost every type of machinery, equipment, and parts at the shipyard. 



Employees at Braswell worked around asbestos and asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) daily as they built and repaired ships. Asbestos was found in:




Boilers and turbines



Electrical, building, and plumbing insulation



Pumps and valves



Steampipes



Incinerators



Gaskets



Tiling



Welding blankets, and more




Other Job Sites Associated with Asbestos Use in Charleston



Along with shipyards, several other companies in and around Charleston used asbestos for years. Several buildings that were constructed with ACMs remain in Charleston today. 



Schools




Citadel Military College of South Carolina



Basic Science Building- Medical University of South Carolina



University of South Carolina




Hospitals




Charleston Memorial Hospital



Roper St. Francis Healthcare



Wm. Jennings Bryan Dorn VAMC




Additional Businesses




Bird and Son Inc.



South Carolina Gas and Electric Company



Charleston Hydraulic Cotton Press



Charleston Oil Refinery



Daniel Construction



General Asbestos and Rubber Company (GARCO)



J. R. Deans Company, Inc.



Westvaco Corporation



Wood Brothers Thresher Company




Specialty Cancer Care in Charleston







If you've been diagnosed with an asbestos-related disease or been exposed to asbestos and need assistance with testing and diagnosis, contact the Hollings Cancer Center (HCC) at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC). It has been helping cancer patients since its inception in 1824.



In 1993, HCC was named a designated cancer center backed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI). 



In addition to extensive cancer research and research trials, HCC offers innovative radiology oncology treatment options through its well-known Thoracic Oncology Program.



Hollings Cancer Center 86 Jonathan Lucas St,Charleston, SC 29425(843) 792-0700



These lawyers made us feel so much better about going through this terrible process. We had no idea where to begin and they helped get us all the compensation we possibly could. They were friendly understanding and very hard-working. They answered any questions we had about compensation and even medical advice.- Natalie F.



Additional Information and Getting Legal Help



Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys. If you need additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Columbus Mesothelioma Lawyer

An experienced Columbus mesothelioma lawyer can help you fight for justice and compensation if you have been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. Columbus has a long industrial history that includes employers and companies that exposed workers to asbestos. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Columbus, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 





Columbus Asbestos Facts




Columbus and Franklin County had nearly 650 deaths from mesothelioma and other rare asbestos illnesses between 1999 and 2017. 



Manufacturing of construction materials, chemicals, pesticides, and fertilizers contributed significantly to asbestos exposure in Columbus workers. 



A mineral and fertilizer processing plant outside of Columbus received shipments of asbestos-tainted vermiculite from Libby, Montana. 




When Do I Need a Columbus Mesothelioma Lawyer?







You need a mesothelioma lawyer in the area if you have a diagnosis of mesothelioma or another asbestos illness. Asbestos exposure causes mesothelioma, a rare cancer. Asbestos exposure is almost always negligent, meaning the responsible companies can and should pay. Mesothelioma typically develops in the outer lining of the lungs, known as pleural mesothelioma. This cancer is not only rare but also aggressive and deadly, with no known cure.



The disease is solely caused by exposure to asbestos, a fact that underscores the critical nature of responsible handling and legal accountability. While treatments offer some hope and can improve quality of life, mesothelioma is generally terminal.



Symptoms and Onset



Symptoms might not appear until 10 to 40 years after asbestos exposure. Common signs include:




Painful and persistent coughing



Respiratory problems



Chest pain



Lumps of tissue on the chest



Unexplained weight loss




For abdominal mesothelioma, symptoms can include abdominal pain or swelling and nausea.



No Safe Exposure Level



It is crucial to understand that no amount of asbestos exposure is safe. Even minimal contact could eventually lead to a mesothelioma diagnosis, emphasizing the importance of strict regulations and accountability for asbestos handling.



An experienced lawyer will help you understand your legal rights and will represent you in negotiations for compensation. 



Mesothelioma and asbestos cases are complicated and require expertise and deep knowledge of asbestos in Columbus. Don't settle for an offer from an insurance company when a lawyer can get you more.



How to Choose a Mesothelioma Lawyer



Hiring a lawyer for your asbestos case is important. Even more essential is choosing the right lawyer. These cases are complicated. You need an experienced lawyer who has handled and won asbestos lawsuits for similar clients. 



Also look for a lawyer who is part of a larger firm. Asbestos law firms have the resources to investigate and prove your mesothelioma case. Without evidence, it's difficult to recover damages. 



The right lawyer will offer you a free initial consultation to review your case and answer questions. They should also offer you contingency payment. This means you pay nothing until they win. 



What Kind of Compensation Can I Get for Mesothelioma? 



Asbestos exposure is negligent, so you are entitled to compensation for the expenses of having mesothelioma. Settlement negotiations and jury awards take several factors into account when determining fair compensation: 




Past and current medical expenses



Estimated future medical expenses



Travel expenses for treatment



Home care and medical equipment



Lost wages



Pain and suffering




Is There a Time Limit for Filing a Mesothelioma Claim in Columbus, Ohio? 



Yes, there is a time limit. It is called the statute of limitations. In Ohio, you have two years from when you were diagnosed with mesothelioma to file a lawsuit. Contact a lawyer as soon as possible after your diagnosis so you don't miss the chance to get the compensation you deserve. 



Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Columbus? 



Many industrial workplaces in and around Columbus used asbestos in the past. They put workers at risk of exposure and resulting illnesses. These are just a few examples of where Columbus residents and workers came into contact with asbestos. 



Beer Breweries in Columbus







Columbus has had a strong presence in beer brewing and manufacturing since the 1850s.



German immigrants founded many breweries in Columbus, including August Wagner Breweries, Capitol Breweries, L. Hoster Brewing Company, and more. 



Workers at breweries were exposed to asbestos. It was used in much of the machinery and structures of breweries. Asbestos was prized at the time for its affordability, ease of use, and resistance to heat and fire.



Owens Corning Corporation 



Owens Corning is one of the world’s largest manufacturers of fiberglass, insulation, resins, shingles, and roofing products. 



One of the company's biggest achievements was the 1932 discovery of an efficient way to make glass fibers. This development made Columbus a center for manufacturing. 



Thousands of Owens Corning employees worked around asbestos daily. Owens Corning used asbestos in various products, including insulation, side panels, roofing material, fiberglass, cement, and more. 



In fact, Owens Corning was one of the first companies to manufacture fiberglass insulation containing asbestos.



The first lawsuit against Owens Corning over asbestos came in 1978.  Two workers filed a mass lawsuit on behalf of themselves and 5,000 other former Owens Corning workers. 



The plaintiffs claimed Owens Corning and other asbestos manufacturers knew and hid health risks from workers. 



In 1997, another lawsuit was filed against Owens Corning in Florida when former worker, Deward Ballard, developed mesothelioma after prolonged asbestos exposure at one of the company’s work sites.



Ballard was awarded over $30 million when the jury agreed that the company hid information regarding the dangers of asbestos for more than 30 years. 



In 2000, Owens Corning filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy after more than 240,000 asbestos-related lawsuits were filed against the company.



In 2006, the Owens Corning Fiberglass Asbestos Personal Injury Trust was created. The company funded the trust with $7 billion. By 2008, it had already awarded $361 million to claimants.



O.M. Scott and Sons Company



Just outside of Columbus, the O.M. Scott and Sons Company processed vermiculite. Today it is the Scotts Miracle-Gro Company that makes fertilizers and pesticides. 



The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry reports that the site processed vermiculite, a mineral, between 1967 and 2001. During this time, it received more than 400,000 tons of asbestos-contaminated vermiculite from the mines in Libby, Montana. 



The report indicates that former workers were exposed to hazardous levels of asbestos. Their families may also have been exposed. 



Kroger Bakery



In 2022, Ohio Governor Mike DeWine announced that the state would fund the cleanup of over 100 brownfield sites in the state. These included an asbestos-contaminated former bakery in Columbus. 



Half Baked Holdings, LLC in Columbus received over $3 million to remediate asbestos. The location operated as a Kroger bakery for more than 90 years. Workers at that time would have been at risk of exposure to asbestos. 



Other Columbus Job Sites and Buildings with Known Asbestos



Schools




Linmoor Middle School



Columbus St. School



Ohio State University



Parsons Elementary School




Hospitals




Columbus State Hospital



Mercy Hospital



Mount Carmel Hospital



Riverside Hospital



White Cross Hospital




Asbestos Products and Chemical Works




Asbestos Service Company



Ashland Chemical



GFS Chemical Company



Momentive Chemical



Gahanna Usalco Plant



Ohio Chemical Services, Inc.



Avantec



Columbus Chemical Industries




Historic Places




Ohio Institution for Feeble-Minded Youth



The Hartman Hotel



Columbus Museum of Art




Military Installations




Rickenbacker Air Force Base/Air National Guard Base



Ohio Army National Guard



U.S. Army Department



U.S. Army Reserve Center



U.S. Navy Department



Beightler Armory



U.S. Defense Logistics Agency



U.S. Defense Department




Ongoing Asbestos Exposure in Columbus, Ohio







Most workplace asbestos exposure occurred in the past, but some people are still at risk in Columbus. Many buildings were constructed with asbestos. Today, some of those buildings still contain asbestos and put residents and workers at risk of exposure. 



A recent example is the Latitude Five25 apartment tower. Residents were forced to evacuate the building on Christmas Day in 2022 due to asbestos concerns and other problems. 



The owner was trying to sell Latitude Five25, but the deal fell through after the incident. A court fined the owners $4.3 million and required the owners to give up the building immediately. 



The Eastland Mall is another site in Columbus with asbestos issues. Currently shuttered, the mall remains abandoned, with many maintenance needs neglected. These include nearly $54,000 worth of asbestos abatement work. The current owners may demolish the building rather than remediate it. 



Cancer Centers in Ohio



There are two National Cancer Center Institute (NCI) certified Cancer Centers in the state of Ohio that provide medical treatment to patients with asbestos-related illnesses such as mesothelioma.



These facilities have qualified specialists in oncology, radiology, and surgery.



Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Care Center



James Cancer Center and Solove Research Institute300 West 10th Avenue, Suite 159Columbus, OH 43210 (614) 293-5066 Outside Ohio, dial 1-800-293-5066



Case Comprehensive Cancer Care Center



11100 Euclid Ave., Wearn 151Cleveland, OH 44106(216) 844-8797



Understanding Mesothelioma: Symptoms and Characteristics



Mesothelioma is a particularly aggressive form of cancer primarily affecting the mesothelium, the thin layer of tissue covering most internal organs, but it is most common in the outer lining of the lungs. Due to its rare and lethal nature, understanding its symptoms and characteristics is crucial.



Key Characteristics




Cause: The primary culprit behind mesothelioma is asbestos exposure. It is a fibrous mineral once commonly used in construction materials.



Latency Period: One of the defining features of mesothelioma is its long latency period. Symptoms often surface decades—usually between 10 to 40 years—after the initial exposure to asbestos.



Prognosis: While treatment can improve quality of life and extend survival, this cancer remains incurable and usually terminal.




Symptoms



Mesothelioma symptoms can vary based on the affected area, but some common signs include:




Persistent Cough: This can be painful and is a frequent symptom for those with pleural mesothelioma affecting the lung lining.



Breathing Difficulties: Respiratory issues are common, often accompanied by chest pain.



Chest Lumps: Tissue lumps may develop in the chest area.



Weight Loss: Unexplained and sudden weight loss can signal an underlying issue.




For those with mesothelioma in the abdomen, symptoms may manifest as:




Abdominal Pain and Swelling: Feelings of discomfort or visible swelling in the abdomen.



Nausea: Persistent nausea can also be a symptom of abdominal mesothelioma.




Safety Reminder



It's critical to remember that no level of asbestos exposure is deemed safe. Even minimal contact can eventually lead to a mesothelioma diagnosis. If you suspect any exposure, monitoring symptoms and seeking medical consultation is highly advised.



When my husband was diagnosed we had no idea what to do. Our doctor said we should reach out to an attorney to talk about compensation. After talking to several firms we found the mesothelioma lawyer center and were grateful we did. They helped with every step of the way. If you need a meso attorney then I would recommend contacting them- Isabelle D.



Getting Legal Help in Columbus



Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you need additional assistance, contact us 800-793-4540.

### Austin Mesothelioma Lawyers

Many businesses in Austin, especially those in the construction industry, used asbestos, putting workers at risk of exposure and deadly illnesses. If you encountered asbestos at work, an experienced Austin mesothelioma lawyer may be able to assist you. 



If you or a loved one have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in Austin, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more.  



Austin Asbestos Facts




Austin, the capital of Texas, has had hundreds of asbestos-related deaths.



Many companies, including Fuller-Austin Inc. and the Holly Power Plant, have contributed to asbestos exposure in the city. 



Older buildings also continue to pose a risk with aging asbestos construction materials. 




Top 10 Mesothelioma and Asbestos Exposure Lawyers in Austin, TX










Paul Danziger




Founding member of Texas-based law firm that handles asbestos and mesothelioma cases throughout the United States



Over two decades of experience in mesothelioma litigation with more than 1,000 mesothelioma patients helped



His law firm, Danziger & De LLano, has won more than $1,000,000,000 in mesothelioma-related claims



Graduated with honors from the University of Texas, 1989



Law degree from Northwestern University, 1993



Bar admission in Texas



Member of the American Association of Justice and Texas Trial Lawyers Association



Recognized among Top 100 Trial Lawyers by National Trial Lawyers, 2017-2019








Working from his law offices in Houston and San Antonio, Paul Danziger handles mesothelioma cases throughout the United States. He has focused on mesothelioma litigation for over 25 years, and has recovered significant compensation for victims of mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, and asbestosis. 



Paul Danziger grew up in Houston and earned a law degree from Northwestern University School of Law in Chicago in 1993.



Contact Paul →









Jeffrey B. Simon




Graduated from the University of Texas School of Law in 1993



Licensed to practice in Texas, New York, and California



Founding partner of Simon Greenstone Panatier, PC



Named among Top Lawyers Under 40 by D Magazine in 2003 and 2004



Named a Texas Super Lawyer by Super Lawyers (a Thomson Reuters service), 2006 to 2009 and 2014 to 2016



Awarded a Dallas County Special Civil Service Commission from 2011 to 2013



Awarded National Trial Lawyers’ Top 100 Trial Lawyers Award in 2016



Awarded Lifetime Achievement Award by America’s Top 100 Attorneys in 2016








Jeffrey B. Simon is a founding partner of Simon Greenstone Panatier, PC. He is licensed to practice in California, Texas, and New York. He has worked on mesothelioma cases for over 20 years. Simon received a lifetime achievement award from America’s Top 100 Attorneys in 2016.



Contact Jeffrey →









David C. Greenstone




Founding shareholder of Simon Greenstone Panatier, PC



Graduated cum laude from the University of Texas Law School in 1998



Instrumental in the first verdict against Colgate for mesothelioma related to asbestos in talcum powder



Helped win a verdict for significant damages in Arizona in 2016 for a U.S. Navy civilian employee who died from mesothelioma



Awarded Top Verdict in 2015, 2016, and 2018 by TopVerdict.com for wins in California and Arizona



Awarded Premier Attorney Award in 2015 by the American Academy of Trial Attorneys



Named among top 100 trial lawyers from 2014 to the present by National Trial Lawyers








Based in Dallas, Texas, David C. Greenstone is a founding shareholder in the law firm Simon Greenstone Panatier, PC. He has gained significant experience working as a trial lawyer, focusing on cases involving asbestos exposure, toxic torts, and pharmaceuticals. These included the first verdict won against Colgate-Palmolive for mesothelioma caused by a talcum powder product. He earned his undergraduate and law degrees from the University of Texas in 1995 and 1998.



Contact David → 









Michelle Whitman




Secured millions of dollars in settlements for victims of asbestos exposure, including workers in construction, shipbuilding, and power plants



Working through Danziger & De LLano, a mesothelioma law firm with over a billion dollars won in asbestos and mesothelioma cases



Over two deceased of experience



Licensed through the Texas State Bar



Active member of American Bar Association, American Association for Justice, and Texas Trial Lawyers Association








Michelle Whitman is a skilled attorney at Danziger & De Llano, LLP, specializing in Mesothelioma and Asbestos litigation. With over a decade of experience in the field, Michelle has built a strong reputation for securing justice and substantial compensation for victims of asbestos exposure. Her expertise in asbestos-related cases has led to millions of dollars in settlements for clients suffering from mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases.



Contact Michelle → 









Rod de LLano




Founding partner of Danziger & De LLano, LLP, one of America’s most successful firms specializing in mesothelioma and asbestos litigation



Secured over $1,000,000,000 in asbestos and mesothelioma compensation for victims through his Texas-based law firm



Featured in New York Times, Boston Globe, Houston Chronicle, and many more



Awarded Super Lawyers Selection in 2025



Awarded Best Attorney, RUE Ratings Best Attorneys of America in 2024



Awarded Best of Business Houston, General Small Business Community Awards in 2014



Awarded Top 10 Law Firms, American Institute of Personal Injury Attorneys in 2020 and 2024








Rod de Llano is a founding partner of Danziger & De Llano, LLP, one of the nation’s most successful firms specializing in mesothelioma and asbestos litigation. A graduate of Princeton University with a degree in Economics, his career took a remarkable turn when one of his cases inspired the independent film Puncture, starring Chris Evans.



Contact Rod’s Texas Mesothelioma Law Firm →









Chris J. Panatier




Graduated from the University of Texas Law School in 2001



Founding partner in Simon Greenstone Panatier, PC



Won verdicts with significant damages



With practice partner, brought the first verdict against Colgate-Palmolive for mesothelioma caused by talcum powder



Named a Thomson Reuters Texas Rising Star, 2005 to 2012



Named Thomson Reuters Texas Super Lawyer from 2013 to 2019



Top Lawyer Under 40, as named by D Magazine for 2006








Chris J. Panatier is a partner in the trial law firm Simon Greenstone Panatier, PC. He focuses on asbestos and mesothelioma, toxic tort cases, products liability, and pharmaceuticals. With a partner he helped to win the first talcum powder and mesothelioma verdict against Colgate-Palmolive. Panatier earned his law degree from the University of Texas in 2001.



Contact Chris →









Lou Black




Partner at Black Law Group



Focuses solely on asbestos exposure and mesothelioma cases



Graduate of Texas Christian University and South Texas College of Law, 1990 and 1993



A career dedicated to asbestos cases and victims of mesothelioma and lung cancer



Admissions in Texas and Pennsylvania



Member, board of directors and executive committee of Texas Trial Lawyers Association








Lou Black is a partner and founding member of Black Law Group, with offices in New Mexico and Texas. A graduate of the South Texas College of Law, Black has been practicing law since 1993. She has dedicated her career to helping victims of mesothelioma and lung cancer from asbestos exposure seek justice and recover damages. She is an expert in asbestos litigation.



Contact Lou →









Peter A. Kraus




Founding partner at Waters, Kraus & Paul



Admitted to the State Bar of Hawaii, California, Missouri, Texas, and Virginia, as well as several U.S. Courts and the U.S. Supreme Court



Involved in numerous mesothelioma cases with significant compensation for victims



Graduated University of Texas School of Law, 1985



Awarded Above and Beyond Award by the American Association for Justice in 2017



Appointee to the Federal Judicial Center Foundation Board, 2014 to the present



Named a Texas Top Rated Lawyer by Lexis Nexis, 2013 through 2016



Listed Best Lawyer in Dallas by D Magazine, 2001, and 2011 to 2019








Peter Kraus is a founding partner with the Waters, Kraus & Paul law firm serving Houston from their Dallas, Texas office. He focuses on litigating cases related to harmful exposure, particularly asbestos. His nearly 30 years of work on behalf of asbestos and mesothelioma victims has led to major wins and jury awards. He is active in his community and spends time on pro bono work and in serving on boards of directors and trustees for a number of charitable organizations.



Contact Peter →









Lawrence G. Gettys




Over 27 years of experience advocating for asbestos victims



Practicing counsel at Talbot, Carmouche & Marcello in Baton Rouge, Louisiana



Graduated with honors, Southern University Law Center, 1995



Bar admissions in Louisiana and Texas



Member, American Association for Justice, Louisiana Association for Justice, and Texas Trial Lawyers Association








Lawrence G. Gettys has over 20 years of litigation experience and focuses on cases involving asbestos exposure and mesothelioma. He has been instrumental in winning major verdicts for asbestos victims as a member of the Waters, Krauss & Paul law firm. Working from the Baton Rouge, Louisiana office, Gettys is admitted to practice in Louisiana and Texas, as well as several federal courts.



Contact Lawrence →









Ross Stomel




Accreditation from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs for excellence in representing veterans



Recovered over $250 million in verdicts and settlements related to asbestos exposure



Named among the “Top 100 Trial Lawyers” by National Trial Lawyers Association








Ross Stomel is a leading expert in mesothelioma and asbestos litigation who practices in Houston, Texas. He has made a career of working with victims of personal injury and wrongful death, with special expertise in asbestos exposure. He has litigated throughout the U.S. and helped his clients recover more than $250 million in settlements and jury awards.



Contact Ross →






What Is Mesothelioma and What Causes it? 



Mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive cancer that develops in the tissue surrounding the lungs (pleural mesothelioma) and abdominal organs (peritoneal mesothelioma). 



Asbestos exposure is the only known cause of mesothelioma. Inhaled or ingested fibers of asbestos cause damage to tissues in the body, resulting in illness in some people. Symptoms usually don't appear for many years. When mesothelioma is diagnosed, it is often in the late stages and has a poor prognosis. 



Most asbestos exposures occurred in the workplace in the past. Many companies used asbestos as an insulating material. Some of the industries that used asbestos most heavily include construction, energy, manufacturing, shipbuilding, and automotive. 



Asbestos materials shed tiny fibers that become part of the dust in the air and on surfaces. Without adequate protection, workers can inadvertently inhale or ingest the fibers. 



When Do I Need an Austin Mesothelioma Lawyer? 







If you receive a diagnosis of mesothelioma, you need a lawyer immediately. Because mesothelioma is caused by negligent workplace asbestos exposure, you have a right to take legal action. A lawsuit or mesothelioma claim can help you seek compensation for your expenses.



Top-rated Austin, Texas, asbestos attorneys are available to review your case, provide advice, and give you the best chance of getting fair compensation.



How Our Mesothelioma Lawyers Can Help




Extensive Experience: Our attorneys have supported thousands of families affected by asbestos exposure, giving them a strong voice in the legal system.



Significant Success: We have secured billions in compensation, holding corporations accountable for their negligence.



Comprehensive Support: From the initial consultation to the final verdict, our legal team handles every step of the process, ensuring you can focus on your health and family.



No Financial Barriers: Our services come with no hourly fees or out-of-pocket costs, so you can pursue justice without financial stress.




Our Austin legal team is here to assist you in building a strong case. Contact us today for a free legal consultation. We will work diligently to determine how you were exposed to asbestos and gather the necessary evidence to support your claim.



Understanding the Role of a Mesothelioma Lawyer



A mesothelioma lawyer is a crucial advocate for individuals and families affected by mesothelioma, a cancer typically caused by asbestos exposure. Their primary role is to seek compensation and justice for the injuries and losses their clients have suffered. Here's how they assist in this pursuit:




Legal Guidance & Strategy: Mesothelioma lawyers provide expert advice, helping clients understand their legal rights and the potential avenues for compensation. They craft a personalized legal strategy based on the unique details of each case.



Documenting Claims: They gather and organize all necessary documentation, such as medical records and employment history, to build a strong case that demonstrates the link between asbestos exposure and the client's illness.



Negotiations: Much of their work involves negotiating settlements with manufacturers, employers, and insurance companies. They aim to secure fair settlements, often without the need for a protracted court process.



Litigation If Necessary: If a settlement cannot be reached, these lawyers are prepared to take the case to trial, fighting for their clients' rights in the courtroom.



Accessibility: Many clients can achieve compensation without the need to attend court, and some cases might even be handled entirely remotely, ensuring that the process is as stress-free as possible for the families involved.




By handling the legal complexities, mesothelioma lawyers allow their clients to focus on health and well-being, while working tirelessly to ensure justice is served.



Why is Filing an Asbestos Claim in Austin Crucial?



Filing an asbestos claim in Austin is essential for several compelling reasons, starting with the potential for financial relief.




Cover Medical Costs: Asbestos-related illnesses often lead to substantial medical expenses. Compensation from a claim can significantly alleviate these financial burdens, ensuring vital treatments are accessible.



Secure Financial Future: Beyond immediate medical expenses, a successful claim can also secure your family's financial well-being, providing support in the face of lost wages and other economic impacts stemming from illness.



Accountability and Justice: Many companies knowingly concealed the dangers of asbestos for years. By filing a claim, you become part of holding these companies accountable for their negligence, fostering greater corporate transparency and responsibility.



Raise Awareness: Taking legal action helps raise public awareness about asbestos risks, potentially preventing future exposure and encouraging safer industry practices.




Ultimately, an asbestos claim isn't just about financial compensation—it's a step towards justice, accountability, and greater awareness, protecting not only your interests but also the broader community.



Choosing an Experienced Mesothelioma Lawyer



Asbestos cases are complicated. To get compensation, you need to know where and when you were exposed to asbestos. You also need to prove that exposure led to your illness. Building a case requires experience, specialized knowledge, and extensive resources. 



When looking for an asbestos attorney in Austin, look for someone with experience handling and winning mesothelioma lawsuits. They should be part of a larger asbestos firm with the resources to take your case.



They should offer a free initial consultation to review your situation and explain your options. They should also offer contingency payment, so you pay no fees until they win your case.



Getting Started with Your Free Consultation



To begin, fill out a simple form provided by the firm, which allows them to understand your basic information and case requirements. Once submitted, the legal team will promptly reach out to you to schedule your consultation.



During this initial meeting, the attorney will work with you to determine how you were exposed to asbestos and gather the necessary evidence to support your claim. This comprehensive approach ensures that you have a strong foundation for your case from the very start.



By choosing a firm that combines experience, resources, and a proactive engagement process, you can confidently move forward in pursuing justice for your mesothelioma claim.



Proven Track Record in Mesothelioma Cases



For more than two decades, our law firm has been a steadfast advocate for families in Austin, Texas, and across the country dealing with the devastating impact of mesothelioma. With extensive experience, we've consistently held large corporations accountable, ensuring that victims receive the justice and compensation they deserve.



Impressive Achievements



Our commitment to justice is reflected in our impressive track record:




Assisted over 6,000 families nationwide who have suffered due to asbestos exposure.



Recovered more than $9.6 billion in compensation for victims across the country.




Local Representation, National Leaders



While our reach extends nationwide, we have a deep understanding of the legal landscape in Austin. Our dedicated team is equipped with the resources and expertise necessary to deliver powerful advocacy, securing meaningful results for those affected by mesothelioma.



Decades of Dedication



With more than 25 years in service, our attorneys have built a reputation as leaders in mesothelioma litigation. We pride ourselves on providing experienced, compassionate representation for thousands of clients, consistently giving victims a strong voice in the legal system.



Through our unwavering dedication, we continue to fight for the rights and compensation that mesothelioma victims in Austin and beyond deserve.



Understanding the Statute of Limitations for Mesothelioma Claims in Texas



When dealing with mesothelioma claims in Texas, one of the most critical factors is the statute of limitations. These legal deadlines determine the time frame within which patients or their families must initiate a legal claim after a mesothelioma diagnosis or death related to asbestos exposure.



What are Statutes of Limitations?



Statutes of limitations are laws that set deadlines for filing lawsuits. The purpose is to ensure claims are made while evidence remains fresh and available. This legal framework helps streamline the judicial process and protect against stale claims.



Impact on Mesothelioma Claims



In Texas, the statute of limitations for mesothelioma claims typically allows:




Two Years from Diagnosis: Patients usually have two years from the date of their mesothelioma diagnosis to file a lawsuit. This period is critical for gathering evidence and building a strong case.



Two Years from Date of Death: In the unfortunate event of a patient's passing, the family members also have a two-year window from the date of death to file a wrongful death claim.




These timeframes underscore the urgency of consulting with an asbestos attorney soon after diagnosis or death. Prompt legal action ensures that your rights to compensation are preserved and that you have access to the best possible legal support.



Why Timely Action is Crucial



Failing to act within the statute of limitations could result in losing the right to seek compensation. This makes it essential to contact a legal expert quickly, who can help navigate the complexities of asbestos litigation and ensure no critical deadlines are missed.



By understanding these statutes, you can safeguard your legal rights and maximize the potential for a successful mesothelioma claim in Texas.



How Much Is Your Mesothelioma Case Worth in Austin, TX?



The average settlement amount for mesothelioma lawsuits is between $1 million and $1.4 million. Jury awards are often much higher, but in a trial, you could end up with nothing.



Compensation amounts vary significantly by case. Factors that affect your compensation include: 




The degree of liability of the defendants



Your past, ongoing, and future expected medical expenses



The severity of your illness



Lost wages



Emotional and physical pain and suffering




One example of a winning case for a Texas asbestos claim illustrates what is possible when you take legal action against negligent companies. In 2013 Union Carbide lost an asbestos exposure case brought by Vernon and Patsy Walker.



Mr. Walker was diagnosed with mesothelioma after working with the company's asbestos materials. Vernon worked for decades as a painter using Union Carbide asbestos-containing paints.



A jury awarded Mr. and Mrs. Walker $11 million in damages. Union Carbide has been at the center of numerous other mesothelioma lawsuits after workers became seriously ill from the company's pro



Complete the form below to discover how much your asbestos-related lawsuit could be worth in Austin, TX.











                
                        
                            Calculate Case Value
                            
                        
                        Diagnosis-- Select --MesotheliomaAsbestosisAsbestos-Related Lung CancerIs Diagnosed Person Alive?-- Select --YesPassed away under 2 years agoPassed away over 2 years agoAge of Diagnosed Person-- Select --Under 6565-8485 or olderExposure-- Select --MilitaryOccupationalSecond-HandOther / UnknownMain Job Site-- Select --ShipyardsBoiler RoomsPowerhousesPaper MillsConstruction SitesAutomotiveFirefightingRailroadsRefineriesOther / UnknownMain Asbestos Product Used-- Select --Fire Protection ProductsBrake Pads / LiningsCeiling Textures / Tile / PlasterElectrical ProductsTransite ProductsHeating & Cooling ProductsVermiculiteRoofing ProductsPaints / Plasters / Wall CoveringsOther / UnknownState-- Select --AlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaNorthern Mariana IslandsOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahU.S. Virgin IslandsVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces EuropeArmed Forces PacificPhone(Required)Email(Required)First Name(Required)Last Name(Required)NameThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
         Any information you send is secure and will never be sold or released.This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
        
                        Δ
                        





Past Mesothelioma Settlements and Verdicts in the Austin Area



Discovering the outcomes of past mesothelioma cases in the Austin region can provide insight into what to expect if you or a loved one is pursuing a legal claim. Below are some notable settlements and verdicts that have been secured:



Significant Case Results




$8.29 MillionAchieved for a U.S. Air Force Veteran and Pipefitter based in Austin, TX. This highlights the potential for substantial compensation, especially for those with military and industrial backgrounds.



$3.38 MillionSecured for an office worker in Hilltop Lakes, TX. This case demonstrates that various occupational backgrounds can qualify for significant settlements.



$4.82 MillionAwarded to a U.S. Army Veteran and Laborer in New Braunfels, TX. Veterans often face unique exposure risks, leading to compelling cases.




Additional Mesothelioma Settlements




A carpenter in Ingram was awarded $2.84 million for peritoneal mesothelioma.



A boiler operator and pipefitter in Austin received $1.64 million.



An auto mechanic in Temple with pleural mesothelioma gained $2.4 million.



A mechanic in Austin was granted $1.63 million for pleural mesothelioma.



An HVAC worker in New Braunfels secured $1.86 million.



A laborer in Temple was provided $1.77 million for pleural mesothelioma.






Factors Influencing Settlements



It's important to note that each case is unique, with outcomes influenced by individual circumstances such as the type of exposure, the age at diagnosis, and other personal factors. While these figures provide a historical perspective, they don't guarantee similar results in future cases.



Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Austin, TX? 



Most negligent asbestos exposure occurs in the workplace. Many of the industries and workplaces in Austin used asbestos in the past and exposed workers. These are a few examples. 



Fuller-Austin 







Fuller-Austin Inc., established in 1962, was an insulation company that installed, distributed, and sold asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) throughout Texas. 



Gas plants, refineries, and power plants in Austin used Fuller-Austin’s asbestos insulation. In 1974, the company stopped using asbestos materials in its products.



Many workers affected by exposure to asbestos in Fuller-Austin products filed lawsuits. Unfortunately for these victims, the company went into bankruptcy in 1998. 



The company set up an asbestos trust for exposure victims. The fund includes enough money for an estimated 77,000 asbestos-related claimants.



Holly Power Plant



Located in East Austin, the Holly Steel Power Plant has been a source of concern for Austin residents for several years.



In 2007, the plant was officially closed after complaints about the health hazards of living around the plant. The concerns revolved around asbestos used in the plant. In May of 2013, crews began tearing the power plant down.



However, the project was extended after even more asbestos was found during the demolition. 



According to TRC Environmental, the company hired to demolish the plant, several internal areas of the plant contained asbestos not previously marked.



Although the demolition was needed and would protect future residents, many employees and contractors faced daily exposure to the harmful fibers of asbestos from 1965 until the plant shut down.



Austin Police and Fire Departments



Older buildings in Austin were typically built with asbestos in insulation, roofing materials, siding, cement board, and other materials. 



The aging asbestos in the Austin Police Department became an issue during the 2019 renovations. 



Work done on the Downtown Patrol Building stirred concerns among employees. They believed the air might have become contaminated with asbestos fibers, and some complained of respiratory issues. 



The problem has been addressed, but it highlights the ongoing risks of asbestos in the older city and public buildings.



Firefighters in the city also face asbestos risks when going into blazes. In May 2021, over 100 Austin firefighters risked exposure to asbestos when they fought a huge warehouse fire. The city will cover health screenings for the firefighters. 



Additional Austin Sites with Asbestos



Many Austin businesses, ranging from power plants, steel mills, paper mills, and more, used asbestos and put many people's lives at risk.



Many Austin public buildings were also associated with heavy usage of asbestos during their construction and are still in use today. 



Schools




Cunningham Elementary School



David Crockett High School



Govalle Elementary School



Gullett Elementary School



Harris Elementary School



J.E. Pierce Middle School



Jones Road Elementary School



Odom Elementary School



Allen Middle School



Anderson High School



Manor High School



Manor Elementary School



Huston-Tillotson College



University of Texas



Travis High School



Travis Heights Elementary School




Hospitals




Austin State School Hospital



St. David’s Medical Center



Scottish Rite Dormitory




Additional Public Buildings




Austin City Auditorium



Crestview Baptist Church



Austin Governor’s Mansion



Harvey Smith Building



Memorial United Methodist Church



Saint John's Methodist Church



Saint Teresa's Parish



South Austin Recreation Center



Austin State Capitol Building



Texas Department of Mental Health



Texas State Library



Texas School For The Blind




Highlighting Client Stories: A Personal Touch



Every individual diagnosed with mesothelioma has a unique journey, and some law firms have a distinctive approach to showcasing these stories. They believe that sharing the personal experiences of their clients can shed light on the impact of asbestos-related diseases.



Personal Narratives



The firm places a strong emphasis on the power of storytelling. By doing so, they aim to inspire and inform others who might be facing similar challenges. Through detailed client stories, they highlight the emotional and legal battles their clients have endured, providing a window into their resilience and courage.



Cases like Dennis



Consider a case where a former Air Force member became a union pipefitter after his service. He diligently worked at nuclear plants and refineries for many years, unknowingly exposing himself to asbestos. When symptoms emerged much later, he was diagnosed with a rare form of mesothelioma, marking the first significant illness of his life.



By sharing his narrative, the firm not only honors his struggle but also demonstrates their role in securing compensation and ensuring the liable corporations are held accountable. This approach underscores their commitment to justice and their clients' well-being.



Client Empowerment



Through these stories, the legal team underscores their dedication to making a real impact in their clients' lives. They focus on the closure and financial security that successful legal intervention can bring, which is a testament to their ability to effect change and offer support where it’s needed the most.



By weaving these narratives into their practice, the law firm humanizes the legal process, illustrating their compassionate approach in an otherwise technical field.



Mesothelioma Treatment in Austin







Austin and nearby cities are home to top-notch cancer treatment facilities, offering excellent care for victims of asbestos exposure: 




Cancer Therapy & Research Center, University of Texas Health Science Center. 7979 Wurzbach Road, Urschel Tower, Room U627, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, 1-800-340-2872



Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. 2201 Inwood Drive, Dallas, Texas, 75390, 1-866-460-4673




The mesothelioma Lawyer Center supported my father during his challenging time. Their expertise, compassion, and dedication were truly remarkable. Not only did they handle the legal complexities with proficiency, but they also provided invaluable support and guidance to our family throughout the entire process. Thanks to their relentless efforts, my father received the compensation he deserved, allowing him to focus on his health and well-being. I highly recommend their services to anyone seeking justice and assistance in similar situations.- Jingjing Z.



Getting Legal Help



If you’ve been exposed to asbestos and have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, remember that you may qualify for significant financial compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Philadelphia Mesothelioma Lawyer

Philadelphia mesothelioma lawyers work with victims of asbestos exposure who are now sick. Many industries in Philadelphia relied on asbestos for years and exposed workers. A lawyer can help you take legal action and recover the compensation you deserve. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in Philadelphia, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 





Philadelphia Asbestos Facts








There were over 17,000 asbestos-related deaths in Pennsylvania between 1999 and 2017. 



During that period, 1,576 of those deaths occurred in Philadelphia County, the third-highest number in the state. 



Several employers and industries in Philadelphia used asbestos and exposed workers, including the U.S. Navy, textile mills, and manufacturing plants. 



Philadelphia public schools are currently facing serious exposure risks in many of the district's older buildings. 




Asbestos and Mesothelioma



Asbestos was in use in many industries for decades. Workers who handled asbestos or worked near it often inhaled tiny fibers that the material shed into the air. These fibers cause damage inside the body, inflaming and scarring cells and tissues. 



Over time, asbestos damage in the lungs or abdomen can lead to several serious health conditions: 




Pleural mesothelioma



Peritoneal mesothelioma



Lung cancer



Asbestosis



Pleural thickening



Pleural plaques




If you know or suspect you were exposed to asbestos, see your doctor right away for medical screenings. This is crucial for early detection of any potential health issues related to asbestos exposure. Additionally, if you live or work in Philadelphia and have been exposed to asbestos, it's important to seek legal advice. Consulting with a mesothelioma lawyer in Philadelphia can help you understand your rights and options, especially if you have received a diagnosis of mesothelioma, asbestosis, or asbestos lung cancer.



Taking these steps not only prioritizes your health but also ensures you are prepared to explore any legal avenues available to you. 



How Can a Philadelphia Mesothelioma Lawyer Help Me? 



Top Philadelphia mesothelioma lawyers can help you seek justice and compensation for your asbestos illness. Most people sue for mesothelioma to recover damages. This is a devastating and costly illness. The companies responsible should pay.



Filing a lawsuit may be an option if you have suffered due to asbestos exposure. Mesothelioma lawyers are experienced litigators who will represent you in pre-trial negotiations and in court if necessary. They ensure that your suffering, resulting from exposure, is addressed through legal means.



One of the most important things an asbestos attorney in Philadelphia will do for you is help you get maximum compensation to cover:




Past and ongoing medical expenses



Future expected medical expenses



Travel costs for treatment and appointments



Lost wages and lost future earnings



Emotional and physical pain and suffering




Asbestos lawyers and law firms bring years of experience and extensive resources to every client’s case. They give you the best chance to settle or win a jury award to compensate you for your expenses through several steps:




Investigate your work history, past asbestos exposure, and the companies responsible



Prove your asbestos exposure led to your illness



Make a claim for compensation with an asbestos trust or file a lawsuit



Negotiate a settlement in the case of a lawsuit



Take the lawsuit to court if necessary and win you a jury award




By understanding when a lawsuit is an appropriate option, you can better navigate the legal process with the help of seasoned professionals dedicated to securing your rightful compensation.



Why is it important to choose a lawyer who specializes in asbestos cases?



Selecting the right lawyer is crucial when dealing with asbestos-related legal battles. A lawyer who focuses primarily on asbestos cases brings invaluable expertise and a deep understanding of the complexities involved in this niche area of law.




Specialized Knowledge: Asbestos litigation is filled with specific legal nuances and scientific details. A specialized lawyer possesses the necessary insight into the harmful effects of asbestos, know how to establish evidence of exposure, and understand medical correlations to diseases like mesothelioma.



Proven Experience: These cases often involve intricate legal and procedural strategies that only an experienced asbestos lawyer can efficiently navigate. Their experience ensures that they can anticipate challenges and maneuver through them effectively, potentially leading to more favorable outcomes.



Focused Dedication: A lawyer concentrating on asbestos cases dedicates their time and resources to staying updated with the latest regulations, precedents, and developments in the field. This focus increases their ability to craft well-informed and strong arguments in court.



Network and Resources: Asbestos cases often require input from various experts such as medical professionals and occupational safety specialists. A specialized lawyer likely has a robust network of contacts they can leverage to strengthen your case with expert testimonies.




In summary, choosing a lawyer who dedicates their practice to asbestos cases provides you with the expertise, dedication, and resources needed to navigate such complex legal proceedings effectively. This specialization often results in a more strategic approach, aimed at achieving the best possible outcome for those affected by asbestos exposure.



How Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Philadelphia?







If you have a mesothelioma diagnosis, you were probably exposed to asbestos on the job. Many Philadelphia workplaces used asbestos in the past. 



Philadelphia is an old city founded in 1692 with a long industrial history. It was once a major manufacturing center. The textile industry dominated in the late 19th century, but railroad factories and shipyards were also important. 



These industries all used asbestos for a significant period of time, causing exposure and illness in workers decades later. 



Steam engines on locomotives and ships had gaskets, pipes, and valves lined with asbestos. Textile mills used asbestos in machinery to protect against friction-related heat.



As the city grew, it also saw a boom in construction, another industry that used asbestos heavily for a period of time. 



Homes and public buildings were built with asbestos insulation, roofing materials, flooring panels, cement, and other components.



Workers in several industries important in Philadelphia likely encountered asbestos on the job: 




Construction



Shipbuilding and repair



Military



Steel 



Manufacturing



Oil refining



Power generation



Automotive




Some of the companies in Philadelphia that once used asbestos and exposed workers include: 




Allied Chemical



A.P. Green Plant



Chevron Oil Refinery



General Electric



Mathis Shipyard



National Sugar Refinery



Pennsylvania Railroad Company



Rohm & Haas Chemical Plant



Scott Paper Company



Standard Oil Company



Sun Oil Refinery




Philadelphia Naval Shipyard



From 1801 to 1970, the U.S. Navy built many warships and support vessels at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard. It was a major repair and refit center for the Navy’s Atlantic Fleet until 1995. 



The Central Navy Yard closed due to post-Cold War cuts in defense spending and cost the area 7,000 jobs.



Philadelphia acquired much of the property in the spring of 2000 and redeveloped most of it for various uses. Aker Solutions, which builds tankers and other commercial ships, leases the west end of the site. 



The Navy used asbestos heavily in its vessels through much of the 20th century. Peak use of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) at the Navy Yard occurred during World War II when workers built 52 new ships and repaired or refitted over 500.



Consequently, yard workers and ship crews were in constant contact with ACMs, and many of them developed asbestos-related illnesses.



Other shipyards and ship companies associated with asbestos use in Philadelphia include: 




Hog Island Shipyard



New York Shipbuilding Company



Cramps Shipbuilding Company



Sun Shipbuilding and Drydock Company




Philadelphia Asbestos Corporation



Pacor, or the Philadelphia Asbestos Corporation, manufactured asbestos materials until it went bankrupt in the 1980s. The company survived and today makes insulation and other products without asbestos. 



Workers at Pacor during the time of asbestos use were at high risk of exposure and later asbestos illnesses. Victims of that exposure can seek compensation through a Pacor asbestos trust fund claim. 



Philadelphia Hospitals Constructed with Asbestos



Several of the city's hospitals were built during a time of heavy asbestos use in construction.



All hospitals associated with asbestos must follow state and federal guidelines regarding asbestos containment and emergency procedures.




Byberry State Mental Hospital



Chestnut Hill



Frankford



Germantown



Hahnemann



Holy Redeemer



Jefferson



Lankenau



Mercy Douglas



Metropolitan



Moss Rehabilitation



Mt. Sinai



Municipal



Nazareth



Pennsylvania State



Presbyterian



Roxborough Memorial



Saint Agnes



Temple University



Thomas Edison University



United States Naval



Philadelphia VA Medical Center




Asbestos in Philadelphia Schools



In the 2000s, the Philadelphia School District began to face the dangers of asbestos in its infrastructure. Many older buildings contain asbestos and need remediation or repairs to avoid exposure risks for students and staff. 



The district failed to act quickly enough for teachers who began a lawsuit to demand a rapid response. In 2020, the American Federation of Teachers created a proposal to deal with the many instances of damaged asbestos the district had yet to remediate. 



Also, in 2020, the University of Pennsylvania and the city of Philadelphia committed $100 million to help the district abate asbestos. By May 2021, the teachers' union released a report indicating that the teachers and students were still exposed to asbestos. 



The report also claimed the project would require $200 million to finish. Asbestos in Philadelphia schools continues to be an ongoing problem. 



The schools in the district with the highest numbers of reports of damaged and dangerous asbestos are: 




Frankford High School



Lewis Elkin School



Overbrook High School



Robert Morris School



Academy at Palumbo



George W. Sharswood School



John B. Kelly School



Penrose School



Roxborough High School



Solomon Solis-Cohen School




By 2023, the city closed several schools because of damaged asbestos materials. The district fell behind in inspecting school buildings. The state legislature called for $5 billion to address what many see as a crisis situation. Frankford High School, which closed in 2023, is not expected to be open for the 2023/2024 school year. 



Specialized Cancer Treatment in Philadelphia







Philadelphia is home to several medical facilities designated as Comprehensive Cancer Centers by the National Cancer Institute. This means that they meet high standards for treatment, research, and innovations in diagnosis and prevention. 




Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania. 3400 Spruce Street, 215-615-5858



Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University. 333 Cottman Avenue, 1-888-369-2427



Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University. 233 South 10th Street, 215-503-5692




Getting Legal Help in Philadelphia



If you’ve been exposed to asbestos and developed mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, remember that there is a good chance that you'll qualify for compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.



These lawyers made us feel so much better about going through this terrible process. We had no idea where to begin and they helped get us all the compensation we possibly could. They were friendly understanding and very hard-working. They answered any questions we had about compensation and even medical advice.- Natalie F.

### Chattanooga Mesothelioma Lawyer

Workers and residents who were injured by asbestos have the right to seek justice with the help of an experienced Chattanooga mesothelioma lawyer. Before the 1980s, many Chattanooga industries depended on asbestos, affecting thousands of workers. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in Chattanooga, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 





Chattanooga Asbestos Facts




Hamilton County and Chattanooga have the second-highest rate of asbestos-related deaths in Tennessee. 



Between 1999 and 2017, 350 people in the Chattanooga area died from asbestos illnesses. 



Metal smelting, textile production, and construction, among other industries, contributed to asbestos exposure in Chattanooga. 




What Is Mesothelioma? 



Mesothelioma is a rare cancer that affects the mesothelium, the tissue that lines the lungs and abdomen. The most common form is pleural mesothelioma, which develops around the lungs. It causes symptoms like chest pains, coughing, and shortness of breath and is often confused with lung cancer. 



Peritoneal mesothelioma develops in the abdomen and is less common. It causes symptoms that include abdominal pain and swelling, constipation, and diarrhea. 



Mesothelioma is caused by asbestos exposure. Asbestos is a natural mineral and insulator heavily used in many industries for most of the 20th century. Most people with mesothelioma were negligently exposed to asbestos at work. 



How Does Secondhand Asbestos Exposure Occur and What Are Its Implications?



Secondhand asbestos exposure typically occurs when a person comes into contact with asbestos fibers indirectly. This happens when someone working directly with the material inadvertently carries these tiny, yet hazardous, fibers home. These fibers can cling to clothing, skin, or hair, making family members or housemates vulnerable to exposure.



Sources of Exposure:




Clothing: Work uniforms or personal garments can trap fibers, which may later be inhaled by others in the household.



Skin and Hair: Asbestos can also adhere to a worker's skin or hair, especially if proper decontamination procedures are not followed.




Health Risks and Implications:




Mesothelioma: Like direct exposure, secondhand contact can lead to serious health conditions such as mesothelioma, a type of cancer affecting the lining of the lungs and abdomen.



Asbestos-Related Diseases: Other potential illnesses include asbestosis and lung cancer. These conditions often develop years after exposure, making early detection and attribution challenging.



Legal Responsibility: Recently, some state courts, like those in Tennessee, have started holding companies accountable for secondhand exposure cases. This legal development underscores the importance of workplace safety and proper decontamination procedures.




Conclusion



Understanding the pathway of secondhand asbestos exposure emphasizes the critical need for rigorous safety protocols in workplaces where asbestos is present. As the long-term health impacts can be severe and widespread, both employers and employees must prioritize preventive measures to protect families and communities from these hidden risks.



How to Take Legal Action for Mesothelioma in Chattanooga







If you have a mesothelioma diagnosis, you have a right to take legal action to seek compensation. There are several ways to recover damages for past negligent asbestos exposure:




Mesothelioma personal injury lawsuit. Because asbestos exposure is negligent, mesothelioma is often considered a personal injury. You can sue the companies responsible for seeking a settlement or jury award.



Mesothelioma wrongful death lawsuit. If your loved one died from mesothelioma, you can sue for damages. It may be considered a wrongful death.



Asbestos trust fund claim. Many asbestos companies went bankrupt and can no longer be sued. You may be eligible to make a claim with an asbestos trust set up by these companies to compensate victims.



VA benefits claim. If you can show your asbestos exposure occurred during military service, you may qualify for VA benefits, including disability compensation.




In Tennessee, the process for filing an asbestos claim is guided by specific legal requirements:




Statute of Limitations: You must file a personal injury claim within 1 year of your mesothelioma diagnosis. For wrongful death claims, the deadline is 1 year from your loved one's passing. This is more restrictive than many other states, so timely action is crucial.



Evidence Submission: Plaintiffs must submit evidence to support the inclusion of each defendant named in a lawsuit within 30 days. Failure to provide sufficient evidence can lead to the dismissal of your case.



Legal Defenses: Be aware of the "bare metal" defense, which allows defendants to argue they aren't liable for asbestos replacement materials they didn't manufacture, distribute, or sell.



Compensation Limitations: Plaintiffs found 50% or more at fault for their injury cannot collect damages, making it essential to build a strong case with legal expertise.




Navigating these legal waters can be complex, but an experienced mesothelioma attorney can guide you through each step, ensuring your claim is filed correctly and exploring any potential legal exceptions that may apply to your case.



What is the Average Mesothelioma Settlement and Verdict in Chattanooga, TN?



In Chattanooga, TN, those impacted by mesothelioma often seek financial compensation for their suffering and related expenses. Generally, settlements in these cases range between $1 million and $2 million. These figures represent negotiations between the parties involved before a case goes to trial.



When cases proceed to court, the compensation awarded by a jury can be considerably higher. Mesothelioma verdicts in Chattanooga, TN, frequently average between $5 million and $11.4 million. This substantial difference typically reflects the jury's assessment of the severity of the claimant's condition and other associated factors.



Understanding these financial prospects can help affected individuals make informed decisions as they navigate their legal options.



How a Chattanooga Mesothelioma Lawyer Can Help



If you want to seek compensation for asbestos exposure and illness, you need excellent legal representation. Top Chattanooga attorneys with asbestos experience can sort through your complicated case and get you the best outcome.



Local mesothelioma attorneys are invaluable because they bring a deep understanding of the Chattanooga, TN legal landscape. Their familiarity with local judges and jury pools can provide you with a strategic advantage in court. Additionally, their knowledge of the numerous at-risk occupations known for asbestos exposure across Chattanooga, TN allows them to build a compelling case with detailed evidence tailored to your specific situation.




Free Initial Consultations: Asbestos law firms offer free consultations to assess your case. They will evaluate your information to determine the viability of your claim.



Comprehensive Case Building: If your case is viable, your attorney will leverage extensive resources to gather evidence demonstrating that companies negligently exposed you to asbestos.



Efficient Legal Process: Being locally licensed, Chattanooga, TN-based law firms can handle your case swiftly, navigating the state's legal system with ease.




Your asbestos attorney will file a lawsuit or claim on your behalf, negotiate a settlement, or take your case to court if necessary. Most importantly, the right lawyer will maximize your compensation for mesothelioma, ensuring that you receive the justice and financial support you deserve.



What Advantages Do Nationwide Asbestos Law Firms Offer?



Nationwide asbestos law firms come with a unique set of benefits that can be pivotal in securing the compensation you deserve. Here’s why you might consider turning to such firms:



1. Extensive Experience and Expertise:These firms boast a deep well of experience in litigating against large corporations. With numerous cases under their belts, they understand the complexities of asbestos-related claims and can navigate the legal system effectively.



2. Comprehensive Resources:Access to vast databases and specialized resources enables nationwide firms to build robust cases. They can tap into historical data, identify responsible parties, and uncover the necessary evidence to support your claim.



3. Proven Track Record:Nationwide law firms often have a proven record of holding corporations accountable. This reputation can be advantageous when negotiating settlements or presenting your case in court.



4. Broad Network Access:With their reach across the country, these firms can utilize a strong network of experts, from medical professionals to industry specialists, ensuring that your case is supported by authoritative testimony.



5. Financial Strength:Larger firms typically have the financial resources to cover upfront costs, such as filing fees and expert witnesses, allowing you to focus on recovery without worrying about immediate expenses.



By choosing a nationwide asbestos law firm, you leverage their scale, experience, and resources, which can significantly enhance your chances of a favorable outcome.



What is the Statute of Limitations for Mesothelioma Lawsuits in Tennessee?



In Tennessee, the statute of limitations for filing a mesothelioma-related lawsuit depends on the nature of the claim:




Personal Injury Claims: If you or someone you know is diagnosed with mesothelioma, you have 1 year from the date of diagnosis to file a lawsuit seeking compensation for personal injuries.



Wrongful Death Claims: In the unfortunate event of losing a loved one to mesothelioma, you must file a wrongful death lawsuit within 1 year from the date of their passing.




These timeframes are critical, so it's important to act promptly to ensure your legal rights are protected. Consulting with a legal expert can help guide you through the process.



Understanding the Impact of Fault on Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Claims in Chattanooga, TN



In Chattanooga, TN, the allocation of fault plays a crucial role in determining the outcome of personal injury and wrongful death claims. Here's how it works:




Comparative Fault Rule: Chattanooga, TN follows a modified comparative fault system. If you're pursuing a claim, your ability to recover damages depends significantly on your percentage of fault in the incident.



Threshold for Recovery: If you're found to be 50% or more at fault for the injury or death in question, you're ineligible to receive any compensation. This rule is designed to hold individuals accountable for their level of responsibility in an incident.



Impact on Compensation: If you're found to be less than 50% at fault, you can still recover damages, but the compensation will be reduced by your fault percentage. For example, if you're deemed 20% responsible, your awarded damages will be diminished by that percentage.




This legal framework encourages plaintiffs to critically assess their role in the incident before proceeding with legal action. Evaluating the distribution of fault can be complex, often requiring expert legal analysis to navigate effectively.



Notable Tennessee Settlements and Verdicts in Asbestos Cases



Tennessee has seen several significant legal outcomes related to asbestos exposure, reflecting both the monetary and personal impacts of this issue. Here are some key examples:




$34 Million Settlement: A mechanic in Kodak received $34 million, representing one of the state's largest asbestos-related awards.



$6.5 Million Verdict: In Clarksville, an auto mechanic was awarded $6.5 million, highlighting the occupational risks faced by those in the automotive repair industry.



$5 Million Award: A stagehand and carpenter from Brentwood secured a $5 million settlement, emphasizing the widespread nature of asbestos exposure across various trades.



$1.4 Million Judgement: In a landmark 2009 case, a Hamilton County jury awarded $1.4 million to Marian Jackson after determining her husband's mesothelioma resulted from asbestos exposure during his career as a pipefitter. This case threw a spotlight on the dangers posed by asbestos in industrial settings.




Another significant case involved Joyce and Ronnie Stockton in 2015. They filed a lawsuit claiming Joyce developed mesothelioma after contact with her husband's contaminated work clothes. Ronnie had been exposed to asbestos products while working as an auto mechanic. Initially, they were awarded $4.6 million. However, a Tennessee appeals court later overturned this verdict, remanding the case to a lower court due to procedural oversights regarding the jury's findings on product safety.



These cases demonstrate not only the substantial awards that can result from asbestos litigation but also the complexities and challenges of navigating the legal process. Working with experienced asbestos attorneys often proves crucial in these intricate situations.



What is the "Bare Metal" Defense in Chattanooga, TN Asbestos Lawsuits?



In Chattanooga, TN asbestos lawsuits, the "bare metal" defense is a legal strategy employed by certain defendants. This defense enables them to argue that they should not be held accountable for any asbestos-containing materials that they neither manufactured, distributed, nor sold. Essentially, the doctrine protects companies from liability related to products they did not supply directly.



The core idea is to shield businesses from legal responsibility for harm caused by asbestos products that were added or replaced by third parties, without the company's direct involvement. Consequently, if a company's product was initially free of asbestos and later modified by someone else to contain this hazardous material, this defense might be used to argue that the company should not be liable for resulting damages.



This legal principle is significant in Tennessee's courtrooms, particularly in complex product liability cases, as it can significantly impact the outcome of asbestos litigation. By emphasizing the origin and supply chain of the asbestos materials in question, defendants can challenge claims more effectively.



Overall, the "bare metal" defense reflects the nuances of product liability law and the importance of clear product lineage in legal battles over asbestos exposure.



Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Chattanooga, Tennessee? 



Several industries in and around Chattanooga used asbestos and put workers at risk of exposure. These are just a few examples of where you could have been exposed. 



Allied Metal Company







This industrial company has several facilities nationwide, including the Chattanooga branch on 3440 Lightfoot Mill Road. 



Allied Metal Company smelts aluminum and zinc, supplying materials for appliances, automobiles, electronics, hardware, household products, and more.



Allied used asbestos for decades. Fire and high heat are always a concern at aluminum facilities. Asbestos resists heat and fire and has long been used as an insulator for fire protection. 



In addition to the machinery used for smelting, asbestos was used in many company-made products. This asbestos put both workers and people who used the products made by Allied at risk of later health problems. 



R.L. Stowe Mill Yard



Many textile mills once used asbestos. The abandoned R.S. Stowe textile mill in Lupton City still poses a risk for nearby residents because of this past use. The site once manufactured thread and employed many people. While it previously helped build the population of the area, it is now a dangerous eyesore. 



The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency confirmed asbestos on the site. The mayor of Chattanooga pledged $1.5 million to clean up the area, but after two years, the effort has been slow. 



Several issues have held up the process, including discovering an elevator shaft with a significant amount of asbestos. In early 2020, the city put the project on hold, citing high costs and the complicated nature of the cleanup. 



Combustion Engineering



Combustion Engineering acquired two companies that made boilers in Chattanooga in 1925. Boilers at that time, and for decades to come, were made with asbestos insulation. The company also made other products with asbestos, including insulation and asbestos cement. 



The Combustion Engineering facilities in Chattanooga exposed many workers to harmful asbestos. One of the victims was Ray Albright, a Tennessee State Senator until 1994. In 2016, Albright spoke out about his diagnosis of mesothelioma. He died in 2017. 



Albright worked at Combustion Engineering beginning in 1953. He spent nearly two decades cutting boiler covers and remembered the asbestos dust it produced. Albright and many other former workers sued Combustion Engineering for failing to protect them from the dangers of asbestos. 



Other Job Sites Associated with Asbestos Use in Chattanooga



Several older buildings and workplaces in Chattanooga have had or currently have issues with asbestos:



Schools




East Ridge High School



McBrien Elementary School



Mccallie High School



Westview Elementary School




Manufacturing Companies




Gager Lime and Manufacturing Company



Invista Nylon Plant




Hospitals




Erlanger Health System



Hamilton County Memorial Hospital




Additional Job Sites




Chattanooga and Tennessee Electric Power Company



Breeding Insulation Company Inc.



Sewanee Coal & Supply Company



Crystal Springs Bleachery Company



E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Company



Eclipse Lookout Boiler Company



Southern Wood Preserving Company



Standard Coosa Thatcher Company



James Supply and Hardware Company



Tennessee Valley Authority



Tennessee Paper Mills Inc




Residents in Chattanooga Still at Risk of Asbestos Exposure







Asbestos exposure was much more common in the past, but people are still at risk. Asbestos lingers in older buildings and can cause harm when it deteriorates or is mishandled. 



In 2012, a Hamilton judge found three Chattanooga residents guilty of purposely polluting the environment with asbestos. The residents didn’t take the proper precautions while working on a demolition project.



David Wood, James Mathis, and Don Fillers violated federal and state laws when their company was hired to demolish a former textile mill, Standard-Coosa Thatcher Plant. The plant was littered with asbestos. 



Wood, Mathis, and Fillers hired several homeless men to help on the project, none of whom were trained and qualified to work around asbestos.



Not only was the community in danger of asbestos exposure, but they also put the workers in direct danger.



All three men were sentenced to prison for violating the Clean Air Act. They also must pay several fines to the city and face civil lawsuits should anyone develop asbestos-related illnesses.



How Chattanooga, TN Controls Asbestos Exposure



Chattanooga, TN employs a strategic combination of state laws and federal guidelines to effectively manage asbestos exposure risks among its residents.



State and Federal Collaboration



The state’s regulations closely align with federal standards set by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants. This integration ensures comprehensive oversight and enforcement.



Key Aspects of Tennessee Asbestos Laws




Personal Injury and Litigation: The legal framework, through statutes like Tennessee Code 28-3-104(a)(1), dictates time limits for filing personal injury and wrongful death claims related to asbestos exposure.



Negligence and Liability: Tennessee utilizes a modified comparative negligence rule specified in certain state codes, detailing how fault is determined in asbestos-related cases.



Damage Caps: Tennessee places limits on non-economic damages, such as emotional distress, with a cap of $750,000. This regulation is detailed under Tennessee Code Annotated Section 29-39-102.



Professional Accreditation: To manage asbestos safely, the state mandates training and accreditation for professionals involved. Chapter 1200-01-20 outlines the requirements for certifying training providers, courses, and asbestos specialists.




Regulatory Bodies and Enforcement



The Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation is the primary body managing asbestos regulations, specifically through its Air Pollution Control Division, which is responsible for overseeing permits linked to demolition and renovation projects involving asbestos.



In workplaces, the Tennessee Department of Labor & Workforce Development Division of Occupational Safety and Health enforces measures to protect employees from asbestos exposure. By upholding these standards, Tennessee ensures a multi-layered approach to safeguarding public health against asbestos risks.



Mesothelioma Treatment in Chattanooga



It’s important to find mesothelioma treatment from doctors and centers specializing in asbestos diseases, preferably a center backed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI). 



Although there are no NCI-designated cancer centers in Chattanooga, nearby options include:




Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center:691 Preston Research BuildingNashville, Tennessee, 37232615-936-8422



Winship Cancer Institute:1365C Clifton RoadAtlanta, Georgia, 30332404-778-1900




His meticulous attention to detail and expertise ensured our case was handled swiftly and efficiently. What truly impressed us was Paul's responsiveness—he was always quick to reply and kept us well-informed throughout.- Patrick M



Getting Legal Help in Chattanooga



Remember, if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on experienced asbestos lawyers in your area. If you need additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Richmond Mesothelioma Lawyer

Contact an experienced Richmond mesothelioma lawyer to learn about your legal options if you received a mesothelioma diagnosis. Richmond is the capital of Virginia and home to the first factories to use cigarette-rolling machines. The city had several workplaces that used asbestos and exposed workers for decades. 



If you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial. There is currently over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, awaiting victims of asbestos diseases and their loved ones. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in Richmond, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 





Richmond, Virginia, Asbestos Facts




The Richmond area experienced nearly 70 deaths from asbestos-related illnesses between 1999 and 2017. 



Cigarette factories in Richmond used asbestos throughout their facilities and exposed workers. 



The Richmond Public Schools continue to struggle with asbestos in older buildings. 




Asbestos Exposure and Mesothelioma



Asbestos exposure causes mesothelioma, a rare cancer that is aggressive and deadly. Asbestos is a natural material that sheds fibers that can easily be inhaled or ingested without protective equipment. 



When inhaled or ingested, asbestos fibers cause inflammation and damage to tissue and cells. Some people will develop cancer or other illnesses decades later because of the damage caused by asbestos fibers. In most people, by the time symptoms of mesothelioma appear, the disease has progressed to later stages. 



Mesothelioma most often affects the tissue around the lungs. This type, known as pleural mesothelioma, causes symptoms such as difficulty breathing, coughing, and chest pains. 



A less common form, peritoneal mesothelioma, results from ingested fibers and affects the abdomen. Asbestos exposure can also cause lung cancer and a non-malignant disease called asbestosis. 



Should I Talk to a Richmond Mesothelioma Lawyer? 







In Richmond, as in many other places in the U.S., the leading cause of mesothelioma is negligent workplace asbestos exposure. If you have mesothelioma, you have a legal right to take action against the asbestos companies responsible. 



You need a top Richmond mesothelioma lawyer to help you take legal action and have a good chance of getting the compensation you deserve.



Get a Free Legal Consultation Today



Mesothelioma is aggressive, and your time to take action is limited. Don't hesitate to reach out to a Richmond area asbestos attorney. Reputable asbestos law firms offer free initial consultations. 



During this meeting, they will review your situation and determine if you have a case to seek compensation. There is no cost and no obligation to hire the firm. 



Filing a Mesothelioma Lawsuit or Claim in Richmond



If a lawyer thinks you have a case against asbestos companies, they will explain your legal options. Your options could include one or more of the following: 




Mesothelioma Personal Injury Lawsuit. Mesothelioma is often considered a personal injury because it is caused by negligent asbestos exposure. You can sue the asbestos companies to seek a settlement or jury verdict and award. 



Mesothelioma Wrongful Death Lawsuit. You can also sue asbestos companies for the wrongful death of a loved one. 



Asbestos Trust Fund Claim. Many asbestos companies filed for bankruptcy after facing so many lawsuits. These companies set up trust funds to compensate future claimants. You might qualify for one of these. 



VA Benefits Claim. Veterans have high rates of asbestos illnesses. If you encountered asbestos during military service, you could qualify for VA benefits. 




Understanding the Statute of Limitations for Mesothelioma Claims in Virginia



In Virginia, the statute of limitations is a legal timeframe within which individuals must initiate a mesothelioma claim. This timeframe is critical as it determines how long patients or their families have to seek compensation after a diagnosis or death related to mesothelioma.



Key Points About Filing Deadlines:




Personal Injury Claims: If you are diagnosed with mesothelioma, Virginia law typically allows two years from the date of diagnosis to file a personal injury claim.



Wrongful Death Claims: If a loved one has passed away due to mesothelioma, the family generally has two years from the date of death to file a wrongful death claim.




Why Timing Matters



These legal deadlines underscore the importance of acting promptly. Missing these timeframes can result in losing the chance to hold responsible parties accountable for asbestos exposure. Therefore, it's crucial for affected individuals or families to seek legal guidance as quickly as possible after a diagnosis or the loss of a loved one.



Consulting with experienced asbestos attorneys can help ensure that your case is filed within the appropriate timeframe, maximizing the potential for a successful outcome.



Factors to Consider When Choosing a Mesothelioma Lawyer in Richmond



Finding the right mesothelioma lawyer is crucial for ensuring you receive the best representation and potential compensation. Here’s a guide on what factors to consider during your search:



Extensive Experience



Look for attorneys with a long history in asbestos litigation. Lawyers with decades of experience are often better equipped to handle the intricacies of such cases. Their years in practice can provide insights and strategies that newer firms might lack.



Proven Success



A track record of winning significant settlements or verdicts is essential. Evaluate their history by checking how much compensation they’ve secured for their clients in the past. This will give you confidence in their ability to handle your case effectively.



Client-Centric Fee Structure



Financial stress can be a burden, especially when dealing with medical issues. Opt for firms that operate on a contingency fee basis. This means they only get paid if they win your case, which can alleviate upfront financial worries and align their success with yours.



Personalized Attention



A good lawyer should offer personalized attention, understanding that each case is unique. Ensure that the legal team is willing to listen to your concerns and provides a tailored approach that best suits your situation.



Local Understanding



While not strictly necessary, choosing a lawyer familiar with Richmond and its local courts can be advantageous. They may have established relationships with local judges and an understanding of the nuances specific to the area.



Testimonials and Reviews



Don’t forget to read reviews and testimonials from previous clients. Positive feedback can give you insights into the attorney’s mannerisms and reliability. It’s essential to choose someone whom past clients describe as supportive and communicative.



By considering these factors, you can make an informed decision and select a mesothelioma lawyer who’s well-equipped to fight for your rights and secure the compensation you deserve.



Why Should You File an Asbestos Claim in Richmond?



Filing an asbestos claim in Richmond can be a vital step for those affected by asbestos-related illnesses. Here’s why it matters:




Financial Relief for Medical CostsTreatment for illnesses caused by asbestos exposure, such as mesothelioma, can be incredibly costly. Compensation from a claim can cover medical bills, from surgeries to ongoing treatments, easing the financial burden on you and your family.



Ensuring Long-Term SecurityBeyond immediate medical expenses, securing compensation can provide financial stability for your family’s future. This is especially crucial if your illness has affected your ability to work.



Holding Companies AccountableMany companies that manufactured asbestos products were well aware of the health risks involved but chose to prioritize profit over people. By filing a claim, you're taking a stand against their negligence, ensuring they answer for their actions.



Accessing Experienced Legal SupportNavigating the legal system can be daunting, but filing a claim means you have expert legal support on your side. Experienced asbestos lawyers can guide you through the process, increasing the likelihood of a successful outcome.



Protecting OthersYour claim can raise public awareness and contribute to regulations that prevent future asbestos exposure, helping to safeguard others from the same fate.




Taking legal action isn't just about compensation; it's about justice and responsibility. To embark on this journey, consider reaching out to a legal expert who specializes in asbestos claims. They can offer the advice and support needed to secure your due compensation.



How Much Does It Cost to Hire a Richmond Mesothelioma Lawyer?



Hiring a mesothelioma lawyer in Richmond doesn't have to be a financial burden. When you choose lawyers from established firms, you won't face any hourly fees or upfront costs. What's more, they operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning they'll only receive payment if your case is successful and you receive compensation.



This client-friendly approach ensures that legal expenses won't be a barrier in pursuing justice and securing the compensation you deserve. You can focus on your case without worrying about immediate legal costs.



Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Richmond, VA? 



Richmond, Virginia, is home to many workplaces and industries that used asbestos in past years. If you have mesothelioma now, you were probably exposed to asbestos at a Richmond job site decades ago. 



Tobacco and Asbestos







Philip Morris and other tobacco companies helped Richmond recover from the effects of the Great Depression with jobs in cigarette factories. 



After World War II, Richmond’s economy continued to expand. Cigarette production reached a local peak of 110 billion a year in 1952. 



Industrial factories, including those that made cigarettes, used asbestos in many components. Machinery, equipment, protective gear, and insulation contained asbestos and put factory workers at risk. 



Other Richmond Industries That Used Asbestos



Cigarette production was just one of Richmond's important industries that used asbestos. The city was home to factories that made weapons for the war effort. 



Energy companies also grew as the city developed, and these also used asbestos. 



As the population of Richmond expanded, construction increased. Both public and private buildings constructed post-war used asbestos in insulation, tiles, siding, roofing materials, wallboard, and much more. 



Workers in these industries were put at risk of asbestos exposure, as were residents. Many of the older buildings in Richmond still contain asbestos and pose risks to many. 



Richmond Job Sites with Known Asbestos 



Since asbestos materials were used in Richmond for many years, there are still job sites in the area where asbestos exposure occurred. Some of these job sites include:




Albemarle Paper Company



American Cigar Company



British American Tobacco



Federal Reserve Bank



Tredegar Iron Works



Caraustar-Richmond Paperboard Corporation



Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company



Harris Electric Company



Richmond Greyhound Bus Terminal



Richmond International Airport



Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad



U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company (formerly U.S. Tobacco Company)




Sites in Richmond Linked to Asbestos Exposure



Despite regulations, asbestos exposure remains a concern in certain places within the Richmond area. Over time, several industrial and commercial sites have been associated with this hazardous material. Here’s a closer look at some of these notable locations:



Key Industrial Sites



Richmond's industrial history includes various facilities where asbestos was prevalent. These are some of the significant locations:




Paper and Metal Industries: Facilities like paper mills and metal works, such as those operated by historical paper companies and iron works, were common asbestos sites.



Chemical and Power Plants: Chemical corporations and power stations in the area were also linked to the use of asbestos due to its heat-resistant properties.




Commercial and Educational Facilities




Tobacco and Printing Plants: Significant players in the Richmond economy, these factories historically used asbestos for machinery insulation and building materials.



Hospitals and Universities: Educational institutions and medical centers are not exempt. Old buildings, particularly those constructed before the mid-1980s, often used asbestos in their structure.




Additional Locations




Railway and Transportation Facilities: Asbestos was often used in transportation sectors, including railway companies for its insulating properties.



Community Centers and Rehabilitation Centers: Some public and community buildings from earlier decades may still contain legacy asbestos materials.




Please keep in mind, this list reflects past associations and does not necessarily indicate current conditions. Let this guide raise awareness about the types of sites historically linked with asbestos in Richmond.



Ongoing Asbestos Risk in Richmond Public Schools







Asbestos was much more of a risk to public health in the past, but it still lingers in older buildings. This asbestos can deteriorate or be disturbed during repairs and renovations, contributing to an ongoing risk. 



Some of those older buildings with asbestos belong to the Richmond Public Schools. The district is struggling to keep up with deteriorating older buildings, and it's putting staff and students at risk of asbestos exposure. 



Most recently, the district began construction on a new George Mason Elementary School on the site of the original school. The plans came to a halt, though, as the city realized that demolishing the old building posed many risks due to asbestos. 



National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers in Virginia




Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, 401 College Street, Richmond, VA 23298, (804) 828-0450



UVA Cancer Center, University of Virginia, 6171 West Complex, Charlottesville, VA 22908, (434) 924-5022




Paul at Mesothelioma Lawyer Center provided outstanding support when my family faced a mesothelioma diagnosis. From the start, his professionalism and genuine care were evident. Paul explained every step of the legal process with patience and empathy.- Patrick M.



Getting Legal Help



Remember, if you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, there is a good chance you may qualify for significant compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Fresno Mesothelioma Lawyer

Experienced Fresno mesothelioma lawyers help victims of asbestos exposure fight for justice. The city of Fresno has a long history of industrialized asbestos, and Fresno County is also the site of naturally-occurring asbestos deposits and mines. Both have contributed to harmful exposure in workers and residents.



Currently, over $30 billion is available in trust funds for asbestos victims. If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for a substantial amount of compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about top Fresno asbestos lawyers, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 



To promptly connect with experienced legal professionals, you can reach out via live chat, telephone, or by completing the contact form provided. Our network of seasoned Fresno mesothelioma lawyers is ready to assist you at any time, ensuring that your case gets the attention it deserves.



Here's how we can help:




24/7 Availability: Our team is accessible around the clock, guaranteeing support whenever you need it.



Expert Guidance: Gain access to top legal advice tailored to your specific situation, helping navigate the complexities of asbestos-related claims.



Comprehensive Resources: Benefit from detailed instructions on filing trust fund claims and securing financial compensation swiftly.




By taking these steps, you can ensure you receive the necessary legal assistance and maximize your compensation potential.





Facts about Asbestos in Fresno








California has seen many asbestos-related deaths over the years, including more than 27,000 between 1999 and 2017.



In that period, Fresno County had more than 580 deaths related to asbestos exposure.



The area around Fresno includes natural deposits of asbestos.



Some of these sites were mined and may still contribute to exposure.




Why Do I Need a Fresno Mesothelioma Lawyer? 



If you have been diagnosed with an asbestos illness, you need a lawyer. Top-rated California lawyers who serve the Fresno area and have experience with mesothelioma cases can help you seek compensation. 







Mesothelioma is a devastating and expensive illness. You're facing medical bills, loss of earning capacity, and personal care costs. Mesothelioma is almost always caused by negligent workplace asbestos exposure, which means you can hold companies liable for your resulting expenses. 



A lawyer with asbestos experience, a local presence, and nationwide reach is the best choice to guide your next steps. They can help you file a lawsuit to seek a settlement, make a claim with an asbestos trust fund, or claim VA benefits if you are a veteran. 



Benefits of Legal Action in Mesothelioma Cases



Taking legal action can lead to significant financial compensation, which can alleviate the burden of medical expenses and lost income. Experienced lawyers in the Fresno area have a strong track record of securing settlements and verdicts for their clients, including those who have been exposed to asbestos in various industries. These industries often include:




Manufacturing Plants



Food-Processing Plants



Retail Locations



Electric Companies



Construction Sites




Furthermore, legal action can benefit not only those directly exposed to asbestos but also families impacted by 'take-home' asbestos. This occurs when workers inadvertently bring asbestos fibers home on their clothing, affecting their loved ones. Lawyers skilled in these specific cases can effectively represent both direct victims and their families.



Over the decades, successful legal cases have resulted in billions of dollars in compensation for victims throughout California, showcasing the potential for substantial financial recovery. This history of success underscores the importance of choosing a lawyer with a strong record in asbestos-related cases.



By pursuing legal action, you not only seek justice for yourself but also contribute to a broader effort to hold negligent companies accountable and prevent future asbestos exposure in the workplace.



Handling of Mesothelioma Lawsuits in Fresno County



In Fresno County, mesothelioma lawsuits are processed through the county's civil court system, a structure that ensures these cases receive the attention and expedited processes they require. These lawsuits fall under complex litigation, highlighting their specialized nature and need for detailed judicial oversight.



Location and Process




Court Location: The primary venue for such legal proceedings is the Fresno County Superior Court, found at 1100 Van Ness Avenue in Fresno, CA.



Expedited Scheduling: Given the serious nature of mesothelioma cases, plaintiffs often receive priority status on the court’s trial calendars. This status allows for a quicker journey to trial and potential resolution compared to typical civil cases.




Why Priority Matters



The prioritization is crucial in mesothelioma cases due to the severe health implications for the individuals involved. Swift legal proceedings aim to deliver timely justice and, when applicable, compensation.



This structured court process exemplifies the county’s dedication to handling these sensitive cases with the urgency and care they deserve.



Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Fresno? 



If you lived or worked in Fresno and now have mesothelioma, you likely encountered asbestos in the area. One of the first things an asbestos attorney will do to help you is track down where and when you were exposed to asbestos. 



Most exposure occurs in the workplace. Some jobs carry a greater risk of asbestos exposure than others. Some of the common types of companies that put workers at risk in Fresno and elsewhere include: 




Manufacturing plants



Construction sites



Automotive repair shops



Power plants



Oil refineries



Steel mills



Industrial plants



Processing plants




Men and women who served in the military also had a high risk of asbestos exposure. 



How Has Asbestos Been Used in Fresno?



Fresno was founded in 1872 by the Central Pacific Railroad. The city grew around a core formed by the railroad station and several stores as settlers from other parts of the country moved into the area. 







In 1874, voters moved the county seat to Fresno, which became an incorporated city in 1885.



After several devastating 19th-century fires, new construction included more durable materials, like brick and cement.



 Locally-available asbestos was added to these construction materials to make them more resistant to fire and heat.



By the beginning of the 20th Century, Fresno had many of the amenities of a modernized and growing American city. 



The influx of new residents, which included immigrants from Armenia, Germany, Italy, Japan, and Scandinavia, required the construction of new homes, businesses, and power plants.



After World War II, Fresno experienced another boom in population due to strong economic growth in the late 1940s and early 1950s.



Fresno’s transition from a frontier town to California’s largest inland city occurred during heavy asbestos use. 



For nearly a century, construction companies, power plants, and various transportation-related enterprises used asbestos and asbestos-containing materials (ACMs).



Most of the houses, apartment buildings, commercial centers, and industrial facilities built between 1930 and 1979 either have or had many parts made from asbestos.



Fresno County Asbestos Mines and Superfund Sites



Fresno is in an area rich with naturally-occurring asbestos deposits (NOAs). According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), two abandoned mines in Fresno County, the Atlas, and Coalinga Asbestos Mines,  have met the requirements for Superfund sites.







The Atlas Asbestos Mine operated from 1963 to 1979 on a large site near Coalinga, California, around 62 miles from Fresno. 



Large amounts of extracted asbestos minerals and processed ACMs passed through Coalinga and were distributed throughout Fresno County. The site is still listed as a Superfund site, and the EPA continues to monitor it.



The separate Coalinga Asbestos Mine occupied 107 acres and was used as an asbestos milling, processing, storage, and distribution center. 



The Coalinga area was also used as a dumping ground for asbestos-contaminated pipes and mining waste by the owners of the Atlas Asbestos Mine and the U.S. Asbestos Company. 



The EPA declared both areas Superfund cleanup sites. They were removed from the list in 1998.



Other Fresno Job Sites and Businesses Associated with Asbestos



Fresno’s origins as a railroad town and the use of asbestos in various industries create a legacy of active and abandoned job sites known to contain dangerous asbestos materials.



Schools, Public Buildings, and Hospitals




California State University



Fresno City College



USCF Fresno



Glen Agnes Senior Housing



Saint Agnes Hospital



Fresno Youth Center



Fresno Convention Center



Fresno County Courthouse



Fresno County General Hospital



Fresno State Hospital




Plants and Power Companies




Pacific Gas and Electric Light Company



Warrick Electric Company



Anderson-Clayton Oil Plant



Fresno Gas & Electric Company




Additional Job Sites and Businesses




Plaskett Construction Company



E & J Gallo Winery



Fresno Distributing Company



Fresno Linen Service



Montgomery Ward



Red Star Industrial Service



R.L. O'Neil Construction



Robert Harper Construction



Sears & Roebuck



Best Fertilizer



California Associated Raisin Co.



California Wine Association



Cyclops Refrigerator



Guild Wineries



Gallo Winery



Del Monte Cannery



Cellulo Company



NAPA Auto Parts



Spreckles Sugar Company



Valley Nitrogen Producers, Inc. 




Understanding "Take-Home" Asbestos



What is "Take-Home" Asbestos?



"Take-home" asbestos refers to asbestos fibers that workers inadvertently carry home on their clothing, shoes, or hair after being exposed at their job sites. When workers handle materials containing asbestos, these tiny, often invisible fibers can attach to their work attire and personal effects.



Impact on Family Members




Secondhand Exposure: Family members, especially those who do the laundry or come into close contact with the worker, can inhale or ingest these asbestos fibers. This secondary exposure can occur in everyday tasks like washing work clothes or greeting loved ones at the door.



Health Risks: Just as with direct exposure, secondhand exposure to asbestos can lead to serious health complications. Family members can develop asbestos-related diseases, such as mesothelioma, a rare and aggressive form of cancer, even if they never stepped foot in an asbestos-rich environment themselves.



Legal Perspectives: Family members affected by take-home asbestos exposure may have grounds for legal action. Many have pursued lawsuits that resulted in compensation for medical treatments and suffering. This recognition in legal systems underscores the significant risk and impact of take-home asbestos.




In addressing take-home asbestos concerns, it's crucial for companies and workers to implement strict decontamination procedures. Regularly changing clothes before leaving the workplace and using protective gear can help minimize the risk of bringing asbestos fibers into the home.



Understanding the Prevalence of Mesothelioma Lawsuits in Fresno



Mesothelioma lawsuits are a significant concern in Fresno, largely due to the city's industrial history. Many residents have experienced asbestos exposure through various occupations, prompting numerous lawsuits.



Common Sites of Asbestos Exposure



Fresno's economy has historically relied on industries that frequently used asbestos-containing materials. Notable locations where exposure often occurred include:




Cellulo Company: Known for using asbestos in manufacturing processes.



Gallo Winery and Guild Wineries: Both have been identified as sites where workers may have encountered asbestos.



NAPA Auto Parts Distribution Center: Workers here have reported exposure, especially during the handling of automotive parts.



Southern California Edison: Employees throughout the county may have been exposed, given the nature of electrical installations and maintenance work.



Westlands Water District: Work in this district sometimes involved asbestos-laden materials.




Occupations at Risk



A variety of workers in Fresno have been at risk, spanning different industries. These include:




Construction Workers: Frequently exposed during demolitions and renovations.



Pipefitters: Often worked with insulation that contained asbestos.



Power Plant Mechanics: Exposed while maintaining and repairing equipment.



Delivery Drivers and Parts Managers: Encountered asbestos in parts and materials transported and handled.




Lawsuit Outcomes



Legal actions concerning asbestos exposure in Fresno cover a broad spectrum of work environments. These encompass manufacturing plants, food-processing facilities, retail outlets, electric companies, and numerous construction sites. The successful litigation of these cases highlights the widespread impact of asbestos on the community.



By understanding the history and common sites of asbestos exposure, individuals in Fresno can better prepare and protect themselves against the risks of mesothelioma.



This firm was extremely professional and responsive. If you have any meso questions, I’d highly recommend them-Michael L.



Mesothelioma and Cancer Treatment Near Fresno



Several medical facilities in the Fresno area offer cancer treatment and support services for those with mesothelioma or other asbestos-related diseases.



California Cancer Center



7257 N. Fresno StreetFresno, CA 93720Phone: (559) 447-4050



Cancer Care Associates



1791 E Fir Ave.Fresno, CA 93720Phone: (559) 326-1222



Saint Agnes Cancer Center



7130 N. Millbrook Ave.Fresno, CA 93720Phone: (559) 450-5500



Fresno Cancer Center



7887 N. Cedar Ave.Fresno, CA 93720Phone: (559) 437-1000



Legal Help in Fresno and Additional Information



Keep in mind that you may be eligible for compensation if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. 

### Aurora Mesothelioma Lawyer

Aurora mesothelioma lawyers are helping area residents seek justice for asbestos exposure. Although Aurora’s economy is less dependent on heavy industries than in the past, many people who worked and lived in the city worked with asbestos. Some got sick later. 



If you or someone you love have been a victim of mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to significant compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in Aurora, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 





Aurora Asbestos Facts




Illinois suffered  asbe12,067stos-related deaths between 1999 and 2017, and hundreds of those were in and around Aurora. 



Aurora's industrial past contributed to asbestos exposure in workers and residents. 



The Caterpillar plant has been a source of exposure for workers and their families.




How to Get Compensation for Mesothelioma in Aurora



If you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, you were the victim of negligent asbestos exposure. You are entitled to seek compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, and other associated costs. There are a few options for making a claim for compensation: 



Mesothelioma Personal Injury Lawsuit



Mesothelioma is considered a personal injury. You can sue the companies responsible for exposing you to asbestos. Most asbestos lawsuits end in settlements, which average between $1 million and $1.4 million. Some go to trial, where a jury may award monetary damages. 



Asbestos Trust Fund Claim



Many companies that used or supplied asbestos filed for bankruptcy after facing thousands of asbestos lawsuits. These companies were required to fund asbestos trusts for future claimants. If any of the companies responsible for your exosure went bankrupt, you can file a claim with the appropriate trust. 



Mesothelioma Wrongful Death Lawsuit



If your loved one died from an asbestos illness, you can file a wrongful death lawsuit to seek compensation. As with personal injury cases, these often result in a settlement for the victim's family. 



Veteran Benefits Claim



Veterans have high rates of mesothelioma because of how much asbestos the military used, especially in U.S. Navy ships. Veterans with mesothelioma qualify for disability compensation and other benefits. 



How to Choose an Aurora Mesothelioma Lawyer



You need legal representation to take any actions against the companies that exposed you to asbestos. Top-rated Illinois mesothelioma lawyers represent asbestos victims in Aurora and beyond. Look for these important factors when choosing the right lawyer: 








Experience working on and winning asbestos and mesothelioma cases



Free initial consultations to get all your questions answered



Clear guidance on all your legal options



A large law firm with expertise in asbestos and the ability to work across state lines



A contingency payment plan and no fees until you win




The right lawyer is essential to success in a mesothelioma case. These complicated lawsuits require investigations, resources, experts, and experience. 



A History of Industry and Asbestos in Aurora, Illinois 



Located in DuPage, Kane, Kendall, and Will counties, Aurora is south and west of Chicago. The industrialization of Aurora began in 1834 when settlers arrived and set up a sawmill. 



Aurora attracted manufacturing due to its ideal location on a river for water- and steam-powered facilities. Textile production was the city’s first major industry. Later, foundries, machine shops, and heavy industries moved into the area.







As in most of the Midwest, Aurora’s growth and development were spurred by the westward expansion of the nation’s railway system. In 1849, the Chicago, Quincy & Burlington Railroad extended its line there.



Aurora became the company’s main source for new railcars and the site of its principal repair facilities. The railroad became the city’s largest employer until the 1960s.



Aurora’s long history as a traditional manufacturing community helped the city grow and prosper. Nevertheless, the benefits that came to Aurora were offset by the effects of decades of heavy use of asbestos in the city's industries.



Starting when the McCarty brothers set up the area’s first sawmill, asbestos was introduced into nearly all of Aurora’s industrial job sites. Asbestos reduced the risk of fires caused by friction-related sparks in machinery, equipment, and construction materials.



Caterpillar Incorporated Plant 



Caterpillar designs its medium- and large-sized wheel loaders in Aurora. The company assembles medium wheel loaders (MWLs) in Aurora and five other Caterpillar facilities around the world; large wheel loaders (LWLs) are built exclusively by workers in Aurora.



In 2001, Caterpillar was still using asbestos in machinery and vehicle parts, susceptible to the effects of friction. The most common parts included brake pads, clutches, and gaskets. 



When brake pads and other parts made with ACMs wear out over time, asbestos particles get into the environment where equipment operators and other workers can be exposed.



In addition, workers at the Aurora plant’s assembly lines constantly handled asbestos-containing vehicle parts, placing themselves and their families at risk of developing asbestos-related diseases.



Caterpillar now uses asbestos substitutes in its manufactured goods, but ACMs are still present in older models of tractors, wheel loaders, and other items in its product line. 



Although the company’s asbestos-substitution efforts may reduce the number of mesothelioma cases in the future, thousands of Caterpillar’s older products still operate in job sites worldwide.



Aurora Pump Company



Today, Aurora Pump is a brand of Pentair products. In the past, it was an Aurora-based company that manufactured industrial pumps. Aurora pumps contained asbestos from the 1920s through 1985. 



The company used asbestos in gaskets and packing that went into the pumps. Workers in the plant who handled the materials were at the greatest risk of exposure. 



Also at risk of exposure to asbestos in Aurora pumps were workers in other industries that used them. This included workers on ships and members of the U.S. Navy. Workers who replaced or repaired Aurora pumps were most likely to disturb asbestos fibers and be harmed by exposure. 



Other Aurora Job Sites Where Asbestos Exposure Occurred



Many of Aurora's past and current workplaces used asbestos and put workers at risk of exposure: 




Alba Manufacturing Inc.



Aurora Paper Board Co.



Aurora Street Railway



Thor Power Tool Co.



St. Joseph Mercy Hospital



Fox River Light, Heat, and Power



C.E. Refractories



Western United Gas and Electric Company



Commonwealth Edison Company



St. Joseph Mercy Hospital



Copley Memorial Hospital



Aurora Paper Board Company



Independent Pneumatic Tool Company



Madonna High School



Walker Process Equipment



Western Wheeled Scraper Company



Consolidated Paper Company



Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.




These lawyers made us feel so much better about going through this terrible process. We had no idea where to begin and they helped get us all the compensation we possibly could. They were friendly understanding and very hard-working. They answered any questions we had about compensation and even medical advice-Natalie F.



Mesothelioma Treatment in Aurora



If you have been exposed to asbestos and diagnosed with mesothelioma or any other asbestos-related disease, several cancer treatment centers provide excellent medical care and other services in and around Aurora, including:



Edward Hospital Multi-Disciplinary Thoracic Oncology Clinic



Naperville Campus120 Spalding Drive, Suite 111Naperville, IL 60540Phone: (630) 527-3788



Cancer Treatment Centers of America



1336 Basswood RoadSchaumburg, IL 60173Phone: (800) 615-3055



Rush University Cancer Center



1725 W. Harrison St.Suite 774Chicago, IL 60612Phone: (312) 738-3732



The University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center



5841 S. Maryland AvenueChicago, IL 60637Phone: (888) 824-0200



Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center



Galter Pavilion675 North St. Clair, 21st FloorChicago, IL 60611Phone: (312) 695-0990



CTCA Midwestern Regional Medical Center



2520 Elisha AvenueZion, IL 60099Phone: (847) 872-4561



Legal Help and Additional Information



Remember, if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. For questions and assistance, feel free to contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Portland, Oregon, Mesothelioma Lawyer

Contact a qualified Portland, Oregon mesothelioma lawyer if you have an asbestos disease or encountered asbestos on the job. Historically, Portland relied on shipyards, lumber, and mineral processing, industries that once heavily used asbestos. 



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Portland, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.





Portland Asbestos Facts








Over 4,700 Oregon residents died from asbestos-related illnesses between 1999 and 2017. 



Multnomah County and Portland had the highest number of asbestos deaths in that period, with more than 700. 



Portland's shipping industry, oil, lumber, and pulp companies contributed to asbestos exposure in workers.



Portland was also home to two vermiculite facilities that processed asbestos-contaminated minerals from the Libby, Montana mines. 




Asbestos Exposure and Mesothelioma



Asbestos exposure causes mesothelioma, a deadly cancer that most often affects the tissue around the lungs. A less common form, peritoneal mesothelioma, develops in the abdomen. 



Most asbestos exposure occurs or occurred in workplaces and is considered negligent. Workers handling or even just working near asbestos inadvertently inhale tiny fibers shed from asbestos materials. 



Inside the body, asbestos fibers damage tissues and cells. This leads to inflammation and, in some people, illness. Asbestos illnesses are usually not diagnosed until decades after exposure. If you think you could have been exposed to asbestos, talk to your doctor immediately. 



When to Contact a Portland, Oregon, Mesothelioma Lawyer



Talk to a top Portland, OR, mesothelioma or asbestos attorney as soon as possible after receiving a mesothelioma diagnosis. Because asbestos exposure is negligent, you have a right to take legal action and seek compensation.



Filing an asbestos claim in Portland is crucial not only for your immediate needs but also for broader justice. Many companies knowingly hid the dangers of asbestos for decades. By filing a claim, you can hold these companies accountable for their negligence, ensuring that they answer for the harm caused.



Don’t hesitate to reach out to a local asbestos law firm. You have no time to lose with this aggressive cancer. There are also time limits on filing asbestos lawsuits and claims, so don’t wait and miss your opportunity.



Securing compensation can help cover medical expenses and provide financial stability for your family’s future. This is more than just a legal battle; it's about protecting your loved ones and making sure your voice is heard.



Understanding the Statute of Limitations for Mesothelioma Claims in Oregon



If you're considering filing a mesothelioma claim in Oregon, it's crucial to understand the statute of limitations. This legal term refers to the strict timeframe within which you must initiate your lawsuit.



In Oregon, the statute of limitations for asbestos-related claims, like mesothelioma, typically allows you to file within two years of the date of diagnosis. If you're filing on behalf of a deceased family member, the filing period is generally two years from the date of death.



Here's why acting quickly is essential:




Preserving Evidence: Mesothelioma cases rely heavily on documents and witness testimonies. The sooner you start, the better your chances of gathering robust evidence.



Legal Preparation: Building a solid case takes time. Early engagement with legal experts ensures there's ample time for preparation.



Avoiding Claim Dismissal: Missing the deadline could result in losing your right to file altogether.




Given these constraints, it's advisable to contact a legal professional who specializes in asbestos cases as soon as possible after diagnosis or a loved one's passing. Doing so ensures you are well within this critical time window.



The Benefit of Working With a Mesothelioma Lawyer



There are many good reasons to work with a mesothelioma lawyer if you have an asbestos illness:




Get a free expert consultation to learn more about your case and legal options.



Benefit from the expertise of someone who has handled and won asbestos cases.



Maximize the compensation you receive from asbestos companies.



Get compensation as soon as within 90 days.



Don’t pay any fees until they win for you.




When choosing a mesothelioma lawyer, consider these key factors to ensure you’re making the best decision:




Experience Matters: Look for a lawyer with decades of experience in asbestos litigation. This ensures they have the deep knowledge necessary to handle complex cases effectively.



Track Record of Success: A proven history of winning significant settlements or verdicts for clients is crucial. This track record not only demonstrates their capability but also builds your confidence in achieving a favorable outcome.



No Upfront Costs: Choose a lawyer who works on a contingency fee basis. This means you won’t have to pay any legal fees unless they secure compensation for you, making it a risk-free engagement.



Comprehensive Support: Opt for a legal team that offers full support throughout the legal process, allowing you to focus on your health and loved ones during this challenging time.




By considering these factors, you can ensure you're partnering with a legal professional who will effectively advocate for your rights and work tirelessly to secure the compensation you deserve.



Notable Mesothelioma Settlements in the Portland Area



If you're curious about past mesothelioma settlements in the Portland area, here are some examples that reflect the diverse circumstances and significant compensations awarded:




A manufacturing worker in Portland received a settlement of $3.76 million.



An asbestos abatement worker from Beaverton secured $3.79 million in compensation.



A welder in Lake Oswego was awarded $2.67 million.




Additional Settlements:




U.S. Navy Veteran in Salem: This individual with peritoneal mesothelioma obtained $2.68 million.



A cashier in Rainier with mesothelioma received $1.87 million.



A machinist based in Milwaukie reached a settlement of $2 million.



Nearly $1 million was awarded to a U.S. Navy veteran in Portland.



A telephone worker in Salem with pleural mesothelioma secured a settlement of $1.18 million.



A mechanic in Molalla was awarded $1.49 million.



A power company worker in Salem received $1.71 million.



A longshoreman from Colton with peritoneal mesothelioma achieved a settlement of $1.49 million.



A combined settlement of $1.35 million went to a U.S. Navy veteran and welder in Salem.




Please Note: Settlement amounts can vary significantly depending on various factors, including the individual's exposure history, age, and diagnosis. Past outcomes do not guarantee future results.



What Kind of Asbestos Claim Can I File in Portland? 



Your lawyer will explain your options, the types of claims you are eligible for, and the best choice for receiving compensation. You might qualify for one or more of the following sources of compensation: 




Mesothelioma Personal Injury Lawsuit. Mesothelioma is considered a personal injury. You can file a lawsuit against the asbestos companies that exposed you. Most of these lawsuits end in settlements. Only rarely do they go to trial, where your lawyer will seek a jury award. 



Mesothelioma Wrongful Death Lawsuit. Too often, a victim of mesothelioma passes away before they can resolve a personal injury lawsuit. Their families may choose to continue the legal action as a wrongful death lawsuit. 



Asbestos Trust Fund Claim. If asbestos companies went bankrupt, you cannot sue them for damages. Instead, you can make a claim with an asbestos trust fund. Many companies set up these trusts during bankruptcy, and they still contain nearly $30 billion for victims. 



VA Benefits Claim. If you are a veteran, you might have been exposed to asbestos during your service. You could be eligible for VA benefits, including monthly disability compensation. 




Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Portland? 



Asbestos exposure almost always occurs on the job. Several industries, including those important to Portland's economy, used asbestos in the past. These are just some examples of Portland workplaces that put workers at risk of exposure. 



Portland Shipyard







Established in 1942, the Portland Shipyard opened to contribute to the war effort. Workers built ships and repaired damaged vessels. Employees and contractors on the site experienced years of asbestos exposure. 



The following are among some of the many types of equipment, parts, and operations that contained asbestos at the Portland Shipyard:




Pipes



Pumps



Incinerators



Gaskets



Welding blankets



Valves



Turbines



Boilers




Many Portland residents developed asbestos-related illnesses after working at the Portland Shipyard. Some of the workers most likely to have been exposed to asbestos include: 




Vessel mechanics



Welders



Pipefitters



Insulators



Electricians



Plumbers




Vermiculite Processing in Portland



The Oregon Department of Human Services and the  Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) evaluated two vermiculite processing facilities in Portland and found issues with asbestos.



 Both received shipments of asbestos-contaminated vermiculite from the W.R. Grace mines in Libby, Montana: 




Vermiculite Northwest. Workers who processed vermiculite between 1967 and 1994 were likely exposed to asbestos. Other people who may have been exposed include family members of the workers and anyone who used or came into contact with the plant's waste rocks. 



Supreme Perlite. This plant processed vermiculite from 1968 to 1974. Some of the minerals came from Libby. Workers during that time period, and members of their households, were probably exposed to asbestos. The soil at the site was not remediated until 2001. Workers in the facility prior to that who did not process vermiculite may have been exposed. 




The vermiculite processed at these facilities went into products, mostly insulation, that were then shipped and used nationwide. 



Many more people were probably exposed to Libby asbestos than the workers in the processing plants. 



Other Job Sites with Asbestos in Portland



Many more workplaces, buildings, and companies in Portland used asbestos in the past. Some of these buildings remain in place and may still pose risks of exposure. 



Schools and Hospitals




Jefferson High School



Concordia College



John Adams High School



Lewis & Clark College



Marylhurst University



Mt. Hood Community College



University of Oregon



Portland State University



Oregon Health & Science University



Legacy Emanuel Medical Center



Legacy Good Samaritan Medical Center



Kaiser



Saint Vincent's Hospital



Woodland Park Hospital



Lincoln High School



Treadwell Nursing Home




Shipyards




Albina Shipyard



Dyer Shipyard



Swan Island Shipyard



Willamette Iron and Steel Shipyard




Chemical and Oil Companies




Chipman Chemical



Chevron Chemical Fertilizer Plant



Paramount Oil Refinery



Rhone-Poulenc Chemical Plant



Stauffer Chemical Plant



Shell Oil



Standard Oil



Union Oil Company



Klamath Chemical



Pennwalt Chemicals




Steel Companies




Oregon Steel Mills, Inc.



Columbia Steel Casting Company, Inc.



Electric Steel Foundry Company (ESCO)



Gilmore Steel Corporation




Construction Companies




American Pipe & Construction



Leonard Construction Company



Raderfab Construction




Apartments and Hotels




King Plaza Apartments



Raleigh Scholls Apartments



The Benson



Cosmopolitan Motor Hotel



Imperial Hotel



Multnomah Hotel




Additional Businesses and Buildings




Acme Trading & Supply Company



Armstrong Cork Company



Associated Meat and Kenton Meat Packing



Blitz Weinhard Brewery



Brooks Scanlon Lumber Company



Century Fund Incorporated



Crown Columbia Pulp and Paper Company



Crown Zellerbach Corporation



Doernbecher Manufacturing Company



Linde Air Products Company



Metalclad Insulation Corporation of Oregon



Mount Hood Railway and Power Company



Multnomah County Farm Power Station



Oregon Laundry and Dry Cleaners



Peninsula Lumber Company



Portland Power & Light



Simpson Logging Company



Troy Laundry Company



Union Carbide Corporation



Union Pacific Railroad



Therm-O-Seal Insulation Company



Spokane, Portland, and Seattle Railway Company




Mesothelioma Treatment in Portland, Oregon







The OHSU Knight Cancer Institute in Portland is a comprehensive cancer care center backed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) as one of the leading medical centers in the entire Northwest. 



The Knight Cancer Institute partners with several national, regional, and worldwide institutions, including the following:




M.D. Anderson Cancer Research Center



The University of California at Los Angeles



Salem Cancer Institute



Quality Healthcare



Mercy Medical Center



Bay Area Hospital




Knight Cancer Institute offers mesothelioma patients clinical trials, advanced treatment options, and state-of-the-art technology. 



Knight Cancer Institute Cancer Center 



3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park RoadPortland, Oregon 97239Cancer Institute: (503) 494-1617Health Care Services/OHSU Switchboard: (503) 494-8311



The Mesothelioma Lawyer Center made my husband and I feel much better about dealing with Meso. They made sure we received everything we could and they also made sure he saw the best medical attention possible. They arranged visits with doctors that they personally knew and recommended. We can't imagine dealing with this without Mesothelioma Lawyer Center.- Isabelle D.



Legal Help in Portland



If you've been injured by asbestos, you may qualify for considerable compensation. Get our free Financial Compensation Packet for information on the top mesothelioma and asbestos lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Memphis Mesothelioma Lawyer

A qualified Memphis mesothelioma lawyer can help if you have been injured by asbestos. Memphis is in the high-risk category for asbestos-related illnesses after many industries in the city used asbestos in products and equipment. 



If you or a loved one has mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Memphis, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.



Filing an asbestos claim in Memphis offers more than just financial relief. It provides a critical opportunity to secure compensation that can help manage overwhelming medical expenses and ensure your family's financial stability.



Many companies knowingly exposed individuals to asbestos, hiding the risks from the public for decades. By filing a claim, you not only seek justice for yourself but also hold these companies accountable for their negligence and the suffering they caused.



In addition to learning about local legal support, you'll understand the steps required to access asbestos trust funds, designed specifically to compensate victims like you. This dual approach of seeking justice and gaining financial support underscores the importance of taking action promptly.





Memphis Asbestos Facts








Memphis's industrial economy has led to significant use of asbestos materials and exposure risks for workers. 



Between 1999 and 2017, the city and surrounding Shelby County reported 349 deaths related to asbestos exposure. 








Asbestos Exposure and Mesothelioma



Mesothelioma is a rare cancer with one known cause: asbestos exposure. Mesothelioma affects the tissue that lines the chest and abdominal cavities. Pleural mesothelioma, which occurs in the chest, is more common than peritoneal mesothelioma, which forms in the abdomen. 



Most asbestos exposure occurs in the workplace. Asbestos materials shed tiny fibers that workers can inhale or ingest if not adequately protected. Once inside the body, asbestos fibers cause inflammation and damage that can lead to illnesses years later. 



Unfortunately, by the time symptoms of mesothelioma appear, and a diagnosis is made, it is usually advanced. If you have this terrible disease, a Memphis mesothelioma attorney can help. 



How Long Does It Take for Mesothelioma to Develop After Asbestos Exposure?



Mesothelioma, a rare and aggressive cancer primarily linked to asbestos exposure, has a notably long latency period. This means it doesn't manifest immediately after contact with asbestos fibers.




Latency Period: The development of mesothelioma can take anywhere from 10 to 50 years after initial exposure. This extensive gap is due to the time it takes for the asbestos fibers to cause enough cellular damage.



Factors Affecting Onset: Variability in the latency period can be influenced by several factors, including the duration and intensity of exposure, individual susceptibility, and genetic predispositions.




Understanding this prolonged timeline is crucial, as it often leads to delayed diagnosis, complicating treatment efforts. If you suspect past exposure, regular medical checks and consultations with healthcare professionals are advisable. Early detection can make a significant difference in managing the disease effectively.



Get a Free Legal Consultation for Mesothelioma



Get a Free Legal Consultation for Mesothelioma



Top-rated Memphis, TN, mesothelioma attorneys are available to help local residents and workers diagnosed with asbestos illnesses. They offer free initial consultations to review your work history and medical records. They can then determine if you have a case.



To start the process, simply fill out the form below. Once completed, our team will promptly reach out to you. This step ensures you receive the personalized guidance you need without any upfront costs.



By taking this simple action, you'll be connected with experienced legal professionals who are committed to fighting for the compensation you deserve. Don't wait—begin your journey to justice today.



Making a Mesothelioma Claim



If you do have a case to take legal action, an asbestos lawyer can explain your options and help you take the next steps:




Filing a Mesothelioma Personal Injury Lawsuit: Seek a settlement or jury award to cover medical expenses and ensure your family's financial future. Many lawsuits are settled out of court, offering a quicker resolution.



Filing a Wrongful Death Lawsuit: If you lost a loved one to an asbestos illness, this option allows you to pursue compensation for your family's loss and emotional suffering.



Making a Claim for Compensation with an Asbestos Trust Fund: With an estimated $30 billion set aside by asbestos companies, these trust funds are designed to compensate individuals who have developed asbestos-related diseases without requiring a court appearance.



Filing for Benefits from the VA: Veterans who have been diagnosed with mesothelioma can access medical and financial benefits through the VA. It's crucial to work with VA-accredited attorneys who can assist in preparing your claim to ensure you receive the benefits you are owed.




Pursuing financial compensation involves navigating a complex legal landscape. With a dedicated legal team by your side, including experienced attorneys, paralegals, and medical staff, you can receive the personalized care and attention needed to guide you through each step of the process.



How a Legal Team Strengthens Your Mesothelioma Lawsuit



Embarking on a mesothelioma lawsuit can be daunting, but a skilled legal team can make a significant difference in your journey. Here’s how:




Comprehensive Expertise: With a diverse team comprising senior partners, seasoned attorneys, paralegals, and even medical staff, you gain access to a wealth of knowledge and experience. This varied expertise ensures your case is handled with precision and care.



Thorough Investigation: Investigators play a critical role in gathering evidence and building a strong case. Their work is essential in uncovering crucial details that might otherwise be overlooked.



Personalized Attention: A dedicated legal team ensures that you receive the individualized attention necessary for your unique situation. This personalized care can help address your specific needs and concerns throughout the process.



Streamlined Process: With a team coordinating efforts behind the scenes, the legal process can proceed more smoothly. This coordination helps ensure all aspects of your case, from documentation to courtroom presentations, are meticulously managed.




Overall, having a legal team by your side not only strengthens your case but also alleviates the burden during a challenging time, allowing you to focus on your health and well-being.



What is the Contingency Fee Basis in Mesothelioma Legal Cases?



When you're considering hiring a lawyer for a mesothelioma case, it's essential to understand the payment structure known as a contingency fee basis. Here's a closer look at what this means:




No Upfront Costs: With a contingency fee arrangement, you are not required to pay any fees to the attorney upfront. This allows you to focus on your health and well-being without the stress of immediate legal bills.



Payment upon Success: Attorneys working on a contingency basis will only collect their fees if they successfully obtain a financial settlement or court award for you. In essence, they get paid a percentage of the compensation you receive.



Financial Motivation for Lawyers: Since lawyers earn their fee as a percentage of the award, they are financially motivated to achieve the best possible outcome for your case. Their compensation is directly tied to how well they represent you.



Risk Mitigation for Clients: Should the case not result in a favorable outcome, you generally won't owe any attorney fees. This arrangement significantly decreases your financial risk in pursuing legal action.




This payment structure is commonly used in personal injury cases, including those involving mesothelioma claims, and ensures that legal representation is accessible to those who might otherwise be unable to afford it.



What Qualifications Should You Look for in a Mesothelioma Lawyer?



When you're facing a mesothelioma diagnosis and considering legal representation, it's crucial to choose a lawyer who is both experienced and effective. Here are key qualifications to consider:




Extensive Experience in Asbestos Litigation: Look for lawyers with several decades of specialized experience in mesothelioma cases. Their long-standing involvement demonstrates a deep understanding of the complexities involved in asbestos-related claims.



Impressive Track Record of Success: An attorney's past successes can be telling. Prioritize lawyers who have secured substantial compensation for their clients. This can often be measured in the billions, reflecting their capability to win significant settlements and judgments.



Contingency Fee Structure: Ensure the lawyer offers a no-win, no-fee arrangement. This means they will only get paid if you do, eliminating any upfront financial risk for your family and aligning their interests with yours.



Strong Client Testimonials and Reviews: Feedback from previous clients can provide insight into the lawyer's professionalism, dedication, and the quality of service you can expect.



National Reach with Local Presence: While it's advantageous to have a lawyer familiar with the local legal landscape, they should also possess the ability to handle cases nationwide. This ensures they have the resources and reach to pursue claims in any jurisdiction.




By focusing on these qualifications, you can confidently choose a mesothelioma lawyer who will advocate effectively for your rights and secure the compensation you deserve.



Understanding the Statute of Limitations for Mesothelioma Claims in Tennessee



In Tennessee, the statute of limitations is a critical legal framework that dictates the time frame individuals with mesothelioma, as well as their families, have to initiate a legal claim. This period ensures that claims are made within a certain time after a diagnosis or death.



Key Points to Remember




Time Frame for Filing: Typically, mesothelioma patients have one year from the date of diagnosis to file a personal injury lawsuit. Similarly, if a loved one has passed away due to mesothelioma, the family usually has one year from the date of death to file a wrongful death lawsuit.



Importance of Timeliness: Prompt legal action is essential. Missing this window can mean losing the right to seek compensation.



Consulting Legal Experts: It's advisable to contact experienced asbestos lawyers familiar with Tennessee laws as soon as possible. They can offer guidance on how to proceed and ensure your claim is filed within the legal time limits.




Taking these steps ensures your claim is considered valid, allowing you and your family to pursue rightful compensation.



How Much Does It Cost to Hire a Mesothelioma Lawyer in Memphis?



When considering hiring a mesothelioma lawyer in Memphis, many individuals worry about the potential costs involved. However, you'll be relieved to know that most law firms adopt a no-win, no-fee approach. Here's what that means for you:




No Upfront Fees: Many reputable law firms do not charge hourly fees or require any out-of-pocket expenses. This structure ensures that anyone affected by mesothelioma can seek legal assistance without financial barriers.



Contingency-Based Payment: The legal team only receives payment if you receive compensation from your case. This arrangement aligns the interests of the client and the lawyer, as your success is their success.




This client-friendly payment approach allows those affected by mesothelioma to access expert legal representation without the burden of financial risk.



Understanding Mesothelioma Case Outcomes Through Past Settlements



Examining past settlements and verdicts offers insightful glimpses into the results of mesothelioma cases. These outcomes can provide potential claimants with an idea of what might be achieved, though it's important to remember that each case is unique.



Examples of Past Verdicts




$3.86 Million: Awarded to a former ammunition specialist based in Memphis, TN.



$3.17 Million: Given to a mechanic from Rutherford, TN.



$2.59 Million: Secured for a boiler plant operator in Memphis, TN.




These figures not only highlight the compensation awarded but also reflect on the varied backgrounds of individuals affected by mesothelioma.



Additional Settlements




$2.87 Million: A sum for a laborer in Saltillo diagnosed with mesothelioma.



$2.24 Million: Compensation for a telephone worker in Atoka suffering from peritoneal mesothelioma.



$2.81 Million: Received by a chemist residing in Germantown.




Factors Influencing Settlements



Past settlements are influenced by multiple factors including the individual’s exposure history, age, type of mesothelioma, and numerous other conditions. While past results can serve as a benchmark, they don’t guarantee future outcomes since every case is governed by its distinct circumstances.



Key Takeaway



By analyzing previous cases, potential claimants can better understand the potential scope of financial recovery. However, consulting with a legal expert is crucial to navigate these complexities and to understand the factors that could uniquely affect their case.



Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Memphis? 



If you worked in Memphis and now have mesothelioma, you were probably exposed to asbestos on the job. Many industries used asbestos for decades and put workers at risk of getting sick. These are just some examples of Memphis companies and buildings associated with asbestos. 



International Paper Company







The International Paper Company is one of the world's largest paper and packaging companies. Founded in 1928, it expanded its reach into the South and eventually overseas.



The workers at International Paper Company pulped, bleached, refined, and dried raw paper materials. Most of the equipment and products used during this process contained asbestos, such as sandpapers, drying machines, and talc.



International Paper Company's facilities were also constructed with ACMs in materials such as flooring, countertops, doors, insulation, pipes, boilers, and more.



According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the majority of asbestos exposure at most paper mills came from equipment repairs. 



When inspecting and repairing the machinery, maintenance workers at paper mills have the highest risk levels for developing an asbestos-related disease.



FedEx and Memphis International Airport



The Memphis International Airport, and the city's largest employer, FedEx, recently came together to upgrade sections of the airport. The $1.6 billion effort included the remediation of asbestos. 



A Federal Aviation Administration report from 2017 found that the airport had several buildings with asbestos. Some of the asbestos was friable, which could flake apart easily and cause exposure issues. 



Workers in the airport before remediation efforts may have been exposed. 



Memphis Businesses and Buildings Associated with Asbestos 



Many other businesses in Memphis put workers at risk of exposure. Some of these sites still contain asbestos materials. 



Schools, Hotels, and Hospitals




Baptist Memorial Hospital



Florida Elementary School



Memphis City Schools



The University of Memphis



Methodist Southwest Hospital



Overton High School



St. Francis Hospital



St. Jude High School



St. Joseph Hospital



West Tennessee State Normal School



Chisa Hotel



Hotel Peabody




Gas, Power, and Electric Companies




Equitable Gas Light Company



Memphis Consolidated Gas and Electric Company



Ensley Bottoms Power Station




Plants




Allen Steam Plant



Allen Fossil Plant



Firestone Rubber Plant



Humko Chemical Plant




Oil Companies




Buckeye Cotton Oil Company



M.F.A. Oil Company



Phoenix Cotton Oil Company



Shelby County Cotton Oil Mill




Manufacturing Companies




Cole Manufacturing Company



Memphis Furniture Manufacturing Company



Prest Manufacturing Company




Additional Businesses




AFR Storage Facility



Anderson Tully Lumber Company



A.P. Green



Buckman Laboratories



Buckeye Technologies



Chickasaw Cooperage Company



Chris Fiedler Company



Crescent Laundry and Cleaning Company



Crump Lime & Cement Company



Desoto Hardwood Flooring Company



Firestone Tire & Rubber Company



Forest Products Chemical Company



Gurley Refining Company



Henders Boiler Tank Company



Ivers and Pond Piano Company



Kimberly Clark Corporation



L. D. Powell Company, Inc.



Memphis Furniture Manufacturing Company



Memphis Steam Laundry



Prest Manufacturing Company



Shelby County Administration Building



Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)



Valley Coal and Ice Company




Mesothelioma Treatment in Memphis







The Baptist Centers for Cancer Care offers cancer patients, including those with mesothelioma and any other asbestos-related illness, innovative treatment options. These include stem cell transplantation, chemotherapy, surgery, brachytherapy, radiation therapy, and more.



Baptist Centers for Cancer Care 55 Humphries DriveMemphis, Tennessee, 38120901-227-0039



For veterans, the Memphis Veterans Affairs Medical Center offers various treatment options for cancer patients. 



Specialized research allows Memphis VA physicians to provide expert medical support for mesothelioma patients while utilizing cutting-edge technology, innovative medical techniques, and the latest state-of-the-art medical equipment.



Memphis Veterans Affairs Medical Center 1030 Jefferson AvenueMemphis, Tennessee, 38104901-523-8990



Paul at Mesothelioma Lawyer Center provided outstanding support when my family faced a mesothelioma diagnosis. From the start, his professionalism and genuine care were evident. Paul explained every step of the legal process with patience and empathy.- Patrick M



Legal Help in Memphis



Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. For questions and assistance, feel free to contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Tampa Mesothelioma Lawyer

Qualified Tampa mesothelioma lawyers are now helping victims of asbestos exposure fight for justice. Vermiculite processing, steam valve manufacturing, steel and cement companies, and other job sites used asbestos in the Tampa area for decades. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Tampa, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.






Tampa and Asbestos Facts








Tampa and Hillsborough County had the fifth-highest number of deaths related to asbestos exposure, with nearly 900 between 1999 and 2017.



Nearby Pinellas County ranked second in the state with over 1,200 deaths.



A vermiculite processing plant in Tampa received shipments of asbestos-contaminated minerals for decades.




Understanding the High Rate of Mesothelioma-Related Deaths in Florida



Florida has garnered attention for its relatively high incidence of mesothelioma-related deaths. A primary reason for this unfortunate reality is the significant presence of industries that historically use asbestos heavily. Let's break it down further:




Industrial Exposure: Florida is home to numerous sectors like construction, shipbuilding, and manufacturing. These industries are known for their historical use of asbestos, given its properties as a fire-resistant material and insulator. Workers in these environments are more likely to come into contact with asbestos fibers, which can lead to mesothelioma, a type of cancer closely linked to asbestos exposure.



Retiree Population: The state is a popular retirement destination. Many retirees might have worked in asbestos-rich industries in other parts of the country before settling in Florida. As mesothelioma can take decades to develop after exposure, these retirees often experience symptoms only after moving.



Historical Use of Asbestos: In the past, asbestos was widely used in building materials across the state, from residential homes to commercial properties. Even today, older structures might still contain asbestos, leading to incidental exposure during renovations or demolitions.



Prolonged Latency Period: Mesothelioma typically develops after a long latency period. This means that individuals exposed to asbestos years or even decades ago may only now be exhibiting symptoms, contributing to current death rates.




The convergence of these factors has led to higher mesothelioma-related mortality in Florida compared to other states. Understanding these elements is crucial for awareness and prevention efforts moving forward.




What Causes Mesothelioma? 



Mesothelioma is an aggressive and incurable form of cancer caused by exposure to asbestos. Unfortunately, symptoms of mesothelioma may not appear until decades after exposure, making early detection challenging.



If you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, you probably encountered asbestos on the job. Several industries in and around Tampa used asbestos in the past and might still contain asbestos today.



When you work with or around asbestos materials, you inhale its fibers. Asbestos readily sheds these tiny fibers, which join the dust in the air. Once inside the body, asbestos fibers cause tissue and cell damage that, in some people, leads to cancer.



Most people do not receive a diagnosis of an asbestos illness until decades after their exposure. These conditions can include pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma, asbestos lung cancer, and asbestosis.




Pleural mesothelioma affects the lining of the lungs and is the most common form.



Peritoneal mesothelioma impacts the abdominal lining.



Pericardial mesothelioma is much rarer and affects the lining of the heart.




While mesothelioma is a serious concern, it’s crucial to distinguish it from other asbestos-related diseases like asbestos lung cancer and asbestosis. Understanding these distinctions can guide individuals in seeking appropriate medical advice and treatment options.



Understanding Common Mesothelioma Symptoms



Mesothelioma, a rare cancer typically linked to asbestos exposure, can present various symptoms depending on the type and location in the body. Here's what to watch for:




Pleural Mesothelioma: This form affects the lining around the lungs. Symptoms often include:

Shortness of breath



Persistent chest pain



Coughing, sometimes with blood





Peritoneal Mesothelioma: Affecting the abdomen, this type might cause:

Abdominal swelling or distention



Loss of appetite leading to weight loss



Digestive issues like constipation or diarrhea



Abdominal discomfort or pain






Some individuals may experience general symptoms such as fatigue, fever, or night sweats. Recognizing these signs early can be crucial for timely diagnosis and treatment. If you or someone you know exhibits these symptoms, it's advisable to consult with a healthcare professional.



How is Compensation Determined in Mesothelioma Cases?



Determining compensation for mesothelioma cases involves a comprehensive evaluation of several critical factors. Here's a breakdown of what typically influences the settlement or judgment amounts:




Medical Expenses: The total cost of medical treatment, including surgeries, medications, and therapies, plays a crucial role in assessing compensation. This includes both past bills and estimated future medical needs.



Lost Income: If mesothelioma has impacted your ability to work, either temporarily or permanently, the loss of wages is considered. This factor accounts for earnings lost and potential future income.



Pain and Suffering: The physical and emotional distress caused by the illness is a significant component. This subjective measure reflects the impact on quality of life.



Impact on Family: Compensation can also cover the effect on family members, such as loss of companionship or support.



Case-Specific Details:

Exposure History: Details surrounding how and where exposure to asbestos occurred.



Responsibility of Parties: Identification of liable parties, such as employers or product manufacturers.





Jury Awards and Legal Precedents: Previous verdicts and settlements in similar cases can provide a benchmark for compensation expectations.




By carefully evaluating these factors, legal teams can work towards securing a fair and just compensation for victims and their families, reflecting the true impact of the disease.



When Do I Need a Tampa Mesothelioma Lawyer? 



If you or a loved one has an asbestos illness diagnosis, you need a lawyer. Asbestos exposure is almost always negligent, which means the companies responsible are liable. You can seek compensation from these companies. 







Top Florida lawyers working on mesothelioma cases in Tampa can help you get compensation through one or more actions: 




Mesothelioma personal injury lawsuit



Asbestos trust fund claim



Mesothelioma wrongful death lawsuit



Veteran benefits claim




When choosing a mesothelioma lawyer in Tampa, look for someone with experience getting settlements and litigating for other asbestos victims. They should have proven wins for clients like you.



Choosing the right law firm is crucial because it allows you to focus on what truly matters during this challenging time—your health and your family. A seasoned lawyer can take the burden of legal complexities off your shoulders, giving you peace of mind and the ability to concentrate on your well-being.



They should also be part of a large, national firm. These firms have the expertise and resources necessary to win complicated asbestos lawsuits. This breadth of support can be invaluable, as it ensures that your case is handled with the utmost care and precision, increasing your chances for a favorable outcome.



Steps Involved in Investigating a Mesothelioma Claim




Review Work History: Begin by examining the individual's employment records to identify potential asbestos exposure points. This step helps pinpoint when and where exposure may have occurred, given that mesothelioma can develop many years after the initial exposure.



Gather Relevant Information: Compile all necessary documents, such as medical records and employment details. This information is crucial for understanding the timeline and nature of asbestos exposure.



Identify Possible Negligence: Analyze the work environments and practices to detect any negligence or failure to warn about asbestos risks. This could involve reviewing safety protocols and the history of asbestos use in those workplaces.



Choose Filing Location: Determine the appropriate jurisdiction to file the claim or lawsuit. This decision is based on factors like the location of exposure and where the responsible companies are based.



Legal Consultation: Engage with experienced attorneys who specialize in mesothelioma claims. They can provide insights into how to proceed legally and the chances of success based on the gathered evidence.




By following these steps systematically, the strength and details of the mesothelioma claim can be accurately established, increasing the chances of a successful outcome.



Understanding the Legal Complexities in Florida Mesothelioma Lawsuits



Navigating the legal landscape of mesothelioma lawsuits in Florida involves several intricate factors. Here’s a breakdown of what makes these cases complex:



1. Statutes of Limitations



Florida imposes specific time limits on when a mesothelioma lawsuit can be filed. These limits can vary based on whether the case involves personal injury for the patient or a wrongful death claim by the family. Understanding these deadlines is crucial.



2. Proving Exposure



One of the key challenges is proving where and how the exposure to asbestos occurred. Evidence must be collected from workplaces, medical records, and witnesses to build a compelling case. This task often requires detailed investigation and expert testimony.



3. Liability Issues



Identifying the responsible parties is another complex area. This could involve multiple entities such as manufacturers, employers, and property owners, each with varying degrees of liability. This complexity often necessitates a comprehensive legal strategy.



4. State-specific Regulations



Florida has unique regulations regarding asbestos and personal injury claims. These include specific disclosure requirements and procedural rules in court that impact how the case is presented and the evidence permitted.



5. Settlement Negotiations



Reaching a fair settlement involves negotiating with insurance companies and defendants, who may be reluctant to pay a fair amount. Skilled negotiation is essential, often requiring an understanding of both the law and the disease's impact on the victim's life.



6. Trial Process



If a settlement isn’t reached, the case may go to trial—requiring a deep understanding of courtroom procedures and the ability to present complex medical and technical evidence clearly and persuasively to a jury.



Working with a seasoned attorney who specializes in mesothelioma cases can help navigate these complexities, ensuring the best possible outcome in a challenging legal environment.



The Role of Evidence in Proving a Mesothelioma Case



When it comes to mesothelioma cases, evidence serves as the backbone of your legal argument. Establishing a connection between asbestos exposure and the negligence of an employer or manufacturer is crucial. Here’s how evidence plays a pivotal role:




Verifying Exposure: Evidence is used to trace back the source of asbestos exposure. This can include employment records, product identification, and eyewitness testimony. The goal is to establish that asbestos exposure would likely not have occurred without negligence from an involved party.



Demonstrating Negligence: To succeed in a mesothelioma lawsuit, it’s critical to demonstrate that an employer or other responsible party failed to observe safety standards. Evidence such as safety reports, internal memos, or lack of protective measures helps to build this aspect of the case.



Establishing Causation: Medical records, expert testimonies, and scientific studies illustrate the direct link between asbestos exposure and mesothelioma diagnosis. This evidence is essential in proving that the exposure directly led to the illness.



Corroborating Claims: Supporting materials like photos, written documents, and historical records bolster the claim by painting a complete picture of the circumstances surrounding the exposure.




In essence, comprehensive evidence not only supports the claim of negligence but also lays the groundwork for a compelling legal argument, significantly impacting the outcome of the case.



How Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Tampa? 







Tampa has many industries and workplaces that used asbestos in the past. If you have mesothelioma, you were probably exposed at work. Some of the industries that most heavily used asbestos include construction, shipbuilding, manufacturing, power generation, and oil refining. 



These are just a few examples of companies and workplaces that put Tampa workers at risk of asbestos exposure and mesothelioma.



Leslie Controls Inc.



Tampa's Leslie Controls Inc. manufactures and distributes steam valves, water pressure valves, and regulators to the military, power plants, and processing plants. For years, the company provided parts for United States Navy vessels during World War I and World War II.



Before the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) regulations on asbestos use, Leslie Controls used asbestos in many of its parts and equipment, including pumps, gaskets, pipe parts, steam valves, and much more. Asbestos was valued for its ability to withstand heat and its fireproof and insulating properties. As a naturally occurring fibrous mineral, asbestos was renowned for its durability and resistance to high temperatures, making it a popular choice in various industries. Historically, it found extensive use in insulation, construction materials, automotive parts, and shipbuilding materials due to these properties.



However, asbestos poses significant health risks. The mineral consists of tiny, shard-like fibers that can easily become airborne when disturbed. If these fibers are inhaled or ingested, they can embed within the lining of the lungs, heart, stomach, or testes. Over time, this can lead to severe health issues, including cancer, which may develop years or even decades later. Understanding both the advantages and dangers of asbestos is crucial for appreciating its complex role in industrial history.



During the 1990s, Watt Industries, an independent valve manufacturer that provides its services worldwide, purchased Leslie Controls. It then went on to become a subsidiary of CIRCOR and remains a subsidiary today.







Asbestos use resulted in numerous lawsuits against Leslie Controls, not only from those who worked directly for the company in manufacturing but also from people who worked with and around the products sold by the company, such as military veterans.



In 2010, the company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, with over 1,000 asbestos personal injury claims against them. Many of the claims stemmed from asbestos use on United States Navy vessels, primarily from the 1940s through the mid-1980s.



As part of the reorganization plan with their bankruptcy, a trust fund, entitled the Leslie Control Asbestos Personal Trust, was established in 2011 with an estimated $75 million.



Leslie Controls used asbestos in several products, including:




Steam and control valves



Regulators



Steam water heaters



Actuators



Insulation



Pipes



Gaskets



Packing materials



Boilers



Pumps



Whistles




Leslie Controls continued to make these products with asbestos until 1988.



Zonolite and W.R. Grace Vermiculite Plant



Another major contributor to asbestos exposure risks in the area was the Zonolite and W.R. Grace and Co. vermiculite exfoliation plant. Vermiculite from the W.R. Grace mines in Libby, Montana, was sent to this facility for decades between the 1950s and 1991.



The Libby mine shipped vermiculite all over the country, but it was only discovered years too late that the mineral was contaminated with asbestos. The Tampa site received thousands of shipments that contributed to exposure in workers and nearby residents.



Additional Tampa Sites Associated with Asbestos



Many other buildings and workplaces in and around Tampa used asbestos and put workers and residents at risk of exposure:



Schools and Hospitals




University of South Florida



St. Joseph's Hospital



Tampa Bay Hospital



Tampa Veterans Administration Hospital



Tampa General Hospital




Military




MacDill Air Force Base




Gas, Water, and Electric Companies




Florida Power & Light Company (FPL)



Gulf Power Company



Lakeland Electric



Tampa Gas Company



Tampa Water Works



Black Point Powerhouse




Steel and Cement Companies




Florida Portland Cement Company



Robert J. Clark Tampa Steel Erecting Company



Florida Steel Corporation




Engineering Companies




Acousti Engineering Company



Airetron Engineering Company



Buell Engineering



Stone and Webster Engineers




Additional Buildings and Businesses




Aerodyne Investment Castings



AP Green Refractories Company



Cameron & Barkley Company



Consolidated Citrus Products Company



Dixie Linen and Uniform Company



Gaylord Container Corporation



Glidden Durkee Company



Gulf Brass Works



Herman Sausage Factory Incorporated



Hillsborough County Animal Control



Hillsborough County Courthouse



Johns‐Manville Sales Corporation



Linde Air Products Company



Nitram Chemicals, Inc.



Ocean Shipholdings, Inc.



Owens-Corning Fiberglass



Tampa Armature Works



Tampa International Airport (TPA)



Tampa Ship Repair & Drydock Company



Tampa Tank and Florida Structural Steel



Thatcher Glass Manufacturing Company



Thompson Hayward Siding



Tiffany Tile Corporation



TSR Corporation



U.S. Phosphoric Productions



Union Carbide Corporation



Westinghouse Electric Company




Asbestos in Tampa Buildings



While most asbestos exposures occurred in the past, harmful asbestos lingers in many buildings in the Tampa area. Because it was used so widely in construction, asbestos continues to pose a threat to area residents. 



Recent events highlight the ongoing dangers: 




Residents of Summit West apartments in Tampa recently raised concerns about asbestos in their buildings. During renovation projects, residents found signs warning of asbestos. Many stayed away for days, fearing the company was not taking adequate precautions to protect them from asbestos dust created by the work. 



During another apartment renovation project, a developer and supervisor were indicted for improper asbestos removal. This occurred at Urban Style Flats in St. Petersburg, former public housing that the new owner renovated. The men indicted violated several asbestos safety regulations, putting residents at risk of exposure. 




Emotional and Financial Impact of a Mesothelioma Diagnosis on Families



A mesothelioma diagnosis can profoundly affect families, extending beyond the immediate health concerns. Here’s how it impacts families both emotionally and financially:



Emotional Strain




Emotional Turmoil: Hearing the word "cancer" can trigger an array of emotions, from shock and disbelief to sadness and anger. These feelings are intense and can linger, creating a continuous emotional rollercoaster for everyone involved.



Mental Health Challenges: Family members may experience heightened anxiety, depression, or even guilt over the situation. Adapting to a new reality requires significant mental resilience and support.



Changes in Family Dynamics: As the focus shifts to caring for the affected individual, roles within the household may change drastically. Caregivers may face stress and fatigue, balancing their responsibilities while offering support.




Financial Burden




Medical Expenses: Treating mesothelioma often involves costly medical procedures, including surgeries, chemotherapy, and specialist consultations. Even with insurance, out-of-pocket expenses can be overwhelming.



Loss of Income: The patient and sometimes even the caregivers might need to reduce working hours or stop working altogether to manage treatments and care, leading to a significant drop in household income.



Additional Costs: Families must also contend with travel expenses for treatment in specialized centers, home care adjustments, and other related costs that add up over time.




Support and Resources




Financial Planning: It's crucial for families to seek guidance on managing medical bills and explore resources like grants or cancer-focused non-profits for financial assistance.



Emotional Support Networks: Participation in support groups can offer solace. Sharing experiences with those undergoing similar challenges can foster a sense of community and understanding.




Understanding these impacts can help families prepare and seek the necessary support, cushioning the blow of such a life-altering diagnosis.



These lawyers made us feel so much better about going through this terrible process. We had no idea where to begin and they helped get us all the compensation we possibly could. They were friendly understanding and very hard-working. They answered any questions we had about compensation and even medical advice.-Natalie F



Getting Treatment for Mesothelioma in Tampa



Established in 1986, Tampa's H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute is a non-profit, comprehensive cancer treatment center at the University of South Florida's Tampa campus. It is a National Cancer Institute (NCI) Comprehensive Cancer Center.



 An NCI-backed cancer center offers the most comprehensive treatment options, research, clinical trials, and cutting-edge medical technology.



The H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center also offers a total of 13 specifically-designed clinical programs for the treatment of various cancer types, including malignant mesothelioma and asbestos-related lung cancer.



H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute 12902 Magnolia DriveTampa, FL 33612



Understanding Mesothelioma Life Expectancy



Life expectancy for someone diagnosed with mesothelioma varies greatly, influenced by several key factors. While a cure remains elusive, treatment options can enhance quality of life and extend survival.




Stage at Diagnosis: Early detection significantly boosts life expectancy. Those caught in initial stages tend to have better outcomes compared to later stages.



Type of Mesothelioma: Patients with peritoneal mesothelioma generally experience a longer life expectancy, often surpassing three years, particularly when treated promptly.



Treatment Options: Innovative treatments, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, can positively impact survival time. Engaging in clinical trials may also provide access to cutting-edge therapies.



Overall Health: A patient's overall health and lifestyle play pivotal roles. Those maintaining a healthy lifestyle often respond more favorably to treatments.




Ultimately, while many variables impact life expectancy in mesothelioma patients, early diagnosis and comprehensive care strategies hold promise for extending survival and enhancing life quality.



Negotiation Tactics for Mesothelioma Settlements



Understanding the Initial OfferWhen involved in mesothelioma settlements, it’s not uncommon for initial compensation offers to fall short of what’s fair. The first step in negotiating effectively is to thoroughly understand the details of this initial proposal, including how the amount was determined and which aspects of your suffering it aims to cover.



Gathering Comprehensive EvidenceEnsure you have comprehensive evidence supporting your claim. Collect medical records, expert testimonies, and detailed expense reports. These bolster your case and provide a strong foundation for negotiation.



Highlighting Non-Economic DamagesIn addition to direct medical costs, emphasize non-economic damages. This includes emotional distress and diminished quality of life. Providing a holistic picture of your hardships can justify a higher settlement.



Engaging Expert NegotiatorsHiring experienced legal professionals can make a significant difference. These experts bring in-depth knowledge of similar cases, allowing them to forecast potential obstacles and leverage their experience to push for a better offer.



Utilizing Comparative SettlementsResearching and referencing settlements from similar cases can be highly persuasive. Demonstrating how your case parallels others with higher settlements can prompt a reassessment of your offer.



Remaining Patient but FirmNegotiation is a process that requires patience. It is crucial to remain firm in your expectations while being open to reasonable compromises. Balancing these elements can lead to a satisfactory outcome.



Employing these tactics effectively maximizes the likelihood of securing a fair settlement in mesothelioma cases.



Tampa Legal Help



As previously mentioned, if you’ve been exposed to asbestos and suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to compensatory damages. Get our free Financial Compensation Packet for information on the top mesothelioma and asbestos lawyers. If you have questions or need assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Cheyenne Mesothelioma Lawyer

Contact a Cheyenne mesothelioma lawyer to learn about your legal rights, if you've been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Numerous job sites in Cheyenne and throughout Wyoming used asbestos for its insulating properties and resistance to fire and heat. 



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, awaiting those who've been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Cheyenne, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.





Cheyenne Asbestos Facts




Although one of the most sparsely-populated states, Wyoming still had 549 deaths related to asbestos between 1999 and 2017. 



Laramie County and Cheyenne, had the second-highest number of asbestos deaths in the state during that time, with 103. 



Oil refining employed many people in Cheyenne but also put them at risk for asbestos exposure. 




Do I Need to Work with a Cheyenne Mesothelioma Lawyer? 







If you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, talk to a Cheyenne or Wyoming mesothelioma lawyer as soon as possible. Mesothelioma is nearly always a personal injury due to negligent asbestos exposure. You have a right to seek compensation.



There are several situations where you might need a mesothelioma lawyer:




Occupational Exposure: If your diagnosis is linked to asbestos exposure at work, especially in industries like construction or manufacturing.



Product-Related Exposure: When asbestos-containing products have contributed to your illness.



Post-Retirement Diagnosis: Even if you developed mesothelioma after retiring, you may still have a claim.



Loss of a Loved One: If you have lost someone to mesothelioma, a lawyer can help you pursue wrongful death claims.




An asbestos attorney in the area will handle every step of the process of making a legal claim. They can help you get the compensation you need to cover your medical expenses and other costs.



Essential Questions to Ask When Choosing a Mesothelioma Lawyer in Cheyenne



Selecting the right mesothelioma lawyer is crucial for ensuring your case is handled effectively. Here are some key questions to guide your decision-making process:




Past Case Experience: Inquire about their history with cases similar to yours. Understanding how they've previously navigated cases can give you insight into their expertise and success rate.



Case Outcomes: Ask about potential outcomes. Knowing the range of possibilities early on will help you set realistic expectations as you move forward.



Timeline Estimation: Discuss the anticipated timeline for your case. A lawyer with experience in mesothelioma claims will provide a more accurate projection of how long each phase might take.



Insurance Negotiation Skills: Confirm their ability to negotiate with insurance companies. Effective negotiations can significantly impact the compensation you may receive.



Alternative Dispute Resolutions: Explore whether alternative resolutions, such as mediation, might be applicable to your case. This could lead to a faster and potentially more amicable agreement.



Fee Structure Clarity: Understand their billing practices. Transparent fee structures, including any contingency fees, will help you avoid unexpected expenses.



Local Practice Experience: Evaluate their experience specifically in Wyoming. Familiarity with state laws and courts can be a substantial advantage.



Expert Resources: Check if they have access to expert witnesses who can strengthen your case. An adept lawyer often works with a network of medical and industry experts.



Evidence Collection Approach: Discuss how they handle evidence gathering. A thorough approach can make a significant difference in building a strong case.



Negotiation and Settlement Strategy: Learn about their strategy for negotiations and settlements. A strategic approach can often lead to favorable outcomes.



Client Involvement: Ask what role you will play during the case. Understanding your involvement can provide clarity and reduce stress throughout the process.




By asking these questions, you'll gain a clear picture of the lawyer's qualifications and whether they're the right fit for your needs.



What Tips Are Useful for Hiring a Mesothelioma Lawyer?



Hiring the right mesothelioma lawyer is crucial for ensuring your rights are protected and your case is handled competently. Here are some steps to guide you through finding the best fit for your needs:




Gather RecommendationsStart by asking friends, family, or colleagues for lawyer referrals, especially if someone you know has gone through a similar legal journey. Personal recommendations can provide valuable insights.



Dive Into Online ResearchLeverage online resources to identify potential lawyers. Check out trusted legal directories and websites that provide client reviews and ratings. This can help you assess a lawyer's reputation and track record.



Schedule Initial ConsultationsMany lawyers offer free consultations. Use this opportunity to ask questions and gauge how you feel about their communication style and professionalism. It's an excellent time to discuss your case and assess how comfortable you feel with them.



Evaluate Their Experience and ExpertiseEnsure the lawyer has specific experience with mesothelioma cases. An attorney familiar with asbestos-related litigation will better understand the complexities and nuances of such cases.



Discuss Fees and Billing PracticesBe clear on how the lawyer charges fees—whether on a contingency basis, hourly rate, or flat fee. Understand all potential costs involved to avoid surprises later.



Trust Your Gut FeelingUltimately, trust your instincts. Choose someone who you feel genuinely understands your situation and demonstrates a commitment to champion your case passionately.




Finding the right mesothelioma lawyer involves careful consideration and research. By following these tips, you can gain confidence and peace of mind knowing your legal matters are in capable hands.



Understanding the Verification Process for Asbestos Attorneys in Cheyenne



When you're seeking a reliable asbestos attorney in Cheyenne, it's crucial to understand the rigorous criteria and process they must go through to be verified for their specialization. Here's a breakdown of what this process entails:




Extensive ExperienceThe attorneys must demonstrate significant expertise and actively practice in asbestos-related law. This ensures they have the knowledge and skill to handle such cases effectively.



Maintained Good StandingOnly attorneys who are in perfect standing with their respective bar associations and possess an unblemished disciplinary record are considered. This is an affirmation of their professionalism and adherence to the industry's ethical standards.



Regular EvaluationsEach attorney is subject to an annual evaluation to ensure they continue to meet the high standards required. This systematic review helps maintain the quality and integrity of their practice.



Commitment to Client ServiceAttorneys must commit to offering exceptional client service and maintaining strict ethical standards. This commitment is a cornerstone of their verification, ensuring clients receive the highest level of support throughout the legal process.




By choosing an attorney who meets these rigorous standards, clients can be confident in the quality and reliability of the legal assistance they will receive, particularly in complex asbestos cases.



Get a Free Legal Consultation



Don't wait to reach out to a lawyer. Top-rated asbestos lawyers in Cheyenne, WY, are available to help you now and offer free initial consultations. There is no risk in talking to a lawyer and getting advice and answers. 



Your time is limited because of your diagnosis. A good lawyer will help you get compensation fast, so you can use it and help support your family. Without a mesothelioma lawyer, you might struggle to obtain the compensation you deserve. Navigating the legal system alone can lead to missed deadlines and insufficient evidence collection, both of which can weaken your case considerably.



Facing large companies or asbestos trust funds without professional support could also be daunting. These entities are equipped with extensive resources to minimize payouts. Without legal expertise, you could end up with less compensation than needed for critical medical treatments and other expenses.



A skilled lawyer not only expedites the process but also ensures you build a strong case to maximize your compensation. They help you navigate complex legal procedures, providing the guidance you need to secure fair compensation for your suffering and financial losses. They can help you take one or more of the following legal actions: 




Mesothelioma Personal Injury Lawsuit



Mesothelioma Wrongful Death Lawsuit



Asbestos Trust Fund Claim



VA Benefits Claim




Criteria for Lead Counsel Verification



To earn the prestigious Lead Counsel verification, attorneys must satisfy a series of rigorous criteria that validate their expertise and commitment to excellence:




Extensive Legal Experience:Lawyers are required to demonstrate substantial experience and proficiency specifically in their area of practice. This ensures clients are guided by experts knowledgeable in relevant legal matters.



Maintaining Professional Integrity:Attorneys must uphold a strong reputation by being in good standing with their respective bar associations. Additionally, they should maintain an impeccable disciplinary record, ensuring trustworthiness.



Ongoing Compliance and Review:Once verified, attorneys must undergo an annual review process. This recurring evaluation ensures that they continue to meet the verification standards year after year.



Dedication to Superior Client Service:A commitment to providing exceptional client service is crucial. Lawyers must adhere to the highest ethical standards, ensuring clients receive diligent and respectful representation.




These stringent requirements ensure that verified attorneys are not only highly qualified but also deeply committed to ethical practice and client satisfaction.



Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Cheyenne, Wyoming? 



If you have mesothelioma, you were most likely exposed to asbestos at work. Many companies in Cheyenne used asbestos in the past, including oil companies and refineries. The construction industry also used a lot of asbestos. 



Frontier Refining Company







Many businesses in Cheyenne once used asbestos, but one of the most significant cases involved Frontier Refining Company. Previously called Winaico Oil, Frontier was an oil and gasoline company with several facilities across the nation, including Cheyenne. 



Frontier has faced several lawsuits in connection with asbestos and hazardous materials.



In 2009, the Environmental Protection Agency investigated the company after complaints of storing hazardous chemicals and materials. 



Prior to the investigation, workers at Frontier were exposed to asbestos on a daily basis as almost every material at the job site contained asbestos.



Throughout most of the 1900s, Frontier used asbestos in almost every product and part in its facilities. Asbestos was used for insulation to protect against heat and fire and as a material that resisted chemical reactions.



Construction



The construction industry in Cheyenne and throughout the U.S. once used asbestos in numerous products. From roofing to siding to insulation, asbestos was used to insulate and protect against heat and fire. 



Buildings in Cheyenne constructed up until the 1980s were likely built with asbestos. If you worked in any part of the construction industry during that time, you may have been exposed to asbestos. Some of the construction workers with the biggest risk for asbestos exposure included: 




Insulators



Sheetrock and drywall installers



Painters



Plumbers



Electricians



Roofers



Flooring installers




Can I Still Be Exposed to Asbestos in Cheyenne, WY? 



Workers at places like Frontier were put at risk of asbestos exposure, but current residents and workers may continue to encounter asbestos in older buildings and abandoned sites. 



Asbestos at Abandoned Construction Lot



In 2006, Cheyenne residents grew concerned after learning they were living across from an old construction lot that was associated with asbestos in the past. 



According to the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), the residents had reason to believe that the lot, located close to Cheyenne's Loop Road, still contained asbestos throughout.



Authorities from Laramie County gained limited access to parts of the lot, where they gathered samples. At least 10 to 15 percent of the collected samples contained chrysotile asbestos.



By 2008 the state Department of Environmental Quality had still refused to get involved without the proper approval. Meanwhile, several area residents have been at risk for asbestos exposure.



Asbestos in Railroad Restoration



The railroad industry used asbestos in machinery and friction parts. Older trains and equipment often still contain asbestos, posing a risk for current workers. 



This became an issue recently when a Cheyenne company was hired to restore a train for the National Park Service. John Eldon Rimmasch, the owner of the now-defunct Wasatch Railroad Contractors, was convicted on several counts related to the project. These included knowingly exposing employees to asbestos. 



Wasatch was hired to restore a 1923 passenger car. Rimmasch failed to follow the required safety procedures that would have protected his workers from asbestos. 



Businesses and Buildings Associated with Asbestos in Cheyenne 




Plateau Supply Company



Sheet Metal Products Company



Union Pacific Plant



Union Pacific Railroad Company



Wycon Chemical Plant



DePaul Hospital



Frontier Refining Company



Husky Oil Company



Memorial Hospital



Municipal Airport



Northern Colo Light and Power Company




Related Practice Areas to Asbestos Law in Cheyenne, WY



If you're exploring legal options related to asbestos exposure in Cheyenne, WY, you might find it helpful to know about related fields within the legal landscape. Here are some practice areas closely connected to asbestos law:




Toxic Mold and Environmental Health: Attorneys specializing in cases involving mold exposure and environmental health hazards often have overlapping expertise with those handling asbestos cases.



Personal Injury Law: Lawyers in this field address harm caused by exposure to hazardous substances, including asbestos. This practice area covers compensation for injuries and illnesses resulting from negligence.



Premises Liability: This area involves holding property owners accountable for unsafe conditions, like asbestos exposure, on their premises. Legal professionals here work to ensure property safety standards are met.




Understanding these areas can provide a more comprehensive view of your legal options and help identify the right specialist for your case.



Mesothelioma Treatment in Cheyenne







Although there are currently no cancer centers in Cheyenne, the University of Colorado Cancer Center (UCC) in nearby Aurora, Colorado, is a National Cancer Institute-designated facility. 



It is staffed by researchers, physicians, cancer experts, and healthcare specialists that focus on mesothelioma cancer and other asbestos-related diseases.











These lawyers made us feel so much better about going through this terrible process. We had no idea where to begin and they helped get us all the compensation we possibly could. They were friendly understanding and very hard-working. They answered any questions we had about compensation and even medical advice.- Natalie F.



Getting Legal Help in Cheyenne



Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. Keep in mind that if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for considerable compensation. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Indiana Mesothelioma Lawyer

An experienced Indiana mesothelioma lawyer can help you if you've been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. Indiana ranks 21st in the U.S. for the most asbestos-related fatalities, including malignant mesothelioma and asbestosis. 



If you or someone you love suffers from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the top mesothelioma lawyers in Indiana, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.





We offer assistance to asbestos victims in all cities and towns in Indiana, including:



Indianapolis, Fort Wayne, Evansville, South Bend, Carmel, Fishers, Bloomington, Hammond, Gary, Lafayette, Muncie, Terre Haute, Kokomo, Noblesville, Anderson, Greenwood, Elkhart, Mishawaka, Lawrence, Jeffersonville, Columbus, Portage, New Albany, Richmond, Merrillville, Westfield, Valparaiso, Goshen, Michigan City, West Lafayette, Plainfield, Marion, East Chicago, Granger, Schererville, Hobart, Crown Point, Zionsville, Franklin, Highland Town, Munster, Brownsburg, La Porte, Clarksville, Greenfield, Shelbyville, Seymour, Vincennes, Logansport, New Castle, Huntington, Griffith, Dyer, Frankfort, Crawfordsville, Lebanon, St. John, New Haven, Jasper, Beech Grove, Warsaw, Avon, Bedford, Chesterton, Connersville, Auburn, Lake Station, Speedway, Madison, Washington, Martinsville, Greensburg, Cedar Lake, Yorktown, Peru, Purdue University, Wabash, Greencastle, Plymouth, Bluffton, Kendallville, Mooresville, Danville, Decatur, Lowell, Columbia City, Angola, Princeton, Elwood, Brazil, Charlestown, Tell City, Notre Dame, Lakes of the Four Seasons, Scottsburg, North Vernon, Nappanee, Mount Vernon, Batesville, Bargersville, and more.




What You Need to Know about Asbestos in Indiana








More than 5,700 people died in Indiana from asbestos-related illnesses between 1999 and 2017.



The highest number of asbestos deaths were in Lake County and the city of Gary.



Mesothelioma is much more common in the urban areas of Indiana, whereas asbestosis is more common in rural areas.



Steel mill workers experienced some of the highest levels of asbestos exposure in the state.



In 1980, Indiana actor Steve McQueen died while having an operation for mesothelioma.





Am I Eligible to File a Mesothelioma Claim in Indiana? 







If you were diagnosed with mesothelioma in Indiana, you are probably eligible to file a claim or lawsuit to seek compensation. Most cases of mesothelioma are caused by negligent asbestos exposure. The companies responsible can be held accountable and liable for your expenses.



You have a few options for taking action to seek justice and compensation:




Mesothelioma Personal Injury Lawsuit: Asbestos exposure is negligent, so when it causes an illness, it is considered a personal injury. Negligent companies can be sued for damages. Most of these cases end in settlements.



Mesothelioma Wrongful Death Lawsuit: When someone dies from mesothelioma, their loved ones can file a wrongful death suit to collect damages.



Asbestos Trust Fund Claim: Many companies went bankrupt in the face of thousands of asbestos lawsuits. They set up trust funds to compensate victims. An asbestos lawyer can determine if you are eligible to file with any of these trusts, which contain a total of about $30 billion in funds.



VA Benefits: If you encountered asbestos during military service, you could be eligible for veteran benefits. These include disability compensation and medical treatment.




Understanding the Legal Process



Navigating the legal system can seem daunting, but with the right team, it becomes manageable. In Indiana, there are experienced mesothelioma lawyers who can guide you through each step. These professionals work in dedicated teams that include attorneys, legal staff, and even registered nurses, ensuring you receive personalized attention.



Here's what your legal team will handle:




Evidence Collection: Gathering necessary documents and testimonies to support your case.



Filing Claims: Ensuring all paperwork is filed accurately and within deadlines.



Legal Representation: Advocating on your behalf, whether in negotiations or, if necessary, in court.




Pursuing Compensation



Filing a lawsuit or claim is about more than just financial compensation; it's about justice and holding negligent parties accountable. Whether you're pursuing an asbestos trust fund claim or a personal injury lawsuit, your legal team will strive to secure the best possible outcome for you.



By understanding these processes and having the right support, you can focus on what truly matters—your health and well-being.



How Can an Indiana Mesothelioma Lawyer Help Me? 



Top-rated Indiana mesothelioma lawyers are your best option for representation in an asbestos case. They have expertise and experience in working with and winning for victims of asbestos exposure.



Extensive Resources and Proven Success



The right lawyer will provide a free initial consultation to review your case and provide advice. If they take your case, they will put their extensive resources to work investigating your past exposure. Based on your work history, they can determine which companies exposed you to asbestos and can be held liable.



Asbestos attorneys give you the best chance of winning compensation through a settlement. If a settlement cannot be reached, they will litigate your case in court to seek a jury award.



Comprehensive Legal Support




Experience in Indiana: With decades of service, these attorneys have represented many clients across Indiana, showcasing their deep understanding of local legal processes.



Full Legal Process Management: They manage every step, from gathering evidence to filing claims, ensuring you’re supported throughout.




Client-Centric Approach




No Initial Costs: You won't face any upfront fees or out-of-pocket expenses. They operate on a contingency basis, meaning they only get paid if you successfully receive compensation.



Convenience and Accessibility: These attorneys prioritize your convenience by offering to meet you at a location that suits you, ensuring their services are accessible without added stress.




By choosing an Indiana mesothelioma lawyer, you align yourself with a team dedicated to giving you the best chance at justice and financial recovery.



Navigating the Legal Process for Mesothelioma Cases in Indiana



If you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma in Indiana, it's crucial to understand the steps involved in the legal process to seek compensation.



Step 1: Initial Consultation



The journey begins with a consultation where you can discuss your case with a specialized legal team. They will gather preliminary information about your asbestos exposure and explain potential legal avenues.



Step 2: Evaluating Compensation Options



There are several pathways to pursue compensation:




Trust Fund Claims: Many companies responsible for asbestos exposure have set up trust funds. These funds, totaling over $30 billion nationally, are available for victims without the need for court proceedings.



Filing a Lawsuit: You may choose to file a lawsuit against the companies accountable for your asbestos exposure. A successful lawsuit can potentially lead to substantial compensation.



Pursuing Veterans Benefits: Veterans who developed mesothelioma due to asbestos in military applications can apply for VA benefits. This includes health care and monthly monetary compensation since 33% of mesothelioma cases involve veterans.




Step 3: Collecting Evidence



For your claim to succeed, collecting evidence is essential. This includes medical records, employment history, and any documentation of asbestos exposure. Your legal team will assist in gathering and organizing these vital pieces of evidence.



Step 4: Claim Filing



Once the evidence is compiled, the next step is to file your claim. It's crucial to adhere to Indiana's legal deadlines, as filing in a timely manner can make a significant difference in the outcome.



Step 5: Handling Negotiations and Court Proceedings



Your legal team will manage all negotiations with companies or trust funds and represent you if the case proceeds to court. They aim to secure the maximum possible compensation by arguing convincingly on your behalf.



By understanding these steps, you can navigate the legal landscape more confidently, ensuring you receive the justice and compensation you deserve.



Why Contacting a Mesothelioma Attorney Promptly is Crucial in Indiana



When it comes to a mesothelioma diagnosis in Indiana, swift action in seeking legal representation can make a critical difference. Here’s why time is of the essence:



Statutes of Limitation



Indiana law imposes specific time limits, known as statutes of limitation, on filing mesothelioma lawsuits. These legal deadlines restrict the window for taking action. Once expired, the chance to secure compensation may be lost forever. Acting quickly ensures your rights are preserved.



Gathering Evidence



Mesothelioma cases require detailed evidence, including medical records and exposure history, which might take time to compile. Initiating contact with an attorney early allows more time to gather vital documents and information.



Emotional and Financial Stability



Beyond legal deadlines, mesothelioma significantly impacts emotional and financial well-being. An experienced attorney can help navigate these stresses, offering peace of mind by handling complex legal matters and pursuing rightful compensation.



Competitive Attorney Selection



With many experienced attorneys to choose from, starting early allows for a measured selection process, ensuring you find the advocate best suited to your specific needs.



By contacting a mesothelioma attorney shortly after a diagnosis, you safeguard your ability to take full advantage of the legal options available, helping secure the future for you and your family.



How Do I Choose a Mesothelioma Lawyer? 



Your choice of lawyer to handle your mesothelioma case is essential. Asbestos lawsuits are complicated and time-consuming. They require particular expertise and a lot of resources. Look for the following in your Indiana mesothelioma lawyer: 




A lawyer in Indiana who is part of a large firm with jurisdictions in other states



Experience working on asbestos cases



Proven wins for other asbestos clients



A free initial consultation



Contingency payment with no fees until they win




When hiring an Indiana mesothelioma attorney, it's crucial to understand the financial arrangements involved. Fortunately, reputable attorneys often work on a contingency basis, meaning you won't face any initial or out-of-pocket costs. This arrangement ensures that the attorney only gets paid if they successfully recover compensation for you. This not only aligns their interests with yours but also provides peace of mind, knowing that you won’t incur legal fees unless you win your case.



Choosing the right attorney with these attributes will give you the best chance at a successful outcome, while also ensuring that financial barriers do not prevent you from seeking justice.



Discover the Qualifications and Achievements of Our Elite Mesothelioma Attorneys



When seeking legal representation for mesothelioma cases, it's crucial to work with attorneys who possess a proven track record and exceptional credentials. Our team of distinguished mesothelioma attorneys stand out due to their unique qualifications and numerous accolades.



Credentials and Distinctions




Recognized Leaders in Trial Law: Among our talented team, you'll find attorneys who have been listed as Top 40 Under 40 National Trial Lawyers. This prestigious honor highlights their excellence and influence in the field.



Honored as Best Lawyers in America: Multiple attorneys in our practice have earned the title of "Best Lawyer in America," setting a standard for superior legal expertise and client success in complex mesothelioma cases.



Specialists in Asbestos Litigation: Our team includes leaders who spearhead asbestos litigation teams, showcasing their in-depth knowledge and strategic prowess in handling cases with outstanding results.




Military Experience and Commitment




Veteran Insights: Our legal roster includes individuals who are not only skilled attorneys but also U.S. Military veterans. Their disciplined approach and commitment to service bring a unique perspective to our clients’ cases.




By choosing our team, you can be confident in our dedication to fighting for justice, backed by a firm commitment to providing personalized support and leveraging extensive legal resources.



Client Feedback: Experiences With A Mesothelioma Law Firm



Peace of Mind Through Financial Security



Clients often commend these law firms for providing peace of mind, knowing their loved ones will be financially secure. This assurance allows clients to focus on what truly matters to them without the constant worry about the future.



Exceeding Expectations With Exceptional Support



Many have found that the support and assistance offered by these firms go well beyond initial expectations. Clients appreciate the comprehensive guidance and unwavering help during challenging times.



Accountability and Justice



A recurring theme in client stories is the empowerment they feel in holding companies accountable for their actions. This accountability is often cited as a critical factor in achieving justice and compensation.



Providing Hope in Difficult Times



Families frequently express gratitude for the hope these firms bring into their lives during their toughest moments. Whether it's through securing settlements or offering emotional support, clients recognize the positive impact on their family dynamics.



Do Mesothelioma Clients Need to Travel for Their Legal Claims?



For individuals diagnosed with mesothelioma, one of the pressing questions is whether pursuing a legal claim requires extensive travel. The good news? It's largely unnecessary for clients to travel, as most legal teams prioritize convenience and accessibility.



Flexible Consultations



Experienced asbestos attorneys often take the initiative to meet clients at their preferred locations. Whether it's the comfort of your home or another place of your choosing, you have the flexibility to decide what's best for you.



Remote Communication



Modern technology allows for significant portions of the case to be handled via phone calls, video conferencing, and email. This minimizes the necessity for face-to-face meetings and makes it easier to communicate with your legal team from afar.



Local Representation



Typically, your legal representation will have networks and partnerships within various jurisdictions, which reduces the likelihood of you needing to travel outside your region for court proceedings.



Rare Exceptions



While it's possible that travel may occasionally be required, these instances are rare. Most cases are structured in a way that the burden of travel is minimized, ensuring that pursuing justice does not add unnecessary strain on you or your family.



By focusing on client comfort and leveraging modern tools, attorneys strive to make the legal process as seamless as possible, letting you concentrate on your health and well-being.



Which Job Sites Used Asbestos in Indiana?



Asbestos use was heavy in most industrial jobs throughout the state until the early 1980s. But some industries and job sites caused a notable amount of exposure and cases of related illnesses:








Steel mill workers in Indiana have some of the highest risks of developing asbestos-related diseases. Steel mill workers were exposed because asbestos was heavily used in the industry to protect against high temperatures and fires.



Workers in the automobile industry were also at great risk. In 1984, the Nuturn Corporation, a brake manufacturing business, was inspected for asbestos. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) determined that employees were being exposed to asbestos at much higher levels than legally allowed.



In July of 1986, NIOSH also surveyed the Federal Office Building in Evansville, Indiana, after the president of the American Federation of Government Employees requested an evaluation. The findings concluded that over nine surface samples contained asbestos, meaning that asbestos was present and could easily become airborne.



Indiana’s USX Corporation facility in Gary, a steel business, faced a multi-million dollar lawsuit when a former employee filed an asbestos lawsuit after being diagnosed with mesothelioma. The former worker won his lawsuit and was awarded $250 million, one of the largest mesothelioma payments ever awarded.







What Other Companies Used Asbestos?



Allison - Bedford Foundry



A-Bomb Heavy Water Plant



Heise Brothers and Company



Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical



Southern Indiana Railway Company



Texas Gas Transmission Corporation



Bluffton City High School



Franklin Electric Company



Bethlehem Steel Corporation



U.S. Steel



United States Steel Corp. 



Heise Brothers and Company



Rolls Royce



General Motors



Peerless Pump



Chemetron Corporation



George Rogers Clark National Park



Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation



Raybestos Friction Materials Company



Linde Air Products Company



Clinton Electric Light and Power Company



Indiana & Michigan Electric Company



Blish Milling Company




Some companies that used asbestos are only now the sites of cleanup efforts. In South Bend, the city will take over the site of the former Drewrys brewery, long abandoned and a dangerous source of community asbestos. 



In Indianapolis, the city plans to redevelop the former site of Carrier-Bryant, a manufacturer of air conditioner units. The site is contaminated with asbestos and other toxic materials. 



In 2023, a warehouse fire in Richmond, Indiana, destroyed a former plastic recycling plant. The plant contained asbestos, and the fire spread harmful debris throughout the area. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency got involved in cleaning up asbestos materials and warned residents to be careful around any debris in their yards. 



How Much Compensation Can I Get in a Mesothelioma Lawsuit? 



Asbestos cases vary significantly by individual. The right lawyer can maximize your compensation by finding all the expenses you face. They can make a reasonable estimate but cannot guarantee a certain amount. 







Asbestos and mesothelioma compensation takes into account: 




Past and ongoing medical expenses



Expected future medical and care expenses



Lost wages and lost earning potential



Pain and suffering




Mesothelioma lawsuit compensation can be significant. One of the largest jury verdicts ever awarded in an asbestos case originated in Indiana. Roby Whittington worked at the U.S. Steel plant in Gary and developed mesothelioma.



An Indiana jury ultimately awarded Whittington $250 million. This included $50 million in compensatory damages and $200 million in punitive damages.



When mesothelioma strikes, the impact on Indiana patients and their families is profound. Beyond financial compensation, these lawsuits offer a lifeline by mitigating the economic strain that accompanies this devastating diagnosis. Legal action allows families to focus their energy where it matters most—on health and loved ones—without the overwhelming burden of medical bills and lost income.



By pursuing a mesothelioma lawsuit, patients can secure their family's future during a tumultuous time. This legal recourse not only holds responsible parties accountable but also provides essential financial relief, empowering families to navigate the challenges of mesothelioma with greater peace of mind.



An Indiana jury ultimately awarded Whittington $250 million. This included $50 million in compensatory damages and $200 million in punitive damages. 



How much compensation has been recovered by a particular law firm for mesothelioma clients in Indiana?



The law firm has achieved significant success, securing more than $440 million for mesothelioma-affected families in Indiana. This is part of a larger achievement, with the firm recovering over $9.8 billion for numerous clients nationwide.



Indiana Laws That Affect Mesothelioma Cases



State laws regarding mesothelioma and asbestos claims vary. In Indiana, victims hoping to file a successful lawsuit need to know about the statute of limitations and the state's stance on secondhand asbestos exposure. 



Indiana Statute of Limitations on Mesothelioma and Asbestos Lawsuits



Unlike many other states, Indiana has specific state laws when dealing with asbestos lawsuits. Indiana has two different categories of statutes of limitations: cases against defendants who sold and mined raw asbestos are separate from all other asbestos cases:




If the plaintiff is suing a defendant who mined and sold raw asbestos, the claim must be filed within two years of the plaintiff discovering they developed an asbestos-related disease.



The plaintiffs suing on behalf of a victim who passed away are allowed two years from the date of death to file a lawsuit.




For all other cases, under Ind. Code Ann. § 34-20-3-1, plaintiffs have two years from the time of cause or within ten years after the asbestos products were delivered to the victim.



Take-Home Duty for Secondhand Asbestos Exposure in Indiana



Secondhand asbestos exposure occurs when someone accidentally brings fibers of asbestos from work into the home. They usually unknowingly carry the fibers on their clothing. Anyone in the home can be exposed. There are many cases of people developing mesothelioma from secondhand exposure. 



Some states recognize that companies have a duty of care in these cases. Indiana recognizes this duty. A company has a duty to warn workers and their families of the risks of secondhand asbestos exposure. This means that victims of secondhand exposure can file an asbestos lawsuit in Indiana. 



The decision came in a 2002 asbestos case. A woman sued after developing mesothelioma from exposure to asbestos on her husband's clothing. He worked as an insulation installer. The insulation contained asbestos. 



Courts initially dismissed her case, but her legal team pursued it and a higher court. That court ruled that the asbestos insulation manufacturer had a duty to warn the woman that she could be exposed. 



What Are Indiana's Asbestos Safety Laws?



The Indiana Environmental Health Department, along with the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM), handles and imposes the laws and regulations in the state concerning asbestos.




Indiana has strict compliance laws when it comes to asbestos, which includes notification requirements, demolition and renovation rules, and technical documents.



Licensing requirements must be met before anyone can work on an asbestos abatement project.



Proper inspection staff must be used for all asbestos abatement procedures.



There are several different types of licensing requirements in Indiana concerning working around asbestos, which are determined by the type of job being performed, including disposal handlers, contractors, supervisors, inspectors, and others.




For more detailed information on the legal requirements of licensing as well as any applicable fees, contact the Indiana Asbestos License Program at 317-233-3861.



To learn more about asbestos disposal, emission requirements, and any other asbestos-related questions or concerns, contact the Indiana Department of Environmental Management at 317-232-8941.



Where Can I Find Mesothelioma Treatment in Indiana?



The National Cancer Institute (NCI) has designated the Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center at Indiana University (IU) as a mesothelioma treatment facility.



An NCI-backed medical facility is recognized for its superior physicians, scientists, and other healthcare professionals with in-depth knowledge and experience with mesothelioma treatments and research.



Always seek treatment at medical centers with experience and knowledge of this rare disease, as time is critical in getting the best results. 



Once victims are diagnosed with an asbestos-related disease, they are usually already in the latest stages of the cancer, as the symptoms of mesothelioma typically lie dormant for up to 50 years.



Legal Help in Indiana



If you've been injured by asbestos, there is a good chance that you'll qualify for considerable compensation. Get our free Financial Compensation Packet for information on the top mesothelioma and asbestos lawyers in your area. For questions and assistance, feel free to contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### San Antonio Mesothelioma Lawyers

With the help of experienced San Antonio mesothelioma lawyers, asbestos victims in the city are fighting back and pushing for justice. From military bases to the oil industry, many San Antonio locations exposed residents and workers to asbestos, a dangerous carcinogen that causes mesothelioma and other illnesses. 



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, awaiting those who've been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in San Antonio, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.



Top 10 San Antonio Asbestos Exposure and Mesothelioma Lawyers










Paul Danziger




Founding member of Texas-based law firm that handles asbestos and mesothelioma cases throughout the United States



Over two decades of experience in mesothelioma litigation with more than 1,000 mesothelioma patients helped



His law firm, Danziger & De LLano, has won more than $1,000,000,000 in mesothelioma-related claims



Graduated with honors from the University of Texas, 1989



Law degree from Northwestern University, 1993



Bar admission in Texas



Member of the American Association of Justice and Texas Trial Lawyers Association



Recognized among Top 100 Trial Lawyers by National Trial Lawyers, 2017-2019








Working from his law offices in Houston and San Antonio, Paul Danziger handles mesothelioma cases throughout the United States. He has focused on mesothelioma litigation for over 25 years, and has recovered significant compensation for victims of mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, and asbestosis. 



Paul Danziger grew up in Houston and earned a law degree from Northwestern University School of Law in Chicago in 1993.



Contact Paul →









Jeffrey B. Simon




Graduated from the University of Texas School of Law in 1993



Licensed to practice in Texas, New York, and California



Founding partner of Simon Greenstone Panatier, PC



Named among Top Lawyers Under 40 by D Magazine in 2003 and 2004



Named a Texas Super Lawyer by Super Lawyers (a Thomson Reuters service), 2006 to 2009 and 2014 to 2016



Awarded a Dallas County Special Civil Service Commission from 2011 to 2013



Awarded National Trial Lawyers’ Top 100 Trial Lawyers Award in 2016



Awarded Lifetime Achievement Award by America’s Top 100 Attorneys in 2016








Jeffrey B. Simon is a founding partner of Simon Greenstone Panatier, PC. He is licensed to practice in California, Texas, and New York. He has worked on mesothelioma cases for over 20 years. Simon received a lifetime achievement award from America’s Top 100 Attorneys in 2016.



Contact Jeffrey →









David C. Greenstone




Founding shareholder of Simon Greenstone Panatier, PC



Graduated cum laude from the University of Texas Law School in 1998



Instrumental in the first verdict against Colgate for mesothelioma related to asbestos in talcum powder



Helped win a verdict for significant damages in Arizona in 2016 for a U.S. Navy civilian employee who died from mesothelioma



Awarded Top Verdict in 2015, 2016, and 2018 by TopVerdict.com for wins in California and Arizona



Awarded Premier Attorney Award in 2015 by the American Academy of Trial Attorneys



Named among top 100 trial lawyers from 2014 to the present by National Trial Lawyers








Based in Dallas, Texas, David C. Greenstone is a founding shareholder in the law firm Simon Greenstone Panatier, PC. He has gained significant experience working as a trial lawyer, focusing on cases involving asbestos exposure, toxic torts, and pharmaceuticals. These included the first verdict won against Colgate-Palmolive for mesothelioma caused by a talcum powder product. He earned his undergraduate and law degrees from the University of Texas in 1995 and 1998.



Contact David → 









Michelle Whitman




Secured millions of dollars in settlements for victims of asbestos exposure, including workers in construction, shipbuilding, and power plants



Working through Danziger & De LLano, a mesothelioma law firm with over a billion dollars won in asbestos and mesothelioma cases



Over two deceased of experience



Licensed through the Texas State Bar



Active member of American Bar Association, American Association for Justice, and Texas Trial Lawyers Association








Michelle Whitman is a skilled attorney at Danziger & De Llano, LLP, specializing in Mesothelioma and Asbestos litigation. With over a decade of experience in the field, Michelle has built a strong reputation for securing justice and substantial compensation for victims of asbestos exposure. Her expertise in asbestos-related cases has led to millions of dollars in settlements for clients suffering from mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases.



Contact Michelle → 









Rod de LLano




Founding partner of Danziger & De LLano, LLP, one of America’s most successful firms specializing in mesothelioma and asbestos litigation



Secured over $1,000,000,000 in asbestos and mesothelioma compensation for victims through his Texas-based law firm



Featured in New York Times, Boston Globe, Houston Chronicle, and many more



Awarded Super Lawyers Selection in 2025



Awarded Best Attorney, RUE Ratings Best Attorneys of America in 2024



Awarded Best of Business Houston, General Small Business Community Awards in 2014



Awarded Top 10 Law Firms, American Institute of Personal Injury Attorneys in 2020 and 2024








Rod de Llano is a founding partner of Danziger & De Llano, LLP, one of the nation’s most successful firms specializing in mesothelioma and asbestos litigation. A graduate of Princeton University with a degree in Economics, his career took a remarkable turn when one of his cases inspired the independent film Puncture, starring Chris Evans.



Contact Rod’s Texas Mesothelioma Law Firm →









Chris J. Panatier




Graduated from the University of Texas Law School in 2001



Founding partner in Simon Greenstone Panatier, PC



Won verdicts with significant damages



With practice partner, brought the first verdict against Colgate-Palmolive for mesothelioma caused by talcum powder



Named a Thomson Reuters Texas Rising Star, 2005 to 2012



Named Thomson Reuters Texas Super Lawyer from 2013 to 2019



Top Lawyer Under 40, as named by D Magazine for 2006








Chris J. Panatier is a partner in the trial law firm Simon Greenstone Panatier, PC. He focuses on asbestos and mesothelioma, toxic tort cases, products liability, and pharmaceuticals. With a partner he helped to win the first talcum powder and mesothelioma verdict against Colgate-Palmolive. Panatier earned his law degree from the University of Texas in 2001.



Contact Chris →









Lou Black




Partner at Black Law Group



Focuses solely on asbestos exposure and mesothelioma cases



Graduate of Texas Christian University and South Texas College of Law, 1990 and 1993



A career dedicated to asbestos cases and victims of mesothelioma and lung cancer



Admissions in Texas and Pennsylvania



Member, board of directors and executive committee of Texas Trial Lawyers Association








Lou Black is a partner and founding member of Black Law Group, with offices in New Mexico and Texas. A graduate of the South Texas College of Law, Black has been practicing law since 1993. She has dedicated her career to helping victims of mesothelioma and lung cancer from asbestos exposure seek justice and recover damages. She is an expert in asbestos litigation.



Contact Lou →









Peter A. Kraus




Founding partner at Waters, Kraus & Paul



Admitted to the State Bar of Hawaii, California, Missouri, Texas, and Virginia, as well as several U.S. Courts and the U.S. Supreme Court



Involved in numerous mesothelioma cases with significant compensation for victims



Graduated University of Texas School of Law, 1985



Awarded Above and Beyond Award by the American Association for Justice in 2017



Appointee to the Federal Judicial Center Foundation Board, 2014 to the present



Named a Texas Top Rated Lawyer by Lexis Nexis, 2013 through 2016



Listed Best Lawyer in Dallas by D Magazine, 2001, and 2011 to 2019








Peter Kraus is a founding partner with the Waters, Kraus & Paul law firm serving Houston from their Dallas, Texas office. He focuses on litigating cases related to harmful exposure, particularly asbestos. His nearly 30 years of work on behalf of asbestos and mesothelioma victims has led to major wins and jury awards. He is active in his community and spends time on pro bono work and in serving on boards of directors and trustees for a number of charitable organizations.



Contact Peter →









Lawrence G. Gettys




Over 27 years of experience advocating for asbestos victims



Practicing counsel at Talbot, Carmouche & Marcello in Baton Rouge, Louisiana



Graduated with honors, Southern University Law Center, 1995



Bar admissions in Louisiana and Texas



Member, American Association for Justice, Louisiana Association for Justice, and Texas Trial Lawyers Association








Lawrence G. Gettys has over 20 years of litigation experience and focuses on cases involving asbestos exposure and mesothelioma. He has been instrumental in winning major verdicts for asbestos victims as a member of the Waters, Krauss & Paul law firm. Working from the Baton Rouge, Louisiana office, Gettys is admitted to practice in Louisiana and Texas, as well as several federal courts.



Contact Lawrence →









Ross Stomel




Accreditation from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs for excellence in representing veterans



Recovered over $250 million in verdicts and settlements related to asbestos exposure



Named among the “Top 100 Trial Lawyers” by National Trial Lawyers Association








Ross Stomel is a leading expert in mesothelioma and asbestos litigation who practices in Houston, Texas. He has made a career of working with victims of personal injury and wrongful death, with special expertise in asbestos exposure. He has litigated throughout the U.S. and helped his clients recover more than $250 million in settlements and jury awards.



Contact Ross →






San Antonio Asbestos Facts




Texas has had a high number of asbestos-related deaths, with more than 15,000 between 1999 and 2017. 



The oil industry in the state, and in and around San Antonio, played a big role in asbestos exposure in workers. 



The military, which has a few bases in the city, also used asbestos heavily and put service members and veterans at risk. 




About Asbestos and Mesothelioma



Asbestos is the only known cause of mesothelioma, a rare and aggressive cancer. Asbestos is a fibrous mineral that was once used heavily in many industries, including several that operated throughout San Antonio.



Most asbestos exposure occurred in the workplace. Asbestos materials shed tiny fibers that workers can inhale or ingest if not using adequate protective gear. When these fibers are inhaled, they can lodge in the mesothelial tissue, which lines the lungs and abdomen. Over a prolonged period, these fibers accumulate, causing irritation and inflammation.



Asbestos fibers cause cell and tissue damage in the body, which can lead to illness decades later in some people. This damage can result in the development of tumors, as the fibers disrupt normal cellular processes and promote cancerous growth. Specifically, asbestos exposure can cause:




Pleural mesothelioma



Peritoneal mesothelioma



Asbestosis



Lung cancer




Understanding the link between asbestos inhalation and mesothelioma is crucial for prevention and early detection. The fibrous nature of asbestos makes it particularly insidious, as it can remain dormant in the body for years before manifesting as a serious health issue.



If you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, a San Antonio attorney can help you recover damages for medical and other expenses. 



Understanding Mesothelioma: Symptoms and Effects on Families



Mesothelioma, a severe and often late-diagnosed cancer, primarily results from long-term exposure to asbestos. It typically affects the lining of vital organs like the lungs and, less commonly, the heart. Each year, around 3,000 new cases emerge in the United States, creating ripple effects that extend beyond the patient to their entire family.



Recognizing the Symptoms



For those at risk or already diagnosed, identifying the symptoms early can be challenging. Mesothelioma symptoms often resemble those of less severe illnesses and may manifest decades after exposure, making diagnosis complex. Common symptoms include:




Persistent Cough: Often dry, this cough can worsen over time.



Shortness of Breath: Arising from fluid build-up around the lungs.



Chest and Abdominal Pain: Resulting from tumor pressure.



Extreme Fatigue: A constant sense of tiredness and low energy.



Weight Loss: Unexplained and rapid weight reduction.




These symptoms not only deteriorate physical health but also significantly impact mental well-being.



Effects on Patients and Families



The diagnosis of mesothelioma is life-altering. Patients often face rapid health decline soon after diagnosis due to the aggressive nature of the disease. The physical toll is immense, but the emotional and financial stress on families can be equally daunting.




Emotional Strain: Watching a loved one battle such a formidable disease can be heartbreaking, bringing feelings of helplessness and despair.



Financial Burden: Medical treatments are expensive, often leading to mounting bills and financial anxiety.



Lifestyle Changes: Families may need to alter their daily routines to care for the patient, impacting work and social life.




Despite these challenges, families often rally together to support one another, seeking justice and compensation for the negligent asbestos exposure that resulted in this devastating disease. Such claims can ease the financial strain and provide some measure of relief.



In times of such hardship, the strength of family bonds and support networks becomes crucial to navigating these difficult waters.



How Much is an Asbestos Exposure or Mesothelioma Lawsuit Worth in San Antonio, TX?



The average settlement amount for mesothelioma lawsuits is between $1 million and $1.4 million. Jury awards are often much higher, but in a trial, you could end up with nothing. 



Compensation amounts vary significantly by case. Factors that affect your compensation include: 




The degree of liability of the defendants



Your past, ongoing, and future expected medical expenses



The severity of your illness



Lost wages



Emotional and physical pain and suffering




One example of a winning case for a Texas asbestos claim illustrates what is possible when you take legal action against negligent companies. In 2013 Union Carbide lost an asbestos exposure case brought by Vernon and Patsy Walker.



Mr. Walker was diagnosed with mesothelioma after working with the company's asbestos materials. Vernon worked for decades as a painter using Union Carbide asbestos-containing paints.



A jury awarded Mr. and Mrs. Walker $11 million in damages. Union Carbide has been at the center of numerous other mesothelioma lawsuits after workers became seriously ill from the company's pro



Complete the form below to discover how much your asbestos-related lawsuit could be worth in San Antonio, TX.











                
                        
                            Calculate Case Value
                            
                        
                        Diagnosis-- Select --MesotheliomaAsbestosisAsbestos-Related Lung CancerIs Diagnosed Person Alive?-- Select --YesPassed away under 2 years agoPassed away over 2 years agoAge of Diagnosed Person-- Select --Under 6565-8485 or olderExposure-- Select --MilitaryOccupationalSecond-HandOther / UnknownMain Job Site-- Select --ShipyardsBoiler RoomsPowerhousesPaper MillsConstruction SitesAutomotiveFirefightingRailroadsRefineriesOther / UnknownMain Asbestos Product Used-- Select --Fire Protection ProductsBrake Pads / LiningsCeiling Textures / Tile / PlasterElectrical ProductsTransite ProductsHeating & Cooling ProductsVermiculiteRoofing ProductsPaints / Plasters / Wall CoveringsOther / UnknownState-- Select --AlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaNorthern Mariana IslandsOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahU.S. Virgin IslandsVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces EuropeArmed Forces PacificPhone(Required)Email(Required)First Name(Required)Last Name(Required)EmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
         Any information you send is secure and will never be sold or released.This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
        
                        Δ
                        





The Importance of Working with a San Antonio Asbestos Lawyer







Asbestos exposure is almost always negligent. If you have mesothelioma, you can hold the asbestos companies accountable for your expenses. You have a right to take legal action, to make a claim, and to demand compensation. 



These cases can get very complicated, so it is essential you choose and work with a top Texas mesothelioma attorney in San Antonio. They should be backed by a big law firm and offer several advantages: 




Extensive experience handling and winning asbestos cases



Jurisdiction in multiple states



A network of investigators and medical experts to prove your case



Deep knowledge of where and when San Antonio companies used asbestos



Experience negotiating settlements and litigating in court



Adequate resources to handle a complex asbestos claim



Free initial consultations and no-fee guarantees until they win



The best chance of getting fair compensation for your illness




Why Acting Swiftly After a Mesothelioma Diagnosis is Essential for Legal Exploration



Receiving a mesothelioma diagnosis can be overwhelming, but it's important to act quickly in considering legal avenues.



Understanding Time Constraints




State-Specific Deadlines: The time you have to file a claim, known as the statute of limitations, varies by state and is often shorter than you might expect.



Decades-Later Advantage: Mesothelioma can manifest many years after exposure, but laws are designed to account for this delayed onset, allowing for cases to be filed long after initial exposure.




Benefits of Prompt Legal Consultation




Evidence Preservation: Acting early helps in gathering critical evidence and identifying witnesses who can support your claims.



Detailed Assessment: An experienced attorney can help you navigate complex medical and occupational records to construct a strong case.



Compensation Potential: By moving quickly, you increase the chances of obtaining compensation to cover medical bills, lost wages, and other related expenses.




Choosing the Right Legal Path




Tailored Legal Advice: Each case is unique, and timely legal advice ensures you explore all available options, including potential settlements or court trials.



Peace of Mind: Swift action can provide peace of mind, allowing you and your family to focus on health and personal priorities.




It's crucial not to delay. Connecting with a seasoned personal injury attorney right after diagnosis can secure your legal rights and potentially lead to a favorable outcome.



How to File a Mesothelioma Claim in San Antonio, Texas



You have several options when filing a claim for mesothelioma and asbestos exposure. The first step in the process is to find the right lawyer to help you. They will explain your options and which you are eligible for: 




Mesothelioma Personal Injury Lawsuit. Negligent asbestos exposure makes mesothelioma a personal injury. You can sue for a settlement or jury award.



Mesothelioma Wrongful Death Lawsuit. You can also sue for compensation if a loved one died from mesothelioma. 



Asbestos Trust Fund Claim. You may qualify to make a claim with a trust fund if any of the asbestos companies that exposed you went bankrupt. 



Veteran Benefits Claim. The VA offers benefits, including disability compensation, to veterans exposed to asbestos during military service. 




Can You File a Mesothelioma Claim Many Years After Exposure?



Yes, it is possible to file a mesothelioma claim even years after exposure. Many individuals worry that too much time has passed since their exposure to asbestos, which primarily occurs in industrial workplaces or through products used decades ago. However, there's hope for those affected.



Diagnosis Triggers Legal Opportunity



The clock for filing a claim often starts ticking at the time of diagnosis rather than at the moment of exposure. Mesothelioma may take several decades to manifest symptoms, thus pushing back the statute of limitations. This means you might still have a viable legal path to pursue compensation once a diagnosis is confirmed.



Why Speak to an Attorney?



Consulting a proficient personal injury attorney is pivotal. They can unravel the complexities of mesothelioma claims, assessing the specifics of your case. An attorney can:




Evaluate your exposure history



Navigate the statute of limitations



Determine the right time to file a claim




Taking swift action post-diagnosis can make a significant difference in the outcome of your claim. Expert legal advice will ensure you explore all possible avenues for compensation, even if it feels like too much time has passed since exposure. Remember, each case is unique, and legal advice tailored to your situation is crucial.



How Was I Exposed to Asbestos in San Antonio? 



You were most likely exposed at one or more jobs in your past. Most people with mesothelioma are diagnosed decades after workplace exposure. This long latency period is typical, as the disease often only emerges many years after the initial contact with asbestos.



In many cases, the progression from exposure to the development of noticeable symptoms can span 20 to 50 years. This delayed onset can make it challenging to link the disease back to the original source of exposure.



Understanding this timeline is crucial for both early detection and effective legal recourse. If you suspect past exposure, regular screenings and consultations with a healthcare professional are advisable to catch any signs early.



Many San Antonio companies and workplaces used asbestos. These are just a few examples:



Asbestos in the Oil Industry







The oil industry has been a huge part of the Texas economy for decades, including in and around San Antonio. The oil industry frequently used asbestos in its facilities. 



Since oil production and refining pose risks of heat and fire, asbestos was used as insulation and in many components and equipment, including: 




Pipes



Manifolds



Valves



Benchtops



Safety clothing  



Electrical equipment 




Oil companies like San Antonio-based Valero Energy used asbestos materials in their administration facilities. Valero’s Bexar County headquarters ranks high in the number of worksites with asbestos exposure.



Valero inherited its job sites from LoVaca Gathering Company and its parent Coastal States Gas Corporation. Many of those job sites, including the San Antonio headquarters building and the Three Rivers refinery, contain asbestos.



Al Gonzalez Energy Management (AGE) is another San Antonio oil company with older facilities.



AGE started operations in 1991, a decade after the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued its first reports linking asbestos exposure to severe health problems.



AGE inherited older facilities, including a San Antonio refinery from Howell Hydrocarbons and Chemical. These former Howell properties contain significant amounts of asbestos dating from the 1940s and 1950s. 



The Military and Asbestos



San Antonio has a long-standing relationship with the U.S. military. 



Three major military bases, Joint Base San Antonio’s Fort Sam Houston, Lackland, and Randolph, were active military installations between the 1920s and the early 1970s. The military was a large-scale user of asbestos during this period. 



In 2021, ten families stationed at three Texas bases, including Lackland, sued a private landlord over asbestos and other poor living conditions. They are suing Balfour Beatty Communities LLC for concealing the dangerous conditions before signing the leases. 



Indirect Asbestos Exposure for Family Members: How It Happens



Family members can face asbestos exposure even if they never step foot inside a workplace where asbestos is present. The danger arises when asbestos fibers cling to the hair, clothing, and personal items of individuals who work with or near asbestos materials. When these workers return home, microscopic fibers can be transferred to household surfaces and the air, inadvertently putting loved ones at risk.



Here's how the process often unfolds:




Contaminated Clothing: Workers may unknowingly bring asbestos fibers into their homes via their clothing. Once home, shaking out these clothes or wearing them around the house can release fibers into the air, posing a threat to others.



Hair and Skin: Asbestos fibers can settle on skin and hair. Simple acts like hugging or sitting together can transfer these fibers to family members, leading to potential health hazards.



Shared Spaces and Laundry: Washing contaminated clothes can expose others in the household, as fibers dislodge in the laundry process, spreading to other garments and surfaces.




By understanding these pathways, families can take preventive steps to reduce the potential for exposure, such as designated work clothes and proper hygiene practices.



Buildings and Businesses Associated with Asbestos in San Antonio



Many businesses and industries used asbestos in San Antonio. This includes the construction industry, which used asbestos in materials that went into residences and public buildings. 



Schools




Alamo Heights High School



Apprentice School



Bexar County Medical School



Camelot Elementary School



Northeast Independent School District’s Central Administration Building



Colonial Hills Elementary School



Columbia Heights Elementary School



Coronado Village Elementary School



Crockett Elementary School



Dwight Middle School



Edgewood Elementary School



Eisenhower Middle School



El Dorado Elementary School



Fox Technical High School



Garner Middle School



Gus Garcia Middle School



Hawthorne Middle School



Incarnate Word College



Jackson-Keller Elementary School



John F Kennedy High School



John Jay High School



John Marshall High School



Lanier High School



Burbank High School



MacArthur High School



Mark Twain Middle School



Oliver W Holmes High School



Palo Alto Elementary School



Rosedale Elementary School



Saint Mary's University



San Antonio College



San Antonio Independent School District



Schenck Elementary School



Stewart Elementary School



Tox Technical High School



Trinity University



Will Jackson Middle School



Winston Churchill High School




Hospitals and Nursing Homes




Baptist Hospital



Bexar County Hospital



Brady Memorial Clinic



Buena Vista Clinic



Caduceus Nursing Home



Community Hospital



Golden Manor Jewish Home For The Aged



Hillside Manor Nursing Home



Kerrville State Hospital



Lackland Air Force Base Hospital



Lutheran General Hospital



Park North General Hospital



Robert B. Green Hospital



Rosa Verde Medical Facility



San Antonio Community Hospital



Santa Rosa Medical Center



South Texas Cancer Radiation Treatment Center



Southwest Methodist Hospital



Wilford Hall Military Hospital




Power Plants




Braunig Power Plant



Leon Creek Power Plant



Mission Road Power Plant



W.B. Tuttle Power Plant




Banks




Alamo National Bank



Bexar County National Bank



Broadway National Bank



Churchill National Bank



Citizens Bank



First Federal Savings & Loan



First National Bank



Main Savings



National Bank of Commerce



Northside State Bank




Other Businesses




City of Public Service Board



City Public Service Board



City Service Power



Coca Cola



College Park Apartments



CrossRoads Shopping Center



Crown Tower Office Building



Cummins Diesel Project



Data Point Terminal



Galveston, Harrisburg, and San Antonio Railway



Pioneer Flour Mills



Post Laundry



S W Research



Saint Benedict’s Convent



Sam's Center



San Antonio City Water




Mesothelioma Treatment in San Antonio







The Mays Cancer Center at the University of Texas Health San Antonio is a National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. An NCI-backed medical center provides excellent care for cancer patients and has cutting-edge treatments, research, clinical trials, and world-class experts. 



Two Comprehensive Cancer Centers are nearby in Houston: the Baylor College of Medicine's Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center and the MD Anderson Cancer Center. 



When my husband was diagnosed we had no idea what to do. Our doctor said we should reach out to an attorney to talk about compensation. After talking to several firms we found the mesothelioma lawyer center and were grateful we did. They helped with every step of the way. If you need a meso attorney then I would recommend contacting them.- Isabelle D.



Get Legal Help from a San Antonio Asbestos Attorney



If you've been injured by asbestos, there is a good chance that you'll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Seattle Mesothelioma Lawyer

Contact an experienced Seattle mesothelioma lawyer if you've been harmed by asbestos. Many early industries in Seattle, such as paper mills and shipyards, used asbestos in the past. Lingering asbestos materials in the city continue to put residents and workers at risk of harmful exposure. 



If you or a loved one has been exposed to asbestos and suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that you may be eligible for significant financial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Seattle, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.





Seattle Asbestos Facts




The state of Washington had 9,200 deaths related to asbestos exposure from 1999 to 2017. 



Seattle and King County led the state in asbestos deaths in that period, with 1,891. 



Shipbuilding and aircraft manufacturing have long been major industries in Seattle, but they also used asbestos and caused worker exposure.




How Did Chemical Companies Contribute to Asbestos Exposure?



Chemical companies played a significant role in asbestos exposure, particularly through their industrial processes and manufacturing practices. Here's how they contributed:




Use of Asbestos in Production: Many chemical companies employed asbestos in their manufacturing processes due to its durability and resistance to heat and chemicals. Asbestos was used to insulate machinery, pipes, and equipment, which, over time, released fibers into the air.



Workplace Environment: Employees working in chemical plants were often exposed to airborne asbestos fibers. Without adequate protective gear or ventilation systems, workers inhaled these fibers, leading to potential health risks.



Handling of Raw Materials: In the production of various chemical products, raw materials often contained asbestos components. The handling and processing of these materials without proper safety measures led to increased exposure for workers.



Legacy of Contamination: Older chemical facilities might have been constructed with asbestos-containing materials. Even after these materials were no longer in use, failure to properly remediate or replace them with safer alternatives resulted in prolonged exposure risks.




These practices not only affected the workforce but also had implications for environmental contamination, impacting surrounding communities. Understanding these historical practices helps underscore the importance of stringent safety measures and regulations in the chemical industry today.



How Were Power and Electric Companies Involved in Asbestos Exposure?



Power and electric companies played a significant role in asbestos exposure due to their extensive use of asbestos-containing materials. Here's how:




Insulation Needs: Asbestos was prized for its exceptional insulating properties and resistance to heat. Power plants, needing effective insulation for turbines, generators, and electrical wiring, often utilized asbestos to prevent heat loss and reduce fire risk.



Exposure Risks: Employees working in these environments frequently handled or were in the vicinity of asbestos products. This put them at risk of inhaling asbestos fibers, which could lead to serious health issues such as asbestosis, lung cancer, or mesothelioma over time.



Product Application: Beyond insulation, asbestos was used in various equipment and structural components, including boilers, pipes, and electrical panels. This widespread application meant that many areas within power facilities posed potential exposure hazards.



Historical Context: Prior to stricter regulations, asbestos use was pervasive in the industry. Companies did not always provide adequate protection or warnings about the risks associated with asbestos, leading to occupational exposure.




In essence, power and electric companies contributed to asbestos exposure through widespread use in insulation and equipment, impacting workers' health due to prolonged exposure over years.



Do I Need a Seattle Mesothelioma Attorney? 



If you have a mesothelioma diagnosis, you need a top Seattle or Washington mesothelioma lawyer. Mesothelioma almost always results from negligent workplace asbestos exposure. You need an experienced asbestos attorney to help hold asbestos companies accountable. 



How Will a Seattle Mesothelioma Lawyer Help Me? 







The right mesothelioma lawyer in Seattle will be able to do several things to help you during this difficult time: 




Explain your legal options for seeking compensation



Recommend the best course of action



File a claim or lawsuit on your behalf



Provide investigators and medical experts to find evidence and build a strong case



Negotiate a fair settlement and ensure you get it quickly



Litigate your case in court if necessary



Come to you if you are too ill to travel



Provide contingency payment, so you pay nothing until they win




Challenges in Litigating a Mesothelioma Case



Litigating a mesothelioma case can be quite complex due to a variety of factors. Here’s what you might face:




Establishing Exposure: One of the primary challenges is proving where and when the asbestos exposure occurred. Because symptoms can take decades to appear, pinpointing the exact source can be difficult.



Identifying Responsible Parties: Over the years, many companies that used asbestos may have merged, rebranded, or ceased operations. Tracking down the correct party accountable for the exposure adds another layer of complexity.



Scientific and Medical Evidence: You’ll need solid medical documentation connecting the exposure to the diagnosis. Mesothelioma has specific latency periods, and thorough medical records are crucial for making a direct link.



Legal Complexity: Mesothelioma cases often involve intricate legal processes. Navigating state and federal regulations, knowing which legal precedents apply, and handling vast amounts of documentation require expertise.



Resource-Intensive Litigation: These cases demand significant resources in terms of time and money. Expert witnesses, medical testimony, and specialized legal counsel are vital, but they also contribute to the overall cost and length of the litigation process.




Each case is unique, and understanding these challenges can help you prepare better for the road ahead. Professional legal assistance is essential to navigate these hurdles effectively.



Get a Free Legal Consultation



It’s important to act fast with asbestos claims. There are time limits on filing. Your illness is likely severe, which also limits your time. Don’t hesitate to reach out to a Seattle asbestos firm or lawyer to get a free initial consultation. You shouldn’t have to pay any fees to talk to a lawyer and get some initial advice. They will review your case and explain your legal options. There is no obligation to go further.



After a mesothelioma diagnosis, you’re faced with emotional distress and daunting financial challenges. Seeking justice for asbestos exposure is a crucial step. A qualified attorney can guide you through the process of securing compensation for both the financial and emotional tolls of the illness.




Understand Your Legal Rights: An experienced lawyer can assess where and how your asbestos exposure occurred, and how it impacts your life now and in the future.



Seek Compensation: Addressing treatment costs, lost wages, and family support is essential. Legal representation can help you pursue the financial relief you deserve, ensuring peace of mind for both you and your loved ones.




Act quickly to explore your legal avenues. By consulting with a dedicated asbestos attorney, you can take the first step towards safeguarding your future and receiving the care you need.



Seattle, Washington, Mesothelioma Settlements and Verdicts



One of the most common questions clients have for their asbestos lawyers is how much compensation they can expect to get in a mesothelioma claim. Lawyers cannot promise a specific amount, but they have the expertise to make a reasonable estimate and maximize their clients' compensation. 



Compensation depends on various factors individual to each case. These are some examples of what Seattle lawyers have been able to recover for their asbestos clients: 




A jury in King County recently awarded a woman's estate $3.5 million for her death from mesothelioma. Ramona Brandes's father worked at ARCO Cherry Point refinery and brought asbestos home on his clothing. Ramona was exposed to those fibers and later developed mesothelioma.  



Another King County jury awarded the wife of Kevan Holdsworth $16.67 million for his death from mesothelioma. Holdsworth worked at a paper mill where he was exposed to asbestos in dryer felts. 



A federal jury in Seattle awarded Henry Barabin $10.2 million for a mesothelioma diagnosis. He worked at Crown Zellerbach Paper Mill and used asbestos materials on the job. 




Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Seattle? 



Seattle has a long history with industries that used asbestos in the past and exposed workers. These are just some of the industries and workplaces where you might have been exposed to asbestos in the area. 



Seattle Shipyards







As an important port city on the west coast, Seattle has a long history of shipbuilding and repair. The shipyard industry has employed thousands of residents, putting many at risk of asbestos exposure.




Established in the early 1940s, the Duwamish Shipyard became one of the largest shipyards in Seattle. Workers here handled asbestos as it went into nearly every part of every ship, including in the steam pipes, steam drums, heaters, engine rooms, building materials, and insulation.



The Todd Pacific Shipyards Seattle Division was formed in 1916 as a dry dock construction and shipbuilding company. It provided many jobs to Seattle residents, but it also caused asbestos exposure.



Lockheed Shipyard was another Seattle ship construction company with a history of heavy asbestos use. From the 1930s until the mid-1980s, thousands of workers were exposed to asbestos in equipment, machinery, pipes, tools, and more.




Aircraft Manufacturing



Seattle is also a major aircraft manufacturing city. The Boeing Company, now headquartered in Chicago, was founded in Seattle in 1916 and still has a significant presence near the city. 



The company's Commercial Airplanes division is headquartered in nearby Reston, where a large factory builds airliners such as the 777 Dreamliner. Boeing is a major supplier of aircraft for the U.S. military. 



From World War I to the present, the company has built combat and support aircraft of all types for the U.S. Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps.



Military service in Washington state, particularly around Seattle and its extensive naval stations, army bases, and air bases, has historically involved significant exposure to asbestos. This material was widely used in military infrastructure and equipment for its fire-resistant properties.



Servicemembers stationed at these locations often encountered asbestos in various forms, from shipyards to aircraft maintenance facilities. The widespread presence of this hazardous material in military settings underscores the potential health risks faced by those who served in Washington.



For veterans, understanding the historical use of asbestos is crucial, as it informs health monitoring and decisions related to service-related health claims. These factors are essential for those who may have been exposed during their military careers.



As in the shipbuilding industry, the use of asbestos by Boeing and other aerospace manufacturers is now minimal. 



At one time, Boeing used asbestos in many of its parts and materials. Until 1981, many military and civilian aircraft made in the U.S. Used asbestos in engine insulation, wiring, adhesives, electrical insulation, and brake pads. Factory workers and maintenance personnel who built or repaired planes built before 1981 are at high risk for asbestos exposure.



In addition to aircraft, asbestos was commonly used in various materials found in buildings due to its heat-resistant properties. Some of these materials include:




Heat-Resistant Fabrics: Often used in protective clothing and fireproofing applications.



Pipe Coating: Used to insulate pipes and prevent heat loss or gain.



Wall Insulation: Integrated into walls to improve thermal efficiency and fire resistance.



Floor Tiles: Incorporated in flooring for durability and fireproofing.



Roofing and Siding Shingles: Applied to enhance weather resistance and fire protection.




Understanding the widespread use of asbestos in both aviation and construction sectors highlights the pervasive nature of its applications. Awareness of these common materials is crucial for identifying potential exposure risks in both older aircraft and buildings.



Additional Job Sites Associated with Asbestos in Seattle



As Seattle grew, many industrial job sites cropped up and used asbestos for decades. Construction of buildings also used asbestos, and many buildings still contain asbestos materials. Workers in the construction industry, especially those involved in building, renovating, or demolishing older structures, may have been exposed to asbestos fibers. This exposure often occurred when asbestos-containing materials were disturbed, releasing tiny fibers into the air.



Individuals who worked in environments with inadequate safety measures were particularly at risk. Asbestos was commonly used in products such as insulation, roofing, and flooring materials. When these materials were cut, sanded, or otherwise manipulated, the risk of inhaling asbestos fibers increased, potentially leading to serious health issues.



While some construction workers may have been aware of the risks, many were not fully informed of the dangers, resulting in potential long-term health consequences. The legacy of asbestos use still impacts the industry today, with many workers experiencing asbestos-related illnesses. Protecting current workers through proper safety protocols and awareness remains a critical priority.



Schools




Cleveland High School



Dearborn Park School



John Muir Elementary School



Lincoln High School



St. Luke School



Norkirk Elementary School



Seattle School District



Shoreline Middle School



Shoreline Community College



Forest Ridge Academy




Steam Companies




Alaska Steam



Auxiliary Steam Plant



Olympic Steamship Company




Hospitals




Children’s Orthopedic Hospital



Firecrest Mental Hospital



Harborview Hospital



King County Hospital



New Providence Hospital



Northwest Hospital



Providence Hospital



Swedish Medical Center




Shipbuilding




Associated Shipyards



Bethlehem Steel Shipbuilding



Boeing Marine Systems Shipbuilding & Repair



Lake Washington Shipyards



Marco Shipyard



Olympic Steamship Company



Seattle Shipyard




Other Job Sites




Naval Supply Depot



Wheeler Osgood Company



Under Sea Gardens



Kaiser Cement



Sitka Pulp Mill Builders



Sundfeldt Equipment Company



Monsanto Chemical Company



Liquid Carbonic Corporation



Kaiser Cement



Automatic Sprinkler Corporation of America



American Linen Supply Company



Northern Pacific Railway Company




Could Working in the Gas Industry in Seattle Lead to Asbestos-Related Diseases?



Absolutely, careers in the gas industry in Seattle have historically posed a risk of asbestos exposure. Many facilities that operated in this sector utilized materials containing asbestos. These materials were prized for their heat resistance and durability, making them ideal for use in high-temperature environments like gas plants.



Potential Exposure Areas



Workers in these facilities often encountered asbestos in:




Insulation for pipes and boilers



Gaskets and seals



Protective gear and clothing




Health Risks



This exposure can lead to serious health conditions such as:




Asbestosis - A chronic lung disease caused by inhaling asbestos fibers.



Lung Cancer - Increased risk primarily linked to long-term exposure.



Mesothelioma - A rare but aggressive cancer found in the lining of the lungs, heart, or abdomen.




Historical Context



Throughout much of the 20th century, the use of asbestos was prevalent in many industrial applications. Regulations around its usage have since tightened, but for many workers, especially those involved in maintenance or renovation of older facilities, the risk of exposure remained significant until more stringent safety measures were put in place.



While awareness has improved and regulations have minimized current risks, the legacy of past practices continues to impact former and even current workers in the gas industry.



Absolutely, hotels can indeed be potential sources of asbestos exposure. Many older buildings, including hotels constructed before modern safety regulations, may have used materials containing asbestos. This is often found in insulation, roofing, ceiling tiles, and even flooring.



Structures like hotels that have not undergone significant renovation or asbestos abatement may still harbor these hazardous materials. Renovations or demolitions can disturb asbestos, releasing fibers into the air and potentially posing health risks to guests and staff.



In particular, notable hotels built during the mid-20th century, when asbestos was a common construction material, might still retain some of these older materials. Therefore, it is crucial for these establishments to assess and manage asbestos risks, especially when undertaking remodeling projects. Always ensure you are informed about the age and renovation history of a hotel if concerned about asbestos exposure.



Am I Still at Risk of Asbestos Exposure in Seattle? 







Unfortunately, asbestos exposure is still a risk for workers and residents in Seattle. The biggest threat comes from asbestos materials that remain in older buildings. If these materials are disturbed by renovations or deteriorate over time, they can release harmful fibers. 



A few recent incidents in and near Seattle highlight the need for concern. An unlicensed asbestos contractor in Bothell was sentenced to jail time after violating safety regulations when working with asbestos in people's homes. 



In Seattle, a house-flipping company was fined $800,000 for asbestos violations. They mishandled asbestos on the job, putting workers and residents at risk of exposure. Neighbors reported the owners to the authorities. 



Asbestos is also a concern in public buildings. Parents recently raised concerns about asbestos in a West Seattle elementary school. On Mercer Island, the city hall building closed in the spring of 2023 because materials in some areas tested positive for asbestos. 



Mesothelioma Treatment in Seattle



It’s important to seek mesothelioma treatment from specialists in cancer and asbestos-related diseases. The following are highly recommended doctors in the Seattle area specializing in mesothelioma:




Dr. Eric Vallieres, Swedish Cancer Institute: 1101 Madison Street, Suite 850, Seattle, Washington, 98104



Dr. Michael S. Mulligan, University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, Washington, 91895




Understanding Mesothelioma: Causes and Implications



Mesothelioma is a serious and often deadly type of cancer that primarily affects the lining of the lungs, abdomen, or heart. The primary cause of this aggressive disease is exposure to asbestos, a naturally occurring fibrous mineral. Despite its once-common use across various industries, asbestos is now recognized for its severe health risks.



What Causes Mesothelioma?




Asbestos Exposure: The dominant factor leading to mesothelioma is prolonged exposure to asbestos fibers. These fibers, when inhaled or swallowed, can become lodged in the mesothelium, the thin layer of tissue covering most internal organs. Over time, they cause inflammation and genetic damage, potentially leading to cancer.



Occupational Hazards: Many individuals develop mesothelioma after working in industries such as construction, shipbuilding, or manufacturing where asbestos was heavily utilized. As a result, job-related exposure remains a significant concern.



Environmental and Secondary Exposure: Although less common, mesothelioma can also occur from environmental exposure to asbestos, such as living near mines or factories. Additionally, secondary exposure happens when family members have contact with asbestos fibers brought home on clothing.




The development of mesothelioma can take decades after asbestos exposure, making it challenging to diagnose early. Unfortunately, as of now, there is no cure, underscoring the importance of early detection and preventive measures in reducing risk.



His meticulous attention to detail and expertise ensured our case was handled swiftly and efficiently. What truly impressed us was Paul's responsiveness—he was always quick to reply and kept us well-informed throughout.- Patrick M.



Getting Legal Help in Seattle



Remember, if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you need additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Jacksonville Mesothelioma Lawyer

Many people who developed asbestos illnesses at work are now fighting for justice with the assistance of a qualified Jacksonville mesothelioma lawyer. Jacksonville is a high-risk area for asbestos exposure because of its long history of shipping and manufacturing. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Jacksonville, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.






Jacksonville Asbestos Facts








Deaths related to asbestos in and around Jacksonville and Duval County numbered 690 between 1999 and 2017.



Jacksonville's important location on the Atlantic led to a thriving shipping industry with heavy asbestos use.



Other industries, as well as military sites, have contributed to asbestos exposure in the Jacksonville area, including energy and construction. 





Why Should I Sue for Mesothelioma? 



Most people sue for mesothelioma to recover damages. Mesothelioma is caused by negligent workplace asbestos exposure. You can hold companies accountable for your exposure and seek compensation for the medical and other expenses resulting from your illness.



Filing a claim not only helps cover immediate medical costs but also plays a crucial role in securing your family’s financial future. Legal action against these companies can provide the necessary compensation to manage ongoing healthcare needs and maintain financial stability for your loved ones.



Moreover, it’s important to recognize that many asbestos companies knew the risks associated with their products but chose to conceal them for decades. By filing a mesothelioma lawsuit, you are not just seeking financial restitution; you are also taking a stand to hold these corporations accountable for their negligence and the harm they have caused.



This dual impact of seeking justice and ensuring financial security underscores the significance of pursuing an asbestos claim, making it an essential step for those affected by this preventable illness.



How to File a Mesothelioma Claim in Jacksonville







If you have been diagnosed with an asbestos illness, you can file a mesothelioma personal injury lawsuit. Loved ones of those who pass away from mesothelioma can file a wrongful death lawsuit. 



Many asbestos companies filed for bankruptcy and cannot be sued. You can still get compensation from these companies by making a claim with the appropriate asbestos trust fund. There is about $30 billion available in asbestos trusts. 



When exploring compensation options for asbestos-related conditions, there are three primary avenues to consider: asbestos trust funds, legal action through mesothelioma lawsuits, and Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits.



1. Asbestos Trust Funds



Asbestos companies, over time, have created trust funds specifically to compensate individuals suffering from conditions linked to asbestos exposure. An estimated $30 billion is available for those affected. These funds are designed to provide financial assistance without the need for litigation, making them an accessible option for those diagnosed with asbestos-related illnesses.



2. Mesothelioma Lawsuits



For some patients and their families, pursuing a legal claim may be the best route. Most lawsuits are resolved through settlements, allowing claimants to receive compensation without going to trial. However, if necessary, cases can be presented in court. Successful lawsuits can result in significant financial awards, assisting affected individuals and their families with medical bills and other expenses.



3. Veterans Affairs Benefits



Veterans who have been diagnosed with mesothelioma may qualify for various medical and financial benefits through the VA. Given the prevalence of asbestos use in military settings, these benefits can be crucial for veterans. Specialized attorneys, accredited by the VA, can assist in the preparation and submission of claims, ensuring veterans receive the support they deserve.



By understanding and utilizing these three options, individuals suffering from asbestos exposure can secure the financial assistance they need.



How a Jacksonville Mesothelioma Lawyer Can Help



Asbestos lawsuits and claims are complicated. One of the most important reasons you need a good lawyer is to prove that specific companies exposed you to asbestos and that this caused your illness. 



Proving asbestos exposure and its link to mesothelioma means reviewing your work history and knowing which companies used asbestos and when. Only experienced asbestos attorneys and firms have the resources to track down the evidence. 



When your lawyer has this information, they can then help you file a lawsuit or an asbestos trust fund claim. If you encountered asbestos during military service, they can help you navigate the process of filing for VA benefits. 



Look for a top Florida mesothelioma lawyer who works with asbestos clients in Jacksonville. They should have relevant experience, proven wins for similar clients, and be part of a nationwide firm.



When evaluating potential attorneys, consider the following criteria to ensure you're making an informed choice:




Extensive Experience: Aim for lawyers with decades of experience handling asbestos-related cases. This experience translates to a deep understanding of the complexities involved in mesothelioma litigation.



Successful Track Record: Seek out attorneys who have demonstrated success in recovering significant compensation for mesothelioma clients. Proven results offer assurance that they can effectively advocate on your behalf.



Contingency Fee Basis: Choose a lawyer who works on a contingency fee arrangement. This means you won’t have to pay unless they secure compensation for you, minimizing financial risk.




By focusing on these key factors, you can find a lawyer equipped to provide the support and expertise required for your case.



How Mesothelioma Lawyers Assist Without Requiring a Trial or Travel



Dealing with a mesothelioma diagnosis can be overwhelming. Fortunately, specialized lawyers offer a way to seek justice and compensation without adding the burden of court appearances. Here's how they can help:



1. Remote Consultations



Modern law firms utilize virtual meetings to connect with clients, enabling you to discuss your case from the comfort of your home. These sessions ensure you grasp the legal process and receive personalized advice without stepping out of your front door.



2. Paperwork and Legal Filings



Mesothelioma lawyers handle all the complex documentation involved in filing a claim. They manage deadlines and paperwork, ensuring everything is in order for a compensation claim. This full-service approach means you won't need to visit any legal offices.



3. Negotiation with Asbestos Trusts



Lawyers leverage their expertise to negotiate with asbestos trust funds on your behalf. These trust funds were established to compensate victims without the need for lengthy trials. Your attorney can work to secure a settlement, sparing you the courtroom stress.



4. Gathering Evidence Remotely



Investigating your exposure history can be done from afar. Lawyers will gather all necessary evidence through phone interviews and digital communication, often working with experts who can support your case without requiring your travel.



5. Contingency Fee Arrangement



Typically, these lawyers work on a contingency basis, meaning they receive payment only if you win your case. This arrangement eliminates upfront costs and further reduces the need for in-person meetings.



Through these strategies, mesothelioma lawyers provide compassionate support and pursue justice, all while allowing clients to focus on their health and comfort.



When evaluating the success rate of mesothelioma claims in terms of compensation, it's essential to consider the significant financial recoveries achieved by legal teams for clients nationwide. Successful firms have been known to secure substantial settlements or verdicts, often reaching billions of dollars collectively for individuals affected by mesothelioma.



For instance, the total compensation attained for victims and their families can exceed several billion, indicating a robust capability in obtaining favorable outcomes for clients dealing with the aftermath of asbestos exposure. This extensive track record of sizable financial awards underscores the effectiveness of specialized legal practices in representing mesothelioma cases.



To fully assess the likelihood of a successful claim, it's also beneficial to examine individual case results and testimonials, as these provide insight into both the quality of the representation and the firm’s commitment to achieving the best possible results for its clients.



Understanding the Statute of Limitations in Florida for Mesothelioma Claims



In Florida, the statute of limitations plays a crucial role in determining the timeframe within which you can file a mesothelioma claim. This legal provision limits the duration you have to initiate legal action following a diagnosis or the death of a loved one due to mesothelioma.



Key Points to Consider:




Personal Injury Claims: For individuals diagnosed with mesothelioma, Florida sets a deadline for filing personal injury claims. You typically have four years from the date of diagnosis to pursue legal action.



Wrongful Death Claims: If you are filing on behalf of a deceased family member, Florida law grants two years from the date of the victim’s passing to file a wrongful death claim.




It’s imperative to act promptly. Since these timelines are rigid, missing the deadline might forfeit your right to seek compensation.



Why Timely Action Is Essential



Due to these restrictions, it is vital for mesothelioma patients and their families to consult with an asbestos attorney in Florida as soon as possible. Legal experts can help ensure that all documentation is correctly filed within the statutory period, improving the likelihood of a successful claim.



Taking early steps not only aligns with legal requirements but also allows for the gathering of essential evidence and the mobilization of necessary resources. Ultimately, timely action could significantly influence the outcome of your case.



Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Jacksonville? 







Workplace exposure is the most common cause of mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses. Several industries that operated in Jacksonville used asbestos. 



Shipping and Asbestos in Jacksonville



The Port of Jacksonville is the largest deepwater harbor in the south and the second largest on the eastern coast of the U.S.  In 2012, the Jacksonville Port Authority’s (JAXPORT) three terminals handled over 8.2 million tons of cargo.



There are also many local shipbuilding and repair yards. Some, like the BAE Systems Shipyards Southeast facility, are currently in operation. Others, such as the Jacksonville Shipyards, have been closed and abandoned.



Ships built before the Environmental Protection Agency’s ban used asbestos in nearly all components. This means that workers constructing, repairing, updating, and crewing ships in the Jacksonville area risked asbestos exposure. Some are still at risk when working on or with older vessels.



The Jacksonville Shipyards



The site known as the Jacksonville Shipyards was one of the area’s largest shipbuilding and repair facilities before it closed in 1992.  It built or refitted thousands of vessels from the 1850s until its closure.



During this period, Jacksonville Shipyards used or handled large quantities of asbestos materials, including insulation for pipes, hulls, engineering spaces, steam lines, and electrical wiring.







The years immediately preceding and following World War II marked the peak period for asbestos use at the site. Operating under the company name Merrill-Stevens Drydock & Repair Co, the facility repaired or refitted hundreds of ships during the war.



The company changed owners and names several times after Merrill-Stevens relocated its headquarters to Miami in the 1950s but continued repair work and modernization work on ships until going out of business in 1992.



Many Merrill-Stevens/Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc (JSI) employees were exposed to asbestos when they performed these repairs and refits, especially those on ships built between the 1930s and the 1970s. Decades later, several of these workers were diagnosed with asbestos illnesses.



Naval Station Mayport



Jacksonville’s strategic location on Florida’s northeast coast makes it ideal for placing military facilities in the area. The U.S. Navy operates two bases in Jacksonville:




Naval Air Station (NAS) Jacksonville



Naval Station (NS)  Mayport




Commissioned in 1942, NS Mayport is a deep water harbor, with repair facilities and Admiral David L. McDonald airfield. The harbor can accommodate 34 ships at a time, including large conventional aircraft carriers.



As with civilian ships and ports, military sites used many asbestos materials in ship components. Service members were put at risk of exposure, just as civilian workers at Jacksonville Shipyards were.



Other Sources of Asbestos in Jacksonville



Asbestos use was heavy in the maritime industry at one time. But it was not the only industry that used this material. The widespread use of asbestos in construction, transportation, power generation, and even textiles has put thousands of people at risk.



According to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, asbestos can even be found in many materials in residential buildings:




Corrugated asbestos roofing



Electrical meter boards



Backyard sheds



Dog kennels



Subfloor packers



Wood heaters



Hot water piping



Eaves



Insulation in heaters and stoves




Many workplaces and public buildings throughout Jacksonville used asbestos. Some examples include:




Anheuser-Busch Brewery



Florida Power & Light (FPL) plant



Ameristeel (formerly Florida Steel) mill



Union Camp Chemical Plant



Jacksonville Electric Authority (JEA)




How Asbestos Exposure Leads to Mesothelioma



Asbestos exposure and the development of mesothelioma is a process that unfolds over several decades. Here's a breakdown of how this unfortunate disease progresses:




Initial Exposure: When individuals inhale or ingest tiny asbestos fibers, these microscopic particles can infiltrate the body.



Lodging in Organs: Once inside, asbestos fibers can become trapped in the protective linings of major organs, such as the lungs. This lining, known as the mesothelium, is delicate and vital for organ protection.



Chronic Irritation: Over time, the presence of these foreign fibers causes persistent irritation and inflammation of the mesothelium. This constant irritation can damage surrounding healthy cells and tissues.



Latent Development: Remarkably, the onset of symptoms may not surface for 10 to 50 years. During this latency period, cellular changes can lead to the development of tumors.



Formation of Mesothelioma: Eventually, these cellular alterations can result in mesothelioma, a rare and aggressive form of cancer that predominantly affects the linings of the lungs, abdomen, or heart.




By understanding these steps, individuals can appreciate the long-term risks associated with asbestos exposure and the critical importance of protective measures to prevent initial contact with asbestos fibers.



When my husband was diagnosed we had no idea what to do. Our doctor said we should reach out to an attorney to talk about compensation. After talking to several firms we found the mesothelioma lawyer center and were grateful we did. They helped with every step of the way. If you need a meso attorney then I would recommend contacting them-Isabelle D.



Specialized Mesothelioma Treatment in Jacksonville



If you have developed mesothelioma or another asbestos illness, you need treatment from specialists. While Jacksonville is not home to any National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers, there are cancer treatment facilities in the area:




Baptist MD Anderson Cancer Center



University of Florida Health Cancer Center



Mayo Clinic Cancer Center




Getting Legal Assistance in Jacksonville



If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, remember that you may be entitled to substantial compensation. Get our free Financial Compensation Packet for information on the top mesothelioma and asbestos lawyers in your area. For questions and assistance, feel free to contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### California Mesothelioma Lawyer

California ranks number one among all U.S. states for deaths caused by mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses. Most of these cases are a result of asbestos exposure on job sites. Many victims are now fighting for justice with the help of a California mesothelioma lawyer.



There is currently more than $30 billion available in trust funds for those affected by an asbestos-related illness. If you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis,  you may be entitled to significant compensation. Complete our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced California mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.





We can offer legal assistance to families in all California cities and towns, including these:



Los Angeles, San Diego, San Jose, San Francisco, Fresno, Sacramento, Long Beach, Oakland, Bakersfield, Anaheim, Santa Ana, Riverside, Stockton, Chula Vista, Irvine, Fremont, San Bernardino, Modesto, Oxnard, Fontana, Moreno, Valley, Huntington Beach, Glendale, Santa Clarita, Garden Grove, Oceanside, Santa Rosa, Rancho Cucamonga, Ontario, Elk Grove, Lancaster, Corona, Palmdale, Salinas, Hayward, Pomona, Escondido, Sunnyvale, Torrance, Orange, Pasadena, Fullerton, Thousand Oaks, Visalia, Roseville, Simi Valley, Concord, Victorville, Santa Clara, Vallejo, Berkeley, El Monte, Downey, Costa Mesa, Inglewood, Carlsbad, Fairfield, Ventura, West Covina, Richmond, Murrieta, Antioch, Temecula, Norwalk, Daly City, Burbank, Santa Maria, El Cajon, Rialto, San Mateo, Clovis, Jurupa Valley, Compton, Vista, Mission Viejo, South Gate, Vacaville, Carson, Santa Monica, Hesperia, Westminster, Redding, Santa Barbara, San Marcos, Chico, San Leandro, Newport Beach, Whittier, Hawthorne, Citrus Heights, Livermore, Tracy Alhambra, Indio, Menifee, Buena Park, Hemet, Lakewood, Merced, Chino, and more.



Do I Need a California Asbestos Lawyer?







If you were exposed to asbestos in the state, believe you may have been exposed, or have been diagnosed with a related illness, you need a lawyer for several reasons:




Federal and California state laws regarding asbestos are complicated.



A lawyer experienced in asbestos cases can explain your options.



The right lawyer will know how to investigate and prove where your asbestos exposure occurred and the companies responsible.



California laws encourage fast-tracking and settlements. You need a lawyer to negotiate on your behalf for a fair settlement amount.



You have just one year from when you discovered you have an asbestos illness to file a lawsuit.




Understanding Asbestos and Its Link to Mesothelioma in California



The Connection Between Asbestos and Mesothelioma



Asbestos is a naturally occurring mineral known for its durability and resistance to heat and electricity. These properties made asbestos a popular choice in a variety of household and industrial products, including roofing materials, insulation, automobile components, and more. However, asbestos fibers pose significant health risks when they are inhaled or ingested. Once inside the body, these fibers can cause mesothelioma, a form of cancer that typically takes decades to manifest, often appearing 10 to 50 years after initial exposure.



Asbestos Use Across Industries



The extensive use of asbestos spanned multiple sectors, from manufacturing and construction to shipbuilding and steel production. This widespread application led to millions of American workers encountering asbestos in their daily lives, with many unaware of the long-term dangers.



The Situation in California



California, with its bustling industrial activities, was not exempt from asbestos exposure. Numerous residents and workers have been exposed, raising significant health concerns across the state. The complexity of identifying specific exposure sites has increased the challenge for individuals seeking justice and compensation for asbestos-related diseases.



Key Facts About Asbestos Exposure




Extensive Product Use: Over 3,000 products were historically manufactured with asbestos.



Health Risks: Asbestos exposure has been linked to severe diseases, including mesothelioma.



National Impact: More than a million workers across the U.S. faced exposure risks, with many still dealing with health repercussions.




In short, while the effort to control and eliminate asbestos use has made significant strides, its legacy continues to impact California residents and workers, prompting the need for legal and medical support for those affected.



Filing a Claim for Mesothelioma in California







Filing a lawsuit or claim for mesothelioma and asbestos exosure is complicated. Your first step should be to find the right lawyer. Look for an attorney in a large firm with expertise in handling and winning asbestos lawsuits. These cases often involve different states, so a nationwide firm is essential. 



The right lawyer will explain your options and take the next steps for you. If you are filing a personal injury lawsuit, they will make the filing, respond to the defendants, investigate and build your case, and seek a fair settlement. If necessary, they will take your case to trial for a jury verdict and award.



Moreover, they will handle every step of the legal process on your behalf, ensuring you can focus on your health and well-being. You can rest easy knowing that you won't incur any legal fees unless your case results in compensation. This contingency fee structure eliminates financial risk and makes it easier for you to pursue justice.



Accessibility is key, and these legal professionals are committed to meeting you wherever and whenever it's most convenient. Initial consultations are free, allowing you to explore your options without any obligation. With such comprehensive support and client-focused service, you can feel confident in your choice to seek legal assistance.



Your lawyer can also determine if you are eligible for compensation from an asbestos trust fund. If any companies that exposed you to asbestos went bankrupt, you cannot sue them. You can make a claim with a trust for the compensation you need.



What Are the Costs Associated with Hiring a Mesothelioma Attorney in California?



When considering legal representation for a mesothelioma case in California, you may worry about the financial implications. Fortunately, many mesothelioma attorneys operate on a contingency fee basis. This approach means that you won't face any initial or out-of-pocket expenses.




No Upfront Costs: You can start your legal journey without any financial anxiety because there's typically no requirement to pay upfront fees.



Pay Only on Success: Attorneys practicing under this model only receive payment if they win your case and secure compensation on your behalf. This outcome-based payment structure aligns their interests with yours, providing an incentive to achieve the best possible outcome.



Transparent Fee Agreements: Before proceeding, it's crucial to discuss and understand the contingency fee percentage, which is usually a portion of the recovered compensation. This way, you'll know exactly what to expect in terms of financial commitment if the case is successful.




By choosing a mesothelioma attorney in California who operates on this basis, you can focus on your case without the stress of financial strain.



Understanding Our Payment Structure for Mesothelioma Cases



When dealing with the financial uncertainties of a mesothelioma diagnosis, knowing how a law firm charges for its services can ease some burdens. Our firm offers a payment structure specifically designed to prioritize your peace of mind:




No Initial Costs: You won’t face any upfront fees when you choose to work with us. Starting your case doesn’t require any initial payment, allowing you to focus on treatment and recovery.



Contingency Fee Basis: Our services are rendered on a contingency fee basis, meaning our payment is contingent upon the successful recovery of compensation. In simple terms, we only receive a fee if we win your case.



Zero Out-of-Pocket Expenses During the Case: While your case is ongoing, you won’t be responsible for any out-of-pocket legal expenses. This ensures that financial concerns do not hinder access to top-tier legal representation.




This approach ensures that legal assistance is accessible without the pressure of immediate financial commitments. Your focus can remain where it should be — on your health and well-being.



When you engage with a mesothelioma law firm, you gain access to a dedicated personal legal team. Each senior attorney is part of a focused group that includes experienced attorneys, skilled legal staff, and knowledgeable registered nurses. This collaborative team approach ensures that your case receives the individualized attention it deserves.



Here's how they support you:




Personalized Guidance: By working closely with a small team, you’re assured of tailored advice that directly addresses the intricacies of your case.



Comprehensive Support: The presence of registered nurses on the team guarantees that your medical issues and needs are well understood and integrated into the legal strategy.



Expert Navigation: Experienced attorneys provide a robust defense and thorough understanding of mesothelioma-related legal matters, ensuring your case is managed with expertise.




This structure ensures that as your case develops, you continue to receive the dedicated, personalized service you need.



Is Travel Required for Clients Filing a Mesothelioma Claim in California?



For those concerned about the need to travel when filing a mesothelioma claim in California, the answer is generally no.



Our experienced legal team prioritizes convenience for clients by visiting them wherever they are. Meetings can be arranged at clients' homes or any location they prefer, ensuring comfort and ease throughout the process.



While it's challenging to promise that travel will never be part of the proceedings, it is uncommon for clients to be required to leave their local area to pursue compensation. The majority of interactions, documentation, and communications can often be managed remotely or in nearby locations, aiming to minimize any travel obligations.



In short, while a small degree of travel might occasionally be needed, it is typically kept to a minimum, ensuring clients can focus on their health and well-being.



Top California Mesothelioma Settlements and Verdicts



Top California Mesothelioma Settlements and Verdicts



Taking legal action for mesothelioma is worthwhile. Your lawyer can help you recover significant damages for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and more. These are just a few examples of successful lawsuits that brought victims in California justice and compensation.



$13 Million for Talcum Powder Exposure



An emerging source of asbestos exposure is contaminated talcum powder products. Companies like Johnson & Johnson are facing thousands of lawsuits from people who used their products for years and developed ovarian cancer or mesothelioma.



In 2015, a California jury awarded Judith Winkel $13 million. She developed mesothelioma after years of using several talc products. Four companies were involved in the lawsuit.



Notable Settlements Across California



Beyond high-profile cases, numerous other settlements underscore the diversity and breadth of successful legal actions in California:




$15 Million: Secondhand exposure victim in Livermore demonstrates the severe impact of indirect asbestos contact.



$7.2 Million: Achieved for a laborer and wire installer in Lancaster, highlighting occupational risks.



$5.6 Million: For an airline industry worker in Santa Barbara, showcasing industry-specific exposure.




$700,000 for Shipyard Asbestos Exposure



Military veterans have some of the highest rates of asbestos exposure. They were affected by asbestos use in all military branches and in all states, including California. Navy veterans were most affected, but civilian workers were also exposed.



One man who worked at the Moore Dry Dock Company in Vallejo, California, died from mesothelioma. His family recovered $700,000.



Extensive Settlements for Varied Professions



The legal landscape is rich with cases that span various professions and exposure scenarios:




$7.5 Million: For a brick tender and laborer in Lakewood.



$5.1 Million: For a union HVAC worker in Sacramento.



$4.3 Million: To a logger in Camarillo.



$3.5 Million: For a union carpenter and U.S. Navy veteran in Fairfield.




$48 Million for Secondhand Asbestos Exposure



A Los Angeles jury awarded a man $48 million after he developed mesothelioma from secondhand exposure. His father worked for Liberty Utilities Corp. and brought asbestos home on his clothing. The jury ruled that the company had a duty to warn workers of the risks of secondary exposure.



These cases illustrate the significant compensation that victims of asbestos exposure can achieve, reflecting the unique stories and circumstances of each individual. The potential for substantial settlements underscores the importance of pursuing legal action with experienced counsel.



Where Did Asbestos Exposure Occur in California?







Several companies and industries in California used large amounts of asbestos from the early 1900s until the 1970s. These included:




Construction



Shipbuilding



Automobile manufacturing



Electronics



The military



Other industries




Why Are Asbestos Exposure Rates So High in California?



There are several reasons that California residents, even today, are especially vulnerable to mesothelioma and other illnesses related to asbestos:




During World War II, California was home to aircraft factories, radar, and radio equipment manufacturers, shipyards, and automobile plants that used asbestos.



Many military men and women who served between World War II and the mid-1970s experienced asbestos exposure during active duty. Veterans are particularly vulnerable to mesothelioma.



Thousands of residential developments still have asbestos. The state’s population boom that led to many new construction projects occurred during the decades of peak asbestos use in the industry.



California has some of the highest levels of naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) in the U.S. NOA deposits are harmless if they remain undisturbed. The effects of earthquakes and human activity stir up asbestos fibers and release them into the air.




Construction in California Triggered High Mesothelioma Rates



The rapid increase in California’s population since the 1940s caused rapid economic expansion. It also led to a rise in mesothelioma cases. The post-World War II construction boom resulted in the widespread use of asbestos.



The fire resistance and heat resistance of asbestos made it desirable for construction materials. Many buildings, including homes, schools, offices, and industrial factories, still have asbestos in them for this reason.



Workers who handled drywall, insulation, roofing materials, steam pipes, plumbing materials, electrical wiring, and many other building materials faced serious exposure risks during the boom in construction and building.



Some of the asbestos used during California's construction boom came from natural deposits in the state. the Coalinga Asbestos Mine operated in the 1960s and 1970s.



Which California Companies Used Asbestos?



Many electric companies, automobiles, aviation, electronics equipment, computer science, mining companies, and chemical industries used asbestos in materials and components. These are some examples of the worst offenders. 



California Zonolite



California Zonolite processed a mineral called vermiculite. Its facilities received multiple shipments of asbestos-contaminated vermiculite from the infamous W.R. Grace mine in Libby, Montana. 



The mine produced and distributed contaminated minerals for decades before it ceased operations. A California Zonolite plant in Glendale is just one example of a facility that put workers and nearby residents at risk of asbestos exposure.



Other Companies That Used Asbestos in California



Some of the many other companies known to have used asbestos in the state include:




Bell Asbestos Mines, Ltd.



Boeing



Calaveras Asbestos, Ltd



California Naval Shipyard



Chevron



Chrysler



Ford Motor Company



Honeywell International



Hunters Point Naval Shipyard



King City Asbestos Company (KCAC)



Moore Dry Dock



North American Aviation



Pacific Gas & Electric



Rockwell



Southern California Edison



San Diego Gas & Electric



Union Carbide



U.S. Steel




What Are California’s Asbestos Safety Laws?



According to the California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR), Title 8 sets guidelines for each industry for the reduction of asbestos exposure, for minimum air quality, and for asbestos exposure documentation.



Under Subchapter 7 of Title 8, Section 5208 of the California Code of Regulations, there are several laws related to the abatement, handling, removal, and disposal of asbestos within the state:




The law sets breathing exposure limits for all affected employees.



Employees working around asbestos must be monitored.



Employees must be professionally trained in working around and handling asbestos.



Facility and building owners must determine the location and amount of any existing asbestos.



Warning signs and postings that clearly convey asbestos in the work area must be posted in the vicinity of the workplace.



Protective clothing and respirators must be provided to and worn at all times by workers around asbestos. Tools and equipment must also be cleaned.




For more detailed information, you can contact the California Department of Industrial Regulations at 510-286-7000.



New California Law Supports Families of Asbestos Victims







Beginning in 2022, California law allows families to collect damages for pain and suffering. Previously, laws in the state prevented families from receiving these non-economic damages if their loved one died before the conclusion of their personal injury trial. 



The new law ends the restriction and allows families to recover more damages in civil lawsuits related to asbestos. Talk to a California mesothelioma lawyer about what you may be eligible to receive if you lost a loved one to asbestos.



California Statute of Limitations on Mesothelioma and Asbestos Cases



The Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1 states that asbestos-related cases in California must be filed separately from personal injury cases. Asbestos cases also have different statutes of limitations.



The plaintiffs filing an asbestos or mesothelioma lawsuit must do so within one year of the first signs of the condition or within one year after the victim should have reasonably received a diagnosis.



Wrongful death lawsuits must be filed within one year of the victim’s death.



It is important to work with an experienced asbestos lawyer if filing a related case, as it is easy to miss the window of opportunity without that expertise and knowledge of the laws.



His meticulous attention to detail and expertise ensured our case was handled swiftly and efficiently. What truly impressed us was Paul's responsiveness—he was always quick to reply and kept us well-informed throughout.I highly recommend Mesothelioma Lawyer Center.-Patrick M



Getting California Legal Help



Keep in mind that you may qualify for substantial damages if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis. Get our free Financial Compensation Packet for info on the top mesothelioma and asbestos lawyers in your area. If you need additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Minneapolis Mesothelioma Lawyer

Contact a Minneapolis mesothelioma lawyer if you came into contact with asbestos on the job and are now sick. Many Minneapolis job sites in the mining industry, mineral processing, construction, and power generation used asbestos and caused exposure and related illnesses. 



If you or a loved one have been exposed to asbestos and diagnosed with mesothelioma or asbestos-related lung cancer, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. Currently, over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds are available to victims of asbestos diseases. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in Minneapolis, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 





Minneapolis Asbestos Facts




Between 1999 and 2017, nearly 6,500 residents in Minnesota died from a disease related to asbestos exposure. 



Hennepin County, home to Minneapolis, had the highest number, with 1,116 deaths during that period. 



A major source of exposure in the city was a vermiculite plant that received asbestos-tainted shipments from the infamous W.R. Grace mine in Libby, Montana. 




How to Find a Top Minneapolis Mesothelioma Lawyer







If you have a mesothelioma diagnosis, don't wait to reach out to a Minneapolis mesothelioma lawyer. Act quickly before you lose the opportunity to seek compensation for your illness. Companies that exposed you to asbestos can and should be held accountable. 



Hiring a lawyer immediately is crucial for several reasons:




Evidence Gathering: Time is of the essence when it comes to collecting vital evidence. A skilled attorney will help secure medical records, employment history, and other documentation that supports your case.



Witness Coordination: Identifying and interviewing witnesses early can provide essential testimony that may fade or become difficult to obtain as time passes.



Medical Support: Your lawyer will collaborate with your healthcare providers to ensure you receive the necessary treatment while also documenting your condition for legal purposes.



Insurance Communication: Handling interactions with insurance companies can be daunting. A lawyer will manage these communications, advocating on your behalf to prevent any attempts to undermine your claim.



Timely Action: Delaying legal action can result in lost opportunities for seeking compensation. Lawyers are equipped to navigate the legal system efficiently, maximizing your chances for a favorable outcome.




By choosing to act swiftly, you ensure that every aspect of your case is handled with the attention and expertise it deserves, positioning you for the best possible resolution.



To take that next step, you need an expert asbestos attorney. Look for a lawyer in the Minneapolis area with experience handling and winning asbestos cases. They should be part of a larger law firm with enough resources to investigate and prove your case.



Your lawyer should offer you a free initial consultation. They should have a contingency payment plan too. Make sure the lawyer you choose answers all your questions and takes the time to explain your options and the legal processes.



When seeking a personal injury lawyer, prioritize those with specialized experience in areas like Personal Injury, Workers’ Compensation, and Wrongful Death claims. These nuances in expertise ensure they are well-equipped to handle the complexities of your case.




Depth of Experience: Aim for attorneys who boast a robust history of successfully managing cases, including auto accidents, medical malpractice, and more. This depth is often indicative of their skill and reliability.



Client-Centric Service: Choose a lawyer who is committed to providing personal service, treating you as more than just a case number. This client-focused approach can significantly impact your overall experience and outcome.



Collaborative Approach: Look for a team-oriented law firm. A collaborative approach often means a more thorough investigation and strategy, leading to better case outcomes.




By selecting a lawyer with these qualifications and a proven track record, you can ensure your legal representation is both knowledgeable and supportive, guiding you through each step with clarity and dedication.



What Are My Legal Options if I Have Mesothelioma? 



If you have mesothelioma, you are probably eligible for one or more lawsuits or claims. These legal actions can help you recover damages for medical expenses and other costs. 



An experienced lawyer will review your case and determine which of these you are eligible for to pursue mesothelioma compensation: 




Personal injury lawsuit. Asbestos illnesses are personal injuries because they were caused by negligent exposure. You can sue the companies responsible, often several, to seek a settlement or jury award. 



Asbestos trust fund claim. If those companies went bankrupt, you cannot sue. Bankrupt asbestos companies were required to establish trust funds to compensate victims. Your lawyer can determine which of these trusts you qualify for and help you make a successful claim. 



Wrongful death lawsuit. If your loved one died from mesothelioma, you may be eligible to file a wrongful death lawsuit to seek compensation. 



VA benefits. Veterans have high rates of mesothelioma because of asbestos use in the military. If you served and now have an asbestos illness, you could be eligible for VA disability compensation. 




Navigating Your Personal Injury or Workers’ Compensation Claim



When embarking on a personal injury or workers' compensation claim, it's crucial to understand the steps involved. Proper preparation can significantly impact the outcome of your case. Here's a comprehensive guide to help you through the process:



1. Initial Consultation




Schedule a Meeting: Arrange a free consultation with a personal injury attorney to discuss your case.



Prepare Questions: Consider what you need to know and ask about their experience, fees, and case strategy.




2. Evidence Collection




Gather Evidence Quickly: Begin collecting evidence immediately. The survival of your claim relies heavily on documentation such as accident reports, witness statements, and photographs of the scene.



Medical Records: Obtain medical records and documentation of any treatments or hospital visits pertaining to the injury.




3. Medical Evaluation and Treatment




Professional Assessment: Get a thorough medical evaluation to document the extent of your injuries.



Ongoing Care: Continue to follow medical advice and keep all medical appointments. This documentation will be vital in proving your case.




4. Communication Management




Insurance Communication: Allow your attorney to handle communications with insurance adjusters to ensure your rights are protected.



Documentation: Keep track of all correspondence and communications regarding your claim.




5. Assessing Your Claim




Case Valuation: With your attorney, assess the value of your claim. This includes calculating medical expenses, lost wages, and any potential future costs associated with the injury.




6. Negotiation




Settlement Talks: Engage in settlement discussions, if appropriate, with the guidance of your lawyer.



Legal Representation: Your attorney should represent you in negotiations to strive for a fair and just settlement.




7. Litigation (if necessary)




Filing Suit: If a fair settlement cannot be reached, your attorney may file a lawsuit to pursue your claim in court.



Court Preparation: Participate in preparing for trial by understanding the legal proceedings and what to expect.




8. Case Conclusion




Resolution: Whether through settlement or trial, ensure all final agreements are thoroughly reviewed and understood.




Being well-prepared and having the right legal support can enhance the effectiveness of your claim and help secure a favorable outcome. The journey might seem daunting, but every step is crucial in achieving justice and compensation for your injuries.



How Long Does It Take to Settle a Personal Injury Case?



Settling a personal injury case can be a lengthy process, often extending beyond a year. In some instances, it may take even longer. One significant factor influencing the timeline is the medical evaluation necessary to determine the extent and permanency of the injury.



Medical Assessments



Doctors and chiropractors play a crucial role. They need ample time to assess whether an injury is permanent, as the complete impact can take months or even years to become evident. This thorough examination is essential for building a strong case.



Gathering Evidence and Documentation



Once the medical assessment is complete, a comprehensive collection of all relevant documents is required. This includes medical records, witness statements, and any other pertinent information that supports the claim.



Negotiation with the Insurance Company



With the case documentation in hand, the next step involves making a settlement demand to the insurance company. This negotiation phase is critical and may span several months. It's during this time that both sides attempt to reach an agreeable settlement amount.



Potential for Legal Action



However, if negotiations stall or an agreement cannot be reached, the case might proceed to court. Filing a lawsuit introduces additional time considerations, as the courtroom process extends the timeline further.



In summary, while many personal injury cases aim for swift resolution, it's not uncommon for them to extend over a year due to medical evaluations, documentation preparation, and negotiations.



What Is My Mesothelioma Case Worth? 



Every mesothelioma case is different, which means compensation amounts vary widely. The average settlement in a mesothelioma lawsuit is between $1 million and $1.4 million. Jury awards are usually much higher, while asbestos trust fund claims average around $180,000. 



An experienced mesothelioma lawyer will be able to find every expense you face due to your illness. They will maximize the compensation you receive from a settlement or claim. Your case’s worth depends on factors such as:




Your past and ongoing medical expenses



Future expected medical expenses



Costs for home care and medical equipment



Lost wages if you can no longer work



Pain and suffering




In addition to these personal impacts, several broader elements play a crucial role in determining the value of your personal injury or workers' compensation case:




Degree of Fault: Understanding the responsibility of the involved parties is essential. The degree to which each party is at fault can significantly influence the outcome.



Severity of Injuries: The more severe your injuries, the higher the potential compensation. This includes any permanent disabilities that may affect your quality of life.



Financial Capability of the At-fault Party: Often tied to the at-fault party's insurance coverage, their ability to pay damages is a critical factor. Insurance companies typically influence the final settlement amount.



Other Damages: These include non-economic damages such as emotional distress and loss of enjoyment of life, which can be challenging to quantify but are equally important.




Each of these factors contributes to the overall evaluation of your case's worth, ensuring that all aspects of your situation are considered for fair compensation.



Notable Settlements Achieved by Personal Injury Lawyers



When it comes to resolving personal injury cases, experienced lawyers have successfully secured significant settlements across various types of claims. Here are some noteworthy examples:



Multi-Million Dollar Wins




Insurance Fraud:

One remarkable case resulted in a $53 million settlement. Fraud cases can involve intricate legalities, making such outcomes notable.





Wrongful Death:

There were instances where families received settlements of $2.4 million for wrongful death claims, providing some financial relief during difficult times.





Truck Driver Accidents:

Settlements reaching $2.2 million were achieved in cases involving truck drivers, dealing with severe accidents and the complexities of transportation regulations.






Other Significant Settlements




Sexual Assault:

Personal injury lawyers helped victims secure settlements of $1.5 million, bringing justice and compensation for the harm endured.





Product Liability:

In cases of product liability, settlements of $600,000 were necessary to address the damages caused by defective products.





Insurance Fraud:

With multiple cases settled at $220,000, insurance fraud continues to be a significant area of litigation.






These settlements reflect the diverse challenges and the expertise required in personal injury law. Achieving justice and securing compensation for victims and their families remains a vital aspect of legal advocacy.



How Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Minneapolis? 







Most people with mesothelioma were exposed to asbestos at work. Many industries with workplaces in Minneapolis used asbestos in the past and put workers at risk. These are just a few examples of the worst offenders: 




Mining



Manufacturing



Oil refining



Power generation



Construction



Mineral processing



Chemical manufacturing



Paper milling



Auto repair




Reserve Mining Company



In 1955, the nearby city of Silver Bay opened the Reserve Mining Company to extract iron ore from taconite. Once the taconite was extracted, the company dumped the waste into Lake Superior. Citizens began complaining that the waste materials polluted the water and killed fish.



Investigators determined that the waste material contained asbestos-like fibers. During the 1970s, The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) filed a lawsuit at the United States District Court of Minneapolis against the Reserve Mining Company.



The EPA succeeded, and the mining company shut down in 1974. Although they re-opened the company a few years later, agreeing that the wastes would be deposited in an inland pond, the lawsuit marks an important victory for the EPA and asbestos pollution.



Workers who extracted iron ore and handled the waste faced health hazards, including the risk of asbestos-related diseases. Many of these workers now live or have died from mesothelioma and lung cancer. 



Western Minerals and W.R. Grace  



Western Mineral Products Inc. processed vermiculite that came from Libby, Montana. The min, operated by W.R. Grace, shipped hundreds of thousands of tons of asbestos-contaminated minerals to places like Western Minerals around the country. 



This put workers at risk of asbestos exposure. It also harmed nearby residents, who were allowed to take rocks left in front of the building for construction uses.



Although the current owners of Western Mills are undergoing a voluntary cleanup site, the (EPA) is still studying its impact on people. It's been estimated that thousands of people nationwide have died due to Libby Montana's production and distribution of tainted vermiculite.



Additional Minneapolis Job Sites and Buildings with Asbestos 



Schools:




Coon Rapids Middle School



Mapleton School



Macalester College



The University of St. Thomas



University of Minneapolis



Cretin High School for Boys




Hospitals:




Mt. Sinai Hospital



Anchor Hospital



Fairview Hospital



Minneapolis VA Hospital



St. Barnabas Hospital




Plants




Bomb Washout Plant



Riverside Power Plant



Sherburne County General Plant (currently known as Xcel Energy)



Willmar Power Plant




Other Companies




3M Company



Minneapolis Star Tribune



Minnesota Linseed Oil Company



Curtis Hotel



Northwestern Consolidated Milling Company



Pillsbury Center



St. Paul and Northern Pacific Railway Company



Hinckle Greenleaf and Company



Minneapolis Gas Light Company




How Personal Injury Lawyers Assist with Medical Care After an Injury



When you're injured, navigating the complexities of medical care and financial recovery can be daunting. Here's how a personal injury lawyer can help streamline the process and support your journey to recovery:




Facilitating Access to Medical CarePersonal injury lawyers can connect you with a network of reputable healthcare providers who specialize in treating injury cases. They can help prioritize your medical needs so that you receive the appropriate care promptly.



Managing Medical DocumentationProper documentation is critical to your case. Lawyers assist in gathering and organizing your medical records and reports, ensuring that every detail necessary to support your claim is meticulously documented.



Understanding Medical Bills and ExpensesLawyers can explain the intricacies of medical billing and may negotiate on your behalf to delay payments until you've secured a settlement. This can alleviate immediate financial pressure, allowing you to focus on healing.



Handling Insurance ClaimsInsurance companies often attempt to minimize payouts. A skilled attorney will negotiate with them to ensure that all your medical expenses, future recovery costs, and any additional support are covered.



Calculating Future Medical NeedsThey evaluate the long-term implications of your injuries, working with medical professionals to determine future care costs. This aids in valuing your claim appropriately to include ongoing and future medical expenses.



Settling Disputes and Legal ActionsIf insurance negotiations stall, attorneys are ready to escalate the situation by filing a lawsuit. They’ll prepare to take your case to trial, seeking compensation that reflects your medical and personal recovery needs.




By offering these comprehensive services, personal injury lawyers not only enhance your access to medical care but also ensure the financial aspects of your recovery are secure. This allows you to concentrate on what truly matters: healing and returning to your normal life.



Mesothelioma Treatment in Minneapolis







Two cancer centers in the Minneapolis area offer comprehensive treatment options, including the nearby Mayo Clinic in Rochester, known for innovative research and cutting-edge technology and treatment options.



Masonic Cancer Center – University of Minnesota Masonic Memorial Building424 Harvard Street S.E.Minneapolis, MN 55455



The Mayo Clinic200 First Street SWRochester, MN 55905



This firm was extremely professional and responsive. If you have any meso questions, I’d highly recommend them- Michael L.



Getting Legal Help in Minneapolis



Keep in mind that if you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma or asbestos-related lung cancer, you may qualify for significant compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. For questions and assistance, feel free to contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Dallas Mesothelioma Lawyers

Dallas mesothelioma lawyers help area residents and workers with illnesses related to asbestos exposure take legal action and seek compensation. As the third-largest city in Texas, Dallas has an extensive history of asbestos use across many industries. 



Keep in mind that if you or a loved one has mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, awaiting those who've been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Dallas, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 



Best Asbestos Exposure and Mesothelioma Lawyers in Dallas, TX










Paul Danziger




Founding member of Texas-based law firm that handles asbestos and mesothelioma cases throughout the United States



Over two decades of experience in mesothelioma litigation with more than 1,000 mesothelioma patients helped



His law firm, Danziger & De LLano, has won more than $1,000,000,000 in mesothelioma-related claims



Graduated with honors from the University of Texas, 1989



Law degree from Northwestern University, 1993



Bar admission in Texas



Member of the American Association of Justice and Texas Trial Lawyers Association



Recognized among Top 100 Trial Lawyers by National Trial Lawyers, 2017-2019








Working from his law offices in Houston and San Antonio, Paul Danziger handles mesothelioma cases throughout the United States. He has focused on mesothelioma litigation for over 25 years, and has recovered significant compensation for victims of mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, and asbestosis. 



Paul Danziger grew up in Houston and earned a law degree from Northwestern University School of Law in Chicago in 1993.



Contact Paul →









Jeffrey B. Simon




Graduated from the University of Texas School of Law in 1993



Licensed to practice in Texas, New York, and California



Founding partner of Simon Greenstone Panatier, PC



Named among Top Lawyers Under 40 by D Magazine in 2003 and 2004



Named a Texas Super Lawyer by Super Lawyers (a Thomson Reuters service), 2006 to 2009 and 2014 to 2016



Awarded a Dallas County Special Civil Service Commission from 2011 to 2013



Awarded National Trial Lawyers’ Top 100 Trial Lawyers Award in 2016



Awarded Lifetime Achievement Award by America’s Top 100 Attorneys in 2016








Jeffrey B. Simon is a founding partner of Simon Greenstone Panatier, PC. He is licensed to practice in California, Texas, and New York. He has worked on mesothelioma cases for over 20 years. Simon received a lifetime achievement award from America’s Top 100 Attorneys in 2016.



Contact Jeffrey →









David C. Greenstone




Founding shareholder of Simon Greenstone Panatier, PC



Graduated cum laude from the University of Texas Law School in 1998



Instrumental in the first verdict against Colgate for mesothelioma related to asbestos in talcum powder



Helped win a verdict for significant damages in Arizona in 2016 for a U.S. Navy civilian employee who died from mesothelioma



Awarded Top Verdict in 2015, 2016, and 2018 by TopVerdict.com for wins in California and Arizona



Awarded Premier Attorney Award in 2015 by the American Academy of Trial Attorneys



Named among top 100 trial lawyers from 2014 to the present by National Trial Lawyers








Based in Dallas, Texas, David C. Greenstone is a founding shareholder in the law firm Simon Greenstone Panatier, PC. He has gained significant experience working as a trial lawyer, focusing on cases involving asbestos exposure, toxic torts, and pharmaceuticals. These included the first verdict won against Colgate-Palmolive for mesothelioma caused by a talcum powder product. He earned his undergraduate and law degrees from the University of Texas in 1995 and 1998.



Contact David → 









Michelle Whitman




Secured millions of dollars in settlements for victims of asbestos exposure, including workers in construction, shipbuilding, and power plants



Working through Danziger & De LLano, a mesothelioma law firm with over a billion dollars won in asbestos and mesothelioma cases



Over two deceased of experience



Licensed through the Texas State Bar



Active member of American Bar Association, American Association for Justice, and Texas Trial Lawyers Association








Michelle Whitman is a skilled attorney at Danziger & De Llano, LLP, specializing in Mesothelioma and Asbestos litigation. With over a decade of experience in the field, Michelle has built a strong reputation for securing justice and substantial compensation for victims of asbestos exposure. Her expertise in asbestos-related cases has led to millions of dollars in settlements for clients suffering from mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases.



Contact Michelle → 









Rod de LLano




Founding partner of Danziger & De LLano, LLP, one of America’s most successful firms specializing in mesothelioma and asbestos litigation



Secured over $1,000,000,000 in asbestos and mesothelioma compensation for victims through his Texas-based law firm



Featured in New York Times, Boston Globe, Houston Chronicle, and many more



Awarded Super Lawyers Selection in 2025



Awarded Best Attorney, RUE Ratings Best Attorneys of America in 2024



Awarded Best of Business Houston, General Small Business Community Awards in 2014



Awarded Top 10 Law Firms, American Institute of Personal Injury Attorneys in 2020 and 2024








Rod de Llano is a founding partner of Danziger & De Llano, LLP, one of the nation’s most successful firms specializing in mesothelioma and asbestos litigation. A graduate of Princeton University with a degree in Economics, his career took a remarkable turn when one of his cases inspired the independent film Puncture, starring Chris Evans.



Contact Rod’s Texas Mesothelioma Law Firm →









Chris J. Panatier




Graduated from the University of Texas Law School in 2001



Founding partner in Simon Greenstone Panatier, PC



Won verdicts with significant damages



With practice partner, brought the first verdict against Colgate-Palmolive for mesothelioma caused by talcum powder



Named a Thomson Reuters Texas Rising Star, 2005 to 2012



Named Thomson Reuters Texas Super Lawyer from 2013 to 2019



Top Lawyer Under 40, as named by D Magazine for 2006








Chris J. Panatier is a partner in the trial law firm Simon Greenstone Panatier, PC. He focuses on asbestos and mesothelioma, toxic tort cases, products liability, and pharmaceuticals. With a partner he helped to win the first talcum powder and mesothelioma verdict against Colgate-Palmolive. Panatier earned his law degree from the University of Texas in 2001.



Contact Chris →









Lou Black




Partner at Black Law Group



Focuses solely on asbestos exposure and mesothelioma cases



Graduate of Texas Christian University and South Texas College of Law, 1990 and 1993



A career dedicated to asbestos cases and victims of mesothelioma and lung cancer



Admissions in Texas and Pennsylvania



Member, board of directors and executive committee of Texas Trial Lawyers Association








Lou Black is a partner and founding member of Black Law Group, with offices in New Mexico and Texas. A graduate of the South Texas College of Law, Black has been practicing law since 1993. She has dedicated her career to helping victims of mesothelioma and lung cancer from asbestos exposure seek justice and recover damages. She is an expert in asbestos litigation.



Contact Lou →









Peter A. Kraus




Founding partner at Waters, Kraus & Paul



Admitted to the State Bar of Hawaii, California, Missouri, Texas, and Virginia, as well as several U.S. Courts and the U.S. Supreme Court



Involved in numerous mesothelioma cases with significant compensation for victims



Graduated University of Texas School of Law, 1985



Awarded Above and Beyond Award by the American Association for Justice in 2017



Appointee to the Federal Judicial Center Foundation Board, 2014 to the present



Named a Texas Top Rated Lawyer by Lexis Nexis, 2013 through 2016



Listed Best Lawyer in Dallas by D Magazine, 2001, and 2011 to 2019








Peter Kraus is a founding partner with the Waters, Kraus & Paul law firm serving Houston from their Dallas, Texas office. He focuses on litigating cases related to harmful exposure, particularly asbestos. His nearly 30 years of work on behalf of asbestos and mesothelioma victims has led to major wins and jury awards. He is active in his community and spends time on pro bono work and in serving on boards of directors and trustees for a number of charitable organizations.



Contact Peter →









Lawrence G. Gettys




Over 27 years of experience advocating for asbestos victims



Practicing counsel at Talbot, Carmouche & Marcello in Baton Rouge, Louisiana



Graduated with honors, Southern University Law Center, 1995



Bar admissions in Louisiana and Texas



Member, American Association for Justice, Louisiana Association for Justice, and Texas Trial Lawyers Association








Lawrence G. Gettys has over 20 years of litigation experience and focuses on cases involving asbestos exposure and mesothelioma. He has been instrumental in winning major verdicts for asbestos victims as a member of the Waters, Krauss & Paul law firm. Working from the Baton Rouge, Louisiana office, Gettys is admitted to practice in Louisiana and Texas, as well as several federal courts.



Contact Lawrence →









Ross Stomel




Accreditation from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs for excellence in representing veterans



Recovered over $250 million in verdicts and settlements related to asbestos exposure



Named among the “Top 100 Trial Lawyers” by National Trial Lawyers Association








Ross Stomel is a leading expert in mesothelioma and asbestos litigation who practices in Houston, Texas. He has made a career of working with victims of personal injury and wrongful death, with special expertise in asbestos exposure. He has litigated throughout the U.S. and helped his clients recover more than $250 million in settlements and jury awards.



Contact Ross →






Dallas Asbestos Facts




Nearly 15,500 people in Texas died from asbestos-related diseases between 1999 and 2017. 



During that period, Dallas had the second-highest number of asbestos deaths at nearly 842.



The oil industry in the area has been a major contributor to asbestos exposure. 




About Asbestos and Mesothelioma



Mesothelioma is a rare cancer diagnosed in about 3,000 people every year. Mesothelioma is aggressive and often diagnosed in later stages when the prognosis is poor. It is a devastating illness that most often affects the tissue around the lungs. This is known as pleural mesothelioma. 



Asbestos exposure is the only known cause of mesothelioma. Asbestos is a natural fibrous mineral that was once used heavily in construction, shipbuilding, manufacturing, and many other industries for its insulating properties. 



Workers handling or near asbestos often inhaled or ingested tiny asbestos fibers. Inside the body, the fibers caused damage, leading to later illnesses in some exposed workers. Asbestos can also cause lung cancer and asbestosis. 



Understanding Secondary Asbestos Exposure: A Dallas Perspective



Secondary asbestos exposure occurs when individuals indirectly come into contact with asbestos fibers through family members or others who have been directly exposed. This is particularly worrying in places like Dallas, where a robust industrial sector heightens the risk.



Workers in industries that handle asbestos-related materials often carry these microscopic fibers home on their clothing, hair, or skin. Once home, these fibers can easily transfer to household surfaces—such as furniture and carpets—where they may become airborne and pose serious inhalation hazards.



This indirect exposure can result in severe health issues for family members, including diseases like mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis. The concern in Dallas is magnified due to the city's industrial activities, which increase the likelihood of workers bringing asbestos fibers into their home environments.



By understanding how secondary exposure occurs, residents can better take precautions to protect themselves and their loved ones from these potentially dangerous health effects.



How Much Is Your Asbestos Claim Worth in Dallas, TX?











                
                        
                            Calculate Case Value
                            
                        
                        Diagnosis-- Select --MesotheliomaAsbestosisAsbestos-Related Lung CancerIs Diagnosed Person Alive?-- Select --YesPassed away under 2 years agoPassed away over 2 years agoAge of Diagnosed Person-- Select --Under 6565-8485 or olderExposure-- Select --MilitaryOccupationalSecond-HandOther / UnknownMain Job Site-- Select --ShipyardsBoiler RoomsPowerhousesPaper MillsConstruction SitesAutomotiveFirefightingRailroadsRefineriesOther / UnknownMain Asbestos Product Used-- Select --Fire Protection ProductsBrake Pads / LiningsCeiling Textures / Tile / PlasterElectrical ProductsTransite ProductsHeating & Cooling ProductsVermiculiteRoofing ProductsPaints / Plasters / Wall CoveringsOther / UnknownState-- Select --AlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaNorthern Mariana IslandsOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahU.S. Virgin IslandsVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces EuropeArmed Forces PacificPhone(Required)Email(Required)First Name(Required)Last Name(Required)PhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
         Any information you send is secure and will never be sold or released.This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
        
                        Δ
                        





Legal Options for Mesothelioma Claims in Dallas



Asbestos exposure causes mesothelioma, and nearly all cases of exposure are considered negligent. This means you have a right to take legal action against the companies responsible for exposing you to asbestos and causing your illness. 



Types of claims you can make if you have mesothelioma include: 




Mesothelioma Personal Injury Lawsuit. Mesothelioma is a personal injury because it is caused by negligence. You can sue the companies responsible to seek compensation through a settlement or jury award. 



Asbestos Trust Fund Claim. If the companies that exposed you went bankrupt, you cannot sue them. You should be eligible for a trust fund claim. Bankrupt asbestos companies set up these trusts to compensate future claimants. 



Mesothelioma Wrongful Death Claim. You can sue asbestos companies for wrongful death if you lost a loved one to mesothelioma. 



VA Benefits Claim. If you can connect your mesothelioma to asbestos exposure during military service, you can qualify for VA benefits and compensation. 




When mesothelioma law firms prepare to file claims, there are several critical factors they consider to ensure a successful case outcome:




Statute of Limitations: One of the first considerations is the legal deadline for filing a claim, known as the statute of limitations. This varies not only between states but also based on specific details of the case. For instance, where exposure took place can influence the filing deadline.



State-Specific Laws: Each state has unique legal frameworks and requirements for mesothelioma claims. Experienced lawyers understand these nuances and strategize accordingly to navigate local laws effectively.



Proof of Exposure: Establishing a clear link between asbestos exposure and the diagnosed disease is crucial. This involves gathering evidence such as medical records, employment history, and potential sources of exposure.



Client's Medical Conditions and Needs: Law firms assess the extent of the client’s health challenges and their immediate needs to prioritize actions that can expedite financial relief or compensation.



Potential Compensation Sources: Identifying all possible avenues for compensation, such as trust funds set up by bankrupt asbestos companies or potential settlements from ongoing lawsuits, is a key task.




By focusing on these elements, law firms build robust cases aimed at securing the best possible outcome for individuals affected by mesothelioma.



What Steps Are Involved in Asbestos Litigation?



Navigating the complex process of asbestos litigation can be overwhelming. Here’s a clear breakdown of the essential steps involved:




Hire a Qualified Asbestos Attorney:Begin by seeking out a skilled lawyer who specializes in asbestos-related cases. Their expertise is crucial in crafting the most effective approach for your unique circumstances.



Assess Eligibility:The process starts with your attorney thoroughly investigating your history of exposure to asbestos. This assessment helps confirm whether you qualify to file a claim. It involves identifying how and when you were exposed, and linking it to the products that caused your health issues.



Initiate a Claim:Once eligibility is determined, your lawyer will guide you through filing a formal claim. This involves meticulous paperwork and must be done in the correct legal venue to ensure it proceeds smoothly.



Discovery Process:During this phase, both your attorney and the opposing parties engage in gathering evidence. This includes conducting interviews, collecting documents, and taking depositions. The goal is to build a robust case that supports your claim.



Reach a Resolution:Most asbestos cases don't end up in court trials. Instead, your lawyer will work diligently to negotiate a settlement that compensates you fairly, avoiding the stress and unpredictability of a courtroom decision.




By understanding these steps, you can approach asbestos litigation with confidence and the knowledge needed to navigate this challenging journey.



Why Work With a Dallas Mesothelioma Lawyer? 







You have a right to seek compensation. Mesothelioma is deadly and very expensive to treat. Companies that failed to protect you can and should pay. To make them pay, you need an experienced asbestos lawyer. 



Asbestos cases are complicated, so don't settle for just any lawyer. Look for a top Dallas mesothelioma lawyer who works as part of a large asbestos firm. They will have the experience and resources needed to give you a good outcome. The right lawyer will explain your options, provide advice, take legal action on your behalf, and maximize the compensation you receive.



Understand the Process:




Find the Right Attorney: Start by seeking a legal professional with a proven track record in handling mesothelioma cases. Their experience is crucial in identifying the best strategies tailored to your situation.



Determine Your Eligibility: A knowledgeable lawyer will delve into your exposure history to assess your qualifications for filing a claim. This involves identifying the asbestos products responsible for your diagnosis.



File Your Claim: Your attorney will guide you through filing your claim correctly in the appropriate court. They ensure every detail is managed meticulously, setting the foundation for a strong case.



Enter the Discovery Phase: This involves gathering evidence through research, interviews, and depositions. Your lawyer, along with the defendants, will build a robust case during this critical phase.



Resolution: Most cases settle before reaching trial. Your attorney's goal is to secure compensation through settlement, sparing you the stress of a courtroom battle.




A good Dallas mesothelioma lawyer not only handles all aspects of the legal process but also provides peace of mind, allowing you to focus on your treatment and recovery. By partnering with an experienced attorney, you can navigate the legal complexities with confidence.



The Role of Mesothelioma Law Firms in Evidence Gathering for Claims



Mesothelioma law firms play a crucial role in meticulously assembling the evidence necessary for a successful claim. These legal experts delve deep into the client's past to gather vital information.



Key Evidence Collection Activities:




Employment and Exposure History: Attorneys compile comprehensive employment records to trace where and how asbestos exposure likely occurred. This step helps pinpoint potential sources and responsible parties.



Medical Documentation: Law firms work closely with healthcare providers to obtain detailed medical records. This documentation is crucial in proving the link between the illness and asbestos exposure.



Expert Consultations: To strengthen the case, lawyers collaborate with medical specialists who can provide expert testimony. These experts establish a scientific connection between asbestos exposure and the subsequent diagnosis.




By undertaking these meticulous steps, mesothelioma law firms build a strong foundation for their clients’ claims. Such thorough preparation ensures that claimants have the best chance of securing the compensation they deserve.



How Was Asbestos Used in Dallas? 



Dallas has long been a major hub for big businesses. Its first significant commodity was cotton. By the late 19th Century, oil extraction and refining became a keystone of the Texas and Dallas economies.



The growth of oil led to an increase in other industries around Dallas, including transportation and communications. This emergence as a major city coincided with peak asbestos use in several prominent industries, including oil and construction. 



As the city grew, buildings were constructed with asbestos. Many of these older public buildings and private residences still contain asbestos materials. Some still pose serious health risks for workers and residents. 



Asbestos was also used during the construction of old schools in the city and continues to cause issues. 



For instance, in 2019, the Dallas School District closed the Morrison Campus Alternative School after ceiling materials with asbestos fell to the floor, putting students and staff in danger of exposure. 



Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Dallas? 







If you have mesothelioma, you were probably exposed to asbestos at work. One or more of your past workplaces likely contained asbestos, which you might have even handled. There are many examples of companies and industries in Dallas that used asbestos. 



Texas Vermiculite Company



Dallas was once home to the Texas Vermiculite Company, which processed the mineral vermiculite for use in several products. 



The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reported that the facility received nearly 400,000 tons of asbestos-contaminated vermiculite from the W.R. Grace mines in Libby, Montana. 



Workers at the facility processed the shipments of Libby vermiculite between 1967 and 1993. Workers at the plant during this time period were likely exposed to asbestos. 



The site continues to be an issue. Soil testing on the site of the former plant in 2022 found asbestos. It could continue to harm workers and nearby residents. 



Dallas Job Sites with Asbestos



Some of the biggest contributors to asbestos exposure in Dallas included oil companies, power generation and distribution facilities, construction companies, railroads, manufacturers of machinery, government agencies, and auto repair shops.



Although EPA regulations were eventually put in place to limit asbestos use, workers suffered long-term exposure at several Dallas job sites: 




A.F. Hoffman Boiler Works



American Airlines/Dallas-Ft. Worth International Airport



APG Firebrick of Texas



Armstrong Cork Company



B&B Engineering and Supply Co. 



Babcock & Wilson



Baylor University Hospital



Chance-Vought Aircraft/LTV



Coca-Cola Enterprises Dallas



Dallas Convention Center



Dallas Electric Light & Power (Luminant)



Dallas Ice Factory Light & Power Company



Dallas Gas Company



Dallas Consolidated Electric Street Railway Company



Dallas Railway Company



Diamond Alkali (Diamond/Shamrock Corporation)



Eugene B. Smith & Company



First International Bank Building



Fuller-Austin Insulation, Dallas Division



GAF Plant



Gulf Oil Company



Holman Boiler Works



Iola Portland Cement Works



Jones-Blair Paint Company



Lone Star Gas Plant



Texas Power & Light Company



Oak Cliff Planing Mill



Parker-Fallis Insulation



Parkland General Hospital



Dallas Dressed Beef & Packing Company



Texas Instruments






Can I Still Be Exposed to Asbestos in Dallas? 







Yes, unfortunately, people are still at risk for asbestos exposure throughout Dallas. The threat comes from older buildings that still have asbestos materials in them. The materials can deteriorate over time, causing exposure. Renovations and demolitions also increase the risk of exposure. 



The Valley View Center is one example of how asbestos persists in Dallas buildings, putting people at risk. It has taken years for demolition to begin on the shuttered property. In 2022, a fire destroyed part of the building, injuring firefighters. They could also have been exposed to asbestos while putting out the fire. 



Dallas firefighters have been put at risk of exposure to asbestos through their stations. Dallas Fire Station 57 closed in 2017 after inspections turned up asbestos in the flooring. Other stations are likely to be contaminated as well. 



Mesothelioma Treatment in Texas



Dallas is home to an expert cancer care center, but patients can also access treatment throughout the state. These are facilities designated comprehensive cancer centers by the National Cancer Institute: 




Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 2201 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX 75390, 214-645-4673



Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, 713-798-1354



M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, 713-792-2121



Cancer Therapy & Research Center, University of Texas Health Science Center, 7979 Wurzbach Road, Urschel Tower, Room U627, San Antonio, TX 78299, 210-450-1000, Cancer Information Line: 1-800-340-2872




The Mesothelioma Lawyer Center made my husband and I feel much better about dealing with Meso. They made sure we received everything we could and they also made sure he saw the best medical attention possible. They arranged visits with doctors that they personally knew and recommended. We can't imagine dealing with this without Mesothelioma Lawyer Center.- Natalie F.



Get Legal Help for Asbestos and Mesothelioma Claims in Dallas



If you’ve been a victim of asbestos exposure and suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, there is a good chance you may qualify for significant compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Georgia Mesothelioma Lawyer

Many Georgia industries once used asbestos at job sites, prompting workers and their families to seek the assistance of an experienced Georgia mesothelioma lawyer. People who worked around asbestos are at risk of developing malignant mesothelioma and other asbestos-related illnesses.



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Georgia, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 





We offer assistance to all asbestos victims and their families in Georgia, including cities such as:



Atlanta, Augusta, Columbus, Macon, Savannah, Athens, Sandy Springs, Roswell, Johns Creek, Albany, Warner Robins, Alpharetta, Marietta, Valdosta, Smyrna, Dunwoody, Rome, East Point, Milton, Gainesville, Hinesville, Peachtree City, Newnan, Dalton, Douglasville, Kennesaw, LaGrange, Statesboro, Lawrenceville, Duluth, Stockbridge, Woodstock, Carrollton, Canton, Griffin, McDonough, Acworth, Pooler, Union City, Decatur, Cartersville, Sugar Hill, Milledgeville, Snellville, Forest Park, Thomasville, St. Marys Tifton, Americus, Kingsland, Suwanee, Dublin, Fayetteville, Calhoun, Chamblee, Brunswick, Norcross, Riverdale, Conyers, Perry, College Park, Moultrie, Waycross, Winder, Powder Springs, Villa Rica, Fairburn, Monroe, Covington, Cusseta, Buford, Bainbridge, Lilburn, Grovetown, Dallas, Douglas, Cordele, Loganville, Vidalia, Richmond Hill, Jesup, Cairo, Cedartown, Fort Valley, Holly Springs, Jefferson, Fort Oglethorpe, Rincon, Thomaston, Fitzgerald, Garden City, Doraville, Toccoa, Braselton, Clarkston, Swainsboro, Centerville, Hampton, LaFayette, Auburn, and more.




Georgia Asbestos Facts








Georgia recorded 4,172 deaths related to asbestos exposure between 1999 and 2017.



Of those deaths, most were from lung cancer, but nearly 800 resulted from mesothelioma.



The county with the greatest number of asbestos deaths is Fulton.



Most asbestos exposure occurred on the job in various industries. 




What Products Used Asbestos in Georgia, and What Impact Did It Have?



Asbestos found its way into a variety of products, especially during Georgia's industrial boom. Primarily, it appeared in construction materials such as insulation, floor tiles, and roofing shingles. The automotive industry also utilized asbestos in brake pads and clutches due to its heat-resistant properties.



Moreover, shipbuilding and manufacturing facilities extensively used asbestos for its durability and fireproof nature. Its applications in equipment and machinery parts were widespread, given the perceived benefits at the time.



Impact of Asbestos Use



While these industries thrived economically, the health repercussions were severe and far-reaching. Workers in factories, construction sites, and shipyards often faced prolonged exposure to asbestos fibers. This exposure has been linked to chronic health issues, such as asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma.



The threat wasn't confined to workplaces. Many residents found themselves exposed in their own homes through insulation and other construction materials. This residential exposure further expanded the circle of those at risk, impacting public health on a larger scale.



In essence, while asbestos may have contributed to industrial growth, it left a legacy of health challenges that resonate to this day.



Understanding Asbestos and Its Dangers



What is Asbestos?



Asbestos is a naturally occurring mineral known for its strong, fibrous structure. This mineral has been prized for its heat resistance and durability. Because of these properties, it found widespread use across several industries. Historically, asbestos was commonly incorporated into construction materials, such as insulation, roofing, and fireproofing. It's also been a staple in manufacturing automotive components and materials for shipbuilding.



Why is Asbestos Dangerous?



The danger of asbestos lies in its microscopic fibers. When asbestos-containing materials are disturbed, these fibers can become airborne, making them easy to inhale or ingest. Once inside the body, the fibers lodge themselves in the lining of vital organs, such as the lungs, creating long-term health risks. Over time, this can lead to serious conditions, including asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma—a form of cancer predominantly linked to asbestos exposure. The symptoms of these illnesses may not appear for many years, making early detection and intervention difficult.



Key Points to Consider




Health Risks: Asbestos exposure can cause life-threatening illnesses.



Invisible Threat: Fibers are invisible to the naked eye, yet potent.



Delayed Symptoms: Health effects may take decades to surface.




With its history of utility now overshadowed by its health implications, asbestos remains a pivotal topic in both health and safety discussions and regulatory measures worldwide.



Understanding the Link Between Asbestos Exposure and Mesothelioma



Asbestos exposure is the primary cause of mesothelioma, a severe and aggressive cancer. This disease develops when tiny asbestos fibers are inhaled or ingested. These fibers can become lodged in the lining of the lungs, abdomen, or heart. Over time, the fibers cause inflammation and scarring, which can lead to cellular damage.



The Pathway to Disease




Initial Exposure: Individuals working in industries such as construction, shipbuilding, and manufacturing are often at higher risk. Asbestos was commonly used for its heat-resistant properties, making it prevalent in numerous materials.



Latency Period: One of the challenges in diagnosing mesothelioma is its long latency period. Symptoms can take 20 to 50 years to manifest after exposure. This delay makes early detection difficult, as the disease often progresses unnoticed.



Onset of Symptoms: Once symptoms do appear, they may include chest pain, shortness of breath, or abdominal swelling, depending on the location of the cancer. These symptoms can be mistaken for other conditions, further complicating timely diagnosis.




The Role of Asbestos Fibers




Inhalation: When asbestos fibers are inhaled, they can penetrate lung tissues and create fibrous plaques over time. This persistent irritation contributes to the development of cancerous cells.



Ingestion: In some cases, fibers can be ingested and embed themselves in the lining of the abdomen. This is typically associated with peritoneal mesothelioma.




By understanding these processes, we gain insight into why asbestos is so dangerous and why protective regulations, such as those endorsed by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), are crucial in preventing exposure.



Breaking down the journey from exposure to disease helps highlight the importance of early prevention and vigilance in recognizing symptoms.



Understanding Mesothelioma: Causes and Types



What Causes Mesothelioma?



Mesothelioma is a severe and currently incurable form of cancer. The primary cause is exposure to asbestos, a naturally occurring mineral once widely used in construction, insulation, and various industrial applications. This disease can take years, often decades, to manifest after initial exposure. Tiny asbestos fibers, when inhaled or ingested, can become trapped in the linings of the lungs, abdomen, or heart, eventually leading to tumors.



Types of Mesothelioma




Pleural MesotheliomaThis type affects the pleura, the protective lining around the lungs. It is the most common form, accounting for about 75% of all mesothelioma cases. Symptoms might include chest pain, persistent cough, and difficulty breathing.



Peritoneal MesotheliomaFound in the peritoneum, the lining of the abdominal cavity, this type is responsible for roughly 20% of cases. Symptoms often involve abdominal pain, swelling, and weight loss.



Pericardial MesotheliomaThis rare form affects the pericardium, the lining around the heart. It accounts for about 1% of cases and can lead to heart-related symptoms such as chest pain and arrhythmias.




Understanding these causes and types can aid in earlier detection and more effective management of this challenging disease. If you suspect exposure or experience related symptoms, consult a healthcare professional immediately. Your health is paramount, and awareness is the first step towards prevention.



When Do I Need a Georgia Mesothelioma Lawyer?


If you or a family member suffered asbestos exposure and received a diagnosis of asbestos-related illness, contact a mesothelioma lawyer for advice. Even if you only suspect exposure occurred, talk to a lawyer. 







An expert in asbestos and personal injury laws can help you:




Understand your legal options



Make the best choice for getting justice or compensation



Get the most compensation possible



Face big companies responsible for your exposure



File a lawsuit or make a claim with an asbestos trust fund



File for VA benefits if you served in the military




Victims like you sue for mesothelioma to recover damages. Mesothelioma is an expensive illness that could and should have been prevented. A lawyer helps you hold companies accountable and makes them pay.



Asbestos-related illnesses often lead to significant financial struggles. Patients face overwhelming costs due to medical bills that continue to mount. The inability to work results in lost wages, further straining finances. Families suffer too, bearing the burden of funeral expenses and enduring the loss of financial support from loved ones. These challenges add to the emotional toll, creating a cycle of hardship.



By seeking legal assistance, you not only pursue justice but also aim to alleviate these financial burdens. Legal action can provide compensation for these struggles, offering you and your family a way to reclaim stability.


How to File a Mesothelioma Claim in Georgia


A top Georgia mesothelioma lawyer will help determine the type of claim to file. They file for you and take all the steps necessary to give you the best chance of winning compensation. Options include: 



Mesothelioma Personal Injury Lawsuit



Mesothelioma is considered a personal injury because it results from negligent asbestos exposure. To file and win a lawsuit, you need to prove that asbestos caused your illness and that specific defendants are liable for that exposure. 



Finding evidence and proving a mesothelioma lawsuit is complicated. This is why you must rely on a lawyer or firm with extensive resources and experience working on and winning asbestos cases. 



Asbestos Trust Fund Claim



If the companies that exposed you to asbestos went bankrupt, you cannot sue them. Instead, you can file a claim for compensation with an asbestos trust fund. Asbestos trusts have more than $30 billion in funds for claimants. 



Your lawyer can determine which companies exposed you to asbestos. They can then decide which trusts you are eligible to make a claim with. 



Mesothelioma Wrongful Death Lawsuit



If you lost a loved one to mesothelioma, you can file a lawsuit over their wrongful death. The companies responsible for their asbestos exposure can be held liable for monetary damages, just as in a personal injury case. 


Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Georgia?






If you have mesothelioma now, you were most likely exposed to asbestos decades ago. Most people were exposed to asbestos at their jobs. Many industries used asbestos for years without warning workers of the risks. 



An experienced asbestos attorney in Georgia has the resources and expertise necessary to determine where and when you came into contact with asbestos. 



These are just a few examples of companies and industries in Georgia that exposed workers to asbestos:



Asbestos Mines



Georgia contains 52 natural asbestos deposits, more than any other state in the eastern U.S. and primarily in the mountains in the north. Georgia was also home to the first asbestos mine in the country. 



Georgia would continue mining asbestos at several sites from the late 1800s through the early 1900s. The mines supplied numerous industries and put miners at risk of exposure. 



The former asbestos mines pose much less of a threat today but can still harm residents. If natural asbestos is disturbed, for instance, by construction or road projects, the fibers can enter the air, soil, and water. This can harm anyone living in the area. 



Georgia-Pacific



Georgia-Pacific, one of the state's biggest companies, is well-known for using asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) in many products. Employees handled these materials daily. Additionally, Georgia-Pacific bought out the Bestwall Gypsum Corporation during the 1960s’, which used asbestos.



According to the Georgia-Pacific newsroom, in 2000, 232,000 asbestos-related cases have been filed against the company since the mid-1980s. 



Although the company claimed it did not anticipate any other lawsuits in the same news statement, it put aside an additional $221 million in 2002 for asbestos-related lawsuits. In 2002, the company had more than 62,000 pending asbestos lawsuits.



The Keebler Company



Many manufacturing plants also used asbestos. In 1989, the Keebler Company in Atlanta was responsible for exposing thousands of workers to asbestos fibers after the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) determined that an oven in one of the company’s plants was releasing the harmful fibers into the air.



Military Sites and Government Buildings



Georgia is home to 13 military bases and several Federal buildings. These military and federal workplaces have been found to contain asbestos.



Veterans have some of the highest rates of mesothelioma in the U.S. The military used asbestos extensively in buildings, vehicles, and machinery. 



U.S. Navy veterans were most affected by asbestos use in the military. Ships contained asbestos in nearly every component for decades. 


Other Job Sites Associated with Asbestos in Georgia



Charmin Paper Products Company



Coats & Clark, Inc.



Cobb Heating & Air Conditioning



Coil Insulation Company



Firestone Tire and Rubber Company



Georgia Alabama Power Company



Georgia Growers Distilling Company



Georgia Power Company



Herck & Company



J.P. Stevens and Company



Lykes Brothers Inc



Merck & Company, Inc.



Merck Chemical Div



Miller Brewing Company, Inc



Georgia Plywood Corporation



J. P. Stevens & Company



Mohasco Industries Inc.



Southeast Paper Manufacturing Company



Brumby Chair Company



Dobbins Air Force Base



Georgia Manufacturing and Public Service Company



Kennesaw Mills Company



Kerby Saunders Incorporated



Mckenney's, Inc.



Mead Container Packaging



Mead Paper Company



Mechanical Associates



Merillat Industries



Metropolitan Eye Hospital



Miss Georgia Dairies



Hickory Lake Apartments (Smyrna)



Lawrenceville High School



Jekyll Island Historical Power Plant



Cowboys (Kennesaw)



Georgia Laws That Affect Asbestos Cases


Each state has its own laws regarding asbestos litigation and claims. Understanding the laws that impact victims filing a lawsuit and recovering damages is important. Because some of these laws make it more difficult to succeed, relying on an experienced asbestos firm is essential. 


Statute of Limitations






The statute of limitations sets a deadline for filing lawsuits related to personal injury or wrongful death in Georgia: 




Under Ga. Code Ann. § 9-3-20 et seq., plaintiffs filing an asbestos-related lawsuit in the state of Georgia must file within two years of the time of diagnosis or within two years of when the illness was discovered.



Wrongful death lawsuits follow the same two-rule; the lawsuit must be filed within two years of the date of the victim’s death.



Georgia allows asbestos-related cases to be consolidated as defined in Rule 42 (a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.




2005 Asbestos Litigation Reforms



The Georgia Supreme Court mandated new restrictions in 2005 that make filing and winning an asbestos-related lawsuit more challenging for victims:




In the past, asbestos victims had to prove that asbestos contributed to their disease, but now it must also be proven to be a substantial contributing factor and the primary cause of a disease.



A medical report must be presented, approved by a physician, that states the victim’s disease came from asbestos exposure. This rule applies to all asbestos-related diseases except for mesothelioma.



A physician must also verify that it has been at least 15 years have passed between the victim’s first exposure to asbestos and the diagnosis.



Victims can only file if they are currently a resident of Georgia and/or were a resident at the time of asbestos exposure.




Take-Home Duty for Secondhand Asbestos Exposure



Most people with mesothelioma were directly exposed to asbestos at work. Some people experienced secondhand asbestos exposure when a family member who worked with it brought fibers home on their clothing. 



Some states have recognized that companies had a duty to warn employees of this risk. Georgia does not recognize that duty, known as take-home duty. 



The Georgia Supreme Court ruled that CertainTeed did not have a duty to warn in a 2016 lawsuit. The victim developed mesothelioma because her father worked at CertainTeed and brought asbestos fibers home without understanding the risks. 


What Are Georgia's Asbestos Safety Laws?


The Environmental Protection Division (EPD) of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources (DNR) is responsible for the state's laws governing asbestos and asbestos abatement projects in Georgia.




Rule 391-3-4-.04 (8) of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources Rules mandates that any “asbestos-containing waste” must be transported for disposal in a state-approved vehicle that has a separate compartment area to transport the asbestos in.



The asbestos must be disposed of in permitted landfills and waste areas within the state.



Each container with asbestos must be sealed tight with the proper warning labels on the front.



All friable asbestos must be “wetted” before removing it from the asbestos abatement project area. The asbestos must remain wet while encapsulating it for proper disposal.



Written notification must be sent to the state within seven days before starting any asbestos abatement project in Georgia.




For more detailed information and additional regulations involved in Georgia asbestos abatement, contact the EPD at 404-657-5947 or toll-free at 888-373-5947.



A recent investigation by 11Alive News in Atlanta uncovered issues with enforcing these regulations. The news agency found that lawmakers largely defunded the program in 2011. 



They also found that the Georgia DNR rarely checks on violations of the state's asbestos laws. Before the defunding, the agency found and acted on numerous violations. This lack of accountability puts residents at risk of harmful asbestos exposure and leads to more lawsuits. 


Understanding the Life Expectancy for Mesothelioma Patients
Mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer with a generally challenging prognosis. However, the outlook varies significantly based on several factors, including the type and stage of the disease at diagnosis.
Life Expectancy Factors:


Type of Mesothelioma:

Peritoneal Mesothelioma: Patients typically have a better prognosis compared to other types. Many can live more than three years following diagnosis.
Pleural Mesothelioma: This is the most common form and often has a shorter life expectancy, usually ranging from 12 to 21 months depending on intervention success.



Stage at Diagnosis:

Early Stages (I-II): If identified early, patients may experience a longer life expectancy due to more effective treatment options.
Later Stages (III-IV): Advanced stages are often harder to treat, resulting in a reduced survival rate.



Treatment Options:

Various treatments, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, can extend life expectancy by managing symptoms and slowing disease progression.
Emerging therapies and clinical trials continue to offer hope for extending life even further.



Overall Health and Age:

Younger patients with no additional health issues often have a more favorable outcome.



While there is no cure for mesothelioma, advances in treatment offer the opportunity to enhance both the quality and length of life for many patients. Early diagnosis remains crucial in improving life expectancy and increasing the likelihood of long-term survival.
Mesothelioma Treatment in Georgia


Victims dealing with an asbestos-related disease and finding the best mesothelioma treatments can be daunting. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) makes this process easier by appointing worthy care centers and hospitals as NCI-designated facilities.



The Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University (WCI) is an NCI-designated care center with researchers, physicians, cancer experts, and healthcare specialists focusing on mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases.



It’s important to seek mesothelioma treatment from a care center specializing in asbestos-related diseases. A typical small family clinic or a general practitioner usually doesn’t have the expertise and knowledge of a physician specializing in asbestos cancer.



Common Symptoms of Mesothelioma



Mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive cancer primarily caused by asbestos exposure. Recognizing its symptoms early can lead to better management and treatment. Here are some of the typical symptoms associated with different types of mesothelioma:




Pleural Mesothelioma (affecting the lungs):

Persistent chest pain



Difficulty breathing



Chronic cough



Unexplained weight loss



Fatigue





Peritoneal Mesothelioma (affecting the lining of the abdomen):

Abdominal pain or swelling



Bloating



Nausea and digestive issues



Changes in bowel habits, such as constipation or diarrhea



Loss of appetite





Pericardial Mesothelioma (affecting the heart lining):

Heart palpitations or irregular heartbeat



Chest pain



Shortness of breath





Testicular Mesothelioma (extremely rare):

Swelling or lumps in the testicular area



Pain in the groin region






These symptoms can often be mistaken for other conditions, which makes accurate diagnosis challenging. If you suspect exposure to asbestos or exhibit these symptoms persistently, it's crucial to consult a healthcare professional for a thorough evaluation. Early detection can significantly influence treatment options and outcomes.



Mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer linked to asbestos exposure, presents a daunting prognosis. The five-year survival rate for individuals diagnosed with this condition is approximately 10%. This statistic underscores the severity of the disease, as many patients face a drastically limited life expectancy, typically ranging from four to 18 months post-diagnosis.



Paul at Mesothelioma Lawyer Center provided outstanding support when my family faced a mesothelioma diagnosis. From the start, his professionalism and genuine care were evident. Paul explained every step of the legal process with patience and empathy.His meticulous attention to detail and expertise ensured our case was handled swiftly and efficiently. What truly impressed us was Paul's responsiveness—he was always quick to reply and kept us well-informed throughout.I highly recommend Mesothelioma Lawyer Center.-Patrick M


Getting Legal Help in Georgia


As previously mentioned, if you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to compensatory damages. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. For questions and assistance, feel free to contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Miami Mesothelioma Lawyer

Many victims of asbestos exposure in Florida are fighting for justice with the help of experienced Miami mesothelioma lawyers. Shipyards and many other Miami job sites and industries used asbestos for decades before the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) limited its use. 



If you or someone you love suffers from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Miami, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 






Miami and Asbestos Facts








Miami-Dade County had the fourth-highest number of asbestos-related deaths in Florida between 1999 and 2017.



The county's death toll from asbestos causes was 972 during that period.



Several shipyards in Miami contributed to asbestos deaths in the area. Other contributors included Bendix, a brake manufacturer, and Nabi Pharmaceuticals.




Understanding Mesothelioma Lawsuit Settlements



When individuals or families seek compensation for mesothelioma cases, settlements typically range from $1 million to $2 million. These figures can vary based on several factors, including the severity of the illness, the number of parties being sued, and the strength of the legal case.



Influential Factors




Severity of Diagnosis: The stage of the disease and its impact on the individual's quality of life can significantly affect the settlement amount.



Company Responsibility: If multiple companies are involved, or if one company bears significant responsibility, the financial outcome can differ.



Legal Representation: Experienced legal teams can negotiate higher settlements due to their expertise in handling complex asbestos-related cases.




Understanding the Components



Settlements usually cover several expenses:




Medical Costs: Includes past, current, and future treatments.



Lost Wages: Compensates for income lost due to inability to work.



Pain and Suffering: Acknowledges the emotional and physical pain caused by the illness.




Conclusion



While the average settlement ranges optimistically between $1 and $2 million, each case is unique. Various elements shape these numbers, emphasizing the importance of tailored legal advice and understanding one's specific circumstances.




What Can a Miami Mesothelioma Lawyer Do for Me? 







"If you have a mesothelioma diagnosis, the right lawyer can help you get much-needed compensation. Mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses cost you a lot of money in treatments, travel costs, lost wages, and more. You have mesothelioma because one or more companies negligently exposed you to asbestos. Let an experienced asbestos attorney in Miami help you hold those companies accountable:




Guidance and Expertise: An experienced attorney is crucial for navigating the complex legal process of a mesothelioma lawsuit. They will guide you through each step, ensuring your rights are protected and your case is handled with the utmost professionalism.



Case Review and Investigation: A lawyer will review your case for free and provide guidance on what to do next. If they take your case, asbestos lawyers will investigate your past asbestos exposure. They will determine which companies can be sued. If any of those companies went bankrupt, your lawyer can find the appropriate asbestos trust and help you file a claim.



Financial Recovery: The asbestos trusts still have $30 billion available for claimants. Your lawyer will file a lawsuit and negotiate a settlement with the defendants. Experienced attorneys often achieve settlements out of court, providing substantial compensation to plaintiffs.




Your lawyer will give you the best chance of recovering damages and will maximize the compensation you receive. If settlement negotiations fail, your lawyer will litigate your case in court and seek a jury verdict and award. Most importantly, the right lawyer allows you to rest and focus on treatment while they take legal actions in your best interests."



Why Acting Quickly on Mesothelioma Claims Matters



Understanding the Latency PeriodMesothelioma is a unique and challenging illness, often taking decades to manifest after exposure. This long latency period means that symptoms only become apparent years later, making it essential to act swiftly once diagnosed.



Legal Time ConstraintsEach state has specific statutes of limitations for filing a mesothelioma claim. Once the diagnosis is confirmed, the clock starts ticking. Missing these deadlines can result in losing the chance to seek justice and compensation.



Securing Vital EvidenceOver time, crucial evidence related to asbestos exposure can be lost or become harder to obtain. Witnesses may become unavailable, companies may dissolve, and records might be lost. Acting quickly can ensure that essential documentation and testimonies are gathered effectively.



Maximizing CompensationPrompt action increases the likelihood of receiving the full compensation you deserve. Delays might affect the viability of a claim, potentially minimizing the financial support available for medical treatments, living expenses, and family security.



Navigating the Legal MazeFiling a mesothelioma claim involves navigating a complex legal system. By reaching out to an experienced attorney sooner rather than later, you can benefit from guidance and advocacy, helping to streamline the process and focus on recovery.



Acting promptly isn't just about meeting deadlines; it's about safeguarding your future and ensuring that your rights are protected every step of the way.



What Steps Should One Take if Exposed to Asbestos in Miami?



Finding yourself exposed to asbestos can be a worrying situation. Here's a step-by-step guide to help you navigate this challenging scenario.



1. Seek Immediate Medical Evaluation




The first and foremost action is to schedule a comprehensive medical evaluation. Reach out to a healthcare professional who specializes in environmental or occupational health. Early detection of any asbestos-related conditions is key to effective management.




2. Document the Exposure




Keep a detailed record of your exposure. Note the date, location, duration, and any potential sources of asbestos. This information will be essential both for your medical records and any future legal actions.




3. Monitor Health Symptoms




Pay close attention to respiratory issues, persistent coughing, or shortness of breath. Regular health check-ups will help detect any arising complications early.




4. Consult a Specialist Lawyer




Contact a qualified attorney who specializes in asbestos-related cases. They can evaluate whether you have grounds for a claim and guide you through the process of pursuing compensation for medical costs and other damages.




5. Gather Evidence and Witnesses




Collect any evidence related to your exposure, including photographs and witness statements. This will support any case you decide to pursue legally.




6. Stay Informed about Asbestos Regulations




Educate yourself about local and national asbestos regulations. Understanding the laws can empower you in protecting yourself and advocating for safer environments.




By taking these steps promptly, you can safeguard your health while ensuring that your legal rights are duly represented. It's important to act swiftly and seek professional guidance each step of the way.



How to Choose a Top Miami Mesothelioma Lawyer



Top-rated Florida mesothelioma lawyers in Miami can help you make your case and get the compensation you deserve. It's essential that you choose the right lawyer to get the best results. Here's what to look for in a lawyer for your asbestos claims in Miami: 




A lawyer experienced in working with and winning for asbestos clients



A local attorney or someone who can come to you but who is part of a large, nationwide firm with adequate resources to investigate and prove your case. 



Someone who offers a free initial consultation and doesn't charge you any fees until you win compensation. 




How Did I Get Mesothelioma? 



If you live in Miami and received a mesothelioma diagnosis, you probably worked with or around asbestos at some point in your career. Asbestos exposure is the leading cause of mesothelioma. 



Asbestos releases tiny fibers that become airborne and are inhaled by anyone working nearby. Inside your body, those fibers can cause damage that might lead to cancer, often pleural mesothelioma or lung cancer. 







While not everyone gets sick from asbestos exposure, those who do develop devastating illnesses. Exposure is most often from the workplace and is negligent. Companies can be held accountable. Industries in which asbestos was once common include shipping, construction, manufacturing, energy, and automotive repair. These industries often utilized a variety of asbestos-containing products due to the material's durability and resistance to heat. In Miami, many buildings still contain these products, posing potential risks to residents and workers alike.



Some of the common products that might be present include:




Adhesives: Used in various applications, often hidden under floors or behind walls.



Floor Tiles: Frequently found in older buildings, these tiles can release asbestos fibers when disturbed.



Insulation: Widely used for its fire-retardant properties, particularly in older homes and commercial buildings.



Pipes: Asbestos was a popular choice for insulating pipes, especially in industrial settings.



Roof Shingles: Many roofs still contain asbestos shingles, which can be hazardous during renovations or repairs.




Understanding these materials and where they are likely to be found helps in assessing the potential asbestos exposure in Miami's buildings.



Shipyards and Asbestos Use in Miami



Miami's economy once relied on the shipbuilding and repair industry. Since time used, asbestos in nearly all components, putting workers at risk of exposure. Shipyards associated with asbestos in Miami include:




Miami Shipbuilding Corporation



Jones Boat Yard



Miami-Dade Drydock



American Shipbuilding



Merrill Stevens Drydock




Bendix Brakes and Asbestos



The shipbuilding industry has been among the heaviest users of asbestos in the past, but not the only one. Bendix, a company that manufactured vehicle brakes, used asbestos in its parts. The asbestos helped to reduce friction and overheating in components.



In 2008, a Miami jury ruled against Honeywell International, the parent company of Bendix, after a former employee filed an asbestos lawsuit. 



Stephen Guilder worked for Bendix during the 1970s and 1980s. Several years later, Guilder was diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma, which stemmed directly from his prolonged exposure to asbestos while working as a mechanic for Bendix.







Guilder’s health declined rapidly, and the courts expedited the trial, resulting in a $24.1 million victory for Guilder. In addition, his wife and three children were awarded $7.1 million, which was factored into the total amount. The total includes pain and suffering, as well as future lost income.



Asbestos at Nabi Pharmaceuticals



Another area job site resulted in a substantial monetary award for a victim of asbestos exposure. Charles Thornton worked at Nabi maintaining equipment made by GEA Mechanical Equipment. 



Centrifuges and other machinery used in the labs contained asbestos in some parts. While doing maintenance work on them, Thornton was exposed and ultimately developed mesothelioma. His lawyers recently helped him recover a jury award of $70 million. 



Other Job Sites Associated with Asbestos in Miami



Several other Miami businesses and buildings have been associated with asbestos, including:



Hospitals




Jackson Memorial



Lebanon



Mercy



Mt. Sinai



St. Francis



Miami VA




Schools




Miami High School



Palmetto Middle School



Holmes Elementary School



Martin Luther King Elementary School



Tropical Elementary School



Riviera Middle School



Coral Gables High School



Miami Springs High School



Miami Beach High School



University of Miami School of Medicine



Northwestern High School




Hotels




Delido Hotel



Diplomat Hotel



Doral Hotel



Eden Rock Hotel



Fontainebleau Hotel



Hollywood Beach Hotel



Holiday Inn Miami




Other Businesses




Miami Herald



Miami Electric Light & Power



Dadeland Shopping Center



Miami Beach Convention Center



Miami International Airport



Miami Steam Electric Station



Turkey Point Power House



Pabco Packing Company




Asbestos in Miami-Dade Schools



Around 1978, several Miami-Dade Public School District schools began experiencing asbestos fibers floating through the hallways. Many students from area high schools transferred to other buildings while crews worked to secure the problems.



In 1988 asbestos issues surfaced again, and hundreds of elementary school children were transported to different schools during air quality testing. More than half of the schools tested in 1988 showed positive signs of asbestos.



Mesothelioma Treatment in Miami



Mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses require specialized care. Seek out physicians who are experienced with these types of diseases.



Miami is home to a designated Comprehensive Cancer Center, facilities recognized for treatment, patient care, and research. 



The Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center treats a wide range of cancers, including pleural mesothelioma. Treatments include robotic-assisted surgery, medical oncology, and advanced radiation therapy. Physicians and surgeons at Sylvester work together in multidisciplinary teams to treat patients. 



Getting Legal Help in Miami



Paul at Mesothelioma Lawyer Center provided outstanding support when my family faced a mesothelioma diagnosis. From the start, his professionalism and genuine care were evident. Paul explained every step of the legal process with patience and empathy.His meticulous attention to detail and expertise ensured our case was handled swiftly and efficiently. What truly impressed us was Paul's responsiveness—he was always quick to reply and kept us well-informed throughout.I highly recommend Mesothelioma Lawyer Center.-Patrick M



If you've been injured by asbestos, there is a good chance that you'll qualify for considerable compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Libby, Montana, Mesothelioma Lawyer

Contact a Libby mesothelioma lawyer for legal advice if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma or have questions about your rights. Libby was home to W.R. Grace vermiculite mines that operated for years. The mine also contained asbestos and poisoned area residents and workers in vermiculite facilities nationwide. 



If you or someone you love suffers from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Libby, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.





Libby Asbestos Facts




With a sparse population, the number of deaths related to asbestos in Montana is small, just over 1,500 from 1999 to 2017. 



Lincoln County, home of Libby, had the highest number of deaths in that period, with 262. 



The W.R. Grace mines in Libby are part of one of the worst man-made environmental disasters in the U.S. 



The contaminated vermiculite is estimated to be responsible for at least 400 deaths and illnesses in more than 2.400 people. 




When Do I Need a Libby Mesothelioma Lawyer? 



If you were exposed to asbestos in Libby, and especially if you have already been diagnosed with an asbestos disease, you need a top Montana mesothelioma lawyer. 



Because of the special circumstances of the Libby asbestos disaster, legal options for victims are a little different. W.R. Grace, the company responsible for asbestos exposure in Libby residents, went bankrupt. 



Victims cannot sue W.R. Grace. However, as part of bankruptcy, the company set up an asbestos trust fund and funded it with $4 billion. 



An experienced asbestos attorney in Libby, Montana, can help you make a successful claim with the trust fund. They can also explain any other legal options you might have. 



Libby, Montana, and the Asbestos Disaster







Mining has long been an important industry in Montana. The story of vermiculite mining in and around Libby began in earnest in the 19th century, but it was in 1919 that E.N. Alley purchased the Rainy Creek mining claims and launched the Zonolite Company. By the early 1900s, the industry was booming.



The Zonolite vermiculite mines comprised the biggest share of the operation in the region. In 1963, Maryland-based W.R. Grace & Company acquired Alley's Zonolite business, marking a new era in the mine's history. At its peak period of operations in the middle of the 20th century, the Libby mine produced two million tons of vermiculite mineral per year. The company shipped the vermiculite to processing plants around the country.



As workers, residents, and the government later learned, the vermiculite was contaminated with asbestos. Libby’s mines may have produced around 80 percent of the world’s vermiculite supply. Mine activities released about 5,000 pounds of asbestos into the air until W.R. Grace ceased operations in Libby in 1990, bringing an end to over 70 years of mining in the area.



This timeline highlights how the industry evolved from its early days to becoming a significant player in the global market, leaving a lasting impact on both the region and the world.



Health Impacts of Asbestos Exposure in Libby, Montana



The town of Libby, Montana, and its neighboring community, Troy, faced devastating health consequences due to asbestos exposure from local mining activities that spanned several decades.



Toll on Human Lives



The asbestos-contaminated mines have led to the deaths of hundreds of residents. The exposure was particularly severe among those directly involved in mining operations. These workers, alongside town residents, faced toxic conditions, leading to numerous respiratory illnesses and related diseases that have claimed many lives.



Medical Findings and Statistics



A study published in 2021 highlighted the grim reality for Libby's population. It revealed that an estimated 15-fold increase in the risk of developing mesothelioma, a type of cancer commonly linked to asbestos exposure, was evident among mine workers. In total, about 694 residents are believed to have died from diseases directly associated with asbestos exposure.



Current Health Status



Today, approximately 10% of Libby's residents live with illnesses tied to asbestos. Since the contamination's onset, around 2,400 individuals have been diagnosed with such diseases, showcasing the long-term impact on the community's health.



Libby's story serves as a harsh reminder of the severe health risks posed by asbestos exposure, affecting generations of workers and their families in the region.



What Kind of Asbestos Was in Libby, Montana? 



Known as Libby Amphibole asbestos, or LA, the asbestos released in Libby was particularly dangerous. Asbestos is a harmful substance because it sheds fibers that can be inhaled or ingested. Fibers inside the body cause tissue and cell damage, leading to illness in some people. 



Friable is especially dangerous because it sheds fibers very easily. Libby Amphibole is highly friable asbestos. Any asbestos would have harmed people in the years that W.R. Grace exposed people to it, but LA was more harmful than other types. 



Libby Asbestos Superfund Sites



The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated Libby as a Superfund site. Since 2002, the EPA has been conducting a massive cleanup effort. According to the agency, the amount of asbestos in downtown Libby is now nearly 100,000 times lower than when the mine was operating, and today, Libby is considered safe by the EPA.



However, the journey to safety has been complex. Between 1,200 and 1,400 Libby properties still show signs of asbestos contamination. Thousands of people in Libby and cities with vermiculite processing plants have been exposed and gotten sick from asbestos. The death toll related to Libby vermiculite is expected to continue rising.



This reduction in asbestos levels marks a significant improvement, but the impact of past contamination continues to affect the community. The EPA's cleanup efforts are ongoing, working to address and remediate the remaining contaminated properties, aiming to protect residents' health and well-being in the long term.



In Libby, at least 1 in 10 residents currently suffers from an asbestos-related illness. This startling statistic highlights the widespread impact of the contamination. Since the issue began, approximately 2,400 individuals have been diagnosed with diseases linked to asbestos exposure. This number underscores the significant health crisis facing the community, with the situation only expected to worsen over time.



While the problem extends beyond Libby, the town remains a central point of concern due to the severity of the impact on its residents. Asbestos exposure continues to pose a severe threat, and efforts to address the health concerns are critical.



Superfund Cleanup Efforts



The EPA has spent hundreds of millions of dollars cleaning up the Libby site. The closed mining facilities have been cleaned of asbestos. 



However, the operations by both Zonolite and its corporate owner W.R. Grace went on for so long that even the wood chips in nearby logging mills were contaminated.



Progress is being made, with another site delisting in early 2020. In 2021, the EPA deleted another part of the site from the Superfund list. 



The EPA will also soon be handing over control of the site to state and county government agencies. 



Compensation for Libby, Montana, Asbestos Victims







The situation in Libby is unique, as it involves so many people, one company, and the government. Libby, Montana, and nationwide asbestos firms have worked hard to get victims the compensation they deserve following this disaster. 



"While W.R. Grace went bankrupt, lawyers could still hold the state of Montana and its insurer liable for victims’ medical expenses. More than 1,300 plaintiffs in the case were awarded $43 million. Their lawyers showed that the state could have done more to warn workers and residents of the risks at the Libby mine. Lawyers and victims have also been successful in holding BNSF Railway Company liable. The company tried to dodge liability, but the Montana Supreme Court ruled it was not shielded. It is accused of spreading asbestos dust and contaminating soil in the rail yard. Some victims and their lawyers have even been able to hold W.R. Grace’s insurer liable for damages despite the company’s bankruptcy.



In 2022, an Oregon jury awarded a former W.R. Grace employee with asbestosis $36.5 million. The jury determined that W.R. Grace’s bankruptcy did not protect the insurer. The insurer had a separate responsibility to warn workers at the mine about asbestos.



Beyond these notable victories, numerous legal actions have unfolded over the years, reflecting the scope of the crisis:




Ralph Hutt's Case: In February 2022, a Montana jury ordered Maryland Casualty Company to pay $35.5 million to Ralph Hutt, an employee who developed asbestosis after working at the Libby mine for just 18 months in the late 1960s. This case set a precedent for more than 900 similar lawsuits against the company.



Major Settlements: A significant group payout occurred in January 2017, where over 1,000 Libby victims were awarded a $25 million settlement. This resolved more than 100 individual lawsuits against Montana state agencies for failing to warn residents about the mine’s dangers.



Historical Context: Between 2000 and 2009, around 800 Libby residents filed claims against W.R. Grace during its bankruptcy proceedings. Before filing for bankruptcy, Grace faced lawsuits from approximately 150 Libby residents, many of which were settled privately.




Despite these legal battles, Montana agencies maintain that they had no legal obligation to warn the public about the mine's dangers. However, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency now considers Libby to be safe, with asbestos levels in downtown Libby nearly 100,000 times lower than when the mine was operational."



The Center for Asbestos Related Disease in Libby



Libby residents affected by asbestos can get treatment at top-notch facilities throughout Montana. Because of the scope of the disaster, residents can also reach out to a local facility for cancer screenings and information about prevention and treatment. 



The Center for Asbestos Related Disease (CARD) is funded by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Contact CARD if you have questions about screenings, treatment, and access to mesothelioma specialists. 



This firm was extremely professional and responsive. If you have any meso questions, I’d highly recommend them- Michael L.



Getting Legal Assistance in Libby



Remember, if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Get our free Financial Compensation Packet for information on the top mesothelioma and asbestos lawyers in your area. For questions and assistance, feel free to contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Jackson, Mississippi Mesothelioma Lawyer

An experienced Jackson mesothelioma lawyer can help you take legal action and seek compensation if you were harmed by asbestos. Many workplaces in Jackson used asbestos, especially in manufacturing and construction. They put workers at risk of exposure and resulting asbestos illnesses.  



If you or a loved one have been affected by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Jackson, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.





Compensation for mesothelioma typically covers a range of costs and losses that affect patients and their families. Understanding these areas is crucial for those seeking justice and financial relief. Here's a detailed breakdown:



1. Medical Expenses



The treatments required for mesothelioma often lead to substantial medical bills. Compensation can help cover the costs of:




Chemotherapy sessions and medications



Surgical procedures



Radiation therapy



Participation in clinical trials



Ongoing hospital stays and doctor visits




2. Lost Income



Illness often means time away from work, resulting in lost wages. Compensation addresses:




Earnings lost during treatment and recovery



Reduced earning capacity if the individual is unable to return to their previous employment




3. Pain and Suffering



Beyond financial strain, mesothelioma profoundly impacts an individual's quality of life. Compensation often includes:




Acknowledgment of physical pain endured during treatment



Reimbursement for emotional distress and trauma caused by the illness




4. Additional Considerations



While the primary focus is on medical and financial impacts, some compensation may cover:




Travel expenses related to treatment



Home care or specialized assistance needs




In sum, mesothelioma compensation aims to alleviate the burdens faced, both tangible and intangible, allowing patients and their families to focus on healing and quality of life.



What Compensation Can Be Sought for Mesothelioma-Related Damages?



If you're dealing with mesothelioma, understanding the compensation available can provide crucial support during such a challenging time. The damages typically sought in mesothelioma cases encompass several critical areas.



Medical Expenses



The cost of treating mesothelioma can be astronomical. Compensation can cover a wide array of medical expenses, such as:




Chemotherapy and Radiation: Essential treatments aimed at combating cancer cells.



Surgical Procedures: Operations necessary to remove or reduce tumors.



Clinical Trials and Medications: Access to cutting-edge solutions and prescribed drugs.



Hospital Bills: Costs incurred from stays and routine check-ups.




Lost Income



A mesothelioma diagnosis often results in missed work opportunities, significantly affecting your financial stability. Compensation might address:




Lost Wages: Reimbursement for income you are unable to earn due to illness.



Potential Future Earnings: Consideration for income that might be lost in the future due to an inability to work.




Pain and Suffering



This aspect of compensation covers the non-economic damages inflicted by mesothelioma:




Physical Pain and Trauma: Recognition of the discomfort and hardship endured.



Diminished Quality of Life: Acknowledgment of how the illness impacts daily life and life expectancy, which is often limited to about 12 months post-diagnosis.




Seeking legal support can help ensure you receive the compensation needed to navigate this challenging time as smoothly as possible.



Jackson Asbestos Facts




Between 1999 and 2017, nearly 2,400 people in Mississippi died from asbestos-related diseases. 



Older buildings in Jackson were often constructed with asbestos and still pose risks to workers and residents today. 



A major refining company in Jackson also contributed to asbestos exposure in the city. 




About Asbestos and Mesothelioma in Jackson, Mississippi



Mesothelioma is a rare type of cancer with one known cause: asbestos exposure. Many industries common in Jackson in the 20th century used asbestos and exposed workers. 



Asbestos materials shed fibers when handled. In the workplace, this results in fibers in the air and dust that workers can inhale or ingest unintentionally. Inside the body, asbestos fibers irritate tissues and cause damage. Cell damage can lead to cancer and other illnesses. 



Asbestos exposure causes lung cancer, asbestosis, and two main types of mesothelioma: 



Pleural Mesothelioma. Pleural mesothelioma involves tissue around the lungs and causes symptoms like coughing, chest pains, and shortness of breath. Over time, asbestos fibers inhaled or swallowed can lodge in the lining of the lungs, damaging cells and causing inflammation. This can lead to the formation of tumors and the development of mesothelioma.



Peritoneal Mesothelioma. This less common form develops in the abdomen and causes abdominal pain, swelling, and gastrointestinal issues. Asbestos fibers can become trapped in the abdominal lining, leading to similar cellular damage and tumor formation.



Additional Symptoms and Importance of Early Diagnosis



Understanding the full range of mesothelioma symptoms is crucial. Some common symptoms across different types of mesothelioma include:




Chest pain



Dry cough



Fatigue



Wheezing



Shortness of breath



Muscle weakness



Fever




Seeking medical treatment as early as possible is essential, as early detection can significantly impact treatment outcomes. Always consult a healthcare professional if you experience any of these symptoms, especially if you have a history of asbestos exposure.



How Does Mesothelioma Impact a Person's Quality of Life?



Mesothelioma is a serious illness that can profoundly alter a person’s quality of life. This rare and aggressive cancer often originates in the lining of the lungs or abdomen, leading to a range of symptoms that significantly affect daily living.



Physical Challenges




Persistent Pain: Patients frequently experience severe and chronic pain, which can make even simple tasks difficult.



Breathing Difficulties: Issues such as shortness of breath or a persistent cough are common, as the disease primarily affects the lungs.



Fatigue: Extreme tiredness can occur, often exacerbated by treatments like chemotherapy.




Emotional and Mental Impact




Emotional Strain: Coping with a life-limiting illness often leads to stress, anxiety, and depression.



Cognitive Effects: There may also be a decline in cognitive functions as patients manage pain and fatigue.




Social and Economic Factors




Loss of Independence: As symptoms progress, many patients require assistance with daily activities, which can be frustrating.



Financial Burden: Medical expenses and lost income can add to the strain, impacting both the patient and their family.




Everyday activities become daunting, and the constant battle with the disease overshadows aspects of life that once brought joy. By understanding the full scope of how mesothelioma affects individuals, we can better appreciate the importance of support and effective management for those impacted by this challenging condition.



Why Early Medical Treatment is Crucial for Mesothelioma



Early intervention in mesothelioma cases is vital for several reasons. Firstly, mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer, and the sooner it's detected, the more treatment options are available. Early stages of the disease offer a better chance of managing symptoms and improving the quality of life.



Common Symptoms to Watch For:




Persistent Chest Pain: This can indicate the presence of a tumor pressing against the chest lining.



Chronic Dry Cough: Often mistaken for other respiratory conditions, but when persistent, it requires medical attention.



Constant Fatigue: A symptom that can significantly impact daily living and may signal that the body is fighting something serious.



Wheezing or Shortness of Breath: These symptoms may result from fluid build-up around the lungs.



Muscle Weakness: A sign that the disease could be affecting muscle function or overall health.



Recurrent Fevers: These may signal the body's ongoing fight against cancer cells.




By addressing these symptoms early, treatment can often be more effective, potentially slowing disease progression and extending survival rates. Early treatment might include surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation therapy, which are typically more successful when the cancer is detected at an earlier stage. Moreover, catching mesothelioma early can lead to more personalized treatment plans, aiming to increase the prognosis and improve recovery times.



In short, timely medical intervention doesn't just provide a chance for better outcomes; it empowers patients with knowledge and options during a challenging time.



How Long Does It Take for Mesothelioma to Develop After Asbestos Exposure?



Mesothelioma, a type of cancer linked to asbestos exposure, doesn't develop overnight. Instead, it typically emerges over a long period, ranging from 10 to 70 years after the initial exposure to asbestos particles. This extensive latency period is why many cases remain undetected until the cancer has advanced significantly.



Understanding the Latency Period




10 to 70 Years: The substantial gap between exposure and diagnosis complicates identification. Many individuals may not connect their symptoms to exposure that happened decades ago.




Importance of Legal Assistance



Due to this lengthy development time, finding the source of asbestos exposure can be challenging. Collaborating with legal professionals who specialize in asbestos-related cases can be invaluable. They are equipped to trace back exposure history and help identify the party responsible, significantly aiding in the quest for justice and compensation.



The delayed onset of mesothelioma underlines the importance of regular health check-ups, especially for those with known asbestos exposure, to catch any signs as early as possible.



When Do I Need a Jackson, Mississippi, Mesothelioma Lawyer? 



If you have a mesothelioma diagnosis, you were probably exposed to asbestos at work years ago. Contact a mesothelioma lawyer right away. You have a right to seek compensation for negligent asbestos exposure, and a lawyer can help. 



Top Mississippi mesothelioma lawyers are often based in Jackson. They are available to give you a free consultation for advice and to answer your questions. If they believe you have a case, they can help you take one or more actions to recover monetary damages: 




File a personal injury lawsuit



Make a claim with an asbestos trust fund



File a wrongful death lawsuit



File for veteran benefits through the VA




Choose a Jackson lawyer with experience handling and winning asbestos cases. They should be affiliated with a large law firm with the resources to bring a complicated asbestos lawsuit to a successful conclusion. 



Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Jackson? 







Jackson has long been home to many industries that used asbestos. If you worked in manufacturing, construction, automotive repair, or many other industries, you could have been exposed to asbestos on the job. These are just a few examples. 



Ergon Refining



A significant employer in Jackson, Ergon Refining, also known as Ergon Inc., refines, processes, transports, and markets oil and gas. In 1945, the business started as a propane distributing company. It quickly expanded into a booming business with over 2,000 employees.



As with many other companies during the 1900s and until the late 1970s, Ergon Refining relied heavily on asbestos for its fire and heat-resistant properties. 



Unfortunately, asbestos at Ergon put workers at risk of exposure and illness. In addition to being used in plants and buildings, asbestos was used in clothing, hard hats, safety gear, benchtops, and more.



Workers in Jackson Still at Risk of Exposure



Asbestos affects workers in a multitude of occupations:




Construction workers



Power plant workers



Pipefitters



Plumbers



Electricians



Insulators



Steelworkers



Mill workers



Electricians



Laborers



Mechanics



Railroad workers




In many cases, workers today are still at risk, not because asbestos is still in use but because it lingers in older buildings. In the last few years, this was illustrated with demolishing old structures in the Fondren neighborhood. 



The buildings were being cleared for new construction. The project hit a snag when it was determined that the buildings may have come down without proper asbestos abatement.  



Job Sites in Jackson Associated with Asbestos Use



The following buildings and job sites were once associated with asbestos use. These job sites were either constructed using asbestos-containing materials or asbestos was used in products and machinery:



Schools




Blackburn Middle School



Brinkley Middle School



Callaway High School



Green Elementary School



Alexander Hall (Jackson State University)




Power and Light Companies




Rex Brown Power Plant



Jackson Electric Railway Light and Power Company



Mississippi Power Company




Hospitals




Jefferson County Hospital



G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery VA Medical Center



Mississippi Baptist Medical Center




Additional Job Sites




Armstrong Cork Company



Buckeye Cellulose Corporation



Century Manufacturing Company



Enoch Lumber and Manufacturing Company



Entergy Mississippi Inc.



Filtrol Corporation



Harper and Company Inc.



Homer C. Porter & Sons, Inc.



Jackson Steam Laundry



Jackson County Water & Sewage Authority



Mid South Insulation



Mississippi Products and Supply Company



R. Hood and Co.



Jitney-Jungle Incorporated



Filtrol Corporation



Carroll Gartin Justice Building




Cancer Treatment in Jackson







Medical treatment for malignant mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases requires specialists with experience in these rare diseases.



There is one comprehensive care center in Jackson. For additional healthcare options, contact the National Cancer Institute at 1-800-4-Cancer.




University of Mississippi Medical Center Cancer Registry: 2500 North State Street, Jackson, Mississippi, 39216, 601-815-5482.




Financial Implications of Mesothelioma Treatment



Dealing with mesothelioma involves significant financial burdens alongside the emotional and physical challenges. Understanding these financial implications can help you better navigate the path forward.



Medical Costs



The costs associated with treating mesothelioma are substantial. Patients typically require a combination of treatments which may include:




Chemotherapy and radiation therapy: These can be ongoing and costly over time.



Surgical procedures: Surgery may be necessary to remove tumors, adding another layer of expense.



Medication and clinical trials: Participation in trials or access to new medication can significantly impact your budget.



Hospital stays: Extended hospital care can rack up expenses quickly.




Loss of Income



A mesothelioma diagnosis often means a significant reduction in work capacity. Many patients find themselves unable to work, resulting in:




Lost wages: Without income, household financial stability is at risk.



Future earnings: Long-term earning potential can be compromised, affecting financial plans.




Pain and Suffering



Beyond the economic costs, mesothelioma patients face non-economic challenges:




Decreased quality of life: Chronic pain and reduced life expectancy (often around 12 months post-diagnosis) take a toll.



Emotional distress: This can also lead to additional healthcare expenditures, such as therapy or counseling.




Seeking Financial Remedies



Understanding these implications is crucial. Exploring legal options like filing lawsuits may offer a pathway for monetary compensation. This can cover medical costs, lost income, and grant some relief for the endured hardships.



Great people. Helped my family through our meso diagnosis.- Donald H.



Getting Legal Help in Jackson



Remember, if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Get our free Financial Compensation Packet for information on the top mesothelioma and asbestos lawyers in your area. For questions and assistance, feel free to contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Kansas City Mesothelioma Lawyer

Kansas City mesothelioma lawyers help victims of asbestos exposure in the area seek compensation. As the largest city in Missouri, Kansas City has a robust economy with many industries that used asbestos for decades. Workers exposed in the past are now at risk of severe illnesses like mesothelioma. 



If you or a loved one have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Kansas City, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim and much more. 



Take the first step towards justice by contacting us for a free legal consultation. Our team will help you understand how you were exposed to asbestos and gather the crucial evidence needed to support your case. This initial consultation is designed to provide clarity and direction, ensuring that you have a strong foundation for your legal journey.



By combining expert legal advice with comprehensive resources, you can navigate the complexities of your claim with confidence. Let us assist you in identifying the best course of action, from pinpointing exposure sources to establishing undeniable proof, ensuring you maximize your potential compensation.



The law firm has successfully obtained compensation exceeding $9.8 billion for individuals affected by mesothelioma nationwide, encompassing those residing near Kansas City and beyond.





Kansas City Asbestos Facts




Missouri had 4,711 asbestos-related deaths between 1999 and 2017. 



Of those deaths, nearly 500 were in Kansas City and Jackson County. 



Industries, including chemical manufacturing and vermiculite processing, were major contributors to exposure in the city. 




Why Do I Need a Kansas City Mesothelioma Lawyer? 







If you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, you are sick because one or more companies negligently exposed you to asbestos. You have a legal right to hold those companies accountable and to seek compensation.



A mesothelioma lawyer plays a crucial role in this process by helping you and your family pursue compensation and justice for your injuries. These specialized lawyers have the expertise to navigate complex asbestos litigation, ensuring that your case is handled with the utmost care and precision.



In many cases, families can recover the money owed without ever going to trial—and sometimes, without leaving their home. This highlights the lawyer's ability to simplify the legal process, making it as stress-free as possible for you.



Taking legal action against these large companies requires expert legal guidance. Top-rated Missouri mesothelioma lawyers serving Kansas City have the experience, expertise, and resources to help you win your case. Asbestos cases are complicated. A local lawyer who can come to you is essential. They should also be backed by a large firm with broad jurisdiction. They must have the resources necessary to prove your mesothelioma came from asbestos associated with specific companies.



When choosing a mesothelioma lawyer, consider these key factors:




Decades of Experience: Look for attorneys with a long history of handling asbestos-related cases. This experience translates to a deep understanding of the complexities involved in mesothelioma litigation.



Proven Track Record: Seek lawyers who have demonstrated success in recovering substantial compensation for their clients. A strong track record is indicative of their ability to effectively advocate on your behalf.



No Financial Risk: Opt for a firm that operates on a contingency fee basis, meaning you only pay if they win your case. This arrangement alleviates financial stress and aligns their success with yours.




Choosing the right lawyer can make all the difference. A seasoned attorney will manage the legal intricacies, allowing you to concentrate on your health and family. Prioritize support, expertise, and a commitment to your well-being during this challenging time.



By reaching out to a Kansas City mesothelioma lawyer, you can take the first step towards holding negligent companies accountable while securing the compensation your family deserves. 



What Are My Legal Options for Mesothelioma? 



The right Kansas City lawyer will explain all your options for seeking compensation for past asbestos exposure.  You might be eligible for one or more of these actions:




Filing a mesothelioma personal injury lawsuit: Many cases are settled out of court, which means you could receive compensation without going through a lengthy trial. Settlements can provide significant financial relief to cover medical expenses and other related costs.



Making an asbestos trust fund claim: There are approximately $30 billion in trust funds established by asbestos companies specifically for individuals affected by asbestos-related diseases. These funds offer a viable option for receiving compensation without court involvement.



Filing a mesothelioma wrongful death lawsuit: Similar to personal injury claims, wrongful death lawsuits often conclude with out-of-court settlements. This allows families to secure compensation for their loss and associated expenses without the stress of a courtroom battle.



Filing for VA benefits: Veterans diagnosed with mesothelioma may qualify for medical and financial benefits through the VA. Specialized attorneys, accredited by the VA, can assist in preparing and submitting claims to ensure veterans receive the benefits they are entitled to.




By exploring these options, mesothelioma patients and their families can potentially secure the financial support they need without the added burden of a court trial.



How Filing a Mesothelioma Lawsuit Can Alleviate Financial Burdens



Filing a mesothelioma lawsuit can be a strategic step in managing the financial challenges brought on by this serious illness. Here's how it can assist with medical costs and ensure your family's future stability:



1. Financial Compensation for Medical Expenses




Coverage for Treatment Costs: A successful lawsuit may lead to compensation that directly addresses the high costs of medical treatments, including surgeries, chemotherapy, and ongoing care.



Funds for Future Needs: Settlements often account for future medical needs, ensuring patients have the resources to continue treatment without financial stress.




2. Securing Your Family's Future




Income Replacement: If mesothelioma has impacted your ability to work, a lawsuit can result in compensation that serves as a substitute for lost wages, providing a financial safety net for your family.



Support for Dependents: The compensation might include provisions for dependents, ensuring that their educational and day-to-day needs are met.




3. Guidance Through the Legal Process




Expert Legal Support: Partnering with experienced attorneys can simplify the legal process, making it less overwhelming and more manageable for you and your loved ones.



Stress Reduction: Instead of navigating complex legal terrain alone, legal professionals handle the intricacies, allowing you to focus on health and family.




By pursuing a mesothelioma lawsuit, you may find relief from financial pressures and peace of mind for your family's well-being. This legal avenue serves both as a financial safeguard and a pathway to hold negligent parties accountable for their actions.



What Are the Costs Associated with Hiring a Mesothelioma Lawyer in Kansas City?



When considering legal representation for mesothelioma cases in Kansas City, understanding the costs involved is crucial. Here's a breakdown of what you can expect:




No Upfront Fees

Many law firms specializing in mesothelioma cases operate on a contingency fee basis. This means that you will not need to pay any initial fees or costs out-of-pocket to hire their legal services.





Payment Based on Results

These firms only receive payment if they secure compensation for your case. This approach aligns their interests with yours—ensuring dedication to achieving a successful outcome.





Transparent Agreements

Before proceeding, you will typically enter into a clear agreement outlining the percentage of any settlement or compensation that the lawyer will receive. This provides transparency and allows you to understand the financial commitment involved.





Peace of Mind

The contingency fee structure removes the financial barrier of accessing experienced legal help, allowing you to focus on your health and family while the legal team works on your behalf.






By choosing a mesothelioma lawyer in Kansas City who offers these terms, you can pursue your case without the stress of financial risk or upfront legal costs. This arrangement not only facilitates access to justice but also ensures that the legal team is motivated to fight for the best possible outcome for your situation.



Understanding Missouri's Statute of Limitations for Mesothelioma Claims



When it comes to filing a mesothelioma claim in Missouri, timing is everything. The statutes of limitations in Missouri set a finite window during which patients and their families can initiate legal action.



What is the Time Frame?




Personal Injury Claims: Typically, individuals diagnosed with mesothelioma have five years from the date of diagnosis to file a personal injury claim. This time frame allows individuals to seek compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, and other related costs.



Wrongful Death Claims: If a loved one has unfortunately passed away due to mesothelioma, families generally have three years from the date of death to file a wrongful death claim.




Why Act Promptly?



Understanding and adhering to these time constraints is crucial. Missing the deadline could mean losing the right to seek rightful compensation. Therefore, it is crucial to act swiftly upon diagnosis.



Next Steps



If you or your loved ones have been affected by mesothelioma, it is advisable to consult with legal professionals who have experience in asbestos-related claims. Prompt action ensures that you are within the legal timeframe to stand a chance in pursuing justice and compensation.



How Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Kansas City? 



Asbestos was once used heavily in many industries, including several that operated in Kansas City. If you lived and worked here decades ago, you were likely exposed to asbestos on the job. 



Some of the industries that most used asbestos in Kansas City in the past include: 




Construction



Chemical manufacturing



Industrial manufacturing



Oil refining



Steel working



Mineral processing




Some examples of specific companies and workplaces that put Kansas City workers at risk of asbestos exposure include: 



Harcros Chemical Incorporated







Chemical manufacturing is an industry that once heavily relied on asbestos. Harcros Chemical Incorporated once used it in all of its plants, including at its headquarters in Kansas City.



 High-temperature machinery and equipment contained asbestos to prevent overheating and fires. 



Subsequently, thousands of workers at Harcros facilities risked asbestos exposure. The company had manufacturing plants across the country. 



Although Harcros stopped using asbestos in the late 1970s, this didn't stop lawsuits after workers developed serious asbestos-related diseases. 



Zonolite Vermiculite Processing



Kansas City was once home to a W.R. Grace/Zonolite vermiculite exfoliation facility. In the 1960s, the plant received thousands of tons of vermiculite from the Libby, Montana, vermiculite mine, which was found later to be contaminated with asbestos. 



Exfoliation of vermiculite is particularly risky for asbestos exposure. The process releases fibers and puts workers and even nearby residents at risk. Anyone who worked there or lived in the area could have been exposed. 



Asbestos in the Jackson County Courthouse



While much asbestos exposure in Kansas City occurred in the past, some workers continue to be at risk. This is because asbestos lingers in many older buildings, including in public buildings like the Jackson County Courthouse. 



Workers in the courthouse won a major victory in 2016 when they received an $80 million settlement for asbestos exposure. The county hired U.S. Engineering to renovate the old building's pipes and air-handling units, which contained asbestos. 



The company failed to protect workers from asbestos dust while doing the work in the 1980s. One worker in the building, Nancy Lopez, died from mesothelioma in 2010 at the age of 56. Her family sued U.S. Engineering and settled for $10.4 million. 



The thousands of other workers in the courthouse joined a class-action lawsuit, suing for damages even though they did not yet show signs of asbestos illnesses. The settlement of $80 million will pay for medical monitoring for the plaintiffs over the next 30 years. 



Other Job Sites Associated with Asbestos in Kansas City



Chemical and mineral industries were major sources of asbestos exposure in Kansas City, but not the only ones: 



Hospitals




Children’s Mercy Hospital



Grace Hospital



St. Joseph Hospital



Research Medical Center



Saint Luke’s Hospital



Kansas City VA Medical Center




Schools




Pasco High School



Kansas City Art Institute




Electric Companies




Association Electric



Edison Electric and Power Company



Empire District and Electric Company



Kansas City Electric Light Company



Kansas City Public Utilities




Hotels




Alcazar Hotel



Grand Avenue Hotel Company



Muehlebach Hotel



The Raphael Hotel




Steel Companies




Armco Steel Corporation



Midwest Steel Division



Scullin Steel Company



Sheffield Steel Corporation



United Aluminum & Steel




Other Companies




Colgate Palmolive Plant



Philips Refinery



Procter & Gamble Plant




How Asbestos Exposure Leads to Mesothelioma



Asbestos exposure is a hidden danger that can have serious, long-term health effects. Here's how it happens:




Inhalation or Ingestion: When asbestos fibers are released into the air, either through damaged materials containing asbestos or other disturbances, they can be inhaled or swallowed. This is particularly common in environments where asbestos is used in construction, manufacturing, or worn down over time.



Lodging in Organ Linings: Once these tiny fibers enter the body, they can embed themselves in the protective linings of major organs, such as the lungs, in a layer called the mesothelium.



Persistent Irritation: Over the years, these fibers can irritate the healthy tissues they come into contact with. Unlike other foreign particles, asbestos fibers are not easily expelled or broken down by the body.



Onset of Disease: This irritation can eventually lead to cell damage and genetic changes, fostering the development of mesothelioma. The latency period of this cancer is exceptionally long, potentially spanning 10 to 50 years after the initial exposure.



Final Stages: By the time symptoms arise, mesothelioma is often in an advanced stage, making early detection challenging.




Understanding the mechanics of asbestos exposure and its long-term effects underscores the importance of preventive measures and stringent regulations in places prone to asbestos presence.



Are There Any Costs Associated with Hiring Mesothelioma Attorneys?



When considering legal representation for mesothelioma cases, financial concerns are often top of mind. Fortunately, many mesothelioma lawyers operate on a contingency fee basis, which can ease these worries substantially.




No Upfront Payments: You won't be required to pay any hourly fees or initial out-of-pocket costs. This structure allows you to focus on your health and case without financial stress.



Payment Upon Success: Attorneys typically receive their fees only if they secure compensation for you. This means their payment is contingent on a successful outcome, aligning their interests with yours.



Transparent Agreements: Before starting your case, your attorney will provide a detailed agreement outlining the contingency fee percentage, ensuring you are fully aware of how they get paid.




By choosing a legal team that follows this payment model, you can pursue justice and potential compensation without financial burden.



Mesothelioma Treatment in Kansas City







If you have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness, getting specialist care is essential. Kansas City is home to one Comprehensive Cancer Center designated by the National Cancer Institute:



The University of Kansas Cancer Center



4001 Rainbow Blvd., Kansas City, KS 



844-323-1227



The lung cancer department can treat patients with pleural mesothelioma. Patients with peritoneal mesothelioma benefit from HIPEC treatment here, the leading treatment type for this kind of mesothelioma that is not available everywhere. 



When my husband was diagnosed we had no idea what to do. Our doctor said we should reach out to an attorney to talk about compensation. After talking to several firms we found the mesothelioma lawyer center and were grateful we did. They helped with every step of the way. If you need a meso attorney then I would recommend contacting them- Isabelle D.



Getting Legal Help in Kansas City



Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. 

### Milwaukee Mesothelioma Lawyer

Most industrial workplaces in Milwaukee used asbestos for decades and put workers at risk of developing fatal diseases. Many people injured by asbestos are now fighting back with the help of an experienced Milwaukee mesothelioma lawyer.  



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, awaiting those who've been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in Milwaukee, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 





Milwaukee Asbestos Facts




Nearly 7,000 people died from asbestos diseases in Wisconsin between 1999 and 2017. 



Milwaukee County had the highest number of such deaths during that period, with 851. 



Manufacturing is an important industry in Milwaukee, and most companies used asbestos for decades, putting workers at risk. 




Between 2015 and 2019, approximately 45 individuals in Milwaukee County received a diagnosis of mesothelioma.



What Caused My Mesothelioma? 



The only known cause of mesothelioma is asbestos exposure. If you have a mesothelioma diagnosis, you were most likely exposed to asbestos at one or more past jobs.



Asbestos is a natural mineral that easily sheds tiny fibers when handled. These fibers enter the air as dust and can be inhaled or ingested by workers not wearing protective gear.



Asbestos fibers in the body cause damage to cells and tissue. This damage can lead to serious illnesses many years later in some people:




Pleural mesothelioma



Peritoneal mesothelioma



Lung cancer



Asbestosis




Mesothelioma is strongly associated with asbestos. The most common form develops around the lungs and causes related symptoms, such as shortness of breath, chest pains, and persistent coughing. However, early symptoms of asbestos exposure can be more varied and extend beyond respiratory issues.



Individuals may experience:




Excessive sweating at night



Unexpected weight loss



Shoulder or back pain



Blood clots



Facial swelling



Loss of appetite



Difficulty swallowing



Hoarseness



Fatigue



Fever



Bloating or abdominal pain




These symptoms may appear gradually and are often mistaken for less serious conditions. Recognizing these early signs can be crucial for timely medical intervention. If you've been exposed to asbestos and notice any of these symptoms, it's important to consult a healthcare professional promptly.



While mesothelioma may seem rare, with only around 2,500 Americans receiving a diagnosis annually, its rarity doesn't diminish its seriousness. In Milwaukee County, for instance, data from 2015 to 2019 shows an infection rate of 0.9 per 100,000, translating to approximately 45 cases during that period. These figures might suggest mesothelioma affects few people, but each case represents a profound impact on the individual and their family.



The misconception that its rarity equates to a lack of severity is misleading. Patients and legal advocates know the profound effect of this illness. Understanding the statistics helps to appreciate the gravity of mesothelioma, emphasizing the importance of awareness and prevention.



Advocating for Veterans in Mesothelioma Cases



Honoring a Special Commitment



Veterans have bravely served their country, and in return, they are owed steadfast support, especially when facing health challenges like mesothelioma. This commitment signifies providing comprehensive legal assistance to ensure veterans and their families receive the justice and compensation they deserve.



Expert Legal Support



Navigating mesothelioma cases can be complex, particularly for veterans exposed to asbestos during their service. Attorneys accredited by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) have the expertise needed to efficiently handle such cases. They are equipped to guide veterans through the intricate legal processes, ensuring all relevant military experiences are accurately presented.



Representation Across All Branches




Navy Veterans: Given their high exposure to asbestos on ships and submarines, legal specialists focus on retrieving detailed service histories.



Marine & Army Veterans: From barracks to combat zones, exposure risks are assessed to build a solid case.



Coast Guard & Air Force Veterans: Advocacy includes examining unique environments of service where asbestos exposure may have occurred.




Why This Matters



Veterans face unique challenges when dealing with mesothelioma, often years after their service. Tailored legal representation can significantly impact the outcome of their claims. It ensures that their sacrifices are honored through diligent pursuit of benefits and compensation, providing financial relief and peace of mind.



This commitment is not just about legal battles; it’s about standing beside those who stood up for their country, ensuring they receive the care and justice they’ve rightfully earned.



Do I Have a Valid Mesothelioma Case? 



If you have mesothelioma, you probably have a valid case to seek compensation. Mesothelioma is almost always caused by negligent asbestos exposure. You can hold asbestos companies accountable and liable for your expenses related to being sick.



Who Can Be Held Liable?



Many parties could potentially be responsible for your asbestos exposure:




Employers: If your employer was aware of asbestos risks and failed to provide protective measures or equipment, they might be held accountable. This is especially true if you worked in industries known for asbestos use.



Product Manufacturers: Companies that produced or distributed asbestos-laden products may be liable if they didn't warn consumers about the dangers. This includes everything from construction materials to automotive parts.



Landlords: Property owners, both residential and commercial, who knew of asbestos in their buildings but didn't disclose it might also face liability. Whether your exposure happened at home or work, legal action against a negligent landlord could be possible.




Legal Avenues



You might be eligible to claim from asbestos trust funds or pursue other forms of legal action if you can demonstrate how these parties contributed to your exposure. Documenting exposure and negligence is crucial in building a strong case for compensation.



The best way to determine if you have a case is to talk to a local Milwaukee asbestos attorney. They can review your work history and medical records to find the companies responsible for your asbestos exposure. 



What Documentation is Needed to File a Mesothelioma Lawsuit?



Filing a mesothelioma lawsuit involves gathering comprehensive documentation to build a strong case. Here's a breakdown of the essential records you'll need:



1. Medical Documentation:




Detailed medical records confirming your mesothelioma diagnosis.



A complete history of treatments and any related medical evaluations.




2. Financial Records:




Documents illustrating financial losses due to the illness. This includes medical bills, records of lost wages, and any other economic impacts stemming from the diagnosis.




3. Employment History:




Evidence showing your work history, particularly where you were likely exposed to asbestos. This could be past employment records or industry certifications.




4. Personal Evidence:




Items like personal diaries or photographs that demonstrate how mesothelioma has affected your quality of life.




5. Witness Testimonies:




Statements from co-workers, family members, or others who can corroborate your exposure to asbestos or describe the toll the illness has taken on you.




6. Supplementary Documentation:




Additional materials, such as news articles, government studies, or product recalls, that might confirm the presence of asbestos in certain environments or products.




Collecting these documents is crucial in laying the groundwork for your mesothelioma lawsuit. Each piece contributes to painting a comprehensive picture of your situation, offering the evidence necessary to back your claims in court.



How to Choose a Milwaukee Mesothelioma Lawyer







You need an expert lawyer on your side to seek compensation after a mesothelioma diagnosis. Here's what to look for in a Milwaukee asbestos attorney: 




Experience handling and winning asbestos cases



Access to investigators to find out where you were exposed to asbestos and the companies responsible



Access to medical experts to prove asbestos exposure caused your illness



Experience settling cases and litigating mesothelioma lawsuits in court



Examples of proven wins and fair compensation amounts for similar clients



A free initial consultation to review your case and answer your questions



Contingency payment, so you pay nothing until they win



Compassion for clients who are ill and often unable to travel




What Is My Mesothelioma Case Worth? 



Every asbestos case is different. The compensation you might receive depends on individual factors: 




Your past and current medical expenses



Loss of income



Future expected treatment costs



Home medical care costs



Medical equipment costs



The costs of travel to medical appointments



Physical and emotional pain and suffering




An expert mesothelioma lawyer can give you a reasonable estimate of compensation expectations. They cannot guarantee any specific amount. 



Most mesothelioma and asbestos lawsuits end in settlements, which average between $1 million and $1.4 million. Jury awards are often much higher, but trials take a long time to resolve. Asbestos trust fund claims average around $180,000. 



Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Milwaukee, Wisconsin? 



Asbestos exposure mainly occurs on the job. If you have mesothelioma, you probably worked with or around asbestos. Milwaukee has long had an industrial economy with numerous workplaces that used asbestos. These are just a few examples. 



P&H Mining Equipment, Inc.







P&H Mining Equipment, also known as the Harnischfeger Corporation, is a manufacturing company for the mining industry. It makes industrial cranes, drills, excavators, welding machinery, and more. 



For decades, the company used asbestos in machinery, parts, and equipment, especially brake linings. Workers were at risk of exposure to the asbestos fibers in these components. 



The brakes on large mining machinery had to be abraded to fit various parts on the machines. 



Each time workers abraded the brakes, asbestos fibers went airborne and contaminated the job site. The company faced several lawsuits after workers were diagnosed with terminal asbestos-related diseases. 



One plaintiff, John Pender, worked at the company from 1952 to 1993. In 2006, Pender was diagnosed with mesothelioma and died a few days later. 



Pender's loved ones filed a lawsuit. Although the jury awarded the family $1.5 million in damages, the decision was later reversed on an appeal. However, the company continues to face similar lawsuits.



H.W. Johns Manville Company



The Manville Covering Company was a Milwaukee asbestos manufacturing company that made insulation. In 1901, it merged with another manufacturing business and became the H.W. Johns Manville Company.



Along with manufacturing asbestos for heat insulation, the company also began making many other asbestos-containing products, such as cement, pipes, fiberglass, and cylinders.



During the height of its use in the 1970s, asbestos was favored due to its heat-resistant properties and strength, offered at an affordable cost. This led to the incorporation of asbestos in a wide variety of products, including:




Ceiling tiles: Often used in homes and commercial buildings for their fireproofing capabilities.



Flooring materials: Asbestos added durability and fire resistance to tiles and linoleum.



Pipe insulation: Widely used in plumbing and heating systems to prevent heat loss and resist fire.



Home siding: Offered protection against weather elements while being fire resistant.



Car brakes: Provided the necessary friction and heat resistance required in automotive components.



Ship components: Many parts of water vessels, including gaskets and boiler insulation, contained asbestos due to its resistance to heat and corrosion.




This extensive list of applications highlights how pervasive asbestos was across different industries, underscoring its once-universal appeal. After many years of prolonged asbestos exposure, workers began to suffer from asbestos-related illnesses.



The sheer amount of asbestos-related lawsuits forced the company to go into bankruptcy. Later, it set up a mesothelioma trust fund to compensate future claimants.



Vermiculite Processing Plants



Two former vermiculite processing facilities operated in Milwaukee, Western Mineral Products Co. and W.R. Grace Construction Products Division. They both received asbestos-contaminated minerals from the W.R. Grace mines in Libby, Montana. 



The Libby mines shipped tainted vermiculite to processing facilities around the country. Workers who handled these materials most likely inhaled asbestos fibers and were at risk of developing asbestos illnesses. Also at risk of exposure were nearby residents. 



Asbestos in Milwaukee Breweries



The beer industry has long been a major employer in Milwaukee. Breweries used asbestos in a few different ways: as insulation in buildings and as a filtering material. Breweries filtered beer with asbestos as late as the 1970s. This use of asbestos put workers at risk of exposure and illness. 



The family of a former worker at Pabst sued the company over his death from mesothelioma. Gerald Lorbiecki worked as a steamfitter at several locations, including Pabst. The jury agreed that Pabst failed to protect workers from asbestos and awarded the family $6.5 million in actual damages. 



Additional Job Sites Associated with Asbestos in Milwaukee



Many companies in Milwaukee used asbestos in the past. Some still have facilities that contain asbestos, and there are also older public buildings that may still pose a risk of exposure. 



Schools




Case High School



Central Continuation School



Forest Home Avenue School



Gesu Grade School



Horace Mann High School



Horlick High School



James Madison High School



Kohler High School



Lloyd Street Global Education School



Mother of Good Counsel School



Oconomowoc High School



Sholes Middle School



Union Grove High School



Marquette University




Hospitals




Columbia St. Mary’s



Lakeview Hospital



Milwaukee Regional Medical Center



Northwest General Hospital



Aurora St. Luke’s Medical Center



St. Catherine's Hospital



St. Francis Hospital




Manufacturing Companies




Bausch Manufacturing



M.C. Bullock Manufacturing Company



Cutler-Hammer



E.R. Wagner Manufacturing Company



Marquette Cement Manufacturing Company



Milwaukee Car Manufacturing Company



Nordberg Manufacturing Company



Vilter Manufacturing LLC



Wrought Washer Manufacturing Company




Breweries




Blatz Brewing Company



Gettelman Brewing



Joseph Schlitz Brewing Company



Miller Brewing Company



Pabst Brewing Company



Valentin Blatz Brewing Company




Can I Still Be Exposed to Asbestos in Milwaukee? 







Asbestos exposure was more prevalent in the past when so many workplaces used it. Today, most companies do not use it, but asbestos remains in older buildings throughout and near Milwaukee. 



Older asbestos materials in buildings deteriorate over time, releasing fibers. Any kind of renovation work or demolition can also release fibers and put people at risk of exposure. 



School buildings are common sources of ongoing asbestos risk. In 2022, Sheboygan was forced to close a middle school due to asbestos that was damaged after a pipe burst. 



In nearby Racine County, Yorkville schools notified parents of an asbestos exposure incident at an elementary school in 2019. A maintenance worker was directed to remove flooring without any protective gear or warnings that it contained asbestos. 



Many older buildings in Milwaukee contain asbestos and must be handled carefully. In 2022, the city received millions in federal funding to support affordable housing. Part of the project necessarily involves safely abating asbestos in older homes. 



A multimillion-dollar project to renovate Milwaukee's criminal courthouse began in 2018. It included abating asbestos throughout the building to make it safer for staff. 



Mesothelioma Treatment in Milwaukee



Treatment for asbestos-related diseases requires specialists in cancer and asbestos illnesses.



The National Cancer Institute (NCI) designates certain facilities, including the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, as Comprehensive Cancer Centers. These facilities provide excellent specialist care, innovative treatment options, and clinical trials.



Comprehensive Treatment Options



For patients diagnosed with mesothelioma, treatment often involves a combination of approaches tailored to the individual's needs. Here are some of the primary treatment options available:




Radiation and Chemotherapy: These are standard treatments aimed at shrinking tumors and managing symptoms, providing a foundation for many treatment plans.



Clinical Trials: Patients may participate in trials offering experimental medications, such as immunotherapy, which show promise in targeting mesothelioma cells more effectively.



Targeted Treatments: These focus on specific symptoms, like shortness of breath, improving the patient's quality of life through specialized interventions.



Palliative Care: This aspect of treatment emphasizes pain management and comfort, crucial for patients at advanced stages of the disease.




In some cases, oncologists might consider surgery to remove cancerous lesions; however, this is typically viable only when the cancer is detected early and hasn't progressed extensively.



The Importance of Early Detection



Despite various treatment options, early detection remains critical. Experimental treatments are evolving, but their availability can be limited. Comprehensive Cancer Centers offer the best chance for accessing these cutting-edge therapies, ensuring patients receive the most effective care available.



Why Mesothelioma Treatment May Require Significant Travel and Expenses



Mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive form of cancer often necessitating specialized treatment. Given its rarity, not every medical facility has the expertise to provide optimal care. Here’s why treatment may involve considerable travel and expenses:




Limited Access to Specialists: Experts in mesothelioma are typically concentrated at major cancer centers. These specialists offer cutting-edge treatments and clinical trials that might not be available at smaller, local hospitals.



Advanced Treatment Options:

Procedures such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation often require state-of-the-art equipment and highly skilled professionals.



Centers of excellence in urban areas or academic hospitals may provide the best opportunity for innovative therapies.





Comprehensive Care Needs: Mesothelioma often demands a multidisciplinary approach. A team including oncologists, surgeons, and support specialists is necessary, which may not be available locally.



Travel-related Expenses:

Transportation: Patients may need to fly or drive long distances to reach these specialized centers.



Lodging and Meals: Extended stays for treatment necessitate accommodation and food, adding to the financial burden.



Lost Income: Time away from work for both the patient and their caregivers can lead to significant income loss.





Insurance Limitations: While some insurance plans cover part of these costs, others may not fully cover out-of-network providers or travel-related expenses, further increasing financial strain.




Navigating these challenges can be daunting, but accessing the most effective treatment is crucial for mesothelioma patients.



When my husband was diagnosed we had no idea what to do. Our doctor said we should reach out to an attorney to talk about compensation. After talking to several firms we found the mesothelioma lawyer center and were grateful we did. They helped with every step of the way. If you need a meso attorney then I would recommend contacting them.- Isabelle D.



Getting Legal Help in Milwaukee



Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. Keep in mind that if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for considerable compensation. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Colorado Mesothelioma Lawyer

Many people seek the guidance of experienced Colorado mesothelioma lawyers because of asbestos exposure in the state. Mining, construction, and other industries in Colorado have contributed to worker asbestos exposure. Too many of these people have fallen ill or passed away from asbestos diseases.



Over $30 billion in trust funds is available to asbestos disease victims and their families. If you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a substantial amount of compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced Colorado mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 





We help all asbestos victims and their families in every city and town in Colorado, including:



Denver, Colorado Springs, Aurora, Fort Collins, Lakewood, Thornton, Arvada, Westminster, Pueblo, Highlands Ranch, Centennial, Boulder, Greeley, Longmont, Loveland, Grand Junction, Broomfield, Castle Rock, Commerce City, Parker, Littleton, Northglenn, Brighton, Security-Widefield, Dakota Ridge, Englewood, Ken Caryl, Wheat Ridge, Pueblo, West Fountain, Lafayette, Columbine, Windsor, Evans, Erie, Louisville, Clifton, Golden, Sherrelwood, Montrose, Durango, Cañon City, Cimarron Hills, Welby, Greenwood Village, Sterling, Fort Carson, Black Forest, Lone Tree, Superior, Fruita, Steamboat Springs, Johnstown, Federal Heights, Berkley, Cherry Creek, Fort Morgan, Firestone, Castle Pines, The Pinery, Frederick, Glenwood Springs, Alamosa, Edwards, Rifle, Gunbarrel, Stonegate, Evergreen, Craig, Woodmoor, Delta, Roxborough Park, Redlands, Cortez, Fruitvale, Trinidad, Fairmount, Derby, Lamar, Fort Lupton, Woodland Park, Gleneagle, Stratmoor, La Junta, Applewood, Aspen, Wellington, Gypsum, Orchard, Mesa, Twin Lakes Cdp, Carbondale, Eagle Avon, Air Force Academy, Cherry Hills Village, Estes Park, Milliken, Sheridan, Gunnison, Monument, and more.




Colorado Asbestos Facts








Colorado has many natural deposits of asbestos.



There were 3,214 recorded deaths related to asbestos in the state from 1999 to 2017.



Of those deaths, 594 were the result of mesothelioma, and 260 were from asbestosis.



Jefferson County has seen the most asbestos-related deaths in the state, closely followed by El Paso and Denver Counties.




Understanding Mesothelioma: Symptoms and Diagnostic Challenges



Mesothelioma, a rare and aggressive cancer linked primarily to asbestos exposure, presents unique challenges in its diagnosis. One of the main obstacles is the delayed manifestation of symptoms. These symptoms can remain dormant for decades, often not appearing until 20-50 years post-exposure.



Common Symptoms:




Persistent Coughing: A relentless cough that doesn’t subside over time.



Chest Pain: Discomfort or sharp pain in the chest area, sometimes extending to the shoulder blades.



Shortness of Breath: Difficulty breathing, which worsens with physical exertion.



Unexplained Weight Loss: Sudden and significant weight loss without any change in diet or activity.




Challenges in Diagnosis:




Symptom Overlap: The symptoms of mesothelioma often resemble those of more common respiratory conditions, such as pneumonia or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).



Latency Period: The long latency period between asbestos exposure and symptom onset complicates diagnosis. Many individuals may not immediately realize their symptoms are related to past asbestos contact.



Imprecise Testing: Initial tests like X-rays may not detect mesothelioma. More advanced imaging techniques and biopsies are often required, which can delay diagnosis further.




Understanding these symptoms and challenges is crucial for early medical consultation and intervention. While the signs can be subtle, awareness and proactive healthcare can significantly impact outcomes for those affected.




Do I Need a Colorado Mesothelioma Lawyer?







Mesothelioma is a devastating cancer caused by asbestos exposure. Most people diagnosed with mesothelioma were negligently exposed to asbestos at work. Inhaled asbestos fibers in the air trigger damage in the tissue around the lungs, which leads to cancer. 



If you have a mesothelioma diagnosis, it is safe to assume you were exposed at work and are entitled to compensation from the companies responsible. Many Colorado companies knew about the dangers of using asbestos long before they stopped using it, putting workers at risk with no warnings.  



You need a Colorado mesothelioma lawyer to represent you in a claim or lawsuit against these companies. An experienced lawyer will:




Evaluate your case for free and answer your questions



Investigate your exposure, where and when it occurred, and the companies responsible



File a lawsuit against the companies to seek a settlement



Litigate your case in court if necessary



Maximize the compensation you get for medical and other expenses



Help you file an asbestos trust fund claim or for veterans benefits




Building a Strong Case with Comprehensive Evidence



Given the complexities of mesothelioma cases, collecting evidence is a crucial step in securing justice and compensation. Experienced lawyers draw on an extensive array of resources to build your case, utilizing:




Decades of Research and Data: Lawyers often have access to comprehensive databases of known asbestos exposure sites and a list of asbestos-containing products. This historical data helps pinpoint where and when exposure likely occurred.



Manufacturer Identification: The ability to trace back to the manufacturers responsible for your asbestos exposure is paramount. Lawyers use established evidence to identify these entities and hold them accountable.



Organized Evidence Collection: With a systematic approach to gathering evidence, lawyers maintain a robust collection of documents, testimonies, and records to support your claim effectively.




By leveraging such detailed evidence, your legal team can construct a formidable case, aiming to achieve the best possible outcome for you and your family.



Why Work with a Mesothelioma Law Firm?



Choosing the right legal representation can significantly impact the outcome of your mesothelioma case. Here's why partnering with a specialized law firm can benefit you:




No Upfront Costs: Many firms offer free legal consultations and operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning they only get paid if you receive compensation. This removes the financial burden from you and your family.



Proven Track Record: Look for firms boasting a history of successful outcomes, with many having recovered substantial compensation for their clients. A high success rate in asbestos cases can provide peace of mind.



Decades of Experience: Firms with several decades of experience handling asbestos and mesothelioma cases bring a wealth of knowledge and expertise, making them adept at navigating complex legal landscapes.



Comprehensive Legal Team: Often, your case will benefit from a dedicated team of professionals, including attorneys, paralegals, and investigators, all working collaboratively to build a strong case.



Client-Centric Approach: Leading firms prioritize client convenience, offering to meet with you at a location that suits your needs, whether in person or virtually, at no additional cost.




By selecting a law firm with these attributes, you ensure that you have a dedicated partner committed to fighting for your rights and maximizing your compensation.



What Factors Influence the Value of a Mesothelioma Settlement?



When determining the value of a mesothelioma settlement, several critical factors come into play. Understanding these can provide insight into why settlements and verdicts might vary significantly from case to case.



1. Severity of the Illness




The stage of mesothelioma and overall health impact significantly affect compensation. Cases where the illness is more advanced often result in higher settlements, as medical costs and impact on quality of life are typically greater.




2. Duration and Extent of Asbestos Exposure




Settlement amounts are influenced by how long and how much a person was exposed to asbestos. Extended exposure or encountering particularly high levels of asbestos can increase the likelihood of a favorable settlement.




3. Medical Expenses and Treatment Costs




Current and anticipated future medical expenses play a major role. This includes costs related to surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, and other necessary treatments.




4. Lost Wages and Earning Capacity




Compensation often reflects not only lost wages but also diminished future earning capacity if the illness prevents the person from working.




5. Negligence and Liability




The degree to which exposure was due to negligence by manufacturers or employers can affect settlement values. Strong evidence of negligence might lead to larger compensation.




6. Emotional and Physical Suffering




Settlements can also account for non-economic damages, such as pain, suffering, and loss of enjoyment of life.




Each factor interplays to shape the financial outcome, with settlements typically ranging from hundreds of thousands to several million dollars. This range is a reflection of the unique circumstances of each case.



How Do I File a Mesothelioma Claim in Colorado? 



Because asbestos exposure is usually negligent, you are probably entitled to compensation. A mesothelioma lawyer can help you take action with one or more legal actions: 



File a Mesothelioma Personal Injury Lawsuit



One option is to file a personal injury lawsuit, typically against multiple companies responsible for your asbestos exposure. Your lawyer will do all the work to file the lawsuit, build a case, prove your exposure, and negotiate a fair settlement. In rare cases, these cases go to trial, where a jury determines a monetary award. 







File a Mesothelioma Wrongful Death Lawsuit



If you lost a loved one to mesothelioma, a lawyer can help you file a wrongful death suit to recover damages. It follows the same steps as a personal injury case and typically ends in a settlement.



Make an Asbestos Trust Fund Claim



You cannot sue companies that went bankrupt, as many asbestos companies did. However, those companies were required to set up trust funds to compensate victims as part of the bankruptcy process. Your lawyer can determine which trusts you are eligible for and help you make a claim for compensation.



Are Asbestos Lawsuits Typically Filed as Class Actions or Individual Cases?



When it comes to asbestos lawsuits, it's common for them to be filed individually rather than as class actions. This approach allows each case to receive personalized attention, which is crucial given the unique circumstances surrounding each claimant's exposure and health impact.



Why Individual Cases Are Preferred:




Tailored Legal Approach: Each individual's exposure to asbestos and resulting health issues can vary significantly. Filing individually allows attorneys to tailor their strategies to the specifics of the client's situation.



Focused Compensation Efforts: By addressing cases individually, lawyers are able to concentrate on securing the maximum possible compensation for each client.



Specificity in Details: The personal nature of these cases means that the specifics—such as exact exposure source, duration, and the resulting medical condition—can be fully explored and presented.




Contrast With Class Actions:




Class Actions: These involve a group of people with similar grievances combining their claims into a single lawsuit. While efficient for widespread, low-dollar amounts or common issues, they may not offer the same depth of personalization required for asbestos-related claims.




In short, the individual approach is generally preferred to ensure comprehensive legal representation and an optimal outcome for those affected by asbestos.



What Are Some Past Mesothelioma Settlement Amounts in Colorado?



In Colorado, individuals affected by mesothelioma have received significant compensation through settlements and verdicts. Here are some examples:




An auto mechanic based in Denver was awarded $3.23 million.



A drywall worker in the same city received $3.08 million.



A laborer and home remodeler from Pueblo secured a $2.37 million settlement.



A shipfitter who served in the U.S. Navy was awarded $2.08 million.



A Denver foundry worker received a settlement of $2 million.



A U.S. Army Police Corps veteran and mine mechanic in Leadville received $1.96 million.



A machinist from Littleton was awarded $3 million.




Keep in mind, these figures are examples and every case is unique. The settlement amounts can vary greatly depending on the case details and individual circumstances. 



Navigating Mesothelioma Settlements: A Comprehensive Guide



Negotiating a mesothelioma settlement involves several key steps to ensure you receive fair compensation. Here’s how the process typically unfolds:



Initial Consultation and Case Assessment




Select an Experienced Attorney: Begin by choosing a skilled attorney who specializes in asbestos-related cases. Their expertise is crucial in building a strong case.



Gathering Evidence: Your attorney will collect relevant medical records, employment history, and any evidence of asbestos exposure. This information is vital to substantiate your claim.




Crafting the Legal Strategy




Evaluating Liability: The legal team will pinpoint the responsible asbestos manufacturers or companies, identifying who is liable for the exposure.



Calculating Damages: They will estimate the compensation amount by considering medical expenses, lost wages, and other impacts on your life.




Settlement Negotiation Process




Initiating Negotiations: Your attorney will negotiate directly with the asbestos manufacturers or their insurers. They'll leverage the evidence and case details to argue for a settlement amount that reflects your damages.



Counteroffers and Mediation: This stage involves back-and-forth discussions, where initial offers can be countered. Mediation may be used to facilitate agreement.




Decision-Making




Weighing the Offer: If a satisfactory settlement is proposed, you'll have the option to accept or negotiate further. Your attorney will advise you on the fairness of the offer based on similar cases.




Trial as a Last Resort




Preparation for Court: If negotiations don’t lead to an acceptable settlement, your case could proceed to trial. Here, a judge and jury will decide the compensation through a verdict.




Throughout this process, the goal is to secure compensation that adequately reflects the damages incurred due to asbestos exposure. Your attorney plays a crucial role in advocating on your behalf, ensuring your rights are upheld at every stage.



How Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Colorado?



Most people with mesothelioma encountered asbestos on the job.  No single type of job or industry is responsible for all asbestos deaths. But many worksites caused exposure and resulting illnesses in all areas of Colorado. 



Power Plants



Asbestos exposure in such work sites as Ft. Collins’ Rawhide Energy Station and the Estes Power Plant in Larimer County was caused by asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) like insulation and fire-retardants in facilities with high-heat operations, like power generating stations.



Government and Military Sites



The U.S. government, especially the military, heavily used asbestos. Many government facilities in Colorado, including the Army’s Ft. Carson and the Air Force’s Buckley Air Force Base (AFB) and Peterson AFB, were built using asbestos.



The U.S. Air Force Academy Cadet Chapel in Colorado Springs is undergoing restorations slated to take years to finish. More extensive asbestos than expected delayed the project. The building contains significant amounts of the mineral, and workers need more time to abate or encapsulate it all safely. 



Other Industries



ACMs were also widely used by the civilian sector, especially in job sites with furnaces, steam generators, dynamos, and smelters. 







Steel mills, oil refineries, and power plants built between 1930 and 1973 contained asbestos. Some specific examples of job sites known to have contained asbestos and put workers at risk of exposure include:




Western Minerals Company asbestos processing plant in Denver



Mountain Bell Telephone Company building in Denver



Sedalia Copper Mine near Salida



Conoco Oil Refinery in Grand Junction



Grand Junction VA Medical Center




Asbestos Lingers in Colorado Buildings



Unfortunately, these sites for exposure are not all in the past. Because asbestos was used so heavily in construction, many older buildings in Colorado still put people at risk of exposure. 



In early 2023, an apartment fire at the Cedar Run Apartments in Denver exposed asbestos and put residents at risk of exposure. Residents of more than 50 units were forced to find somewhere else to live. 



In 2020 in Fort Collins, an office tower shut down after an asbestos incident. Asbestos materials were disturbed during a renovation project and put workers at risk. 



These are just a few big examples of how people in Colorado can still be exposed to asbestos in their own homes and in commercial and public buildings. 



Understanding Secondhand Asbestos Exposure and Its Impact on Families



Secondhand asbestos exposure occurs when individuals indirectly come into contact with asbestos particles brought into the home environment by someone who works in an area where these hazardous fibers are present. This exposure often happens when someone unknowingly carries asbestos fibers on their clothing, skin, or hair after leaving a work site.



How Does It Happen?




Transport on Clothing and Hair: Those working in industries such as construction, shipbuilding, or manufacturing may inadvertently carry asbestos particles home. These fibers cling to work clothes, shoes, and even accessories, turning everyday items into potential hazards for loved ones.



Contamination of Living Spaces: Once home, these fibers can settle into upholstery, carpeting, and laundry areas. Regular activities like washing clothes or cleaning can disturb the fibers, thereby releasing them into the air and increasing the risk of inhalation by other household members.




Impact on Families




Health Risks: Breathing in asbestos fibers can lead to serious illnesses, including mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis. The risk is not limited to the direct workers alone but extends to any family members who come into contact with contaminated items or environments over a prolonged period.



Delayed Onset of Symptoms: One of the most concerning aspects is the latency period of diseases caused by asbestos exposure. It can take decades for symptoms to present themselves, making it challenging to trace back and address these exposures in a timely manner.



Emotional and Financial Strain: The diagnosis of an asbestos-related condition can place a significant emotional and economic burden on families, affecting their quality of life and requiring considerable resources for treatment and care.




By understanding the mechanisms of secondhand asbestos exposure, families can take proactive steps to reduce this risk, such as following strict decontamination protocols and using protective gear at worksites. Though less direct, the threat of secondhand exposure is very real, making awareness and prevention crucial.



How Can Veterans Affected by Mesothelioma Access VA Benefits?



Veterans diagnosed with mesothelioma due to asbestos exposure during their military service have a pathway to access benefits through the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Here's how they can proceed:




Understand Eligibility: Mesothelioma is recognized by the VA as having a 100% disability rating. This classification means eligible veterans might receive substantial monthly compensation, sometimes exceeding $3,800, along with free healthcare services.



Starting a Claim: Initiating a VA benefits claim involves compiling necessary military service and medical documentation that proves the link between asbestos exposure during service and the mesothelioma diagnosis.



Seek Professional Guidance: It can be advantageous to consult with VA-accredited attorneys or representatives. These experts assist in navigating the claims process, increasing the chances of a successful application—even if previous attempts were denied.



Filing a Lawsuit: It's important to know that pursuing a mesothelioma lawsuit doesn’t influence or jeopardize the benefits claim with the VA. Veterans can pursue compensation from other sources while still receiving VA support.



Utilize Available Resources: Veterans are encouraged to take advantage of information and support offered by veteran organizations and legal aid services specializing in these cases.




By following these steps, veterans can effectively access the benefits they deserve while managing health-related challenges.



What About Colorado's Natural Deposits of Asbestos?



Colorado is a mountainous area rich in mineral resources, including asbestos and the amphibole variety. The fibrous minerals usually lie in the same mineral veins as coal, gold, and mined resources.



When left undisturbed, these naturally occurring asbestos minerals are relatively harmless to humans.



However, road work, development and construction, mining, and even natural disasters can expose natural asbestos. The fibers may contaminate soil, air, and water and put nearby workers and residents at risk.



Colorado Statute of Limitations on Mesothelioma and Asbestos Cases



The statute of limitations in Colorado puts a deadline on when you can file personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits: 




Statute of limitations for asbestos-related cases in Colorado fall under personal injury law: Colorado Rev. Stat. § 13-80-102 et seq.



The plaintiffs wishing to file an asbestos-related lawsuit must do so within two years of the time of diagnosis or within two years from the date the disease should have been reasonably discovered.



For wrongful death lawsuits, plaintiffs must file within two years of the actual death date of the victim.




Transparency in Colorado Asbestos Cases



Colorado passed the Asbestos Claims Transparency Act in 2018. The law requires that anyone filing an asbestos lawsuit disclose claims made with trusts. Any money received from a trust fund can be deducted from a jury award in a trial.



This law might limit damages recovery for some asbestos victims. An experienced lawyer can explain what it means for you and ensure you get all the compensation you are entitled to. 



Colorado Asbestos Safety Laws



The Colorado Department of Health and Environment (CDHPE) implemented several asbestos regulations after the hazards of asbestos fibers were made apparent by the EPA, including the following:




Before starting any remodeling or renovation project, a licensed Colorado asbestos building inspector must first inspect the building and report the amount and location of asbestos to the state. 



A permit from the state must be granted before the removal of any asbestos from public buildings and facilities. However, private homeowners do not need a permit as long as the asbestos is only limited to your primary residence. However, asbestos should still be handled by a licensed professional. 



Landfills equipped to take asbestos must be contacted in advance for approval. Keep in mind that most landfills in Colorado will only take non-friable asbestos. Friable asbestos is only accepted at five landfills within Colorado. Each landfill has its own set of regulations, so understand the requirements when deciding which landfill to use. 



Written notification must be sent to the CDHPE before working around asbestos. This applies to all buildings, facilities, and structures, except for private residential homes. The written notification must be received at least ten days before the work is set to begin. 




For more information, contact the CDHPE directly at:




Denver County: 720-865-5474



Jefferson County: 303-271-5714



Pueblos County: 719-583-4982




Mesothelioma Treatment in Colorado



Colorado is home to a National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Center, recognized for expert treatment and cancer research:



The University of Colorado Cancer Center



1665 North Aurora Court



Aurora, Colorado 80045



(720) 848-0300



The Anschutz Medical Campus in Aurora offers the most comprehensive care for mesothelioma in the state. The Lung Multidisciplinary Clinic is a group of specialists who collaborate on treatment for lung cancer and similar illnesses, like pleural mesothelioma. 



The Peritoneal Cancer Multidisciplinary Clinic treats peritoneal mesothelioma. Specialists in this group offer HIPEC, the leading treatment for peritoneal mesothelioma that is not available everywhere. 



Understanding How Registered Nurses Assist with Mesothelioma Diagnoses and Treatment Options



When faced with a mesothelioma diagnosis, the journey can be overwhelming and complex. Registered nurses play a crucial role in easing this burden by offering invaluable support and guidance. Here's how they can assist:



Expertise in Medical Explanations




Clarifying Diagnosis: Registered nurses have the medical training to break down complex medical jargon into understandable terms. They can explain what a mesothelioma diagnosis means, including the stage and type of cancer.



Discussing Treatment Options: Nurses are well-equipped to explain various treatment plans, from surgery and chemotherapy to newer targeted therapies. They help patients understand the purpose, process, and potential outcomes of each option.




Personalized Care and Support




Creating Customized Care Plans: They work alongside doctors to develop individualized care plans tailored to a patient's specific needs, preferences, and medical history.



Emotional Support and Counseling: Beyond medical details, registered nurses offer emotional support. They listen to concerns and provide reassurance, often acting as a bridge between doctors and patients.




Coordination and Advocacy




Liaison for Patients: Nurses often act as patient advocates, coordinating appointments and ensuring timely communication between different healthcare providers.



Resource and Referral: They can also connect patients with external resources such as support groups, financial aid options, and palliative care services for comprehensive support.




Registered nurses are pivotal in navigating the complexities of a mesothelioma diagnosis and its treatment, making them an essential part of the patient care team.



These lawyers made us feel so much better about going through this terrible process. We had no idea where to begin and they helped get us all the compensation we possibly could. They were friendly understanding and very hard-working. They answered any questions we had about compensation and even medical advice-Natalie F.



Getting Legal Assistance in Colorado



Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Charleston, West Virginia, Mesothelioma Lawyer

Charleston mesothelioma lawyers help local residents seek justice for asbestos illnesses. Charleston, the state capital of West Virginia, has a long history of asbestos exposure. Mines and other major employers in the area used asbestos in the past and put workers at risk. 



If you or a loved one has mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, set up for those who have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Charleston, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.





Charleston Asbestos Facts




There were more than 3,000 deaths related to asbestos in West Virginia between 1999 and 2017. 



The largest number of deaths, 566, occurred in Kanawha County and Charleston. 



The mining and power industries in the region played a big role in the asbestos exposure of workers and residents. 




Every year, approximately 3,000 individuals in the United States are diagnosed with mesothelioma. This rare and aggressive cancer is typically linked to asbestos exposure, affecting the lining of the lungs, abdomen, or heart. With its limited cases, awareness and understanding of mesothelioma are crucial for early detection and treatment options.



Mesothelioma: Key Statistics and Insights



When exploring the landscape of mesothelioma, a few vital statistics provide a comprehensive understanding of diagnosis and life expectancy.




Incidence Rate: Annually, around 3,000 individuals are diagnosed with mesothelioma in the United States. This cancer is relatively rare but significant in its impact.



Affected Areas: The disease predominantly targets the lungs, although it can also affect other parts of the body.



Demographics: Men face a higher risk of developing mesothelioma compared to women. This disparity is often linked to historical occupational exposure to asbestos, which has traditionally been more common in male-dominated industries.



Age at Diagnosis: Most individuals receive a mesothelioma diagnosis at an average age of 69 years. This late age is often attributed to the long latency period of the disease.



Life Expectancy: Following diagnosis, the typical life expectancy ranges from 12 to 21 months. This statistic underscores the critical need for early detection and advanced treatment options.




By understanding these statistics, one can gain deeper insights into the challenges and realities faced by those living with mesothelioma.



How Did I Get Mesothelioma? 



A diagnosis of mesothelioma can be a big shock. Mesothelioma is a rare, aggressive cancer with one known cause: asbestos exposure. If you have mesothelioma, you were likely exposed to asbestos at work. 



Many industries used asbestos heavily through the middle of the 20th century. Workers at greatest risk worked in construction, industrial manufacturing, automotive repair, mining, power generation, oil refineries, and steel mills. 



Asbestos exposure causes pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma. Pleural mesothelioma affects the tissue around the lungs. Symptoms include shortness of breath, coughing, and chest pains. 



Peritoneal mesothelioma causes cancer in the abdomen. Symptoms include gastrointestinal issues, abdominal pain, and abdominal swelling. Asbestos can also cause lung cancer and a non-malignant disease called asbestosis.



What Are the Stages of Mesothelioma Progression?



Understanding the progression of mesothelioma is crucial for managing treatment and expectations. The disease advances through four distinct stages, each characterized by how far the cancer has spread within the body.



Stage 1: Localized Mesothelioma



In the initial stage, mesothelioma is confined to a small area and hasn't yet invaded surrounding tissues. At this point, the cancer is typically localized to the lining of the lungs, abdomen, or heart.



Stage 2: Regional Spread



As the condition progresses, cancer begins to invade nearby lymph nodes. This marks the second stage, where the tumor may also become larger and affect more of the body's lining in the same area.



Stage 3: Advanced Regional Spread



By the third stage, mesothelioma has extended to distant lymph nodes and potentially some nearby tissues. The cancer may spread further within the chest or abdomen, making it more challenging to treat.



Stage 4: Distant Metastasis



In the final stage, the cancer has metastasized to distant regions or other organs. This widespread distribution can significantly impact treatment options and outcomes, as the disease is usually more resistant to conventional treatments at this point.



This progression highlights the importance of early detection and diagnosis to optimize treatment efficacy and improve quality of life for individuals affected by mesothelioma. 



Diagnosing mesothelioma is a critical process that requires careful attention, as the disease is often mistaken for other illnesses. This cancer, linked to asbestos exposure, can take decades to manifest, making early detection a challenge.



Steps in Diagnosing Mesothelioma




Initial Assessment and Misdiagnosis Risks Mesothelioma presents symptoms akin to other diseases, leading to potential misdiagnosis. Patients may not immediately recall their asbestos exposure, complicating early detection.



The Essential Biopsy A biopsy is the definitive method for diagnosing mesothelioma. During this procedure, doctors remove a small tissue sample from the affected area. This sample is then examined under a microscope for cancerous cells.



Identifying the Type and Stage The most prevalent form, accounting for 75% of cases, is pleural mesothelioma, which affects the lung lining. Once identified, staging follows, determining how far the cancer has spread:

Stage 1: Cancer is localized and hasn't spread to nearby tissues.



Stage 2: It extends to nearby lymph nodes.



Stage 3: Involves distant lymph nodes and other cells.



Stage 4: Has reached other organs.





Treatment Considerations While there is no cure, treatment typically involves surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation—tailored to the cancer's stage.




Despite the lack of a cure, early and accurate diagnosis is vital for managing the disease and improving the quality of life. Understanding these steps can lead to more informed conversations with healthcare providers.



Why You Need an Experienced Charleston Mesothelioma Lawyer







If you were diagnosed with mesothelioma, you have a right to take action to seek compensation. Asbestos exposure on the job was negligent, which means asbestos companies can be held accountable. 



Asbestos cases can be complicated, though. You need a top-rated, experienced Charleston asbestos or mesothelioma attorney to take your case. They have the experience, knowledge, and resources to handle a complicated claim and give you the best chance of receiving compensation sooner. 



What to Look for in a Charleston Asbestos Attorney



Working with an experienced mesothelioma lawyer is essential for the best outcome for your asbestos case. Here's what to look for in a winning mesothelioma lawyer or firm:  




Proven years of experience handling and winning asbestos and mesothelioma lawsuits



Experience negotiating large settlements for clients



Experience litigating cases in court



A free initial consultation and contingency payment, so you pay no fees and risk nothing unless they win



A compassionate team that understands your illness and will come to you



A large law firm with jurisdiction in multiple states




Asbestos cases are complicated. Many cases involve multiple defendants and different states. You need a law firm with the resources to investigate, prove, and win your asbestos lawsuit. 



Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Charleston, WV? 



Several industries and workplaces in and around Charleston contributed to asbestos exposure in residents. These are a few examples. 



Power Generation







Although Charleston has a diverse economy that includes government, education, and medicine, utilities and power generation are still vital industries in the city. 



Several energy-producing companies, including Appalachian Power and the Mountaineer Gas Company, have headquarters in Charleston.



Any factory or power plant built during the early to mid-20th Century used large amounts of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs}. 



Pipes, furnaces, coal storage bins, work benches, and even fire-protective clothing contained asbestos. So did vinyl floor tiles, roofing materials, and insulation installed behind walls.



Even though these materials helped reduce the risk of catastrophic fire or electrical discharges, the amount of asbestos in the environment and the subsequent health problems proved disastrous.



Mining and Asbestos 



Although not mined in West Virginia, workers often extracted asbestos along with coal from naturally-occurring deposits. 



West Virginia has over 100 coal seams. Asbestos is not found in all of them, but many miners have been exposed to asbestos dust in mines.



Every step of the mining process, starting with extraction and ending with crushing or grinding large chunks of coal into small ones, puts miners at risk of inhaling asbestos fibers and developing deadly diseases.



Workers were also at risk of asbestos exposure through mining equipment and machinery. 



Many of the components contained asbestos to reduce friction and prevent overheating. Repair and maintenance workers were at particular risk of exposure. 



Charleston-Area Job Sites with Known Asbestos



Many of these job sites have undergone modernization and asbestos abatement work in recent years. Workers and maintenance personnel from previous decades may have been exposed to ACMs.




Appalachian Power Company - London Power Plant in Kanawha



Appalachian Power Company - Kanawha River Power Plant in Kanawha



Appalachian Power Company - Marmet Power Plant in Kanawha



Appalachian Power Company - Winfield Power Plant in Kanawha



E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Co. Belle West Virginia Power Plant in Kanawha



Union Carbide (Dow Chemical) Plant in South Charleston



Daniel Boone Hotel in Charleston



Ohio Power Company Facility in Charleston



Atlas Warehouse Building in Charleston



Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Building in Charleston



Kanawha Water and Light Company Facility in Kanawha



Thomas Memorial Hospital in South Charleston




Mesothelioma Treatment in Charleston







Two major cancer care facilities in West Virginia provide medical care to mesothelioma patients: Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center (MBRCC) at the West Virginia University Medical Center in Morgantown and the Schiffler Cancer Center of Wheeling Hospital in Wheeling.



MBRCC offers expert care and world-class staff. It is also involved in cancer research. Its research staff includes over 80 members from 33 different departments in the WVU Medical Center.



The Schiffler Cancer Center in Wheeling provides medical services for West Virginia and areas of Ohio and Pennsylvania. The Schiffler Cancer Center is led by a team of five radiation oncologists, including Dr. Jondavid Pollock. 



Due to its collaborative relationship with the Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia, the Schiffler Cancer Center is the only West Virginia hospital with membership in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). 



The mesothelioma Lawyer Center supported my father during his challenging time. Their expertise, compassion, and dedication were truly remarkable. Not only did they handle the legal complexities with proficiency, but they also provided invaluable support and guidance to our family throughout the entire process. Thanks to their relentless efforts, my father received the compensation he deserved, allowing him to focus on his health and well-being. I highly recommend their services to anyone seeking justice and assistance in similar situations.- Jingjing Z.



Legal Options for Mesothelioma Victims When the Responsible Company Is Defunct



If you or someone you know has developed mesothelioma due to asbestos exposure, the journey to seek justice might seem daunting, especially if the company responsible is no longer operational. However, there are still viable legal avenues to pursue compensation.



Special Trust Funds



Many companies that once dealt with asbestos have gone out of business. To address this, asbestos bankruptcy trust funds were established. These trusts are designed specifically to provide financial compensation to victims of asbestos exposure. Each trust has its own process and criteria for claims, but they collectively hold billions of dollars set aside for valid claims.



Filing a Lawsuit



Even if the initial company is defunct, victims and their families may still initiate a lawsuit against successor companies. These could be businesses that acquired the original company or its liabilities. Legal experts can help determine if there is a viable legal target or if other related entities can be held accountable.



Working with a Specialized Attorney



Navigating the complexities of asbestos-related legal claims, especially involving trust fund claims or lawsuits against successor companies, typically requires specialized legal assistance. An attorney with experience in this area can evaluate your situation, help you understand your rights, and guide you through the claim process to ensure the best possible outcome.



By exploring these options, victims and their families can pursue the compensation they deserve, even when the responsible party is no longer operating.



Getting Legal Help in Charleston



Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. Keep in mind that if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for considerable compensation. For additional assistance, contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Kansas Mesothelioma Lawyer

Many job sites in Kansas used asbestos in products and equipment, which led to workers developing mesothelioma and other illnesses. Kansas mesothelioma lawyers are now helping asbestos victims fight for justice.



If you or someone you love suffers from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in your area, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.



Understanding Asbestos Trust Funds



Decades ago, many asbestos-related companies faced lawsuits due to the harmful impact of their products. To manage the financial liabilities, these companies often filed for bankruptcy. However, the courts intervened, requiring them to establish asbestos trust funds specifically for compensating victims.



Why These Funds Matter




$30 Billion: That's the estimated amount currently available in asbestos trust funds. This substantial financial resource is dedicated to supporting mesothelioma patients and their families.



Ease of Access: You can file claims without the need to go to court. The process is designed to be straightforward, allowing you to potentially receive compensation from multiple funds without leaving your home.




By understanding the purpose and structure of these trust funds, you can better navigate the compensation process with the guidance of experienced legal professionals.





We are happy to assist all cities and towns in Kansas, including:



Wichita Falls, Overland Park, Kansas City, Olathe, Topeka, Lawrence, Shawnee, Manhattan, Lenexa, Salina, Hutchinson, Leavenworth, Leawood, Dodge City, Garden City, Junction City, Emporia, Derby, Prairie Village, Hays, Liberal, Gardner, Pittsburg, Newton, Great Bend, McPherson, El Dorado, Ottawa, Winfield, Arkansas City, Andover, Lansing, Merriam, Haysville, Atchison, Parsons, Coffeyville, Mission, Chanute, Independence, Augusta, Fort Riley, Wellington, Fort Scott, Park City, Bonner Springs, Valley Center, Pratt, Bel Aire, Roeland Park, Abilene, Mulvane, Ulysses, Eudora, De Soto, Spring Hill, Paola, Iola, Colby, Concordia, Tonganoxie, Basehor, Wamego, Goddard, Goodland, Baldwin City, Russell, Osawatomie, Edwardsville, Louisburg, Clay Center, Baxter Springs, Larned, Hugoton, Fairway, Rose Hill, Scott City, Beloi,t Maize, Lyons, Hesston, Mission Hills, Lindsborg, Frontenac, Garnett, Marysville, Holton, Columbus, Hiawatha, Kingman, Ellsworth, Galena, Hillsboro, Osage City, Norton, Girard, Hoisington, St. Marys ,Oaklawn-Sunview, Burlington, and more.




Kansas Asbestos Statistics








While most states have seen more deaths related to asbestos, Kansas still had over 2,100 such deaths between 1999 and 2017.



Just 397 of those deaths were from mesothelioma, while 1,588 resulted from asbestos lung cancer and 129 from asbestosis.



The largest number of asbestos-related deaths in the state came from Sedgwick County.



According to the Environmental Working Group (EWG), Kansas ranks 29th in the nation for asbestos-related deaths.




Understanding Asbestos and Its Health Risks



Asbestos is a mineral found naturally in the environment that gained popularity in the 20th century for its remarkable strength and resistance to heat. Due to these properties, it was incorporated into numerous products, from construction materials to automotive parts.



Health Hazards Linked to Asbestos



Despite its beneficial uses, asbestos poses significant health risks. When its microscopic fibers are inhaled or ingested, they can become trapped in organs, notably the lungs. Over time, these fibers can irritate and damage tissues, leading to serious illnesses, including:




Mesothelioma: A rare and aggressive cancer affecting the lining of the lungs, chest, or abdomen.



Lung Cancer: Regular exposure to asbestos increases the risk.



Other Diseases: Such as asbestosis, which causes scarring of lung tissue.




The insidious nature of asbestos-related diseases lies in their latency period. Symptoms may take decades—sometimes up to 50 years—after exposure to manifest, complicating early detection and treatment.



In summary, while asbestos provided substantial benefits in industrial applications, its health implications are severe and long-lasting, complicating the lives of those exposed.



Should I Sue for Mesothelioma?


This is a personal choice, but the truth is that most cases of mesothelioma were caused by negligent asbestos exposure. This means companies can be held accountable.



They can also be held legally liable for your resulting expenses. Most people sue over mesothelioma to get the compensation they need to treat this costly illness.



Mesothelioma lawsuits can provide significant financial relief, with awards ranging from $1 Million to $11.4 Million on average. This compensation can vary depending on whether the case settles or goes to court.




$1M - $1.4M is the average settlement amount, offering victims substantial support without the need for a lengthy trial.




Working with experienced mesothelioma lawyers can be crucial in navigating these complex legal processes. They assist in:




Identifying the asbestos-containing products responsible for exposure



Holding accountable the companies that manufactured these harmful products



Pursuing compensation that covers medical treatments and secures your family's financial future




With over 99% of mesothelioma lawsuits resulting in settlements, the majority of plaintiffs receive compensation without stepping foot in a courtroom. Additionally, families have the option to file claims on behalf of loved ones who have passed away due to the disease, ensuring justice and financial compensation even posthumously.



Steps for Filing a Mesothelioma Lawsuit in Kansas



Embarking on the journey of a mesothelioma lawsuit in Kansas involves a well-defined legal process. Here’s a breakdown of the steps you need to take:




Initial ConsultationBegin by reaching out to a trusted mesothelioma attorney or law firm to discuss your situation. A free case evaluation is often available to determine if you have a valid claim.



Evidence CollectionYour attorney will gather crucial information, including your detailed work history and medical records, to identify any asbestos exposure sources responsible for your illness.



Filing the ClaimOnce sufficient evidence is collected, your attorney will officially file the lawsuit against the parties accountable for your asbestos exposure.



Negotiation and SettlementThe majority of these cases reach a settlement out of court. Experienced attorneys usually negotiate on your behalf to secure favorable compensation without the need for trial.



Court ProceedingsIf a settlement is not achieved, the case may proceed to court. Your legal team will advocate for you before a judge and jury to obtain a verdict.




These steps are designed to ensure comprehensive representation and maximize potential compensation for those affected by mesothelioma due to asbestos exposure in Kansas.



How Much Can a Mesothelioma Settlement Be Worth?



When it comes to mesothelioma settlements, amounts can vary widely based on specific case details. Generally, settlements often fall between $1 million and $1.4 million. However, this isn't a hard and fast rule. Factors such as the severity of the illness and the duration of asbestos exposure can significantly influence the settlement size.



In some instances, cases may go to trial, resulting in verdicts. These awards can be considerably higher, often ranging from $5 million to $11.4 million. The impact of the disease on the individual's life and the strength of the evidence presented can play a crucial role in the final figure.



Ultimately, each case is unique. Consulting with a legal expert can provide a clearer picture tailored to your circumstances.



Past Mesothelioma Settlement Amounts in Kansas



If you're wondering about previous mesothelioma settlement figures in Kansas, several notable cases can provide insight:




$3.17 Million awarded to a mechanic specializing in tractor-trailers from Wichita.



$3 Million settled for a U.S. Army veteran who also worked as a maintenance worker in Rose Hill.



$2.9 Million for a construction worker who served in the U.S. Marine Corps, hailing from Wathena.



$2.8 Million granted to an auto worker formerly employed by a notable tire manufacturer.



$2.57 Million for an embroiderer who served as a plant foreman, affected by pleural mesothelioma, based in Garfield.



$2.34 Million reached for a patient from Bonner Springs diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma.



$2.6 Million awarded to an Air Force veteran who worked in a warehouse in Hays.




Keep in mind that while these amounts reflect successful cases, mesothelioma compensation isn't assured. Each settlement hinges on unique case details and individual circumstances.



How a Kansas Asbestos Lawyer Can Help Pursue Compensation



A Kansas asbestos lawyer can be a vital ally in your pursuit of compensation if you or a loved one is affected by mesothelioma. Here's how they can make a difference:




Exploring Compensation Avenues:Lawyers with expertise in asbestos-related cases can guide clients through various options for compensation. These options may include mesothelioma lawsuits, asbestos trust funds, and receiving benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).



Lawsuits and Settlements:Mesothelioma lawsuits can result in significant financial awards, ranging from $1 million to over $11 million. Most cases are settled outside of court, meaning the majority of clients receive compensation without the need for a courtroom appearance.



Case Evaluation and Accountability:These legal professionals help pinpoint the specific asbestos-containing products responsible for exposure. They work diligently to hold manufacturers accountable, thereby aiding in claiming damages for illness caused by negligence.



Securing Financial Stability:Compensation can cover medical treatment expenses and help secure your family’s financial future. The process is often expedited, with many clients seeing results in as little as 90 days.



Support After Loss:If a loved one has passed away due to asbestos exposure, a lawyer can assist families in filing claims to ensure they receive the compensation owed.




By partnering with a knowledgeable asbestos lawyer in Kansas, you gain a resourceful advocate committed to easing the financial and emotional burdens of mesothelioma, ensuring you navigate the complexities of the legal system with confidence.



What is the Process for Negotiating a Mesothelioma Settlement?



Navigating the path to a mesothelioma settlement can be intricate, but understanding the process can help you set realistic expectations and make informed decisions. Here’s a step-by-step guide on what to expect:



1. Consultation and Case Evaluation



Your journey typically begins by sitting down with an experienced asbestos attorney. They will evaluate your case, consider the evidence, and discuss the potential for a settlement.



2. Filing the Lawsuit



If your attorney believes you have a strong case, the next step is filing a lawsuit against the responsible parties, often including asbestos manufacturers. This step is crucial, as it establishes the legal grounds for your compensation claim.



3. Discovery Phase



During this phase, both sides exchange relevant information. Your legal team gathers evidence to support your claim, which might include medical records, employment history, and expert testimonies.



4. Settlement Negotiations



The majority of mesothelioma cases tend to end in negotiated settlements. Your attorney will negotiate on your behalf, aiming to reach an agreement without going to court. This process can be swift; compensation offers may start trickling in within a few weeks.



5. Trial (If Necessary)



If a settlement isn’t reached, your case may proceed to trial. Here, a judge and jury will weigh the evidence and make a determination regarding compensation. While this is less common, it ensures that you have a pathway to justice if negotiations don't yield a satisfactory outcome.



6. Receiving Compensation



Once a settlement or verdict is reached, you can begin receiving compensation. Initial payouts can occur relatively quickly, with others following over the duration of any agreed terms.



Understanding this procedure equips you to work closely with your legal team and pursue the justice you deserve.



Will an asbestos lawsuit be filed as a class action?



No, your asbestos lawsuit will not be filed as a class action. Instead, it will be pursued on an individual basis. This approach ensures your legal team focuses specifically on the unique details and circumstances of your case. By handling it individually, your attorney can better advocate for the maximum compensation you are entitled to. This personalized attention is critical, as each asbestos case can vary greatly depending on exposure history and health impacts.


What to Look for in a Kansas Mesothelioma Lawyer


Taking legal action and suing over mesothelioma is a big step. For the best chance of success, you need an experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyer. When looking for a lawyer in Kansas, consider these important factors: 








Relevant experience. Your lawyer should have experience handling asbestos and mesothelioma cases. They should be able to provide evidence of past wins for similar clients. 



A nationwide firm. Working with a lawyer in Kansas is important, but they should be part of a firm with jurisdiction in other states. Asbestos cases are not always tried where you live or even where you worked. 



Adequate resources. Another reason to choose a lawyer who is part of a larger firm is that they will have the resources necessary to investigate, litigate, and settle your case. 



Contingency payment. You should not have to pay any fees if and until they win your case and get you compensation. They should offer a free consultation and contingency payment if they take your case. 




How Does a Mesothelioma Law Firm Gather Evidence for a Case?



The journey of building a mesothelioma legal case can be complex, given that asbestos exposure typically occurs decades before a diagnosis is confirmed. However, experienced mesothelioma law firms employ a meticulous process to gather the necessary evidence to support such cases.




Historical Research: Law firms begin by delving into historical data to pinpoint known sites and industries where asbestos exposure was prevalent. This often includes identifying factories, shipyards, and construction sites that were active during the client's relevant exposure period.



Product Identification: It's crucial to determine which asbestos-containing products an individual was exposed to. Lawyers conduct extensive research, often leveraging databases that catalog products by their asbestos content, manufacturer, and period of use.



Corporate Investigations: Many law firms maintain detailed records on companies historically involved in manufacturing or using asbestos products. This information helps in linking exposure to specific entities that can be held accountable.



Personal Testimonies and Records: Gathering statements from the affected individuals, their coworkers, and family members can provide insight into the exposure history. Personnel records, employment histories, and medical records also play a critical role in corroborating claims.



Scientific and Medical Evidence: Expert testimony from medical specialists who can relate asbestos exposure to mesothelioma is vital. These professionals help establish the causal link between exposure and the disease.




Through these strategies, mesothelioma law firms are able to systematically piece together the evidence needed to build a robust case, aiming for justice and compensation for those harmed.



Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Kansas?



Kansas has more than just farming, and some of the biggest industries and workplaces in the state have caused asbestos exposure and illness in workers.



Occupations at Risk for Asbestos Exposure




Auto or Aircraft Mechanics: Handling vehicle parts, particularly high-friction brakes, exposed workers to asbestos.



Boilermakers: Often worked with insulated pipes and boilers containing asbestos.



Cabinet Makers and Carpenters: Frequently dealt with materials containing asbestos in older construction projects.



Construction Workers: Regularly encountered asbestos in various building materials.



Custodial and Maintenance Workers: Cleaning and maintaining facilities with asbestos-containing materials posed risks.



Drywall Installers: Often cut and sanded materials that included asbestos.



Electricians and Plumbers: Worked in environments where asbestos was used for insulation.



Factory Workers: Many manufacturing processes involved asbestos components.



Firefighters: Faced asbestos exposure in older buildings during fire response.



Insulators: Directly handled asbestos insulation materials.



Miners: Extracted asbestos-containing minerals.



Painters: Applied paints and coatings that sometimes contained asbestos.



Shipyard Workers: Built and repaired ships with asbestos-laden materials.



U.S. Military Service Members: Frequently exposed during service, especially on ships and in older facilities.




Kansas-Specific Exposure




Workers in the aviation industry make airplane parts, including high-friction asbestos-containing brakes for airplanes. Workers who handled them were likely exposed.



Boeing, one of the world’s largest aerospace companies, has a facility in Kansas where many residents were employed while asbestos was still being used. Other aviation job sites in Kansas include Cessna Aircraft Company and Trans World Airlines, Inc.



Another Kansas company associated with asbestos use is Chanute’s Mid-America Refining Company (MARCO). From 1940 until 1981, MARCO used asbestos throughout the entire job site because of its resistance to heat and fire.



Older buildings in Kansas often contain asbestos and can continue to put workers and residents at risk. In 2005, a Topeka prison was found guilty of violating the Clean Air Act. It risked exposing prisoners and staff to asbestos when it failed to check for asbestos or provide adequate protective gear during renovation work.




Even people who have not directly worked around asbestos can be diagnosed with mesothelioma, often due to secondhand exposure to asbestos. This highlights the widespread impact of asbestos, affecting not just workers but also their families and communities.



Other Job Sites Associated with Asbestos







In addition to aviation and refining companies, other Kansas businesses have been associated with asbestos, including:




Kansas Power and Light



Larned Electrical Light



Mobil Oil Refinery



Municipal Light Plant



Trend Construction Corporation



Kansas State Agricultural College



Eagle Refrigeration Company



Kansas State University



Socony-Vacuum Oil Company



Manhattan Country Club



Bushton Hydrocarbon Plant



Globe Oil Refining Company



Chloride Ceramics Company



Archer Daniels Midland



Prairie Pipe Line Company



Trudeau Port Cement Company



Sunflower Ammunitions Plant



Hercules Powder Company, Inc.



Emporia State Teachers College



Armstrong Contracting & Supply Corporation



Kansas Electric Utilities Company



Kansas Army Ammunition Plant



Kansas Gas & Electric



Kansas Ordnance Plant



Huxtable-Hammond Company, Inc.



Wheatland Electric Cooperative



Kansas City Southern Railroad




Is There Any Naturally-Occurring Asbestos in Kansas?



Most asbestos-related diseases in Kansas were from prolonged daily exposure at job sites. However, the state also has a few naturally-occurring asbestos sites, which have led to some exposure via airborne particles disturbed from the deposits.



There are three naturally-occurring asbestos sites in Kansas:




Two are in close proximity of each other in the Eastern portion of the state, close to U.S. Highways 75 and 77.



The third site is located in the Southeastern area of Kansas, near Parsons.




Tornadoes and Asbestos in Kansas



Kansas is prone to tornadoes. Tornadoes are extremely destructive, tearing apart buildings and leaving behind a big mess of mangled construction materials. 



Unfortunately, the leftover waste often contains asbestos. When older buildings collapse during a tornado, they expose asbestos materials. Residents and rescue and cleanup workers risk exposure. 



Kansas Laws That Affect Mesothelioma Cases



How asbestos, mesothelioma, personal injury, and wrongful death lawsuits proceed depends on state laws. A few laws in Kansas impact how your case might proceed, when you can file, and whether or not you can recover damages. 



Kansas Statute of Limitations








Kan. Stat. Ann. § 60-501 et seq. requires the plaintiffs to follow the two-year discovery rule when filing an asbestos lawsuit in Kansas.



If you plan to file a lawsuit, you must do so within two years of the time that the asbestos-related was discovered or should have been discovered.



Wrongful death lawsuits are to be filed within two years of the date of the victim’s death.




These laws fall under personal injury laws in Kansas, as there are no specific laws pertaining exclusively to asbestos.



Secondhand Asbestos Exposure and Take-Home Duty



Most people were exposed directly to asbestos at work. Some people were exposed through secondhand exposure. This occurred when a member of the family or household inadvertently brought asbestos fibers home on their clothing. 



Many women developed mesothelioma this way. They laundered their husbands' clothing, inhaled the attached fibers, and ultimately got sick. 



Unfortunately, Kansas law does not allow these victims to sue for damages. Some states have found that companies have a take-home duty, a responsibility to warn workers and their families of the risks of secondhand asbestos exposure. Kansas does not recognize this take-home duty. A law states that companies are only liable for exposure that occurs on their premises.



However, family members may still explore legal actions if a loved one passes away from mesothelioma, depending on the state. In many jurisdictions, a wrongful death lawsuit can be filed by:




Spouses



Children



Parents



Estate representatives




Such lawsuits can help families manage financial burdens by potentially covering medical bills, funeral expenses, and lost wages. Unfortunately, due to the specific limitations in Kansas law, these options may not be available locally, emphasizing the importance of understanding state-specific legal contexts.



Kansas Asbestos Safety Laws



The Kansas Department of Health and Environment is responsible for the implementation of asbestos regulations and statutes in Kansas:




Under 65-5302 of the Kansas Statutes Annotated Asbestos Control, all individuals working on an asbestos project in the state of Kansas must first be licensed and certified to work around asbestos.



Kansas follows both OSHA and NESHAP regulations in regard to the disposal of asbestos. Asbestos must be encapsulated in an airtight container and labeled appropriately. Disposal must be in a state-approved landfill for disposal.



Anyone working on an asbestos abatement project must notify the state, in writing, within 10 days prior to the start of the project. All applicable fees must also be paid before beginning the project.




For more detailed information and additional rules and regulation in Kansas, contact the Kansas Department of Health and Environment at 785-296-6024.



Understanding Mesothelioma Symptoms and Diagnosis Challenges



Mesothelioma, a rare and aggressive cancer, poses significant diagnostic challenges due to its elusive nature. One major complication stems from its symptoms, which can easily be mistaken for those of more common conditions, leading to potential misdiagnosis or delayed treatment.



Common Symptoms:




Respiratory Issues: Persistent coughing and difficulty breathing.



Chest Pain: Discomfort or tightness in the chest area.



Fatigue and Weakness: A general feeling of exhaustion and loss of energy.



Unexplained Weight Loss: Sudden and unintended weight decrease.



Abdominal Swelling and Pain: Particularly relevant in peritoneal mesothelioma.




These symptoms often mirror those associated with respiratory infections or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), complicating early detection.



Diagnostic Challenges:




Latency Period: Mesothelioma symptoms might not manifest until several decades—often between 20 to 50 years—after initial asbestos exposure, further complicating timely diagnosis.



Non-Specific Symptoms: The overlap with other illnesses means that healthcare providers may initially explore more common conditions first.



Advanced Diagnostic Techniques Required: Detection typically requires specialized imaging tests, such as CT scans or MRIs, and often biopsy confirmations.




The combination of these factors underscores the importance of increased awareness and specialized diagnostic approaches to improve early detection rates and treatment outcomes in mesothelioma cases.



Where Can I Get Treatment in Kansas?



It's best to get treatment from physicians specializing in mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases. 



The National Cancer Institute (NCI) helps cancer patients find the best treatments available by designating facilities. NCI-designated care centers are always recommended for those with asbestos-related diseases.



The University of Kansas Cancer Center (KUCC) is an NCI-designated center. An NCI designation means the care center has been recognized for its superior physicians, scientists, and other healthcare professionals with in-depth knowledge and experience dealing with cancer.



What VA Benefits Are Available for Mesothelioma Patients?



Veterans who have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, often due to asbestos exposure during their military service, may be entitled to various benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Here's what you need to know:



1. Disability Compensation



Mesothelioma is recognized by the VA with a 100% disability rating. This classification means eligible veterans can receive approximately $3,800 monthly in financial compensation. This benefit aims to support veterans by offsetting the significant health and lifestyle impacts of the disease.



2. Healthcare Benefits



Veterans with mesothelioma can access free health care through the VA. This can significantly ease the financial burden of treatment and ensure access to necessary medical services and support, including specialized care for mesothelioma.



3. Assistance with Claims



Even if a claim has been denied previously, veterans have the opportunity to seek help from VA-accredited representatives. These experts can guide veterans through the process of filing or appealing claims, ensuring that applicants receive the benefits they're entitled to.



What to Consider




Eligibility: To qualify, you must show a connection between your military service and asbestos exposure. Documentation and medical records play a crucial role in this process.



Impact on Lawsuits: It's important to note that pursuing VA benefits does not affect the ability to file a separate mesothelioma lawsuit. Veterans can still seek legal action against responsible parties without jeopardizing their government benefits.




Understanding the benefits and support available can be pivotal for veterans navigating the challenges of a mesothelioma diagnosis. These resources provide both financial relief and vital healthcare access, helping to alleviate some of the burdens associated with this serious illness.



Great people. Helped my family through our meso diagnosis.-Donald H.



Getting Legal Help in Kansas



If you've been injured by asbestos, there is a good chance that you'll qualify for considerable compensation. Get our free Financial Compensation Packet for information on the top mesothelioma and asbestos lawyers in your area. For questions and assistance, feel free to contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Eugene, Oregon, Mesothelioma Lawyer

Contact an experienced Eugene mesothelioma lawyer if you've been injured by asbestos. Eugene, Oregon, is well known for its scenery and outdoor recreation, but the city's history with asbestos use in many industries left a lasting impression on workers and residents. 



If you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for significant compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in Eugene, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 





Eugene, Oregon, Asbestos Facts




More than 400 people in the Eugene area and Lane County died from asbestos-related illnesses between 1999 and 2017. 



Several industries important to the area contributed to asbestos exposure in workers, including lumber, manufacturing, and insulation. 




Why Do I Need a Eugene Mesothelioma Lawyer? 







If you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, you have a right to seek compensation. Most cases of mesothelioma are caused by negligent workplace asbestos exposure. A top Eugene, OR, mesothelioma can help you get the compensation you deserve. 



Mesothelioma is an expensive disease requiring extensive treatment by professionals. An asbestos lawyer can help you get the money you need to cover these costs and others. 



How Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Eugene, Oregon? 



Most people with a mesothelioma diagnosis were exposed to asbestos on the job decades ago. You could have been exposed at one or more jobs in and around Eugene. At one time, most industries used asbestos. The types of industries with the greatest risk of exposure include: 




Construction 



Insulation



Manufacturing



Shipbuilding and ship repair



U.S. Navy



Steel mills



Lumber mills



Paper mills 



Mining




Asbestos and the E.J. Bartells Company







Established in 1923, the E.J. Bartells Company makes insulation and fabric materials. The more well-known companies that E.J. Bartells has supplied with materials include Boeing, Intel, Xerox, and Apollo Sheet Metal. It is an important employer in Eugene but has also exposed many workers to asbestos. 



When the company began, E.J. Bartells used asbestos to provide insulation and heat resistance in many products. This not only put workers at risk at job sites that received the company's products but also numerous people who used the products.



The company ended up facing numerous mesothelioma lawsuits due to worker asbestos exposure. 



In 2000, the company stopped doing business, but a private company revamped it in 2001 and renamed it just E.J. Bartells. It has several branches throughout Oregon.



One high-profile case against the company happened when the spouse of a former electrician filed a wrongful death lawsuit against several companies, including E.J. Bartells. 



The electrician died from pleural mesothelioma after excessive asbestos exposure. A jury found E.J. Bartells partially responsible for his death. 



The victim's spouse won $1.5 million in economic damages, $3 million in punitive damages, and an additional $307,000 in compensatory damages.



E.J. Bartells was again hit with another wrongful death lawsuit when the family of a former employee sued the company for the employee's death benefits, disability benefits, and funeral costs. 



E.J. Bartells Company settled the case, and in turn, the deceased's family received monthly payments of $750 over the next 20 years.



More lawsuits followed, and with the overwhelming amount of cases against them, E.J. Bartells filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2000. 



One of the conditions of bankruptcy protection was that an asbestos trust fund was to be established to cover both pending and future asbestos lawsuits against the company.



E.J. Bartells Company manufactured a variety of materials and products that contained asbestos, including:




Tapes



Sealants



Adhesives



Cement



Board insulation



Joints



Pipe coverings



Insulation pads



Duct connectors




Additional Job Sites Associated with Asbestos in Eugene



In addition to the E.J. Bartells Company, many other job sites, businesses, and buildings have been associated with asbestos use in Eugene. Numerous buildings are still in use today.



Lumber Companies and Plywood Mills




Associated Plywood Mills



Bohemia Lumber Company



Lane Plywood



Cuddeback Lumber




Schools




University of Oregon



Adamson Elementary School



Twin Oaks Elementary School



Monroe Middle School



Sheldon High School



McCornack Elementary School



Camas Ridge Elementary School



Kennedy Middle School



South Eugene High School




Additional Buildings and Companies




Skipworth Juvenile Detention Center



Armstrong World Industries



Bailey Hill Meadows Apartments



Cascade Fiber Company



Eugene Fruit Growers Association



Eugene Water & Electric



First National Bank of Eugene



Lane County Electric Company



Willamette Valley Wood Chemical Company



Eugene City Hall




The Ongoing Risk of Asbestos in Eugene, Oregon







Not all asbestos exposure is in the past. Because so many buildings in Eugene were built with asbestos materials, it lingers and continues to put workers and residents at risk of exposure. 



A couple of development projects in Eugene highlight this risk. For example, the city recently sold the abandoned Eugene Water and Electric Board Steam Plant on the riverfront downtown. It will be developed into a new neighborhood and park, but first, requires millions of dollars of asbestos abatement. 



Cancer Treatment Near Eugene



Although there isn't a comprehensive cancer care center in Eugene, the Knight Cancer Institute in nearby Portland is backed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI). It's one of the most innovative medical centers in the entire Northwest.



Knight Cancer Institute has more than 200 experts and researchers participating in four different research programs, including cancer prevention and control, hematologic malignancies, solid tumors, and cancer biology.



In addition, the Knight Cancer Institute has partnerships with a multitude of national, regional, and worldwide institutions, including:




M.D. Anderson Cancer Research Center



The University of California at Los Angeles



Salem Cancer Institute



Quality Healthcare



Mercy Medical Center



Bay Area Hospital




Knight Cancer Institute Cancer Center



3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park RoadPortland, Oregon 97239Cancer Institute: (503) 494-1617



Health Care Services/OHSU Switchboard: (503) 494-8311



Main Operator at OHSU: 1-888-222-6478



Great people. Helped my family through our meso diagnosis.- Donald H.



Legal Help in Eugene



Remember, if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you need additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Detroit Mesothelioma Lawyer

Many workers exposed to asbestos rely on Detroit mesothelioma lawyers to seek justice. Detroit is the largest city in Michigan and has long been its economic hub. Known as "the Motor City," Detroit is home to three of the world's biggest automotive companies, an industry that long used asbestos in parts. 



If you suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to substantial financial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Detroit, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.





Detroit Asbestos Facts




Michigan experienced more than 10,000 asbestos-related deaths between 1999 and 2017. 



The highest number of deaths during that period, 1,342, occurred in Wayne County and Detroit. 



Auto manufacturing, the city's most important industry, used asbestos for decades, exposing workers. 



Older buildings in Detroit also contain asbestos and pose a risk to residents as they crumble or get demolished. 




Understanding the Risks of Asbestos Exposure and Its Link to Mesothelioma



Asbestos exposure poses significant health risks, primarily affecting vital organs. When tiny asbestos fibers are breathed in or ingested, they can embed themselves in the protective linings of organs such as the lungs. This persistent presence of fibers can silently irritate tissue over many years without immediate symptoms.



How Asbestos Causes Damage:




Fiber Inhalation: Once asbestos fibers enter the respiratory system, they can become trapped in the lung lining, known as the pleura.



Long-term Irritation: Over time, these fibers cause chronic inflammation and scarring, which can alter healthy tissue.



Latency Period: This process can occur gradually, often taking several decades before any visible signs of illness emerge.




The primary condition linked to asbestos exposure is mesothelioma, a type of cancer. Mesothelioma develops primarily due to the prolonged irritation and damage caused by these fibers. Shockingly, the disease can manifest anywhere from 10 to 50 years after the initial exposure, making early detection challenging.



Preventive Measures:




Avoidance: Minimize exposure by steering clear of environments known to contain asbestos.



Protective Gear: Use appropriate masks and gear if dealing with asbestos-containing materials.



Regular Check-ups: For individuals with past exposure, routine health screenings are crucial for early detection and intervention.




Understanding these risks emphasizes the importance of safety measures and proactive health monitoring to mitigate the potential impact of asbestos exposure.



How Do I File a Mesothelioma Lawsuit in Detroit? 







The process of seeking compensation for mesothelioma in Detroit depends on the type of claim you make: 



Mesothelioma Personal Injury Lawsuit



Asbestos exposure is negligent, so you can file a personal injury lawsuit against the companies responsible. These companies knew the dangers of asbestos when they included it in their products, yet they proceeded, putting thousands at risk. A lawyer can file for you and will most likely negotiate a settlement to get you compensation. In some cases, these lawsuits go to trial. Through these legal actions, you can hold these corporations accountable for their reckless decisions and pursue justice for your family. In a trial, the jury decides if defendants owe you compensation and decide on an amount. This process not only seeks to obtain compensation but also serves as a powerful statement against corporate negligence. Your lawyer will litigate on your behalf if you choose to go to trial.



By pursuing an asbestos claim, you contribute to a broader effort to ensure that companies prioritize safety over profit, sending a clear message that negligence will not be tolerated. 



Mesothelioma Wrongful Death Lawsuit



If your loved one died from mesothelioma either before or after beginning a personal injury lawsuit, your lawyer can help you file a wrongful death claim. It will most likely end in a settlement but can also go to trial. 



Asbestos Trust Fund Claim



Many asbestos companies went bankrupt after facing thousands of lawsuits. You cannot sue these companies but could be eligible for compensation through an asbestos trust. 



Bankrupt asbestos companies had to set up asbestos trust funds to compensate victims. A lawyer can find all the trusts you are eligible for and file the claim for you. 



Veteran Benefits



If you served in the military, you might have been exposed to asbestos during your service. If you can tie asbestos in the military to your current illness, you qualify for VA benefits. These include healthcare and monthly disability compensation. 



Understanding the Impact of Statutes of Limitations on Mesothelioma Claims in Michigan



In Michigan, the statute of limitations plays a crucial role in the filing of mesothelioma claims. This set of laws dictates the time frame within which patients, or their families, must initiate legal action following a diagnosis.



Time Constraints




Filing Deadline: Generally, it's essential for individuals to file their claim within a predetermined period after the diagnosis. If this window is missed, the claim might be invalid, making it impossible to seek compensation.



Variation by Case: The specific time allowed can vary depending on individual circumstances. For example, wrongful death claims may have different time constraints compared to personal injury claims.




Importance of Timely Action



Taking prompt legal action is vital due to these time restrictions. The earlier a claim is filed post-diagnosis, the better the chances of navigating the complexities of the legal process effectively.



Legal Guidance is Key



Consulting with experienced asbestos attorneys without delay ensures that patients and their families understand these legal time frames. Lawyers can provide guidance on how to proceed efficiently, securing the right to pursue compensation before the deadline lapses.



In summary, the statute of limitations significantly influences how and when mesothelioma claims are filed in Michigan, making swift legal counsel and action indispensable for affected individuals seeking justice.



Mesothelioma claims in the Detroit area have resulted in a variety of significant settlements and verdicts, highlighting the legal support available to those affected by asbestos exposure. Here's a glimpse into some notable outcomes:



Major Settlements in Detroit and Surrounding Areas




$4.98 Million Settlement

Awarded to a welder in Detroit who suffered due to occupational exposure.





$3 Million Payout

Secured for a chemical plant worker from Algonac, showcasing the serious impact of workplace exposure.





$4.92 Million Award

Granted to a U.S. Navy Veteran and welder residing in Kimball, acknowledging dual exposure risks in military and civilian roles.






Additional Noteworthy Settlements




Communication Worker in Superior: Achieved a settlement of $2.85 million.



Flint Resident's Case: $2.32 million for a woman exposed indirectly through her husband's repair activities.



Lake Orion Union Pipefitter: Received $2.55 million, particularly for pleural mesothelioma claims.



Bricklayer in Flint: Secured a $2.6 million settlement due to pleural mesothelioma.



Detroit U.S. Army Veteran and Laborer: Awarded $1.2 million in compensation.



White Lake Laborer: Notable $2.54 million settlement for peritoneal mesothelioma.



Maintenance Worker in Lansing: Earned a $2.58 million payout.



Owosso Factory Worker: Benefited from a $2.1 million settlement for pleural mesothelioma.



Machine Builder in Clinton Township: Awarded $2.52 million.




While these outcomes demonstrate substantial compensation, it's important to note that results can vary. Factors such as individual exposure circumstances, age, and diagnosis significantly influence each case, and success cannot be guaranteed.



What to Look for When Choosing a Mesothelioma Lawyer



Selecting the right mesothelioma lawyer is crucial for securing appropriate compensation. Here are key characteristics to consider:




Extensive Experience: Seek out attorneys with a solid background in mesothelioma cases. Experience directly correlates with an ability to navigate the complexities of asbestos-related lawsuits.



Successful Track Record: Investigate the lawyer's history of winning significant settlements or verdicts. A proven track record can provide confidence in their capability to achieve favorable outcomes.



Client-First Payment Structure: Prioritize attorneys who work on a contingency fee basis. This means they only receive payment if they successfully win your case, eliminating upfront costs and financial risk for you.




These elements ensure that the attorney you select is both competent and committed to your cause, providing the best chance for a successful claim. Choose wisely to secure the best possible support for your case.



Are There Any Costs Associated with Hiring a Mesothelioma Lawyer in Detroit?



When considering legal representation for a mesothelioma case in Detroit, you might wonder about the potential costs involved. It's reassuring to know that many firms adopt a client-friendly approach to fees.




No Upfront Fees: You won't need to worry about hourly charges or paying out-of-pocket costs initially.



Contingency-Based Payment: Your lawyer will only receive payment if you win the case and receive financial compensation. In essence, if there's no win, there's no fee.




This arrangement ensures that you can pursue legal action without financial stress, aligning your attorney's success with your own.



How Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Detroit? 



Many industries used asbestos, and Detroit has long been an industrial city. You most likely were exposed to asbestos at one of these jobs. Industries in Detroit that used asbestos include automotive companies, steel mills, and construction. 



Asbestos in Detroit's Automotive Industry



Detroit is the home of the modern American automotive industry, including the so-called "Big Three" of Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler. 



For decades, car companies used asbestos in brakes, clutches, and body components to resist heat, friction, and fire. 



Thousands of people have been exposed to asbestos because of these car parts. Factory workers assembling automobiles and mechanics and car enthusiasts are at risk of developing asbestos-related diseases.



The Packard Plant







Although it hasn’t been active in decades, officials found up to 18 inches of asbestos littered throughout Detroit’s Packard Plant. The huge former manufacturing facility once produced thousands of vehicles. In the 1990s, officials attempted to demolish the plant.



However, after losing a lawsuit, the plant remained standing. Many former employees were exposed to asbestos daily when it was in operation, but even today, the plant puts nearby residents at risk. 



Great Lakes Steel on Zug Island



Zug Island in the Detroit River is home to a steelworks. Much reduced in size compared to the past, it still operates today as U.S. Steel. Detroit Iron Works built the first facility there in 1901. 



Great Lakes Steel began operating a steel mill on Zug Island in 1931 and was purchased by U.S. Steel in 2003. Great Lakes Steel used asbestos in several components, including refractory products and insulation. Many people who worked at the facility developed respiratory illnesses. 



Asbestos in Detroit Buildings



Detroit experienced a population boom in the early part of the 20th century. This was when asbestos was used in construction for everything from siding to insulation and adhesives. 



Today, many of those buildings now pose a risk to current residents. Abandoned homes are decaying, which can expose asbestos fibers to the air. 



Demolition projects to clean up blight can safely remove asbestos, but many contractors have been cited for violating federal and state asbestos rules. 



Other Job Sites Associated with Asbestos in Detroit



Automotive Industry




American Motor Car Company



Budd Wheel Company



Chevrolet Motor Plant



Chrysler Military Service Plant



Dodge Truck Division of the Chrysler Corporation



Ford Motor Manufacturing Services



General Motors Cadillac Plant



Hudson Motor Car Corporation



Plymouth Motor Car Company



Saxon Motor Car Corporation



Chevrolet Gear & Axle Plant



Briggs Manufacturing Company



Chrysler Huber




Schools




Amelia Earhart Middle School



Ann Arbor Public Schools



Best Middle School



Burroughs Middle School



Carleton Elementary School



Central High School



Clintondale High School



Coldwater High School



Crestwood High School



Cranbrook Institute



Denby High School



Detroit Public Schools



Everett High School



Fairbanks Elementary School



Henry Ford High School



Kelloggsville High School



Kimball High School



Marion High School



Michigan Center High School



N.W. High School



Oakland Elementary School



Pardee Elementary School



Royal Oak Board of Education Building



Riverside Middle School



Scott Elementary



Southeastern High School



Starr Elementary



University of Detroit



Upton Elementary School



Wayne Elementary School



Wayne State University



Webber Middle School



Cass Technical High School




Hospitals




Blaine Hospital



Botsford Hospital



Detroit General Hospital



Grace Hospital



Harper Webber Hospital



Henry Ford Hospital



Herman Kiefer Hospital



Holy Cross Hospital



Metropolitan Hospital



Mount Carmel Hospital



Saint Joseph’s Hospital



Saint Mary’s Hospital



Sinai Hospital of Detroit




Additional Companies




Acme Equipment Company



Acorn Iron Works



Alcoa Aluminum



Allied Chemical Company



American Agricultural Chemical Company



American Bar and Foundry Company



Anderson Company - Nitrogen Division



Brunswick Corporation School Equipment



C.M. Hall Lamp Company



Cobo Hall



Connors Creek Station



First Federal Savings & Loan



Grace Baking Company



Grand Circus Park



Grant Southern Iron & Metal



Great Lakes Engineering Works



Grey Iron Foundry



Greyhound Bus Terminal



Marathon Oil Company



Monsanto Chemical Company



Minergy Corporation



Ohio Oil Company



Republic Steel



Taylor Supply Company




Treatment for Mesothelioma in Detroit







If you have been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness, it is essential to consult an expert on these diseases. Specialists can provide the best care for these rare illnesses. 



There are two National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers in the Detroit area that can help: 




The Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit



University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor




The Van Elsander Cancer Center in Grosse Pointe Woods also offers excellent care. Between these facilities, patients can get the most advanced treatment for pleural mesothelioma and peritoneal mesothelioma. 



When my husband was diagnosed we had no idea what to do. Our doctor said we should reach out to an attorney to talk about compensation. After talking to several firms we found the mesothelioma lawyer center and were grateful we did. They helped with every step of the way. If you need a meso attorney then I would recommend contacting them- Isabelle D.



Getting Legal Assistance in Detroit



Remember, if you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for financial compensation. Get our free Financial Compensation Packet for information on the top mesothelioma and asbestos lawyers in your area. For questions and assistance, feel free to contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Connecticut Mesothelioma Lawyer

Many civilian workers and military personnel received diagnoses of asbestos diseases and are now getting help from an experienced Connecticut mesothelioma lawyer. Connecticut has a long history of harmful asbestos exposure because of industrial workplaces, shipping, and naval facilities. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for substantial compensation.



Asbestos exposure is linked to several serious diseases, which include:




Mesothelioma: A rare and aggressive cancer that affects the lining of the lungs, abdomen, or heart.



Asbestosis: A chronic lung disease caused by inhaling asbestos fibers, leading to scarring of lung tissue.



Lung Cancer: In addition to mesothelioma, asbestos exposure can significantly increase the risk of developing lung cancer.




Understanding the connection between asbestos exposure and these diseases is crucial. If you or someone you know is affected, exploring your legal options for compensation could provide needed support during this challenging time.



Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is full of information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 





Keep in mind that we are happy to offer assistance to residents of all Connecticut cities, such as:



New Haven, Hartford, Stamford, Waterbury, Norwalk, Danbury, New Britain, Greenwich, Bristol, West Hartford, Meriden, Hamden, Fairfield, Manchester, Milford, West Haven, Stratford, East Hartford, Middletown, Enfield, Wallingford, Southington, Shelton, Groton, Norwich, Torrington, Trumbull, Glastonbury, Naugatuck, Vernon, Newington, Cheshire, Branford, Windsor, East Haven, New Milford, Newtown, Westport, South Windsor, New London, Wethersfield, Farmington, Mansfield, Ridgefield, North Haven, Simsbury, Windham, Guilford, Watertown, Bloomfield, Berlin, Darien, New Canaan, Southbury, Montville, Monroe, East Lyme, Rocky Hil,l Madison, Waterford, Ansonia, Bethel, Stonington, Killingly, Wilton, Avon, Plainville, Brookfield, Wolcott, Seymour, Colchester, Plainfield, Suffield, Ledyard, Tolland, Ellington, North Branford, New Fairfield, Orange, Cromwell, Clinton, Oxford, East Hampton, Windsor, Locks, Derby, Coventry, Plymouth, Stafford, Griswold, Granby, Somers, East Windsor, Winchester, Old Saybrook, Weston, Canton, Woodbury, Portland, Prospect, and more.




Connecticut Asbestos Facts








Connecticut ranks in the middle of states for asbestos-related deaths.



The state had 3,865 deaths from asbestos exposure between 1999 and 2017.



Among that total were 715 deaths from mesothelioma.



Hartford County has the highest number of asbestos-related deaths in the state.




Why is Asbestos Considered Dangerous to Human Health?



Asbestos poses a significant health risk due to its fibrous nature. When materials containing asbestos are disturbed, tiny fibers can be released into the air.



Once airborne, these microscopic fibers are easily inhaled or swallowed, where they can lodge in the tissues of vital organs such as the lungs, heart, and stomach. Over time, the body struggles to expel these durable fibers, leading to serious conditions.



Health Risks Associated with Asbestos Exposure:




Asbestosis: A chronic lung disease characterized by scarring of lung tissue, reducing elasticity and impairing breathing.



Mesothelioma: A rare and aggressive cancer that primarily affects the lining of the lungs (pleura) and, less commonly, the abdomen or heart.



Lung Cancer: Long-term exposure can significantly increase the risk of developing lung cancer, especially in smokers.



Other Cancers: Asbestos exposure is also linked to other types of cancer, such as those affecting the larynx and ovaries.




The latency period is notably long, with diseases manifesting decades after initial exposure. This delayed onset makes early detection difficult, complicating treatment and reducing survival rates.



Therefore, it's crucial to handle asbestos-containing materials with extreme care and follow safety protocols to minimize the risk of exposure.



Understanding Mesothelioma: Causes and Delayed Symptoms



What Causes Mesothelioma?



Mesothelioma is primarily triggered by exposure to asbestos, a naturally occurring mineral once commonly used in construction and manufacturing due to its heat resistance and durability. When asbestos fibers are inhaled or ingested, they can become trapped in the lining of the lungs, abdomen, or heart. Over time, these fibers may cause inflammation and genetic mutations, eventually leading to cancerous growths.



Why Do Symptoms Take so Long to Appear?



The latency period for mesothelioma can span anywhere from 20 to 50 years after initial exposure to asbestos. This extended timeline occurs because the disease progresses slowly. Asbestos fibers, once lodged in the body, gradually irritate tissues over many years before manifesting any noticeable signs. By the time symptoms appear, the disease is often at an advanced stage, complicating treatment options.



Recognizing the Symptoms



It's crucial to be aware of the potential symptoms, which can include:




Persistent cough or trouble breathing



Chest or abdominal pain



Unexplained weight loss



Fatigue




Key Takeaway



Early detection remains challenging due to the prolonged latency period. Awareness and regular health check-ups, especially for those with a history of asbestos exposure, are vital in managing mesothelioma risk.



Understanding the Different Types of Mesothelioma



Mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive cancer primarily linked to asbestos exposure. It affects the mesothelium, the protective lining that covers most of the body's internal organs. There are several types of mesothelioma, each categorized based on the location in the body where the cancer develops.



Major Types of Mesothelioma




Pleural Mesothelioma

Location: This type occurs in the pleura, the lining around the lungs.



Prevalence: It is the most common form, accounting for approximately 75% of all mesothelioma cases.



Symptoms: May include chest pain, shortness of breath, and persistent cough.





Peritoneal Mesothelioma

Location: Found in the peritoneum, the lining of the abdominal cavity.



Prevalence: Makes up about 10-20% of cases.



Symptoms: Often presents with abdominal pain, swelling, and weight loss.





Pericardial Mesothelioma

Location: Develops in the pericardium, the sac surrounding the heart.



Prevalence: Extremely rare, comprising roughly 1% of cases.



Symptoms: Can include heart palpitations, chest pain, and difficulty breathing.






Each type of mesothelioma affects the body differently, influencing symptoms, treatment approaches, and prognosis. Early detection and specialized care are crucial for managing the disease effectively.



Each year in the United States, more than 3,000 individuals receive a diagnosis of mesothelioma. Although the overall numbers have been decreasing, this figure highlights the ongoing presence of new cases annually. This data serves as a crucial reminder of the disease's prevalence and the importance of continued awareness and research.




How to File an Asbestos or Mesothelioma Claim in Connecticut



If you have mesothelioma, you were probably negligently exposed to asbestos. You can hold companies liable and claim compensation for medical expenses and other costs. You have several options for making a claim: 







File a Mesothelioma Personal Injury Lawsuit



Negligent asbestos exposure that causes an illness like mesothelioma is a personal injury. You can sue the companies responsible for your exposure, which likely occurred in the workplace. 



Most asbestos lawsuits end in a settlement. This occurs when the defendants agree to provide you with a certain amount of compensation as negotiated with your lawyer. 



Mesothelioma and asbestos settlements average around $1 million to $1.4 million. In rare cases, the suit will go to trial. If the plaintiff wins, the jury often awards a much larger amount of damages, sometimes in the tens of millions of dollars.



Make a Claim with an Asbestos Trust Fund



If the companies that exposed you to asbestos in Connecticut filed for bankruptcy, you cannot sue them. You can make a claim with the asbestos trust fund for compensation. These asbestos trusts currently contain around $30 billion in funds. 



File a Mesothelioma Wrongful Death Lawsuit



You can file a wrongful death lawsuit if you lost a loved one to negligent asbestos exposure. As with personal injury, it will most likely end in a settlement rather than going to trial. 



Claim VA Benefits



Veterans have high rates of mesothelioma because of the extensive use of asbestos in the military, especially on U.S. Navy ships. If you served in the military and have mesothelioma, you can claim benefits, including monthly compensation. 



How Can a Connecticut Mesothelioma Lawyer Help Me? 







Top Connecticut lawyers handling mesothelioma and asbestos cases are available to help you if you have received a mesothelioma diagnosis. They will first provide an initial consultation for free to evaluate your case and provide guidance. 



To arrange your free case review, call our dedicated team at 888-554-2030. We’ll connect you with one of our experienced mesothelioma attorneys to discuss your situation in detail.



Alternatively, you can reach out through our website to schedule a consultation at your convenience. Our experts are committed to guiding you through every step, ensuring you receive the support and compensation you deserve.



By taking these steps, you’ll have access to expert legal advice tailored to your unique circumstances, setting you on the path toward justice and peace of mind.



If they believe you have a case, a lawyer will investigate your work history and find out which companies can be held liable for your asbestos exposure. They will explain your options and help you take the next step. 



Experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Connecticut can determine how much compensation you are owed, file a lawsuit, and negotiate a fair settlement. 



Choose a local Connecticut lawyer with experience handling asbestos cases. They should be part of a large, nationwide firm because asbestos lawsuits are complicated and often reach across state borders.



When selecting a law firm for a mesothelioma lawsuit, experience is crucial. An experienced lawyer can navigate the complexities of asbestos litigation, ensuring that all possible avenues for compensation are pursued. These cases often involve intricate details and require a deep understanding of both state and federal laws.



Furthermore, experienced attorneys have a track record of securing significant settlements and verdicts. This history of success not only demonstrates their expertise but also provides you with confidence that they can effectively advocate for your rights. An accomplished lawyer will have the skills to identify liable parties and gather the necessary evidence to build a strong case.



Ultimately, working with a seasoned legal team increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome, providing you with both the justice and compensation you deserve.


Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Connecticut?


The residents and workers of Connecticut have been put at risk of exposure to asbestos through several sources. Most exposures occurred on the job, and the risk was higher in specific industries.



The Brass Industry



Waterbury, Connecticut, earned the nickname “Brass City” for its numerous brass products manufacturing factories. 



Most of Waterbury’s industries used asbestos in significant quantities, especially in the facilities where brass products were made, including:




American Brass Company



Mattatuck Manufacturing Company



Chase Brass and Copper Company



Olin Brass



General Insulation Distributor



Anaconda Metal Hose



Waterbury Clock (Timex)



Waterbury Brass Company



Scovill Manufacturing Company



Waterbury Buckle Company



Somers Thin Strip Brass (Wieland)



Waterbury Button Company




Other Industries That Used Asbestos in Connecticut



Throughout the latter half of the 19th Century and for much of the 20th, almost every industry in Connecticut had a connection to asbestos. These ranged from hats made in mechanized millineries to aircraft and submarine factories. For a period of time, nearly all used asbestos either in the manufacturing facilities or in their products.



Asbestos is a naturally occurring fibrous mineral known for its extraordinary heat resistance and durability. These properties made it an appealing choice for numerous industries. Its ability to withstand high temperatures and wear meant that it was commonly found in:




Insulation: Protecting buildings and machinery from heat damage.



Construction Materials: Reinforcing structures with its tough, long-lasting nature.



Automotive Parts: Used in brake linings and gaskets for its resilience under friction.



Shipbuilding Materials: Providing essential fireproofing in hazardous environments.




Despite its widespread use, asbestos is now recognized as a carcinogenic material, posing serious health risks. This awareness has led to a significant shift away from asbestos use, reflecting its complex legacy in industrial history.



Some of the cities with the highest levels of industry and, therefore, asbestos exposure are Hartford, Waterbury, and Danbury, known primarily for their hat-making factories.



Raymark Industries made asbestos automotive brakes in Stratford for nearly 100 years. Declared a Superfund site, the abandoned Stratford site has been in the cleanup process for 25 years. In late 2021, the state allocated $2.5 million to remove toxic materials from the water and soil. 



Shipping and Military Asbestos Use



Although Connecticut doesn’t have an Atlantic coastline, it has access to the open sea through Long Island Sound to its south. 



From colonial times to the present day, the state has been involved in building civilian and military ships and submarines.



Deep-sea fishing, ship repair, and other maritime enterprises form part of Connecticut’s economy. Additionally, the U.S. Navy and Coast Guard have two major facilities in the state. 



Asbestos insulation was used on almost every steam pipe or piece of machinery aboard ships built in the first half of the 1900s.



Groton is particularly notable in the maritime industry and is known as the World's Submarine Capital. In 1899, Isaac Rice founded the Electric Boat Company to construct John P. Holland’s first submarines for the U.S. Navy.



Electric Boat grew from a small Connecticut shipyard into General Dynamics’ Electric Boat Division. 



Navy officers and sailors trained at the nearby Submarine School in New London crewed the submarines built in Groton. New London is also the home of the Navy’s main submarine base.



Thousands of shipyard workers, engineers, sailors, and naval officers encountered asbestos in Groton and New London. 



People who built or operated submarines were especially at risk for asbestos exposure because of the cramped interior space and poor ventilation.



Other military installations and maritime workplaces in Connecticut that put workers and personnel at risk of asbestos exposure include:




U.S. Coast Guard Training Station



U.S. Coast Guard Academy



Groton Vocational Technical High School



Pfizer, Inc Research Laboratories



Ballard Oil



Groton Shipyard



Asbestos in Connecticut Buildings


Even non-industrial and civilian workers experienced asbestos exposure in Connecticut. This is because asbestos was used heavily in the construction of public and residential buildings. 







Some examples of buildings known to have contained asbestos include several in Waterbury:




St. Margaret’s School



Sacred Heart Rectory



Waterbury Button Shop



Waterbury Bank



Our Lady of Mount Carmel Catholic Church



St. Anne’s Catholic Church and School




Homes built before the mid-1980s may contain asbestos.


Is There a Deadline for Filing a Mesothelioma Lawsuit in Connecticut?


All states have a deadline for filing personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits. These apply to asbestos cases: 




As with most other states, Connecticut follows a strict statute of limitations for filing an asbestos-related lawsuit. A mesothelioma or asbestos lawsuit must be filed within three years of being diagnosed with an asbestos-related disease.



For wrongful death cases, the plaintiff must file within three years of the victim’s date of death.




What Laws in Connecticut Protect Against Asbestos Exposure?



The Connecticut Department of Public Health set forward regulations on how asbestos is handled within the state to protect people from the hazards of dangerous asbestos fibers:




Any schools built with asbestos-containing materials must go through routine inspections and maintenance at all times.



Anyone handling asbestos-related materials must be trained and certified by the state of Connecticut.



Buildings with friable asbestos can be deemed condemned and, in turn, must be either renovated or demolished by an asbestos professional.



Heating, air conditioning, and ventilation must be turned off prior to any asbestos abatement project in order to stop contamination. The area must be marked off clearly, with warning signs.



All tools used during asbestos abatement must be thoroughly cleaned, before and after, with HEPA-filtered vacuums and antibacterial cleaning wipes.



Once an asbestos project is complete, the asbestos technician must test the air thoroughly to ensure it's as clean as possible from asbestos. They then must make sure that the removed asbestos is disposed of properly.




For additional details regarding asbestos regulations in Connecticut, contact the Connecticut Department of Public Health at 860-509-8000.



Mesothelioma Treatment in Connecticut



Mesothelioma is a difficult cancer to treat because it is aggressive and often diagnosed in later stages. It's best to get excellent cancer treatment as soon as possible. There are two top-notch cancer centers in Connecticut: 



Yale Cancer Center



The Yale Cancer Center is recognized by the National Cancer Institute as a Comprehensive Cancer Center. It provides expert treatment and also conducts research. Patients here can access clinical trials. 



The staff includes specialists in medical oncology and thoracic surgery. These experts are equipped to treat pleural mesothelioma.



Hartford Healthcare Cancer Institute



Located at Hartford Hospital, the Hartford Healthcare Cancer Institute is one of the largest cancer treatment centers in the northeastern U.S. On staff are experts who can treat both pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma.



Understanding the Life Expectancy for Mesothelioma Patients



When discussing life expectancy for those diagnosed with mesothelioma, it’s essential to consider various influencing factors. Mesothelioma, a rare form of cancer typically linked to asbestos exposure, unfortunately has no definitive cure. However, the prognosis isn't entirely bleak.



For patients with peritoneal mesothelioma, the average life expectancy often extends beyond three years. This longer timeline is particularly true when the condition is detected early. Early diagnosis can significantly improve both the survival rate and longevity.



It’s important to highlight that the stage of cancer at diagnosis plays a pivotal role. Patients who receive an early diagnosis generally have better chances of prolonged survival. This is because treatments—such as surgery, chemotherapy, or a combination of therapies—are more effective when the cancer is detected at an earlier stage.



Here's a breakdown of important factors affecting life expectancy:




Type of Mesothelioma: Peritoneal mesothelioma typically has a longer life expectancy compared to other forms, such as pleural mesothelioma.



Stage at Diagnosis: Achieving an early diagnosis can lead to more treatment options and better outcomes.



Overall Health: The patient's overall health and age can impact how well they will respond to treatment.




Ultimately, while the outlook can vary widely, advancements in treatment continue to improve the life expectancy for mesothelioma patients. It's always advisable to consult with a healthcare provider for personalized information.



Mesothelioma is a devastating disease for both victims and their families due to its aggressive nature and the emotional turmoil it brings. This rare form of cancer primarily affects the lining of the lungs, abdomen, or heart, and is most commonly linked to asbestos exposure.



The Physical Toll




Late Diagnosis: One of the cruelest aspects of mesothelioma is that symptoms often appear decades after exposure, leading to late-stage diagnoses. This delay makes treatment options more limited and less effective.



Rapid Progression: Once diagnosed, the disease tends to progress quickly, leaving patients with a limited time to manage their health and explore treatment possibilities.




Emotional and Financial Strain




Emotional Impact: The suddenness of the diagnosis and the grim prognosis take a heavy emotional toll on families, as they are forced to come to terms with an uncertain future.



Financial Burden: The costs associated with medical care, potential loss of income, and legal actions to secure compensation add a significant financial strain to already stressed households.




Limited Treatment Options



While there are treatments available, such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, they often provide minimal relief and can come with severe side effects. Clinical trials and new therapies offer hope, but are not guaranteed solutions.



Coping with Uncertainty



Families face an ongoing challenge of balancing hope while preparing for the potential outcome. Support groups and counseling can aid in managing this emotional rollercoaster, but the journey is undeniably tough.



In summary, mesothelioma devastates families by combining a late, lethal diagnosis with emotional and financial hardships, leaving them grappling with limited treatment success and an uncertain future.



When my husband was diagnosed we had no idea what to do. Our doctor said we should reach out to an attorney to talk about compensation. After talking to several firms we found the mesothelioma lawyer center and were grateful we did. They helped with every step of the way. If you need a meso attorney then I would recommend contacting them-Isabelle D.



Getting Legal Help in Connecticut



Remember, if you’ve been a victim of mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, there is a good chance you may qualify for significant compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain, suffering, and more. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. For questions and assistance, feel free to contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### New York Mesothelioma Lawyer

If you were exposed to asbestos in the state, let an experienced New York mesothelioma lawyer help you get justice and compensation. New York has a long history of worker asbestos exposure and mesothelioma deaths. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. We invite you to complete our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in New York, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 



We help New York residents get the help and compensation they need, including residents of these and other cities:



Albany, Amsterdam, Auburn, Batavia, Beacon, Binghamton, Buffalo, Brookhaven, Islip, Kensington, Liberty Village, West Haverstraw, New Paltz Village, Hempstead, Oyster Bay, Rochester, Huntington, Ramapo, Amherst, Smithtown, Greece, Greenburgh, Cheektowaga, Clarkstown, Colony,  Canandaigua, New Rochelle, Towanda, Schenectady, Clay, Cohoes, South Hampton, Hamburg, Hempstead Village, Irondequoit, Orangetown, Rye, Perington, West Seneca, Mount Pleasant, Webster, Henrietta, Freeport, Cortlandt, Lancaster, Monroe, Valley Stream, Ossining, Clifton Park, Penfield, Corning, Courtland, Dunkirk, Elmira, Fulton, Geneva, Glen Cove, Glens Fall, Gloversville, Hornell, Hudson, Ithaca, Jamestown, Johnstown, Kingston, Lackawanna, Little Falls, Lockport, Long Beach, Mechanicville, Middletown, Mount Vernon, New Rochelle, Bronx, Queens, New York City, Kings, Richmond, Newburgh, Niagara Falls, North Tonawanda, Norwich, Ogdensburg, Olean, Oneida, Oneonta, Oswego, Peekskill, Plattsburgh, Port Jevis, Poughkeepsie, Rensselaer, Rochester, Rome, Rye, Salamanca, Saratoga Springs, Schenectady, Sherrill, Syracuse, Troy, Utica, Watertown, Watervliet, White Plains, Yorktown, Carmel, Salina, Long Beach, Riverhead, Yonkers, and more.




New York Asbestos Statistics








From 1979 to 1991, over 3,000 New York residents died from asbestos-related cancer. This estimate may be low because the United States government did not calculate all deaths until the 1990s.



In 1998, 235 people died from an asbestos illness in the state. By 1999, the death rate increased to 2,343. 



Queens has the most victims of asbestos illnesses, with over 300 deaths. Most of these deaths were from mesothelioma, while over 60 were from asbestosis. 



Nassau County reported over 250 asbestos-related deaths, followed by Suffolk County with over 244 deaths. 



According to the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), New York ranks 34th for deaths from mesothelioma between 1999 through 2005. 



New York is home to several specialty cancer treatments and research centers. These include the Albert Einstein Cancer Center,  Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York University, and the Mount Sinai School of Medicine. 




How Industrial History and Occupational Exposure Contribute to Asbestos-Related Diseases in New York



New York's industrial past is deeply interwoven with the history of asbestos use, leading to significant health repercussions for workers and their families. As the state evolved into a bustling hub of factories, textile mills, power plants, and shipyards, the demand for asbestos skyrocketed due to its exceptional heat-resistant properties.



The Impact of Shipyards



At the core of this issue were New York's shipyards. Here, asbestos was indispensable for preventing fires and shielding metal from seawater corrosion. Workers, especially those in shipbuilding, faced constant exposure as asbestos products were extensively employed throughout vessels. As a result, thousands who served or worked in these shipyards were at risk, inadvertently taking asbestos fibers home on clothing and skin.



Manufacturing and Processing



Similarly, the state's thriving manufacturing domain saw extensive asbestos integration. This mineral was added to a vast array of products to enhance durability and heat resistance. Such widespread use meant that workers across various manufacturing sectors routinely came into contact with hazardous asbestos fibers.



High-Risk Occupations



Several occupational roles stood at the forefront of asbestos exposure in New York. Key high-risk professions included:




Chemical and construction workers



Insulation and manufacturing plant workers



Oil refinery and power plant employees



Shipbuilders and those in textile mills




These sectors heavily depended on asbestos for its functional benefits, inadvertently putting those within at severe health risk.



Ripple Effects on Families



The danger didn’t stop at the workplace. Families of workers experienced secondhand exposure, with asbestos fibers hitching rides into homes on clothing or skin, further expanding the circle of those affected.



By tracing New York's industrial history, it's evident that the state's reliance on asbestos-rich industries has left a lasting legacy of health concerns. This widespread occupational exposure has been a significant driver behind the prevalence of asbestos-related diseases in the region.



How Asbestos Exposure Became a Significant Issue in New York



Asbestos exposure in New York became a major concern notably after the tragedy of 9/11. The collapse of the Twin Towers released an estimated 400 tons of asbestos-laden dust into the city, drawing widespread attention to the dangers of the mineral. However, the roots of the asbestos issue in New York run much deeper.



In the late 19th century, New York emerged as a hub for asbestos-related industries. It played a critical role in popularizing asbestos due to its fire-resistant properties. Companies in New York City began mass-producing construction materials and insulation containing asbestos, driving the demand for this so-called 'magic mineral.' This boom made asbestos a staple in construction, shipbuilding, and various other industries nationwide.



By the mid-20th century, the hazardous health effects of asbestos exposure became clear. Companies involved in its production faced countless lawsuits, leading to significant legal and financial repercussions. Notably, the late 1980s marked a turning point when the first asbestos settlement trusts were created in New York, aiming to compensate affected workers and their families.



The legacy of asbestos in New York is a reminder of the mineral's rise and fall, from miraculous solution to public health hazard. The realization of its risks has prompted ongoing efforts to address and remediate asbestos exposure, safeguarding current and future generations.



How to File a Mesothelioma Claim in New York






The first step in filing a mesothelioma claim is finding the right lawyer. They will review your case and determine which types of claims you qualify for:



Mesothelioma Personal Injury Lawsuit



Asbestos exposure is the leading cause of mesothelioma. Asbestos exposure most often occurs in the workplace and is negligent. This means that mesothelioma and other asbestos illnesses are personal injuries. The negligent companies can be held liable through a lawsuit. 



Most mesothelioma lawsuits end in a settlement. If your case goes to trial, you could get a jury verdict, but it will likely take a lot more time to resolve. 



Asbestos Trust Fund Claim



Asbestos companies that went bankrupt over lawsuits can no longer be sued. Instead, victims can file claims with asbestos trusts that these companies funded during the bankruptcy process. Your lawyer can find the asbestos trust funds you are eligible for. 



Mesothelioma Wrongful Death Lawsuit



If you lost a loved one to mesothelioma, you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit to recover damages. You can seek compensation for past medical expenses, funeral costs, and emotional pain and suffering. 



Veteran Benefits Claim



Mesothelioma rates are high in veterans. The military used asbestos heavily, especially the U.S. Navy. If you served and now have an asbestos illness, you could be eligible for benefits through the VA. These include healthcare and disability compensation. 


Working with a New York Mesothelioma Lawyer


Asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys will handle every step of the process of filing a claim or lawsuit. The process starts with a free consultation. A lawyer reviews your case and answers any questions. 



If they believe you have a case, the lawyer will then enlist a team of investigators and experts. A New York mesothelioma lawyer will determine which companies exposed you to asbestos using your work history. They gather evidence to prove your exposure and resulting illness and build a solid case.



They will put these resources to work to negotiate a fair settlement or ensure you get trust fund compensation. They will litigate your asbestos case in court and seek a jury award if necessary. 


What to Look for in a New York Mesothelioma Lawyer


Asbestos cases are complicated, but top-rated New York mesothelioma lawyers and law firms are available to help. Before you hire anyone, make sure the lawyer for your asbestos case meets these requirements: 




They offer a free initial consultation. 



They have proven experience and wins for asbestos clients. 



They work in New York and are part of a larger firm with jurisdiction in multiple states. 



They communicate regularly with their clients and come to you if necessary. 



They offer contingency payment, so you pay nothing until they win. 



They have experience settling cases and litigating in court. 




How Does Asbestos Compensation Help Families Affected by Mesothelioma in New York?



Asbestos compensation serves as a crucial lifeline for families grappling with the challenges of a mesothelioma diagnosis in New York. Here's how it makes a difference:




Covering Medical Expenses: Mesothelioma treatment can be incredibly expensive. Compensation often covers substantial medical costs, including surgeries, chemotherapy, and other vital treatments, easing the financial burden on families.



Supporting Lost Income: The illness can hinder an individual's ability to earn, either because they are too unwell to work or because a family member becomes a caregiver. Compensation can supplement this lost income, maintaining financial stability.



Managing Additional Expenses: Beyond the obvious medical bills, families face a range of other expenses, from travel costs for treatment to home adaptations. Asbestos settlements help alleviate these additional financial strains.




Types of Compensation Available




Settlements from Legal Claims: Many families receive significant settlements through legal action. Experienced attorneys have a record of winning substantial awards for their clients, providing essential financial relief.



Asbestos Trust Funds: Trust funds established by bankrupt asbestos companies offer another source of compensation. These funds provide crucial payouts to affected individuals without the need for lengthy court battles.




In essence, asbestos compensation in New York equips families with the financial resources they need to navigate this challenging journey, providing support and peace of mind.



Notable Asbestos Settlements and Verdicts in New York



New York has seen several significant asbestos-related settlements and verdicts, underscoring the severe health impacts of asbestos exposure. Here are some notable cases:




In 2023, a former construction worker received a $31.5 million settlement after developing lung cancer. The cancer was attributed to his prolonged exposure to asbestos-laden boiler parts during his extensive career.



The same year, a New York County Supreme Court jury awarded $28.5 million to a steamfitter who worked at the World Trade Center. This individual developed lung cancer due to asbestos exposure linked to his job.



Another major verdict in 2023 came when a New York jury ordered a company to pay $23 million to a mesothelioma patient. His illness was traced back to working with hazardous materials like asbestos-containing flange gaskets and valves.



Back in 2004, a combined sum of $22 million was granted to a former electrician from the Brooklyn Navy Yard and a seaman who served in both the Navy and Merchant Marines. This verdict was confirmed by the New York State Supreme Court.



Lastly, the New York Supreme Court upheld a $15 million award to the family of a construction worker who succumbed to mesothelioma in 2023. The case involved exposure to asbestos-infested joint compounds, reinforcing the ongoing risks faced by those in the construction industry.




These cases reflect the gravity of asbestos exposure and the legal repercussions for industries failing to protect workers.



What are the Advantages of Choosing a Nationwide Asbestos Law Firm?



Engaging a nationwide asbestos law firm offers numerous benefits for those dealing with mesothelioma or asbestos-related claims. Here’s why expanding your search beyond local options may be advantageous:




Broad Jurisdictional Reach: If your asbestos exposure happened outside of your home state, or the responsible company operates elsewhere, a nationwide firm can help navigate these complexities. They have experience with filing claims across multiple states, ensuring that your case is taken to the jurisdiction most favorable to you.



Diverse Case Experience: With a presence in nearly every state, nationwide firms bring significant experience in handling various types of asbestos cases. This versatility can be crucial, as it allows the firm to tailor their strategy to the unique aspects of your situation.



Strategic Case Management: Different states have varied statutes and regulations pertaining to asbestos litigation. A nationwide firm understands these nuances and can strategically choose where to file your claim. This tailored approach can potentially increase the likelihood of a favorable outcome.



Resource Availability: Larger firms often have more resources at their disposal, from expert medical testimonies to comprehensive investigative teams. This breadth of resources can enhance the quality and depth of your case presentation.



Increased Flexibility: Filing in your home state might not always be the ideal choice. A nationwide firm provides the flexibility to pursue your claim in the location that offers the best legal advantages, considering factors such as laws, previous case successes, and local jury perceptions.




In essence, working with a nationwide asbestos law firm offers strategic advantages that can significantly influence the success of your claim. By tapping into their broad jurisdictional expertise and resource availability, you can confidently navigate the complexities of asbestos litigation.


Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in New York?






Nearly 400 sites in New York have been known to contain asbestos. These include shipyards, manufacturing plants, breweries, school buildings, industrial and manufacturing plants, office buildings, and hospitals.



Shipyards and Docks




Brooklyn Naval Shipyard



Brooklyn Coastal Dry Dock



Bethlehem Steel Shipyard



New York Naval Shipyard



U.S. Naval Shipyard




Breweries




Schaefer Brewery




Buildings




Empire State Building



Thruway Authority Building



Bankers Trust Office Building



Pan Am Building



Bausch & Lomb Building




Plants




Chevrolet Axle Plant



Ford Motor Stamping Plant



Sewage Disposal Plant



Harrison Radiator Plant



Glen Clove Power Plant



General Electric Plant



ALCOA Aluminum Plant



Carborundum Plant



R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant



Yorktown Sewage Plant



Schenectady Chemical Plant



American Locomotive Plant



Delco Plant




Schools




Saugerties High School



Baldwinsville High School



New York City Technical College



Bennett High School



Gowanda School



Mercyhurst College



Millcreek School



State University of New York



West Side High School (Corning)



Cortland Senior High School



Cornell University



Ithaca College




Hospitals and Nursing Homes




Amsterdam City Hospital



Genesee County Nursing Home



Southside Hospital



Bassett Hospital



Cortland Memorial Hospital



Mohawk Valley Nursing Home



St. Lukes Hospital



Long Island Jewish Medical Center



St. Lawrence State Hospital



Oneida City Hospital



Mather Hospital



Creedmoor Psychiatric Center



New York State Department of Mental Hygiene



Rockland State Hospital



Moses Ludington Hospital




Additional Businesses




Republic Steel



Western Electric



Star Textile



Dunlop Tire & Rubber



Radio City Music Hall



Plancor



Torrington Industries



Subway (New York City)



Rockefeller Center



Rochester Products



Star Textile



Linde Air Products Company



New Hyde Park Supply



Triangle Sheet Metal Workers



Clark Estates



International Milk Products Company



Cortland County Jail Buildings



Cortland County Traction Company



Cortland Wagon Company



Ekenberg Company



Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation



Dewitt Community Church



Transelco Inc.



Continental Can Company



Long Island Light Company



Garden City Hotel



Our Lady of the Angels Seminary



Where Else Is There Asbestos in New York?


Workplaces are the primary sources of asbestos exposure, but not the only ones. New York is home to many older buildings containing mineral and naturally occurring deposits.



Pre-1970s Buildings



New York regulations in the 1970s placed strict rules on asbestos use. Newer buildings have little to no asbestos, but many older buildings may still have asbestos materials used in their construction. 



Nearly 100,000 teachers, plumbers, engineers, electricians, and plumbers could be exposed on the job. However, these aren't the only professions at risk. Various high-risk occupations are prevalent in New York, where workers might encounter asbestos more frequently.




Chemical plant workers: Often handling materials that may contain asbestos.



Construction workers: Regularly involved in renovation and demolition, activities known to disturb asbestos.



Insulation installers: Directly work with insulating materials historically made with asbestos.



Manufacturing plant workers: Exposed through machinery and building materials.



Metal workers: May come into contact with asbestos used in metal fabrication.



Oil refinery workers: Encounter asbestos used in fireproofing and heat-resistant materials.



Paper millers: Work in environments where asbestos was used for its heat resistance.



Power plant workers: Often exposed to asbestos insulation around turbines and pipes.



Rubber workers: Could handle equipment insulated with asbestos.



Shipbuilders: Historically used asbestos in shipbuilding for its fire-resistant properties.



Textile mill workers: Worked with machinery and in environments where asbestos was used to produce heat-resistant fabrics.




Understanding these risks can help in taking necessary precautions to protect workers in these industries.



Current laws protect workers in older buildings, like asbestos safety training and appropriate gear.



Additionally, workers who handle or investigate asbestos must be professionally certified.



'Asbestos Mountain' in Kingston, New York



In 2022, a notorious dumping ground known as Asbestos Mountain was finally removed from Kingston in Ulster County. It was formerly part of a tech campus and home to IBM for three decades. 



The site was left contaminated, especially with asbestos, which put local residents at risk of exposure. Government agencies finally implemented a plan that removed over 7,000 tons of asbestos. 



Naturally-Occurring Asbestos in New York



Buildings and workplaces cause the vast majority of asbestos exposure in New York. However, the state is home to natural deposits that can also cause exposure:




According to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Jefferson County had the highest amount of mesothelioma deaths before 1981.



Jefferson County contains naturally-occurring asbestos deposits.



When disturbed by construction, road building, or natural disasters, these deposits can contaminate soil, air, and water.



What Are New York's Asbestos Laws?


Asbestos laws in New York determine how mesothelioma lawsuits proceed. Safety regulations protect current workers and residents from exposure. 



The Role of New York City in Asbestos Lawsuit Filings in 2023



In 2023, New York City emerged as a pivotal player in the landscape of asbestos litigation in the United States. Ranking as the third most active jurisdiction for filing such lawsuits, the city handled approximately 7% of all asbestos claims nationwide.



This substantial volume of cases has positioned New York attorneys as some of the most seasoned professionals in the field. Their extensive experience is a result of the city's prominent status in these legal proceedings, making them highly adept at navigating the complexities of asbestos-related litigation.



Such a heavy caseload not only underscores New York's significance but also highlights the city's pivotal role in shaping the legal strategies and outcomes in this specialized area of law.



New York courts have developed specific procedural strategies to efficiently handle the substantial number of asbestos lawsuits they face. To streamline these cases, they implement a "first in, first out" process. This involves prioritizing claims from terminally ill individuals and setting them for expedited trials twice a year. This approach ensures that the most urgent cases receive attention swiftly.



In addition, the courts have designed case management orders to further manage these cases effectively. These orders allow for the clustering of similar lawsuits, which can include grouping multiple cases that originate from a single law firm. This grouping simplifies the trial and discovery phases, making the legal process more manageable and reducing delays. By organizing cases in this way, the courts aim to clear the backlog while ensuring fair and timely resolution for those affected.


Statute of Limitations






N.Y. Civ. Prac. Laws & Rules § 201 et seq. states that plaintiffs must file a mesothelioma or asbestos lawsuit within the statute of limitations.



The limit is three years from the time of diagnosis or two years from the time when an individual should have discovered it. This allows for the long delays people experience between asbestos exposure and diagnosis.



Plaintiffs in wrongful death cases must file lawsuits within two years of the victim’s death. Even though the statute for these lawsuits is strict, New York is known as a “pro-victim” state. Victims have already won millions of dollars in asbestos lawsuits.



Secondhand Asbestos Exposure and Take-Home Duty



Some mesothelioma patients were exposed to asbestos secondhand. This means that someone in the household worked around asbestos and inadvertently brought asbestos fibers home on their clothing. Many women who developed mesothelioma inhaled fibers on their husbands' work clothes when they did the washing. 



New York does not recognize take-home duty, the responsibility of a company to warn workers and their families about the risks of secondhand asbestos exposure. 



A woman with mesothelioma was exposed to asbestos on her husband's clothing. He worked at the Port Authority of New York. A court dismissed her lawsuit, claiming the asbestos companies involved had no duty to warn her of the dangers. 



Asbestos Safety Laws



The New York Department of Labor’s Asbestos Control Bureau enforces both state and federal asbestos laws:




Under Industrial Code Rule 56, anyone working on an asbestos abatement project must be licensed and certified.



New York’s Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) must be notified before a large asbestos project can begin.



The DEP can inspect any large asbestos projects at any time.



Once asbestos projects have been completed, they must be closed according to New York law, which includes the proper handling, removal, and disposal of asbestos.



Packages of asbestos being transported to a certified New York landfill must be clearly labeled.




For additional information regarding the New York asbestos laws, contact the New York Asbestos Control Bureau at 518-457-2735.


Getting Mesothelioma Treatment in New York


New York has thousands of mesothelioma cases, but it is also home to some of the best cancer treatment centers in the world: 




Albert Einstein Cancer Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York City



Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City



Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, Manhattan, New York City



Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, Manhattan, New York City




Great people. Helped my family through our meso diagnosis.- Donald H.


Getting Legal Help in New York


If you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, keep in mind that you may qualify for substantial financial compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. For questions and assistance, feel free to contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Kalamazoo Mesothelioma Lawyer

Many workers and residents were exposed to asbestos while working at job sites in Kalamazoo. If you received a diagnosis of an asbestos illness, like malignant mesothelioma, an experienced Kalamazoo mesothelioma lawyer could help you take legal action. 



If you or a loved one have been exposed to asbestos and suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible to receive substantial compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Kalamazoo, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 





Kalamazoo Asbestos Facts




Michigan experienced over 10,000 asbestos-related deaths from 1999 to 2017. 



A significant number of those deaths occurred in and around Kalamazoo. 



Kalamazoo earned the nickname "Paper City" for the number of paper mills, most of which used asbestos. 



Asbestos continues to be an issue today in older factories and schools, and other public buildings. 




When Do I Need a Kalamazoo Mesothelioma Lawyer? 



You need a Kalamazoo mesothelioma lawyer when you have a diagnosis of mesothelioma or another asbestos illness. Mesothelioma is caused by negligent asbestos exposure. You can hold asbestos companies accountable and liable for your expenses. 



Look for a top-rated Kalamazoo mesothelioma lawyer in a larger firm. They should have the experience and resources necessary to get you the compensation you need through one or more of the following: 




Mesothelioma personal injury lawsuit



Mesothelioma wrongful death lawsuit



Asbestos trust fund claim



VA benefits claim




Kalamazoo's Industrial History with Asbestos



The expansion of America’s railroad system into the Kalamazoo area began the city’s long association with heavy industries. 



When Kalamazoo gained a connection to the Michigan Central Railway, it partially contributed to an economic boom in the community.



New residents moved to the area to work in the numerous paper mills. These mills and their paper products earned Kalamazoo the nickname “Paper City.”



By the 20th Century, several new industries came to Kalamazoo, some of which still operate here:




Electricity and power generation



Windmill part manufacturing



Manufacturing of musical instruments



Beer brewing




How Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Kalamazoo? 



Many of the city's industries operated during peak asbestos use. Additionally, buildings constructed during this period used asbestos in many components, especially insulation. 



Several paper mills operated in Kalamazoo and used asbestos. The mills operated boilers and other equipment at high temperatures. Asbestos materials were used to insulate pipes, boilers, and other heating equipment. 



Even in the 21st Century, long after builders stopped using ACMs to construct new homes, the danger of asbestos exposure persisted. 



People who live in homes built in Kalamazoo between 1930 and 1980 risk developing mesothelioma and asbestosis, especially if they disturb asbestos deposits by removing old insulation or doing renovation work.



Ongoing Asbestos Issues in Kalamazoo



Most industries now use no asbestos, but the mineral lingers in some workplaces. The city, companies, and workers are still dealing with it today. 



One example is the Graphic Packaging International company. Hoping to expand its operations in Kalamazoo, Graphic Packaging faces a multi-million dollar renovation of a vacant industrial site. The project must tackle the problem of lingering asbestos in the area. 



Another problem area is the vacant Rock-Tenn paper mill in nearby Otsego. The Environmental Protection Agency is just beginning the site's cleanup process, which includes demolishing buildings and safely removing asbestos. 



Residential buildings also continue to pose a threat. In 2023, the city of Kalamazoo announced it would demolish three vacant homes and two garages full of asbestos. 



Kalamazoo Job Sites with Asbestos



Thousands of Kalamazoo residents were exposed to asbestos in places where they worked.  



Hospitals, Churches, and Schools




Borgess Hospital (Borgess Health)



Bronson Methodist Hospital



Kalamazoo Psychiatric Hospital



Central High School



Kalamazoo College



Nazareth College



Old Central High School (now known as the Community Education Center)



Western Michigan University



Kalamazoo Institute of Arts (KIA)




Paper Mills 




Allied Paper Mill



Brown Paper Company



Bryant Paper Mill



Georgia Pacific Paper Mill



International Paper Company



Kalamazoo Paper Mill



Monarch Papermill



St. Regis Paper Mill



Sutherland Paper Company




Additional Job Sites and Businesses




American Cyanamid



Bond Supply



C. R. Hough & Son



Harrow Spring Company



Industrial Firebrick Inc.



Kalamazoo Protection Products



Lapekas Stone Company



Michigan Bell Telephone



Ruud Manufacturing Company



Winkel Machine Co.



Durametallic




Cancer Treatment Near Kalamazoo



The University of Michigan Health System’s Comprehensive Cancer Center in Ann Arbor is one of only 41 cancer facilities with a “Comprehensive” designation awarded by the National Cancer Institute (NCI).



The Center focuses on providing a range of surgical, radiation, and pharmaceutical treatments to patients with all types of cancer, including small cell, non-small cell lung cancer, and malignant mesothelioma. 



University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center



1500 East Medical Center DriveAnn Arbor, MI 48109Phone: (800) 865-1125



Legal Help in Kalamazoo and Additional Information



As previously mentioned, if you’ve been exposed to asbestos and suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to compensatory damages. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you have questions or need assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### New Jersey Mesothelioma Lawyer

Contact an experienced New Jersey mesothelioma lawyer if you were harmed by asbestos. New Jersey asbestos law firms can help you fight for compensation. New Jersey has a history of heavy industry and numerous job sites that used asbestos and affected thousands of families. 



If you or a loved one have mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be eligible for a large amount of compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in New Jersey, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.




Understanding Asbestos Trust Funds



Asbestos trust funds were established by courts to ensure that victims of asbestos exposure receive compensation, even when companies try to evade liability through bankruptcy. These funds hold an estimated $30 billion to support mesothelioma patients and their families.



How They Work




No Court Required: Unlike traditional lawsuits, accessing these funds doesn't require you to go to court.



Multiple Claims: You can potentially file claims with multiple trust funds, maximizing your compensation without leaving home.




By integrating this comprehensive understanding of asbestos trust funds with the resources available in our Financial Compensation Packet, you are empowered to take informed steps toward securing the compensation you deserve.






We are pleased to offer assistance to asbestos victims and their families in all areas of New Jersey, including:



Newark, Jersey City, Paterson, Elizabeth, Edison, Woodbridge, Lakewood, Toms River, Hamilton Township, Clifton, Trenton, Camden, Brick, Cherry Hill, Passaic, Union City, Old Bridge, Middletown, Franklin Township, Bayonne, East Orange, Gloucester, North Bergen, Vineland, Piscataway, Union Township, New Brunswick, Jackson, Wayne, Irvington, Parsippany-Troy Hills, Hoboken, West New York, Perth, Amboy, Howell, Plainfield, Washington Township, East Brunswick, Bloomfield, West Orange, Evesham, Bridgewater, Sayreville, South Brunswick, Hackensack, Egg Harbor, Manchester, Mount Laurel, North Brunswick, Kearny, Berkeley, Linden, Monroe Township, Marlboro, Teaneck, Manalapan, Atlantic City, Winslow, Hillsborough, Montclair, Galloway, Monroe Township, Ewing, Belleville, Freehold Township, Fort Lee, Pennsauken, Lawrence Township, Fair Lawn, Willingboro, Garfield, Westfield, Deptford, Long Branch, City of Orange, Livingston, Voorhees, Upper Saddle River, Millville, Mount Olive, Nutley, Rahway, West Windsor, Pemberton Township, Neptune, Lacey, Englewood, East Windsor, Ocean Township, Bergenfield, Bernards, Stafford, Hamilton Township, Paramus, West Milford, Mahwah, Wall, Randolph, Ridgewood, Bridgeton, and more.




New Jersey Asbestos Facts








Between 1999 and 2017, 11,367 New Jersey residents died from a disease related to asbestos exposure.



This makes New Jersey the state with the sixth-highest number of asbestos deaths.



Nearly 8,200 of the deaths resulted from asbestos-related lung cancer, and over 2,000 were from mesothelioma.



Ocean County has had the most asbestos deaths in the state.



Industries that used asbestos began appearing in New Jersey during the late 1800s. Asbestos was used to protect against fire and heat.



The heaviest use of asbestos in the state was from the 1940s to the 1970s, when federal regulations limited most uses.




Asbestos and Mesothelioma


Mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive type of cancer caused by asbestos exposure. Approximately 3,000 people are diagnosed with mesothelioma every year. The damage caused by asbestos develops over many years, and most people get sick decades later. 



Most people with mesothelioma encountered asbestos at work. Many industries, including several that employed people in New Jersey, used asbestos for decades. Workers handled or worked near asbestos and inhaled the harmful fibers. 



Mesothelioma most often develops around the lungs and causes symptoms like chest pains, shortness of breath, and coughing. Peritoneal mesothelioma develops in the abdomen and causes pain, fatigue, swelling, and gastrointestinal symptoms.



Diagnosing mesothelioma presents significant challenges due to its symptoms’ resemblance to those of more common illnesses. This overlap can easily lead to misdiagnosis or delayed identification. Moreover, symptoms may not manifest until 20-50 years after initial asbestos exposure, making early detection difficult and complicating the potential for timely treatment.



Understanding both the specific symptoms and the broader diagnostic challenges is crucial for those at risk, as it underscores the importance of seeking specialized medical advice if exposure to asbestos is suspected.


How to File a Mesothelioma Claim in New Jersey






Because asbestos exposure is almost always negligent, you can take legal action to seek compensation if you have mesothelioma. A mesothelioma attorney in New Jersey can help you take one or more of the following actions:




File a mesothelioma personal injury lawsuit



Make a claim with an asbestos trust fund



File a mesothelioma wrongful death claim



Claim VA benefits




Your lawyer can help decide which type of asbestos claim to make. You could be eligible for one or more. They will then take all the steps necessary to ensure the best outcome and that you get the compensation you deserve.



Steps for Filing a Lawsuit




Initial Consultation: Start by contacting a mesothelioma attorney for a free case evaluation. They can determine the viability of your case and guide you on the best legal path.



Evidence Collection: Your attorney will gather crucial evidence, such as your work history, details of asbestos exposure, and medical diagnosis. This step is vital to build a strong case.



Filing the Claim: Once the evidence is collected, your attorney will file the legal claim on your behalf, targeting those responsible for your asbestos exposure.



Negotiation and Settlement: The majority of mesothelioma cases are resolved through settlements. Your attorney will negotiate to secure the best possible settlement without going to trial.



Trial Proceedings: If a settlement cannot be reached, your lawyer will represent you in court, presenting your case before a judge and jury to seek a favorable verdict.




Filing a mesothelioma claim can be a complex process, but with the right attorney by your side, you can navigate the legal system confidently.



Will an Asbestos Lawsuit Be Filed as a Class Action or Individually?



When considering an asbestos lawsuit, a crucial question is whether it will proceed as a class action or be filed individually.



Today, it's uncommon to see mesothelioma lawsuits pursued as class actions. The reason for this is straightforward: individual lawsuits generally yield more substantial compensation for victims and their families. Class actions, while beneficial for certain types of lawsuits, often distribute a settlement among many claimants, which can reduce the amount each person receives.



By filing individually, your case receives focused attention from your legal team. This approach ensures that your specific circumstances are carefully considered, increasing the likelihood of obtaining the maximum possible compensation. This compensation is vital in covering expenses such as cancer treatment, caregiving, and other related costs.



In summary, if you are pursuing an asbestos lawsuit, it's more advantageous to file individually rather than as part of a class action. This method not only prioritizes your unique case details but also aims to secure better financial outcomes for you and your loved ones.


Finding an Experienced Mesothelioma Lawyer in New Jersey


To take any legal steps to hold asbestos companies liable, you need an expert asbestos attorney. Look for a New Jersey lawyer with proven experience working with and winning for mesothelioma clients.



Choose a lawyer who is part of a large, national firm. A local lawyer can be a great help, but they need the backing of a big firm with extensive resources. Large asbestos firms use experts, investigators, and other resources to find evidence, prove your asbestos exposure, and build a strong case.



Working with a seasoned mesothelioma legal team offers several tangible benefits:




Product Identification: They can help identify the asbestos-containing products you were exposed to, which is crucial for building your case.



Holding Companies Accountable: These lawyers have the expertise to hold the responsible companies accountable for your illness, ensuring justice is served.



Securing Compensation: Pursuing life-changing compensation is a priority, helping you cover treatment costs and secure your family's financial future.




Importantly, over 99% of mesothelioma lawsuits result in settlements. This means that many clients may never have to step foot in court, reducing stress and allowing you to focus on what truly matters—your health and well-being.



What Are the Costs Associated with Hiring an Asbestos Attorney?



When considering legal representation for asbestos exposure, understanding the financial commitment is crucial. Many asbestos attorneys offer a client-friendly payment structure known as a contingency fee arrangement.



Key Points to Consider:




No Upfront Costs: Most asbestos lawyers do not require any initial payment, making it accessible for clients to secure legal representation without financial barriers.



Contingency Fee Basis: This arrangement implies that attorneys will only receive payment if they successfully secure compensation for the client. Typically, their fee is a predetermined percentage of the settlement or court award.



Risk-Free Consultation: Prospective clients often benefit from free initial consultations, allowing them to explore their legal options and the strength of their case without any obligation.




In summary, hiring an asbestos attorney often involves no immediate expenses, ensuring that pursuing justice doesn't come with financial strain upfront.


How Much Compensation Can I Get for a Mesothelioma Claim?
Compensation in mesothelioma claims and lawsuits varies depending on individual factors. These include your medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and the degree of liability of the defendants.
On average, mesothelioma settlements range from $1 million to $1.4 million, while verdicts can be significantly higher, typically between $5 million and $11.4 million. However, these values can fluctuate based on numerous factors, such as the severity of the illness and the duration of asbestos exposure.
An experienced attorney can find every expense this illness costs you to maximize your compensation. Some examples of New Jersey asbestos lawsuits illustrate the amount of compensation available to victims who have the right lawyer:

$90 Million for Johns Manville Workers. In 2014, families of eleven Johns Manville workers who died from mesothelioma received more than $90 million. Several companies that supplied Johns Manville with asbestos were held liable in the lawsuit.
$2.38 Million for Factory Worker. A New Jersey jury awarded Willis Edenfield’s family over $2 million after he died from mesothelioma in 2010. He worked in a factory with asbestos supplied by Union Carbide.
$10 Million for Boiler Worker. William Rhodes developed mesothelioma after working with boilers and handling asbestos insulation. A Middlesex County jury awarded Rhodes and his wife $10 million to be paid by Universal Engineering and other defendants.

These examples demonstrate that while average figures provide a baseline, individual case results can vary widely, underscoring the importance of skilled legal representation in achieving fair compensation.
Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in New Jersey?


One of the most important reasons to work with an experienced mesothelioma lawyer is to find out where you encountered asbestos. New Jersey has many industries and workplaces that used asbestos and exposed workers. These are just some examples.


Johns Manville






The first asbestos-related lawsuits in the country arose in New Jersey as early as the 1920s. One major employer, asbestos producer Johns Manville, suppressed medical data connecting asbestos to serious health conditions for 50 years.



When the (Environmental Protection Agency) EPA began reporting in the 1970s that a link existed, Johns Manville claimed no such data had been published before 1964.



However, Johns Manville possessed information regarding the dangers of asbestos as early as the 1930s while continuing the production of asbestos-containing materials.



The company had a large manufacturing plant in Manville, Somerset County. The plant is now closed, but workers were exposed to asbestos while it operated. 



Johns Manville declared Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 1982 after thousands of victims filed lawsuits against it in New Jersey and other states.



Vermiculite Processing



W.R. Grace operated a vermiculite mine in Libby, Montana, that supplied processing facilities with asbestos-contaminated materials for decades. Workers were exposed to asbestos in vermiculite facilities across the country that received shipments of Libby vermiculite. 



New Jersey plants received tons of shipments from the W.R. Grace mines. One of these, in Wayne, New Jersey, was eventually declared a Superfund site by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. It has since been remediated. 


Other New Jersey Businesses Associated with Asbestos


Along with Johns Manville, many other businesses have been associated with asbestos, including the following:



Plants




Campbell’s Soup Plant



General Motors Plant



Squibb Pharmaceutical Plant



Johnson & Johnson Plant



American Cyanamid Chemical Plant



OC Berlin Plant




Schools




Central Region High School (Bayville)



Berkeley Heights Elementary School



St. Catherine of Siena (Caldwell)



Cherry Hill High School



Clifton High School



Bergenfield High School



New Milford High School



Ridgewood High School (East Orange)



Rumson Elementary School (East Orange)



Lyndhurst High School



Plainfield High School



Rahway High School



NJ Training School ( Totowa)



Totowa Memorial School



Edinboro State Teachers College



Cooper Medical Center




Hospitals




New Jersey State Hospital (Ancora)



New Jersey State Hospital (Avenel)



All Souls Hospital



John F. Kennedy Hospital



Lakehurst Naval Hospital



Morristown Memorial Hospital



Nyack Hospital



Princeton Hospital



Somerset Hospital



Holy Name Hospital




Additional Businesses




Public Service Electric & Gas Co. Generating Station



U.S. Pipe & Foundry



Pennsylvania Reading Seashore Lines



Exxon (Linden)



American Standard Inc.



Arc Mercer, Inc.



Claridge Hotel



Atlantic City Electric Co.



Atlantic City Convention Hall



Haddon Hall Hotel



John Sykes Co.



California Oil



Owens Corning Fiberglass



Allied Chemical Corp.



Bakelite Co.



Union Carbide Building



Monsanto Chemical Co.



Hercules Powder Co.



Bell Telephone



Cadillac Dog Food



Camden Courthouse and Jail



American Stores Company



Charles S. Woods Company



Samuel Miller Center



Wecoline Products Company



Mitronics Hi-Temp



Bordentown Reformatory



United Gas Improvement Company



E.I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Company



New Jersey State Reformatory For Women



International Nickel Company



Forstmann and Huffman Company



Fritzsche Brothers Inc.



Federal Telephone & Radio Corporation



Stewart Hartshorn Company



Fuchs Lang Manufacturing Company



Hungerford Electric Manufacturing Company



Unimatic Manufacturing Company



Fucho and Lang Manufacturing Company



Bridgeton Condensed Milk Company



P.S. Sewaren Generating Station



Heyden Chemical Corporation



Hammerschlag Manufacturing Company



Koppers Coke



Theobald Animal Products Refinery




Shipyards




Federal Shipbuilding and Drydock



New York Shipbuilding



Naval Weapons Station Earle



Bethlehem Steel Shipyard



Todd Shipyard



Asbestos Laws in New Jersey


Asbestos laws vary by state and address both how lawsuits proceed and keeping residents and workers safe from ongoing exposure. 


Statute of Limitations on Mesothelioma and Asbestos Lawsuits







Although there is no set statute for asbestos lawsuits in New Jersey, plaintiffs must follow N.J. Stat. Ann. § 2a:14-1 et seq.; the personal injury law for the statute of limitations.



This mandates that the lawsuit must be filed within two years of discovering the asbestos-related disease or within two years from when it should have been reasonably discovered.



In the instance of a wrongful death lawsuit, the same statute applies. However, in New Jersey, the personal injury statute must not have expired before the date of the victim’s death.




Secondhand Asbestos Exposure and Take-Home Duty



Secondhand asbestos exposure occurs when a worker inadvertently brings asbestos fibers home, exposing members of the household. This typically happens when fibers stick to their clothing. Many women developed mesothelioma after laundering their husbands' contaminated work clothing. 



Through lawsuits, mesothelioma lawyers in New Jersey have argued for take-home duty. This refers to the responsibility of companies to warn workers and their families of the risks of secondhand exposure.



Thanks to the victims who sued, and their asbestos attorneys, New Jersey recognizes take-home duty in secondhand asbestos exposure cases. The precedent case involved a woman who died from mesothelioma after secondhand exposure from her husband, who worked at Exxon Mobil. 



Asbestos Safety Laws in New Jersey



The New Jersey Department of Health and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Affairs are responsible for implementing asbestos laws and regulations in the state.



For asbestos in public school buildings, the New Jersey Department of Community Affairs regulates asbestos and its remediation.




To do any sort of asbestos-related work in New Jersey, you must first obtain the proper training and certification.



Any school in New Jersey that was built using asbestos-containing materials must maintain an approved asbestos management plan.



Although homeowners in New Jersey can remove asbestos without approval or licensing, contacting a professional is highly recommended.



For any type of demolition, renovation, or asbestos-abatement work, you must be licensed to work around asbestos before starting the project.



Wastes containing more than 1% of asbestos must be encapsulated, labeled, and disposed of at an approved New Jersey waste management location.




For more specific information and in-depth details regarding asbestos rules and regulations in New Jersey, contact the New Jersey Department of Health’s Indoor Environments Program at 609-826-4950.


Mesothelioma Treatment in New Jersey


It's important to act fast when taking legal action for mesothelioma. It is even more important to get expert medical care as soon after a diagnosis as possible. 



In New Jersey and nearby New York City, mesothelioma patients have access to specialists at top cancer centers: 




Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey



The Tisch Cancer Institute at Mount Sinai



The Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center at Columbia University



The Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Medical Center




These world-class cancer treatment centers offer mesothelioma specialists, cutting-edge treatments, and access to clinical trials. 



Great people. Helped my family through our meso diagnosis.- Donald H.


Getting Mesothelioma Legal Help in New Jersey


Get our free Financial Compensation Packet for information on the top mesothelioma and asbestos lawyers in your area. For questions and assistance, feel free to contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Nevada Mesothelioma Lawyer

Victims of asbestos exposure in the state are fighting for justice and compensation with the help of experienced Nevada mesothelioma lawyers. Several industries in Nevada, including construction and mineral processing, were associated with asbestos at job sites. Exposure has led to thousands of asbestos illnesses and deaths. 



If you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, it's important to note that you may qualify for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Nevada, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.





We are happy to offer assistance in all states and cities in Nevada, including:



Las Vegas, Henderson, Reno, North Las Vegas, Paradise, Spring Valley, Sunrise, Manor, Enterprise, Sparks, Carson City, Whitney, Pahrump, Winchester, Summerlin, South Elko, Fernley, Sun Valley, Mesquite, Spanish, Springs, Boulder City, Spring Creek, Gardnerville, Ranchos, Dayton, Incline Village, Fallon, Cold Springs, Winnemucca, Laughlin, Moapa Valley, Johnson Lane, Indian Hills, Silver Springs, Gardnerville, Lemmon Valley, West Wendover, Ely, Washoe Valley, Hawthorne, Minden, Battle Mountain, Yerington, Tonopah, Nellis AFB, Carlin, Golden Valley, Kingsbury, Lovelock, Verdi, Bunkerville, Topaz, Ranch Estates, East Valley, McGill, Panaca, Mogul, Sandy Valley, Smith Valley, Jackpot, Wells, Stagecoach, Owyhee, Caliente, Ruhenstroth, Moapa Town, Grass Valley, Stateline, Beatty, Genoa, Pioche, Indian Springs, Wadsworth, Fish Springs, Round Hill Village, Ruth, Fallon Station, Alamo, Schurz, Virginia, Osino, Fort McDermitt, Eureka, Searchlight, Carter Springs, Goldfield, Nixon, Crescent Valley, Zephyr Cove, Blue Diamond, Sutcliffe, Mount Charleston, Paradise Valley, Lund, Walker Lake, Skyland, Golconda, Gerlach, Orovada, Glenbrook, Crystal Bay, Topaz Lake, Lakeridge Silver City, and more.




Nevada Asbestos Facts








Between 1999 and 2017, more than 1,700 people in Nevada died from causes related to asbestos exposure.



Of those deaths, 1,332 were from lung cancer, 333 from mesothelioma, and 125 from asbestosis.



Clark County, home to Las Vegas, has had the highest number of asbestos-related deaths.




Understanding Mesothelioma and Its Impact
Mesothelioma is an aggressive form of cancer that primarily affects the lining of the lungs, abdomen, or heart. It is predominantly caused by exposure to asbestos, a natural mineral once widely used in various industries due to its heat-resistant properties.
Who Is Affected by Mesothelioma?


Workers in Asbestos-Related Industries: Those employed in construction, shipbuilding, or manufacturing where asbestos was prevalent are at high risk. Asbestos fibers can be inhaled or ingested, leading to severe health issues over time.


Family Members: Individuals can indirectly be affected if they were exposed to asbestos fibers brought home on the clothing or gear of a family member working in an affected industry.


Consumers Using Asbestos Products: People who used products containing asbestos may also develop mesothelioma if they were unaware of or unprotected against the risks.


Legal Considerations
Many companies were aware of the dangers associated with asbestos but failed to adequately warn or protect individuals. As a result, those diagnosed with mesothelioma or their families might be entitled to seek compensation. This often involves legal claims against companies responsible for asbestos exposure.
Supporting Those Affected
Even if a loved one has passed away due to mesothelioma, their families might still pursue legal claims to hold negligent parties accountable and secure compensation for their loss.
How Do Nevada Mesothelioma Lawyers Help Clients?






If you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, you have legal rights and can seek compensation. A mesothelioma lawyer in the area will help you decide which step to take next and will handle every part of the process. They will give you the best possible chance of recovering damages. 



Some of the many benefits of working with an experienced, top Nevada mesothelioma lawyer include: 




A free initial consultation to discuss your case and options



Expert advice based on real experience with mesothelioma clients



A team of investigators and medical experts to prove your case



Negotiation expertise to get you the best settlement



Litigation experience, if your case goes to trial



Maximum compensation for all the expenses of living with mesothelioma



Contingency payment, so you pay nothing until they win




When you first meet with our mesothelioma attorneys, expect a comprehensive overview of your legal journey. Our team, dedicated solely to mesothelioma cases, is here to demystify the process and guide you every step of the way. Each client benefits from personalized attention, as our senior attorneys collaborate with small, focused teams, including legal staff and medical experts, ensuring that every aspect of your case is meticulously handled. This structure not only promises individual care but also leverages specialized skills to bolster your case.



Our commitment extends beyond just legal support. With registered nurses on staff, we offer medical insights that are crucial for building a robust case. From the outset, you'll experience a partnership aimed at achieving the best possible outcome for you and your family.



As you look for a lawyer to represent you, keep these benefits in mind. You need a true expert in mesothelioma and asbestos cases. They should be able to come to you wherever you live in Nevada, but they should be part of a large nationwide firm. 



How Does a Mesothelioma Law Firm Personalize Its Legal Services for Each Client?



Navigating a mesothelioma case can be daunting, but choosing the right law firm can make a significant difference in the process and outcome. A specialized mesothelioma law firm tailors its services in various ways to ensure each client receives focused and personalized attention.




Dedicated Legal Teams: Each client is supported by a dedicated team, usually comprising senior attorneys, experienced legal staff, and registered nurses. This team collaborates closely to develop an understanding of the unique aspects of your case, ensuring a tailored legal strategy.



Contingency Fee Structure: With a contingency fee approach, the firm aligns its interests with your success. You only pay if your case results in compensation, removing upfront financial barriers and underlining their commitment to achieving a favorable outcome for you.



Flexible Consultations: Understanding that convenience matters, reputable firms offer free consultations and are often willing to travel to meet you at your preferred location. This flexibility ensures you receive expert guidance without added stress or disruption to your routine.



Personal Communication: A cornerstone of personalized service is consistent and clear communication. Law firms often prioritize regular updates and are readily available to address any questions or concerns, helping to alleviate the anxiety often associated with legal proceedings.




Through these personalized services, mesothelioma law firms demonstrate their dedication to not just handling cases but actively supporting their clients every step of the way.


Filing a Mesothelioma Lawsuit in Nevada


A mesothelioma lawsuit is a legal action suing the companies responsible for your asbestos exposure and resulting illness. If you were negligently exposed to asbestos at a Nevada workplace, you have a right to take this step and seek compensation. 



The best way to file a mesothelioma or asbestos lawsuit is to find an experienced lawyer. They will file the suit and take all necessary steps to bring it to a successful conclusion. If you believe your occupational asbestos exposure is linked to a mesothelioma diagnosis, it is crucial to contact a mesothelioma attorney immediately for a free legal consultation. This step is vital to understanding your legal options and initiating the process.



Your attorney can also determine if you qualify for other types of claims, such as:




Wrongful death lawsuit



Asbestos trust fund claim



Veteran benefits claim




Taking prompt action by reaching out to a legal professional ensures that you receive the guidance needed to navigate the complexities of mesothelioma-related legal matters.


How Much Mesothelioma Compensation Can I Get in Nevada?


Compensation in mesothelioma claims varies significantly depending on the factors in your case: 




The severity of your illness



Past and current medical expenses



Future expected medical expenses



Home care costs



Travel costs for treatment



The degree of your pain and suffering



The defendants involved and their liability




Most mesothelioma lawsuits end in settlements, averaging $1 million to $1.4 million. Jury awards are often much higher but are not always worth the risk. A trial can take years to resolve and could result in no compensation.



To better understand the compensation secured by Nevada mesothelioma lawyers, consider these specific outcomes:




$3.61 million for a smelter worker in Mesquite



$5.47 million for a forklift operator in Las Vegas



$3.99 million for a mining laborer in Battle Mountain



$3.37 million for a construction worker in Las Vegas



$2.4 million for a Carson City boilermaker with pleural mesothelioma



$2.98 million for a Henderson power plant worker with pleural mesothelioma



$2.95 million for a U.S. Navy veteran and inspector in Carson City




These examples highlight the significant compensation amounts that have been secured for clients, reflective of each individual’s unique circumstances.



Results vary based on factors such as exposure, age, and diagnosis. While the averages provide a benchmark, the specific context of each case plays a crucial role in determining the outcome.


Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Nevada?






Many industries in the state used asbestos-containing materials in their job sites for things like insulation, fireproofing, and as a part of mineral processing:




Between 1948 and 1993, Nevada received 484 shipments of asbestos-contaminated vermiculite from the W.R. Grace mines in Libby, Montana.



According to the EWG, 37,213 tons of the toxic mineral entered the state.



Workers, their families, and even nearby residents were at risk for exposure to the contaminating fibers of asbestos.




Below are just a few examples of industries and workplaces in Nevada known to have used asbestos and exposed workers. 



Asbestos Use in Nevada's Construction Boom



Tourism is one of Nevada's most important industries. Its big resorts draw millions of people to the state each year. 



To accommodate a large number of tourists, Nevada relied on the construction industry to build the hotels, casinos, and other attractions that made the state famous.



Many of the older tourist attractions in Las Vegas, Lake Tahoe, and Reno were built between the late 1940s and the early 1970s. This was the peak period of asbestos use in the nation.



Construction workers, plumbers, and electricians who worked in tourism were exposed to asbestos-containing materials (ACMs). This increased their chances of developing asbestosis, lung cancer, and malignant mesothelioma.



Asbestos in the Power Industry



The power-generating industry was also a significant user of asbestos and ACMs. The industry prized asbestos for its fire-retardant properties and electrical and heat insulation.



Employees at these job sites worked in an environment where it was easy to inhale or even swallow the fine asbestos fibers. 



As a result, power plant workers in Nevada are a high-risk group for developing asbestosis and mesothelioma.



A former worker of Nevada Power in Las Vegas filed a lawsuit in 2005 after developing mesothelioma from working in the boiler room from 1957 to 1964. 



The plaintiff sued the power company’s manufacturer, D.B. Riley, and with the help of his mesothelioma lawyer, settled for $2 million.



Some of the plants in the state known to have used asbestos include:




Mohave Power Station, Laughlin



Desert Peak Power Plant, Reno



Harry Allen Power Station, Las Vegas



Clark Station, Las Vegas



Valmy Power House, Valmy



Beowawe Power Plant, Beowawe



Bradley Power Plant, Fernley



Timet Power Plant, Henderson



Nevada Power Company, Las Vegas



Reid Gardner Power Plant, Moapa



Sunrise Power Plant, Las Vegas



Desert Peak Power Plant, Reno



Dixie Valley Power Plant, Reno



Empire Farms Power Plant, Reno



Pinon Pine Power Plant, Reno



Steamboat Power Plant, Reno




Processing Contaminated Vermiculite in Nevada



Vermiculite processing plants exposed many workers to asbestos in the past. Many of these facilities received shipments of asbestos-contaminated vermiculite from the W.R. Grace mines in Libby, Montana. 



Nevada vermiculite processing plants that used contaminated minerals from Libby include: 




Flintkote



Pabco Gypsum/Johns Manville



U.S. Gypsum




These companies processed the vermiculite that went into drywall and other construction products. Both workers in these facilities and nearby residents were at risk of exposure to asbestos fibers. 


Other Job Sites Associated with Asbestos in Nevada


Chemical Companies




American Potash and Chemical Corporation, Henderson



Kerr McGee Chemical Company, Henderson



Montrose Chemical, Henderson



Stauffer Chemical Company, Henderson



Titanium Chemical Plant, Henderson



Stauffer Chemical Company, Las Vegas




Military and Government




Las Vegas County Courthouse, Las Vegas



Nellis Air Force Base, Las Vegas



Laughlin Air Force Base, Laughlin



Steed Air Force Base, Reno




Hotels and Casinos




Caesar’s Palace, Las Vegas



Desert Inn Hotel, Las Vegas



Hilton Hotel, Las Vegas



Hotel Showboat, Casino, and Lanes, Las Vegas



MGM Grand Hotel, Las Vegas



Stardust Hotel Casino, Las Vegas



Sun Coast Resort, Las Vegas



Tropicana Hotel, Las Vegas



Nugget Casino, Sparks



Asbestos Exposure Is Still a Risk in Nevada


While most harmful asbestos exposure occurred years ago, the risk is not past. Nevada residents and workers can still be exposed to asbestos from a couple of important sources: 



Naturally-Occurring Asbestos



Asbestos is a natural mineral that was once mined for its useful properties. Nevada has several natural deposits of asbestos that are potentially harmful to residents. 



The risk occurs when activity disturbs asbestos deposits. This could happen during road building or the development of new residential areas. As a state with ongoing growth, this is a real concern. 



Boulder City, outside of Las Vegas, is being developed rapidly with new roads and construction. The area has natural asbestos deposits. Experts have warned of the risks of asbestos exposure in this area of Nevada as it grows and workers disturb asbestos. 



Asbestos in Nevada's Older Buildings



Another source of ongoing asbestos exposure risk in Nevada is asbestos in older buildings. Residential, commercial, and public buildings constructed before the 1970s often contain asbestos. As the materials deteriorate or are disrupted by renovations, workers and residents are at risk of exposure. 



Some of those buildings include public schools. Existing asbestos materials in schools can release fibers and expose teachers, staff, and students. In Ely, Nevada, the school district is currently seeking $60 million from the state to renovate old buildings full of asbestos and with other health hazards. 



In 2022, an apartment manager in Las Vegas pleaded guilty to violating the Clean Air Act when he used untrained, unlicensed workers to renovate asbestos-containing units. He admitted to knowing about the asbestos and failing to protect workers and residents. 


Nevada's Asbestos Laws


Nevada laws protect against ongoing asbestos exposure and impact how lawsuits over past exposure proceed. 


Statute of Limitations for Asbestos-Related Cases in Nevada






If you want to file a mesothelioma lawsuit in Nevada, you must do so within the statute of limitations: 




Asbestos-related lawsuits in Nevada follow the same legal guidelines for personal injury lawsuits.



Plaintiffs must file their case within two years of the asbestos-related diagnosis or within two years in which the illness should have been discovered.



The plaintiffs filing a wrongful death lawsuit on behalf of a loved one must file within two years of the victim’s death.




Comparative Negligence



Nevada has a comparative negligence rule for personal injury cases, like asbestos lawsuits. The rule states that a plaintiff cannot recover any damages if they are found to be more than 50% to blame for their own injuries. 



Punitive Damages



Personal injury lawsuits award different types of damages to the plaintiff: economic, non-economic, and punitive. The first two are designed to compensate the victim for their costs. The latter is supposed to punish the defendants. 



Nevada limits punitive damages in asbestos cases. The cap is three times the amount of compensatory damages. 



Nevada's Asbestos Safety Regulations



The state of Nevada has asbestos laws and regulations in place. Along with state laws, Nevada also follows the federal OSHA guidelines and the EPA regulations for asbestos abatement.



Asbestos regulations in regard to the following are covered under Chapter 18, Occupational Health and Safety, under Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) and include:




Asbestos rules enforcement and penalties



Regulations on the control of asbestos



Application procedures for obtaining an asbestos license



Rules for the proper disposal of asbestos and asbestos-containing materials (ACMs)



Laws and regulations regarding the construction, renovation, and demolition of any public buildings containing asbestos



Applicable fees due prior to starting an asbestos abatement project



General safety and health regulations and guidelines while working around asbestos



State Environmental Commission regulations in regard to asbestos



Mandatory OSHA training rules and completion requirements



Transportation rules when transporting asbestos to the proper waste disposal site



Emergency asbestos laws and regulations




For more in-depth detailed information concerning all asbestos rules and regulations in Nevada, contact the Nevada Department of Business and Industry at 702-486-9020.



How Sharing Personal Mesothelioma Stories Influences Awareness and Legal Outcomes



Each individual living with mesothelioma or an asbestos-related ailment carries a unique narrative, offering insights that go beyond statistics and medical jargon. Sharing these personal stories can have a profound impact on both public awareness and legal outcomes.



Raising Awareness




Human Connection: Personal stories humanize the condition, transforming abstract facts into relatable experiences. They evoke empathy and understanding, bringing the realities of mesothelioma into a clearer, more tangible focus for wider audiences.



Educational Value: These narratives educate the public about the dangers of asbestos, a material still present in many older buildings and products. Awareness can drive advocacy for stricter regulations and better safety standards.



Empowerment and Support: By sharing their experiences, individuals empower others facing similar battles, creating a community of support and solidarity. This can inspire collective action toward funding research and promoting legislative change.




Impact on Legal Outcomes




Stronger Cases: Personal testimonies play a crucial role in legal proceedings. They provide compelling evidence that can highlight the negligence of companies and the impact of their actions on real lives, strengthening the victim's case.



Informed Advocacy: Engaging with personal stories can inform legal strategies and advocacy efforts. Lawyers can tailor their approach based on individual experiences, ensuring each case reflects the unique challenges and impacts faced by the claimant.



Driving Compensation: Highlighting the personal toll of mesothelioma aids in securing just compensation, helping victims and their families manage medical costs and secure their futures.




In summary, sharing mesothelioma stories is more than a therapeutic exercise—it’s a powerful tool for fostering awareness and achieving meaningful legal outcomes. These stories illuminate paths to justice and change, benefiting countless individuals affected by this devastating disease.


Getting Treatment in Nevada


When seeking treatment for asbestos-related diseases, it is important to turn to facilities that specialize in cancer. Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada (CCCN)in Summerlin provides excellent cancer care services for patients in the Las Vegas area.



CCCN was formed in 2000 when the Southwest Cancer Clinic merged with Nevada Radiation Oncology Centers. CCCN has nine treatment centers in the greater Las Vegas area, Pahrump, and Boulder City.



Great people. Helped my family through our meso diagnosis.- Donald H.


Legal Assistance for Nevada Asbestos Victims


Remember, if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Get our free Financial Compensation Packet for information on the top mesothelioma and asbestos lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Mississippi Mesothelioma Lawyer

Mississippi mesothelioma lawyers help asbestos victims and their families fight for justice. Mississippi's shipyards and industrial job sites exposed many workers and contributed to many asbestos-related deaths throughout the state. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in Mississippi, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 





Keep in mind that we assist asbestos victims and their families in every city and town in Mississippi, including:



Jackson, Raleigh, Gulfport, Southaven, Hattiesburg, Biloxi, Meridian, Tupelo, Olive Branch, Greenville, Horn, Lake Pearl, Clinton, Madison, Starkville, Ridgeland, Vicksburg, Columbus, Brandon, Pascagoula, Oxford, Laurel, Gautier, Ocean Springs, Clarksdale, Greenwood, Natchez, Long Beach, Hernando, Corinth, Moss Point, Canton, Grenada, McComb, Brookhave,n Cleveland, Byram, Yazoo, West Point Bay, St. Louis, Petal, Picayune, D'Iberville, Indianola, Diamondhead, Booneville, New Albany, Gulf Hills, Flowood, Senatobia, St. Martin, Holly Springs, Batesville, Philadelphia, Kosciusko, Latimer, Amory, Richland, Waveland, Louisville, West Hattiesburg, Columbia, Gulf Park Estates, Pontotoc, Vancleave, Forest, Aberdeen, Ripley, Pass Christian, Carthage, Saltillo, Waynesboro, Crystal Springs, Winona, Ellisville, Wiggins, Magee, Leland, Florence, University, Pearl River, Fulton, Hazlehurst, Beechwood, Escatawpa, Houston, Tutwiler, Nicholson, Morton, Newton, Water Valley, Baldwyn, New Hope, Mississippi State, Verona, Iuka, Lucedale, Ruleville, Poplarville, Macon, Okolona, and more.




Mississippi Asbestos Facts








Mississippi recorded 2,365 deaths related to asbestos between 1999 and 2017.



Of those deaths, 1,404 were from lung cancer, 632 from asbestosis, and 351 from mesothelioma.



The highest numbers of asbestos-related deaths in the state are in the counties along the Gulf of Mexico.





How Did I Get Mesothelioma? 



Mesothelioma is a rare cancer that most often affects the tissue lining the lungs (pleural mesothelioma). Sometimes it grows in the tissue in the abdomen (peritoneal mesothelioma). Symptoms of pleural mesothelioma include chest pains, coughing, and shortness of breath. Peritoneal mesothelioma causes abdominal pain, bloating, and gastrointestinal issues.



Diagnosing mesothelioma presents significant challenges due to the nature of its symptoms. These symptoms are often similar to those of more common illnesses, making it difficult for medical professionals to identify the disease early. Moreover, symptoms might not appear until 20-50 years after the initial exposure to asbestos, further complicating timely diagnosis.



If you were diagnosed with mesothelioma, you were probably negligently exposed to asbestos at work. When workers handle asbestos materials, they shed fibers that can then be inhaled or ingested. Inside the body, asbestos fibers cause damage. In some people, that damage leads to cancer decades later.



If you worked in an industry in Mississippi that used asbestos in the past, it is the most likely cause of your illness.



Understanding these challenges and symptoms can help in recognizing the need for comprehensive medical evaluations if you've been exposed to asbestos. Early detection remains crucial, despite the inherent difficulties.



How Does Secondhand Asbestos Exposure Occur?



Secondhand asbestos exposure happens when microscopic asbestos fibers are inadvertently carried away from their original source, creating a risk for those not directly involved with the material.



Key Pathways for Exposure:




Workplace Carriers: Individuals who work in environments with asbestos, such as construction sites or shipyards, may unknowingly bring the fibers home. These fibers can settle on clothing, shoes, or even in their hair, making their way to otherwise safe spaces.



Household Contamination: Once asbestos fibers hitch a ride to a residence, family members and roommates can encounter them through simple, everyday activities like doing laundry or cleaning.



Environmental Factors: Areas surrounding asbestos mines or demolition sites can have fibers dispersed into the air. These can travel significant distances, potentially affecting nearby communities.




The Risks Involved



Understanding that anyone in proximity to contaminated individuals or environments can be at risk is crucial. These fibers are durable and can persist in the environment, remaining a hidden danger. It's vital for employers and workers to take appropriate measures to prevent these fibers from leaving the workplace to safeguard their families and communities.



Am I Eligible to File a Mesothelioma Claim in Mississippi? 







Because mesothelioma is almost always caused by negligent workplace asbestos exposure, you are eligible to make a claim and seek compensation. You could be eligible for one or more of the following:




Mesothelioma personal injury lawsuit. One option is to file a personal injury lawsuit to recover damages. Several companies are likely responsible for your asbestos exposure, illness, and resulting expenses. A lawsuit can force them to pay damages through a settlement or jury award.



Mesothelioma wrongful death lawsuit. For the death of a loved one from mesothelioma, consider filing a wrongful death suit. You can recover damages for medical costs, funeral expenses, and more.



Asbestos trust fund claim. Many asbestos companies went bankrupt in the face of lawsuits and cannot be sued. They set up trust funds to compensate victims. You could be eligible to make a claim with one or more trust funds.



Veteran benefits. If you encountered asbestos during active military service, you are entitled to benefits. These include monthly disability compensation and specialist treatment at VA medical centers.




Steps to File a Mesothelioma Lawsuit in Mississippi



Once you determine your eligibility, the process of filing a mesothelioma lawsuit can begin. Here’s a step-by-step guide to help you navigate this journey:




Initial Contact: Reach out to a qualified mesothelioma attorney for a free case evaluation. This step is crucial to understand your legal standing and the potential avenues for compensation.



Evidence Collection: If your case is viable, your legal team will gather comprehensive evidence. This includes your work history, details of asbestos exposure, and medical diagnosis.



Filing the Claim: Your attorney will file a legal claim on your behalf against the parties responsible for your asbestos exposure.



Settlement Negotiation: Most mesothelioma cases are resolved through settlements. Skilled attorneys will negotiate on your behalf to secure the compensation you deserve.



Court Proceedings: If a fair settlement cannot be reached, your case may proceed to court. Your legal team will represent you and fight for a favorable verdict.




This structured approach ensures that you can focus on your health and family while professionals handle the complexities of the legal process.



Will a Mesothelioma Lawsuit Be Filed as a Class Action?



In most cases today, mesothelioma lawsuits are not filed as class actions. Instead, these lawsuits are typically pursued on an individual basis. This approach ensures that your case receives dedicated attention, maximizing the potential compensation for medical costs and other related expenses.



Why Individual Lawsuits Are Preferred:




Tailored Legal Strategy: An individual lawsuit allows your attorney to create a strategy specifically for your circumstances. This personal focus can lead to better outcomes compared to the one-size-fits-all nature of class actions.



Potential for Higher Compensation: Individual cases often result in higher compensation, as they can be more precisely aligned with the specific damages and suffering you've experienced.



Case Specificity: Your unique medical history and asbestos exposure details can be highlighted, offering a more comprehensive understanding of your situation to the court.




In summary, while class action lawsuits were once common, the shift towards individual filings reflects a strategic effort to optimize legal outcomes for mesothelioma patients and their families. This personalized approach ensures that every aspect of your case is thoroughly addressed.



How Much Compensation Can I Get for a Mesothelioma Claim?



The value of a mesothelioma claim varies depending on individual factors. Your expert mesothelioma lawyer is best positioned to estimate a value and to maximize the compensation you seek based on several factors: 




Past medical expenses



Ongoing medical costs



Future expected medical costs



Lost wages



The severity of the illness



The companies involved and their degrees of negligence



Pain and suffering




Understanding Mesothelioma Settlements and Verdicts



When discussing the financial outcomes of mesothelioma lawsuits, two primary figures come into play: settlements and verdicts.




Settlement Amounts: For mesothelioma cases, settlements typically fall within the range of $1 million to $1.4 million. This represents the amount agreed upon outside of court to compensate those affected by this asbestos-related cancer.



Verdict Amounts: Should the case proceed to a court verdict, the average compensation can be substantially higher, often ranging from $5 million to $11.4 million. These figures reflect the potential awards determined by a jury.




Understanding these figures can provide a clearer picture for those considering legal action, enabling them to make informed decisions based on realistic financial expectations.



How Can a Mississippi Mesothelioma Lawyer Help Me? 



If you have mesothelioma, contact an asbestos lawyer in Mississippi as soon as possible. There are time limits on filing a lawsuit or making a claim, so don’t hesitate to reach out and get a consultation. A Mississippi mesothelioma lawyer can help you in several ways:




Provide a free initial consultation to review your case and answer questions



Explain legal options for filing a lawsuit or making a claim



Expert advice on which options to choose



File the lawsuit or make the claim for you



Provide investigators and medical experts to prove your case



Find all the compensation you are owed to maximize damages



Negotiate with defendants for a fair settlement



Litigate in court for a jury award if necessary



Provide contingency payment, so you pay nothing until they win




Understanding the Legal Process



Once you decide to move forward, your lawyer can guide you through the legal process with clarity and precision. Here’s what you can expect:




Initial Contact: Reach out via phone or fill out a contact form for a free case review to kickstart the process.



Case Evaluation: If you have a viable case, the lawyer will gather crucial evidence including your work history, asbestos exposure details, and medical diagnosis.



Filing the Claim: The attorney will file a legal claim on your behalf against those responsible for your asbestos exposure, ensuring all legal protocols are followed.



Negotiation: With over 99% of cases resolving in settlements, your attorney will negotiate to secure the compensation you deserve without the stress of a trial.



Trial Preparation: If an agreement isn’t reached, your legal team is prepared to advocate for you in court, presenting your case before a judge and jury to seek a favorable verdict.




By understanding each step, you can proceed with confidence, knowing your lawyer is handling the complexities of the legal system while you focus on your health and well-being.



Look for a top-rated Mississippi mesothelioma lawyer who works with a large, nationwide firm. You need a large firm and the experience of asbestos attorneys to take your case to a successful conclusion. They should be local and convenient to you but also able to file cases in other states, which is often necessary for asbestos lawsuits.



When choosing a law firm for mesothelioma cases, consider the following key factors:




Proven Track Record: Opt for a firm that has successfully recovered substantial compensation for mesothelioma clients. A strong history of winning cases is a testament to their expertise and effectiveness.



Extensive Experience: Select a firm with decades of experience in handling asbestos-related cases. This experience ensures they are adept at navigating the complexities of mesothelioma litigation.



Dedicated Legal Team: Ensure the firm has a comprehensive team of professionals, including seasoned attorneys, paralegals, and medical experts, who will all work collaboratively on your case to maximize your chances of success.



Client Accessibility: The best firms offer flexibility and convenience, traveling to meet clients at their location or offering virtual consultations, all at no extra cost. This commitment underscores their dedication to prioritizing client needs.




By focusing on these factors, you'll be better equipped to choose a law firm that aligns with your needs and can effectively handle your mesothelioma case, ensuring the best possible outcome.



Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Mississippi? 



One of the most important reasons to work with a large, experienced asbestos firm is that they can track down the source of your asbestos exposure. You might not know where you were exposed, but the right lawyers and experts have the resources available to find every company that caused you harm. 



Most industrial workplaces used asbestos in the past. In Mississippi, these include shipyards and shipbuilding companies, as well as the oil industry. 



Mississippi has long been a cotton-growing state, but its industrial base diversified in the 20th and 21st Centuries to a mix of agriculture and industrial workplaces. 



The largely rural population of the state limited asbestos exposure as those of more industrialized states in the Union. Still, it ranks in the middle of all 50 states in asbestos-related illnesses and deaths because of shipbuilding and oil production along the Gulf Coast.




Gulfport is one of the epicenters of Mississippi’s asbestos problem. It is home to several major shipyards, including the Trinity Marine Group yard that builds yachts and other watercraft. This facility covers 38 acres of Gulfport’s waterfront and includes a manufacturing area that encompasses 200,000 square feet.



Though Trinity was founded in the 1990s, a decade after most shipyards stopped using asbestos on newly constructed vessels, the yard had already been operating under the banner of the Halter Marine Group. Halter’s pre-1970s shipbuilding processes used large amounts of asbestos. Most Trinity Yacht workers were exposed to asbestos fibers while building or repairing vessels.



Pascagoula is another major center for shipbuilding on Mississippi’s Gulf Coast. The city is home to Ingalls Shipbuilding, the largest source of jobs in the state. This shipyard covers 800 acres of Pascagoula and is a major source of ships for the U.S. Navy. Ingalls Shipbuilding and its predecessors in Pascagoula began operating at the peak era of asbestos use in the shipbuilding industry (the 1930s to early 1970s).




Job Sites Associated with Asbestos Use in Mississippi







Power Companies




Mississippi Power and Light, Hattiesburg



Hercules Power Plant, Hattiesburg



Mississippi Power and Light, Greenville



Mississippi Power and Light, Jackson



Mississippi Power and Light, Vicksburg



Vicksburg Power Plant, Vicksburg



Watson Power Plant, Gulfport



Wilson Power Plant, Vicksburg



Mississippi Power and Light, Tupelo



Philips Day-Brite, Tupelo




Shipyards




Ingalls Shipbuilding, Pascagoula



Lighten Shipyard, Pascagoula



Chicago Bridge and Iron Shipyard, Pascagoula




Paper Companies




Georgia Pacific Pulp and Paper, Monticello



St. Regis Paper Company, Monticello




Hospitals and Schools




Denman Junior High School: Mccomb



University of Mississippi, Oxford



Coahoma County Hospital, Clarksville



Columbia Training School, Columbia




Other Businesses




V.A. Medical Center, Jackson



Greenville Mills, Greenville



Armstrong Cork Company, Jackson



Transco Compression Station, Hattiesburg



Mississippi Gulf Refining Company, Purvis



Black Creek Refinery, Purvis



Kaiser Aluminum, Purvis




Ongoing Risks of Asbestos Exposure in Mississippi



Asbestos is rarely used in any industry today, but the risk of exposure remains. The construction industry used asbestos in many components for decades. Older buildings throughout Mississippi still contain these outdated materials and put residents and workers at risk of exposure. 



One issue is exposure to asbestos after natural disasters. Mississippi is vulnerable to tornadoes and hurricanes, which destroy buildings. When older buildings are ruined in storms, they can spread asbestos. 



Most recently, in 2023, residents in Rolling Fork were warned of the dangers of asbestos and moldy debris after March tornadoes devastated many buildings. 



Sometimes, human activity releases asbestos from older buildings, harming residents. In 2017, whistleblowers notified authorities of asbestos concerns at a demolition site in the Fonden neighborhood in Jackson. 



Developers had not complied fully with asbestos regulations and claimed none was on the site. This proved to be false. Their demolition work put area residents at risk of exposure. 



Johnson & Johnson Asbestos Lawsuit in Mississippi



Johnson & Johnson has recently faced thousands of lawsuits over mesothelioma and ovarian cancer caused by asbestos in its talcum powder products. Evidence from these lawsuits has proven that the company knew about the contaminating asbestos in talc but failed to warn or protect consumers. 



Mississippi began a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson on behalf of residents in the state. The attorney general started the lawsuit to recover damages for Mississippi victims, to punish the company, and to prevent future harm. 



Johnson & Johnson used a controversial bankruptcy strategy to try to unload its liabilities in talcum powder cases. As a result, individual lawsuits and those brought by states like Mississippi have been put on hold. 



Mississippi Asbestos Laws



State laws affect how asbestos cases proceed. They also include regulations designed to protect residents from asbestos that persists in Mississippi buildings and abandoned industrial sites. 



Statute of Limitations for Asbestos Lawsuits in Mississippi







To file an asbestos-related lawsuit in Mississippi, plaintiffs must file within the state’s statutes of limitations which mandates that the case must be filed within three years from an official diagnosis and within three years from the time of death for a wrongful death lawsuit.



Punitive Damages



Damages in personal injury cases can be divided into three types: economic, non-economic, and punitive. The first two compensate victims. Punitive damages are intended to punish the defendants. 



Many states limit punitive damages in asbestos cases. Mississippi does not restrict or cap punitive damages, which makes it a more favorable state for filing asbestos lawsuits. Without this restriction, you can potentially recover more monetary damages in Mississippi. 



Asbestos Safety Regulations



The Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) is responsible for the implementation and enforcement of asbestos abatement laws in the state.




Demolition and renovation activities in the state of Mississippi require prior approval as well as prior written notice under Section 8 of APC-S-1.



Demolitions and renovations involving residential homes with less than four dwelling units are exempt from approval and written notification.



A certified MDEQ inspector must inspect any structure prior to demolition and/or renovation for asbestos.



NESHAP law 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M, must be adhered to at all times before, during, and after an asbestos abatement project.



Schools must follow the asbestos procedures defined by the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA), which the EPA sets forth.



An approved landfill must be used at all times for the disposal of asbestos. Asbestos must also be encapsulated and clearly labeled.




For more information on state-specific asbestos laws in Mississippi, contact the MDEQ at 601-961-5769. For details on school procedures, visit the official EPA school buildings website.



Treatment for Mississippi Asbestos Victims



Mesothelioma is a rare and life-threatening disease. It is important for anyone diagnosed with an asbestos-related disease like this to seek medical help from qualified physicians and clinics that specialize in these types of illnesses.



There are no medical facilities in Mississippi backed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI). 



However, Oxford’s Baptist Centers for Cancer Care is a cutting-edge medical facility that focuses on all forms of cancer. BCCC has won several awards, including the Gold Certification Seal Standard by the Mississippi cancer registry.



Located in nearby Nashville, Tennessee, the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center is an NCI-designated medical facility that offers patients various treatment and rehabilitation options. 



The University of Alabama Kirklin Clinic was also explicitly made for mesothelioma patients.



How Do Registered Nurses Assist with a Mesothelioma Diagnosis and Treatment?



When facing a mesothelioma diagnosis, the expertise of registered nurses can be invaluable in several ways:



Understanding the Diagnosis




Explaining Medical Terms: Nurses simplify complex medical jargon, ensuring you clearly understand your diagnosis and what it entails.



Clarifying Tests and Results: They guide you through your test results, helping you comprehend what each number and data point means for your condition.




Exploring Treatment Options




Discussing Treatment Plans: Registered nurses review and explain the various treatment options available, such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, tailoring explanations to suit your specific situation.



Coordinating with Doctors: Acting as a liaison, they facilitate communication between you and your healthcare providers, ensuring all your concerns and questions are addressed.




Providing Emotional Support




Offering Counsel: Nurses provide a compassionate ear, offering emotional support and reassurance during a challenging time.



Connecting to Resources: They can connect you to support groups, counseling services, and other resources that can help you navigate this journey.




Managing Day-to-Day Care




Monitoring Symptoms: By keeping track of symptoms and side effects, nurses can help adjust treatment plans as necessary to improve quality of life.



Educating on Self-Care: They provide education on daily care routines that can help manage symptoms and enhance well-being.




In essence, registered nurses serve as guides and advocates in your mesothelioma journey, ensuring you are informed, supported, and cared for throughout your treatment.



This firm was extremely professional and responsive. If you have any meso questions, I’d highly recommend them- Michael L.



Legal Help in Mississippi



As previously mentioned, if you’ve been exposed to asbestos and suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to compensatory damages. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on experienced asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Massachusetts Mesothelioma Lawyer

Victims of mesothelioma have the right to retain a Massachusetts mesothelioma lawyer who can help them fight for compensation and justice. The prolonged use of asbestos in many important industries in Massachusetts has left people with life-threatening diseases.



If you've been a victim of mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to substantial compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Massachusetts, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.





We offer help to all cities and towns in Massachusetts, including:



Boston, Worcester, Springfield, Lowell, Cambridge, New Bedford, Brockton, Quincy, Lynn, Fall River, Newton, Somerville, Lawrence, Framingham, Waltham, Haverhill, Malden, Brookline, Plymouth, Medford, Taunton, Chicopee, Weymouth Town, Revere, Peabody, Methuen Town, Barnstable Town, Pittsfield, Attleboro, Arlington, Everett, Salem, Billerica, Westfield Leominster, Beverly, Fitchburg, Holyoke, Marlborough, Woburn, Amherst, Chelsea, Braintree, Shrewsbury, Chelmsford, Dartmouth, Andover, Natick, Randolph, Watertow, Franklin, Lexington, Falmouth, Dracut, Tewksbury, Needham, Gloucester, North Andover, Wellesley, Norwood, North Attleborough, Agawam, West Springfield, Northampton, Milford, Stoughton, Melrose, Saugus, Danvers, Milton, Bridgewater, Wakefield, Marshfield, Burlington, Belmont, Reading, Dedham, Walpole, Yarmouth, Easton Middleborough, Mansfield, Wilmington, Westford, Acton, Hingham, Wareham, Canton, Winchester, Stoneham, Ludlow, Sandwich Gardner, Marblehead, Bourne, Hudson, Norton, Concord, Westborough, Somerset, and more.




Asbestos-Related Death Statistics in Massachusetts








The state of Massachusetts recorded 8,103 deaths related to asbestos between 1999 and 2017.



Of those deaths, 1,505 were caused by mesothelioma, and over 619 were related to asbestosis.



Middlesex County had the greatest number of deaths in the state related to asbestos exposure during that time period.




About Asbestos and Mesothelioma - How Did I Get Sick?


Asbestos is a natural material and a human carcinogen. Exposure in people can lead to mesothelioma, lung cancer, or the non-malignant interstitial lung disease called asbestosis.



Most asbestos exposure occurs in the workplace. When handled or when it deteriorates, asbestos sheds tiny fibers into the air. Any workers in the area can inhale those fibers. Asbestos fibers cause damage in the body, which in some people leads to illness many years later.



While lung cancer can have many causes, mesothelioma is rare, almost always triggered by asbestos exposure.



Over 3,000 household and industrial products were known to contain asbestos. These include everyday items like roofing shingles, talcum powder, and automobile brakes, as well as industrial materials such as insulation and boilers. The mineral's durability and resistance to heat and electricity made it a favorite across multiple industries, including manufacturing, steel working, and shipbuilding.



More than 1 million U.S. Workers were exposed to asbestos during the 20th century, facing serious health risks that linger today. This is particularly relevant in states like Massachusetts, where industries from construction to shipbuilding used asbestos extensively, putting countless workers at risk.



Most people encountered asbestos on the job. Massachusetts has many industries, from construction to shipbuilding, that used asbestos and exposed workers over many years.



Inhaling or ingesting asbestos fibers can cause mesothelioma to develop 10-50 years after initial exposure, underscoring the long-term dangers associated with this pervasive mineral.




Why Should I Work with a Massachusetts Mesothelioma Lawyer? 








Because mesothelioma is so closely tied to asbestos, the leading cause is known to be workplace exposure. Asbestos exposure on the job is negligence. Employers and asbestos companies had a duty to warn and protect workers. 



Decades later, Massachusetts workers have gotten sick from asbestos exposure. If you have a diagnosis of mesothelioma, you can hold companies accountable and seek compensation through lawsuits and claims. 



"You must work with an experienced Massachusetts mesothelioma lawyer to take this step. They have years of experience working on asbestos cases, proven wins for similar clients, and the extensive resources necessary to build a case with strong evidence."



These legal experts don't just win cases; they transform lives. Consider the story of a family who found solace in knowing their children's futures were financially secure, thanks to a successful legal outcome. Another client shared how the compassionate approach of their lawyer made them feel like more than just another case number, but rather like valued friends.



For many, the process is daunting, but with the right lawyer, clients often find a sense of peace and justice. One individual noted how their loved one was uplifted by the victory, restoring their faith in the legal system.



By blending a wealth of experience with genuine empathy, these lawyers not only deliver results but also offer much-needed support during challenging times.



What Are the Costs Associated with Hiring a Massachusetts Mesothelioma Attorney?



Hiring a mesothelioma attorney in Massachusetts typically involves no upfront costs, meaning you won't need to worry about any initial financial burden. This is an important aspect for many clients who are already dealing with medical expenses.



Contingency Fee Arrangement



Most Massachusetts mesothelioma attorneys operate on a contingency fee basis. This means you pay nothing unless your attorney successfully recovers compensation for you. If your case results in a settlement or favorable verdict, the attorney will take an agreed percentage of the compensation as their fee.



Free Initial Consultation



The majority of these attorneys also offer a free initial consultation. This meeting allows you to discuss your situation without any financial commitment. It's a chance to determine if the attorney is a good fit for you, and for them to assess the merits of your case.



Key Takeaways




No Initial Fees: Start your legal journey without out-of-pocket costs.



Pay Only if You Win: Attorney fees are contingent on successful recovery.



Free Evaluation: Initial consultations to understand your case are often complimentary.




This structure provides access to legal assistance that might otherwise be financially out of reach, ensuring justice is more accessible to those affected by mesothelioma in Massachusetts.



Starting Your Free Consultation with Mesothelioma Lawyers in Massachusetts



Are you seeking legal advice for mesothelioma? Here's how you can get started with a free consultation:




Visit a Legal Services Website: Begin by navigating to the website of a reputable law firm specializing in mesothelioma cases in Massachusetts. Look for firms with positive client testimonials and a proven track record.



Locate the Consultation Form: On the homepage, you'll often find a clear call-to-action button or a dedicated section for free consultations. Click through to access the consultation form.



Fill in Your Information: The form typically requires details such as your name, contact information, and a brief description of your case or questions. Be as specific as possible to help the legal team understand your situation.



Submit the Form: Once completed, submit the form. This action signals your interest in obtaining a consultation and allows the law firm to understand your needs.



Wait for a Response: After submission, a legal representative should contact you promptly. They will discuss your situation, clarify any initial questions, and set up a time for your detailed free consultation.



Prepare Your Documents and Questions: Before your scheduled consultation, gather any documents or medical records you may have related to your diagnosis and prepare any questions about your case or potential legal action.



Attend Your Consultation: During the consultation, you'll discuss your case in detail with the attorney. They will offer you advice on legal strategies and explain how they might assist you in seeking compensation.




By following these steps, you’ll be on your way to receiving the legal guidance you need to navigate your mesothelioma case in Massachusetts. Remember, initiating a consultation is often the first, crucial step towards seeking justice and potential compensation.



Will You Need to Travel for a Mesothelioma Claim in Massachusetts?



Filing a mesothelioma claim can be daunting, but traveling shouldn't be an added burden. Fortunately, in Massachusetts, individuals typically don’t need to travel extensively to pursue their claims. Here's why:




Home Visits by Legal Experts: Lawyers handling such claims often go the extra mile—literally. They will usually come to you, whether at your home or a location that's convenient. This personalized approach ensures that the process is as seamless as possible for claimants.



Minimal Travel Requirements: While it’s common practice for most aspects of the legal process to be handled without the need for the claimant to travel, some court appearances or meetings might still be necessary. However, these are rare.



Local Representation: By securing legal representation within Massachusetts, many claimants find that their lawyers can manage the bulk of interactions and proceedings without requiring their presence.




So, while there's a slight chance that some travel may be involved, it’s unlikely that extensive travel will be required for those looking to file a mesothelioma claim in Massachusetts.


What Kind of Mesothelioma Claims Am I Eligible for?


A top Massachusetts mesothelioma lawyer can provide the best advice for which types of claims you can make and which is your best option. You could be eligible for one or more of the following: 



Mesothelioma Personal Injury Lawsuit



As a negligent act, asbestos exposure leading to illness qualifies you to file a personal injury lawsuit. You can seek damages for medical and other expenses. 



Most personal injury suits end in a settlement. Your lawyer negotiates with the defendants for a fair amount. If negotiations fail, you can opt to take your case to trial. There, a jury may decide in your favor and award damages. 



Asbestos Trust Fund Claim



If the companies that exposed you to asbestos filed for bankruptcy, you cannot file a lawsuit against them. You can, however, make a claim for compensation with an asbestos trust fund. 



Bankrupt asbestos companies set up trust funds to compensate future claimants. Your lawyer will determine which trusts you are eligible for. There is still about $30 billion available in asbestos trusts. 



Mesothelioma Wrongful Death Lawsuit



You can sue companies for the wrongful death of a loved one due to negligent asbestos exposure. As with a personal injury lawsuit, you can sue for damages, and the case is likely to end in a settlement. 



VA Benefits



Another option may be to file for veteran benefits. Massachusetts has a long history of military installations, and the military used a lot of asbestos. In fact, veterans have higher rates of mesothelioma than the general population.



The VA rates mesothelioma as 100% disabling. If you can trace your asbestos exposure to military service, you can apply for monthly disability payments. 


How Much Compensation Can I Get for Mesothelioma in Massachusetts?


Compensation in mesothelioma cases varies depending on individual factors: 




Medical expenses



Future medical expenses



Home care and medical equipment costs



Lost wages



The defendants involved and their extent of negligence



Pain and suffering




The average settlement in a mesothelioma lawsuit is between $1 million and $1.4 million. Jury awards are often much higher, but trials can also result in zero compensation.



In Massachusetts alone, mesothelioma attorneys have successfully recovered more than $176 million for families affected by this devastating disease. This substantial figure highlights the potential for significant compensation beyond average settlements, reflecting the dedication to holding those responsible accountable.



By choosing experienced legal representation, victims and their families can pursue justice and potentially secure the financial resources needed to cover medical bills and other expenses related to mesothelioma.



Examples of Past Massachusetts Mesothelioma Settlements and Verdicts



Massachusetts has seen numerous mesothelioma settlements and verdicts, reflecting the varied backgrounds and experiences of those affected by asbestos exposure. Here's a glimpse into some past cases:




$5.72 Million secured for an engineer in Manchester, highlighting significant compensation for professionals exposed in the workplace.



$4 Million was awarded to a U.S. Navy veteran from Marshfield, demonstrating the risks faced by military personnel.



$3.67 Million for a factory worker in Paxton, which underscores the industrial hazards workers encountered.




Additional Case Highlights




A U.S. Navy veteran and firefighter received $3 million, showcasing the potential for those who served in multifaceted roles.



A substantial $2.57 million was delivered to a laborer in Revere suffering from pleural mesothelioma, exemplifying the severity and impact of specific asbestos-related conditions.



For a Chatham fireman also working with sheet metal, $2.42 million was awarded, illustrating the heightened risk of dual occupational exposure.



Teachers, such as one in Gloucester, have also been affected, with settlements reaching $2.49 million.




Other Notable Settlements




$2.84 Million to a construction foreman from Pembroke with pleural mesothelioma.



$1.99 Million for a Marine Corps veteran who balanced roles as a machinist.



$3.66 Million was reached for a Pembroke auto mechanic and Navy veteran.



$2.55 Million compensation for a Salem landscaper also working in construction.




These figures reveal not only the diverse backgrounds of those affected but also underscore the importance of personalized legal representation. Each case considers factors such as exposure, age, and diagnosis, which all influence the final outcome. The journey for justice is highly individual, mirroring each client's unique exposure story and health challenges.


Asbestos and Ships in Massachusetts - A Major Source of Exposure






Massachusetts’ location on the U.S. East Coast has made the Bay State a principal hub for shipbuilding and U.S. Navy installations.



The shipping industry’s heavy use of asbestos for the greater part of the 20th Century led to significant exposure and had tragic consequences. 



Asbestos, used as insulation and fire-inhibiting material since ancient times, was heavily used in all kinds of civilian and military ships.



When the U.S. Navy modernized during the 19th and 20th Centuries, it began to build all ships with many components that used asbestos. 



Every U.S. Navy ship built between 1930 and 1973 included 300 or more asbestos-containing components to protect equipment, ammunition, fuel, and crew members from fire. Some examples of shipyards that exposed workers to asbestos include:




Fore River Shipyard, Quincy



Charlestown Naval Yard



Fairhaven Shipyard, Fairhaven



Victory Yard, Squantum



What Other Job Sites in Massachusetts Used Asbestos?


Asbestos was widely used in various industries through much of the 20th Century. Most factories, power plants, chemical works, incinerators, and paper mills used asbestos for the same reasons as the maritime industry.



As a result, every power plant in the state of Massachusetts built from 1930 to 1973 contained large quantities of asbestos.



Mineral processing companies, paper mills, all kinds of factories, and even public and school buildings used and contained asbestos, causing dangerous exposure for decades:




 Marlboro Electric Company, Marlboro



The University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Amherst



W.R. Grace Site, Walpole



Stevens Paper Mill, Andover



Mead Paper Mill, Lee



Tyco Healthcare Group Textile Mill Site, Walpole



Algonquin Generating Plant, Freetown



General Dynamics Shipyard, Quincy



Bethlehem Steel Shipyard, Quincy



Norton Grinding Company, Worcester



Lawrence Factory, Peabody



Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant, Plymouth



Monsanto Plant, Springfield



Ongoing Asbestos Exposure in Massachusetts


Asbestos attorneys primarily work with clients who were exposed at work decades ago. Unfortunately for Massachusetts residents today, the risk of exposure still exists. 



For example, Massachusetts has Superfund sites known to contain asbestos. One of these is the Blackburn and Union Privileges Superfund in Walpole. Companies that operated there in the past made automotive clutches and brake linings with asbestos. 



Residents in Massachusetts can also be exposed to asbestos lingering in older buildings. Schools, residential buildings, and government buildings constructed before the 1970s often contain asbestos materials. When those materials decay, they can expose residents and workers. 


What Are the Asbestos Laws in Massachusetts?


State laws regarding asbestos include safety regulations and laws that impact how, when, and where lawsuits proceed. 



Statute of Limitations







The statute of limitations is an important law to know. It limits the time you have to file a lawsuit over asbestos and mesothelioma. This timeframe is crucial because missing it means losing the chance to seek justice and compensation.



In Massachusetts, while there isn’t a specific statute of limitations for asbestos cases, the state adheres to the tort statute of limitations. Under ALM GL ch. 260, § 2A, the plaintiff has three years from the date they discovered the asbestos exposure or three years from diagnosis of an asbestos-related disease to take legal action.



Time is of the essence. Once these deadlines pass, it's too late to pursue legal recourse for your illness. This makes it vital to act swiftly upon diagnosis or discovery of exposure.



Loved ones can also file on behalf of a deceased victim within three years of the death or within three years of finding out the cause of death. Acting promptly ensures that you don’t forfeit your right to legal action due to expired deadlines.



Contact legal professionals as soon as possible to discuss your situation. They can provide guidance on whether you still have time to file a claim and help you navigate the legal process efficiently.



Statute of Repose in Asbestos Construction Cases



The statute of limitations is necessarily flexible. The clock typically starts when a negligent action occurred. In the case of mesothelioma, the clock starts when the victim receives a diagnosis. This is necessary because mesothelioma develops decades after asbestos exposure, the negligent action. 



A statute of repose puts a hard deadline on lawsuit filings. Massachusetts has a statute of repose in liability cases related to construction claims. The limit is six years after the negligent incident. 



This continues to be a problem for mesothelioma plaintiffs exposed to asbestos on construction sites. They are unlikely to get diagnosed with asbestos illness within six years, making it impossible to file a lawsuit. 



Asbestos Safety and Abatement Laws



The Massachusetts Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EEA) and the Massachusetts Department of Labor oversee asbestos abatement laws in the state: 




Under BWP AQ 04 (ANF-001), any asbestos contractor, owner, and/or operator of a facility or area must notify the state prior to starting an asbestos abatement project. Notification must be sent within 10 days before the project is set to begin. However, no notification is required if the area containing asbestos is less than three square or linear feet.



Under 310 CMR 4.00 of the MassDEP regulations, a fee of $100 must be submitted with each notification for asbestos removal. This fee is non-refundable even in the event that the asbestos project is canceled.



In addition to notifying the state of Massachusetts of any asbestos project, a notification may also be required to the city you live in as well. Check with your local city laws to determine if you’re required to send the notification.



Under 301 CMR 7.00 (Massachusetts Air Pollution Control Regulations), asbestos removed during an abatement project must be encapsulated, labeled, and disposed of at a state-approved waste management site.




For additional regulations and more in-depth information regarding asbestos laws in Massachusetts, contact the EEA at 617-626-1000.


Mesothelioma Treatment in Massachusetts


It’s essential to seek medical assistance from qualified physicians and clinics with a background in dealing with asbestos-related diseases. 



Since these types of cancers are rare, a physician specializing in asbestos-related diseases provides you with a much better chance of promising treatment. Currently, two medical facilities in Massachusetts are backed by the National Cancer Institute:




Dana-Farber Cancer Institute: 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA. 02215



Brigham and Women’s Hospital: 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA. 02115




When my husband was diagnosed we had no idea what to do. Our doctor said we should reach out to an attorney to talk about compensation. After talking to several firms we found the mesothelioma lawyer center and were grateful we did. They helped with every step of the way. If you need a meso attorney then I would recommend contacting them- Isabelle D.


Getting Legal Help in Massachusetts


Remember, if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation.  Get our free Financial Compensation Packet for information on the top mesothelioma and asbestos lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Rhode Island Mesothelioma Lawyer

Many workers who were injured by asbestos are fighting back with the help of a qualified Rhode Island mesothelioma lawyer. Although Rhode Island is a small state, it has had its share of devastating asbestos exposure, mostly from manufacturing and shipbuilding industries. 



If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Rhode Island, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.



In Rhode Island, mesothelioma lawyers have successfully recovered over $30 million for families affected by asbestos exposure. This impressive achievement is part of a broader effort, with more than $9.8 billion recovered for thousands of clients nationwide.



By engaging with seasoned professionals, you not only gain access to expertise but also become part of a legacy of significant compensation wins. Don't navigate this challenging time alone—discover how you can benefit from the expertise and proven track record of successful mesothelioma claims.




Learn about top Rhode Island lawyers



Understand the claims process



Access asbestos trust funds




Secure your financial future today with the help of dedicated legal experts.





We offer assistance in all areas of Rhode Island, including:



Providence, Warwick, Cranston, Pawtucket, East Providence, Woonsocket, Coventry, Cumberland, North Providence, South Kingstown, Johnston, West Warwick, North Kingstown, Newport, Westerly, Bristol, Smithfield, Lincoln, Central Falls, Portsmouth, Barrington, Middletown, Burrillville, Narragansett, Tiverton, East Greenwich, North Smithfield, Warren, Scituate, Glocester, Hopkinton, Charlestown, Richmond, Exeter, West Greenwich, Jamestown, Foste, Little Compton, New Shoreham, and more.




Rhode Island Asbestos Facts








Rhode Island ranks low in the nation for asbestos-related deaths.



There were 1,363 deaths in the state between 1999 and 2017.



During that period, 249 people died from mesothelioma and 121 from asbestosis.



Providence County and the city of Providence had the most asbestos deaths.




About Mesothelioma and Asbestos Exposure


Mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive type of cancer. It most often affects the tissue around the lungs, which is known as pleural mesothelioma. Less common is peritoneal mesothelioma, which develops in the abdomen. 



The only recognized cause of mesothelioma is asbestos exposure. Asbestos is a natural mineral that easily sheds tiny fibers. Workers or residents in buildings with asbestos can inhale those fibers. They cause tissue and cell damage in the body that can lead to mesothelioma, asbestosis, or lung cancer. 



Mesothelioma is often diagnosed decades after asbestos exposure. If you have mesothelioma now, you probably encountered asbestos on the job many years ago. 


Why Should I Sue for Mesothelioma?


Asbestos exposure causes mesothelioma. And asbestos exposure is almost always negligent. Companies that exposed people to asbestos without warnings and without safety protections can and should be held accountable. 



Most people sue over mesothelioma to get compensation and to hold these companies liable for their expenses. Mesothelioma is expensive and can cost you in medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. 



Track Record of Mesothelioma Settlements and Verdicts in Rhode Island



In recent years, there have been numerous successful settlements and verdicts for mesothelioma cases in Rhode Island. Victims have received substantial compensation to cover medical expenses and to pursue justice against those responsible for their asbestos exposure.



Below is a snapshot of some significant compensation amounts awarded to individuals:




$5 Million: Granted to a factory worker in Smithfield, highlighting successful outcomes for industrial workers impacted by asbestos.



$2.3 Million: Secured for a drywaller and welder from Little Compton, exemplifying critical recovery for tradespeople.



$2 Million: Awarded for secondhand asbestos exposure in Providence, underscoring the broad impact of asbestos-related harm.




Additional Notable Settlements




$1.54 Million: Achieved for a U.S. Navy veteran and boiler tender from Coventry.



$1.19 Million: Allocated to a union laborer in Newport suffering from pleural mesothelioma.



$1.37 Million: Recovered for a concrete worker in Portsmouth.



$1.14 Million: Directed to a North Kingstown U.S. Navy veteran and electrician.



$1.36 Million: Compensated for a machinist mate from Charlestown with a military background.



$1.12 Million: Granted to a Hope-based union insulator afflicted by pleural mesothelioma.




These figures illustrate the diverse backgrounds of individuals affected by mesothelioma and the legal system’s role in delivering justice. Each case is unique, with outcomes shaped by factors such as the level of asbestos exposure and the personal circumstances of the victim. This record underscores the importance of personalized legal strategies aimed at maximizing compensation for each client.


Free Consultation with a Rhode Island Mesothelioma Lawyer






Top Rhode Island mesothelioma lawyers are available and offer free initial consultations. You shouldn’t have to pay anything to get answers.



During a consultation, a lawyer will review your case, answer any questions, and explain your legal options. You could be eligible for one or more of the following compensation claims:




Mesothelioma personal injury lawsuit



Mesothelioma wrongful death lawsuit



Asbestos trust fund claim



VA benefits claim




Comprehensive Legal Support for Mesothelioma Victims



Our legal team is dedicated to guiding you through every step of the process, ensuring you understand the intricacies of your case. From collecting evidence to filing your claim on time, we handle all the details so you can focus on your health and family. If your lawyer believes you have a case, they will help you take the steps to file a claim or lawsuit, giving you the best chance of receiving fair compensation.



Multiple Avenues for Compensation



Your legal team can pursue mesothelioma compensation in several ways:




Asbestos Trust Fund Claims: With over $30 billion still available in trust funds, you can access compensation without stepping foot in court.



Mesothelioma Lawsuits: These can secure significant compensation from companies responsible for asbestos exposure.



Veterans Benefits: Recognizing that veterans make up a significant portion of mesothelioma cases, we help you access VA benefits, which provide health care and monthly compensation.




Our commitment to you includes traveling to meet you at your convenience and ensuring you don't pay unless we secure compensation for you. This client-focused approach ensures you receive the support and guidance you need during this challenging time.



What Are the Costs Associated with Hiring a Mesothelioma Attorney in Rhode Island?



When facing a mesothelioma diagnosis, understanding the legal costs involved in pursuing compensation is crucial. Fortunately, hiring a mesothelioma attorney in Rhode Island often comes with financial peace of mind.



No Upfront Costs



Most mesothelioma attorneys operate on a contingency fee basis. This means you won't need to worry about paying any initial fees or out-of-pocket expenses. The contingency model ensures that legal teams are driven by the objective of winning your case and recovering the compensation you deserve.



Payment Upon Success



Attorneys specializing in asbestos cases typically only receive their fee if they successfully secure a settlement or win a verdict on your behalf. This arrangement aligns the interests of both you and your legal team, as their payment hinges on achieving a favorable outcome for you.



Thus, by choosing a mesothelioma attorney in Rhode Island, you can focus on your health and recovery without the added burden of immediate legal costs.



Can Mesothelioma Victims in Rhode Island Access Asbestos Trust Funds without Going to Court?



Yes, mesothelioma victims residing in Rhode Island can potentially access significant compensation through asbestos trust funds without the hassle of court proceedings. These trusts, established by asbestos companies that have declared bankruptcy, are dedicated to compensating those affected by asbestos-related illnesses.



How Does It Work?




Eligibility: Victims don't need to attend court. Instead, they file claims directly with the trusts, which assess eligibility based on exposure history and diagnosis.



Availability: An estimated $30 billion remains available in these trust funds, offering substantial financial relief for medical expenses, lost wages, and suffering.



Process: The claim process generally involves submitting medical records and employment history. Many victims work with experienced attorneys to streamline this process and enhance their claims.



Peace of Mind: By sidestepping traditional legal proceedings, victims save time and reduce stress, allowing them to focus on recovery and family.




For those in Rhode Island facing the challenges of mesothelioma, these trust funds present a viable option for compensation without the courtroom ordeal.



Will clients need to travel to pursue a mesothelioma claim with a lawyer's assistance?



When pursuing a mesothelioma claim, many clients worry about the inconvenience of travel. Fortunately, most law firms understand these concerns and offer flexible arrangements to ease the process.




In-Home Visits: Many firms are willing to meet with clients in their homes or at a location of their choice. This means you can discuss your case without the stress of traveling.



Remote Communication: With the rise of digital communication tools, much of the necessary correspondence and document signing can be handled online, reducing the need for in-person meetings.



Localized Assistance: Generally, you won’t have to leave your community. Legal experts will make it a priority to handle proceedings in your area, making extended travel unlikely.




While there may be rare occasions where travel is necessary, these are exceptions rather than the rule. Most clients can count on their legal team to work around their needs and minimize disruptions.


Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Rhode Island?


Rhode Island is small, but it has long been home to industries that used asbestos. If you have mesothelioma now, you were probably exposed to asbestos at work. These are some of the main sources of exposure in the state. 


Textiles and Manufacturing


Manufacturing has long been an important industry in Rhode Island. Textile manufacturing, in particular, was a big part of the state's economy for years. Unfortunately, textile mills contributed significantly to asbestos exposure.




Asbestos was used on machinery and equipment for textile production.



It was also used as a component in fabrics and clothing.



Although textile production is no longer a major industry in Rhode Island, the residual effects of its asbestos use are still being felt.



Some asbestos-related fatalities happened after former employees faced prolonged exposure to asbestos.



Asbestos in Shipyards






Rhode Island is also home to two major shipyards: Newport Naval Yard and Walsh-Kaiser Shipyard.



Shipyards are well-known for extensive asbestos use. Asbestos was typically used to build ships, repair parts, and provide insulation. The most hazardous period for asbestos exposure in shipyards was from the 1930s until the late 1970s.


Asbestos in Rhode Island Schools


Before restrictions were placed on asbestos in the 1970s, many schools, including elementary schools, middle schools, high schools, and colleges, were constructed using asbestos.



Asbestos was a popular choice for its insulation and fire-resistant properties, and even today, staff members, teachers, and students are still at risk of exposure.



In 1991 the Rogers Williams Educational Building in Province underwent a health hazard evaluation.  



Results showed asbestos in the furnaces, pipes, boilers, and insulation of the building, and only 50 percent contained. 



Staff members were already beginning to experience respiratory problems when the evaluation began in 1991.



Additionally, three Rhode Island schools, Sarah Dyer Barnes Elementary, Winsor Hill Elementary, and Brown Avenue Elementary, were all shut down for renovations after the Rhode Island State Health Department determined that the buildings were riddled with asbestos.


Additional Job Sites Associated with Asbestos in Rhode Island



Smithfield Air National Guard



Wickford Shipyard



North Smithfield Sr. High School



Artic 1st Congregational Church



St. Bernard’s Convent



Artic Christ & King Church



Artic Industrial National Bank



Artic Municipal Building



Arctic Telephone & Telegraph



Washburn Wire Company



F. W. Bird and Son



Peterson-Puritan Company



Synchron Chemical



Davisville Naval Station



GW Reynolds and Company



Meadowcrest Elementary School – Riverside



Industrial Underground Bank



Clayville Elementary School



Ongoing Asbestos Exposure in Rhode Island






Asbestos exposure was much more prevalent in the past. There is still a risk of exposure. Many buildings in Rhode Island were constructed with asbestos and still contain asbestos which puts workers and residents at risk.



Asbestos in school buildings is an important example of this ongoing risk. Both students and staff can be exposed when old asbestos materials deteriorate and release fibers. Any renovation or repair work also puts everyone in the building at risk. 



Asbestos is also a risk in infrastructure. The town of Bristol, Rhode Island, received more than $ 1 million in 2022 to rehabilitate sewer pipes full of asbestos. Those pipes were beginning to deteriorate and release fibers into water. 


Rhode Island’s First Asbestos Lawsuit


In 1983, Rhode Island saw its first asbestos lawsuit when Georgette Brady, widow of former Navy submarine engineer, Frank Brady, filed a suit for wrongful death. 



While working on submarines before his death in 1977, Frank was exposed to asbestos on a daily basis.



Frank developed mesothelioma lung cancer and eventually died at age 58 from a heart attack. 



According to a radiation oncologist who provided testimony, Frank’s heart attack resulted from lung scarring and straining after asbestos exposure.



Four asbestos manufacturers were sued, including Raybestos Manhattan, Owen Corning Fiberglass, Keene Industries, and Celotex Co. 



After overwhelming evidence against the defendants, they settled out of our court for an undisclosed amount.


Asbestos Laws in Rhode Island


Rhode Island has laws in place to regulate the abatement of asbestos and keep current workers and residents safe. Other laws affect how asbestos lawsuits proceed. 


Rhode Island Statute of Limitations on Mesothelioma and Asbestos Lawsuits



R. I. Gen. Laws § 9-1-12 et seq. provides the statute of limitations for personal injury cases in Rhode Island, and asbestos-related cases must follow the same statute as personal injury lawsuits.



The plaintiffs must file within three years from the date of the victim’s death for a wrongful death lawsuit.



For asbestos-related illnesses, plaintiffs must file their lawsuit within three years from the time the disease was diagnosed or within three years from the date the illness should have been reasonably discovered.




Asbestos Safety Regulations



Rhode Island maintains its asbestos removal programs through the state’s Department of Health, setting the standards for removal and certifications for those involved in the asbestos abatement process.




Rhode Island maintains an “Asbestos Control Program” that approves the certification of inspectors and contractors.



Notification of any work to remove asbestos material must be sent to the state at least ten days in advance.



Rhode Island also has strict regulations on how asbestos material is removed; for example, certain materials must be removed via a HEPA vacuum or filter. Friable material must be removed by the “wetting” process, meaning to dampen the material and secured in an approved container.



The state, through its Asbestos Control Program, is aggressive in locating and, when necessary, removing the hazardous material from public property and schools.



Mesothelioma Treatment in Rhode Island


Currently, there are no cancer centers backed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in Rhode Island. 



However, the Jackson Laboratory Cancer Center in the nearby state of Maine is an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer treatment center, meaning top-notch doctors who specialize in cancer treatment are available.



Time is a critical factor in getting expert care. Once victims are diagnosed with an asbestos-related disease, they are usually already in the latest stages of cancer, as the symptoms of mesothelioma typically lie dormant for up to 50 years.



A small clinic or a general practice physician may not have the kind of experience and medical equipment needed to give you the best possible options and mesothelioma treatments.



These lawyers made us feel so much better about going through this terrible process. We had no idea where to begin and they helped get us all the compensation we possibly could. They were friendly understanding and very hard-working. They answered any questions we had about compensation and even medical advice.- Natalie F.


Getting Legal Help in Rhode Island


Remember, if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. If you need additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Montana Mesothelioma Lawyer

Due to the state's mining industry, thousands of people developed life-threatening asbestos-related illnesses in Montana. An experienced Montana mesothelioma lawyer can help if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma or any other asbestos disease. 



Keep in mind that if you or a loved one have been injured by mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to a significant amount of compensation.  Fill out our form to get a free Financial Compensation Packet. You’ll learn about the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Montana, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file a claim for the asbestos trust funds, and more.



Many clients start receiving compensation in as few as 90 days, with additional checks arriving over the next year or so until the case is fully resolved. While the timeline can vary based on the specifics of each case, our dedicated Montana asbestos lawyers strive to secure the maximum compensation as swiftly as possible.



By engaging with our resources, you’ll gain insights into:




The process of filing a claim.



Expected timelines for initial and ongoing payments.



How to effectively navigate the asbestos trust funds.




This comprehensive approach ensures you are well-prepared and informed every step of the way.





We are happy to offer assistance to all asbestos victims and their families in every city and town in Montana, including:



Libby, Billings, Missoula, Great Falls, Bozeman, Butte-Silver Bow, Helena, Kalispell, Havre, Anaconda-Deer Lodge, County Miles, Helena Valley West Central, Helena Valley Southeast, Belgrade, Livingston, Laurel, Lockwood, Whitefish, Evergreen, Sidney, Lewistown, Orchard Homes, Glendive, Columbia Falls, Polson, Hamilton, Bigfork, Dillon, Malmstrom AFB, Helena Valley Northwest, Hardin, Lolo, Glasgow, Shelby, Four Corners, Deer Lodge, Cut Bank, Montana, Wolf Point, Helena Valley Northeas,t Conrad, Lakeside, East Missoula, Big Sky, Colstrip, North Browning, Pablo, Red Lodge, Lame Deer, East Helena, South Browning, Columbus, West Glendive, Malta, Townsend, Ronan, Three Forks, Plentywood, Stevensville, Baker and Forsyth, Crow Agency, Roundup, Choteau, Bonner-West Riverside, Big Timber, Frenchtown, Clancy, Manhattan, Fort Benton, Fort Belknap, Agency and Sun Prairie, Thompson Falls, West Yellowstone, Seeley, Lake Helena, West Side, Chinook, Absarokee, Boulder, Eureka, Black Eagle, Gardiner, Helena Flats, Whitehall, Somers Plains, Scobey Park, Browning, Gallatin, Gateway, Harlowton, White Sulphur Springs, Rocky Boy, West Churchill, Troy, Fairview, Pinesdale, Hungry Horse, Clinton, Hays, Florence, Chester, and more.




Montana Asbestos Facts








Montana saw 1,520 deaths related to asbestos exposure between 1999 and 2017.



Of those deaths, 240 were a result of mesothelioma, and 337 were from asbestosis. The rest can be attributed to lung cancer.



Lincoln County, the site of the infamous Libby mine, has the highest rate of asbestos-related deaths in the state.



The mines near the town of Libby, owned and operated by W.R. Grace, extracted millions of tons of asbestos and vermiculite.



Many companies, including W.R. Grace, mined, sold, and shipped both asbestos-contaminated vermiculite to plants in other states, exposing many more people.




How Does Asbestos Exposure Lead to Mesothelioma?



Understanding the link between asbestos exposure and mesothelioma is crucial for anyone who might come into contact with this hazardous material. Asbestos fibers, once considered a miracle mineral, are now well-known for their severe health risks.



The Path from Exposure to Illness




Inhalation or Ingestion: When materials containing asbestos are disturbed, tiny fibers are released into the air. These fibers can be inhaled or ingested unknowingly by individuals.



Lodging in the Body: Once inside the body, these fibers can embed themselves in the lining of organs, particularly in the lungs, abdomen, or heart, where they start to irritate healthy tissues and cells.



Cellular Damage Over Time: The irritation caused by embedded asbestos fibers can, over a span of decades, cause the surrounding tissues and cells to undergo mutations. This cellular damage can lead to various forms of cancer, with mesothelioma being the most notorious.



Long Latency Period: One of the most challenging aspects of diagnosing mesothelioma is its long latency period. Symptoms can take anywhere from 20 to 50 years to manifest after the initial exposure. By the time symptoms appear, the disease may have already progressed significantly, complicating potential treatments.




Challenges in Diagnosis



The symptoms of mesothelioma often overlap with those of more common illnesses, which makes diagnosing it particularly difficult. This overlap can lead to delays in receiving the right treatment, emphasizing the need for awareness and regular health check-ups if asbestos exposure is suspected.



In summary, while asbestos was once lauded for its durability and fire-resistant properties, it's now a well-documented health hazard. Its fibers, when lodged in the body, can escalate into serious health issues like mesothelioma many years after the initial exposure. Understanding this process is key to prevention and early diagnosis.



Am I Eligible to File a Mesothelioma Lawsuit in Montana?






If you were diagnosed with mesothelioma in Montana, you are probably eligible to file a lawsuit. A mesothelioma lawsuit is a legal action suing companies responsible for your asbestos exposure. The reason to sue over mesothelioma is to seek compensation for your resulting expenses. These lawsuits can provide substantial compensation, typically ranging from $1 Million to $11.4 Million, depending on whether your case settles or goes to court. Settlements usually average between $1M and $1.4M.



A Montana mesothelioma lawyer can explain your legal options, which might include one or more of the following:




Personal injury lawsuit. Mesothelioma is considered a personal injury because asbestos exposure is usually negligent. The companies responsible can be held liable, and a lawsuit can result in compensation through a settlement or jury award.



Wrongful death lawsuit. If your loved one died from mesothelioma, you could be eligible to file a wrongful death suit for compensation.



Asbestos trust fund claim. If the companies that exposed you to asbestos went bankrupt, you cannot sue. However, they should have funded asbestos trusts to compensate victims. You can file a claim with all those that apply.



VA benefits claim. Military veterans have high rates of asbestos illnesses. If you can connect your illness to asbestos exposure during service, you can file a claim for benefits.




By working with legal experts, you can also get help:




Identifying the asbestos-containing products you were exposed to.



Holding the companies that manufactured those products accountable for your illness.



Pursuing life-changing compensation that can help you pay for treatments and secure your family's financial future.




Over 99% of mesothelioma lawsuits result in settlements, meaning many clients never have to step foot in court to receive compensation. This process not only holds negligent companies accountable but also provides financial relief for medical treatments and secures the future for your family.



How Much Is a Typical Mesothelioma Settlement Worth?



When considering compensation for a mesothelioma claim, it's important to understand the financial range that settlements and verdicts typically fall within.




Settlements: On average, mesothelioma settlements tend to fall between $1 million and $1.4 million. These figures represent negotiated agreements between the plaintiff and the defendant, often reached before a case goes to trial.



Verdicts: If the case proceeds to court and results in a verdict, the average compensation can be significantly higher. Court verdicts often range from $5 million to $11.4 million. This amount reflects the jury's decision and may include additional damages for the suffering endured by the victim.




These figures provide a general idea of potential financial outcomes, although each case is unique, and the actual amount can vary based on factors such as the severity of the illness, legal representation, and jurisdiction.



Will an Asbestos Lawsuit Be Filed as a Class Action?



In the past, class action lawsuits were a common approach for handling asbestos cases. However, these types of lawsuits have become less frequent today. The main reason? They often don't secure as much financial compensation for individuals who have been affected by asbestos-related diseases like mesothelioma.



Instead, asbestos lawsuits are now predominantly filed on an individual basis. This method allows for personalized legal attention, which can be crucial for your case. Your attorney will focus on your unique circumstances, striving to secure the maximum compensation possible to cover medical treatments and related expenses.



Why Choose an Individual Lawsuit?




Personal Attention: Your case receives individual focus, enhancing the chances of a favorable outcome.



Maximum Compensation: Individual lawsuits aim to obtain the highest possible financial award tailored to your specific needs.



Tailored Legal Strategy: Your attorney can develop a bespoke approach that aligns with your unique situation.




Choosing the right legal pathway can make a significant difference in the outcome, so it's beneficial to consult with a seasoned attorney who can guide you through the process and ensure your case receives the attention it warrants.


How to Find a Montana Mesothelioma Lawyer


Consider working with a mesothelioma lawyer if you were diagnosed with any asbestos illness. Asbestos exposure is almost always negligent, so you have a right to seek compensation. 



When you're ready to take that step, look for a top Montana mesothelioma lawyer in a larger asbestos firm. The backing of a large firm means they will have the experience, network, and resources necessary to bring your case to a successful conclusion.



The right lawyer should have proven experience winning cases for similar clients. Be sure they offer contingency payment, so you pay nothing until they win.



When evaluating Montana mesothelioma lawyers, consider those with a strong track record of success. Look for attorneys who have secured substantial compensation for their clients, boasting high success rates in asbestos cases. Experience matters, and finding a legal team that has handled thousands of mesothelioma cases can make a significant difference in the outcome.



Decades of dedicated practice in the field reflect a deep understanding of the complexities involved in asbestos litigation. Opt for a legal team comprising experienced attorneys, paralegals, and investigators who work collaboratively to build a robust case.



By choosing a lawyer with these credentials, you ensure that you're not only represented by someone who knows the ins and outs of mesothelioma cases but also by someone who has a history of delivering results.



The right Montana asbestos attorney will also offer a free initial consultation. You shouldn't have to risk any money just to reach out and get some questions answered. 



How Successful is This Law Firm with Mesothelioma Cases?



This law firm boasts an impressive history of securing favorable outcomes for mesothelioma cases. They have successfully recovered over $5.2 billion on behalf of their clients facing asbestos-related illnesses.



With a remarkable 98% success rate in securing compensation for asbestos cases, they demonstrate consistent effectiveness in delivering results for their clients. Their experience and dedication significantly increase the likelihood of obtaining a favorable settlement or verdict.



How Does This Law Firm Gather Evidence for a Mesothelioma Case?



Gathering evidence for a mesothelioma case is a meticulous process. Given the long latency period of asbestos exposure—sometimes spanning 20 to 50 years—pinpointing the source of exposure can be daunting. However, specialized law firms excel in this area due to their depth of experience.



Comprehensive Evidence Collection




Historical Research: These firms delve into historical records to trace back potential exposure points. This involves exploring job sites, product lists, and known asbestos exposure locations.



Product Identification: They maintain extensive databases of asbestos-containing products and the companies that manufactured them. This aids in identifying what specific products could have been responsible for exposure.



Industry Expertise: Leveraging years of experience, these firms have accumulated vast amounts of data on past cases. This includes lists of manufacturers and employers known to have used asbestos.




By combining in-depth research, data analysis, and historical records, law firms build robust cases. Their goal is to identify those accountable for your exposure and pursue justice on your behalf. Through this structured approach, they can effectively navigate the complexities of asbestos litigation.


Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Montana?






Most people with mesothelioma were exposed to asbestos on the job. Some of the industries that used the most asbestos include construction, shipbuilding, manufacturing, and oil refining. 



Montana is a largely rural state with fewer industrial jobs than many other states. This should have protected more residents from asbestos exposure. The presence of a vermiculite mine contaminated with asbestos increased the risk of exposure for many workers and residents.



Libby, Montana, and its W.R. Grace vermiculite mine remains the primary exposure area for Montana residents but not the only one. Some other buildings and workplaces exposed Montana residents to asbestos.



What is Secondhand Asbestos Exposure, and How Does It Occur?



Secondhand asbestos exposure, also known as para-occupational or household exposure, refers to the unintentional contact with asbestos fibers by individuals who do not directly work with asbestos but live with someone who does. This type of exposure typically takes place when a person inadvertently carries asbestos fibers into the home.



How It Occurs:




Clothing Contamination: Workers in industries such as construction, shipbuilding, or automotive repair might unknowingly bring asbestos fibers home on their work clothes.



Hair and Skin Contact: Asbestos fibers can settle on a person’s hair or skin while they are at work, potentially transferring to family members during physical contact or activities such as hugging.



Home Environment: The presence of asbestos particles in the household environment—transferred from contaminated clothing or personal items—can expose family members over time.




The key risk of secondhand exposure lies in the microscopic size of asbestos fibers, which can be easily inhaled. Regular interactions and the close proximity of family members can heighten the risk of health issues linked to asbestos, such as mesothelioma or other respiratory diseases. 


Libby, Montana: Asbestos and Mesothelioma


Mining has long been an important industry in Montana. The company W.R. Grace mined vermiculite in the area for decades. What no one knew for many years was that the otherwise harmless mineral contained contaminating asbestos.



Asbestos Exposure in Libby



Consequently, thousands of residents in and around Libby were exposed to asbestos fibers. According to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, a mortality analysis of death certificates issued between 1979 and 1998 indicated a high number of deaths from cancer in the small town of Libby.



According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the mines around Libby “may have produced 80 percent of the world’s supply of vermiculite.” Sold by W.R. Grace under the brand name Zonolite, this material was widely used in such products as attic insulation.



Because the Libby vermiculite deposits contained asbestos fibers, the distribution of the material to other states spread asbestos to other processing plants, workers, and residents. 



The EPA estimates that in 1985, around 940,000 homes contained or had contained Zonolite vermiculite insulation.



Stimson Lumber Mill



Another Libby-area business affected by asbestos exposure was the Stimson Lumber Mill. The mill, which was destroyed in a 2010 fire, was closed in 2003 due to asbestos-related problems.



The asbestos residue was found in Stimson’s plywood plant, finger jointer, central maintenance building, and the log yard during a 2002 EPA inspection. 



In addition, EPA testers found asbestos in two large piles of wood chips and tree bark outside the town limits.



Other Sites of Asbestos Exposure in Libby



The job sites in and around Libby impacted by asbestos include:




Libby Mine



Stimson Lumber Mill



Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad, Libby line



Karst Mine




Compensation for Libby, Montana, Asbestos Victims



The most recent update in the case of Libby came late in 2021 when the Montana Supreme Court upheld a nearly $100 million asbestos judgment in favor of the state. 



When victims sued the state over asbestos exposure in Libby, the government turned to its insurer, National Indemnification Co. The court decided the insurer owed the state millions to help pay claims and litigation costs. 



W.R. Grace went bankrupt after facing lawsuits. During the bankruptcy process, the company set up an asbestos trust fund to compensate victims who could no longer sue the defunct company. 



W.R. Grace funded the asbestos trust with $4 billion. It began accepting claims on August 25, 2014, and still takes claims today. The current payment percentage on claims is 31.7% for both expedited and individual reviews. 



Examples of Mesothelioma Settlement Amounts in Montana



When considering mesothelioma lawsuits in Montana, several past settlements and verdicts highlight the financial outcomes some have achieved. Here are a few examples:




A patient from Conrad received a settlement of $3 million.



An asbestos worker in Saint Regis was awarded $2.8 million.



Columbia Falls saw an aluminum worker obtain a settlement of $1.5 million.



In Great Falls, a farmer and mechanic secured $1.34 million.



Forsyth provided a U.S. Navy veteran and laborer with $1.22 million in compensation.



A utility worker from Billings received $1.13 million.



A settlement of $2.49 million was awarded to a resident of Dillon with mesothelioma.




These examples reflect a range of settlements, but it's crucial to understand that each case is unique. Settlement amounts can vary significantly based on the specifics of the case and various underlying factors.


Other Montana Job Sites with Asbestos


Workers in Montana’s three oil refineries and at least six electrical power plants came into contact with asbestos fibers. 



Most of the asbestos-lined pipes transferred either oil or high-pressure steam, but a significant amount of asbestos fibers was woven into the fabric of the workers’ protective gear.



Other areas of asbestos exposure in Montana include mines, lumber companies, and public buildings. 



Asbestos exposure occurred in the following facilities:




Anaconda Copper Mining Company in Butte



Colstrip Power Plant in Colstrip



Water and Electric Light Company in Miles City



Union Oil Company refinery in Cut Bank



Texaco Oil facility in Sunburst



Montana Refining Company facility in Great Falls



Conrad Placer Mining Company



C&C Plywood Corporation



Anaconda Copper Mining Company



Saltenberger Plumbing & Heating



Farmer’s Union Central Exchange



Boston and Montana Consolidated



Laurel Oil and Refining Company



Cenex Refinery



J Neil Lumber Company



Saint Regis Paper Company



Northern Pacific Railway Company



Bozeman Montana College



Lewis and Clark Power Plant



Stauffer Chemical Company



Helena Power Transmission Company



Western Ranch Supply Company



Sierra Talc and Clay Company Inc



Montana State Hospital



Warm Springs State Hospital



Montana Coal and Iron Company



Montana Refining



University of Montana



Montana State University



Montana Asbestos Laws


Montana state laws help keep current residents and workers safe and direct how lawsuits and claims proceed. 


Statute of Limitations on Mesothelioma and Asbestos Lawsuits


Mont. Code Ann. § 27-2-2021 et seq., the Montana statute of limitations for personal injury cases, including asbestos-related lawsuits, requires that each case must be filed within three years of the time the illness was discovered or should have been discovered.



Wrongful death asbestos-related cases must be filed within three years of the victim’s actual date of death.



Montana's Asbestos Safety Regulations



Montana follows state asbestos laws, as well as regulations implemented by the EPA, OSHA, and NESHAP. 



Montana’s Department of Environmental Quality Asbestos Air Act and Asbestos Control Act enforces and outlines regulations related to asbestos: 




All schools built with asbestos in Montana must follow the EPA asbestos regulations. However, state rules under the Montana statutes also apply, as well as OSHA rules.



The Montana Asbestos Control Act mandates that anyone working on an asbestos abatement not only must provide written notification to the state beforehand but also must be certified to work around asbestos by the state.



A clean-up order is strictly enforced for anyone who dumps or leaves asbestos on their property if it poses threats to the public.



A certified Montana inspector must inspect all areas of an asbestos abatement project before it begins.



When removing asbestos, it must be contained in an encapsulation that is clearly marked and then taken to an approved landfill.




For more information and in-depth details about asbestos laws in Montana, contact the Montana Department of Environmental Quality’s Asbestos Control Program at 406-444-1436.



The Process for Negotiating a Mesothelioma Settlement



Navigating a mesothelioma settlement involves several key steps that can lead to compensation for those affected by asbestos exposure. Understanding this process can help you or your loved ones prepare for what's ahead.



Starting with Legal Representation



The first step is securing a knowledgeable asbestos attorney. These professionals bring experience in handling complex cases and can significantly strengthen your position in negotiations. They know the industry players, including the manufacturers typically involved in such cases.



Gathering Evidence



Your attorney will gather all necessary documentation and evidence, including medical records, employment history, and proof of asbestos exposure. This is crucial for building a strong case that illustrates the responsibility of manufacturers or other parties involved.



Initiating Negotiations



Once your attorney has compiled the evidence, they will begin negotiations with the responsible asbestos product manufacturers. The aim here is to reach a fair settlement that compensates for medical expenses, lost income, and other damages.



Settlement vs. Trial



Most mesothelioma cases conclude with a settlement, as parties often prefer to avoid the uncertainty and expense of a trial. However, if negotiations don't result in an acceptable settlement, your attorney may recommend proceeding to trial. In court, a judge or jury will evaluate the case and decide the compensation amount.



Receiving Compensation



After a settlement is agreed upon, compensation can be distributed relatively quickly. In some cases, initial payments might begin in as few as six weeks, with additional payments potentially extending over several months to a year.



Continuous Monitoring



Even after a settlement is reached, ongoing communication with your legal team ensures you receive all entitled benefits and any further necessary legal action is promptly addressed.



In essence, the process aims to secure compensation efficiently, allowing victims and their families to focus on recovery and managing other life aspects. Understanding each stage can make a daunting journey more manageable.


Mesothelioma Treatment in Montana






Montana is home to several cancer treatment centers, including the Montana Cancer Center in Missoula. The Center for Asbestos-Related Disease in Libby offers screenings and other resources. 



Wherever you seek treatment, it is important to find an experienced doctor specializing in asbestos-related diseases. 



Montana Cancer Center



The Montana Cancer Center at St. Patrick Hospital in Missoula was certified by the Commission on Cancer as a Community Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Program in 1998. 



Its various specialists, including oncologists and surgeons, treat cancers of all types, including mesothelioma and lung cancer.



Most patient care services are offered at the Montana Cancer Center’s main facility in Missoula. However, the Center’s oncologists visit outreach centers outside Missoula twice weekly. 



The Montana Cancer Center offers mesothelioma treatments to patients in all stages of the disease, including biopsies, imaging, surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy.



The Center for Asbestos Related Disease (CARD)



Because of the great need in Libby, CARD opened there to provide impacted residents with important resources. CARD operates with funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 



You can get cancer and asbestos illness screenings here, resources to learn more about asbestos and mesothelioma, and help managing an existing disease. 



Diagnosing mesothelioma presents significant challenges due to its subtle and often delayed symptoms. The disease can mimic other ailments, making it difficult for doctors to pinpoint mesothelioma as the cause right away.



Symptoms might not surface until decades after the initial asbestos exposure, sometimes taking 20 to 50 years to appear. When symptoms do emerge, they often resemble those of more common respiratory or gastrointestinal conditions.



Common symptoms include:




Persistent cough



Chest pain



Shortness of breath



Unexplained weight loss



Fatigue



Abdominal swelling and discomfort




These symptoms can easily be mistaken for other, less severe health issues, complicating the path to a definitive diagnosis.



This delayed symptom onset and symptom similarity to other diseases pose a substantial challenge for healthcare professionals, often necessitating extensive testing and thorough patient history reviews to arrive at an accurate diagnosis.



This firm was extremely professional and responsive. If you have any meso questions, I’d highly recommend them- Michael L.


Getting Legal Help in Montana


Remember, if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Get our free Financial Compensation Packet for information on the top mesothelioma and asbestos lawyers in your area. If you have questions or need assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Utah Mesothelioma Lawyer

Contact a Utah mesothelioma lawyer to hear about your legal rights if you've been injured by asbestos. Although Utah is home to several naturally-occurring asbestos deposits, most asbestos-related diseases and deaths stem directly from prolonged exposure to asbestos in the workplace. 



If you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to considerable compensation. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Utah, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 



When dealing with mesothelioma claims, many clients begin to see compensation in as few as 90 days. This initial payment is just the beginning. Additional checks may continue to arrive over the next year or so, ensuring ongoing support until the case reaches full resolution.



By accessing our Financial Compensation Packet, you'll be equipped with the knowledge of:




How to connect with top mesothelioma lawyers in your area.



The detailed steps to start receiving payments promptly.



Comprehensive guidance on filing an asbestos trust fund claim.




Take the first step towards securing your compensation today with our expert resources at your fingertips.





We offer assistance to all cities and towns in Utah, such as:



Salt Lake City, West Valley, Provo, West Jordan, Orem, Sandy, Ogden, St. George, Layton, Millcreek, Taylorsville, South Jordan, Lehi, Logan, Murray, Draper, Bountiful, Riverton, Roy, Spanish Fork, Kearns, Pleasant Grove, Cottonwood Heights, Tooele, Springville, Midvale, Clearfield, Cedar City, Kaysville, Magna, American Fork, Holladay, Herriman, Syracuse, South Salt Lake, Eagle Mountain, Saratoga Springs, Washington, Farmington, Clinton, Payson, Brigham, North Ogden, North Salt Lake, Highland, South Ogden, Centerville, Hurricane, Heber, West Haven, Woods Cross, Lindon, Smithfield, Vernal, Cedar Hills, Alpine, West Point, Santaquin, North Logan, Grantsville, Washington Terrace, Mapleton, Pleasant View, Riverdale, Price, Bluffdale, Park City, Hooper, Tremonton, Summit Park, Hyrum, Richfield, Ivins, Providence, Salem, Roosevelt, Santa Clara, South Weber, Ephraim, Farr, West Plain City, Snyderville, Enoch, Nibley, Harrisville, Fruit Heights, Nephi, Erda, West Bountiful, White City, Sunset, Moab, Stansbury Park, Perry, Kanab, Midway, La Verkin, Hyde Park, Morgan, Blanding, and more.




Utah Asbestos and Mesothelioma Statistics and Facts








According to the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), Utah ranks 25th in the United States for mesothelioma deaths.



Salt Lake County has had the most asbestos deaths.



Between 1999 and 2017, there were 1,593 asbestos-related deaths in the state, 559 of which were in Salt Lake County.



In 2007, the Utah Department of Health issued a Neighborhood Health Alert to Salt Lake City residents after two processing plants, Vermiculite Intermountain and Intermountain Products, were found to still contain asbestos.




Facts About Mesothelioma and Asbestos


Approximately 3,000 people are diagnosed with mesothelioma every year in the U.S. The only known cause of mesothelioma is asbestos exposure. Most people with asbestos illnesses were exposed on the job.



Asbestos is considered dangerous because it has been linked to several severe health conditions. When asbestos fibers are inhaled or ingested, they can become lodged in the lining of organs, irritating healthy tissues and cells. Over time, these irritated cells may mutate and become cancerous, leading to diseases such as:




Mesothelioma



Lung cancer



Other asbestos-related diseases




One of the most alarming aspects of asbestos exposure is the long latency period. Symptoms may not appear until 20-50 years after the initial exposure, making it difficult to diagnose and treat illnesses early. This delayed onset of symptoms can make the management of asbestos-related diseases particularly challenging.



The most common form of mesothelioma is pleural. It develops in the tissue around the lungs many years after inhaling tiny asbestos fibers. Pleural mesothelioma causes shortness of breath, coughing, and chest pains. A less common form of mesothelioma is peritoneal and forms in the abdomen.



Diagnosing mesothelioma presents significant challenges due to its elusive nature. Symptoms can mimic those of other illnesses, making it difficult for medical professionals to pinpoint the disease without extensive testing. Moreover, symptoms may not manifest until 20-50 years after initial asbestos exposure, complicating timely diagnosis and treatment.



Understanding these nuances is crucial for those at risk, as early detection can significantly influence treatment outcomes. By recognizing the complexity and latency of mesothelioma symptoms, individuals can better advocate for their health and seek appropriate medical consultation.


What Can a Utah Mesothelioma Lawyer Do for Me?






If you have mesothelioma, it is important to talk to an asbestos attorney as soon as possible. They can determine if you have a case, explain your legal options, and help you take steps to get compensation.



There are several benefits to working with an experienced mesothelioma lawyer in Utah:




Get a free, no-obligation case review



Learn more about your options



Have an expert on asbestos backing your case



Get solid evidence that companies negligently exposed you to asbestos



Get the best chance of recovering maximum compensation



Work with someone who is compassionate and understanding about your illness




Track Record of Success



When choosing a mesothelioma lawyer, their history of success matters. Our team has a proven track record, having recovered over $5.2 billion for mesothelioma clients. Impressively, 98% of our asbestos cases result in compensation, illustrating our dedication and effectiveness in seeking justice for our clients.



By partnering with us, you're not only gaining an advocate who understands the intricacies of asbestos litigation but also someone with a history of achieving substantial results. This combination of expertise and proven success offers you peace of mind, knowing you're in capable hands.


Am I Eligible to File a Mesothelioma Claim in Utah?


A lawyer who specializes in asbestos lawsuits can answer this question. Generally, if you have mesothelioma, you are entitled to make a claim and to seek compensation. 



Mesothelioma is almost always caused by negligent asbestos exposure. This means you can hold asbestos companies responsible for your illness and force them to pay.



What Are Some Past Mesothelioma Settlement Amounts in Utah?



If you're seeking information on past mesothelioma settlements in Utah, there are several noteworthy cases to consider. These figures highlight the substantial compensation some individuals have received due to mesothelioma, often influenced by different factors such as occupation and exposure level.




$5.39 Million was awarded to a worker with diverse roles, including factory work, roofing, and carpentry, in Central Utah.



A $3.91 Million settlement was reached for a U.S. Army veteran in Salt Lake City who also served as a supervisor.



Another significant sum of $3.58 Million was secured for an individual involved in construction work.



$2.8 Million was received by a U.S. Navy veteran who also worked as a laborer in Morgan, highlighting the risks faced by military personnel.



A pipefitter in Tooele was awarded $2 Million, reflecting compensation aligned with their specific circumstances.



In Morgan, a union electrician received $1.73 Million for their claim.



A mining worker from Vernal was granted $1.68 Million.



Lastly, a U.S. Navy veteran from Enterprise received a settlement amounting to $2.27 Million.




It's crucial to remember that compensation amounts can widely differ based on individual case details and contextual factors. While these numbers may provide a benchmark, there’s no guarantee of outcomes, as each case is unique.



Are There Costs Associated with Hiring a Mesothelioma Lawyer?



When considering legal representation for mesothelioma cases, a common concern is the potential cost. The good news is that many mesothelioma lawyers typically don't require upfront payments or out-of-pocket expenses.



Contingency-Fee Basis



Most reputable mesothelioma attorneys operate on a contingency-fee basis. Here's what that means for you:




No Fees Until Compensation: Your lawyer will only receive payment if your case is successful in securing compensation.



Financial Risk is Minimized: Since legal fees are contingent upon a favorable outcome, you won't be burdened with costs in the event your case does not win.




Peace of Mind




Focus on Recovery: This payment structure allows you to focus on your health and recovery without financial stress.



Transparent Agreement: Before proceeding, your lawyer will provide a thorough explanation of any costs that may later be deducted from your settlement or award.




In essence, hiring a mesothelioma lawyer should not add financial pressure. Always ensure that you're clear about the fee structure during your initial consultation.


Types of Mesothelioma Claims
Your lawyer will explain all of your options for seeking compensation for past asbestos exposure. You could be eligible for one or more of the following:

Personal Injury Lawsuit. Mesothelioma is a personal injury because asbestos exposure is most often negligent. Most of these lawsuits end in settlements and never go to trial.
Wrongful Death Lawsuit. You can file a wrongful death suit if you lose a loved one to mesothelioma.
Asbestos Trust Fund Claim. If the companies that exposed you to asbestos went bankrupt, you can file for compensation through an asbestos trust fund. These trusts still have about $30 billion in compensation available.
VA Benefits Claim. If you were exposed during military service, your lawyer can help you claim VA benefits, including disability compensation.

Mesothelioma lawsuits have the potential to award substantial settlements, typically ranging from $1 million to $11.4 million. This amount can vary depending on whether your case is settled out of court or proceeds to trial. Notably, over 99% of these cases result in settlements, meaning many clients receive compensation without the stress of a courtroom battle.
By working with experienced mesothelioma lawyers, you can achieve crucial steps in your case:

Identifying exposure: Determine which asbestos-containing products you were exposed to.
Accountability: Hold the companies responsible for manufacturing those products accountable for your illness.
Securing compensation: Pursue financial restitution that could cover your treatments and ensure your family's financial security.

Understanding these options not only empowers you to take action but also highlights the significant potential for financial recovery that could change your life.


What Are the Steps to File a Mesothelioma Lawsuit in Utah?



Filing a mesothelioma lawsuit involves several important steps. If you're in Utah, here's a guide to understanding the process:




Initial Contact and Case Evaluation

Reach out to a specialized attorney or legal firm experienced in asbestos cases.



Provide them with details about your work history, exposure to asbestos, and any medical diagnosis.



They will conduct a free case evaluation to determine the strength of your claim.





Evidence Collection

Collect detailed information about your occupational and environmental exposure to asbestos.



The legal team will gather medical records, employment history, and other documentation to build your case.





Filing the Lawsuit

If the evaluation is favorable, your attorney will draft and file a legal claim in the appropriate Utah court.



This claim will be directed against the companies or entities deemed responsible for your asbestos exposure.





Negotiation for Settlement

The legal team will enter negotiations with the defendants, aiming for a fair settlement.



In most cases, a settlement is reached outside of court, ensuring a quicker resolution and compensation.





Court Trial

If a satisfactory settlement cannot be negotiated, your case might proceed to trial.



Your attorney will represent your interests before a judge and possibly a jury to secure a verdict.






Throughout each step, having an experienced mesothelioma attorney is critical to navigate legal complexities and secure the best possible outcome.



How Will My Asbestos Lawsuit Be Filed?



When pursuing an asbestos lawsuit, you might wonder whether it will be handled as a class action or on an individual basis.



In most cases, your lawsuit will be filed individually. This approach ensures that your attorney can focus on the unique aspects of your case, providing the personalized attention and dedication it requires.



Here’s why individual filing is often preferred:




Tailored Legal Strategies: An individual lawsuit allows your attorney to craft a strategy that best addresses your specific circumstances and needs.



Maximized Compensation: With a personalized approach, your lawyer can aim for the highest possible compensation based on the details of your case.




By going this route, clients often find that their legal representation is more responsive, thorough, and effective in securing the justice and financial recovery they seek.


Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Utah?


If you have mesothelioma, you were most likely exposed to asbestos in the workplace. Many industries used asbestos and harmed workers. These are just some examples of industries and locations that could have exposed you to asbestos in Utah. 


Mining and Asbestos in Utah


Miners in Utah faced the most significant risk of exposure, illness, and asbestos-related death. They worked in asbestos mines scattered throughout the state and were exposed each day they went to work. 



The most common forms of asbestos in Utah mines are actinolite and tremolite.



Vermiculite Processing







Vermiculite is a mineral that is mined and then processed in plants to make various products. Two vermiculite plants in Utah near Salt Lake City received asbestos-contaminated vermiculite from the W.R. Grace mine in Libby, Montana. 



The Libby mine shipped thousands of tons of harmful vermiculite to plants around the country through the early 1990s. Anyone who worked at the Salt Lake City plants or even lived nearby could have been exposed to asbestos. The two plants eventually shut down and were abated. 


Public Buildings and Asbestos


Many government buildings in Utah are associated with asbestos, including the Salt Lake Jail, the Salt Lake City District Court, and the Salt Lake City Circuit Court. 



Additionally, several Utah schools built before the 1980s still have asbestos materials in them. Many of these schools are still in use today and must undergo regular inspections for asbestos to ensure the fibers haven’t been disturbed.


Other Job Sites Associated with Asbestos in Utah



Columbia Geneva Steel



Columbia Steel Company



Geneva Steel Company



Geneva Works



U. S. Steel Corporation



United States Steel Corporation



Bingham Consolidated Mining and Smelting Company



Bingham Copper and Gold Mining Company



Bingham Junction



Northgate Business Center



Steiner Corporation



Tesoro Refining Marketing



West One Bank



Whittier Elementary



Bloomington Power Plant



Lakeside Power Plant



Millcreek Power Generation



Gadsby Power Plant



Geneva Steel Mine



Utah Air Quality Board Lawsuit


In 2000, the State of Utah, via the Utah Quality Air Board, was involved in a lawsuit. The state's Environmental Health Division analyzed the ceiling tiles in the Truman Mortenson Family Trust building and found asbestos throughout the tiles.



Almost all of the workers in the building were at risk of exposure and had not been given the proper protective gear. 



Under Utah State law, anyone working around asbestos must always have access to hygiene products and must always wear protective clothing and gear provided by the employer.



The workers were also using improper techniques, which worsened exposure risks. Not only were the workers being exposed to asbestos, but citizens in the surrounding areas were running the risk of exposure as well.


Utah's Asbestos Laws


Asbestos laws by state help protect workers today from exposure. Other laws impact how and when asbestos lawsuits proceed. 


Utah Statute of Limitations to File an Asbestos Lawsuit


The statute of limitations is a time limit on filing personal injury and wrongful death asbestos lawsuits. 




Under state law, anyone wishing to file a mesothelioma or asbestos lawsuit in Utah must do so within four years of discovering their illness.



This rule also applies to family members and loved ones seeking a wrongful death lawsuit.




Rights for Secondhand Asbestos Exposure Victims







Secondhand asbestos exposure occurs when someone inadvertently brings asbestos fibers home on their clothing, exposing others in the house. Some of these secondhand exposure victims develop mesothelioma later. 



Utah recognizes that companies had a duty to warn workers and their families of the risks of secondhand asbestos exposure. This means that these additional asbestos victims can seek justice and compensation. 



Asbestos Trust Fund Transparency



If you plan to file a mesothelioma lawsuit to seek compensation, you must disclose information about trust fund claims. If you receive compensation from a trust fund, a Utah court can reduce a jury award you receive during a lawsuit. 



Asbestos Safety Regulations



Utah follows NEPSHA federal regulations regarding the removal process of asbestos material. The Utah Department of Environmental Quality governs state laws.




The state requires contractors to be certified in the asbestos removal process, as well as inspectors specifically used to identify potential areas where asbestos may be located.



The state does allow exemptions in the case of homeowners as well as condominium operators with less than four units.



The state requires a “wetting” process for the removal of asbestos removal, meaning the material must be dampened prior to being secured in containers for safe removal.



For companies and individual contractors specialized in the asbestos removal process, there is an annual recertification fee, as well as refresher training in order to maintain the approval of the state to continue in the removal process.




For additional information, contact:



Utah Department of Environmental Quality195 North 1950 WestSalt Lake City, UTOffice: 801-536-4440


Utah Mesothelioma Treatment


It's important to find a physician specializing in asbestos-related diseases, as these illnesses are still considered relatively unique in the medical world. 



The National Cancer Institute (NCI) helps make this process easier by appointing worthy care centers and hospitals as NCI-designated facilities.



The Huntsman Cancer Institute (HCI), located at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, is an NCI-designated care center with researchers, physicians, cancer experts, and healthcare specialists focusing on mesothelioma cancer and other asbestos-related diseases.



 In addition, HCI is a member of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN).



This firm was extremely professional and responsive. If you have any meso questions, I’d highly recommend them.-Michael L.


Legal Assistance in Utah


You might be entitled to significant compensation if you or a loved one has been a victim of mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis. Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. For additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Oklahoma Mesothelioma Lawyer

Let a top-rated and experienced Oklahoma mesothelioma lawyer help you and your family fight for the compensation you deserve after asbestos exposure. Oklahoma job sites have been responsible for causing asbestos exposure and illness in many workers, mainly through the oil and gas industry. 



If you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. To begin, we offer a streamlined process to help you determine your eligibility. Start with a free legal consultation where we’ll explore your life and work history to identify potential asbestos exposure.



During this consultation, expect to:




Answer questions about your occupational and residential history.



Discuss any known instances of asbestos exposure.



Receive guidance tailored to your personal circumstances.




Once your eligibility is assessed, fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on:




Experienced mesothelioma attorneys in your area.



How to file a claim for asbestos trust funds.



Steps to get paid in 90 days, and more.




Take the first step towards securing the compensation you deserve with our comprehensive support and expert guidance.





We offer assistance in all cities and towns in Oklahoma, including:



Oklahoma City, Tulsa, Norman, Broken Arrow, Lawton, Edmond, Moore, Midwest City, Enid, Stillwater, Muskogee, Bartlesville, Owasso, Shawnee, Ardmore, Ponca City, Yukon, Duncan, Bixby, Del City, Sapulpa, Altus, Bethany, Sand Springs, Mustang, Claremore, Jenks, McAlester, El Reno, Ada, Durant, Chickasha, Tahlequah, Miami, Woodward, Elk City, Okmulgee, Guymon, Weatherford, Choctaw, Glenpool, Guthrie, Warr Acres, Coweta, Clinton, Pryor Creek, The Village, Newcastle, Sallisaw, Wagoner, Poteau, Cushing, Blanchard, Skiatook, Seminole, Catoosa, Idabel, Blackwell, Anadarko, Grove, Noble, Tecumseh, Piedmont, Tuttle, Purcell, Collinsville, Pauls Valley, Henryetta, Holdenville, Vinita, Harrah, Hugo, Lone Grove, Perry, Alva, Sulphur, Kingfisher, Marlow, Sayre, McLoud, Bristow, Slaughterville, Verdigris, Broken Bow, Fort Gibson, Spencer, Pocola, Stilwell, Madill, Nichols Hills, Frederick, Nowata, Hobart, Pawhuska, Hominy, Dewey, Park Hill, Wewoka, Heavener, Checotah, and more.




Oklahoma Asbestos Facts








Oklahoma ranks near the middle in the nation for asbestos-related deaths.



Between 1999 and 2017, Oklahoma had 2,618 deaths related to asbestos exposure.



Most of those deaths were the result of lung cancer, while 485 were from mesothelioma and 203 were from asbestosis.



Oklahoma County currently has the highest number of asbestos-related deaths in the state.





When to Work With a Mesothelioma Lawyer in Oklahoma







If you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma in Oklahoma, contact an experienced asbestos attorney or law firm as soon as possible. A lawyer can do several things to help you in this terrible situation: 




Review your case for free and provide options for seeking compensation



Handle all steps of the legal process so that you can focus on your family and your own health



Investigate your past asbestos exposure to find evidence and build a strong case



Maximize the compensation you receive through a mesothelioma settlement, jury award, or asbestos trust fund claim



Provide contingency payment, so you pay nothing until they win. 




Absolutely, the law firm is willing to meet with clients in Oklahoma, and there's flexibility in how this can be done. Their team will arrange to meet you at a place that's convenient for you, whether that's in person or through a virtual meeting. Best of all, there's no additional cost for them to travel to your location.



Asbestos lawsuits are typically not filed as class actions due to the personalized nature of each case and the varying degrees of impact on individuals. Class action suits often lump together numerous plaintiffs, which can dilute the amount of compensation each person receives. In contrast, individual lawsuits allow for greater scrutiny of each claimant’s specific circumstances, leading to potentially higher compensation that more accurately reflects their unique medical expenses and suffering.



Additionally, personal attention is crucial in asbestos-related cases. Individual lawsuits enable attorneys to focus on the distinct details and complexities of each case, tailoring their approach to maximize the outcome. This personalized approach increases the likelihood of securing the full compensation deserved for medical treatments and other associated costs.



Ultimately, the decision to file individually rather than as a class action ensures that each victim’s case is effectively represented and the specific damages are fully addressed.



What Kind of Mesothelioma Claim Can I File in Oklahoma? 



If you have mesothelioma, you are eligible to seek compensation. There are a few options that a lawyer can explain: 




Mesothelioma personal injury lawsuit. Mesothelioma is considered a personal injury because asbestos exposure is almost always negligent. You were probably exposed at work, and companies can be held accountable for your illness. 



Mesothelioma wrongful death lawsuit. You also have rights if your loved one died from mesothelioma. Often, a victim begins a personal injury lawsuit but passes away before it resolves. Their family can continue it as a wrongful death suit. 



Asbestos trust fund claim. Many asbestos companies went bankrupt and cannot be sued. They set up asbestos trust funds to compensate victims. Your lawyer can determine which trusts you are eligible for and help you make a claim. 



VA benefits claim. If you served in the military, you might have been exposed to asbestos during your time in the service. You likely qualify for VA benefits, like monthly disability compensation. 




You could be eligible for one or more of these options. Your lawyer will advise you and help you take the next steps. 



How Long Does it Take to Get Compensation for Mesothelioma? 



Experienced asbestos attorneys know that your time is limited. They push hard to get compensation as soon as possible. Many people get compensation through a mesothelioma settlement within 90 days. 



Most lawyers will try to settle your case out of court. If it goes to trial, it could take years to resolve and for you to see the compensation you deserve.



What is the Average Settlement Amount for Mesothelioma Lawsuits?



When it comes to mesothelioma lawsuits, financial compensation can vary significantly depending on various factors. Generally, settlements for these cases range from approximately $1 million to $1.4 million. This sum typically reflects a mutually agreed-upon resolution between the parties involved, providing funds for treatment expenses, lost income, and other related costs.



In contrast, if a case goes to trial and results in a favorable verdict, the compensation awarded can be notably higher. On average, jury verdicts for mesothelioma cases fall between $5 million and $11.4 million. This discrepancy underscores the potential benefits of pursuing a case through the legal system while also highlighting the unpredictability of trial outcomes.



Past Mesothelioma Settlement Amounts in Oklahoma



In Oklahoma, several substantial settlements and verdicts have been awarded to individuals affected by mesothelioma, a serious illness often linked to asbestos exposure. Here are some notable examples:




A Seminole resident received a $4.98 million settlement.



An asbestos worker in Calvin secured $4.59 million.



A secretary from Tulsa was awarded $3.92 million.



A foreman and U.S. Navy veteran in Chouteau obtained $2.7 million.



A heavy equipment operator and truck driver received $1.97 million.



A U.S. Army veteran and auto mechanic in Checotah settled for $1.92 million.



A boilermaker in Midwest City was granted $2.39 million.



An auto worker in Lookeba with peritoneal mesothelioma achieved a $1.58 million settlement.



An oil rig worker from Tulsa was awarded $3 million.




It's crucial to recognize that these amounts are not guarantees for future cases. The compensation provided in mesothelioma cases depends deeply on the unique circumstances and specifics of each case.



How is the Value of a Mesothelioma Settlement Determined?



Understanding how the value of a mesothelioma settlement is determined can empower those affected by the disease. Although each case is unique, several key factors typically influence the settlement amount.




Severity of Illness: The progression and impact of mesothelioma on an individual’s health plays a crucial role. More severe and debilitating conditions generally lead to higher settlements.



Extent of Asbestos Exposure: The duration and intensity of exposure to asbestos are critical. Longer exposure and higher asbestos levels often raise the settlement value.



Medical Expenses and Treatment Costs: All medical expenses—past, present, and future—are taken into account. This includes treatments, medications, and any necessary medical support.



Lost Wages and Financial Impact: Compensation typically considers lost income due to the inability to work, alongside the broader financial burden on families.



Pain and Suffering: Emotional distress and diminished quality of life caused by the illness are evaluated to determine their effect on the victim’s life.



Legal Precedents and Jurisdiction: Previous case outcomes in the jurisdiction where the lawsuit is filed can influence settlements. Laws vary by state or region, impacting verdicts and awards.



Defendant's Willingness to Settle: Companies may prefer to settle to avoid costly trials, which can influence negotiations and settlement amounts.




The combination of these factors determines the final settlement amount, highlighting the personalized nature of each case.



How Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Oklahoma? 







For much of its history, Oklahoma was primarily an agricultural state. The economy became more industrialized in the 1940s after the Great Depression, and the Dust Bowl damaged farms and ranches. 



The oil industry, heavy manufacturing, and construction sectors were the primary users of asbestos in Oklahoma and elsewhere.



Oil and Gas



According to StateImpact, a reporting project of National Public Radio member stations, the oil and gas industry accounts for “roughly one-quarter of all jobs in Oklahoma, directly or indirectly.”



Halliburton Corporation was founded in Duncan. Several other oil firms, including ONEOK, Williams Companies, Oklahoma Gas & Electric, ConocoPhillips, and Continental Resources, are either based in the state or have a strong presence there.



Asbestos was prized for resisting heat, fire, and electricity and adding strength and flexibility to materials used in oil and gas. It was used for insulation, fire-retardant, and as a strength-enhancing additive to metals and other materials. It was found in the buildings, equipment, and machinery. 



Asbestos in Oklahoma Buildings



The construction industry used asbestos in hundreds of materials, including insulation, siding, roofing materials, flooring, adhesives, drywall, and more. Anyone who worked in construction before the 1980s could have been exposed to asbestos.



Several buildings in Oklahoma still contain asbestos and continue to put people at risk. The First Christian Church in Oklahoma City contained asbestos and was demolished in 2022. The demolition process is hazardous and can expose workers and nearby residents. 



In Norman, Oklahoma, renovations uncovered asbestos in the city's library. Doing renovation or repair work without first testing for and abating asbestos is risky and dangerous. 



The Oklahoma City Council approved funds in 2023 to remove asbestos from several schools in the city. Asbestos in school buildings is common and puts teachers, staff, and students at risk. 



Asbestos Superfund Sites in Oklahoma



Some of Oklahoma'sthe oil and refining sites are now Superfund Sites contaminated with asbestos and other pollutants. The Hudson Refinery in Cushing, Oklahoma, was abandoned in the 1980s after operating for more than 60 years. 



The Fourth Street Refinery in Oklahoma City was also abandoned and contained asbestos. Cleanup concluded in 2008 but not before the site put nearby residents at risk of exposure to asbestos and other harmful substances. 



Why Is Mesothelioma Difficult to Diagnose?



Diagnosing mesothelioma presents a unique set of challenges primarily due to how its symptoms manifest. The symptoms often mimic those of more common illnesses, leading to frequent misdiagnosis. For instance, individuals may experience chest pain or shortness of breath, which are symptoms common to conditions like pneumonia or lung cancer.



Adding to the complexity is the latency period associated with mesothelioma. Symptoms can take anywhere from 20 to 50 years to appear after the initial asbestos exposure. This long waiting period can cause patients and doctors to overlook potential asbestos exposure that occurred decades earlier.



Furthermore, mesothelioma's rarity poses another hurdle. Many healthcare professionals may go their entire careers with limited or no experience diagnosing it. As a result, they might not immediately consider mesothelioma as a potential cause when evaluating patients with general respiratory or abdominal symptoms.



Ultimately, the combination of symptom similarity, prolonged latency, and limited familiarity among practitioners makes mesothelioma a particularly elusive disease to correctly identify.



How Asbestos Exposure Leads to Mesothelioma



Asbestos exposure is a serious health risk that can result in life-threatening conditions, including mesothelioma. But how does this process unfold?



The Danger of Asbestos Fibers



When tiny asbestos fibers are inhaled or ingested, they pose a significant danger to your health. These fibers can infiltrate the body and lodge themselves in the protective lining of organs, such as the lungs or abdomen.



Cellular Irritation and Mutation



Once settled, the fibers irritate surrounding healthy cells and tissues. This persistent irritation can cause cells to undergo mutations, which can eventually become cancerous. Over many years, these mutations may develop into mesothelioma, a rare but aggressive form of cancer.



Long Latency Period



One of the unique challenges of asbestos exposure is its long latency period. Symptoms of mesothelioma can take 20 to 50 years to emerge after the initial exposure. This delay makes early detection and diagnosis incredibly difficult, often resembling symptoms of other illnesses.



Understanding the link between asbestos exposure and mesothelioma underscores the importance of prevention and early intervention. Avoiding exposure in the first place and seeking medical evaluation if exposure has occurred are crucial steps in reducing the risk of developing this devastating disease.



How Asbestos Exposure Leads to Mesothelioma



Asbestos exposure is a serious health risk that can result in life-threatening conditions, including mesothelioma. But how does this process unfold?



The Danger of Asbestos Fibers



When tiny asbestos fibers are inhaled or ingested, they pose a significant danger to your health. These fibers can infiltrate the body and lodge themselves in the protective lining of organs, such as the lungs or abdomen.



Cellular Irritation and Mutation



Once settled, the fibers irritate surrounding healthy cells and tissues. This persistent irritation can cause cells to undergo mutations, which can eventually become cancerous. Over many years, these mutations may develop into mesothelioma, a rare but aggressive form of cancer.



Long Latency Period



One of the unique challenges of asbestos exposure is its long latency period. Symptoms of mesothelioma can take 20 to 50 years to emerge after the initial exposure. This delay makes early detection and diagnosis incredibly difficult, often resembling symptoms of other illnesses.



Understanding the link between asbestos exposure and mesothelioma underscores the importance of prevention and early intervention. Avoiding exposure in the first place and seeking medical evaluation if exposure has occurred are crucial steps in reducing the risk of developing this devastating disease.



Oklahoma Job Sites with Known Asbestos Exposure



Some of the workplaces known to have contained asbestos in Oklahoma are:




Altus Air Force Base in Altus



Tinker Air Force Base in Oklahoma City



Vance Air Force Base in Enid



Fort Sill U.S. Army Base in Lawton



Phillips Petroleum Refinery in Okmulgee



Cushing Oil Terminal in Cushing



Ben Franklin Refining Company in Tulsa



Norman Naval Air Station (closed) in Norman



Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company Plant in Drumright



Duncan Oil Company Refinery in Duncan



National Zinc Company in Bartlesville



Standard Asbestos Manufacturing and Insulating Company in Oklahoma City



BC Fertilizer Plant in Enid



Enid Asbestos Company in Enid



Midwest Insulation and Material Company in Oklahoma City




Oklahoma Asbestos Laws



State laws dictate how and when asbestos lawsuits proceed. Asbestos regulations aim to keep current Oklahoma residents and workers safe. 



Statute of Limitations on Mesothelioma and Asbestos Lawsuits







The statute of limitations puts a time limit on when you can file a lawsuit: 




Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 91 et seq. provides the statute of limitations when filing an asbestos-related lawsuit in Oklahoma.



If you plan to file, make sure you do so within two years from the date of the discovery of the illness.



If you plan to file a wrongful death lawsuit in Oklahoma, it must be done within two years from the actual date of the victim’s death.



Both wrongful death and asbestos-related injury cases fall under the discovery rule.




Asbestos Claims Transparency



Oklahoma is among many states that passed an asbestos claims transparency law. This law requires plaintiffs in asbestos lawsuits to disclose any claims they have made or plan to make with asbestos trust funds. 



The court can then offset any jury award the plaintiff wins by deducting the amount they received from an asbestos trust. 



Take-Home Duty and Secondhand Asbestos Exposure



Oklahoma is also among many states that set a precedent not recognizing take-home duty in asbestos cases. Take-home duty means that a company is responsible for warning workers about the dangers of asbestos and anyone else who might come into contact with them. 



Secondhand asbestos exposure sometimes occurs when a worker accidentally brings asbestos fibers home on their clothing. This exposes people in the home and sometimes causes asbestos illnesses. 



In 1992, the Oklahoma 10th Circuit Court found that asbestos insulation manufacturers were not liable for the death of a woman from asbestos. She developed mesothelioma after handling her husband's clothing. He worked with asbestos insulation. 



Oklahoma Asbestos Safety Rules



Asbestos rules and regulations in Oklahoma are carried out by the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ):




For asbestos control, the state of Oklahoma follows OAC 252:100, 41-15 of the NESHAP regulations as well as 40 CFR Part 61.140-157 of the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants.



For any demolitions in Oklahoma, regardless of whether asbestos is present at the demolition location, written notification must be sent to the state.



All demolitions, renovations, and asbestos abatement projects must follow the aforementioned NESHAP regulations.



NESHAP laws must be adhered to at all times in the state of Oklahoma. Failure to comply with the regulations could possibly result in civil penalties and fines of up to $10,000, per the Oklahoma Clean Air Act.



Renovations do not require prior written notification and approval as long as no asbestos is in the facility being renovated.




For more detailed information regarding asbestos-related regulations and rules in Oklahoma, contact the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality at 405-702-4100.



Getting Mesothelioma Treatment in Oklahoma



The National Cancer Institute (NCI) helps patients find the best treatment by recognizing the best cancer centers.



Known as NCI-designated facilities, these care centers comprise elite doctors, scientists, and professionals who go above and beyond to research cancer and help treat those affected by the disease.



The Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma is an NCI-designated facility located in Oklahoma City. Patients receive cutting-edge treatment here and have access to clinical trials. 



The INTEGRIS Health Cancer Center is not NCI-designated but offers cancer treatment throughout the state. INTEGRIS has six campuses in Oklahoma, including the Proton Campus in Oklahoma City.



Great people. Helped my family through our meso diagnosis.- Donald H.



Legal Assistance in Oklahoma



Remember, if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area.

### Wisconsin Mesothelioma Lawyer

Wisconsin mesothelioma lawyers help these victims and their families get justice and compensation from the companies responsible. Wisconsin ranks high among states for asbestos-related deaths. 



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Currently, there is over $30 billion in asbestos trust funds, awaiting those who've been diagnosed with an asbestos illness. We invite you to fill out our form today for a free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information about experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Wisconsin, how to get paid in 90 days, how to file an asbestos trust fund claim, and much more. 





We are pleased to offer assistance to residents in all Wisconsin cities and towns, including:



Milwaukee, Madison, Green Bay, Kenosha, Racine, Waukesha, Oshkosh, Eau Claire, Janesville, West Allis, Appleton, La Crosse, Sheboygan, Wauwatosa, Fond Du Lac, New Berlin, Wausau, Brookfield, Greenfield, Beloit, Franklin, Menomonee Falls, Oak Creek, Manitowoc, West Bend, Sun Prairie, Superior, Stevens Point, Mount Pleasant Village, Fitchburg, Neenah, Caledonia Village, Muskego, De Pere, Mequon, Grand Chute, South Milwaukee, Pleasant Prairie, Germantown Village, Menasha Town, Onalaska, Cudahy, Wisconsin Rapids, Marshfield, Onalaska, Howard Village, Middleton, Ashwaubenon, Beaver Dam, Menomonie, Kaukauna, Watertown, Menasha, Weston Village, Bellevue, Hartford, Greendale, Whitefish Bay, Allouez, Chippewa Falls, Pewaukee, Shorewood, Glendale, Hudson, Stoughton, Fort Atkinson, Waunakee, Plover Village, Salem, Baraboo, Brown Deer, River Falls, Two Rivers, Grafton Village, Suamico, Cedarburg, Whitewater, Richfield Village, Port Washington, Platteville, Appleton, Verona, Marinette, Harrison, Monroe, Greenville, Sussex, Burlington, Little Chute, Portage, Lisbon, Elkhorn, Sparta, Merrill, Somers, St. Francis, Oregon Village, Reedsburg, Shawano, Tomah, and more.








Wisconsin Asbestos Facts and Statistics








Between 1999 and 2017 there were 6,815 asbestos-related deaths in Wisconsin.



The majority of these were in urban areas, with Milwaukee and its surrounding areas having the most fatalities.



The majority of asbestos-related deaths in Wisconsin were mesothelioma victims, followed by asbestosis victims.



Per the Wisconsin Department of Health Services, pipefitters, plumbers, and steamfitters are the most frequently recorded occupations that led to asbestosis deaths.



Almost 90% of all Wisconsin mesothelioma cases are caused by prolonged exposure to asbestos.




Mesothelioma Statistics: A Global and U.S. Perspective



In 2020, over 30,000 people worldwide were diagnosed with mesothelioma, a severe and aggressive form of cancer. Unfortunately, the condition claimed more than 26,000 lives globally within the same year.



On the domestic front, approximately 3,000 individuals in the United States received a mesothelioma diagnosis annually. The average age for a diagnosis is notably higher, with most patients being around 72 years old.



Wisconsin's Mesothelioma Impact



Focusing on the U.S., Wisconsin stands out with a notably higher mesothelioma death rate. From 1999 to 2015, this state reported a significant number of fatalities from the disease, with the rate varying between approximately 11 to 14 deaths per million people. Furthermore, data from the Wisconsin Occupational Health Program highlights that a striking 88% of the deceased were aged 60 and older, indicating a pronounced impact on the older population.



Overall, these statistics underline the global and national burden of mesothelioma, spotlighting regions and demographics disproportionately affected by this challenging illness.



What is Asbestos and Mesothelioma?


Asbestos is a natural mineral once used heavily in many industries like construction and manufacturing. It is fibrous and can shed tiny fibers when handled or as it deteriorates.



In the past, most companies failed to protect workers from these fibers. When workers without safety gear worked near asbestos, they were at risk of inhaling or ingesting asbestos fibers. Inside the body, the asbestos fibers cause damage that can lead to illnesses decades later: 




Pleural mesothelioma



Peritoneal mesothelioma



Lung cancer



Asbestosis




Common Symptoms of Mesothelioma



Mesothelioma symptoms often appear many years after a person has been exposed to asbestos. This extended latency period means that initial signs can be subtle and easily mistaken for other conditions. Here's what to watch for:




Persistent Fever: A prolonged and unexplained fever is an early indicator that something might be wrong.



Chronic Cough: Look for a cough that lingers and doesn't seem to improve with time or treatment.



Fatigue: A constant feeling of tiredness or exhaustion that persists despite adequate rest.



Shortness of Breath: Difficulty breathing can develop as the condition progresses.



Night Sweats: Experiencing excessive sweating during sleep without an obvious cause.



Unexpected Weight Loss: Shedding pounds without a change in diet or exercise routine is a red flag.



Chest Pain: Discomfort or pain in the chest area, which may worsen with deep breaths.




In addition to these, a medical examination may reveal pleural effusion, where fluid accumulates in the lungs. This condition can further exacerbate symptoms such as difficulty breathing and chest pain.



The challenge with diagnosing mesothelioma is that these symptoms overlap with other diseases like lung cancer or pneumonia. Therefore, if you suspect asbestos exposure in your past, consult your healthcare provider for thorough testing. Seeking a second opinion can also be crucial for an accurate diagnosis.



Understanding Mesothelioma Transmission: Is it Contagious?



When considering whether mesothelioma can be transferred to others, it's crucial to clarify that the disease itself is not contagious. One individual cannot directly pass mesothelioma to another. However, the risk comes from the transfer of asbestos fibers, which can indirectly affect others.



How can asbestos fibers be transferred?




Secondary Exposure: While the disease doesn’t spread like an infection, it can stem from indirect contact with asbestos, known for causing mesothelioma. For instance, individuals working with asbestos-containing materials may carry these harmful fibers home on their clothing, skin, or hair.



Household Exposure: Family members of those regularly exposed to asbestos may unknowingly come into contact with these fibers. This incidental exposure occurs when asbestos workers return home without proper decontamination measures, thus putting their loved ones at risk.



Environmental Presence: Sometimes, asbestos fibers can linger in environments such as homes or workplaces that have been inadequately cleaned or repaired, leading to accidental exposure over time.




Precautionary Measures



To minimize the risk of secondary exposure, it's vital for those who work with asbestos to follow strict safety protocols. This includes changing clothes and showering before returning home to reduce the chance of carrying fibers into domestic spaces.



In conclusion, while mesothelioma itself is not transmissible, the asbestos fibers that cause it can unintentionally be transferred to others, underscoring the importance of stringent protective measures for those handling asbestos.



Do I Have a Case for a Mesothelioma or Asbestos Claim? 



The best way to determine if you have a valid mesothelioma case is to talk to an expert Wisconsin asbestos attorney. They can provide a free initial consultation to review your work and medical history. 



If you have a diagnosis of mesothelioma, you are probably eligible to seek compensation. Most cases of mesothelioma are caused by negligent asbestos exposure. You could be eligible for:




A personal injury lawsuit



A wrongful death lawsuit



An asbestos trust fund claim



VA veteran benefits




For veterans, particularly those who served in roles with high asbestos exposure risk, such as shipyards or construction, there are specific paths to legal assistance. If your exposure occurred during your military service, you may qualify for benefits provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). It's crucial to connect your illness with your service to access these benefits.



Additionally, if your asbestos exposure happened while working in civilian roles, like certain industries or locations known for asbestos use, you might have grounds to file a legal claim. This could include seeking compensation for medical expenses or other hardships caused by your condition. Understanding your work history and the nature of your exposure can significantly impact your eligibility and the type of legal action you can pursue.



By exploring these options, you can find the right path to get the support and compensation you deserve.



What Qualifications Should a Wisconsin Mesothelioma Attorney Have?



When searching for a Wisconsin mesothelioma attorney, it's vital to consider specific qualifications to ensure you have expert representation. Here’s what to look for:




Expert Knowledge on Asbestos ExposureAn attorney with in-depth understanding of asbestos-related products and their health risks is crucial. This knowledge helps in building a strong case by identifying responsible parties and showcasing the impact asbestos had on your life.



Medical Insight into MesotheliomaThe lawyer should be well-versed in the progression of mesothelioma. Understanding the disease's complexities and the associated treatment costs enables them to advocate effectively for appropriate compensation.



Proven Negotiation and Litigation SkillsExperience in negotiating settlements and handling complex litigation is essential. A successful attorney should possess a track record of securing favorable outcomes for their clients, whether through settlement or trial.



Extensive Legal Experience with Asbestos CasesLook for an attorney or firm with a history of dealing specifically with mesothelioma and asbestos-related cases. This specialization often indicates a greater chance of success due to familiarity and experience in these types of legal proceedings.




When choosing legal representation, ensuring these qualifications can make a significant difference in the outcome of your case. An attorney equipped with these skills and knowledge will be better prepared to fight for the compensation you deserve.



When Should You Contact a Mesothelioma Lawyer?



The optimal time to contact a mesothelioma lawyer is as soon as you suspect or have been diagnosed with the illness. Here's why:




Securing Evidence: Acting quickly ensures that crucial medical and occupational records are preserved. Over time, documents can be misplaced, witnesses may become unavailable, and details about exposure could fade from memory.



Statute of Limitations: Legal time limits, known as statutes of limitations, restrict how long you have to file a lawsuit after being diagnosed. These periods vary by state, so prompt action is crucial to avoid missing out on potential compensation.



Trust Fund Availability: Many companies have established trust funds to compensate individuals affected by asbestos exposure. However, these funds can be depleted over time. Initiating your claim early increases the likelihood of accessing these resources.



Changing Laws: Legislation can shift, potentially impacting your right to pursue compensation. Consulting with a lawyer early means you can navigate any legal changes more effectively.




Why Early Action Matters




Peace of Mind: Knowing legal proceedings are underway allows you to focus on your health and well-being.



Comprehensive Support: An experienced lawyer will guide you through the complex legal landscape, ensuring you have the best chance of a favorable outcome.




Reaching out to a knowledgeable mesothelioma lawyer promptly can significantly influence the success and timing of your case, providing you with resources and support during a challenging time.



How Much Is My Mesothelioma Claim Worth? 



Your claim's value depends on individual factors. An experienced asbestos law firm can make a reasonable estimate of what you can expect based on:




The severity of your illness



Your past and current medical expenses



Future expected medical expenses



Home care costs



Medical equipment costs



Emotional and physical pain and suffering




Compensation also depends on the defendants involved and their degrees of liability. Most asbestos lawsuits end in settlements, which average $1 million to $1.4 million. 



What Are the Costs Associated with Hiring a Mesothelioma Attorney in Wisconsin?



When considering legal assistance for mesothelioma cases in Wisconsin, understanding the financial aspects is crucial. Here’s a clear breakdown of what you can expect in terms of costs:




Free Consultation: Initially, mesothelioma victims can typically receive a free consultation with Wisconsin attorneys. This is a chance to discuss your case and explore your legal options without any financial commitment.



Contingency Fee Structure: Most mesothelioma lawyers operate on a contingency fee basis. This means you won't face any upfront costs. The lawyer only receives payment if they successfully secure compensation for you. Their fee is usually a percentage of the settlement or award.



No Upfront Legal Fees: You do not need to worry about paying legal fees in advance. This arrangement ensures that your financial risk is minimized as you pursue justice.



Out-of-Pocket Costs: While there are minimal direct fees, you may encounter some out-of-pocket expenses. These might include specific costs like court filing fees or other minor case-related expenses, which are often nominal.




Overall, hiring a mesothelioma attorney in Wisconsin is financially accessible, as the primary costs are contingent upon the successful resolution of your case. This structure allows victims to seek justice without adding financial strain.



Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Wisconsin? 



The vast majority of cases of prolonged exposure to asbestos come from workplaces. Many of Wisconsin's industries used asbestos for decades and put workers at risk. These are some examples of industries and specific workplaces that harmed workers. 



Automotive



The automotive industry long used asbestos in friction products, like brakes and clutches. 



One of Wisconsin's most prominent asbestos exposure cases occurred at Four Wheel Drive, a brakes manufacturing company in Clintonville. Several workers became ill in the early 80s, which resulted in a complaint call to the National Institute for Occupational Safety (NIOSH).



In 1987, NIOSH evaluated the facility and found asbestos in the brake products and all over the machinery and equipment.







Metal Manufacturing



The Ladish Company in Milwaukee was also associated with asbestos. As a metal manufacturer, numerous furnaces containing asbestos were in operation every day for years. 



In addition, most of the pipes, machinery, and other equipment contained asbestos. Several workers at the Ladish company ended up with mesothelioma cancer and other asbestos-related illnesses.



Paper Manufacturing



Several paper manufacturing companies also exposed workers to asbestos. Paper manufacturing companies placed some of the highest risks for workers in Wisconsin.



Decades ago, Wisconsin was one of the leading paper manufacturing states. Wisconsin was home to several branches of leading paper manufacturing companies, such as Georgia-Pacific and Charmin.



Vermiculite Processing



Vermiculite is a natural, mined material that is processed into numerous products. Vermiculite is not harmful, but it is often found in deposits with asbestos. 



The W.R. Grace vermiculite mine in Libby, Montana, notoriously shipped hundreds of thousands of tons of asbestos-contaminated vermiculite to processing plants nationwide. This lasted until approximately the 1990s. 



At least two Wisconsin vermiculite plants received these asbestos-contaminated shipments. Workers at Koos processing plants in Kenosha and Racine risked asbestos exposure as a result. Nearby residents were also at risk of exposure. Today, the sites are considered safe. 



Additional Wisconsin Workplaces That Used Asbestos



Other examples of specific workplaces that used asbestos and put workers at risk of exposure and illness include:




Falls Paper and Power Company



Kimberly-Clark Corporation



Oconto Falls Tissue Inc.



Scott Paper Company



Scott Paper Mill



Gardner Machine Company



Hydro-Blast Corporation



P. B. Yates Machine Company



Rock River Generating Station



Wisconsin Construction Company



Wisconsin Power & Light Company



Yates-American Machine Company



Burlington Junior High School



Carbonite Metal



Helene Curtis



Murphy Products



Nestle Company Inc



Nestle Usa, Inc.



Case Threshing Machine Company



Chicago Rubber Clothing Company



Grace Evangelical Lutheran Church



Horlick High School



J I Case Threshing Machine Company



J. Bashaw, Inc.



J.I. Case Company



J.I. Case Senior High School



Jacobson Thomas Tire Company



Lakeside Malleable Castings Company



Mosinee Paper Mill



Industrial Insulation Corporation of Wisconsin



Valley Ready Mixed Cement Company



Wisconsin Cabinet and Panel Company



Falls Paper and Power Company



Wisconsin Power and Light



Wisconsin Construction Company




Wisconsin's Asbestos Laws



Wisconsin's asbestos laws include safety regulations and laws that impact how lawsuits proceed. 



Asbestos Safety Regulations



The Wisconsin Department of Health Services enforces asbestos policies and laws in the state.




Under Chapter 254 of the Wisconsin Environmental Health laws, prior to beginning an asbestos abatement project in Wisconsin, written notification must be provided to the state. 



Anyone working on an asbestos abatement project must be state-certified. 



The Wisconsin Department of Health Services can enter the area of an asbestos abatement project at any time to ensure that only qualified individuals are working on the project. Proof of qualification, such as a certification card, may also be asked for and must be produced. 



Public schools and buildings that were built using asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) must have an asbestos management plan in place at all times. 




For more in-depth, detailed information and additional asbestos rules and regulations in Wisconsin, please contact the Wisconsin Department of Health Services at 608-266-1865.



Wisconsin Statute of Limitations on Mesothelioma Lawsuits







The statute of limitations places a time limit on filing mesothelioma and asbestos lawsuits: 




The statute of limitations when filing an asbestos-related lawsuit in Wisconsin starts within three years from the time the illness is first discovered or within three years from the date that it should have been reasonably discovered.



Wrongful death lawsuits must also be filed within three years; however, the time starts according to the date of the victim’s death.




Construction Statute of Repose



The construction industry used asbestos more than almost any other in Wisconsin and other states. Unfortunately, a Wisconsin law limits asbestos lawsuits related to construction exposure. 



Wisconsin has a construction statute of repose that places a hard limit of ten years for filing a personal injury lawsuit. It applies to any case in which the injury resulted from structural defects. 



A court in 2020 interpreted this as applying to asbestos in some situations. A woman sued when her husband died from mesothelioma after working as a pipefitter building power plants. The Court of Appeals ruled that the statute of repose applied in her case. 



Asbestos Claims Transparency Law 



In May of 2013, the Wisconsin Assembly passed a new bill that requires plaintiffs who file an asbestos lawsuit to reveal any other companies they have sued. This is supposed to limit attorneys maximizing awards on several claims.



Supporters of the bill claim it’s also a way to allow a jury to understand just how many defendants are at fault for one individual’s asbestos-related illness, which may bring about higher award amounts for plaintiffs. 



Those who opposed the bill indicated that it is another attempt to prolong asbestos-related cases until the victim dies.



Mesothelioma Treatment in Wisconsin



Find a physician specializing in asbestos-related diseases, which are still considered relatively rare in the medical world. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) makes the process easier by appointing worthy care centers and hospitals as NCI-designated facilities.



**The Froedtert Hospital in Milwaukee is an NCI-designated care center with researchers, physicians, cancer experts, and healthcare specialists focusing on mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases.



The NCI and the National Health Institute (NHI) recommend that asbestos victims seek treatment from a facility specializing in mesothelioma and other asbestos diseases.



When considering treatment options for mesothelioma, patients have a variety of avenues to explore. Treatments are generally categorized into those that manage symptoms and those that aim to control or eliminate the cancer.



Symptom Relief Treatments




Paracentesis: A procedure for those with abdominal mesothelioma, involving the removal of fluid from the abdominal cavity using a needle.



Thoracentesis: Used for patients with fluid buildup around the heart, involving fluid withdrawal from the chest.



Pleurodesis: Designed for individuals with lung-related mesothelioma, this involves inserting a needle into the chest to manage fluid buildup.




Cancer Control Treatments




Chemotherapy: Utilizes intravenous drugs to target and kill cancer cells, either alone or alongside surgery.



Radiation Therapy: Employs radioactive energy to destroy cancer cells and can complement surgical efforts.



Targeted Therapy: Focuses on attacking specific cancer cell molecules, often administered in pill form.



Immunotherapy: Leverages the body’s immune system to fight cancer, and is being explored in clinical trials.




Personalized Treatment Plans



Doctors determine the most suitable treatment options based on factors such as:




Cancer location



Stage of cancer



Overall health of the patient




Patients are encouraged to discuss their options thoroughly with their healthcare provider to weigh the benefits and drawbacks of each treatment path. Personal preferences and specific health considerations play a significant role in choosing the best approach.



By seeking care at an NCI-designated facility, patients can access a comprehensive range of treatment options tailored to their needs, supported by specialists who focus on mesothelioma and related conditions.



The NCI and the National Health Institute (NHI) recommend that asbestos victims seek treatment from a facility specializing in mesothelioma and other asbestos diseases.



When determining the most appropriate treatment for mesothelioma, several critical factors come into play.



How is Mesothelioma Typically Diagnosed, and Can It Be Misdiagnosed?



Diagnosing mesothelioma often poses a challenge, primarily because symptoms can take years to manifest after initial exposure to asbestos. Patients typically don't exhibit immediate signs post-exposure, which complicates early detection.



Early Indicators of Mesothelioma:




Persistent cough



Unexplained fatigue



Difficulty breathing



Fever and night sweats



Unexpected weight loss



Chest discomfort




These symptoms may lead individuals to consult their doctors. Often, a routine examination and further tests reveal pleural effusion, which is the accumulation of fluid around the lungs—a sign that warrants closer investigation.



The Diagnostic Process:




Initial Consultation: Discussing symptoms and any history of asbestos exposure with a healthcare provider is crucial.



Imaging Tests: X-rays or CT scans help identify abnormalities in and around the lungs.



Biopsies and Lab Tests: Tissue samples are examined to confirm the presence of cancer cells, specifically mesothelioma.




Potential Misdiagnosis:



Mesothelioma symptoms overlap with other respiratory conditions like lung cancer or pneumonia, leading to potential misdiagnoses. These shared symptoms can result in incorrect treatments initially, which underscores the importance of an accurate diagnosis.



Getting a Second Opinion:



If you've experienced asbestos exposure and suspect misdiagnosis, seeking a second opinion is often advisable. Consulting another specialist can confirm the diagnosis and ensure appropriate treatment is administered. This proactive approach could make a significant difference in managing and treating the condition effectively.



Key Influencing Factors




Cancer Location: The exact site where the cancer has developed significantly impacts the treatment strategy. This can affect decisions about surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy techniques.



Cancer Stage: Understanding whether the cancer is in its early or advanced stages helps doctors decide on aggressive treatment or more conservative management.



Overall Health of the Patient: A patient's general health and physical condition are crucial. Treatments can be demanding, so practitioners must consider whether the patient can tolerate specific therapies.




Combining Medical Insight and Patient Preferences



While these factors guide the medical team's recommendations, the patient's preferences and values are integral to the decision-making process. Each treatment option comes with its pros and cons, which are weighed in discussions between doctors and patients to tailor a plan that aligns with the patient's quality of life goals and personal circumstances.



This collaborative approach ensures that the treatment plan is not only medically sound but also respects the patient's autonomy and individual needs.



Great people. Helped my family through our meso diagnosis.- Donald H.



Legal Help in Wisconsin



Don't forget to fill out our form to get our free Financial Compensation Packet, filled with information on the experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys in your area. Keep in mind that you may qualify for substantial compensation if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis. For additional assistance, contact us toll-free at 800-793-4540. 

### Omaha Mesothelioma Lawyer

An Omaha mesothelioma lawyer can help you if you've been harmed by asbestos exposure. Omaha has a long industrial history crucial to the local economy, but many of the companies in the state used asbestos and put workers and residents at risk. 



If you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to substantial compensation for pain, suffering, lost wages, and much more. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in Omaha, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more.



Getting started on your journey to compensation can be overwhelming, but with the right guidance, it becomes manageable. Here's how you can begin:




Consult with Experienced Attorneys:

Connect with seasoned mesothelioma attorneys who can navigate the complex legal landscape for you. They will explain your rights and help map out the best course of action tailored to your situation.





Explore Compensation Options:

Asbestos Trust Funds: Access part of the estimated $30 billion set aside for victims of asbestos-related diseases without the need to go to court.



Mesothelioma Lawsuit: Many cases are settled out of court, providing substantial compensation without the hassle of a trial. However, your legal team is prepared to take your case to court if necessary.



Veterans Affairs (VA) Benefits: If you're a veteran, specialized attorneys can assist you in accessing medical and financial benefits from the VA.





Benefit from a Dedicated Legal Team:

Work with a comprehensive team that includes attorneys, paralegals, medical staff, and investigators, ensuring you receive personalized care and attention.






Starting with these steps will not only help you secure financial compensation but also bring peace of mind during a challenging time.





Omaha Asbestos Facts




Douglas County and Omaha account for the largest number of asbestos-related deaths in Nebraska. 



Between 1999 and 2017, more than 501 people in the county died from asbestos exposure and illness out of just over 1,600 such deaths in the state. 



Several industries, as well as older buildings constructed with asbestos, have caused exposure and continue to be an issue in Omaha. 




Asbestos Exposure and Mesothelioma



Asbestos exposure causes mesothelioma, a devastating cancer with a poor prognosis. If you worked with or around asbestos, you might have inhaled its fibers. Those fibers cause inflammation and damage in tissues and cells. 



Some people exposed to asbestos develop illnesses decades later. In addition to mesothelioma, asbestos causes lung cancer and asbestosis, a non-malignant disease. 



Most people exposed to asbestos encountered it on the job. Companies can be held accountable for negligent exposure. Victims have a right to seek compensation for resulting damages.



If you’ve been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may be entitled to substantial compensation for pain, suffering, lost wages, and much more. Beyond financial relief, filing an asbestos claim in Omaha serves a deeper purpose.



Filing a Mesothelioma Lawsuit in Omaha







A mesothelioma lawsuit can help you get compensation to cover medical and other expenses. These lawsuits can be complicated, but an Omaha mesothelioma lawyer can guide you through the process and give you the best chance of a good outcome. 



In addition to a mesothelioma injury lawsuit, an asbestos attorney can help you make other types of claims to seek compensation: 




Asbestos trust fund claim. Asbestos trust funds currently contain nearly $30 billion to compensate asbestos-exposure victims. Ask your lawyer if you are eligible for any of these trust funds. 



Wrongful death lawsuit. If you lost a loved one to mesothelioma, your lawyer can help you sue for damages. 



Veteran benefits claim. If you are a veteran, your lawyer can determine if you were exposed to asbestos in the military. They can help you navigate the benefits system. 




Most mesothelioma lawsuits end in settlements, which average between $1 million and $1.4 million. Jury awards are larger, but most of these cases do not go to trial.



For those curious about specific outcomes, here are some notable settlements and verdicts from the Omaha area:




$4.47 Million for a lead mechanic in Grand Island, NE



$2.7 Million for a union electrician in Omaha, NE



$2.61 Million for a U.S. Army veteran and machinist in Omaha, NE




Additional settlements include:




$2.21 million to a carpenter and firefighter in Omaha with pleural mesothelioma



$3.13 million for a U.S. Navy veteran in Columbus



$2.11 million to an Omaha U.S. Army veteran and maintenance man



$3.12 million for a Henderson custodian



$1.72 million for an Omaha mesothelioma patient



$2.48 million for a pipefitter and welder with pleural mesothelioma in Lincoln




These figures highlight the significant compensation achieved in past cases, though results will vary based on individual factors such as exposure, age, and diagnosis. There’s never a guarantee of results in any case.



Understanding the Statute of Limitations for Mesothelioma Claims in Nebraska



Navigating the legal landscape after a mesothelioma diagnosis can be daunting, but understanding Nebraska's statute of limitations is crucial for timely filing. The statute of limitations is a law that dictates the period during which a lawsuit must be filed.



Timeframe for Filing:In Nebraska, individuals diagnosed with mesothelioma typically have a limited window within which they can file a legal claim. This time frame generally begins from the date of the diagnosis or, in certain cases, from when the illness should reasonably have been discovered.



Why Timing Matters:Filing within this timeframe is essential because missing the deadline often means forfeiting the right to seek compensation. This makes it vital for patients and their families to act promptly.



Steps to Take:




Consult with Legal Experts: It's advisable to speak with a qualified asbestos attorney in Nebraska soon after diagnosis.



Gather Documentation: Begin collecting medical records, employment history, and any other relevant documents that could support your case.




Special Considerations:There may be different rules for wrongful death claims if a patient has already passed away. Again, consulting an attorney can provide clarity tailored to your specific situation.



Understanding and adhering to the statute of limitations is crucial for ensuring that your claim is considered valid in court. Prompt action ensures the best possible chance of receiving the compensation you and your family may be entitled to.



The law firm has achieved settlements and verdicts totaling more than $9.8 billion for clients affected by mesothelioma throughout the United States, including those residing near Omaha.



Work with an Omaha Mesothelioma Lawyer at No Cost



Reputable asbestos firms do not charge for an initial consultation. If they take your case, they charge no fees until they win. You can contact and work with a lawyer at no cost, so don't hesitate to reach out. 



Choose a lawyer with experience handling and winning asbestos cases. They should be part of a large firm. Because asbestos cases are complicated, you need the backing of a big firm with a lot of resources.



For over two decades, experienced firms have successfully represented families affected by mesothelioma, securing billions in compensation nationwide. These firms have the resources and expertise to hold powerful companies accountable.



The firm will use these resources to investigate your past asbestos exposure. They use investigators and medical experts to gather evidence and prove that negligent asbestos exposure led to your current illness.



With a proven track record of significant settlements and verdicts, such a firm demonstrates not only its legal prowess but also its commitment to achieving justice for clients. Whether your case is local or stretches across state lines, their extensive reach ensures comprehensive support and representation.



By holding corporations accountable for their actions, the firm ensures that justice is served. This includes building a strong case to demonstrate how these corporations failed in their duty to protect individuals from harmful exposure. With a strategic approach, the firm not only seeks to prove negligence but also pursues rightful compensation for you and your family.



This dual focus on accountability and compensation provides a comprehensive service, guiding you through the legal process while fighting for the justice you deserve.



Our firm has provided support and legal assistance to more than 6,000 families across the United States dealing with the impact of asbestos exposure.



Where Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Omaha? 



Many industries and workplaces in Omaha used asbestos for decades. These companies and those that supplied them with asbestos negligently exposed workers, putting them at risk for mesothelioma. These are just a few examples. 



Western Mineral Products



Omaha was once home to an important vermiculite processing plant. Between 1967 and 1991, it handled over 165,000 tons of the mineral commonly used in construction minerals. 



Owned by Western Minerals Products, the plant received shipments of vermiculite from the infamous W.R. Grace mines in Libby, Montana. The minerals shipped out from the Libby mines contained contaminating asbestos. 



The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry concluded in a site report that workers and their families were likely to have been exposed to harmful levels of asbestos. Whether or not nearby residents were exposed is unknown. 



Omaha Public Power District







Omaha Public Power District (OPPD) is Omaha's largest utility company. Almost all of its stations, plants, and facilities were constructed before the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) strict regulations on asbestos. Workers in these facilities risked asbestos exposure.



An Omaha judge awarded Dale Watson, a former employee of OPPD, compensation after he filed an asbestos lawsuit against the company in 2001. From 1979 to 1996, Watson inhaled asbestos fibers in the central maintenance department.



In 1997, Watson left OPPD. A few months later, a physician diagnosed him with pulmonary asbestosis. 



Even though a different company employed Watson at the time of his diagnosis, the judge determined he developed asbestosis after spending long hours working at OPPD. 



Potentially many more workers at OPPD were exposed to asbestos and developed illnesses. Asbestos was once used in the company's equipment, insulation, tiling, machinery, pipes, and machinery.



Other Job Sites and Businesses Associated with Asbestos Use in Omaha



Many industries used asbestos before the EPA's regulations. While some of these companies are no longer in business, many of the buildings with asbestos are still in use. 



Electric and Power Companies




Anderson Electric



General Electric (GE-North Omaha Power Station, Unit 4)



Master Electronics



Omaha Steam Electric Station



Sperry Electric Light Company



Western Electric Plant



Bellview Power Plant



Nebraska Power & Light




Hospitals




The Nebraska Medical Center



Douglas County Community Mental Health Center



Lutheran Medical Hospital



St. Joseph's Hospital




Refineries




American Smelting and Refining Company (ASARCO)



Sinclair Refining




Hotels




Castle Hotel



Hilton Omaha Hotel




Additional Buildings and Job Sites




Alger Warehouse



Allied Chemical



Ceco Building Systems



Drake Williams Steel



Fairmont Creamery Company



Chaney Furnace Company



American Loan and Trusts



Blue Chip Auto Corporation



Armstrong Contracting and Supply



Cornhusker Motor Club



Ferer Aaron & Sons



Falstaff Brewing



First Methodist Church



Kelley Plant



Campbell's Soup



Kellogg Corporation



Kiewit Plaza



Land Paving Company



Northern Gas Products



Offutt Air Force Base



Olron Brothers Inc.



Omaha Gas Works



Omaha Ice and Cold Storage Corporation



Paul Davie and Sons



Quaker Oats Company



Swift & Company (Store and Store Rooms)



Thomas A. Walsh Manufacturing Company



United States Post Office and Garage



Dewey Park Tennis Center (J.L. Tatum Residence)



University of Nebraska- Activities Building



University of Nebraska- Gymnasium



St. Anthony Parish Church



Union Stock Yards (House Barns)



Puritan Manufacturing



Rosborough Fire Brick & Supply



Fred Krug Brewing Company



Jack Perry Plumbing



Sears, Roebuck & Company



United Benefit Life Insurance Company



Union Pacific Railroad Company



Willow Springs Distillery




Ongoing Asbestos Exposure in Omaha



Asbestos is less of a danger now than it was in workplaces in the past, but some people are still at risk of exposure. This is because many older buildings in Omaha were constructed with asbestos in several materials, like insulation. 



Asbestos has been an ongoing issue in Omaha's police headquarters. The city has been in discussions to provide new, combined facilities for the police and firefighters due to numerous building issues. One of these is lingering asbestos that puts workers at risk of exposure.



People in Omaha also face risks of asbestos exposure in residential buildings. In 2019, residents of Legacy Crossing Apartment were forced to evacuate over asbestos concerns. 



Cancer Treatment in Omaha







Several cancer treatment centers in Omaha provide quality care with innovative, cutting-edge technology. Each center offers treatment options, clinical trials, research, and specialized oncology.



Creighton University Medical Center
Cancer Center
601 North 30th Street
Suite 2803
Omaha, Nebraska 68131



Good Samaritan Health Systems 
Mesothelioma Treatment Section
Connie S. Wittman,
RN, MN 10 E. 31st St.
Kearney, Nebraska



Creighton University Medical Center, Cancer Center 
Mesothelioma Treatment Section
Brian W. Loggie, MD, Professor of Surgery, Chief, Division of Surgical Oncology,
Director, Cancer Center
601 N. 30th Street
Omaha, Nebraska 68131



CCOP-Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium Mesothelioma Treatment DepartmentJames A. Mailliard, MD601 N. 30th St. #2565Omaha, Nebraska 68131



The Importance of Sharing Personal Stories of Those Affected by Mesothelioma



Personal stories of individuals impacted by mesothelioma offer unparalleled insights into their journeys. These narratives serve multiple vital purposes:




Raising Awareness: By sharing experiences, individuals highlight the dangers of asbestos exposure, educating others about the risks and symptoms associated with this condition.



Providing Support and Inspiration: Stories of resilience and courage inspire those who are newly diagnosed. They offer comfort in knowing they're not alone and showcase the strength found in community and shared experiences.



Influencing Advocacy and Policy: Personal accounts humanize the statistics, prompting greater advocacy for change in policies regarding asbestos use and safety regulations. They act as powerful testimonies that can influence lawmakers and organizations to implement protective measures.



Driving Research and Advances: The visibility of these stories can drive funding for research, encouraging medical advancements and the development of new treatments, ultimately leading to better outcomes for future patients.



Creating a Legacy: For many, sharing their experiences is about leaving a lasting impact. It ensures their story contributes to a broader understanding and aids in the collective fight against mesothelioma, providing hope for future generations.




Each personal account aids in bridging the gap between individual experiences and collective societal change, making storytelling a crucial tool in the fight against asbestos-related diseases.



Great people. Helped my family through our meso diagnosis.- Donald H.



Legal Assistance in Omaha and Additional Information



Remember, if you've been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for significant compensation. Remember to fill out our form to get your free Financial Compensation Packet, with information on asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers in your area. For questions and assistance, feel free to contact us at 800-793-4540. 

### Newark Mesothelioma Lawyer

Many residents have sought the help of Newark mesothelioma lawyers after working for years in industrial facilities that used asbestos. Many job sites still contain asbestos, putting Newark residents at risk of developing mesothelioma. 



If you or a loved one suffer from mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, or asbestosis, you may qualify for substantial compensation. Fill out our form to receive our free Financial Compensation Packet. Our packet is loaded with information on experienced mesothelioma attorneys in Newark, how to file a claim for asbestos trust funds, how to get paid in 90 days, and more. 



Pursuing mesothelioma compensation can seem daunting, but understanding the process makes it manageable. One of the most effective ways is through Asbestos Trust Fund Claims. With over $30 billion estimated to be available, these trust funds are specifically set aside for mesothelioma victims and their families.



Here's why you should consider this option:




No Court Appearance Needed: Access these funds without the hassle of stepping into a courtroom.



Expedited Process: Many claims can be processed and paid out within 90 days, getting you the support you need quickly.




Our comprehensive packet not only guides you on how to file these claims but also connects you with top-tier legal professionals who specialize in navigating the complexities of asbestos-related cases. Whether you're looking for detailed steps or expert advice, this packet is your essential resource for financial recovery.





Newark Asbestos and Mesothelioma Facts




Nearly 430 Newark and Essex County workers or residents died from asbestos-related illnesses between 1999 and 2017.



As a port city, shipbuilding and shipyards have been important industries in Newark and heavy users of asbestos. 



Asbestos in older buildings in the city still poses risks for residents and workers. 




How Did I Get Mesothelioma? 



Mesothelioma is linked to workplace asbestos exposure. If you have mesothelioma, you probably worked with or around asbestos in Newark. Asbestos illnesses only appear decades later, so you could have come into contact with it many years ago. 



Asbestos in the workplace is dangerous when it sheds small fibers that workers then inhale or ingest. Once in the body, those fibers cause inflammation and damage. In some people, this leads to mesothelioma, asbestosis, or lung cancer. 



Mesothelioma is rare but only caused by asbestos. It can almost always be traced back to workplace exposure. 



Mesothelioma Lawsuits in Newark, New Jersey



If you have a mesothelioma diagnosis, you can and should take legal action to seek compensation for:




Past and current medical expenses



Future medical expenses



Home and end-of-life care



Lost wages



Pain and suffering




You may be able to file a mesothelioma legal claim if you're directly affected or if you're a family member or estate representative of someone with mesothelioma. This means that even if your loved one has passed away from mesothelioma, you may still be able to pursue compensation on their behalf.



Legal action helps you manage the financial burden and holds responsible parties accountable for exposure to asbestos. Understanding who can file a claim is crucial in ensuring that you or your family receive the justice and financial support you deserve.



Mesothelioma is an expensive illness, and it is caused by negligent asbestos exosure. Asbestos companies can be held liable through mesothelioma lawsuits, settlements, and verdicts.



Understanding the Process of Filing a Mesothelioma Lawsuit in Newark, New Jersey



Filing a mesothelioma lawsuit in Newark, New Jersey involves several critical steps, and expert legal assistance can make the process smoother. Here's what you need to know:



Initial Consultation and Case Evaluation



The process begins with an initial consultation with experienced mesothelioma attorneys. During this meeting, the legal team will review your medical records, work history, and potential exposure to asbestos to determine if you have a viable case.



Assembling Your Legal Team



Your case will be managed by a dedicated team, typically including attorneys, paralegals, and medical professionals. This diverse expertise ensures personalized attention and comprehensive handling of your case.



Pursuing Compensation



Your legal team can pursue several avenues for compensation, tailored to your specific situation:




Asbestos Trust Fund Claims: Many companies have set up trust funds with billions of dollars reserved for asbestos-related claims. These funds allow victims to file claims without the need for court appearances.



Filing a Mesothelioma Lawsuit: If there is a responsible party, your attorneys may file a lawsuit against the companies responsible for your asbestos exposure. This can result in substantial compensation for damages.



Veterans Benefits: If you served in the military, you might be eligible for VA benefits. These benefits can provide health care and monthly compensation, especially as a significant percentage of mesothelioma cases occur among veterans.




Managing the Legal Process



The legal team will guide you through every step, from gathering necessary evidence to ensuring that your claim is filed within deadlines. They handle all legal procedures and communications, providing you with the space to focus on your health and well-being.



This structured approach not only ensures that all aspects of your case are addressed but also maximizes the potential for securing the compensation you deserve.



What Are the Deadlines for Filing a Mesothelioma Lawsuit in Newark, New Jersey?



When it comes to filing a mesothelioma lawsuit in Newark, New Jersey, there are specific time constraints dictated by state laws known as statutes of limitation. These laws establish the timeframe within which legal action must be initiated.



Key Timeframes to Consider:




Personal Injury Claims: If you're filing a lawsuit due to a personal diagnosis of mesothelioma, New Jersey law typically requires that the lawsuit be filed within two years from the date of diagnosis.



Wrongful Death Claims: If a loved one has passed away due to mesothelioma, family members generally have two years from the date of death to file a wrongful death lawsuit.




These deadlines make it crucial to act promptly. Consulting a legal professional experienced in asbestos-related cases can ensure that you understand your rights and meet all required deadlines effectively.



Why Timeliness Matters



Filing within these prescribed periods is essential to preserving your right to seek compensation. Missing the deadline could result in the loss of legal recourse, reducing potential financial recovery for medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.



Next Steps



To navigate these legal complexities and enhance your chances of a successful claim, reach out to a mesothelioma attorney in New Jersey as soon as possible. They can provide expert guidance tailored to your specific situation, helping to streamline the process and safeguard your interests.



Recent Mesothelioma Verdicts and Settlements for Newark, New Jersey Families



Newark, New Jersey families affected by mesothelioma have seen substantial legal victories and settlements, providing crucial financial support for medical expenses and justice against those responsible for asbestos exposure.



Notable Mesothelioma Verdict



In a landmark case from July 2022, the family of Munir Seen was awarded $15 million. Munir, who worked at construction sites in both New York and New Jersey, developed mesothelioma due to consistent asbestos exposure from powdered joint compounds. This significant verdict underscores the legal accountability of companies that manufactured these harmful products.



Extensive Settlements to Aid Families



Legal efforts in New Jersey have successfully secured over $145 million in settlements for families affected by mesothelioma. Below are some of the significant settlements achieved for New Jersey residents:




$4.5 Million - Accountant in Sicklerville, NJ



$3.4 Million - Factory Worker & Truck Driver in Roselle Park, NJ



$4.7 Million - Electrician in Cranford, NJ




Additional Settlements




$2.6 million for a Social Security Administration analyst in Marlton



$2.1 million for a U.S. Army veteran and bricklayer in Cape May Court House



$1.97 million to a tool and die maker in Union



$2.9 million for a union electrician in Rivervale




These settlements reflect individual stories of exposure and the diverse backgrounds of those affected, including veterans, electricians, and mechanics. Each case is unique, influenced by various aspects such as exposure history, age, and medical diagnosis. Legal representation continues to strive for justice, seeking compensation tailored to the specific circumstances of each case.



Finding a Mesothelioma Lawyer in Newark



Top mesothelioma lawyers and asbestos law firms in Newark help patients throughout New Jersey. They work with asbestos-exposure victims to file lawsuits, make claims, and seek benefits. 



If you have mesothelioma and live in the area, you need a Newark lawyer who is part of a large asbestos firm. The firm should have extensive experience winning asbestos cases and have jurisdiction in multiple states. Asbestos lawsuits are complicated. You need a large law firm with the resources to investigate your past exposure to asbestos and build a strong case with evidence linking exposure to your illness.



When choosing legal representation, consider firms that have successfully recovered significant settlements for their clients. For example, top firms have historically secured billions in compensation for mesothelioma victims, demonstrating their capability and expertise.




In states like New Jersey, these firms have obtained extensive settlements, sometimes exceeding hundreds of millions, showing their adeptness in local jurisdictions.




Moreover, these firms often have decades of experience, underscoring their ability to handle complex cases effectively. Their track record frequently includes numerous successful verdicts across the nation, indicating a robust understanding of the multifaceted legal landscape surrounding asbestos litigation.



When evaluating potential representation, ensure the firm has a proven history of securing favorable outcomes, both locally and nationwide. This combination of local knowledge and expansive resources is crucial for building a compelling case tailored to your unique circumstances. 



The right lawyer should offer you a free initial consultation and come to you if you are too sick to travel. They should offer contingency payment so you pay nothing until they win.



When considering the cost of hiring a mesothelioma attorney, it's essential to understand that many reputable lawyers work on a contingency fee basis. This means you won't face any upfront costs or out-of-pocket expenses. Essentially, the lawyer only gets paid if they successfully recover compensation for you. This approach ensures that financial concerns don't prevent you from seeking the justice you deserve.



By choosing an attorney who provides these terms, you can focus on your health and recovery without worrying about legal expenses. This financial arrangement aligns your lawyer's motivation with your goal of achieving a successful outcome.



How Was I Exposed to Asbestos in Newark? 



The asbestos industry touched many workplaces in Newark. These are just some examples of the types of companies and specific worksites where people were known to have been exposed to asbestos.



Ships and Transportation







Newark had a thriving shipbuilding industry during the city's industrial era. Significant employers in the industry included the Federal Shipyard and the Federal Shipbuilding & Dockyard Co. Ships at one time were constructed with asbestos in nearly all materials and components. 



Automotive facilities in Newark also used asbestos. Brake pads and clutches contained asbestos to combat friction and overheating. Workers in plants and mechanics who repaired these parts risked asbestos exposure on the job. 



Asbestos is also present in transportation facilities. One of the largest Newark work sites with asbestos contamination is Newark-Liberty Airport. Asbestos insulation and other materials were used in various hangars between 1948 and the early 1970s.



Thousands of transportation workers, shipbuilders, and military personnel in Newark were exposed to asbestos for prolonged periods. Many of these workers have been diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma and other illnesses.



Asbestos in Newark Schools



Newark's aging school buildings pose a significant risk to faculty, staff, and students. By current estimates, Newark Public Schools need $2.5 billion in fixes, including asbestos abatement. 



Asbestos in older schools can be dangerous. As it deteriorates, it releases fibers into the air. Any maintenance work done on insulation, pipes, and boilers can also release harmful fibers. 



Other Newark Businesses and Buildings with Asbestos



Oil and Metal Companies




Sun Oil-Sunoco



Humble Oil Keystone Sheet Metal Works



Enterprise Steel Fabricators



Hudson Oil Company



Keystone Sheet Metal Works, Inc.



Pure Oil Company




Transportation Companies




Federal Transportation



Newark Airport




Chemical Companies




Allied Chemical



Pitt Consolidated Chemical



Wyandotte Chemical



Lister Agricultural Chemical Company




Food and Drink




Anheuser Busch



Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company



Pabst Brewing Co.




Hospitals




Nyack Hospital



Cornwall Hospital



Newark City Hospital



St. Barnabas Hospital For Women and Children



St. James Hospital




Additional Businesses




Benjamin Moore and Co



Colonnade Apartments



Engineering Development Center



Enterprise Steel Fabricators



Lederle Labs



Ballentine Salon



Mohawk Refining Corporation



Prudential Insurance



Western Electric



Woolsulate Corporation




How Can Veterans Affected by Mesothelioma Access Benefits?



Veterans who develop mesothelioma due to asbestos exposure during military service can tap into various benefits provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Mesothelioma is a type of cancer often linked to asbestos exposure, which was commonplace across all military branches.



Steps to Access Benefits




Eligibility Check: First, verify your eligibility for VA benefits. You must have been honorably discharged and diagnosed with mesothelioma due to military service exposure.



Gather Documentation:

Service Records: Collect documents that d